• Network: Netflix
  • Series Premiere Date: May 21, 2015
Season #: 2, 1
Metascore
47

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 10
  2. Negative: 2 out of 10

Critic Reviews

  1. Reviewed by: Maureen Ryan
    May 13, 2015
    80
    Though Between doesn’t belong among the most ambitious shows on that roster, it knows what it wants to do and sets about doing it efficiently, effectively and with a minimum of fuss.
  2. Reviewed by: Tirdad Derakhshani
    May 22, 2015
    70
    It's too early to tell where Between will take us. But it's off to a great start.
  3. Reviewed by: Joshua Alston
    May 20, 2015
    58
    The pilot does the work of introducing the ensemble of characters, but spends so little time with each of them that when it builds to a cliffhanger in which one of those characters is imperiled, it doesn’t feel any more important than the frequent deaths of the adult characters.
  4. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    May 19, 2015
    50
    Beyond that conceit [that none of the survivors are over 21], though, most of the action in the opening episodes is familiar ensemble soap opera with conspiracy-theory embroidery (the government knows more than it’s saying).
  5. Entertainment Weekly
    Reviewed by: Kevin P. Sullivan
    May 18, 2015
    42
    Despite the intriguing premise, Between's writing winds up being as deadly as the show's virus, except this sickness affects viewers of all ages. [22 May 2015, p.58]
  6. Reviewed by: Mary McNamara
    May 21, 2015
    40
    The town is lovely, the premise solid if overfamiliar, but the script lacks both depth and tension (big problem), and McCurdy is one of the few cast members who can act. All of which makes it difficult to care very much.
  7. Reviewed by: Keith Uhlich
    May 20, 2015
    40
    A post-apocalypse is only as interesting as the people left behind, and these are all a bland, badly acted bunch.
  8. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    May 12, 2015
    40
    There’s an “Under the Dome”-type vibe to the situation--especially with those tall, barbed-wire fences that immediately sprout up--with a “Lord of the Flies” wrinkle. That all has to be taken on faith, however, given the messiness of the premiere, which races about introducing undistinguished characters whose subplots have yet to connect.
  9. 30
    The dialogue on Between is horrendous, and the performances are not much better.
  10. Reviewed by: Brian Tallerico
    May 20, 2015
    30
    It is flat, filled with some surprisingly horrible performances sketching two-dimensional characters.
User Score
4.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 49 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 49
  2. Negative: 18 out of 49
  1. Jun 19, 2015
    0
    Truly terrible show. Netflix should have hired better actors and better writers for the show. In my opinion, the lead actors voice isTruly terrible show. Netflix should have hired better actors and better writers for the show. In my opinion, the lead actors voice is extremely annoying, and none of the actors apparently have experienced death, due to the ho-hum reactions to their loved ones dying in front of their eyes. Do better next time, Netflix. Full Review »
  2. May 23, 2015
    4
    This review is made based on the first episode alone, untill I get to see some (If it gets better).

    So far, It's really not the good. 1)
    This review is made based on the first episode alone, untill I get to see some (If it gets better).

    So far, It's really not the good.

    1) We've seen that exact premise in Dome, which so far is much better (from the very first episode).

    2) bad dialog : Let me give you an exemple. (Spoilers) The epidemic has alreay killed a few dozen people. Yet when a teenager tells his mom that they should leave the town while they can, comes the this response : "Oh Son, don't be silly. You're over reacting. We'll be just fine." Really? REALLY? I mean did the writter of this piece of crap read the news in the past year? Did they see how people lost their minds with Ebola when it actually didn't do much in the states/europe? And you expect me to believe that people living in a small city would just chill and relax when knowing that people are dying of an unknowed deseases? Get the **** out! Who wrote this ****

    3) weak/Cliché characters : **** richest dad in town? Check! His equally **** rich boy with fancy car? Check! Nerdy/hacker protagonist? Check!

    Look, I am not saying the show is terrible. But so far, the first episode is extremely "average" (and I am being generous here). Maybe it will get better later on (Hated falling skies at first and loved it later on).

    But from what I have seen so far, I don't think this show will have that much success.
    Full Review »
  3. Jun 9, 2015
    3
    I watched the first two episodes, but wasn't bored enough to watch any more after that. This show is painfully low-budget. Low-budgetI watched the first two episodes, but wasn't bored enough to watch any more after that. This show is painfully low-budget. Low-budget apparently means they can't hire good writers, directors, or actors. The premise is cliche, and the story just barely interesting enough to watch a few minutes of it. It isn't terrible, or the worst thing I have ever seen, but, it is pretty close, and worse than mediocre. Don't waste your time. Full Review »