The moose and the squirrel join a handful of friends to push buttons in the right order. [Issue#33, p.117]

Will struggle to hold the attention of anyone that didn't hammer these games back in the day. [May 2013, p.88]

You'll wonder why you didn't just stick with multiplayer greats like Bomberman. [May 2013, p.89]

Absolutely savaged by constant loading screens, it’s hard to appreciate the seven or so gems in Namco Museum.

Warriors Orochi is exactly what its mentally ill fans anticipated – more of the same. This is appropriate fare for them, but technically incompetent and repetitive for everyone else.

Just don't play that bloody enhanced version, you'll never forgive yourself. [Issue#29, p.118]

Entertaining enough, but not the best Sega arcade title on XBLA. [Issue#48, p.99]

As an old-school shooter, Earth Defense Force has much more fun to offer. [Issue#84, p.84]

FaceBreaker is one of those typical EA test games which will no doubt be improved upon next time around but for now needs major improvements. It would help if it was like boxing, for a start.

None of it feels much like Resident Evil. [Issue#84, p.85]

Simply doesn't have what it takes to survive in today's cut-and-thrust market. [Issue #22, p.115]

It just isn't particularly good. [Issue#84, p.86]

Supreme Commander could have been great, but the wait for the console translation leaves an overriding sense of disappointment. Plus the technical flaws leave it almost unplayable.

It's a novel concept but lack of control variation, plus the obvious graphical deficiencies, make it a dulled thrill. [Issue#36, p.114]

Within its own limited scope, a multiplayer giggle. [Issue#40]

A dreadful port. [Issue#54, p.92]

We're so incensed with yet another Xbox Live Arcade game using "Robotron"-style controls. [Issue 17, p.116]

A title revered for its looks in the years gone by both ages badly and succumbs to design logic issues... [Issue#65, p.105]

Too few varieties of enemy are included, sporting little variance of attack approach, to entertain anything other than your base reflexes. [Issue#71, p.102]

Our advice is to simply move onto the next review before the retro buffs come back with their pixelated pitchforks and limp fist-waving to show their anger, the crazy bastards. [Issue 15, p.116]

A shooter that's about as "meh" as you can get. [Issue#86, p.87]

A solid enough conversion. [Issue#46, p.101]

Lacking the intensity and lavish budget of a "Need for Speed." [Issue#25, p.101]

Much slower and less action-packed than we'd hoped - plus, it doesn't even look that much like a next-gen game. The online mode needs to be awesome if there's any hope for this one. [Issue 9, p.80]

Feels like an uphill climb against the odds. [Issue#6, p.120]

No game, regardless of what it may be, can try and get away with developing one level and then replicating it over the course of 12 hours. A massive shame, because there are some truly breathtaking elements. [Issue 27, p.82]

Undeniably a good concept spoiled. [Issue#53, p.95]

The best elements of Heroes Over Europe can only ever be described as 'meh', while the worst will make you want to rip out your own hair. [Issue#51, p.92]