For 20,313 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,401 out of 20313
-
Mixed: 8,446 out of 20313
-
Negative: 2,466 out of 20313
20313
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
You might, nonetheless, want to see this movie, even -- or maybe especially -- if you have seen “Billy Elliot” or “Bend It Like Beckham.” Familiarity is not always a bad thing, and if the script, by Shauna Cross, piles sports movie and coming-of-age touchstones into a veritable cairn of clichés, the cast shows enough agility and conviction to make them seem almost fresh.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
A minor diversion dripping in splatter and groaning with self-amusement.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
While the movie is a conceptual pip filled with quotable laughs and gentle pokes at religious faith at its most literal, it also looks so shoddy that you yearn for the camerawork, lighting and polish of his shows.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The art is lacking, but the material is remarkable enough to make up for pedestrian filmmaking.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Art executed under the most excruciating conditions deserves a far more searching study than this too short film, which has the structure of a hurried checklist. Even so, a lot of the art shown in the documentary, often side-by-side with photographs of the same places and events, is compelling.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
This laughably clichéd dive into sexual masochism and hardscrabble survival replaces story with outline and characters with place holders.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
In truth there isn’t much story here, or much insight either; the kind of alienated teenagers wandering through this film exist in movies far out of proportion to their number in real life.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
An enraptured fantasia of high times at the hotel, the film is so intoxicated with the Chelsea’s bohemian mystique it virtually consumes itself.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rachel Saltz
Vulgar, noisy and excessive, Do Knot Disturb is a Bollywood sex farce with almost no sex, and comedy pitched so low you’re more likely to groan than giggle.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mike Hale
The movie goes flat, though, when Mr. Siri and his co-writer, Patrick Rotman, shift their attention from the action to the moral math of guerrilla warfare.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Anyone looking for some idiosyncratic, visually stimulating entertainment this week could do worse than Where Is Where?, an intriguing narrative experiment by the Finnish artist and filmmaker Eija-Liisa Ahtila.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
The film is not a primer on this heartbreaking condition. Instead it recounts a deeply personal, highly subjective and inarguably thought-provoking story of one family’s quest for a certain kind of peace.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
In this kind of industrial entertainment, particularly one that seems to be missing some connective narrative tissue, it’s hard to know if the writers or the director can be credited or blamed for what’s left on screen.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
A crudely made, half-clever little frightener that has become something of a pop-culture sensation and most certainly the movie marketing story of the year.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
According to the press notes, pandorum means “Orbital Dysfunctional Syndrome”; whatever that is, by the end of the movie I was convinced I had caught it.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
A mediocre gross-out movie that barely pushes the envelope.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The blossoming of her ambition, as much as her love life, drives the story forward, and turns Coco Before Chanel into a costume drama worthy of the name.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Has a burnished, high-quality look and a heart swollen with maudlin self-regard.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Andy Webster
While the movie suffers from a surfeit of flash, it nonetheless offers the undeniable power of young performers pursuing art at peak dexterity.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The self-consciousness of the premise and the playlike structure of Blind Date clash with the naturalism of Mr. Tucci and Ms. Clarkson’s acting styles, and the film never lifts itself above its origin as a well-meaning, underdeveloped exercise.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
Starts out feeling a little too “inside Hollywood” and only grows more so as it rolls along. By the end, this small film about scriptwriters ends up being mostly for scriptwriters, despite appealing performances from the two leads.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Compacted into an 80-minute mishmash of interviews, confessions and sketches, melded into a shaky mosaic, the answers from a cross section of men are shallow, self-serving and ultimately unenlightening.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
More an infomercial than a movie, Rollin Binzer’s awed documentary is, at best, a well-earned tribute to one man’s unwavering vision and unrelenting hard work.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mike Hale
Essentially a series of home movies, but home movies of a very high order.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Like most of his movies, Capitalism is a tragedy disguised as a comedy; it’s also an entertainment.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Smothering insightful moments in verbal and musical treacle (courtesy of Harriet Schock’s sticky songs), Mr. Jaglom displays an endearing lack of cynicism but an equal lack of discipline.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
The best thing about In Search of Beethoven, Phil Grabsky’s biography of the composer, is the company he brings along on the hunt.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
It is Mr. Soderbergh’s insistence on seeing the A.D.M. scandal as a collective tragedy rather than as another white-collar crime that gives the movie force, resonance, feeling.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Daniel M. Gold
If the filmmakers opt to make only light statements about junk food, obesity and solid waste, they at least leave the audience sated on a single serving of inspired lunacy.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The vital signs in Love Happens, a movie that feels likes a laboriously padded outline, are faint.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by