For 20,311 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,399 out of 20311
-
Mixed: 8,446 out of 20311
-
Negative: 2,466 out of 20311
20311
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
A would-be erotic thriller with no heat and zero chills, Deception has the kind of glassy, glossy sheen and risible story that mean to suggest "Basic Instinct" but instead invoke lesser laughers like "Jade" and "Sliver."- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
This movie sets out to honor and refresh a youthful enthusiasm from the past and winds up smothering the fun in self-conscious grandiosity.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Shirley’s instant metamorphosis from insecure high school student to ruthless madam is ludicrous in spite of the best efforts of the talented Ms. Waterston to convince you otherwise. The Babysitters has the increasingly jerky momentum of a film that was butchered in the cutting room, sacrificing continuity and character development to whip the plot forward.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
War, Inc. is gonzo moviemaking with a bleeding heart. A satirical farce that wants to be "Dr. Strangelove" for the age of terrorism, it is a zany, nihilistic free-for-all that goes soft.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
I wish Ms. Parker had let that bee in her bonnet go silent, because the movie that she and Mr. King have come up with is the pits, a vulgar, shrill, deeply shallow -- and, at 2 hours and 22 turgid minutes, overlong -- addendum to a show that had, over the years, evolved and expanded in surprising ways.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
The movie's amoral momentum is fatally slowed by an acronym-heavy script and flimsy characterizations that offer fine actors -- including Rip Torn as Tom's contemptuous father and Naomie Harris as his missed opportunity -- little to play.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
Ms. Zeta-Jones is too elegant for the lowlife she's supposed to be, Ms. Ronan isn't endearing enough to be a ragamuffin, and, under Gillian Armstrong's direction, never for a minute do you believe they're mother and daughter.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The kindest thing to be said for this frantic, cluttered mess of cheesy computer-generated action-adventure clichés is that at least you can see how the estimated $175 million budget was spent.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
One of the most undermotivated plots in many a moon, the zero-wit, zero-gravity misadventures of Nat, I.Q. and Scooter are embarked on merely because they're bored on their garbage dump.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The film's spiritual deck is stacked. In the mawkish tradition of movies like "Simon Birch," "Wide Awake," "August Rush" and "Hearts in Atlantis," Henry Poole Is Here is insufferable hokum that takes itself very, very seriously.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Laura Kern
Strains to sell itself as one crazy ride (raging parties! hot lesbian sex! bare breasts!), and chances are it won't disappoint those looking solely for unadulterated raunch.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Features annoying characters navigating unbelievable situations.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
Of all the shoddy, insipid qualities of Bangkok Dangerous, the most egregious is the most fundamental: The film is simply dreadful to look at.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Soon after that the movie simply stops dead in its tracks, as though the money had run out and the project had been called off in the middle of a scene that makes no psychological or dramatic sense. It leaves you frustrated and annoyed.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The suds that cascade through Tyler Perry’s The Family That Preys more than equal the cubic footage from nighttime soaps like "Dallas," "Dynasty" and their offspring.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Not that Madonna has gone in for originality, which isn't really her thing: rather, instead of repurposing a genre, she has riffled through the art-house catalog for inspiration, as evidenced by the film's intentionally grubby visual texture, jumpy editing, direct-address commentary, freeze frames and other tricks.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
A supernatural thriller so mechanically inept and lacking in suspense that it doesn't even pass muster as lowbrow Halloween-ready entertainment.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Soured by its enervated star and uninspired writing, the movie offers only tiny moments of joy, like a hailstorm of gumballs that's unexpectedly magical.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
The film teeters so perilously and routinely at the edge of camp, both with some of its casting choices and some unfortunate dialogue (the repeated warning that "Jumby wants to be born now"), that it's hard to know if Mr. Goyer wants to make us howl with fear or laughter.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Watching Ms. Zellweger’s joyless performance, you have to wonder what happened to this formerly charming actress who not so long ago seemed on the verge of becoming a softer, more vulnerable Shirley MacLaine.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
Looks like a comedy, acts like a comedy and sounds like a comedy, but it isn't funny. This is a problem in a movie that aims for laughs.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Nathan Lee
There are, as you may have guessed, 12 rounds of this arbitrary nonsense. Annoying as the conceit may be, it neatly functions as a means to gauge how much is left to endure.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Gives you the creeps, the giggles and the groans in almost equal measure.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
A clumsy and confused adaptation of Michael Chabon's 1988 novel.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Even when Mr. Coogan can't make his scenes work, his prickly presence keeps you watching, as does the eerie scenes of winter that Mr. Glatzer captures with the camera.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
It isn't saying much, but at least her (Carey) work here is more substantial than in the catastrophic "Glitter."- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Suffers from abusive close-ups, repetitive fight sequences and uninspired demon design.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review