For 20,311 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,399 out of 20311
-
Mixed: 8,446 out of 20311
-
Negative: 2,466 out of 20311
20311
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
There used to be entertainment in the dodging and wit in the scripts; now there’s 3-D.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
An interminable mess of a film that juggles more characters and undeveloped subplots than it can handle and even manages to bungle the setup.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Like his scripts for “21 Grams” and “Babel,” this one makes heavy use of happenstance and temporal displacement, and like them, too, it depends on ideas about human behavior that can only be called preposterous.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Timing, good jokes and characters you can laugh with and at are mostly missing from Gentlemen Broncos.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
A very shallow comedy. For the real thing, rent “The Ref,” in which Kevin Spacey and Judy Davis, with a boost from Glynis Johns, set the house on fire.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
What we see on screen is a lumbering, flat-footed fancy-dress melodrama.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Alternately rancid and ridiculous, strident and sickly sweet, Our Family Wedding”offers plenty that’s old, borrowed and blue; it’s the something new that’s missing.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
It’s hard to know what the director Allen Coulter could have done to improve Will Fetters’s absurdly contrived, yakky script about love and loss, largely set in the summer of 2001. But Mr. Coulter doesn’t help matters by infusing the movie with grave self-importance.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
For his sins poor Stewart is kidnapped, tortured and shot up with horse tranquilizer after his leg is broken. It’s disturbing, and somewhat baffling too, until you grasp that this hapless sucker is a surrogate for the audience.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Although there is the germ of a very sharp comedy in the intersection of real mobsters and make-believe thugs in a Hollywood mob comedy, Analyze That is far too lazy to do much with it.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
The cinematographer-turned-director likes his MTV-style editing so much that in his drive for hyperkinetic overkill he sacrifices coherence to wallow in barely contained chaos.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Little more than a loose- jointed succession of goofy "Saturday Night Live"-style sketches and sight gags inspired by an actual event that is nearly half a century behind us.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Starts on a note of relative naturalism and under Mr. La Salle's nuanced direction gradually becomes more and more unhinged until it concludes in an altogether different genre.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Summer is like an episode of the religious children's series "Davey and Goliath," without the entertainment value of animation and a talking dog.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
It might have been a satisfying if not terribly original piece of historical melodrama, but its clumsiness turns it, against its best intentions, into half-baked operatic kitsch.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Metamorphoses from a character study into a confusingly edited sampler of sexual possibilities that feels both programmatic and old-hat.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The film dissolves into a series of diminishing anticlimaxes, ending on a note of portentous ambiguity. To the last, Mr. Levin maintains his uneasy balance of reportage and melodrama.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The movie is like spending an idle afternoon browsing, and not buying.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
In trying to be both bold and nonthreatening, the movie ends up seeming tame and mildly offensive.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The results, to judge from the examples here, have been stuffy and disappointing, an unholy alliance between Playboy Channel prurience and PBS cultural alibis.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Seems both overplotted and underimagined, though there is at least some creativity and a dose of realism, evident in the hairstyles themselves.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
If you're looking for laughs, give "Valley of the Dolls" another read instead.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lawrence Van Gelder
Eventually becomes preaching that is likely to tax the credibility of the unconverted.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Like a ham-fisted high-concept public service announcement, directed with stagy deliberateness and written with tin-eared vernacular speechiness.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by