Slant Magazine's Scores

For 7,767 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 33% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 64% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 6.2 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 59
Highest review score: 100 Mulholland Dr.
Lowest review score: 0 Jojo Rabbit
Score distribution:
7767 movie reviews
  1. The film’s skittishness is particularly maddening considering that Woody Allen has nothing to artistically to prove.
    • 51 Metascore
    • 50 Critic Score
    In the end, the film is unable to bridge the gap between the emotions it elicits and the messages it imparts.
  2. This adaptation gets straight to the heart of the material, which is basically two hours of stray cats introducing themselves.
  3. The film is overstuffed with characters and subplots that ultimately have little to do with Ip Man and his legacy.
  4. Only rarely does Karim Aïnouz allow for loopholes to refreshingly emerge from the film’s stylistic deadlock.
    • 53 Metascore
    • 38 Critic Score
    The film, hyper-aware of the shadow cast by the franchise’s history, struggles to both honor and redeem the past before everything comes to a close.
  5. Chinonye Chukwu’s film is a morality play with a true sense of contradiction and melancholia.
  6. The documentary is enjoyable, but one suspects that its subject may have found it soft.
  7. Throughout, the filmmakers occlude the most fascinating and potentially powerful elements of Jean Seberg’s history.
  8. The filmmakers’ overly simplistic depiction of good and evil is mitigated to some degree by the presence of Landon (Caleb Eberhardt).
  9. For all the emphasis on video game characters who can be swapped out on a whim, it’s the players themselves who come across as the most thinly drawn and interchangeable beneath their avatars.
  10. The simplicity of bodies barely moving before a camera that brings their quotidian temporality into a halt is nothing short of a radical proposition in our digital era.
    • 64 Metascore
    • 38 Critic Score
    The film is too irreverent in tone and narrow in scope to place Roger Ailes’s criminality in a larger, more meaningful context.
  11. The film is greater in its confrontational force than the sum of a dozen festival breakthroughs lauded for their fearlessness.
  12. Ironically, Clint Eastwood is as condescending of Jewell as the bureaucrats he despises.
  13. While some individuals are inevitably more compelling than others, as a whole the entire series, and “63 Up” in particular, is completely enveloping as it draws us into the latest happenings of these people we’ve followed for so long.
  14. There isn’t anything in the bleeding-heart positions espoused by Jorge Bergoglio that complicates Pope Francis’s public persona.
  15. It’s fascinating to see Benedetta Barzini in academic action, like an ethnographer of the patriarchy herself, bringing back news from its most glamourous yet rotten core.
  16. It’s the mix of the humane and the calculating that gives the film its empathetic power.
  17. As a suspense film, it’s so sluggishly structured that it borders on the avant-garde.
  18. The film is all surface, and its depiction of trauma becomes increasingly exploitative and hollow as it moves along.
  19. The film gets so lost in its affected idiosyncrasies that it stops probing any discernible human feelings.
  20. Strickland’s film is another fetish object that rues the perils of fetishism.
  21. Its performatively extreme imagery thinly masks a rather banal view of male subjectivity and inner conflict.
  22. The film’s tone is extremely eerie, with creeping camera movements, striking imagery, abrupt edits, and a delicately sinister score.
  23. Think Michael Mann’s Heat but in East Africa and with real-world stakes.
  24. Jessica Hausner confidently expresses a thorny and disturbing theme, though perhaps with too much confidence.
  25. The most thrilling and haunting details here are actively undermined by the chief technical gimmick of the film.
    • 91 Metascore
    • 63 Critic Score
    Individual scenes are set to the rhythm of the young women’s conversations, which at times approach Gilmore Girls-level warp speed.
  26. Its sensitivity to how something as seemingly ordinary as food can have an immense emotional impact is consistently and unobtrusively profound.

Top Trailers