Slant Magazine's Scores

For 7,772 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 33% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 64% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 6.3 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 59
Highest review score: 100 Mulholland Dr.
Lowest review score: 0 Jojo Rabbit
Score distribution:
7772 movie reviews
  1. The film is an ultra-violent parody of unearned self-entitlement, of people who feel tricked into a lifestyle they refuse to challenge for the comforts it still offers.
  2. We're never far away from a crude digression demoting an ethereal sense of artistry to hunkered-down artifice.
  3. Yet another ghost story that insists there's nothing more chilling than a professional woman charged with raising a child on her own.
  4. These myriad impressions never quite add up to anything coherent by the end, but perhaps the incoherence is precisely the point.
  5. The film's sense of conviction and psychological nuance never rises above that of the "I Learned It from Watching You" anti-drug PSA.
  6. The film only feels interesting when it focuses on looking at what the characters aren't doing and listening to what they aren't saying.
  7. Throughout the film, writer-director Jash Hyde avoids Paul Haggis's patronizing white liberal attitude toward class warfare.
    • tbd Metascore
    • 75 Critic Score
    At once familiar and enigmatic, Javier Rebollo's The Dead Man and Being Happy feels like a connect-the-dots film with a few lines artfully blurred.
  8. The film can boast of an exotic locale and rare potential, but in Mike Magidson's hands the filmmaking is disappointingly shopworn.
  9. Filmmaker Juan Manuel Echavarría's hands-off approach hinders us from mocking the believers' naïveté.
  10. The film is uproariously funny, but its laughs don't come with an aftertaste of cynicism so much as they are the aftertaste of cynicism.
  11. By eschewing even basic B-roll footage, it ends up feeling even more stripped down than Frederick Wiseman's patient inquisitions, yet nearly as complex overall.
  12. A film that outwardly wants its depiction of class privilege to be ridiculing and farcical, but lacks the ability to express these critiques in lieu of the means of the class on the chopping block.
  13. Pegi Vail beautifully edited film somehow addresses a lot, but ultimately says nothing at all.
  14. The film, although it positions itself in dialogue with contemporary debates about the border, eschews a clearly delineated historical narrative.
  15. Adam Rifkin's documentary convincingly portrays the sense of community fostered by Giuseppe Andrews's crazed passion.
  16. It's mercifully free of the ruin-porn shots that turn so many contemporary films about struggling cities into self-consciously arty exercises in the romanticization of decay.
  17. North Korean culture is lensed in part through a South Korean perspective, with the final chapter asking: “Is reunification possible?”
  18. The film is a patient exploration of the enlaced connections between professional and emotional sectors.
  19. It convincingly insists that the human figure is no more vital to the image than the rapidly shifting landscape it inhabits.
  20. The premise amounts to numerous raised glasses and classical music cues, but little of this schmoozing strikes a notable chord beyond the démodé back-patting engaged throughout.
  21. It passive-aggressively seems to suggest that anyone who isn't exactly interested in monogamy may be some kind of selfish, intolerable sociopath.
    • tbd Metascore
    • 50 Critic Score
    Overall, the film's educational prerogatives tend to overwhelm its more interesting formal properties.
  22. It inflates the meta conceit (already borderline overblown) of a pop-obsessed, sex-negative serial killer to excessive but trite proportions.
  23. It may be described as a Yasujirô Ozu drama done in the Romanian style; if only there was more to distinguish it beyond such extra-textual concerns.
  24. It effectively implies that the subjects' troublemaking is the stuff of transience, a phase before they're ushered into the realm of adult responsibility.
  25. If the documentary isn't quite dynamic in its revelations, it's considerably more so in its challengingly essayistic presentation.
  26. The filmmakers never really answer inevitable questions: What's the point of these fussy allusions?
  27. Tom Shoval, who eschews stylistic flourishes in order to focus on character, leaves the film's heavy lifting to the actors and his own screenplay.
  28. It captures the frustration and the longing of forever wanting more and better at the expense of casualness of being.

Top Trailers