Slant Magazine's Scores

For 7,776 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 33% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 64% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 6.3 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 59
Highest review score: 100 Mulholland Dr.
Lowest review score: 0 Jojo Rabbit
Score distribution:
7776 movie reviews
  1. The chemistry between Pacino and his cast mates gives this lightly amusing contrivance surprising emotional resonance.
  2. Jessica Hausner is less interested in historical revisionism than mining this real-life tragedy for its existential thrust.
  3. Chaitanya Tamhane's grand canvas is Indian society as represented by its legal system, and what it reveals is none too flattering.
  4. True to its title, Marielle Heller's adaptation of Phoebe Gloeckner's semi-autobiographical novel has the loosely structured, unfiltered feel of a young person's diary.
  5. It affects a general air of artistically inclined realism, but it's mostly concerned with building tension via a steady accumulation of flatly conceived misery.
  6. Charles Poekel displays an assured directorial hand and maintains a modest, appealing, even droll sensibility throughout.
  7. This juvenile horror-comedy spoof is primarily, if unintentionally, a cautionary tale about the perils of allowing brahs to make movies.
  8. It bridges the cautionary elements of a horror film with the wish-fulfilling platitudes of a touristy romance.
  9. Anja Marquardt feels the need to puff up her film with relatively artificial conflict that generally comes off as sops to screenwriting conventions.
  10. The mannered direction is at its most effective when it inspires an enhanced sensitivity to the import of every gesture, visual or verbal.
  11. It settles firmly into the perspective of a lost soul who finds solace in the swaddling security of fantasy.
  12. Throughout, BenoƮt Jacquot never loses sight of the primordial compulsions that drive feelings and expressions of great love and beauty.
  13. This time around, in spotlighting Liam Neeson's fatigued charisma, Jaume Collet-Serra's formidable filmmaking chops have plateaued.
  14. The filmmakers cut the film to emphasize the story's familiar plot points, rather than highlight any instances of personal visual artistry.
  15. Overall, the documentary comes off as a solipsistic, uncritical look at an incredible moment in the history of American music.
  16. Frank Whaley never gives these characters a humanizing moment outside of their default personalities, which turns them into cartoon impressions of the worst of each class.
  17. Ethan Hawke's concentration on Seymour Bernstein isn't a betrayal of his own ego massaging, but rather an attempt to have a genuine soul-bearing conversation.
  18. Though visionary, David Robert Mitchell's film abounds in undigested ideas and dubious sexual politics.
  19. On one hand, the film is surely a celebration of a land's distinct creatures and the people who live among them, but on the other, it's a culture's biting auto-critique.
  20. A shamelessly derivative and preposterous would-be blockbuster that goofily fashions itself as a sweeping romance, time-travel sci-fi tale, and gallant period piece all at once.
  21. Thomas McCarthy evinces no interest in the people who come into Max's store and wind up as fodder for his increasingly violent and self-absorbed escapades. Not a shred.
  22. The source material, which is convoluted even by Shakespeare's narratively dexterous standards, is admittedly a tough nut for a filmmaker to crack.
  23. The whole point of Vince Vaughn's cinematic existence is that he's a paragon for reformed chauvinism. He's an irrepressible but highly tamable id. Not so here.
  24. Individual politicians, detectives, and mafiosi come and go so quickly that the audience doesn't have enough time to become emotionally invested in their lives and deaths.
  25. The film's exasperating atonality washes out any legitimate idea about identity, education, nature versus nurture, or artificial intelligence that Neill Blomkamp hoped to evince.
    • 70 Metascore
    • 75 Critic Score
    The film obliquely addresses its narrative mysteries through the conversational cracks of two people in enforced proximity.
  26. The lusterless camerawork keys itself almost empathetically to the drab reality of the film's spaces, settled and unsettled alike, but it can't enliven the hackneyed plot.
  27. An issues documentary that scores its points through a seductive combination of clearly stated arguments and pithy humor.
  28. Like its predecessor, the film is a charming example of what great actors can do with mediocre material.
  29. For all the thematic emphasis the script ultimately places on the allegedly thick bonds among these men, it's surprising how often they communicate solely through exposition.

Top Trailers