San Francisco Chronicle's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 9,306 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
52% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
46% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.1 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 63
| Highest review score: | Mansfield Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Speed 2: Cruise Control |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 5,162 out of 9306
-
Mixed: 2,658 out of 9306
-
Negative: 1,486 out of 9306
9306
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Ruthe Stein
Brosnan and Moore display a knack for fast delivery of smart dialogue both in court and in bed. Their verbal sparring is the main attraction of Laws of Attraction and helped me overlook plot holes of massive proportions.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Mick LaSalle
In Godsend, we have the spectacle of three good actors tied to the mast of a sinking premise.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mick LaSalle
The film is neither fish nor fowl nor some arresting new entity, but a lumpish coagulation of conflicting impulses and unrealized gestures.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Hartlaub
It's too much feel-good movie to take in one sitting, but Stroke of Genius captures just enough detail from the greatest sportsman you've never heard of to keep the historical drama interesting.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Carla Meyer
The concept is high, the humor lowbrow and the joy of experimentation evident in every frame of this wonderful picture.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mick LaSalle
As in "The House of Yes'' and "Freaky Friday,'' Waters keeps it wild but real, and the result is not only a series of lively scenes but lively close-ups: The big-eyed, expressive performances are just fun to watch.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Joel Selvin
The film is a touching, detailed portrait of an important and often overlooked band. Filmmaker David C. Thomas has done a wonderful job of stitching his filmed interviews together with the extensive vintage footage he scrounged.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mick LaSalle
Whenever the movie's point of view turns omniscient, and we're seeing events from the director's vantage point, Man on Fire becomes a blurry, shaky mess.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Mick LaSalle
The possibilities of Jenna's confusion are exploited for full comic effect. Garner, who turns out to be a charming, abandoned comedian, makes Jenna's incredulousness and innocence very funny and occasionally even touching.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Walter Addiego
Its gently delivered theme and friendly images of nature (no lions eating antelopes here), this is a fine thing for families and school groups.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Ruthe Stein
Insightful but unfocused.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mick LaSalle
All [Tarantino] has to do is trim a full hour out of "Vol. 1" and a half hour out of Vol. 2, combine what's left and he'll have something not just amusing and idiosyncratic, but outstanding.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Carla Meyer
It's a prevailing sense of humor that makes this an entertaining, if silly, film adaptation of the Marvel comic.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Walter Addiego
This offering is a mostly undistinguished addition to the long list of films about alienated and self-pitying young people.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Carla Meyer
Tilda Swinton's rich, compelling performance is reason enough to see this uneven picture, which devolves from a riveting romantic triangle to a morality tale without a moral center.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
G. Allen Johnson
Hernandez's debut feature is a thuddingly slow, often wordless portrait of emotional pain.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Mick LaSalle
An exceptionally well-written script, full of unexpected turns and clever reversals, and a trio of deft actors in the principal roles.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Carla Meyer
Lacks the clever twists and turns that made the original such fun. The sequel has exactly one twist, and it's not very clever.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Carla Meyer
Beautifully shot and compelling blend of thriller and coming-of-age drama.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Carla Meyer
The brave men who fought and perished at the Alamo believed fervently in their cause. For The Alamo to work, the audience must believe as well. That never really happens.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Ruthe Stein
The movie doesn't aspire to be art, merely to entertain adolescent girls, which is practically guaranteed by the luminous presence of Anne Hathaway.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Peter Hartlaub
Nearly a scene-for-scene rip-off of "National Lampoon's Summer Vacation" -- where the only substantive change from the original is a reversed travel route.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Mick LaSalle
The movie itself is just a routine showcase, modest in its aspiration and effective within its limits, entertaining in the moment but, in the end, faintly silly. On the plus side, it's only 86 minutes long.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Carla Meyer
A masterful portrait of the seasons of a life.- San Francisco Chronicle
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by