Rare Pokemon fail to mask the tedium in this fleetingly entertaining aside. [Dec 2012, p.106]

It's all a bit drab thanks and not much fun at all. [Sept 2008, p.98]

Once again Sega comes so close to getting it right - and then ruins it with another gimmick.

This is just shameful. A missed opportunity let down by sloppy, lazy programming. [Jan 2009, p.90]

A brilliant idea that works well, but it's far too short to offer value for money. [June 2012, p.106]

Bland and unimaginative. [July 2009, p.93]

The better of the two Bearsworth Manor games, but still rather cumbersonme to play. [Sept 2010, p.94]

Its challenge is too variable. [Feb 2012, p.105]

Neat career mode, but controls are vital in tennis games and this is disappointing. [Apr 2011, p.101]

The most damning issue is over the game's presentation, which ranges from sloppy in some places to downright awful in others.

A surprisingly tough game, but if you have the previous installment it's not different enough.

It's so dated and slow it rarely feels exhilarating when you avoid a laser blast by millimetres and take out a boss.

Slick, polished and surprisingly varied for a movie tie-in, this is one piece of blockbuster merchandise that's worth checking out. Just don't buy it for an easily aggravated child. [Oct 2006, p.94]

A real fitness game for men with giant eyebrows and real, angry fists. [Aug 2011, p.100]

The game is abrupt, lasting only a couple of hours, and trying to tap the right object is consistently niggling. [Dec 2009, p.94]

Doesn't have the mettle for a sustained run in the first team. [Christmas 2009, p.98]

It's a laugh for a while but gets old quickly. [June 2010, p.97]

You can't transform a turd, no matter how hard you try. [Oct 2007, p.89]

Between the dog-eared visuals and repetitive gameplay, it's only just bearable. Shame, really. [Aug 2007, p.98]

Limited, dated and very boring, only die hard fans and young kids will find any fun here. [July 2008, p.95]

A straight remake would have been better. [July 2009, p.60]

Short, but never quite sweet, Wii U's first budget game does exactly what you'd expect, good and bad. [May 2014, p.91]

Curiously addictive. [Jan 2012, p.87]

Dull, and in many cases, incredibly annoying and frustrating. [July 2007, p.86]

A high quality game that makes a strong start then descends into repetition, sadly.

When it does work, Snapped! is a really fun experience, if a little short. [June 2009, p.87]

Awful, just awful. It's a dirty, cheap, slapped-together cash-in title that's not woth the round plastic disc it comes on. [Apr 2008, p.92]

Fans of the series will be saddened at the lack of challenge the new scheme offers, and the lack of value. [June 2007, p.92]