Watchmen

10

AndréSMar 23, 2009

If you didn't get it, watch it again... this IS one of the best and most complex super-hero story ever told!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DerekHMar 23, 2009

This was a very faithful translation of the book. It shed only the unnecessary parts and kept the theme. The soundtrack and effects were well chosen.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JakeBMar 23, 2009

Great movie, not quite as good as the book but that is to be expected. Just about as good as The Dark Knight.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

JosephAMar 23, 2009

Just not that good. If I hadn't been familiar with the story I don't think I would've enjoyed it at all.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TimLMar 23, 2009

A fantastic adaptation to a novel considered unfilmable. This movie certainly won't appease the fanboys (but what actualy does?). The most drastic change in the plot between novel and movie was probably necessary to keep the movie under A fantastic adaptation to a novel considered unfilmable. This movie certainly won't appease the fanboys (but what actualy does?). The most drastic change in the plot between novel and movie was probably necessary to keep the movie under 3 hours long. The pacing of the various stories does well in keeping the overall movie moving. The use of The Times They Are A-Changin to tell the tale of the Minutemen is an ingenious way to give a background to the history of masked vigilanties. Having read the novel before seeing the movie, I have to say that people who expected every page to be present in the movie are dreaming. The screenplay holds onto Moore's ideas of a lost society and anyone who is angry Moore didn't take part in this adaptation have to realize he wouldn't have taken part in any retelling of his novel. The actors do an excellent job of portraying these beloved masked crusaders and I personally think every actor was perfect for their role. If this film was released later in the year we could easily be seeing James Earl Haley nominated for a Best Supporting Actor nomination. People have to go see this movie for what it is, an adaptation to what Time magazine called one of the 100 best novels of the past 80 years.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

ChristopherP.Mar 22, 2009

Spits right in the face of the source material in favor of a Hollywood-grade cinematic spinoff. It'd be an average movie on its own, but because it's based off of something it takes no shame in completely destroying, It's Spits right in the face of the source material in favor of a Hollywood-grade cinematic spinoff. It'd be an average movie on its own, but because it's based off of something it takes no shame in completely destroying, It's insulting drivel. It's no surprise at all that the author wanted his name out of the credits.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

VerminDeathstackMar 21, 2009

Not half as bad as I

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JakeGMar 21, 2009

A modest fan of the book, I thought Snyder did as well of a job anyone can do in pulling this book off. It's devout to the theme, keeping that same original volatile morality, but with extras that are a perfect blend of Zack Synder and A modest fan of the book, I thought Snyder did as well of a job anyone can do in pulling this book off. It's devout to the theme, keeping that same original volatile morality, but with extras that are a perfect blend of Zack Synder and Watchmen. I really don't see how someone could hate it. Powerful for a superhero movie. Better than the fanboy-magnet Dark Knight.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MattS.Mar 21, 2009

This movie is hugely underrated. Most people who went to see it were probably looking for a cheap action movie with no thinking involved. If you do want to stimulate your mind however this movie is the best option.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TonyS.Mar 21, 2009

Purely inspired filmmaking! It's like the panels of the graphic novel came to life onscreen. Unbelievable hearing Rorschach's gravelly voice, or seeing Dr. Manhtattan's backstory, and devolving into inhumanity. Visually Purely inspired filmmaking! It's like the panels of the graphic novel came to life onscreen. Unbelievable hearing Rorschach's gravelly voice, or seeing Dr. Manhtattan's backstory, and devolving into inhumanity. Visually sumptuous. Has to be seen many times to fully appreciate.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

ArleneC.Mar 21, 2009

It started off pretty well, the first hour. I waited with bated breath for the reason why they were getting killed one by one. It all started falling apart with the needless, ludicruous love scenes, and when the reason for the killings was It started off pretty well, the first hour. I waited with bated breath for the reason why they were getting killed one by one. It all started falling apart with the needless, ludicruous love scenes, and when the reason for the killings was revealed, and the subsequent absurdity - it was more than I could stomach. I walked out of the cinema. 1 point, is for making me curious enough to want to know why and whom wanted them killed. Zero - after you know why. So many parts could easily and should have been edited. What a pain it was.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KellyO'O.Mar 20, 2009

Brilliant, just brilliant. Snyder did the impossible and made a credible film version of the greatest comic ever written. I hated 300, but this is way more intellectual, super hero movies cannot be the same after this, it's on another level.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JohnN.Mar 20, 2009

Was a film that tried to accomplish too much in such a short time. Yes, the movie was long. However, the amount of fictional events it covered required another level of comprehension from its audience. I can tell you the averagemovie goer Was a film that tried to accomplish too much in such a short time. Yes, the movie was long. However, the amount of fictional events it covered required another level of comprehension from its audience. I can tell you the averagemovie goer like me found it anything but braincandy. Minus the explicit scenes it is a complete opposite of Zack Snyder's work on "300". It forces a moral question unto the audience and leaves you thinking. I still believe that this movie was too lengthy though. It could have ended during several diffrent scenes. So if your in the mood for a film that requires a bit of audience participation this would be one you don't watn to miss.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AlecBMar 20, 2009

Watchmen is easily the best film of 2009. Far better then Taken or Friday the 13th. It has everything a good action film should have. You care about some of the characters, a good plot, and lots of action. Im tired of people fucking Watchmen is easily the best film of 2009. Far better then Taken or Friday the 13th. It has everything a good action film should have. You care about some of the characters, a good plot, and lots of action. Im tired of people fucking complaining about it was too gorey or there was too much sex in the movie. Who cares the movie is rated R for a reason. Its not a pussy PG-13 superhero movie so for parents bringing there 4 year old kid to go see it, then complaning about the movie and how violent it is need to shut up and realize its their own fault for bringing the kid in the first place. Yes, the movie is extremely long but why are people complaning about it. If you could handle the dark Knight then you can handle this. ohh yea and to the kid who said the music sucks? its supposed to be set in like 1985 of course its going to have that kind of music. Sorry that the film didnt have your faggot 50 cent black music going on.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ArtieJMar 19, 2009

Wow. Visually gorgeous and a very faithful adaptation to Moore's graphic novel. I loved every frame. I think those that knock it just don't understand it, and that's ok. This isn't a movie for the masses, and that's Wow. Visually gorgeous and a very faithful adaptation to Moore's graphic novel. I loved every frame. I think those that knock it just don't understand it, and that's ok. This isn't a movie for the masses, and that's fine by me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

AnneAMar 19, 2009

Truly one of the worst films I have ever had the misfortune to sit through. You'd think Dr. Manhattan -- super genius and all powerful master of the universe -- could conjure up a pair of pants but no, apparently that eludes his grasp.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

christopherjMar 19, 2009

Confusing, undercooked piece of shite. You know who the bad guy is 2 minutes into the movie. Surprise! The movie could have ended there, and I could have done almost anything else to make my life better.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MarkMMar 19, 2009

As good of an adaptation as you are ever going to see. Though simplified, the themes and the ideas behind the story are in tact. The film even gave me a better understanding and appreciation of the graphic novel. And the love (sex) scene As good of an adaptation as you are ever going to see. Though simplified, the themes and the ideas behind the story are in tact. The film even gave me a better understanding and appreciation of the graphic novel. And the love (sex) scene that everyone is so cranky about? I usually think these scenes are completely gratuitous but in The Watchmen I felt it was pointed, relevant and moving. Make no mistake. This is a Hollywood film. Realize this, accept this. If you don't like the implications then... don't... go... see... it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DecepticonPomMar 19, 2009

An absolute bold, unexpected modern classic in cinema. Yes, I AM serious. I expected to simply 'like' it, I didn't expect to be blown away by a masterpiece.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

StevenHMar 19, 2009

While the movie was not perfect, it definitely included a lot of the novel and I was pleased with how it turned out. For those of you that took your children to see it, do some research next time, read the novel, find out what you are taking While the movie was not perfect, it definitely included a lot of the novel and I was pleased with how it turned out. For those of you that took your children to see it, do some research next time, read the novel, find out what you are taking your 'impressionable' minds to watch. Little girls getting eaten by dogs, people getting ripped up, yeah, its all in there. Rape, mayhem, hell, they omitted a ton of violence. Just wait for the DVD of the comic 'black freighter' to come out. Riding on a boat made of the corpses of your fallen comrades?? The book discusses the depth of destruction, corruption and violence that society has fallen to. Nations at each others throats with the only chance of unity in the world riding on the shoulders of some worldwide disaster (i.e. 'Squid Thing' in the novel, nuclear bombs in movie) propelling people to take a look at what they value, what is worth fighting for. Should we fight each other or are there things out there worth making peace with our neighbor for that we might be stronger to battle evils that we alone cannot defeat. Remember, the novel was written back in the 80s, when the world was waiting for WWIII to destroy humanity. Those of you who went thinking 'omg superhero movie' need to actually read some variety of 'comic' books, because that is what it is, its a 'comic' not a superhero movie, and comics cover an extremely wide variety of genres. If you said worst movie ever, I'm sorry, off the top of my head, Cronicles of Riddick, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (another Alan Moore adaptation) are movies that come to mind just off the top of my head. But, as I stated earlier with the parents taking their kids to see this, if you are going to review something that is an adaptation, you need to actually 1.) read the novel the movie is going to be based on 2.) research information about the novel, because guaranteed, one read through does not get you all the subtle, in depth nuances and, lets face it, many of you out there are too stupid to get them anyway since you took your children to see this movie. and 3.) understand that novels turned into film are never going to be able to include everything (i.e. why you need to read the novel) and to include everything that would satisfy your inability to comprehend what is going on during the film would take 4+ hours and lets face it, I don't want to sit for 4 hours just because you are an idiot, I will wait for the unrated/extended version to come out on DVD, understanding that a lot of the novel cannot be included in the film and thus what they will include for viewers is what attracts the largest audience: sex and violence. Remember, Hollywood is about making money, their output is what sells the most, those of us that actually enjoy the novels that films are based on must at least wait for the DVD in order to actually see what the director wanted to include in the film to make an unbiased judgement on the film. Finally, I did knock the film 2 points because I agree that the soundtrack sucked and my 2 friends and one of their wives was with me and we all laughed at the soundtrack, but all of us thoroughly enjoyed the film. BTW: props to Snyder for actually showing Manhattan's penis, it was in the novel but I didn't think they would have the balls to put it into the film, so hats off for all the risks he took with this film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

JoeSMar 19, 2009

Depressing and heavy handed, the story likes to pretend it has some deep philosophical statement about human kind, but mostly it just keeps slapping you in the face with mallet that has "Humans suck!" written on it in fingerpaint. An Depressing and heavy handed, the story likes to pretend it has some deep philosophical statement about human kind, but mostly it just keeps slapping you in the face with mallet that has "Humans suck!" written on it in fingerpaint. An undeniably beautiful film, its just depressing and dark. None of the characters are likeable or have any sort of redeeming quality, and the few actually fun parts are far too short. I haven't read the graphic novel, but I have no doubt this would be better shown in narrative form because this movie just drains the life out of itself. I give it a 3 for excellent visual appeal, but I could not recommend this to anyone.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

KeaganAMar 19, 2009

A truly great movie. In my opinion sets a standard in cinematography that 'hero' movies of the future will struggle to meet. Its great to see a movie that doesn't glamorize the 'superhero' scene and parodies all that A truly great movie. In my opinion sets a standard in cinematography that 'hero' movies of the future will struggle to meet. Its great to see a movie that doesn't glamorize the 'superhero' scene and parodies all that came before it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JackSMar 19, 2009

Amazing film which completely catches the essence of Moore's brilliant graphic novel.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

gernickMar 19, 2009

The movie never feels overlong (quite an achievement at 2.44 hrs) and the acting is great. Seeing the movie after seeing it panned in so many reviews I was pleasantly surprised. I can absolutely recommend this film to anyone, comic geek or not.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JaredBMar 18, 2009

One of the best movies I've seen in recent years. If you're a fan of darker movies, sci-fi, action, a well-established storyline with depth, and surprise endings, this flick is for you. If you like bubblegum hero flicks (Fantastic One of the best movies I've seen in recent years. If you're a fan of darker movies, sci-fi, action, a well-established storyline with depth, and surprise endings, this flick is for you. If you like bubblegum hero flicks (Fantastic 4 comes to mind here) and always expect Superman-type superhero personalities in a non-real worl setting, you're probably not going to like it. I thought it was phenomenal, and since I didn't read the graphic novel beforehand, it's that much better. It is a long movie, but the amount of information you're given never feels rushed or sparse, and the bittersweet ending just blew me away. Fans of thinking movies with a polished style will love this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JeffWMar 18, 2009

The comic was a masterpiece. The film was incredible; done with due reverence, pride and effort. Extremely entertaining. I am afraid to say it, but it was better than batman, and it made spiderman look like the carebear's circus The comic was a masterpiece. The film was incredible; done with due reverence, pride and effort. Extremely entertaining. I am afraid to say it, but it was better than batman, and it made spiderman look like the carebear's circus adventure movie for religiously indoctrinated children.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

JohnDisapointedMar 17, 2009

An astounding fail this movie is an abomination to the book it was spawned. It is no suprise what so ever that Alan Moore wants to disassociate himself with the movie. It was a terrible movie at best on its own, had there been no book to An astounding fail this movie is an abomination to the book it was spawned. It is no suprise what so ever that Alan Moore wants to disassociate himself with the movie. It was a terrible movie at best on its own, had there been no book to compare it to countless people would have lost interest and it would have scored a 6-7. BUT since the movie was based upon a deep and powerfull book when it kills the theme, mocks the ideas and charactors and acts as an embodiment of the cancer that is hollywood I cannot help but judge hardly. They overpowerd the charactors, they added excessive sex appeal, they skipped themes, they CHANGED THE CHARACTORS turning some into archetypal supervillian douchbags rather then taking any time to explain them, I loved watchmen because there were no archetypes, now theres a supervillian, a badass, a man reliving his glory days and a slut on the screen.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

0

MarkCMar 17, 2009

Tom C - very eloquent. IM not glad I disliked this film but Im glad fans of teh book can admit that it is indeed a horrendous film. I know many people who have great taste in books and have recommended that I read the book and I still intend Tom C - very eloquent. IM not glad I disliked this film but Im glad fans of teh book can admit that it is indeed a horrendous film. I know many people who have great taste in books and have recommended that I read the book and I still intend to do it with a blank slate, but I think your summary is just and articulate.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

NickMMar 17, 2009

Between the unrealistic and unneccesarily graphic fight scenes, and the bizzare and outlandish plot that barely makes sense, this movie trys to make a moral/philosophic point, but it is completely lost in a mess of absurdity. The only reason Between the unrealistic and unneccesarily graphic fight scenes, and the bizzare and outlandish plot that barely makes sense, this movie trys to make a moral/philosophic point, but it is completely lost in a mess of absurdity. The only reason i even gave it a one is because it was so stupid that it gave me something to laugh at, even though that that wasn't the movie's intention.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AndyMMar 16, 2009

As a casual fan of the graphic novel, I thought the movie was satisfying. The action scenes were beautifully executed and added a nice flare to what I expected to be a dead adaptation of the original masterpiece. I thoroughly enjoyed it, but As a casual fan of the graphic novel, I thought the movie was satisfying. The action scenes were beautifully executed and added a nice flare to what I expected to be a dead adaptation of the original masterpiece. I thoroughly enjoyed it, but my opinion alone cannot be trusted because of my familiarity with the story and Snyder's distinct style. Without knowing the plot, I can understand someone getting lost and without recognizing key scenes, I can also see how transitions could be abrupt. Overall, as a fan, but not fanatic, of the comic I give it a 9 because it remained incredibly faithful while adding cinematic zing that movies need but comics can do without. I was very excited for this movie, and was not disappointed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

AaronFMar 16, 2009

Overall, I'm very conflicted on the movie. I loved parts of it and really thought others were overdone. The story-telling was beautiful, the effects were well choreographed, and the acting was great. I can say that the changes were Overall, I'm very conflicted on the movie. I loved parts of it and really thought others were overdone. The story-telling was beautiful, the effects were well choreographed, and the acting was great. I can say that the changes were great, and overall it really faithfully captured the comic book. On the other hand, their were many un-needed moments. The violence was made a bit too graphic for the material. Made with all the finesse of a good horror movie, the action is portrayed more graphic than it even needs to be to be realistic. While many movies such as Sin City were able to go into graphic detail and violence, it was handled tastefully. In Watchment, it was the pure opposite. It was over-emphasized as in a horror movie to make you cringe, which was just odd to the feeling of watching this interpretation of a great comic book.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MattKMar 16, 2009

Very good movie. It's unfortunate that much of the population isn't smart enough to comprehend it...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

RCRMar 16, 2009

Watchmen is a fantastic film. I knew nothing of the Watchmen's story prior to seeing the movie, but I was determined afterwards to pick up the graphic novel. My main objective was to see what differences existed between the film and its Watchmen is a fantastic film. I knew nothing of the Watchmen's story prior to seeing the movie, but I was determined afterwards to pick up the graphic novel. My main objective was to see what differences existed between the film and its source material; if I had enjoyed the movie as much as I did, surely the graphic novel would be a greater experience. I finished reading, revisited the film, and enjoyed my experience just as much as the first time. The film succeeds as an excellent companion piece to the graphic novel as well as a superb introduction for the uninitiated into the well-defined waters of Moore's epic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AlainGMar 16, 2009

I'd give it more of a 7.5 but there aren't any decimals on here... It's definitely not a perfect film, a couple aspects/scenes are pretty bad. Despite the almost three-hour length, the ending still felt rushed, and in the I'd give it more of a 7.5 but there aren't any decimals on here... It's definitely not a perfect film, a couple aspects/scenes are pretty bad. Despite the almost three-hour length, the ending still felt rushed, and in the process, I feel that it lost some of the emotional impact that the book had. I had heard a lot about how bad Silk Spectre and Ozymandias were, so I went in with pretty low expectations for their characters. Their performances weren't as bad as I expected, but they definitely didn't have the emotional depth of the original characters. That being said, the film also has several brilliant moments and some great acting. The Comedian is great. I wish he were in it longer. He really is able to capture Blake's personality. Ditto for Rorschach and Dr. Manhattan, who are both perfect. The latter is a cgi character, but is given so much depth by Crudup's performance. My favourite part of the film is Manhattan's brilliant scene on Mars, when he is recounting his life. Had the entire film stayed on the same level as this scene, it would have been a masterpiece. Unfortunately, it doesn't. However, I'm willing to look past Watchmen's flaws and enjoy it's brilliant moments.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

KieranHMar 16, 2009

Visually beautiful. Captures a number of photogenic scenes and animates them- without bringing them to life. To analogize this film to the source material is to compare a soulless flesh-eating zombie to Frankenstein's tragic creation. Visually beautiful. Captures a number of photogenic scenes and animates them- without bringing them to life. To analogize this film to the source material is to compare a soulless flesh-eating zombie to Frankenstein's tragic creation. It is a low-functioning, blood-thirsty automaton, oblivious to even its own state of undeath. To the dubious fanboys who actually rate this movie above 3, I suggest that you truly re-read Moore's masterpiece before presuming that its detractors have failed to intellectually digest the intricate themes of the original. Only a superficial appreciation of the graphic novel would lend this film any credibility as a faithful adaptation.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AndréAMar 16, 2009

If you didn't like this movie, is because you didn't get it... read the graphic novel and than watch it again!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

TomCMar 16, 2009

I understand the difficulties inherent in adapting Watchmen to the screen and, to be fair, Snyder was incredibly faithful in maintaining the look, dialogue and basic plot elements of the original. A Watchmen film that runs at two hours and I understand the difficulties inherent in adapting Watchmen to the screen and, to be fair, Snyder was incredibly faithful in maintaining the look, dialogue and basic plot elements of the original. A Watchmen film that runs at two hours and forty minutes requires the economy of a poet. Defenders of the film have argued that Snyder has created the best adaptation of Watchmen possible given these constraints, but there was plenty of fat that could have been skimmed off the surface of this bloated, superficial adaptation. For example, why did the Comedian's death need to be an extended action sequence in an adaptation that leaves no room for superfluity? Not because it served the source material or even the film, but because Snyder couldn't help himself. Why does a goofy sex scene drag on interminably while a devastating international attack is practically glossed over? A simple matter of priority, I suppose. What Snyder lost in his supposedly dutiful translation of Moore's text is the emotional richness and relentless dramatic tension that makes the novel work in the first place. I didn't care about any of these characters, despite the generally phenomenal performances (with the exception of Akerman, Gugino and Goode). The film completely lacks any organic arc to carry the reader through its world, which is what sucks the life out of these performances. The sense of dread that slowly boils until it bubbles over in the graphic novel has been replaced with, "...and then...and then...and then," amounting to little more than a cheap game of 'connect the dots' for fans of the comic. By the time Ozymandius unveils his masterstroke, the impact is totally nullified. Indeed, why should we care about a nuclear holocaust in a film with nothing identifiably human about it? Why should we feel betrayed by Adrian Veidt when there's no humanity in the film worth saving? Ultimately, I loathed Watchmen not for it's excision of my favorite subplots or its atrocious soundtrack, but for its plasticity. I love the graphic novel for it's intellectual depth and subtlety of characterization, sure, but also for the way it makes me feel. The graphic novel moved me, while the film left me scratching my head. And in a film adaptation that leaves no room for excess, I would argue that Snyder worried far too much about superficial replication and sensationalism and too little about the human pulse of Watchmen. Shave off thirty seconds of a sex scene and give me thirty seconds of a newsvender making smalltalk with a smart alec kid, so that when a nuclear blast disintegrates them as they share a desperate hug in their final moments on a tragic planet, it actually means something. This film has no reason to exist other than as an exercise in nostalgia for Watchmen fans who haven't read the novel recently enough to remember what makes it work. Snyder understands how everything fits except people.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DMar 16, 2009

Big fan of the comic. The climax actually worked better than the comic, IMO, because it had deeper implications regarding a world reintroduced to religious fear. Direction cleverly capitalizes on this theme by emphasizing parallels to a Big fan of the comic. The climax actually worked better than the comic, IMO, because it had deeper implications regarding a world reintroduced to religious fear. Direction cleverly capitalizes on this theme by emphasizing parallels to a certain character. The characters are more super-powered than in the comic, but it made sense to do that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DallasPMar 16, 2009

Don't believe they negative review. Movie was excellent and a nice translation of the comic books.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CraigEMar 16, 2009

Apparently this is one of those movies that are either Loved or Hated...I Loved this movie - having just recently finished reading the graphic novel (which I had intended to for quite some time but was spurred into action upon the news of Apparently this is one of those movies that are either Loved or Hated...I Loved this movie - having just recently finished reading the graphic novel (which I had intended to for quite some time but was spurred into action upon the news of the movie) I was curious to see how it was adapted to the big screen. I was Entirely impressed. The casting was phenomenal, I thought each character looked/acted/embodied their inked counterparts to a T. Obviously the movie was not able to delve completely into the social commentary and more subtle undertones that the book did, but I felt that what was omitted was probably for the better, due to the fact that it would most likely make for boring movie watching (as it was some of the more difficult reading to get through as well) I was intrigued the whole way through the movie and each characters story was so well portrayed that for me, the 2.5 hrs flew by...The movie did NOT feel as long as it was. My sister in law (who has not read the book) also liked it tremendously, and she can be a very harsh critic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

THATMOVIEGUYMar 16, 2009

B- for effort. However, if you guys want to see an actual 10 out of 10, stunning visual representation of the Watchmen comic... Get the Watchmen 6 hour Animated Comic. It's a totally new medium of art that going overlooked, and one of B- for effort. However, if you guys want to see an actual 10 out of 10, stunning visual representation of the Watchmen comic... Get the Watchmen 6 hour Animated Comic. It's a totally new medium of art that going overlooked, and one of the greatest films you could watch right now! Why? Because it's a frame for frame (not recreation with "decent" actors and an action/horror director) COMIC with GREAT VOICE ACTING and subtle not over the top animation of the actual comic, WATCHMEN. Go see it, after you leave this "alright" film, please. And if you like it, tell more people!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ChaseMMar 16, 2009

Brock R. you lost all respect you may have previous have by saying "that weird Hallelujah cover" that was the original you stupid twat.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

RonLMar 16, 2009

1. The acting sucked. 2. The soundtrack was annoying. 3. The ending didn

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JoshWMar 16, 2009

I had never heard of Watchmen until recently so I decided to but the graphic novel before seeing the film. I know the hardcore fanboys are getting ridiculously distraught over what has been changed etc but in my opinion Zack Snyder has taken I had never heard of Watchmen until recently so I decided to but the graphic novel before seeing the film. I know the hardcore fanboys are getting ridiculously distraught over what has been changed etc but in my opinion Zack Snyder has taken a good book that in places was boring and downright stupid (squid anyone?) and made it into a brilliant film that stays faithful to the novel whilst also improving many scenes and especially improving the end (especially between Nite Owl and Ozzy). Well made, well acted (nixon looked idiotic though with THAT nose) and I cannot wait for the blu ray edition.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RyanLMar 15, 2009

While some people had a problem with the ending straying from that of the graphic novel I like it more because it gives it makes it more personal and direct to the story. Other than that it perfectly represents the novel (or as much as is While some people had a problem with the ending straying from that of the graphic novel I like it more because it gives it makes it more personal and direct to the story. Other than that it perfectly represents the novel (or as much as is possible in 2:45), which was perfect itself.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

LoganOMar 15, 2009

Reading some of the negative reviews, i find it odd that they think someone new to Watchmen won't find anything interesting. It's the opposite for me; rorschach, the comedian, dr. manhattan are interesting characters, the story is Reading some of the negative reviews, i find it odd that they think someone new to Watchmen won't find anything interesting. It's the opposite for me; rorschach, the comedian, dr. manhattan are interesting characters, the story is very interesting, and i was transported to the world of Watchmen. this coming from someone 100% new to the novel. The reverence is bashed constantly, but i ask you, even if the directer made a story board remake of the novel, is that such a terrible thing? Because of the movie i'm now contemplating buying the graphic novel, and i plan on seeing the movie a second time. Not perfect, but a very good movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

SteveMar 15, 2009

Was It Worth Watching? We should give Watchmen its props for the most faithful adaptation of a comic book to the screen. This is a good thing. Alan Moore

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

ShawnBMar 15, 2009

Decent, but not able to live up to its source material. Can't say it was a failure as a film but it was a bit of a disappointment to someone who had read the original story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

RobertoGMar 15, 2009

I read the original graphic novel when it was first released. As any adaptation, it will differ. I went to the movie with the approach that it was, by default, going to be different. So I enjoyed it the movie because I decided not to compare I read the original graphic novel when it was first released. As any adaptation, it will differ. I went to the movie with the approach that it was, by default, going to be different. So I enjoyed it the movie because I decided not to compare it to the original.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

TrajanMar 15, 2009

the plot was far too disjointed to make a good movie. the sex and graphic violence didn't add to the story. it was very difficult to care about any of the characters. i could never figure out if any of the characters aside from dr. m. the plot was far too disjointed to make a good movie. the sex and graphic violence didn't add to the story. it was very difficult to care about any of the characters. i could never figure out if any of the characters aside from dr. m. had special powers (aside from the ability to take a lot of damage). overall, it was simply nothing special.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

AndréLMar 15, 2009

I give it 5 for changing so much stuff from the original story, like rorschach pass and a LOT of stuff that don´t make sense to change, shit, if i could beat zack snyder it would be great, simply destroyed the reputation of the history I give it 5 for changing so much stuff from the original story, like rorschach pass and a LOT of stuff that don´t make sense to change, shit, if i could beat zack snyder it would be great, simply destroyed the reputation of the history for those who doesn´t know.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

IsaacNMar 15, 2009

Ok, I know some people might hate me but. I don't think the technology was right for this movie still. I still think It's almost an unfilmable movie. It was great amazing. It didn't catch me but it was good for what it was Ok, I know some people might hate me but. I don't think the technology was right for this movie still. I still think It's almost an unfilmable movie. It was great amazing. It didn't catch me but it was good for what it was supposed to be.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JpOMar 15, 2009

I think that people that don't understand the concept of the story rate it below a 7. And that's fine, this comic books isn't for everybody. Keep in mind, all this was based on the comic book, and all they did was portray that I think that people that don't understand the concept of the story rate it below a 7. And that's fine, this comic books isn't for everybody. Keep in mind, all this was based on the comic book, and all they did was portray that in the movie, in an AMAZING way might I add. We each have different views, and the movie is a perfect example of that. In their way on how they saw to end the cold war at the time, had superhero's existed. A triumph, a 4.5 thumbs up!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BenMMar 15, 2009

I thought this movie was truly great in nearly every respect. The acting was good, the plot was (obviously) comic book-esque, but still good. The acting clicked very well, and overall the movie feels like an adult super-hero epic. For not I thought this movie was truly great in nearly every respect. The acting was good, the plot was (obviously) comic book-esque, but still good. The acting clicked very well, and overall the movie feels like an adult super-hero epic. For not having experienced the graphic novel, I'm stunned, and very impressed with what Zack Snyder's done. It made me run out and buy the graphic novel the next day, and that's truly a testament to its power.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

MonkeyManMar 15, 2009

Doesn't live up to its hype. A movie without a real plot, mostly boring and made for teenagers.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MattMar 15, 2009

Well acted and possibly the best comic adaptation of recent years. At times however it feels like Snyder overused action sequences and gore too much. The overall message from the graphic novel was there, middle aged vigilantism, and at timesWell acted and possibly the best comic adaptation of recent years. At times however it feels like Snyder overused action sequences and gore too much. The overall message from the graphic novel was there, middle aged vigilantism, and at times kept the same brooding nature. Some scenes were altered for continuity and to make the story line look like it happened in a a matter of days.
Changing the ending, though it may appear as heresy to the fans of the graphic novel, made the Watchmen acessable to a new audience while allowing for the Film to be shorter,
The music adds to the moment and some of the montages are fantastic.
The Film ignored many of the sub-plots and tiny relationships built up in Moore's work however if you look the relationships are there; they are just not as explicitly pointed out.
All in all a very good translation only stopped from being truly fantastic by the insistence of fight sequences and gore that adds nothing to the plot and seem to be there just so those who wish to see violence do not get bored.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TyW.Mar 14, 2009

First things first, I read the novel. And I liked the movie a lot. Don't let all these negative fanboy reviews fool you, Watchmen is a good flick whether you have read it or not. I have a friend that was a guy who didn't read it First things first, I read the novel. And I liked the movie a lot. Don't let all these negative fanboy reviews fool you, Watchmen is a good flick whether you have read it or not. I have a friend that was a guy who didn't read it that loved it, and a girl that did the same as well. I think it's ridiculous to point out minor faults in movie adaptations. If the watchmen was based directly on the novel without change, it would be a boring movie. Props to the writers for making it interesting. And Alan Moore was quoted saying it was "the best screenplay that they could've done". Sounds good to me. Violence wasn't over the top, and there wasn't much sex. It's rated R for a reason. Parents read the ratings. There is a point behind them. I'll agree the girl playing Silk Spectre was terrible, but the acting wasn't too awfully bad. And the slow-mo cams are mixed nicely with fast-mo cams for very interesting action sequences. I loved the film, and I am tired of all of the Watchmen Purists and Zack Snyder haters bashing the crap out of this movie. It was good! P.S. Music Trivia: That was the ORIGINAL Hallelujah by Leonard Cohen. Look it up.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

RussellHMar 14, 2009

I have not read nor seen anything from the comic book. The movie was for the most part good, however 3 hours was not enough time to tell the whole story. Its a longer movie that was compacted and some details seem to be missing from the I have not read nor seen anything from the comic book. The movie was for the most part good, however 3 hours was not enough time to tell the whole story. Its a longer movie that was compacted and some details seem to be missing from the movie. I did like the style of the movie though.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

PeterFMar 14, 2009

A thoroughly unpleasant experience. I'd give it a zero, but the motes of dust floating around Dr. Manhattan were a nice effect, and no mainstream American film that I know of comes close to having as much full frontal male A thoroughly unpleasant experience. I'd give it a zero, but the motes of dust floating around Dr. Manhattan were a nice effect, and no mainstream American film that I know of comes close to having as much full frontal male nudity--impressive. Otherwise this is just one more depressingly violent, unimaginatively filmed comic book movie. What exactly is the point of watching bones break and bodies explode to a deafening techno score? Why do filmmakers who peddle nihilistic porno-violence think they can even pretend to have something valid to say about the state of the world? Abysmal.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

GrahamKMar 14, 2009

Very enjoyable movie. Interesting story line and characters with depth, for me it really grabbed my attention. Highly recommended.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

AaronJMar 14, 2009

Maddening waste of time and money. Takes an hour and a half before we start to stumble across anything that could be called a story. A violent video game where no one is playing. Not a movie - a prelude to a sequel.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

GerryGMar 14, 2009

Parts of it were great, others good, some disturbing, some silly, and some scenes were quite graphic (nudity, sex, attempted rape, bloody violence). Surprisingly little language, though, considering the other elements. It was uneven, but Parts of it were great, others good, some disturbing, some silly, and some scenes were quite graphic (nudity, sex, attempted rape, bloody violence). Surprisingly little language, though, considering the other elements. It was uneven, but never boring or poorly acted. If you have a religious or conservative leaning, you probably would do best to avoid this. Not for kids.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

roberti.Mar 14, 2009

A parallel universe, compressed into two hours and forty minutes. Is this the first adult superhero flick, tinged with shadows and gore and lust? Never mind that we can't follow the plot completely, nor that it's 40 minutes too A parallel universe, compressed into two hours and forty minutes. Is this the first adult superhero flick, tinged with shadows and gore and lust? Never mind that we can't follow the plot completely, nor that it's 40 minutes too long. Dive in.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

ZachC.Mar 14, 2009

From someone unfamiliar with this (or any other) graphic novel: I felt too little was explained, which made me feel lost, and what was explained was overexplained, which made me feel insulted. It was fun to watch at many points, but dull and From someone unfamiliar with this (or any other) graphic novel: I felt too little was explained, which made me feel lost, and what was explained was overexplained, which made me feel insulted. It was fun to watch at many points, but dull and slow in many others, and the story was not believable. I loved X-men and don't demand fidelity to the laws of science, but I like humans to act like humans, and didn't buy into several characters in this movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

4

KenithG.Mar 14, 2009

The only thing decent about this movie was the visual quality.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

IanDMar 14, 2009

The reviewer from the Hollywood reporter gets it dead right. The movie is nonsense. I still cant believe i didn't just walk out and save myself the extra hour and a half.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AnonymousMCMar 14, 2009

Poster of Watchmen said: By visioneer Zack Snyder. That's why this great movie ain't going to any respect! No one understands genius' before they die...except I do. This movie had great story, effects and acting. Really,Poster of Watchmen said: By visioneer Zack Snyder. That's why this great movie ain't going to any respect! No one understands genius' before they die...except I do. This movie had great story, effects and acting. Really, what's wrong with the movie? Maybe too much crap talk but that's it! The haters just can't stand watching superhero movie with only ONE superpowered person.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

OCMar 14, 2009

A plodding film that sets out to fill some very large boots but ends up falling head over heels. Having not read the graphic novel I entered the cinema with little expectation; to walk away almost three hours later wondering what all the A plodding film that sets out to fill some very large boots but ends up falling head over heels. Having not read the graphic novel I entered the cinema with little expectation; to walk away almost three hours later wondering what all the fuss is about is a sad testament to the lack of resonance this film has. Unfortunately even the set pieces don't stand up to much scrutiny. Worthy performances from the central actors but not enough to rescue this B-movie adaptation.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

stooge4444VTMar 14, 2009

First off, I've never read this comic and probably will not. I find it interesting that many of the negative reviews seem to be inconsistent with each other; one review may say CGI sucks while the other says its awesome, or one says First off, I've never read this comic and probably will not. I find it interesting that many of the negative reviews seem to be inconsistent with each other; one review may say CGI sucks while the other says its awesome, or one says music sucks and the other says its awesome. Normally, when a movie really sucks, the people generally agree on the suckiness. That being said, I thought it was a great movie that wove an interesting tale of "super-heroes" and their backgrounds into an over-arching characterization of life, the universe, and everything. There are many things going on and it may be difficult for some to follow but I thought the sequences and timing of most of the scenes worked really well into weaving all the stories into one. I think that the alternate reality 1980s was depicted well with some iconic 80s imagery as easter-eggs. I think the majority of the music was very capturing and well suited for the emotion and texture that was being conveyed. I think the representation of "super-heroes" from the 1940s was done very well. I don't think that slo-mo was over used because I can only recall two scenes that used it (although there are probably more). Obviously, if one is looking for a something specific they will see it predominantly whereas if you look at the bigger picture, you will ostensibly get the bigger picture. This movie is violent....and it should be. The scenes with extreme violence carry a message meant to be attached to a character or group of characters; these messages include: helplessness, superiority, survival, humanity, justice, evil, reality, and confusion. This movie is not for everyone but it stands very well on its own. I think this movie is nowhere near similar to Sin City or 300. This is a different class that deserves a view from a wide range of audiences that are looking for a different view of our past, present, and future (in science fiction terms.).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

AlexHMar 14, 2009

Three hours were wasted of my life only to see a naked Dr. Manhattan and New York City in destruction.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

richardgMar 14, 2009

Glad to see this movie. It was awesome. It should please the fans of the comic. To me the movie matched exactly the comic. I can understand the hate, this ideas in this story are a bit complicated but the movie kept its form compared to the Glad to see this movie. It was awesome. It should please the fans of the comic. To me the movie matched exactly the comic. I can understand the hate, this ideas in this story are a bit complicated but the movie kept its form compared to the comic. The movie itself is a historic and visual restoration of the comic. For that am greatly thankful. That's all i wanted and i got it. I'm glad it was done this way. I didn't want watchmen story to change. It was the best!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MRMar 14, 2009

Overall, an enjoyable enough adaption and probably as close as a movie is going to get to the source material. Some scenes work a lot better than others: Dr Manhattan's origin sequence is fantastic as are Rorshach's jail sequences. Overall, an enjoyable enough adaption and probably as close as a movie is going to get to the source material. Some scenes work a lot better than others: Dr Manhattan's origin sequence is fantastic as are Rorshach's jail sequences. I actually enjoyed the ending which deviates somewhat from the source material as personally I don't think the graphic novel's ending would have worked on screen. Other moments didn't work at all and drag the movie down quite a bit, specifically Snyder's over the top gore and poorly inserted fight scenes as well as the most awkwardly staged sex scene ever filmed. Both of these elements jar with the rest of the movie which has enough moments of greatness to make it worthwhile. The soundtrack has the same problem in that when it works, it works well, and when it doesn't, it fails spectacularly. I understand it was in keeping with elements of the graphic novel but I don't think it was a good choice (oh, and to the reviewer who commented on the 'weird' cover of Hallelujah... thats actually the original version..). The cast vary pretty wildly with a standout being Jackie Earle Hayley who turns in a great, great performance, while others barely register at all beyond looking like their characters. Some of the dialogue lifted directly from the graphic novel just doesn't work when read aloud so I wouldn't say the fault is with the script. Despite its disjointed nature, its a movie well worth seeing provided you're not expecting a typical superhero movie. Just don't expect it to be brilliant.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

KarlLMar 13, 2009

Why are the ratings for this movie all over the place? Fanboys of course. Most people enjoyed the movie but the smallest compromise sends fanboys into an uncontrollable fit of downvoting. Its a good movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JoelmMar 13, 2009

I believe it was worthwhile watching. The run-time didn't really bother me, if it does bother you, you need to improve your attention span. Great soundtrack and special effects. Haven't read the Graphic Novel (Which I'm told I believe it was worthwhile watching. The run-time didn't really bother me, if it does bother you, you need to improve your attention span. Great soundtrack and special effects. Haven't read the Graphic Novel (Which I'm told is 100 times better), but my friends who have, said that this was a fairly good adaptation of the graphic novel. Some people might be confused by the storyline, so if you aren't very good at understanding what's going on in movies i recommend not seeing this film. Although it is by no means a great film, it is worth watching.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

AlexanderWMar 13, 2009

Who watches the watchmen? Not I...beyond terrible, just because you capture the visuals of the graphic novel doesn't mean you've got the spirit behind it. Alan Moore's graphic novel set a precedent in how it stirred the comic Who watches the watchmen? Not I...beyond terrible, just because you capture the visuals of the graphic novel doesn't mean you've got the spirit behind it. Alan Moore's graphic novel set a precedent in how it stirred the comic book world with the idea of super heroes of human origin and subtlety. It wasn't about rampant slow motion sequences, low budget acting due to matching the face of drawings (in order to appease a childish fanboy basis), nor having men punch men through columns. The subtlety lay in its creating a dark world with parallels and commentary on society of the time, granted, it was so prolific it still manages to be viable in today's society. The fantastical idea of Jon, Dr. M, gives us the conflict of a human enduring with the struggle of losing grip with emotion...of indulging so far on mathematical and absolute perception that humanity is no longer indivisible to him. The heroes are just run-of-the-mill burnouts, with only the two unstables remaining in play. Watchmen is such a human film...it was like the 1984 of comics. Zack Snyder doesn't know how to direct original films, lets see him try his hand at something that isn't a remake nor has been pitched to him by some big studio lackey looking for the next remake or adaptation to save Hollywood from its drought of unoriginality. What next? An American REMAKE of the Korean perfection that is Oldboy? Oh wait...that's already happening. On a final note...when you slow motion spit coming out of a man's mouth from a punch in order to capture the essence and "grit" of the comic book film, don't. When you make a movie like 300 that is 99.9% bullet time? Don't pretend that by making a 2hour 41minute fagfest with 66.6% bullet time that you're any more artsy and have variety up your sleeve. The CG looks like sci-fi channel cheap bullshit too...oh, and on a last note? Bullet time action sequences ruin a literary masterpiece, as Alan Moore said in so many words, some things just don't adapt well.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

NathanDMar 13, 2009

I believe The Watchmen will please fans of the comic and the average movie-goer as well. Anyone who hasen't read the comic, however, might be a little confused about the opening sequence, which shows all the events prior to the present I believe The Watchmen will please fans of the comic and the average movie-goer as well. Anyone who hasen't read the comic, however, might be a little confused about the opening sequence, which shows all the events prior to the present setting, which are all explained in the comic series. The only reason Snyder decided to do it that way was because the movie would have been way too long. The action is intense and satisfying, the dialogue is perfectly portrayed as in the comic, and the visuals are breathtaking. There is alot of slow-mo, however, but It's used in all the right places, and it adds a lot of visual eye-candy. The only thing I didn't like about the movie was the makeup department. What happened guys?? You made "Nixon" look horribly deformed and fake. In General, though, I think this is a must-see for comic fans and regular movie-goers alike.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

BrockR.Mar 13, 2009

This has to be one of the worst movies I have seen in a long time. The only thing keeping it from a 0 is the great special effects. Those same special effects were used WAY to much however. Too Gorey, boring and all around bad acting. Was This has to be one of the worst movies I have seen in a long time. The only thing keeping it from a 0 is the great special effects. Those same special effects were used WAY to much however. Too Gorey, boring and all around bad acting. Was there a point to that sex scene? it wasnt in the novel. Lets just see how pointy and small we can make her breats look. And I did read a review on here and I completely agree with the campy ass music. That had to be the worst part, way to predictable for the music as well as some terrible choices to even be in the movie (that weird halleluh cover) All in all i feel I wasted money and time. And of course I saw it in IMAX so I got to see it REALLY suck.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PhilDMar 13, 2009

Anyone who liked The Dark Knight for good reasons will love this movie. It followed the graphic novel exacty, until certain moment. But still a movie even Allen Moore would enjoy, but still won't see. Oh and god forbid your attension Anyone who liked The Dark Knight for good reasons will love this movie. It followed the graphic novel exacty, until certain moment. But still a movie even Allen Moore would enjoy, but still won't see. Oh and god forbid your attension span might be increased the movie is 3 hours, and I could have watched for another hour. Oh and anyone who complains about the running time, go watch titannic or your pirates movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

DragOMar 13, 2009

Almost 3 wasted hours of my life that i will never get back.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

YonatanJMar 13, 2009

Perfectly captures the brilliant graphic novel.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ChrisWMar 13, 2009

Pretty darned good. I approached this with some trepidation, having waited for it for around 20 years. Unlike with the recent Star Wars films, I wasn't disappointed at all. Not even a niggling feeling. Most of the casting was spot on Pretty darned good. I approached this with some trepidation, having waited for it for around 20 years. Unlike with the recent Star Wars films, I wasn't disappointed at all. Not even a niggling feeling. Most of the casting was spot on (Ozymandeus being the only slight mis-casting). The decision on what to include and what not to was close to perfect and overall the movie was very brave and uncompromising. Very, very good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ThomasLMar 13, 2009

This movie is 98% true to the comic book, if you liked the comic, you will love this movie

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

SimonSMar 13, 2009

Are you kidding me? This movie is an absolute joke. One of the worst films to come out in the last ten years, do not waste your time on this pretentious, bloated, say nothing piece of ****. It is rubbish.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

HyperSMar 13, 2009

A bit long and was a let down from the epic movie trailer(s) that raised expectations to an unachievable level. That aside, the plot of the movie was fine [Dark and gritty in a Sin City-esque way].... nothing mind blowing and actually mostly A bit long and was a let down from the epic movie trailer(s) that raised expectations to an unachievable level. That aside, the plot of the movie was fine [Dark and gritty in a Sin City-esque way].... nothing mind blowing and actually mostly took a back seat to the individual characters themselves... but at least the story remained unpredictable to the end so that's good. Really for me the star of this movie isn't the plot, but rather two characters (even if at times they are overdone): Dr. Manhattan (his presence alone on camera commands God-like "oohs" and "ahhs") and the psycho that was Warshack, both of whom who could have warranted a movie of their own. The other masked "heroes" unfortunately were just bleh and really didn't carry the same character complexities to warrant much deep thought or attention. Definitely recommend at least one viewing... two on the other hand? That's debatable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SimonDMar 13, 2009

I'm a fan of the graphic novel (but I don't weep over how good it is like some) and I thought the film was great. Was true to the novel (obviously they had to omit quite a bit) but overall it was just a condensed version of the I'm a fan of the graphic novel (but I don't weep over how good it is like some) and I thought the film was great. Was true to the novel (obviously they had to omit quite a bit) but overall it was just a condensed version of the book. Rorschach is perfectly cast and Dr Manhattan has a fat schlong. What more could you ask for?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TMMar 12, 2009

This movie is brilliant, it encompasses much of the vision of the graphic novel, portrays the characters to the depths first envisioned to the writers, and with the extra content, like the upcoming DVDs, will accurately portray the plot This movie is brilliant, it encompasses much of the vision of the graphic novel, portrays the characters to the depths first envisioned to the writers, and with the extra content, like the upcoming DVDs, will accurately portray the plot lines of six main characters spanning half a century. Scriptwriting at its finest. Casting was brilliant, sets and effects were precisely what was needed, and the director clearly had exactly what he wanted in his mind as the film was being made. This movie is a must see for anyone who likes movies that are deeper and more meaningful than your run of the mill comic book movie. What people who gripe about this movie need to understand is that it is not a hero movie. Not about superheroes. it is the story of Ant-heroes. the characters ALL have deeply ingrained, deep-seated psychological issues. Also, they have yet to see the full picture, with the 'Tales of the Black Freighter' and 'Under the Hood' DVDs being released, and (Hopefully!) a directors cut will all reveal even more of the story, the characters and the plot. The biggest complaint many seem to have is related to the amount of violence, specifically concerning the portrayal of a rate and murder of a pregnant woman however, it should be noted that this violence is included as a character history, portraying that these events deeply scarred and deeply damaged the involved characters. Much of the negativity people throw around is centered on their own need to blame something for their ignorance or lack of understanding of the greater depths of this masterpiece.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

AnonymousMCMar 12, 2009

I think that the main thing in this film is the soundtruck. it's not coincidence that there is 3 dylan's songs.... and the film is actually answer the question "how many deaths will it take till he knows That too many people haveI think that the main thing in this film is the soundtruck. it's not coincidence that there is 3 dylan's songs.... and the film is actually answer the question "how many deaths will it take till he knows That too many people have died?" very strong experiance but the problem is, its still a super hero movie... where is the bad guy? and the super heros don't have a real power!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JohnDMar 12, 2009

Finally, a superhero film that does'n't have out of control fast paced fight scenes. I really enjoyed seeing the fights, as well as most high energy scene at a regular pace. As someone who had never heard of the novel beforehand I Finally, a superhero film that does'n't have out of control fast paced fight scenes. I really enjoyed seeing the fights, as well as most high energy scene at a regular pace. As someone who had never heard of the novel beforehand I managed to pick up the story fairly early on. How this is apparently worse than any of the Spiderman/Batman films is beyond me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

HiKMar 12, 2009

Surprisingly good. I never read the graphic novel. I saw the first trailer during The Dark Knight and thought wow, awesome trailer, I like that Smashing Pumpkins song and the way they made it work with the trailer, and the movie will never Surprisingly good. I never read the graphic novel. I saw the first trailer during The Dark Knight and thought wow, awesome trailer, I like that Smashing Pumpkins song and the way they made it work with the trailer, and the movie will never be this good. But my office was buying tickets to anyone interested and a couple friends of friends said it was good, so I decided to check it out. I'm not going to comment on the story, since I'm assuming it is based on the book. It was intriguing enough, besides one random heroic scene toward the end of the middle of the movie where I was like uh, that was pointless. As far as cinematography and such, there were too many popular songs in the film, but all but one worked (I forgot which one, somethin in the middle). The sex scene toward the end was also super cheesy and I wasn't sure if the director was trying to make it atrociously bad intentionally to show awkwardness or he just failed. Overall though, I liked the movie and would watch it again with a friend so I can talk about it with them instead of not wanting to spoil it haha.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SeansMar 12, 2009

I thought this movie was great very true to the book which is pretty hard to say for most books turned into movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TylerCMar 12, 2009

Overall excellent movie, but don't go into this thinking you it is an action oriented superhero popcorn flick. There is not much action for nearly three quarters of this 3 hour film. The plot of this film is very heavy handed, and Overall excellent movie, but don't go into this thinking you it is an action oriented superhero popcorn flick. There is not much action for nearly three quarters of this 3 hour film. The plot of this film is very heavy handed, and thought provoking, but not for everyone. The writing of this movie is some of the best I've seen in recent years, and the acting for the most part compliments the acting excellently. I've never read the novel, but my friend who I saw it with says that they lifted most of the dialog directly from the book which was a great idea. No need to reinvent the subject matter that was portrayed so perfectly in the book. Overall, this is an excellent movie. I took away one point because the plot is a little dialog heavy and may bore certain people (but not me, I was refreshed actually to the usual superhero popcorn drivel) and there are a few cliche plot twists although they were slightly appropriate. My friend also explained to me the "Giand Squid Ending" (look it up), and to be honest I thought that would have been better but the ending was alright as is. Here's looking forward to the director's cut DVD with the proper ending.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JamesNMar 12, 2009

While not perfect by any means, it does its source material justice. For me it's more like a motion picture compendium to the novel; complementary instead of trying to completely overwrite and disregard the novel. It has more in common While not perfect by any means, it does its source material justice. For me it's more like a motion picture compendium to the novel; complementary instead of trying to completely overwrite and disregard the novel. It has more in common with Blue Velvet and Seven than it does superhero movies such as Superman and Spiderman. Chalk full of theory, political discourse, and the creepier parts of human existence.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

WayneAMar 12, 2009

Great adult oriented superhero flick. Purists to the graohic novel either say he was too faithful or not faithful enough. I loved the source material but kept that seperate in my mind while watching the movie and loved the movie. Bravo for Great adult oriented superhero flick. Purists to the graohic novel either say he was too faithful or not faithful enough. I loved the source material but kept that seperate in my mind while watching the movie and loved the movie. Bravo for giving us a R rated superhero flick.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

TonyMMar 12, 2009

One of the finest pieces of cinema it has ever been my privilege to witness. The graphic novel was brought to life on screen with a scintillating mix of style and substance.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JulianRMar 12, 2009

The first thing you have to learn about this movie is: if you never read the book it's not for you. I read the graphic novel and therefore understand the subtleties in the film. There was absolutley no way anyone could put the entire The first thing you have to learn about this movie is: if you never read the book it's not for you. I read the graphic novel and therefore understand the subtleties in the film. There was absolutley no way anyone could put the entire novel in and keep a reasonable time limit.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

KominoMar 12, 2009

An interesting idea but ultimately a movie that is way too long and with a story that, while could have been gripping, is left stretched and devoid of punch. The fans of the original seem to love it, so only really can be recommended to them.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

SPMar 11, 2009

This movie had so many problems, it's hard to know where to start. Unless you're a fan of the source material, there's simply nothing to care about except that you've wasted nearly 3hrs of your life! Anthony Lane's This movie had so many problems, it's hard to know where to start. Unless you're a fan of the source material, there's simply nothing to care about except that you've wasted nearly 3hrs of your life! Anthony Lane's review right on the nose.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KimberlyGMar 11, 2009

I thought the movie was pretty close to amazing. It met the expectations that I had from reading the graphic novel (with the exception of a few details that they left out). Rorschach and Silk Spectre II were dead on and all of their I thought the movie was pretty close to amazing. It met the expectations that I had from reading the graphic novel (with the exception of a few details that they left out). Rorschach and Silk Spectre II were dead on and all of their performances really reflected the deep psychological characteristics that each of the characters held. It is pretty long I guess, but regardless I would have stayed in the theatre two extra hours to see more of it. It's not the stereotypical "super-hero movie", so I would advise you not to take your children to go see it unless they can handle seeing gore, nudity, and sexuality. But if you are a fellow comic book nerd like myself and enjoyed "300," "V for Vendetta," and "The Matrix".... then grab your popcorn and Raisenettes and enjoy a mindblowing movie with awesome music and killer performances!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

YouareAMar 11, 2009

Let the ignorant, low rated reviews go to show you that THIS MOVIE IS NOT FOR THE AVERAGE MOVIE GOER. If you fit the demographic of people that like thoughtless, cliched, hollywood-esque Michael Bayism, please... do yourself a favor and Let the ignorant, low rated reviews go to show you that THIS MOVIE IS NOT FOR THE AVERAGE MOVIE GOER. If you fit the demographic of people that like thoughtless, cliched, hollywood-esque Michael Bayism, please... do yourself a favor and don't spend your money on this movie. Quite frankly, it's above you and your mere presence in the theater taints the absolute awesome-ness that is WATCHMEN. However, if you don't match the above criteria and have read the graphic novel and actually appreciated it, or even LOVED it, then see this film. Just as good as the Dark Knight if not better. Snyder stays true to the source material (which is on TIME's list of 100 GREATEST NOVELS OF ALL TIME, yeah... that's right) and has transferred it to film like no other could. The themes are crystal clear to those that actually like to think at the movies. Entertaining, engaging, beautiful, and thought-provoking... one of the greatest comic book movies of all time. Enjoy!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JohnHMar 11, 2009

I read Watchmen this past summer after seeing the preview of the film version before The Dark Knight. Needless to say I became an instant fan and have been anticipating this film for quite some time. I recently saw Watchmen and was very I read Watchmen this past summer after seeing the preview of the film version before The Dark Knight. Needless to say I became an instant fan and have been anticipating this film for quite some time. I recently saw Watchmen and was very pleased with how much attention was given to detail by Zach Snyder. A few element of the story were left out, but the main elements were flawlessly portrayed throughout the entire film. I can see how someone could get lost in the film if they had not read the novel. However, anyone who enjoyed the film, will very much enjoy the graphic novel. GO READ WATCHMEN… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Watchmen

User Reviews