The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1
Lionsgate | Release Date: November 21, 2014
6.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1005 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
538
Mixed:
319
Negative:
148
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
6
georgyporgyNov 26, 2014
It's not bad, it just feels too much like filler and a set up for the final film, which I have no doubt will be far more entertaining. Kind of a shame though considering how good the second one was.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
LTRNov 22, 2014
This is a good first part of the last Hunger Game films. The story is great, the characters were good, there isn't much action, but the end feels very cheap. So overall, it's a good movie with a bad ending.
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
8
AGarcia732Dec 3, 2014
I personally was very put off by the idea that Mockingjay would be split into 2 parts. (Now it seems every movie has/will do that--Breaking Dawn, Deathly Hallows, Avengers: Infinity War, Allegiant, etc.) I read many reviews online, and theyI personally was very put off by the idea that Mockingjay would be split into 2 parts. (Now it seems every movie has/will do that--Breaking Dawn, Deathly Hallows, Avengers: Infinity War, Allegiant, etc.) I read many reviews online, and they almost convinced me (without even watching the movie) that THG: Mockingjay--Part 1 was a pointless, boring cash-grab; a set-up movie filled with exposition and "filler"; a holdover for “THG Mockingjay--Part 2”. But if I have learned anything from watching so many recent films, it is this: don't judge a film by its posters, trailer, or reviews without seeing the movie for yourself--some films may really surprise you and are better (or worse) than you expected.

I think some of the characters didn’t get the screentime they deserved. But I truly only think that because you got to know the characters well in the books, and I think it’s kind of hard to replicate that in the movies without some kind of internal monologue. If Mockingjay was a standalone film not based on a book, I’d probably have a very difficult time relating to the characters. However, I know them all well enough to not be that disappointed by a character’s short screen time.

I can understand why some people who didn't read the books were disappointed with and failed to connect to Mockingjay--Part 1. But those who read the books should've been satisfied with the film. I think that because I read the books, I maybe could appreciate the movie better than some people (due to the fact that many of scenes in the movie might’ve seemed pointless, unnecessary, or boring to those who haven’t read the books). I personally wasn’t bored during the movie—because while nobody was fighting to the death, and there wasn’t much action—there was still good performances from the cast and some nice “political subtext”.

Because of the focus given on character-driven storylines and political allegories, I think that some viewers were distanced by the film’s approach. I personally think that instead of adapting the book as well as they did, they should’ve created some battle scenes (possibly focusing on missions from each side of the war between the districts and the capitol). Maybe they could’ve shown some battles that rebel and Capitol soldiers fought, with people such as Beetee, Haymitch, Boggs, President Snow, etc. overseeing it all. “Mockingjay Part 1 is less popular than its predecessors because it's a deliberate move away from action towards a more cerebral, darker kind of war movie.” Because the movie doesn’t rely on action scenes, and it’s still good (IMO), it's proof that THG films aren’t dumb YA novel adaptations. They can do well without deadly competitions in arenas and “silly teenage romance”.

The movie has a lot of things that probably turned off some people--no Hunger Games, no real action/fighting, less of an emphasis on the love-triangle romance, being split in two parts, etc. And being on top of “Fandango's list of most-anticipated films of 2014” probably contributed to this film’s lukewarm critical reception. When people had such enthusiasm and high expectations for the movie and they were disappointed, they probably got angry. So, besides a lack of action sequences and some characters getting little screentime, I actually thought that the movie wasn’t bad. This movie probably could’ve explored/developed certain aspects of the movie’s environment/atmosphere better than it did, but I think it’s still a bit better than the first HG film. It’s still not nearly as good as Catching Fire though. Mockingjay-Part 1 “did not do a good enough job showcasing the conflict between the characters. The third book was very somber and full of distrust. The movie…didn't really capture all that you read, where previous movies they did.” The second one can reach level of tension and excitement that this one never can.

Mockingjay-Part 2 will be released on November 20, 2015.

I have reviewed 33 other movies, including the 2014 films: Dracula Untold, The Maze Runner, The Expendables 3, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Guardians of the Galaxy, The Giver, Sharknado 2, Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, Transformers: Age of Extinction, Edge of Tomorrow, X-Men Days of Future Past, Godzilla, Blended, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Divergent, Transcendence, Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit, The Lego Movie, and more.

I review TV shows, such as: The Flash, Arrow (Season 3), Gotham, The Last Ship, Sleepy Hollow, Marvel's Agents of SHIELD, The 100, I Wanna Marry Harry, Crisis, Gang Related, and more. I also have reviewed the mobile Android games: Minecraft Pocket Edition, Clash of Clans, and Five Night's at Freddy's.

(P.S, the quotes are from other reviews online.)… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
4
wilsonadamsNov 21, 2014
As an enthusiast of dystopian fiction, and film, not as an enthusiast of the Hunger Games novels, my take on this film is simple: it was unnecessarily uneventful. The third book did not need to be split into 2 films if this was to be theAs an enthusiast of dystopian fiction, and film, not as an enthusiast of the Hunger Games novels, my take on this film is simple: it was unnecessarily uneventful. The third book did not need to be split into 2 films if this was to be the outcome of the Part 1 instalment. The lack of excitement is not my reasoning for this rating. The film was flush with intrigue and theme and emotion and decent enough acting and dialogue. It has enough meaningful lessons on how propaganda is just as important as fighting battles, if not more, to enlighten anyone. But those elements, unfortunately, are all this film had to offer. No conceivable climax or conclusion, no fulfillment at the end of this 2 hours. It did not make me want to see the next film, it made me want it to come to some kind of ending already. I wish I could go back, and wait for the Part 2 to be released, so I could watch them back to back. Seeing this was a waste of time.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
Another_NerdDec 3, 2014
A movie which went perfectly with the book. Now that is what makes a good adaptation. The direction was great - Lawrence (well, both of them) mesmerized again with his skills, everything went good.

But, the same concept of having two partsA movie which went perfectly with the book. Now that is what makes a good adaptation. The direction was great - Lawrence (well, both of them) mesmerized again with his skills, everything went good.

But, the same concept of having two parts for Mockingjay has its cons, which will not be overlooked by many. Nobody sees the point in making two parts. A lot of the parts in Part I could have been skipped, and be merged with the finale.

At the same time, this characteristic is what earned Catching Fire the thumbs-up as well. The book was slow, no doubt. But, it is a book all the same. In that sense, yes, Mockingjay I is a job very well done.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
bmaster46166Nov 22, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Its really just okay to me. There's plenty of flaws because of how they stretch the hell out of it. Manly because of the idiotic splitting of the final chapter. There's scenes of them just walking around for like three minutes or of them just sitting there in silence for three minutes. I don't get it. The book is small enough for one movie. The movie is half down and the conclusion to this one felt that way. Just ends. This more about the story then the movie (fault is manly on Susan), it's about political gain for majority of the movie. Just trying to outwit the other ones with the better/more powerful message. Nonsense really. The action and CGI is pretty strong and the performance
s by the cast was the best out of the series, so that boasts it up a lot. The dramatic tension of who's dying or whats goes going to happen next was pretty powerful. The haunting details and showings of death, destruction, fear, etc.were powerful. Its just bogged down by a slow and boring plot, not enough fighting, half a movie, dumb plot about political power, etc. Overall I enjoyed it but nothing special and the worst of the series. 7.9/10… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
7
joaquinsharpeNov 22, 2014
I thought the movie was decent but a good decent. There wasn't many action and there were some parts that almost put me to sleep & bored me. The plot was a new step for the franchise and a good setup for the epic finale that I hope willI thought the movie was decent but a good decent. There wasn't many action and there were some parts that almost put me to sleep & bored me. The plot was a new step for the franchise and a good setup for the epic finale that I hope will happen in the next movie. Jennifer Lawrence was great as always & so was the cast and the CGI for Philip Seymour Hoffman. The score was good and this one song by Lorde that I liked.
Overall, it was good. I know so people were complaining that movie had to be broken up in 2 parts but that's good because I don't want an overstuffed finale and it ends up terrible and disappointing like Spider-Man 3, X-Men:The Last Stand & The Matrix Revolutions. So I'm happy that they split it up because this movie got a 69% on Rotten Tomatoes and the HG1 got a 84% & HGCF got a 89% and the final movie can get like a 91% or something.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
8
jrincon6Dec 21, 2014
is not the best nor the worst movie of this saga. It has much suspense scenes and that is appreciated. Not being a 100 percent action film don't make it the worst. It has parts that keeps the viewer watching the screen without unstuck. Iis not the best nor the worst movie of this saga. It has much suspense scenes and that is appreciated. Not being a 100 percent action film don't make it the worst. It has parts that keeps the viewer watching the screen without unstuck. I loved very much.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
zonatedmuleDec 23, 2014
The movie is not bad but not great, the form that they want to make a love history is too stupid and the form of making a war of propaganda is to bad made it. The producers eliminates important elements that the first half of the book has andThe movie is not bad but not great, the form that they want to make a love history is too stupid and the form of making a war of propaganda is to bad made it. The producers eliminates important elements that the first half of the book has and the result is a movie that has a lot of boring moments and bad representation of the book.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
ajarias96Jan 8, 2015
Definitely not the best film in the series but still worth watching. The always emotional Hunger Games series does not let up in this part 1 to the final film of the franchise. Jennifer Lawrence gives another incredible performance asDefinitely not the best film in the series but still worth watching. The always emotional Hunger Games series does not let up in this part 1 to the final film of the franchise. Jennifer Lawrence gives another incredible performance as Katniss; which in my opinion is the main piece of the puzzle that makes this film franchise more than just another set of teen films. Julianne Moore and the late Philip Seymour Hoffman also play their parts very well and give film just another added layer to make it even more enjoyable. Elizabeth Banks continues to be one the best parts of the series and gives another awesome performance as Effie. Overall, the second to last installment has its emotional scenes and keeps the viewer on the edge of their seat till the very end.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
DBPirate1129Jan 11, 2015
Not as great as Catching Fire but it's definitely not the worst installment. Mockingjay-Part 1 doesn't offer many action sequences but has a compelling plot with great visuals and acting as well as many unexpected scenes.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
5
GuilhermeAugApr 1, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. No doubt that the film was well-acted, but it was boring, because when you watch "The Hunger Games" film franchise, you always expect action scenes to be in the entire film or a grand part of it and this kind of stuff, but this one... It didn't have anything like the other two past films... Including a completely awkward ending.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
SilverartsMay 2, 2015
Mockingjay Part 1 allows a different view of all characters, scenes and current knowledge the audience possess of the games as a whole. As the point of the games is completely removed from the films presence. This therefore would add a uniqueMockingjay Part 1 allows a different view of all characters, scenes and current knowledge the audience possess of the games as a whole. As the point of the games is completely removed from the films presence. This therefore would add a unique edge as Katniss’ journey through fame and struggle for Peter is shown with great light. Nevertheless this consequence of light, leads to too much detail which appears of an excess through the duration of the film, as the main climax only lied between the scenes of reuniting Katniss and Peter. Even so the tension through the stories concept was fulfilled with intelligent, bold, but obscure effects via scene distribution in Katniss’ (Jennifer Lawrence) anger which is well thought through in accordance to acting the role successfully. Additionally the growing admiration for Peter that develops through the film is complimented by the phenomenal representation in recreating the distress through costume design and makeup construction by layering and contouring, accurately executing his purpose during the film, even though evidencing this purpose during the film could be improved, instead of the single resource of the TV analogy via scripture.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
MasterRileyJul 20, 2016
A decent movie. It was a bad choice to split this last book into two movies however. Because of it most of the action and importance of the plot is left out of this movie. It is slow and dull because of it but still is pretty enjoyable toA decent movie. It was a bad choice to split this last book into two movies however. Because of it most of the action and importance of the plot is left out of this movie. It is slow and dull because of it but still is pretty enjoyable to watch, especially for fans of the books.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
All_ButTrU4Sep 25, 2022
Unfortunately bare film that doesn't really do much beyond appearing as an ill intentioned cash grab very common in the post twilight era (see : final two installments of breaking dawn). And understandably there was a large amount of materialUnfortunately bare film that doesn't really do much beyond appearing as an ill intentioned cash grab very common in the post twilight era (see : final two installments of breaking dawn). And understandably there was a large amount of material in the last book that unlike the previous two couldn't be confronted in one viewing but this movie doesn't address that meaningfully. Where this one should have focused on orienting us with district 13,the state of all the other districts after 12's bombing or Katniss new status it instead meanders around the aforementioned points,whilst contrastingly never explores them to the length they deserve and could be in a 1hr+ movie of a much anticipated series. They waste most of the movie on vapid scenes of the creation of the katniss revolutionary brand as well as her relationship with gale now peeta presence isn't an active obstacle. With that said it's still not a completely disappointing film and doesn't ruin the standard of the franchise. It's inoffensive when consumed in succession with it's concluding counterpart . And the cinematography and performances are still impressive nonetheless.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
zNeverSleepingOct 14, 2020
Por mais que o filme tenha me prendido, sinto que poderia haver algo a mais.

Como citei na review anterior, havia um bom background para estabelecer o universo - e assim: os personagens; mas o desenvolvimento aqui me pareceu nulo. É como sePor mais que o filme tenha me prendido, sinto que poderia haver algo a mais.

Como citei na review anterior, havia um bom background para estabelecer o universo - e assim: os personagens; mas o desenvolvimento aqui me pareceu nulo. É como se os personagens apenas fossem pra frente. O relacionamento entre Peeta e Katness é um exemplo de quão forçado algo pode vir a ser sem devida atenção. Há alguns elementos que são tirados por pura conveniência e isso passou a me incomodar bastante, que me faz deixar a suspensão da descrença de lado, o que deslegitimiza todo o filme - mas não, isso não aconteceu ainda.

No quesito entretenimento, acredito que o filme cumpre o seu propósito: passa o tempo. Mas só fica nisso mesmo.

Audio: English, with portuguese subtitles. J4300 32' TV Speakers
Quality: 720p SDR [Bluray]… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
JAKEJACOBJORDSep 17, 2021
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021
----------------------------------5.4/10-----------------------------------
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
smijatovJan 30, 2016
All through watching Mockingjay I thought somehow it feeling familiar... and I realised it reminded me a bit of the Harry Potter series and the point where Harry Potter got darker and more grown up. While the Potter franchise successfullyAll through watching Mockingjay I thought somehow it feeling familiar... and I realised it reminded me a bit of the Harry Potter series and the point where Harry Potter got darker and more grown up. While the Potter franchise successfully transitioned from it's 12-year old demographic, The Hunger Games, did not quite manage so well.

Not all is bad. There is some interesting criticism here of media and propaganda, but those are all smack -in-the-face type of observations. The film makes no secret of it. The darkness comes from the topic itself: the film is set in the aftermath of a violent crackdown by the Capitol onto the rebelling districts. It is dystopic, but what is missing is the emotion behind it. Jennifer Lawrence is more Jennifer Lawrence than Katniss, and when she is Katniss...well, Katniss is annoying. The consistent need to push her into doing what she has to do is quite frustrating. Mind you, it is (probably?) a limitation imposed in the Hunger Games books, but that still does not make her any less annoying and infuriating when she'd rather choose Peeta over the future of the whole world.

Technically, the Hunger Games have polished up quite nicely. The CGI does not look as dated as it did in the first film, which is good. This film is very grim and dark - the colourful costumes of the Capitol have been replaced by the darkness of the underground shelter and the military uniform. Overall, though, the film sustains the continuation of a mediocre, yet entertaining, franchise. That being said, this one is the least entertaining film so far. The whole "Part 1" charade is a charade at its best. Not much really happens here, beyond some character "development" for Katniss (also known as everyone pushing her to get her act together).

The first film is still the most engaging and entertaining one - let us hope they will end the series on a better note than Mockingjay Part 1, because otherwise, it will be a snooze.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
intruder313Nov 5, 2015
The book is quite boring and splitting it in two has resulted in an interminably dull first part. Part 2 looks more promising as they have saved the best bits / action for that.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
netflicJan 4, 2015
This is the third movie in "Hunger Games" series.
I haven't read the books but watched previous two movies. In my opinion, this one is the weakest so far. While performances of Jennifer Lawrence, Phillip Saymour Hoffman (RIP), and JulianneThis is the third movie in "Hunger Games" series.
I haven't read the books but watched previous two movies. In my opinion, this one is the weakest so far. While performances of Jennifer Lawrence, Phillip Saymour Hoffman (RIP), and Julianne Moore deserve praise, there are too many over-stratched episodes. The director probably tried to follow the books closely. However, many people think that by making two movies out of one book, they were just milking more money out of the audience. There were a few scenes that were great, but too few for a two hour movie. If cut in half, I would love it.
I understand that Part 1 is a preparation for a grand finale but as I was leaving the theater I was disappointed, I expected much more. I hope Part 2 will justify being bored half of Part 1.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
LJHayesDec 4, 2015
I've deficated better stories than this. The whole thing plays out like a PR campaign. It is literally two hours of Katniss trying to make a good tv advert while all the action (in typical hunger games fashion) takes place off screen. Oh andI've deficated better stories than this. The whole thing plays out like a PR campaign. It is literally two hours of Katniss trying to make a good tv advert while all the action (in typical hunger games fashion) takes place off screen. Oh and here's something that'll shock you: Peeta needs rescuing. Again. Y'know, just for a change.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JbrizzyNov 27, 2014
This movie was the epitome of filler and cash grab. This movie was just boring as all hell. The last two movies had me crying and at the edge of my seat. This one just had me rolling my eyes and sitting in disgust and disbelief. DisbeliefThis movie was the epitome of filler and cash grab. This movie was just boring as all hell. The last two movies had me crying and at the edge of my seat. This one just had me rolling my eyes and sitting in disgust and disbelief. Disbelief that a great franchise like this would have such a lackluster installment. The only scene that had some suspense is when the small team infiltrated the hunger games tower (which was way towards the end might I add). But hey they made their goal. The probably raked in almost a billion dollars due to this movie and will continue to have loyal fans. I just pray that this franchise gets the wonderful send off this deserves. This movie was two hours of my life that I will never get back… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
drebin8Jan 17, 2016
Wow... Jennifer Lawrence's acting has really dropped off. Seems like fame got to her head. It's not a very good movie anyway, but Jennifer is awful compared to her previous movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Odin-Dec 10, 2014
In short, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is a long and tedious film lacking depth and meaning. The storyline is vanilla and boring which can be summarised as a protagonist striving to free a world from tyranny, the way in which this isIn short, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is a long and tedious film lacking depth and meaning. The storyline is vanilla and boring which can be summarised as a protagonist striving to free a world from tyranny, the way in which this is done however is outside the box and creative but I question its execution.

With Jennifer Lawrence at the helm, she does a poor job in evoking a passionate narrative and leaves you feeling like she’s simply trying too much which is annoying and irritating to watch.

The film stagnates and over saturates the viewer with the same monotone imagery repeating the same message, the constant sit downs with supporting actors comforting each other or offering pep talks gets old after the first several times, this is basically the film, with little else to add contrast to mix things up.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
xDaudexAug 27, 2015
This movie is pretty much a hype train for the final movie but I don't think that's a bad think. I actually think the first two movies would have been more enjoyable as a whole if they were each split into two movies as well. I do perfectlyThis movie is pretty much a hype train for the final movie but I don't think that's a bad think. I actually think the first two movies would have been more enjoyable as a whole if they were each split into two movies as well. I do perfectly understand why they did it like they did though.

Pros:
Main character is a strong woman
World building
The movies pacing is slower than the first two which I found more enjoyable

Cons:
Not that much actually happens in the movie.
Some scenes could have been explained better before they happen. There was a couple of times I had no idea what was going on until it was explained afterwards.
I'm personally not a fan of the leader of district 13. Her character seems somewhat generic and not that interesting.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
anshimanMar 13, 2015
My new least favourite phrase: "Part 1". Pretentious, jarringly hollow and unrelentingly drab, this latest entry in 'The Hunger Games' franchise is a sloppy, clumsy and cloddish exploration of the power of political propaganda and inspirationMy new least favourite phrase: "Part 1". Pretentious, jarringly hollow and unrelentingly drab, this latest entry in 'The Hunger Games' franchise is a sloppy, clumsy and cloddish exploration of the power of political propaganda and inspiration to alleviate suffering and strengthen the collective human spirit. Devoid of any engaging plot progressions, fleshed-out characters, or captivating narrative, this wafer-thin shell of a movie fails to illustrate the intrigue of the mythos that's drawn minds all over the world.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
moonman1994May 19, 2015
Although not plainly bad, all The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is, is setup for part 2. This large amount of setup and background information keeps the view desiring a sequel but does not put forth an interesting film. This causes theAlthough not plainly bad, all The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is, is setup for part 2. This large amount of setup and background information keeps the view desiring a sequel but does not put forth an interesting film. This causes the film at many times to drag. That being said the entire cast is still great and it will be exciting to see the conclusion in part 2.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Jack97Dec 17, 2016
If you're riding the fast paced, energetic thrills of Catching Fire then you might be let down by Mockingjay Part 1. It's slower and more plot focused, thus there's barely any action in it. But if you're up for a more propaganda heavy focusIf you're riding the fast paced, energetic thrills of Catching Fire then you might be let down by Mockingjay Part 1. It's slower and more plot focused, thus there's barely any action in it. But if you're up for a more propaganda heavy focus at a rebellion, the film completely delivers on that aspect.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
foxgroveNov 24, 2014
Lacking the spectacle, colour and even the games themselves this is still an enjoyable instalment in what is undoubtedly the best franchise currently being produced. Whilst unquestionably the weakest of the three films to date it still hasLacking the spectacle, colour and even the games themselves this is still an enjoyable instalment in what is undoubtedly the best franchise currently being produced. Whilst unquestionably the weakest of the three films to date it still has much to commend it. Top of the list has to be the excellent Jennifer Lawrence for whom the word coasting doesn't seem to exist in her vocabulary. With this role she has created a female heroine the like of whom hasn't been seen since Sigourney Weaver delighted us in the 'Alien' films. The tone of this chapter is certainly darker (even without all the killing) and there is less action and more exposition, but somehow it all works. Julianne Moore is a welcome addition to the cast and effortlessly integrates herself into the film. The late Phillip Seymour Hoffman shamefully has little to do in this his last film appearance and Liam Hemsworth is limp and uninteresting as Lawrence's Conflicted love interest. Still, it's all very watchable even though more will be expected from next year's final act.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
sanyrubJan 25, 2015
Great blockbuster that continues the unexpected quality run this franchise is having. It is not as entertaining as Catching Fire (which was pretty much a perfect blockbuster) but the acting is equally great or better, with Jennifer LawrenceGreat blockbuster that continues the unexpected quality run this franchise is having. It is not as entertaining as Catching Fire (which was pretty much a perfect blockbuster) but the acting is equally great or better, with Jennifer Lawrence owning the role once more, and also Josh Hutcherson doing a fantastic job. I also liked Julianne Moore a lot as the new leader. I have to say I am very glad that a blockbuster with few action in it can be this successful and become the biggest box office hit of the year, so glad. This new chapter is definitely all about the propaganda war and the definitive birth of a revolution, which does not mean it lack very tense scenes. A great watch. I give it a 7.5 out of 10. So pumped for the last installment. See it!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
riaan_radioheadJan 8, 2015
Mockingjay Part 1 is a competently acted and shot picture but it is also a movie mostly void of any entertainment value. This is young adult post apocalyptic fiction that takes itself way too seriously (its source material is hardlyMockingjay Part 1 is a competently acted and shot picture but it is also a movie mostly void of any entertainment value. This is young adult post apocalyptic fiction that takes itself way too seriously (its source material is hardly comparable or relevant as say Children of Men, 1984) and offers little in terms of blockbuster thrills and excitement.
Where Catching Fire was largely entertaining in its action packed final act, Mockingjay Part 1 is an unnecessarily somber film that covers just enough ground but to setup the final installment due in 12 months… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
CaptainCupboardNov 25, 2014
Can only say I am rather disappointed. Simply not as good as the previous two films, scenes of action lacked surprise and excitement. Only thing that really kept me watching were the occasional glimpses of comedy.The last two films left me inCan only say I am rather disappointed. Simply not as good as the previous two films, scenes of action lacked surprise and excitement. Only thing that really kept me watching were the occasional glimpses of comedy.The last two films left me in suspense but Mockingjay does not; it almost felt like a poor way to fill a gap rather than a film. Some good elements like attention to detail but all in all depressingly average.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
njlakeMar 3, 2015
This is the definition of a cash grab.

So many things in this movie are drawn out and uninteresting. It could have easily fit into about 45 minutes which would have left plenty of time to feature the second part. I enjoyed the first movieThis is the definition of a cash grab.

So many things in this movie are drawn out and uninteresting. It could have easily fit into about 45 minutes which would have left plenty of time to feature the second part. I enjoyed the first movie and like the second one even more so, but this left a lot to be desired and not in a good way. Hate to say this, but if you've read the books, don't waste your time on this. Just wait and save your money for the second movie that will tell a much more compelling portion of this story.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
gracjanskiJul 15, 2022
Another great part of Hunger Games and great movie about dictatorship. Again there are some improvements to the predecessor:
First, the world of Panem, the dialogues and the story around dictatorship are perfectly made: Donald Sutherland asAnother great part of Hunger Games and great movie about dictatorship. Again there are some improvements to the predecessor:
First, the world of Panem, the dialogues and the story around dictatorship are perfectly made: Donald Sutherland as Snow is very impressive and convincing, the perfect villain. Also I noticed, that the main topic of the franchise is propaganda, my favourite theme.
The 2nd part of the movie is more action orientated and they had some flaws in the first and second Hunger Games. But in this movie they were tense, maybe because it was not so clear if the good guys will survive this and the bunker scenes were also nice. In addition I liked, that this movie was a bit different than the first two: no more games, but real war.
Another improvement: Jennifer Lawrence was finally convincing.
Oh..and I like the dark, threatening atmosphere.

There was one element that I dislike a lot: Julianne Moore. I cant watch her, she is simply too ugly to be shown, lol. And I didnt understand, why suddenly Katniss was so much in love with Peeta, although Gale fits better to her (see the first movie) and their ralationship was more a fake.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TheApplegnomeFeb 24, 2015
I’m not a big fan of Hunger Games, but the franchise keep surprise me.

The first aspect I would like to mention is the rebellion. It’s so different from the previous installments, and I totally love it. The ”games” didn’t impress me asI’m not a big fan of Hunger Games, but the franchise keep surprise me.

The first aspect I would like to mention is the rebellion. It’s so different from the previous installments, and I totally love it. The ”games” didn’t impress me as much as I would like to. So I really did enjoy this third Hunger Games movie. There’re even some metaphorical messages witch really gives the movie depth. The first act is okay, but not more. And the opening scene could have had a much greater contexture. I did expect a lot unique things that Catching Fire had, but there're not much of those. Many do criticize this movie because it doesn’t have much action, and I somewhat agree. The tempo is very slow, but I didn’t find it boring. On the contrary; I thought it was very entertaining. There are not much CGI and the movie overall felt very natural. But there are some events that are predictable, which is not good. The best thing with this movie is the second act, it’s very entertaining. But the third is a bit disappointing. The ending could have been much more exiting and eventful. I didn’t feel any excitement when the movie ended. Overall is this third Hunger Games movie great, even though the soundtrack could have been much more astounding and powerful. But the main cast are all very good and the movie did surpass my expectations.

The focus of this movie is on insurrection, survival and hope. There's a big difference between this and the previous movie. The strong sides are the dialogs, plot and strong development of existing characters. But the big weakness is the lack of action.

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 gets a 7/10.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
dyshpoMar 20, 2015
Slow and empty hopefully they cram part2 with lots of details left out during the whole series of films. It felt as if all parties of production and actors were set on zombie. This entry was far from Catching Fire as in flow but it did haveSlow and empty hopefully they cram part2 with lots of details left out during the whole series of films. It felt as if all parties of production and actors were set on zombie. This entry was far from Catching Fire as in flow but it did have slightly more in it. The only actor who still fits their role is Donald Sutherland that I know is because all his scenes were finished in 2 months the rest of the cast may be tired but they're getting paid a lot they should give more . Workers of the World Unite. Love Socialism vs. Capitalism novels… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Jack_SunshineSep 8, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. With the presumably thrilling conclusion to The Hunger Games series just over the horizon, we return to last year’s Mockingjay – Part 1 in an attempt for my reviews to maintain at least some contemporary relevance. There are two ways to look at a film which is part of a series. One is to view it as a chapter in the larger story, making this one little more than the calm before the storm. The other way is to see if the narrative works as a standalone film, and sadly here it does not.

The film has followed the trend of turning the last part of a novel series into a two part picture (Harry Potter, Twilight, to an extent The Hobbit) so that Part 1 becomes so much set-up for a ‘missing’ final act. Is it a cynical cash-grab to stretch the franchise out for another year, or sincere attempt to do justice to the literature? Who can say?

With Mockingjay – Part 2, this effect is thoroughly in place, moving from one relatively unsatisfying cliff-hanger at the end of Catching Fire to another at the end of itself. It somehow manages to be another big ol’ film of (just) over two hours, although it’s almost half an hour shorter than Catching Fire, which took over half its running time to actually get to the bloomin’ Hunger Games.

Though the full title retains the series banner, there are no games here, so the arena combat angle that provided a clear structure to the first two films is gone. Maybe that’s for the best. The second film was in many ways a retread of the first, though the pre-game ruminations I’ve just lamented were really about the seeds of rebellion, and our heroine Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) and her Mockingjay becoming the symbols of the revolution (the Mockingjay starts life as a symbolic token Katniss is given by an elderly neighbour in the first film, which gradually takes on greater significance).

So it’s not a standalone story, but what’s this film about, and where does it take the characters we met in the last two films? At first glance, not very far. Most of the movie takes place in an underground bunker where the rebellion is based, safe below District 13 (a mysterious place previously believed to have been long destroyed), while the two sides throw propaganda back and forth at each other. Katniss does get out into the field, but she only fires one arrow (although granted, it does quite some damage).

But at the film’s core is this media warfare of hearts and minds, and Katniss’ initial reluctance to play into it. Her struggle is to weigh the needs of the many, who see so much in her, against her own personal losses and dissatisfaction with how the revolution is being run. She is always asking who should have been saved, and at what cost?

The film inherits the great cast of the series, from Jennifer Lawrence herself, whose name is now synonymous with the franchise and characters, to the continued presence of Woody Harrelson and Elizabeth Banks, who play off each other nicely after their frosty relationship of the last two films. What is good is that as we spend more time out of the area with the rebels, Gale (Liam Hemsworth) finally has a little more to do, getting out into the field with Katniss and even leading one of the film’s few action sequences, a daring raid on the capital to liberate the captured victors of Catching Fire.

Similarly, Philip Seymour Hoffman, who tragically died during filming, manages to maintain a complete and worthy presence as the games master turned rebel propagandist. His more reasoned encouragement of Katniss brings a subtle reserve to offset the fiery District 13 President Alma Coin (Julianne Moore) who is all rousing speeches and lack of compromise, continually at loggerheads with our heroine. Much of the first third of the film is her coercive attempts to make her agree to participate in the propaganda; though we ask ourselves how different this really is to the gaudy reality TV of the first film.

Everybody has their own two cents to say on how the revolution should be run, but on the other side of the coin. President Snow (Donald Sutherland) abandons his affable façade in the face of all out war to snarl and gloat from the video screen.

I have said that true action sequences are few and far between; they are dispersed like raisins in a bowl of porridge through the film’s inflated length, but they come as a re-engaging wake up call. I particularly enjoyed the scenes of open rebellion in other Districts.

Returning Catching Fire director Francis Lawrence has finally delivered the darker sequel suggested by his back catalogue (Constantine, I am Legend). Of note is the apocalyptic sequence in which Katniss breaks down while exploring the ruins of District 12. The Hunger Games universe has always come with a high human cost, but never has it been so graphic.

So while the film is well made and there are many standout scenes, the pacing still feels slow and the dramatic narrative is far from satisfying. After all, it’s really only half a film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
joao1198pedroDec 10, 2014
This movie its an outstanding up from the first movie, first because it isnt about the hunger games anymore, and second is about an civil war, much more interesting than the first one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
marcmyworksApr 20, 2015
I felt the critics were a little too tough on this film. Sure it was slower and contained less action, but of all three released so far it had the best character development and really proved why Katniss was the hero that everyone needed andI felt the critics were a little too tough on this film. Sure it was slower and contained less action, but of all three released so far it had the best character development and really proved why Katniss was the hero that everyone needed and deserved.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
moviemitch96Nov 29, 2014
While I did like this latest installment in the series for the most part, I also found it to be the weakest one yet. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's sick of Hollywood splitting the final film of a book-based franchise into two partsWhile I did like this latest installment in the series for the most part, I also found it to be the weakest one yet. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's sick of Hollywood splitting the final film of a book-based franchise into two parts (seriously Hollywood, enough with that money-greedy bull****!!!) But overall, I honestly got slightly bored with this one about halfway through. And of course, just when I was getting ready for more, the film ended and left me hanging! Overall, good performances from the returning cast, as well as the fine addition of Julianne Moore and hopefully the second part will satisfy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
bfoore90Nov 20, 2019
Mockingjay Part 1 was a low point in the series. With the principle cast returning with expanded roles for some, its still not enough to life this movie above being just "okay"
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
lukechristianscJan 24, 2015
Remember Catching fire the sequel with too much drama then action! then the first one Now we have the defining chapter in the series "Mockingjay." To be honest i hated the twisted elements in the last, i thought this movie was gonna be likeRemember Catching fire the sequel with too much drama then action! then the first one Now we have the defining chapter in the series "Mockingjay." To be honest i hated the twisted elements in the last, i thought this movie was gonna be like the last with more stupid drama cliche' but no i was wrong. this movie has intense, entertaining action and interesting elements. Katniss is at District 13, President Coin (Moore) wants her to be the mockingjay defend for herself, peta, her family and District 13. she shatters the games forever, cause President Snow turns society/capital into a living nightmare. Coin uses Everdeen as a weapon then Snow ( who is played very well by Donald Sutherland) uses her love Peta against the capital. the plot is definitely interesting and the suspense is pure gold! and i was on the edge of my seat. I definitely enjoyed this movie alot i can't wait part 2. Grade A- (the reason why i gave an A- is Natalie Dormer's character).… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MarkT2014Dec 26, 2014
Film seems a bit naive at times, but generally if you loved the catching fire, you'll love this one as well. Though I'd argue catching fire is still the best one in terms of depth, screenplay and script.

It's 2 hours long which is a bitFilm seems a bit naive at times, but generally if you loved the catching fire, you'll love this one as well. Though I'd argue catching fire is still the best one in terms of depth, screenplay and script.

It's 2 hours long which is a bit disappointing. There was enough material to make a 3 hour movie. I'm not sure why they didn't, unless money was a problem. You get impression as if everything was rushed through.

Rating, I'd say 7 would be the honest number.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
diogomendesDec 19, 2014
With a cast that delivers superb performances and a story that offers some beautiful scenarios, "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" is nowhere near a bad movie, but it lacks the action and the emotion that made the previous movies so compelling.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Brent_MarchantNov 27, 2014
Despite some occasional pacing problems and a cliffhanger that could have been handled more effectively, this third installment in the "Hunger Games" franchise delivers a suspenseful, enjoyable action adventure, full of surprises, thoughtfulDespite some occasional pacing problems and a cliffhanger that could have been handled more effectively, this third installment in the "Hunger Games" franchise delivers a suspenseful, enjoyable action adventure, full of surprises, thoughtful moments and an unexpected dose of nuance. I can't wait to see the final entry in a series that keeps getting better with each outing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
AcePilot24Nov 26, 2014
Boring,Cash Grab,Lack of Action,Lack of interest with characters,Pretty nice acting from the actors but Catniss is not that interesting in this movie,Decent plot .
And thats why this movie will keep overrated by the fan girls and keep makinBoring,Cash Grab,Lack of Action,Lack of interest with characters,Pretty nice acting from the actors but Catniss is not that interesting in this movie,Decent plot .
And thats why this movie will keep overrated by the fan girls and keep makin more money and not caring about the entertainment i hope Mockingjay - Part 2 will fix all of those problems in their sequel… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
WelshTomJan 13, 2015
Some admittedly fine acting performances fail to redeem what is ultimately an hour's worth of decent content elongated into two boring hours. Do not waste time and money seeing this blatant cash-in at the cinema - watch it as a warm-up justSome admittedly fine acting performances fail to redeem what is ultimately an hour's worth of decent content elongated into two boring hours. Do not waste time and money seeing this blatant cash-in at the cinema - watch it as a warm-up just before the real finale is released.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SkyrimGuy935Feb 20, 2015
Enjoyable for sure, but not as good as the first or Catching Fire for that matter. The soundtrack was surprisingly good, and the few brief moments of action are thrilling and fast-paced. The whole propaganda aspect was also very intriguingEnjoyable for sure, but not as good as the first or Catching Fire for that matter. The soundtrack was surprisingly good, and the few brief moments of action are thrilling and fast-paced. The whole propaganda aspect was also very intriguing and entertaining to watch. However, it of course suffers from a partially unsatisfying cliffhanger ending, and very little development is given to the few new characters.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
prawntoast1Mar 28, 2015
Took me while to get round to watching this movie especially after enjoying the previous two Hunger Games movies (particularly Catching Fire). But overall Mockingjay Part 1 was disappointing, very disappointing. It seemed like a mere cashTook me while to get round to watching this movie especially after enjoying the previous two Hunger Games movies (particularly Catching Fire). But overall Mockingjay Part 1 was disappointing, very disappointing. It seemed like a mere cash grab because nothing much actually happened in this movie. I found myself absolutely hating Katniss and Peta and finding them very annoying. In conclusion, Mockingjay Part 1 is a very forgettable movie but saying that I will still probably watch Part 2.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MortiNov 30, 2014
Don't expect anything great from this film except for special effects unless of course you're a twelve year old boy or girl.

The main problem I had with the movies and the books is that, if you are actually mature, you will have noDon't expect anything great from this film except for special effects unless of course you're a twelve year old boy or girl.

The main problem I had with the movies and the books is that, if you are actually mature, you will have no emotional attachment to any of the people in the series. This is purely because they have no personality and are completely two dimensional as you would expect from a movie where the target audience is only there for explosions or Liam Hemsworth. However, I don't believe this excuses not trying to improve on Susanne Collin's simplistic writing style for the sake of making a piece of art, which they could do with their massive budget, as well as pander to their original audience.

One of the worst aspects of the movie had to be the acting. I am sincerely disappointed with Jennifer Lawrence's performance, since she is supposed to be capable of delivering Oscar winning pieces of acting yet in this she was just plain standard. She seemed like she was just trying to look like she cared and not that she really did. A key point of acting is that you have to become your character and feel what they are feeling, if not then you must be extremely good at lying: in this film Jennifer Lawrence seemed to be stuck somewhere in the middle in an unconvincing and cringe worthy performance. Most of the acting was like this with the exception of Philip Seymour Hoffman who was brilliant and Katnisse's sister who was terrible. (average for a child actor though)

Some scenes of the film did however hold the film up with fantastic special effects and directing that made you come back from the boring scenes of Katniss crying or characters you didn't care about talking. However when they did show these scenes it did just make me feel frustrated that they would spend so much money on CGI and sets that they couldn't spend some more money on writers or half decent actors.

I seriously believe that there does need to be a change in the Cinema industry and that is acting over attractiveness. Instead of hiring guys with washboard abs to play main characters, why not hire people who can actually act? The same goes for female roles as well, the actress who played Prim was utterly wooden but had a pretty face so she got the part. What the hell is going on?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
horcrux2007Nov 24, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Since the first novel was released in 2008, The Hunger Games series has become one of the biggest YA franchises on the market, and it's been probably the only series to legitimately rival the Harry Potter franchise in sheer popularity. Although The Maze Runner and Divergent have enjoyed enough success to spawn their own film adaptations, neither have been nearly as lucrative as The Hunger Games. The franchise's complicated and timely hero as well as its biting political subtext has attracted many people to the series, and seven years, later the final film has been released to close the series. To get ready for it, I decided to watch the penultimate chapter, Mockingjay: Part 1. After destroying the arena at the 75th Annual Hunger Games, Katniss is brought to the underground District 13 in order to assume her identity as the Mockingjay, a symbol of hope and rebellion for the people of Panem. However, Katniss's hope begins to burn out when she realizes that Peeta was captured by the Capitol and is being brainwashed to convince the people to stop the rebellion. Even as a fan of the series, splitting the final book into two parts felt less like a narrative enhancement and more like an attempt to make more money. Some scenes seemed to drag on too long or be completely unnecessary. The book could easily be adapted into an epic three-hour conclusion and still be effective. There was also much less action than the previous films. However, the action scenes that were present are as poignant and exciting as ever. The series' strengths have always outweighed its issues, and Mockingjay: Part 1 is no exception. Jennifer Lawrence is still mesmerizing in her portrayal of Katniss, and the social commentary is just as timely and striking as it is in the other films. It may feel like too much exposition for the conclusion, but The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is a grim and exciting set-up for a hopefully action-packed finale.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
WrongKlenaMar 26, 2015
Como sempre a franquia sendo super fiel aos livros, incrementaram muita coisa e mais ação do que no livro, até pra dar uma pequena "animada" no começo, eu esperava um filme ruim, sem ação, monótono,mas o diretor conseguiu fazer um trabalhoComo sempre a franquia sendo super fiel aos livros, incrementaram muita coisa e mais ação do que no livro, até pra dar uma pequena "animada" no começo, eu esperava um filme ruim, sem ação, monótono,mas o diretor conseguiu fazer um trabalho incrível sendo fiel ao livro e dando um toque de ação.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TheFilmFanaticNov 25, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is a slow-paced, tension-building first half to a two-part finale of the Hunger Games franchise. Francis Lawrence shows us the world of Panem without the vicious games, bringing to light a different perspective in this dystopian society. Most new characters are underdeveloped with the focus on the demons that Katniss and Peeta deal with in the aftermath of Catching Fire. It is essentially the Katniss, Peeta and Gail show in a young adult molded film that is saved by its overpowering political subtext. It hopes that the intensity built pays off, although waiting a year to release Part 2 will make most of the tension dissipate.

I was a bit disappointed with the lack of use for the oscar-calibre cast. I mean you have Philip Seymour Hoffman, Julianne Moore, Woody Harrelson and Donald Sutherland yet not much other than generic plot-moving dialogue from them. I understand that the film is based on a novel and that the filmmakers wanted to stay as true to them as possible, but with actors like that how can you not try to make these characters come to life off the page using their unique acting styles? I also found that the splitting of Mockingjay into two parts was unnecessary as the tension-building in this film only works if the events of Part 2 are seen in succession, not a year later. I would have preferred a three-hour movie instead of 2 two-hour films released a year apart.

Regardless it is a decent filibuster film due to its strong political commentary that makes most fans, die-hard and casual, wish that the final film was released at the beginning of 2015. Even if it burns, we burn with it because no matter what fans will see it for the highly anticipated climax of this great series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JohnMasterLJan 4, 2015
A pesar de ser "la mas floja" de la saga, Sinsajo Parte 1 es una excelente película. En esta parte no hay acción (mas que pequeñas secuencias) pero lo fuerte de esta primera parte es su dialogo, el guion. Cargado de temas políticos yA pesar de ser "la mas floja" de la saga, Sinsajo Parte 1 es una excelente película. En esta parte no hay acción (mas que pequeñas secuencias) pero lo fuerte de esta primera parte es su dialogo, el guion. Cargado de temas políticos y revolución, hacen que nos preocupemos por los personajes, las actuaciones como siempre son muy buenas, muchos consideran esta parte "mala" o "aburrida" pero se nota la ignorancia y la falta de interés al analizar el guion, en si es cierto que "es la mas floja de las 3" pero esperen a ver "Sinsajo Parte 2" y quedaran sin palabras...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
HomeBoyJakeDec 10, 2014
It's actually pretty good. Not as good as 1 or 2 though, which is sad, because I was looking forward to it..... I just don't think it should've been split into two parts. The actor's performances are good though!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
LuretuyNov 27, 2014
The Hunger Games - Mockingjay Part 1 had a more rich drama and romance, due to Katniss' preocupation of Peeta (that didn't appeared in both prequels, due that she was faking). Buy it had way less action. That sense of mistery, suspense,The Hunger Games - Mockingjay Part 1 had a more rich drama and romance, due to Katniss' preocupation of Peeta (that didn't appeared in both prequels, due that she was faking). Buy it had way less action. That sense of mistery, suspense, action that had especially the first one, and the second one, didn't appeared in this episode of The Hunger Games chronology. I give a 7/10

- Rich Do.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
dfelesinaMar 5, 2015
As per usual, the Hunger Games is the typical Young Adult shlock that is pushed out to make a major cash grab from teens everywhere. Again, the movie tries to push "commentary" that is so oblivious that anyone who calls this movie smarterAs per usual, the Hunger Games is the typical Young Adult shlock that is pushed out to make a major cash grab from teens everywhere. Again, the movie tries to push "commentary" that is so oblivious that anyone who calls this movie smarter than the average YA movie or thinks they are smarter for watching this movie is actually getting dumber for watching it. It wastes the talented cast on meaningless dialogue that is just following the YA formula at this point.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AbsurdReviewsNov 29, 2014
Having just seen this movie recently, I was thoroughly pleased with this film. The plot was captivating, and the acting was phenomenal. The ending was quite the twist, and I certainly am looking forward to Part Two!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AnaLeeJonesNov 30, 2014
Out of all the movies, I thought this one was the best. The part that stole the whole show was definitely Katniss' beautiful singing of the Hanging Tree. The audience that was watching it when I was in the cinema were loving it; laughing atOut of all the movies, I thought this one was the best. The part that stole the whole show was definitely Katniss' beautiful singing of the Hanging Tree. The audience that was watching it when I was in the cinema were loving it; laughing at all the right places and holding their breath at the climaxes. I do agree however that it might have been a way of making more money. Now we have to wait a whole year for the final chapter... I might have read the book but I'd love to see the actors portraying it. The last half an hour had me on the edge of my seat! IT WASN'T A BORING MOVIE.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
canelopeeaterDec 9, 2014
Should you watch it? Maybe. If you like cliffhangers Epic battle scenes, and if you've actually watched the other movies. (If not you'd be completely lost). The director more or less stuck to the book about 40 percent of the time, getting youShould you watch it? Maybe. If you like cliffhangers Epic battle scenes, and if you've actually watched the other movies. (If not you'd be completely lost). The director more or less stuck to the book about 40 percent of the time, getting you confused at certain moments, and probably getting you angry when things dont go the way you'd expect. All in all, this movie left me waiting for Part 2, partly because the intense battle sequences raised my expectations for the big finale. Should you watch it? I say yes, if you are a true Hunger Games Fan, and no, if you haven't watched the other movies or at least read the books, or if you hate extreme cliffhangers… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Count_DookuDec 8, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I must say that I am no fan of the series, the other two films entertained me but not impassioned me. I believe that history is for young-adult (I am, but I like the deep arguments and in my opinion this is not it). When I went to see Mockingjay Part 1 with my friends I thought, "Well, at least the action scenes make me have a good time because I do not really like history" shortly after would prove that I was wrong and now I will tell you why. To begin the concept of rebellion is widely used, but this is not the main problem, I always thought that if a concept widely used you add something new is good, but in this film do not add any interesting concept remains the same as always, two sides, shooting, hostage rescues ... When I first heard within the film the Mockingjay what I thought would finally demonstrate what can be drawn from such an argument, but it turned out just to be a instrument for advertising of one side. The scenes are unnecessarily lengthened so you end up getting bored in the action scenes the camera moves too much, and loving undertone is typical of two boys with different ideas and a girl who can not decide, well, very basic all . I do not recommend this movie people who have not seen the others, people who do not like (or simply are not interested) the saga. But if you like the series I encourage you to see it and waste your time on that boring two-hour movie that lives of the fame that the other movies won. Gentlemen, I think it's better to read the books than see this on the big screen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Joliveira7Dec 11, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The symbol of the Mocking Jay strikes the heart of the audience once again, after seeing the ending of Catching Fire there were high expectations of how the story would unfold. The Mocking Jay Part 1 continued to be shocking, brave and an action packed film leaving the audience speechless. The Hunger Games: Mocking Jay Part 1 continues the story of Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) the “girl on fire” who is now the face of the rebellion, carried away to the previously fallen District 13, after being rescued from the Hunger Games arena that Katniss had destroyed. Mocking Jay now continues the story of the main characters struggle to start the rebellion with District 13 to get their freedom back from the Capitol of Panem, while also remaining in a love triangle with Gale (Liam Hemsworth) and Peeta (John Hutcherson) who was captured and punished by the Capitol. The third movie to the sequel continues the further understanding of the characters, and shows what they will do to save the ones they love. Mocking Jay is a great movie because of good writing by continuing the story of Katniss Everdeen’s journey, and by having great actors who truly portrayed their characters by physicality, body language, facial expression and voice changes. Also, the film is adapted well from the book by grabbing details and transferring that to the screen. Finally, Mocking Jay appeals to a large audience. As other film adapted sequels like Harry Potter or Twilight, when characters come from a printed page to a movie screen, fans of the sequels cringe in excitement. This results in sold out showtimes and a theatre where not a whisper or a blink of an eye are heard nor seen. After watching the other previous films of the Hunger Games, as I walked in the theatre and found my seat were just small steps, to fulfill a year full of excitement of re watching the trailers, and to be in this very moment of watching Mocking Jay Part 1. The thrill from reading the book was in affect, as I waited to see the courageous, brave and deeply emotional Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence), the hurt and lovable Peeta (John Hutcherson), quiet yet fearless Gale (Liam Hemsworth), drunk and helpful Haymitch (Woody Harrelson), the blood-dripping terrifying President Snow (Donald Sutherland) and all other characters that help or want to destroy Katniss throughout her journey as the face of the rebellion. As I longed for Katniss’ bravery and heart in the Mocking Jay, I was a little disappointed after being emotionally and psychologically crushed by the last Games she had entered, she begins Mocking Jay scared and sleepless because no one but Peeta (John Hutcherson) understands what she is going through. As she always reflects on the fact that her team in the arena did not stick to the plan of saving Peeta instead of her. As hurt as she is, after being put to see how the Capitol burned District 12 her hometown to the ground, killing thousands of her people and how President Snow (Donald Sutherland) had made it a crime to even speak to rebels. Katniss begins her journey as the face of the rebellion for District 13’s President Coin (Julianne Moore) to gather more rebels in the districts but, with consequences that she will only do it if District 13 saves Peeta and other tributes in the Capitol.As Jennifer Lawrence carries on the story of Katniss Everdeen, Lawrence continues to portray as the same Katniss that was in the first Hunger Games, the Katniss that had volunteered for her sister Prim in the games by giving the same facial expressions of bravery and commitment to helping her family as Lawrence did in the first Hunger Games, when first given the role of Katniss Everdeen. Lawrence was able to show her bravery but also show how deeply crushed she was by the games by having a weak voice that sounds as if she had been crying forever and her physicality was weak and unhealthy both were beneficial to understanding Katniss Everdeen’s role in the movie and how she truly had been crushed by the games. Lawrence stated in an interview “when you find Katniss Everdeen in Mocking Jay she is completely stripped down, she was already suffering from Post Dramatic Stress from the first and second movie. Now she has t completely rebuild herself...” (LionsgateFilmUK). Lawrence also use body language, facial expression and her voice to show how she was also mentally ill by having a tiresome face with a beaten body which hunched over, using a scratchy voice when caught sleeping after hours. In a cast interview, Jennifer Lawrence was asked how in the first films there was more action but in the last film is acting more with her eyes and facial expression and how the is different in Mocking Jay? Lawrence replied stating “ Lot less action in this movie, she is in a very different place emotionally, the games have completely changed her. So, she has to totally rebuild herself, not as much action more so of her reaction to everything” (Beyond the Trailer).… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
xxSnowman250xxDec 13, 2014
Overall in my opinion not worth seeing.Many people say its because you have to read the book, but when a movie finishes and not a single person claps in the theater ,that means something is wrong.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Mockingjaypart1Dec 13, 2014
This is the best movie of 2014, Jennifer Lawrence was wonderful and the history too, the movie was entertainig and touching and The Hunger Games is the BEST saga of the world
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
meneilmadDec 15, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" is far away the worst movie of the series when the focus is stir emotions. Obviously, so many people cried in the parts of Josh suffering ('cause, lord, his fans are like, crazy as any others), and so many people cried when he was back to Jennifer (but remembering: also thinking that she was the enemy), and in the parts of the districts (OK, I admit, I cried when Katniss sang The Hanging Tree too). But most of the people who has cried read the books as well. Was not that emotional to my parents (who just listened to me talking about the books over and over again), or to my friends (that think that the only thing important in the movie is Josh parts). Is not a bad movie considering the direction and the script. But comparing that movie to the other two, it's not the best.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
UnderagedReviewDec 15, 2014
The movie was good and is following the books almost perfect, but it is really stretched out, like they do the best they can to make the story as much exiting as the first 2 movies. This destoyes a lot, because it ruins the impression of theThe movie was good and is following the books almost perfect, but it is really stretched out, like they do the best they can to make the story as much exiting as the first 2 movies. This destoyes a lot, because it ruins the impression of the film. You are not stunned by the end of the movie. It leaves a impression like something is missing, that you just watched half of a movie. Worth watching if it is available for you.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
petrocsDec 17, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Hunger Games film franchise has been one of the most popular in recent memory. From the first film on, the film's premise has centered around murder and class warfare, but at the center of that bleakness was a beacon of hope, Katniss Everdeen, however, in Mockingjay Part 1, that hope takes a turn for the worse. Centered around the aftermath of the events of Catching Fire, we find our heroine at her darkest point, surrounded by a colony of freedom fighters and lost without the man whom she has grown to care for, Peeta. There's a shadow looming over Katniss and a growing weigh upon her shoulders. The penultimate film in this franchise has moved on from the games and into the war.
Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) finds herself in an underground bunker within District 13. Following the escape from the quarter quell, the tributes have either been captured by the Capitol or were rescued by Plutarch's (Philip Seymour Hoffman) rebel squadron. Katniss is suffering from PTSD and remains under the care of the district's medical staff. Fellow survivor Finnick Odair (Sam Claflin) is suffering from the same despair and is resigned to survivors remorse, mourning for the loss of his beloved Annie and the others who were captured by the Capital. Katniss is taken to see President Coin (Julianne Moore), the president of District 13 and the leader of the rebellion who requires Katniss' help to win the war over President Snow (Donald Sutherland). Katniss reluctantly agrees, but on the condition that Peeta (Josh Hutcherson) and the other tributes would be rescued. Just one problem, it appears Peeta has been recruited and is now a spokesperson for the Capital and is speaking out against the revolution.
Katniss, believing that Peeta is being brainwashed into saying these outlandish remarks, decides that she will not rest until she can rescue her friend. Through a series of vignettes, the rebellion broadcasts images of Katniss in battle defeating the Capitol guards and hoping to convince those unwilling to fight to take up arms and join Katniss and District 13's side. With the help of Gale (Liam Hemsworth), her former beau, Katniss travels from district to district to assess the damages done by the Capitol and reaffirming her decision to take up arms against her oppressors. Peeta, through a series of intimate interviews with Capitol spokesperson Caesar Flickerman (Stanley Tucci), pleads for the resistance to lay down their arms and work to strive peace with the Capitol. The two former companions who had protected each other in the games are now sparring in a war of words with the fate of the world at each others finger tips.
Each side makes their move to gain a powerful foothold in their vicious war. As the rebellion gains support, President Coin elects to send in a rescue mission to bring back to captive tributes, including Peeta, and remove the Capital's most powerful propaganda weapon. With time running out, will the resistance succeed in rescuing the tributes and turning the tide of the war or will they fall prey to the plans of President Snow and tip the scales in the favor the Capital?
Deciding to stick closely to the plot of the novel by Suzanne Collins, director Francis Lawrence delivers a politically charged dystopian drama that is not for the faint of heart. Like many war films, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is unwavering in its relentless depiction of the brutality of war. That being said, the film may be too bleak for many of the films core fans. Fans of the book series on the other hand are sure to be prepared for the events that transpire.
The acting in the movie has a lot to be desired. Whether it be the screenplay from Peter Craig and Danny Strong or the actors themselves, there's something missing in the delivery of much of the films dialogue. Jennifer Lawrence is the staple that keeps this film together but much of the film is spent retreading on the awkward love triangle between Katniss, Gale and Peeta. The chemistry between Liam Hemsworth and Jennifer Lawrence is as flat as it was in the previous films. Josh Hutcherson, in limited screen time, makes the most of it and turns in a great performance. The transformation of his character from the previous films til now is one of the bright spots of Mockingjay Part 1. Two disappointments for me were the use of Julianne Moore and the late great Philip Seymour Hoffman. Each provide lifeless depictions of their characters and the lack of emotions in the delivery of important dialogue is truly disappointing.
Overall, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is excruciatingly slow and opts for more drama than action this time around. Film goers may be disappointed at the pacing of this one. Truth be told, this final book did not need to be split into two separate movies; one would've been just fine. Lionsgate missed the mark with this decision. Let's hope word of mouth doesn't hurt too much because this franchise deserves a better fate.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
jacobshoffDec 21, 2014
I loved this installment. I am a huge fan of the Hunger Games, I watch these movies over and over and over again. Cannot wait for Part 2, it's also gonna be sad though with Part 2 because it's the last film in this series. Anyway love all ofI loved this installment. I am a huge fan of the Hunger Games, I watch these movies over and over and over again. Cannot wait for Part 2, it's also gonna be sad though with Part 2 because it's the last film in this series. Anyway love all of the movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
danippMar 13, 2015
A good third film of the franchise, with great performances and a quite interesting script, which focus on politics and advertising. Some fans might be disappointed with the lack of action if compared to the two previous movies but thisA good third film of the franchise, with great performances and a quite interesting script, which focus on politics and advertising. Some fans might be disappointed with the lack of action if compared to the two previous movies but this political analyses is amazing. The only problem with this adaptation is the snub of Finnick and Johanna, which were abismal and I really hope the final chapter compensates that.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
crai3gDec 27, 2014
It wasn't horrible but very slow paced compared to previous ones. You'll walk away wondering when the next release will be offered. They could have made Mockingjay into one film instead of 2 and it would have been better. Can anyone say $$$
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
WheelzFourReelzDec 28, 2014
Although this feels more like an extended trailer than a full movie, Mockingjay Part 1 definitely manages to be both entertaining and emotional while staying true to the source material.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
shl13132Dec 30, 2014
I wanted to like this movie, I really did. I enjoyed the first two installments of the series and this movie just didn't deliver. The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 felt like a long extended trailer for Mockingjay - Part 2. You will sitI wanted to like this movie, I really did. I enjoyed the first two installments of the series and this movie just didn't deliver. The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 felt like a long extended trailer for Mockingjay - Part 2. You will sit there watching this movie waiting for something to happen, the last ten minutes of this movie were intense and entertaining, and I was thinking, "Yes, now we get to the good part," then the movie ended. Jennifer Lawrence gave a fantastic performance as Katniss, but Josh Hutcherson did not have as much screen time as he has had in the past two movies, making it harder for him to build on his character. Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson, Liam Hemsworth, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Donald Sutherland have excellent performances. The only problem with characters I had with this movie was Julianne Moore, her acting was great but the story did not go deep enough into character. The last thing wrong with this movie is Katniss Spent a great deal of the movie crying, she did one thing throughout this two hour movie, and you already saw it in the trailer.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Emmanuel_MathewJan 1, 2015
Mockingjay Part 1 is a solid movie considering it is only the "part 1" of the Hunger games franchise finale. Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson really nailed their roles , julianne Moore , philip seymour hoffman , Elizabeth Banks and WoodyMockingjay Part 1 is a solid movie considering it is only the "part 1" of the Hunger games franchise finale. Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson really nailed their roles , julianne Moore , philip seymour hoffman , Elizabeth Banks and Woody Harrelson also did their roles very well. My only complaint with the acting is from the rebels in D13! I didn't really felt like they are rebels. They only seemed to act like someone was forcing them to act. The direction was almost perfect! it's amazing how they took things like "the hanging tree" song from the book and made it into such powerful scene. I get why Francis decided to make Part 1 as a propaganda movie and part 2 as war movie! because if both the films had the same theme then splitting the book into 2 films would have been a stupid decision but 2 films should stand out on its own and Mockingjay part 1 do standout! but with a cliffhanger though. If you have read the book you know what is coming and how things which felt to some people as boring in part 1 will benefit once they see part 2. i didn't felt like the movie was boring at all like some people say! but yes , if you expected to see an adrenaline rush film like Hunger Games or Catching Fire! then you will be disappointed.Considering what is going to happen in Part 2! this film is very well done with justice to the book. conclusion :- brilliantly acted , smart political intrigue , great direction.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Joseph_VintonJan 6, 2015
As I have read all three books and have now seen all the released movies I can safely say that I do believe that the Hunger Games franchise is in safe hands. For both people who have read the books or who have only seen the films I think theyAs I have read all three books and have now seen all the released movies I can safely say that I do believe that the Hunger Games franchise is in safe hands. For both people who have read the books or who have only seen the films I think they will be satisfied.

I was sceptical at first whilst going into the movie and yet I was intrigued to see how the narrative would play out on screen. I personally felt that the third book in the Hunger Games Trilogy “Mockingjay” was the most monotonous and disengaging out of the lot, so when I heard that Lionsgate was going to split the novel into two I like most people thought it was a heartless cash grab that would not pay off.

Mockingjay Part 1 is by no means better than the other two previous instalments of the series but it is not however a bad film contradictory of some of the other more naïve reviews. It serves (as I had hoped) as an engaging build up for the final chapter in the Hunger Games cinematic series. Although I still think that it was not right to split Mockingjay up, the first part has proved to be better than I thought and I walked out of the cinema feeling exited for the finale.

For people who have not read the books and have only watched the “Hunger Games” and “Catching Fire” I have to mention that the movie is a complete deviation from the practically identical structure of the other two films. Mockingjay Part 1 delves deeper as you might expect into the intricacies of building a revolution against the capitol. If you enjoyed the two movies purely for the spectacle of the arena and the survival element of the plot you will not like this movie but if you are invested in the acting talents of this series you are more likely to see this movie as an enjoyable cinematic experience.

For people who have read the book I will say that Mockingjay Part 1 is a pleasant surprise. I thought like the book the film would be dull and slow paced. The first two thirds of this film are worth your time even if the final part felt a little stretched. All of the Mockingjay book by Suzanne Collins was a disappointment for me but I think the plot has been rectified and showcased properly in this film. The film unlike the book expands on Collin’s world, in a subtle way and gives you more of an insight into the establishment of opposing propaganda clips which I found thoroughly entertaining and interesting (this was not depicted so much in the book).

I would have given this film a 5 instead of a 7 if it was not for the superb talents of Jennifer Lawrence & the late Philip Seymour Hoffman. Their performances arguably carry the story and do not falter throughout the duration of the movie. Hoffman’s intellectual and shockingly comedic portrayal of Plutarch Heavensbee is yet another reminder of what a great character actor who we have lost and who will miss in the foreseeable future.

This movie includes a solid soundtrack and outstandingly realistic special effects. If you have enjoyed the acting and the characters you will like this movie. If you didn't like Mockingjay the book try out this feature because it may as I found surpass your expectations. This movie has at the very least made me want to rush to see the final film which I suppose was its primary function as a studio cash grab.

Even now I think that this time next year when the final movie of the Hunger Games has come and gone I may even be a little upset when I come to realize that it is all over.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
jlittle1404Jan 7, 2015
Sad to say this did not meet my expectations. Not enough action scenes and slower paced unlike the first two in the series. That being said if you are a Hunger Games fan you will appreciate the story and the continuing love triangle ofSad to say this did not meet my expectations. Not enough action scenes and slower paced unlike the first two in the series. That being said if you are a Hunger Games fan you will appreciate the story and the continuing love triangle of Katniss, Peeta, and Gale. Hopefully Mockingjay part 2 can pick up the slack! I give it a 6 out of 10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
QldgamerFeb 1, 2015
Why they split this into two movies was clearly to make money, as the movie was padded so much it was pretty dull at times.

A mixed bag that struggled to draw me in.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
imdajudgem8Feb 6, 2015
Not as enjoyable as the past 2 Hunger Games movies, which were both fantastic. However, i do want to comment the acting is amazing and i would especially like to commend Liam Hemsworth. Overall an OK film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
NRNSWApr 3, 2015
Not as good as previous Hunger Games and could have done with some more editing. I have a feeling that Part 1 and Part 2 could have been delivered as one film - but that wouldn't have made them as much money. Don't rush to see it - might beNot as good as previous Hunger Games and could have done with some more editing. I have a feeling that Part 1 and Part 2 could have been delivered as one film - but that wouldn't have made them as much money. Don't rush to see it - might be better to wait until Part 2 comes out and then watch them together.....… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
boubadiopFeb 24, 2015
This film is purely for building the story and you will probably never watch it again. Bit like the last harry potter,where no one really cares for part 1 after you've watched it once
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DavidV293Mar 7, 2015
I'm not a fan of reading books. So I can't really judge. But I gotta say that this was not exciting. It was boring and it got me disappointed. Definitely worth a wait on Netflix and Redbox
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MattBrady99Mar 10, 2015
Remember Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, were nothing really exciting happens in that movie, and the movie has a slow paste run time and they try to save the all the exciting and awesome parts in part 2, and now we gotRemember Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, were nothing really exciting happens in that movie, and the movie has a slow paste run time and they try to save the all the exciting and awesome parts in part 2, and now we got Mockingjay and I can happily say that Mockingjay is a little better than Deathly Hallows Part 1, but it does lack of the two parter thing and this movie is not near from perfect.

Mockingjay Part 1 continues the story has Katniss Everdeen along with Peeta Mellark, and a handful of other survivors, have successfully escaped the Quarterquell thanks to helps from Haymitch Abernathy and former gamemaster Plutarch Heavensbee. But escaping is just the start, as Katniss finds herself having to embrace the symbol she has become to the people of Panem - a symbol of rebellion against President Snow and the autocratic Capitol.

I was really looking forward to Mockingjay, because I thought the squeal (Catching Fire) was a big improvement and just overall a better movie then the first one. The trailer to Mockingjay won me over by it's excellent tone and it's brilliant shots, and I was actually counting down the days for the movie release, but now after seeing the film I got to say.... I'm a bit disappointing. Now let me get something out there, I don't hate this movie, I just think it's really disappointing for and please don't hate me for this.

Let's start off with the good things in this movie: Jennifer Lawrence was just flawless in this movie and now every time I see her in interviews or new movies I straight away like her as a person and as a actress. Rest of the cast did good as well. The movie had that Apocalypse settings to it and it suited the tone of the film and I'm just happy they got that right.

Now for the things that did not work at all and came off messy: The fact that this is a two parter really spoils the film for me, because without giving away anything, but basically this movie is just a set up for the next film and sometimes movies can pull that off, but when the the second part comes out not a lot really of people won't be talking about part 1 anymore, just like Harry Potter and I know I keep bring up Potter a lot but it's really hard not to.

The movies pasting is like watching a snail starting walking to point A to point B, that's the movies paste right there. The movie really wants me to care about the character's and the character's may not be boring, but there not really that interesting to me.

Overall Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 feels less then a stand alone film, but more of a cash grab and I hate saying that because I really wanted to like this and I trying my damn best, but I'm sorry for letting you all down but this movie was a disappointing to me and saying that sucks.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
mhansen69Jun 9, 2016
What a terrible, terrible movie. Why did they have to split the last book into 2 films? The 3rd book was great. Why did they have to mess with it? I'm seriously considering throwing-out both DVDs of The Mockingjay. I never want to see themWhat a terrible, terrible movie. Why did they have to split the last book into 2 films? The 3rd book was great. Why did they have to mess with it? I'm seriously considering throwing-out both DVDs of The Mockingjay. I never want to see them again. I think I'll just read the 3rd book again and hope to forget I ever saw those last two awful movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CineAutoctonoDec 2, 2015
Perhaps the worst of the saga, but it is good , there " Mockingjay : Part 1" , where courage and thirst for vengaza Katniss to Snow began certainly for its atrocities against it , there began the rebellion of the Mockingjay, TO BE CONTINUED...!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
aadityamudharApr 17, 2016
Another exciting addition to the Hunger Games franchise, Mockingjay Pt. 1 makes for an insightful look into propaganda, politics and rebellion. It doesn't matter that this is an introduction to the grand finale, the film uses its time wellAnother exciting addition to the Hunger Games franchise, Mockingjay Pt. 1 makes for an insightful look into propaganda, politics and rebellion. It doesn't matter that this is an introduction to the grand finale, the film uses its time well and is every bit as thrilling.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
EpicLadySpongeJan 3, 2016
They're back again for one last game. This time, it's split up in two parts to save movie time. Like its two predecessors, it's only at a score of 7 out of 10 for the same reasons the previous two installments have.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
NikitaBrandtJan 3, 2016
Again, I note the tremendous work of the director, actors and even writers. But I can not be angry at this lousy marketing ploy division last book into two parts. Although, I must admit, it was done correctly.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
BarneyOnMTJan 5, 2016
WHAT I LIKED: It's pretty much 2 hours focused on developing 2 things - the character of Katniss and the political revolution to the capital. As a result, these things are done absolutley beautifully, with heartfelt moments and some seriousWHAT I LIKED: It's pretty much 2 hours focused on developing 2 things - the character of Katniss and the political revolution to the capital. As a result, these things are done absolutley beautifully, with heartfelt moments and some serious themes explored in so many thought out and well directed ways. This also means it's all very well set up for part 2, plus it's very well shot and doesn't feel too stretched out for a 'part 1 film.'
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: It only focuses on two things, so is a touch boring in terms of any plot. Also, tension builds constantly with no real climax, partly due to the lack of action or exciting and defiant scenes (which is supposedly so that we go and see part 2.) One little gripe too is that the soundtrack is a bit weird in places - though music and chants are used powerfully throughout
VERDICT: This sets up part 2 beautifully, but as a film on it's own it struggles to grab excitement from audiences. Having said that, what's there is done brilliantly, it just feels like there could be more.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
BlancheJun 23, 2016
A boring, not very engaging film cluttered with under-developed characters and dodgy appearances. Wouldn't watch this again personally, but the film wasn't a total waste. There were good effects and good visual representation, as well asA boring, not very engaging film cluttered with under-developed characters and dodgy appearances. Wouldn't watch this again personally, but the film wasn't a total waste. There were good effects and good visual representation, as well as decent tension produced through the placement of cinematic music. But it didn't amount to anything of real significance.

This film was below par for me. Also heard that the film had a big budget - what a waste.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SrPepeNov 18, 2017
Si bien avanza bastante lenta, la película es muy interesante. El problema mayor de esta entrega es estar a la altura de las anteriores, claramente no lo logra.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
sjultiDec 6, 2016
This is by far the worst in the series, withe the games ending it became more about talking, and the movie is boring their is literally nothing going on in this one, the only thing that saves it from being bad are the actors.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
audricedselDec 26, 2016
Mockingjay - part 1 is a boring movie in this series. But, it's not bad, actually. It's still good, there are a lot of drama and politic about propaganda and something like that. That cliffhanger ending leaves the audiences a question thatMockingjay - part 1 is a boring movie in this series. But, it's not bad, actually. It's still good, there are a lot of drama and politic about propaganda and something like that. That cliffhanger ending leaves the audiences a question that will be answer in the part 2. Lawrence is still charming and more powerful.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SomePersonaFeb 8, 2017
Same as the second part. Half a movie. It worked for the Deathly Hallows since it's seven hundred pages long, but it does not work much here. You might as well mush these movies together, edit some stuff out for length, and make one great movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ZerpnosMar 17, 2017
Bence ilk iki filmin aksine çok daha iyi bir film çıkmış ortaya, diğer filmler konuyu anlatma açısından, sanal oyunlar ve olayları göstermek açısından iyiydi. Açlık oyunlarının oynandığı kısımlarda zevk alamayan biri olarak, bu filmde gerçekBence ilk iki filmin aksine çok daha iyi bir film çıkmış ortaya, diğer filmler konuyu anlatma açısından, sanal oyunlar ve olayları göstermek açısından iyiydi. Açlık oyunlarının oynandığı kısımlarda zevk alamayan biri olarak, bu filmde gerçek aksiyonun yaşanması daha çok hoşuma gitti. Devrimlerin ne kadar zorlu bir süreç olduğunu ve diktatörlerin nasıl davrandığını gösteren bir film. Filmde mıntıkada ki insanların umutları ve inancı, aklıma Kuvâ-yi Milliye zamanlarını getiriyor. Bu güzel zamanların dışında tabi ki filmde sinirden çatlayacak dakikalar yaşadığımı da belirtmek isterim. Kitaplarını okumadım falan filmde de geçtiği gibi Katniss 15 yaşındaymış, yaşına verecek olursam eğer anlamsız triplerini ve karışık kafasını anlayabilirim fakat filmde hiç 15 yaşındaymış gibi durmadığı için sürekli tripler atıp, ağlaşması sinirimi bozdu. Tabi ki bu hem oyuncunun güzel bir oyunculuk sergilediğini, hemde senaryonun iyi olduğunu gösteriyor. 2. bölümün çok daha aksiyonu ve duygusunun bol olacağını düşünüyorum ve beklentimi çok yüksekte tutuyorum. Umarım yanılmam.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017
It is kind of boring, and only half a movie. This is the first in the series without the actual Hunger Games, and it does it well. It just needs to be one movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
HPFANBOY1237Apr 9, 2017
This film is exactly what it needs to be, and it is extremely underrated. It is not dull, it is dark, gritty, emotional, captivating. Every scene is filled with such raw emotion. Besides from the District 8 scene, everything is directed wonderfully.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JPKJun 24, 2019
Decent, But Big Drop In Quality
Now I understand this is only part 1, But this should’ve been better written in all honesty, But I still liked the film at least 72% of the time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018
Joan of Arc gets all the peasants united or something? The Hunger Games are over and this more a war movie now, but it still worked so.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DomgwyDec 20, 2017
Back in 2010 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 started a dangerous trend — splitting novel adaptations into multiple parts.

Since then we’ve seen the Twilight series split its finale in two and (unforgivably) J.R.R Tolkien’s 300Back in 2010 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 started a dangerous trend — splitting novel adaptations into multiple parts.

Since then we’ve seen the Twilight series split its finale in two and (unforgivably) J.R.R Tolkien’s 300 page ‘The Hobbit’ turned into a three film, nine hour epic.

So how does the latest entry in The Hunger Games franchise fare? To be honest, I think its pretty good.

After two films of build up the oppressed people of Panem are finally taking up arms against a brutal, totalitarian regime led by Donald Sutherland’s President Snow.

So you’d expect a lot of large scale action right? Na, we do get a lot of propaganda though.

Here the Battle Royale style ‘games’ take a back seat as the two political entity’s battle for the hearts and minds of the population.

The ideology of war and the effects of state run media are not often the subject of mainstream Hollywood films. To me however this has always been the most interesting element of the franchise, one that elevates it above the teenage, love triangle, blockbuster it is often dismissed as. I mean these films are so overtly political at this point that its even starting to negatively effect the box office takings in key worldwide markets.

So does all this politics and propaganda make the film boring? Absolutely not. Jennifer Lawrence’s performance once again brings real emotion and depth to Katniss demanding empathy despite some tricky (and at times downright unlikeable) character traits.

The extended running time also allows some of the series’ side characters to have some much needed development. Liam Hemsworth’s Gale and Elizabeth Banks’ Effie finally get scenes of their own, free from Katniss, where they can establish their own motivations and backgrounds.

The returning cast also up their game. Josh Hutcherson is fantastic as Peeta (despite reduced screen time) showing real restraint when needed in scenes a lesser actor would overplay. Of course Donald Sutherland is on fine menacing form as President Snow.

The only disappointment in terms of performance is the late, great, Philip Seymour Hoffman. Don’t get me wrong, he’s great, it just seems he's a little underused. It's a shame that what would turn out to be his final screen role is that of the rather subdued Plutarch Heavensbee. This is hardly a defining or particularly memorable posthumous role like Heath Ledgers Joker or Oliver Reed in Gladiator. Of course the filmmakers can’t be criticised for this and they show Hoffman the upmost respect, dedicating the film to his memory.

Unfortunately much like The Deathly Hallows, Mockingjay Part 1 can’t escape the feeling of being connective tissue and not a film in its own right. This instalment could quite fairly be accused of simply being a two hour trailer for next years’ conclusion. It’s impossible not to see the irony in a film with a quite Marxist message (the downtrodden proletariat rising up against a powerful ruling class) being split in half by a Hollywood elite for commercial gain.

But politics and commercialism aside, the fact remains that Mockingjay-Part 1 is a well made, well acted movie. In all honesty it probably shouldn’t exist but, as it does, there are far worse and less thought provoking ways to spend a couple of hours.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
realperson2018Jun 26, 2021
This "Young Adult Sci-Fi" flick is much smarter than most. There is less flamboyant action, because it tries and more often than not succeeds in telling a story about the things which make a revolution work like myth building and sacrificeThis "Young Adult Sci-Fi" flick is much smarter than most. There is less flamboyant action, because it tries and more often than not succeeds in telling a story about the things which make a revolution work like myth building and sacrifice and propaganda. These are unusual themes for a movie aimed at a younger audience. This movie and the last one in this series make it the best example of this particular genre.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

64 Critic Reviews

6.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL