Read User Reviews and Submit your own for The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1

5

Sosmooth1982Dec 28, 2022

I thought series was going to be good. I don't know why people like these movies so much. The only thing that's good is the storyline. The movies have all sucked so far.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

All_ButTrU4Sep 25, 2022

Unfortunately bare film that doesn't really do much beyond appearing as an ill intentioned cash grab very common in the post twilight era (see : final two installments of breaking dawn). And understandably there was a large amount of materialUnfortunately bare film that doesn't really do much beyond appearing as an ill intentioned cash grab very common in the post twilight era (see : final two installments of breaking dawn). And understandably there was a large amount of material in the last book that unlike the previous two couldn't be confronted in one viewing but this movie doesn't address that meaningfully. Where this one should have focused on orienting us with district 13,the state of all the other districts after 12's bombing or Katniss new status it instead meanders around the aforementioned points,whilst contrastingly never explores them to the length they deserve and could be in a 1hr+ movie of a much anticipated series. They waste most of the movie on vapid scenes of the creation of the katniss revolutionary brand as well as her relationship with gale now peeta presence isn't an active obstacle. With that said it's still not a completely disappointing film and doesn't ruin the standard of the franchise. It's inoffensive when consumed in succession with it's concluding counterpart . And the cinematography and performances are still impressive nonetheless.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

gracjanskiJul 15, 2022

Another great part of Hunger Games and great movie about dictatorship. Again there are some improvements to the predecessor:
First, the world of Panem, the dialogues and the story around dictatorship are perfectly made: Donald Sutherland asAnother great part of Hunger Games and great movie about dictatorship. Again there are some improvements to the predecessor:
First, the world of Panem, the dialogues and the story around dictatorship are perfectly made: Donald Sutherland as Snow is very impressive and convincing, the perfect villain. Also I noticed, that the main topic of the franchise is propaganda, my favourite theme.
The 2nd part of the movie is more action orientated and they had some flaws in the first and second Hunger Games. But in this movie they were tense, maybe because it was not so clear if the good guys will survive this and the bunker scenes were also nice. In addition I liked, that this movie was a bit different than the first two: no more games, but real war.
Another improvement: Jennifer Lawrence was finally convincing.
Oh..and I like the dark, threatening atmosphere.

There was one element that I dislike a lot: Julianne Moore. I cant watch her, she is simply too ugly to be shown, lol. And I didnt understand, why suddenly Katniss was so much in love with Peeta, although Gale fits better to her (see the first movie) and their ralationship was more a fake.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021

----------------------------------5.4/10-----------------------------------

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

mikesgold2KNov 16, 2021

Kolejna dawka tego samego w tej serii. W sumie bardzo fajne przedstawienie rewolucji od strony wojny propagandowej oraz wywiadowczej. Reszta aspektów niezmienna

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JAKEJACOBJORDSep 17, 2021

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

glommanSep 10, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I don't really know what they went with here, while the first two movies had me at the edge of my seat, this one kinda falls flat. The whole plot with District 13 is way less interesting than it could have been and ofcourse Katniss is the sole factor that can turn the tides of the impending civil war. It gets old really quick.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

imthenoobJul 25, 2021

What ruins this movie for me is that the majority of it is just nonsense filler. We are given no depth to the new characters, who are largely silent and mostly absent, and there is no real setup for the finale (part 2). This very much is aWhat ruins this movie for me is that the majority of it is just nonsense filler. We are given no depth to the new characters, who are largely silent and mostly absent, and there is no real setup for the finale (part 2). This very much is a cash grab attempt to milk the franchise by making a needless two-part finale when it easily could have been condensed into a single, slightly longer, film. This movie is trash and because it sucks so much, I won't even bother with the sequel.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

realperson2018Jun 26, 2021

This "Young Adult Sci-Fi" flick is much smarter than most. There is less flamboyant action, because it tries and more often than not succeeds in telling a story about the things which make a revolution work like myth building and sacrificeThis "Young Adult Sci-Fi" flick is much smarter than most. There is less flamboyant action, because it tries and more often than not succeeds in telling a story about the things which make a revolution work like myth building and sacrifice and propaganda. These are unusual themes for a movie aimed at a younger audience. This movie and the last one in this series make it the best example of this particular genre.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JACOBJORDANBAJun 23, 2021

I love The hunger games Jennifer Lawrence did a good job has katniss everdeen I just love the hunger games I love The hunger games and I love catching fire Mockingjay part 1 and Mockingjay part 2

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MaddoxWhiteApr 24, 2021

Takes the last two and puts a spin on it that works great. The spin allows it to add more depth to the themes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

zNeverSleepingOct 14, 2020

Por mais que o filme tenha me prendido, sinto que poderia haver algo a mais.

Como citei na review anterior, havia um bom background para estabelecer o universo - e assim: os personagens; mas o desenvolvimento aqui me pareceu nulo. É como sePor mais que o filme tenha me prendido, sinto que poderia haver algo a mais.

Como citei na review anterior, havia um bom background para estabelecer o universo - e assim: os personagens; mas o desenvolvimento aqui me pareceu nulo. É como se os personagens apenas fossem pra frente. O relacionamento entre Peeta e Katness é um exemplo de quão forçado algo pode vir a ser sem devida atenção. Há alguns elementos que são tirados por pura conveniência e isso passou a me incomodar bastante, que me faz deixar a suspensão da descrença de lado, o que deslegitimiza todo o filme - mas não, isso não aconteceu ainda.

No quesito entretenimento, acredito que o filme cumpre o seu propósito: passa o tempo. Mas só fica nisso mesmo.

Audio: English, with portuguese subtitles. J4300 32' TV Speakers
Quality: 720p SDR [Bluray]… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

JKGamer76Sep 13, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is not that good. It is very basic and follows a tiring flow. You must to go watch this movie with an open mind.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SoapNuggetJul 15, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. When watching Mockingjay Part 1 right after Catching Fire it is obvious that it is much worse than the 2nd, the characters are only shooting commercials for 2 hours, where the only thing that happens is Peeta is brainwashed and gets rescued and that happens at the end of the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TEMP0Jun 16, 2020

The Mockingjay Part 1 is an enjoyable adventure, although I have to accept there were flaws too. One of the main flaws being that they didn't let iconic YouTuber/Twitch Streamer Cr1TiKaL who had dreams of being actor get any screen time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Dostoyevsky3May 12, 2020

This part 1 of a decidedly cut in two book to film adaptation doesn't provide much and is without any of the gripping thrills that led the series. While diving deeper in its mythology and still driven by an always terrific performance fromThis part 1 of a decidedly cut in two book to film adaptation doesn't provide much and is without any of the gripping thrills that led the series. While diving deeper in its mythology and still driven by an always terrific performance from Jennifer Lawrence, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 ends on an incomplete and distressing note that makes this an unsatisfying continuity for the series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

FilipeNetoMay 3, 2020

This film is the third in the adaptation of the literary trilogy by Suzanne Collins, but, unlike the first two films, it brings only part of the last book to the cinema. I didn't read them, I have no particular intention of doing so for anyThis film is the third in the adaptation of the literary trilogy by Suzanne Collins, but, unlike the first two films, it brings only part of the last book to the cinema. I didn't read them, I have no particular intention of doing so for any particular reason, so I will ignore the books and focus on the film.

In this film, we follow Katniss' first steps as a revolutionary. After being rescued from the arena and recovering from her injuries, she discovers that she is with a group of rebels, the same ones who allegedly lost the civil war seventy-five years earlier, the same ones who inhabit the supposedly extinct District 13. After all, everything was a lie. Everything was a manoeuvrer by Snow's regime to hide the existence of a strong movement of political contestation. Alma Coin, the head of the Resistance, asks for Katniss's support, wants her to become a symbol, a mascot. But she only thinks about the fate of her friends, especially Peeta, who is in Snow's power and seems to have been brainwashed.

Well, after the second film turned out to be excellent it was difficult to do better, but it was totally possible to match it. I don't think that happened, although it is very close. This continues to be an excellent film and to be within a standard that does not clash or belittle the other two. I just don't seem to have managed to be that good. To begin with, I hate when a film based on a book splits into two halves, it is almost always a sign that there is immense straw that could be perfectly removed in an editing room by a skilled editor. The film, in fact, drags a little more than those that preceded it, but if the audience gets involved in the story it ends up not even noticing much. It is also a film that has a lot of sci-fi, the most focused on that genre in all of tetralogy.

Jennifer Lawrence has remained excellent, but it brings nothing that we have not seen. In addition, attempts to create a romantic plot around her character are weak and cold, whatever the target of Katniss's interest. Donald Sutherland continues to surprise and now gives us an almost perfect villain, in his megalomania, narcissism and thirst for control and power. He is truly an exceptional actor, at his best. Stanley Tucci was much more serious and restrained in the way he brought Cesar, a sensationalist TV host, to life, but it reveals how his character is just a puppet of the regime. Elizabeth Banks is an actress who reveals herself in this film, thanks to the profound mental and psychological transformation that her character will undergo here, and Woody Harrelson gains strength and seriousness, as she becomes one of the most fervent supporters of "Mockingjay". Julianne Moore alternates between contained sweetness and charismatic strength and presence; Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jeffrey Wright and Jena Malone are very good, but they don't do much more than they ask. Josh Hutcherson continues to sound weird, although in this film this is almost required by the character.

In addition to a great cast and a good story, the film has excellent production values: careful cinematography with good contrast, excellent sets and costumes and great CGI and sound effects that make fights and combats seem like they want to get off the screen . The soundtrack also deserves special mention for its effectiveness and beauty. Composed by James Newton Howard, it is one of those that remains in the ear long after we have seen the film.

Full of action and with an excellent story, this film is excellent, although it is not as engaging and intense as the film that preceded it. It drags on more, some scenes seem to be expendable, but that's what happens when, for money, a book unfolds in two films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AWESOM-0Apr 27, 2020

The special effect have improved greatly and the acting is very good. However, I don’t get it, you have a powerful female character and a good vehicle to tell a modern story. Then the creators (didn’t read the novel so I can’t say the theThe special effect have improved greatly and the acting is very good. However, I don’t get it, you have a powerful female character and a good vehicle to tell a modern story. Then the creators (didn’t read the novel so I can’t say the the author meant this) pull out the old Hollywood troupes and fail to show her as this powerful/intelligent heroine that she is. Those little things kind of annoy me. I did enjoy the movie but it could have been better. Also being a fan of sci-fi, it’s kind of unforgivable to me to not show some kind of consistency in the use of technology.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

bfoore90Nov 20, 2019

Mockingjay Part 1 was a low point in the series. With the principle cast returning with expanded roles for some, its still not enough to life this movie above being just "okay"

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JPKJun 24, 2019

Decent, But Big Drop In Quality
Now I understand this is only part 1, But this should’ve been better written in all honesty, But I still liked the film at least 72% of the time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

NolanLundgaardJan 16, 2019

The first Mockingjay movie adds more humor and depth to the Hunger Games series, but the story wasn’t quite as good as the first two. The movie still had a great story and stunning visuals that have become the norm for this series, makingThe first Mockingjay movie adds more humor and depth to the Hunger Games series, but the story wasn’t quite as good as the first two. The movie still had a great story and stunning visuals that have become the norm for this series, making another successful addition to the saga.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018

Joan of Arc gets all the peasants united or something? The Hunger Games are over and this more a war movie now, but it still worked so.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ErikTheCriticSep 26, 2018

Part 1 is filled with clever political subtext and propaganda, with great acting and some very absorbing and emotional scenes. What is slightly lacking is the amount of action.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DyliebarAug 3, 2018

The lack of action and Liam Hemsworth are not helping this movie whatsoever, but this movie as a propaganda film is actually quite intriguing!

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

5

DomgwyDec 20, 2017

Back in 2010 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 started a dangerous trend — splitting novel adaptations into multiple parts.

Since then we’ve seen the Twilight series split its finale in two and (unforgivably) J.R.R Tolkien’s 300Back in 2010 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 started a dangerous trend — splitting novel adaptations into multiple parts.

Since then we’ve seen the Twilight series split its finale in two and (unforgivably) J.R.R Tolkien’s 300 page ‘The Hobbit’ turned into a three film, nine hour epic.

So how does the latest entry in The Hunger Games franchise fare? To be honest, I think its pretty good.

After two films of build up the oppressed people of Panem are finally taking up arms against a brutal, totalitarian regime led by Donald Sutherland’s President Snow.

So you’d expect a lot of large scale action right? Na, we do get a lot of propaganda though.

Here the Battle Royale style ‘games’ take a back seat as the two political entity’s battle for the hearts and minds of the population.

The ideology of war and the effects of state run media are not often the subject of mainstream Hollywood films. To me however this has always been the most interesting element of the franchise, one that elevates it above the teenage, love triangle, blockbuster it is often dismissed as. I mean these films are so overtly political at this point that its even starting to negatively effect the box office takings in key worldwide markets.

So does all this politics and propaganda make the film boring? Absolutely not. Jennifer Lawrence’s performance once again brings real emotion and depth to Katniss demanding empathy despite some tricky (and at times downright unlikeable) character traits.

The extended running time also allows some of the series’ side characters to have some much needed development. Liam Hemsworth’s Gale and Elizabeth Banks’ Effie finally get scenes of their own, free from Katniss, where they can establish their own motivations and backgrounds.

The returning cast also up their game. Josh Hutcherson is fantastic as Peeta (despite reduced screen time) showing real restraint when needed in scenes a lesser actor would overplay. Of course Donald Sutherland is on fine menacing form as President Snow.

The only disappointment in terms of performance is the late, great, Philip Seymour Hoffman. Don’t get me wrong, he’s great, it just seems he's a little underused. It's a shame that what would turn out to be his final screen role is that of the rather subdued Plutarch Heavensbee. This is hardly a defining or particularly memorable posthumous role like Heath Ledgers Joker or Oliver Reed in Gladiator. Of course the filmmakers can’t be criticised for this and they show Hoffman the upmost respect, dedicating the film to his memory.

Unfortunately much like The Deathly Hallows, Mockingjay Part 1 can’t escape the feeling of being connective tissue and not a film in its own right. This instalment could quite fairly be accused of simply being a two hour trailer for next years’ conclusion. It’s impossible not to see the irony in a film with a quite Marxist message (the downtrodden proletariat rising up against a powerful ruling class) being split in half by a Hollywood elite for commercial gain.

But politics and commercialism aside, the fact remains that Mockingjay-Part 1 is a well made, well acted movie. In all honesty it probably shouldn’t exist but, as it does, there are far worse and less thought provoking ways to spend a couple of hours.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SrPepeNov 18, 2017

Si bien avanza bastante lenta, la película es muy interesante. El problema mayor de esta entrega es estar a la altura de las anteriores, claramente no lo logra.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017

It is kind of boring, and only half a movie. This is the first in the series without the actual Hunger Games, and it does it well. It just needs to be one movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

HPFANBOY1237Apr 9, 2017

This film is exactly what it needs to be, and it is extremely underrated. It is not dull, it is dark, gritty, emotional, captivating. Every scene is filled with such raw emotion. Besides from the District 8 scene, everything is directed wonderfully.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ZerpnosMar 17, 2017

Bence ilk iki filmin aksine çok daha iyi bir film çıkmış ortaya, diğer filmler konuyu anlatma açısından, sanal oyunlar ve olayları göstermek açısından iyiydi. Açlık oyunlarının oynandığı kısımlarda zevk alamayan biri olarak, bu filmde gerçekBence ilk iki filmin aksine çok daha iyi bir film çıkmış ortaya, diğer filmler konuyu anlatma açısından, sanal oyunlar ve olayları göstermek açısından iyiydi. Açlık oyunlarının oynandığı kısımlarda zevk alamayan biri olarak, bu filmde gerçek aksiyonun yaşanması daha çok hoşuma gitti. Devrimlerin ne kadar zorlu bir süreç olduğunu ve diktatörlerin nasıl davrandığını gösteren bir film. Filmde mıntıkada ki insanların umutları ve inancı, aklıma Kuvâ-yi Milliye zamanlarını getiriyor. Bu güzel zamanların dışında tabi ki filmde sinirden çatlayacak dakikalar yaşadığımı da belirtmek isterim. Kitaplarını okumadım falan filmde de geçtiği gibi Katniss 15 yaşındaymış, yaşına verecek olursam eğer anlamsız triplerini ve karışık kafasını anlayabilirim fakat filmde hiç 15 yaşındaymış gibi durmadığı için sürekli tripler atıp, ağlaşması sinirimi bozdu. Tabi ki bu hem oyuncunun güzel bir oyunculuk sergilediğini, hemde senaryonun iyi olduğunu gösteriyor. 2. bölümün çok daha aksiyonu ve duygusunun bol olacağını düşünüyorum ve beklentimi çok yüksekte tutuyorum. Umarım yanılmam.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SomePersonaFeb 8, 2017

Same as the second part. Half a movie. It worked for the Deathly Hallows since it's seven hundred pages long, but it does not work much here. You might as well mush these movies together, edit some stuff out for length, and make one great movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

audricedselDec 26, 2016

Mockingjay - part 1 is a boring movie in this series. But, it's not bad, actually. It's still good, there are a lot of drama and politic about propaganda and something like that. That cliffhanger ending leaves the audiences a question thatMockingjay - part 1 is a boring movie in this series. But, it's not bad, actually. It's still good, there are a lot of drama and politic about propaganda and something like that. That cliffhanger ending leaves the audiences a question that will be answer in the part 2. Lawrence is still charming and more powerful.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Jack97Dec 17, 2016

If you're riding the fast paced, energetic thrills of Catching Fire then you might be let down by Mockingjay Part 1. It's slower and more plot focused, thus there's barely any action in it. But if you're up for a more propaganda heavy focusIf you're riding the fast paced, energetic thrills of Catching Fire then you might be let down by Mockingjay Part 1. It's slower and more plot focused, thus there's barely any action in it. But if you're up for a more propaganda heavy focus at a rebellion, the film completely delivers on that aspect.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

sjultiDec 6, 2016

This is by far the worst in the series, withe the games ending it became more about talking, and the movie is boring their is literally nothing going on in this one, the only thing that saves it from being bad are the actors.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Iky009Nov 21, 2014

Disappointing !. It was just bad, I could not feel emotion in the film, Katniss does not pass any emotion, it seemed very artificial, even the rest of the cast shows this difficulty. And sad, even the action scenes can not save the movie,Disappointing !. It was just bad, I could not feel emotion in the film, Katniss does not pass any emotion, it seemed very artificial, even the rest of the cast shows this difficulty. And sad, even the action scenes can not save the movie, which I thought would improve, fell too much, the movie was disgusting, the drama did not convey feelings and the characters the same thing. Part 1 was a complete disaster.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

7

MasterRileyJul 20, 2016

A decent movie. It was a bad choice to split this last book into two movies however. Because of it most of the action and importance of the plot is left out of this movie. It is slow and dull because of it but still is pretty enjoyable toA decent movie. It was a bad choice to split this last book into two movies however. Because of it most of the action and importance of the plot is left out of this movie. It is slow and dull because of it but still is pretty enjoyable to watch, especially for fans of the books.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

BlancheJun 23, 2016

A boring, not very engaging film cluttered with under-developed characters and dodgy appearances. Wouldn't watch this again personally, but the film wasn't a total waste. There were good effects and good visual representation, as well asA boring, not very engaging film cluttered with under-developed characters and dodgy appearances. Wouldn't watch this again personally, but the film wasn't a total waste. There were good effects and good visual representation, as well as decent tension produced through the placement of cinematic music. But it didn't amount to anything of real significance.

This film was below par for me. Also heard that the film had a big budget - what a waste.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

mhansen69Jun 9, 2016

What a terrible, terrible movie. Why did they have to split the last book into 2 films? The 3rd book was great. Why did they have to mess with it? I'm seriously considering throwing-out both DVDs of The Mockingjay. I never want to see themWhat a terrible, terrible movie. Why did they have to split the last book into 2 films? The 3rd book was great. Why did they have to mess with it? I'm seriously considering throwing-out both DVDs of The Mockingjay. I never want to see them again. I think I'll just read the 3rd book again and hope to forget I ever saw those last two awful movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

aadityamudharApr 17, 2016

Another exciting addition to the Hunger Games franchise, Mockingjay Pt. 1 makes for an insightful look into propaganda, politics and rebellion. It doesn't matter that this is an introduction to the grand finale, the film uses its time wellAnother exciting addition to the Hunger Games franchise, Mockingjay Pt. 1 makes for an insightful look into propaganda, politics and rebellion. It doesn't matter that this is an introduction to the grand finale, the film uses its time well and is every bit as thrilling.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

smijatovJan 30, 2016

All through watching Mockingjay I thought somehow it feeling familiar... and I realised it reminded me a bit of the Harry Potter series and the point where Harry Potter got darker and more grown up. While the Potter franchise successfullyAll through watching Mockingjay I thought somehow it feeling familiar... and I realised it reminded me a bit of the Harry Potter series and the point where Harry Potter got darker and more grown up. While the Potter franchise successfully transitioned from it's 12-year old demographic, The Hunger Games, did not quite manage so well.

Not all is bad. There is some interesting criticism here of media and propaganda, but those are all smack -in-the-face type of observations. The film makes no secret of it. The darkness comes from the topic itself: the film is set in the aftermath of a violent crackdown by the Capitol onto the rebelling districts. It is dystopic, but what is missing is the emotion behind it. Jennifer Lawrence is more Jennifer Lawrence than Katniss, and when she is Katniss...well, Katniss is annoying. The consistent need to push her into doing what she has to do is quite frustrating. Mind you, it is (probably?) a limitation imposed in the Hunger Games books, but that still does not make her any less annoying and infuriating when she'd rather choose Peeta over the future of the whole world.

Technically, the Hunger Games have polished up quite nicely. The CGI does not look as dated as it did in the first film, which is good. This film is very grim and dark - the colourful costumes of the Capitol have been replaced by the darkness of the underground shelter and the military uniform. Overall, though, the film sustains the continuation of a mediocre, yet entertaining, franchise. That being said, this one is the least entertaining film so far. The whole "Part 1" charade is a charade at its best. Not much really happens here, beyond some character "development" for Katniss (also known as everyone pushing her to get her act together).

The first film is still the most engaging and entertaining one - let us hope they will end the series on a better note than Mockingjay Part 1, because otherwise, it will be a snooze.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

drebin8Jan 17, 2016

Wow... Jennifer Lawrence's acting has really dropped off. Seems like fame got to her head. It's not a very good movie anyway, but Jennifer is awful compared to her previous movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

BarneyOnMTJan 5, 2016

WHAT I LIKED: It's pretty much 2 hours focused on developing 2 things - the character of Katniss and the political revolution to the capital. As a result, these things are done absolutley beautifully, with heartfelt moments and some seriousWHAT I LIKED: It's pretty much 2 hours focused on developing 2 things - the character of Katniss and the political revolution to the capital. As a result, these things are done absolutley beautifully, with heartfelt moments and some serious themes explored in so many thought out and well directed ways. This also means it's all very well set up for part 2, plus it's very well shot and doesn't feel too stretched out for a 'part 1 film.'
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: It only focuses on two things, so is a touch boring in terms of any plot. Also, tension builds constantly with no real climax, partly due to the lack of action or exciting and defiant scenes (which is supposedly so that we go and see part 2.) One little gripe too is that the soundtrack is a bit weird in places - though music and chants are used powerfully throughout
VERDICT: This sets up part 2 beautifully, but as a film on it's own it struggles to grab excitement from audiences. Having said that, what's there is done brilliantly, it just feels like there could be more.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

NikitaBrandtJan 3, 2016

Again, I note the tremendous work of the director, actors and even writers. But I can not be angry at this lousy marketing ploy division last book into two parts. Although, I must admit, it was done correctly.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

EpicLadySpongeJan 3, 2016

They're back again for one last game. This time, it's split up in two parts to save movie time. Like its two predecessors, it's only at a score of 7 out of 10 for the same reasons the previous two installments have.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

gdiego135Dec 4, 2015

Pure BOREDOM this movie is pointless, like Part 1's always are, nothing interesting happens like at all!!!!!! I don't recommend this movie, but the first and second one are pretty good so just watch or rewatch those.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

LJHayesDec 4, 2015

I've deficated better stories than this. The whole thing plays out like a PR campaign. It is literally two hours of Katniss trying to make a good tv advert while all the action (in typical hunger games fashion) takes place off screen. Oh andI've deficated better stories than this. The whole thing plays out like a PR campaign. It is literally two hours of Katniss trying to make a good tv advert while all the action (in typical hunger games fashion) takes place off screen. Oh and here's something that'll shock you: Peeta needs rescuing. Again. Y'know, just for a change.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

CineAutoctonoDec 2, 2015

Perhaps the worst of the saga, but it is good , there " Mockingjay : Part 1" , where courage and thirst for vengaza Katniss to Snow began certainly for its atrocities against it , there began the rebellion of the Mockingjay, TO BE CONTINUED...!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

horcrux2007Nov 24, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Since the first novel was released in 2008, The Hunger Games series has become one of the biggest YA franchises on the market, and it's been probably the only series to legitimately rival the Harry Potter franchise in sheer popularity. Although The Maze Runner and Divergent have enjoyed enough success to spawn their own film adaptations, neither have been nearly as lucrative as The Hunger Games. The franchise's complicated and timely hero as well as its biting political subtext has attracted many people to the series, and seven years, later the final film has been released to close the series. To get ready for it, I decided to watch the penultimate chapter, Mockingjay: Part 1. After destroying the arena at the 75th Annual Hunger Games, Katniss is brought to the underground District 13 in order to assume her identity as the Mockingjay, a symbol of hope and rebellion for the people of Panem. However, Katniss's hope begins to burn out when she realizes that Peeta was captured by the Capitol and is being brainwashed to convince the people to stop the rebellion. Even as a fan of the series, splitting the final book into two parts felt less like a narrative enhancement and more like an attempt to make more money. Some scenes seemed to drag on too long or be completely unnecessary. The book could easily be adapted into an epic three-hour conclusion and still be effective. There was also much less action than the previous films. However, the action scenes that were present are as poignant and exciting as ever. The series' strengths have always outweighed its issues, and Mockingjay: Part 1 is no exception. Jennifer Lawrence is still mesmerizing in her portrayal of Katniss, and the social commentary is just as timely and striking as it is in the other films. It may feel like too much exposition for the conclusion, but The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is a grim and exciting set-up for a hopefully action-packed finale.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

MikeWoodardJrNov 19, 2015

'Mockingjay Part 1' is a reminder that splitting and dragging out a relatively small book into two films, while a great financial scheme for studios, kills the value of its story. Where 'Catching Fire' had those who hadn't read the series,'Mockingjay Part 1' is a reminder that splitting and dragging out a relatively small book into two films, while a great financial scheme for studios, kills the value of its story. Where 'Catching Fire' had those who hadn't read the series, (Me!,) captivated, Part 1 crashes back to reality, and reveals the flaws of the franchise. Katniss, a character you could root for as a strong female protagonist, falls right back into the Hollywood trap of being entirely dependent on a man, and even manages to make her more gullible, naive, and unlikable than she ever was in the first two films. The story's initial premise, as a battle of political ad campaigns, with both sides taking their shots back and forth, is interesting, but falls victim to slow pacing a repetitive story points. While 'Catching Fire' managed to infuse its political commentary into an engaging story, here we are treated to overblown politics with very little engaging action. The supporting cast is a delightful but wasted treat, as former Academy Award winners are pushed into mainly support roles. This includes the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman, a real beam of light in the previous film, whose character serves no real arc in this part of the story. The plot suffers from the two-part problem, as there is no real pay-off or development of the characters, and it ends more abruptly and confusing than its predecessor. The movie grinds to a halt in some areas, with fake-tension scenes that have no real bearing on the overall plot. It comes to a breaking point when Katniss is literally teasing a cat with a flashlight, and suddenly discovers a realization she should have known from near the beginning of the film. Overall, a huge letdown based on what the previous films had set-up. Instead of leaving the non-book reading viewers wanting more, it leaves us with more of a deep sigh and leaves us wondering why we devoted our time to this series in the first place.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

intruder313Nov 5, 2015

The book is quite boring and splitting it in two has resulted in an interminably dull first part. Part 2 looks more promising as they have saved the best bits / action for that.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Jack_SunshineSep 8, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. With the presumably thrilling conclusion to The Hunger Games series just over the horizon, we return to last year’s Mockingjay – Part 1 in an attempt for my reviews to maintain at least some contemporary relevance. There are two ways to look at a film which is part of a series. One is to view it as a chapter in the larger story, making this one little more than the calm before the storm. The other way is to see if the narrative works as a standalone film, and sadly here it does not.

The film has followed the trend of turning the last part of a novel series into a two part picture (Harry Potter, Twilight, to an extent The Hobbit) so that Part 1 becomes so much set-up for a ‘missing’ final act. Is it a cynical cash-grab to stretch the franchise out for another year, or sincere attempt to do justice to the literature? Who can say?

With Mockingjay – Part 2, this effect is thoroughly in place, moving from one relatively unsatisfying cliff-hanger at the end of Catching Fire to another at the end of itself. It somehow manages to be another big ol’ film of (just) over two hours, although it’s almost half an hour shorter than Catching Fire, which took over half its running time to actually get to the bloomin’ Hunger Games.

Though the full title retains the series banner, there are no games here, so the arena combat angle that provided a clear structure to the first two films is gone. Maybe that’s for the best. The second film was in many ways a retread of the first, though the pre-game ruminations I’ve just lamented were really about the seeds of rebellion, and our heroine Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) and her Mockingjay becoming the symbols of the revolution (the Mockingjay starts life as a symbolic token Katniss is given by an elderly neighbour in the first film, which gradually takes on greater significance).

So it’s not a standalone story, but what’s this film about, and where does it take the characters we met in the last two films? At first glance, not very far. Most of the movie takes place in an underground bunker where the rebellion is based, safe below District 13 (a mysterious place previously believed to have been long destroyed), while the two sides throw propaganda back and forth at each other. Katniss does get out into the field, but she only fires one arrow (although granted, it does quite some damage).

But at the film’s core is this media warfare of hearts and minds, and Katniss’ initial reluctance to play into it. Her struggle is to weigh the needs of the many, who see so much in her, against her own personal losses and dissatisfaction with how the revolution is being run. She is always asking who should have been saved, and at what cost?

The film inherits the great cast of the series, from Jennifer Lawrence herself, whose name is now synonymous with the franchise and characters, to the continued presence of Woody Harrelson and Elizabeth Banks, who play off each other nicely after their frosty relationship of the last two films. What is good is that as we spend more time out of the area with the rebels, Gale (Liam Hemsworth) finally has a little more to do, getting out into the field with Katniss and even leading one of the film’s few action sequences, a daring raid on the capital to liberate the captured victors of Catching Fire.

Similarly, Philip Seymour Hoffman, who tragically died during filming, manages to maintain a complete and worthy presence as the games master turned rebel propagandist. His more reasoned encouragement of Katniss brings a subtle reserve to offset the fiery District 13 President Alma Coin (Julianne Moore) who is all rousing speeches and lack of compromise, continually at loggerheads with our heroine. Much of the first third of the film is her coercive attempts to make her agree to participate in the propaganda; though we ask ourselves how different this really is to the gaudy reality TV of the first film.

Everybody has their own two cents to say on how the revolution should be run, but on the other side of the coin. President Snow (Donald Sutherland) abandons his affable façade in the face of all out war to snarl and gloat from the video screen.

I have said that true action sequences are few and far between; they are dispersed like raisins in a bowl of porridge through the film’s inflated length, but they come as a re-engaging wake up call. I particularly enjoyed the scenes of open rebellion in other Districts.

Returning Catching Fire director Francis Lawrence has finally delivered the darker sequel suggested by his back catalogue (Constantine, I am Legend). Of note is the apocalyptic sequence in which Katniss breaks down while exploring the ruins of District 12. The Hunger Games universe has always come with a high human cost, but never has it been so graphic.

So while the film is well made and there are many standout scenes, the pacing still feels slow and the dramatic narrative is far from satisfying. After all, it’s really only half a film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

xDaudexAug 27, 2015

This movie is pretty much a hype train for the final movie but I don't think that's a bad think. I actually think the first two movies would have been more enjoyable as a whole if they were each split into two movies as well. I do perfectlyThis movie is pretty much a hype train for the final movie but I don't think that's a bad think. I actually think the first two movies would have been more enjoyable as a whole if they were each split into two movies as well. I do perfectly understand why they did it like they did though.

Pros:
Main character is a strong woman
World building
The movies pacing is slower than the first two which I found more enjoyable

Cons:
Not that much actually happens in the movie.
Some scenes could have been explained better before they happen. There was a couple of times I had no idea what was going on until it was explained afterwards.
I'm personally not a fan of the leader of district 13. Her character seems somewhat generic and not that interesting.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

AaronDWassermanJun 26, 2015

Pretty mediocre, I get this is a set up for the finale, but it was boring, Deathly Hallows part 1 did the splitting of the books better. This just felt like a waste of time.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

PeterAlexanderJun 10, 2015

The attempt to split the final act into two films is a mistake often seen nowadays and it ends in the same result every time. Whilst on the most part the Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is an engaging movie, it is a distinct drop in qualityThe attempt to split the final act into two films is a mistake often seen nowadays and it ends in the same result every time. Whilst on the most part the Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 is an engaging movie, it is a distinct drop in quality in comparison to the two previous films. The film is far too slow paced and fails to capture the audience from start to finish. Despite this, there are redeeming qualities that make this film enjoyable to watch. The exploration of propaganda and the harsh realities of war are at some points demonstrated to perfection. This is not enough to justify the final act being split into two films however.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

RalfbergsJun 7, 2015

Compared to other parts of the Hunger games this one really lacked something in my opinion. I mean, there weren't that many story parts in the movie and not much happened in my opinion, which would be worth mentioning. I think they justCompared to other parts of the Hunger games this one really lacked something in my opinion. I mean, there weren't that many story parts in the movie and not much happened in my opinion, which would be worth mentioning. I think they just strecthed it out to two parts so that it would make more money (talking about Mockingjay parts). There weren't really much of emotional parts or really anything that interesting happenning which would make this a stand out movie. Not that it was a boring movie, but I think much more was expected from it. What I did like was the soundtrack though :)… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

MadMaxFuryRoadMay 23, 2015

Hunger Games Mockingjay Part 1 is an entertaining movie. Though there was barely any action in the movie and less like a hunger games movie, it was still fun to watch. It is still a huge step down from Catching Fire with a twist.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

moonman1994May 19, 2015

Although not plainly bad, all The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is, is setup for part 2. This large amount of setup and background information keeps the view desiring a sequel but does not put forth an interesting film. This causes theAlthough not plainly bad, all The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 is, is setup for part 2. This large amount of setup and background information keeps the view desiring a sequel but does not put forth an interesting film. This causes the film at many times to drag. That being said the entire cast is still great and it will be exciting to see the conclusion in part 2.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SilverartsMay 2, 2015

Mockingjay Part 1 allows a different view of all characters, scenes and current knowledge the audience possess of the games as a whole. As the point of the games is completely removed from the films presence. This therefore would add a uniqueMockingjay Part 1 allows a different view of all characters, scenes and current knowledge the audience possess of the games as a whole. As the point of the games is completely removed from the films presence. This therefore would add a unique edge as Katniss’ journey through fame and struggle for Peter is shown with great light. Nevertheless this consequence of light, leads to too much detail which appears of an excess through the duration of the film, as the main climax only lied between the scenes of reuniting Katniss and Peter. Even so the tension through the stories concept was fulfilled with intelligent, bold, but obscure effects via scene distribution in Katniss’ (Jennifer Lawrence) anger which is well thought through in accordance to acting the role successfully. Additionally the growing admiration for Peter that develops through the film is complimented by the phenomenal representation in recreating the distress through costume design and makeup construction by layering and contouring, accurately executing his purpose during the film, even though evidencing this purpose during the film could be improved, instead of the single resource of the TV analogy via scripture.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Tss5078May 1, 2015

It is a common misconception among people who never read the series, that all the books are similar and simply about the games. They don't realize that the games are just a small part of what is happening in Suzanne Collins futuristic worldIt is a common misconception among people who never read the series, that all the books are similar and simply about the games. They don't realize that the games are just a small part of what is happening in Suzanne Collins futuristic world of Panem. If you've only seen the first film, and you're thinking that the rest are just the same thing in another setting, you couldn't be more wrong. Normally I would give a synopsis of the story before I review the film, but it's difficult to do without spoilers, so I will say, that Mockingjay couldn't be more different than the other films/books. There are no games, but the story does follow some of the people you met in the games. Once again, this film is like a page for page telling of the book in such a way that I've never seen before or since. When you read a book, often times you get pictures in your head of people, places, and things. When those films are transferred to the screen, most of the time, what you pictured in your head is not what you're seeing on the screen. The Hunger Games is different, because it really is like Suzanne Collins was in my head when I was reading the book and transferred my thoughts to film. It's what I loved about the first two films, and that hasn't changed in the third movie, despite a new Director. Once again, Jennifer Lawrence stars and continues to be the perfect choice to play Katniss Everdeen. Years ago, when I first read the Hunger Games books, I thought to myself that if this ever became a movie Jennifer Lawrence would be the perfect choice to play Katniss and apparently Collins had the same thought. Lawrence is the focus of the film and with all of America and Panem watching her, the Mockingjay shines, as both the face of innocence and as a leader to her people. I've read a lot of books before I've seen their film adaptations, but never has a story jumped so vividly from the pages to the screen. This series continues to be exciting, inspiring, and just plain terrific. If you're the kind of person who is turned off by sequels, don't let that stop you from catching up with the Hunger Games, because every film is just as good, if not better than the film before it.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

CaptainZexiasApr 30, 2015

Francis Lawrence is an AMAZING director and manages to capture things in the movie you do not think of, he adds little details that are very welcomed and makes the movie that much more special and changes the way you read the book in a goodFrancis Lawrence is an AMAZING director and manages to capture things in the movie you do not think of, he adds little details that are very welcomed and makes the movie that much more special and changes the way you read the book in a good way, if i could i would like to personally thank him, as being a big lover of the book, to find a director who makes a movie as good as the book is very hard to find, but to find one who i dare say makes it better? That is a very unique talent, i cannot put into words how much i love this movie, and how much i appreciate the fact he got all of the emotions and more into the movie, and like i said, possibly made it better than the book, there are so many extra scenes added and so many little details added to it to make it so special, i am sad that unlike the other two i did not manage to get the two disk version (If it was made for this film that is), but yes, i am very grateful we got him as a director as no one could have done a better job than he has!
But moving onto the movie itself, like i have been saying, it is very very good, the emotions you feel, the details, the characters, everything, there may be some faults and people will be harsh to it, but it is one of the best movies i have seen, probably the best in that genre of movie!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

marcmyworksApr 20, 2015

I felt the critics were a little too tough on this film. Sure it was slower and contained less action, but of all three released so far it had the best character development and really proved why Katniss was the hero that everyone needed andI felt the critics were a little too tough on this film. Sure it was slower and contained less action, but of all three released so far it had the best character development and really proved why Katniss was the hero that everyone needed and deserved.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

NRNSWApr 3, 2015

Not as good as previous Hunger Games and could have done with some more editing. I have a feeling that Part 1 and Part 2 could have been delivered as one film - but that wouldn't have made them as much money. Don't rush to see it - might beNot as good as previous Hunger Games and could have done with some more editing. I have a feeling that Part 1 and Part 2 could have been delivered as one film - but that wouldn't have made them as much money. Don't rush to see it - might be better to wait until Part 2 comes out and then watch them together.....… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

GuilhermeAugApr 1, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. No doubt that the film was well-acted, but it was boring, because when you watch "The Hunger Games" film franchise, you always expect action scenes to be in the entire film or a grand part of it and this kind of stuff, but this one... It didn't have anything like the other two past films... Including a completely awkward ending.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

prawntoast1Mar 28, 2015

Took me while to get round to watching this movie especially after enjoying the previous two Hunger Games movies (particularly Catching Fire). But overall Mockingjay Part 1 was disappointing, very disappointing. It seemed like a mere cashTook me while to get round to watching this movie especially after enjoying the previous two Hunger Games movies (particularly Catching Fire). But overall Mockingjay Part 1 was disappointing, very disappointing. It seemed like a mere cash grab because nothing much actually happened in this movie. I found myself absolutely hating Katniss and Peta and finding them very annoying. In conclusion, Mockingjay Part 1 is a very forgettable movie but saying that I will still probably watch Part 2.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

WrongKlenaMar 26, 2015

Como sempre a franquia sendo super fiel aos livros, incrementaram muita coisa e mais ação do que no livro, até pra dar uma pequena "animada" no começo, eu esperava um filme ruim, sem ação, monótono,mas o diretor conseguiu fazer um trabalhoComo sempre a franquia sendo super fiel aos livros, incrementaram muita coisa e mais ação do que no livro, até pra dar uma pequena "animada" no começo, eu esperava um filme ruim, sem ação, monótono,mas o diretor conseguiu fazer um trabalho incrível sendo fiel ao livro e dando um toque de ação.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

dyshpoMar 20, 2015

Slow and empty hopefully they cram part2 with lots of details left out during the whole series of films. It felt as if all parties of production and actors were set on zombie. This entry was far from Catching Fire as in flow but it did haveSlow and empty hopefully they cram part2 with lots of details left out during the whole series of films. It felt as if all parties of production and actors were set on zombie. This entry was far from Catching Fire as in flow but it did have slightly more in it. The only actor who still fits their role is Donald Sutherland that I know is because all his scenes were finished in 2 months the rest of the cast may be tired but they're getting paid a lot they should give more . Workers of the World Unite. Love Socialism vs. Capitalism novels… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

laughingalMar 16, 2015

I signed up here just to give this movie zero stars. I thought the first two movies were contrived, but this one was just plain boring. Observations:

1) little to no action, how little did they spend on this thing? 2) the highly-praisedI signed up here just to give this movie zero stars. I thought the first two movies were contrived, but this one was just plain boring. Observations:

1) little to no action, how little did they spend on this thing?
2) the highly-praised J. Lawrence came off 'rehearsed' and 'deer-in-the-headlights' to me
3) the movie jumps from scene to scene w/o rhyme or reason . . . lazy script writing
4) pompous and unbelievable

Have a nice day… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

danippMar 13, 2015

A good third film of the franchise, with great performances and a quite interesting script, which focus on politics and advertising. Some fans might be disappointed with the lack of action if compared to the two previous movies but thisA good third film of the franchise, with great performances and a quite interesting script, which focus on politics and advertising. Some fans might be disappointed with the lack of action if compared to the two previous movies but this political analyses is amazing. The only problem with this adaptation is the snub of Finnick and Johanna, which were abismal and I really hope the final chapter compensates that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

anshimanMar 13, 2015

My new least favourite phrase: "Part 1". Pretentious, jarringly hollow and unrelentingly drab, this latest entry in 'The Hunger Games' franchise is a sloppy, clumsy and cloddish exploration of the power of political propaganda and inspirationMy new least favourite phrase: "Part 1". Pretentious, jarringly hollow and unrelentingly drab, this latest entry in 'The Hunger Games' franchise is a sloppy, clumsy and cloddish exploration of the power of political propaganda and inspiration to alleviate suffering and strengthen the collective human spirit. Devoid of any engaging plot progressions, fleshed-out characters, or captivating narrative, this wafer-thin shell of a movie fails to illustrate the intrigue of the mythos that's drawn minds all over the world.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MattBrady99Mar 10, 2015

Remember Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, were nothing really exciting happens in that movie, and the movie has a slow paste run time and they try to save the all the exciting and awesome parts in part 2, and now we gotRemember Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, were nothing really exciting happens in that movie, and the movie has a slow paste run time and they try to save the all the exciting and awesome parts in part 2, and now we got Mockingjay and I can happily say that Mockingjay is a little better than Deathly Hallows Part 1, but it does lack of the two parter thing and this movie is not near from perfect.

Mockingjay Part 1 continues the story has Katniss Everdeen along with Peeta Mellark, and a handful of other survivors, have successfully escaped the Quarterquell thanks to helps from Haymitch Abernathy and former gamemaster Plutarch Heavensbee. But escaping is just the start, as Katniss finds herself having to embrace the symbol she has become to the people of Panem - a symbol of rebellion against President Snow and the autocratic Capitol.

I was really looking forward to Mockingjay, because I thought the squeal (Catching Fire) was a big improvement and just overall a better movie then the first one. The trailer to Mockingjay won me over by it's excellent tone and it's brilliant shots, and I was actually counting down the days for the movie release, but now after seeing the film I got to say.... I'm a bit disappointing. Now let me get something out there, I don't hate this movie, I just think it's really disappointing for and please don't hate me for this.

Let's start off with the good things in this movie: Jennifer Lawrence was just flawless in this movie and now every time I see her in interviews or new movies I straight away like her as a person and as a actress. Rest of the cast did good as well. The movie had that Apocalypse settings to it and it suited the tone of the film and I'm just happy they got that right.

Now for the things that did not work at all and came off messy: The fact that this is a two parter really spoils the film for me, because without giving away anything, but basically this movie is just a set up for the next film and sometimes movies can pull that off, but when the the second part comes out not a lot really of people won't be talking about part 1 anymore, just like Harry Potter and I know I keep bring up Potter a lot but it's really hard not to.

The movies pasting is like watching a snail starting walking to point A to point B, that's the movies paste right there. The movie really wants me to care about the character's and the character's may not be boring, but there not really that interesting to me.

Overall Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 feels less then a stand alone film, but more of a cash grab and I hate saying that because I really wanted to like this and I trying my damn best, but I'm sorry for letting you all down but this movie was a disappointing to me and saying that sucks.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

dannygardsMar 7, 2015

J Lawrence really nailed the "one expression throughout an entire 2 hour film" brief. As for the film, well katniss' s obsession with
PEEEETTTAAAAA ruined it for me. Want to be the mockingjay and save the districts? "Where's PEEEETTTAAAAA?"J Lawrence really nailed the "one expression throughout an entire 2 hour film" brief. As for the film, well katniss' s obsession with
PEEEETTTAAAAA ruined it for me. Want to be the mockingjay and save the districts? "Where's PEEEETTTAAAAA?" Here's your mum and sister alive and well despite your district being destroyed - " great... how could you leave PEEEETTTAAAAA." We've lost contact with the rescue team, 5 men and your childhood friend are assumed dead... "Oh PEEEETTTAAAAA, PEEEETTTAAAAA, F***IN PEEEETTTAAAAA"… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

DavidV293Mar 7, 2015

I'm not a fan of reading books. So I can't really judge. But I gotta say that this was not exciting. It was boring and it got me disappointed. Definitely worth a wait on Netflix and Redbox

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

dfelesinaMar 5, 2015

As per usual, the Hunger Games is the typical Young Adult shlock that is pushed out to make a major cash grab from teens everywhere. Again, the movie tries to push "commentary" that is so oblivious that anyone who calls this movie smarterAs per usual, the Hunger Games is the typical Young Adult shlock that is pushed out to make a major cash grab from teens everywhere. Again, the movie tries to push "commentary" that is so oblivious that anyone who calls this movie smarter than the average YA movie or thinks they are smarter for watching this movie is actually getting dumber for watching it. It wastes the talented cast on meaningless dialogue that is just following the YA formula at this point.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

njlakeMar 3, 2015

This is the definition of a cash grab.

So many things in this movie are drawn out and uninteresting. It could have easily fit into about 45 minutes which would have left plenty of time to feature the second part. I enjoyed the first movieThis is the definition of a cash grab.

So many things in this movie are drawn out and uninteresting. It could have easily fit into about 45 minutes which would have left plenty of time to feature the second part. I enjoyed the first movie and like the second one even more so, but this left a lot to be desired and not in a good way. Hate to say this, but if you've read the books, don't waste your time on this. Just wait and save your money for the second movie that will tell a much more compelling portion of this story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

nonasteFeb 27, 2015

Unfortunately this movie was lame and weak compared to the first two. Just read the other "Mixed" and "Negative" comments to learn why. What a letdown

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

cryhardhumorFeb 25, 2015

It's a flawed film, there is no doubt about that, and maybe this movie shouldn't have "Part 1" on the end of it...but THE HUNGER GAMES: MOCKINGJAY-PART 1 is directed and acted well enough to make it worth your $12.50.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

boubadiopFeb 24, 2015

This film is purely for building the story and you will probably never watch it again. Bit like the last harry potter,where no one really cares for part 1 after you've watched it once

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TheApplegnomeFeb 24, 2015

I’m not a big fan of Hunger Games, but the franchise keep surprise me.

The first aspect I would like to mention is the rebellion. It’s so different from the previous installments, and I totally love it. The ”games” didn’t impress me asI’m not a big fan of Hunger Games, but the franchise keep surprise me.

The first aspect I would like to mention is the rebellion. It’s so different from the previous installments, and I totally love it. The ”games” didn’t impress me as much as I would like to. So I really did enjoy this third Hunger Games movie. There’re even some metaphorical messages witch really gives the movie depth. The first act is okay, but not more. And the opening scene could have had a much greater contexture. I did expect a lot unique things that Catching Fire had, but there're not much of those. Many do criticize this movie because it doesn’t have much action, and I somewhat agree. The tempo is very slow, but I didn’t find it boring. On the contrary; I thought it was very entertaining. There are not much CGI and the movie overall felt very natural. But there are some events that are predictable, which is not good. The best thing with this movie is the second act, it’s very entertaining. But the third is a bit disappointing. The ending could have been much more exiting and eventful. I didn’t feel any excitement when the movie ended. Overall is this third Hunger Games movie great, even though the soundtrack could have been much more astounding and powerful. But the main cast are all very good and the movie did surpass my expectations.

The focus of this movie is on insurrection, survival and hope. There's a big difference between this and the previous movie. The strong sides are the dialogs, plot and strong development of existing characters. But the big weakness is the lack of action.

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 gets a 7/10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

ARROWNO1Feb 21, 2015

first and second Movie repetetd itself in a bad way the 3 Movie getting crapier what a **** Movie
stop doing this **** Movies give helping Children that Money Hollywood.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

SkyrimGuy935Feb 20, 2015

Enjoyable for sure, but not as good as the first or Catching Fire for that matter. The soundtrack was surprisingly good, and the few brief moments of action are thrilling and fast-paced. The whole propaganda aspect was also very intriguingEnjoyable for sure, but not as good as the first or Catching Fire for that matter. The soundtrack was surprisingly good, and the few brief moments of action are thrilling and fast-paced. The whole propaganda aspect was also very intriguing and entertaining to watch. However, it of course suffers from a partially unsatisfying cliffhanger ending, and very little development is given to the few new characters.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

real022Feb 19, 2015

Crying facials for 2 hours is what this movie is about. They are all crying non stop. One of the worst films I watched in last 5 years for sure. So bad in every aspect. Do not bother even to download this ****

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

csw12Feb 17, 2015

The darkness of the film has made the series that much better. Mockingjay Part 1 incorporates some of the best scenes the series has had to offer so far.

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

horizonbtsFeb 15, 2015

For those of you that read the series of books you will like the 3rd installment. I found it to be true to the book and well put together, just like I would have imagined it while reading. For those of you that didn't read the book you willFor those of you that read the series of books you will like the 3rd installment. I found it to be true to the book and well put together, just like I would have imagined it while reading. For those of you that didn't read the book you will be somewhat disappointed as it isn't about the Hunger Games, but more about the uprising of the districts and the revolution taking place. As I have enjoyed the first two movies, I thought once again much thought has taken place with the casting as they have been true to the characters in the book. Also much to my surprise, the 3rd has taken the time to be true to the setting and the scenery depicted in the 3rd book. Bravo and gave it a 9 for efforts moving forward in the series, can't wait to see the last installment!!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

imdajudgem8Feb 6, 2015

Not as enjoyable as the past 2 Hunger Games movies, which were both fantastic. However, i do want to comment the acting is amazing and i would especially like to commend Liam Hemsworth. Overall an OK film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

TheLKidFeb 5, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What is it with the Hunger Games? Why is it that people everywhere treat it like its Shakespeare? Its just a teen novel based around an illogical Dystopian society. I haven't read the books, but i have seen the movies, and if the movies are anything like the book then I don't know what to do.

This whole movie is just this: a commercial for Katnis. Plain and simple. It's for this whole, "epic revolution" that is occurring. But it is so boring; so uninteresting it amazes me at how much people like and praise it.

My first gripe is that Katnis, or specifically Jennifer Lawrence has one expression throughout the entire movie,( surprising that she won an Oscar). She never smiles, she rarely cries,(only at the end,really), etc. "But she is experiencing great pain over Peeta!" Well, Peeta baisically did nothing so I don't know why. Also, Peeta? Just because his parents were bakers doesn't mean he should be named after a type of bread!!!!

This whole movie is riddled with plot holes that are so easy to spot it's not even funny.

1: They bomb a whole district to rubble yet leave one house practically unschathed, (which I assume is Katnis's house or something). Either the Capital bombes have a really bad aim,( which is highly unlikely since a) they levelled the rest of the district and b) this society is technologically advanced).

2. They see Katnis land near a hospital but don't bomb the hospital until Katnis has left. They would have saved SO much time and resources if they just killed her there, but then it wouldn't be much of a movie, would it? AND, technically Katnis is the one who killed all those people in the hospital because she only went there for the equivalent of a photoshoot!

3. She takes down two bombers with a bow. "But she was using explosive-tipped tips!". Well, aren't bombers supposed to be flying at super-sonic speeds or something and fly at a slightly higher altitude? And this world looks pretty small, so why don't they just use missiles? I think this scene is only in the movie is to make up for how boring the rest of the movie is and o make Katnis look awesome, since she is seen as sensitive throughout the rest of the movie,( also, when she took out those bombers, she looked bored like," Whatever. I take down bombers down all the time.")

3. Their base is bombed and,(get this), President Snow PUTS A BULLDOZER LOAD OF WHITE ROSES IN THE CRATER OF WHERE A BOMB EXPLODED. Is this supposed to be symbolic, because to me this is kind of stupid. And, how did he know that Katnis would emerge from that one crater? Did he put roses in all the craters? Also, one of my favorite parts is where they say they are "fully operational" even though they have a 40 foot crater in their base. I am no structural engineer but I think a 40 foot crater is going to affect your operations in some shape or form.

4. Bunkers have to have bunkers in them.

5. This girl risks her life saving a cat. But, if she loved that cat so much why did she leave it behind in the first place?

6. Apparently this dam, that is probably bigger than the Hoover Dam, is the only, solitary power source for the Capital. And the most effective way to take out this dam is not to bomb it, risking less human lives. No, you send a mob of people with three crates of explosives running at soldiers gunning them down, making it look like something out of World War Z. And, the security at the dam is ridiculous. there are only a few soldiers with guns. No mines, turrets, nothing. And let me say the "Hanging Man Tree" song is played during this scene. Let me just say; that song had no reason to be in this movie. The producers only put it in here so they could have there own "Frozen".

7. They break in to this building to save Peeta and they knock the guards out with tear gas even though they are wearing helmets.

8. Leaves are bulletproof.

9. The ending is so anticlimactic. So basically, President Snow had an oppurtunity to shoot down the jet with Peeta on board. So I though, "This might get interested. What if he had a bomb in him, taking Katnis out when he is close enough to her." But no, they just drug Peeta on meth and it makes Katnis,*tear, sniff*, "sad".

A final note; I think President Snow likes Katnis. It might be crazy, but just hear this out:

1. He answers her calls,
2. He sends roses,
3. It looks like a love-hate relationship, (explaining why he doesn't just take her out),
4. He is turned on around her.

I gave this movie a low rating because people need to wake up; to see that pop culture is misleading and just because of "PEEEEEEEEEEEETTTTTTTTTTTTTTTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" doesn't mean its a good movie. This movie doesn't deserve a 0, but I am compensating for all the biased reviews out there.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

6

QldgamerFeb 1, 2015

Why they split this into two movies was clearly to make money, as the movie was padded so much it was pretty dull at times.

A mixed bag that struggled to draw me in.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

sanyrubJan 25, 2015

Great blockbuster that continues the unexpected quality run this franchise is having. It is not as entertaining as Catching Fire (which was pretty much a perfect blockbuster) but the acting is equally great or better, with Jennifer LawrenceGreat blockbuster that continues the unexpected quality run this franchise is having. It is not as entertaining as Catching Fire (which was pretty much a perfect blockbuster) but the acting is equally great or better, with Jennifer Lawrence owning the role once more, and also Josh Hutcherson doing a fantastic job. I also liked Julianne Moore a lot as the new leader. I have to say I am very glad that a blockbuster with few action in it can be this successful and become the biggest box office hit of the year, so glad. This new chapter is definitely all about the propaganda war and the definitive birth of a revolution, which does not mean it lack very tense scenes. A great watch. I give it a 7.5 out of 10. So pumped for the last installment. See it!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

lukechristianscJan 24, 2015

Remember Catching fire the sequel with too much drama then action! then the first one Now we have the defining chapter in the series "Mockingjay." To be honest i hated the twisted elements in the last, i thought this movie was gonna be likeRemember Catching fire the sequel with too much drama then action! then the first one Now we have the defining chapter in the series "Mockingjay." To be honest i hated the twisted elements in the last, i thought this movie was gonna be like the last with more stupid drama cliche' but no i was wrong. this movie has intense, entertaining action and interesting elements. Katniss is at District 13, President Coin (Moore) wants her to be the mockingjay defend for herself, peta, her family and District 13. she shatters the games forever, cause President Snow turns society/capital into a living nightmare. Coin uses Everdeen as a weapon then Snow ( who is played very well by Donald Sutherland) uses her love Peta against the capital. the plot is definitely interesting and the suspense is pure gold! and i was on the edge of my seat. I definitely enjoyed this movie alot i can't wait part 2. Grade A- (the reason why i gave an A- is Natalie Dormer's character).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

DavidWardenJan 23, 2015

OH MEH GED WHEReS PEETA?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

DCEdmondsJan 14, 2015

"The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1" 10 Scale Rating: 4.5 (Mediocre) ...

The Good: For the most part, the cast turns in solid performances. Julianne Moore starts off stiff, but eventually finds her way and does a good job. The late"The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1" 10 Scale Rating: 4.5 (Mediocre) ...

The Good: For the most part, the cast turns in solid performances. Julianne Moore starts off stiff, but eventually finds her way and does a good job. The late Phillip Seymour Hoffman was excellent, though that is to be expected. Josh Hutcherson and Liam Hemsworth are once again adequate and I had no complaints there. Donald Sutherland, however, was hands down the best part of the film. While his scenes were few and far between, he dominated the screen every time he appeared. He seemed to enjoy playing the villainous President Snow and it shows. The last 30 minutes of the film are solid and somewhat entertaining.

The Bad: Sadly, the film is slow and boring to the point that it is difficult to watch. Very little of note actually happens for the 1:30 of the movie and I found myself wanting it to hurry up and just end. Jennifer Lawrence did her best with what she had to work with, but spent the bulk of the film sobbing and crying at every turn. You'd think that a strong character like Katniss, who has seen and been through a LOT at this point, would be able to hold it together. I gave the first two films an 8.0 out of 10.0, so this is a massive letdown and I hope that the final film in the series has much more to offer.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

WelshTomJan 13, 2015

Some admittedly fine acting performances fail to redeem what is ultimately an hour's worth of decent content elongated into two boring hours. Do not waste time and money seeing this blatant cash-in at the cinema - watch it as a warm-up justSome admittedly fine acting performances fail to redeem what is ultimately an hour's worth of decent content elongated into two boring hours. Do not waste time and money seeing this blatant cash-in at the cinema - watch it as a warm-up just before the real finale is released.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DBPirate1129Jan 11, 2015

Not as great as Catching Fire but it's definitely not the worst installment. Mockingjay-Part 1 doesn't offer many action sequences but has a compelling plot with great visuals and acting as well as many unexpected scenes.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

4

riaan_radioheadJan 8, 2015

Mockingjay Part 1 is a competently acted and shot picture but it is also a movie mostly void of any entertainment value. This is young adult post apocalyptic fiction that takes itself way too seriously (its source material is hardlyMockingjay Part 1 is a competently acted and shot picture but it is also a movie mostly void of any entertainment value. This is young adult post apocalyptic fiction that takes itself way too seriously (its source material is hardly comparable or relevant as say Children of Men, 1984) and offers little in terms of blockbuster thrills and excitement.
Where Catching Fire was largely entertaining in its action packed final act, Mockingjay Part 1 is an unnecessarily somber film that covers just enough ground but to setup the final installment due in 12 months… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ajarias96Jan 8, 2015

Definitely not the best film in the series but still worth watching. The always emotional Hunger Games series does not let up in this part 1 to the final film of the franchise. Jennifer Lawrence gives another incredible performance asDefinitely not the best film in the series but still worth watching. The always emotional Hunger Games series does not let up in this part 1 to the final film of the franchise. Jennifer Lawrence gives another incredible performance as Katniss; which in my opinion is the main piece of the puzzle that makes this film franchise more than just another set of teen films. Julianne Moore and the late Philip Seymour Hoffman also play their parts very well and give film just another added layer to make it even more enjoyable. Elizabeth Banks continues to be one the best parts of the series and gives another awesome performance as Effie. Overall, the second to last installment has its emotional scenes and keeps the viewer on the edge of their seat till the very end.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

jlittle1404Jan 7, 2015

Sad to say this did not meet my expectations. Not enough action scenes and slower paced unlike the first two in the series. That being said if you are a Hunger Games fan you will appreciate the story and the continuing love triangle ofSad to say this did not meet my expectations. Not enough action scenes and slower paced unlike the first two in the series. That being said if you are a Hunger Games fan you will appreciate the story and the continuing love triangle of Katniss, Peeta, and Gale. Hopefully Mockingjay part 2 can pick up the slack! I give it a 6 out of 10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Joseph_VintonJan 6, 2015

As I have read all three books and have now seen all the released movies I can safely say that I do believe that the Hunger Games franchise is in safe hands. For both people who have read the books or who have only seen the films I think theyAs I have read all three books and have now seen all the released movies I can safely say that I do believe that the Hunger Games franchise is in safe hands. For both people who have read the books or who have only seen the films I think they will be satisfied.

I was sceptical at first whilst going into the movie and yet I was intrigued to see how the narrative would play out on screen. I personally felt that the third book in the Hunger Games Trilogy “Mockingjay” was the most monotonous and disengaging out of the lot, so when I heard that Lionsgate was going to split the novel into two I like most people thought it was a heartless cash grab that would not pay off.

Mockingjay Part 1 is by no means better than the other two previous instalments of the series but it is not however a bad film contradictory of some of the other more naïve reviews. It serves (as I had hoped) as an engaging build up for the final chapter in the Hunger Games cinematic series. Although I still think that it was not right to split Mockingjay up, the first part has proved to be better than I thought and I walked out of the cinema feeling exited for the finale.

For people who have not read the books and have only watched the “Hunger Games” and “Catching Fire” I have to mention that the movie is a complete deviation from the practically identical structure of the other two films. Mockingjay Part 1 delves deeper as you might expect into the intricacies of building a revolution against the capitol. If you enjoyed the two movies purely for the spectacle of the arena and the survival element of the plot you will not like this movie but if you are invested in the acting talents of this series you are more likely to see this movie as an enjoyable cinematic experience.

For people who have read the book I will say that Mockingjay Part 1 is a pleasant surprise. I thought like the book the film would be dull and slow paced. The first two thirds of this film are worth your time even if the final part felt a little stretched. All of the Mockingjay book by Suzanne Collins was a disappointment for me but I think the plot has been rectified and showcased properly in this film. The film unlike the book expands on Collin’s world, in a subtle way and gives you more of an insight into the establishment of opposing propaganda clips which I found thoroughly entertaining and interesting (this was not depicted so much in the book).

I would have given this film a 5 instead of a 7 if it was not for the superb talents of Jennifer Lawrence & the late Philip Seymour Hoffman. Their performances arguably carry the story and do not falter throughout the duration of the movie. Hoffman’s intellectual and shockingly comedic portrayal of Plutarch Heavensbee is yet another reminder of what a great character actor who we have lost and who will miss in the foreseeable future.

This movie includes a solid soundtrack and outstandingly realistic special effects. If you have enjoyed the acting and the characters you will like this movie. If you didn't like Mockingjay the book try out this feature because it may as I found surpass your expectations. This movie has at the very least made me want to rush to see the final film which I suppose was its primary function as a studio cash grab.

Even now I think that this time next year when the final movie of the Hunger Games has come and gone I may even be a little upset when I come to realize that it is all over.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

netflicJan 4, 2015

This is the third movie in "Hunger Games" series.
I haven't read the books but watched previous two movies. In my opinion, this one is the weakest so far. While performances of Jennifer Lawrence, Phillip Saymour Hoffman (RIP), and JulianneThis is the third movie in "Hunger Games" series.
I haven't read the books but watched previous two movies. In my opinion, this one is the weakest so far. While performances of Jennifer Lawrence, Phillip Saymour Hoffman (RIP), and Julianne Moore deserve praise, there are too many over-stratched episodes. The director probably tried to follow the books closely. However, many people think that by making two movies out of one book, they were just milking more money out of the audience. There were a few scenes that were great, but too few for a two hour movie. If cut in half, I would love it.
I understand that Part 1 is a preparation for a grand finale but as I was leaving the theater I was disappointed, I expected much more. I hope Part 2 will justify being bored half of Part 1.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JohnMasterLJan 4, 2015

A pesar de ser "la mas floja" de la saga, Sinsajo Parte 1 es una excelente película. En esta parte no hay acción (mas que pequeñas secuencias) pero lo fuerte de esta primera parte es su dialogo, el guion. Cargado de temas políticos yA pesar de ser "la mas floja" de la saga, Sinsajo Parte 1 es una excelente película. En esta parte no hay acción (mas que pequeñas secuencias) pero lo fuerte de esta primera parte es su dialogo, el guion. Cargado de temas políticos y revolución, hacen que nos preocupemos por los personajes, las actuaciones como siempre son muy buenas, muchos consideran esta parte "mala" o "aburrida" pero se nota la ignorancia y la falta de interés al analizar el guion, en si es cierto que "es la mas floja de las 3" pero esperen a ver "Sinsajo Parte 2" y quedaran sin palabras...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Emmanuel_MathewJan 1, 2015

Mockingjay Part 1 is a solid movie considering it is only the "part 1" of the Hunger games franchise finale. Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson really nailed their roles , julianne Moore , philip seymour hoffman , Elizabeth Banks and WoodyMockingjay Part 1 is a solid movie considering it is only the "part 1" of the Hunger games franchise finale. Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson really nailed their roles , julianne Moore , philip seymour hoffman , Elizabeth Banks and Woody Harrelson also did their roles very well. My only complaint with the acting is from the rebels in D13! I didn't really felt like they are rebels. They only seemed to act like someone was forcing them to act. The direction was almost perfect! it's amazing how they took things like "the hanging tree" song from the book and made it into such powerful scene. I get why Francis decided to make Part 1 as a propaganda movie and part 2 as war movie! because if both the films had the same theme then splitting the book into 2 films would have been a stupid decision but 2 films should stand out on its own and Mockingjay part 1 do standout! but with a cliffhanger though. If you have read the book you know what is coming and how things which felt to some people as boring in part 1 will benefit once they see part 2. i didn't felt like the movie was boring at all like some people say! but yes , if you expected to see an adrenaline rush film like Hunger Games or Catching Fire! then you will be disappointed.Considering what is going to happen in Part 2! this film is very well done with justice to the book. conclusion :- brilliantly acted , smart political intrigue , great direction.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

shl13132Dec 30, 2014

I wanted to like this movie, I really did. I enjoyed the first two installments of the series and this movie just didn't deliver. The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 felt like a long extended trailer for Mockingjay - Part 2. You will sitI wanted to like this movie, I really did. I enjoyed the first two installments of the series and this movie just didn't deliver. The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 felt like a long extended trailer for Mockingjay - Part 2. You will sit there watching this movie waiting for something to happen, the last ten minutes of this movie were intense and entertaining, and I was thinking, "Yes, now we get to the good part," then the movie ended. Jennifer Lawrence gave a fantastic performance as Katniss, but Josh Hutcherson did not have as much screen time as he has had in the past two movies, making it harder for him to build on his character. Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson, Liam Hemsworth, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Donald Sutherland have excellent performances. The only problem with characters I had with this movie was Julianne Moore, her acting was great but the story did not go deep enough into character. The last thing wrong with this movie is Katniss Spent a great deal of the movie crying, she did one thing throughout this two hour movie, and you already saw it in the trailer.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

BikerjamesDec 29, 2014

If you've read the books, you already know going into this latest installment it will be a downer. There are no more games, so the movie focuses on the interplay between Katniss and the Capital, and trying to get the remaining districts onIf you've read the books, you already know going into this latest installment it will be a downer. There are no more games, so the movie focuses on the interplay between Katniss and the Capital, and trying to get the remaining districts on board with the rebellion. The installment is very faithful to the book, and the look and feel was exactly as I pictured it when I read it. As a stand alone film it may not be successful, but who wants to watch one film in the middle of a series without watching the rest of the series? Personally I was never bored watching it. A little depressed, maybe, but The Hunger Games is not an uplifting series to begin with. Jennifer Lawrence was stellar as usual, and carries the entire film. I also liked Julianne Moore as President Coin and Elizabeth Banks as Effie. Women actors are really dominating this series. The look of the film is also terrific. If you read the books I think you will enjoy this latest installment.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews