The Hateful Eight

4

ObertorJan 10, 2016

I love you Tarantino, but this movie was disgusting. I'm a big fan, but this movie is unforgivable. Murder for the sake of murder.. Just terrible in almost every way.

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

9

phnordJan 10, 2016

This is Tarantino back to his best - intricate plot, perfectly paced, beautifully shot and exciting to the end. My preference would be for slightly less violence but that's the name of the game really.

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

0

Huey777Jan 10, 2016

Total rubbish, worst film of the year. Pointless, sadistic and a waste of everyone's time. It's basically a rehash of the resevoir dogs story line, I guess he has his fans that will love it. Idiots.

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

10

SzenJan 10, 2016

Exceptionally written, amazingly well crafted and acted, "The Hateful Eight" is one of the finest films in the filmography of Quentin Tarantino and proves that he can catch your attention for as long as he wants.

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

6

underinJan 10, 2016

The scenery is beautiful. I disagree with the comments that the first half is dragged out. I think the first half is great. It sets up the movie just right however it is the second half which lets the movie down. It has two main flaws:
1.The scenery is beautiful. I disagree with the comments that the first half is dragged out. I think the first half is great. It sets up the movie just right however it is the second half which lets the movie down. It has two main flaws:
1. The suspense is not revealed in a manner befitting a Thriller. It is laid out in the open.
2. Enough character building is not done and not strongly enough. This, I feel is the most important flaw of the movie which makes it second grade when you compare it to Django Unchained or even an Inglourious Basterds both of which movies I idolize. There is no standout performance unlike Django where you had atleast four.

All in all 6 is a fair score.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

David_HobbsJan 9, 2016

I won't lie to you and say I didn't enjoy this movie because I did, but in all honestly I expected better from this movie, but that is just down to the high expectations that I have for Tarantino'a movies, because of the high bar that he hasI won't lie to you and say I didn't enjoy this movie because I did, but in all honestly I expected better from this movie, but that is just down to the high expectations that I have for Tarantino'a movies, because of the high bar that he has set for himself with masterpieces such as 'Pulp Fiction' and 'Django Unchained'. It felt like half the movie had been filmed and Tarintino realised that he hadn't killed anyone yet so he packed as many deaths in a short space of time as he could. The dialogue was okay but not as sharp and witty as most of his films. The movie wasn't as bad as 'Death Proof' but I was definitely beginning to feel the same way about 'The Hateful Eight' as I do about 'Death Proof' in that it probably seemed like a good idea at the time but turned out not being that great..
It has to be said though that the movies main pitfall is the length, I found myself thinking "When will this movie finally end" which is never a good sign, because it was definitely beginning to drag on and it definitely started losing my attention, which yet again the only other Tarantino movie in which that happens is 'Death Proof'.
In conclusion it's a decent movie, compared to the rest of the big budget films coming out now a days. My main problem with the movie is the length (Which ultimately lost my attention) the dialogue being okay but not what I expected it to be, and what I believe is Tarantino's only flaw as a director, is that he has such un-orthodox, original, and wacky ideas (In a good way) is that sometimes those ideas aren't as good as he thought or they don't work together, which more often than not they do work well. There were a few few themes and plot lines which I felt didn't work, or I was just sitting there thinking "Why did he even put this in the movie". Still if you just want to see the latest Tarantino film, you just can't get enough of he his movies, or you want to see the latest wacky idea (Again this is sort of a complement) he has came up with up with, you probably won't read this, you will read it after the movie and are wondering what everybody else though, then there is no way the review will change your mind. If you haven't made up your mind, you probably should watch it, it's a good movie, you might not enjoy it but it will still be a good day/night out to the cinema, or it's you can just get another insight into Tarantino's strange and wacky mind and the sot of things he thinks a bout, either way it's worth a watch.
After reading this over it does seem quite harsh, but I can assure you I love Tarantino's movies and I enjoyed this movie, but just not as much as his other movies, The only reason I have these negative things to say about the movie is because it has 'Quentin Tarantino's' name to it, otherwise I would have just put it down as another movie that I enjoyed watching but probably wouldn't remember it in a few months or ever watch it again. Still, despite all I've said about it, it;s still a decent movie worth a watch and you should definately check it out… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

8

JacobJan 9, 2016

The Hateful Eight is another example of Tarintino being a master filmmaker. Tarintino creates a distinct western that while to some extent is Reservoir Dogs in the west is so fine tuned that you won’t mind. With emphasis on his greatThe Hateful Eight is another example of Tarintino being a master filmmaker. Tarintino creates a distinct western that while to some extent is Reservoir Dogs in the west is so fine tuned that you won’t mind. With emphasis on his great dialogue, a verbal battle between various well defined characters, and well shot with the trademark Tarintino violence it is hard not to be engaged. The film is long but it is mostly justified. The only slow part is the first act, which while necessary could’ve been trimmed. Otherwise the film remains intense as you try and figure what will happen and who is lying and who is telling the truth. The revelation at the end provides rewatch value as you will see the film in a whole new light knowing what is going to come. If you can get past the intimidating three hour length you will find another master work from Tarintino. Hopefully, this isn’t his last film.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

9

liveAndLetLiveJan 9, 2016

This is a mystical-magical movie that I enjoyed from the first note of opening music till the camera fades to black. I loved this movie!! Easily in the top 3 QT movies. Most of the spoilers written in negative comments are taken out ofThis is a mystical-magical movie that I enjoyed from the first note of opening music till the camera fades to black. I loved this movie!! Easily in the top 3 QT movies. Most of the spoilers written in negative comments are taken out of context. I read a few reviews on here and decided not to go see it on opening weekend. What a mistake because this movie delivers! Go see it. Any fan of his movies will fall in love.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

2

herndonrulesJan 9, 2016

What a mess. Sorry to see the Tarantino winning streak end so dismally. No reason for this to have been shot in 70 mm (if you want spectacular cinematography check out The Revenant) since 90% of the film takes place in a cabin. Much tooWhat a mess. Sorry to see the Tarantino winning streak end so dismally. No reason for this to have been shot in 70 mm (if you want spectacular cinematography check out The Revenant) since 90% of the film takes place in a cabin. Much too long, ponderous, excessively over the top violence, even by Tarantino standards and a waste of superior acting talent. Earns two stars for Walton Goggins breaking out.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

7

TrilobiteGJan 9, 2016

Not Tarantino's best, but it is still certainly a good movie. Of course, gorgeous cinematography, breathtaking dialogue with suspenseful sequences along with superb acting across the board (and a, whilst possibly rehashed, important finalNot Tarantino's best, but it is still certainly a good movie. Of course, gorgeous cinematography, breathtaking dialogue with suspenseful sequences along with superb acting across the board (and a, whilst possibly rehashed, important final moral) makes this a good movie. However, this movie has a habit of shifting tones when it shouldn't as well as sticking to a messy rhythm. I would still recommend this one, Tarantino fans will love it as it still has it's blood and light humour. Just be warned, almost 3 hours of running time will bring it down for some, it did a little for me.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

6

Rebecca31Jan 9, 2016

If I could sum up this movie in one word it would be "overkill." Tarantino has given us over 3 hours of people talking in the snow, people talking in a carriage, people talking in the snow again, people talking in a cabin and endless bloodIf I could sum up this movie in one word it would be "overkill." Tarantino has given us over 3 hours of people talking in the snow, people talking in a carriage, people talking in the snow again, people talking in a cabin and endless blood and gore. With so much potential it ends up being a bit of a joke; that is if you find mutilation, woman beatings and the n-word hilarious. The two biggest problems, the length and Samuel L Jackson's over acting. Yet you'll be entertained, shocked and disgusted all at the same time and if that's what Tarantino was going for well done. Recommended for all you mad bastards out there.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

UrbanlistenerJan 9, 2016

The guy did it again! Yet another extremely entertaining, dialogue-driven and beautifully shot piece of art from Tarantino. The movie hits almost all the right notes, it is surprisingly very funny, it is thrilling, suspenseful, entertaining,The guy did it again! Yet another extremely entertaining, dialogue-driven and beautifully shot piece of art from Tarantino. The movie hits almost all the right notes, it is surprisingly very funny, it is thrilling, suspenseful, entertaining, action-packed, bloody, gory, grotesque at times and most of all perfectly executed on the dialogue part. Everybody shines in that film, Sam L Jackson, Kurt Russel, Jennifer Jason Leigh and Walter Goggins, they are amazing.… Expand

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

8

NerdConsultantJan 9, 2016

What else is there to say about The Hateful Eight. It’s a really good movie. I would highly recommend it but I would say I would only recommend it if you have liked previous Quentin Tarantino movies. Ideally it stands up with it’s classicsWhat else is there to say about The Hateful Eight. It’s a really good movie. I would highly recommend it but I would say I would only recommend it if you have liked previous Quentin Tarantino movies. Ideally it stands up with it’s classics like ‘Reservoir Dogs’ and ‘Pulp Fiction’, ‘Inglorious Bastards’ and ‘Django Unchained’ although I think I would recommend those films over this one for various reasons and I still say Django is my favourite of Tarantino films, but this is a very good film with an excellent suspenseful screenplay that really works, excellent cinematography and a really good cast delivering great performances. It won’t be to everyones taste and I am certainly aware that there will be a lot of people that will outright skip this movie, but I would say it’s really worth a watch. If you are unsure of it I would understand waiting for it to come out on DVD, but I think there are a lot of good reasons to see this one in a cinema while it’s still in that environment and I suspect with the Oscar nominations that happened yesterday from this review’s publication it will be sticking around there for a while. The film is slightly un-done by it’s plot twist and it’s overly long ending but that’s really a minor nit pick. I will say, it’s worth checking out.… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

10

YvetteJJan 9, 2016

I ended up seeing this movie because I arrived at the theater late and the movie
I had wanted to see already started. Honestly having no choice between HATEFUL EIGHT or just going home, I chose the film. I'd seen Tarantino's work before andI ended up seeing this movie because I arrived at the theater late and the movie
I had wanted to see already started. Honestly having no choice between HATEFUL EIGHT or just going home, I chose the film. I'd seen Tarantino's work before and even enjoyed parts of DJANGO UNCHAINED. Nothing could have prepared me for this. It's ironic if you read all the "CRITICS" from Newspapers who give it 100 or say " It's the best film of the year!" It reminds me of the Emperors new clothes. The only reason I gave it a 10 was for Kurt Russell and Samuel L. Jackson. They were both good in their roles considering the script they had to work with.

Trust USER Reviews every time. DON'T waste your time or money!… Expand

2 of 15 users found this helpful213

All this user's reviews

0

javamageJan 9, 2016

The Hateful Eight is officially the WORST film I have ever seen. I'm not talking most disgusting or anything like that. It was utter crap, meaningless repetitive dialog and absolutely nothing happens until the last 20 minutes. I should haveThe Hateful Eight is officially the WORST film I have ever seen. I'm not talking most disgusting or anything like that. It was utter crap, meaningless repetitive dialog and absolutely nothing happens until the last 20 minutes. I should have walked out but I kept thinking *something* had to happen... but it was pitifully almost nothing. It wasn't even in the "so bad it's amusing" category. It was just. Plain. Awful. I want those 3 hours back.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

3

sbechtJan 9, 2016

This movie is 2 hours and 45 minutes long, and about 45 minutes of it were worth viewing...which means there were 2 hours of really bad dialogue, uninteresting exchanges, and overdone stereotyping. I can't disagree with any of the recentThis movie is 2 hours and 45 minutes long, and about 45 minutes of it were worth viewing...which means there were 2 hours of really bad dialogue, uninteresting exchanges, and overdone stereotyping. I can't disagree with any of the recent comments from those who rated this movie between a 0 and a 3.

It's an awful movie.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeJan 8, 2016

What does the Hateful Eight deserve? A hateful 8. Get it? No? Ah, forget it. It seems like movies like these just don't come out as fast as expecting a pun out of the movie.

5 of 16 users found this helpful511

All this user's reviews

0

ClaymakerJan 8, 2016

It's a very very boring beginning, and really gets annoying as you hear the looping sounds of "yah yah, let's go.... Yah yah, common let's go"...if you have ever had horses,or road on a carriage with them, you don't keep whipping and yellingIt's a very very boring beginning, and really gets annoying as you hear the looping sounds of "yah yah, let's go.... Yah yah, common let's go"...if you have ever had horses,or road on a carriage with them, you don't keep whipping and yelling at them over and over and over again....so annoying by about 35 minutes in you can't stand it much anymore.
The scripts are so poorly written, that just about every other word is vulger or a swear word, I know the government has worked very hard to dumb down America, but seriously do you really think they sweetie this much back then? I think not...It's like listening to rap music with big time explicit lyrics....Then factor in a whole long dragged out scene of having to see a man's penis and scrotum absolutely disgusting...I quite watching.… Expand

5 of 16 users found this helpful511

All this user's reviews

5

TVJerryJan 8, 2016

After a slow set up, 2 bounty hunters (Kurt Russell and Samuel L. Jackson) and one fugitive (Jennifer Jason Leigh) end up snowbound in a small cabin with 6 other suspicious types. As is typical with writer Quinton Tarantino, there’s lots ofAfter a slow set up, 2 bounty hunters (Kurt Russell and Samuel L. Jackson) and one fugitive (Jennifer Jason Leigh) end up snowbound in a small cabin with 6 other suspicious types. As is typical with writer Quinton Tarantino, there’s lots of conversation…most of which lacks his typical sharp edge. This chatter goes on way too long before the action fun begins (probably 2 hours into it’s 2:47 length). The whodunit nature of the plot becomes convoluted and the payoff isn’t worth the loooong wait. Don’t get me wrong, there are some enjoyable elements: some of the characters are fun (esp. Leigh’s crusty delivery) and the final bloodbath is full of his trademark violence and humor. Not his best.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

MichaelDNJan 8, 2016

I always liked Tarantino, but found him a little overrated. I always relied on him to make thoroughly entertaining movies, but they were never really emotionally profound or thought provoking. The Hateful Eight is all of those things. TheI always liked Tarantino, but found him a little overrated. I always relied on him to make thoroughly entertaining movies, but they were never really emotionally profound or thought provoking. The Hateful Eight is all of those things. The story and dialogue are incredibly sharp, creating a brilliantly satirical portrait of human psychology in response to societal manipulation, particularly in regards to hatred and racial discrimination. The dynamics of the relationships in Minnie's Haberdashery (the setting of the film) serve as a microcosm of that of the society we live in today. The Hateful Eight is as layered and complex as it needs to be to tackle issues this serious. It is quite unsettling to hear the characters say things about racism, or anything that indicates one of society's flaws, and to be reminded of how far we still have to come. There are conversations in this movie about progress that sound optimistic, until you realize they are scarily familiar to conversations we still have today. Yet, there is still a tone of hope to this movie. It is the way the movie conveys all of these emotions and ideas that make it one of Tarantino's two best films along with Pulp Fiction.… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

8

DanteB1Jan 8, 2016

Saw it in 70mm. A very good Quentin Tarantino movie -- not on par with Pulp Fiction, Inglourious Basterds, and Django Unchained (maybe even slightly below Reservoir Dogs); about even with the "Kill Bill" movies. In any case, sub-par TarantinoSaw it in 70mm. A very good Quentin Tarantino movie -- not on par with Pulp Fiction, Inglourious Basterds, and Django Unchained (maybe even slightly below Reservoir Dogs); about even with the "Kill Bill" movies. In any case, sub-par Tarantino is still better than most other films out there.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

10

SeanGamerDaysJan 7, 2016

How do you mixed-up Django Unchained with The Usual Suspect? The answer is The Hateful 8!

Django drops many n---er soo much, and Usual Suspect, was, well... I only watch the middle of it, but who cares?! It was really2 good! QuentinHow do you mixed-up Django Unchained with The Usual Suspect? The answer is The Hateful 8!

Django drops many n---er soo much, and Usual Suspect, was, well... I only watch the middle of it, but who cares?! It was really2 good! Quentin Tarantino movies was rocked-out solid than any s--t!… Expand

5 of 17 users found this helpful512

All this user's reviews

7

LoneWolfSonesJan 7, 2016

I am not intimately familiar with Tarantino's other films. Whether you enjoy Hateful Eight or not will ultimately be subjective based on your own preferences and biases. Hateful Eight is slow to start but the added exposition and dialogueI am not intimately familiar with Tarantino's other films. Whether you enjoy Hateful Eight or not will ultimately be subjective based on your own preferences and biases. Hateful Eight is slow to start but the added exposition and dialogue serve to present the characters. The film draws inspiration from western influences as well as mystery novels. Kurt Russel and Samuel L. Jackson's performances are the standouts of the movie. There are some comedic moments added for a bit of brevity in an otherwise grisly and bloodletting film. If you stripped all of the blood letting the story itself would still be an intriguing one. Once the revelations start to occur the movie's pace picks up and has you eager to see what happens next.… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

7

roosevelt323Jan 7, 2016

Quentin is just being Quentin. This movie is a little bit of Django... some pulp fiction.. with some Clint Eastwood /Old western thrown in to mix the pot. With Tarantino.. you know what you get with him. So if youre a fan.. you willQuentin is just being Quentin. This movie is a little bit of Django... some pulp fiction.. with some Clint Eastwood /Old western thrown in to mix the pot. With Tarantino.. you know what you get with him. So if youre a fan.. you will still be a fan after watching this movie. Otherwise... if youre not a fan... you will simply shake your head...… Expand

5 of 17 users found this helpful512

All this user's reviews

10

cheesycowboyJan 7, 2016

I understand all the mixed opinions about this movie, but i personally think this is another great film from Tarantino. It is not a masterpiece like Pulp Fiction, but it is definitely not at his worst. I see people who expected something likeI understand all the mixed opinions about this movie, but i personally think this is another great film from Tarantino. It is not a masterpiece like Pulp Fiction, but it is definitely not at his worst. I see people who expected something like Inglourious Basterds or Django Unchained could be disappointed if they expected something incendiary or lots of action scenes. Unfortunately, this film does not have that much action scenes, and 90% of the film is set in one room when the movie is almost 3 hours. Therefore, it may not appeal to lots of people unlike IG and DU did (not to mention these films had better star power) . But this film still gives moviegoers a great, different cinematic experience that only Tarantino can gives. This is most violent and bleak film from Tarantino so far. Dialogues and music score from Ennio Morricone are fantastic as always. I would recommend this movie if you are a movie fan.… Expand

6 of 18 users found this helpful612

All this user's reviews

6

AffableParadoxJan 7, 2016

Hateful Eight was a good 2hr movie that was stretched into a plodding 3 long Tarantino self-masturbatory film that pandering critics and his blind fans are going to just gush about because of its liberal use of racial slurs and wannabe modernHateful Eight was a good 2hr movie that was stretched into a plodding 3 long Tarantino self-masturbatory film that pandering critics and his blind fans are going to just gush about because of its liberal use of racial slurs and wannabe modern day Woody Allen dialogue...

It almost feels like he had more of a need to out-Tarantino himself instead of making a really good movie. I generally love me some QT movies. This isn't one of them.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

0

Cowboy4ChristJan 6, 2016

One of the worst movies I've ever seen. It was disgusting. I mean, who wants to go see a western just to see a man sucking on another man's you know what! I bet there were a lot of people expecting to see a good western only to get there andOne of the worst movies I've ever seen. It was disgusting. I mean, who wants to go see a western just to see a man sucking on another man's you know what! I bet there were a lot of people expecting to see a good western only to get there and be highly disappointed. I walked out it was so bad.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

9

WanderManJan 6, 2016

I liked it. WAY better than Star Wars 2015. Tartantino's over-the-top violence may be a turn off for some, and it is a bit too long. But it's interesting and enjoyable, with good acting and intelligent dialogue. Which again, is WAY betterI liked it. WAY better than Star Wars 2015. Tartantino's over-the-top violence may be a turn off for some, and it is a bit too long. But it's interesting and enjoyable, with good acting and intelligent dialogue. Which again, is WAY better than the recent crap that passes for movies these days.… Expand

4 of 15 users found this helpful411

All this user's reviews

5

kmdcanadaJan 6, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. CMON!? You start the movie off so well, 3 great interesting characters. Then it's like a "who dunnit" setting with a bunch more interesting characters... and you effin cop out and just make it a stupid snuf gore movie for no reason!!!

What a total waste of a great cast and an awesome start! It's like a big FU to your audience. Making a guy suck another guy off and kill him so his father picks up a gun? Why?… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

BKMJan 6, 2016

I'm not prepared to label Quentin Tarantino a genius, but he is definitely one of the most interesting directors working today. The Hateful Eight is everything you would expect: violent, talky, darkly funny, pretentious and way too long.I'm not prepared to label Quentin Tarantino a genius, but he is definitely one of the most interesting directors working today. The Hateful Eight is everything you would expect: violent, talky, darkly funny, pretentious and way too long. Yet it's hard to shake it after the final credits roll. Just what is the point of all of this? The film is ultimately an enigma, much like it's talented but sometimes directionless creator.… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

6

dirkdeaglerJan 6, 2016

Mixed feelings on this one.

In general, I was a fan of most of the cast before coming to the theatre, and I really liked the performances from Samuel L. Jackson, Kurt Russell, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Walter Goggins, and Bruce Dern. Jackson,Mixed feelings on this one.

In general, I was a fan of most of the cast before coming to the theatre, and I really liked the performances from Samuel L. Jackson, Kurt Russell, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Walter Goggins, and Bruce Dern. Jackson, Russell, and Leigh really seemed to inhabit the characters. The interplay between Jackson and Bruce Dern produced a really memorable scene. Russell and Leigh had good chemistry as a bounty hunter/outlaw handcuffed together.

Michael Madsen really stuck out in a bad way. His faux-cowboy accent was just terribly unconvincing and he came off as trying to be the same character from Reservoir Dogs with a lame outfit and accent. Also not sure what they were trying to do with the "Bob" character-- apparently an attempt to caricaturize representations of Mexicans in Westerns but it was just kinda incomprehensible.

The film's structure was jarring. The opening really took it's time setting the stage and introducing the principal characters, and the initial scenes in Minnie's Haberdashery were fairly slow-paced. I was expecting a slow build through the first half of the film, and then an increasing pace as the volatile dynamics between the characters played out. I actually enjoyed the slow build-up through the first half of the movie, so the transition to Tarantino's voice-over narration to start Chapter 4 felt out-of-place and like an artificial device to speed up the plot development. The narration and the flashback chapter really robbed the "whodunnit" aspect of the film of its earlier promise owing to the slow buildup. I would have liked to see what this film would have been if the events played out a little more naturally, with the audience not having complete information.

Knowing this was a Tarantino film, I expected over-the-top violence walking into the theater. In some cases, the violence helped drive the theme that post-Civil War America really was a pretty nasty place. Tarantino more than made his point though, and at some point the violence almost crossed over into slapstick territory. The film's tone wasn't exactly solemn throughout, but the second half of the film seemed more devoted to humorous moments than to resolving the plot in a comprehensible way. The forced fellatio scene just felt out of place, and took away from an otherwise great scene.

I'm not a big enough Western enthusiast to understand all the homages Tarantino felt he needed to include to do a proper tribute to the genre. I left with the lingering feeling that Tarantino included certain homages or references at the expense of making a tighter film.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

2

yosemiteJan 6, 2016

I rated this film a 3 last night after seeing it. After further consideration, its a 2. A good film should have entertainment value , be thought provoking , contain a good plot and solid acting. This one had a good plot and solid acting butI rated this film a 3 last night after seeing it. After further consideration, its a 2. A good film should have entertainment value , be thought provoking , contain a good plot and solid acting. This one had a good plot and solid acting but not enough of either to offset the basic fact thats its just not entertaining. Like watching an autopsy ! Tarantino's formula for dialogue worked in Pulp Fiction ( do you know what they call a Big Mac in France ; I'm going to get medevil on him ). It also entertained in Reservoir Dogs and Jackie Brown. I have not seen Kill Bill or Basterds. It does not serve as well in this movie. Creative guys like Tarantino develop a cult following and they want to expand on that creativity. They lose track of the reality that movie making is a commercial enterprise. Take away those viewers (and critics ) that rated this movie favorably JUST BECAUSE it was a QT film and you have a whole bunch of movie goers that wish they had their $10 back.… Expand

8 of 17 users found this helpful89

All this user's reviews

8

0_osmile0_oJan 6, 2016

Not only did Tarantino write himself into the annals of history by releasing The Hateful Eight in a glorious 70mm format but also into my own annals since I haven't had so much butt pain in quite a while. After 3 hours of watching this movieNot only did Tarantino write himself into the annals of history by releasing The Hateful Eight in a glorious 70mm format but also into my own annals since I haven't had so much butt pain in quite a while. After 3 hours of watching this movie while resting on my winter coat, toque and gloves I have come to a conclusion that it was **** worth it! In a nostalgia infused, dialogue filled and blood gushing evening I have seen many familiar faces along with new ones that were mostly a very nice addition to the movie. While absurd was smashing through the roof and faces were starting to get covered in blood often not belonging to those people I couldn't stop thinking that Tarantino was shooting this movie in several attempts while being in distinctly different conditions and under influences of several different substances. From gorgeous nature shots that were displaying the Tarantino's obsession with his new filming equipment but rather empty in context to cocaine infused, head exploding, blood vomiting shootouts. When taking a break and buggering off from the table full of white powder we get amazing dialogues with mediocre exposition that sometimes seems forced down our throats like Samuel Jackson's big black thing that was devoted to a whole separate dialogue accompanied by a piano soundtrack. Which brings me to an amazing score that proves once again that Ennio Morricone is an absolute genius who must be very expensive since he only wrote one track that was brutally chopped up into bits to fill the entirety of the movie. Nevertheless the enjoyment that I received from this movie has surpassed anything that I was expecting from it and I can easily award 8 bleeding Samuel Jacksons out of 10 and recommend it to any Tarantino fan and anyone else.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

8

moviemitch96Jan 6, 2016

I do have to say that this is one of Tarantino's weakest films to date, but it's really not saying much, because this was still an overall worthwhile and bloody fun film to watch. On the plus side, you've got many great performances fromI do have to say that this is one of Tarantino's weakest films to date, but it's really not saying much, because this was still an overall worthwhile and bloody fun film to watch. On the plus side, you've got many great performances from several Tarantino regulars, such as Samuel L. Jackson, Kurt Russell, Tim Roth, Michael Madsen, Bruce Dern, etc, along with the usual over-the-top violence and fun that can be expected from every Tarantino film. It also has a noteworthy score composed by Ennio Morricone. However, on the negative side, the film is a little too dialogue-heavy compared to Tarantino's previous works, the script felt a bit weak and suffers this time around (possibly due to the changes Tarantino had to make to it after the script infamously leaked early a couple years ago), and the plot feels somewhat uneven and (to quote from the film) moves slow like molasses many times. Overall, it should be enough to satisfy fans of Tarantino for the most part, but I wouldn't set my expectations on this one too high, as it certainly doesn't reach the level of some his great and more recent films, such as Inglorious Basterds and Django Unchained.… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

5

jayman69Jan 5, 2016

Big fan. But agree here with the non-sayers. Loved the opening Title sequence, Ennio's music, the camera shots....alI 60's western material, and the first 4 chapters I could sit through enjoying (even though he does go overboard with someBig fan. But agree here with the non-sayers. Loved the opening Title sequence, Ennio's music, the camera shots....alI 60's western material, and the first 4 chapters I could sit through enjoying (even though he does go overboard with some dialogue-doesn't Tarantino know westerns are best known for less dialogue?) Anyway....chapter 5 totally unnecessary...ruins the momentum and flashback not needed in his style in this instance. Should've just went for the good ole guts ending. EDIT. Trim da fat.
Like I mentioned...I was bored after chapter 4. Would've been about an 8 if he sealed the deal earlier...… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

0

CarribeanDeanJan 5, 2016

I had to go back and change my review. There is a scene in which Samuel Jackson tells a story about forcing a guy to give him a blowjob in detail for like 5 minutes. I have felt sick and unable to sleep because of the scene, a first for meI had to go back and change my review. There is a scene in which Samuel Jackson tells a story about forcing a guy to give him a blowjob in detail for like 5 minutes. I have felt sick and unable to sleep because of the scene, a first for me for a movie. In retrospect I think Tarantino really wants to perform oral sex on Samuel Jackson and I wish he had not fantasized about it through a movie. it is like the Deliverance hillbilly rape, just very disturbing and the disgusting scene , in retrospect it was too graphic and disturbing. AVOID !!!… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

9

Kevdog33Jan 5, 2016

In the pantheon of Tarantino films this fits right in, right near the top. Violence and savagry as a form of comic expression is best left to the auteurs. While certainly not for the squeamish one must revel in the hate whether expressed inIn the pantheon of Tarantino films this fits right in, right near the top. Violence and savagry as a form of comic expression is best left to the auteurs. While certainly not for the squeamish one must revel in the hate whether expressed in the spoken word or to the tune of a bullet. You can loathe it or love it but you will not find anyone pushing the boundaries like Q.… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

8

RvwFromUpHereJan 5, 2016

Who: Samuel L. Jackson, Magic Mike, and the tranny from Sons of Anarchy as The Sheriff
What: A gimpless, Thurmanless, Royale with Cheeseless yet somehow enjoyable Tarantino movie
Where: That wonderful Tarantino universe known forWho: Samuel L. Jackson, Magic Mike, and the tranny from Sons of Anarchy as The Sheriff
What: A gimpless, Thurmanless, Royale with Cheeseless yet somehow enjoyable Tarantino movie
Where: That wonderful Tarantino universe known for over-the-top violence, twisted sexual fantasies, and John Travolta dying on the toilet
When (can I watch again): Whenever you have that lust for blood that can't be satiated by non-Tarantino films
Why: If you liked the vengeance in Django, the simplicity of Reservoir Dogs, and hated the subtitle reading in Inglorious Bastards, this movie is for you… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

8

moonman1994Jan 5, 2016

The Hateful Eight is a Western unlike any other Westerns. It's heavy reliance on dialogue and small number settings turn the film into more of a "who's done it" mystery movie as opposed to a western. The entire cast is great but the movie isThe Hateful Eight is a Western unlike any other Westerns. It's heavy reliance on dialogue and small number settings turn the film into more of a "who's done it" mystery movie as opposed to a western. The entire cast is great but the movie is elevated by the performance of Jennifer Jason Leigh as the evil Daisy Domergue. The movie is filled with surprises and gore that you'd come to expect from a Tarantino movie. The real flaw of the movie is its pacing especially in the first half of the film. The dialogue is entertaining but not entertaining enough to justify the length of the first half. It's not to say that the first half is bad but it certainly is slow. After the halfway point however the film really heats up and you find yourself unable to look away. I'd recommend the movie for sure so long as you're willing to sit through a three hour film! 8/10… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

9

eagleeyevikingJan 5, 2016

The Hateful Eight is a superior Western mystery with the usual Tarantino traits: cracking dialogue, well developed characters, over-the-top violence, a long running time, and an abundance of quality filmmaking.

10 of 23 users found this helpful1013

All this user's reviews

0

rrrosJan 4, 2016

Well, I have to say this movie is beyond bad! Except for performance of Jennifer Jason Leigh. It is so hard for me to believe that the same man made this total waste of time and a is also responsible for Inglorious Bastards-unbelievable!

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

7

SpangleJan 3, 2016

Quentin Tarantino's blood-soaked eight film, The Hateful Eight, is truly everything one can expect from a Tarantino film. Gratuitously violent and intensely over the top at times, The Hateful Eight is incredibly Tarantino-esque throughout, soQuentin Tarantino's blood-soaked eight film, The Hateful Eight, is truly everything one can expect from a Tarantino film. Gratuitously violent and intensely over the top at times, The Hateful Eight is incredibly Tarantino-esque throughout, so much so, it even includes references to his own films. Incredibly masturbatory at times, The Hateful Eight is still a very good film that is beautifully shot, features a great score Ennio Morricone, and great performances from Walton Goggins, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Demian Bichir, and Tim Roth. As a whole, the entire cast is great, but those were just the performances that stuck out to me. The film is just as violent as one would expect from a Tarantino film, but as always, it is incredibly stylish and so over the top, it does not feel as bloody as it is, though this film will definitely leave you sitting in awe a few times from the suddenness of the violence. Overall, not my favorite Tarantino film, but I do like it more than the Kill Bill's and Django Unchained.… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

7

vgmkyleJan 3, 2016

Sadly, the plot is actually fairly predictable for the kind of "Clue" type movie it tries to be. The characters are well acted, but they feel experimental if anything -- and they lack any real ambition but money. We see more of the racismSadly, the plot is actually fairly predictable for the kind of "Clue" type movie it tries to be. The characters are well acted, but they feel experimental if anything -- and they lack any real ambition but money. We see more of the racism theme; which has been a very common theme in Tarantino movies as of late. It's not bad, but it's nothing we haven't seen before. Still a mediocre Tarantino film is better than most films released today. It's beautifully shot, and there are enough entertaining actors to make it good enough to get to the end.… Expand

7 of 20 users found this helpful713

All this user's reviews

9

CountryPetInnJan 3, 2016

Granted, I'll say I am a Tarantino fan and this latest release did not disappoint me. I actually enjoyed this latest release better than Django. Would make a great stage play!

3 of 16 users found this helpful313

All this user's reviews

3

Brent_MarchantJan 3, 2016

More conclusive proof that Quentin Tarantino is the most overrated, overhyped director in Hollywood. This latest offering is little more than an overlong, pointless, gratuitous blood bath that celebrates violence against women and hatredMore conclusive proof that Quentin Tarantino is the most overrated, overhyped director in Hollywood. This latest offering is little more than an overlong, pointless, gratuitous blood bath that celebrates violence against women and hatred toward minorities without any of the macabre, campy humor that characterized previous offerings like "Django Unchained" and "Inglorious Basterds." I found myself frequently checking my watch while screening this, anxious for it to be over and done with. And, except for a few fine performances by the likes of Jennifer Jason Leigh and Kurt Russell, there's really nothing else worth watching here.… Expand

12 of 25 users found this helpful1213

All this user's reviews

0

adrenilinmattJan 3, 2016

Disappointed. So very, very, disappointed. For QT to make a boring film is astonishing. The definition of disappointment should be just that. "Disappointment; when Quentin Tarantino, one of the world's most treasured talents creates a boringDisappointed. So very, very, disappointed. For QT to make a boring film is astonishing. The definition of disappointment should be just that. "Disappointment; when Quentin Tarantino, one of the world's most treasured talents creates a boring movie". I wish I hadn't hyped it up so much, the pointless 70mm, when the movie is 90 percent wooden cabin. Pointless. Uninspired dialogue, void of intelligence, filled with repeated use of racial slurs. I understand it's representing a different time, but it's pointless. It'd be less pointless if the rest of the dialogue was actually interesting. Channing tatum cannot act. His use here escapes me and leaves me perplexed. Ugh. I'm just upset.… Expand

10 of 23 users found this helpful1013

All this user's reviews

9

3nhan98Jan 3, 2016

Vốn là 1 fan của Quentin,từ Plup Fiction đến Kill Bill,Inglourious Badterds và Django Unchained.
The Hateful Eight,tôi cho rằng bộ phim là một sự kết hợp hài hòa của tất cả những phim trên và nếu để ý bạn có thể thấy Quentin đã cho vào TheVốn là 1 fan của Quentin,từ Plup Fiction đến Kill Bill,Inglourious Badterds và Django Unchained.
The Hateful Eight,tôi cho rằng bộ phim là một sự kết hợp hài hòa của tất cả những phim trên và nếu để ý bạn có thể thấy Quentin đã cho vào The Hateful Eight những cảnh rất quen thuộc trong các phim trước của ông như một phần thưởng dành riêng cho mình
Tôi không hiểu tại sao mọi người lại ghét nó ? bạo lực chăng ? hay là quá dài dòng ? hay một cái kết quá là "bật ngữa" ? tất cả là thương hiệu của Quentin và The Hateful Eight không làm tôi thất vọng… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

10

TruthInCritiqueJan 3, 2016

It was an incredibly suspense full movie, the characters, setting, dialogue, the music, everything was done really really spot on and i had a great, great time watching it. Probably the most fun i have had in a theatre ever, definitelyIt was an incredibly suspense full movie, the characters, setting, dialogue, the music, everything was done really really spot on and i had a great, great time watching it. Probably the most fun i have had in a theatre ever, definitely recommend it to whoever is going to the theatres.… Expand

5 of 18 users found this helpful513

All this user's reviews

1

WindolickerJan 3, 2016

Are you serious? Over 3 hours and 40 dollars spent for RPX tickets and this was what I got? I respect the craft of the film and there are redeeming qualities of the film but they simply aren't enough. Everybody is so up Tarantino's ass thatAre you serious? Over 3 hours and 40 dollars spent for RPX tickets and this was what I got? I respect the craft of the film and there are redeeming qualities of the film but they simply aren't enough. Everybody is so up Tarantino's ass that they can't call the film what it is, a waste of time and money. I love Tarantino movies but compare this to the incredible suspense of Inglorious Basterds and it isn't even a contest. I tried to feel the buildup but it was so horribly drawn out I just stopped caring. By the time things got interesting I was already too angry to enjoy it. There were multiple times where I tapped my girlfriend and said, "It's about to get crazy!" only for it to fizzle out with more dialogue. This film isn't even worth a rent; unless you consider yourself a die hard Tarantino fan. I told my girlfriend that Tarantino movies were a "sure thing" but I was dead wrong. I had to apologize to her because she wanted to see another movie.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

8

ChampionaaronJan 3, 2016

His most technically proficient film is Bastards, it's simply a perfect film from a technical point of view. This however, while not even close as proficient a film, lands more as his most honest emotionally in regards to his style and visionHis most technically proficient film is Bastards, it's simply a perfect film from a technical point of view. This however, while not even close as proficient a film, lands more as his most honest emotionally in regards to his style and vision as a Director.

Its a violent fun throw-back to the serial TV westerns, think of it more as a long TV series playing out in a movie. There is not so much a "story" as it's more a series of events. If you want to turn your brain off and enjoy a great ride, this will deliver. It's a blood bath blast.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

1

wild5448Jan 2, 2016

This is the first movie I've walked out on and left my boyfriend in the theater. It was TERRIBLE. There were things that should never be put into a movie and left me feeling disgusting. I went because the trailer look pretty good andThis is the first movie I've walked out on and left my boyfriend in the theater. It was TERRIBLE. There were things that should never be put into a movie and left me feeling disgusting. I went because the trailer look pretty good and previous Tarantino movies have been fine, but it was a complete disappointment.… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

6

PrimeProjectorsJan 2, 2016

A film that is telling the story of a handful of men, all having a similar attribute, needs to be handled carefully. On the one hand you could have "Seven Samurai" (Akira Kurosawa) that spends its time establishing the situation thoroughly,A film that is telling the story of a handful of men, all having a similar attribute, needs to be handled carefully. On the one hand you could have "Seven Samurai" (Akira Kurosawa) that spends its time establishing the situation thoroughly, then goes to grab each man individually, establishing their ability and personality leading up to their challenge. Or have "Magnificent 7" (John Sturges) , which has a similar premise buy does more to get to the meat of things. Magnificent 7 shows us a situation and then has the characters be shown congruently throughout the situation. One thing to note is "Seven Samurai" is well over 3 hours and "Magnificent 7" is promptly 2 hours. "The Hateful 8" (Quentin Tarantino) is sort playing to both sides and is 2 hours and 47 minutes and I really did feel the extra time wasn't necessary but at the same time it didn't feel that long. While I understand there is an urgency to discover the mystery involved in the film I also star to lose sympathy for the characters. The way we start to learn of our 8 is through, what else dialogue and interactions. But then in the second act (or 4th chapter) something is revealed, I won't spoil but it makes the characters lose personality and let's their title speak for them, not their personality. Even with that the characters weren't exactly as whimsically bastardly as Leonardo DiCaprio performance (Django Unchained) or Christoph Waltz (Inglroious Basterds). As a side note Tim Roth is basically doing Christoph Waltz in this film. Though all the performances are fine, except Samuel L. Jackson, he was great. He really does still have that intimidating glare and powerful voice that he had in Pulp Fiction. Quentin Tarantino uses him very well in his directing, but the others are not quite as illustrious, but I enjoyed Tim Roth and Walton Goggins the most. A lot of the sudden gun shots that are used by Quentin Tarantino a lot are done to great effect here. But the issues I take most with is with the writing. It's not bad it just feels slightly off toward the end. The murder mystery plot seems slightly sudden especially when the dialogue and direction show that it seems to carry great weight, but it didn't quite feel that way. And as I said the characters personalities get lost toward the end and they let their titles speak for themselves. I feel one more rewrite would have made the situations and characters slightly stronger, otherwise it felt spread a bit too thinly. However, there is still enjoyment from Quentin Tarantino's Hateful 8.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

8

vinniecatalano3Jan 2, 2016

This movie was kinda like the game clue. Someone is killing people in the middle of a winter storm in a inn (tavern). If you are a fan of 70's/80's movies, old western movies this is right up your alley. You start off not caring about anThis movie was kinda like the game clue. Someone is killing people in the middle of a winter storm in a inn (tavern). If you are a fan of 70's/80's movies, old western movies this is right up your alley. You start off not caring about an individual or even disliking them. However as it goes along you start to root for people and really try to solve the crime. Samuel Jackson is soooooo good in this he plays a bounty hunter who's horse dies in the middle of the storm and hitches a ride with a fellow bounty hunter and his wanted person. It's 3 hours long but does not feel like it. Good movie but not tarintinos best… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

0

Candilady1Jan 2, 2016

Absolutely HORRIBLE! If there was a way to get my money back I would have. Way to long, lots of gore and no valuable story line. It was so bad I couldn't even give it a ZERO!! Don't waste your money.

9 of 20 users found this helpful911

All this user's reviews

6

kman5473Jan 2, 2016

It's Reservoir Dogs in post-Civil War Wyoming. Quentin Tarantino manages to repackage himself without anything new. It is completely disappointing. Even with the promise of 70mm, 2/3s of the story takes place in the same room! Except for theIt's Reservoir Dogs in post-Civil War Wyoming. Quentin Tarantino manages to repackage himself without anything new. It is completely disappointing. Even with the promise of 70mm, 2/3s of the story takes place in the same room! Except for the exteriors, it is such a waste of attempting to use this feature as the one to bring back 70mm in a big way. I expected so much more from this, and it fell very short. Most, but not all, of the dialogue is solid as to be expected, but the plot is SO predictable that even the "big twist" fell flat. In addition to this, the editing was off in certain places. Cuts in the opening credits felt that they came too late, while one shot of Leigh after her nose is broken by Russell seems to hold for too long just so the next cut comes on the beat from when the music picks up. Maybe pick a different song? Maybe fade in the music from later in it? This is far from a work of art and more just the result of Tarantino being impulsive yet determined about making a Western without doing anything new. Solid performances by the cast do somewhat make up for all of this, and it is undeniable that the film is entertaining and beautiful to watch, it's just absolutely overhyped.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

smoothoperatorJan 2, 2016

Most people who don't like this movie have grown up in a time of over-produced, lifeless films who lack anything close to entertainment and they are missing the point of what Tarantino is doing here. He is trying to revive a long lost art ofMost people who don't like this movie have grown up in a time of over-produced, lifeless films who lack anything close to entertainment and they are missing the point of what Tarantino is doing here. He is trying to revive a long lost art of film, Westerns.

Everything in this movie is extremely well done. The cinematography is second to none, set and costume design are fantastic, the characters are excellent and well-developed which gave me zero problems enjoying this film for three hours as I appreciate films created with intent over profit. Westerns move slowly and today's society cant handle that, they need constant explosions and action to satisfy their endless ADD.

People who flame the movie for being racist are just asinine, the point of the movie is to make you BELIEVE that it took place in the time and place of which the story is told and I cannot believe people have such a hard time understanding this is actually how it was, much worse actually, and it takes place right after the civil war...some of you people are just ridiculous, stick to your transformers and hangover movies and don't even waste your time seeing a movie that is a work of art.

It is a sad reality that QT is essentially the only director not afraid to stick to what film should be, it should evoke emotion and keep a viewer engaged through dialogue and story and the Hateful Eight does just that. It is amazing he could write a movie that could keep interest for over 3 hours when it occurs in essentially one location. He once again proved he is an expert at picking cast members and writing dialogue; Samuel L Jackson is truly phenomenal in this movie and Goggins is absolutely spectacular.

This movie will be loved by those who understand its intent and lost to those who know little about what a movie, especially a western, is supposed to be. If you saw this movie and think poorly of it, I recommend you go watch a handful of the great westerns and re-asses your opinion.… Expand

8 of 23 users found this helpful815

All this user's reviews

9

beingryanjudeJan 2, 2016

Quentin Tarantino’s THE HATEFUL EIGHT is not only awe-inspiring, it is a cinematic experience. For those lucky enough to see the 70mm roadshow release of the film, we see true appreciation for the art and execution of film. The story, theQuentin Tarantino’s THE HATEFUL EIGHT is not only awe-inspiring, it is a cinematic experience. For those lucky enough to see the 70mm roadshow release of the film, we see true appreciation for the art and execution of film. The story, the music and all of those involved are merely the cherry-on-top. Bravo!… Expand

7 of 23 users found this helpful716

All this user's reviews

0

honestmabJan 2, 2016

This movie is a piece of junk and not worth wasting your 3 hours of life on. It is gross. It is boring. It is an insult to human behavior. Tarantino has a sick mind and doesn't know how to create a decent movie
If you take a date to thisThis movie is a piece of junk and not worth wasting your 3 hours of life on. It is gross. It is boring. It is an insult to human behavior. Tarantino has a sick mind and doesn't know how to create a decent movie
If you take a date to this movie, don;t expect to have a second date.… Expand

10 of 21 users found this helpful1011

All this user's reviews

7

tranemonkJan 2, 2016

Despite the typical Tarantino violence, it's a very engaging film with an interesting backstory. Recommended if you can tolerate the violence, and the language. Samuel Jackson is excellent.

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

6

TheKavehJJan 2, 2016

The Hateful 8 is basically a 3 hour whodunnit mystery, and sure it works at some parts, but the other parts have you wondering when exactly the film is ending. Once again, Tarantino delivers, but this time, he delivers the wrong package.

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

4

TLHGJan 2, 2016

So, generally, I think this movie is worth watching and is worth the ticket. The movie starts off with the right foot. Tarantino really seems to have grown as a director with this movie, as the movie promises a mature work along the firstSo, generally, I think this movie is worth watching and is worth the ticket. The movie starts off with the right foot. Tarantino really seems to have grown as a director with this movie, as the movie promises a mature work along the first hour and a bit further. No other Tarantino movie delivers the atmosphere he was able to build right from the first scene. The first set of characters was marvelously played and their interaction during the first three quarters of the movie (but mostly during the first half) was really well crafted (the highlight being the dynamics between Kurt Russel and Jennifer J. L.). Moreover, for most part of the film, Tarantino seems to be over all that little audiovisual tricks that were part of his "unique style" in his early years but have become annoying Tarantino clichés lately. As the dialogues run and new characters are introduced, the plot becomes very intriguing and mysterious. At a point, the story reaches a very interesting puzzling edge that makes you, as the audience, start playing a detective in your own head, developing hypotheses of solutions. At this point, the movie is doing great (except for one forgivable unnecessary and childish attempt to make the watcher feel uncomfortable - as long as this one attempt remained as an isolated manifestation of Tarantino's need for thinking he is shocking the audience, it would be harmless to the quality of the movie) and there isn't much time left to screw ups, so you really think that this can be one of the great movies of the year. So Tarantino has every one in the crowd right where you would want them: everybody is eager to learn the answer to the puzzle, everybody is dying curious to see which bizarre hateful character will march triumphant from the mess they put themselves into, and what does Tarantino do? He simply does the laziest job in concluding the story. The answer to the puzzle is completely silly and backed with inconsistencies in the plot. The outcome of the messy situation is the least interesting anyone could come up with. Tarantino simply kills all the fun with the last 30 minutes of the movie.
So why did I say the movie is worth watching? Well, up to the least minutes, the movie is great and could be Tarantino's finest job. Up to then, the movie is really good and worth the money. And why did I say Tarantino seems to have grown as a director with this one? Because he really does! When it comes to directing, he couldn't do much better. The directing is very mature and is one of the reasons the movie builds up so well. The problem here is Tarantino as a writer. After this one, he really should retire from that position or call someone to help him with the ending of the story.… Expand

1 of 13 users found this helpful112

All this user's reviews

0

iuliiaJan 2, 2016

The most racist and violent movie. It looks like Tarantino just wanted to send a political message of nowadays and he layered it in this "western". Disappointing.

7 of 22 users found this helpful715

All this user's reviews

9

NomusJan 2, 2016

Modern american society is afraid to look at it's past. That's why they don't want to like this movie because it contains too much n-word and women abuse. For those who is not afraid i would say it's a great Tarantino movie on par withModern american society is afraid to look at it's past. That's why they don't want to like this movie because it contains too much n-word and women abuse. For those who is not afraid i would say it's a great Tarantino movie on par with Reservoir dogs. Only this man is able to make 3 hours of talking interesting.… Expand

8 of 21 users found this helpful813

All this user's reviews

9

arjunhairJan 1, 2016

Tarantino returns to tendencies earlier in his career by slowing down the action and putting more emphasis on character dynamic and tension. The build up is gradual, and at times grating (after all the movie is 3 hours long), but the payoffTarantino returns to tendencies earlier in his career by slowing down the action and putting more emphasis on character dynamic and tension. The build up is gradual, and at times grating (after all the movie is 3 hours long), but the payoff is certainly worth it.

Tarantino has always had a knack for writing gripping dialogue, but that dialogue is nothing without the amount of talent that was evident from the actors, each of whom played their roles exceptionally.… Expand

7 of 21 users found this helpful714

All this user's reviews

10

hazlnutJan 1, 2016

In a world, where films are boring and predictable reboots, remakes, super hero CGI crap-ola, one filmmaker continues to turn out original, engaging, American masterpieces. Bob Richardson's brilliant cinematography didn't hurt neither (andIn a world, where films are boring and predictable reboots, remakes, super hero CGI crap-ola, one filmmaker continues to turn out original, engaging, American masterpieces. Bob Richardson's brilliant cinematography didn't hurt neither (and I'm not talking about the landscapes, which are few, I'm talking about making a film taking place in one big room look better than Star Wars--that's genius). Tarantino has got the suspense of Hitchcock and the bloody, gutsy take-no-prisoners attitude of Peckinpah. THIS is the film that film lovers have been waiting all year to see.… Expand

8 of 21 users found this helpful813

All this user's reviews

1

kirsten123Jan 1, 2016

Tarantino's latest is as cold and barren as the landscapes in the movie but certainly not as beautiful. It's an ugly, soulless movie, and I would have walked out halfway through except I had a morbid desire to see how bad things could get.Tarantino's latest is as cold and barren as the landscapes in the movie but certainly not as beautiful. It's an ugly, soulless movie, and I would have walked out halfway through except I had a morbid desire to see how bad things could get.

In that respect I wasn't disappointed.… Expand

17 of 35 users found this helpful1718

All this user's reviews

7

Myttion123Jan 1, 2016

Tarantino is a masterful world builder, but in this film it really was too much, the film took too long to get going, once it did it was amazing, but the start really took away from the film

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

9

BenTheBrownieJan 1, 2016

Quentin Tarantino is one of my favorite writer/directors of all time so I was jumping on the hype train for this movie... And they hype paid off. For everyone who is looking forward to this movie and are afraid that it might be bad. Don'tQuentin Tarantino is one of my favorite writer/directors of all time so I was jumping on the hype train for this movie... And they hype paid off. For everyone who is looking forward to this movie and are afraid that it might be bad. Don't worry because it is awesome although very different from Tarantino's usual style of film. The Directing and Acting is amazing but the screenplay is something to behold. In my opinion, this is probably my second favorite screenplay from Quentin Tarantino. Involving twists, turns and great dialogue that you would only expect from the masters of film. The movie didn't really follow any specific or any formula for that matter. I haven't seen any film like this in my entire life. Throughout the entire run time of the film (which is two hours and forty-eight minutes btw) there is a certain tension in the air the entire especially in the second half of the film and it doesn't let go. The film grabs your attention and refuses to let go. The film isn't necessarily fast paced but the constant peril of every single character is quite a thrill. Only one con, Channing Tatum felt incredibly miscast. I respect Tarantino and everything he has created except for this. I couldn't stand seeing him on screen. He gave a decent performance but just felt so out of place. In the end, The Hateful Eight is one of my favorite films of the year and will definitely be one I will check out when it comes out New Years Day. I'm giving this one a 9.5/10.… Expand

6 of 19 users found this helpful613

All this user's reviews

7

misadventurerJan 1, 2016

The most Quentin Tarantino film ever with all the salty language, florid prose, and buckets of blood as you'd come to expect from such a die hard cinéaste. While not his masterpiece, it is a masterwork of a cast, both returning favoritesThe most Quentin Tarantino film ever with all the salty language, florid prose, and buckets of blood as you'd come to expect from such a die hard cinéaste. While not his masterpiece, it is a masterwork of a cast, both returning favorites (Samuel L Jackson & Tim Roth) and some welcome newcomers like Kurt Russell and Walton Goggins, Tarantino spins a post-civil war tale of deception and justice. Kurt Russell plays John 'The Hangman' Ruth, a bounty hunter who specializes in bringing his quarry to the authorities alive, when most others prefer the Dead option when a warrant specifies Dead or Alive. John Ruth is escorting a bountyhead worth $10,000 in the form of Jennifer Jason Leigh's Daisy Domergue, a member of the dastardly Domergue gang, racing towards Red Rock, Wyoming before a blizzard, they manage picking up Samuel L Jackson's Major Marquis Warren, another bounty hunter, and Walton Goggins's Chris Mannix, the new sheriff of Red Rock. The carriage has to stop at trading post to bed down during the blizzard, where they find more company. Tensions run high, in the suddenly full house, when the proprietress is absent, who can John Ruth trust? He's met Major Warren before though he begins acting mighty suspicious, and he knows of Chris Mannix's father's reputation as a Rebel Renegade during the Civil War, though he has no proof to his claim of being the new sheriff, can anyone in Minnie's Haberdashery be who they claim?

Tarantino captures the tone of John Carpenter's "The Thing" of isolation and paranoia while earning a place in spaghetti western heaven, having Ennio Morricone score, though goes overboard filming on 70mm (super-duper wide screen) when 90% of the film takes place in one room, though it will never be said Tarantino isn't ambitious. Hateful Eight is a bygone dirty auteur film in the age of politically correct digital cinema, and no one else could have made this movie.

Film Grade: B… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

10

NousernamesDec 31, 2015

Perfect. All those people are saying Boring can go watch Transformers, it's more their level. If you like Pulp Fiction or Reservoir Dogs, you will love this movie.

5 of 18 users found this helpful513

All this user's reviews

7

ahnehnoisDec 31, 2015

This is a really beautiful film. This is one of the ones where the visual experience of seeing it projected as part of its limited run is worthwhile. It's quite long, but the intermission in the middle is welcome. My theater started theThis is a really beautiful film. This is one of the ones where the visual experience of seeing it projected as part of its limited run is worthwhile. It's quite long, but the intermission in the middle is welcome. My theater started the showing right on time (no trailers), causing me to miss the first minute or two of the opening, a shame given the striking musical score. Fair warning.

Besides that, it's much what you'd expect. The Eight are indeed gonna hate, and none of the movie's characters could be classified as a good guy. The language and violence are extreme. The dialogue frequently meanders back and forth across the line between quotable and corny. On both sides of that line, the actors are clearly having a good time, and anything with Walton Goggins in it (among others) is watchworthy.

At the end, I kind of wondered what the point of it was, all the violence and hate. And maybe that's the point itself, that behaving this way is pointless. If you're looking for any grander theme than that, you won't find it. If you're looking for a stylish Western that'll keep you engrossed for three hours, you'll go home happy.… Expand

7 of 19 users found this helpful712

All this user's reviews

4

bradchengDec 31, 2015

I just got back from seeing "The Hateful Eight" and my head is
spinning because it's such a weird movie I'm not sure if it's somewhat good or exceedingly awful. What's sad is that it starts off wonderfully -- I felt myself
getting excitedI just got back from seeing "The Hateful Eight" and my head is
spinning because it's such a weird movie I'm not sure if it's somewhat good or exceedingly awful. What's sad is that it starts off wonderfully -- I felt myself
getting excited by the prospect of Tarantino returning to form for
about a half hour -- then keeps getting sillier and sillier until it's
nothing but a comedy -- and the comedy is so unsubtle, it might have
been made by Mel Brooks or Jerry Lewis on acid.

What's funny is the much touted, rich color of the Panavision stock and
the fake cabin interior of "Minnies Haberdashery (not a hat in sight)"
makes the film look like the over-saturated movies from the sixties
like "Paint Your Wagon" which always looked vaguely fake to me -- a
plastic universe cobbled together on a back lot and lit with huge
overhead arc lights. Add big splashes of red blood and it started to
look like the garish color of some the 60s Disney films, so there was
this bizarre set of associations going through my head.

When the finale of the film turns to grand guignol slapstick in these
hyper-pumped colors, I felt like I was having a flashback to a bad 60s
Dick van Dyke comedy like "Fitzwilly" or "Cold Turkey," and, honestly,
I left the theater stunned by the near absurdity of it all. It's as if
someone unearthed an awful 60s comedy (Sergio Leone? Hah? That's a
laugh) that was buried in the vaults by the studios.

This "love letter to the cinema" is really a love letter to himself, as
Tarantino riffs off elements of his own movies like "Reservoir Dogs"
and throws in some steals from Paul Thomas Anderson (it almost sounds
like Anderson doing the narration. Narration? Where the $%^& did that
come from? Wow, talk about the weakest attempt I've ever seen to clue
an audience when some sloppy structuring fails the film.)

The dialogue is Tarantino-lite, like a second-rate writer trying to
imitate him (Samuel Jackson's goading of Bruce Dern is probably the
worst monologue Tarantino has written) and the story is Agatha Christie
with a lobotomy. There are some good performances (Kurt Russell is
great as John Wayne) and some awful ones (Tim Roth at his over-the-top
worst) but the film itself unravels like a spoonful of spaghetti
Western. And this isn't a spaghetti Western, it's a pizza and beer
comedy. I'm sure it will be a big hit at frat houses across America.

I'm amazed how some people (known critics, as well) even venture to
justify the racial undercurrent as social commentary. Tarantino has
never written symbolically or allegorically. He writes character, and
that's that. "The Hateful Eight" is a "political statement" in the same
way that "I Spit on Your Grave" is an indictment of contemporary
religion. Please.

How do I sum this movie up in one word? Well, the one that comes to the
top of my head right now is: "Goofy." Maybe those big Panavision camera
got to Tarantino because he subconsciously started to think he was
making a bloody version of "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World."
I need to have a drink. At this rate, I have to say "thank god there's only two more to go."… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

5

shoulderoforionDec 31, 2015

For a Quentin Tarantino movie this was plodding and tiresome, was more of a play turned movie, and not a great one at that, better luck next time, I hope

3 of 14 users found this helpful311

All this user's reviews

10

TheAdamDaileyDec 31, 2015

This is probably my favorite film of the year. Reminds me so much of a western mixed with horror. The Thing comes to mind. It probably helps it has one of the same leads and composer from The Thing. There is the sense of dread, andThis is probably my favorite film of the year. Reminds me so much of a western mixed with horror. The Thing comes to mind. It probably helps it has one of the same leads and composer from The Thing. There is the sense of dread, and violence that looms over the characters that gets released in the final acts. There are so many great performances, especially Jennifer Jason Leigh, and a superb monologue by Samuel L Jackson. If you aren't a fan of Tarantino, this probably won't win you over, but all true fans are in for a treat.… Expand

7 of 22 users found this helpful715

All this user's reviews

3

swimjayDec 31, 2015

Pure trash. Yes, it celebrates its trashiness, revels in the purity of its trashiness, makes knowing reference to other trashiness, but it's still trash, and toxic. In the next QT movie, I hope everyone just shoots each other in the firstPure trash. Yes, it celebrates its trashiness, revels in the purity of its trashiness, makes knowing reference to other trashiness, but it's still trash, and toxic. In the next QT movie, I hope everyone just shoots each other in the first five minutes and gets it over with, followed by 90 minutes of high-def nature photography.… Expand

20 of 47 users found this helpful2027

All this user's reviews

9

mace8704Dec 31, 2015

Addressing the "misogyny" of The Hateful Eight: Prior to viewing the film, everyone should be well aware that Tarantino has created yet another film that the politically correct, social justice advocate may find in poor taste. The filmAddressing the "misogyny" of The Hateful Eight: Prior to viewing the film, everyone should be well aware that Tarantino has created yet another film that the politically correct, social justice advocate may find in poor taste. The film contains gratuitous violence, excessive racial slurs, battery of women, discrimination against Mexicans, and worst of all for the social justice advocate, Tarantino did not include a strong female protagonist like in Kill Bill. In fact after creating one of the most powerful female characters in cinema (Beatrix Kiddo), the female lead in the Hateful Eight, Daisy Domergue, is a disgusting, manipulative, racist who spends the majority of the film in cuffs. How dare Tarantino! Did he not get the Hunger Games and Star Wars memo that benevolent female protagonist that are good at everything are in?! Daisy advocates for the genocide of an entire town. Daisy tries to seduce a black man to free her even though she's a racist. Daisy takes advantage of benevolent sexism. After all, should the fairer sex ever be executed by the hangman? To our social justice friends, the physical abuse Daisy receives primarily by the bounty hunter is evidence of Tarantino's hatred of women. What they fail to realize is that Tarantino is highlighting the ugly, morally reprehensible, and HATEFUL behavior of those living in post civil war America. Does every film need a Katniss or a Rey? Does the creator of Beatrix Kiddo/Kill Bill hate women?… Expand

8 of 23 users found this helpful815

All this user's reviews

0

CaliColoradoDec 31, 2015

This movie was advertised as something to look forward to (finally a quality western). From the onset however the hateful eight was despicable. This movie was a waste of effort, money, time, resources and whatever else was involved in makingThis movie was advertised as something to look forward to (finally a quality western). From the onset however the hateful eight was despicable. This movie was a waste of effort, money, time, resources and whatever else was involved in making it. All of Hollywood should be ashamed of this production. People want substance and creativity not emptiness and trash. It's so unfortunate that anyone would look up to this director... or that anyone would waste their talents on this type of production. The racism, sexism, anger, stupidity and filth expressed is inexcusable. Anyone who lasted through this 167 minutes of sickness and ignorance ...became less for doing so. This movie and other movies residing in the category of "should have never been made" ...make today's Hollywood very small and unworthy of the glory that Hollywood past once knew.… Expand

14 of 26 users found this helpful1412

All this user's reviews

6

JimmyJackDec 31, 2015

I'd give the first half (or at least the first hour) a 2, and I'd give the second half a 7 or an 8. So I settled on a 6 because I really enjoyed the last third of the movie.

The first hour is almost all dialog (and not very well-writtenI'd give the first half (or at least the first hour) a 2, and I'd give the second half a 7 or an 8. So I settled on a 6 because I really enjoyed the last third of the movie.

The first hour is almost all dialog (and not very well-written dialog at that), while very little actually happens. It's basically an hour of setup that needed serious editing. Oddly enough, in the second half of the movie where the action happens, Tarantino himself does a few almost unnecessary voice-overs (that sound very amateurish) explaining some things... If he was going to do that anyway, he could have done it in the first half to give us the character back-stories that took forever and weren't worth the time.

The last 40% of the movie is exciting -- if you enjoy Tarantino-style bloodbaths -- and almost feels worth the wait. Sam Jackson and Walton Goggins (who was awesome on Justified) made it interesting. Michael Madsen (the guy who always comes across like he's trying way too hard to act and sound cool) was a set piece, and a couple of other characters were so-so.

Quentin should have chopped half of the first half, added some kind of extra dimension with something/anything happening somewhere else (maybe in the nearby mountains?), and gotten some objective feedback and re-written some of his annoying dialog. (Hey Q, when you speak personally, you sound a bit mental. You're f-ing annoying when you talk, and your characters shouldn't sound like that! So get a clue. The dialog in the first half of this movie was almost as bad as the dialog in your last movie with Kurt Russell -- which sucked. Kurt was good in this movie, but his character didn't have the chance to be great.)

The ending seems to suggest that Tarantino made the whole movie as a social commentary on racism -- how bad it was in the 1800s, and how far we still have to go. He makes his point by saturating us in racism and hate, which is probably only enjoyable to people who resonate with racism and the excitement of watching brutal violence. So he gives us our thrills, while at the same time telling us we shouldn't enjoy it. I'd say the man himself must be internally conflicted to create the movies he creates. (Yes, of course that's an understatement. We all know Tarantino must be majorly F-ed in the head to make the movies he makes. But that's why we enjoy them :)

Lastly, the whole hullabaloo about 70 mm is pointless when most of the movie takes place in a stagecoach and a cabin.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

FM99Dec 30, 2015

what a Great Movie ..The Screenplay was a Wonderful , So 60s And Robert Richardson Behind The Cameras do a Great job Quentin Tarantino, You are a legend

5 of 17 users found this helpful512

All this user's reviews

8

BrianMcCriticDec 30, 2015

Definitely not my favorite Tarantino film, but there is still plenty to like here. Like all Tarantino films it's about the characters and the dialogue. Even when you get to the more violent scenes in the movie you still get the charactersDefinitely not my favorite Tarantino film, but there is still plenty to like here. Like all Tarantino films it's about the characters and the dialogue. Even when you get to the more violent scenes in the movie you still get the characters motivations because of that great dialogue. You really understand why. Finally I got to say Samuel L. Jackson is the absolute stand out. He's never been better. A-… Expand

7 of 18 users found this helpful711

All this user's reviews

1

lenny68Dec 30, 2015

This is an awful, amateurish {in some respects} movie from a director who doesn't deserve the adoration he so often gets.

The Hateful Eight is a nasty piece of work featuring crude caricatures of characters from much better Westerns. IThis is an awful, amateurish {in some respects} movie from a director who doesn't deserve the adoration he so often gets.

The Hateful Eight is a nasty piece of work featuring crude caricatures of characters from much better Westerns.

I hope this bombs at the box office and forces everyone involved with this rubbish to give pause for thought.… Expand

31 of 67 users found this helpful3136

All this user's reviews

1

principaldgDec 30, 2015

There's zero reason to go see this film. Terrible plot, and the recurring theme that African Americans used to be treated poorly in this country. We get it. So overdone, unoriginal, and just flat not entertaining at all.

10 of 23 users found this helpful1013

All this user's reviews

9

tjman09Dec 30, 2015

Quentin Tarantino, whether you like his films or not, deserves credit as one of the best directors of our age, because his films are so consistently great. Tarantino’s “Hateful 8” should be experienced as he intended, in 70mm film showings,Quentin Tarantino, whether you like his films or not, deserves credit as one of the best directors of our age, because his films are so consistently great. Tarantino’s “Hateful 8” should be experienced as he intended, in 70mm film showings, because average theaters can’t quite do the film justice. The Hateful 8 is blood covered fun, with a story that is surprisingly unpredictable, and features truly beautiful cinematography. A note for anybody not aware, Tarantino’s films are extremely gory and feature strong language, so if you don’t like that kind of subject matter, this film isn’t for you.
Tarantino’s is notorious for his use of gore and language, but he always finds a way to make it fun. The Hateful 8 is no exception as the film is both extremely gory, and often hilarious. One of the biggest reasons the film is so funny is Tarantino’s iconic, and witty dialogue. It is widely discussed that Tarantino is one of the best writers of dialogue and “The Hateful 8” is a great showcase of that.
Before seeing the film, I was curious, because the film was advertised as a story of 8 people trapped in a cottage during a blizzard, while that is a part of the story, it is far larger than that. The best example is that entering the film Channing Tatum was confirmed to be in the film, and it seemed unclear what role he could have, however he has a pretty significant role in the film. In many ways the plot unfolds like a game of clue, and the story is unpredictable in what turns the plot will take next. The unpredictable plot helps save the almost 3 hour running time, which is a little too long.
An example of why the run time is just a little too long, is a lot of the film focuses on the cinematography, which is why the 70mm film showings are truly worth the time to see. Most of the film is set in the gorgeous snow covered mountains of Wyoming, and the use of 70mm film gives the entire film a sleek and classical look. While the film could have been tightened up a little, if there wasn’t such a focus on the cinematography, the film would lose a little of the spectacle that makes it so special.
In the end The Hateful 8 is a spectacle, that should be experienced the way it was intended to, in a 70mm film showing. The film is beautiful, funny, unpredictable, and extremely violent, but it all blends in a very clean way. Tarantino has once again made a great film, and considering his resume, it seems logical to say that he is one of the best modern directors. If you like Tarantino’s previous films, or films similar to Tarantino’s it would be a good idea to check out The Hateful 8.… Expand

8 of 23 users found this helpful815

All this user's reviews

0

hotfromcauldronDec 30, 2015

Tarentino’s eighth and ninth film is a horse poop ( this site won't let me say the word) game of Clue that is clueless. In Tarentino’s words - it’s a game of patience- for anyone sitting through it. If these actors turned it up one moreTarentino’s eighth and ninth film is a horse poop ( this site won't let me say the word) game of Clue that is clueless. In Tarentino’s words - it’s a game of patience- for anyone sitting through it. If these actors turned it up one more notch it could have been an incredible SNL skit. It’s a cliche to put the beginning at the end in 2015. In fact every possible theme or gimmick has been used to much greater effect in his last seven films. And being in 70 mm is a waste - one panoramic shot of a stagecoach gliding in the snow doesn’t hold a candle to Ben-Hur, West Side Story or even Cleopatra which was better than this - if you can believe that! If he deleted the “N” word and all the who’s who and all the repetitious dull banter - he would have been left with a twenty minute bloody good short. In fact if he deleted this awful script he would have saved me three hours of my life.… Expand

9 of 21 users found this helpful912

All this user's reviews

10

snowman1901Dec 30, 2015

I thought it was outstanding , Tarantino just does stuff nobody else can pull off, Samuel Jackson was outstanding as usual and the rest of the characters were equally good. Saw it on 70mm film, really outstanding camera work, can't wait forI thought it was outstanding , Tarantino just does stuff nobody else can pull off, Samuel Jackson was outstanding as usual and the rest of the characters were equally good. Saw it on 70mm film, really outstanding camera work, can't wait for his next film.… Expand

6 of 19 users found this helpful613

All this user's reviews

4

CallidorDec 30, 2015

The cinematography was great, acting was good obviously. But it is just another piece of ego porn from Tarantino. The story was predictable and shallow, it felt very very drawn out and I found myself checking the time to see when it wouldThe cinematography was great, acting was good obviously. But it is just another piece of ego porn from Tarantino. The story was predictable and shallow, it felt very very drawn out and I found myself checking the time to see when it would freakin end.

Its ok for some mild brainless entertainment, but it is no way a well done movie imo. Tarantino has done a lot better in his past and I fear all the ego stroking he has received over the years have gone to his head and now he primarily makes shallow, predictable ego porn for himself and his sycophants to marvel at.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

1

FatFreddyDec 30, 2015

Boring, self-indulgent crap from a smug and arrogant director. I could only sit through the first half, so perhaps it is saved by the second. I will never know, however. Outstanding actors cursed by third rate dialogue and, with someBoring, self-indulgent crap from a smug and arrogant director. I could only sit through the first half, so perhaps it is saved by the second. I will never know, however. Outstanding actors cursed by third rate dialogue and, with some exceptions, by overly stylized (almost bordering on too cute, in some cases) characters to protray. Leaden pace. 70mm wasted after the first few minutes of landscape shots. Offensive material drawn out for no dramatic purpose, but soley to offend, a prime example of which is the speech by Jackson that ends the first half. Jackie Brown - Yes! Pulp Fiction - Yes! Basterds - well, OK. Hateful Eight - No, No, No!… Expand

24 of 53 users found this helpful2429

All this user's reviews

9

OrwDec 30, 2015

This is why Tarantino is one of a kind. Only he can pull off something as monumental as this, and still entertain and captivate from the very first scene. The movie has great characters and performances. The dialog is brilliant and, althoughThis is why Tarantino is one of a kind. Only he can pull off something as monumental as this, and still entertain and captivate from the very first scene. The movie has great characters and performances. The dialog is brilliant and, although it lasts almost 3 hours, i don't remember even thinking about time or wishing it to end before it does. I would watch it again tomorrow. It's as good as "Inglorious Basterds" or "Django Unchained". At least to me. Quentin keeps getting better and better.… Expand

7 of 22 users found this helpful715

All this user's reviews

0

movielover49Dec 30, 2015

One of the most violent, misogynistic, racist and ugly movies ever produced. Tarantino has said he's considering retirement. May he do so before he ever writes and directs another movie. If I could give this piece of trash a rating less thanOne of the most violent, misogynistic, racist and ugly movies ever produced. Tarantino has said he's considering retirement. May he do so before he ever writes and directs another movie. If I could give this piece of trash a rating less than zero, I would.… Expand

10 of 30 users found this helpful1020

All this user's reviews

10

erolsabadoshDec 30, 2015

Tarantino's best since Jackie Brown!! Most films over 90 minutes try my patience but for 3 full hours The Hateful Eight kept me absolutely glued to the screen with amazing performances, beautiful cinematography and sharp dialogue. I thoughtTarantino's best since Jackie Brown!! Most films over 90 minutes try my patience but for 3 full hours The Hateful Eight kept me absolutely glued to the screen with amazing performances, beautiful cinematography and sharp dialogue. I thought this was a much more mature effort than some of QT's recent offerings and I'm thrilled to see him do another film along the lines of Reservoir Dogs that is just a group of people in a room during an extraordinary situation that brings about tension and conflict. The focus is tight and the build-up is slow but methodical. Without a doubt this is Tarantino firing on all cylinders as writer; the dialogue crackles with wit and bite and the story unfolds with an ever deepening sense of unease until the shocking final segment. Sensational filmmaking and, in my opinion, this is leagues better than any of his post-Jackie Brown efforts.… Expand

4 of 18 users found this helpful414

All this user's reviews

0

HellionDec 30, 2015

Pure boredom plain and simple. Good performances throughout but a pretty graphic, pointless, violent tale better suited for a graphic novel rather than a movie.

17 of 35 users found this helpful1718

All this user's reviews

2

lennycliff123Dec 30, 2015

I can't help but think that all the positive reviews have come from die hard Tarantinophiles.! Tarantino has produced a few memorable movies. This is not one of them.

If there is any justice this will be on a short list of worst movies ofI can't help but think that all the positive reviews have come from die hard Tarantinophiles.! Tarantino has produced a few memorable movies. This is not one of them.

If there is any justice this will be on a short list of worst movies of the year.… Expand

32 of 67 users found this helpful3235

All this user's reviews

6

WindrammerDec 29, 2015

The first half of the movie was enjoyable. Not remarkable, but still good. But pretty much exactly halfway through the movie it seems that Tarantino started getting excited, and the movie started getting weird. It lost a lot of substance inThe first half of the movie was enjoyable. Not remarkable, but still good. But pretty much exactly halfway through the movie it seems that Tarantino started getting excited, and the movie started getting weird. It lost a lot of substance in the glee of the mayhem, and it was just tiring. It felt like a story that wasn't fully fleshed out, and a pace that wasn't given thought. The plot is still clever, and in that it almost feels like kind of a waste with the execution.… Expand

7 of 17 users found this helpful710

All this user's reviews

3

Lambo442Dec 29, 2015

Definitely the most cynical Tarantino film yet, with no likeable characters and a focus on violence against over character development of plot. I've never believed the criticism levelled at Tarantino that he glorifies violence until I watchedDefinitely the most cynical Tarantino film yet, with no likeable characters and a focus on violence against over character development of plot. I've never believed the criticism levelled at Tarantino that he glorifies violence until I watched this. Really enjoyed his last two for films as they seemed to be making a statement and we're a lot more focused and purposeful. With Hateful Eight Tarantino seems to be just churning out a film for the sake of it. Imagine a film that removes everything that gives a film soul and leaves you with nothing but a nasty, exploitative mess wherein the actors become more like charicatures of typical Tarantino characters. I think he should either stop making films or have a serious look in the mirror and try to rediscover what makes a film exciting,namely characters you can engage with, relate to or empathise with.… Expand

18 of 45 users found this helpful1827

All this user's reviews

3

jrodfilmsDec 29, 2015

really boring. i like boring movies but there has to be a purpose. the purpose of this movie was sold that it was shot with glorious 70mm ultra panavison film. the most of this glory will be during the opening credits, the rest of the filmreally boring. i like boring movies but there has to be a purpose. the purpose of this movie was sold that it was shot with glorious 70mm ultra panavison film. the most of this glory will be during the opening credits, the rest of the film you are locked in a room hearing the n word over 200 times and seeing jennifer jason leigh be brutalized.… Expand

17 of 37 users found this helpful1720

All this user's reviews

0

MonsterAxeRogueDec 29, 2015

I tried to like this movie, but it was just as boring as hell and full of all kinds of repetitive clichés and drizzly dialogue. I couldn't believe how cringe worthy and lame this movie turned out to be.

18 of 39 users found this helpful1821

All this user's reviews

9

TubaFettDec 28, 2015

A suspenseful murder mystery set in the old west with the usual Tarantino twists. It's got snappy dialogue and engrossing characters. The story is good enough that I really didn't notice the 3 hour runtime, although the intermission wasA suspenseful murder mystery set in the old west with the usual Tarantino twists. It's got snappy dialogue and engrossing characters. The story is good enough that I really didn't notice the 3 hour runtime, although the intermission was welcome to stretch a bit. I saw the 70mm Roadshow and HIGHLY recommend this version if you're near a theatre showing it. The entire frame is crisp with none of the slight blurring around the edges typical of modern film and the panoramic shots are breathtaking. This is just a good old-fashioned movie and is very well made!… Expand

3 of 15 users found this helpful312

All this user's reviews

8

tzakielDec 28, 2015

A solid 8/10. If not the best Tarantino movie ever, still very funny and offensive in all the right ways. Compelling characters. Felt like a labor of love.

2 of 13 users found this helpful211

All this user's reviews

4

StuffHobbesDec 28, 2015

Typical Tarantino.
The first half of the story is intriguing.
A Who-Done-It style film, set in a wild west backdrop quickly turns to pointless garbage as the second half of the film demolishes everything the first half had accomplished.Typical Tarantino.
The first half of the story is intriguing.
A Who-Done-It style film, set in a wild west backdrop quickly turns to pointless garbage as the second half of the film demolishes everything the first half had accomplished.
What a waste.… Expand

9 of 17 users found this helpful98

All this user's reviews

6

CaptiosusDec 28, 2015

I am not a Tarantino fan: I like some of his movies but dislike others. That said, I enjoyed Hateful Eight, which was Tarantino's take on a spaghetti western with limited locations, character development and dialog driven suspense. DespiteI am not a Tarantino fan: I like some of his movies but dislike others. That said, I enjoyed Hateful Eight, which was Tarantino's take on a spaghetti western with limited locations, character development and dialog driven suspense. Despite the styling, the 70mm filming process, and the Ennio Morricone score, Hateful Eight was one of his so-so films.

ALL of the characters are, as the name implies, hateful bastards. There's not a "good" character in the lot. The suspense comes in wondering how they're going to die and if they're all who they say they are. Walton Goggins as Chris Mannix carries the movie, in my opinion, with Jennifer Jason Leigh as Daisy Domergue coming in a distant second. Samuel L. Jackson as Marquis Warren is, well, Samuel L. Jackson (which is to say we know what to expect from him in this kind of role). My biggest character disappointment came from Kurt Russell as John Ruth, a bounty hunter and one of the first characters the audience is introduced to. His performance is decent but the character is utterly forgettable.

Ultimately, the movie runs too long and the end sequence flashback, although necessary to tie up loose ends, really disrupts the flow and suspense. Tarantino as the 'narrator' in some scenes really kinda sucked (sorry, don't have any better way to describe it) and, although I understand the style Tarantino was aiming to copy, the movie really didn't need a 12 minute intermission. Although it has the trademark Tarantino gore, it's more subdued than in his past movies and it doesn't dwell on the gore like, say, Kill Bill or even Django Unchained.

Overall I enjoyed it but it won't be for everyone. I give it a 6 out of 10 but I enjoyed it enough that I'll probably pick it up on blu-ray when it comes out.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

The Hateful Eight

User Reviews