The Hateful Eight
Weinstein Company, The | Release Date: December 25, 2015
7.6
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1702 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,368
Mixed:
182
Negative:
152
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
10
robert21Dec 25, 2015
one more reason to love Tarantino because his new film of his best work. Plot, dialogue and characters are all done at the highest level and with love
53 of 108 users found this helpful5355
All this user's reviews
0
HellionDec 30, 2015
Pure boredom plain and simple. Good performances throughout but a pretty graphic, pointless, violent tale better suited for a graphic novel rather than a movie.
17 of 35 users found this helpful1718
All this user's reviews
1
kirsten123Jan 1, 2016
Tarantino's latest is as cold and barren as the landscapes in the movie but certainly not as beautiful. It's an ugly, soulless movie, and I would have walked out halfway through except I had a morbid desire to see how bad things could get.Tarantino's latest is as cold and barren as the landscapes in the movie but certainly not as beautiful. It's an ugly, soulless movie, and I would have walked out halfway through except I had a morbid desire to see how bad things could get.

In that respect I wasn't disappointed.… Expand
17 of 35 users found this helpful1718
All this user's reviews
2
lennycliff123Dec 30, 2015
I can't help but think that all the positive reviews have come from die hard Tarantinophiles.! Tarantino has produced a few memorable movies. This is not one of them.

If there is any justice this will be on a short list of worst movies ofI can't help but think that all the positive reviews have come from die hard Tarantinophiles.! Tarantino has produced a few memorable movies. This is not one of them.

If there is any justice this will be on a short list of worst movies of the year.… Expand
32 of 67 users found this helpful3235
All this user's reviews
1
lenny68Dec 30, 2015
This is an awful, amateurish {in some respects} movie from a director who doesn't deserve the adoration he so often gets.

The Hateful Eight is a nasty piece of work featuring crude caricatures of characters from much better Westerns. IThis is an awful, amateurish {in some respects} movie from a director who doesn't deserve the adoration he so often gets.

The Hateful Eight is a nasty piece of work featuring crude caricatures of characters from much better Westerns.

I hope this bombs at the box office and forces everyone involved with this rubbish to give pause for thought.… Expand
31 of 67 users found this helpful3136
All this user's reviews
0
MonsterAxeRogueDec 29, 2015
I tried to like this movie, but it was just as boring as hell and full of all kinds of repetitive clichés and drizzly dialogue. I couldn't believe how cringe worthy and lame this movie turned out to be.
18 of 39 users found this helpful1821
All this user's reviews
3
jrodfilmsDec 29, 2015
really boring. i like boring movies but there has to be a purpose. the purpose of this movie was sold that it was shot with glorious 70mm ultra panavison film. the most of this glory will be during the opening credits, the rest of the filmreally boring. i like boring movies but there has to be a purpose. the purpose of this movie was sold that it was shot with glorious 70mm ultra panavison film. the most of this glory will be during the opening credits, the rest of the film you are locked in a room hearing the n word over 200 times and seeing jennifer jason leigh be brutalized.… Expand
17 of 37 users found this helpful1720
All this user's reviews
2
allisonjane65Dec 28, 2015
I'm no Tarantino fan by any means, though I have enjoyed a few of his movies. I do however love a good western and 'whodunit' which is what made me part with my cash to see this.

All I can say is this is the biggest waste of close to threeI'm no Tarantino fan by any means, though I have enjoyed a few of his movies. I do however love a good western and 'whodunit' which is what made me part with my cash to see this.

All I can say is this is the biggest waste of close to three hours of my time that I've suffered in recent memory.… Expand
30 of 66 users found this helpful3036
All this user's reviews
1
FatFreddyDec 30, 2015
Boring, self-indulgent crap from a smug and arrogant director. I could only sit through the first half, so perhaps it is saved by the second. I will never know, however. Outstanding actors cursed by third rate dialogue and, with someBoring, self-indulgent crap from a smug and arrogant director. I could only sit through the first half, so perhaps it is saved by the second. I will never know, however. Outstanding actors cursed by third rate dialogue and, with some exceptions, by overly stylized (almost bordering on too cute, in some cases) characters to protray. Leaden pace. 70mm wasted after the first few minutes of landscape shots. Offensive material drawn out for no dramatic purpose, but soley to offend, a prime example of which is the speech by Jackson that ends the first half. Jackie Brown - Yes! Pulp Fiction - Yes! Basterds - well, OK. Hateful Eight - No, No, No!… Expand
24 of 53 users found this helpful2429
All this user's reviews
1
listenerDec 25, 2015
Quentin Tarantino sure had his moments but this is bottom of the barrel.Bloated,boring,ridiculous,pointless-the most repulsive piece of cinema I saw in a while.Lots of talents wasted for nothing.Do your self a favor and don't waste your timeQuentin Tarantino sure had his moments but this is bottom of the barrel.Bloated,boring,ridiculous,pointless-the most repulsive piece of cinema I saw in a while.Lots of talents wasted for nothing.Do your self a favor and don't waste your time on this one.… Expand
23 of 52 users found this helpful2329
All this user's reviews
3
swimjayDec 31, 2015
Pure trash. Yes, it celebrates its trashiness, revels in the purity of its trashiness, makes knowing reference to other trashiness, but it's still trash, and toxic. In the next QT movie, I hope everyone just shoots each other in the firstPure trash. Yes, it celebrates its trashiness, revels in the purity of its trashiness, makes knowing reference to other trashiness, but it's still trash, and toxic. In the next QT movie, I hope everyone just shoots each other in the first five minutes and gets it over with, followed by 90 minutes of high-def nature photography.… Expand
20 of 47 users found this helpful2027
All this user's reviews
0
mrpaultraceyDec 26, 2015
Awful. Way too many wasted words in the dialog. A very simple story drawn out over several monotonous hours of chitter chatter. I cannot remember seeing another western this bad. Arty up his own arsie, waste of time.

The Man with no nameAwful. Way too many wasted words in the dialog. A very simple story drawn out over several monotonous hours of chitter chatter. I cannot remember seeing another western this bad. Arty up his own arsie, waste of time.

The Man with no name would of shot them all on site and went on to make a good movie.… Expand
19 of 45 users found this helpful1926
All this user's reviews
3
Tone01Dec 25, 2015
Based on the 168 minute version.

There's no denying Quentin Tarantino's twisted genius and perverse vision. His films are unapologetic challenges to share the roller-coaster as long as one accepts Tarantino run the ride. No one seems toBased on the 168 minute version.

There's no denying Quentin Tarantino's twisted genius and perverse vision. His films are unapologetic challenges to share the roller-coaster as long as one accepts Tarantino run the ride. No one seems to mind. It may be time to challenge that precept.

In a "Playboy" interview, Tarantino stated, "I just don't want to be an old-man filmmaker." Pure Tarantino, "The Hateful Eight" is poetic, profane, laconic, really nasty, bloody as all hell, and meditative; the first half - uncharacteristically old man-y, moody and brooding with meaningful dialogue sharp as a razor. There's promise of a re-think as if Tarantino's voice finally broke to adult from adolescent. Then the film derails to the usual Tarantino high jinks.

This filmmaker is a master at creating tension; cinematic foreplay teasing and teasing until big, sweet, orgiastic release in blood and guts. He also deconstructs and spins plot twists and turns into gold. That task is easy in, essentially, a stage play with eight trapped in one room. A Tarantino film with social commentary as text, the subject under the microscope is race hatred. Setting the film post-Civil War allows the saying of things unacceptable in contemporary society. Like "Django Unchained," nary a few minutes pass without a "ni**er." And the room is divided into North and South.

The length works against this film. At 168 minutes it was quite enough. The added twenty-odd minutes in the roadshow version might make the experience interminable. The film runs out of steam as it plays out and plays out with dialogue between the bang-bang – and there is plenty of blood.

Then there's misogyny. "The Hateful Eight" revels in the abuse of Jennifer Jason Lee, even with her portrayal of a scheming, cold-hearted killer. Her multiple beatings and battered face appears as if a domestic violence victim – most unappealing.

The cast does well with the material. There are no standouts, really, but Tim Roth channels Cristoph Waltz who must have been busy.

The cinematography is spectacular. Not necessarily the lighting, but the incredible use of the wide screen frame. The look and feel is evocative of David Lean epics Tarantino emulates even to the use of 'Roadshow', a practice that passed out of favor fifty years ago. Films are no longer shot this way. In this regard it was a pleasure to watch.

If Tarantino wished to create the emotion of hate in the audience, he succeeded. The hate spills over the footlights, but there is a fine line between using verbiage and posture to underscore race hatred and making a racist (and misogynistic) film. More than in other films, "The Hateful Eight" crosses that line. This film again leads to question Tarantino's personal attitude. He becomes more suspect peppering scripts with "ni**er" - even in his contemporary films (joining real life "Black Lives Matter" protesters notwithstanding). Sometimes racists hide behind satire and commentary. Every use of "ni**er" is another nail in that coffin. Also, his neurotic mentions of big black c**k in several films (here, sucking) skews toward wish fulfillment.

This is a very distasteful, caveman film within grand entertainment. That push-pull leads to a zero sum, and self-reflection as to what exactly is entertaining about "The Hateful Eight." Given the dichotomy, not a lot.… Expand
16 of 39 users found this helpful1623
All this user's reviews
3
antmolly1995Dec 26, 2015
All style and very little substance, much like the massively disappointing Star Wars Episode VII. The talk {and boy is there a lot of talk!} gets frustratingly repetitive leaving only the cinematography to admire

As the saying goes "youAll style and very little substance, much like the massively disappointing Star Wars Episode VII. The talk {and boy is there a lot of talk!} gets frustratingly repetitive leaving only the cinematography to admire

As the saying goes "you can polish a turd but it's still a piece of crap"… Expand
15 of 37 users found this helpful1522
All this user's reviews
3
Lambo442Dec 29, 2015
Definitely the most cynical Tarantino film yet, with no likeable characters and a focus on violence against over character development of plot. I've never believed the criticism levelled at Tarantino that he glorifies violence until I watchedDefinitely the most cynical Tarantino film yet, with no likeable characters and a focus on violence against over character development of plot. I've never believed the criticism levelled at Tarantino that he glorifies violence until I watched this. Really enjoyed his last two for films as they seemed to be making a statement and we're a lot more focused and purposeful. With Hateful Eight Tarantino seems to be just churning out a film for the sake of it. Imagine a film that removes everything that gives a film soul and leaves you with nothing but a nasty, exploitative mess wherein the actors become more like charicatures of typical Tarantino characters. I think he should either stop making films or have a serious look in the mirror and try to rediscover what makes a film exciting,namely characters you can engage with, relate to or empathise with.… Expand
18 of 45 users found this helpful1827
All this user's reviews
1
pdw123Sep 19, 2016
What a BIG BIG disappointment from an auteur as Quentin and would give it 0 stars if I could. I have loved all his exploitation cinema before and know deeply about it, but this was just a boring and tedious mess, and in a theater in Utah thatWhat a BIG BIG disappointment from an auteur as Quentin and would give it 0 stars if I could. I have loved all his exploitation cinema before and know deeply about it, but this was just a boring and tedious mess, and in a theater in Utah that was way too crowded on New Year's also. It's a prime example of way too many establishment and thus highly paid and over paid actors using name recognition to get folks in the seats. Next time, Quentin, please use little known and independent actors who are hungry vs. totally spoiled and get back to the great films that you used to make please.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
JPKJul 25, 2019
Another Terrific Film From Tarantino
It’s not quite as good as Inglorious or Django, But Hateful Eight is still another solid edition to Tarantino’s film library.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
BruterakeAug 4, 2020
É um show de atuação só ator caro e a história é boa fácil de entender e vai desenrolando de um jeito que te deixa preso no filme.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
MrPajamasAug 8, 2021
We have another Tarantino film, and this time it's a western. I like westerns, so I'm already liking Quentin Tarantino with this one. What's also great is the casting of Samuel L. Jackson. And now for the film. There's probably one bigWe have another Tarantino film, and this time it's a western. I like westerns, so I'm already liking Quentin Tarantino with this one. What's also great is the casting of Samuel L. Jackson. And now for the film. There's probably one big problem for most people here and that's the pacing. The movie is almost three hours long and not much happens for about an hour and a half. I didn't find that a problem and I'm not even a Tarantino fan. I don't mind slow movies in general, but for a lot of people, half the movie will probably be an ordeal. Later on, things start to happen and the plot gets pretty interesting and raises a few questions, which are of course answered at the end and you are left with a clearer picture when the film is over. What added to the film's juice were the frequent n-words, which Tarantino just isn't afraid of. I enjoyed myself and although the film was slow as I mentioned, I personally found it interesting. I don't know whether to recommend it then, because after all the pace probably won't suit everyone. In addition to that, the film changes a minimum of locations and the plot takes place in the same place, which will probably also displease a few people and I was a bit disappointed at the beginning, but it gradually stopped bothering me because I just found the plot interesting. For me, the film was great and I'll put it this way. I recommend it to fans of the director, because his style is classically signed here, for example in the form of chapter divisions or the occasional narrator speaking into the plot. Perhaps even more fans of the genre might find it fitting.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
NickTheCritickNov 3, 2021
This movie has a great cinematography and good suspance and action though it is almost entirely shot in a ranch. But you're talking about Tarantino that can give entertainment with everything he touches. He mix some genres here giving homageThis movie has a great cinematography and good suspance and action though it is almost entirely shot in a ranch. But you're talking about Tarantino that can give entertainment with everything he touches. He mix some genres here giving homage to his beloved Spaghetti Western genre. An entertaining ensemble movie.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
FeDoSNov 26, 2021
It was the best movie I have ever seen(Cause I have seen such few moviesat all). So cool actor's playing. The Characters are really charismatic. Also the fantastic entourage is available in the movie. My applause for Quentin Tarantino. IIt was the best movie I have ever seen(Cause I have seen such few moviesat all). So cool actor's playing. The Characters are really charismatic. Also the fantastic entourage is available in the movie. My applause for Quentin Tarantino. I recommend this film… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
gtholidayApr 30, 2016
This movie was so good at the beginning and then the 2nd minute it drastically went downhill. Actually the 2nd minute was the 2nd of a 10 minute scene where a stagecoach was going unbelievably slow in the snow. This film was pointless andThis movie was so good at the beginning and then the 2nd minute it drastically went downhill. Actually the 2nd minute was the 2nd of a 10 minute scene where a stagecoach was going unbelievably slow in the snow. This film was pointless and baseless. The good things: cinematography, acting, directing. The bad: bad script, hard to watch the first 1.5 hours, bad script, nauseating, a lot of yawning (by me, not the actors). After Pulp Fiction and Resovoir Dogs, Tarantino has gotten worse save a couple films and this isn't one. Avoid, even if it randomly comes on TV.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
The3AcademySinsOct 23, 2017
The Hateful Eight is a long, slow, beautiful burn of a film that serves as Quentin Tarantino's tribute to John Carpenter's The Thing. Strong characters and dialogue take the center stage in this film. The gory finale definitely delivers inThe Hateful Eight is a long, slow, beautiful burn of a film that serves as Quentin Tarantino's tribute to John Carpenter's The Thing. Strong characters and dialogue take the center stage in this film. The gory finale definitely delivers in strong, gratuitous Tarantino fashion. The film kind of loses its steam at some points, which holds it back from being a 9 or a 10. If you can somehow see this in 70mm, it is a solid 8 out of 10, otherwise, it's a strong 7.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
VladiMiagkMay 14, 2018
Прекрасный фильм. Сюжет и диалоги на высшем уровне! Все в стиле Тарантино.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
Richmond95Oct 5, 2019
While the Hateful Eight's ending is a bit disappointing, the rest of the film manages to maintain the tension, and the uneasiness of being trapped at this claustrophobic setting works well all throughout, featuring great acting, and someWhile the Hateful Eight's ending is a bit disappointing, the rest of the film manages to maintain the tension, and the uneasiness of being trapped at this claustrophobic setting works well all throughout, featuring great acting, and some messed up violence that Tarantino has always delivered.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
TheApplegnomeJan 13, 2016
An almost three hour long dialog-western were most of the time is spent on exchanging stories, lies and basic human traits; how can that be fun? But it sure is, but not everybody appears to agree on that since, yes; it’s a slow film and thereAn almost three hour long dialog-western were most of the time is spent on exchanging stories, lies and basic human traits; how can that be fun? But it sure is, but not everybody appears to agree on that since, yes; it’s a slow film and there are some boring moments (!). QT is back with his most intense dialog-driven flick that might not surpass his previous films but it’s a near, but deeper, miss. It’s all about human traits, and this might be a meh-film for some, but a masterpiece for others. But it sure isn’t a wild action-western. The well written dialogs keeps the film have this cold, dark & deep feel for these crazy, sick & wild characters. The film is highly driven on unpredictability. The plot is like a puzzle; many small events that eventually leads to something greater (& bloody). TH8 is a brave move by Quentin, and a highly original and artistic one. Too slow plot, too dialog-driven, too stereotypical & a lack of plot-development & top-notch humor, might be flaws for some. But the beauty of basic filmmaking with stunning camerawork and a clever editing; well Tarantino does not lack creativity.

Personal rating: 73/100
Critical rating: 87/100… Expand
9 of 16 users found this helpful97
All this user's reviews
4
bradchengDec 31, 2015
I just got back from seeing "The Hateful Eight" and my head is
spinning because it's such a weird movie I'm not sure if it's somewhat good or exceedingly awful. What's sad is that it starts off wonderfully -- I felt myself
getting excitedI just got back from seeing "The Hateful Eight" and my head is
spinning because it's such a weird movie I'm not sure if it's somewhat good or exceedingly awful. What's sad is that it starts off wonderfully -- I felt myself
getting excited by the prospect of Tarantino returning to form for
about a half hour -- then keeps getting sillier and sillier until it's
nothing but a comedy -- and the comedy is so unsubtle, it might have
been made by Mel Brooks or Jerry Lewis on acid.

What's funny is the much touted, rich color of the Panavision stock and
the fake cabin interior of "Minnies Haberdashery (not a hat in sight)"
makes the film look like the over-saturated movies from the sixties
like "Paint Your Wagon" which always looked vaguely fake to me -- a
plastic universe cobbled together on a back lot and lit with huge
overhead arc lights. Add big splashes of red blood and it started to
look like the garish color of some the 60s Disney films, so there was
this bizarre set of associations going through my head.

When the finale of the film turns to grand guignol slapstick in these
hyper-pumped colors, I felt like I was having a flashback to a bad 60s
Dick van Dyke comedy like "Fitzwilly" or "Cold Turkey," and, honestly,
I left the theater stunned by the near absurdity of it all. It's as if
someone unearthed an awful 60s comedy (Sergio Leone? Hah? That's a
laugh) that was buried in the vaults by the studios.

This "love letter to the cinema" is really a love letter to himself, as
Tarantino riffs off elements of his own movies like "Reservoir Dogs"
and throws in some steals from Paul Thomas Anderson (it almost sounds
like Anderson doing the narration. Narration? Where the $%^& did that
come from? Wow, talk about the weakest attempt I've ever seen to clue
an audience when some sloppy structuring fails the film.)

The dialogue is Tarantino-lite, like a second-rate writer trying to
imitate him (Samuel Jackson's goading of Bruce Dern is probably the
worst monologue Tarantino has written) and the story is Agatha Christie
with a lobotomy. There are some good performances (Kurt Russell is
great as John Wayne) and some awful ones (Tim Roth at his over-the-top
worst) but the film itself unravels like a spoonful of spaghetti
Western. And this isn't a spaghetti Western, it's a pizza and beer
comedy. I'm sure it will be a big hit at frat houses across America.

I'm amazed how some people (known critics, as well) even venture to
justify the racial undercurrent as social commentary. Tarantino has
never written symbolically or allegorically. He writes character, and
that's that. "The Hateful Eight" is a "political statement" in the same
way that "I Spit on Your Grave" is an indictment of contemporary
religion. Please.

How do I sum this movie up in one word? Well, the one that comes to the
top of my head right now is: "Goofy." Maybe those big Panavision camera
got to Tarantino because he subconsciously started to think he was
making a bloody version of "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World."
I need to have a drink. At this rate, I have to say "thank god there's only two more to go."… Expand
10 of 18 users found this helpful108
All this user's reviews
0
rrrosJan 4, 2016
Well, I have to say this movie is beyond bad! Except for performance of Jennifer Jason Leigh. It is so hard for me to believe that the same man made this total waste of time and a is also responsible for Inglorious Bastards-unbelievable!
13 of 24 users found this helpful1311
All this user's reviews
0
CaliColoradoDec 31, 2015
This movie was advertised as something to look forward to (finally a quality western). From the onset however the hateful eight was despicable. This movie was a waste of effort, money, time, resources and whatever else was involved in makingThis movie was advertised as something to look forward to (finally a quality western). From the onset however the hateful eight was despicable. This movie was a waste of effort, money, time, resources and whatever else was involved in making it. All of Hollywood should be ashamed of this production. People want substance and creativity not emptiness and trash. It's so unfortunate that anyone would look up to this director... or that anyone would waste their talents on this type of production. The racism, sexism, anger, stupidity and filth expressed is inexcusable. Anyone who lasted through this 167 minutes of sickness and ignorance ...became less for doing so. This movie and other movies residing in the category of "should have never been made" ...make today's Hollywood very small and unworthy of the glory that Hollywood past once knew.… Expand
14 of 26 users found this helpful1412
All this user's reviews
4
StuffHobbesDec 28, 2015
Typical Tarantino.
The first half of the story is intriguing.
A Who-Done-It style film, set in a wild west backdrop quickly turns to pointless garbage as the second half of the film demolishes everything the first half had accomplished.Typical Tarantino.
The first half of the story is intriguing.
A Who-Done-It style film, set in a wild west backdrop quickly turns to pointless garbage as the second half of the film demolishes everything the first half had accomplished.
What a waste.… Expand
9 of 17 users found this helpful98
All this user's reviews
0
joefurlan1Jan 14, 2016
DO NOT SEE THE HATEFUL 8!!!

Warning... disgusting stuff, foul language and spoilers in this review. Not for kids to read. People, I haven't gotten on and ranted about a horrible movie since Noah but as a public service I have to warnDO NOT SEE THE HATEFUL 8!!!

Warning... disgusting stuff, foul language and spoilers in this review. Not for kids to read.

People, I haven't gotten on and ranted about a horrible movie since Noah but as a public service I have to warn you all against this piece of trash.

Don't get me wrong, I am (or was) a big Tarantino fan. I loved pulp fiction, loved the Kill Bills, loved Inglorious Bastards, loved death proof...even loved Django (though the gratuitous violence and constant use of the N word was beginning to get old.)

This movie though.... seriously, I should have got up and left half way through when Sam L. Jackson (in a horrific flash back) forces fellatio on a naked white guy who's on his knees begging for a blanket in the snow (Sam laughing his big signature Sam L. Jackson laugh the whole time). But I in cowardice looked away and waited for the movie to get better. It didn't.

From the running gags where Jennifer Jason Leigh is repeatedly called a **** and punched in the face until her front teeth break off and she's covered in blood, to the big finally where Jackson (barely conscious from having his nuts shot off) along with a horrible mortally wounded racist sheriff team up to (in their dying moments) deliver true justice to Leigh but noosing her and lifting her to the rafters until she slowly dances to death at the end of the rope, this movie is nothing but gore-porn idiocy.

There are no heroes to root for there are no Nazis or slave masters to hate. Everyone is horrible. Everything is violent. Everything is.... well... just gross. To make matters worse it's frekking BORING! After a relatively hopeful first half hour or so with a few funny bits, some smart dialogue, some dramatic building and beautiful scenery... the thing basically becomes a bloated whodunit play with every other line containing the word **** or **** I was so bored I nearly fell asleep two hours in. It just drags on and on.

I literally felt dirty driving home. It really made me question my own media consumption habits and where I draw my lines in life. Maybe I should have know better? Perhaps I should have drawn the line at the rape scene in Kill Bill 12 years ago. But the would be rapist immediately gets his ass handed to him in that movie by one of the most interesting bad ass heroines to grace the silver screen. Creative,violent revenge against horrible people is intriguing and at times invigorating and delightful in Tarintinos previous films. The purposeless over the top all around evil in this one though... it just goes too far down a very dark road.

I don't know.... This one really made me question my own discernment. Avoid at all costs!!!… Expand
10 of 19 users found this helpful109
All this user's reviews
0
ocounoJan 26, 2016
I was really looking forward to the Hateful 8 and have always been a fan of Tarantino's movies but I am pretty disappointed by this one. I just felt as though I didn't get anything our of it really. The characters and the occasional symbolismI was really looking forward to the Hateful 8 and have always been a fan of Tarantino's movies but I am pretty disappointed by this one. I just felt as though I didn't get anything our of it really. The characters and the occasional symbolism was interesting but it just didn't go anywhere.… Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
4
themattman2Jan 18, 2016
If you’ve seen any of Quentin’s previous films, you know he’s pretty loose with his language–like the f-bomb is just another adjective. If you’ve seen Django Unchained, then you know he’s pretty loose with the n-word, too. Some people calledIf you’ve seen any of Quentin’s previous films, you know he’s pretty loose with his language–like the f-bomb is just another adjective. If you’ve seen Django Unchained, then you know he’s pretty loose with the n-word, too. Some people called it “authentic,” but I felt it was a little jarring. There was a point early in the movie when one character drops the n-word and another character says, “You know, black people don’t like to be called that.” At this point, I wondered if this film would be free of the n-word, or at least very light on it. Psych! The rest of the movie is very heavy on the word.

The movie itself seemed like a stage play. One character walks up to another character and spills his entire life story as an introduction. The second character responds by spilling his entire life story. Both stories serve as an introduction for the audience, but come off as un-natural. I had a writing teacher describe this as “soap opera dialogue.” It was odd to see it on-screen. The Broadway production of The Hateful Eight is gonna be huge.

The gore was heavy… In some parts of the movie I would consider it over-the-top. There was one scene that caused all of us to gasp. If you’ve seen The Kingsman, and you call that a “ten” for violence, I’d call this one an “eight.” It sneaks up on you, too. For the first part of the movie, little to no violence. Then BAM! Violence is hot and heavy. There’s at least one scene where I think there was violence just for violence sake–I don’t think it was realistic for that character to act that way.

If you put the language and gore aside, how was the movie? Well, it’s quite a lot of both to put aside, but I’ll try. It definitely put you into what Wyoming during a blizzard in the Old West would feel like. The sets and costumes looked terribly authentic. You see characters ride in a stage coach, and you find yourself marveling at how rough it seems in comparison to modern automobiles.

The characters wind up in a trading post cabin in the middle of nowhere on their way to a town in the middle of nowhere. It oozes authenticity, and is an eye-opener to what life was like in the Wild, Wild West.

But the language and gore… It was tough to stomach. Was language really that rough at that time? I thought language of today was a product of hip-hop, street culture. Am I just being racist? I need to do some Googling now and find out when heavy language became a “thing.”… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
0
kreschnickMar 31, 2016
The worst Tarantino movie ever. A total waste of time and money. I'm a huge Tarantino fan, liked all of his movies up to this one. It seems like he has run out of ideas.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
0
y996328Apr 20, 2016
This is Tarentino's latest drag through the gutter, but this time it is our sacred Western. Guess he needs money to buy more porno to impress his gay infested entertainment industry friends.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
3
EludiumQ36Jul 16, 2016
Wow, that's a study in depravity. So. Much. Blood and Guts. There was ample opportunity and motivation for rape but somehow QT dispensed with that. And wow, was this an N-word festival or what?! So there'll be a segment of the audience thatWow, that's a study in depravity. So. Much. Blood and Guts. There was ample opportunity and motivation for rape but somehow QT dispensed with that. And wow, was this an N-word festival or what?! So there'll be a segment of the audience that will be thrilled with that, though I think SL Jackson was overqualified for his role, but he's a regular in QT's films so that was going to happen, but he doesn't play the role well; he doesn't capture the Civil War era well at all, and as we all know that falls to the director to ensure his actors are in the proper frame of time and mind, so that's a mark more against QT than SLJ. But mega props to Jennifer Jason Leigh as Daisy for taking so much in the face! She'll need therapy after this role, seriously. But speaking of therapy, QT is crying out for it. I mean the amount of time he had to think, visualize, and plan for the depravity in this film is crazy and then to actually produce it. Wow, this guy is some kind of warped.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
foxgroveJan 14, 2016
The opening credits of ‘The Hateful Eight’ rather egotistically state that this is the eighth film by Quentin Tarantino. Presented in 70mm and complete with an overture and intermission, this can be seen as either a vanity undertaking by itsThe opening credits of ‘The Hateful Eight’ rather egotistically state that this is the eighth film by Quentin Tarantino. Presented in 70mm and complete with an overture and intermission, this can be seen as either a vanity undertaking by its director or as a passion project by someone who loves cinema and the old traditions it stood for. The story outline is a mere strand and it is overblown to epic proportions (a staggering 187 minutes) that it cannot possibly hope to sustain. Things start promisingly enough with Kurt Russell’s bounty hunter escorting Jennifer Jason Leigh’s Daisy, by stagecoach in a raging blizzard, to her date with destiny on the gallows. En-route they meet up with Samuel L Jackson and Walton Goggins before holing up with the rest of the titular number in a cabin which is the home of ‘Minnie’s Haberdashery’. The torturous corkscrewing of the plot plays out from here, but interest is lost after a while due to the overly talky first half. The intermission when it comes is almost a relief. Things pick up considerably after the break and the screenplay introduces flashbacks, narration and a plot twist that livens things up no end. These devices are, in fact, Tarantino’s forte. This second half also lets rip in the blood letting department and anyone who has seen a Tarantino film before will know exactly what to expect. The cast have a lot of fun, with the best performances coming from Samuel L Jackson, Jennifer Jason Leigh and, especially, an unknown Walton Goggins. The film is technically proficient, although when the actors are competing with both Ennio Morricone’s forceful score and the sound effects of the raging blizzard, much dialogue is lost as a result. The 70 mm presentation is stunning and Robert Richardson’s cinematography of both interiors and exteriors is ravishingly beautiful. It may not be vintage Tarantino, but despite the flaws it somehow manages to stay with you long after you have left the cinema.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
NathonasMar 18, 2016
Hateful Eight is an entertaining film, but Tarantino's previous work is better. The dialogue, plot, and characters are simply not as good as in his previous films, and the whole thing feels a little bit tedious and drawn-out.

It'sHateful Eight is an entertaining film, but Tarantino's previous work is better. The dialogue, plot, and characters are simply not as good as in his previous films, and the whole thing feels a little bit tedious and drawn-out.

It's certainly still fun to watch and has all of the characteristic Tarantino things, but they're just not executed as well and feel a little obvious and tiring. For example, the film randomly throws in characters with non-American accents just for the hell of it rather than having a serious reason or explanation. Also when you really get down to it, the story is very simple and doesn't need to be drawn out for so long.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
2
cloverblobJan 25, 2016
When the titlecard came up that said 'The Last Chapter', I swear I heard an audible sigh of relief throughout the entire theatre. This has to be QT's most self-indulgent film yet. The characters are crude two-dimensional jerks, theWhen the titlecard came up that said 'The Last Chapter', I swear I heard an audible sigh of relief throughout the entire theatre. This has to be QT's most self-indulgent film yet. The characters are crude two-dimensional jerks, the cinematography is nothing special, the plot was weak and would have been better told in the span of twenty minutes, not three hours. Maybe the film would have been saved had it had better pacing, I'm not sure. However, the gentleman sitting behind me who had fallen asleep and snored for a good hour seemed to fit right in with the atmosphere of the movie.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
3
moothemagiccowFeb 2, 2016
This is easily the worst Tarantino film. It seems more suited to a play or novel.
Basically, if you want to hear the backstories of the rootinest, tootinest Yosemite Sammiest bad boys of the Ol' West told over the course of 3 hours ofThis is easily the worst Tarantino film. It seems more suited to a play or novel.
Basically, if you want to hear the backstories of the rootinest, tootinest Yosemite Sammiest bad boys of the Ol' West told over the course of 3 hours of painfully slow one-on-one deaths, watch this.

Whoever leaked the script was doing the director a favor. He should not have made this film.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
2
hkamelJan 31, 2016
I loved Django, Kill Bill, and Pulp Fiction, and I take a perverse amount of pride in my unusually high tolerance for racism, misogyny, and gore when it serves the story. The Hateful Eight had so many major story problems, huge plot holes, aI loved Django, Kill Bill, and Pulp Fiction, and I take a perverse amount of pride in my unusually high tolerance for racism, misogyny, and gore when it serves the story. The Hateful Eight had so many major story problems, huge plot holes, a narrator that appears halfway through for no good reason, that it took all the fun out of the spectacle. This should have been called 8 Actors in Search of an Author, or maybe 12 Angry Tropes.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
1
FastpooseJan 16, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Worst movie I've seen in while, and yes I'm a big fan of Tarantino movies.

SPOILER ALERTS: First few conversations are interesting with Russell and Jackson, then every other conversation (there are many, way too many) becomes bloated and extremely boring. QT used to have a talent of making conversations between characters really interesting and funny, not in this movie. The script is total trash. After 2 hours of crap conversation I was over it, especially after the 'gay' oral sex rape scene...

Obviously QT has an axe to grind re US history and racism, and QT went for a record on how many times the word ni##a could be used, it gets very old and boring about 30mins in...

Tim Roth's character was rubbish and his 'speeches' were pointless and unbelievable. The mexican character started well then was never used properly. It was essentially a movie where the overblown script ruined every chance to connect with any character, much of the movie should have been left on the cutting room floor.

Then there was the narration from QT about 70mins in, where I thought I was listening to a Directors cut special on a DVD, it was so bad, and also ruined any tension that may (or may not) have been building.

Crap movie, don't pay a dime to see it, I'm still a little shocked at so many 'fan boys' who will never say a bad word about QT, this movie was a shocker, one word BORING :(… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
HfahmyJan 22, 2016
Snowy, cold, over lengthy, bloody, theatrical. These are the main keywords for this movie. All events occur in one location, the rest store for travelers "Minnie's Haberdashery". The first half of this more than three hours show is extremelySnowy, cold, over lengthy, bloody, theatrical. These are the main keywords for this movie. All events occur in one location, the rest store for travelers "Minnie's Haberdashery". The first half of this more than three hours show is extremely boring with long dialogues involving racism and almost no real events. The second half is packed with violence after the plot of the gang was revealed. Now, which gang? The theatrical show is about a gang who killed the rest house owners to free the sister (Jennifer Jason Leigh) of their leader, sent to be hanged by a bounty hunter (Kurt Russel). The plot is spoiled by the arrival of a hangman (Samuel Jackson) and a would be sherif (Walton Goggins). The acting in general is good specially by Samuel Jackson, Jennifer Jason Leig, Kurt Russel, Walton Goggins. Directing is pretentious, the scenario is not for a movie packed with places and moving. The opening music is nice and reminds the Good, the Bad, the Ugly and for Few Dollars More. At the end of the more than three hours, no one is left alive, blood is shed generously every where. All in all, a "show" that can be missed; if attended you have to be patient or have nothing else to do.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
2
imthenoobMar 30, 2016
Well acted but the plot never really gets going and the conclusion isn't worth sitting through the three hour run time for. I'm a huge Tarantino fan and this would hands down be my least favorite film of his.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
2
MattyiceApr 24, 2016
I love Tarantino, but I honestly don't know what he was thinking while making The Hateful Eight. While the characters are cool, the twists do come, the film's shot well, and Ennio Morricone's score is great, the rest of the film, much unlikeI love Tarantino, but I honestly don't know what he was thinking while making The Hateful Eight. While the characters are cool, the twists do come, the film's shot well, and Ennio Morricone's score is great, the rest of the film, much unlike Tarantino's usual films, felt overwhelmingly boring and derivative. It did not have nearly the level of action or interest as in films past, the film's plot and dialogue drags on and on, and its near 3 hour self-indulgent running time is far from necessary. Overall, this film was far from one of Tarantino's best and one of the most underwhelming movies I have seen from a critically acclaimed director in a very long time.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
5
NikolayGJan 30, 2016
I saw this because Inglorious Bastards was fun, and because Jennifer Jason Leigh is an unparalleled actress but she's about vanished this past decade. The Hateful Eight would finally give me a chance to see her in a movie again. However, thisI saw this because Inglorious Bastards was fun, and because Jennifer Jason Leigh is an unparalleled actress but she's about vanished this past decade. The Hateful Eight would finally give me a chance to see her in a movie again. However, this movie is the Samuel L. Jackson show, with everyone else getting a small piece of the pie; there are so many cast members that each piece is relatively small. So JJL didn't get much to sink her teeth into. But hey, I love Samuel L. Jackson, too, so it still could have been great.

Problem is...

...this movie has no point. It has no soul. It has no purpose. It has no emotional core. It has no theme. It has nothing but a kooky plot about scheming and killing that any 12 year old could make up during recess period. I mean, there is just nothing to this.

And to top it off, it's way too long. When they showed one of the characters removing his gloves loosening one finger at a time before taking them off, I knew we were in for trouble. The exact same script could have been shot with a half hour or forty minutes less running time and it would not have felt rushed. This film as shot just feels so slow it's painful, especially the length of time before they get to the cabin where most of the movie takes place. This is one of the only movies I ever fell asleep in, and it was for about fifteen minutes during that opening phase when the stagecoach is heading for the cabin or store or haberdashery, whatever the place is.

I do not recommend this movie, but if you must see it, rent it and fast forward when things get slow.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
talonps1Mar 15, 2016
Definitely, some good acting along with some good actors with some clear professional and artistic shots of the camera. That is literally all that is good about this movie. I won't rant on about the dull, shock value, politically drivenDefinitely, some good acting along with some good actors with some clear professional and artistic shots of the camera. That is literally all that is good about this movie. I won't rant on about the dull, shock value, politically driven drivel that is the story rather this sums it up...

The Hateful Eight = Reservoir Dogs part II minus everything that actually made Reservoir Dogs spectacular.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
1
manwithcheeseJan 28, 2016
overrated.boring. and more boring

i was going to quit in the half of the movie but i stayed for this review and it didint worth i want my money and time back .plot was bad . dialogues was so long and it didint drag me in to the movie! 1overrated.boring. and more boring

i was going to quit in the half of the movie but i stayed for this review and it didint worth i want my money and time back .plot was bad . dialogues was so long and it didint drag me in to the movie! 1 point for samuel l. jackson… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
1
BabyRocketJan 24, 2016
I cant believe anyone would give this movie a 10 - because its a Tarantino movie ?
Its a 3 hr snoozefest set in one room.
Sorry but i think Tarantino has lost the plot with this movie - literally.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
3
SaraSpisaMar 13, 2016
I enjoyed myself for a good 45 minutes, but after the first hour watching it felt like utter torture. Great setting, great graphics, good choice in music, wonderful acting by Jennifer Jason Leigh. Unfortunately the movid did not quite live upI enjoyed myself for a good 45 minutes, but after the first hour watching it felt like utter torture. Great setting, great graphics, good choice in music, wonderful acting by Jennifer Jason Leigh. Unfortunately the movid did not quite live up to its potential.
The scenes were stretched too long making the movie monotone and boring.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
0
Panache124Sep 25, 2016
Do not waste the money. It is shocking to me the actors and actress would sign on to play in such a horrible movie. I do not know who is "curbing" the results but everything I have read agrees that this is not worth wasting your time..Do not waste the money. It is shocking to me the actors and actress would sign on to play in such a horrible movie. I do not know who is "curbing" the results but everything I have read agrees that this is not worth wasting your time.. Whomever does not agree must be receiving compensation to say different.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
10
gtwistNov 26, 2017
One of Tarantino's best films, The Hateful Eight has amazing dialogue, as well as performances from the whole cast. The cinematography was beautiful, and the score was fantastic. This is everything I like in a film and more!
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
0
BedlamSep 12, 2017
I liked the setting, but I just haven't seen a good Tarantino film. His narration interjection halfway though the film is an example of his sub-par writing ability. Additionally, the movie was extremely long. As usual his movie is extremelyI liked the setting, but I just haven't seen a good Tarantino film. His narration interjection halfway though the film is an example of his sub-par writing ability. Additionally, the movie was extremely long. As usual his movie is extremely crass, going for his standard shocks.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
juliankennedy23Mar 12, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Quentin Tarantino should really remake The Thing. In fact, he easily could remake it with the cast and setting of this very film. Heck, he already has an incredible Oscar-winning Ennio Morricone who unironically utilizes unpublished excerpts from his The Thing soundtrack. He has The Thing star, Kurt Russell. He has an isolated cabin in a blizzard. Had the cabin has some dogs outside that started barking when Samuel L Jackson came near this would have been a better movie for it. (And it would have let Morricone reuse some his soundtrack from that Kristy McNichol vehicle White Dog that he penned the same year as his Thing soundtrack.)

That the idea above is an overly film geeky and a silly genre switcheroo is what one used to hope for from a Tarantino film. This film, however, plays out much more straight and really doesn’t hold it’s most interesting gambits that it does keep. Kurt Russell has a prisoner played by Jennifer Jason Leigh that he is stubbornly bringing in alive. He is convinced (correctly) that one or more people trapped in this cabin with him are working against him to free his charge. The movie threatens to break into a surprisingly engaging Agatha Christie-style mystery. Unfortunately, Tarantino switches gears about the time it starts to get interesting. This being a Tarantino movie we are awash in an excess of blood and cruelty and racial epithets. Alas, the film simply doesn’t earn them as well as say Reservoir Dogs did. There are some great set pieces that I will not spoil but they are surrounded by a lot of slow. Tarantino might argue (correctly) that he with his score, 70mm filming, and pacing is aping the style of the old three-hours western such as Once upon a Time in the West, or the Dollars trilogy. But seriously have you sat through one of those in one films in one sitting in the last twenty years? It can be a slog. This film can be a slog.

All the actors (sans Madsen) do a great job. The soundtrack is wonderful. Parts of the movie such as the Agatha Christie bits mentioned above really work well. Alas, there are some things that simply do not work. There is an overlong flashback that basically takes all the mystery out of the last act. Tarantino's narration is jarring, poorly done and unnecessary. The first hour of the movie takes that hour to tell twenty minutes of setup. Overall worth a watch for Tarantino fans and for Jennifer Jason Leigh’s fantastic performance. But like those three-hour westerns of old, I don’t see myself watching it again.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
brewistmonkNov 2, 2017
how is it humanly possible for a professional critic (2 in fact) to give this 100??? wtf??? basically your saying it's not possible to make a better movie than this. I am sick of this bs. those critics are freaking morons who should not behow is it humanly possible for a professional critic (2 in fact) to give this 100??? wtf??? basically your saying it's not possible to make a better movie than this. I am sick of this bs. those critics are freaking morons who should not be allowed to collect a paycheck. zero. suck it. this movie was nothing special. all you tarantino fans can keep jerking off to his films. you're dummies too.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
BulletstormAug 12, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is terrible and I'm 99% sure this movie is just a test by Tarantino. He wanted to see how far he could go making the most boring movie ever while fans still defend it. In the first 9/10 of the movie literally nothing happens, the opening scene already warns you. You get treated to seeing a coach approach in the snow for a whopping 15 minutes, so exciting.. after that follows the most boring conversation ever which lasts for about an hour. Nothing in this dialoque is important for the story, which is basically nonexistent anyway. Then at the end everybody starts shooting and everyone dies. Good job Tarantino on making another piece of trash. How the hell you ever became so big isa mystery to me, please retire.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
Lycan1795Aug 16, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Fitting to give it an 8, would have given it 10 if Kurt Russel didn't destroy an 1800's Martin guitar haha.

I watched this film knowing nothing about it, having not seen any trailers and i can say i really enjoyed this film.

Quentin's take on Western movies never cease to amaze me.

It's a shame though it was overshadowed by SJW star wars at the time. Hateful Eight is the better film by a mile, this has re-watch value whereas SJW star wars movies do not.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
1
KlebartJun 21, 2019
Went to this one expecting something unusual and interesting. Instead found cliches, childish attempts to build characters, and generally poor script with characters I didn't care about one way or the other. Spent my money on a Tarantino filmWent to this one expecting something unusual and interesting. Instead found cliches, childish attempts to build characters, and generally poor script with characters I didn't care about one way or the other. Spent my money on a Tarantino film and left telling myself I would not see one of his films again. So Disappointed.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
Zoe9000Dec 29, 2020
Complete garbage, lasting 3 loooong hours. Plotless, full of empty dialogue, gory scenes as if made by a 10 year old boy.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
LamontRaymondDec 26, 2015
I saw it in 70 MM Panavision with the 15 minute intermission (which was essential, given the length), and I had a really good time with it. I wouldn't say it's in the upper echelon of the Tarantino canon, but well-worth seeing for SamI saw it in 70 MM Panavision with the 15 minute intermission (which was essential, given the length), and I had a really good time with it. I wouldn't say it's in the upper echelon of the Tarantino canon, but well-worth seeing for Sam Jackson and Walton Goggins alone. Jennifer Jason Leigh probably delivers the performance of her career (though maybe just a hair behind Fast Times). Just be aware that it's one of the goriest film's you'll ever seen (perhaps just a touch short of Dead Alive).… Expand
14 of 29 users found this helpful1415
All this user's reviews
9
LonnieMFDec 25, 2015
Still one of the best arguments for auteur in these frenzied hollywood film days. The pacing is surprisingly swift for this three hour movie, but it's not for the squeamish. It's gruesome as hell.
14 of 29 users found this helpful1415
All this user's reviews
3
Brent_MarchantJan 3, 2016
More conclusive proof that Quentin Tarantino is the most overrated, overhyped director in Hollywood. This latest offering is little more than an overlong, pointless, gratuitous blood bath that celebrates violence against women and hatredMore conclusive proof that Quentin Tarantino is the most overrated, overhyped director in Hollywood. This latest offering is little more than an overlong, pointless, gratuitous blood bath that celebrates violence against women and hatred toward minorities without any of the macabre, campy humor that characterized previous offerings like "Django Unchained" and "Inglorious Basterds." I found myself frequently checking my watch while screening this, anxious for it to be over and done with. And, except for a few fine performances by the likes of Jennifer Jason Leigh and Kurt Russell, there's really nothing else worth watching here.… Expand
12 of 25 users found this helpful1213
All this user's reviews
5
CanisrahDec 25, 2015
So like many I generally enjoy Tarantino films. After sitting through The Hateful Eight (THE) however I'm concluded that this is one of his weaker offerings.

While one of the strengths of Tarantino's films is held to be dialogue - I thinkSo like many I generally enjoy Tarantino films. After sitting through The Hateful Eight (THE) however I'm concluded that this is one of his weaker offerings.

While one of the strengths of Tarantino's films is held to be dialogue - I think THE manages to cross the line from smart and immersive dialogue into borderline pointless self-indulgence. Endless discussions between characters which don't necessarily add much to the progression of the plot (such as it is).

The narrative itself has some appeal - but it's strung out over such a long time-frame and climaxes in a pretty banal shower of blood that leaves the viewer wondering why they sat through 2.5 hours of smug dialogue just for a pretty standard bloodletting in the last 15 minutes.

There's some good characters there - and some interesting moments; a strong cast makes for enjoyable viewing in parts, but in my view this film doesn't have enough substance to warrant it's length. Nor does it hold the viewer's attention for the duration in the same manner as the director's previous film.

Also borderline irritating is the niggling feeling that we're being preached at with some sort of social or political perspective which undermines historical authenticity (though this is a minor point as I doubt the film is trying to be authentic any more than a comic book western is shooting for historical accuracy).

In summary - it's OK - but self-indulgent and ultimately underwhelming.… Expand
10 of 21 users found this helpful1011
All this user's reviews
0
honestmabJan 2, 2016
This movie is a piece of junk and not worth wasting your 3 hours of life on. It is gross. It is boring. It is an insult to human behavior. Tarantino has a sick mind and doesn't know how to create a decent movie
If you take a date to thisThis movie is a piece of junk and not worth wasting your 3 hours of life on. It is gross. It is boring. It is an insult to human behavior. Tarantino has a sick mind and doesn't know how to create a decent movie
If you take a date to this movie, don;t expect to have a second date.… Expand
10 of 21 users found this helpful1011
All this user's reviews
2
yosemiteJan 6, 2016
I rated this film a 3 last night after seeing it. After further consideration, its a 2. A good film should have entertainment value , be thought provoking , contain a good plot and solid acting. This one had a good plot and solid acting butI rated this film a 3 last night after seeing it. After further consideration, its a 2. A good film should have entertainment value , be thought provoking , contain a good plot and solid acting. This one had a good plot and solid acting but not enough of either to offset the basic fact thats its just not entertaining. Like watching an autopsy ! Tarantino's formula for dialogue worked in Pulp Fiction ( do you know what they call a Big Mac in France ; I'm going to get medevil on him ). It also entertained in Reservoir Dogs and Jackie Brown. I have not seen Kill Bill or Basterds. It does not serve as well in this movie. Creative guys like Tarantino develop a cult following and they want to expand on that creativity. They lose track of the reality that movie making is a commercial enterprise. Take away those viewers (and critics ) that rated this movie favorably JUST BECAUSE it was a QT film and you have a whole bunch of movie goers that wish they had their $10 back.… Expand
8 of 17 users found this helpful89
All this user's reviews
4
CallidorDec 30, 2015
The cinematography was great, acting was good obviously. But it is just another piece of ego porn from Tarantino. The story was predictable and shallow, it felt very very drawn out and I found myself checking the time to see when it wouldThe cinematography was great, acting was good obviously. But it is just another piece of ego porn from Tarantino. The story was predictable and shallow, it felt very very drawn out and I found myself checking the time to see when it would freakin end.

Its ok for some mild brainless entertainment, but it is no way a well done movie imo. Tarantino has done a lot better in his past and I fear all the ego stroking he has received over the years have gone to his head and now he primarily makes shallow, predictable ego porn for himself and his sycophants to marvel at.… Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
0
Cowboy4ChristJan 6, 2016
One of the worst movies I've ever seen. It was disgusting. I mean, who wants to go see a western just to see a man sucking on another man's you know what! I bet there were a lot of people expecting to see a good western only to get there andOne of the worst movies I've ever seen. It was disgusting. I mean, who wants to go see a western just to see a man sucking on another man's you know what! I bet there were a lot of people expecting to see a good western only to get there and be highly disappointed. I walked out it was so bad.… Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
3
sbechtJan 9, 2016
This movie is 2 hours and 45 minutes long, and about 45 minutes of it were worth viewing...which means there were 2 hours of really bad dialogue, uninteresting exchanges, and overdone stereotyping. I can't disagree with any of the recentThis movie is 2 hours and 45 minutes long, and about 45 minutes of it were worth viewing...which means there were 2 hours of really bad dialogue, uninteresting exchanges, and overdone stereotyping. I can't disagree with any of the recent comments from those who rated this movie between a 0 and a 3.

It's an awful movie.… Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
0
javamageJan 9, 2016
The Hateful Eight is officially the WORST film I have ever seen. I'm not talking most disgusting or anything like that. It was utter crap, meaningless repetitive dialog and absolutely nothing happens until the last 20 minutes. I should haveThe Hateful Eight is officially the WORST film I have ever seen. I'm not talking most disgusting or anything like that. It was utter crap, meaningless repetitive dialog and absolutely nothing happens until the last 20 minutes. I should have walked out but I kept thinking *something* had to happen... but it was pitifully almost nothing. It wasn't even in the "so bad it's amusing" category. It was just. Plain. Awful. I want those 3 hours back.… Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
0
oilydroppersJan 12, 2016
For a movie with nothing much else going on, the character development was weak and nothing we haven't already seen in every other QT film. Two dimensional outlets for the directors strange and immature ideas around race and violence. I guessFor a movie with nothing much else going on, the character development was weak and nothing we haven't already seen in every other QT film. Two dimensional outlets for the directors strange and immature ideas around race and violence. I guess I am just tired of Quentin Tarantino, who seems like a spoiled child, and his attitude permeates every **** character in his movies. He seems to reply the same characters and the same dialogue over and over again in a self-masturbatory and narcissistic fashion. Also, what a waste of wide format to have almost the entire movie take place in one room. The whole thing plays out like a racist childs bloodbath fantasy. Please QT, retire and donate some of your money.… Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
0
CarribeanDeanJan 5, 2016
I had to go back and change my review. There is a scene in which Samuel Jackson tells a story about forcing a guy to give him a blowjob in detail for like 5 minutes. I have felt sick and unable to sleep because of the scene, a first for meI had to go back and change my review. There is a scene in which Samuel Jackson tells a story about forcing a guy to give him a blowjob in detail for like 5 minutes. I have felt sick and unable to sleep because of the scene, a first for me for a movie. In retrospect I think Tarantino really wants to perform oral sex on Samuel Jackson and I wish he had not fantasized about it through a movie. it is like the Deliverance hillbilly rape, just very disturbing and the disgusting scene , in retrospect it was too graphic and disturbing. AVOID !!!… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
1
WindolickerJan 3, 2016
Are you serious? Over 3 hours and 40 dollars spent for RPX tickets and this was what I got? I respect the craft of the film and there are redeeming qualities of the film but they simply aren't enough. Everybody is so up Tarantino's ass thatAre you serious? Over 3 hours and 40 dollars spent for RPX tickets and this was what I got? I respect the craft of the film and there are redeeming qualities of the film but they simply aren't enough. Everybody is so up Tarantino's ass that they can't call the film what it is, a waste of time and money. I love Tarantino movies but compare this to the incredible suspense of Inglorious Basterds and it isn't even a contest. I tried to feel the buildup but it was so horribly drawn out I just stopped caring. By the time things got interesting I was already too angry to enjoy it. There were multiple times where I tapped my girlfriend and said, "It's about to get crazy!" only for it to fizzle out with more dialogue. This film isn't even worth a rent; unless you consider yourself a die hard Tarantino fan. I told my girlfriend that Tarantino movies were a "sure thing" but I was dead wrong. I had to apologize to her because she wanted to see another movie.… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
2
iseenthefutureJan 16, 2016
You've got Tarantino composing a single song, on a single set, with 'a fistful of characters' that have been given the one song to sing, yet harmony is more than should be expected. However, as Tarantino's film's/speeches have grown in numberYou've got Tarantino composing a single song, on a single set, with 'a fistful of characters' that have been given the one song to sing, yet harmony is more than should be expected. However, as Tarantino's film's/speeches have grown in number and as his troupe of overused and over-scripted puppets have multiplied we cannot fault this leopard for not changing it's spots, nor for force feeding his cubs his toothless ghetto growl, we can only listen and know, we've heard this song before...a long time ago and many times since, and every time there were too many voices singing the same tune. Tarantino has promised to stop after his 10th movie so roll on number 10 so we can all be done with this angst B.S. If the truth be told he never had more than one movie in him, just told in ten different genres (by Samuel L.Jackson).… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
2
herndonrulesJan 9, 2016
What a mess. Sorry to see the Tarantino winning streak end so dismally. No reason for this to have been shot in 70 mm (if you want spectacular cinematography check out The Revenant) since 90% of the film takes place in a cabin. Much tooWhat a mess. Sorry to see the Tarantino winning streak end so dismally. No reason for this to have been shot in 70 mm (if you want spectacular cinematography check out The Revenant) since 90% of the film takes place in a cabin. Much too long, ponderous, excessively over the top violence, even by Tarantino standards and a waste of superior acting talent. Earns two stars for Walton Goggins breaking out.… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
0
Huey777Jan 10, 2016
Total rubbish, worst film of the year. Pointless, sadistic and a waste of everyone's time. It's basically a rehash of the resevoir dogs story line, I guess he has his fans that will love it. Idiots.
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
0
pcoutsauerkrautJan 20, 2016
I don't understand why this movie had to be 3 hours long. I lost interest halfway through after spending 20 minutes watching people nail a door shut. Pointless drawn out scene, after pointless drawn out scene. 5 minutes of a stagecoach in theI don't understand why this movie had to be 3 hours long. I lost interest halfway through after spending 20 minutes watching people nail a door shut. Pointless drawn out scene, after pointless drawn out scene. 5 minutes of a stagecoach in the snow. We get it. Nothing happened until the last 30 minutes. I know other people hated the dialog and the gore but i don't even care about that. It's a Tarantino movie so that stuff is going to be in there. I felt like the scene where Samuel L Jackson was describing torturing the guys son and making him suck his d*ck, was a metaphor for Tarantino and his fans. He can do anything and they'll still suck his d*ck while he laughs. I felt like i was being tortured watching this.… Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
0
Candilady1Jan 2, 2016
Absolutely HORRIBLE! If there was a way to get my money back I would have. Way to long, lots of gore and no valuable story line. It was so bad I couldn't even give it a ZERO!! Don't waste your money.
9 of 20 users found this helpful911
All this user's reviews
3
lunanulFeb 21, 2016
This is the least of Tarantino's films and hopefully not his swan song. Happy to have seen it in the 70mm 'Roadshow' version as there were at least some lovely big screen treats. No interest in seeing it again (having seen every other QT filmThis is the least of Tarantino's films and hopefully not his swan song. Happy to have seen it in the 70mm 'Roadshow' version as there were at least some lovely big screen treats. No interest in seeing it again (having seen every other QT film multiple times) Not much else to say...for completists only.… Expand
8 of 18 users found this helpful810
All this user's reviews
4
AreYouSeriousDec 28, 2015
Long winded, and generally quite boring. It only kicks into gear in the last 40 to 50 minutes once the actual story reveals itself.

The opening sequence of Inglorious Bastards is a 23 minute scene in a single room with two men that isLong winded, and generally quite boring. It only kicks into gear in the last 40 to 50 minutes once the actual story reveals itself.

The opening sequence of Inglorious Bastards is a 23 minute scene in a single room with two men that is totally and utterly compelling - not one scene in The Hateful Eight has anywhere near the level of skill or execution.

Sadly, it's Tarantino's weakest enter in years.

But I'm sure the blind Tarantino lovers will embrace it...… Expand
8 of 18 users found this helpful810
All this user's reviews
4
ThundermaxJan 16, 2016
The worst of Tarantino's movies. Extremely slow pacing and boring, dialogues are just long and tedious blah blah without any wit or charm. At least one hour too long, maybe more. I had to apologize to my wife for bringing her to see this s***t.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
4
njlakeFeb 5, 2016
As far as Tarantino movies are concerned, this is among the worst... Coming from Inglorious Basterds and then Django (which was only a slight step down) this was a huge drop off. The movie is about a bunch of people stuck in a room that sortaAs far as Tarantino movies are concerned, this is among the worst... Coming from Inglorious Basterds and then Django (which was only a slight step down) this was a huge drop off. The movie is about a bunch of people stuck in a room that sorta kinda know each other from some loose affiliation that have way too much dialogue.

So, my experience with it? I think this basically sums it up – have you ever had to go somewhere with a friend and they run into someone that they barely knew from their hometown and you have to sit there through their awkward conversation, get introduced for one second then get back to listening to them talk for too long about something you couldn't care less about? That's basically what this movie is. Even when it starts to get interesting (the 3rd act) it's really not interesting.… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
6
ScienceAdvisorMar 14, 2016
Unfortunate. With so much buildup, and such richness of characters, the ending is disappointing and needlessly wasteful. Instead Tarantino should have re-watched some of his classics, like "4 Rooms" for example, and remembered what made hisUnfortunate. With so much buildup, and such richness of characters, the ending is disappointing and needlessly wasteful. Instead Tarantino should have re-watched some of his classics, like "4 Rooms" for example, and remembered what made his name so great. This deserves to be re-shot with a new last 30 minutes, so it can take a place of honor on the classics shelf. Though the homage to "The Thing" was worth the price of admission, and probably built-up expecations (beyond the over-hype) for the rest of the movie, for anyone that recognized it.… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
4
Unladenswallow0Jan 13, 2016
(for full effect, please read this voice in 70mm Samuel L Jackson)

Wow, this movie was hyped up to the reaches of heaven and earth as the greatest thing to touch the screens of Earth since Mel Gibson died on the cross. Tarrantino, you are(for full effect, please read this voice in 70mm Samuel L Jackson)

Wow, this movie was hyped up to the reaches of heaven and earth as the greatest thing to touch the screens of Earth since Mel Gibson died on the cross. Tarrantino, you are my man, but **** i think your time is up. What was that you said about Directors losing their mojo as they age? I think you'd better get yo'self a Directoscomy because i think youve got whatever M night Shalaman has stuck up his ****

Dont get me wrong, the movie was decent. It had an amazing score, some fantastic camera work and some tense moments that had me on the edge of my seat. But jesus, it was 3 hours, 3 hours and i cant say in truth that at times i wasnt checking my watch. If you like a lot of dialogue, and you like very very slow build up, then this is the movie for you. But man, it felt like at the end Tarantino just said **** it, lets just kill the ****… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
1
Val-835Jan 13, 2016
One of the worst movies I've seen in years. Tarantino thinks that dialogue, dirty language and good actors are a substitute for a good plot, story, cinematography, etc. He got away with that in some of his previous creations. Not this time.One of the worst movies I've seen in years. Tarantino thinks that dialogue, dirty language and good actors are a substitute for a good plot, story, cinematography, etc. He got away with that in some of his previous creations. Not this time. An endless bore. Absolutely awful.… Expand
7 of 16 users found this helpful79
All this user's reviews
0
adrenilinmattJan 3, 2016
Disappointed. So very, very, disappointed. For QT to make a boring film is astonishing. The definition of disappointment should be just that. "Disappointment; when Quentin Tarantino, one of the world's most treasured talents creates a boringDisappointed. So very, very, disappointed. For QT to make a boring film is astonishing. The definition of disappointment should be just that. "Disappointment; when Quentin Tarantino, one of the world's most treasured talents creates a boring movie". I wish I hadn't hyped it up so much, the pointless 70mm, when the movie is 90 percent wooden cabin. Pointless. Uninspired dialogue, void of intelligence, filled with repeated use of racial slurs. I understand it's representing a different time, but it's pointless. It'd be less pointless if the rest of the dialogue was actually interesting. Channing tatum cannot act. His use here escapes me and leaves me perplexed. Ugh. I'm just upset.… Expand
10 of 23 users found this helpful1013
All this user's reviews
9
eagleeyevikingJan 5, 2016
The Hateful Eight is a superior Western mystery with the usual Tarantino traits: cracking dialogue, well developed characters, over-the-top violence, a long running time, and an abundance of quality filmmaking.
10 of 23 users found this helpful1013
All this user's reviews
9
geo333Dec 26, 2015
Quentin Tarantino latest film is another great movie to add to his impressive portfolio. Driven by a great story and a great cast make this film an enjoyment to watch. Although the development of story starts slow it then quickly createsQuentin Tarantino latest film is another great movie to add to his impressive portfolio. Driven by a great story and a great cast make this film an enjoyment to watch. Although the development of story starts slow it then quickly creates suspense and excitement. Overall, The Hateful Eight will please fans and non fans or Q. Tarantino work.… Expand
10 of 23 users found this helpful1013
All this user's reviews
1
principaldgDec 30, 2015
There's zero reason to go see this film. Terrible plot, and the recurring theme that African Americans used to be treated poorly in this country. We get it. So overdone, unoriginal, and just flat not entertaining at all.
10 of 23 users found this helpful1013
All this user's reviews
8
Movie1997Dec 25, 2015
To be honest, I didn't know whether or not I was going to like this movie or not. I will say that it's a really good movie, but not a great one. Let me split the movie into roughly three acts. As for the first act, I felt that it went on forTo be honest, I didn't know whether or not I was going to like this movie or not. I will say that it's a really good movie, but not a great one. Let me split the movie into roughly three acts. As for the first act, I felt that it went on for too long. Most Tarantinto fans realize that he likes his really drawn out scenes of nothing but pure dialouge. And it's fine when it works, but for the first third of this movie, it takes way to long to set up its characters. And not all of them are even introduced until closer to the second third of the movie. And plus, Walton Goggins got really annoying from the get go. In a nutshell, the first third had me worried. But by the time we jump into the second act, the dialouge starts to get more interesting and the movie starts to take a different turn and reveal itself. The who done it storyline really starts to becoming engaging in great Tarantino fashion. You start putting the pieces of the puzzle together. By the third act, the dialouge still becomes intriguing in the longer and drawn out scenes. However, they never got boring by this point because we're into the thick of the meat (metaphorically speaking). So in a nutshell, "The Hateful Eight" has a slow setup, but once you really get into the main plot, it's a free for all and a rather fun and crazy one to say the least. I wish the movie didn't waste it's time so much with its slow first act. It could have been an all around great Tarantino movie. Nevertheless, it was still a fun movie to watch and I'm glad I did watch it. And I'm glad it got even better as the film went on. I'm going to give "The Hateful Eight" a B+!… Expand
12 of 28 users found this helpful1216
All this user's reviews
0
hotfromcauldronDec 30, 2015
Tarentino’s eighth and ninth film is a horse poop ( this site won't let me say the word) game of Clue that is clueless. In Tarentino’s words - it’s a game of patience- for anyone sitting through it. If these actors turned it up one moreTarentino’s eighth and ninth film is a horse poop ( this site won't let me say the word) game of Clue that is clueless. In Tarentino’s words - it’s a game of patience- for anyone sitting through it. If these actors turned it up one more notch it could have been an incredible SNL skit. It’s a cliche to put the beginning at the end in 2015. In fact every possible theme or gimmick has been used to much greater effect in his last seven films. And being in 70 mm is a waste - one panoramic shot of a stagecoach gliding in the snow doesn’t hold a candle to Ben-Hur, West Side Story or even Cleopatra which was better than this - if you can believe that! If he deleted the “N” word and all the who’s who and all the repetitious dull banter - he would have been left with a twenty minute bloody good short. In fact if he deleted this awful script he would have saved me three hours of my life.… Expand
9 of 21 users found this helpful912
All this user's reviews
0
ThomasSmithsonJul 9, 2016
The Boring Eight?

Tarantino obviously lives in that bubble where everyone tells him how great he is, but knowing how brilliant he can be, I can tell him what crap this is.... I thought Snakes On A Plane was Samuel L's worst, I wasThe Boring Eight?

Tarantino obviously lives in that bubble where everyone tells him how great he is, but knowing how brilliant he can be, I can tell him what crap this is....

I thought Snakes On A Plane was Samuel L's worst, I was wrong. Just goes to show, we all need a paycheck....… Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
6
WindrammerDec 29, 2015
The first half of the movie was enjoyable. Not remarkable, but still good. But pretty much exactly halfway through the movie it seems that Tarantino started getting excited, and the movie started getting weird. It lost a lot of substance inThe first half of the movie was enjoyable. Not remarkable, but still good. But pretty much exactly halfway through the movie it seems that Tarantino started getting excited, and the movie started getting weird. It lost a lot of substance in the glee of the mayhem, and it was just tiring. It felt like a story that wasn't fully fleshed out, and a pace that wasn't given thought. The plot is still clever, and in that it almost feels like kind of a waste with the execution.… Expand
7 of 17 users found this helpful710
All this user's reviews
0
raporgiMar 2, 2016
2 frickin hours too long. The 1st hour is basically everybody calling Sam Jack a n-i-g-g-g-e-rr. The rest is an endless repetition of threats and mean spirited commentary. Really do yourself a favor and watch any other Western but this.
8 of 20 users found this helpful812
All this user's reviews
3
Q8MarrongGlaceMar 7, 2016
Waste of time movie My 3 points goes to music and picture especially for the snow flecks and the exhale breath other than that nothing much to worth watching this movie which it was a big shock for all that high rating and nominations !
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
BrianMcCriticDec 30, 2015
Definitely not my favorite Tarantino film, but there is still plenty to like here. Like all Tarantino films it's about the characters and the dialogue. Even when you get to the more violent scenes in the movie you still get the charactersDefinitely not my favorite Tarantino film, but there is still plenty to like here. Like all Tarantino films it's about the characters and the dialogue. Even when you get to the more violent scenes in the movie you still get the characters motivations because of that great dialogue. You really understand why. Finally I got to say Samuel L. Jackson is the absolute stand out. He's never been better. A-… Expand
7 of 18 users found this helpful711
All this user's reviews
0
FilmWatchaJan 17, 2016
Quite easily the worst film I've ever seen. What a flogfest. Garbage story line, garbage dialogue, and set in one room for almost 3 hours. How this film has received any positive reviews completely boggles me.
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
9
NomusJan 2, 2016
Modern american society is afraid to look at it's past. That's why they don't want to like this movie because it contains too much n-word and women abuse. For those who is not afraid i would say it's a great Tarantino movie on par withModern american society is afraid to look at it's past. That's why they don't want to like this movie because it contains too much n-word and women abuse. For those who is not afraid i would say it's a great Tarantino movie on par with Reservoir dogs. Only this man is able to make 3 hours of talking interesting.… Expand
8 of 21 users found this helpful813
All this user's reviews
10
hazlnutJan 1, 2016
In a world, where films are boring and predictable reboots, remakes, super hero CGI crap-ola, one filmmaker continues to turn out original, engaging, American masterpieces. Bob Richardson's brilliant cinematography didn't hurt neither (andIn a world, where films are boring and predictable reboots, remakes, super hero CGI crap-ola, one filmmaker continues to turn out original, engaging, American masterpieces. Bob Richardson's brilliant cinematography didn't hurt neither (and I'm not talking about the landscapes, which are few, I'm talking about making a film taking place in one big room look better than Star Wars--that's genius). Tarantino has got the suspense of Hitchcock and the bloody, gutsy take-no-prisoners attitude of Peckinpah. THIS is the film that film lovers have been waiting all year to see.… Expand
8 of 21 users found this helpful813
All this user's reviews
6
csw12Dec 25, 2015
Like many movies this year, part of the film is great and the other not so much. The hateful eight has a horrible beginning but by the half way point because something worth seeing. The second half has better dialogue, better acting, andLike many movies this year, part of the film is great and the other not so much. The hateful eight has a horrible beginning but by the half way point because something worth seeing. The second half has better dialogue, better acting, and something to keep your eyes open. There is no excuse for the length.… Expand
9 of 24 users found this helpful915
All this user's reviews
1
wild5448Jan 2, 2016
This is the first movie I've walked out on and left my boyfriend in the theater. It was TERRIBLE. There were things that should never be put into a movie and left me feeling disgusting. I went because the trailer look pretty good andThis is the first movie I've walked out on and left my boyfriend in the theater. It was TERRIBLE. There were things that should never be put into a movie and left me feeling disgusting. I went because the trailer look pretty good and previous Tarantino movies have been fine, but it was a complete disappointment.… Expand
6 of 16 users found this helpful610
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

68 Critic Reviews

7.6 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL