Spider-Man

9

RiverShenJun 30, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not only an amazing Spider-Man take, but also an amazing movie overall.
Likeable characters, thrilling action scenes and great Drama. Each and every person in this movie came out directly from a Comic-Book from the 1960's with all it's campiness but not in a bad way. The script is so well-written and the actors fit so well in this corny world that it only feels natural and charming. Peter's arc of going from the kid who says "Stop pretending to be (my father)!" to his Uncle to a (Spider) man who has the maturity to say "I have a father, his name was Ben Parker" is brilliant, Mary Jane's struggles to learn how to have self-value and understand love is beautiful and there's also an amazing Set-Up for a future Harry Osborn arc. William DaFoe is also a joy to watch and he succeds in delivering a villain that makes me fear him to the point that I feel he's a threat even to Tom Holland's Spider-Man (who faced Thanos, mind you). Amazing. Spectacular. Sensational. This is Spider-Man.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

RobertBobertJul 30, 2022

No words are needed here. THIS IS JUST A LEGEND!!!! I give this movie 90% also because I know better movies with Spider-man. But for 2002, this movie was simply incredible. Amazing CGI, Amazing Story, Amazing Action, Amazing Spider-man!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MovieMax55Apr 16, 2023

Still the best Spiderman movie and with the best Marvel villain, William Dafoe's Green Goblin. Sam Rami nailed it on his first try at a comic book translation to the big screen!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

LuisTop23Jul 31, 2023

E um otimo filme com um dos melhores atores para atuar e um começo extraordinário para o primeiro Homen Aranha.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Burmun-B2010Aug 15, 2023

This movie is one of those that brought comic book works into the limelight and brought them to their true place in the cinema. And it is officially a masterpiece. Its flaws are very minor. For example, the Green Goblin's costume is not veryThis movie is one of those that brought comic book works into the limelight and brought them to their true place in the cinema. And it is officially a masterpiece. Its flaws are very minor. For example, the Green Goblin's costume is not very interesting, or the special effects are not very strong. They didn't work (on the other hand, the stunts of the actors are extremely strong and the battle sequences become more natural) and I felt that James Franco's performance could have been better.
Instead, all the actors are excellent. From Tobey Maguire, who is the undisputed star of the film, to Cliff Robertson and Bill Nunn, who play extremely important roles, they have done a great job. Peter and Mary Jane are amazing. And the only thing I can do for this is Begham movie is that its epic and emotional moments affected me more than its action, and whenever the name of this movie comes up, I remember them.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ERG1008Aug 23, 2010

Geek gets bitten by "special" spider, gets spider powers, in love with mates girlfriend, mate has rich weird dad, look out here comes the Spiderman.
Very good Superhero flick with fast-paced action & big effects. Decent cast & Willem Dafoe isGeek gets bitten by "special" spider, gets spider powers, in love with mates girlfriend, mate has rich weird dad, look out here comes the Spiderman.
Very good Superhero flick with fast-paced action & big effects. Decent cast & Willem Dafoe is as good as he usually is.
Shame they had to ruin all the good work by playing the thoroughly dreadful Nickelback at the end.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

drlowdonApr 22, 2014

Having been bitten by a radioactive spider nerdy teen Peter Parker suddenly finds himself endowed with spider-like abilities. Able to sense danger and cling to walls he uses these powers to stop crime around New York City.

The story ofHaving been bitten by a radioactive spider nerdy teen Peter Parker suddenly finds himself endowed with spider-like abilities. Able to sense danger and cling to walls he uses these powers to stop crime around New York City.

The story of Spiderman is of course well known amongst comic and movie fans and the first in the trilogy deals with Peter Parkers attempts to deal with his new found abilities whilst fighting off the unwanted attentions of The Green Goblin. The movie is of course action packed featuring some breathtaking scenes but director Sam Raimi also brings the humorous dialogue from his days working on Xena: Warrior Princess making for a thoroughly enjoyable watch.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

jos95Sep 17, 2011

This was the first Marvel film I ever watched, and for this fact I have a large respect for this movie (clearly Sony doesn't respect this series at all, which is how the reboot came to pass) It has a decent story and solid acting, but theThis was the first Marvel film I ever watched, and for this fact I have a large respect for this movie (clearly Sony doesn't respect this series at all, which is how the reboot came to pass) It has a decent story and solid acting, but the Green Goblin's dialogue was just AWFUL and many of the visual effects did not age well. Despite this, it provides plenty of superhero excitement and fun for all tastes.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

grandpajoe6191Sep 21, 2011

"Spiderman" is a movie that flows like a comic; its rough but smooth, has deep character depth with witty dialogue, and most of all its pure fun just to watch your friendly neighborhood swing into widescreen action.

14 of 21 users found this helpful147

All this user's reviews

8

ZilcellNov 22, 2011

Good movie. It has a great way of telling the story, even though it is slow in some parts. I wish that there could have been more action though. It is a good superhero movie.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

TyranianApr 13, 2019

An awesome Spiderman film, Raimi nails it and the whole cast is perfect. Great humour, music and screenplay.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

imthenoobJul 8, 2020

Spider-Man is such an important movie because it really changed how people viewed superhero movies. It proved that you could make one that really connects to a mass audience rather than a select few. Then again, with Sam Rami at the helm, ISpider-Man is such an important movie because it really changed how people viewed superhero movies. It proved that you could make one that really connects to a mass audience rather than a select few. Then again, with Sam Rami at the helm, I doubt much could go wrong. He's a criminally underrated director that really solidified his status as a great director with this movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Tall_But_ShortJul 4, 2012

Sam Raimi's orginal Spider-Man was a great film, but not without flaws. Tobey Maguire is a great choice for the science nerd, Peter Parker. As Spider-man though, sometimes he does fall flat though because Spidey is supposed to be eccentricSam Raimi's orginal Spider-Man was a great film, but not without flaws. Tobey Maguire is a great choice for the science nerd, Peter Parker. As Spider-man though, sometimes he does fall flat though because Spidey is supposed to be eccentric delivering witty one-liners as he whacks bad guys. I would have loved to seen more of this in the movie, but it still doesn't take away from the overall value of the film. The origin story of Spider-man is amazingly well done in this movie but in some parts the movie falls apart. There are some cheesy moments in the film which didn't impress me at all such as the entire scene when the Green Goblin appears and the NYC parade float. These scenes do take away from the movie, which is a true shame. Kirsten Dunst was an excellent choice for Mary Jane Watson as was James Franco for Harry Osborn and Williem Dafoe as Norman Osborn. The build up to Peter discovering his powers is brilliant executed especially the bully scene during the beginning. Overall, Spider-man is a much more solid film than the newer reboot, The Amazing Spider-man, with Andrew Garfield.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

8

MonsieurEamesJul 12, 2012

Silly and over-the-top at times, with sometimes cheesy special effects, but Spider-Man works because of the cast's chemistry with each other and their likableness, as well as the genuine fun that occurs whenever Spidey is involved. EmotionalSilly and over-the-top at times, with sometimes cheesy special effects, but Spider-Man works because of the cast's chemistry with each other and their likableness, as well as the genuine fun that occurs whenever Spidey is involved. Emotional scenes were done well, also.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

btzneb92Aug 12, 2012

Intentionally campy, but a great deal of fun and heart in all of it.Intentionally campy, but a great deal of fun and heart in all of it. Intentionally campy, but a great deal of fun and heart in all of it.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Nov 28, 2012

For what it is, "Spider-Man" is still an outstanding adaptation of the comic hero I truly adore.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

SwatiFeb 12, 2013

It had all the superhuman crap you expect from a superhero movie. This is the only time I liked Kirsten Dunst. The villain, however, was pathetic. There were a few good scenes. On the whole I enjoyed it, but it was nowhere near the perfectIt had all the superhuman crap you expect from a superhero movie. This is the only time I liked Kirsten Dunst. The villain, however, was pathetic. There were a few good scenes. On the whole I enjoyed it, but it was nowhere near the perfect start to a franchise.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

survivorfan989May 26, 2013

The original Spider-Man in my eyes and while its probably been overshadowed now by the remake I still really enjoyed this one. A little corny perhaps but in a way that simply works thanks to the actors and characters in the film they play.The original Spider-Man in my eyes and while its probably been overshadowed now by the remake I still really enjoyed this one. A little corny perhaps but in a way that simply works thanks to the actors and characters in the film they play. Maguire plays a respectable Peter Parker and gives the character a likability that other actors would not have given. It's a great storyline also that moves well with a villain that was actually pretty creepy. Overall a solid comic book film with good sequels!… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

8

sil3nt_nickMar 27, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Tobey McGuire leads this talented cast on an adaptation of the classic Marvel series of the same name. Heart wrenching in some scenes, such as the death of Uncle Ben and very good action scenes made this movie a true success, along with its screenwriting.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

MalevolentJun 4, 2013

Sam Raimi did a good job. Tobey was great as Peter Parker/Spider-Man and James Franco was great as Harry Osborn. The Green Goblin reminded me very much of the Joker although his suit was a little silly. Some of the dialogue was cheesy but itSam Raimi did a good job. Tobey was great as Peter Parker/Spider-Man and James Franco was great as Harry Osborn. The Green Goblin reminded me very much of the Joker although his suit was a little silly. Some of the dialogue was cheesy but it doesn't matter. I liked the Stan Lee cameo even though they're all great. Its a really good Spider-Man movie.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

FranzHcriticJul 27, 2014

With an even pace, above average action scenes, and genuine emotional depth, it'll be enjoyable throughout the whole two hours. A thoughtful story about a man who becomes a superhero, and tries to win the heart of his longtime crush. ThereWith an even pace, above average action scenes, and genuine emotional depth, it'll be enjoyable throughout the whole two hours. A thoughtful story about a man who becomes a superhero, and tries to win the heart of his longtime crush. There were so many ways to f**k this up, and Sam Raimi didn't do that here. Here, he succeeded admirably. I still think Kirsten Dunst is annoying.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

ThatCooperGuyOct 10, 2015

Oh the nostalgia. If I wasn't watching Star Wars, I was watching Spider-Man. I still think this movie is entertaining, yes it's pretty campy and the visual effects look like garbage by today's standards, but every time I re-watch it I'mOh the nostalgia. If I wasn't watching Star Wars, I was watching Spider-Man. I still think this movie is entertaining, yes it's pretty campy and the visual effects look like garbage by today's standards, but every time I re-watch it I'm always in a good mood. The film score by Danny Elfman is terrific and I liked Tobey Maguire's portrayal of Peter Parker. He does look too old to be a teenager in the first film, but I still believed his sense of being an underdog who later gains these ultimate powers to save his hometown. Besides, he graduates high school pretty early in the film. It's aged, but I still enjoy watching it, it's a decent enough superhero movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

FreedomFightersOct 31, 2016

One of the movies credited with helping revitalize the superhero genre, "Spider-Man" is not perfect, but it's plenty of fun to watch, it's well-acted and well-directed. Sure, it's been outdone by other superhero films and it may no longer beOne of the movies credited with helping revitalize the superhero genre, "Spider-Man" is not perfect, but it's plenty of fun to watch, it's well-acted and well-directed. Sure, it's been outdone by other superhero films and it may no longer be the pinnacle of comic book films, but "Spider-Man" is still a very worthwhile watch for anyone that enjoys the web-slinger.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

DaEagleNov 15, 2013

An instant classic for superhero movies, succeeding with it's emotionally engaging and strong story, clever dialogue and well developed characters. Even the humor is extremely well done. Spider-Man is a great movie (Final Score: 8.65)

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

diogomendesJul 5, 2014

Tobey Maguire is a great Spidey and Kirsten Dunst is not hard to look at. This is a classic and a good one, I highly recommend it for the fans of the webslinger.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

BronsonApr 27, 2014

Sam Raimi's 2002 movie "Spider-Man" is a testament on how a good superhero movie is done. This also paved the way for future superhero movies with it's groundbreaking effects (for it's time) and likeable cast with Tobey Maguire as PeterSam Raimi's 2002 movie "Spider-Man" is a testament on how a good superhero movie is done. This also paved the way for future superhero movies with it's groundbreaking effects (for it's time) and likeable cast with Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker, William Dafoe as Norman Osborn, Kristen Dunst as Mary Jane and James Franco as Harry Osborn. Everything just works in this movie. Great villain. Great action. Great storytelling. Just a good movie across the board.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

SpiderPlayerMay 17, 2015

The film is great, has good special effects for its time, good story, I think I would have had a better relationship between Mary Jane and Peter Parker, but the film clearly shows this thing Spider Man responsibility, and the villain is greatThe film is great, has good special effects for its time, good story, I think I would have had a better relationship between Mary Jane and Peter Parker, but the film clearly shows this thing Spider Man responsibility, and the villain is great and interesting.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

SythusRATINGSOct 22, 2014

Peter Parker (Maguire), after being bitten by a genetically altered spider, becomes Spider-Man, a hero of superhuman strength with the ability to cling to any surface. He dedicates himself to a life of fighting crime, while living a doublePeter Parker (Maguire), after being bitten by a genetically altered spider, becomes Spider-Man, a hero of superhuman strength with the ability to cling to any surface. He dedicates himself to a life of fighting crime, while living a double life as a superhero and working student.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

CineAutoctonoJul 21, 2015

Too bad that Spider -Man is not the first Marvel film but that movie is really lovely, as he began the history of this wonderful superhero , and always leaves her web at the scene of the good deed.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

kyle20ellisMar 31, 2022

I am not into action films particularly,(I'm 17) but this was a really pleasant surprise. This is a well-designed, well-acted and well-directed film, that is close to the comics, which my younger brother used to collect. I loved the musicI am not into action films particularly,(I'm 17) but this was a really pleasant surprise. This is a well-designed, well-acted and well-directed film, that is close to the comics, which my younger brother used to collect. I loved the music score by Danny Elfman, very like Batman. The special effects were excellent, especially with the scene on the bridge, and the direction from Sam Raimi was fast-paced and secure. But for me, the acting was the best aspect of the movie. Tobey Maguire was the biggest surprise. Usually actors playing comic book heroes are bland, but Maguire was not that at all. If anything he was very charming. Kirsten Dunst portrays the thankless role of the damsel in distress, and I must say, she is very impressive. J.K Simmons gets the most laughs as Jameson, but the best actor was Willem Dafoe as Norman Osborn aka the Green Goblin. He not only looked the part of the Green Goblin, but brought some welcome gravitas to the role. The story is sweet and sometimes poignant towards the beginning, though the only real complaints I have of this movie is that the script at times is a little uneven, and the film is a bit long. All in all, a satisfying take on the comic book hero. 8/10 Bethany Cox.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

aadityamudharApr 18, 2016

The original Spider-Man in my eyes and while its probably been overshadowed now by the remake I still really enjoyed this one. A little corny perhaps but in a way that simply works thanks to the actors and characters in the film they play.The original Spider-Man in my eyes and while its probably been overshadowed now by the remake I still really enjoyed this one. A little corny perhaps but in a way that simply works thanks to the actors and characters in the film they play. Maguire plays a respectable Peter Parker and gives the character a likability that other actors would not have given. It's a great storyline also that moves well with a villain that was actually pretty creepy. Overall a solid comic book film with good sequels!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeJan 22, 2016

Spider-Man is an enjoyable installment that seems to be getting the plots between Peter Parker just right. The first is truly the best out of the other Spider-Man installments.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

SonEdoMar 20, 2016

My first superhero movie that I ever saw in cinemas, so yes there will be some bias. Green Goblin is my favourite villain because of this, Dafoe was great in the role.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Shadow1Apr 10, 2016

This is best film of the 2002 . This movie has good story , but story in Spider-man 3 better than story in Spider-man . Im love this film because I like Spider-man and films with amazing storyline .

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

ReelViews94Mar 23, 2016

The pic’s first, and better, half is devoted to Peter’s makeover from campus dweeb to physically unique righter-of-wrongs. While visiting a Columbia U. science lab, Peter is bitten by a mutant blue-and-red spider. Next day, his vision isThe pic’s first, and better, half is devoted to Peter’s makeover from campus dweeb to physically unique righter-of-wrongs. While visiting a Columbia U. science lab, Peter is bitten by a mutant blue-and-red spider. Next day, his vision is perfect and he’s newly buff, and it isn’t long before he discovers he’s capable of spinning industrial-strength webs and walking up buildings.

He first uses his new strength and acrobatic skills to dispatch Mary Jane’s a-hole b.f. in a school fight, then thinks to impress her by earning money in a wrestling challenge matched against a monster named Bone Saw. This entire apprenticeship section was always going to live or die on the charm and appeal of the actor playing Peter, and the initial sweet sensitivity Maguire conveys, followed by the growing thrill of self-discovery of his new superhuman abilities, proves captivating.

Peter’s strictly larky use of his powers comes to an unwelcome end when his uncle Ben (Cliff Robertson), who with wife May (Rosemary Harris) has raised the boy, is killed in a Manhattan carjacking. Donning Spider-Man gear and swinging via self-generated threads from building to building like an urban Tarzan, he dispatches the culprit while deftly eluding police seizure. Already in this early major action sequence, though, something feels a bit off; the movement seems herky-jerky, the pursuit unnecessarily hurried, so that while the sight of the young crime-buster gallivanting through the nocturnal canyons of New York City is impressive, it lacks the desired visceral thrill.

Naturally, Spider-Man requires an adversary, and he gets one in the form of the Green Goblin (Willem Dafoe), an armor-plated fiend who zips around like a rabid snowboarder on a heavily armed glider dropping pumpkin bombs on uncomprehending foes. Like Spider-Man, the Goblin has a human identity, that of Norman Osborn, an ousted corporate arms manufacturer who becomes a Jekyll-and-Hyde upon consuming an experimental formula of his own devising. Unlike Peter, Norman can’t control when he slips into his alternate self, and Dafoe’s best moments come when the two sides of his personality argue with one another and flip back and forth as quickly as a light switch.

Unfortunately, when “Spider-Man” settles into full superhero mode an hour in, the conventional contours of David Koepp’s script come fully to the fore. With the Green Goblin committing such heinous acts as blitzing a World Unity Festival in Times Square toplining Macy Gray and threatening to drop Mary Jane and a Roosevelt Island tram loaded with kids into the East River, he and Spider-Man face off in increasingly standard-issue good guy/bad guy fashion, with no bigger issues to give their rivalry special import. Further deflating the balloon is an abundance of over-cranked digital physical action that’s singularly lacking in grace or the feel of real movement, human or animal.

Welcome compensation comes in the form of Peter’s continued pursuit of Mary Jane, who remains oblivious to his dual personality for some time but eventually warms to his newfound confidence. For many teenage boys, pic’s highlight will not be found among the action interludes but rather in the scene of Mary Jane, her flimsy shirt drenched by rain, peeling back the lower part of Spider-Man’s facemask in order to kiss him while he’s hanging upside down in a dark street.

Ironically, it’s when “Spider-Man” sticks to simple human interaction that the film breathes and ingratiates itself. Chemistry between Maguire and the winning Dunst is excellent, and there are good moments, too, between Maguire and James Franco, who plays Norman’s unhappy son and Peter’s only friend at school, as well as with Robertson and Harris as Peter’s doting substitute parents. Cackling behind his armored Goblin costume, Dafoe is stuck with routine villainy when not writhing through his transformations, while standout supporting turn is served up by J.K. Simmons, who brilliantly catches his piece’s comicbook origins while snapping out funny one-liners as a cynical newspaper editor.

Physically imposing production is notable for Neil Spisak’s production design, which involves considerable invention but also allows New York City to play itself without Gotham City-like stylization. James Acheson’s costumes, beginning with the terrific ribbed Spider-Man outfit, are splendid, Danny Elfman’s score punches things up in customary form, and Don Burgess’ lensing, while accommodating the countless effects, makes the actors look great.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

SrPepeNov 29, 2017

A pesar de la historia de orígenes de Spiderman (horrible por cierto) la película está buena y los actores son geniales. Marca una nueva era en el cine.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

FilmClubMar 27, 2016

The pic’s first, and better, half is devoted to Peter’s makeover from campus dweeb to physically unique righter-of-wrongs. While visiting a Columbia U. science lab, Peter is bitten by a mutant blue-and-red spider. Next day, his vision isThe pic’s first, and better, half is devoted to Peter’s makeover from campus dweeb to physically unique righter-of-wrongs. While visiting a Columbia U. science lab, Peter is bitten by a mutant blue-and-red spider. Next day, his vision is perfect and he’s newly buff, and it isn’t long before he discovers he’s capable of spinning industrial-strength webs and walking up buildings.

He first uses his new strength and acrobatic skills to dispatch Mary Jane’s a-hole b.f. in a school fight, then thinks to impress her by earning money in a wrestling challenge matched against a monster named Bone Saw. This entire apprenticeship section was always going to live or die on the charm and appeal of the actor playing Peter, and the initial sweet sensitivity Maguire conveys, followed by the growing thrill of self-discovery of his new superhuman abilities, proves captivating.

Peter’s strictly larky use of his powers comes to an unwelcome end when his uncle Ben (Cliff Robertson), who with wife May (Rosemary Harris) has raised the boy, is killed in a Manhattan carjacking. Donning Spider-Man gear and swinging via self-generated threads from building to building like an urban Tarzan, he dispatches the culprit while deftly eluding police seizure. Already in this early major action sequence, though, something feels a bit off; the movement seems herky-jerky, the pursuit unnecessarily hurried, so that while the sight of the young crime-buster gallivanting through the nocturnal canyons of New York City is impressive, it lacks the desired visceral thrill.

Naturally, Spider-Man requires an adversary, and he gets one in the form of the Green Goblin (Willem Dafoe), an armor-plated fiend who zips around like a rabid snowboarder on a heavily armed glider dropping pumpkin bombs on uncomprehending foes. Like Spider-Man, the Goblin has a human identity, that of Norman Osborn, an ousted corporate arms manufacturer who becomes a Jekyll-and-Hyde upon consuming an experimental formula of his own devising. Unlike Peter, Norman can’t control when he slips into his alternate self, and Dafoe’s best moments come when the two sides of his personality argue with one another and flip back and forth as quickly as a light switch.

Unfortunately, when “Spider-Man” settles into full superhero mode an hour in, the conventional contours of David Koepp’s script come fully to the fore. With the Green Goblin committing such heinous acts as blitzing a World Unity Festival in Times Square toplining Macy Gray and threatening to drop Mary Jane and a Roosevelt Island tram loaded with kids into the East River, he and Spider-Man face off in increasingly standard-issue good guy/bad guy fashion, with no bigger issues to give their rivalry special import. Further deflating the balloon is an abundance of over-cranked digital physical action that’s singularly lacking in grace or the feel of real movement, human or animal.

Welcome compensation comes in the form of Peter’s continued pursuit of Mary Jane, who remains oblivious to his dual personality for some time but eventually warms to his newfound confidence. For many teenage boys, pic’s highlight will not be found among the action interludes but rather in the scene of Mary Jane, her flimsy shirt drenched by rain, peeling back the lower part of Spider-Man’s facemask in order to kiss him while he’s hanging upside down in a dark street.

Ironically, it’s when “Spider-Man” sticks to simple human interaction that the film breathes and ingratiates itself. Chemistry between Maguire and the winning Dunst is excellent, and there are good moments, too, between Maguire and James Franco, who plays Norman’s unhappy son and Peter’s only friend at school, as well as with Robertson and Harris as Peter’s doting substitute parents. Cackling behind his armored Goblin costume, Dafoe is stuck with routine villainy when not writhing through his transformations, while standout supporting turn is served up by J.K. Simmons, who brilliantly catches his piece’s comicbook origins while snapping out funny one-liners as a cynical newspaper editor.

Physically imposing production is notable for Neil Spisak’s production design, which involves considerable invention but also allows New York City to play itself without Gotham City-like stylization. James Acheson’s costumes, beginning with the terrific ribbed Spider-Man outfit, are splendid, Danny Elfman’s score punches things up in customary form, and Don Burgess’ lensing, while accommodating the countless effects, makes the actors look great.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Titanic21Mar 18, 2018

The original Spider-Man movie has in my eyes what all the new Marvel and especially DC movies are lacking of nowadys: Lovable characters, reasonable depth and emotion. Sure, this one is by far not as much stuffed with action and effects asThe original Spider-Man movie has in my eyes what all the new Marvel and especially DC movies are lacking of nowadys: Lovable characters, reasonable depth and emotion. Sure, this one is by far not as much stuffed with action and effects as others, but exactly that's it what makes Spider-Man so sympathic to me. The atmosphere is pretty sad most the runtime and for the first time I could relate to the actors or at least to their roles, which are from my point of view well casted and more importantly feel with them. This movie didn't make me cry and neither laugh, but it's quite remarkable to have some calm moments in times of evil needing to be defeated. Unlike many other superficial action and especially super hero movies, this one was to stay in my memory long time after and for sure this one has one of the most important voicelines to start with. I am very pleased this movie is there and I wish for many of the upcoming Super Hero series to take Spider-Man as an example for how they should be made.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

KelvinSelimorFeb 2, 2022

Spider-Man. Great power and great responsibility. Beautifully filmed and superbly acted, this is the start of the Peter Parker film series. The effects look great for 2002 too.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

LoletinAlexisJun 24, 2019

Sam Raimi's Spiderman continues to demonstrate even today that he is an example to follow.
This first installment is great and maintains a correct balance on elements such as humor and drama. What I have missed a little is more action.
AndSam Raimi's Spiderman continues to demonstrate even today that he is an example to follow.
This first installment is great and maintains a correct balance on elements such as humor and drama. What I have missed a little is more action.
And Tobey... Oh, Tobey. He was just perfect for the character.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

EgeBerkJul 18, 2019

The most beautiful film in the Spiderman series maybe because it's the first time I love it so much or because I watched it as a kid but I think this is the most successful film.
Although it was shot in 2002, it was both emotional and funnyThe most beautiful film in the Spiderman series maybe because it's the first time I love it so much or because I watched it as a kid but I think this is the most successful film.
Although it was shot in 2002, it was both emotional and funny and immersive
of course the effects were bad because it was shot in 2002, but it doesn't matter if there is a good scenario,also acting very good quality and Toby is best Spiderman… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

ErikTheCriticOct 5, 2018

It has thrills, it has action and it has heart. The film successfully combines the elements and brings us an entertaining origin story of Peter Parker.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

BrunoVn00Mar 31, 2019

This is one of the best super hero movies ever made. Granted, it's not high art and not as good as its sequel, but for a superhero movie and one of the first to truly define the genre, it's fun and really entertaining. It has good andThis is one of the best super hero movies ever made. Granted, it's not high art and not as good as its sequel, but for a superhero movie and one of the first to truly define the genre, it's fun and really entertaining. It has good and memorable action scenes and yes it's a cheesy and silly movie, with over-the-top acting, cartoon characters and cheesy dialogue but that's what makes this movie so special, that it doesn't take itself too seriously and is still so much fun. It's a good summer movie overall.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

zNeverSleepingApr 5, 2020

Nostalgia define essa obra. Sinto saudade das OST's de identidade, as aberturas com os créditos e até mesmo do Tobey como Spider-Man.

Uma das características que mais gosto nesse filme é a dualidade de camadas, que geralmente está maisNostalgia define essa obra. Sinto saudade das OST's de identidade, as aberturas com os créditos e até mesmo do Tobey como Spider-Man.

Uma das características que mais gosto nesse filme é a dualidade de camadas, que geralmente está mais presente em animações. Aqui temos aspectos mais óbvios e aqueles que só uma pessoa mais atenta e madura perceberá. Isso fica ainda mais perceptível no segundo filme, que é livre para todas as idades e ainda sim é pesadíssimo. Fico imaginando quão mais relevante esse filme seria se fosse abordado hoje em dia, de maneira mais seria, como a trilogia do Nolan. A perda do seu Tio por conta de uma atitude vingativa, a relação do Harry com seu pai, o bullying estereotipado que assim foi enxergado por muito tempo, até mesmo a relação com Mary Jane e o poder de escolha da mesma, fora a mídia massacrando o Herói apenas para lucrar mais.

A OST do filme é lendária, só de escutar já emociona. Isso é talvez o melhor exemplo de uma musica de Herói. A fotografia funciona muito bem nas cenas onde o mesmo voa, e as cenas de luta são bem estruturadas. Os momentos de alivio cômico são memoráveis e te fazem gargalhar.

Quanto aos personagens, devemos lembrar que o foco aqui é o publico jovem, dai seria errado pedir demais profundidade, mas mesmo assim há uma presença aqui. Peter é um personagem muito fácil de simpatizar, visto que ele é humanizado a todo momento, tomando decisões que provavelmente tomaríamos, decisões essas que corroboram para problemas que o mesmo terá de enfrentar no futuro. Harry tem um relacionamento conturbado com o pai. Ele tem uma certa admiração, porém sente-se a sombra dele e tem a responsabilidade de seguir os mesmos passos. Já não bastasse isso, sente ciumes da relação dele com seu melhor amigo, que o mesmo deixa claro que admira. Já sobre o pai, temos uma arrogância natural por parte de um estudo cientifico, como também temos um desespero por haver um risco de perder a verba do seu projeto e ver a sua empresa a beira da falência. Atitudes devem ser tomadas, mas é sabido que a ciência não é amante do tempo - Willem Dafoe estava excelente no papel. Rosemary Harris consegue ser suave, mostrar sua fragilidade devido a sua idade, e atua muito bem nos momentos onde o drama é exigido. E por ultimo, e não menos importante, J. K. Simmons é lendário e seu papel já faz parte da historia do cinema como um dos mais cômicos e marcantes.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MaxShibeSep 14, 2019

By far one of the best superhero movies ever made. Spider-Man 1 does have some dated effects..But what movie from that Time period doesn't? Spider-Man 1 is definitely a masterpiece and a Classic.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Dungeon00XNov 23, 2019

So this movie is still pretty good, all things considered. I still think it has some great cinematography, and great performances from all the actors. It probably hasn't aged well, but we still got some amazing Macho Man Randy Savage moments.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

ShawnSmithNov 6, 2019

So many Spiderman movies out there but this will always be the original. Though the other ones have better CGI and maybe action sequences, none can match the plot this one has.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

AGuyFromGothamOct 19, 2019

Great Origin For Spider-Man.
This movie is great comic book movie.
Storyline is good.Acting is good.I liked this movie.This Trilogy are only Marvel movies I loved.This is my childhood

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MrNightOwlAug 31, 2021

A careful start, from the best comic trilogy yet. Anyway, the best comes with continue part...

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Dovakinxr7Aug 21, 2020

O filme homem aranha na época é claro teve bons efeitos especiais, um dos primeiros filmes decentes da Marvel, Tobey Maguire é o melhor (Spider‑Man) do cinema e trilha sonora é de arrepiar.
O filme falha em romance chatinho e lutas não sãoO filme homem aranha na época é claro teve bons efeitos especiais, um dos primeiros filmes decentes da Marvel, Tobey Maguire é o melhor (Spider‑Man) do cinema e trilha sonora é de arrepiar.
O filme falha em romance chatinho e lutas não são bem coreografadas.
Um ótimo filme!recomendo dms!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Onlyclassicvg1Dec 19, 2020

Peter Parker (Maguire), after being bitten by a genetically altered spider, becomes Spider-Man, a hero of superhuman strength with the ability to cling to any surface. He dedicates himself to a life of fighting crime, while living a doublePeter Parker (Maguire), after being bitten by a genetically altered spider, becomes Spider-Man, a hero of superhuman strength with the ability to cling to any surface. He dedicates himself to a life of fighting crime, while living a double life as a superhero and working student. (Sony)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

FilmGuyDudeDec 27, 2020

A great breath of fresh air to bringing the comic book to life. The first official Spider-Man most certainly executes the realistic brutality as well as the balance of light and dark in the name of filmmaking.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Agentep99Jan 27, 2022

A very good super-hero movie, yes it was campy, but that kind of had it's charm

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

geewahJan 30, 2021

Still remains as arguably the strongest of all the Spider-Man movies.
Tobey Maguire surprises as Peter Parker in this touching and well paced superhero flick.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

mikesgold2KFeb 8, 2022

Dalej bardzo dobra ekranizacja przygód człowieka-pająka i jego genezy, ze świetnie obsadzonymi rolami: od Petera Parker, przez Normana Osborna po J.J. Jamesona

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Aboodash56Jul 31, 2021

Spider-Man does great job in bringing the webslinger into the big screen and paves the way for the comic book movie craze in the 2000s. Sam Raimi does an exceptional job in bringing the character to life and manages to humanize him andSpider-Man does great job in bringing the webslinger into the big screen and paves the way for the comic book movie craze in the 2000s. Sam Raimi does an exceptional job in bringing the character to life and manages to humanize him and fleshing out his world. Tobey Maguire will always be the Spider-Man I grew up with and Williem Dafoe is fantastic as the Green Goblin. The action sequences are well-choreographed and hold up well for the most part, especially the final fight scene. The cinematography is dazzling to look at and the editing keeps the movie at a nice pace. The story is also well-written, as it manages to flesh out the characters and the world of Spider-Man. This film will always have a special place in my heart and it still remains one of the best superhero origin films ever made.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Stagger74Jul 16, 2021

********************************************************
》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JonnyTheGamerFeb 18, 2022

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

LibertyLemurMay 2, 2022

This movie was a pretty good start for the Spider-man Movie Franchise.

I know people give Tobey Maguire **** for being meek and a "bad actor," but if you ask me, I like how much of a dork Tobey makes Peter look in this movie. There alsoThis movie was a pretty good start for the Spider-man Movie Franchise.

I know people give Tobey Maguire **** for being meek and a "bad actor," but if you ask me, I like how much of a dork Tobey makes Peter look in this movie. There also tends to be criticism of how Tobey isn't as humourous as Spider-man in the comics, which I agree with, but it's not like he didn't show any humour. On the contrary, he still cracked jokes on par with Spider-man's humour.

Willem Dafoe's performance as the Green Goblin is hilarious, and he does an excellent job at bringing home the insanity that is the Green Goblin. He suits the Goblin so well that I see him as my definitive Green Goblin. Whenever I read a line from the Green Goblin, I hear Willem Dafoe's voice.

Some people may look back on this film and think it's (for lack of a better word) "cringey" because of the campiness. But, honestly, I love the comic book silliness of this film. It makes the movie a lot homier.

If there is anything, I will say, Tobey Maguire has crappy and monotone narration, and I think it would be better without it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DolphinReviewsJul 20, 2022

Pioneered the superhero genre. Everything about this movie is great. Must watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SaladaumAug 3, 2022

incredible!One of the best Spider-Man movies ever.The characters are good, deep and we really care about them, except for MJ.JJJ is wonderful, very good, the green elf is not even spoken, only the costume is strange.Sam raimi did very well.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

j9hnny97Sep 8, 2022

This movie isn't perfect but for me it's a classic and has (for me) the best version of Spider-Man to ever hit the screens. I give it a re-watch from time to time for that nostalgia craving moments and it never disappoints.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Chriscorc876Apr 10, 2023

Sam Raimi's Spider-Man (2002) is a classic superhero film that delivers on both action and emotion. The movie does an excellent job of capturing the essence of the iconic comic book character, and Tobey Maguire gives a convincing performanceSam Raimi's Spider-Man (2002) is a classic superhero film that delivers on both action and emotion. The movie does an excellent job of capturing the essence of the iconic comic book character, and Tobey Maguire gives a convincing performance as the awkward and endearing Peter Parker. The action sequences are thrilling and visually stunning, and the film's soundtrack adds to the overall experience. The supporting cast, including Willem Dafoe as the menacing Green Goblin and Kirsten Dunst as the charming Mary Jane Watson, adds depth to the story. Overall, Spider-Man is a must-see for fans of the genre and a timeless classic that still holds up today.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Fixer84Mar 15, 2023

Perhaps the film that definitively launched the superhero genre in the cinema. Definitely, a milestone that still today, after more than 20 years, is still enjoyed.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

PasquiMay 10, 2023

Good writing, good special effects, good characters (apart from MJ, which is not terrible like in the third film) and good soundtrack.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JacobApr 18, 2014

CC: This film is a mixed bag especially given how big a part of my childhood it was. On one end most of the acting is good, the first half of the movie is really good, and the film is fun with a nice feel good atmosphere. At the same time theCC: This film is a mixed bag especially given how big a part of my childhood it was. On one end most of the acting is good, the first half of the movie is really good, and the film is fun with a nice feel good atmosphere. At the same time the film is bogged down by a not as good second half with little supposed, some cheesy dialogue, and some not so great acting. At the end of day though I still have fun watching this movie and prefer it over the reboot. It’s a fun summer blockbuster, which is what it should be and is worth a watch.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

TokyochuchuDec 2, 2012

Spider-Man is a fun superhero movie. It's colorful and has some good fights between hero and villain. Beyond that, there is not much else to say. It's not a masterpiece or anything but Spider-Man does more than enough to entertain throughSpider-Man is a fun superhero movie. It's colorful and has some good fights between hero and villain. Beyond that, there is not much else to say. It's not a masterpiece or anything but Spider-Man does more than enough to entertain through it's running time.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

JawsPapi87Aug 25, 2011

It's not a huge stand out now with all the superhero movies but in 2002 it was pretty significant. It doesn't have a great script but it's entertaining enough

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

EssenceOfSugarJul 18, 2012

I found Maguire portrayed Spider-Man in an accurate way - I don't think Parker is supposed to be cool and Maguire had that specific look about him. The story itself was entertaining, although it was slightly imbalanced in the way that we sawI found Maguire portrayed Spider-Man in an accurate way - I don't think Parker is supposed to be cool and Maguire had that specific look about him. The story itself was entertaining, although it was slightly imbalanced in the way that we saw too much of Spider-Man rather than the villain, but that's not a particular problem, in way of the style of development of the story. Many of my concerns were with Mary Jane, who I felt kind of interfered in some scenes where she tried too hard to look independent but it was obviously see through as she behaved much more desperate and helpless. The villain was O.K, but I think his costume looked a bit childish and plasticky. This film is entertaining but it is flawed. Maguire is an extremely good Spider-Man - much better suited to the role than Garfield - but it was mostly the other characters who needed more space and time to improve in light of the flaws that I have pointed out.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

spadenxDec 9, 2011

It wasnt that bad. The acting wasnt as good as I expected but the story was solid and Green Goblin was a great start off villian for the film. I think fans of the series would enjoy it.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

cameronmorewoodNov 12, 2012

Spider-Man jumps into what seems to be a third-act way too quickly. I want to know more about Peter Parker's past. Who were his parents? How did they die? Though the action is very good, the film seems far to anxious to get to it.

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

7

Rox22Mar 14, 2013

An alright Spider-man movie. Sam Raimi did a decent job at telling his origin story. However the special effects were a bit sloppy at times and the Green Goblin's costume was just a joke. William Dafoe on the other hand was extremely good asAn alright Spider-man movie. Sam Raimi did a decent job at telling his origin story. However the special effects were a bit sloppy at times and the Green Goblin's costume was just a joke. William Dafoe on the other hand was extremely good as Norman Osborn and really did a great job capturing his mentality (overdoing it a tad at time, but overall a good effort on his part.) Overall: Considering when it came out, it was a very good movie that had allot of minor flaws but it was still enjoyable none the less.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

SuperheroMoviesAug 3, 2013

Being my favorite superhero, Spider-Man is delivered with heart and a likable lead in Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker who shows a candid spirit towards his role. Despite some special effects being only average, overall Spider-Man is loads of fun.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

marcmyworksDec 2, 2013

A decent starting point in the Spider-Man franchise which is only weakened by some Sam Raimi cheesiness and the worst Green Goblin costume ever featured.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

Meth-dudeApr 19, 2014

The movie spider-man do not have enough action and the movie is too long.James Franco and Tobey Maguire are pretty good in their roles but the movie do not have what it takes to be a good movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

AaronWasserman2May 4, 2014

For its time Spider-Man revolitionized comic book movies. the movie was so enjoyable and still is. Raimi's film is very campy but does feel very much like a spidey world. While Dunst isnt so compelling. Franco, Maquire, Simmons, and DafoeFor its time Spider-Man revolitionized comic book movies. the movie was so enjoyable and still is. Raimi's film is very campy but does feel very much like a spidey world. While Dunst isnt so compelling. Franco, Maquire, Simmons, and Dafoe defintally are a plus… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MovieManiac83Apr 22, 2015

Recent times have been good to Marvel comics, and the long-anticipated arrival of Spider-Man represents the latest step up the ladder. Long the underdog in the motion picture arena, Marvel has at last been able to catch up to rival DC comicsRecent times have been good to Marvel comics, and the long-anticipated arrival of Spider-Man represents the latest step up the ladder. Long the underdog in the motion picture arena, Marvel has at last been able to catch up to rival DC comics by placing a trio of its superheroes into multiplexes - Blade, the X-Men, and Spider-Man. DC may have struck first with Superman and Batman, but, these days, the comics-to-cinema summit belongs to Stan Lee's corporation. The second X-Men movie is on its way, as are Daredevil, The Hulk, and, a little farther into the future, The Fantastic Four.

The first hour of Spider-Man is unquestionably better than the second. This is the segment of the film where Peter discovers his newfound powers and tentatively explores them. Covertly, then with more confidence, he stands up to the school bully. He also has to deal with his unrequited love for Mary Jane and cope with the responsibilities and consequences of using (or not using) his abilities. An exhilarating sequence in which Spider-Man first employs his webs to swing from building-to-building is filmed in such a manner that we can sense how close he is to losing control and plunging to the streets below. The latter half of the film is more action-oriented and features an excessive reliance upon special effects. The CGI work is not clumsily done, but it is evident when the movie switches from live actors to computer-generated ones. Peter Parker has a lot of appeal and emotional depth. Those qualities do not always remain in force once the mask is donned.

Spider-Man's greatest strength is Tobey Maguire. The Cider House Rules actor, who has never given a bad performance, is an inspired choice for the role. Not only is he capable of handling the role of nerdy Peter, but he has bulked up enough that he looks good under the spider-suit (that is, when it's him under it). Maguire never overacts the part, nor does he view this as camp. It's a quiet, serious performance, and it doesn't take us long to believe in Peter. And, when tragedy strikes, it's genuinely moving. Added to that, Maguire can make some extremely dopey lines of dialogue sound convincing. With this everyman interpretation, Maguire shows us what could have been with Michael Keaton as the Caped Crusader, but never was.

aimi's direction is solid, although not as involving as it was in the Evil Dead movies or his other superhero yarn, Darkman. He avoids an overabundance of trickery, but chooses his shots in a way that often gives us the sense of being on a journey with Spider-Man, rather than standing to the side as detached observers. The special effects may not be entirely convincing, but they do not eclipse the characters. Danny Elman's score is workmanlike and somewhat reminiscent of the music he composed for Batman.

Spider-Man gets the 2002 summer movie season off to a satisfying start. This is a pure popcorn movie - the kind of film one can unabashedly enjoy for what it is. There's plenty of visual flash and dizzying action, but not at the expense of the other qualities that make for a complete motion picture experience. As a character in a comic book, Spider-Man is four decades old. His leap into this new medium has rejuvenated the legend, and offers movie-goers an opportunity to sit back and enjoy the birth of a new cinematic superhero.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

waronassermanMay 2, 2015

lost a bit of magic over time but still one of the greatest comic book movies of all time! and an excellent start to Spider-Man's adventures on the big screen

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

luketeddyJul 16, 2015

very good movie from marvel even if spider-man 2 is better but this one is still pretty good. marry was not as bad as people say and this is a good watch.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Morbid_TzAug 7, 2015

Solid adaptation of one of the greatest comic book superheroes. To see one of my favourite childhood hero being brought to life on the big screen was something very satisfying. Solid performances from lead actors, effects are maybe outdatedSolid adaptation of one of the greatest comic book superheroes. To see one of my favourite childhood hero being brought to life on the big screen was something very satisfying. Solid performances from lead actors, effects are maybe outdated today, but back then it was something big. Villain is probably the weakest point in the movie, as Spider-Man's main nemesis Green Goblin looks like a standard Power Rangers baddie.
In my personal opinion, not that great but still very entertaining blockbuster that, along with X-Men started the new wave of superhero movies.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Cinemassacre94Mar 20, 2016

A SPIDER-MAN movie had been in the making for years. In the eighties, the schlockmeisters at Cannon Films threatened to make a low-budget feature film (which at one time was rumoured to star Bob Hoskins as Doc Ock) before the company wentA SPIDER-MAN movie had been in the making for years. In the eighties, the schlockmeisters at Cannon Films threatened to make a low-budget feature film (which at one time was rumoured to star Bob Hoskins as Doc Ock) before the company went under. Considering what they did with SUPERMAN IV: THE QUEST FOR PEACE, and what Menahem Golan did with CAPTAIN AMERICA & THE FANTASTIC FOUR, we should be grateful this project never came to fruition.
Throughout the nineties, James Cameron was attached to direct a big-budget version, with Leonardo Di Caprio rumoured to star. For one reason or another, this never happened. In 2000, Bryan Singer's X-MEN demonstrated that a credible, non-cartoony superhero film could be made, and would have crossover appeal beyond comic-book fans, opening the floodgates, from which the SPIDER-MAN series emerged.

Thus, in 2002, a SPIDER-MAN film finally hit the big-screen. Sam Raimi, director of THE EVIL DEAD series (not to mention DARKMAN- a nifty superhero film in it's own right) was on-board to direct, and Tobey Maguire, a low-key actor known for his work in films like THE CIDER HOUSE RULES and WONDER BOYS was signed to play the title role. At the time, he casting was ridiculed in the same way Michael Keaton being signed for BATMAN was over a decade earlier. Like BATMAN, a trailer was enough to change peoples' minds, and SPIDER-MAN opened amid a white-hot fury of hype, broke box-office records, and was well-received by fans and critics.

Ten years later, the first SPIDER-MAN holds up relatively well, although I'd wager that it loses some of it's luster in hindsight only due to the fact that later superhero entries (X2, BATMAN BEGINS, THE DARK KNIGHT, IRON MAN, THE AVENGERS and SPIDER-MAN 2) proved just how good a superhero film really could be.

In a way, the first SPIDER-MAN is like a rough draft for all the superhero films to follow. A good deal of time is spent establishing the character of Peter Parker, and Tobey Maguire absolutely anchors the film with a role he seems to have been born to play. In fact, Maguire is so good both in and out of the Spidey suit that he's still struggling to emerge from the typecasting that's linked him so closely to the part. The first section of the film is really good, establishing his sweet relationship with Aunt May, and Uncle Ben (beautifully played by Cliff Robertson in one of his final roles). Once he gets bitten, Maguire's (real) physical transformation is startling, as the usually gangly and weak-seeming Maguire was able to pack on pounds of muscle and instantly transform himself into a big-screen hero.
For me, the weaker parts of SPIDER-MAN mostly have to do with his relationship with Mary-Jane. I always liked Kirsten Dunst in the part, but other than the steamy rain-soaked upside-down kiss, I always felt the relationship came across as shallow. Sure, Parker is in love with her, but why? Because she's hot- that's why. And of course, Mary-Jane won't give him the time of day until he's absolutely ripped after the mid-way point, and her final confession of love to Parker seems unearned and phony, although Raimi takes the unusual step of ending the film without them together. Of course, that would all change later in the franchise, and the second film does indeed make the relationship a little more credible.

As Parker's best pal, we get James Franco, who was just coming off the amazing FREAKS & GEEKS. Franco's always been the kind of actor who can either knock your socks off or be as boring as watching paint dry. I always thought he was phoning it in as Harry Osborn, and this would actually get worse in each film.

But back to what works. The CGI, for the time, was truly-groundbreaking, and the FX still hold up pretty well, making the web-slinging look convincing, a considerable feat ten years ago (just look at how bad THE HULK looks in a film that was made a year later). Most importantly, SPIDER-MAN feels like a real “A-picture” meaning that all involved took it seriously, and didn't turn it into a campy ride, like what happened with the nineties post-Burton Batman movies. There's a reason SPIDER-MAN was a smash and crossed-over to a mainstream audience, and it's that- warts and all, it's quite a good film.

In his first outing as Spider-Man, Tobey Maguire is just great. Obviously he knew this role had the potential to make him a star, and he clearly threw himself into the role, giving a performance that compares favourably to the parts that helped him break-out in the nineties.

Willem Dafoe as Norman Osborn/ The Green Goblin. With the Goblin's suit is a bit dumb, Dafoe is excellent, striking exactly the right balance between the relatively sympathetic, weak Norman, and the evil incarnate of Green Goblin. The final moment, before he dies, when he says “Peter” in Norman's voice is one of the more affecting moments of the series.

Overall it's quite a good film.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

Aaron_WassermanMay 31, 2016

Great for the start of Spidey on the big screen, and for the true start of the superhero craze, but as time goes on its flaws become more apparent, but still after all this time Raimi's first movie is still enjoyable.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

superbatApr 24, 2020

Though I found it to be bit too silly at times (mainly the dialogue), Spider-Man is a decent movie nonetheless. Tobey Maguire does a good job as a relatable Peter Parker. Kirsten Dunst and Willem Dafoe are good in their roles as Mary Jane andThough I found it to be bit too silly at times (mainly the dialogue), Spider-Man is a decent movie nonetheless. Tobey Maguire does a good job as a relatable Peter Parker. Kirsten Dunst and Willem Dafoe are good in their roles as Mary Jane and Norman Osborn/Green Goblin.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Cameronius_113Mar 21, 2017

Spider-Man was released in 2002 and was directed by Sam Raimi. The film is about a high school kid named Peter Parker whose life changes completely when he is bitten by a radioactive spider and gains superpowers, going on to develop theSpider-Man was released in 2002 and was directed by Sam Raimi. The film is about a high school kid named Peter Parker whose life changes completely when he is bitten by a radioactive spider and gains superpowers, going on to develop the alter-ego of Spider-Man.
What makes this movie stand out from other superhero movies is how much attention to human detail it is given; we're presented with relatable every-day characters which we begin to care for because of how much we identify with them and it becomes a story you can understand and doesn't seem out-of-this-world like many other superhero films. The director also understands how to balance the amount of time given to both the human side and the superhero sides of the characters.
Tobey Maguire is perfect as Spider-Man and even though I think Tom Holland will do a greatn job in the new Spider-Man: Homecoming, Tobey is the true Spider-Man in my eyes. He captures the character of Peter Parker perfectly; awkward and quirky but a character you can identify with and relate to and therefore care for. His traits combined with Maguire's performance make him a very likeable character and a great lead.
The relationship between Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) and Peter Parker was handled in a realistic, albeit very entertaining manner and there are multiple situations that many can relate to as they can put themselves in the positions of both of those characters and feel what they are feeling which makes their relationship one that audiences can connect with.
Willem Dafoe portrays the main antagonist of Norman Osborn/the Green Goblin. I loved his performance as Oborn and he was a fascinating, complex character, however I couldn't really buy the Green Goblin too well. I understand that the film is supposed to be comical and goofy at times and for the most part that aspect is handled well but I think they might have gone just a bit too far with this villain; his motivations for acting this crazy don't really make much sense and he literally says and does every supervillain cliche in the book. His costume also looks absolutely ridiculous and it's impossible to take him seriously, however this isn't something that holds the movie down too much.
I've also got to mention how amazing J.K Simmons is as J. Jonah Jameson; all I can say is perfect casting choice.
This film is a film that certainly has dated, however it isn't necessarily a negative point. When you watch it, you can instantly tell that it's from the early 2000s, whereas watching the other two you'll have a harder time working out what time period it's from. It's mainly the style of the film which has made it dated, the biggest reason being the character of the Green Goblin for me. Like I said, this isn't necessarily a negative point but something I felt should be said.
Conversely, the style is also something which makes the movie unique as what it is and gives it the comic-book feel, but not going too over-the-top (most of the time anyway). The style adds for plenty of humour which was refreshing to see and makes the movie even more charming.
Overall, I don't really have anything else to say about this movie and I thought it was really good, with a great lead character and a director who clearly understands the material. It's a film that has certainly dated, however it isn't necessarily a bad thing.
7.8/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

SonicHD7May 31, 2017

"Spider-Man" centers on student Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) who, after being bitten by a genetically-altered spider, gains superhuman strength and the spider-like ability to cling to any surface. He vows to use his abilities to fight crime,"Spider-Man" centers on student Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) who, after being bitten by a genetically-altered spider, gains superhuman strength and the spider-like ability to cling to any surface. He vows to use his abilities to fight crime, coming to understand the words of his beloved Uncle Ben: "With great power comes great responsibility."… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Dragonfly44May 5, 2018

This is without a doubt a great movie. A tad cheesy and the special effects do not hold up well in this day an age, but the plot and the love story between Mary Jane and Peter Parker make this a fantastic movie.

Rating - 78%

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoOct 7, 2019

Good, but not extraordinary.

This movie basically shows the emergence of Spiderman: the way Peter Parker, a teenager, changes his life after being bitten by a genetically modified spider. He becomes a hero, able to do justice and protect theGood, but not extraordinary.

This movie basically shows the emergence of Spiderman: the way Peter Parker, a teenager, changes his life after being bitten by a genetically modified spider. He becomes a hero, able to do justice and protect the weak. But on the other side of the barricade comes the Green Goblin, a villain that only he can stop.

I'm not a fan of comics-based movies, but I must admit that this movie has its quality. It shows a hero who, after all, is still a teenager with doubts and learning. The script seems to me well done, presenting a story reasonably capable of capturing the interest of those who do not even like this genre of movies very much.

The actors seem to me to have made a positive effort. I liked Tobey Maguire, he was quite human in a character who risked being just a red suit that jumps from building to building. Willem Dafoe was a pretty good villain, and even before turning, he knew how to give his character an amoral touch. Kirsten Dunst, an actress I don't even appreciate widely, did a job well done. James Franco didn't surprise me, but there's no room for much more than he did either. J.K. Simmons was a surprise to bring us a profoundly annoying character, but it brings great touches of humor to the movie.

Technically, the movie is not surprising, nor is it even brilliant. You bet heavily on CGI, as you'd expect, but it doesn't bring us anything that truly impresses us. Photography is regular, with many action scenes designed to capture the public but become tiring over time. The soundtrack is good, but not particularly good either.

In short, it is a summer movie, designed to attract large masses of crowds and crowded box offices, with a foreseeable sequel soon ahead. It's good, it's certainly better than other cartoon movies, but it's not extraordinary.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

DeepKamateApr 6, 2018

The first successful attempt to transfer the "Spider-Man" to the big screens. Why did the studio bosses turn to the director of "Evil Dead", I probably will never understand, but the most important thing is that everything turned out reallyThe first successful attempt to transfer the "Spider-Man" to the big screens. Why did the studio bosses turn to the director of "Evil Dead", I probably will never understand, but the most important thing is that everything turned out really good. Despite the fact that the costume of the Green Goblin looks as stupid as possible, and in the movie about "Spider-Man" there are not that many "Spider-Man", I believe that this film clearly demonstrates how to shoot superhero movies ... Why you couldnt do the same, Marvel?!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

NolanLundgaardJun 26, 2018

While I liked Spider-Man, I cannot day that I was completely impressed with the film. It had an okay plot, with a good villain (which is always appreciated in these types of movies), and enough great scenes in the film (both action andWhile I liked Spider-Man, I cannot day that I was completely impressed with the film. It had an okay plot, with a good villain (which is always appreciated in these types of movies), and enough great scenes in the film (both action and emotional scenes) for me to give it a seven out of ten. By no means is this the best movie I have seen from Marvel, since it’s sometimes predictable and the special effects look unrealistic, with bad CGI. Spider-Man was enjoyable, but not my favorite.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

GrantD243Apr 25, 2018

I wasn't a huge fan of Spider-Man when it first came out. And while I do feel like I appreciate what it did for the genre more now, I still can't say that I love it. There's just a little too much cheese, and I don't like how he's supposed toI wasn't a huge fan of Spider-Man when it first came out. And while I do feel like I appreciate what it did for the genre more now, I still can't say that I love it. There's just a little too much cheese, and I don't like how he's supposed to be of high school age but he nor any of his friends really look high school age. I will say that William Dafoe is perfect as the Green Goblin in this film. I also think a lot of the CGI in this movie was pretty dang good for early the 2000s. But overall, this movie ranks towards the bottom of the superhero movies I have in my collection.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

TheTalkSep 23, 2018

A timely classic that has definitely made my teen years, but furthermore, the childhood of plenty more people. Comic books have always been popular, in most cases, but not just everywhere and when you didn't have that culture (even if comicA timely classic that has definitely made my teen years, but furthermore, the childhood of plenty more people. Comic books have always been popular, in most cases, but not just everywhere and when you didn't have that culture (even if comic books were around), you'd get into characters like these by television shows and movies. I definitely love the adaptation and the corniness definitely makes a 2000's film, but unfortunately, it has not aged that well. Truly, if you are a Spider-Man, you MUST watch this film but overall, it's a film whose acting can be somewhat flawed and almost hilarious to watch when it comes to seeing Tobey's weird face expressions. Not to talk about the special effects and CGI; it's so blatantly poor that it ruins plenty of scenes. When it comes to the story; nothing to say. Definitely a classic that is capable of conveying emotions that can hardly be felt in modern films nowadays.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

GarethBNov 10, 2018

A good intro into spiderman with decent action and characters. These movies really work better with fewer characters in them.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Timothy25Oct 22, 2019

Although the plethora of superhero films in recent years have diluted the appeal of the genre, Spider- Man was released during the infancy of the process and as such is a good film that considers plot and characters as much as the specialAlthough the plethora of superhero films in recent years have diluted the appeal of the genre, Spider- Man was released during the infancy of the process and as such is a good film that considers plot and characters as much as the special effects. The first hour of Spider-Man is unquestionably better than the second. This is the segment of the film where Peter discovers his newfound powers and tentatively explores them. Covertly, then with more confidence, he stands up to the school bully. He also has to deal with his unrequited love for Mary Jane and cope with the responsibilities and consequences of using (or not using) his abilities. An exhilarating sequence in which Spider-Man first employs his webs to swing from building-to-building is filmed in such a manner that we can sense how close he is to losing control and plunging to the streets below. All in all, this is a good superhero origin movie. (The origins of Spiderman).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Ahmedrizwan11Aug 16, 2019

It was an entertaining movie , however not a very well made movie. The movie was rushed. it was a good spider man movie but not a great movie

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

NickTheCritickApr 24, 2022

Peter Parker is a young college student, not particularly bright, who lives with his beloved uncles and is secretly in love with the beautiful Mary Jane Watson. During a visit to a laboratory, the young man is bitten by a spider that he hasPeter Parker is a young college student, not particularly bright, who lives with his beloved uncles and is secretly in love with the beautiful Mary Jane Watson. During a visit to a laboratory, the young man is bitten by a spider that he has been the guinea pig for numerous experiments. The next day Parker sees his muscle mass increase, his myopia disappear, his five senses sharpen and he realizes he can throw resistant cobwebs from his wrists, but unfortunately for him the euphoria does not last long: his uncle is in fact killed during a robbery. . Shocked by pain and eager to put his powers to good use without revealing his true identity, he designs a red and blue costume with the effigy of a spider. The Spiderman trilogy acquires meaning thanks to the hand of a great director like Raimi, who manages to shoot the only cinecomics he has ever been able to appreciate. Speech that is valid at least for the first two Spiderman. This first film is perhaps a bit 'in flurries, discontinuous yes, but which suggests good things.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Rickniks38May 8, 2022

A great origin story of one of the best superheroes of all time. I absolutely loved Willem Dafoe's performance as the Green Goblin he is probably one of the most comic accurate villains I have seen in any superhero movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

GaryC.Dec 12, 2006

It has a good lesson to it and it was great entertainment but I'd say its a little draggy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

AndrewN.Aug 25, 2007

Not so great for non spider-man fans. This was mostly just style over substance.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

OfficialNov 11, 2013

"Spider-Man" is a fun comic-book movie, but quite a lot of the acting is pretty cheesy and unreal too. It has good fight scenes between the hero and villain, that's probably all I can say about the film. The movie just doesn't feel satisfying"Spider-Man" is a fun comic-book movie, but quite a lot of the acting is pretty cheesy and unreal too. It has good fight scenes between the hero and villain, that's probably all I can say about the film. The movie just doesn't feel satisfying when it's over.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

6

RayzorMooseNov 12, 2013

Comic fans will rejoice.
The highly anticipated Sam Rami hero flick Spider-man depicts practical faults of a special ,but still average young hero. With very dry acting and a very predictable plot; Spider-man simply learns to crawl.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

Spider-Man

User Reviews