Spider-Man

Columbia Pictures | Release Date: May 3, 2002

8.1	USER SCORE Universal acclaim based on 1969 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

Ascended333Oct 25, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Overrated garbage. Garbage effects, the only good actor is William Dafoe. Cheesy as hell… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

mailpollFeb 17, 2022

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

seiferJan 5, 2011

ok... but could be a lot better and some of you state this is one of the greatest movies of all time! Well... how old are you 6?! it's a 3 from me and there shouldn't be a rating higher!

1 of 17 users found this helpful116

All this user's reviews

MessiahL.Dec 4, 2007

Like Spiderman 3, Spidey 1 is atrocious. The 2nd is a masterpiece of the art form. Don't listen to individuals who didn't get at least a Bachelor's. Americans without such a degree are, by and large, retarded and, Like Spiderman 3, Spidey 1 is atrocious. The 2nd is a masterpiece of the art form. Don't listen to individuals who didn't get at least a Bachelor's. Americans without such a degree are, by and large, retarded and, unfortunately... easily entertained. Nostalgia and first-impressions over content depth.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful

Gamer44Dec 5, 2012

How did spider-man get such good reviews let's face it this movie is terrible.The acting is just awful some of the worst acting I have ever seen.Toby Maguire is definitely the worst choice for the role of spider-man his acting sucks and andHow did spider-man get such good reviews let's face it this movie is terrible.The acting is just awful some of the worst acting I have ever seen.Toby Maguire is definitely the worst choice for the role of spider-man his acting sucks and and he goes on and on like a baboon.The storyline there is no word to describe how terrible and awful it is.If I had to review this movie in 2002 I would have given it a perfect 10.As I did not know the difference between a good film and a terrible film.Having seen it again on TV yesterday I can with pride know the difference between a good film and and a terrible one and spider-man is one of the worst films in history.It is by far not worth a 10. spider-man is only worth a 0 and it deserve's the 0 hands down.,… Expand

0 of 12 users found this helpful012

All this user's reviews

DerekReideApr 7, 2019

So a lot of people are going to disagree with me here, but this is what I have to say. Ugh.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

Toasty87Jul 12, 2020

Rubbish then And it's rubbish now bad acting with even worse script I would avoid.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

MankDemerFeb 19, 2022

doesn't hold up at all, the second one was great but this one is just ugh, willem dafoe is dope tho

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Itzach2005Aug 25, 2022

Um dos filmes MAIS genéricos de super-heróis, mesmo com seu marco histórico no gênero, é inegável que é um turbilhão de clichês, desenvolvimento 0, efeitos que envelheceram mal, atuações medianas (exceto DaFoe), vilões mal escritos, herói malUm dos filmes MAIS genéricos de super-heróis, mesmo com seu marco histórico no gênero, é inegável que é um turbilhão de clichês, desenvolvimento 0, efeitos que envelheceram mal, atuações medianas (exceto DaFoe), vilões mal escritos, herói mal escritos e ações sem consequencias.
Um filme tosco e genérico que habita nossos corações com nostalgia, sem essa nostalgia, isso é nada.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews