Spider-Man 3

8

htsowerJul 2, 2020

This is my favorite Spider-Man movie because shows you another spiderman, a dark spider-man if you haven't seen it yet... I don't know what are you doing, see it.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

MrPajamasSep 26, 2020

After previous excellent films came Spider-Man 3, which is the best and unfortunately the last part of the Spider-Man trilogy by Sam Raimi. The story is excellent again, so is the action and the soundtrack. I don't even have to describe howAfter previous excellent films came Spider-Man 3, which is the best and unfortunately the last part of the Spider-Man trilogy by Sam Raimi. The story is excellent again, so is the action and the soundtrack. I don't even have to describe how masterful it is. The negative here may not have been as excellent as in previous episodes, but Venom saves it all. Since I don't want to spoiler, I won't say what the scene is, I'm just saying that there are some of the most epic scenes in superhero movies ever. Excellent film and it's a shame that 4 was never made.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

Gorbunov2004Nov 28, 2021

Ну все как обычно силы куда-то пропадают а Мэри Джейн прошманда. Но Веном получился классный хотя не такой крутой как в фильмах 2018 и 2021 года.Ну все как обычно силы куда-то пропадают а Мэри Джейн прошманда. Но Веном получился классный хотя не такой крутой как в фильмах 2018 и 2021 года.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Pluto744Jun 22, 2021

●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●
:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;;;;;;::::::;;;;;;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

HeroicAge616Oct 26, 2021

Spider-Man 3 balanced comedy and drama well, providing a satisfying if bittersweet end to the Raimi trilogy.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

Dominick-LNov 21, 2021

Although yes the movie can get pretty silly at times this movie was not that bad and is pretty underrated.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

sugarniteApr 5, 2022

If you’ve never heard of Sam Raimi, or just prefer lifeless, washed out Marvel film #763, you can stop reading.

This movie is the victim of far too many “baby’s first movie review” people who parrot worn-out one liners. Truthfully, this isIf you’ve never heard of Sam Raimi, or just prefer lifeless, washed out Marvel film #763, you can stop reading.

This movie is the victim of far too many “baby’s first movie review” people who parrot worn-out one liners.

Truthfully, this is the Army of Darkness of the Raimi Spider-Man trilogy. There’s goof, great set pieces, and almost perfectly fleshed out characters.… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

8

HaytopJan 8, 2022

It had many twists. It was action-packed and fun. I recommend it. It has many surprises and is not very predictable.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

RiverShenJun 30, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie... has a lot to it.
It may seem like a "bad" movie, rushed and confusing, but both the cast and crew faced many obstacles that make me look at this in another way.
I'm not a movie-critic (and I don't pretend to be), I'm just a comic-book reader who enjoys CB-stuff and wants to talk about them. I get it that critics look at a movie for what it is not what went behind the courtains, but I don't do that.
I really respect Sam Raimi as a director, he already proved himself more than capable in his Evil Dead franchise and Spider-Man 1/2, so when I learned that he was forced to make a movie with characters he didn't like, I was surprised.
When you look at it not as a mess of a movie, but as the efforts of a fan trying to do the best he can with a box of not-connected elments that some guy told him to do.
The premise of the movie in itself is amazing; Peter learned what responsability is, what it's weight is and now learned how to deal with it and he's living the high-point in his life. Seeing a hero who struggled two movies to be better now acting like a prick is heartbreaking, you feel how disappointed Aunt May and Mary Jane are because you are as well, but you still have faith in Peter and by the end of the movie he learns how to forgive and let go of his demons that led him to such a dark place.
Sandman is an intriguing character. He's definetly different from the comics, but I'm not concerned about that (99% of CB adaptations differ from the source material anyway), I just dislike it when the change is for the worse, which isn't the case. At first, I was against it; I always though Carradine should be the one who pulled the trigger, but now I understand Raimi's intention: revenge and forgiveness, the driving point for Peter's downfall and he's redemption, respectivelly, and that's beautiful to me. Also, Marco is the protagonist to many emotional scenes that I enjoy.
Eddie Brook is another character I didn't like at first, but after knowing that he was forced into the movie even though Raimi has no feelings for the character made everything clear. He is a good Eddie, but instead of the brute bully, he's a pathetic loser. It's a nice twist and a little more screen-time could have benefited him a lot. He's not amazing like Ock or Goblin, but he's a really effective character.
Harry Osborn. Wow. I see his arc and I love it, but the amnesia thing is clearly something Raimi came up to move the other parts foward more easily so I can forgive that. I won't go on for too long, but he's arc is one of the best in the series and I loved the end of it.
All the other characters continue to shine; the Bugle crew, Aunt May, etc are all enjoyable, but Mary Jane's character takes on another level of depth. Gwen differs A LOT from the source material and it's not a "change for the better". Liz Allen could've been a better character, but I don't know if Raimi intented her to do more, so I'll let it slide.
The ending is also beautiful, no words, just two soul-mates reconcilling and getting together.
I'm obviously a Raimi Fan but I don't shy away from this fact. You can dislike this movie or the trilogy, prefer other movies over them and I give you all the reason to do this, opinions are important and everyone should have their own and be respected for it. This is mine: These movies are peak Spider-Man, peak Marvel, peak Comic-Books. I love them.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DolphinReviewsJul 20, 2022

This movie is ridiculous and I love it! Don't like my review? Get religion!

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

M.LeeMay 4, 2007

It's not as bad a some make it out to be. There's nowhere as much character development as in 1 and 2. Why should there be? You've seen these characters for 5 hours on film already, why do you need that much more? There's It's not as bad a some make it out to be. There's nowhere as much character development as in 1 and 2. Why should there be? You've seen these characters for 5 hours on film already, why do you need that much more? There's a lot more action, and as a side-effect, too much CGI. I think this film has become a victim of too much hype, and too much footage already released in trailers and "sneak peeks". Venom looked AWESOME. Just wish he had more than just 30 mins or so. It's better than 2, not a good as 1. It's a film that you'll like more and more, the more you see it. There's too many smaller nuances that you miss in one viewing with all the action. The biggest flaw was not enough JK Simmons. He always steals the movie, and he just isn't in this one enough.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

BenjaminB.May 5, 2007

The problem with this movie are that there are too many unneccessary scenes. do you want to see how MJ and Harry are cooking, do you want to see how peter is dancing to express his evil character traits, or do you want to see how he tries toThe problem with this movie are that there are too many unneccessary scenes. do you want to see how MJ and Harry are cooking, do you want to see how peter is dancing to express his evil character traits, or do you want to see how he tries to be a macho? I don't want. Maybe they were ment to be ironic, but they were too normal to be ironic and too stupid to be normal. the other movies had no ironie in it, so no one in the cinema got that it was (maybe) ment to be ironic. without these stupid scenes and a little bit more fighting-action I would give it a 10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

EaskyMay 6, 2007

This one may not be as good as last 2,however,it's a deeper one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

AlexMay 6, 2007

As far as some franchise/superhero movies go, Spiderman 3 isn't bad. its entertaining enough to keep a Monster-addicted high-schooler (me) watching happily for the two hour running time. unfortunately, there are some departments where itAs far as some franchise/superhero movies go, Spiderman 3 isn't bad. its entertaining enough to keep a Monster-addicted high-schooler (me) watching happily for the two hour running time. unfortunately, there are some departments where it just falls short. the movie has a tendancy to skip around a bit, making it midly difficult to follow, and some of the acting (especially on Toby McGuire's part) just plain sucks. and then there was Venom. quite simply, he could not have been more poorly excecuted. he just came off as an evil, power hungry version of spiderman with bad teeth and black webs who wanted to exact revenge because he lost his job. Venom is one of my favorite bad guys, but after this movie, i'm not sure i can still say the same thing. but, i guess, in the end, it was still a fairly good movie. could have been better, but its still worth a good rental, or even a buy. overall, 7 out of 10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

kurtcJul 13, 2008

A pretty good film, though not really a magnificent one. In the comics Venom is muscular and cool. In here, he's some skinny wimp.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

Andrewfidel1tyMay 4, 2007

I enjoy this movie. It is interesting and cinematic.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

DwightM.May 4, 2007

I give this a 7 because in grade-school, a 70 is a C for average. I felt that this movie was average when compared to what we've already seen from this franchise. I was expecting lots more but received even less. I am sorry to see these I give this a 7 because in grade-school, a 70 is a C for average. I felt that this movie was average when compared to what we've already seen from this franchise. I was expecting lots more but received even less. I am sorry to see these characters go like this. Alas.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

LeeS.May 5, 2007

Deeply flawed masterpeice. I think Sam Raimi didn't have the time needed to give this movie the edit that it needed. With a better cut Raimi could easily remove the worse scenes and improve the poorer and more contrived story elements. Deeply flawed masterpeice. I think Sam Raimi didn't have the time needed to give this movie the edit that it needed. With a better cut Raimi could easily remove the worse scenes and improve the poorer and more contrived story elements. However it will never be as good as Spider-man 2, which was pretty much perfect. There are some really great scenes and amazing action sequences, and the stellar cast help make the movie fun despite a few bad scenes, bad pacing and forced plot elements.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MicS.May 5, 2007

It was pretty good. Not as good as 2 and 1, and somewhat of a let down only because we've seen it all before. Venom did feel a tiny bit rushed and thrown in at the end. I think it would've benefitted from just having the Sandman. It was pretty good. Not as good as 2 and 1, and somewhat of a let down only because we've seen it all before. Venom did feel a tiny bit rushed and thrown in at the end. I think it would've benefitted from just having the Sandman. Harry could've stayed. Other than that, was cool.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SteveA.May 5, 2007

There were a few flaws. However, this movie had too much heart to dislike. I can picture Raimi not being one of the cool kids in school (that was probably someone like Michael Bay or James Cameron). Instead, he was probably the sweet, goofy There were a few flaws. However, this movie had too much heart to dislike. I can picture Raimi not being one of the cool kids in school (that was probably someone like Michael Bay or James Cameron). Instead, he was probably the sweet, goofy kid with a ton of talent and heart.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

HalB.May 5, 2007

More fun than I thought it would be. Yes, it focuses more on emotion than action at times, but what's wrong with that? There are a couple scenes that fall flat, but the overall story arc moves along nicely, the special effects are good More fun than I thought it would be. Yes, it focuses more on emotion than action at times, but what's wrong with that? There are a couple scenes that fall flat, but the overall story arc moves along nicely, the special effects are good (but don't dominate the film) and the acting is decent. People who give this anything below a 5 are way harsh. The cameo by Bruce Campbell is excellent. And who knew that Dunst cold actually sing? or that Toby could dance a bit?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JamesA.May 6, 2007

The flaws of the movie were that it doesn't follow the comic. Venom himself should have been Hulk appearence (not size). The major flaw was that 3 enemies divided the action and no major battles occured unlike Spider-man 2. I say go and The flaws of the movie were that it doesn't follow the comic. Venom himself should have been Hulk appearence (not size). The major flaw was that 3 enemies divided the action and no major battles occured unlike Spider-man 2. I say go and see it, the movie was enjoyable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MikeC.May 6, 2007

If you go into this movie expecting nothing but flare and glare, then I can understand how you were disappointed. To me, the movie was about the hardships that Peter Parker as a person had to experience. I think they should have followed the If you go into this movie expecting nothing but flare and glare, then I can understand how you were disappointed. To me, the movie was about the hardships that Peter Parker as a person had to experience. I think they should have followed the cartoon for the Symbiote. It seemed to..random. Harry's "amnesia" served no real purpose in the plot, and cramming Venom into the last 15 minutes was extremely disappointing. I think the directors had so many ideas for scenes, that when it came to putting it together, they lost focus on where the story was supposed to be in the end. The first hour+ felt slow-moving, and the last 30+ felt extremely rushed. Very X-Men 3-ish... :/… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

AndyH.May 7, 2007

I can only describe this film as a missed opportunity. It could have been an epic, and indeed completed an epic trilogy, possibly one of the best super hero movie series of all time. But it was not. There was no lack of substance, everything I can only describe this film as a missed opportunity. It could have been an epic, and indeed completed an epic trilogy, possibly one of the best super hero movie series of all time. But it was not. There was no lack of substance, everything needed was there to create the movie it should have been. However there was also a lot more than was needed, and it was poorly put together. I do not have a problem with long films, but this should have been shorter. The writers seemed to feel the need to tie up every loose end, which I do not think is necessary or compelling, whether there is to be a sequel or not. Purely from observation it seems there was conflict on what the writers wanted this film to be, which is a shame. All though it is not my place to say how it could be improved, I think the removal of at least one villain would have been a start. Complicated films are good, but they should not be complicated due to an overflow of content, and this type of film should be simple if you wish to view it in such a light. Spider-man 3 is complicated in all the wrong ways.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

DylanD.Jun 12, 2007

Although I'm an action junkie, this movie was still not amazing as far as dialogue and story goes. Loved the villains. Venom is what got my rating up.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

BryanM.Nov 5, 2007

what is so wrong with this? it is a great action movie and yes I know they gayest thing about it is it has way to much love in it with mary jan. but that black spider man was so cool. the only bad part is I did not get to see the ending i what is so wrong with this? it is a great action movie and yes I know they gayest thing about it is it has way to much love in it with mary jan. but that black spider man was so cool. the only bad part is I did not get to see the ending i saw it on a bus trip. o and harry is a bad villen. he got his butt wopped to easy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SteveC.Nov 7, 2007

There is a lot wrong with this movie, but in the end it's still entertaining.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

RayT.May 12, 2007

Ruined the comics, spent to omuch time cramming in Christian morals and principles. Spider Man 2 was able to have its morals and still be an overall achievement.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

RirenMay 12, 2007

The weakest of the three existing Spider-Man films, it's still quite entertaining. Spider-Man 3 wades into cartoony logic, bordering on the style of Asian comedy/action flicks from time to time. It's opening is its weakest point, The weakest of the three existing Spider-Man films, it's still quite entertaining. Spider-Man 3 wades into cartoony logic, bordering on the style of Asian comedy/action flicks from time to time. It's opening is its weakest point, with the characters acting irrationally or being downright stupid, and the plot setups being completely contrived (the evil black costume literally falls from space, and is never given an origin or motive - it's just a mean little puddle of slime). Once action sequences are great, the humor is refreshing, and computer graphics are beautiful (really - Sandman's first empowered appearance is one of the most beautiful computer effects in the history of film), but the drama is all hammy and silly. Also, with three villains, two love interests and a darkening hero on its hands, the movie has too much material to pace itself properly, leading to a disappointing climax. Fans of the comics should be warned that the beloved Venom isn't done justice, not by the script, not by the terrible actor they cast, and not by whatever genius decided Eddie Brock should sprout pointy teeth when unmasked, and that he should unmask every two minutes. Definitely see this in the theatre, though; it's the best way to appreciate the effects, and to lose yourself in its murky atmosphere.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

WilliamJ.May 14, 2007

Like the last two, with more jokes and corny parts. Various things are wrong with it and a lot is good but unfortunately it cannot live up to the last two.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

HaroonAwanMay 19, 2007

Amazing looking scenes, visual effects are first class and funny. However, there was too much going on. And, what was the story-line again? Fight his best friend; Harry Osborn? Nope, that only happened for 5 minutes... Get rid of the BlackAmazing looking scenes, visual effects are first class and funny. However, there was too much going on. And, what was the story-line again? Fight his best friend; Harry Osborn? Nope, that only happened for 5 minutes... Get rid of the Black Suit? No, that only happened for about an hour... Fight Venom? Still no; that was for around 15 minutes... (Next time we should see more of the uber villain) And what in tarnation did Maguire do to his hair half way through? Back to basics with the next one (if there will be) please.… Expand

6 of 6 users found this helpful

7

S.J.May 22, 2007

This is one of those movies I will have to see again before I give full judgement. The certainly good elements were the special effects, the best of the three and some of the best I've ever seen. I was especially blown away with the This is one of those movies I will have to see again before I give full judgement. The certainly good elements were the special effects, the best of the three and some of the best I've ever seen. I was especially blown away with the crane scene. There were parts in which it felt scattered, but the humor I thought was taken up a notch and it felt more like a comic book story with some class. Black and white strong messages, inspiring heroics, exciting action, and engaging drama. My main specific complaints would be, as aforementioned, it was scattered at times. As well, one of the villains needed to be a little stronger, the last fight should have been longer and more climactic, and the ending should have a little bit more story wrapping...such as a wedding or at least his proposal finally happening. Also, venom should have been seen as more evil in the end. I thought the story with Harry was good...but him turning evil, then good, then evil again, seemed a little out of place. But the ending was good Overall, I would say this had the makings of being a good super-hero story ending...and further films may mess it up. However, it may give a chance to make an even better ending.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ArthurC.May 24, 2007

The good stuff is awesome. But the stuff that sucks, really sucks. Sam Raimi adds on a little too much which weighs the film down from being a perfect 10 to a decent 7. The battle scenes are stunning and thrilling, and Venom proves to be a The good stuff is awesome. But the stuff that sucks, really sucks. Sam Raimi adds on a little too much which weighs the film down from being a perfect 10 to a decent 7. The battle scenes are stunning and thrilling, and Venom proves to be a great villain but movie should've focused on him.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

HyperShadowMay 27, 2007

I enjoyed myself. The special effects were good and the story wasn't bad. The ending wasn't magnificent by any stretch of the imagination, but good enough. Venom was a nice addition and the Sand Man was okay. Had a very comic book I enjoyed myself. The special effects were good and the story wasn't bad. The ending wasn't magnificent by any stretch of the imagination, but good enough. Venom was a nice addition and the Sand Man was okay. Had a very comic book feeling to it and while it did make a move toward the later lame Batman movies of that series it didn't quite make the complete crossover. It was a different Spiderman than the previous two, but like I said it was enjoyable... that is minus the lame scenes of Peter Parker trying to be cool .... that was completely uncalled for.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

KentP.May 7, 2007

OK, I read the user reviews prior to going to the movie, so I was expecting the worst to begin with...It wasn't as bad as the "red" votes would have you believe...sure there was some sappy garbage at the end of the movie....sure there OK, I read the user reviews prior to going to the movie, so I was expecting the worst to begin with...It wasn't as bad as the "red" votes would have you believe...sure there was some sappy garbage at the end of the movie....sure there was some overly drawn-out parts in the beginning that could have been editted out...but for the most part the movie was quite enjoyable...people here talked about the pacing being poorly executed...I thought it was ok....people here hated the humor...I thought it was great - (and funny).....what's wrong with that anyway ?....The action sequences were very cool - fast and destructive - full marks there, in my opinion......I actually liked the transition to cocky Peter Parker with the dark suit on underneath - that was very VERY funny to watch - and the whole John Travolta strut, with the Jazz dancing stuff was also funny.....hey, it made me laugh - it wasn't "that" bad, people.....This is not supposed to be "dark" is it ?.....This is not Batman......In any event, sure - they could have made it better by tweaking a few things here and there, but overall it was enjoyable - (and I am a harsh critic)......By the way, I saw this in a so-called IMAX theater.....I did not see what the big deal was with IMAX - it looked almost the same as any other regular wide screen theater - save your money on the ticket price and see it in a regular theater....Ciao !… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

PaulY.May 7, 2007

Too busy. Three villains is too many, especially when the first two movies worked really well with one villain each. Venom was especially underused, basically appearing in only one scene and coming across as laughable with a sinister Too busy. Three villains is too many, especially when the first two movies worked really well with one villain each. Venom was especially underused, basically appearing in only one scene and coming across as laughable with a sinister creature spouting the voice of Eric Forman. On the plus side, visuals, acting, fight sequences, etc were all as top-notch as the first two installments of the series. It was those storytelling aspects that kept Spdey 3 from reaching its full potential.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

NickJul 6, 2007

Disappointing, but still fun.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MiKEJan 12, 2008

I actually enjoyed watching this movie. Sure there are numerous stuip things, but just ignore them like they were not there and enjoy the rest the movie. The special effects are excellent! and the movie is loaded with them, I also found theI actually enjoyed watching this movie. Sure there are numerous stuip things, but just ignore them like they were not there and enjoy the rest the movie. The special effects are excellent! and the movie is loaded with them, I also found the story to be well writen as well. Once again afew lose ends. Overall this is the 2nd best Spiderman movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

CatherineN.Oct 17, 2009

Spider Man could be a good teaching material for children, especially the Episode One. Spider Man

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

PeterJ.Nov 24, 2007

Good solid movie and very entertaining. Not the best Spiderman film, but those giving this movie 1's and 2's are absolute morons.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MarkB.May 31, 2007

A religious tract that I very recently spotted in a men's room, not shy about being up-to-the-minute on pop culture zeitgeist but apparently reluctant to use Captain Jack Sparrow as a role model, drew a pertinent analogy between living A religious tract that I very recently spotted in a men's room, not shy about being up-to-the-minute on pop culture zeitgeist but apparently reluctant to use Captain Jack Sparrow as a role model, drew a pertinent analogy between living the Christian life and being everyone's favorite web-slinger. The pamphlet's thesis was that to truly serve the Lord, Christians have to say goodbye to those things in the world they love, just as Peter Parker, in order to effectively fight crime and save the world (or at least New York City), must give up his beloved Mary Jane. Since great drama often involves having to make impossible Sophie's choices like this, the first Spider-Man movie still stands as the cream of Sam Raimi's trilogy. It tells us that you can't fulfill your destiny and STILL have MJ's love at the same time; Spider-Man 2, seen by most critics and fans as the apex of the series, counters that you CAN. Spider-Man 3's thesis is that, yes, it IS possible...but it's tough work. All the debate about whether this installment is overlong, overstuffed and/or has two or three villains too many has obscured the fact that, even more than Spideys 1 and 2, Spidey 3 is a relationship movie front and center; lose the action sequences, colorful costumes and mysterious black goo, and you've got a bigger chick flick than Pretty Woman. The ups and downs of Peter's and MJ's romance are discussed at great length and in great detail, with not one but two third parties around to provide dramatic conflict...and, most revealingly of all, the movie's final shot is NOT of Spidey in action but of...well, see for yourself. Co-scenarist Alvin Sargent's previous credits (Ordinary People, Julia) clearly show that he knows his way around material like this, but the occasionally forced results, such as an extended restaurant sequence in which MJ (Kirsten Dunst) tries to share a heartbreaking professional setback with Peter (Tobey Maguire) and every contrivance in the world including a Clouseau-like head waiter combines to keep the message uncommunicated, show that Sargent isn't quite working at his peak here. (And in regards to another subplot, someone should remind Sargent and co-writers Sam and Ivan Raimi that amnesia, short-term memory or whatever you want to call it, was officially outlawed by Congress after it was used in a Gomer Pyle episode in 1967.) More successful is the movie's depiction of Peter's increasingly excessive pride in being Spider-Man, which morphs into hubris and then egomania. This is depicted powerfully enough that the comic-book McGuffin (a spiny, tar-like substance from the skies with characteristics common to the Alien, the Beast with Five Fingers and the Id Monster) doesn't seem entirely necessary to explain it. Whether three villains in one movie is or isn't a case of oversplat is best left discussed elsewhere, but it is what it is, and Thomas Haden Church, Topher Grace and James Franco are more than satisfactory, with Church very affectingly haunted as Sandman; all three have interesting and convincing dimensions and motivations, but then Spider-Man's nemeses have always had more gray areas than a shelf full of Jodi Picoult novels. Special effects are more than worth your ten bucks (Sandman's transformation in particular is memorably majestic and tragic) and the climactic punch-and-spin-out over the city delivers the goods, even if the unnecessary inclusion of reporters telling us what we're already seeing is hokey enough for a 1940s serial but has no place here. Spidey 3 isn't perfect, and yes, it is overall the weakest of the three, but it's interestingly offbeat and ambitious. In The Summer Of The Third Part That's Less Than The Other Two (Either Together Or Individually), if you have to choose to spend your entertainment dollars on either Spidey or Sparrow, far better to get bitten on the hand than stabbed in the back.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

PaulC.Aug 16, 2007

Spidey 3 was very good, but not great. We all know that we were waiting for Venom!! I was left feeling a little 'ripped-off' in this area. I had no emotion for Sandman or his situation whatsoever; I felt that the characters story Spidey 3 was very good, but not great. We all know that we were waiting for Venom!! I was left feeling a little 'ripped-off' in this area. I had no emotion for Sandman or his situation whatsoever; I felt that the characters story was crammed in, there was no need for his story. The screen time and money could have been better off spent on Venom's story! The introduction of the symbioent left me thinking … Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

AnonymousMCJun 18, 2009

Spider-Man 3 is just a huge disappointment. There are some things I loved about the film and things I disliked about the film and things I just downright hated about the film. Not a terrible movie at all, not in the slightest. I had fun withSpider-Man 3 is just a huge disappointment. There are some things I loved about the film and things I disliked about the film and things I just downright hated about the film. Not a terrible movie at all, not in the slightest. I had fun with it in some places and I liked its message, so I'm gonna be nice and give it a seven. By no means a bad movie, but definitely a disappointment compared to the first two films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

TokyochuchuJul 9, 2017

Spider-Man 3 is an entertaining but bloated movie that fails to capture the same emotional highs as it's predecessor. But again... It's entertaining. And certainly nowhere near as bad as some would have you believe.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

grandpajoe6191Sep 21, 2011

"Spider man 3" is very impressive and astounding; Sam Raimi manages to give the obvious fresh joy and humor from the previous sequels and even throws in more villains. The Result? Perfect.

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

7

Jai11elasJul 5, 2012

OK ending to the franchise but still this had to be a little more exciting heart pounding.............just satisfaction and nothing else i gave it a 7 just cuz of the VENOM

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Tranquilbez22Apr 7, 2012

As much as this movie was spectacular it had too much going, Too much Sandman, not enough new Goblin and Venom, The scene where Peter cries cause MJ boke up with him was so frustrating, he was basically being a sook. With the exception ofAs much as this movie was spectacular it had too much going, Too much Sandman, not enough new Goblin and Venom, The scene where Peter cries cause MJ boke up with him was so frustrating, he was basically being a sook. With the exception of Topher Grace, casting was spot on. It's a fun filled ride but it isn't as fun as the first two were. still it's a worthy addition to your movie collection, especially blu-ray.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

7

TyranianApr 13, 2019

By no means the horrible film its been made out to be but the worst in the trilogy, Spidey 3 has a lot of good things about it but makes a few stumbles too.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

dharmaJun 9, 2012

Studio VS Sam Raimi. By the time Spider-Man 3 is finished, we have way too many villains and way too many plot points. It shows how cluttered and unfocused this sequel was, the 'final' installment of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy. It wasStudio VS Sam Raimi. By the time Spider-Man 3 is finished, we have way too many villains and way too many plot points. It shows how cluttered and unfocused this sequel was, the 'final' installment of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy. It was rumored that Raimi was forced to include Venom in the film as he is one of the more 'popular' villain out there. By the time number 4 was in pre-production, the wrangling between the film maker and studio resulted in a complete reboot of this franchise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

anshimanDec 23, 2012

Though it has its emotionally heightened, strong moments, and visual splendour to spare, these are the last yellow spots on a rotten banana. 'Spider-Man 3' lacks the honest emotion that made the first two so great, as well as developing theThough it has its emotionally heightened, strong moments, and visual splendour to spare, these are the last yellow spots on a rotten banana. 'Spider-Man 3' lacks the honest emotion that made the first two so great, as well as developing the too-many-villains disease that makes the plot wear thin before your eyes. A disappointing final chapter to Raimi's otherwise brilliant trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MonsieurEamesJul 12, 2012

While it certainly has its silly parts and its overloaded with too many characters, Spider-Man 3 ultimately works because of its dazzling special effects and strong emotional focus.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

tontoMay 30, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The final installment in the original trilogy, Spider-Man 3 is a solid film though it doesn’t quite measure up to its predecessors. We start the movie with Peter still going to college studying the hard sciences, he’s on top of his class and still working for the Daily Bugle as a photographer and dating Mary Jane Watson. Harry Osborn, his former best friend, having found out that Peter was Spider-Man in the last movie and discovered his father’s secret Green Goblin lair has undergone the performance enhancing procedure that gave his father his abilities and drove him insane. He plans to exact revenge on Peter for his father’s death and attacks Peter as the second Green Goblin using his father’s tech in an early fight sequence which takes place on the streets of Manhattan with Peter out of his Spidey costume. He ends up losing the fight and develops amnesia in a cliche and uninspired subplot to get him out of the way for another supervillain, Flint Mark or the Sandman, a small-time crook who is down on his luck, gains sand shape-shifting abilities in a freak accident, and has a young daughter dying of an undisclosed illness. It’s revealed, in a somewhat contrived way, that Flint Marko had something to do with the carjacking that resulted in Uncle Ben being shot and loosing his life. A black alien symbiotic goo attaches itself to Peter, turns his costume black and enhances his abilities. It also gives him a dark side, as he turns to a darker nature and gets revenge on Sandman attempting to kill him. Although the symbiote storyline had potential, it is largely played up for laughs, showcasing Peter dancing in the streets and nightclubs and it can get pretty campy. Gwen Stacy is introduced in this one, to serve as a love interest that complicates Peter and Mary Jane’s relationship. I liked the love triangle aspect in this movie, and thought Peter and MJ’s complicated relationship seemed believable, both actresses that played Gwen Stacy and Mary Jane were attractive and likable like their comic book counterparts. Eddie Brock, the rival photographer at the Daily Bugle is played by pumped up Topher Grace who is disgraced by Peter when Peter is under the influence of the alien symbiote. As Peter is removing the symbiote in a church, the symbiote bonds with Brock and he becomes the villainous Venom, who vows revenge on Spider-Man. Venom is only in the movie for the final third of the movie and teams up with Sandman to kidnap Mary Jane and hold her hostage. Spider-Man ends up rescuing her with the help of Harry, suited up as the Goblin with his glider. Unfortunately, Venom ends up impaling Harry with his glider in a similar fashion to the way his father died. Peter kills Venom, forgives Sandman and lets Sandman go, an aspect of the movie I am a little critical of. Peter ends up getting back together with MJ at the end of the movie. Overall, not the strongest Spider-Man movie, but still a good movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JamesCannonDec 13, 2014

In the pantheon of Spider Man movies, this one often looked as being overstuffed and inferior to the previous two. I will actually take this one over any of the new Amazing Spider Mans and even maybe the first Raimi one. Sure there is theIn the pantheon of Spider Man movies, this one often looked as being overstuffed and inferior to the previous two. I will actually take this one over any of the new Amazing Spider Mans and even maybe the first Raimi one. Sure there is the whole rebellious Peter Parker that comes off a little forced, or the indestructible Harry Osbourne Jr., who can survive high falls at maximum speeds. He can even take a grenade point blank and come up with only a couple of scars on his face. That aside I liked the team up of Venom and Sandman. The ending is great and even some of the themes of forgiveness are able to hit their mark.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JmsbppJul 15, 2013

Se daño un poco la saga sin embargo tiene su encanto de Hombre araña que demuestra en la primera y segunda parte, De un modo Peter Parker saca su lado oscuro de una forma no muy chevere tal vez al ponerle mas accion se perdio el hombre arañaSe daño un poco la saga sin embargo tiene su encanto de Hombre araña que demuestra en la primera y segunda parte, De un modo Peter Parker saca su lado oscuro de una forma no muy chevere tal vez al ponerle mas accion se perdio el hombre araña que habia antes… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MalevolentMay 31, 2013

I was in third grade when this movie came out and I absolutely loved it. But as I grew older I realized that I didn't like Venom in this movie. There just wasn't enough of him in this movie and I could tell Sam Raimi didn't try to make him asI was in third grade when this movie came out and I absolutely loved it. But as I grew older I realized that I didn't like Venom in this movie. There just wasn't enough of him in this movie and I could tell Sam Raimi didn't try to make him as cool as he is in the comics. I also wish they had left Sandman out of this film. Overall, it was a decent film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MovieGuysSep 20, 2013

Damn. For the first two movies, the premise was fresh, exciting, never lagged, and was just so fun to watch. So, what happened in the third movie? It got a little dull, and included more drama, less action. Something big happens at the endDamn. For the first two movies, the premise was fresh, exciting, never lagged, and was just so fun to watch. So, what happened in the third movie? It got a little dull, and included more drama, less action. Something big happens at the end which I won't spoil, and I swear by everything that is holy that no one wanted this event to happen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Pinglu50Jun 6, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie isn't as bad as it seems, according to most of the Spider Man spectators. There were many villains in it and the plot twists during the movie don't follow a specific story-line. Despite of it, the denouement was impressive and I really appreciated it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

G6In3DAug 30, 2014

No, seriously. The movie actually wasn't that terrible, in my honest opinion. I recently rewatched Spider-Man 3 (4 days ago, to be accurate), and I have to say: the movie was quite underrated...I'll give the people reading this a minute or soNo, seriously. The movie actually wasn't that terrible, in my honest opinion. I recently rewatched Spider-Man 3 (4 days ago, to be accurate), and I have to say: the movie was quite underrated...I'll give the people reading this a minute or so to wrap that around their heads............................................................okay, minute over.
Now, this would be the part where I put, "Some Spoilers Below". However, given that Spider-Man 3 came out in 2007...let's move on.
Sandman was arguably the most superlative villain in the movie. The revelation that he was actually Uncle Ben's killer was certainly an effective plot twist. I truly felt that I could relate to him as a character. Furthermore, I believe that his final scene and "death" was the most emotional section of the entire film.
Venom wasn't that badly portrayed either. I thought Topher Grace was a decent choice to play Eddie Brock (unlike a multitude of Spider-Man fans...). In addition, the Venom/Symbiote suit was also well translated from the comics into the big screen, in my opinion. Unfortunately, I found Harry Osborn to have been basically "tacked on" to the movie. The "New" Goblin's fight with Spider-Man felt utterly pointless (not to mention, he pulled 4 heel/face turns throughout the course of the movie). Other than that though, Spider-Man 3 was a good movie.
I actually found the "Emo Peter Parker" to be pretty amusing. In fact, I thought that was the best (and most daring) portrayal of Peter in the entire Sam Raimi trilogy.
So, while Spider-Man 3 (and I cannot stress this enough) is definitely NOT the greatest Spider-Man movie of all time, it is absolutely not a bad film either.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

bfoore90Sep 16, 2016

Look, we all get it. Spider-Man 3 is the worst of the Raime series, the movie has its faults but overall I enjoyed it. The action sequences and visual effects, including the final battle are on point and the performances of Tobey Maguire,Look, we all get it. Spider-Man 3 is the worst of the Raime series, the movie has its faults but overall I enjoyed it. The action sequences and visual effects, including the final battle are on point and the performances of Tobey Maguire, Kristen Dunst, James Franco, ect were also up to par with the first 2. The problem here is that there is just so much going on in this film, theres too many plot lines to match with too many villains. As much as this movie was had going for it, it had just as much bringing it down. First off, There was too much Too much Sandman and not enough Goblin and Venom(whose supposed to be the main villain). I know i'm in the minority here but I enjoyed Topher Grace's performance as Eddie Brock, I just felt that his adaption wasn't particularly treated fairly. I mean, we get that the character was forced onto the director by the studio but at the same time, why on earth would you so badly mistreat one of the most popular characters in Spider-Man lore? Not to mention give him maybe 5 minutes of total screen time. Overall to me, Venom felt really shoe horned into the film which was the result of Sony pushing Raimi to include him in the movie despite Raimi not wanting him to in the first place. That led to him not having enough screen time which resulted to there not being enough character depth to convincingly convey the reasons why he hated Peter/Spider-Man so much. Like i said, I didn't mind Topher's performance as Eddie Brock not being a huge muscular guy because I felt that properly represented a nemesis for Peter Parker, One that was simply like an 'evil' version of himself. Since Spider-Man 3 wrapped and Spider-Man 4 was cancelled, Spider-Man has been rebooted twice. The Amazing Spider-Man brought heart and potential with different and I thought more welcomed adaption to the character but unfortunately like Spider-Man 3, it fell victim to Sony's reach exceeding it's grasp. While time will tell if we ever get to see a proper adaption of Spider-Man, as it stands Spider-Man 3 did a fine just of wrapping up the Raimi series, Despite its faults.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

guitarguy001Jan 11, 2014

I enjoy this movie, but it does have it's problems.

The acting is good, the direction is good, the story is paced well and the action scenes are well done. I really do enjoy Harry as the goblin in my opinion as it creates a lot of tensionI enjoy this movie, but it does have it's problems.

The acting is good, the direction is good, the story is paced well and the action scenes are well done. I really do enjoy Harry as the goblin in my opinion as it creates a lot of tension between Peter and Harry as they are (or were) best friends. Peter and MJ finally have a romance, unlike the previous Spider Man movies and Jameson is always funny. The visuals are also great.

However, the story has so many plot points that it becomes convoluted and all of them could have been their own movie. You have the Sandman being the killer of Uncle Ben, the new goblin and his conflict with Peter and the Symbiote which creates Emo Peter, Peter breaking up with MJ, and Venom. Emo Peter was just unneeded and poorly done, instead of showing conflict with the symbiote, he appears to have a good time until he punches MJ and realized what he has done.

Venom was completely underutilized. When he showed up, he looked great, but the vast majority of the time he spoke, he was unmasked. Why? He looked great, why do we need to see Grace's face instead of VENOM? He is so far Spider Man's most anticipated villain to make an appearance on the big screen and when we got it, it was for 10 minutes. Disappointing.

Even though it's the weakest Spider Man movie, i enjoy watching Spider Man 3. I feel like it's a well made movie as it has good things like the acting, direction, action sequences and the visuals. However, because of having too many villains, the plot was convoluted and ALL of them could have made their own movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SythusRATINGSOct 22, 2014

Spider-Man 3 reunites the cast and filmmakers from the first two blockbuster adventures of a webslinger with secrets, vengeance, love, and forgiveness.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

UltimateBubFeb 1, 2015

No, this is not a bad movie. Just a little inferior, that's all. And no, it's not the worst Spider-Man film. The big problem here was that, it tried to be the biggest film ever, and it never stood a chance. Many fans will undoubtedly beNo, this is not a bad movie. Just a little inferior, that's all. And no, it's not the worst Spider-Man film. The big problem here was that, it tried to be the biggest film ever, and it never stood a chance. Many fans will undoubtedly be disappointed with how some characters are handled: Gwen Stacy, Eddie Brock and even Peter Parker. BUT, "Spider-Man 3" remains a visual spectacle with entertaining scenes, an interesting but flawed plot and a few funny bits.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

homer4presidentMar 13, 2015

Compared to the first two movies, this one had a different feel. It seemed like the actors, at some points, were working the lines just a little too much. Over the top, If I may.

Despite some of the cliche lines, I did love the portrayalCompared to the first two movies, this one had a different feel. It seemed like the actors, at some points, were working the lines just a little too much. Over the top, If I may.

Despite some of the cliche lines, I did love the portrayal of the internal battle of good vs. evil. The internal struggle is something we can all relate to and it was neat to see a superhero have some common struggles.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

NatT96Aug 19, 2015

Ok so this movie is my least favorite. It's plot had too much going on, humor was great, visuals were great but not memorable. This movie tried to do too much, its plot was easily guessable and it wasn't my favorite part of the movie.Ok so this movie is my least favorite. It's plot had too much going on, humor was great, visuals were great but not memorable. This movie tried to do too much, its plot was easily guessable and it wasn't my favorite part of the movie. Honestly, its not worth watching, especially the ending either. I decided to give it a 7 because Peter Parker was still Peter Parker… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Batman2752Mar 16, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Don't kill me but I liked this movie. What I think pissed every off was just the dancing, emo Peter Parker. Now people will probably say "but it so goofy" and to that I say, so is Willem Defoe talking to himself in a mirror saying to attack the heart. Now this is not the best spider-man movie and never will be but it's not as bad as everyone says… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

YellowKirbySep 27, 2015

First of all, who cares if there are too many villains? That just makes it more awesome! And although it takes a while for Venom to finally show up, it's all worth it in the end just for his very appearance in the trilogy! It was fun andFirst of all, who cares if there are too many villains? That just makes it more awesome! And although it takes a while for Venom to finally show up, it's all worth it in the end just for his very appearance in the trilogy! It was fun and action-packed, which is what we want to see in super hero movies, right?… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

gameguardian21Mar 10, 2016

While spider man 3 isnt as good as the other two, and has peter parker dancing like a fool, and a terrible venom, I enjoyed the rest of it, and how spider man struggles with his powers.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

KayVen17Jan 11, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Zur Vorbereitung auf No Way Home habe ich nochmal alle Spiderman Filme geschaut. Ich habe diesen Film damals gar nicht leiden können. Er war mir viel zu überladen. Inzwischen muss ich aber sagen. Es ist kein schlechter Film. Er ist nur deutlich schlechter als Teil 1 und 2. Man sieht dem Film deutlich die Probleme hinter den Kulissen an. Trotzdem finde ich ihn als Abschluss der Trilogie gelungen. Die Geschichte wurde meiner Meinung nach zufriedenstellend zu Ende erzählt. Trotzdem hätte man meiner Meinung nach Venom aus dem Film raustreichen sollen. Der Fokus auf Sandman und Harry hätte hier wahrlich alles verbessert. Harry und Peter wären beide mit der Tatsache konfrontiert worden, dass der Mörder ihres Vaters (Onkel Ben war dies ja für Peter) noch auf freiem Fuß sind.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MasterRileyJul 20, 2016

Not nearly as good as the first two, Spider-Man 3 falls short of greatness. Its still a good movie however. It still has great action, great music, great effects, and amazing production value. The biggest problem is the crowded script, tooNot nearly as good as the first two, Spider-Man 3 falls short of greatness. Its still a good movie however. It still has great action, great music, great effects, and amazing production value. The biggest problem is the crowded script, too many unfleshed out villains, and emo Peter Parker. I prefer pizza time Peter Parker.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JPKJun 9, 2019

Not That Bad Is Spider-Man 3 perfect?, no.
Is it awful?, also no.
Spider-Man 3 definitely isn’t as good as the first 2, But it’s still a good movie.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

KelvinSelimorMar 6, 2022

Spider-Man 3. Come to the dark side. The third part can not be called bad, but still there is something in it like in the previous two films. There are more villains, the quality of shooting is even higher, but still something is missing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

coolwaliJun 23, 2020

While the pacing is off, the film has a lot of heart and serves as the excellant conclusion to the Raimi trilogy even if it never was meant to be

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

Deanfm123456789Mar 3, 2019

TBH, This isn't a bad Movie at all, The story is really good, and Sandman really had a really Good origin Story, As much as i was Disappointed at The Amazing Spider-Man 1 & 2, I Definitely Preferred Spider-Man 3 more that those Films, andTBH, This isn't a bad Movie at all, The story is really good, and Sandman really had a really Good origin Story, As much as i was Disappointed at The Amazing Spider-Man 1 & 2, I Definitely Preferred Spider-Man 3 more that those Films, and Venom wasn't that bad in the Movie, and Sam Raimi At least Managed to make it more Interesting.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

TomtagApr 14, 2019

This was a bit boring. Venom was poorly acted by Topher Grace and there was so much things audiences disliked about the film

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

zNeverSleepingApr 19, 2020

Uma conclusão que emociona fans do Tobey como Spider - muito pelos velhos tempos-, mas que cai na síndrome da trilogia.

Como os filmes antecessores, Homem Aranha 3 tenta desenvolver seus personagens assim presentes, mas falha com o excesso eUma conclusão que emociona fans do Tobey como Spider - muito pelos velhos tempos-, mas que cai na síndrome da trilogia.

Como os filmes antecessores, Homem Aranha 3 tenta desenvolver seus personagens assim presentes, mas falha com o excesso e falta de lógica. Claro que, ao se tratar de um universo cômico de super heróis, lógica não é o ponto a ser levado a sério, mas ao comparar com Spider-Man 1 e 2, percebemos que aqui há uma urgência muito maior, como se os sentimentos fossem muito mais exaltados. Peter nunca tomou decisões tão estúpidas, e quando questionado sobre elas, o mesmo nem sabe como explicá-las. Isso é subestimar a inteligência do público, que espera que o personagem não pareça meramente escrito. O seu relacionamento com Mary Jane é artificial, e isso fica claro quando mesmo ela sabendo que Peter é o Homem Aranha, tudo quanto a segunda vida dele se torna isolado. É como se ela não soubesse de nada, mesmo que ele mencionasse isso várias vezes. O roteiro foca muito na mudança de personalidade do Peter, mesmo antes da Simbiose. O problema é que me parece completamente forçado e nada progressivo.

Ademais, as cenas de luta são excelentes, e a batalha final é muito emocionante - talvez seja por uma questão de nostalgia. Na realidade, algumas imagens me remetem ao emocional por puro simbolismo.
Quando ele vai salvar Mary Jane e o povo o aplaude, nada ali faz muito sentido e nem tem um apelo muito grande. O população não estava contra ele até então e a proporção do perigo era pequena demais. Se o filme trabalhasse melhor com o Peter, a Simbiose e suas consequências, aquilo poderia ser muito mais marcante. A trilha sonora é, de longe, a melhor da trilogia - levando em conta a adaptação. Eu amei e sinto saudades de algo do tipo.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

Kostas101Nov 2, 2021

I don't think it's a bad movie, but there's a lot of wasted potential. I still like it, but the previous movies were far more memorable with better writing and action sequences.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ShawnSmithNov 6, 2019

This movie is about Spidey's revenge and transformation to bad Spidey. It has a dark feel to it that I found one of the most appealing factors to this movie. Because we've all gotten used to Peter Parker being "your friendly neighborhoodThis movie is about Spidey's revenge and transformation to bad Spidey. It has a dark feel to it that I found one of the most appealing factors to this movie. Because we've all gotten used to Peter Parker being "your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man,” having him turn to the dark side for some time and watch him get out of it was a whole new experience.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MichaelWillDec 23, 2019

Now that I think about it, this film just had too much going on. Compared to the first two which were both hyper-focused on just one storyline, Spider Man 3 lacked that distinct characteristic which I know most of us will agree on.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

WilliamJones1Dec 23, 2019

Out of all the Tobey Maguire Spider Man films, this one had the best effects. But with that, the overall quality of the movie in terms of the plot greatly decreased. I wish they would've stuck with the same strategies they had for the firstOut of all the Tobey Maguire Spider Man films, this one had the best effects. But with that, the overall quality of the movie in terms of the plot greatly decreased. I wish they would've stuck with the same strategies they had for the first two films.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

CharlesTaylorJan 3, 2020

This still is a great movie even if it felt like two separate movies stacked on top of each other. This would've worked really well if maybe they had more time to put everything together.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

DanielThomasJan 4, 2020

I'm not hating on the studio for doing a bad job on this one but this is just what happens when you try to please everybody. It's such a shame that the original Spider Man franchise had to end like this. I wanted it to be so much more memorable.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MarkMartinJan 16, 2020

If only they could've done a better job with Spider Man 3. It would've been up there together with Matrix as one of the few trilogies that didn't suck.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

JeffreyYoungJan 2, 2020

They had too many concepts that they tried to cram in one movie that it ended up being an awkward mess.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

StephenScott1Jan 2, 2020

It felt like a totally different Spider-Man. It's such a shame because they had such a good storyline that connected the previous films.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MrNightOwlAug 31, 2021

The film went through a lot of trouble with studio interference, and it's really sad that Raimi couldn't tell the story he wanted. Despite all these problems, the worst-received movie, from the comics industry, was created. BUT, this filmThe film went through a lot of trouble with studio interference, and it's really sad that Raimi couldn't tell the story he wanted. Despite all these problems, the worst-received movie, from the comics industry, was created. BUT, this film eventually matured like wine. Many of the references and ideas that Raimi smuggled into this film are really good, and as a result, with countless MCU films behind us, the film offers a far better psychological story than most MCU films. And people noticed it, and they look at the film differently. Raimi was timeless, although the filming was not the most beautiful, he took the material what he did not know quite well and managed. Yes, the film is cheesy sometimes, but in my opinion less than the first part. This movie is more of a cult from the point of memes. I love it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

richardmillerDec 29, 2019

Spider Man 3 is still pretty good but when you compare it with its other two predecessors, you can see that there is a huge step down in the overall quality of the film.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

paulthompsonJan 16, 2020

Even though Spider Man 3 was not as good as the first two, I still want to thank Tobey Maguire and everyone else for putting out a lot of effort to give us an ending to the first Peter Parker.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

FirstSpawnMar 8, 2021

Самая слабая часть из трилогии, на мой взгляд. Но всё равно это один из моих любимых фильмов о любимом супергерое.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

mikesgold2KFeb 8, 2022

odstaje od reszty trylogii jednak nadal przyjemnie się imo ogląda. Film cierpi też na nagromadzenie wątków które nie dostają dobrego rozwinięcia i zakończenia

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

PhoenixReveiwsFeb 2, 2021

✅74%

Even above all of the weird dancing scenes, and overcrowded scenes, this movie still felt like a good Spider-Man movie. Shame on Sont for rebooting these. I enjoyed them all, and with one failure they shouldn't have traded two good✅74%

Even above all of the weird dancing scenes, and overcrowded scenes, this movie still felt like a good Spider-Man movie. Shame on Sont for rebooting these. I enjoyed them all, and with one failure they shouldn't have traded two good movies and one mediocre movie for two "meh" movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BullyMaguireDec 2, 2021

Definitely a major step down from how good the first two Raimi movies were, as you can tell sony was getting way too involved with this movie. However, the movie is honestly still really fun to watch and is just hilarious. Yes, the movie hasDefinitely a major step down from how good the first two Raimi movies were, as you can tell sony was getting way too involved with this movie. However, the movie is honestly still really fun to watch and is just hilarious. Yes, the movie has a ton of major problems such as so many plotlines and the campy tone going way too far, and even some actors not doing a very good job. However just like the first two Raimi movies, the action is still pretty great, and the music is great and probably the best out of the whole trilogy. Despite the movie's flaws this is still in my opinion a flawed but satisfying conclusion to an awesome trilogy.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021

----------------------------------7.4/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

moviefan23u429uOct 30, 2022

this movie isn't actually bad. In fact, I think the movie is very underrated. The only bad thing was venom who could be improved, but still a good movie

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

superfrog281Jun 14, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a surprisingly more emotional and darker movie than the previous two. I think those scenes are highlights, but I feel like the movie is overlong and and has too much going on. I feel like the villains should be reduced to two, and have Spider Man fight sandman and have harry osbourne by his side too. Nonetheless, it has some great moments and a great excuse for the That 70s Show star to break out as a film villain.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

oneofjwNov 24, 2022

You can **** on this movie all you want, but you cannot deny you didnt like the dancing scene.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SPIDER-MAX56Jun 3, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Although I love this movie to death, I can wholeheartedly agree it has its missteps and the lost potential it could’ve have if it was done correctly. This isn’t Sam Raimi’s fault at all, as some may say it was lied forcefully into the hands of Avi Arad of how he thinks this movie should’ve played out with its villains, especially venom. Besides that, comparing this third entry to the past movies of 1 & 2, it has degraded a bit in terms of a pretty muddled plot with a lot thrown at you to focus but upon my multiple viewings I never really had a problem with it. The problem was that there was too many antagonists to begin with for Spider-Man to face, since one may’ve felt forced in, one may’ve felt rushed, this isn’t some sort of multiverse or sinister six movie anyways, the point being some didn’t have the room to breathe for character development.

Like there were some misuses when Venom (Eddie Brock) and Sandman (Flint Marco), were teaming up in this dark alley way then Venom talking in his irregular voice “I” want him dead too Flint or “I” want to kill the spider, this is a mess up since the character Venom always refers to himself as “we” in the comics, so it takes away the personality of the symbiote and also since it’s made to seem like there’s one organism when there’s technically two.

Out of all the issues I talked about, there’s still a lot of good to be had with Spider-Man 3 as I had a blast every time I watched it, including the notorious memes and the soundtrack, everyone still does their part decently.

7.2/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SteveB.May 5, 2007

After the mansion fight scene between Peter and Harry I hoped it would be more like Burton's Batman instead of Schumacher's Batman. Regardless, it was a fair movie overall. I think that they had a chance to make it a better, After the mansion fight scene between Peter and Harry I hoped it would be more like Burton's Batman instead of Schumacher's Batman. Regardless, it was a fair movie overall. I think that they had a chance to make it a better, grittier film, but with $300 million and change at risk they took the safer route.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

MattS.May 9, 2007

I enjoyed this film, but ultimately, I found it a disappointment. It is, however, my son's favorite movie of all time, a position previously held by "Night at the Museum".

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

rajatshuklaMay 3, 2007

i am one of the biggest spidey fans...saw the premier show on 2 may ... but the movie was not upto my expectations... a lot of money has been spent on special effects(there r bout 7 to 8 fights as there are 3 villans) but its all hooj paoch..i am one of the biggest spidey fans...saw the premier show on 2 may ... but the movie was not upto my expectations... a lot of money has been spent on special effects(there r bout 7 to 8 fights as there are 3 villans) but its all hooj paoch.. story line is not as good as spidey 1 and 2... ending has been extended.. i think it could have been made much better if concentration was on only main characters like black spidey and sandman... toby could be seen without his spidey mask in action and hary osborn character is cool as green goblin!!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

6

BigRedMay 5, 2007

Who would have thought that I would actually want to leave a Spider-Man movie?

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Spider-Man 3

User Reviews