SPECTRE

7

adpirtleJan 10, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Serving as the final act for Daniel Craig's rebooted Bond, "SPECTRE" does everything it has to. It delivers terrific action sequences and, thanks to returning director Sam Mendes, looking great doing it. Its premise is a clever one, that all of the trials and tribulations that 007 has faced over the past three films were orchestrated by the film's eponymous shadow organization, headed by Ernst Stavro Blofeld. After MGM finally settled the legal wrangling around the rights to the classic supervillain, it was inevitable that he'd make his appearance in Craig's swan song, and Academy Award winner Christoph Waltz delivers a predictably wonderful performance in the role. But it's what the writers of "SPECTRE" chose to add to Blofeld's characterization which is the movie's biggest flaw. It's a big enough leap to expect audiences to buy into the retconning of the drama of the last three films as being due to a heretofore unmentioned (at least in this particular iteration of the franchise) secret organization. To make its leader James Bond's heretofore unmentioned 'brother' is a retcon too far, and in my opinion a needless one. However, that creative boondoggle aside, the 24th official Bond film does a decent job of providing Craig's Bond with a measure of closure, even allowing him, for the first time, to get the girl in the end.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

ToFewViewsFeb 15, 2016

Going into Spectre I didn't have the highest expectations but was slightly surprised with some of the filming in this Movie. Parts like the opening and most of the fights are filmed great with no shaky cam or the fast blurry camera work youGoing into Spectre I didn't have the highest expectations but was slightly surprised with some of the filming in this Movie. Parts like the opening and most of the fights are filmed great with no shaky cam or the fast blurry camera work you see in most action films. The parts of action that are CGI blend well with the practical effects to come together seemingly...For the most part.The story is nothing new with it pretty much being the same to the new Mission Impossible movie, The build up in the mystery is alright but still makes you feel like it could have been more. On the other hand the acting is great and Daniel Craig, Christoph Waltz and Lea Seydoux all do a great job but I feel like more could have been done with Waltz's character. Action scenes where enjoyable and it all had that James Boned Feel that they should, Some scenes started to feel a little generic action movie. Overall if you enjoyed the other recent James Bond I'm sure you'll like this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JaniRamersNov 16, 2015

Spectre is a good and exciting action-movie. It has and super badass villain, but sadly he is underwhelmingly used. A step down from Skyfall, that wasn`t so actionpacked as this one, but altogether a better Bond-movie then this one. AnSpectre is a good and exciting action-movie. It has and super badass villain, but sadly he is underwhelmingly used. A step down from Skyfall, that wasn`t so actionpacked as this one, but altogether a better Bond-movie then this one. An exciting movie that is worth-while.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

NerdConsultantNov 6, 2015

Spectre is a pretty good film, it’s just not a great film and fails to live up to its predecessor Skyfall in a couple of ways, mainly in plotting and its villain department. However it delivers some excellent action and while the plot mightSpectre is a pretty good film, it’s just not a great film and fails to live up to its predecessor Skyfall in a couple of ways, mainly in plotting and its villain department. However it delivers some excellent action and while the plot might not be great it’s still pretty decent. I also think the acting in this film is excellent and we have had one of the best Bond Girls in a long time. Everything you would expect from a Bond film is pretty much here and Bond fans will eat this one up with all the others, just don’t expect for this one to be on the top of your list in your next Bond marathon. When I reviewed Kingsman ealier this year I said I was worried I wouldn’t be able to take Spectre seriously but that really is not the case though I did prefer Kingsman overall I would recommend actually going to see this one in the Cinema, This will take a while to come on DVD and I don’t think you should wait that long. But don’t go in with really lofty expectations like I did, because it won’t quite match up to them and that’s a mistake because it’s actually a pretty good film when you really look at it.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

7

DCEdmondsDec 1, 2015

"Spectre" 10 Scale Rating: 7.0 (Good) ...

The Good: Daniel Craig once again reminds us all of why he's been such a fantastic Bond. Sticking to a depiction of the character that is closer to his literary counterpart, Craig might be the best"Spectre" 10 Scale Rating: 7.0 (Good) ...

The Good: Daniel Craig once again reminds us all of why he's been such a fantastic Bond. Sticking to a depiction of the character that is closer to his literary counterpart, Craig might be the best Bond actor in the series. As usual, the settings were fantastic and exotic. The opening sequence doesn't disappoint and overall the action is well done. The fight scenes are also well choreographed and are the perfect blend of comedic moments and violent moments, which is a Bond staple. The supporting cast mostly delivers as well. Wishaw is an amusing young Q, Harris was a solid Moneypenny, and Bautista was classic Bond henchman. While Judy Dench's camaraderie with Craig was definitely missed, Ralph Fiennes was more than adequate as M. Perhaps one of the stronger points of the film was the fact that the other operatives in MI6 got plenty of screen time and were actually an integral part of the final outcome. Lastly, while he didn't have a ton of screen time, Waltz was fantastic as the lead villain.

The Bad: Unfortunately, Waltz's character was poorly written and not very well developed. His motivations were questionable and the end game of his organization, Spectre, was not as grand in scale as one would have hoped. As the film attempts to tie the previous three films together with this one, more was expected from the shadowy organization supposedly behind it all. Lea Seydoux (who is a very talented actress) was completely wasted in the film. We are advised and shown early on that she is tough as nails and can take care of herself, but then degenerates into a cliche damsel in distress within minutes of appearing, remaining that way right up until the end. She also lacked chemistry with Craig, thus making their supposed love completely unbelievable. Lastly, MI6 are "betrayed" by someone close to the organization, but the individual in question was obvious from the moment he steps onto the screen. When the big reveal occurs, you're surprised to find that this was supposed to be a twist of some sort. "Spectre" isn't a bad film and I enjoyed it and while it is a much better film than the disappointment that was "Quantum of Solace", it falls well short of both "Casino Royale" and "Skyfall".… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

ProsmoothDec 25, 2015

A solid Bond film. Not as special as Skyfall or Casino Royale, and not as weak as Moonraker or The Living Daylights. I enjoyed it--even though Judi Dench is missed, and the villain is underused.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

tjman09Nov 6, 2015

Spectre, possibly Daniel Craig’s final Bond film maintains the approach of departing from the older tone of Bond, while also lovingly referencing them. The film came at an inopportune time, as it has a similar plot to recent films such asSpectre, possibly Daniel Craig’s final Bond film maintains the approach of departing from the older tone of Bond, while also lovingly referencing them. The film came at an inopportune time, as it has a similar plot to recent films such as “Captain America: The Winter Soldier” and “Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation.” Spectre is entertaining, action packed, but a little too formulaic. In the end though the film is a good time at the theaters.
Spectre maintains the tone and feel of Skyfall, also directed by Sam Mendes, but lacks the finesse of Skyfall. Daniel Craig, Lea Seydoux, Christoph Waltz are all good in their respective roles, and help make the film more entertaining. The film also does a good job remaining serious, yet funny much like Skyfall, but despite good acting, humor, and tone the biggest strength of the film is that it is action packed.
The film is a little too long, but the action sequences are entertaining to watch, and fairly well shot. The best action sequences are those between Daniel Craig and Dave Bautista, mostly because Bautista embodies the silent powerful henchmen. The film does suffer from many weaknesses though, and is nowhere near as good as Skyfall. The biggest problem with the film is the plot.
The plot is a little too formulaic, as many plot points are straight out of other bond films, or other recent films, and thus become a little too predictable. The character development is bad, as they are given little development, and some characters are only in the film for minutes. The story is thinned out a little too much, and the villain is a little weak, despite Waltz’s performance. It would have been refreshing to see Spectre be as carefully crafted as Skyfall.
In the end Spectre’s tone, acting, and action are good, but the plot of the film is very weak. The film will likely satisfy Bond fans, and some casual fans, but is a little formulaic, and a little predictable. At the same time the film is not the best Bond film ever, and is probably the weakest of the Daniel Craig filmography.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

7

WindrammerNov 22, 2015

Surprisingly underrated, and unquestionably better than Skyfall. What made critics so enamored of Skyfall had a lot more to do with it's pretentious tone than anything. Spectre goes back to some of the classic goofiness that James Bond wasSurprisingly underrated, and unquestionably better than Skyfall. What made critics so enamored of Skyfall had a lot more to do with it's pretentious tone than anything. Spectre goes back to some of the classic goofiness that James Bond was traditionally known for - it aims to please the fan, rather than the critic. It wasn't a mind blowing film but it was a consistently enjoyable one, certainly more engaging than Skyfall. Not quite as good as Casino Royale, but I would call it a "good" film nonetheless.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

acaiberryNov 8, 2015

I give this a 7 and yeah okay the plot wasnt that great and it was actually sorta confusing if you didn't watch Skyfall, but people the Bond movies at this point are made to thrill with intense fast-paced action, sexy cars, beautiful women,I give this a 7 and yeah okay the plot wasnt that great and it was actually sorta confusing if you didn't watch Skyfall, but people the Bond movies at this point are made to thrill with intense fast-paced action, sexy cars, beautiful women, and landscape of the world.

I thought cinematography was great, the music was solid, and the action scenes not that bad!
Daniel Craig once again proves to be a bad ass and everything about the costume design, scenery, action was pretty solid. Once again, weak plot and seemed to be drawn out.
Side Notes:
Im waiting for a really hot Bond girl to actually show up but I was rather a bit disappointed this time.

Overall, id watch this movie and i rate it about the same as Skyfall so thats my review.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

UrbanlistenerFeb 23, 2016

A fairly decent Bond movie, spectacular action scenes, great special effects, great cinematography and score and of course performances, but the problem is the plot. It is very by the numbers, unoriginal, there is not much to it, it is reallyA fairly decent Bond movie, spectacular action scenes, great special effects, great cinematography and score and of course performances, but the problem is the plot. It is very by the numbers, unoriginal, there is not much to it, it is really your typical action movie plot and also the villain is really not exploited the right way. You have a great actor (Christoph Waltz) playing the villain and a lot of premise, but his talents are kind of wasted. They build the character for more than an hour and when he finally appears it is for maybe 2-3 short scenes where he does pretty much nothing and when he does do something it fails and he look moronic. But in the end, it is a very enjoyable as an action film, but definitely not as much as Skyfall or Casino Royale.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FilmPhonicNov 22, 2015

When you consider the lavish Royal premiere in London, the logistically impressive opening scene and the elaborate title sequence, it’s no surprise that the ‘Spectre’ budget snowballed to around $350 million, but luckily for the audience it’sWhen you consider the lavish Royal premiere in London, the logistically impressive opening scene and the elaborate title sequence, it’s no surprise that the ‘Spectre’ budget snowballed to around $350 million, but luckily for the audience it’s all up there on the screen.

With the daunting task of following ‘Skyfall’, a genre redefining Bond and the most successful British movie ever, producers have meticulously crafted a spy romp that ticks all the 007 boxes. From stunning locations in 5 different countries to spectacular action sequences, classic villains to tongue-in-cheek humour and sexy but substantial Bond ladies, ‘Spectre’ has everything you might expect from an James Bond film within a 21st century context.

‘Spectre’ also expands on the themes of cyberterrorism and the dangers of ubiquitous government surveillance established by its predecessor, while stretching out a fanciful mysterious storyline that weaves together the principal players in Daniel Craig’s Bond legacy so far.

So all the pieces you might expect or want from 007 are in place, and that’s the major problem with ‘Spectre’. If you constantly look for the same elements in every Bond film plus constant nods to the entire legacy, then you’ll love this film, as you should.

If however your expectations have been slightly warped by the bold and Bond-redefining ‘Skyfall’ then you might be disappointed here, it’s all a matter of perspective. For any modern Bond film there must be a balance between nostalgia and moving the character forward, ‘Skyfall’ struck that balance well and perhaps because of its success and the production issues with ‘Spectre’, producers have leaned heavily towards legacy here.

The film builds nicely but the final third descends heavily into archetype with story and characters you can see from a mile away, building up to a spectacular but predictable conclusion that’s ultimately underwhelming. Perhaps the most frustrating element of ‘Spectre’ is the criminal misuse of Christoph Waltz’s talents as a one-dimensional villain who’s familiar on way too many levels.

The Bottom Line…
While not the genre re-defining film that ‘Skyfall’ was and despite some disappointingly predictable elements, ‘Spectre’ has everything you might want from a 21st century Bond, grandiose while stylish, entertaining throughout and for us, it cements Daniel Craig as the greatest 007 thus far.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

TheDude-Nov 7, 2015

Spectre is the latest adventure in the ongoing Daniel Craig bond series that surprisingly does a throwback to the more hokey Roger Moore films giving us a movie that is more centred around the explosions, cars and beautiful women and itSpectre is the latest adventure in the ongoing Daniel Craig bond series that surprisingly does a throwback to the more hokey Roger Moore films giving us a movie that is more centred around the explosions, cars and beautiful women and it certainly makes for a fun time at the movies that's not to say the movie doesn't have its moments in the narrative aspect as the dialogue is very well written, the villain is menacing and the two leads are likable. but spectre's story is very disjointed in parts and is lacking the tension casino royale and skyfall had, also some scenes in the film can be a little uninteresting at times. none the less still an enjoyable instalment.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

7

PeterAlexanderNov 17, 2015

Whilst never reaching the heights of his last Bond instalment, Sam Mendes succeeds in bringing the magic and feel of James Bond to the big screen. The film opens with what I believe is one of the most well done sequences in any Bond film toWhilst never reaching the heights of his last Bond instalment, Sam Mendes succeeds in bringing the magic and feel of James Bond to the big screen. The film opens with what I believe is one of the most well done sequences in any Bond film to date. The film never really captures the same level of quality, however there are several thrilling and tense sequences that help to ensure it is an enjoyable cinema experience. There are problems however, especially in the form of character development and the story. Whilst Lea Seydoux gives an impressive performance, and Ben Wishaw's portrayal of Q is further developed expertly, Christoph Waltz's role as the main villain is underwhelming in a narrative sense. The story, which is heavily harmed by the fact that Waltz is only present in the final act, seems to have run dry. It appears that Mendes as the director, and Daniel Craig as Bond have past their prime in bringing James Bond to screen. Nevertheless, Spectre acts as a good sendoff for both and is certainly a film worth watching in the cinema.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

PipeCNov 28, 2015

Since the first 007 film until San Mendes' "Spectre" have been impregnated its own original stamp but this does not mean that the James Bond's films The movies are only originality. It was only a matter of time for producers begin to realizeSince the first 007 film until San Mendes' "Spectre" have been impregnated its own original stamp but this does not mean that the James Bond's films The movies are only originality. It was only a matter of time for producers begin to realize imitations of successful franchises (Batman). The James Bond's last three films are based on these franchises full of cliches, explosions, love , good and evil , girls and more filler.

'Spectre' is completely original stunts and explosions, trains, planes, helicopters, Mexico,day of the death, the Bond girls , secrets , lifesavers, bombs, jokes, eccentric scenarios and the discovery of the author of all the suffering of agent 007.

If you love Skyfall and all the rest of the list, you will love the game of decisions and findings of 'Spectre'. The antagonists of this story is the familiar Franz Obenhauser come back to finish destroying the little life that has 007. (Remember that he is the author of all his suffering).His development in the movie is awesome, and can show us his real hatred against his half-brother. (even with a catastrophic scar in the eye)

Yes, undoubtedly, 'Spectre' was a great movie with scenes full of drama and action but gradually it decreases the level of film, evaporating our minds as 'Skyfall'.

Or Maybe the script is the real problem, the story is quite illogical and soft achieving confuse viewers too. The explosions , chases and shootouts won't fix a bad history.

Whatever the cause, "Spectre" is a movie where the media shows a completely different face to what really is it ( Like "Terminator Genisys", Remember). Nowadays, the media abuse their authority, they play with the minds of viewers with one purpose capture the attention through TV SPOTS, Teaser, Trailers, CLIPS, Featurette and more publicity.

It is almost unnecessary to mention that one of the strongest points of the movie is the fabulous theme song Sam Smith "Writing's On the Wall" which it was introduced in the movie to start. Personally , they presented the song in the film in a rather strange way (A brief explanation about the organization 'Spectre'). It was quite peculiar.

The character Moneypenny (Naomie Harris)is not very important in the movie but she helps Bond, is her function, Right?. The girls Bond (Monica Bellucci - Léa Seydoux) made their performances at high but definitely and obviously the face of the film is for Bond. Really, I do not know much about the old Bond films but Daniel Craig 'Spectre' made a fascinating characterization and without doubt is one of the best James Bond for his elegance , style , poise , joy , humor , hard work and all you have a great agent 007,

Even at a simple glance, the 'Spectre' Trailer makes promises it can not keep. The dark touch that gave Sam and Waltz is frightening, treating us to give the first Bond Horror movie.

But of course 'Spectre' falls short of trying to imitate the Nolan's classic. This movie was not entirely a lost opportunity, but really they did not avail all the privileges that have a Bond film .'Spectre' has beauty, class and all the weight of its predecessors (more than anything 'Skyfall'). James Bond is back for twenty fourth time , does not the best way but he returns, and yes:

- "He's Bond, He's James Bond"… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

KungfubkkNov 9, 2015

While this is not the best from recent 007 movie, it is waaaaayyyy more entertaining to watch than Quantum of Solace, seriously though QOS is freaken boring compared to this one. First off, I really hate the song played by Sam Smith from theWhile this is not the best from recent 007 movie, it is waaaaayyyy more entertaining to watch than Quantum of Solace, seriously though QOS is freaken boring compared to this one. First off, I really hate the song played by Sam Smith from the opening credits, its just very annoying. I really had high hopes for this movie for it being another fantastic 007 movie from Sam Mendes who did the last 007 film Skyfall. It did had some enjoyable moment, there was a lot of well done shots in different scenes that makes it look awesome, especially the brutal train fight sequence with Dave Bautista. Speaking about Bautista, he is one of the cool parts about this movie and in my view, he is like the next Jaws(which kinda sounds weird). Besides all of that, it does have some real cheesy moments and some people will say the writing is kinda all over the place the movie just dragged on for too long and they made parts that is way too slow and I will get bored for a bit but for some reason Bond will spend a night with a girl that will only last for 5 secs. You have Christopher Waltz as the main villian but you hardly get to see him, you only see him once around the first quarter and you don't see him again until the very end, not really doing anything. Overall, its not the best 007 movie and won't win any Oscars again BUT some 007 fans might enjoy this for being a decent 007 film. If you are not a fan of 007, you are better off saving your money for now and watch Skyfall(or The Peanut movie that just came out)

3.5 out of 5… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

YellowKirbyNov 9, 2015

As my first proper exposure to Bond, I didn't agree with most criticisms people had (like how much of a rehash it was). That's probably why I enjoyed it so much, apart from the good performances from Daniel Craig, Ben Wishaw, and ChristophAs my first proper exposure to Bond, I didn't agree with most criticisms people had (like how much of a rehash it was). That's probably why I enjoyed it so much, apart from the good performances from Daniel Craig, Ben Wishaw, and Christoph Waltz. Apart from a few flaws, and its surprising similarity to Austin Powers 3, SPECTRE is a truly fun and enjoyable flick.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

7

DanBurritoNov 6, 2015

Fun, action-packed spy film. This was the first James Bond movie I've ever seen so it was kind of an important moment in my moviegoing history. It had a small pacing problem but I liked it anyway. It's got everything you'd expect from a BondFun, action-packed spy film. This was the first James Bond movie I've ever seen so it was kind of an important moment in my moviegoing history. It had a small pacing problem but I liked it anyway. It's got everything you'd expect from a Bond film- Bond girls, power-hungry villains and lots of action. Christoph Waltz was pretty good as the villain too. But as good as Daniel Craig was, I think this should be his last bond. He's too old now! Anyway, it's a good movie that delivers exactly what the trailers promised. 7/10.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

7

reviewer2015lolJan 16, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. My score is about 6.5

This movie was not bad but it's hardly epic and interresting. The villan is a major dissapointment. The car was only in the movie for like 10 minutes. And there is barrely action in it if you compare it to skyfall. Just watch it one time in the cinema but stay away for it then.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ctow123Nov 7, 2015

The good: the environments, scenery, costume design, music, fight sequences, car scenes, action in general was all done in spectacular fashion.
The bad: the plot was your typical bond plot so no complaints, but i felt that the villain was aThe good: the environments, scenery, costume design, music, fight sequences, car scenes, action in general was all done in spectacular fashion.
The bad: the plot was your typical bond plot so no complaints, but i felt that the villain was a little weak and i didn't like how James just walked into the villains hands. This might be picky, but i felt like the villain was a little underdone in the movie.
Overall: definitely worth the watch for the filming and visuals alone. The action scenes were unreal. The plot was also good too. It portrayed the harsh realities of todays world. This was a classical bond film with a modern touch and some light humor, but overall a serious movie. I only feel that if they developed the villain a little more this could have been one of the best bond films of the Craig era and perhaps one of the all time great bond films… Expand

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

7

dantrekNov 6, 2015

First the things I loved:
1. Gunbarrel sequence back at the beginning
2. SPECTRE is back 3. Opening sequence in Mexico City is great! Things I didn't care for: 1. Plodding Plot 2. Boring down time (although I loved not having constantFirst the things I loved:
1. Gunbarrel sequence back at the beginning
2. SPECTRE is back
3. Opening sequence in Mexico City is great!

Things I didn't care for:
1. Plodding Plot
2. Boring down time (although I loved not having constant gunfire)
3, Sam Mendes need to shoot in that yellow haze, smokey lens.

All that being said, this is a good Bond movie but not a great one. I love that they have FINALLY got back to a somewhat Bond formula. Craig looks tired in this film, although he still delivers as Bond. Lea Seydoux (as Madeline Swann) has potential as a Bond girl, but is given stale dry dialogue. Not the best Chemistry with Swann and Bond but I blame a lot of that on the script and director. Naomie Harris, Ralph Fiennes, And Ben Whishaw are equally good as Moneypenny, M, and Q. Christoph Waltz gives a fine performance as the main villain. (no spoilers on who he is) Seeing the organization SPECTRE around their huge member table was awesome and well done. Its still a robust Bond adventure and worth the watch. In closing I miss David Arnold's scores, they are more reminiscent of John Barry. Robert Newman's is passable, but like most movie music today just so interchangeable.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

7

StanRezaeeNov 7, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Its no Skyfall but its still better than Quantum of Solace. I was excited when it was announced that SPECTER would return and I was hoping the film would be a remake of Thunderball. While that is not the case, the film does a good job at paying homage to several classic Bond films like From Russia With Love and Dr. No (only a true Bond fan will notice these). The story is good but the concept of all the films being connected by SPECTER was stupid while the plot of Blofeld motive being Daddy Issues is idiotic. However it was still good film to watch.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

StarBeastDec 3, 2015

In Spectre, as in The Dark Knight Rises, here is a film as much anticipated as it was doomed from the outset. For Bond's latest outing and in reference to The Batman's most recent adventure, Spectre follows directly on the heels of, and wasIn Spectre, as in The Dark Knight Rises, here is a film as much anticipated as it was doomed from the outset. For Bond's latest outing and in reference to The Batman's most recent adventure, Spectre follows directly on the heels of, and was perhaps unfairly expected to top a series best.
Skyfall, like The Dark Knight, delivered the knockout punch critics, audiences and the box office were all screaming for. After the success of both films, their respective studios and the film makers involved were tasked with what must've seemed like mission impossible; recreate that same magic whilst giving audiences something they had never seen before.
Cut to 2015 and Spectre arrives, much like The Dark Knight Rises did back in 2012, to mixed reviews, diminished expectation and division among it's series fans.
But is it all doom and gloom? No. While the film itself is not quite the well oiled machine it's predecessor was, and although it's stab at tying up all that has come before is thinly executed and is therefore annoyingly less than convincing, Spectre is however a worthy entry in the Bond cannon and the Daniel Craig era of Bond films. It succeeds in scope as a globetrotting action adventure, it is beautifully photographed and it's set pieces rival if not better much of what has come before, particularly it's pre credits sequence.
Unfortunately, like the film I've referenced here and for all that Spectre does have going for it, it will forever live on in Skyfall's shadow. Watchable, fun, sexy and cool but achingly and perhaps annoyingly running a close second to Craig's best.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

moviescriticnetDec 8, 2015

Despite the fact that Spectre is undoubtedly so far the most popular movie of 2015, it seems that neither critics, nor the audience really appreciated it. That's probably because this is the most dark and thoughtful James Bond movie.
For theDespite the fact that Spectre is undoubtedly so far the most popular movie of 2015, it seems that neither critics, nor the audience really appreciated it. That's probably because this is the most dark and thoughtful James Bond movie.
For the first time in Bond history the bad guys are not just one ridiculous and eccentric person (ex. Goldfinger) but a massive network of legitimate companies and white collar criminals. The enemy is in fact modern capitalism. The main themes in Spectre is that you can't really divide humanity into good and bad guys and that Information is today's most valuable asset. This is the first Bond movie that parodies itself, since even the use of the special agents is put under criticism. Bond operates under no authorization and seems powerless against this massive conspiracy like a "kite dancing in a hurricane", as one of the bad guys states in the movie. Moneypenny is now black, Mr Q is a young hacker and even the "bad guy" is using technology and not muscles to torture Bond. In a nutshell this is the most modern movie of the series. Sam Mendes' direction is a bit different and strange (what did you expect from the guy behind American Beauty?), Bellucci becomes a Bond girl just for a night, Lea Seydoux is sexy, Daniel Craig is (as always) tough and sarcastic and Christoph Waltz is just fantastic (possible oscar nomination). Worth mentioning is that Spectre features a great sense of humor that lacked earlier entries. All in all those new elements mixed together in this modern James Bond version give a new breath of life to the series but might puzzle the old school action driven fans. Still, there is plenty of action in this film and Bond always manages to succeed in an explosive way, just to make sure that the series remain on track.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

GadgetyDec 18, 2015

A little more humor from Craig this time, not all seriousness. He's still shaping the character. The opening scene is spectacular. One of the best Bond openings. It's a drawn out shot, a long sequence, and it sucks you into the movie, wham,A little more humor from Craig this time, not all seriousness. He's still shaping the character. The opening scene is spectacular. One of the best Bond openings. It's a drawn out shot, a long sequence, and it sucks you into the movie, wham, you're there. Make sure you go see it in a theatre with a great sound system. It's a long film, almost 2.5 hours, for better and for worse. Mostly for better. In Quantum of Solace, the pace was so high it just blurred by, all action, bang, bang, bang. SPECTRE is more drawn out affording to linger in certain scenes, giving more texture, more detail, more the feel of what it's like to BE there. It's what makes Bond Bond, time for a drink, time to take in the scenery rather than only breathless action. Sam Mendes, and his cinematographers have brought real beauty to the Bond franchise. Nothing beats Deacon's color palette in Skyfall, however. I miss his cinematography in this film. It would have heightened the beauty of it more than van Hoytema's love of grainy images. It's not bad, yet I think Deacon would have made more of it. Other improvement points? I had huge expectations on outrageously skilled Christoph Waltz, but he's sort of not capitalized upon. He begins well, and he's creepy but it doesn't go beyond that. Javier Bardem was sensational in Skyfall. A tough act to follow, perhaps? I get the feeling it's the script that holds Waltz back. There's not much in it. In fact that's the major issue: the Bond movies need better scripts. They shouldn't start until there's a rock solid story. In addition, perhaps it's time to bring in some more evil forces, real scary stuff, going on in the world, rather than villains who seem sort of harmless, even though they're creepy. As for Léa Seydoux, she's great and plausible in her role. Great natural looking make up as well. Only a few faux pas, also script wise (no details, don't want any spoilers). Lastly, the title song. I remember reacting to the song, really listening during the opening. I wasn't sure whether it was a man or a woman, or both. Captivating. Sam Smith's singing is fantastic. All in all, what stays in my mind after this film is really the opening, the laughs, a sweaty sequence in north Africa, and the feeling it was worthwhile to see it for its entertainment value.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

nahtan1244Jan 23, 2016

Spectre is Directed by the same guy who directed the fantastic Skyfall. The opening shot in mexico Is worth the price of admission alone. The opening credits are also beautifully made. Christoph waltz was a great casing choice as the mainSpectre is Directed by the same guy who directed the fantastic Skyfall. The opening shot in mexico Is worth the price of admission alone. The opening credits are also beautifully made. Christoph waltz was a great casing choice as the main villain. This movie leans toward the earlier entry's of the bond films and constantly makes subtle references to the earlier entry's. Back to the villain he delivered in every scene he appeared even though he only in like 3 scenes and didn't show up until half way into the movie. Also you could tell both Sam and Danial Craig were running out of steam as the movie went on. this will likely be Danial Craig's last bond movie but none of the less Spectre is way better than Quantum of solace and is very entertaining throughout even though it is not quite as good as casino royale or skyfall.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MovieGeeksApr 1, 2016

Does it mean something that James Bond drinks a dirty martini in “Spectre,” the latest in the seemingly unkillable franchise? It’s too soon to know, though true Bondologists will be parsing this new drink’s significance shortly. As more of anDoes it mean something that James Bond drinks a dirty martini in “Spectre,” the latest in the seemingly unkillable franchise? It’s too soon to know, though true Bondologists will be parsing this new drink’s significance shortly. As more of an amateur in all-things Bond, I had hoped a dirty bomb would go boom or that the actress Léa Seydoux would do something unspeakable to Daniel Craig, given that the pre-credit sequence features female nudes writhing alongside an octopus with busy arms. Part of the bankable pleasure of the series, after all, is that every so often, among the usual guns and girls, the unexpected happens — a bikini stops the film, a villain revs it up, Bond surprises.

There’s nothing surprising in “Spectre,” the 24th “official” title in the series, which is presumably as planned. Much as the perfect is the enemy of good, originality is often the enemy of the global box office. And so, for the fourth time, Mr. Craig has suited up to play the British spy who’s saving the world one kill at a time, with Sam Mendes occupying the director’s chair for a second turn. They’re a reasonable fit, although their joint seriousness has started to feel more reflexive than honest, especially because every Bond movie inevitably shakes off ambition to get down to the blockbuster business of hurling everything — bodies, bullets, fireballs, debris, money — at the screen.

Before that happens here, there’s the usual narrative busywork that plays as if it were written by committee, which it was (John Logan, Neal Purvis, Robert Wade and Jez Butterworth). If you have watched one Bond movie, you know the score. The band — M (Ralph Fiennes), Moneypenny (Naomie Harris) and Q (Ben Whishaw) — gets back together, with Bond singing lead. There’s an opening lollapalooza blowout that Mr. Mendes largely delivers in one long silky take, having clearly studied trends in contemporary art cinema. Mr. Craig and the camera move together beautifully in this sequence, whether Bond’s sauntering across a roof (and in what has become a signature, adjusting a shirt cuff) or riding down a collapsing building as easily as you would a slide at a water park.

There’s more, of course, including car chases, nominally exotic locales and a pulpy, visceral slugfest on a passenger train with a Bluto-size hurting machine (Dave Bautista) who’s evocative of that old Bond enemy Jaws. The train, as well as the purr of an Aston Martin, suggests that the filmmakers are working the nostalgia angle, though, the series has always been driven by longing for other men and worlds, for the British Empire, for a hyper-masculine savior, for sex kittens (friends or foes) and for a reassuring vision of the world in which the greatest threat is an orderly criminal organization run by a single supervillain. The superbaddie in “Spectre” is, alas, a bore, enlivened only by our series sentimentality and Christoph Waltz working his accented villainy with a smile.

Back in 2006, Mr. Craig slipped into “Casino Royale” and the role of James Bond like a middleweight’s fist in a boxing glove, bringing to the gig a battered beauty one punch away from ugly, a powerful chest that looks good in a tux and a visceral predatory quality that works equally well for annihilating villains and ladies.

Mr. Craig delivers the blows — the crushing uppercuts and sucker punches — more persuasively than the chaste kisses, although given the anemic seductresses Bond is often now paired with, the actor can scarcely take the blame. A few sashay through “Spectre,” most agreeably Monica Bellucci, cinema’s current go-to Italian bombshell. She shows up in widow’s weeds, which Bond promptly removes while she babbles intel about her dead husband. The husband is a nail that leads to the shoe, the horse, the rider and finally the kingdom, little of which has anything to do with the world as it exists, with its environmental disasters and political uncertainties, religious wars and ordinary terrors. But then it’s hard to imagine Bond taking on, say, the Islamic State.

The Bond movies have always managed to tap into reality by switching on a camera, a connection to the material world that lingered no matter how far out the villains, their wild lairs and intrigues.The current Bond team is trying to keep the audience entertained with new tricks and gizmos while keeping it kind of real, which perhaps explains why this Bond sweats buckets, tears up and even bares his feelings. Mr. Craig is very good at selling Bond’s humanity, though in truth, what has always really turned us on isn’t 007’s humanity but the reverse.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TheFilmBuffApr 2, 2016

'Spectre' Grinds Through Plot, but It and Craig Look Great!

Because women are particularly beguiling when viewed from behind, the camera loves to follow them: Anyone who's watched James Stewart's lovesick detective trailing Kim Novak, a'Spectre' Grinds Through Plot, but It and Craig Look Great!

Because women are particularly beguiling when viewed from behind, the camera loves to follow them: Anyone who's watched James Stewart's lovesick detective trailing Kim Novak, a platinum dream poured into a pale gray flannel hourglass, understands the voyeurism at the heart of Vertigo. With Spectre — the twenty-fourth James Bond picture and the fourth and probably final one to feature Daniel Craig as 007 — director Sam Mendes takes a tip, perhaps unwittingly, from Hitchcock, as well as from Orson Welles's Touch of Evil: The picture opens in Mexico City with a regal, ambitious, Wellesian tracking shot that begins in the midst of a Day of the Dead parade and eventually finds its way to Craig's Bond, standing in the crowd.

He's wearing a holiday-appropriate costume, a sexy-threatening skull mask and a black topcoat with a silkscreened skeleton's spine winding up the back. There's a masked beauty on his arm, but who's looking at her? The camera trails the couple as they trek through the reveling masses, and it's impossible to take your eyes off that spine, a sensuous, rippling, imaginary x-ray of the man beneath. Why, oh why, don't real 3-D glasses — the ones advertised in the backs of comic books and sold to young boys hoping to see through women's clothes — actually exist?

We don't really need to see through Daniel Craig's clothes, because eventually he does take at least some of them off. But dressed or un-, he's the chief pleasure to be had in Spectre, along with the joys of gazing at the feral-flower beauty of Léa Seydoux (as Madeleine Swann, the headstrong psychologist Bond falls for), Monica Bellucci (who appears only briefly, as an Italian widow in a merry widow), and the radiant charmer Naomie Harris (who again plays MI6 administrative assistant Miss Moneypenny, although like most administrative assistants, she's sorely underappreciated and given only unimportant things to do).

Spectre on the whole is gorgeous, shot — by cinematographer Hoyte van Hoytema — in a bevy of locales including sandy-gold Morocco, glowing, gray-marble Rome, the winter-white Austrian Alps, and, of course, dazzling, polychrome Mexico City. Every action sequence is beautifully staged and edited clearly: There's a rough-and-tumble dustup set in a train's dining car and a breathtaking midair scuffle in which the two principals dangle precariously from a flying helicopter. Mendes and his screenwriters (John Logan, Neal Purvis, Robert Wade, and Jez Butterworth) give us multiple villains to thrill to and hate, one played by appealing muscleman Dave Bautista, another by Christoph Waltz, who's perfectly fine if you're not yet tired of his trademark death's-head grin. This isn't your average James Bond movie; it's more of a SuperBond, packed with all sorts of things you didn't know you wanted — but also with things you don't really need.

Because in the end, Spectre is just too much of a good thing. Though each scene is carefully wrought, there's little grace, majesty, or romance in the way the pieces are connected. The whole is bumpy and inelegant — entertaining for sure, but hard to love. It's easy to see how all this aggressive splendor could fall flat: Both Mendes and Craig have said in interviews that they were nervous about being able to top the over-the-topness of 2012's rich, resonant Skyfall, Mendes's first film in the franchise; Craig has also said that he's "done" with James Bond, and though that could be exhaustion speaking, it's easy to see how the excesses of Spectre might cause anyone to say, Enough.

The shaky plot mechanics don't help: Acting on a tip from his late, and beloved, boss M (Judi Dench, who appears here only in a small, moving snippet of video), Bond goes rogue to root out the mysterious head of bad-guy syndicate SPECTRE. In the process, he flagrantly disobeys his new boss (played with bespoke tastefulness by Ralph Fiennes) and messes up the beautiful Aston Martin DB10 he's stolen from fidgety gadget mastermind Q (an adorable Ben Whishaw, dressed in a series of amazing jackets, in plum tweeds and dark-blue windowpane-checks). Meanwhile, an evil new boss (Andrew Scott, of Sherlock) has taken over MI6 with plans to dissolve it. There's enough plot here for six movies, and Spectre groans under the weight. Mendes has dropped in some lovely details that nearly get lost: Not surprisingly, Bond's underfurnished bachelor-spy apartment is lacking in tchotchkes, but we do get a glimpse of a miniature bulldog figurine, its back adorned with a Union Jack, that in the old days used to sit on M's desk.

This scrappy bulldog Bond is tired, but he's also capable of tenderness. And no matter how frustrating or exhausting Spectre may be, there's nothing but sadness to be felt in watching him walk away.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MasterRileyJul 22, 2016

Spectre isn't as good as Casino Royale or Skyfall, but it is definitely better than Quantum of Solace. Its a good movie all around; with great action, good characters, good writing, and good music.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JP32Dec 7, 2021

As an uber-sleek and spit-polished take on the 007 formula, it reminded me a lot of the newest Mission Impossible movies, which sacrificed unique auteuristic spins for premium-grade stunt shows.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DominArsenDec 9, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. James Bond Spectre

Surement l'épisode ou Daniel Craig rendra son costume...
Un film à la belle allure sortit à un moment mouvementé pour la France. À été acclamé pas forcement en bien.
!SPOILER!
On commence par une scène d'introduction qui se passe quasiment sans changement de caméra, ça rend le film fluide, j'ai trouvé cela sublime d'autant que la fête (Squellete) fait office de compteur ... On a une autre scène avec des jeux d'ombre géniale et pour un film avec un beau casting; dans cette scène se trouvent très peu de paroles. De plus j'adore Christophe Waltz (le dentiste dans Django) qui endosse le costume du méchant...

La scène du train a été ressentie comme une cassure pour moi, il se casse mutuellement... c'est assez étrange dans un James Bond.

Une fin qui m'attriste un peut, car le méchant qui dit que "c'est à cause de lui toutes les difficultés de BOND" .... Personnellement le méchant on en parle que dans spectre. Pour dire rapidement tout s'effondre à partir de cette citation ce qui est vraiment dommage.

Après il été difficile de faire mieux que l'excellence qu'a été SKYFALL !!! ADÈLE MUSIQUE… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

amheretojudgeJan 16, 2018

Mendes is a fanatic for arthouse system, a love letter he writes to Fleming, I wonder who will do the same to him.

Spectre Mendes is a local seller. This time, breathing pure England-ness and all the patriotism towards it, the director, SamMendes is a fanatic for arthouse system, a love letter he writes to Fleming, I wonder who will do the same to him.

Spectre

Mendes is a local seller. This time, breathing pure England-ness and all the patriotism towards it, the director, Sam Mendes is going global with household methods. And to me, it is an ode to this franchise. Never has been a film so formal and personal altogether, like this. Many have come and gone, including his own version in the previous round, but no one was this professional. They have been claiming James Bond's excellence and superiority in his work shamelessly, and never had even cared to prove it. But with a clean polished job comes Mendes, with a neatly poised futuristic world i.e. the present one in which we are living. His huge set pieces gives away the clues. Armed with a huge production budget, Mendes colors the film with ravishing locations and Ridley Scott's Blade Runner-isc captivating tone.

Calculative steps and a simple pragmatic way out, from those steps, Daniel Craig is carrying a much heavy weight on his shoulder. Reinventing the character after a complete arc, he is given everything gift wrapped and untouched. And his version of sober Bond leaves a safe air in the room that is soothingly quiet and cathartic. Christoph Waltz, a mere pawn of the game, no matter how much he brags himself to be the puppeteer, he always stays a puppet.

Despite of a brief appearance, Monica Bellucci casts an unbreakable spell on us from which even the lead, Lea Seydoux couldn't free us. Personally, I feel for Ralph Fiennes, hiding someone else's mistakes and correcting his own, to bring down an evil empire Spectre, his job is to justify all the chapters of the franchise keeping in contrast to the materialistic world, this current generation is drawn to, "A license to kill is also not a license to kill." he concludes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LoletinAlexisJun 27, 2018

Spectre is a blurred version of Skyfall, which although entertains and the action scenes are cool, the story is not interesting, the villain is horrible and the film has plenty of footage.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoSep 6, 2018

Since always the 007 franchise has a special place in my personal cinematheque. I have all the movies and I really enjoy watching them. And although the majority are very good, of course, not all have been good. Some were realSince always the 007 franchise has a special place in my personal cinematheque. I have all the movies and I really enjoy watching them. And although the majority are very good, of course, not all have been good. Some were real disappointments, however much the unconditional fans find it difficult to admit. For me, there is a difference between being a fan and being a blind. I loved to watch "Skyfall", I really enjoyed the honors that are made there to several others past movies (it was released during the celebration of the franchise's fifty years, and it made sense to pay these homage). Another point I loved about "Skyfall" was the way it made connections to previous films, creating a thread through these films since "Casino Royale", and I was excited to see how this was going to continue. And, unlike a lot of people, I've never put any objections to the way Daniel Craig plays Bond nor do I get homesick thinking the previous actors were better than him. Every actor who wore the 007 suit had his time and his personal way of being Bond, and that diversity helps franchise to become richer and appealing. It's my opinion on that. So, as you might imagine, I was really excited about "Specter". Of course, the title showed me one thing: Bloofeld was going to come back one way or another. And so it was.

As always, Craig was well on the main character. Charismatic and seductive without losing the rough and dangerous look, he never lets us forget that he is a man on a mission. Christoph Waltz was compelling and Machiavellian and rose to the challenge of embodying one of the most iconic Bond villains. Ralph Fiennes, Ben Whishaw, Andrew Scott and Naomie Harris were impeccable in supporting roles. On the other hand, Lea Seydoux is far from being a memorable bond-girl with an uninspired performance, while veteran Monica Bellucci, despite her age, is much more sexy and could have been more interesting if she had a more active and important character. Sam Mendes is an excellent director, with good ideas, good casting skills and what appears to be a long-term plan for future films. However, the excessive length of the film, with a very slow pace sometimes and an ending that is, at least, disillusioning, showed me that this director has some difficulty in post-production work. For example, the pre-opening sequence in Mexico was more worthy of being a movie ending than what I saw in the end. Attempts to make humor or even some romance were also a resounding failure and suspense, that should be growing throughout the film, seem more to come in waves, growing and collapsing to re-grow in the next action sequence. Speaking of action, there's plenty to suit everyone, from car or train chases to truly unbelievable fights. All very well done but sometimes overdone and unbelievable. Soundtrack is unremarkable and Sam Smith's theme-song is boring, effeminate and far from the quality of its immediate predecessor (Adele's "Skyfall"), to give just one example.

Thus, "Specter" proved to be a good addition to the franchise and a very positive continuation although, of course, not as good as the film that preceded it. Let's see what will come next.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. (74/100)
The plot was rather simple and almost all of the CGI looked bad. But it still is another good instalment in the bond franchise and isn't terrible. Spectre deals with James's past in a good way and doesn't take away the focus of the plot like Quantum of Solace did. The look into his past was also suitable seen as Blofeld is his step-brother.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

OnaskDec 27, 2018

La última película hasta la fecha del Bond de Craig me deja un sabor agridulce.

Spectre coge partes de Skyfall y desgraciadamente también otras de Quantum of Solace. Su primera mitad es muy buena, pero conforme se acerca el final empieza aLa última película hasta la fecha del Bond de Craig me deja un sabor agridulce.

Spectre coge partes de Skyfall y desgraciadamente también otras de Quantum of Solace. Su primera mitad es muy buena, pero conforme se acerca el final empieza a desmoronarse y pierde bastante esencia de todo lo que ha construido durante la primera hora de metraje: he sentido que veía algun film de acción genérico y no a James Bond. De nuevo, interpretaciones brutales de Craig, Seydoux y Fiennes, así como del nuevo villano, Cristoph Waltz. El personaje femenino característico de la cinta me ha sabido a muy poco, mal construido y mal llevado durante toda la película, aunque la actriz cumple con su papel. La acción de nuevo muy bien dirigida: desde una elegante persecución por las calles de Roma en coches de alta gama hasta feroces tiroteos en alta montaña. En cuanto a la trama, me parece que han tirado de manera un poco descarada de las películas previas. En este aspecto no me ha agradado mucho: no he sentido al villano como un verdadero peligro en ningún momento y parece ser que tiene los mismos delirios de grandeza que Silva (Skyfall). Es una película sólida y entretenida, pero dado el gigantesco presupuesto, la posible extensa toma de referencias de Mendes en la saga (cuarta película y parece que siempre toca una buena y una "mala", alternando) y lo bien que se adapta Craig al papel del agente 007, creo que podrían haber exprimido esta última entrega mucho más. En cualquier caso, recomendada. Espero con ansias Bond 25.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DanielNS87May 11, 2020

This movie contain the structure classic of James Bond Films, action, intrigue and sexy womans, Sya Is beatiful! All actors has a decent performance, and a good direction of Sam, Is a decent film.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

ItsmayaOct 7, 2021

I enjoyed this film, I will repeat what I said in my Skyfall review because I think it's necessary, just ignore the first two films in the Daniel Craig saga!
Léa Seydoux and Daniel Craig are wonderful in this film, the story was great, andI enjoyed this film, I will repeat what I said in my Skyfall review because I think it's necessary, just ignore the first two films in the Daniel Craig saga!
Léa Seydoux and Daniel Craig are wonderful in this film, the story was great, and the villain was also good (not remotely as the villain in Skyfall tho).
To sum up, if you like bond films, you will probably enjoy this one as well.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AJ_13Nov 5, 2021

A good Bond movie. Craig is as great as always, and you can't ask more to Seydoux and Waltz performance-wise. Score and cinematography also stand out.

Nonetheless the script has more flaws. Some pacing issues, some annoying "deusA good Bond movie. Craig is as great as always, and you can't ask more to Seydoux and Waltz performance-wise. Score and cinematography also stand out.

Nonetheless the script has more flaws. Some pacing issues, some annoying "deus ex-machina", and some clumsily ended plots. It also has strong moments though (beginning, action scenes) .… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

mikesgold2KMar 4, 2021

Mocny zjazd po świetnym Skyfall. Kolejna zła organizacja stojącą za wszystkim, przerysowany ten zły i jego dziwne połączenie z Bondem. Szkoda, bo był potencjał

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

GDsReviewsJun 7, 2022

This movie doesn't stand well on its own as it requires seeing Casino Royale, Quantum of Solace, and Skyfall beforehand to fully grasp its story. If you have seen all three of those beforehand, it actually becomes quite powerful and good to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

JacobNov 27, 2015

Spectre is a fun film that follows the Bond formula and gives you everything you’d expect. The film does get a little too convoluted later on. There are a lot of twists and turns for an epilogue that is quite obvious. Nonetheless, the hero,Spectre is a fun film that follows the Bond formula and gives you everything you’d expect. The film does get a little too convoluted later on. There are a lot of twists and turns for an epilogue that is quite obvious. Nonetheless, the hero, villain, girl, etc. are all well done and the film is well shot. Regardless of length or convoluted the film is still worth it if only for the opening sequence, which might be the best thing in the film. Not as good as Skyfall but enjoyable.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

trooper1993Nov 6, 2015

The biggest flaw in this movie is the half-cooked script that probably was the result of good but unrelated bits and pieces stitched together in one single plot.

It's entertaining, yes. But for the amount of money they invested in it, IThe biggest flaw in this movie is the half-cooked script that probably was the result of good but unrelated bits and pieces stitched together in one single plot.

It's entertaining, yes. But for the amount of money they invested in it, I really can't see why they couldn't find a better script.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

6

rob_vzDec 7, 2015

Great opening sequence before titles, but rest of the film was a relatively plotless hunt. Lots of nods to classic Bond set pieces, but ultimately a boring travelogue with guns.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

ClariseSamuelsNov 24, 2015

Spectre is uneven to say the least. There are scenes that are everything Bond fans could wish for, and there are scenes that are borderline absurd. The most brilliant thing about Spectre is the pairing of Daniel Craig and the glamorous LéaSpectre is uneven to say the least. There are scenes that are everything Bond fans could wish for, and there are scenes that are borderline absurd. The most brilliant thing about Spectre is the pairing of Daniel Craig and the glamorous Léa Seydoux. Those two make a beautiful couple with the most intense romantic chemistry, and if Craig were not already married, one would swear that he fell in love on the set. Seydoux brings out the best in Craig.

Be that as it may, Spectre has glaring flaws. It would seem the producers, director, and writers had plenty of time to develop the script; nevertheless, the script is half-baked, and Craig does most of his acting during chase scenes and rescue scenes. His lines are terse and laconic, if not positively epigrammatic. Director Sam Mendes must have read the criticism about the female roles in Skyfall, because every Bond girl in Spectre (there are four of them!) is intelligent, fearless, and undeniably strong. Seydoux plays the main love interest in the role of Madeleine Swann, and although she fiercely denies being a damsel in distress, Bond has to rescue her at least three times (possibly four, if you count the train scene, where there is a question mark about who rescued whom). The first rescue scene in the Austrian Alps, where Swann is abducted by the bad guys, brings back the Bond of yore. Bond not only shows up on the tail of the bad guys who escape in their Range Rovers, but he is skillfully piloting a BN-2 Islander military plane commandeered on very short notice. Nothing in the script explains how he absconded so quickly with an airplane borrowed from the British Army. He simply shows up in the cockpit, and he proceeds to rescue Swann by crashing the plane. Unfortunately, it is precisely that kind of illogical plot with its preposterous premises that got Pierce Brosnan replaced by Craig in the Bond franchise.

Naomie Harris is back with a strong supporting role as Moneypenny. Ben Whishaw as Q has an improved persona, and he is no longer just the kid who still has “spots.” Ralph Fiennes continues as M, a role which he had just taken over at the end of Skyfall. He’s been rehearsing at home, it seems, because he has developed his M to perfection. Fiennes has turned M into a force to be reckoned with, at almost Oscar-level intensity and nearly out of place in a Bond film. We do not get to see enough of Monica Bellucci, now on record as the oldest Bond girl (age 50 at filming). She is dark, mysterious, and quintessentially beautiful, but her presence in Spectre is too brief. The fourth Bond girl is Stephanie Sigman, who hails from Mexico, and one suspects she nearly ended up on the cutting room floor. She shares an opening scene with Craig, who then leads her into a hotel room ostensibly to make love. Next thing she knows, he’s climbing out the window. She has one line for the entire film: “Where are you going?” And then she’s out. Christoph Waltz is not quite as evil as he was in Inglorious Bastards, but he gets scarier toward the end.

Mendes tries to pay homage to classic Bond, but his directorial heart is not in it. Bond mistakenly asks for a martini, shaken not stirred, at a health bar where he is instead served a green smoothie for vegans only. The classic Bond car shows up as a brand new Aston Martin DB10 intended for Agent 009, but Bond steals it and trashes the magnificent vehicle in a canal in Rome. When Bellucci’s character asks him his name, he doesn’t say it with his usual austerity because he is too busy kissing her, so he is still panting when he says, “Bond. James Bond.” Not the same effect.

Nevertheless, Craig is still handsome, dynamic, and charismatic. He’s good to go for another round, as long as he publicly apologizes for saying he would rather slit his wrists than play Bond again.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

PunisherLHNov 6, 2015

Daniel Craig's 3rd best Bond Film, or 2nd Worst depending on how you want to look at it. My Main problem with this film is how they tried to link the 3 previous Bond Films to this one. It just didn't make much sense and was too unbelievableDaniel Craig's 3rd best Bond Film, or 2nd Worst depending on how you want to look at it. My Main problem with this film is how they tried to link the 3 previous Bond Films to this one. It just didn't make much sense and was too unbelievable and contradictory for me to be invested in the story. The lack of Christoph Waltz was very disappointing, as he only gets around 10-15 minutes screen time in a 150 minute film. I found the first hour and a half of the film to be pretty dull and boring, it picks up in the final hour and was quite enjoyable towards the end. It's better than Quantum Of Solace, but not as good as Casino Royale and definitely not as good as Skyfall.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

6

TyranianApr 11, 2019

Another decent entry in the never ending franchise, Spectre has good action though its story has issues.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

T-rodneyDec 1, 2015

Spectre was definitely a good film, but this is the case whereby the sequel did not pass it's predecessors . First of all the opening scene of the movie was great, it was well shot and fun but the tempo for the rest of the film went downhillSpectre was definitely a good film, but this is the case whereby the sequel did not pass it's predecessors . First of all the opening scene of the movie was great, it was well shot and fun but the tempo for the rest of the film went downhill from there.What this movie really had was solid performances, like Daniel Craig's performance as James Bond(gold as always), Benjamin Whishaw as Q was also good, and Ralph Fiennes as M who surprisingly filled Judi Dench shoes well, but Christoph Waltz as the villain was rather disappointing,he never really feels like he is part of the movie because his screen time is short and even when he is there he really didn't do much as Oberhauser(Blofeld), in the last act there was some hope, but all potential was wasted, don't get me wrong he wasn't a bad villain it's just that he didn't do much.The run-time of the film was okay for me, it didn't feel too long because of the chemistry between Léa Seydoux and Daniel Craig(even at times it felt a bit forced).Going in to this movie it was always going to be compared to Skyfall,which was amazing and going out of this film i wasn't as amazed, the plot was rather small compared to Skyfall making the risks not quite as big, which came off as a huge disappointment, but the film covered up with some one liner humour which the film pulled off so well and the action was okay not great but satisfying especially the car chase scenes which were awesome. Spectre was definitely not perfect, but i enjoyed this film, it tied up all of Daniel Craig's films neatly,came to a satisfying end, so overally not as great as Syfall but a good film in it's own right.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

MattyiceNov 6, 2015

While Spectre has its moments, specifically in the beginning and the end of the film, it ultimately falls flat. The film moves at a very sluggish pace, which leaves the audience terribly bored. Additionally, Christoph Waltz is completelyWhile Spectre has its moments, specifically in the beginning and the end of the film, it ultimately falls flat. The film moves at a very sluggish pace, which leaves the audience terribly bored. Additionally, Christoph Waltz is completely underutilized as a villain. He is in the film for a solid 10 minutes at disjointed scenes. However, Spectre does manage to keep the action (when it actually exists) intense and Craig is still a great 007. It's unfortunate that the Daniel Craig Bond era ends on a very "meh" note.… Expand

7 of 10 users found this helpful73

All this user's reviews

6

alexnodeFeb 13, 2016

The last two Films seemed that they were leading the franchise to an interesting place. Spectre went two steps back to "sex, run, crash with style and repeat". Really silly plot , nice style.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

NickLikesMoviesNov 14, 2015

... Overall, "Spectre" has great action scenes and beautiful cinematography, but falls flat in its writing and plot, and becomes one of the biggest disappointments of the year.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

samichsupernovaDec 3, 2015

Disappointing. Craig is a great Bond but this script really felt tossed-together. I like the throwback quality to this film but attempts to ape some of Bond's better moments without properly motivating them fall flat. Waltz, Bellucci, andDisappointing. Craig is a great Bond but this script really felt tossed-together. I like the throwback quality to this film but attempts to ape some of Bond's better moments without properly motivating them fall flat. Waltz, Bellucci, and Bautista are all somewhat wasted. The two good action scenes are the opening sequence with the chopper and a bout with Bautista's character on the train. The car chase could and should have been done better. This film's high budget shows but it is lacking in the artistry fans expected, especially considering the good work Mendes did on Skyfall. Here the editing and cinematography are often at odds and the script is riddled with plot holes and inconceivable happenings. This film could have been so much better, but it simply lacks the layer of polish the other Craig Bond films had. Here's hoping Craig gets one more go as Bond as this was not a proper send-off.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

azgoodazDec 1, 2015

To be completely honest and straight forward. I'm not a Daniel Craig type of guy, I'm more of a Pierce Brosnan. Either way here is my honest review of Spectre.

The movie was kinda a let down. They should have upped the film rating fromTo be completely honest and straight forward. I'm not a Daniel Craig type of guy, I'm more of a Pierce Brosnan. Either way here is my honest review of Spectre.

The movie was kinda a let down. They should have upped the film rating from PG-13 to R to get more action/gory scenes in the movie that is usually limited by the PG-13 rating. I thought it had cliche moments, situations, and endings in the movie that you can probably guess what is going to happen next, even if you haven't watched the movie. In general, the movie did not feel like a James Bond film it felt more like a movie that separated itself from the series.

In sum, the movie needed more action. It did not have enough of gadgetry like how a James Bond film should have and more focused on adding 'fluff' to the storyline.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

jamessFeb 11, 2016

There are things to like about Spectre, and things that have grown stale. The opening Day Of The Dead scene was beautifully shot and well executed. The "one take" scene from the hotel room to the Mexican rooftops was very well done, but theThere are things to like about Spectre, and things that have grown stale. The opening Day Of The Dead scene was beautifully shot and well executed. The "one take" scene from the hotel room to the Mexican rooftops was very well done, but the helicopter fight went on a little long for my taste. The building collapse tried to recreate the Skyfall crane/train feeling, but felt a bit forced (nice landing on a convenient couch). So what happens? Bond gets suspended because of Mexico. What happens next? Bond goes rogue. AGAIN. How many Bond movies, hell, how many spy movies have the plot involving the agent going rogue? Almost every MI? 17 Bond movies? The train fight scene is a great throwback to the physical fistfights of the Connery days, and the car chase is slick, but somehow not as exciting as recent vehicle chases from the MI's or Bourne's. There's no sense of real danger. And that's about all there is to recommend. Much has been said about Craig sleepwalking through the role, and his slightly pursed-lip serious look gets a serious workout. Without Taratino's dialogue (just see The Green Hornet, The Three Musketeers, etc. or best..don't), Waltz is rather flat as the villain. Bellucci is wasted in her very small role for a two and half hour film. And that's the thing. Do we a two and half hour James Bond? About as much as we need a two and half hour Judd Apatow comedy. MI Rogue Nation told a better story, with better action and did it twenty minutes shorter.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SergeantSozNov 19, 2015

People who are giving this a 10 are the people who don't understand the point of the 0 - 10 scale. If they hate it they give it a 0. If they love it they give it a 10. For me this was a good movie, but not a great movie. The opening scene wasPeople who are giving this a 10 are the people who don't understand the point of the 0 - 10 scale. If they hate it they give it a 0. If they love it they give it a 10. For me this was a good movie, but not a great movie. The opening scene was the best part and unfortunately in a 2 and a half hour movie, isn't a good thing. The biggest problem is the villain. He's hardly in the movie and he just doesn't deliver. It was all very underwhelming. I couldn't even tell you the film's climax because it just seemed like they were going through the motions and it just eventually ended. Its a classic cat and mouse chase and as usual the villain instead of just killing the protagonist, plays games with him and makes it possible for him to escape. There were a lot of spy movie cliches. Car chases, shootouts, fist fighting and he gets the girl. Its the same old routine. It was an entertaining movie but I wouldn't put it at the top of my list. If you like Bond movies, go see it.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

cryhardhumorNov 16, 2015

After a stand-out Skyfall, SPECTRE fails to be anything more than a supbar and admittedly disappointing chapter in the Bond saga with nothing playing out to it's full potential

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

6

TheApplegnomeJan 17, 2016

007 is back, way back to the old & classic days of action & thrills -- but I don’t recall forced romance, rushed plot-lines nor vague writing being a part of this ”shoot first, ask later-franchise”. It’s James Bond; intense & cliché-ish007 is back, way back to the old & classic days of action & thrills -- but I don’t recall forced romance, rushed plot-lines nor vague writing being a part of this ”shoot first, ask later-franchise”. It’s James Bond; intense & cliché-ish action isn’t something new to the genre, and it does bring some great & odd moments to the screen. It’s a great action-flick, but not more than that. The major lack of a better visualization of characters, protagonist as antagonist, are shockingly vague. There’re some understanding & depth to the plot & characters -- but there could have been so much more. Character development? Relatable romance? More originality? Character & plot motivation? A not-odd and non-fitting title-sequence? Nope, not much of that. Still an entertaining & eye-popping flick, yes -- but at the expense of the future of the franchise, that’s for sure.

Personal rating: 67/100
Critical rating: 70/100… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ManiacUKNov 8, 2015

People are giving this movie the benefit of doubt purely because of the Bond brand, but the truth is that it makes for poor watching. Sure there's some great special effects and fantastic cinematography featuring a montage of some of the mostPeople are giving this movie the benefit of doubt purely because of the Bond brand, but the truth is that it makes for poor watching. Sure there's some great special effects and fantastic cinematography featuring a montage of some of the most beautiful places on earth, but the plot itself completely ruins anything the film had going for it. The storyline is unbelievably predictable but filled with more holes than Swiss cheese. The actions of the villains are moronic and their aims and motivations are so underdeveloped that you simply don't care. Bond is nothing more than an action hero with luck at every step. There's nothing smooth about how he operates in this film - he's not charming, not devious, not cunning, not smart and most certainly not subtle. In fact he could easily be described as a one man Delta force team because he just moves from location to location, wreaking havoc and running around guns blazing, leaving behind a trail of destruction. It is far more Rambo than it is Bond.

Basically if you're a huge Michael Bay fan and love movies where things get blown up or where heroes are able to escape any situation completely unscathed through no logic whatsoever, then you'll love this film. However if you're a classic Bond fan, you'll be bitterly disappointed - not because any of the casting, directing or music was that bad but simply because the writing was so absolutely dreadful it makes Transformers look like a masterpiece.… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

6

marcmyworksNov 10, 2015

Daniel Craig may not return as Bond and this film was meant to be a closure of his reboot of the Bond franchise (his Quadrilogy ending if you will). The concepts of Spectre being behind the events of the last three films is genius, howeverDaniel Craig may not return as Bond and this film was meant to be a closure of his reboot of the Bond franchise (his Quadrilogy ending if you will). The concepts of Spectre being behind the events of the last three films is genius, however this organization really does not do much. There aren't any huge twists and turns, and though beautifully shot, the script is barebones, the pacing odd and the music out of place. I would have loved to have seen something unexpected and powerful, however it truly comes across predictable. Daniel Craig, Ralph Fiennes and Ben Whishaw's performances are the saving grace, as Christoph Waltz is inches away from being type cast.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

violinguy88Nov 12, 2015

Let me put it to you this way. Spectre isn't as bad as Quantum of Solace but not nearly as good as Skyfall. The film is very pretty to look at. The opening scenes are tremendous, but the rest of the film just doesn't hold up.

The plotLet me put it to you this way. Spectre isn't as bad as Quantum of Solace but not nearly as good as Skyfall. The film is very pretty to look at. The opening scenes are tremendous, but the rest of the film just doesn't hold up.

The plot is a little old (Bond goes rogue to stop a menace that only he sees as dangerous), and the tie-ins to the previous 3 films are contrived and unnecessary. I don't mind the lack of humor as much as some reviewers because Craig's Bond is, well, a bad-ass. Imagine Daniel Craig hamming it up with the red-neck sheriff from Live and Let Die. Wouldn't work.

One thing I did love is Mendes' penchant for honoring previous films (not just the Craig ones). There are somewhat obvious nods to Goldfinger, You Only Live Twice, and even Man with the Golden Gun. The villain (skillfully played by Christoph Waltz) is menacing, but like the contrived tie-ins to Casino Royale and Skyfall, ultimately disappointing.

Spectre is much better than most of the Bond films of the last 20 years but unfortunately, it doesn't measure up against Skyfall and Casino Royale in quality.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

ahnehnoisNov 6, 2015

On the good side, it is the second most expensive film ever made, and it looks like it. The cinematography is gorgeous, and Thomas Newman clearly had fun writing this score.

On the bad side, the actual events that are being filmed aren'tOn the good side, it is the second most expensive film ever made, and it looks like it. The cinematography is gorgeous, and Thomas Newman clearly had fun writing this score.

On the bad side, the actual events that are being filmed aren't that interesting. The Bourne-style action and ruggedly humorless Daniel Craig characterization are more than a little tired, as is the series of references to Bond tropes. It isn't a great showing for the supporting cast either; Christoph Waltz and Monica Belucci might seem like casting coups, but they're both wasted, and Lea Seydoux is of course very, very pretty, but her character's archetypically fickle and irrational Bond girl behavior feels increasingly out of touch in a gritty 2010's movie.

Plot holes abound, the henchmen have the level of marksmanship you'd expect, and you'll wonder what kind of intelligence agency builds a massive prominent headquarters out of glass. None of this is really outside of the Bond ouvre, but it's getting tired. It's a fun movie at times, but it's trying to be realistic, unrealistic, and tongue-in-cheek all at the same time, and that just doesn't work.… Expand

13 of 18 users found this helpful135

All this user's reviews

6

Voodoo123Nov 9, 2015

A fun if tired entry that in the Daniel Craig films. I enjoyed watching this movie. I just wish they hadn't tried so hard with the fan service that crops up later on though. Didnt like the effort made to tie everything together from the craigA fun if tired entry that in the Daniel Craig films. I enjoyed watching this movie. I just wish they hadn't tried so hard with the fan service that crops up later on though. Didnt like the effort made to tie everything together from the craig plotlines here... felt like that decision was detrimental to the quality of its own self contained story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AcidwormApr 29, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Very disappointing overall. I love Craig's Bond which gives a lot of depth to the role with some backstory that the series never gave Bond, and his icy seriousness works well. However, he is a little light on the humor, which the character is most known for.

The movie is overlong, and makes poor use of the villain and his main henchman. I enjoy how the movie connects all the Craig installments, but the plot becomes very convoluted in the second half with a lot of confusing sub-plots and backstory that are not always properly explored. The first half of the movie is excellent, but the second half really drags it down.

The love scenes come across very jarring and forced. First Bond sleeps with Monica Belluci after killing her husband and it makes no sense that she would jump into his arms so easy. Then she is quickly forgotten. The lead-lady role is a poorly designed character. One minute she pushes Bond away having no sexual interest in him whatsoever giving off an image that she is a strong woman that can take care of herself and very unavailable to men, and then after a fight scene they are in each other's arms a couple scenes later, and she tells him a little later how much she loves him. This sudden change of behavior for her does not work.

Such a shame as the movie began so well and Skyfall left the series on a high note including a refreshing change in direction.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

diogomendesNov 7, 2015

Serviceable at best. Really disappointing considering the standards that its latest predecessor, "Skyfall", set. I know a lot of people are complaining about critics comparing those two movies, but honestly, the difference is quite notable.Serviceable at best. Really disappointing considering the standards that its latest predecessor, "Skyfall", set. I know a lot of people are complaining about critics comparing those two movies, but honestly, the difference is quite notable. "Spectre" lacked the emotional resonance and substance that made far better Bond movies a success. I'm not saying it isn't good, it's just that the action in this one didn't fare as I wanted. Even knowing it's a 007 film, it's really hard to give a pass to the preposterous set-pieces. Like that helicopter that was spinning around and never crashed, near the beginning of the movie. Or that plane that James Bond was driving, how the f*ck was the airplane still moving after losing its two wings and the tail? And how about hitting the car where the henchman (played by Dave Batista) was driving as well? I know the guy has lot of muscles, but c'mon, let's be realistic here.

Though the cinematography was fine, especially in Austria. Every frame well put together. All that snow was so pretty to look at. On the other hand, I pretty much enjoyed Daniel Craig's typically smooth and charismatic performance. As usual, he brings a sense of energy to its character that is not possible to resist. The Bond female was also a plus. As for the villain, well, he was, disappointing. Being the biggest nightmare Bond has ever had, this film doesn't truly accomplish in illustrating that. You don't feel like he's the most evil thing that has ever happened to James. More like another bad guy who just got in the main character's way. That scene where he reveals himself was spectacular though.

If the rumors are to be true, and this installment is the last one we will ever see from Sam Mendes and Daniel Craig, then I guess it's a decent send-off for the franchise. While ultimately lacking unforgettable action and a worthy foe, "Spectre" has still its thrills, and I would recommend it if you're a Bond fan. As for the others, you might just go with your friends for merely popcorn entertainment, or you can just wait for the DVD.

Final Score: 6.5/10… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

43in2014Nov 23, 2015

Do you remember how dull Quantum of Solace (or as I call it, Question of Sports) was? In that film, Bond had disobeyed orders and went about doing his own thing. He went from Place A to Place B and so on, following a trail, killing one personDo you remember how dull Quantum of Solace (or as I call it, Question of Sports) was? In that film, Bond had disobeyed orders and went about doing his own thing. He went from Place A to Place B and so on, following a trail, killing one person then another and another, found out one of MI5 employee is a double agent and he ultimately dies. Crucially, he saved a girl, not your typical 20th century dumb bond girl but a strong-willed girl who is out for revenge, he asked her if she knows what's it like to kill a person, they go into an seemingly empty desert, end up blowing up some villains' place, etc. Well, if you have seen that film, there's not really a point to see this one!

What an utter waste of $250m to repeat the same dull stuff again. If you need further proof of the laziness, two of the three writers of the Question of Sports have returned with copies of their previous script to do some minor editing and then submit as a new film!

Score: 3/5 (No half score) (Save your money and watch it on TV)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

SwiftReviewsMar 29, 2016

It was a good movie, i would probably rank it last out of the other Daniel Craig bond films, i enjoyed it because it was a bond film but it didn't seem very original and it didn't really take any risks.

so the good points are, the openingIt was a good movie, i would probably rank it last out of the other Daniel Craig bond films, i enjoyed it because it was a bond film but it didn't seem very original and it didn't really take any risks.

so the good points are, the opening scene was fantastic, with an awesome helicopter scene that was unique and visually exciting. The music overall was good and the theme song matched the movie well.

Overall it was put together well with some really good action scenes but a lot of it wasn't very memorable. I didn't like the storyline, the plot points were poor. I am thinking they must be running out of ideas or something.

When compared to Skyfall this movie fails pretty badly.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ovrthtop34Nov 8, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Spectre is a missed opportunity of a movie. First is Christoph Waltz. We are talking about an Academy Award winning actor who made Inglorious Basterds and Django Unchained more than just good movies. He made them great movies. He complimented the story, the screenplay, the director and the cast perfectly and made the entire film much better. Not so much with this film. Mendes missed this opportunity as a director as did the screenwriters. Instead of creating a supervillan to equal Bond, they minimized his talents and essentially shuffled him into the background. In all of the Bond films, has Blofeld been minimized this much? Maybe Diamonds are Forever, but not like this. But I digress. This is but one problem I have with the film. The screenplay seemed forced at times, not fluid, and the dynamic between Moneypenny and Bond is stale. Ralph Fiennes was sterile as M and Dave Bautista who was so awesome in Guardians of the Galaxy was minimized himself. Daniel Craig dominated, and one would expect this as he is the centerpiece, but Spectre is not just an organization, it was the driving force behind most of the early franchise and created a perfect antagonist for MI6 and while its central place is highlighted, it is Bond who always overshadows the other players. It comes back to Blofeld. Instead of firmly establishing him as the counterpoint to Bond and creating a tense mystery story, all is revealed in a lackluster, Deus Ex Machina manner.
There is no ingenious or elegant cat and mouse game that was played so well in films such as From Russia with Love. There is no “big reveal” of who this person is, not in comparison to what the franchise has established. I think this has a bit to do with the editing. It seemed pieced together in a not so organic manner. It is a departure from Casino Royale and Skyfall. The film is not devoid of its highlights. Tying up the loose ends with Mr. White was nicely done. It created a nice link to the character Madeleine Swann, but instead of wasting our time with the Day of the Dead scenes which opened way too slowly but did make use of the long scene in a good way, the audience could have been slowly introduced to the Swann character in a tense build-up that could have culminated in the chase/rescue scene. It is but one of the miscues of this film that seemed rushed in order to beat the hype of Star Wars and rekindle the excitement of Avengers and Jurassic World and the incredible Mad Max: Fury Road. This movie would have benefitted from another several months of shooting or editing or maybe refinement of the screenplay. While not a horrible movie, the entire franchise missed an opportunity. Instead of creating a cohesive and incredible follow up, we are left with a bit of an average Bond film and one that may fall within the middle of the pack in regards of memorable.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

courtpassantNov 12, 2015

Bond is bland. Chasing chasing chasing, womanizing, chasing chasing chasing. There is one fight scene that is amazin. Other than that, meh. This is no Skyfall. But I still love 007.

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

6

AliceofXDec 29, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The biggest problem with Spectre is that it feels like just another entry in a long series. Like a mid-season episode of a TV series that knows it doesn't have to try very hard. For the first half of the film I found myself bored because without an intriguing plot the action did little to entertain me.

The romance is unconvincing. Yes, I know that Bond always has a girl, but it appears that we as an audience have become too accustomed to it since the film's makers put in little effort to establish the romance. Sure, Bond is supposed to be a womaniser, but Madeleine is supposed to be something more instead of just another woman to be seduced. Why does Bond care for her other than because the plot dictates so?

But the thing that most intrigues me is why is this film so alike to Mission Impossible 5? It is basically the same plot in the same spy genre. Is it really a rip-off or just a symptom of Hollywood's chronic lack of originality?

That all said I can't say I disliked this film. It's a decent action film and it picks up toward the second half.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

Movi3R3vi3werNov 9, 2015

Daniel Craig continues his Bond journey with SPECTRE, a mostly forgettable Bond movie with some fun action set pieces and a good supporting cast. However SPECTRE suffers from a story that isn't all that interesting, completely wasting theDaniel Craig continues his Bond journey with SPECTRE, a mostly forgettable Bond movie with some fun action set pieces and a good supporting cast. However SPECTRE suffers from a story that isn't all that interesting, completely wasting the great Christoph Waltz and relying too heavily on the previous Bond formula that this series has tried avoided.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

6

walkabout_88Dec 28, 2015

Surprisingly campy at times, SPRECTRE delivers lots of fun action but fails to make any sense. It feels not as the epic conclusion of an ideal quadrilogy, and more like a tv season finale, trying hard to tie loose ends and raise interest forSurprisingly campy at times, SPRECTRE delivers lots of fun action but fails to make any sense. It feels not as the epic conclusion of an ideal quadrilogy, and more like a tv season finale, trying hard to tie loose ends and raise interest for what’s next. Waltz’s villain lacks any interesting motives in his nonsensical actions, and nothing feels genuine here. It is a feature that it’s also a cannibal of its own IP: it doesn’t play on its status nor its most famous Spectre organization, but it feeds on these things just to come up with something between the action scenes. Skyfall’s sense of urgency had probably raised the stakes a little too much, and no real character development appears on this installment, no new ideas. The initial tracking shot is probably the most fascinating item on this feature, and at least Mendes has mastered his skills in Bond visuals and action scenes. SPECTRE is nonetheless enjoyable, full of classic throwbacks one might have missed (film stock!) or not missed that at all (poorly drafted female characters and villains). It’s still fun to watch most of the time, but it has very little replay value.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

condythugNov 17, 2015

very average James Bond film with a poor storyline and VERY SLOW pacing throughout, as if it was always waiting for a moment for the movie to lift off; sadly it never did get beyond third gear.

nice acting by the villain and the usual hotvery average James Bond film with a poor storyline and VERY SLOW pacing throughout, as if it was always waiting for a moment for the movie to lift off; sadly it never did get beyond third gear.

nice acting by the villain and the usual hot and sexy actress but they can't save the movie. Q (the gadget boy) acted terribly and the whole movie is really a snore fest after halfway through when u just gave up waiting for the movie to move up a gear. if this movie wasn't a James Bond titled film, i am pretty sure it will do a lot worse in the box office and ratings.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

jlittle1404Mar 30, 2016

I thought a long time on this one and I don't think this Bond film was great but it wasn't the worst. Middle of the road action movie. Boring at times and will leave half the audience scratching their heads. I hope Daniel Craig comes back forI thought a long time on this one and I don't think this Bond film was great but it wasn't the worst. Middle of the road action movie. Boring at times and will leave half the audience scratching their heads. I hope Daniel Craig comes back for one more because this would be a low note to go out on.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Darkly_TranquilNov 20, 2015

Well made an generally entertaining, Spectre is neither a particularly good or particularly bad Bond film. There are solid performances all round, with a particularly gleeful turn from Christoph Waltz, and well executed action sequences, butWell made an generally entertaining, Spectre is neither a particularly good or particularly bad Bond film. There are solid performances all round, with a particularly gleeful turn from Christoph Waltz, and well executed action sequences, but the film runs at least 30-45 minutes too long and the story never really feels particularly well fleshed out to justify the runtime. Entertaining but unremarkable.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

Ripper89Nov 23, 2015

SPECTRE isn't a bad film, but the plot and the role of the main villain are incredibly week. The action is good, the acting isn't bad, but this movie is not as good as Skyfall. Sad way to say goodbye to Daniel Craig as James Bond, as he suitsSPECTRE isn't a bad film, but the plot and the role of the main villain are incredibly week. The action is good, the acting isn't bad, but this movie is not as good as Skyfall. Sad way to say goodbye to Daniel Craig as James Bond, as he suits the role perfectly in my opinion.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

6

FilmGobNov 6, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A cryptic message from Bond's past sends him on a trail to uncover a sinister organisation. While M battles political forces to keep the secret service alive, Bond peels back the layers of deceit to reveal the terrible truth behind SPECTRE.

Let me say that listening to Sam Smith's theme song for the very first time in the cinema is quite unpleasant, it just sounded like someone wailing uncontrollably. And the opening credits has cgi tentacles all over the place. We're off to a bad start.

As impressive as the opening scene is, where Bond chases 'Sciarra' through the Day of the Dead festival crowd, the fact that our hero thinks it's a good idea to punch the **** out of the pilot in an out of control helicopter, with a crowd of innocent people below, is baffling. The character of Bond feels schizophrenic as ever. I'm not sure what i'm supposed to think of a guy who, only after a minute of being acquainted, is bedding the widow (Monica Bellucci) of the assassin he killed earlier. And after a quick 'Ciao Bella' or whatever, she's not seen again. So much for the progressive choice of an age-appropriate Bond girl.

Mr White (Jesper Christensen) returns briefly as Bond pledges to protect his daughter, the fairly two dimensional Dr Madeleine Swann (Léa Seydoux). Together they travel from Rome, Austria, Tangier to track down Oberhauser (Christoph Waltz), leader of the mysterious Spectre, at his base of operations only a megalomaniac would be proud of. And yes, the big secret that isn't much of a secret, Oberhauser is actually Ernst Stavro Blofeld, pre and post face scarring.

There's plenty of fun nostalgia ahead with a brutal fight inside a speeding train with Mr Hinx (Dave Bautista), escaping a car chase using the ejector seat, escaping torture with an exploding wrist watch (of course, what else would it be!?) and then escaping the crumbling MI6 HQ by jumping into a safety net that came out of nowhere. Then it dawns on you that... this isn't anything new. Retro repetition, pandering, it's either what you want or what you dread.

The visuals are beautifully crisp and framed perfectly, thanks to director of photography Hoyte van Hoytema. Whether in frantic action scenes like the car chase on the streets of Rome, or dark indoor halls where the tense Spectre meeting takes place, it's what we expect from a modern Bond film. The score has moments of class but is mostly forgettable. Apart from one laugh out loud moment (during the car chase), the film is pretty much humorless, with little quips that didn't get much reaction from the audience.

Craig's run of Bond films suffer from an inconsistency in tone, direction and characters. Director Sam Mendes returns but there's still a lack of identity despite claims Bond is now 'Nolan-esque'. Did you want a return to over the top swagger of classic films after the modern but dire Skyfall? Well you're stuck between a rock and a hard place with Spectre. Go too hard edge, you get a Bourne clone. Go old school and you're left with a selfish, misogynistic pig for a hero. Never mind Daniel Craig, the whole franchise has run its course. All parody and little progress.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

6

mathodusNov 6, 2015

There is always a blotch in a movie franchise, whether it be Star Wars Episode I or Batman & Robin, there are always at least one film that falls short. These movies fail to capture what made their franchises great by abandoning creativeThere is always a blotch in a movie franchise, whether it be Star Wars Episode I or Batman & Robin, there are always at least one film that falls short. These movies fail to capture what made their franchises great by abandoning creative storytelling and character development for fun whimsical tropes which are solely put in to gather audiences of a wide variety to buy tickets. These blotches and tropes have already existed in the Bond franchise, dating back to the Sean Connery era, but before you know it, lightning will strike again and again. Following the massive critical and financial success of Skyfall, the twenty-forth Bond film had kept people wondering "what's next for our hero?", "what new situations can you put him in that makes the story compelling and the character enthralling?". Well, filmmakers of course decided to make a nostalgia piece, ditching the dark character study of the previous films in the Daniel Craig Era for a cliched adventure film, full of deus ex machinas, quips, one-dimensional characters and completely amateur storytelling. There are more Hollywood cliches in this film than actual story. The only audience that would enjoy this movie is the people who have never seen any Bond films before, so that they have no frame-of-reference for a great Bond film, small children who cannot yet comprehend what makes a film good or bad, and 60+ year old retirees who feel a sense of nostalgia that connects this film with the campiness of the early days of the franchise, which by all means the filmmakers achieved. The main issue with this film is that the movie does not take itself seriously. Some may argue that Craig's Bond is too dark and brooding, but the people who think that do not understand that the change in character which made him seem more cold and human, realistically placed him within a setting that was both practical and compelling. Going back and representing the classic Bond tropes is an entertaining thought, but that is completely impractical and unoriginal. The best films which stand out above the rest are those that offer a unique story, a story that no one has yet thought of, a story that takes your mind within the screen, never once letting you get out of your seat, but to tell the truth, I never felt that. I wanted the film to end abruptly as soon as possible, and when the screen went dark, I rushed myself out of the theater, questioning why the filmmakers or Sony or whoever is responsible for this movie decided to change the mood and atmosphere of both the story and its characters. My best guess is that they simply decided to film an action/adventure, blockbuster, popcorn movie that you watch on a first date, and granted, they achieved that, but I enjoyed the franchise because of the changes made over the years which evolved from Sean Connery flying away in a jetpack to Daniel Craig holding a dying M in his arms. However, this film chose to make Bond a quipping, rebellious douche who conveniently gets out of ridiculous situations. Highs and lows have always existed, but when you get to the point of liking Austin Powers more than this movie, it has become an abyss. Let us hope that the next one is decent.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

RalfbergsNov 19, 2016

I liked it generally, but the plot lacked a bit , especially how James Bond got near to bad guys - either just casually going to them, or they kidnap him and just bring to their place etc. I mean it felt a bit dumb and maybe overused in someI liked it generally, but the plot lacked a bit , especially how James Bond got near to bad guys - either just casually going to them, or they kidnap him and just bring to their place etc. I mean it felt a bit dumb and maybe overused in some earlier Bond films - I bet they could have thought of something more interesting by now. There were some other parts where the movie lacked and it was mostly quite predictable, so that makes it a bit more boring.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

YoloSwag4DogeJun 16, 2016

I can't say the dialogue or plot was particularly engaging, but the action sequences are great. My greatest issue with the film was the musical score. I felt like I was watching some high end opera theater instead of an epic, high action bondI can't say the dialogue or plot was particularly engaging, but the action sequences are great. My greatest issue with the film was the musical score. I felt like I was watching some high end opera theater instead of an epic, high action bond film. It was quite off putting and really killed a lot of the excitement for me. Overall, I'd say it's a good movie, but not really memorable.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

CineAutoctonoJan 19, 2016

"SPECTRE" is a movie with lots of action and romance, but it was a little boring but very revealing , but I still doubt whether Daniel Craig as James Bond continues , if it continues as I'll get to see Daniel all the movies many times as"SPECTRE" is a movie with lots of action and romance, but it was a little boring but very revealing , but I still doubt whether Daniel Craig as James Bond continues , if it continues as I'll get to see Daniel all the movies many times as desired , and if not this may be the last of Daniel as James Bond , without hesitation Daniel Craig he has left a mark on this incredible saga.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

movieman2001Nov 6, 2015

I just saw Spectre and was a little disappointed, it was ok but it wasn't as good as Casino Royal or Skyfall. Both of those films are great but i will say that Spectre is better than Qauntum of Solace with was awful in my opinion.I will sayI just saw Spectre and was a little disappointed, it was ok but it wasn't as good as Casino Royal or Skyfall. Both of those films are great but i will say that Spectre is better than Qauntum of Solace with was awful in my opinion.I will say the opening sequence in mexico is very, very good, one of my favorite as far as the opening scenes go. It has a lot of action scenes throughout the movie but the story is where the real problem lies, first of all the vilian who is played by Christoph Waltz should be much better, but its not his fault its the script he was given to work with and the scenes with the bond girl character fell flat as well.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

Jollyjoe1000Mar 12, 2016

it was not that bad but just kinda off. Missing the charm of the other films(at least most of them) but I hope that daniel craig will be able to fix the bond series with a good new installment that will come in a few years.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RichGGNov 7, 2015

Spectre was a marginally decent movie, it followed the outline of the past Bond movies structurally, but the story was a bore. Some scenes seemed too goofy to be in the film - almost a parody of itself, other scenes were mediore and a coupleSpectre was a marginally decent movie, it followed the outline of the past Bond movies structurally, but the story was a bore. Some scenes seemed too goofy to be in the film - almost a parody of itself, other scenes were mediore and a couple were fun. If you have money to blow, and have nothing else to see, then go for it. For the rest of you... it's a netflix movie for sure.… Expand

9 of 10 users found this helpful91

All this user's reviews

6

YorkManJan 25, 2016

Spectre is merely an average Bond movie. There's been much better and, unfortunately, there has been far worse.

The main crux of the problem stems from the need to tie together the overarching storyline set up in the previous three DanielSpectre is merely an average Bond movie. There's been much better and, unfortunately, there has been far worse.

The main crux of the problem stems from the need to tie together the overarching storyline set up in the previous three Daniel Craig outings, and the introduction of the organisation of Spectre, with Blofeld at its head, being the super secret 'umbrella' cartel that has been yanking Bond's chain.

Why is this a problem? Because it, in numerous ways, undermines the whole notion of what had come before. Especially the plot devices used in Quantum of Solace and then expanded on in Skyfall. This was the idea that Quantum was THE criminal cartel. Why bring back Spectre and Blofeld (and the need to create a backstory that links Bond and Blofeld together, having a shared childhood)? Because the producers of the film were able to secure usage of the name, nothing more, nothing less.

As a film, it's directed fairly well, the cinematography is fine, the musical score isn't that memorable, and the acting performances (on the whole) are ok(?). But as a whole, it doesn't really add up to much.
Craig as Bond is on autopilot and if he's brought back again for a fifth outing (to close off the Blofeld story arc) he needs a director who'll kick his arse and make him look at least like he cares.
Same with Christophe Waltz as Blofeld. It's clear this film is designed to introduce the character (the ending is left ambiguous), and it's not a spoiler in any sense to know Blofeld doesn't die!
But Waltz is also just acting by numbers in this movie.
For me though, the biggest acting issue is the casting of Lea Seydoux as the 'main' Bond girl. She's as wooden as a toothpick and not much better to look at. When the 'minor' Bond girl (played by Monica Belucci in a fairly small role) is so much more memorable, then the casting director got something very wrong indeed!!

But, if I'm being critical, it's the script that fails the most. Craig has established a Bond who is both rugged and emotive, both tough and free to show his fear. In Spectre he's very flat, with none of the suaveness and one liners that he's poured onto the screen in earlier films. Add to that a plot which revolves around the internal machinations of MI5, a power struggle in the 'boardroom' between M and and an up and coming 'techie' who believes field agents are an outmoded concept in the digital/cctv/smartphone/laptop world, and the actual actions scenes feel like a completely different movie.
The dialogue is cliched, and there's so much exposition (because of the dual storylines, and the need to keep the audience 'up to date') that I came away feeling like someone had pushed that secondary storyline so hard, as merely a means to have a substantial run-time for the movie. Believe me, they could knock it down to 90 minutes and have the 'other' storyline merely pop up as a rationale, a few throwaway lines here and there, and it wouldn't have changed the way the main story developed.

Overall, it's just average. It's never going to be hailed as a Bond classic, and that's fair enough. I am just hoping they pull out all the stops and go for a massive action finale for Craig's final outing!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BibbitibobNov 22, 2015

A decent send off for Daniel Craig (if this truly is his last Bond outing), with a strong yet wasted performance from Christoph Waltz. It spends too much time paying homage to older entries, and is quite anti-climactic, but the actionA decent send off for Daniel Craig (if this truly is his last Bond outing), with a strong yet wasted performance from Christoph Waltz. It spends too much time paying homage to older entries, and is quite anti-climactic, but the action sequences and gorgeous cinematography help make Spectre enjoyable.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

EpicLadySpongeJan 8, 2016

It's almost there to a good score but this movie of 007 named Spectre has almost made it to the score of 7. It's pretty much decent and loving at the same time while it's lacking the excitement from the previous 007 movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

tobeeryDec 29, 2015

Visually, it's certainly great but I didn't care for the plot as I did with Skyfall, for example. Bond films are always formulaic conceptually, but this didn't seem to have that extra spice to lift it from the average action flick. Needed wayVisually, it's certainly great but I didn't care for the plot as I did with Skyfall, for example. Bond films are always formulaic conceptually, but this didn't seem to have that extra spice to lift it from the average action flick. Needed way more Waltz… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

NicoteenMar 9, 2016

" A moderate movie, a weak Bond. Skyfall was one of the best Bond movies of all time, so the sequel is never as good Skyfall (weak action, boring characters).. I like Christoph Waltz, but he couldn't save it. In the end it's entertaining for" A moderate movie, a weak Bond. Skyfall was one of the best Bond movies of all time, so the sequel is never as good Skyfall (weak action, boring characters).. I like Christoph Waltz, but he couldn't save it. In the end it's entertaining for a BD/DVD night, but not more.."

GENRE RATING (AGENT/THRILLER): 6.4
OVERALL RATING: 5.8… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

in_obsessionJan 31, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Coming off the high that was Skyfall, a lot of people were expecting a lot out of this movie. And did it deliver?

....not really, no. In fact, I'd venture to say that it's probably only a bit better than Solace and definitely not up to calibre with Skyfall's success. The most serious flaw (a flaw that many movies have tbh) is in it's villain. I admit the introduction leading up to him was interesting but then it just...stagnates. He spends so much time talking about what he's done but never actually does anything. Not to mention the fail that was Andrew Scott. Not as an actor because the way he looks Bond up and down...ahhh that was a beautiful Moriarty look there, but his entire part could have been erased and it probably would have been a better movie. Let's not even talk about the uselessness that was Bautista's character. There was no need for the dramatics of his introduction. In fact, there was so much that could have been cut out and that time used instead to introduce more by way of character depth to the main villain.

It's so sad when so many great actors get together to make what could have been a great movie but had a shoddy script to work with.

The gold in this film lies not with anything Bond does with his Bond girls or M getting down into the trenches or even Andrew Scott's subtle interest in all the men in this movie, but in the Bond/Q relationship. Shipping aside, their chemistry is absolutely wonderful and I wish desperately that they had focused more on that than with their sad excuse for a romance. Each scene with them together was filled with snark and just...so much perfection.

Watch this movie if you just want to watch a Bond movie, no matter how bad it is. It's at least better than Solace?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

JyroJyroJul 24, 2017

Unfortunately, we've seen this sort of film a thousand times before. Forgettable characters, unbelievable stunts and a poor attempt of 'connecting the dots'. It's a shame because Daniel Craig shines as effortlessly in this as he did in theUnfortunately, we've seen this sort of film a thousand times before. Forgettable characters, unbelievable stunts and a poor attempt of 'connecting the dots'. It's a shame because Daniel Craig shines as effortlessly in this as he did in the previous three films (he really has set a new mantle for Bond actors). Just as well the storyline isn't quite as hopeless as Quantum of Solace...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DomgwyDec 20, 2017

I have been trying to collect my thoughts on the latest entry to the Bond franchise for the best part of a day now….here goes nothing.

After three films of origin stories and departures from the Bond formula, the end of Skyfall finally sawI have been trying to collect my thoughts on the latest entry to the Bond franchise for the best part of a day now….here goes nothing.

After three films of origin stories and departures from the Bond formula, the end of Skyfall finally saw all the pieces in place for a return to the classic Connery-era Bond.

In many respects Spectre delivers on this promise. Ben Whishaw’s Q, Naomie Harris’ Moneypenny and a scene steeling Ralph Fiennes as the new M provide great energetic back up to Daniel Craig’s Bond as he embarks on his latest globe trotting mission.

I have always been a fan of Craig’s portrayal of the character, but in Spectre the actor has reached a new level. Here Bond is cocky, deadly and cold while simultaneously remaining witty, charming and at times even playful. However the film’s plot also allows Craig to display those rare moments of vulnerability as his past comes back to haunt him in the form of the shady organisation of the title.

Unfortunately it is also the plot that lets the film down. As is often the case with franchise films the end result is only as strong as the lead villain and their scheme. Although two time oscar winner Christoph Waltz delivers a subtly sadistic performance the writers have let him down in a major way.

The role of SPECTRE and Waltz’s Oberhauser in the film is often reduced to a MacGuffin, only there to give Bond motivation to move from one scene to the next. We spend the majority of the film waiting for Oberhauser to step out from the shadows and explain his organisations’ goals and motivations. When he is finally revealed however no such explanation is given. From the context of the secondary plot and a standout scene where the members of SPECTRE meet in Rome, the audience is left to piece together their scheme without being spoon fed via exposition.

For this reason above all Spectre is a film that demands repeat viewing. I feel like during my first watch, any time the plot was unclear or I missed a key line, it was ok because Waltz would inevitably spell it all out for me. The fact that this never happened is really to be comended. I feel that modern audiences (myself very much included) have now come to expect this overt kind of expository dialogue, so much so that when it is missing films feel incomplete and disjointed. However commendable though, this is still a major flaw that leads the last third of the film feeling decidedly anti-climatic.

Despite these plot concerns (and a somewhat misjudged and underdeveloped attempt to tie in Craig’s previous Bond films) Spectre certainly doesn’t disappoint when it comes to action set pieces and sharp dialogue.

With standout performances and some great action, if this is indeed to be Craig’s final outing it certainly gives the audience the Bond film they have been asking for ever since Casino Royale. Whether this is the Bond film we deserve however, is another matter entirely.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AlanoSilvaPBFeb 24, 2023

Mais do mesmo, na minha opinião o melhor é o primeiro filme, o do Cassino. O roteiro não tem muita criatividade e parece que sempre é o mesmo filme, sem falar que é cheio de conveniências!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ErikTheCriticSep 26, 2018

It's not a bad movie, it's just not as good as I wanted it to be. The action and cinematography are masterful, however the film can be tiresome from time to time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MaxMyDogJun 11, 2019

My problems with this film relate to where the series has gone. connecting the previous films together. the story behind blofeld. love interests. that being said it is one of the best looking bond films made. right up there with skyfall.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Onlyclassicvg1Sep 10, 2022

A cryptic message from Bond's past sends him on a trail to uncover a sinister organization. While M battles political forces to keep the secret service alive, Bond peels back the layers of deceit to reveal the terrible truth behind SPECTRE.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SoapNuggetJul 25, 2021

Eh, Spectre is fine. It's not the worst Craig Bond film, that is 100% Quantum of Solace, but Spectre is disappointing after Skyfall, still worth a watch

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MrPajamasFeb 24, 2021

After the amazing Skyfall, there was another fall called Specter. The locations were great, but they didn't have a Skyfall, and especially the overall story faltered quite a bit. Although the action scenes were great, there weren't many ofAfter the amazing Skyfall, there was another fall called Specter. The locations were great, but they didn't have a Skyfall, and especially the overall story faltered quite a bit. Although the action scenes were great, there weren't many of them, but the music was great. Overall, I would say it's a good movie that I can recommend.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

511andahalfFeb 7, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just a decent movie that has a lot of flaws. The film connects the last 3 Craig movies together when it had absolutely no reason to do so; CR, QOS, and SF all worked perfectly fine on their own. The whole topic of Blofeld being Bond's long lost brother is also very unnecessary and feels shoehorned in. Madeline, the Bond girl, is also one of the weaker Bond girls, she has 0 chemistry with Bond.

The film is partially saved thanks to some pretty good cinematography and a few good action scenes, like the helicopter fight and train fight. But overall, Spectre had a lot of potential to be really good and just fails to live up to its hype.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SQRLYJul 25, 2021

The Bond franchise has seemed to settle into a good/mediocre movie pattern. After following the almost perfect Skyfall, this outing is rather bland and dull. The characters are hollow and leave us wondering what could have been.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ChanekeCholoDec 13, 2021

I watched it this morning and I remember a little the history and is well, but for two hours and twenty eight minutes is very ambiguous, at the end gets boring and forgettable. The action scenes are great but not like in the past film. TheI watched it this morning and I remember a little the history and is well, but for two hours and twenty eight minutes is very ambiguous, at the end gets boring and forgettable. The action scenes are great but not like in the past film. The performances are well but the development of the characters are missing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

liamexeDec 21, 2022

The real irony is that Bond has thrived for 53 years on a tried-and-true formula, only making adjustments when needed. He is at a worrying crossroads where, if confident stability is not established, his fictional descendants (Mission:The real irony is that Bond has thrived for 53 years on a tried-and-true formula, only making adjustments when needed. He is at a worrying crossroads where, if confident stability is not established, his fictional descendants (Mission: Impossible, espionage parodies like Kingsmen and The Man from U.N.C.L.E., and even superhero movies themselves) threaten to nudge him into irrelevance and antiquity. The abundance of incredible entertainment in Spectre's first half further supports Daniel Craig's argument that, yes, the world does unquestionably still need James Bond to return, which he has spent the last four films reiterating. It's time he began to think so for himself. And if another facelift is necessary to see that come to pass,… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

SPECTRE

User Reviews