Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Noah - Page 3

7

LamontRaymondMar 30, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'd say that the critical average of 70 is about right on for this one. I'm a Catholic, and of course this "drama" strays from the literal reading of Genesis 5 - 9, but of course it had to, right? It would have been tough to find a 600-year-old actor to play Noah disembarking the ark. (In MY scripture class, a 600-year-old was meant to represent a "very old" man... Father Gatto would be proud.) And yes, the Bible provided for wives for the three sons as they entered the ark, and there was no stowaway, but those deviations from the literal Genesis chapters are done for dramatic effect, and they don't take away from the essential meaning of the passages - that man had become corrupt, and God sought Noah's help to begin things again. I also didn't have a problem with the angels/rock-monsters - they were a convention to explain how such a small group could build such a massive structure in such a short time, while keeping the bad dudes at bay. The movie flagged a bit as Noah was convinced God would want him to take the life of his would-be granddaughter. The visual effects are amazing in this movie, and the leading actresses (Jennifer Connelly & Emma Watson) are outstanding. Great to see such strong women represented in a Biblical interpretation. As a friend of mine advised, it might be helpful to read Genesis 5 - 9 twice - just before and directly after you see the movie, simply to put things in context.… Expand

3 of 18 users found this helpful315

All this user's reviews

5

MrRobinsonMar 30, 2014

So the movie has some very good moments such as the acting and Aronofsky's direction, some very bad moments such as the length and some of the horrible special effects, and some strange moments such as the rock Transformers that move as ifSo the movie has some very good moments such as the acting and Aronofsky's direction, some very bad moments such as the length and some of the horrible special effects, and some strange moments such as the rock Transformers that move as if they were animated with go-motion technology. In the end the movie is okay, I don’t dislike it, but I have no desire to watch it again. However for something I originally had no desire in seeing, it was definitely better than what I imagined it would be.… Expand

0 of 9 users found this helpful09

All this user's reviews

8

ParadiseIsLostMar 30, 2014

Beautiful film, and one of the most interesting worlds I've been to in a while. There was, admittedly, a lot that didn't work all that well (most of the action sequences seemed out of place), but as a character study of Noah, and by extensionBeautiful film, and one of the most interesting worlds I've been to in a while. There was, admittedly, a lot that didn't work all that well (most of the action sequences seemed out of place), but as a character study of Noah, and by extension the Creator he's trying to follow, it's just pretty brilliant.… Expand

3 of 19 users found this helpful316

All this user's reviews

0

RST303Mar 30, 2014

I have never written a movie review before but this one cries for one. This was absolutely one of the most boring movies I have ever seen. Almost every scene was over dramatized and agonizingly drawn-out, resulting in one slow, boringI have never written a movie review before but this one cries for one. This was absolutely one of the most boring movies I have ever seen. Almost every scene was over dramatized and agonizingly drawn-out, resulting in one slow, boring movie. It was painful to watch; I just wanted to walk out. Giant rock monsters built the ark? This film was a total waste of my time - two hours of my life I will never get back. If you need a good nap, go to this movie.… Expand

9 of 22 users found this helpful913

All this user's reviews

2

petitorenjiMar 30, 2014

This movie should have been renamed "Ila" because it felt like the film was really about her struggles from a kid to a mother. The CG animals were designed and animated in a very lackluster way. The animated CG intro was, for lack of a betterThis movie should have been renamed "Ila" because it felt like the film was really about her struggles from a kid to a mother. The CG animals were designed and animated in a very lackluster way. The animated CG intro was, for lack of a better word, a joke. Every character pretty much had the same expression on their faces the whole way through, which is appropriate in this case but it really bores the audience and dulls the character. I went because of the interesting reviews, but now I realized I probably haven't read them carefully enough. I am one of the many others who want my dough back. It's a shame, really: it had good potential.… Expand

7 of 18 users found this helpful711

All this user's reviews

1

namelessMar 30, 2014

First hour is fine but then it turns into a talk fest with the director making the mistake that if he shows the characters experiencing emotion we will feel it.... doesn't work. The second half slowly dies until you are just waiting for it toFirst hour is fine but then it turns into a talk fest with the director making the mistake that if he shows the characters experiencing emotion we will feel it.... doesn't work. The second half slowly dies until you are just waiting for it to be over. The actors are doing an excellent job but there just isn't enough to save it. Don't waste your money, see it on cable where you can watch the best parts and then turn it off.… Expand

15 of 35 users found this helpful1520

All this user's reviews

9

NpurgatoryMar 30, 2014

Loved the movie.. I mean it has only a couple small story things that did not make much sense.. BUT, the acting and animals were great.. Great story.. All around good movie.. Plus i been saying for awhile that Emma Watson is a STAR.. ProvedLoved the movie.. I mean it has only a couple small story things that did not make much sense.. BUT, the acting and animals were great.. Great story.. All around good movie.. Plus i been saying for awhile that Emma Watson is a STAR.. Proved it once again.. Not as EPIC as Gladiator but some good fight scenes none the less.. Overall was very happy.. I think its 100% worth watching!… Expand

14 of 31 users found this helpful1417

All this user's reviews

7

BradySmithMar 30, 2014

Noah is solid entertainment, but nothing incredible. The action is done well, and the acting is first rate but it never really reaches the stunning heights that it should have. Aranofsky adds a lot of artistic expansion onto the story, likeNoah is solid entertainment, but nothing incredible. The action is done well, and the acting is first rate but it never really reaches the stunning heights that it should have. Aranofsky adds a lot of artistic expansion onto the story, like the rock creatures, and fictional animals, which I thought were ok additions. I didn't feel like he did this enough with his direction though. It's missing lyricism in many parts and never approaches the grandness seen in films like Life of Pi, or Avatar. The effects are solid but occasionally cheesey. Animals sometimes look too obviously fake. The flood itself however was very realistic looking. The script is pretty decent. It raises some tough questions and is filled with brutal occurrences. This movie is not for the easily frightened. Crowe's performance, some great scenes, and the fact that this is the first big budget bible epic in decades all make it worth seeing. I advise you however not to expect anything miraculous.… Expand

1 of 12 users found this helpful111

All this user's reviews

6

BalconyViewMar 30, 2014

The acting is great and it's a well-made movie overall. It could have been a great movie by accurately portraying Noah and his relationship with God. The movie could have expanded on the story on Noah in much the same way while keeping theseThe acting is great and it's a well-made movie overall. It could have been a great movie by accurately portraying Noah and his relationship with God. The movie could have expanded on the story on Noah in much the same way while keeping these essentials truths 1. Noah loved God and clearly heard His voice. There was a relationship there. 2. God loves people and He wanted to preserve them as much as the animals through the flood.
I highly recommend reading the original story in Genesis chapters 6 to 8 (or 1 to 8 since the movie talks about creation too).

For non-Christians I recommend both seeing the movie and reading the original story in the book of Genesis in the Bible. Then read the book of John to put God's love for us into context.

For Christians, I suggest reading the 3-part article on Noah at Christianity Today magazine and then decide whether to see the movie. Search for the articles "Noah: Five Positive Facts about this Film", "Noah: Five Negative Features about this Film" and "Noah: Application for Christians and Hollywood". The Focus on Family PluggedIn review is wimpy and seems like it is trying to avoid offending anyone by holding back their opinions, perhaps to avoid discouraging Hollywood from making more movies on Bible events.

The movie does not closely follow the Bible's account step-by-step. See the press release from Paramount pictures for more details. "The film is a dramatization of the major scriptural themes and not a line-by-line retelling of the Bible story."… Expand

0 of 13 users found this helpful013

All this user's reviews

8

RoganwarriorMar 30, 2014

Geez Relax, It was a movie, not a documentary. I thought it was a decent movie. Usually 2 hour plus long movies don't keep me motivated for that long, but I was entertained, hence this is a movie.

3 of 19 users found this helpful316

All this user's reviews

1

2thepointMar 30, 2014

First off, Aronofsky and the bible shouldn't even be in the same sentence. I'm not even a bible nut, I don't have a religion, but holy **** this movie sucked every one of the male animal's testicles, and thoroughly. The rock creatures weren'tFirst off, Aronofsky and the bible shouldn't even be in the same sentence. I'm not even a bible nut, I don't have a religion, but holy **** this movie sucked every one of the male animal's testicles, and thoroughly. The rock creatures weren't even original, it was like a play on the tree guardians from The Two Towers. I did go into this movie knowing full well the probability it would be a complete train wreck, I just didn't know how bad of a train wreck it could be. Another thing, what the hell was a bear trap doing in the forest when Ham and the girl were running back? Anyways, the 1 isn't even for this movie, it's for making a love scene between Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis become a reality.… Expand

9 of 19 users found this helpful910

All this user's reviews

1

LightninWillMar 30, 2014

Average acting, overly grandiose soundtrack, jittery cinematography, and ridiculous special effects that were often poorly executed make this a waste of money, time, and a good piece of fiction known as the Bible. I agree with those who haveAverage acting, overly grandiose soundtrack, jittery cinematography, and ridiculous special effects that were often poorly executed make this a waste of money, time, and a good piece of fiction known as the Bible. I agree with those who have called this movie a cross between "Transformers" and "Waterworld". Add "The 300" and you get a blood and water soaked disaster movie that had me wishing that Noah's poorly constructed ark would just sink and get it over with.… Expand

12 of 28 users found this helpful1216

All this user's reviews

2

Ed1SmithMar 30, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I went with high hopes based on some early screening feedback, talk about disappointment! I expected a lot of story fill in and even some liberties on surrounding events, but most of this movie had absolutely no basis in the biblical account. Noah as presented and played by Crowe was no better than the people that were being destroyed! I am used to Hollywood presenting male characters as weak, flawed and stupid, but c'mon! Plus BORING! at least make it entertaining! Now on to the absolute lack of imagination in stealing from LOTR...The cross between Ents and Trolls that were inserted as a major story driver are not only found NOWHERE in the bible (I know they used the giant Nephilim that are mentioned, but really?}, but I fully expected as Sauron's army stormed the Ark for Gandalf to step out, plant his staff and yell 'You shall not pass!!!'. The amount of visual theft should have Jackson suing!

All in all a complete disappointment from the now ubiquitous eco-green theme, to the inserted evolution mantra(I am not a 'young earther'...but I also do not buy the evolution hypothesis that has NO support in the fossil record or cell biology), to the weak, psycho Noah, to the whole finding a mate (the bible clearly says that all 3 sons brought their spouses with them), to the Ark being built in less than 10 years by the rock monster from Galaxy Quest, to the stow away, to the snake skin talisman (what the hell?!?)...it was just all completely ridiculous and a turgid plod to an unfulfilling climax...ugggh, what a waste of money and time!… Expand

10 of 20 users found this helpful1010

All this user's reviews

7

GregTheGr8gamrMar 30, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Alright I saw this movie last night and I was VERY surprised. First off Noah has this army of rock creatures that are really stupid. Second this movie had some really scary parts like when people got chopped apart to eat and when the people outside the ark were on that rock and getting washed away. I would not recommend this movie for people under age 11… Expand

1 of 13 users found this helpful112

All this user's reviews

8

StaticSpineMar 30, 2014

The movie is about the fanatic Noah trying to fulfill the will of God (as he sees it) at any cost, even if it hurts his own family. The visuals are breathtaking. Crowe, Jennifer Connelly and Anthony Hopkins were great, Emma Watson's characterThe movie is about the fanatic Noah trying to fulfill the will of God (as he sees it) at any cost, even if it hurts his own family. The visuals are breathtaking. Crowe, Jennifer Connelly and Anthony Hopkins were great, Emma Watson's character was pretty bland. I felt the length of the movie was too much. Overall I liked it.… Expand

2 of 17 users found this helpful215

All this user's reviews

1

TwentyTwotwentyMar 30, 2014

Firstly I should admit that I saw this movie for free - and it was still too expensive. Preachy eco-twaddle delivered through wooden performances in an epic marathon of sheer boredom.

The movie consists of vacant stares into the distance,Firstly I should admit that I saw this movie for free - and it was still too expensive. Preachy eco-twaddle delivered through wooden performances in an epic marathon of sheer boredom.

The movie consists of vacant stares into the distance, a nonsensical script, a fight scene from LOTR all interjected by some random documentary clips. The acting in the crying, emotive, scenes was laughable.

I gave this movie one star for the only actor who gave a convincing performance - Emma Watson. To put how terrible this movie was into context - the people beside us in the cinema began playing games on their mobiles about half way through the movie.… Expand

9 of 18 users found this helpful99

All this user's reviews

0

fantasyMar 30, 2014

Let me preface my remarks by stating I am not one of those religious fanatics as I could care less. The public gets hosed again by the bought & paid for professional critics. This movie is so bad and boring, that you almost hope, the entireLet me preface my remarks by stating I am not one of those religious fanatics as I could care less. The public gets hosed again by the bought & paid for professional critics. This movie is so bad and boring, that you almost hope, the entire planet gets washed away. Somewhere PT Barnum is smiling as it's true a sucker is born every minute. How can a professional critic with even an ounce of dignity not expose this film for the crap it truly is. Anthony Hopkins has about 4 minutes of screen time. He has to be embarrassed by his performance in this dreadful movie. Russell Crowe as Noah is mentally deranged. You don't care one iota about any of the characters. Rock Monsters built the arc? Where were the transformers? LOL And just when you thought the movie is mercifully over, it goes on and on and never ends. How ludicrous was this. It starts to rain. About a minute later the dam breaks from below ground and everyone is washed away. Why would the Creator, by the way, never mentioned as G-d, have it rain for one minute and then a minute later water is everywhere as if a broken water main. I wouldn't watch this movie again on free TV. Avoid at all costs.… Expand

8 of 18 users found this helpful810

All this user's reviews

6

Compi24Mar 30, 2014

Though it's almost undone by some absolutely ridiculous conceptual elements throughout, Darren Aronofsky's "Noah" still retains its entertainment value with a bevy of powerful performances and some characteristically striking visuals for theThough it's almost undone by some absolutely ridiculous conceptual elements throughout, Darren Aronofsky's "Noah" still retains its entertainment value with a bevy of powerful performances and some characteristically striking visuals for the director.… Expand

1 of 12 users found this helpful111

All this user's reviews

0

MrWestsideMar 30, 2014

A story from the bible meets science fiction with rock monsters!?!? What were they thinking? Would have definitely skipped this movie if the trailer showed how truly ridiculous it is. The rock monsters are not shown in the movie trailer at all!

8 of 17 users found this helpful89

All this user's reviews

10

ByarruMar 30, 2014

An incredible movie with great graphics, story and characters. As a christian I do not find a unique interpretation of the Noah story a bad thing. No, on the contrary I think it is a really good thing - if I want to read the actual story,An incredible movie with great graphics, story and characters. As a christian I do not find a unique interpretation of the Noah story a bad thing. No, on the contrary I think it is a really good thing - if I want to read the actual story, I'll read the Bible. The Noah is not a retelling, but rather an attempt to understand the values and to make the short tale something bigger and more complex. And they did it right - drama made me weep, action made me thrilled, conclusion gave me feeling of hope and happiness… Expand

36 of 87 users found this helpful3651

All this user's reviews

10

Sam1234Mar 30, 2014

Great movie, Very entertaining, I think it deserves a eight because I did find things wrong with it, I gave it a ten due to the fact there are so many bible loving hippies on here that trying drag it down... I don't understand these peopleGreat movie, Very entertaining, I think it deserves a eight because I did find things wrong with it, I gave it a ten due to the fact there are so many bible loving hippies on here that trying drag it down... I don't understand these people who believed this guy build a boat to fit every animal that doesn't exist on the same continent? but still cant accept that there religious groups rape there own children even though its on the news every day? Maybe these people should go back to there business ooops mean "church" that are buying up property with the donations they get!!! Let people who want to see a great entertaining film enjoy it without having to read all there crap!… Expand

11 of 31 users found this helpful1120

All this user's reviews

0

LowbrowCinemaMar 29, 2014

NOAH is overproduced and just plain awful. Metacritic requires 150 characters but I can't come up with any more to describe this total vapid mess of a movie.

13 of 26 users found this helpful1313

All this user's reviews

1

hayceelynt_2Mar 29, 2014

I can't believe how many positive reviews there are from professional critics! Were they threatened?! Bribed?! Or did they just see a different movie than me.

This has surely got to be an early contender for worst movie of the year.

18 of 32 users found this helpful1814

All this user's reviews

7

Mr_zaneageMar 29, 2014

dont listen to all the bible bashers!. We all know the story of noah and this Hollywood adaptation isn't that bad, sure their is a few plot holes but other than that noah is an entertaining movie. the movie may not be historically accuratedont listen to all the bible bashers!. We all know the story of noah and this Hollywood adaptation isn't that bad, sure their is a few plot holes but other than that noah is an entertaining movie. the movie may not be historically accurate but its still an amazing looking film.

i would recommend this film its enjoyable, has awesome CGI and has pretty descent acting.… Expand

5 of 24 users found this helpful519

All this user's reviews

0

n0junkMar 29, 2014

If you eat meat then you must die... well that is what this movie is about. Humans are evil because we eat meat and need to be wiped off the earth. The action in the movie was outweighed by the boring boat ride. I noticed a bunch of peopleIf you eat meat then you must die... well that is what this movie is about. Humans are evil because we eat meat and need to be wiped off the earth. The action in the movie was outweighed by the boring boat ride. I noticed a bunch of people walk out at that point. I would have too if I hadn't been with some friends. Turns out I wasn't the only one in my group that wanted to walk out. Not only am I mad that I paid for the movie, but I probably won't watch another movie in theaters for a while. Yep, that bad.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

0

WarKittensMar 29, 2014

I learned some things from this movie! Apparently Methuselah was Gandalf! And Noah built the ark with the help of rock elementals! And "righteous in the eyes of God" means "psychotic homicidal maniac"! And when the Bible says "Noah and ShemI learned some things from this movie! Apparently Methuselah was Gandalf! And Noah built the ark with the help of rock elementals! And "righteous in the eyes of God" means "psychotic homicidal maniac"! And when the Bible says "Noah and Shem and Ham and Japeth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife and the three wives of his sons with them, entered the ark" it REALLY means "Noah, his wife, his kids, Shem's wife, and this guy who snuck on board and tried to kill Noah"! And those explicit instructions in Genesis for how to build the ark? Really that was a cryptic acid trip where nothing was really explained. Thank you Darren Aronofsky for setting me straight. I thought that I knew how to read, but apparently I was wrong! And thank you Russel Crowe for your most dynamic performance yet!

for those who can't tell, this is all sarcasm.… Expand

16 of 28 users found this helpful1612

All this user's reviews

1

paulmarsMar 29, 2014

Are you kidding me? What, they ran out of comic book super-heroes to make blockbusters out of so Hollywood is resorting to Bible characters?
And even a bible-based movie has to have talking sci-fi monsters to sell tickets to the massesAre you kidding me? What, they ran out of comic book super-heroes to make blockbusters out of so Hollywood is resorting to Bible characters?
And even a bible-based movie has to have talking sci-fi monsters to sell tickets to the masses these days?
I predict in 20 years people then will be laughing at just how cheezy movies today were - like people laugh today at Godzilla movies from the 60s.

Besides that, it basically was horrible in most every other way. Bad acting, fight scene after fight scene, boring CGI scenery. God help us!… Expand

16 of 31 users found this helpful1615

All this user's reviews

0

FantasygirlMar 29, 2014

Absolutely horrible! They made Noah look like a fumbling idiot, chasing down his daughter-n-law trying to murder her twin babies because God said only a certain amount could live. He doubted God in the movie and had no hope. The worst partAbsolutely horrible! They made Noah look like a fumbling idiot, chasing down his daughter-n-law trying to murder her twin babies because God said only a certain amount could live. He doubted God in the movie and had no hope. The worst part was the rock monsters with glowing eyes who helped build the ark! Say what???????????????????? What the heck? This was more science fiction then biblical. Who came up with rock monsters???? I couldn't believe my eyes! Worse movie ever! The only thing that resembled the bible story was the name Noah, an ark, rain, and the dove. And get this! The villain in the movie even stowes away with them on the ark after the earth has flooded and Noah's son helps plan his father's murder! Say what? Horrible movie!!!! Don't waste your precious money. I want mine back!… Expand

16 of 30 users found this helpful1614

All this user's reviews

5

bmaster4616Mar 29, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie was quite disappointing in the way it was hyped as this bold version of the telling of Noah. The story Darren tells is quite bold and it had a great dark tone to it. However, its message was thrown at you in a way that pissed me off. This idea that god would kill off the bad is a good thing, but to let the good suffer along with them is stupid. The loss of mental control of Noah wasn't something I was taught but maybe it was true. I'm right on the fence with this one; until I read the actually story (which is something I need to do). Maybe the story was true which would piss me off more than I'm already at. In the context of the bible of course. Stories of things that I believe were put there to tell the world what is wrong and right. Nothing to be interpreted as real life. So if this was the real story of Noah, then I've lost most my fate in the Bible all together. The story of how one man could get something wrong from god was good and the extent of his awakening was pretty satisfying. Though the decision of Noah to go to that extent where he thinks god is telling him he should kill kids is ridiculous and I wouldn't want a god like that. Though his revaluation at the end kind of made up for it. So at this point its more of a good movie than a bad, but I've got to read the story to see how much the movie is true to it. 7.6/10… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

0

racer10Mar 29, 2014

Just saw the movie and it is pure garbage from almost any point of view ,such as , script , acting , costumes, sets . I nearly walked out several times . Any "critic" who rates more than 2 stars don't ever trust again , they don't have a clue.

12 of 24 users found this helpful1212

All this user's reviews

2

lennycliff123Mar 29, 2014

This film would be laughable if it wasn't so depressing, and by depressing I mean Aronofsky's blatant disregard for the Bible account he supposedly drew inspiration from.

I wish I had walked out but I was compelled by a morbid desire toThis film would be laughable if it wasn't so depressing, and by depressing I mean Aronofsky's blatant disregard for the Bible account he supposedly drew inspiration from.

I wish I had walked out but I was compelled by a morbid desire to see just how bad it could get. In that respect I wasn't disappointed.… Expand

24 of 39 users found this helpful2415

All this user's reviews

7

GinaKMar 29, 2014

This is not a film for people who ask a lot of literal questions. Not exactly myth, unless you consider it Aronofsky’s version of myth, which seemed always in service of telling a story that made just enough sense to keep people from walkingThis is not a film for people who ask a lot of literal questions. Not exactly myth, unless you consider it Aronofsky’s version of myth, which seemed always in service of telling a story that made just enough sense to keep people from walking out. I enjoyed the film and thought the cast was very good, especially Russell Crowe. I know he is rightly celebrated for parts like this (e.g., Gladiator), but he is still sincere and convincing even in Aronofsky’s weird world. I thought there were a few slow parts, but generally the film was lively and crazy enough to hold your interest and was perhaps even occasionally moving. I don’t remember a rainbow, but I couldn’t help but wonder if Aronofsky will take on the fire next time. I hope not. Once was enough.… Expand

1 of 14 users found this helpful113

All this user's reviews

1

sirkelMar 29, 2014

This movie has zero to do with the true Noah in the Bible, and should be considered blasphemy against the truth of God's history provided for us in the Bible. This is typical Hollywood garbage trying to make money from the hype that followedThis movie has zero to do with the true Noah in the Bible, and should be considered blasphemy against the truth of God's history provided for us in the Bible. This is typical Hollywood garbage trying to make money from the hype that followed the popularity of that Bible TV show. Apparently they missed the point they need to follow the real story of the Bible not a made up fantasy using Bible characters and general story back drop. I can just see people who know little to nothing about the truth actually think this is what really happened. Sad very sad indeed, but what should we expect from immoral establishment media who hates Christianity and truth.… Expand

17 of 38 users found this helpful1721

All this user's reviews

7

TheHelpMar 29, 2014

If you go into this movie expecting a strong christian movie, you WILL be disappointing. I think that the creators of this movie did a really good job with appealing to Christians and non-Christians alike. For example, they hint at the bigIf you go into this movie expecting a strong christian movie, you WILL be disappointing. I think that the creators of this movie did a really good job with appealing to Christians and non-Christians alike. For example, they hint at the big bang and evolution, but not "apes to humans". Small things like these really help the movie stand out. The first half was fantastic. The last hour or so really made me lose some interest. To the people who are strong Christians, I do recommend you watch this movie on one account. You need to go in with an open mind, remembering that nobody really knows what happened from this long ago. The writers simply read the text, inferred their opinion of what happened, and tried to make it interesting to large crowds of people. I think they did well.… Expand

8 of 31 users found this helpful823

All this user's reviews

7

titanium-tigerMar 29, 2014

I heard a reviewer call this film both "faithful and fanciful" and that's exactly what it is. I don't believe in as literal, historical Noah and the Flood, but I do believe in human good and evil, and it's told masterfully in this film. It'sI heard a reviewer call this film both "faithful and fanciful" and that's exactly what it is. I don't believe in as literal, historical Noah and the Flood, but I do believe in human good and evil, and it's told masterfully in this film. It's an epic myth about humanity and divinity. Crowe and Connelly are superb. The visuals are good. Overall, very good.… Expand

5 of 24 users found this helpful519

All this user's reviews

9

TheTransmutedMar 29, 2014

There is a great deal of controversy surrounding this film, and rightly so. It's one of the most bizarre, ballsy interpretations of a Biblical story I've seen. If you were expecting a "to-the-letter" rendition of Noah you will very muchThere is a great deal of controversy surrounding this film, and rightly so. It's one of the most bizarre, ballsy interpretations of a Biblical story I've seen. If you were expecting a "to-the-letter" rendition of Noah you will very much dislike Aronofsky's take on the story. If you want to watch a deeper than usual exploration of the nature of God with fully humanized Biblical characters, strongly stated moral questions, and striking visual effects, you may just about love it. I fall into the latter category, and would happily recommend this film on the basis of moral and spiritual exploration and exposition, not as an historical set piece.… Expand

14 of 36 users found this helpful1422

All this user's reviews

3

gfnyMar 29, 2014

This movie is a hybrid of religion and science fiction and will disappoint fans of both. The absurd storyline in a semi religious setting is so unbelievable that it loses the viewer’s interest. Had it been a made for TV Movie, it would lastThis movie is a hybrid of religion and science fiction and will disappoint fans of both. The absurd storyline in a semi religious setting is so unbelievable that it loses the viewer’s interest. Had it been a made for TV Movie, it would last 30 minutes before the channel was changed. The trailer on the internet is misleading which adds to the dislike of the movie. Russell Crowe does a good job holding it together, but he can’t overcome the absurdity of this Harry Potter type of movie. A redeeming value of the movie is that it shows the religious story of Noah and an Ark could never have existed and is a bible fantasy.… Expand

11 of 28 users found this helpful1117

All this user's reviews

8

LWTBPMar 29, 2014

Some may dislike how 'far fetched' the Darren Aronofsky adaptation of the Biblical story of destruction and new hope is, but you got to give it to him for having taken such a new and emotionally complex look at it.

The whole challenge ofSome may dislike how 'far fetched' the Darren Aronofsky adaptation of the Biblical story of destruction and new hope is, but you got to give it to him for having taken such a new and emotionally complex look at it.

The whole challenge of Noah, the man, lies in his human limitation that we all share. Most of us have wished for God to speak to us the way he spoke to the men and women of old, but perhaps he didn't. Perhaps he didn't come down in the shape of an angel and in clear linguistic signals tell them what they need to do and expect them to follow blindly.

Noah only 'feels' what he must do. And like any human, possibly errs in trying to understand what God may really want. Maybe he wants mankind dead, and the story of the Ark was a redemption of mankind ONLY IN RETROSPECT. Noah, like any of us, gropes in the dark and does his best to do what he thinks is God's work. And that's what takes up the length of this movie.

It does pack a good amount of classy effects and action to keep the adrenaline rushing once in a while. Of course, it's not going to be clean cut like a Nolan movie, where most would love it. It's bound to have haters and lovers balanced on a scale.

But one thing cannot be refuted - Aronofsky has delivered a deeper and more complex version of the Noah's Ark story than has ever been attempted before.

8/10 from me.… Expand

3 of 22 users found this helpful319

All this user's reviews

9

avchemeMar 29, 2014

No one should see Noah without knowing who Darren Aronofsky is. No one should see Noah expecting a Mel Gibson movie about Bible stories. People should expect to see pain and evil manifest on screen. That's what makes Noah great.

As withNo one should see Noah without knowing who Darren Aronofsky is. No one should see Noah expecting a Mel Gibson movie about Bible stories. People should expect to see pain and evil manifest on screen. That's what makes Noah great.

As with any Aronofsky film a single viewing is hardly enough to get his message. That said, I don't think this is his best movie. It does hold up to his other work which says a lot considering the company. Some scenes early on are so intense and jarring they assure you this is classic Aronofsky brilliance. These short lived moments aren't to say the rest of the movie is bad, and it's not as though the intensity decreases later on, but if you lose sight of these moments you're likely going to miss the message.… Expand

14 of 38 users found this helpful1424

All this user's reviews

7

busbfranMar 29, 2014

Noah is a fun adventure however, it lacks in character performance. Emma Watson stole the show leaving the rest of the cast in dust. You will feel satisfied after watching the new take on 'Noahs Arch' however, it never really lives up to theNoah is a fun adventure however, it lacks in character performance. Emma Watson stole the show leaving the rest of the cast in dust. You will feel satisfied after watching the new take on 'Noahs Arch' however, it never really lives up to the suspense or hype. I had a real problem with the performance by the 'villain king' ,just felt like he was yelling annoyingly into the audience towards the end. Anyway all in all its worth your time and the privileges of the cinema experiences. they have really built on a new and mysterious world, which brought the movie to its full glory.… Expand

1 of 16 users found this helpful115

All this user's reviews

0

franissavioMar 29, 2014

What on heaven was this? I've always wondered how Noah build the ARK. Now, I know ROCK MONSTeRS did, lol. What were those people wearing Jeans n leather boots pathetic costume department. I still don't know how I survived 2 1/2 hrs ofWhat on heaven was this? I've always wondered how Noah build the ARK. Now, I know ROCK MONSTeRS did, lol. What were those people wearing Jeans n leather boots pathetic costume department. I still don't know how I survived 2 1/2 hrs of Aronofsky's plague.… Expand

14 of 30 users found this helpful1416

All this user's reviews

1

antmolly1995Mar 29, 2014

There's a well worn phrase "if it ain't broke don't fix it". Why Aronofsky felt the need to tamper with an epic story that would/could have been thrilling and thought provoking in it's unadulterated form baffles me.

What we've been givenThere's a well worn phrase "if it ain't broke don't fix it". Why Aronofsky felt the need to tamper with an epic story that would/could have been thrilling and thought provoking in it's unadulterated form baffles me.

What we've been given instead is a crude lecture on environmentalism fused with an utterly corrupted Bible account and a large dose of misanthrope thrown in for good measure.

I hope this bombs at the box office and forces everyone involved with this rubbish to give pause for thought.… Expand

23 of 40 users found this helpful2317

All this user's reviews

0

junofotoMar 28, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I can't believe Hollywood is going so low, What exactly is this story, I understand you smoke strong stuff but give the world this, is unacceptable, definitely something need to fixe at Hollywood. I need a refund cuz Noah is a crap.… Expand

11 of 25 users found this helpful1114

All this user's reviews

3

NightReviewsMar 28, 2014

Controversy is sure to ensue following the release of the Bible’s greatest and most epic story found in the Old Testament involving Noah and his arc. Visionary director and passionate auteur Darren Aronofsky has always been fascinated withControversy is sure to ensue following the release of the Bible’s greatest and most epic story found in the Old Testament involving Noah and his arc. Visionary director and passionate auteur Darren Aronofsky has always been fascinated with the character of Noah, and the inner workings of a man tormented by the voice of God and conflicted by his own voice of reason. For the sake of skeptics, religious groups, and devout Catholics, I intend to avert my review very far away from any religious claims or criticism for the film Noah, and instead intend to only offer criticism on the film itself, regardless of its strong Biblical undercurrent. Visually, Noah floats adrift many previous films that share a similar look (The Road, Tree of Life, The New World) but unfortunately sinks in a preposterous commentary set amongst mythological creatures, accepting fate and the age-old argument of man versus God, man versus nature, and man versus himself.

Aronofsky’s Noah begins with the Bible’s first chapter of creation and the story of Adam and Eve. As temptation lures Eve to evil, along with Adam, spawn Cain, Abel, and Seth proceed their parents to a new life. Cain kills Abel, and what begins is the regression of man’s propensity for evil, death, and murder. Noah (Russell Crowe) is one of the last of Seth’s bloodline, and he along with his family, including his wife Naameh (Jennifer Connelly) and his three sons, seem to be the only last remaining decent people during a time where descendants of Cain believe that natural survival instincts like killing and hunting are crucial to man’s survival in the world.

Aronofsky is a man fascinated with the inner workings of famously tormented individuals, and this project has been one of his greatest passion projects since beginning a career in film. Born to conservative Jewish parents, Aronofsky attempts not take any biased religious approach to his newest film, and instead focuses on the human element through an artistic lens. Insert ‘The Watchers’, mythological creatures/fallen angels who are imprisoned on Earth and betrayed by man, Noah, only momentarily floats as a forced visual studio epic that it never needed to be.

With The Wrestler, Black Swan and yes, even The Fountain, Aronofsky challenged the aesthetic of his narratives with the power of his lead performers. Mickey Rourke, Natalie Portman and Hugh Jackman are all prisoners to the shattered worlds they live in and must confront their demons and life itself to overcome adversity. With Noah, one of many vexed characters in the Bible, Aronofsky never challenges his fate by elevating the choices of a man to the fate predestined by a Creator. Instead, and unlike any of the other characters in Aronofsky’s films, Noah gives into accepting his fate of death, an unlikely characteristic for the director’s leads and the man depicted early in the film. Crowe, who is unable to tap into the mind of a man and be led into acting sanctity like Aronofsky’s previous actors, shows why he was the director’s third choice to play the character behind Christian Bale and Michael Fassbender. Crowe’s depiction of Noah is hardened much like ‘The Watcher’s’ outer rock form. Not to mention he delivers a sloppy performance of a man who is the only person who can hear the Creator’s voices in his head–often being eluded as a crazy person and not as the chosen one to hear The Creator’s celestial voice.

Like any other good Aronofsky character, Noah suffers from premonitions. He envisions the destruction of the world. With the help of his wise and all-knowing grandfather Methuselah (Sir Anthony Hopkins), Noah heeds to the Creators visions and builds an arc. Focused less on the creation of the arc itself, offering no type of montage to an arc that seemed to have lasted a least a decade to construct, Aronofsky directs his focus to man, the greatest evil the Creator has formulated–yet, it is a human being that puts together The Creator’s plan. Throughout, by adding a very strong artistic take to a story that is resonant in the minds of religious individuals, once the inclusion of imagination and artistry is injected into anything Biblical, doubt crashes the mind like waves on a reef. Much like oil and water, two fluids that don’t mix, art and religion are two very subjective and delicate areas to combine together. Just ask Mel Gibson, whose reimagining of the crucifixion of Christ, The Passion of Christ, will surely be met with a much larger commercial welcome than Noah.

After the uproar of its first trailer, Paramount Pictures conducted various private secret screenings of different versions of the film, including Aronofsky’s cut of the film, although he was signed to have the final cut of the movie out for distribution. Repulsed and deeply offended, Aronofsky got wind of the studios deception, and allowed the studio to reconsider and agree to release the film as the director had intended, with his cut intact.… Expand

9 of 21 users found this helpful912

All this user's reviews

3

allisonjane65Mar 28, 2014

While not the worst film I've ever seen, Noah has to be one of, if not the most disappointing.

I was under no illusion that this would be 100% faithful to the source material, and some embellishment was to be expected, but what AronofskyWhile not the worst film I've ever seen, Noah has to be one of, if not the most disappointing.

I was under no illusion that this would be 100% faithful to the source material, and some embellishment was to be expected, but what Aronofsky has done is inexcusable and absurd.

What a wasted opportunity.… Expand

30 of 51 users found this helpful3021

All this user's reviews

2

ericisadogMar 28, 2014

Incoherent, confusing, and completely stupid. Major plot holes, overlong, and entirely unfun. wayyyyyyyyyy too damn long. if you have small children accompanying you whilst watching this film, be prepared to give them "the talk". not aboutIncoherent, confusing, and completely stupid. Major plot holes, overlong, and entirely unfun. wayyyyyyyyyy too damn long. if you have small children accompanying you whilst watching this film, be prepared to give them "the talk". not about sex, but about incest. remember incest=wincest!!!… Expand

20 of 39 users found this helpful2019

All this user's reviews

3

dave495Mar 28, 2014

Movie held at best 10% of the biblical version of the story. Acting is ok but too many rock monsters for my liking - I mean ROCK monsters! LOL. Noah is very scary as a character & not at all likeable. want those 2 1/2 hours of my life back.

19 of 35 users found this helpful1916

All this user's reviews

2

jcjs33Mar 28, 2014

bleak, too slow, drab, no laughter, no smile, historically inaccurate not that i care...as i was leaving theater a woman said 'that was horrible'...i tried hard to like it because i liked Aronofsky's 'Wrestler' and 'Pi' and Black Swan ableak, too slow, drab, no laughter, no smile, historically inaccurate not that i care...as i was leaving theater a woman said 'that was horrible'...i tried hard to like it because i liked Aronofsky's 'Wrestler' and 'Pi' and Black Swan a little but this was so drab, drawn out...nothing to it...bad news flick.… Expand

18 of 40 users found this helpful1822

All this user's reviews

0

SpazzBrozzMar 28, 2014

I want to know who is responsible for the story of this film; whoever it was needs to be fired... immediately! I believe fiction can only be taken so far. 0/10 would not watch.

21 of 40 users found this helpful2119

All this user's reviews

5

GreatMartinMar 28, 2014

There is as much good as bad in “Noah” with good being the acting of Russell Crowe as the title character doing a strong role convincingly with Jennifer Connelly as his wife, repeating a role she played opposite Crowe in “A Beautiful Mind”.There is as much good as bad in “Noah” with good being the acting of Russell Crowe as the title character doing a strong role convincingly with Jennifer Connelly as his wife, repeating a role she played opposite Crowe in “A Beautiful Mind”. Their sons are played by Douglas Booth as the eldest boy Shem, Logan Lerman themiddle son Ham and with Leo Carroll as the youngest Japheth and Emma Watson as the adopted daughter Ila.

The central story of the bible of Noah building an Ark, taking his family and two of every earthly creature, spending 40 days and nights at sea and starting a new world. (I have very little knowledge about how the world would be repopulated but I suppose that is for bible studiers to answer.) The story has been expanded---one of the bads of the film is the length of the movie--to include a super villain Tubal-cain, a descendant of the Abel killer, his brother Cain, played by Ray Winstone,--by the director Darren Aronofsky and he with co-writer Art Handel. I am almost sure there were no such characters as The Watchers, live rock formations, in the bible though I was told they were the equivalent of Nephilim, supposedly fallen angels. The Watchers are voiced by unrecognizable sounds of Frank Langella and Nick Nolte.

The watchers are the biggest waste of time--and they are a big part of the second half--but save the director and writers explaining how the Ark was built and how the creatures were gathered. The use of special effects is becoming an excuse not to explain things in movies and bringing a certain unreality to the screen.

The production values are first rate and even the musical score never overtakes the story.

“Noah” is neither a good or bad movie though it is good to see Russell Crowe handling a deep role with ease as he did in his early days but even with that though Moses will always be Charlton Heston, Crowe may not always be Noah.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

3

phillytomMar 28, 2014

If you believe in the Biblical version of the story of Noah, this is not the movie for you. However, if you are a transformer fan, you're right at home. The actors were solid in their performance. Hollywood creators never cease to amazeIf you believe in the Biblical version of the story of Noah, this is not the movie for you. However, if you are a transformer fan, you're right at home. The actors were solid in their performance. Hollywood creators never cease to amaze me. How do you get rocks to act like transformers and yet when their job is finished they get beamed up to heaven. I will NOT recommend this movie to my friends.… Expand

24 of 41 users found this helpful2417

All this user's reviews

7

PimpinpakmanMar 28, 2014

If we are grading this movie on accuracy then score would be very low. If we were to disregard the accuracy, because the director did take liberties with the source material molding it into something quite different, then this movie actuallyIf we are grading this movie on accuracy then score would be very low. If we were to disregard the accuracy, because the director did take liberties with the source material molding it into something quite different, then this movie actually deserves a lot more credit. Religious people will be offended and upset but as far as the movie is concerned, i liked it. It was directed well, amazing visuals, with great acting so judging it harshly because it did not interpret the story of Noah as others do seems narrow minded. This is someone else's interpretation of the story while stretching quite a few aspects of it but the movie itself was good and faulting it because of source material doesnt sit well with me. Decide for yourself but its definitely worth a watch.… Expand

4 of 26 users found this helpful422

All this user's reviews

2

lenny68Mar 28, 2014

What do you get if you mix 130 million dollars, a talented but clearly misguided director and a story believed and respected by hundreds of millions of people around the world.

In this instance, a nonsensical mess thats what. The 2What do you get if you mix 130 million dollars, a talented but clearly misguided director and a story believed and respected by hundreds of millions of people around the world.

In this instance, a nonsensical mess thats what.

The 2 points are for a few striking scenes in an otherwise dreadful movie.… Expand

31 of 56 users found this helpful3125

All this user's reviews

2

Unsung_PaladinMar 28, 2014

I walked out of the theater and dearly wished I hadn't wasted $10 and two hours of my life. Have you ever heard of Tommy Wiseau's The Room? That movie was a cinematic masterpiece in comparison.

16 of 40 users found this helpful1624

All this user's reviews

3

WillADOCMar 28, 2014

This was extremely disappointing. Yes the special effects were cool but that was about it. The story line was... Noah-esque perhaps? It had little to nothing to do with the bible story of Noah. Amid a large number of Christian movies comingThis was extremely disappointing. Yes the special effects were cool but that was about it. The story line was... Noah-esque perhaps? It had little to nothing to do with the bible story of Noah. Amid a large number of Christian movies coming out at this time, people should be aware going in that it is NOT a Christian. It's really an environmental movie. It was less Charleton Heston's 'The Ten Commandments' and far more 'The Day After Tomorrow' or 'Birdemic'. Just terrible, the whole thing.… Expand

22 of 43 users found this helpful2221

All this user's reviews

9

splitshockMar 28, 2014

Excellent movie! Highly engaging & greatly acted! Some amazing bible themed CG set pieces spread across! Outstanding score by Clint Mansell will drive you from start to final credit roll!!! Amazing movie

19 of 48 users found this helpful1929

All this user's reviews

9

ThegodfathersonMar 28, 2014

Ultimately, Noah is a powerful but complicated experience that’s deeply fascinating in the way it subverts expectations. It will crash over you like the flood itself, knocking you back, allowing you to take in awe-inspiring visuals but alsoUltimately, Noah is a powerful but complicated experience that’s deeply fascinating in the way it subverts expectations. It will crash over you like the flood itself, knocking you back, allowing you to take in awe-inspiring visuals but also forcing you to contemplate complex questions. An absorbing character study and an action epic all at once, Noah is a highly ambitious, largely successful outing for its director and star.… Expand

20 of 49 users found this helpful2029

All this user's reviews