Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Noah - Page 2

10

co2345Jul 5, 2014

i REALLY liked this movie...it was awesome! i really liked Emma Watsons acting in this movie...and the story line was very well put together, i like the other actor they chose...like Logan Lerman. i really liked this movie and i wouldi REALLY liked this movie...it was awesome! i really liked Emma Watsons acting in this movie...and the story line was very well put together, i like the other actor they chose...like Logan Lerman. i really liked this movie and i would recommend you watch it.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

8

EzekiusJul 5, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was fun to watch. Lots of cool things happen in this movie. The real story of Noah is boring as **** so I am glad they changed it to be entertaining. Most people talk about how they love the story of Noah, but most people don't even know a half of it.

People seem to forget that Noah got sodomized by Ham in his vineyard when he was passed out drunk and naked (oh yeah Noah was a boozer) who liked to pass out naked places.

They do make a reference to it in the movie, and I though that alone made the movie awesome.… Expand

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

4

kheuvelJul 2, 2014

If you didn't tell who the director of the new Noah movie was I would assume almost immediately that it was Michael Bay, not the talented Darron Aronovsky that everyone has come to know. I'm not rating this movie from a Biblical standpointIf you didn't tell who the director of the new Noah movie was I would assume almost immediately that it was Michael Bay, not the talented Darron Aronovsky that everyone has come to know. I'm not rating this movie from a Biblical standpoint because everyone should know by now that it isn't accurate at all. (fallen angels that look like rock versions of Optimus Prime, no wives for the other two sons, someone actually getting into the ark) This movie is being completely rated based completely on the production which is sorely lacking in an interesting story. First the good is that the leads do an excellent job of acting the story out and Ruselle Crowe hasn't looked this alive in a movie in about ten years. The scenery is also quite the spectacle and the special effects are almost Bay-like and definitely had a lot of money put into them. That money was spent in vain though. First this movie needed an actual script that didn't sound like it was written by a five year old. Some of the one liners in this movie are actually almost painful to listen too. The acting by a few of the minor characters is awful. The directing by Aronovsky almost seems like the man is truly confused. He almost doesn't even seem to know where this movie was going. The score is almost too ridiculous for its own good. Its constantly too epic and blasts practically throughout the entire movie even when a scene doesn't have any tension whatsoever. Ultimately the bad outweighs the good in this movie. Anybody into explosions and Transformers will be into this film but anyone who actually wants to see a good movie might as well steer clear of this one.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

saintivanJun 27, 2014

If you watch Noah with an open mind, you will be treated to an intense experience that has created a whole new world from one we thought we knew. From the very first scene I knew the movie was going to be well-made, and I was notIf you watch Noah with an open mind, you will be treated to an intense experience that has created a whole new world from one we thought we knew. From the very first scene I knew the movie was going to be well-made, and I was not disappointed. The movie does not hold your hand. As a good movie should, I had unanswered questions, and the movie stayed with me afterwards and the next day.… Expand

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

4

smeeeeeJun 22, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. $130 million? $130 million should have made the movie a lot better. Okay, I'll admit it, I liked the graphics. Giant world-covering tsunamis do actually look good. However combine that with a story many centuries old, and mix it with a madman who carries the name Noah, and throw in some random rock people, and this movie becomes plain disrespectful. Battle scenes? Rubbish. Lame tactics (they only charged and used infantry, no cavalry, siege engines, or arrows, javelins, shields, not even slings!), men with no swords, and this adds on to the level of disrespect this movie brings on. If you're Jewish or strongly Catholic, this will not make you happy at all.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

meagan214Jun 7, 2014

People who rated this amazing movie 1 or 0 is what is wrong with the world. Don't listen to the idiots downrating this movie. This is a masterpiece and with top notch performances. Kudos to everyone involved.

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

10

andreydelorenzoMay 28, 2014

Good and ambitious film. An incredible and cohesive movie under his own universe with great story, graphics and characters.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.....
.

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

8

djniceyMay 27, 2014

I really enjoyed this film, much more than I was expecting. The rock monsters felt a bit out of place but they were a necessary plot device and I think they did work. I think the film interpretation of the story was very well done and theI really enjoyed this film, much more than I was expecting. The rock monsters felt a bit out of place but they were a necessary plot device and I think they did work. I think the film interpretation of the story was very well done and the values that the film was trying to convey came across well for me, it did make me think afterwards and very few films these days do that. The special effects were very well done, the scenery was beautiful and the water effects were powerful and very well done.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

7

rh2599May 26, 2014

Being a Russell Crowe Fan I personally thought he put on an Oscar Winning Performance. There was never any reference to God only to the Creator.. When you add alien looking creatures as the Watchers of The Wall you tend to think theBeing a Russell Crowe Fan I personally thought he put on an Oscar Winning Performance. There was never any reference to God only to the Creator.. When you add alien looking creatures as the Watchers of The Wall you tend to think the producers believe we were created by Alien Beings.I thought all the actors put in terrific performances and the movie had a strong theme of Good vs. Evil with of course Good winning out. As whacked out as Hollywood is at least up to this point they do not have Evil prevailing.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

david1997May 26, 2014

a breathtaking movie and its nowhere near being a horrible movie for what everybody else says ..This movie can be the most beautifully movie I've seen in awhile .. A True biblical movie that's put together nicely.

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

1

surfnow3May 25, 2014

As a Christian, I can accept somethings about this movie that could be in the bible. For example there is no mention of people wanting to get onto Noahs ark in the bible. However I am sure during this time period, people probably thought NoahAs a Christian, I can accept somethings about this movie that could be in the bible. For example there is no mention of people wanting to get onto Noahs ark in the bible. However I am sure during this time period, people probably thought Noah was crazy, but I have little doubt that they tried to get on, with the impending doom. The rock monsters I am not so sure about.

What was ridiculous is when Noah flipped out and wanted to kill the unborn. Utter nonsense.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

SimonSays18May 17, 2014

Noah may be visually outstanding and very well-acted, but it is unable to satisfy due to a weak third act and unnecessary liberties Darren Aronofsky decides to take.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

WhySoSerious54May 16, 2014

A nice fresh take on an old story. I enjoyed the originality and the acting was overall solid. The action sqeuences were amazing. Yes you understand there is a God, you understand, humans are to be punished, you understand love conquers all.A nice fresh take on an old story. I enjoyed the originality and the acting was overall solid. The action sqeuences were amazing. Yes you understand there is a God, you understand, humans are to be punished, you understand love conquers all. This was the basic principle behind the original story but updated in a new unique way. I am a person of faith and I apretiated the new take on it.… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

6

TBrianBryanMay 16, 2014

So-So... Well thought out details to fill the gaps in bible story. Special effecs good to OK. Expected a little more from a Russel Crow flick, but good enough to rent from Red-Box when available.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

GarfoodleMay 11, 2014

As an Atheist, i dont care about accuracy.

Its just dull. **** action sequence, 2 hours of pointless stuff, then action sequence, then done. More or less a waste of time, its not very good. Also, the acting is quite **** so thats done

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

EdorkMay 7, 2014

Seriously, why is everyone freaking out about this? Do I have to be a religious fanatic in order to hate this movie? Because this film was amazing! "Worst movie ever"??? Get over yourselves!

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

9

ursula079May 2, 2014

A very well done movie. I went in without knowing much about it. The story is good, the animation is good as well. The story is easy to follow and doesn't leave you confused. I would watch it again, and that says a lot. If you like storiesA very well done movie. I went in without knowing much about it. The story is good, the animation is good as well. The story is easy to follow and doesn't leave you confused. I would watch it again, and that says a lot. If you like stories like the Hobbit you will enjoy this movie.Watch it from the perspective of a story you've never heard before and you can't help but love it. I felt a range of emotions: happiness, anger, sadness, hope, despair. Worth the watch, for sure… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

0

howardbeensMay 2, 2014

Saw this movie for free and was angry I spent so much to get in. HORRIFIC! Only thing it has to do with Noah is the title. The actual biblical account of Noah could have made a fantastic movie, this was a bad mix of generic Star Wars typeSaw this movie for free and was angry I spent so much to get in. HORRIFIC! Only thing it has to do with Noah is the title. The actual biblical account of Noah could have made a fantastic movie, this was a bad mix of generic Star Wars type characters that didn't belong, muddled dialog, bad cinematography, horrible special effects and extreme violence that seemed to be thrown in just to have extreme violence. Didn't add to the story one whit. Towards the end seemed to be nothing more than a flagrant attempt to paint important Christian figures as weak and evil.… Expand

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

5

RamonGuerreroMay 1, 2014

Noah tries to be an epic biblical journey, a visual spectacle, a psychological thriller, but it fails in every aspect. It's true, the performances are great, but there's something about the plot that turns out to be dull and flat. AronofskyNoah tries to be an epic biblical journey, a visual spectacle, a psychological thriller, but it fails in every aspect. It's true, the performances are great, but there's something about the plot that turns out to be dull and flat. Aronofsky has done way better films.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

M9kiApr 29, 2014

An interesting movie to say none the less it never stops amazing you. Finally a religious movie that raises the roof and exposes what will happen to the wicked hearted.

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

2

GMaj777Apr 28, 2014

Very poor and nearly sent me to sleep. The highlights included a scene which followed the earth from its birth to now and Russell Crowes performance. Apart from that it was a dour film in which another Bible adventure was depicted in a boringVery poor and nearly sent me to sleep. The highlights included a scene which followed the earth from its birth to now and Russell Crowes performance. Apart from that it was a dour film in which another Bible adventure was depicted in a boring way. The issue I have with Bible stories is that you know the plot and the ending therefore no suspense or even a slight bit of interest towards the end of the film.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

arunkchowApr 27, 2014

This biblical inspired action adventure from Darren Aronofsky is not as great as any of his previous films but it does stand out because of it's darkly narrated plot with superior performances by it's cast. Clint Mansell's score is an assetThis biblical inspired action adventure from Darren Aronofsky is not as great as any of his previous films but it does stand out because of it's darkly narrated plot with superior performances by it's cast. Clint Mansell's score is an asset to the film though the film's CGI went haywire at few places.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

1

sewandsewsApr 27, 2014

Dont waste youre money or youre time on this one, if you are going to make a Biblical epic at least follow the story. This was Holly Wood at its worst making things up as it goes along, worst film i have ever seen.
Total fabrication and notDont waste youre money or youre time on this one, if you are going to make a Biblical epic at least follow the story. This was Holly Wood at its worst making things up as it goes along, worst film i have ever seen.
Total fabrication and not in the same league as other epics like "Ben Hur", "The Robe", "Ten Commandments", it was just drivel.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

7

ClariseSamuelsApr 25, 2014

Darren Aronofsy is being billed as “visionary” director, and in general, I would have to agree with that assessment. He's still young, and his fame is based on a mere handful of movies, so there are still great expectations for this brilliantDarren Aronofsy is being billed as “visionary” director, and in general, I would have to agree with that assessment. He's still young, and his fame is based on a mere handful of movies, so there are still great expectations for this brilliant and politically engaged director. With Noah, Aronofsky reached for the sky, almost literally, and went slightly askew in an attempt to do a strange admixture that included disaster movie, blockbuster-for-teenagers movie, and a Biblical epic that would appeal to the faith-based audience. It was a tall order. Did Aronofsky succeed? To a certain extent, although there are some glaring weaknesses.

In general Noah is a sweeping and inspirational film. It explores the faith of one man who was chosen to lead the world forward after certain disaster, and also the frustration of dealing with G-d, who is often silent and remote, or who communicates with signs and wonders that are open to multiple interpretations. Let's not forget that in Exodus, Moses wants to know the Lord's name. The answer in Hebrew has been translated as “I am who I am,” which is inaccurate because it's more literally translated as “I will be what I will be.” What kind of name is that? G-d never gives a straight answer. His answers sound like a New Age philosopher. Yoko Ono would probably come up with lines like that.

Aronofsky mined the Midrash, the rabbinical interpretation of the Bible, for some of his own interpretation. The Midrash is a good source, but Aronofsky also took some strange liberties. Probably the greatest anomaly in the film, or Aronofsky's most fantastical element, is that Noah supposedly received help in building the ark from a horde of fallen angels. These angels appear in the form of giant rock monsters, and they vaguely resemble transformers; they don't just help with the ark—they pretty much do all of the heavy labor. The idea of angels helping Noah is entirely acceptable; rock monsters, however, are a little off-the-wall.

And the costumes sometimes look too modern—did they really wear scarves that are fashionably wrapped around their necks? (Aronofsky is often photographed wearing fashionable scarves.) In one scene, Noah (Russell Crowe) is wearing what vaguely looks like a polo shirt and jeans. There is an overemphasis on the purity and innocence of animals, and the sanctity of vegetarianism. Animals hunt and kill other animals, although they do it by instinct and not design. Aronofsky is reported to be a vegan. Some scholars say the Garden of Eden was meant to be vegetarian; others disagree. Nevertheless, if the Old Testament demanded it, every Orthodox Jew would be a vegetarian to this day. There are strict rules for koshering meat given in great detail in the Bible—killing an animal painlessly is paramount. Kosher slaughter is quick and painless; if pain is incurred even accidentally, then the meat is not kosher. Noah's vegetarianism may have been implied by a Biblical passage where permission to eat meat, with restrictions, seems to have been given after, but not before, the Flood.

Another exaggeration in the film was that some kind of Industrial Revolution was destroying the Earth at the time. No one is sure when Noah lived. However, in Biblical times the population of the planet was just a tiny fraction of what it is today. Even if every individual did something to poison the Earth, with so few people, the affect would be negligible. Nevertheless, the Biblical version states that humans were evil and had to be wiped off the face of the Earth, with the exception of Noah and his family. The story is open to interpretation, especially if the entire story is an allegory, which is another theory.

To complicate matters, shortly after the release of the film, Aronofsky announced that he was an atheist. Atheists are entitled to make Biblical films if they are so inclined, but for the faith-based audience, the director's atheism might be a serious sticking point, if not positively baffling.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

0

ZisckyApr 22, 2014

Is 2014 a magnet to biblical movies?Despite the spot on performance from Emma it just feels like...i don't know 'reverse sci-fi' with too much imagination

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

3

evearcherApr 22, 2014

Rock creatures built the Ark, rock creatures ? Such a weird movie.....using bad cartoons to explain the state of the earth and how it came to be....Movie was watchable but could have been GREAT. The Rock Creatures made the movieRock creatures built the Ark, rock creatures ? Such a weird movie.....using bad cartoons to explain the state of the earth and how it came to be....Movie was watchable but could have been GREAT. The Rock Creatures made the movie laughable.....too much MAGIC....the movie should not be called NOAH because it really was a different movie.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

10

karinrocksApr 21, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I have met people who "knew" they would hate this movie before they saw it so they either didn't see it and dis it anyway which makes no sense or they went to the theater and made a point of walking out loudly and rudely. One person said he was VERY angry that the word "God" was replaced with "Creator" and for him it "had to be" downhill from there. A lot of the negative reviews here and elsewhere seem to be coming from the same mindset. Obviously this review is not for these people. Either they won't read it or if they do they won't like it. But for the rest of you, those with open curious minds in search of a film worth spending money on, this is a very good movie. Russell Crowe leads an excellent cast through a script respectful of the Creator and his Creation, especially the innocent, the animals. And we humans must admit that we have not been very good caretakers of this planet and the flora and fauna who share it with us. It's an excellent movie for Earth Day! And it's also full of mindblowing special effects. You won't be bored!… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

9

mpicus5000Apr 21, 2014

So the Lord said, “I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.” (Genesis 6:7)
The story of NoahSo the Lord said, “I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.” (Genesis 6:7)
The story of Noah is the first apocalypse story ever told. Humanity has become corrupt and vain and now must be destroyed as punishment. In this version of the tale, Noah (Russell Crowe), is the last descendant of Seth, Adam and Eve's third son. He is a righteous man tasked by the Creator to save the innocents from humanity's impending doom. The rest of the world is made up of descendants of Cain, Adam and Eve's first son. They are wicked and have corrupted the world, and it is because of this that the Creator wishes to destroy humanity, by sending a massive flood. Noah and his family are tasked with saving the innocent by building an ark that can carry them as well as two of every kind of animal, so that creation can continue after the flood ends.
The story is only five chapters long in the book of Genesis. It can be read in less than ten minutes, but this movie is almost two and a half hours long. How does such a short story get made into such a long movie? It strays from the story A LOT. There are so many differences between this story and the story in the Bible. There are already so many interpretations of the story, but this film is a very interesting interpretation.
The particular interpretation that is getting the most attention is that of the Creator. God is referred to as the Creator in this film, and nothing else. The word God is not mentioned once in the entire movie. More observant people in many different religions might be offended by this, but this film is not a particularly religious interpretation of the story. This is a big plus for me. I'm not the biggest fan of movies based on religious interpretations.
As a movie, it's very entertaining. It's quite slow and could probably be about an hour shorter than it already is, but it is still worth seeing. The special effects are pretty good and it's almost like an action/adventure movie. When we think of movies about the apocalypse, we think about movies that have to do with the apocalypse happening in modern times. The story of Noah is the first recorded apocalypse story we know of, and there are so many other cultures with similar stories of a great flood destroying the world. It's a very serious movie and there isn't any comic relief at all.
Russell Crowe delivers a fine performance, as does Jennifer Connelly. Anthony Hopkins is a pleasure to watch on screen, as he is always. But this isn't really a movie that's going to be best known for its acting performances, nor its special effects. This is a movie that's going to be known as another interpretation of the story we all know.
There's something interesting that happens after the movie ends and you walk out of the theater though. You might find yourself wondering if at some point in the future, humanity is to face this story in real life. Have we corrupted our world? If so, are we going to face consequences for it? How is humanity to survive such destruction should it come our way? This aspect is perhaps the best part of the film. It's a conversation starter about the state of humanity today. Perhaps it's relevant to today's world.
Noah is a movie that is not to be missed. While the Bible may not paint the most horrifying picture of this story that one could imagine, that's where Aronofsky comes in. The film is excellently directed and will take you on a truly fascinating journey.… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

0

NagromNniuqApr 20, 2014

This movies is a waste of money, both in the production of and the going to see of. Not only does it not follow the actual story of Noah, it is fully of absurd situations and creatures that have no real bearing on the story being told. TheThis movies is a waste of money, both in the production of and the going to see of. Not only does it not follow the actual story of Noah, it is fully of absurd situations and creatures that have no real bearing on the story being told. The agnostic and environmentalist agenda is being pushed so hard that it detracts seriously from the movie as a whole regardless of what religion or view point you are coming from. It takes away from what could have been an entertaining movie, that was about something other than the story of Noah, and instead makes it a mixmash of explosions, special effects, poor acting and lines, that is painful to sit through. Sad.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

catanna1Apr 20, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. My husband and I just saw Noah and we both loved it. Well and bravely written, beautifully acted, creative CGI & not "biblical" but certainly spiritual and ultimately inspiring, especially for nature lovers like ourselves. Noah: "We have to be gentle with the animals and we have to be protective. If something were to happen to them, a small piece of creation would be lost for ever" And so it has. And there are many way to appreciate this movie outside of its reference to the Old Testament story. As clever science fiction/fantasy ~ an intense family drama ~ edge of your seat action/adventure ~ a cautionary tale that could inspire some interesting discussion about the state of the world and our place in it afterward.… Expand

7 of 18 users found this helpful711

All this user's reviews

2

LincolnbazApr 20, 2014

Not sure how people who query accuracy have a leg to stand unless they were there at the time of Adam, Eve, Noah and friends. However, that does not excuse the film makers coming up with probably the worst film I have ever seen. There isNot sure how people who query accuracy have a leg to stand unless they were there at the time of Adam, Eve, Noah and friends. However, that does not excuse the film makers coming up with probably the worst film I have ever seen. There is simply nothing positive I can say about it. Refund please, for my wasted time and money.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

1

WakeForestNCApr 18, 2014

Transformer rocks and that's all you need to know about this nonsensical fantasy film. Bad, very bad. The liberal film critics liked Noah more due to it's left leaning Biblical story.

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

6

googolendtimesApr 18, 2014

While it left me feeling drained as I left the cinema, "Noah" was technically superb, offering yet another outlet for Darren Aronofsky to showcase his skill as a director, and well-acted; Russell Crowe, in particular, fit the lead better thanWhile it left me feeling drained as I left the cinema, "Noah" was technically superb, offering yet another outlet for Darren Aronofsky to showcase his skill as a director, and well-acted; Russell Crowe, in particular, fit the lead better than I expected he would; his performance is haunted, sunken and finely nuanced. It drags, it feels an hour longer than it actually was, and only loosely adherent to the Bible, which may leave some offended. But it was an impressive piece of filmmaking, even if its entertainment value didn't quite measure up.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

JmsbppApr 18, 2014

Noe es una historia interesante donde se cuenta con un excelente elenco de actores, la película suele rodarse y tornarse lenta pero al mismo tiempo interesante es una combinación que no me gusta mucho pues en ciertas partes predomina elNoe es una historia interesante donde se cuenta con un excelente elenco de actores, la película suele rodarse y tornarse lenta pero al mismo tiempo interesante es una combinación que no me gusta mucho pues en ciertas partes predomina el aburrimiento y la desolacion… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

2

Navin_AdApr 16, 2014

I would have given this movie a 0 if it wasn't for the spectacular special effects put into this movie. However, I'm not a Christian so I was bored half-way through the movie. It had a weird storyline of Noah killing all humans on earthI would have given this movie a 0 if it wasn't for the spectacular special effects put into this movie. However, I'm not a Christian so I was bored half-way through the movie. It had a weird storyline of Noah killing all humans on earth including himself. To be honest, the movie Evan Almighty was even way better than this. I know, Noah was way more darker but I found Evan Almighty more fun and entertaining to watch.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

0

glgApr 16, 2014

"Noah" is the worst movie my two friends and I have ever seen in a theater -- and we're in our 60s and love movies, so that's saying a lot. (And no, we aren't religious fanatics.) It's so bad it's laughable, beginning with the Adam and Eve"Noah" is the worst movie my two friends and I have ever seen in a theater -- and we're in our 60s and love movies, so that's saying a lot. (And no, we aren't religious fanatics.) It's so bad it's laughable, beginning with the Adam and Eve sequence to the Hobbit-ripoff rock monsters. The plot is boring and so full of plot holes (including a huge tent that the characters just happen to put together out of backpacks) that it's beyond stupid.. The acting is bad, even though we all three usually love Crowe. It was like the actors were cringing at having to put up with anything so moronic. Don't waste your money!… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

8

Pablo22Apr 15, 2014

Noah review

It´s weird that I´ve heard many people saying that it rained on the day they watched Noah and it got even weirder when the same happened to me. My theory is Arnofsky made a pact with god to make it rain while his movie isNoah review

It´s weird that I´ve heard many people saying that it rained on the day they watched Noah and it got even weirder when the same happened to me. My theory is Arnofsky made a pact with god to make it rain while his movie is screening to get us viewers in the mood. If that is true, it may have worked because I kinda liked this movie!

The movie is obviously based around the biblical story of Noah, who builds an arch to save the animals and the good from a great flood send by god as a catastrophe to cleanse the world. Arnofsky uses the source material to build his own mythology and world which is an aspect I respect. That is why many aspects created or "added" by Arnofsky don´t feel out of place. This adds tension to the movie as you cannot predict what the characters will do next as Noah is not the cheerful old dude that stuck a thousand animals in a boat that we pictured from what we had heard. This story is a lot darker. The characters are darker, especially Noah whose conviction to what he feels he is meant to do takes him into some VERY scary places. Logan Lerman´s character is a conflicted one too and has a nice arch written for him. The majority of these actors do a good job, even Jennifer Connelly who I thought was gonna be a generic character has his shining moments. I can´t tell you a lot about Emma Watson because holy hell she is beautiful and it got me a little distracted and the dude who bangs her is pretty forgettable as I can´t remember his name and I don´t even feel like looking it up. The one that really shone for me was Iron Man´s director, Jon Favreau. Nah I´m kidding it´s Ray Winstone, but jesus, does he look like Jon Favreau! Ray Winston made the villain as imposing and badass as the character got and I congratulate him on that. Hopkins got a few scenes in this movie and the two of them were charming. He even got his berry!

Aside from the darker parts of this movie, of which there are some that may surprise you and maybe stick in your brain for a few days, this movie is absolutely epic! EPIC, in capitals. From them moments the prophecy is shown you know something big is coming. But when the douchey villain is introduced and the movie starts going from the arch to the villain´s army camp back and forth it starts picking up on the epicness and it all climaxes when the rain drops start hitting that bald Russel Crowes head! That battle sequence was one well done action setpiece. All the rock giants are swinging legions of bad guys across the screen... it is awesome!

As seen in the battle sequences, this movie is very well filmed and directed. It even has an evolution montage which used an awesome technique that made it unique.

This movie goes a little bit further than an epic summer/spring movie and I give it props for it. It isn´t Arnofsky´s best and it won´t leave you burning your brain while you decode it afterwards and it is weirdly edited in some scenes, but it sure is a little bit better than a very good time at the movies.

I give Noah an 8 out of 10.

I do have a question that bothered me throughout the movie: If the rock angel commited suicide why did it go to heaven?? I´ll let Arnofsky go on this one for that Mila Kunis + Natalie Portman scene he gifted us with.
Check my other reviews in http://thechannelofawesome.blogspot.mx/ !… Expand

1 of 11 users found this helpful110

All this user's reviews

3

XirrApr 15, 2014

Film felt confused; it just added content inconsistent with original Biblical teaching, but then tried to approach evolution, and even mix in the story of Abraham instead of just telling the story.

Cinematography was quite well--honestlyFilm felt confused; it just added content inconsistent with original Biblical teaching, but then tried to approach evolution, and even mix in the story of Abraham instead of just telling the story.

Cinematography was quite well--honestly one of the better approaches to use of imagery and special effects which is why I give it a 3. But the film is probably best watched on mute.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

0

MemetoApr 15, 2014

Saw it yesterday. Just made an account to write this. What a waste of time, money, humor.... You name it. Went out of the movie very disappointed, a little angry too. Story sucks, play sucks, effects sucks. I rate with 1 for those who tookSaw it yesterday. Just made an account to write this. What a waste of time, money, humor.... You name it. Went out of the movie very disappointed, a little angry too. Story sucks, play sucks, effects sucks. I rate with 1 for those who took the time to get together one of the worste movie ever.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

6

JoeKnowReviewsApr 15, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. To be clear on this review: I did NOT read the bible story of Noah's ark recently when going into this film. I wasn't looking for a faithful adaptation or something to recapture my feelings on my first experience reading the bible: all I was looking for was a good film.

And, after the beginning and middle parts of the film went by, It didn't look like I would get it and I was ready to give this film a 4/10. While it may have had artistically stunning visuals, solid acting and a compelling story: my reasonable enjoyment of it was hampered by its shallow script, underdeveloped characters and their various plot points, weak villain and its occasional sluggish pacing. That was when I noticed a change in the third act, and my enjoyment was rekindled again. Aronofsky did a fantastic job at portraying Noah's complexity in the last third: where he was at constant battle with himself contemplating on what the right thing to do was, what he felt he had to do for his 'lord'. Some of the other characters gained an extra dimension to them too (Naameh and ila in particular). Perhaps the biggest factors in the last third that really appealed to me were its great messages, and genuine emotions shared between characters at the ending. That was enough to take my rating of this film up to 6/10. Still not a great film: but a surprisingly decent and occasionally epic film that I was glad I saw in the end; for the aspects that were worth it at least.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

0

FnacyApr 15, 2014

What should have been an at least 'so bad its good' disaster movie, compounded to create one of the most drab and dull films i've seen in cinema for years. Each line feels as though it drags on longer than its previous, the script in itselfWhat should have been an at least 'so bad its good' disaster movie, compounded to create one of the most drab and dull films i've seen in cinema for years. Each line feels as though it drags on longer than its previous, the script in itself as wooden and repetitive as the acting. And one of the most irritating pauses after each and every line to try and emphasise the 'cleansing' or whatever drivel the actor/actress was spouting. I couldn't care less about it's religious inaccuracies, as long as you make it a decent story, but unfortunately the film fails on both accounts. Not worth anyones time.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

6

BenubcApr 15, 2014

Over dramatized; that's what I told myself about 5 minutes into this drawn out epic, and that feeling only continued to overpower my thrill of this fantastical story which includes the Watchers within a decently explained creationismOver dramatized; that's what I told myself about 5 minutes into this drawn out epic, and that feeling only continued to overpower my thrill of this fantastical story which includes the Watchers within a decently explained creationism framework. Aronofsky is such a skilled director that I didn't think he would ever rely on such an unevenly paced story, disjointed and overly emotional characters, or plot devices that stretched the movie to an uncomfortable length, while failing to truly complete the yarn. That being said, much of the drama culminated in Watson's outtro, which was finally well executed... thereby making sense of the build up, yet not in a way that warranted the sloppy footwork of the preamble.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

9

RobMcQuearyApr 14, 2014

Let’s begin where the Book does…

5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on theLet’s begin where the Book does…

5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. 7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. Genesis 6:5-7 KJV

Let’s allow the movie to begin where it desires to as well (these are the first words at the top of the movie’s website)…

The film is inspired by the story of Noah. While artistic license has been taken, we believe that this film is true to the essence, values and integrity of a story that is a cornerstone of faith for millions of people worldwide. The biblical story of Noah can be found in the book of Genesis.

Since its March 28th release (and before, really) I have had the advantage (and in some cases, disadvantage) of reading many passionate reviews… all before I had seen the movie. I was reminded that some of us actually read reviews to decide whether or not we will go to the theater to see a movie. So reviews have their place. As usual, I come to this evaluation process from a bit of a different angle. For the last 20+ yrs. I have been a professional storyteller. You may look at my resume and wonder why a pastor would call himself that, but that’s exactly what we who deliver sermons are doing… we are telling and retelling the stories found in the Scriptures.

If you were/are looking to the Noah movie to retell the story word-for-word as the Scripture does, I nearly certain that you will walk away as many have… disappointed. However, most of us who attend Christian churches would be equally disappointed if we showed up to a worship service and the sermon for the day was solely the reading of Scripture. We want to know some perspective. How does that text apply to my life? What am I supposed to do or be because of what the Scripture teaches? I think this movie does both masterfully. Here a few of the high points that stood out to me:

- total ownership of why God was destroying the earth… the wickedness of man… sin
- acknowledging God as Creator
- even enumerating the very acts of creation day by day
- showing Noah as the righteous yet fallen human that he was
- even the weird stuff (you already have your list) does not diminish the power of the story

So even if you don’t end up liking the movie, let’s be the ones that are known what we’re for instead of what we’re against. May this retelling of the story of Noah cause audiences to consider the greatness and grace of our God.… Expand

12 of 27 users found this helpful1215

All this user's reviews

0

RTFORDApr 14, 2014

Like many of the other 'user reviews', I didn't expect to see an exact representation of the biblical account, but I did expect to see a movie that included the basic facts of the 'Noah' story. Unfortunately, this debacle was so far removedLike many of the other 'user reviews', I didn't expect to see an exact representation of the biblical account, but I did expect to see a movie that included the basic facts of the 'Noah' story. Unfortunately, this debacle was so far removed from the original story that I'm tempted to call it intentional blasphemy and I'm left wondering whether God will hold the author or authors accountable. My wife and I nearly left the theater when the 'Watchers' were introduced but managed to endure until Russell Crowe told his family that they all would die, implying that God only used them to build a boat to save the animals. Disgusting!… Expand

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

5

LaffingravyApr 14, 2014

Personally I was divided by 'Noah'. I'm not well acquainted with the intricacies of the Bible story so I entered the cinema not really sure what to expect. I immediately, however, recognized that this rendition of the story would bePersonally I was divided by 'Noah'. I'm not well acquainted with the intricacies of the Bible story so I entered the cinema not really sure what to expect. I immediately, however, recognized that this rendition of the story would be embellished and changed, something I have absolutely no problem with.

I thought the first half of the movie was interesting and actually rather good. It was well shot and, as an origin story for humanity on this early version of earth, quite effective. I thought the depiction of the animals as less evolved versions of their modern counterparts was a nice touch. Taken out of context of the biblical scripture it had a good, mythical element to it's story which I appreciated. Sure there are a few inconsistencies here and there especially regarding the biology of repopulating the earth from one family (severe inbreeding... although it may explain a few things about the state of humanity now... Joke) but I was happy to overlook them as I just saw the story taking place in a parallel reality.

However, when Ray Winstone starts to get involved I thought it all went to **** In the second half of the movie Aronofsky throws his subtle camera work and interesting tale of legend out the window and replaces it with Hollywood drama and CGI bonanza. Granted, the effects look great but it was boring. Plus all the time on the Arc gave Emma Watson a chance to really show off her acting talent... of which she has none. Her constant crying or screaming in her remarkably quick childbirth were just awful.

So I'm giving it a 5. I wish Aronofsky had chosen to continue to deal with the story with the care and artistic integrity he used in the first half of the movie. It can not redeem what was simply just an awful, cliched final act.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

3

RATCHETSLYJAKApr 13, 2014

One of the worst movies I have ever seen in years. Do not go to this movie expecting any accuracy to the Bible stories. The acting is ok but the plot is so dragged out and just becomes pointless after the 2 hour mark. I even began to sideOne of the worst movies I have ever seen in years. Do not go to this movie expecting any accuracy to the Bible stories. The acting is ok but the plot is so dragged out and just becomes pointless after the 2 hour mark. I even began to side with the villain at one point hoping that he would end the movie , but nope , it dragged giving me a headache and making me ponder wither to leave or not. Even me giving it a 3 is a bit too generous.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

7

jakesaysApr 12, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The fallen angels were really something to see and added a bit of depth to an otherwise same old story. The animals should have been more brightly colored and have more to do with the story than just falling asleep.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

1

itsjustmeonlymeApr 12, 2014

not even close to the bible. what a let down. The sad thing is some will watch it and think that was what the bible said. Very sad. If only it would have been called by another name. It might have been an o.k. story.

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

6

GardenChairApr 11, 2014

Any logical person will know that the Bible is a work of fiction, The director also thinks this as he has openly created Noah as a fantasy movie and it does not try to pretend to be anything else, people who have liked any other bigAny logical person will know that the Bible is a work of fiction, The director also thinks this as he has openly created Noah as a fantasy movie and it does not try to pretend to be anything else, people who have liked any other big blockbuster fantasy movie like the LOTR series will probably enjoy this movie. I can see why some people are creating a fuss about this movie because the director Darren Aronofsky makes it clear in every scene that this stuff obviously did not happen. Anyone who tries to argue that this movie was based on a true story would get laughed at, Aronofsky does not even attempt to hide the logical problems with the source material instead he puts a spotlight onto them and goes out of his way to remind people that the story he is telling is pure fantasy.… Expand

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

3

Zaphod20212Apr 11, 2014

I went to see this full of high expectation,but almost left halfway through I was so disappointed...Lots of looking into the distance, histrionics and overloud music does not compensate for a poor script. Too many holes in the film for myI went to see this full of high expectation,but almost left halfway through I was so disappointed...Lots of looking into the distance, histrionics and overloud music does not compensate for a poor script. Too many holes in the film for my liking,my friend felt the same way.Basically a waste of money, wish I had not bothered. Some of the story was hard to follow too, and did not bear much resemblance to the actual biblical story! Save your money!. An epic it is not inspite of the good actors(Crowe, Winstone & Watson).
The directing is beyond poor in my opinion and I am a seasoned film viewer! Rubbish!… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

8

itsjustmealbertApr 10, 2014

So, it may not follow the bible, but Noah has a powerful message worth telling. The visuals are so incredible. It is one of the most beautiful (in the darkest way) movies that I've ever seen. If you open your mind and don't expect a bibleSo, it may not follow the bible, but Noah has a powerful message worth telling. The visuals are so incredible. It is one of the most beautiful (in the darkest way) movies that I've ever seen. If you open your mind and don't expect a bible story, you are in for a really good and powerful movie.… Expand

2 of 14 users found this helpful212

All this user's reviews

4

xser12249Apr 9, 2014

Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movieNice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie Nice movie… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

6

foxgroveApr 9, 2014

Noah is definitely not one for the purists. Opening in a bleak landscape and adopting a preachy tone, the film takes a good hour to really get going. Darren Aronofsky, usually one of the best visual directors around, takes a fair while toNoah is definitely not one for the purists. Opening in a bleak landscape and adopting a preachy tone, the film takes a good hour to really get going. Darren Aronofsky, usually one of the best visual directors around, takes a fair while to bring his undoubted talent to the fore concentrating instead on character development and uninteresting family dialogue. Even the visual effects, including some rock monsters that look as if they have just stepped out of a Transformers movie, seem dislocated from everything else going on at this time. In fact, it's not until the tremendous battle for the ark that things start to improve. From here, it's onwards and upwards and the cast finally have some dialogue and drama to sink their teeth into. A crazed Russell Crowe starts to lose it; Jennifer Connelly steals the acting honours in just two scenes; Emma Watson cries a lot, but shows real promise here, and even Ray Winstone is rather good in a baddie role that he can play in his sleep.

Once aboard the ark Aronofsky finally delivers what one has come to expect from him and the visual effects also become more integrated into the story. The animals arrival at the ark is wonderful as is a backwards tracking shot of the vessel from end to end. Also, one sequence is surprising in its unpredictability. Ultimately you leave the cinema fairly satisfied even as you begin to question things like; if they are the only ones left how did they re-populate? Oh well, it's only a film.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

1

belfastbikerApr 8, 2014

I was with a girl at the time, and I felt nothing but embarrassment watching this with her, as it was my choice for movie. Boy, I'll check out more than one crazy fundamentalist christian review next time. **** insane, that part I liked.I was with a girl at the time, and I felt nothing but embarrassment watching this with her, as it was my choice for movie. Boy, I'll check out more than one crazy fundamentalist christian review next time. **** insane, that part I liked. But to many parts were just cringeworthy and cheesy.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

2

MrBBPrinterApr 8, 2014

Saw this movie on 4/2. While we were expecting somewhat of a fantasy movie we had no idea that it would be so preposterous. We're not fans of the Hobbit-type movies and this was really in that genera. None the less, I (male) found the actingSaw this movie on 4/2. While we were expecting somewhat of a fantasy movie we had no idea that it would be so preposterous. We're not fans of the Hobbit-type movies and this was really in that genera. None the less, I (male) found the acting to be atrocious. Compare this movie to Beautiful Mind in which both these actors starred. It is a masterful work. We expected a fictional movie, not a science fiction movie.

Save your money, rent it if you must see it. The CGI effects are worthy of a large screen but the remainder can be viewed on anything. As it droned on we found ourselves hoping that each scene was the last so we could go. When the credits ran, so did we.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

7

eupatorusApr 8, 2014

"Noah" is possibly Darren Aronofsky's worst movie. That being said it's still an entertaining well made film in it's own right. I was a little disappointed, but only because I hold him in such high regard with such an amazing track record of"Noah" is possibly Darren Aronofsky's worst movie. That being said it's still an entertaining well made film in it's own right. I was a little disappointed, but only because I hold him in such high regard with such an amazing track record of movies (The Fountain alone is enough to mark him as a modern master in my opinion, not to even mention Black Swan, The Wrestler, and Requiem). I think his first foray into CGI may have demanded enough of his attention that the film suffered a little. It's not as succinct as his previous outings.

With that "disclaimer" out of the way, this ain't your momma's Noah. There's no Gandalfian white beard, no shepherd's hook, no fluffy white lambs being led two-by-two into a wooden ship. Instead we follow the ass-kicking Noah and his family, the last "good people" in the world, as they prepare for and weather (no pun intended) the destruction of mankind, who in the years since their creation, have fallen corrupt and one step from downright evil.

The movie is solid on all fronts. The acting is great, especially from Ray Winstone, who I could barely recognize, playing the anti-Noah Tubal-Cain ferociously to my delight. The cinematography is excellent, as we've come to expect from Aronofsky, and shines especially in Noah's visions and few time-lapse sequences about the creation of the universe and evolution of earth, and the Creator's (as he is referred to in the film) miraculous conjuration of a forest from which Noah is to build his ark. The dialogue and story is interesting for the most part, and while straying from the little detail given in the bible and the torah, works within it's own world.

My only real problems with the movie are that it is a little too long at some where around 2hrs 20min and it feels this way because the last third of the movie feels a little slow compared to it's dramatic first parts and largely focuses on Noah's internal struggle and clashing with his family over whether mankind is ordained to live on through them or simply die out.

Don't listen to the bad reviews on here, however and ignore the 0,1, and 2 point attack-reduced User Score. Even if it wan't a good movie, which it is, it would warrant a 4 or 5 based solely on it's quality production. But by reading them you can tell that largely they are from a bunch a religious types that wanted to watch the same story they've been told a thousands time come to life on the big screen. While this is the Noah story at it's core, from start to finish, there is plenty of interpretation and creativity applied as well, which for my money worked very well.

I give it a 6 or 7, although I was tempted to give it a 10 to counteract all the knee-jerk negativity flowing around this movie. Maybe you don't need to see it in theaters, but if you're curious and open, definitely check it out.… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

2

AlanCheungApr 8, 2014

People were quick to judge the movie based on that fact it is biblical, but that should be put aside because it never mattered.
Story: Seemed like a story that was meant for environmentalists. A lot of it emphasized the importance ofPeople were quick to judge the movie based on that fact it is biblical, but that should be put aside because it never mattered.
Story: Seemed like a story that was meant for environmentalists. A lot of it emphasized the importance of maintaining the Earth the way it was when it was originally created.
Acting: Emma Watson and Jennifer Connolly stole the show with their sorrowful performances. Russell Crowe and Logan Lerman gave an average performance, which was limited by the script.
Direction: The Watchers were a bad idea, they never felt like they belonged in that world. Almost like a poor man's Lord of the Rings. Their clunky animations made it look like a stop motion animation. Very poor choice on Darren Aronfsky's part.
Enjoyability - Regardless of whether the story of The Great Flood means anything to you. It wouldn't be a movie you'd pay for if you wanted to watch something enjoyable.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

0

BingBongApr 8, 2014

I usually can't be bothered to write reviews, but 'NOAH' was so bad I've even gone to the trouble of creating an account (yep, another password to forget) in order to share this. Oh grief, 'NOAH is rubbish. Russell Crowe did his usual halfI usually can't be bothered to write reviews, but 'NOAH' was so bad I've even gone to the trouble of creating an account (yep, another password to forget) in order to share this. Oh grief, 'NOAH is rubbish. Russell Crowe did his usual half asleep lump of acting except when he was required to become a gladiator and kill someone, Anthony Hopkins (who has seemingly cornered the market in twinkly wisdom) twinkled and Ray Winstone looked menacing (as he always does, so no change there) About the only actor who was remotely convincing was Jennifer Connelly, emoting like a steam train on heat. Directing was lumpen and the special effects (such as they were) scored about 3/10 on the special effects scale while the script was devoid of both humanity and humour, everyone talking in constipated statements and trying to look serious. Why don't they hire people who know how to write?

OK, having got that off my chest, let's be constructive. As with most films, you have to either go big or go small. A tight, intense drama of family tension, madness, incest and infanticide inside a big boat, written by a proper writer and well acted, might work. Or something OTT with special effects and cataclysmic events coming along every ten minutes or so, I could see that working as well. But this film was neither. It lasted about five years, the first year of which was tedious, the next year a little better (Ray Winstone inventing - would you believe - a primitive gun), then a year of special effects (yep, when it started to rain) and finally 3 years of more tedium. At the very least, someone should have been sea-sick.

Russell Crowe might be a great actor (the point is moot) but he can't do mad, in the same way that Tilda Swinton (now there is someone who can act) can't do comedy. Sorry, I digress.

Well, that's it. Go and see it if you like, but frankly, save your money.

Zero points.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

0

StahlApr 7, 2014

How could anyone possibly think the special effects were any good? The Watchers were almost funny in their ridiculousness - they definitely took you out of the movie every time they appeared on screen. Aronofsky bragged that none of theHow could anyone possibly think the special effects were any good? The Watchers were almost funny in their ridiculousness - they definitely took you out of the movie every time they appeared on screen. Aronofsky bragged that none of the animals were real - NO JOKE. They were anything but. Watch 'The Life of Pi' for some incredible CGI animals (I still can't believe the Lion was not real). Muddles story, poor execution and sometimes painful to sit through. I could care less if this adheres to the biblical story - just do it well.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

3

MetaCrypticApr 7, 2014

They ignored every little bit pof personality the original bible lore had and turned into an action oriented bull **** This movie could of gone much better had they stuck with the spiritual interpretation of the original.

But then againThey ignored every little bit pof personality the original bible lore had and turned into an action oriented bull **** This movie could of gone much better had they stuck with the spiritual interpretation of the original.

But then again what could you expect knowing this was directed by an Atheist, those who take anything about the bible LITTERALY, when it should actualy be interpreted. But at least he tried.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

8

CanucksApr 7, 2014

I got dragged along to this film and went in thinking it would be too religious for me... But I was surprised, It was a nice twist on a great biblical story... Special effects were well done and this is one movie that I am sure is Far betterI got dragged along to this film and went in thinking it would be too religious for me... But I was surprised, It was a nice twist on a great biblical story... Special effects were well done and this is one movie that I am sure is Far better to watch at the cinema rather than at home... All is all I enjoyed it and the 2 and a half hours went by quickly.… Expand

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

4

ViolettApr 7, 2014

No, I didnt like this. First of all this movie is rough misinterpretation of Bible story, for me, religious man, this is bad. I am not any sort of religious fanatic, I am not going to curse this movie, no. I just didnt enjoy the fact of suchNo, I didnt like this. First of all this movie is rough misinterpretation of Bible story, for me, religious man, this is bad. I am not any sort of religious fanatic, I am not going to curse this movie, no. I just didnt enjoy the fact of such Bible rework. Second, actors are kinda overplaying, especially Conelly and Watson. I know Conelly is a great drama actress, and I like her, but this movie should be about Noah, God and The Sundering, not about Noahs wife nerves and arguing. I watch movies to enjoy the plot, decorations or actors play, but spitting tears and saliva at the face of Noah is quite disgusting. Scenes of pregnancy and birth accompanying by Watson screams is even more disgusting. This movie is dirty - this is the right word - dirty and dark. This is not a drama, not a disaster film, I dont know what is it. Aronofski is a great director, but I believe he failed this time.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

10

l4zy610Apr 6, 2014

Amazing visuals, great acting and a really good story. I really didn't know Emma Watson was that good. I enjoyed the movie very much. Not a penny was wasted.

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

8

OuendanerApr 6, 2014

Although it was inconsistent to have something stuck home, taking the viewer the first time sleepy
of film, then has some radical and unexpected changes to the public, featuring a very powerful climax in
which two quite distinct poles areAlthough it was inconsistent to have something stuck home, taking the viewer the first time sleepy
of film, then has some radical and unexpected changes to the public, featuring a very powerful climax in
which two quite distinct poles are discussed, highlighting the antagonist whose ideals were more sober than his action, is that the moment you realize that the title of this antagonist character is earned by being
against the actor and not as the villain in the movie. Finally the outcome fairly well developed
leaves the viewer as bad as it offsets the start of the movie. About the offended people by
film, the fictional fantasy in which the work is more notable for what it considered offensive is not possible. I traduce this from spanish to english on googletranslate

Español
A pesar de lo inconsistente que fue, al tener un inicio algo trabado, teniendo al espectador somnoliento la primera hora
de pelicula, luego tiene algunos cambios radicales e inesperados para el publico, presentando un climax muy potente en
el cual se debaten dos polos muy marcados, haciendo resaltar al antagonista cuyos ideales eran mas sobrios que su
accionar, es aquel el momento en que uno se da cuenta que este personaje se gana el titulo de antagonista por estar
en contra del protagonista y no por ser el villano en la pelicula. Finalmente el desenlace bastante bien elaborado
dejan al espectador conforme ya que compensa el mal arranque de la pelicula. Acerca de la gente ofendida por la
pelicula, la fantasia en la obra es mas que notable por lo que no es posible considerarla ofensiva.… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

0

officerhansenApr 6, 2014

There is a first for everything. Yesterday, on my 31st birthday something happened around me that I have never before experienced. I am not talking about the dinner with the love of my life eating the love of my life, Pizza, leading up to theThere is a first for everything. Yesterday, on my 31st birthday something happened around me that I have never before experienced. I am not talking about the dinner with the love of my life eating the love of my life, Pizza, leading up to the movie. I am not talking about the romantic walk towards each other that ended up in hot steamy kiss up against the glass of shop on the street outside the theatre. I walked to the street corner after I purchased the tickets for the movie and as I turned my head to my left I saw her, it was like the first time I had seen this woman but I felt the energy from a block away, I knew she had me in her sites. I knew she was determined to run into me, I felt compelled to meet her half way and run into her just as determined. Our bodies collided like two galaxies in outer space. There is no collision more graceful than that of two galaxies. So large, so great, so passionate that when they collide the planets that make them up never hit. The two beautiful forces of our universe dance like they are in love until they settle into one new galaxy. That was us right there on the sidewalk under the streetlight at night just like in the movies. However this is not the first I am speaking of. The night was young and the movie had yet begun. After having a few laughs at the tavern next door, we walked through the crystal clear glass that lead to our horror. With a big bag of mouthwatering popcorn in one hand and a genetically engineered fructose corn syrup soup in the other. Sitting in the third row, we were traditionally set for our feature presentation starring, Rustle Crow. At first I am moved, pulled in by the selflessness of Noah and his sons. I thought I was proud to be in this crowd, so glad to see a movie that did not promote bad. However it was at this moment that I witnessed something I had never seen before! Something that totally made sense but yet none at all. I needed to take a picture so people would believe me when I share it on social media with the world to save them from making the same mistake we made that beautiful night. To save them from not only having to watch this movie but from possibly facing the same fate of those around me. To my right it was happening. Directly in front of me it was happening, I turned to look behind me and it was happening all around me. I thought at first, its ok, this is a dream, pinch yourself you fool this can’t happen in real life. It hurt, I was not sleeping, not yet, but if I subjected myself to this anymore I could end up doing just that. Doing what all the sinners around me were doing, engaging in what seemed to be either a mass suicide attempt or possibly a slumber party. People were sleeping not only around me but on each other. The young couple to my right fell asleep leaning against each other. The mother who sat in front of me separating her husband and son started snoring. People all around were speechless as we were subjected to the glorious acting out of a phycodic script obviously written or directed by a white male animal lover who probably has small ligaments. A white man that feels inferior to woman and children. Scared that one day people will wake up and realize that this is not a white man’s world. But a natural habitat for humanity. Scared that people will realize there is no one greater than our creator who is genderless and colorless. This movie features 100% people with a white ethnic background and a man who tells his sons that he does not believe there should be kings for there is no man greater than our creator. But after the king and his men are killed by the water from above Noah becomes a King, President, Dictator, Ruler, CEO whatever you want to call it, its all the same. He decided who lives and who dies. He decides who will go and who will stay regardless of the thoughts of the people who make up his pride. A man who believes that woman are to serve man and bear children. Only if he wants them to. He cares not what other humans say, he is only interested in carrying out the decisions that take place in his own mind and claims that they are orders from above, from the almighty who works threw no one other than himself. He believes that humans are not animals, that its only ok for lions to eat other animals, for if a human eats another animal he is eating the forbidden fruit. He supports the idea that killing mass quantities of humans is justified for the humans are all sinners. My take on this movie is that if you believe you are getting orders from god, you should act them out regardless of the thoughts of others around you even if it involves killing babies that are one day old or making mankind extinct. That murdering most the world population if not all is not only justified but glorious in the evolution of our Garden of Eden which we of the modern world refer to as planet earth, the third rock from the sun.… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

7

Iamlush7Apr 6, 2014

Aronofsky puts an exciting sci-fi spin on a renowned biblical story that really does give it a new lease of life.

It may be inaccurate at times but I defy anyone to dislike this film simply for that. The performances were strong, theAronofsky puts an exciting sci-fi spin on a renowned biblical story that really does give it a new lease of life.

It may be inaccurate at times but I defy anyone to dislike this film simply for that. The performances were strong, the cinematography epic and the director's style shines through subtly.

My whole cinema enjoyed it and some may well of learnt a thing or two.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

10

ThatDR_VApr 6, 2014

Biblical accuracy - pretty accurate, most "inaccuracies" are just filling in blanks. Reviews that say otherwise need to reread their Bible.
The Creator - using the word "God" would be an anachronism. 8(?) generations from Adam and Eve makesBiblical accuracy - pretty accurate, most "inaccuracies" are just filling in blanks. Reviews that say otherwise need to reread their Bible.
The Creator - using the word "God" would be an anachronism. 8(?) generations from Adam and Eve makes sense to still call God "The Creator."
Stone Giants - a bit of Artistic license here - Genesis 6:4 "The Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them: the same were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown."
Environmentalist agenda - reread Genesis 9:4-5 and Genesis 2. God tells man that they can eat plants but not meat until after the flood and even then man will have to account for it.

As a Movie - Great Dynamic characters, Stunning Visuals, Story that means something. Pretty Much everything you can look for in a movie.… Expand

11 of 23 users found this helpful1112

All this user's reviews

7

judahjsnApr 5, 2014

I love Aronofsky. And the more out he is, the more I love him - The Fountain is my favorite of his films. Anything he makes is required viewing in my opinion and I'm glad I saw Noah, frustrating as it was. It's a thought-provoking movie but II love Aronofsky. And the more out he is, the more I love him - The Fountain is my favorite of his films. Anything he makes is required viewing in my opinion and I'm glad I saw Noah, frustrating as it was. It's a thought-provoking movie but I didn't enjoy any of it. The CGI is cartoonish, the score is wall to wall and suffocating, and the general emotional and visual palette is so relentlessly bleak that it feels like one long minor chord. There are numerous moments of genius and true beauty though as well as great performances. I thought Jennifer Connolly did a lot with the little material she was given and Ray Winstone always brings it. I have trouble connecting with Russell Crowe - he's always this monolithic block of human force, but I never see a person - but he gets the job done and carries all of his films.

I think the abuse of CGI was the biggest failing of the film for me. We're talking about water, wooden structures, people and animals. All naturally-occuring things that could have been filmed for real (the Watchers are another story, there's no getting around CGI'ing rock-Transformers). I think the film would have been more powerful with more low-tech effects done in-camera the way they were in The Fountain, and in this week's Captain America Winter Soldier.

I just think the balance was off. For a film to connect with me it has to approximate real life. Seriousness must be balanced with levity. Clouds must give way to sunshine. Noise gives way to silence. Even Saving Private Ryan had some laughs. I think Aronofsky has a tendency to become a hellfire and brimstone kind of preacher and forget to be a storyteller. It's why I never liked Requiem For a Dream. I like that with Noah and The Fountain he's trying to tell primal human stories that transcend any particular historical setting but I also think Noah bludgeons.… Expand

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

9

docarmobrunoApr 5, 2014

Simply amazing! I get stuck all the course of the film, to the dip of the plot and to the grandiose special effects. Great acting, great elements of emotion, drama, angst, and very few cliches and predictable elements. People who becameSimply amazing! I get stuck all the course of the film, to the dip of the plot and to the grandiose special effects. Great acting, great elements of emotion, drama, angst, and very few cliches and predictable elements. People who became negative this movie, most certainly mixed their religion and their beliefs. I as an atheist, I attended an amazing story extremely well executed visually and sonically.… Expand

15 of 31 users found this helpful1516

All this user's reviews

1

bartmirApr 5, 2014

What a waste of money! I am not a very religious person but I found it disrespectful to the Bible and religion. In two words lame and stupid. They missed the opportunity of making a great film.

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

5

drewstroyerApr 5, 2014

It would be hard to predict who might like this show, and who might not.

If you had never heard the story of Noah, and had no religious interest in the film, you might think it was a decent, not great, epic movie. Some things were over theIt would be hard to predict who might like this show, and who might not.

If you had never heard the story of Noah, and had no religious interest in the film, you might think it was a decent, not great, epic movie. Some things were over the top, but some things were really pretty cool. I enjoyed it for what it was.

If you expect this to be a religious exposition of the Bible in detail, with a Christian message underneath, don't even think about seeing it. The creators of this movie took the simple basics of the Noah story and then turned it into a modern fantasy tale.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

C-MoneyApr 4, 2014

What a waste of good potential. Strike 1: it's a perversion of a Biblical story. Strike 2: it drags into an overly-dramatic, slogging mess after the midpoint. It could have been so much more. Save your money.

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

4

Alan250Apr 4, 2014

I wasn't expecting any accuracy to the bible story but this was frustating. So many drugs man. Don't watch. Unless you like special effects and CGI, but if so keep away from the plot

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

10

KirbyehApr 4, 2014

Dont listen to the RELIGIOUS NUT CASES reviewing them they sleep with there dear old bibles every night and feed their bibles with their mouths. When they walk out of the house its like they are seeing hell so its expected for them to giveDont listen to the RELIGIOUS NUT CASES reviewing them they sleep with there dear old bibles every night and feed their bibles with their mouths. When they walk out of the house its like they are seeing hell so its expected for them to give everything one. Only at night time with there bibles they are truly happy. They are sub human and not to be listened to. There 1 actually means a 7 or higher. but as I said before all they can rate anything is a 1 other then there precious bibles… Expand

13 of 26 users found this helpful1313

All this user's reviews

10

jlbrown100Apr 4, 2014

I don't understand the negative reviews. Cinematography is superior, acting is excellent, story line was made suspenseful. (Pretty good for a biblical movie.) All together - very entertaining.

13 of 26 users found this helpful1313

All this user's reviews

10

CristApr 4, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Encantadora y atrapante pelicula para ver en familia,los actores una joya la trama es increiblemente atrapante mucha emocion y nada triste, como me gunstan ami… Expand

11 of 24 users found this helpful1113

All this user's reviews

2

OTPOBEHApr 4, 2014

The film is showing Noah as some kind of psychopathic servant of a deaf evil deity . It is like "Lord of the Rings", but with bad CGI and with psychopaths.

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

8

NicolasCageApr 3, 2014

A solid film that drags on a little bit in its final half but the special effects and its message is very powerful and Russel Crowe's performance is top notch.

2 of 15 users found this helpful213

All this user's reviews

8

RedOwlReviewsApr 3, 2014

As far as biblical epics go, they don’t get much better than Noah. And to a great extent, Noah isn’t even a biblical epic. It’s more of a vividly realized action period piece – only the period is an apocalyptic deluge centuries after theAs far as biblical epics go, they don’t get much better than Noah. And to a great extent, Noah isn’t even a biblical epic. It’s more of a vividly realized action period piece – only the period is an apocalyptic deluge centuries after the birth of mankind. The biblical elements pertain solely to the inner mechanisms of the characters; the audience is only supposed to come in knowing the basics of Abrahamic religion (Adam and Eve, original sin, God is ruler, Noah built an ark). Basically, Noah isn’t The Passion of the Christ, and Russell Crowe isn’t Mel Gibson. Director Darren Aronofsky uses the biblical story as an inspiration, a rough sketch to redraw with creative license and paint over with poetic dialogue, breathtaking imagery and near-flawless acting. With Noah, Aronofsky reaffirms he is an artist, and not simply a storyteller (as if Black Swan didn’t already do that).
The film starts off a little clumsily, taking time before finding its footing. The introduction is slow, unexciting and heavily narrative-driven. However, at the twenty-something minute mark, Aronofsky introduces his variation of a “fallen angel” – ramshackle Transformer-esque gargantuan rock beings that live in quarantined wastelands. This moment is where your head will perk up, because Aronofsky isn’t afraid to remodel the biblical story to accommodate to modern trends in visual culture. He isn’t creating a documentary, after all. He is directing his idea of a contemporary creative visualization of Noah’s journey. The movie then progresses with more force in each consecutive scene, employing Aronofsky’s fine eye for set pieces and choreographed movements. Each plot point is charged with incontrovertible energy and metaphorically significant poetry (as one would imagine the biblical story was to readers in 400 B.C.), induced by raw acting, transcendent writing and CGI used correctly. All this continues until the halfway point of the film, where all the animals and Noah’s family have boarded the ark (and defeated the invading makeshift peasantry army, but I don’t recall that being in the Bible).
The second half of the film experiences a dramatic shift in tone from action-based to character-centered. Aronofsky takes this chance to explore the darker, antihero aspects of the biblically impeccable Noah, questioning the intrinsic nature of sin and free will and what it truly means to be “free of sin.” Manipulating terrifying familial conflicts, Aronofsky constructs a surprisingly clever story. I can’t help but notice, though, that too often, he will follow up ambiguous dialogue and plot points with inspirational imagery, such as rapid-fire montages of time progression outside the ark and glistening horizons atop endless oceans. However, stronger scenes with powerful acting and head-on conflict adequately wipe away the more ambiguous scenes from memory.
The casting for Noah is perfect, with the entire cast delivering commanding roles. Although Russell Crowe cements a new image of the biblical Noah for our generation and sweetheart Emma Watson effectively jerks a few tears from the audience, the true majesty comes from Jennifer Connelly, who provides the most raw and grounded performance in the entire film. She smiles while suffering and uses subtle expressions and longing movements to establish a painfully real character. If you have just over two hours to spare this weekend, make a point to catch this year’s first true blockbuster. Aronofsky makes the most of his time, never letting his guard down and rarely slipping in momentum. Unless you are a staunchly conservative theist, you will surely enjoy Noah.

FINAL SCORE: 80 (great)… Expand

2 of 14 users found this helpful212

All this user's reviews

9

orderApr 3, 2014

Personally I enjoyed this movie as a fiction film, though if you are looking for an accurate biblical tale it might not satisfy your expectations. I feel the people giving this bad reviews are only doing so because it does not fit "their"Personally I enjoyed this movie as a fiction film, though if you are looking for an accurate biblical tale it might not satisfy your expectations. I feel the people giving this bad reviews are only doing so because it does not fit "their" view of the biblical story.

This is Russel Crows best film in many years, his acting was solid considering some of his previous poor performances. The movie has an obvious agenda that man should appreciate the earth and not destroy it and makes you think about becoming a vegetarian. I really enjoyed the movie and it's worth watching as a "movie" but again don't expect it to be a film based on a tale from the bible, enjoy it for what it is and try to judge it as that.

People will love this, or hate it. Most that hate it will be people upset it was not an accurate biblical adaptation, but then again no one knows what is true/false or exaggerated in the bible so it's hard to judge a fiction movie which is based on a bible story. Judge it as a movie, nothing more.… Expand

13 of 28 users found this helpful1315

All this user's reviews

1

KuseApr 2, 2014

Very to little of this movie is biblical, Golems, Magic and Noah is a raging madman? Leave it to an atheist to try and discredit God by calling it a "Creator".

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

9

ScrawnyPunkApr 2, 2014

I felt this movie was astounding – flawed, but astounding. It is what it wants to be and it does not bow to convention. It is both a block buster and a psychological character study. It is both Biblical and inventive. It is both digitalI felt this movie was astounding – flawed, but astounding. It is what it wants to be and it does not bow to convention. It is both a block buster and a psychological character study. It is both Biblical and inventive. It is both digital and auteur. It is also, obviously, very thought-provoking…which is more than can be said for most big movies these days.

What this movie is – a VERY loose interpretation of the Biblical flood story, with tiny packets of the Book of Enoch and the Qu’ran to flesh out the back story. As with most Aronofsky films, it is primarily a psychological study. What exactly does faith mean when it requires a man to let ALL OF HUMANITY DIE? If that man is sane, how does he react? Cope? Adjust to change? What are the depths of his despair if he feels that his familial compassion equate to failing his God? These are the questions posed in Noah, and it does a fairly (but not exceedingly) good job working through them.

What this movie is not – a Bible study or lesson in Theology. However, biblical accuracy is not one of my criteria for movie critiques. It would be akin to stating “Dante’s Inferno is HORRIBLE…there is no evidence for nine circles whatsoever in any religious text!” Obviously, such a criticism would miss the point. My suggestion is that if you are looking for Biblical consistency you should probably go see Son of God instead.

There are some slight flaws (e.g. the strength with which Mickey Rourke carries The Wrestler is in a different league than Russel Crowe’s performance; diversions into implied veganism and earth-first philosophy detract from the larger character study, etc.) but the good outweighs the bad. I choose to believe this movie is a step in the evolution of movies as both big and thought-provoking, and I quite liked it.… Expand

15 of 32 users found this helpful1517

All this user's reviews

10

Brute1995Apr 2, 2014

The biblical story of Noah is fake too, so I don't see why Christians are getting so worked up about this. It's a nice movie. Christians are just mad that the director didn't misinterpret Noah's story to their liking.

Would watch again 10/10

12 of 26 users found this helpful1214

All this user's reviews

0

VukBrankovicApr 2, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It is just an awful movie. There is no nicer way of saying that. Forgetting the religious objections completely, the movie is long, boring, and not in the least entertaining. When you add to that the fact that it seems engineered to piss Christians and Jews off, you end up wondering what the hell they were thinking.… Expand

7 of 14 users found this helpful77

All this user's reviews

2

MenrothApr 1, 2014

Just bad, like they wanted to do a new take on Noah and halfway decided to play it safe and give you the classic story with bad acting and a lot of special effects. Wanted my money back 30 minutes in, even though I honestly tried to like it.

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

7

HeadcrusherApr 1, 2014

This film was inspired by two different sources IMO - the Bible and the Lord of the Rings movies, put them together and you get something like this.

Still, one of the ways I estimate a films effectiveness is by the way the audienceThis film was inspired by two different sources IMO - the Bible and the Lord of the Rings movies, put them together and you get something like this.

Still, one of the ways I estimate a films effectiveness is by the way the audience responds - it was a talkative late night crowd but once the film got going, they were totally silent and riveted to the screen. When the film was over there was both uncomfortable laughter and applause. It definitely gave them something to think about and I bet a bunch of those people went home and cracked open their bibles to read the story, some maybe for the first time.

By the way Noah was not a Christian - or a Jew - at that point in the biblical narrative God hadn't even given the law yet so there is no reason to think Noah is a Christian film in the first place. The actual biblical story is about 3 pages in the bible which if depicted word for word might have made it to 20 or 30 minutes, unless you had 90 minutes of feeding and cleaning the animals.… Expand

2 of 13 users found this helpful211

All this user's reviews

8

therynoApr 1, 2014

I would like to point out that this is not supposed to be the biblical account of Noah's Ark. Honestly, I think that this is why I enjoyed Noah. The acting was good, the special effects were great, and I enjoyed the plot. This is a must watch.

2 of 16 users found this helpful214

All this user's reviews

1

achomefrontApr 1, 2014

The only reason this is evening scoring a one is simply for the actors.
I could present this deep philosophical review, however wish to spare all the painful reading and get to the point. This is NOT a depiction of Noah as in the Bible.The only reason this is evening scoring a one is simply for the actors.
I could present this deep philosophical review, however wish to spare all the painful reading and get to the point. This is NOT a depiction of Noah as in the Bible. There are ridiculous rock monsters called watchers, the desire of Noah to end all humanity and his denial of entry to anyone in the Ark. All FALSE. I am not against anyone wishing to place their own spin on any story, however warn your audience this is not a biblical movie but a fantastical version. I walked in believing our family was going to enjoy the retelling of an amazing biblical story only to leave early and have wasted 52.00 dollars.

In conclusion, if you wish to see a biblical version, pass.
If you just wish to be slightly entertained, go.… Expand

10 of 26 users found this helpful1016

All this user's reviews

7

TVJerryApr 1, 2014

Russell Crowe plays the titular character in this arty version of the tale. Anyone looking for a flood epic will be disappointed. About 10 minutes is devoted to the actual deluge and it's pretty cool. Much of the rest of the time is all aboutRussell Crowe plays the titular character in this arty version of the tale. Anyone looking for a flood epic will be disappointed. About 10 minutes is devoted to the actual deluge and it's pretty cool. Much of the rest of the time is all about drama and family conflict. Darren Aronofsky ("Black Swan") is known for his singular, dark vision and it's manifest in this imaginative adaptation (the evolution of Earth and the montage of violence are standout moments). Like so many epics these days, this one could lose about 30 minutes and be a more compelling film. As it stands, it's a moderately involving drama that puts a pretty unique spin on the Bible story.… Expand

3 of 17 users found this helpful314

All this user's reviews

0

Rossi163Mar 31, 2014

I hereby contribute a series of two word mini-reviews of the film, Noah.

unintentionally hilarious

astoundingly ridiculous

dramatic tripe

transparent hollywood-ism

offensively presumptuous

8 of 18 users found this helpful810

All this user's reviews

10

alexito660Mar 31, 2014

Incredible movie you gonna love actor sand is din,t like bible whit so much action and adventure, incredible beautiful, and the efectos awesome, al actores awesome but tus el dont amase but the others yes, this movie is dont like bible butIncredible movie you gonna love actor sand is din,t like bible whit so much action and adventure, incredible beautiful, and the efectos awesome, al actores awesome but tus el dont amase but the others yes, this movie is dont like bible but ITS a big movie hit.… Expand

9 of 26 users found this helpful917

All this user's reviews

0

ydoc16Mar 31, 2014

A Horrible perversion of everything the bible teaches, whats worse is it seems to push a vegan/environmentalist/atheistic point of view down the viewers throat. It's not a movie so much as it seems to be propaganda by the director.

9 of 18 users found this helpful99

All this user's reviews

9

theofficeMar 31, 2014

I don't get all the negative reviews and hate. On one end people are mad because of this director's interpretation of the story in the Bible. On the other end people won't like it because it has to do with the Bible. And then you will haveI don't get all the negative reviews and hate. On one end people are mad because of this director's interpretation of the story in the Bible. On the other end people won't like it because it has to do with the Bible. And then you will have people not like for other stupid political reasons not even mentioned. I get it.... for some reason the film is polarizing. This movie is NOT the same as the cartoon movie you saw as a kid (yes people that is also one guy's interpretation). However it does have essentially everything that is in the Bible with some artistic flair which is cool with me. Sure they don't say "God" but everybody knows "The Creator" is "God" so whatever... that does kinda bug me but I won't hate on it too much. In any case I enjoyed the movie. It has good action, a pretty faithful telling of the story, interesting take on the pre-flood world, fantastic acting etc. I think you guys need to see the movie for what it is and not make it more than it sets out to be. It's a really good film.… Expand

19 of 41 users found this helpful1922

All this user's reviews

5

rory_sMar 31, 2014

This movie is interesting. The beginning is very hard to understand, with odd editing choices and a sluggish pace. The middle of the film is pretty good, with some standout fight sequences, but still no story that makes sense. Then the end ofThis movie is interesting. The beginning is very hard to understand, with odd editing choices and a sluggish pace. The middle of the film is pretty good, with some standout fight sequences, but still no story that makes sense. Then the end of the movie drags on in an overly dramatic sequence on the ark. The acting is alright, with Ray Winstone being the standout. But ultimately none of the characters are put to good use. However, some the CGI is very good, the "world-creation" scenes being the standouts. But, in the end, the movie fails.… Expand

1 of 13 users found this helpful112

All this user's reviews

5

RyanbMar 31, 2014

This movie was one I was skeptical about since the first trailer. Yes, it is directed by Darren Aronofsky. And while he has a pretty good track record, I honestly did not love this film. It was intriguing in some standout scenes, and it wasThis movie was one I was skeptical about since the first trailer. Yes, it is directed by Darren Aronofsky. And while he has a pretty good track record, I honestly did not love this film. It was intriguing in some standout scenes, and it was very beautifully shot, but I felt that it wasn't well put together and the editing was a bit "off". The movie was filled with little continuity errors, and overall screw-ups. It didn't have a great start, and then got gradually better, it then got to an incredibly well-shot action scene which definitely upped my review, but, it then got boring and predictable, it went on for far too long and didn't have the intrigue that Aronofsky's other films have clearly shown. So, yes, it's worth renting, but I honestly wouldn't go out of your way to see this film.… Expand

0 of 8 users found this helpful08

All this user's reviews

0

schmoresMar 31, 2014

Confused, baffling, overly violent humourless and contrived, Noah suffers from a complete lack of focus and direction (other than into the belly of a difficultly realised arc) which leaves its actors struggling, its epic set pieces cold andConfused, baffling, overly violent humourless and contrived, Noah suffers from a complete lack of focus and direction (other than into the belly of a difficultly realised arc) which leaves its actors struggling, its epic set pieces cold and its emotional engagement minimal.

Topped with some bizarre outfit choices, a scattering of rock monsters and Ray Winstone typecast as himself you wind up with a quasi sci-fi epic that lacks the cohesive world of Lord of the Rings (surely there was enough source material in the Bible), the gritty post apocalyptic 90s charm of Water World (wheres Dennis Hopper when you need him) and the full on visceral action of Transformers (epic titans falling from the sky sent to protect humanity anyone) all of which it shamelessly apes.

Russel Crowe appearing from the depths of a (very brief) drunken stupor wandering down a beach in a Noah era dinner jacket was really the icing on a 2 1/2 hour struggle.

From the director that brought us the amazing Requiem for a Dream, Black Swan and The Wrestler this is a depressing fall from grace.

Michael Bay all is forgiven.… Expand

12 of 20 users found this helpful128

All this user's reviews

1

tuneintofansMar 31, 2014

first of all they get almost everything wrong. If you are going to do a historic piece, you should at least try to keep the story correct. only the names re the same and there is an arc full of animals and birds, etc. that is where it endsfirst of all they get almost everything wrong. If you are going to do a historic piece, you should at least try to keep the story correct. only the names re the same and there is an arc full of animals and birds, etc. that is where it ends being the story of noah. Cain kills Able and starts an industrial society, according to the narrator, but since when did people in an industrialized society still run around in ragged clothes and animal skins and use clubs and swords? And then fallen angels come down to help mankind and are crusted with volcanic rock as punishment from God. That's so wrong, I'm not even going there. And it just gets worse. Noah is supposedly given the decision to save or destroy all of mankind, by God, and he chooses to destroy all. so this is offensive not only Christians, but to anyone who ever saw a great story come to screen, and it was all screwed up by Hollywood.… Expand

16 of 29 users found this helpful1613

All this user's reviews

5

geoff_hanoMar 31, 2014

Nick Nolte rock monster. Nick Nolte rock monster. Nick Nolte rock monster. Nick Nolte rock monster. Nick Nolte rock monster. Nick Nolte rock monster...

0 of 9 users found this helpful09

All this user's reviews

0

kechmocashMar 31, 2014

Not Biblical except for a very few references. The special effects were pedestrian, at best. We were so disappointed, having looked forward to the movie. We should have walked out when the first words on the screen were, "In the beginning,Not Biblical except for a very few references. The special effects were pedestrian, at best. We were so disappointed, having looked forward to the movie. We should have walked out when the first words on the screen were, "In the beginning, there was.....nothing"! Or perhaps when the rock beasts showed up! Don't waste your time or money!… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

9

SimpleReviewzMar 31, 2014

Before we start, let's make a note about the controversies surrounding the movie. So many people got sensitive because it wasn't their "exact interpretation" of the story. Settle down. Be thankful that someone in HOLLYWOOD actually made aBefore we start, let's make a note about the controversies surrounding the movie. So many people got sensitive because it wasn't their "exact interpretation" of the story. Settle down. Be thankful that someone in HOLLYWOOD actually made a movie about this biblical tale. Now, time to review. Darren Aronosky (hope I spelled that right) is at it again with one of the most destructive and action-packed tales from the Bible. Who better to do it? Noah is a home run in terms of movie making and sits along with Requiem of a Dream and Black Swan in a stalemate. Everybody in the movie does a fantastic job and all feel equal in terms of skill and screen time. While it doesn't have as much action as you'd expect, the drama is still amazing and even sad at times. Speaking of action, what you do get is phenomenal. Giant rock men fighting against regular men with armor and spears, destructive water effects, and my jaw was open so many times during the action. But sadly, I felt there wasn't enough. I'd never want it to be a Michael Bay kind of movie, but if I got 15-30 minutes more of action, I'd be very satisfied. Another flaw I noticed was that it can be a little hard to follow at times. A few times I thought to myself "OK...let me think this over...". While the story can be harsh at times, I appreciated these parts and they make the movie feel like something different. There's so much more to say, but you should already get the gist that you should see this movie. It's worth every penny.… Expand

17 of 36 users found this helpful1719

All this user's reviews