Inferno

Columbia Pictures | Release Date: October 28, 2016

5.6	USER SCORE Mixed or average reviews based on 212 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

juliankennedy23Jan 30, 2017

I have a confession. I liked the Dan Brown books and honestly, I don’t really understand the amount of stick they get. He is no Umberto Eco mind you but he is hardly Stephenie Meyer. The other confession? I have not liked the movieI have a confession. I liked the Dan Brown books and honestly, I don’t really understand the amount of stick they get. He is no Umberto Eco mind you but he is hardly Stephenie Meyer. The other confession? I have not liked the movie adaptations.

The first was one was okay mind you but Angel’s and Demons was the kind of train wreck that really requires Mike and the robots to enjoy.

Hope springs eternally and while director Ron Howard has certainly had some misses recently star Tom Hanks is always a dependable watch. I was expecting a decent movie and got a surprisingly good one. Even more shocking Ron Howard's direction is one of the strengths this time.

First off though let me get this out of the way. The story is pulpy illogical nonsense. The twist in the middle can be seen from space and the twist, in the end, makes absolutely zero sense. (Still better than Angels and Demons Illuminati scavenger hunt, however.)

What works though is the visuals. Ron Howard creates visions of hell that are actually effective and creative. The travelogue element is beautiful and unlike Angels and Demons (God I hated that movie) it is in daylight so one can actually see and enjoy the scenery. (Angels and Demons didn’t have permission to film in the Vatican so a lot of the scenes were at night, in the rain with all the lights turned off to hide this fact.)

As for the cast, Irrfan Khan steals every scene he is in, Tom Hanks is dependable as usual. Sidse Babett Knudsen is dull and has zero chemistry with her costars, Omar Sy almost gives an OJ Simpson Naked gun performance that seems like it should be in a Pink Panther film, and Felicity Jones does that pixie eyes thing so all is forgiven there (No actress could really make her character work so she gets points for looking cute while flailing around.)

Overall a fun film with surprisingly good visuals, some decent performances, and a silly story. Grab some popcorn.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

smiyamotJan 25, 2017

Not as good as the Da Vinci Code, but I didn't read the book so I don't know if it's the movie or the book. Prof. Langdon wakes up in the hospital with a wound to the head and he doesn't remember the last 2 days. It was Langdon'sNot as good as the Da Vinci Code, but I didn't read the book so I don't know if it's the movie or the book. Prof. Langdon wakes up in the hospital with a wound to the head and he doesn't remember the last 2 days. It was Langdon's deciphering of the clues that drove the story line of the "Code" but in this movie he can't remember squat. Not good. If the Da Vinci Code was an "A", this was a C+… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

StanleyKubrickOct 28, 2016

It's not easy to review this film, because what are the standards for a 'good Dan Brown adaptation' ? You can't make gold out of crap. That said, I found this film cinematic, beautifully shot, well cast and it has some good scenes. Does itIt's not easy to review this film, because what are the standards for a 'good Dan Brown adaptation' ? You can't make gold out of crap. That said, I found this film cinematic, beautifully shot, well cast and it has some good scenes. Does it make sense? Not really, but I've seen worse films. I liked the colorful supporting actors, especially Ana Ularu as the ruthless assassin Vayentha. She has nearly no dialogue and very few scenes, but makes a powerful impression. Usually I don't buy the Hollywood actresses in 'tough parts', but she was tough as nails. I would have loved to see more of her. All in all, if you're a Dan Brown nut, you might enjoy this a lot, because it's formula, but otherwise it's more of a rental.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

XiztOct 29, 2016

Very good film! Amazing story and characters but it was very little mysteries. There are an interesting plot coups in Inferno. I can praise the actor role of Tom Hanks. You might enjoy this film.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

Brent_MarchantOct 30, 2016

Pay no attention to those nattering naysayers. This latest installment in the Dan Brown mystery thriller series is a fun, suspenseful afternoon at the show. Admittedly it's not groundbreaking cinema nor especially original (as severalPay no attention to those nattering naysayers. This latest installment in the Dan Brown mystery thriller series is a fun, suspenseful afternoon at the show. Admittedly it's not groundbreaking cinema nor especially original (as several previous James Bond movies have already demonstrated), but its intellectually gonzo attitude, intriguing plot twists and beautiful cinematography of some of the best Europe has to offer make for a rollicking thrill ride against the clock. Don't expect Oscar material here, but don't be disappointed by the sheer entertainment value it effectively serves up.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

MahonerOct 31, 2016

Great movie. Continues the excellent genre of thriller/history lesson that I've come to appreciate in this modernized trilogy. Lost of twists and turn, well acted, very happy with the movie.

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

bfoore90Nov 16, 2016

Inferno was alot better than I expected it to be and I would say it holds up well to the other Dan Brown installments. It breaks no new ground, the plot is a bit dense and it bastardizes the book a bit but Tom Hanks and Felicity Jones didInferno was alot better than I expected it to be and I would say it holds up well to the other Dan Brown installments. It breaks no new ground, the plot is a bit dense and it bastardizes the book a bit but Tom Hanks and Felicity Jones did well as well as some of the other actors. Overall, I liked it alot and if you're a fan of the series then give it a shot and see what you think.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

inimicalNov 4, 2016

If you're a fan of the series, it really is a film worth seeing. That being said, if you're a fan of the books it may leave you cringing at how they butchered a couple of the characters. Essentially, they had to change the ending so that itIf you're a fan of the series, it really is a film worth seeing. That being said, if you're a fan of the books it may leave you cringing at how they butchered a couple of the characters. Essentially, they had to change the ending so that it was less of a think-piece and less drawn out, but unfortunately they ruined one of the main characters in the process and that alone left me uneasy at the end of the film. Not to mention they basically blow through one of the cities so fast it almost feels like it wasn't even really a part of the story, which it absolutely should have been.

Regardless, I think one could certainly enjoy actually seeing some of the many places mentioned in the book during the film, which basically takes place exclusively in beautiful places. Minus the depictions of hell, which feel a bit like a horror film, at times. Still, worth seeing… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

humbledrNov 6, 2016

I was surprised that this opened so poorly. My wife and I are both fans of this series and we thought that it was consistent with the quality of the first two movies. I thought the actress who played Dr. Sienna Brooks was very convincing inI was surprised that this opened so poorly. My wife and I are both fans of this series and we thought that it was consistent with the quality of the first two movies. I thought the actress who played Dr. Sienna Brooks was very convincing in her role. The plot was decent - a little out there but good enough to cause me to think more about it. I would probably prefer the first two over this but would still watch this one again!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

JAX85Jan 14, 2017

I love this movie - good story - best actor tom hanks - best location - excellent genre of thriller/history. angels and demons + the da vinci code + Inferno

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

KenRMay 9, 2023

Dante’s Inferno – An Early Morality Tale Inspired by the Alighieri Classic. Those not understanding the extreme limitations that makers of film spectaculars had to endure in the early 30s won’t understand the raves for this astoundingDante’s Inferno – An Early Morality Tale Inspired by the Alighieri Classic. Those not understanding the extreme limitations that makers of film spectaculars had to endure in the early 30s won’t understand the raves for this astounding production. American-born Harry B. Lachman, who in his early 20s emigrated to Paris and became a much-lauded impressionist painter (awarded the Légion d'Honneur by the French government) When he returned to America he was sought after as a set designer and director. For this picture, he was teamed with talented Hungarian- born cinematographer Rudolf Mate (Dodsworth ’36 - who 12 years later would turn to directing). What these artists do with massive sets and models merged with eye-popping photography is little short of breathtaking. Without the likes of CGI, they had to create and work with giant sets, with high numbers of extras working in dangerous situations, and come out looking as believable as the times would permit. The end result is quite exceptional. Sound was still in its early days so some levels were a challenge. Performances from a young Spencer Tracy and lovely Clair Trevor are very good considering the material they are working with – veteran performer Henry Walthall (of D.W.Grifith fame) supplies fine support as Pop, the owner of the ‘Inferno’ sideshow attraction. Prolific veteran composer (sadly too often uncredited) Reginald Hazeltine Basset (David Copperfield ’35) supplies the vast score and Rita Hayworth dances uncredited. This is one to enjoy for its inventive use of visuals and all the challenges that early filmmakers had to overcome. It’s now a little-known vintage winner that should be seen by all motion picture devotees. It’s the last film produced by the Fox Corporation before the merger with 20th Century and there are nice remastered discs available Note: some content will be seen as politically incorrect nowadays.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews