Read Negative User Reviews for Inferno (2016)

3

MattBrady99Jul 19, 2017

Let me break this down for you in terms of my thoughts:

The best: + Tom Hanks is ace as usual + Some interesting ideas + It's nicely shot The worst: - Hanks hair - Felicity Jones character - It's boring - Bland directing - Horrible writingLet me break this down for you in terms of my thoughts:

The best:
+ Tom Hanks is ace as usual
+ Some interesting ideas
+ It's nicely shot

The worst:
- Hanks hair
- Felicity Jones character
- It's boring
- Bland directing
- Horrible writing
- Who ask for a third one?

Good luck with the next Han Solo movie, Howard.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

JusthinkingOct 30, 2016

Too bad it wasn't in a foreign language, I would not have been aware of how badly the lines were delivered. When you put a mediocre movie in your best theaters showrooms expectation doesn't only make the film more disappointing but also theToo bad it wasn't in a foreign language, I would not have been aware of how badly the lines were delivered. When you put a mediocre movie in your best theaters showrooms expectation doesn't only make the film more disappointing but also the whole movie going experience. This is sad because seeing a good movie in a Cine 1 is worth the extra cost.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

chidimeDec 17, 2016

Giving this a zero for one main reason: They changed the ending from the book. That's pretty cowardly of them. Keeping the correct ending might have saved this movie. In addition, the movie just felt empty, like a train with no passengersGiving this a zero for one main reason: They changed the ending from the book. That's pretty cowardly of them. Keeping the correct ending might have saved this movie. In addition, the movie just felt empty, like a train with no passengers travelling hours from destination to destination, just because it is scheduled to do so, even though the reason for it's movement (passengers) is absent. I kinda feel bad for people who watch the movie without reading the book. They are really missing out on the flesh of the story.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

TheChosenOne7Nov 2, 2016

Don't watch this. It follows the book just fine, apart from the single most important part!!! (the ending). I really enjoy the novels, which to the contrary of several reviews form user and critic; they are masterfully written. You can't justDon't watch this. It follows the book just fine, apart from the single most important part!!! (the ending). I really enjoy the novels, which to the contrary of several reviews form user and critic; they are masterfully written. You can't just take a best seller and then change the single most important aspect of the story.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

2

GreatMartinOct 28, 2016

Though a huge Tom Hanks fan that doesn't mean he always makes good movies. I saw but don't remember the first two films based on the books by Dan Brown and this is the most forgettable of all, that is if you can even remember what the plotThough a huge Tom Hanks fan that doesn't mean he always makes good movies. I saw but don't remember the first two films based on the books by Dan Brown and this is the most forgettable of all, that is if you can even remember what the plot was about though it was again a case of a man wanting to rule the world and the good people who want to stop him.

Tom Hanks, not being a Tom Cruise, doesn't go around fighting 5 people at a time and winning the fight and, in fact, gets beaten up a few times, but, yes, recovers pretty quickly as only movie heroes can. At 60 he isn't running as fast or as much as he use to but the one thing Hanks has is that tremendous likability that always makes him a winner in any movie he is in.

There is a strong supporting cast made up of young, middle aged and old actors doing a professional job but, alas, all for nothing. I am a firm believer of checking your logic at the door when coming to see an action movie but the screen writer David Koepp and director Ron Howard seem to be deyfing you to follow the film. Yes, someone wants to eliminate half the population, as he feels we are overpopulated, releasing a virus and there are a load of red herrings and some people are out to stop the virus from being released.

Three things going for the movie are the soundtrack by Howard Shore, the production design by Peter Wenham and the cinematography by Salvatore Totino in Florence, Venice and Istanbul but that's not enough for a good movie.

If you haven't seen Tom Hanks in "Scully" then skip "inferno" or save your money to see "Moonlight" next week and "Loving" the week after!… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

0

JustAll2Nov 23, 2016

I think this isnt a goodI think this isnt a good movie....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

3

Theone789Dec 19, 2016

I have read all of dan browns books and I have watched all of the movies that were made based on the books and I was so sicken by the changes made in this movie especially toward the end that I will never waiste 20 dollars to see another oneI have read all of dan browns books and I have watched all of the movies that were made based on the books and I was so sicken by the changes made in this movie especially toward the end that I will never waiste 20 dollars to see another one of these movies in the theater. To the actors i do not blame you but I blame the group of people that allowed the movie to deviate the ending away from the book in the hopes that a violent gun fight would sale more tickets compared to a non violent and truthful ending as the book presents.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

thedaywalkerJan 13, 2017

So many useless characters that don't do anything to an already messy plot, with more puzzles needed to be solved, inconsistency with dialogues and story telling, even Tom Hanks couldn't save this movie

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

joshybeanMay 31, 2023

The worst of the three movies and the most insane. This movies story so absurd characters just teleport everywhere and somehow always know where each other are. The dialogue has some atrocious moments that made me almost laugh and the lineThe worst of the three movies and the most insane. This movies story so absurd characters just teleport everywhere and somehow always know where each other are. The dialogue has some atrocious moments that made me almost laugh and the line delivery seemed like the actors remembered “oh **** I am going to be paid a ton for this ill try like 2%”. In my eyes the enjoyable parts of the other films were the ridiculous puzzles that somehow tom hanks knows instantaneously and both of the orignial films are filled with huge exposition dump after huge exposition dump. This movie is not as much like the other two films in that way, there is a lot of explaining, a lot of story telling and puzzle solving stuff but there is much more focus on the story and that hurts it because the story is ass. The characters once again are trash, they have nothing to them except for the ability to BE BLAND AS **** But this movies plot is so ridiculous its just hard to care at all. Inferno has less going for it than both of the other films I would suggest just watching the Da Vinci Code and not going near Angels & Demons nor this film. I also want to say that even though I think the other movies are non stop exposition dumps that is what gives them their identity. The absurdity of langdon knowing EVERYTHING IN EXISTENCE can sometimes be a little enjoyable. So all of the value for me in the first two movies is tom hanks knowing everything and explaining **** to people. dumb/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Jack97Dec 16, 2016

Tom Hanks gives it his all, but he can't save Inferno from being completely unremarkable and very boring...not to mention convoluted and at times ridiculous.