Warner Bros. | Release Date: May 16, 2014
6.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1759 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,105
Mixed:
445
Negative:
209
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
TrilobiteGJun 13, 2015
Despite having one of the best movie scenes of 2014 (Godzilla's kiss of death). Bryan Cranston's character felt too disposable and unnecessarily there (like his face was used for promotion). Some of the action scenes do hit you hard withDespite having one of the best movie scenes of 2014 (Godzilla's kiss of death). Bryan Cranston's character felt too disposable and unnecessarily there (like his face was used for promotion). Some of the action scenes do hit you hard with awesomeness, but there is too much dawdling to be a very good monster movie. This just about gets a 6/10 in my book, barely. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
InlikeflynnJun 8, 2014
This movie... really lacks something...

I am not complaining about the lack of Godzilla in the movie or anything like that... but general choices that makes me scratch my head and ask "why?". Why do we need an American family living in
This movie... really lacks something...

I am not complaining about the lack of Godzilla in the movie or anything like that... but general choices that makes me scratch my head and ask "why?". Why do we need an American family living in Japan? Did the movie makers though that we wouldn't sympathize with the characters unless they where generic American stereotypes? Why a forced death scene? Oh yeah... because we need to have one of our characters being obsessed about his wife's death trying to find this monster, of course... Why treat the movie like it's "Transformers"? and like that I have many more "why's"...

Is not a BAD movie ok?... I know the directer is very good at working on special effects and it shows, the monster design is great and... yeah... I think I get why some people were calling this Godzilla "fat".

The original Godzilla movie was not just a monster movie, it was a tragedy and it shows in the way that movie portraits the situation and that is what I expected from this one... maybe I expected too much from it...
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
unluckydiceJul 21, 2014
4 things that work in this movie are Bran Cranston, Godzilla's Roar, Ken Watanabes voice and the last 20 to 30 minutes of the movie, the rest is just filled with characters we don't care about and a lifeless protagonist.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
MonkinsaneApr 29, 2021
The director and scriptwriter were absolute morons. A 2 hr Godzila movie where Godzilla gets about 10 mins of screentime. They cut away from the first encounter between godzilla and the other montster to show a kid watching it happen on TV.The director and scriptwriter were absolute morons. A 2 hr Godzila movie where Godzilla gets about 10 mins of screentime. They cut away from the first encounter between godzilla and the other montster to show a kid watching it happen on TV. Whomever thought this plot was a good idea needs his head examined. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
gracjanskiApr 8, 2020
Good movie with focus on the story and background information in the beginning and great action scenes in the middle and end of the movie. But there were some logical problems in the 2nd part of the movie and also it was very military in the end.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TheDarkKnight22Sep 8, 2014
This movie is probably the best action movie of 2014. It stays to the original story but adds onto it. My main complaint is that i didn't care about most of the characters.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
DHChrisApr 1, 2021
Godzilla 2014 makes up for the sin that was the 1998 "adaptation", but on its own merits isn't a much better film. Perhaps to be expected from a first outing, G14 only gingerly dips its toes into the water and plays everything thoroughly,Godzilla 2014 makes up for the sin that was the 1998 "adaptation", but on its own merits isn't a much better film. Perhaps to be expected from a first outing, G14 only gingerly dips its toes into the water and plays everything thoroughly, almost laughably safe. Little of the series' Japanese and sci-fi/fantasy roots are allowed to show, replaced instead with all the typical tropes and trappings of a typical Hollywood blockbuster. A common complaint is that the titular kaiju doesn't show up enough, but in the movie's defense this is not true- Godzilla has no less screentime than in the average Japanese feature and as a character is treated with greater fanfare and respect than literally anything else in the film. The real problem is that the human protagonist (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) is painfully ill-equipped to carry this story. His character is wooden and boring at best, showing almost no emotion whatsoever, and his supposedly "heroic" actions endanger the lives of his loved ones and brothers in arms so often it's hard to think of him as anything but delusional. Compounding the problem is that the film's handling of the monsters seems just as confused as the hero: the new MUTO beasts are portrayed as dangerous but not evil, acting more like misplaced animals than villains, and are even given some tender moments to demonstrate their emotional range and capacity for love... yet in the end Godzilla and the human hero inexplicably treat them with excessive, gory malice, as if the audience were meant to hate them all along and cheer at their demise. Regardless of what you feel towards them, none of the three monster characters are given much chance to leave an impression visually. The film seems outright hesitant to show them for any longer than a few seconds at a time, frequently cutting away to random civilians or Aaron Taylor-Johnson's character just as the action starts to pick up. When they do get the screen they're usually shrouded in thick smoke and darkness, probably why so many movie-goers felt they hardly saw Godzilla despite the number of scenes he was in. The end result is a bleak, generic, and surprisingly boring film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
oDjentoJan 4, 2015
This film built up brilliantly for seeing Godzilla. The visual effects are brilliantly and it's far more along the linea of the source material. Acting is pretty decent for the most part, not outstanding though. The pacing was mainly good butThis film built up brilliantly for seeing Godzilla. The visual effects are brilliantly and it's far more along the linea of the source material. Acting is pretty decent for the most part, not outstanding though. The pacing was mainly good but drifted off for a bit in the middle with the kid and the train. The director did a good job of the film and look forward to his second outing with Godzilla. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
xolveJun 8, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Godzilla: A brief review
Well, you Could go see Godzilla. OR... and this is just a suggestion.
Go home.
Turn the lights off.
Watch the discovery channel.
Burn some paper so there's lots of smoke in the air.
And listen to dubstep.
Honestly, you'll get a lot more out of that than you will out of the ear-ache-inducing, shrill, and what-felt-like-decades-long exhaustive study into american psychology or "why john everyman doesn't care about anything and neither should you" that is this epic.
Honestly, the best parts of this film are right at the start with Bryan Cranston lending some emotional weight to why we should give a damn about tremors. After he dies, the slack is picked up by his son, the aforementioned everysoldier who doesn't care. In the end, I ended up agreeing with him.
I would've been happy with a monster flick - I also would've been happy with an emotional action flick.
I wasn't happy with the only useful actor being killed in the first 30 minutes and the rest of the film showing mostly standard 'disaster movie' tropes such as:
adults yelling "run" then not running
soldiers shooting guns at things that quite obviously can't be touched by guns
children looking placid in the face of terror
a scientist explaining the plotline
a girlfriend who you don't give a **** about reunited with the main character that you don't give a **** about
bass drones so constant you'll be wondering if there's a subway tunnel under the theatre

Don't be fooled - this is amateur dreck pumped up with a massive budget. Hang out until the next pacific rim, or even transformers, god forbid.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
zombiechanOct 20, 2014
This film does a great job at capturing the original Godzilla movies. If you are a hardcore godzilla fan, you will love this movie, no doubt. The actors are great, the graphics are great, this is the movie that Godzilla **** deserves.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TheCartoon77Jul 21, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is exactly as I thought it would be. A more realistic look of the most famous movie monster therefore distancing itself from Godzilla's much earlier films. If your expecting Bryan Cranston as some sort of lead role then turn back now because he's not in it for that long. Its a shame really because the trailer portrayed him very well. I can't help thinking he was only in this as a selling point because he was in Breaking Bad. Instead they make us sympathise with a dull and unrelatable marine soldier. This brings the film down further because he's terrible in this. Honestly the most blatant and obvious example of a bad main character. The most interesting character (next to Bryan Cranston) is Godzilla himself. At the end of the film, he's treated as some sort of hero for defeating the enemy MUTO's. But here's the thing in every film he's portrayed in Godzilla only serves himself and nothing else. I only thought that Godzilla defeated the MUTO's because he wanted to reclaim his territory which is cool but the film ultimately wants to express Godzilla as a saviour of the people instead of an uncaring and unfeeling atrocitie of humankind. Overall Godzilla is a good watch if not a little dull in parts. But if the perfectly executed fight scenes sell it to you then this film could be forgiven for a lot. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CherryxldMar 30, 2015
Godzilla es una película con efectos visuales atronadores y que, al fin al cabo, resulta ser un film fuerte e interesante.

Esta película se puede decir que es un remake astuto, donde podemos ver al impresionante e implacable monstruo de
Godzilla es una película con efectos visuales atronadores y que, al fin al cabo, resulta ser un film fuerte e interesante.

Esta película se puede decir que es un remake astuto, donde podemos ver al impresionante e implacable monstruo de Godzilla (que además la forma en que lo presentan en este largometraje fué una estrategia bastante inteligente por parte del director) que sin dudas es el absoluto protagonista de este film abarcando desafiantes puntos de esta historia en donde a pesar que tenemos que esperar bastante tiempo (que a veces resulta empalagoso) para ver a esta criatura., el resultado final es satisfactorio.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
chwMay 25, 2015
The movie didn't focus on Godzilla entirely. If you want a lot of Godzilla, go see the terrible Roland Emmerich traffic collision. If you want a good movie with decent (to say the least) acting that features a good-looking Godzilla, watch this.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
supermann234Dec 23, 2014
This movie features a lot of action and a good storyline. The only problems with the movie are that Godzilla was featured too little times in the movie and it has little use of sound effects. However, this is overall a good film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
undefeatedGaulJun 8, 2021
Biggest criticism: not enough Godzilla.
My Rating: 5.1 out of 10 or 51% fresh.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
IMAX500Oct 31, 2014
Good Special Effects, OK Sound Mixing, Good Storyline. This monster is killer to you if you watch this movie. Fast-Paced Time and Action Will make your time less. Watch this movie and you be pretty amazed at this movie. Replay Value: High
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Meth-dudeAug 8, 2015
Great cast, awesomely realistic visuals and special effects and a movie packed with action, Godzilla had everything to make a great movie and fortunately, it worked.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
elderjlinMay 24, 2014
I did not like the design of this Godzilla he looked like a overweight toed. Not enough Godzilla in action and scenes were too dark. Disappointing could have been much better.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
PrettyRaveKatJun 8, 2014
The beginning was entertaining, but somewhere near the middle, I found myself wondering when the movie would end. My main question, as I have not seen the older Godzilla movies, was "Why is Godzilla fighting the male thing when both of themThe beginning was entertaining, but somewhere near the middle, I found myself wondering when the movie would end. My main question, as I have not seen the older Godzilla movies, was "Why is Godzilla fighting the male thing when both of them are 'dinosaur's'?" If you are ready to sit down and waste your time for 2 hours, go ahead and do so. If not, I suggest you give yourself a high-five. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
43in2014Jul 11, 2015
Before watching this film: I was aware of Godzilla and had seen some parts of the Japanese live action films and some American cartoons. I did not finish watching the 90's Godzilla film on TV - it was dull.

Premise: Godzilla appears from
Before watching this film: I was aware of Godzilla and had seen some parts of the Japanese live action films and some American cartoons. I did not finish watching the 90's Godzilla film on TV - it was dull.

Premise: Godzilla appears from the deep to fight other monsters and in doing so, cause major damage and many deaths.

(This review is based on watching the film on TV, so my judgement is not fooled by the Dolby 7.1 surround sound or the big screen you would get in a cinema.)

Pros: There isn't any.

Cons:
1) Some reviewers have said that there are too few scenes with Godzilla in them. This is true and it is a major disappointment.

2) Some reviewers have said that having fewer Godzilla scenes is a positive for the film. They are lying to you or they are living in denial. They had wanted to like the film and this has clouded their judgement.

3) This film is unbelievably frustrating because it is as if the director had intentionally kept scenes of Godzilla to a minimal, as if to imitate Spielberg's decision on Jaws. Gareth Edwards hid Godzilla away with smoke, darkness, closing doors, scene change, etc. However, Spielberg was forced to do so due to numerous problems with the shark models. Gareth Edwards had CGI and his decision here just makes me want to hate him.

4) The acting of the main characters were bad! Brian Cranston was unnecessarily desperate, his characters son's and Strathairn just looked bored, and Watanabe was overwhelmed all the time. This is what happens when you get actors to act opposite nothing. The monsters were added in afterwards. The same thing happened in the three Star Wars prequels.

5) The plot was just dumb. It's the same type of nonsense you get when the US encounter aliens or big monsters. Just bomb the enemy to smithereens and if that doesn't work, bring out your nuclear arsenal and bomb them some more.

6) Many of the special effects were wrong. The Golden Gate bridge's deck would have dropped down a few feet when the first major cable was snapped by the exploding missile and the whole middle span would have collapsed when both major cables had snapped. Both of these did not happen and no one bothered to tell the director or the director had not bothered to check this out. Furthermore, Godzilla moving about in the water so close to shore would have caused major tsunamis. Some tsunamis were clearly missing.

7) Why did Godzilla have a grudge against the MUTOs? Such a grudge that it needed to get out of it's hiding place to kill the MUTOs and risk being killed by the US Army?

8) How could any living thing love radiation that much such that it requires radiation for it's eggs? Radiation kills.

Score: 2/5 (no half scores) Don't bother watching this film. Not even on TV. Not even when someone lends you the DVD.

Who would be satisfied with this film? Some teens and some adults.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
HBTBJun 9, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Aside from amazing visual effects and Bryan Cranston's terrific performance, Godzilla makes some very, VERY bad choices. While people are saying that it pays more homage to the 1954 film, I'd say that the design does, but the story and characters don't. When I walked out of the theater I didn't find ANY of the characters except for Cranston and Watanbe's memorable. There is good tension, but very little pay off. It constantly teases you with the monster fights and you see more of Godzilla in the trailers then the actual movie it's self. "But Godzilla was supposed to be like that! Haven't you ever seen the old one?" Yes, I have. And the new one is one of the worst Godzilla movie's I've ever seen. I'd be fine if they didn't tease you with fights and didn't have cardboard characters. Another thing to add, was Godzilla was the good guy. Yes, we have gone from bad ass anti-hero just trying to survive to saving the day good guy. And the dark tone? Well forget that! Because by the end people are screaming praise to him by the end of it and everyone makes it out alright. Oh yeah, You remember Cranston? That amazing actor they put in everything for our marketing and advertising? HAH! You actually thought they'd put him in for the whole movie! No, lets only kill him off! And make his boring son (I actually like Aaron-Taylor Johnson but in this movie, he's as emotionless as a rock) the main character. I also found the Muto very uninspired and expect them to be the main monsters, because Godzilla is just used as an excuse for them not to breed. This movie wasn't a "So bad it's good" movie like it's other 1998 American Remake, At least I had fun with the 98' one, but all this one did was just piss me off. Not recommended. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
azamitusJun 12, 2014
not the best re imagination of a cult monster..not one bit..just a wholesome big screen experience, if that is what you're after, total rubbish ending though.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
inaneswineNov 14, 2017
I understand that this is a film about Godzilla, and the masses buying their tickets want to see cities and landscapes smashed to a million billion bits. In this respect, Godzilla 2014 delivers outright. But there's no reason we shouldn't getI understand that this is a film about Godzilla, and the masses buying their tickets want to see cities and landscapes smashed to a million billion bits. In this respect, Godzilla 2014 delivers outright. But there's no reason we shouldn't get a decent story as well. As soon as we see the eponymous creature, the humanistic side of the film descends into chaos. The characters are one-dimensional, the script is terrible and I can barely remember any dialogue. In addition, I couldn't help but note how intrusive Alexandre Desplat's soundtrack was. Gone is the tense, choral subtlety of the film's trailer and we are instead treated to Hollywood-standard booming orchestral pieces that actually make the monsters less terrifying. But on a positive note, Godzilla himself was absolutely gorgeous, and Edwards bravely waits almost a full hour to unleash him in one of the best unveilings of any cinematic character of all time. It's mad to think how an entirely digital creation can become the emotional centre of a story. And someone definitely deserves some kind of award for the film's sound design. It's just a shame that Edwards loaded the film with walking clichés, while forgetting to give show-stealer Bryan Cranston anything to do. Very disappointing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
jacob4May 25, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was an O.K movie but, it didn't live up to what the trailer promised. It looked like a Heisenberg vs. Godzilla film, but sadly there were let downs. Despite the title being "Godzilla" the bad guy MUTOs make more appearances and do more damage than Godzilla does. Also it looked like Bryan Cranston was going to be a main role character, but sadly he dies a 1/3 through the movie leaving us with Aaron Taylor-Johnson's character taking up the main role. And where was Godzilla this whole movie? When he did appear in some scenes you only got to see his spiky back swimming through the water, shrouded in smoke, his full scale body not seen clearly enough until the very end, and right when a Godzilla fight scene begins it cuts to another scene. Also if Godzilla is suppose to be a good guy, why is the Army shooting at him while the navy teams up and rendezvous with him, wouldn't the Navy like tell the Army that Godzilla is an ally before they bring him to the city? Even though the movie had some down sides it still had positive sides like, awesome special effects and CGI, interesting action, and a brand new Godzilla who may appear to be fat, but hey, least they made his atomic breath look cool and brought back his iconic roar. So unless you didn't like the 1998 version this reboot will make you forget that one even existed. Let's just hope that the planned future sequel will be better. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JJD2014Jun 25, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It really bothers me to write this review. I've been pumped since this movie was announced because I was a Godzilla fan since I was a little kid. This movie just did not do it for me. The movie bothered me because they advertised HEAVILY on Bryan Cranston. Then Bryan dies in like the first 30 minutes of the movie and instead you get a very stale and boring Aaron Taylor Johnson. The human story was one of the most boring human stories in a Godzilla movie. Listen, I'm aware that the original one had a lot of teasing and "tension building" but in the first movie there was a mystery. You know what I mean it was like "Whats Godzilla?" "When is he going to attack?" In this one is was like oh Godzilla is about to fight a Muto *cuts to something else* Me and my brothers started to FREAK OUT. We all know the fight is going on but they don't feel like showing it instead watch Aaron Taylor Johnson and his squad running. Another bad thing is that Godzilla is not really the focus. Not even monster wise the Mutos were more of the focus monster wise. But a thing that completely overshadowed the monster story was the horrible.. stale... boring human story. It featured Bryan Cranston (which was great while it lasted) Aaron Taylor Johnson (come on he could've tried harder) and Ken Watanabe (completely underused). Aaron Taylor Johnson had a terrible performance and showed no emotion even after his father died. Godzilla was one of the most badass looking Godzillas however and I did enjoy the new Muto monsters. The CGI was one of the best CGI's I've ever seen. However this was not the movie that was advertised. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
NeekReviewsOct 28, 2014
I, along with the rest of mankind waited anxiously for the new Godzilla movie to break. After the dreadful 1998 debacle with Matthew Broderick (where’s he been?), Hank Azaria (where’s he been?) & Jean Reno, I’m confident saying the GodzillaI, along with the rest of mankind waited anxiously for the new Godzilla movie to break. After the dreadful 1998 debacle with Matthew Broderick (where’s he been?), Hank Azaria (where’s he been?) & Jean Reno, I’m confident saying the Godzilla freaks were chalking off days on their calendar like a prisoner chalks off his days on his cell wall. With all this anticipation the new movie had to be a sure hit, if not with the industry then with its fans…Well, let’s take the tour.

The movie should have opened with a disclaimer informing everyone who paid their hard earned cash, or stolen cash, depending on your place in society, that the first 50 minutes or so was going to lull you into dream state where you swear you could hear those 2 adorable Asians twins singing “Mothra, Mothra” At any point during the first hour of this movie of the movie I would have loved to have seen Mothra jump on screen and start kicking ass, not Godzilla’s but Gareth Edwards who directed this movie. Listen, I know the diehard Godzilla fans will say “if you look at all the Godzilla movies you’ll notice the Mean Green stomping Machine has minimal screen time in all of them” Really?? So 28 wrongs shouldn't make a right!

I plopped into my nice comfortable recliner, I’m all comfy eating my popcorn, when, what the hell, It’s the guy from Breaking bad! Hey, I have nothing against Bryan Cranston but at about the time he realizes his on screen wife, Juliette Binoche’ ass is soon going to be a bright nuclear red, I was hoping the rage he was feeling was going to make him shave his head and revert back to his Walter White character if for nothing else but to keep the audience’s attention, which I could swear was starting to hum “Mothra, Mothra”.

Alright, enough of the bashing. All I’m trying to say is that studios spend more money promoting their movies than some small countries spend on keeping their people alive! When the movie does end you leave scratching your head wondering if I just saw a ‘monster” movie or the remake of “A Love Story”? However, a “monster” movie with a plot involving characters that fall in love with each other can work & has. Can you say King Kong? Yes, the beginning of that movie also dragged along a bit in the beginning but Peter Jackson was smart enough to use beauty to keep your attention until Kong arrives, both in the female form, Naomi Watts & in scenery, New Zealand. By the time Kong arrives you’re heart starts to pump just as mine did when I saw Godzilla making waves waiting for him to come on shore and start wreaking havoc. But then all I got was Godzilla walking with his back to the viewers! What the what?? Hell, my heart wasn’t pumping anymore, it was barely beating.

Jackson had enough sense to hit you full blast with Kong, taking no prisoners. Had Jackson taken Edwards approach just showing Kong’s ass, we would have been wondering why only his ass & was Kong going to take a sh!t on some of the tribesmen? Here is my thought to the studios that are willing to spend millions on strategy & concept and have no sense on what the public wants. We came to see Godzilla!

Let me put it to you this way. Would Paramount or Universal do a remake of the Godfather using Judd Apatow as their director? Hell no! They would track down Ridley Scott or Martin Scorsese. So why would Warner Brothers sign an unknown director with minimal experience to direct a nostalgic “Monster” movie we all grew up with? Godzilla deserved better! This one should have been a 9 or 10 but ends up with a 6.

- Vigo
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MovieGamerJul 11, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I saw goddzilla about a month ago now and I thought it was an ok film. But the majority of it was military based and that ruined the film for me. The ending was predictable and having a huge fight at the end was also but I loved the characters. It was just too Military based and more for boys (eventhough I am one) Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
OpinionatedGuyOct 8, 2014
I remember watching the previous Hollywood attempt on Godzilla as a kid. I was confused, bored and I had my eyes rolling. It showed that I do not like every blockbuster I have seen as a child. So when I heard that it’s going to be rebootedI remember watching the previous Hollywood attempt on Godzilla as a kid. I was confused, bored and I had my eyes rolling. It showed that I do not like every blockbuster I have seen as a child. So when I heard that it’s going to be rebooted but this time in a much darker tone, I had high hopes and it did not disappoint, barely.

The plot is well-crafted for a monster movie like Godzilla. It’s quite thought-provoking. I thought about how the world is dealing with the aftermath of Godzilla.

The cast performances was okay. Bryan Cranston’s performance is really excellent to watch. I really enjoyed him as an actor and as a person and I really forgot that he is Heisenberg when I was watching his scenes. As for Aaron Taylor Johnson’s performance, I am sure he is a nice guy but during the entire movie, all I could think of his character is that he is played by Aaron Taylor Johnson. So, I am so sad to agree with people saying that he is a terrible actor in this movie.

The character development is actually really good. It made me care enough for the human characters in this movie.

The CGI and visual effects are perfect and realistic. It actually looked like San Francisco is really in ruins. The monster designs of Godzilla and MUTO are really well done that they are very scary to look at.

The direction from Gareth Edwards is also excellent. The cinematography was also really good for a movie like Godzilla.

The dark tone of this movie really paid tribute and respected to Godzilla’s legacy. It seems like Hollywood already forgot about its previous disastrous attempt.

Overall, not the best movie ever but it’s a really good monster movie that I enjoyed watching. I am looking forward to the sequels and it would be interesting how it would take the story from there.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ydnar4Sep 14, 2014
Godzilla is a character that is very difficult to portray on the big screen. This was a movie that was easily a box office success and we all predicted that. This reboot certainly beat the 1998 version of the film but there is still some roomGodzilla is a character that is very difficult to portray on the big screen. This was a movie that was easily a box office success and we all predicted that. This reboot certainly beat the 1998 version of the film but there is still some room for improvement. It is a long wait before we ever even get to get to see Godzilla and it never really seems like he is the focal point of the movie. The action in the last half hour of the movie is what makes the movie worth watching. Godzilla is a movie that should be watched in a theater and not on home video in order to capture the full experience. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ToFewViewsSep 24, 2014
Great as an action movie with cool fighting monsters, accompanied by amazing effects and audio. The story could use a bit more work and felt lacking, but in all honesty I'm here to see mass destruction and that's what you get.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
vikesh2206Nov 10, 2014
While it's human characters barely leave a lasting impact (with the exception of the talented Bryan Cranston), Godzilla compensates with plenty of action and an overall eerie tone not found in other epic monster movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
aguyglobalSep 9, 2014
Many complain about the lack of Godzilla in this film, but you know what? The parts that do have Godzilla in them are great. Bryan Cranston portrayed a very strong character in the form of Joe Brody, despite the rest of the human cast beingMany complain about the lack of Godzilla in this film, but you know what? The parts that do have Godzilla in them are great. Bryan Cranston portrayed a very strong character in the form of Joe Brody, despite the rest of the human cast being somewhat weak. The atmosphere, effects, and action in the film were also pretty satisfying. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
mbigAug 15, 2014
I'll give 'em points for a good try. Like that lady used to say in the tv commercials, where's the beef'??? The producers made trailers showing Brian Cranston as the main figure in this picture. Unfortunately he dies in the middle of theI'll give 'em points for a good try. Like that lady used to say in the tv commercials, where's the beef'??? The producers made trailers showing Brian Cranston as the main figure in this picture. Unfortunately he dies in the middle of the movie. Juliette Binoche a renowned international actress, dies after saying 6 lines of dialogue 10 minutes into the movie. Seems like a waste of good talent. Nothing to say about Godzilla himself however (what little we saw of him). They got that right! Now, please, in the sequel, give us some action? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MasiTronXIIISep 17, 2014
As a massive Godzilla fan, I was a bit of a skeptic going into this movie, but as time went on and the more I learned about it the more excited I became. I was not disappointed, but yet I was a little bit. This movie did Godzilla right. TheAs a massive Godzilla fan, I was a bit of a skeptic going into this movie, but as time went on and the more I learned about it the more excited I became. I was not disappointed, but yet I was a little bit. This movie did Godzilla right. The monster I mean, his character was just what he needed to be. This was very important to me and I was happy to see it, considering how wrongly done the 1998 version was. Overall, the movie isn't really anything special, the cast is a bit lackluster and the acting/script isn't much either. It drags on for a long time and Godzilla is seen few and far. Director Edwards went on and on about this "cinematic foreplay" he would be using and I was surprised how much of it was used. We were TEASED with Godzilla. Showing fights but then not really and stuff like this. I initially was very frustrated by this, but after a second and third watch see what he was going for. The combat in the end is stunning. Absolutely jaw dropping. Technology has truly come far to create the king of monsters and his foes so perfectly. Now I don't speak for everyone, but I would estimate that if you are a godzilla fan like myself, this movie is generally between 7/10 and 10/10 and if you are not, I would say 5/10 to 8/10. It depends on how much you are willing to put up with to get to the monster. Overall, I'm pleased with the reboot. The king is back and next movie needs to be intense. I feel Edwards was afraid to just go all out with this movie and make it a monster bash for fear of harsh criticism, so they really tried to use human feeling in this, that's fine and all, but I would hope at some point we can get to a monster bash movie. I won't complain too much, but with all these visual effects, a destroy all monsters type movie would instantly be one of the greatest movies of all time in my opinion. I will give Godzilla (2014) an 8/10. Good movie, not a great movie, +points because GODZILLA Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RainwholeOct 20, 2014
Gareth Edwards has a very promising future, and his film Godzilla serves as a perfect example of that. Although not a cinematic masterpiece by any means, Godzilla is in fact a monster-filled extravaganza that when the monsters are on screenGareth Edwards has a very promising future, and his film Godzilla serves as a perfect example of that. Although not a cinematic masterpiece by any means, Godzilla is in fact a monster-filled extravaganza that when the monsters are on screen (either Godzilla or the Muto's) is truly excellent. The Kaijus look fantastic and every shot feels like a painting of perfect coloring and composition.

Then, there's the human factor of the movie. Which holds it back from achieving excellent. I refuse to accept this tag-on human stories just because its "big budget Hollywood". That doesn't mean anything at all.

A lot of people complain that Godzilla is not in the movie often enough. That's true, yet there's no shortage of Monster mayhem thanks to the presence of the Mutos. Which are a fantastic addition to the roster of Kaijus in Godzilla's lore.

I honestly can't wait for a sequel to this movie. But as it stands, Pacific Rim is a better Kaiju movie overall, but when Godzilla is good and the monsters are on screen, it beats Pacific Rim. Yet, it's obvious that unlike Pacific Rim, Godzilla was not intended to be a pure Kaiju movie. It was intended to be part that and mostly a disaster movie. Which is not bad if the human aspect of the story was better...
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DartboardMar 11, 2015
As a film, it's very flawed. As a monster destroy-it-all, it might be a little lacking. I forgive most of this for the very fact it respects the Spielberg-ian essence of filmmaking, which turns out to be a pretty decent fit for Godzilla. TheAs a film, it's very flawed. As a monster destroy-it-all, it might be a little lacking. I forgive most of this for the very fact it respects the Spielberg-ian essence of filmmaking, which turns out to be a pretty decent fit for Godzilla. The reveal of the big green lizard was one of the most exciting and intense experiences I've had in the cinema in a long time. The VFX are simply jaw-dropping, and at least it TRIES to maintain a human element. I respect the very bold pacing choices, many of which are never seen in tentpoles these days. If you like Godzilla, you owe it to yourself to at least give it a chance. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SythusRATINGSOct 23, 2014
The world’s most revered monster is reborn in a powerful story of human courage and reconciliation in the face of titanic forces of nature, when the awe-inspiring Godzilla rises to restore balance as humanity stands defenseless.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
skorpyoOct 17, 2014
The movie was alright. I am sure I would have enjoyed it more if There's more light. I know its suppose to be dark and gloomy. But hey, you can't see anything!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ApolscFeb 1, 2015
This Godzilla is a love letter to the original. You have a powerful monster that doesnt care about the humans and their weapons dont even tickle him. I dont know if "realistic" is the word, but the CGI and the design of Godzilla is beautiful.This Godzilla is a love letter to the original. You have a powerful monster that doesnt care about the humans and their weapons dont even tickle him. I dont know if "realistic" is the word, but the CGI and the design of Godzilla is beautiful. If we had only Ken Watanabe in Tokio with a son or something, without the US cast, this movie would be excellent, but maybe that is too much to ask for. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Red-Opposom-098Dec 4, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Boring movie, felt like 3 and a half hours instead of 2 hours. The part where Byran Cranston dies is so predictable it's just stupid, Godzilla barely was in the movie, don't know if it was like this in other movie but if it is that's just bad. I really didn't like it Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TheFilmFanaticNov 2, 2014
Godzilla is the monster of all monsters and seemingly the hardest remake to ever try to accomplish, evident in the 1998 release. However Gareth Edwards is able to do this in the current release of this iconic monster's return to the bigGodzilla is the monster of all monsters and seemingly the hardest remake to ever try to accomplish, evident in the 1998 release. However Gareth Edwards is able to do this in the current release of this iconic monster's return to the big screen. First of all Godzilla looks stunning in this film, showing how he really is the King of Monsters. The CGI is impeccable, making this gargantuan creature as realistic as possible. The use of Godzilla as an anti-hero is a fresh twist on the story, making this story much more interesting. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Movi3R3vi3werMar 23, 2015
While lacking in some needed story and a few wooden performances (although Bryan Cranston kills it), Godzilla is one of my favorite movies of the year. Gareth Edwards pays great respect to the Godzilla legacy, keeping to the original designWhile lacking in some needed story and a few wooden performances (although Bryan Cranston kills it), Godzilla is one of my favorite movies of the year. Gareth Edwards pays great respect to the Godzilla legacy, keeping to the original design and even though the monster isn't given much screen time (but is masterfully build up) whenever Godzilla got on screen, it was some of the greatest movie scenes I've ever witnessed in a film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Le__XenomorphJan 23, 2015
A very strong and confident film. Gareth Edwards took a bold step by only showing Godzilla for 30% of the film. But when he does show up, it is spectacular and the effects are stunning. 8/10 (Great)
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
WheelzFourReelzJan 4, 2015
I would've liked to have seen more Godzilla in the second act, but overall, Godzilla is a very exciting, intense, and fun monster movie that's definitely worth watching.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ceej101Jan 17, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Sad to say this is my first time finally being able to see wht all the hype was about after being accosted by the many trailers and promos for my favorite movie monster whom i've had the distinct and sometimes not so distinct pleasure of seeing on both the large and small screen as a kid. Loved the various makeovers down through the years as 'zilla went from the ass kicking, one lizard demolition crew to being downright cute in the 70s and back to being a sleep deprived threat to humanity ( lemme tell ya...i'd be pissed too if someone awakened me from a sound sleep) and in the late 90s found a niche as Doritos spokeslizard. Yes, i have the nerve to refer to tht debacle of a movie tht in '98 tht should have remained on the cutting room floor. The only thing tht saved this movie from a much lower rating were the special effects (hence the rating of ''7'') along with the presence of Bryan Cranston, Ken Watanabe, Juliette Binoche and let us not forget the true star of this movie Godzilla who has of course been working out (check the well toned abs and beautiful white teeth and those ''guns''...niiiiiice! ). After having read the various reviews for this movie, i've noticed the many laments of ''not enough screen time or the murky darkness. At first glance, i too was wondering why the film was so dark and then i saw the final fight between Godzilla and the the mutos and then it hit me: if the fight was staged in broad daylight it would have a devastating effect visually...a waste of perfectly good special effects and who needs tht? I watch to be amazed...to feel the same thrill and awe I did when i first saw the original Gojira. I wanted to see his signature move and have it blow me away and it did just tht! His roar was incredible (awesome sound effects) ..the mutos could've used a little more ....originality in their design but were overall menacing enough to pass muster and quite possibly scare the candy corn out of u if u happen to be below the age of twelve. Because of the length of the movie i'm not entirely certain tht children would be patient enough to wait for the King of the Monsters appearance but once he does show it is well worth the wait. Ok. Anyone taking bets on whether there's a sequel in the works? Hopefully, the makers will improve upon the this treasured franchise enough to do it justice. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
UltimateBubJul 22, 2015
I have one big complain, and I'll jut put it out here: the film is not interactive. For the most part, I feel none of the human characters really mattered, because the whole monster plot was going on independently from the people. Eventually,I have one big complain, and I'll jut put it out here: the film is not interactive. For the most part, I feel none of the human characters really mattered, because the whole monster plot was going on independently from the people. Eventually, the monsters would have surfaced and Godzilla would have killed them whether the characters did or did not whatever, and that's it, eventually. Now, I may be completely wrong I know, but that's the feeling I get and I'm just a casual viewer. The movie doesn't make me feel like I'm part of the experience, and that's bad. And some characters are just there for show. Even though I'm bashing this movie right now, I will say that I liked it. I feel it was original and well done, despite the aforementioned problem. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
emlugo123Feb 27, 2015
They teased Godzilla so much in this movie which was really frustrating but when you do see Godzilla its a sight to behold. The main character was meh, I didn't really dislike him or like him.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
russiangamerMar 13, 2017
Фильму больше подходит название "Жуки-убийцы"
Годзиллы тут от силы 15 минут, при чём половину этого времени мы видим его полностью, а другую половину мы видим его хвост, тень, ноги, снимок, спину. Да и финальная битва как-то, нууу... не
Фильму больше подходит название "Жуки-убийцы"
Годзиллы тут от силы 15 минут, при чём половину этого времени мы видим его полностью, а другую половину мы видим его хвост, тень, ноги, снимок, спину. Да и финальная битва как-то, нууу... не очень.
Диалоги никакие, ни плохие, ни хорошие. А вот эффекты и атмосфера порадовали.
Итог: Не худший фильм... просто фильм, по-скольку годзилла тут где-то на пятых ролях.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
darkbloodshed13Apr 28, 2015
I've been waiting for years for a new Godzilla movie to come out. Especially considering how bad the last one was and I've got to say this movie does not disappoint. It has good characters that actually feel real, which is unique consideringI've been waiting for years for a new Godzilla movie to come out. Especially considering how bad the last one was and I've got to say this movie does not disappoint. It has good characters that actually feel real, which is unique considering that most monster movie characters feel bland. However since there is more time donated to the humans in the film the monster aren't seen as much as I would like. Which leads to my biggest problem with the film, the monster fights are cut short. Most of the time in the movie we only see the beginning and end of the fight meaning we don't get to enjoy what made Godzilla infamous. Also they changed Godzilla's origin's, from an experiment gone wrong to a giant creature who lived in prehistoric times while feeding of radiation to survive, yet Godzilla lives at the bottom of the ocean so how does it get radiation? In conclusion if your a long time fan of Godzilla you might want to steer clear, but if you just some one looking for good movie then sit down and give this movie a watch. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Epik_NinnjaMay 23, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A new Godzilla movie with the awesome CGI you've come to expect from modern blockbusters? And it's got Bryan Cranston in it? Awesome! The story is well told at first but it just isn't as interesting after Cranston's character dies. It's not that he shouldn't have died, it's that the wfie worrying over her husband and all just wasn't as good as, well, the plot before. The fight scenes are epic, though (even though there are few). Godzilla owns those [expletive]s! I'll admit I was just a tad disappointed, but it's still around a 7.5/10 in my opinion and it's definitely worht seeing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
PeterAlexanderJun 10, 2015
The 2014 rendition of Godzilla returns the great lizard to cinema screens in awesome fashion. Through the use of strong character development and a gripping story, the film builds tension up until the epic reveal of Godzilla. What ensues is aThe 2014 rendition of Godzilla returns the great lizard to cinema screens in awesome fashion. Through the use of strong character development and a gripping story, the film builds tension up until the epic reveal of Godzilla. What ensues is a treat to witness on the big screen, as not only does Godzilla itself deliver, but the narrative arc that surrounds it provides the audience with a tense and exciting story. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Scout523Jun 20, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Looking back at this movie, the characters actually all fall flat. Some are just there cuz plot, whereas the ones that serve importance just sort of stand around planning how to kill Godzilla and the other two monsters. Elizabeth Olsen is only there to make you care about whether or not Aaron Taylor-Johnson's character survives to the end, which is something that Bryan Cranston's character did not succeed in doing, even though he should've. In my opinion, he was the best character in the movie, as he predicted that the monsters would eventually overpower the humans, but, when they did, he ended up getting killed. What? Why? I wish his character would've lasted longer just to see what he could've done. In the final battle scene, Godzilla does all the work in killing the two monsters, whereas the other soldiers all get themselves killed, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson runs off and tries to fight the monsters himself, but realizes how stupid he is being and cowers in fear, waiting for help to arrive. The only reason he survived is because his father was already dead and he had a wife and young son, however, if he didn't have that, and his character was just a miserable loser, the movie could've gotten away with killing him off. The special effects in this movie were absolutely phenomenal, and whoever edited this film should've won Best Editing at the Oscars. So, the characters just fall flat completely, but the special effects and monster scenes make up for that loss with their sheer scale and awesomeness. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Th3GreenHorne7Jul 4, 2015
My hopes to have Godzilla's glory replenished, America had paid everyone back for the mistake of 1998 with the first attempt to but Godzilla in America's theaters, which only made them successful in it's box office, but not it's approval byMy hopes to have Godzilla's glory replenished, America had paid everyone back for the mistake of 1998 with the first attempt to but Godzilla in America's theaters, which only made them successful in it's box office, but not it's approval by the critics. 16 years later and here is their apology with a movie that lives up to it's name by making Godzilla look the way he did in the movies made the original creators of the ginormous beast. Director Gareth Edwards did the smart thing by building up the story piece by piece which helped the audience stay at a very normal following pace. The Actors and Actresses were very well by making their characters likable and very easy to understand who they actually are. This Godzilla was an even better at box office and it was praised more the critics. The only problem I had was that Godzilla had only 20 minutes of screen time throughout all 123 minutes of the film's running time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
ZebunkerDec 20, 2015
Remember those old 50's monster movies from the drive-in. The ones that tacked on love stories to get women to the drive-ins. The big payoff came at the very end. Moments from the credits. Imagine that same formula but you hardly see theRemember those old 50's monster movies from the drive-in. The ones that tacked on love stories to get women to the drive-ins. The big payoff came at the very end. Moments from the credits. Imagine that same formula but you hardly see the monsters or it cuts away to forced family drama when all you want to see is a monster destroy a city. What if the director did this 3 times in the movie. Welcome to Godzilla. Take any of the movies that have the world Godzilla or monster in them and they will be 100x better than this. Even the dous equis guy would agree with me! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CineAutoctonoDec 5, 2015
For the edition of Roland Emmerich it is very bad , but everything has changed with the release of Gareth Edwards if I exceeded expectations , although the first and made ​​in Japan wins, the Godzilla of Edwards if he had more action andFor the edition of Roland Emmerich it is very bad , but everything has changed with the release of Gareth Edwards if I exceeded expectations , although the first and made ​​in Japan wins, the Godzilla of Edwards if he had more action and excitement Dinosaur against giant radioactive pterodactyl. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
ToThePointJul 31, 2015
A dreary look at one military mans experience following Godzilla and others. This is terribly slow and uneventful. Just when momentum is building the camera cuts away to the poorly acted family drama sequences. Lackluster plot with no smarts.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
DanielwWhiteNov 27, 2015
This movie is really not that great. It is the typical Godzilla movie with good graphics and animated scenes but not a great story or conclusion of the story.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
payment21Dec 19, 2015
I think this is a good blockbuster godzilla film . It packs a good story and has decent cgi . The only thing i didn't like about this film is the human story as we really wanna know more about godzilla.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
SrPepeJul 8, 2018
Godzilla es una película bastante mala con actuaciones aún peor, muy olvidable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
shag00Apr 23, 2022
I realise this is a movie for the pre pubescent set but it really stretches credulity even so. What does this monster, roughly the size of a 20 story building do for the rest of the time it is not fighting other monsters, yeah, the ones thatI realise this is a movie for the pre pubescent set but it really stretches credulity even so. What does this monster, roughly the size of a 20 story building do for the rest of the time it is not fighting other monsters, yeah, the ones that eat radioactive **** My ten year old was excited over the movie but I was anything but. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Antgiog1202May 1, 2016
I hate the fact that people are complaining that Godzilla wasn't what they hoped for; that it isn't what they expected coming into the theater. As a fan of Godzilla, I thought this was a satisfying film and a CGI masterpiece. Gareth EdwardsI hate the fact that people are complaining that Godzilla wasn't what they hoped for; that it isn't what they expected coming into the theater. As a fan of Godzilla, I thought this was a satisfying film and a CGI masterpiece. Gareth Edwards demonstrated that he has potential in Hollywood -- hopefully Rogue One is great as well. The performances were great by Ken Watanabe, David Strathairn, Elizabeth Olsen, and definately Bryan Cranston. I wasn't a big fan of Aaron Taylor-Johnson's character -- though it wasn't a huge problem. I was disappointed that it was snubbed for "best achievement in visual effects" from the Academy Awards as it simply was beautiful to watch.

Rating : 9/10

A+ = 10
A = 9
A- = 8
B+ = 7
B = 6
B- = 5
C+ = 4
C = 3
C- = 2.5
D+ = 2
D = 1.5
D- = 1
F = 0
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JPSpinoRex65Jun 4, 2016
This film is amazing, but it's hated for the wrong reason. People complain about Godzilla's lack of screen time. Well, he got 10 minutes of screen time in the original, which everyone praised.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
rmsc12May 3, 2016
Godzilla is what modern blockbusters needed, suspense and thrill. Despite having a distinct lack of the titular character, the character buildup and story meshed with the underlying tone of the film. The CGI is masterful and used incredibly.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
HTGamerMar 1, 2019
The newest Godzilla film is a modern take on the long running film series. This movie focuses more on the people that get caught in a battle between giant monsters and the ensuing destruction. The giant monsters are hidden from view for mostThe newest Godzilla film is a modern take on the long running film series. This movie focuses more on the people that get caught in a battle between giant monsters and the ensuing destruction. The giant monsters are hidden from view for most of the film's duration, in an effort to build up suspense. Seeing Godzilla emerge from the water and scream for the first time is awesome. My favorite scene is the soldiers parachuting through clouds while Godzilla fights the MUTOs (what a horrible codename), it's an astounding vista. Human characters and their stories are OK, but it's lame to think they can affect the battle, and the whole Monarch arc story is great in theory but badly executed. The plot is pretty straight forward, as in "Godzilla comes to kill the MUTOs and then takes his leave", but at least this movie stays faithful to the original japanese movies. It's far better than Roland Emmerich's Godzilla film from 1998. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
COOLQUINN17Jul 13, 2016
Godzilla is my all time favorite monster and i remember renting this movie on Xbox. It was good but unfortunately it does have some problems. Godzilla is only in the film for about 10 minutes, that's right, 10 MINUTES. Shouldn't it focus onGodzilla is my all time favorite monster and i remember renting this movie on Xbox. It was good but unfortunately it does have some problems. Godzilla is only in the film for about 10 minutes, that's right, 10 MINUTES. Shouldn't it focus on Godzilla more since it's his movie? Another thing is that, when your really excited for the action, it switches to a new scene. that was kinda stupid of them to do that. I thought that there was a lack of action and there should of been some more action. Okay, i'm gonna get to the good stuff cause there are great things about the movie. One is Godzilla. They got the design right and it looks like the classic Godzilla rather than that bad design of Godzilla from the 1998 film of the same name. two, the acting was great, they know what's happening. Three is the fight scene between Godzilla and another monster, that was pretty cool. Godzilla can be boring at times but wait til the action comes, you'll have a bit of fun! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
reviewfrom19842Sep 3, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. a good movie. It is weird that the best charter dies in the first 20 minutes and that Godzilla is in the movie for 8 minutes. But I did when to see way was going to happen. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
caledo1801Mar 6, 2017
This would have been a great Godzilla movie. Godzilla's new appearance is very nice, despite being made of CGI, it's very well made. But the BIG problem with this movie is that they try to focus too much on boring human characters with noThis would have been a great Godzilla movie. Godzilla's new appearance is very nice, despite being made of CGI, it's very well made. But the BIG problem with this movie is that they try to focus too much on boring human characters with no development that no one cares about. The movie is 2 hours long and Godzilla only appears for 8 minutes, they even cut off most of the fighting scenes just to show the human characters. What is the reason of making a Godzilla movie without it's prime essence that are the fighting scenes??
This is the third wrost Godzilla movie, only losing to the american 1998 Godzilla and Godzilla's Revenge (1969)
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
alejandro970Mar 13, 2021
Unlike the painful version of 1998, this one is attached to the essence of the monster created by Japanese cinema in the distant 50's. The action sequences work as they should as well as the performances that look plausible. Should we lookUnlike the painful version of 1998, this one is attached to the essence of the monster created by Japanese cinema in the distant 50's. The action sequences work as they should as well as the performances that look plausible. Should we look forward to the big showdown against King Kong? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Brandon3685Nov 8, 2016
Ok movie...................................................................................................................................................
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
BroyaxSep 14, 2017
Fort bien réalisé et très spectaculaire quand il le veut, ce Godzilla nouveau profite à fond de ses effets spéciaux mais se perd malheureusement en incohérences diverses et variées qu'on ne compte plus... On ne demande certainement pas unFort bien réalisé et très spectaculaire quand il le veut, ce Godzilla nouveau profite à fond de ses effets spéciaux mais se perd malheureusement en incohérences diverses et variées qu'on ne compte plus... On ne demande certainement pas un scénario amoureusement fignolé, bien léché et roulé sous les aisselles mais quelque chose qui ne nous fasse pas lever les yeux au ciel régulièrement...

Fait aggravant, ce Godzilla se perd trop souvent dans une guimauve ridicule qui lui nuit énormément et n'exploite pas correctement le rôle de Bryan Cranston, trop rapidement escamoté ; même Ken Watanabe fait davantage de la figuration qu'autre chose. Par contre, le blaireau Aaron Taylor-Johnson (les Kick-Ass de mon cul), on le voit du début à la fin ! on voit beaucoup trop également cette tronche de cheval (Sally Hawkins) qui nous file le bourdon.

C'est vraiment dommage, car malgré ses délires (monstrueux) le film fonctionne étonnamment bien par moments... mais par moments seulement avant de re-sombrer dans le gnangnan et le ridicule.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SonicHD7May 31, 2017
Ford Brody (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), a Navy bomb expert, has just reunited with his family in San Francisco when he is forced to go to Japan to help his estranged father, Joe (Bryan Cranston). Soon, both men are swept up in an escalating crisisFord Brody (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), a Navy bomb expert, has just reunited with his family in San Francisco when he is forced to go to Japan to help his estranged father, Joe (Bryan Cranston). Soon, both men are swept up in an escalating crisis when Godzilla, King of the Monsters, arises from the sea to combat malevolent adversaries that threaten the survival of humanity. The creatures leave colossal destruction in their wake, as they make their way toward their final battleground: San Francisco. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
rubsomebacononiJun 6, 2017
As far as enjoyable experiences, this movie was far and away the best movie I have watched to date. As a long time Godzilla fan, nostalgia and the pure awesome that was Godzilla fueled my excitement constantly. The way they shot it, holdingAs far as enjoyable experiences, this movie was far and away the best movie I have watched to date. As a long time Godzilla fan, nostalgia and the pure awesome that was Godzilla fueled my excitement constantly. The way they shot it, holding back until the end, was genius. But leading up to the action were beautiful shots of the Tokyo skyline, for example. The cinematography was stellar, and the acting was fantastic by Bryan Cranston (as per usual) and the other characters weren't terrible. I watched this movie several times before it got even close to old. The better resolution, the better for viewing experience. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Bugger217Sep 11, 2017
America's second attempt at rebooting Godzilla is much more successful than the first. This time, we have Legendary Pictures producing, with Gareth Edwards behind the camera. This is Edwards' second film, having only done a micro-budgetedAmerica's second attempt at rebooting Godzilla is much more successful than the first. This time, we have Legendary Pictures producing, with Gareth Edwards behind the camera. This is Edwards' second film, having only done a micro-budgeted sci-fi flick beforehand. The first act is great. It has an intense atmosphere and a fantastic central performance from Bryan Cranston. It expertly builds tension, culminating in a sequence that reveals the film's monsters. Problem is, it sags a bit in the middle.

Even after the reveal, Edwards shies away from showing any significant monster action, and the focus shifts from Cranston to Aaron Taylor-Johnson, who isn't nearly as interesting. Thankfully, the final act pays off in a big way, delivering a truly jaw-dropping monster brawl. At the end of the day, I think the strengths of the first and third acts, along with the technical prowess, make this an overall engrossing experience. I just hope future installments focus more on Godzilla himself.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
skeletoroneOct 1, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Godzilla is a by-the-numbers monster movie even a great actor like Bryan Cranston couldn't save. All characters without any exception are bland and boring. It was hard to keep my attention on the screen. The only thing I liked about the movie is the fact that Godzilla is the good guy. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
amheretojudgeJun 1, 2019
It is the titled character's performance that you are looking forward to, although the techniques are bit like Kong's.

Godzilla Edwards packs a lunch full of power bars. Productive, nutritious and delicious is his methods and excited, keen
It is the titled character's performance that you are looking forward to, although the techniques are bit like Kong's.

Godzilla

Edwards packs a lunch full of power bars. Productive, nutritious and delicious is his methods and excited, keen and thrilled are our experience. The director, Gareth Edwards wraps this humongous gift for the comic book lovers and film goers of this genre, with a subtle hip and happening color, that makes this all look convincing. For a brief period, but surely believable. Unfortunately, one would think, that the first act of the film that drives us into the chaotic world through humanely emotional characters creates depth, one is wrong. What carves this piece of cake into an edible and healthier one, is Edwards's perception of these worlds. He respects both, mythological events and the modernized materialistic world.

There are too many military references and too many fables of some old myth. Finding that very grey area, the film is a commercial film but of good quality, the kind that we don't see around, nowadays. And when I say his eyes are sharp, I mean it cuts-through-glass, sharp. All the cameras installed to encounter this outrageous battle is from a definite perspective. In a sense, that each shot is like it is taken from some person, someone's perspective, that helps connect with the viewers easily.

In fact, all the animated, alienated sequences are often shot with a frame between us and them. Like a car window or a glass window of a building or goggles or binoculars. These tiny aspects grounds the film despite of its bizarre plot points. The performance is nothing outstanding, it pretty much is, finding yourself running from something you don't understand or fear or scream for, but what hurts the most, is that the reunions that never catches us. Just like the reason of Sally Hawkins being in one of these films, Godzilla is another meaningless addition to this franchise that is showcased to present the same old story with favorite fanboy moments.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
FilipeNetoMar 2, 2020
A new life for Godzilla, after years of being mistreated in the cinema.

I confess that I was never a fan of Godzilla because it always seemed unrealistic to me. The amount of bad movies with the city-destroying monster doesn't help either.
A new life for Godzilla, after years of being mistreated in the cinema.

I confess that I was never a fan of Godzilla because it always seemed unrealistic to me. The amount of bad movies with the city-destroying monster doesn't help either. So, it is no wonder that I had little expectations for this film and decided not to see it in the cinema but at home, when it was on TV.

I felt, right from the start, that the film is concerned with creating a logical story to sustain the monster. The nuclear theme is there, but now it was not created by human bombs, it existed for thousands of years, drawing power from atomic radiation, like a chargeable battery. Even so, I did not feel completely convinced, given that radiation kills and, here, human beings seem at ease with a gigantic creature that certainly emanates more radiation than fifty thousand reactors. There are more times when everything sounds false and the story reveals weaknesses, but it is better not to take these issues further if we want to give the film a chance.

The script is simple: it all starts with a tragic nuclear accident in Japan and Joe Brody's search for what really happened. His search causes him and his son, now an American military man, to stumble upon a hidden truth: that there are colossal creatures in the world, older than Humanity and mostly asleep, who can wake up and endanger our lifestyle. They are monitored by a secret international organization called Monarch, and one of its leaders, Ishiro Serizawa, places hopes on the strongest and most powerful of them - the Gojira lizard - to control all the rest. The rest of the film is a trail of destruction, with humans screaming, soldiers firing, things on fire and colossal creatures in titanic battles.

The film features a cast full of famous stars but it is not the type of film we see for the interpretive quality of the actors nor do we have the opportunity to truly care for the characters. Moreover, most of the actors have little time on the scene and little to do. This is the case of Bryan Cranston, Elizabeth Olsen and Juliette Binoche. Aaron Taylor-Johnson is weak to lead the film but works reasonably as an action figure. Ken Watanabe is the most striking actor in the entire film, functioning as a kind of "Master Yoda" who knows more than everyone else and always has a cliche of wisdom up his sleeve. Watanabe always knew how to stay above the rest of the cast and give us a good job.

Technically, the film is grandiose and justifies the millions in the budget. Bet on creating a threatening environment, with a lot happening at night or in cloudy scenarios, where we don't see everything. There are cities devastated to the ground, a lot of noise everywhere, dust and animalistic deafening roars. The sound and visual effects are to be congratulated, as well as the entire CGI and computing department. Well-made sets, good props, good sound mixing and editing work are also very evident. The soundtrack, responsibility of Alexandre Desplat, is competent but not impressive or epic, as it could be.

Of all the films I've seen involving Godzilla, this is certainly the best. But it is the best because the others were too bad or too weak to compete with a film that has more money, more sound actors and better production values. It is a film that could be better, but it is good enough to be worth it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JoseAngel47Feb 22, 2018
This is great movie. It has great visuals, great sound editing, great characters. The bar for a good american Godzilla adaptation was set pretty low by the 1998 film but this surpassed that. It takes a similar approach to Spielberg's Jaws byThis is great movie. It has great visuals, great sound editing, great characters. The bar for a good american Godzilla adaptation was set pretty low by the 1998 film but this surpassed that. It takes a similar approach to Spielberg's Jaws by keeping the monster absent for most of the movie in order to build anticipation for The reveal of Godzilla. (Which In My Opinion this tacit works) So I strongly recommend this film Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Caldan58Apr 6, 2019
9.3/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SerchvazJul 2, 2019
This is a good Godzilla movie, but not a masterpiece Godzilla film, it has a good history with the human characters, but in the whole movie Godzilla appears a few moments, yeah, Godzilla should not be in the whole movie, but the human historyThis is a good Godzilla movie, but not a masterpiece Godzilla film, it has a good history with the human characters, but in the whole movie Godzilla appears a few moments, yeah, Godzilla should not be in the whole movie, but the human history showed is awful, they couldve made a better movie with the human characters related to the Godzilla history. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
GodzillaAvengerFeb 26, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As a huge fan of Godzilla, I was really hoping for a movie that could capture that magic from the older movies. This one does that towards the end of the movie, but not so much before. The main issue I have with this movie is that Godzilla is not in it that much. They show him from time to time but it's not full scenes of Godzilla doing his thing. With that said, the battle scene at the end of the movie is so fantastic, and possibly one of the best fights of any monster movie. The performances in this movie were pretty good all around, Bryan Cranston did a great job with his character for the beginning of the film. I would say that it does leave much to be desired, but for me, it was a fun time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ChrisRyderMar 8, 2019
Godzilla is a great movie in my opinion, but it is not without flaws. It does a great job making the monsters feel real and threatening. I mostly liked the characters, but they could have been down a little bit better. I did like how theGodzilla is a great movie in my opinion, but it is not without flaws. It does a great job making the monsters feel real and threatening. I mostly liked the characters, but they could have been down a little bit better. I did like how the committed to a slow burn approach, but there was a couple of times I think they should have shown more of the monsters engaging in battle. All in all a great film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Ikereviews1Aug 24, 2019
This movie is very suspenseful. It builds up the confrontation between Godzilla and mutos very well. The plot was actually pretty good. This movie is very great movie. But this did lack Godzilla despite it being called godzilla
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ProVConReviewsMay 28, 2019
Godzilla 2014 (5/28/19)

Pros Taking a more symbolic disaster-flick approach to the title rather than the giant monster all-out smackdown as some of its predecessors had done; Godzilla 2014 shines the best when it comes to showing the
Godzilla 2014 (5/28/19)

Pros
Taking a more symbolic disaster-flick approach to the title rather than the giant monster all-out smackdown as some of its predecessors had done; Godzilla 2014 shines the best when it comes to showing the aftermath of nature’s wrath on mankind and using imagery from tragic events known to viewers at the time of release to show a message of nature’s power over us. It has genuinely great cinematic moments that leave me in awe and a soundtrack that leaves a powerful impression as these creatures wreck havoc in unique ways. When the creatures are on the screen all attention is properly directed towards them, as the effects used to portray their size, and to give them a feeling of being part of the natural world, still works today as it is truly cutting edge with what they pulled off. The sound design as well demands to be played in surround sound as the film uses each roar to build the tone and to set the scene as even the creatures themselves prove to show some genuine symbolism that leaves the viewer to think a bit more than they thought to. And while the total screen time for all creatures totals to around twenty minutes, their devastation is known through the beautifully shot destruction. Regardless the movie does have genuine shortcomings that take away a lot of what the effort was made towards and stains the movie with genuine disinterest throughout several portions of the film, which is to be discussed in the cons. + The aftermath of nature is this films strong suit
+ Outstanding effects both visual and auditory
+ Wonderful soundtrack
+ Intriguing creatures
+ Wonderfully done metaphors and symbolic imagery
+ “Kiss of Death”
+ Great cinematography
+ Creature’s presence when on screen can’t go ignored

Cons
To pull this iteration of Godzilla off in a disaster-flick, Spielberg approach; you have to have well written characters that one can emotionally attach to which this film sadly fails to provide. I could never feel for the characters, the emotion was there to feel for them and sometimes they genuinely have good moments of character but it never pays off nor does it leave me rooting for any of them. Even with the title character himself, which pains me to say because I have loved the character ever since I was a toddler, as they don’t develop his character outside of his origins and his purpose. They try to but it falls flat due to the interest being directed towards the villains of the movie which is honestly where the films development and true efforts into writing something actually extremely interesting go into play by showing a basis for the creature’s full life cycle. But with Godzilla, that isn’t provided unless you read up online on this iteration or look deeper into his actions. But the biggest problem is the film’s main character and focus of the story regarding him. It is painfully generic, and just takes away from some of the coolest portions of the film because the film decides to maintain the focus on this generic storyline regarding the character. Who, like most everything else, is underdeveloped. Another huge issue with the film is the lighting which makes some scenes or shots almost impossible to view which is an absolute shame as most of the action takes place at night and the use of strictly natural lighting is intensely present. There is a lot wrong with this film and for the sake of time, I would rather just save it for a separate piece.

- Poorly written - Emotional disconnected
- Focus of the film is generic and takes away from the greatest portions of the film
- Pitch-black lighting
- Characters are underdeveloped
- Off pacing

Overall
Godzilla 2014 does have some great parts to it and genuinely fantastic effects that still hold up to this day. But it is sadly held back by so many flaws that make a lot of it just forgettable and that is no way to treat a king.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Huey_KratosJun 11, 2019
This movie is not as good as you would want it to be unless you knew the future plans for King of the monsters. How Godzilla is never really shown fully until towards the end of the movie, but the humans did leave something else to be desired.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
IUseRedditJan 12, 2020
For all of you wanting to see a Godzilla movie, this is definitely a not bad Godzilla movie. However, compared to the Toho movies, this is absolute garbage. I prefer the Toho movies (especially the Millennium era ones) for their pureFor all of you wanting to see a Godzilla movie, this is definitely a not bad Godzilla movie. However, compared to the Toho movies, this is absolute garbage. I prefer the Toho movies (especially the Millennium era ones) for their pure insanity. Also, not enough suitimation. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Im_just_playingApr 17, 2020
I think this is a mediocre movie. CGI and Music are great and Godzilla's design looks gorgeous, but most of the cast is awful in this... I don't know. The plot isn't bad, but it could be better. Also it has better dialogues than Godzilla:I think this is a mediocre movie. CGI and Music are great and Godzilla's design looks gorgeous, but most of the cast is awful in this... I don't know. The plot isn't bad, but it could be better. Also it has better dialogues than Godzilla: King of the Monsters, but I wasn't interested at all. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
GojifanDec 5, 2019
Cardboard characters, bland action, hype filled shlock. It also started a civil war in The Godzilla fandom, that didn't end until late 2017. The only Good thing this film did was try to fill the gap between Final wars and Shin Godzilla.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ViTRiFYJan 22, 2020
This movie was really good! If we're looking at it from the perspective of someone who isn't a Godzilla fan our just looking at it as a film. I feel it is has a great story with actors and was even better on the second watch.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
FreddoFazbeardoApr 15, 2020
I did not like this movie so much, I liked King of the monsters much more, in summary part 2 ...
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Rick444Apr 17, 2020
It's like b or c movie with a high budget. Godzilla from 1998 had obviously much bigger success and making the Godzilla more fat and slower just made the movie more boring as it was expected
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
S2P_cinephileSep 9, 2023
The real disaster in form of the timeless-classic "GODZILLA". Beside the meh script, Gareth Edwards visualized Godzilla in the most realistic yet cinematic EPIC like no other ever achieved!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
pur__0_0__Aug 18, 2021
My friend is a huge fan of kaiju movies. He showed me the trailer of Godzilla: King of the Monsters when it first came. I was so much filled with awe, I decided to watch all the movies in Monsterverse. This was the first one, and the veryMy friend is a huge fan of kaiju movies. He showed me the trailer of Godzilla: King of the Monsters when it first came. I was so much filled with awe, I decided to watch all the movies in Monsterverse. This was the first one, and the very reason why I got interested in this cinematic universe. I did watch a couple of other Godzilla movies and saw how this is different, since this movie has so many negative reviews compared to them. But turns out this is still good.
The thing which struck me about this movie which makes it different from other kaiju movies is what made me like it so much. This movie shows Godzilla from the humans' eye view. Because of this it shows the intensity of Godzilla's movement. You can actually feel his weight every time he walks, runs, growls or uses his atomic breath. Every time he moves dust falls out of his body, which is probably how insects also see us. My favourite scene was the one where some people are in a casino and it is being shown on TV that Godzilla is coming. Suddenly the power goes off and then the roof comes off.
The two MUTOs are also way better monsters than the Skullcrawlers or the ones from King of the Monsters. Unlike them, here we get to see exactly what their motivation is and what is at stakes here. They would lay their eggs and populate earth, destroying all the small life. Unlike King Ghidorah or Rodan, there are both male and female MUTOs who can lay millions of eggs which will make their work spread for centuries. This is more in likes to Skullcrawlers except it would be the whole world instead of one island.
People here are complaining about how much screen time is given to talking and army instead of the monsters. But this isn't a problem actually. To show such a realistic kaiju movie we would require a boat load of money. The thing is, the showing should not be inconsistent, something which ruined King of the Monsters. When the monster fight is shown, it's shown. It does not cut back to the humans until the fight is finally over. After that Godzilla just wakes up and walks into the sea.
Godzilla is a fresh take on something we have seen many times before, except with a different point of view. It's nice to see monsters from a human's eyes. It's like all the fantasies I dreamt of as a kid with extinct animals. I really wish this franchise becomes super successful in the future.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DoosisoshdhJan 27, 2021
Uma história boa. O que o filme se destaca são nos efeitos especiais e CGI sem dúvidas.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SoapNuggetApr 26, 2021
Not gonna lie, I was very surprised with this film and the level of quality it had. Yes, Godzilla doesn't appear until 40 minutes, Yes, the final battle is hard to see, Yes, the film focuses mostly on humans, these are all valid complaints,Not gonna lie, I was very surprised with this film and the level of quality it had. Yes, Godzilla doesn't appear until 40 minutes, Yes, the final battle is hard to see, Yes, the film focuses mostly on humans, these are all valid complaints, but this film had a very compelling story and good acting from really everyone the tension building in it works really well. The mystery behind Godzilla is one of the reasons why I love this film so much, definitely recommend Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
WhiteMobsterApr 29, 2021
Quando a gente quer ver um filme do Godzilla, queremos briga, luta, conflito, porrad4 e nos só temos 10 minutos disso em um filme de 2h e pouca. Muito blá blá blá de relacionamento familiar que ninguém liga.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Cementer200Sep 22, 2020
Godzilla is an ok movie. it's a good reboot of Godzilla but the movie was a bit to long
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
NoneLovesMeMar 4, 2021
There are points in the movie where I felt like it wasn't worth watching, but then Godzilla came on screen, for 5 seconds then back to the human stuff Bryan Cranston gives a great performance as Joe Brody but is killed off, its overall an okThere are points in the movie where I felt like it wasn't worth watching, but then Godzilla came on screen, for 5 seconds then back to the human stuff Bryan Cranston gives a great performance as Joe Brody but is killed off, its overall an ok movie but a fantastic kaju film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Lia_CApr 3, 2021
There's more plot here than I was expecting, but also a lot of futile action which depending on what you're looking for can be frustrating. It's a pretty good crash bang monster flick but I wish the antagonist monsters looked a little cooler.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
PhoenixReveiwsJan 28, 2021
✅73%

Some decent characters, solid cast to perform those characters. Pretty good story, but we all know why we're here. To see Godzilla and other monsters. I feel like they could've used more of the movie's screentime on Godzilla rather than
✅73%

Some decent characters, solid cast to perform those characters. Pretty good story, but we all know why we're here. To see Godzilla and other monsters. I feel like they could've used more of the movie's screentime on Godzilla rather than human characters, although that's just my child imagination and nostalgia talking.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MrJurassicYTMar 30, 2021
Great movie just needed more Godzilla scenes instead of humans talking but the human characters are not the worst the director managed to make a human story in the movie as well
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews