Glass

7

bfoore90Jan 23, 2019

After a string of successes in "The Visit" and "Split" after a major career downturn, M Night Shyamalan returns to the big screen with his Unbreakable sequel 19 years after the release of the first one. The performances, especially JamesAfter a string of successes in "The Visit" and "Split" after a major career downturn, M Night Shyamalan returns to the big screen with his Unbreakable sequel 19 years after the release of the first one. The performances, especially James McAvoy are top notch and the film as a whole is not as bad as being advertised. While I did not like the ending, you have to give M. Night props for having the balls to go out and tell his story the way he wants it to be told. With that being said, Glass was a good if not serviceable conclusion to the Unbreakable trilogy… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

4

TrevorsViewJan 31, 2019

Let’s reflect on comic book history, and also compare it to why M. Night Shyamalan’s cap to the Unbreakable trilogy continues his negative artistic streak. In 1897, The Yellow Kid in McFadden’s Flats became the first comic, somethingLet’s reflect on comic book history, and also compare it to why M. Night Shyamalan’s cap to the Unbreakable trilogy continues his negative artistic streak. In 1897, The Yellow Kid in McFadden’s Flats became the first comic, something perfectly straightforward in its simplicity, unlike Glass, which relies on superfluous flashbacks instead of conflict between the three patients who lead the story. The film also diminishes anyone with Brown skin to the background in ever-so-subtle hints of unintentional racism, which feels too much like 1937, when comics evolved into monthly “funnies.” What Shyamalan comments on about the history of superheroes forgets to put Superman’s influence on the subtext, or any true knowledge about the platinum age of comic books. Not just that, he doesn’t even bother to speak up on the reality of superheroes leading psychiatric patients into a dictatorship.

The disloyalty goes on to the comics’ golden age as well, that time when Batman, Wonder Woman, Captain Marvel, Flash, Green Lantern, and others came around. Each of these heroes are still instantly recognizable now because they’re all more sympathetic than the returning Samuel L. Jackson role, Elijah. Here is shown a flashback of his mom watching him get hurt on a carnival ride as a child, yet any internal pain of his remains intangible. Even if he along with the two other freaks are believed to be superheroes, actual comic books have better-analyzed heroic theories. At this rate, I’d rather see Samuel L. Jackson hop off the wheelchair to start preaching Ezekiel 25:17 again, and not have to keep wearing that obvious wig for a now-dated story arc.

Onto the silver age, comic books began to be seen as corruptive to the youth, thus the Comics Code Authority began, which caused an eventual bright, campy tone to take over; think Adam West’s Batman as a strong example. Shyamalan actually handles that well without feeling out of place alongside the established golden age grit. Remember how Batman & Robin was almost all Dutch angles? A similar style is used here to suggest how Elijah reads his interactions, or how a hysterical perspective of “the Beast’s” victims is seen upside down when he crawls on the ceiling. To switch back on cheesiness without the unintentional (or failed) humor, dangerously deep focus on closeup shots block out distractions, working off a pink hallway designed by Chris Trujillo (Stranger Things) to mimic a supervillain’s lair. It’s like every frame here is a legit comic book panel!

It compensates for the way Sarah Paulson (12 Years a Slave, Carol) keeps an insincere face throughout her entire performance, even more so for Anya Taylor-Joy’s (Thoroughbreds, The Witch) absent sense of rhythm in her expressionless eyes that look like Natalie Portman sobbing, “Anakin, you’re breaking my heart.” Yet the almost completely untalented cast ironically works to the advantage of James McAvoy when his killer portrayal shatters barriers immediately upon introduction.

An odd sense of fulfillment breaks through as the three leads fit nowhere, much like how the bronze age lead to comics taking on a realistic tone. Plenty of disturbing images shed mortality to familiar comic book images, particularly a line of high school cheerleaders chained up, all of which are enhanced by the musical score’s stressed strings—a ticking bomb that signals time to break for impact.

Then finally comes the dark age of comics, when antiheroes, particularly Watchmen and Deadpool, got their origins. Shyamalan’s three antiheroes could make a valid case for criminal actions… if consistency exists anywhere. Probably the most noticeable logical inconsistency is how bright lights change James’ character personalities, but it really gets out of hand throughout the ridiculous third act. It attempts to comment on the climaxes of other comic book movies, except this happens after the entire feature proves unable to decide which scenes are fiction or fact.

Thus, the audience appeal winds up weak, mainly to the fault of M. Night Shyamalan’s screenplay preaching the old comic book idea that love heals (ugh). He cannot authenticate the full potential of such a gross idea in any way, and even takes the wrong turns to explore it; one of those approaches includes a legitimate case of Stockholm syndrome!

So today, with all our comics becoming strong cinematic/television properties, it tells our minds to honor having super abilities greater than our own God-given abilities. It tells us that anyone considered a freak is a psycho with a mind set to rule the world. Shyamalan’s commentary is dead-wrong.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

lytrunghieuJan 31, 2019

this is not a satisfied movie for everybody especially those who haven't seen Unbreakable or Split yet, though this film is a super x3,14 good movie, why? i'll tell you because Shyamalan worked so good for the twists, for the hidden hint,this is not a satisfied movie for everybody especially those who haven't seen Unbreakable or Split yet, though this film is a super x3,14 good movie, why? i'll tell you because Shyamalan worked so good for the twists, for the hidden hint, easter eggs and etc,...... 2/3 of the movie was soooooo great,the slow running type, talk scene, the rest 1/3 is the end, the end of this movie is good, worth it, reasonable, but yet not comfortable and satisfied, you may think that there'are ways to make the end better but Shyamalan chose this way, he wants to make different, he wants to deliver deep meaning of this film. and you can find infinite hint in this movie through youtube, google, ,...etc.... trust me, if you love Unbreakable, and Split, i can not stop you from watching this movie, give it a try, and you'll be surprised.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

clarkaddisonJan 30, 2019

A disappointing third movie in a trilogy. With two many loose ends and a long ridiculous ending, this movie just disappoints. Without some great music and acting this movie would be even worse off.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

4

oakley07Jan 28, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Ohhhh dear... I waited 18 years for this... Left the theater feeling like I was going to cry. 18 years to see David Dunn again as his amazing superhero self. Waited and waited! Could never understand what was taking so long. Then, nearly jumped out of my seat at the end of Split when, there he was, so nonchalantly sitting in a diner. Finally, my favourite hero was back. At the beginning of Glass, I was thrilled to see a cast of familiar faces. First 20 minutes seemed ok... bit odd that David's big comeback consisted of him beating the crap out of two delinquent youth, but hey, he was back. The scene in the factory was great, but it all happened along a super hyper timeline. From then on the disappointment in my heart grew. I walked out believing that Shyamalan must have just wanted the whole trilogy to be over, like he'd been pressured into doing Glass, and his heart really wasn't into it. So much potential... came off seeming... tired- just like David Dunn. All that aside James Macavoy rocked his 'characters'. Sam-U-L was great, but poor Bruce ... he simply wasn't given enough time in the light... And that, my friends is a travesty.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

Datzman290Jan 28, 2019

My 17-year old son and I (I'm 50) saw this together after re-watching both Unbreakable and Split together the week before. It's not your typical Marvel/DC super hero movie; putting things in a far more "what if this really happened" frame ofMy 17-year old son and I (I'm 50) saw this together after re-watching both Unbreakable and Split together the week before. It's not your typical Marvel/DC super hero movie; putting things in a far more "what if this really happened" frame of mind, and wondering about the potential of it. Some questions remain unanswered (I'm guessing very purposefully), but the movie did exactly what we wanted... It wrapped up the story line with us looking forward to the potential Shyamalan twist. Once again the acting by McAvoy was FANTASTIC (He's truly a talent), though everyone else was great as well (not wanting to dismiss the talent of the rest of the cast). If you didn't like the other 2 movies, leave this one alone. If you did, it's recommended.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

5

Vitor007Jan 28, 2019

The conclusion of a universe "unpublished" of cinemas is not a disaster, but it cannot be good. The end of a trilogy that originates from the classic "Unbreakable", makes us anxious in "Split", falls into "Glass ". With a naïve script, theThe conclusion of a universe "unpublished" of cinemas is not a disaster, but it cannot be good. The end of a trilogy that originates from the classic "Unbreakable", makes us anxious in "Split", falls into "Glass ". With a naïve script, the film tries to emscore new connections only in its conclusion, to try to revive the public, after hours whose no surprising event occurs to revive its script. The interpretation of the characters, although they fall from income, remain well synchronized. I'm not saying I can do better than that, but we all know it could have been better. 5.7/10… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

EliOli123Jan 28, 2019

I thought the movie was great. It wrapped up this trilogy very nicely and left room open for more films set in this universe. Some of these movie critics seem to have watched a different movie, or maybe had indigestion from eating too muchI thought the movie was great. It wrapped up this trilogy very nicely and left room open for more films set in this universe. Some of these movie critics seem to have watched a different movie, or maybe had indigestion from eating too much popcorn in the theater.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

10

GrusJan 27, 2019

Very interesting plot and actors play. Poor locations and effects. Good third movie in trilogy.

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

8

MoviesAreNiceJan 27, 2019

It has an epic start and a very good 2nd act. The ending might be "split" but the "glass" is "unbreakable" personally. I think its worth a watch and is mostly good with a bit of bad.

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

5

movieseeerJan 27, 2019

GLASS #9

I wasn’t particularly thrilled by M. Night Shyamalan’s split personality film before this one called, indeed, Split. But here is its sequel Glass, which finds the 3 ‘bad guys’ of the core of these films, Unbreakable, Night’s bestGLASS #9

I wasn’t particularly thrilled by M. Night Shyamalan’s split personality film before this one called, indeed, Split. But here is its sequel Glass, which finds the 3 ‘bad guys’ of the core of these films, Unbreakable, Night’s best film to date, in a Psyche facility as prisoners. There is The Beast, the split personality character from Split who calls himself the Horde. Glass himself a mostly comatose character throughout the film who is the mastermind behind the train wreck in Unbreakable and of course Bruce Willis reprising his Unbreakable self from the same named film.

All three share a wing at this insane asylum but I was glad that the film had some action before the shrinks got ahold of the story. Nothing scintillating but at least there’s something to go on. After the opening the three have long and useless chats with the resident psychoanalyst, Dr. Ellie Staple. Most of the supposed ‘events’ in the film concern The Beast where actor, James McAvoy can try on a few lisps and mannerisms, that do feel contrived and mostly Hollywood in tone and circumference. The movie really is missing action as the main story is if these three are ‘Special’ with a capital S, are they Superheroes, like Superman or as the analyst demands, are they ordinary men with delusions. Not a bad supposition but here in Glass there is in the end a somewhat secret society that thinks these ‘insane’ should be suppressed. One does wonder what for, as these ‘freaks’ really aren’t likely to get any traction in larger society. 5.5 Out Of 10

Glass reaches it’s harebrained conclusion but takes some time in getting there, by then there doesn’t seem to be all that much going on. The ‘nuts’ are all dead, and the ‘clowns’ the general public are all put back to sleep. The last scenes of this are oddly ineffective but Shyamalan’s dreadful fear of anything happening at all dangerous etc., is thankfully for him, put down. #CLAYSMOVIEREVIEWS #movie #movies #film #films
#cinema #instamovie #instamovies
#moviefan #moviereview #review
#critic #filmcritic #critical #moviecritic
#rated #cinema #reviews #moviereviews #GLASS #MNIGHTSHYAMALAN… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

JohnnyCanuckJan 26, 2019

There is a nugget of a better movie in the first 1/3 of this film. But what remains is absolute horsesh*t. The logic of the universe just does not add up and the rest is just sloppy. 3 super powered people - and 2 orderlies to watch themThere is a nugget of a better movie in the first 1/3 of this film. But what remains is absolute horsesh*t. The logic of the universe just does not add up and the rest is just sloppy. 3 super powered people - and 2 orderlies to watch them all. makes sense. SOmeone wake up Shymalan.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

3

AdamBeamJan 26, 2019

Unbreakable is the best film Shyamalan has ever done, and Split was a genuinely nice surprise, but sad to say that Glass breaks your heart if your fan of either film, and is just a complete mess. A film that fails as a sequel, and as aUnbreakable is the best film Shyamalan has ever done, and Split was a genuinely nice surprise, but sad to say that Glass breaks your heart if your fan of either film, and is just a complete mess. A film that fails as a sequel, and as a competent movie as well, just a very upsetting disappointment to start the year off with. Glass waste all the potential and interesting concepts it offers, and whatever good graces the film still had with audiences or my patience will be immediately dashed in the last 15 minutes, where the twist(s) absolutely destroy the film and all hopes it had. Seriously your best bet with the film is either skip the movie, or leave before the last 15 minutes and just imagine a better ending than what we're actually given.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

10

RogerYoung32717Jan 26, 2019

I just left Glass and my mind is boggled at the Critics Score. Mr. Shamalan has done us proud and tied up the trilogy with a perfect bow. As a part of the trilogy, this movie deserves a 10. Between the critic score for this movie andI just left Glass and my mind is boggled at the Critics Score. Mr. Shamalan has done us proud and tied up the trilogy with a perfect bow. As a part of the trilogy, this movie deserves a 10. Between the critic score for this movie and what they scored for The Last Jedi, I guess it is user scores only for me from now on. ALWAYS check User scores, IGNORE critic scores, or don't waste your time checking reviews at all because the critics are clearly under some influence other than the desire to steer us towards quality filmmaking.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

4

Rebecca31Jan 25, 2019

Just take a moment to think about the fact that M. Night Shyamalan set up a more successful film Universe than the dead on arrival Dark Universe. I'm sure none of you actually wrote to M. Night requesting a sequel to Split/Unbreakable but ifJust take a moment to think about the fact that M. Night Shyamalan set up a more successful film Universe than the dead on arrival Dark Universe. I'm sure none of you actually wrote to M. Night requesting a sequel to Split/Unbreakable but if films aren't part of some franchise anymore will anyone even bother seeing them? So here we are anyway. The third film in the M. Night Universe, well that is until he decides The Sixth Sense fits into this mess somehow. M. Night is no fool, most of his films (not you Lady in the Water) make a huge amount of money no matter what you think of them. In today's climate superhero movies and horrors are nearly always a sure thing when it comes to financial success so why not combine the genres and see what you get, so we've gotten Glass. A film somewhere in the area of better than The Happening but not as good as Split. But what does it matter what I think of it, or what anyone thinks of it? Glass has only been in cinemas a week and it has already made five times its production budget and you just know this isn't the last we've seen of the M. Night Cinematic Universe. For those of you who do want to know what I thought of it, please continue to read because in case you couldn't tell I didn't like it.

David Dunn (Bruce Willis) is back from Unbreakable and has adopted his vigilante persona as "The Overseer" a raincoat wearing stalkery superhero who beats up bad guys. He turns his attention to Kevin Wendell Crumb (James McAvoy) who is still at large and currently mutilating girls around the town. We also have the return of Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson) cause reasons. Meanwhile Doctor Sarah Paulson apparently specialises in this area of mental illness because why not, sure it's the M. Night Universe and anything is possible. Look closely and you might even see a little cameo from M. Night himself. I don't mind a directors cameo but seriously don't give yourself lines you're not an actor. Leave that to the actual actors. Although the only one doing any real acting in this is McAvoy. He's outdone himself yet again and if you thought Split was impressive then watch him transform into all twenty-four personalities before your eyes. Willis on the other hand doesn't look like he cares at all about this film, it's a look of "give me my damn pay cheque and get on with it." I'm beginning to wonder if we just took him out of the film altogether would it even make a difference. Glass will force you to question the possibility of real life superheroes or is it all just happening in their heads, either way don't worry because the movie will stop and explain everything to you every few minutes, and I do mean every few minutes. Split was guilty of this unnecessary plotsplaining only it's somehow worse in Glass. The story felt like it was trying to be more impressive than it was, and although it did try to bring the superhero genre in a new direction I found myself getting repeatedly bored and the only thing that was keeping my attention was McAvoy's performance. As with Split, he is carrying the film and he is honestly the only reason you should give Glass the time of day. Not recommended unless you really have nothing better to do with your time.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

SupremeCheeseJan 25, 2019

Great and very harshly criticized. Shyamalan is consistently putting good movies out now and people are really hating on him.

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

6

TVJerryJan 25, 2019

M. Night Shyamalan reunites the stars of his 3 biggest films (Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson and James McAvoy) into a sort of trilogy finale to Unbreakable and Split. Willis is not reviving his role from Sixth Sense, he's playing anotherM. Night Shyamalan reunites the stars of his 3 biggest films (Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson and James McAvoy) into a sort of trilogy finale to Unbreakable and Split. Willis is not reviving his role from Sixth Sense, he's playing another character with superhuman powers. This trio is brought together in a psychiatric hospital, where Sarah Paulson's talky character tries to convince them that they're just deluded. While the premise starts with some promise, the rambling pace and sometimes confusing writing keep it from paying off. There is a conclusion (that may even augur a new world of superheros), but it's more frustrating than satisfying. A few moments of intensity don't make for a taut thriller.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

3

JDIGITALJan 24, 2019

Movie Review, I saw Glass and it was Ass. The three main characters from there respected movies are interesting but they just got smushed together in this boring, lackluster film.

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

8

MB2KForeverJan 24, 2019

This movie is NOT 33%. Its not a D, or C movie - its a bold, different, and enjoyable super hero movie, and that's what people are faulting it for - that it's not a "Avengers" or "Spiderman". It's certainly not perfect - and I'd admit IThis movie is NOT 33%. Its not a D, or C movie - its a bold, different, and enjoyable super hero movie, and that's what people are faulting it for - that it's not a "Avengers" or "Spiderman". It's certainly not perfect - and I'd admit I wanted it to be a traditional super hero movie going in and was initially dissapointed that it wasn't - but its still a good, enjoyable movie (with flaws). Too many people are expecting a traditional super hero movie with this movie but forgetting this was never a traditional super hero franchise. Unbreakable and Split are unconventional, quirky, slow movies. Also important is that this director does not make traditional super hero movies. He makes movies that defy audience expectations. This movie definitely does that, and that's its strength. The third finale to the trilogy is different, its bold, and it goes against the expectations of your traditional super hero movie, and ends the trilogy in a way that is consistent with what we are familiar with in the director's previous movies (including those in the trilogy). I applauded this movie for finding a different way to do a superhero movie, and think this is one of the "good" M. Night movies, and would watch it again. A worthy part of the trilogy, even if I don't agree with all the choices in this movie.… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

6

kiwijinxterJan 24, 2019

I tried hard to go into this movie without any expectations. I mostly succeeded although I had read some reviews ("normal people" user reviews - not the useless professional critics' reviews). Some user reviews gave me the impression thatI tried hard to go into this movie without any expectations. I mostly succeeded although I had read some reviews ("normal people" user reviews - not the useless professional critics' reviews). Some user reviews gave me the impression that there was a fantastic major twist at the end that's bigger than Sixth Sense. Yes, there was a twist at the end but not quite at Sixth Sense levels. Still it was a nice twist.

Overall the movie had great veteran actors in the 3 main "superhero" parts who all gave very good performances for their parts - James McAvoy, Bruce Willis and Samuel L Jackson. You'd expect that, and you got that. Their performances held the movie up. The movie itself - without giving anything away - wasn't as "twisty" as I expected but it does keep you on edge due to the tenseness of all the characters, particularly McAvoy's "Split" character. In the end I did get the similar feeling I got when I watched Unbreakable. (I haven't watched Split yet). It was OK satisfying but not over the top. I think the problem M. Night Shyamalan is that Sixth Sense was so extraordinary that it is very hard for him to top that. Overall, it's a reasonably satisfying movie, but I felt that I wanted more fleshed out. Personally, I give it a 6/10… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

Jmorgan62Jan 24, 2019

NO SPOILER TIME Glass is the final movie to M. Night Shyamalan's trilogy that started with Unbreakable in 2000 and I have to say I really enjoyed this movie. The plot and story telling was pretty good but the way it is presented inst theNO SPOILER TIME Glass is the final movie to M. Night Shyamalan's trilogy that started with Unbreakable in 2000 and I have to say I really enjoyed this movie. The plot and story telling was pretty good but the way it is presented inst the best, Its better for a movie to let people figure things out. and how the movie is told is very similar to how Unbreakable was which was pretty good. there is minor things in this movie that all adds up and can annoy you, well at least it did to me as far as camera angles, editing, and writing. the performances was great especially Samuel Jackson and James Mcavoy, Bruce Willis could've done better and I mean a lot better but he wasn't given much to do. Some character were defiantly not needed even towards the end because it'll show why they are not needed. toward the end/ third act things kinda took a weird end that some people will not expect and might be disappointing. The structure of the movie was a little unbalanced and which is why I say Bruce could've done more. Towards the end also He quote on quote "Shyamalaned" it but He still has a lot to learn and improve on for himself and I praise this man for his hard works. go see it if you love the previous movies

SPOLIER TIME YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

Glass is the final movie to M. Night Shyamalan's trilogy that started with Unbreakable in 2000 and I have to say I really enjoyed this movie. The plot takes places fairly close after the events of Split from what I can remember from the movie, and from how it is laid out it was also really good but I wish the directing would have left a lot of the surprises for the audience to figure out and theorize about instead of it being told to us about what happened. the pace of the story telling was fairy close to unbreakable's pace, a nice slow burn. I really wanted the movie to expand to more than just the asylum and a few other minor locations. We never ended up going to tallest building made and that would've been sweet to see but we were just teased. The theme of the movie fitted everything in a nice way but not much was done for to make it a thriller, Split was a thriller movie and that felt like one but this one was great on the theme of sci-fi and drama with action mixed in. The art was pretty good and seeing Mr. Glass new suit looked fresh and everyone had their classical outfits that made it a charm to watch and not much other stuff to say about the art. Cinematography was interesting, new and sometimes plain annoyingly not wise, the angles that looks like it takes a lot of time to do was fine but there was so many extremely close up shots and awkward angles, but it wasn't too annoying to the movie because the cuts were about evenly good nothing to go off on. Same goes with the editing, it was interesting and wasn't anything annoying. The fonts at the start of the movie kinda got in the way but it was a style choice I'm assuming. Acting was about 50/50. I loved Samuel L. Jackson as well as James Mcavoy, and they did a great job. As far as Bruce Willis I wanted him to do more in this movie because I felt as though he was pushed to the side a lot and he could've given a better performance I know he could've. and more could've been better from pretty much all supporting casts. Anya Taylor-Joy in my opinion had no reason to be in this movie and served no purpose in my opinion. Spencer Treat Clark also did a great job too, almost perfect too. the writing of this movie was pretty good, there was a lot of things that could've been done smarter. Kevin could've wrapped a pillow around his head, Mr. G didn't have to do this suicide mission, and my goodness the ending of this movie was not satisfying, everything before the main characters death was great and enjoyable and I find it disrespectful to the fans of these characters and the way they went out and it was all in silly ridiculous ways and the people who saw it will most likely agree. Music was good too and every piece fitted every scene just fine. as far as originality it fine and I really do see this as an origin story to maybe M. Knight's next series of films, possibly. The secret organization wasn't really needed but we have it and it sets up a few questions. It kinda doesn't make since this organization didn't go to David's house when they heard a man survived a train crash so these people were forced in. Overall This movie was good and enjoyable and if acting was done a tad bit better it would've been even more better. The ending sets up a possibility for more superhero like moves from M. knight but we will just have to wait and see. There is a lot of small things M. knight needs to work on from here on and I applaud him for sticking with this movie and finishing it. He is truly a good man and has a passion for movies like very few others. Please see Unbreakable and Split before this movie and after those two. If I were to grade this movie it would get a 86 percent, but for reviewing over all it gets a 7 out of 10… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

9

Angus9821Jan 24, 2019

This film has a few flaws and a slightly disappointing ending, but the critics have been slamming this film way to hard which is undeserved, Night’s filmmaking techniques are outstanding and this film is one of his most exhilarating filmsThis film has a few flaws and a slightly disappointing ending, but the critics have been slamming this film way to hard which is undeserved, Night’s filmmaking techniques are outstanding and this film is one of his most exhilarating films yet,definitely go see this film!… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

7

sassymahJan 24, 2019

Testing this feature. Good blend of genres and plotlines from Unbreakable and Split.

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

3

EikoxJan 24, 2019

So you saw Unbreakable, you enjoy Split and you are ready for Glass!! But after 20 minutes of watching suddenly you notice something odd, oh yes is the poor will of Bruce Willis in his acting where he can be replaced easily for a obscureSo you saw Unbreakable, you enjoy Split and you are ready for Glass!! But after 20 minutes of watching suddenly you notice something odd, oh yes is the poor will of Bruce Willis in his acting where he can be replaced easily for a obscure silhouette with his voice or a random double with a green poncho. Is sad that one of the most iconic character bring down the whole movie, where you can find a decent plot carried by the marvelous performance of McAvoy and the always reliable Samuel L.J.
From the side of the plot is good see this three character collide (more of ten if you count the multiple one of McAvoy) and continue with the developed under the influence of each other.
From the technical aspect is nothing from another world, if you pay enough attention you will encounter some mistakes in the continuity but still for sometimes seems a movie filmed for a project and not a jewel of hollywood so dont expect to much, as I say McAvoy and Jackson carried the movie in their shoulders.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

7

HighHeelKnightJan 24, 2019

"Glass" is a good movie, but it is not good enough for 2019. "Unbreakable" came out in 2000, the year that "X-Men" sparked a superhero renaissance. If "Split" and "Glass" could have shifted back 6 to 10 years, as the MCU brought a new"Glass" is a good movie, but it is not good enough for 2019. "Unbreakable" came out in 2000, the year that "X-Men" sparked a superhero renaissance. If "Split" and "Glass" could have shifted back 6 to 10 years, as the MCU brought a new renaissance, then Shyamalan's trilogy would have been brilliant. Today, superhero projects dominate movies and television, from "Watchmen", "Deadpool", "Avengers", and the Arrowverse to "The Incredibles", "Big Hero 6", "The Lego Batman Movie", and TWO types of Teen Titans. All seven of the main actors of "Glass" have been in superhero or comic book projects as well. The world has elevated past with Shyamalan wants to offer. "Glass" is worth seeing, but it is too late to the superhero party. Don't see it in Imax either.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

2

AfonsoCarlosJan 24, 2019

Holy hell that was disapointing, I knew going in that Glass wasn't going to be anywhere near decent, but how did they manage to miss this by such a longshot? This property had potencial but i feel like they just ran it into the ground. TheHoly hell that was disapointing, I knew going in that Glass wasn't going to be anywhere near decent, but how did they manage to miss this by such a longshot? This property had potencial but i feel like they just ran it into the ground. The story was not captivating, the sets were boring and i feel like they wasted the awesome characters they had built... In conclusion, when Im asked about what movie disappointed me the most, despite already having low expectations, i will answer "Glass" (2.4/10)… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

4

Jk9785Jan 23, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Shyamalan's most disappointing film since Airbender, considering everyone knew After Earth was gonna suck. This film has no meaning, and telling one why would require spoilers. So from here on out, SPOILER ALERT is in effect. The first third of this film is some of Shyamalan's best work, with some suitably creepy scenes involving Kevin (James McAvoy) and his multiple personalities. Enter David Dunn (Bruce Willis) who releases the girls that Kevin was holding captive, and then fights "The Horde". Long story short, Shyamalan kills all the main characters off in the most anticlimactic way possible. Mr. Glass (Samuel L. Jackson) dies of internal bleeding, Kevin gets shot and dies, and David Dunn, considering his weakness is water, drowns while Dr. Staple watches. And of course, everything is connected with the train crash that David Dunn survived, while Kevin's father was killed. This movie is disappointing, and it is only the first act that keeps this from being one of M. Night Shyamalan's worst films.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

AcaciaJan 22, 2019

I have seen all of M. Night’s movies, good and bad. For me, this one falls somewhere in the middle. I did not enjoy this movie and had a pretty hard time figuring out what was going on. I thought it was very confounding and often just kindI have seen all of M. Night’s movies, good and bad. For me, this one falls somewhere in the middle. I did not enjoy this movie and had a pretty hard time figuring out what was going on. I thought it was very confounding and often just kind of stupid. For those of you who really liked it, I am happy for you, because I really wanted to like it too. Unfortunately, I just came away feeling very disappointed. So much of it didn’t make any sense to me.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

Sensible_PersonJan 23, 2019

Absolutely fabulous movie filled with compelling performances and characters you genuinely care about. Contrary to everyone else the third act reveal really was unexpected and awesome for me and took the story in an interesting new direction.Absolutely fabulous movie filled with compelling performances and characters you genuinely care about. Contrary to everyone else the third act reveal really was unexpected and awesome for me and took the story in an interesting new direction. While everyone was fantastic in their respective roles James McAvoy and Samuel L Jackson were the clear standouts. I suggest everyone give this a shot if you are willing to have an open mind and are okay with the movie going in directions you wouldn't expect. This is Shyamalan's film after all and I was thoroughly entertained and genuinely moved by it from beginning to end. Congratulations to everyone involved in closing out this unique trilogy in just as introspective and quietly compelling manner as those films that came before it.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

7

marcmyworksJan 23, 2019

Glass is not as terrible as the critics make it out to be. It follows in the footsteps of the first two entries in this trilogy with slow pacing, character development that leads to an inevitable climax. The problem is that it promises tooGlass is not as terrible as the critics make it out to be. It follows in the footsteps of the first two entries in this trilogy with slow pacing, character development that leads to an inevitable climax. The problem is that it promises too much for its payoff but is filled with a wonderful well-rounded cast.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

1

StHoustonJan 23, 2019

Вы когда-нибудь ловили себя на мысли что в кинотеатре вы смотрите не на экран? Добро пожаловать на просмотр данного фильма.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

Meth-dudeJan 23, 2019

While it's not awful, it's no masterpiece either. The acting is generally good, although watching McAvoy's character constantly changing personalities was cringe inducing, the cinematography looks good, and the ending was fun. Unfortunately,While it's not awful, it's no masterpiece either. The acting is generally good, although watching McAvoy's character constantly changing personalities was cringe inducing, the cinematography looks good, and the ending was fun. Unfortunately, the movie is quite boring and the plot twist at the end was predictable. It's not a bad movie, it's just very average.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

9

257sandJan 22, 2019

After an hour of slow pacing, that has you on the edge of your seat, Glass delivers a rather superb turnover by presenting a payoff that will keep you smiling until the end credits roll. Leaving the merits of its predecessors aside, GlassAfter an hour of slow pacing, that has you on the edge of your seat, Glass delivers a rather superb turnover by presenting a payoff that will keep you smiling until the end credits roll. Leaving the merits of its predecessors aside, Glass succeeds in making you empathize with its supposedly "superhuman" cast along with the seemingly normal array of supporting characters. Impressive use of camerawork to appropriately frame the various states of each character without confusing the audience. The soundtrack felt right and was never blaring but also not silent enough to keep your feelings on the same string. James McAvoy continues with his impressive skillset of portraying the most amount of characters an actor has ever played. Each personality really did house a different person because of his acting. Samuel Jackson's performance gives a light-hearted tone to the film, a testament to his commitment to the "villain" role. Bruce Willis' continues his style of acting from 'Unbreakable', which in my opinion is the best use of him as an actor.

After a series of debacles with big-budgeted movies, returning to form IS the best path for Shyamalan. There were no flashy capes, big explosions or snarky one-liners as is the standard for superhero films nowadays and that's a good thing. The best thing even. What Shyamalan did to his way of approaching things can be seen in this film that gets closer to the heart even with various subtleties.

Shyamalan grounded himself like Glass was grounded in reality, and, more importantly, empathy. And in so doing, he's made a film that truly does shatter expectations like the paper-mache bones of the lovable titular character.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

HarryPettigrewJan 22, 2019

Note: I advise you watch Unbreakable and Split before reading any reviews for Glass.
Glass is an alternative take on the superhero origin story as David Dunn and Kevin Wendell Crumb start to question their supernatural abilities.
The film isNote: I advise you watch Unbreakable and Split before reading any reviews for Glass.
Glass is an alternative take on the superhero origin story as David Dunn and Kevin Wendell Crumb start to question their supernatural abilities.
The film is set in the same universe as M. Night Shyamalan previous films Unbreakable and Split. All the main cast from the previous films reprise their characters in this film.The main cast consists of James McAvoy, Bruce Willis, Samuel L Jackson, Sarah Paulson and Anya Taylor-Joy.
It deviates from the traditional superhero genre by focusing on the psychology of its main characters and doesn't rely on big action set pieces to intrigue its audience. The film follows themes established in the first film in the series Unbreakable and only brings in certain aspects that were established in its sequel Split.
If your favourite film in the series so far was Unbreakable you will enjoy Glass because of their shared similarities.
The similarities in both films allows the mystery surrounding the series to finally come to a close. This trilogy started nineteen years ago and is impressive that the series has maintained its level of quality after all this time. You can tell that the director M. Night Shyamalan is passionate about the series as he doesn't normally do sequels to his films. He has also confirmed he will not produce a sequel to Glass so this film is the final entry in the series.
M. Night Shyamalan's has redeemed himself with this latest release after he released the critically panned The Last Airbender and The Happening in the 2000's which tainted his filmography.
The writing in the film is questionable at times as some conversations in the film can come across as unnatural. I believe this is due to issues with the script and isn't caused by the acting featured in the film. James McAvoy's performance in the film is a real showcase of his acting range as he effortlessly interchanges between the twenty-four personalities his character possesses. With the surprise inclusion of Black Panther being nominated for Best Picture at the Academy Awards this year, it would be outrageous if James McAvoy isn't considered for a best actor nomination.
The run time for the film clocks in at 2hr 9 minutes which is needed to establish the connections for all the characters from the previous two films. This doesn't affect the pace of the film and compliments the film's climax well.
Glass received an age rating of 15 in the United Kingdom, so it is targeting a mature audience and will be inappropriate for younger audiences. This is due to the inclusion of graphic violence and swearing.
The film seems to have been faced with mixed reviews with critics. At the time of writing this, review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes awarded it 37% while its competitor Metacritic gave it 42 which is lower than the two previous films. This can be subject to change in the following weeks.
Glass is a great film for fans of the franchise but does require you to be familiar with the previous films to enjoy it. It is also one of the first major releases of the year, so I believe it will do extremely well at the box office due to the lack of competition.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

7

sandbornJan 22, 2019

Great 1st and 3rd acts with a mushy 2nd. The setup or first half hour is awesome! I was totally captivated by it. The last half hour is equally awesome. The showdown between hero and villains is way better than most actual superhero movies. IGreat 1st and 3rd acts with a mushy 2nd. The setup or first half hour is awesome! I was totally captivated by it. The last half hour is equally awesome. The showdown between hero and villains is way better than most actual superhero movies. I love how their strengths and weaknesses are used. It's the 2nd act that loses me. It gets bogged down with psychology and I thought I wasn't going to like this movie. But M. Night pulls off a great ending. Definitely worth it!… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

5

GrantD243Jan 22, 2019

Glass takes a bit of a different approach to the story than I expected. I appreciate how it all comes together in the end with Mr. Glass, but a lot of what happens before that (including "the twist") left me scratching my head. I also foundGlass takes a bit of a different approach to the story than I expected. I appreciate how it all comes together in the end with Mr. Glass, but a lot of what happens before that (including "the twist") left me scratching my head. I also found David Dunn's arc to be incredibly disappointing. It's a mixed bag, but I am glad that M. Night Shyamalan was able to end this trilogy how he wanted.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

5

ScienceAdvisorJan 22, 2019

The last third of the movie is exposition city, describing what is going on instead of doing it. The degredation of the writing is shockingly poor with plot holes and contrivance that leaves the buildup as disposable. The Shyamalanic twistThe last third of the movie is exposition city, describing what is going on instead of doing it. The degredation of the writing is shockingly poor with plot holes and contrivance that leaves the buildup as disposable. The Shyamalanic twist is disappointing to say the least, and the big reveal ranges from yawn-inspiring to soul-shattering. The dropped continuity of two murderers (the largest mass murderer in history and the other a cannibal of young girls) suddenly being treated their powers are a positive, is downright demented and betrays the previous two movies in yet another attempted retcon by Hollywood. The final objective point is that for a movie called Glass, it would have been nice if he was in the first two-thirds of the film. When he finally does arrive it does pickup, but by that point the writing has degraded to the point where even McAvoy and Jackson can save it. The combat is decent in the first third, and lackluster and disappointing for the rest of the movie.

I guess all the people handing out 10s while suggesting the reviewers are wrong were not really paying attention to the series, and are treating Glass as a stand-alone movie, when it is the third part of a trilogy. As a single movie it would be better by one point, but as the climax to a nearly 20 year series it just falls flat. You would have to be not only easy to please, but have a comprehensive disorder to truly enjoy Glass. Either that or use some form of temporary method of achiving that state. If you have seen the previous two movies (Unbreakable and Shattered) you will have to see it for yourself, but set your expectations very low as it all falls apart in the end. Great performances from McAvoy and Jackson as well as the build up, but sadly the delivery is unsatisfying. Stand alone movie 6/10, as the end to the trilogy 5/10
Breakdown by thirds (out of 10): 8, 5, 3… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

10

Krtek90Jan 22, 2019

This is a great but underrated movie. If you liked Split and Unbreakable, you will definitely like this movie.

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

8

llectricJan 22, 2019

Not sure as to why this movie is getting panned first of all. My only advice for someone going to see this is, do not go with the mindset that this is a generic super hero movie. There are no flashy action scenes like you would expect from aNot sure as to why this movie is getting panned first of all. My only advice for someone going to see this is, do not go with the mindset that this is a generic super hero movie. There are no flashy action scenes like you would expect from a Marvel or DC movie. As most M. Night Shyamalan film's, what carries the film is his ability to get the best performance out of the actors & actresses involved with the "obvious" twist at the end. Obvious meaning that it's not an M. Night Shyamalan movie without the obligatory twist you thought you would never see coming.

It is a good movie, far from a perfect one in fact. Though it was able to keep my interest right to the end. I am glad I did not allow the critics review sway me from seeing the final chapter to M. Night Shyamalan's vision. I hope that Mr Glass's word do ring true for the future, that this is an origin story and we will see different meta humans within this universe.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

3

Supergaz27Jan 22, 2019

Third act is horrendous, nothing original or clever about it. They could of cut out about an hour of Sarah Coulson monologuing and perhaps it wouldn't of been as boring.

If you're a fan of the the other two I'd say avoid it. Left a bad tasteThird act is horrendous, nothing original or clever about it. They could of cut out about an hour of Sarah Coulson monologuing and perhaps it wouldn't of been as boring.

If you're a fan of the the other two I'd say avoid it. Left a bad taste in my mouth.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

9

SuperduperjewJan 22, 2019

Was really surprised at how well this movie flowed. Loved the ideas and the camera work. Wasn't expecting much considering the critics' opinions but once again they're just full of themselves. 9/10

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

9

AfonsobJan 22, 2019

Glass had the courage and originality to bring a conclusion to its story line, speaking about superhero movies it's not usual and only Watchmen and Logan brought it until now. It's not a flawless movie but It's far from what the critics areGlass had the courage and originality to bring a conclusion to its story line, speaking about superhero movies it's not usual and only Watchmen and Logan brought it until now. It's not a flawless movie but It's far from what the critics are saying. It's a original, deep and intense movie that brings a fresh air to the gender of superhero movies, something made by few before. I would say that Glass deserves a place among Logan and Watchmen.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

7

BrianMcCriticJan 21, 2019

I've thought a lot about this film and while there were some problems I had with pacing and a character that was central to the story that I really didn't like, this is still an idea movie that goes for it. M. Night deserves credit for thisI've thought a lot about this film and while there were some problems I had with pacing and a character that was central to the story that I really didn't like, this is still an idea movie that goes for it. M. Night deserves credit for this trilogy and while to me Glass is the worst of the three I still appreciated it. Overall a low 7 a B.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

2

Daniel_EndureJan 18, 2019

Glass is interesting at times, no doubt, but it's one of those sequels that takes away a little something from its predecessors just simply by existing. Glass's biggest problem is that the script never gives a clear reason to care about anyGlass is interesting at times, no doubt, but it's one of those sequels that takes away a little something from its predecessors just simply by existing. Glass's biggest problem is that the script never gives a clear reason to care about any of its three protagonists, instead promoting their lock-up as ultimately justifiable when all is said and done. The entirety of the second act is even a first-class trip straight into boredom. Any and all attempts at humor, which usually come from one of McAvoy's many personalities, in particular, Hedwig, come off flat and usually are more striking as random than humorous. Lastly, if you still can't muster skipping this one, prepare for Shyamalan's signature unnatural-feeling character interactions, directing, and acting from those supporting the main players of the cast.… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

10

KadorathJan 21, 2019

I thought this movie was amazing. I honestly have a lot of trouble understanding why the critics hated it so much.

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

10

ocean1505Jan 21, 2019

I cannot understand why people are being so harsh on this movie. This will most definitely develop a cult following as the years pass, much like unbreakable in my opinion.

8 of 14 users found this helpful86

All this user's reviews

9

shaoran2Jan 21, 2019

The real heroes an ending that is far from clichés! a story well told away from the everyday in the cinema great actors great performances.

the real heroes are in this movie they do exist! ignore the critics and pay your ticked enjoy theThe real heroes an ending that is far from clichés! a story well told away from the everyday in the cinema great actors great performances.

the real heroes are in this movie they do exist!
ignore the critics and pay your ticked enjoy the performances and a unique story with much suspense!… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

10

NileOuroborosJan 20, 2019

I've been reading several critic reviews for this film, and can't stop shaking my head. These are people I respect, who are usually spot on for how I feel about films, A.A. Dowd in particular who gave this one a B-. So I'll state myI've been reading several critic reviews for this film, and can't stop shaking my head. These are people I respect, who are usually spot on for how I feel about films, A.A. Dowd in particular who gave this one a B-. So I'll state my position: This film is perfect. Flawless. At long last and thank heaven, M. Night Shyamalan has arrived; fully self-realized and glorious to behold.

I think where the critics are at a disadvantage comes from two things. First, M. Night Shyamalan has become such a joke in this business that he's practically a meme, certainly a cautionary tale in hubris, and they simply can't accept that he might emerge fully formed from the trash heaps of The Happening and Airbender and After Earth as the seminal film auteur that he always showed the potential of being. Second, Shyamalan has only ever made one movie (barring the ones written in whole or in part by others), and this one is no different. He's just finally perfected it.

And the only movie he's ever made is this: "You're not gonna believe this, but it's true," and he then dissects what he just showed you to irrevocably prove that indeed, it can't be true, and he's transparent about everything the whole time, and in the end he pulls a rhino out of thimble and lo! - It's actually true, and your mind is blown. Or the short version: "The Twist Ending." And the problem with that story is that it is, at its core, a con. Unless it's perfect, in which case it's magic. And it's worked exactly five times (The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable, Signs, Split, and Glass). Every other attempt failed, and we felt cheated and conned at the end of it.

I do not think less of the auteur for trying to perfect one story over and over. I admire it. If you 'got' Jiro Dreams Of Sushi, you'll understand my perspective. Jiro spends his entire life perfecting one thing. And he only achieves perfection after a full life pursuing it. Compared to that, Shyamalan is precocious in his achievement with Glass.

But why? How? What makes Glass perfect? The best imagery I can provide is one the film itself raises during a therapy session: that the world's finest magicians work at the subtlest levels with inhuman precision to read minds, fool eyes, make believers out of skeptics. What Shyamalan has always been, even in relative drivel like Airbender, is a unique filmmaking voice. His pacing, his framing, lighting, sets, performances... absolutely every single element of what ends up on the screen is distinctly and uniquely his, and almost invariably beautiful to behold. To quote the respected A.A. Dowd: "Every shot is an event." Take a second to appreciate this. The craft of moving images has been evolving at breakneck speed for a solid century, and within all that susurrus, Shyamalan stands out, is distinct, is unique and even momentous in his craft unlike anything current (no disrespect Mr. Tarantino), and surpassing even his inspiration in deliberate purpose: Mr. Hitchcock himself.

The 'meta' nature of this film is brought up in every professional review. What this means is that Shyamalan here is not only a magician, or a magician rolling up his sleeves to show you he isn't cheating. He's walking out on stage completely in the buff, hiding and holding nothing. And as he proceeds to perform his magic he's explaining every step to you in excruciating detail. And at the end, from nowhere, a thimble appears, and a rhino is pulled out, and it sings the national anthem in falsetto.

How does he accomplish this? Let's take for granted that his cinematic craft is flawless, as always. What's different? What's different is that his usual shortcoming has finally been shored up. Even in Split, his secondary characters suffered from what they usually do: they are his exposition. The therapist there is his stopgap, explaining wall climbing and bluntly postulating the film's thesis, which is that DID is an evolutionary step past normal humanity (i.e. a super power). It's too direct. While Split and the others survived this flaw, The Village and the rest were much worse and did not. But it's part of his ploy, to reveal all upfront so you can't believe the final twist. Yet it weakens these characters, which erodes their nominal job as supporting structures for the main characters. Why it works here in Glass is because that exposition comes more from the image sequences themselves, and of course from the meta element - delivered by the titular Mr. Glass himself - which fits both his character and the nature of the whole magic trick.

And that's pretty much it. The eternal fatal flaw finally healed. It doesn't hurt that his leads are some of the most talented actors. Ever. Yeah, you heard me - go ahead, look at Willis' body of work and prove me wrong.

But okay yeah, there is one flaw here. Mr. Glass' mama's aging makeup in super close up. But I'm gonna call that the mole on the supermodel's face that highlights the perfection of everything else.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

10

TheTrollManOMGJan 21, 2019

M. Night at his best, i just don't get the critics that this movie has had in the US. It's an outstanding one. This movie will certainly not dissapoint you.

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

9

PinokiaJan 21, 2019

The film is good, watched in one breath. But before the start it is worth watching the first two films in the trilogy, otherwise much will not be clear

13 of 20 users found this helpful137

All this user's reviews

10

Tarot1575Jan 21, 2019

Yet again critics get it wrong, and the people who say the end is terrible are just plain loony. This is M. Night at his best and all I could say at the end was WOW because I was blown away. It’s ballsy and original and the end rivals theYet again critics get it wrong, and the people who say the end is terrible are just plain loony. This is M. Night at his best and all I could say at the end was WOW because I was blown away. It’s ballsy and original and the end rivals the Sixth Sense. If you like Unbreakable and Split you’ll love this film. I took my daughter who had not seen Split and saw Unbreskable 15 years ago, and she too loved it too. This is one of those times to ignore the critics.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

10

IpecacJan 20, 2019

Go and see this movie. It is awesome. Blows away the disney garbage. It does not rely on CGI in every scene. Both me and my son had a blast at movies with this one.

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

1

Hectic101Jan 20, 2019

If you care about Unbreakable and Split then I suggest leaving this movie when the third act begins, because it's a doozy. The movie is rather dull and redundant up until then but still ok, but that last 30 minutes or so really takes a dumpIf you care about Unbreakable and Split then I suggest leaving this movie when the third act begins, because it's a doozy. The movie is rather dull and redundant up until then but still ok, but that last 30 minutes or so really takes a dump all over everything with a REALLY dumb ending and lazily annoying twists. Gets a "1" strictly because of McAvoys performance, otherwise it'd be a "0" it pissed me off that badly. Massive step down from the last two movies of this "trilogy". Wish I had listened to my concerns going in and not seen it. Now I don't know if I can ever watch Unbreakable again without thoughts of this dumpster fire ruining it...… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

10

TryASummersaultJan 20, 2019

9.5/10 A spectacularly bizarre fusion of psychological intricacy, and signature clever plotting, M. Night crafts his tragic yet powerful magnum opus with this future classic; GLASS.

As the ultimate culmination of Unbreakable and Split, this9.5/10 A spectacularly bizarre fusion of psychological intricacy, and signature clever plotting, M. Night crafts his tragic yet powerful magnum opus with this future classic; GLASS.

As the ultimate culmination of Unbreakable and Split, this film has already been insanely misunderstood and unfairly rated/reviewed by “ critics” and some average moviegoers alike. They seemed to have expected a fast paced superhero film without deep character study, and dedicated storytelling with heart which is what this film has in bunches. If anything this is the most realistic and grounded film about super humans/heroes/villains that we've ever seen with dramatic outcomes that don't fit the usual formula of so many superhero related films. Another reason Shymalan deserves tons of respect for swinging away ambitiously with his stories and overall vision knowing many won't understand it.

The film starts out with a marvelous opening sequence that throws us back into familiar territory with these intriguing characters and what they are up to presently, and sets the tone nicely with excitement. As things progress the film does slow down drastically to spend time on characterization and the story's overall emotional depth. When everything comes together for the conclusion, the pace picks up intensely to an absolutely mind blowing string of events that will leave people talking for ages to come. Shyamlan is known for clever twists and extremely crazy endings and this one might be his most effectively executed one yet and that says something.

On the acting spectrum, this showcases once again just how mind boggling and versatile James McAvoy's Kevin/Horde character is. His enthusiasm, dedication, and wide range execution is up there with some of the greatest and most legendary acting I've ever seen, and he was snubbed of an Oscar and most likely will be again. He deserves massive amounts of credit once again. Sam Jackson's Elijah Glass portrayal is fantastic as well and just as witty and eccentric as ever, though i wish we would've had more dialogue from him. Speaking of dialogue, one of my only gripes is just how underutilized Bruce Willis's David Dunn character was in the film. I felt like they could've really designated some more time to his character, and especially given him some more lines. He was still solid and his normal self, but wasn't around enough imo.

Presentation wise, this was classic M. Night with crisp camera work, colorful schemes, and creative angling. He clearly has a keen eye for setting up certain scenes and shots in a unique and brilliant manner and keeps the film visually intriguing throughout. The effects in the action sequences are relatively solid especially when you think of the practical and frugal budget, which makes it all the more impressive. The soundtrack perfectly blends the familiar sonic themes from the first 2 films and compliments the overall experience fantastically.

Overall I would say to go into this like its more of a psychological drama than a thriller, and to really stop and think just how grounded its identity really is with all of its emotional power and symbolic messages. I believe once people can do that eventually they will learn to love this film the way its intended to be.… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

8

mrmonsterJan 20, 2019

Don't listen to the critics, this is a great movie. It proves that M. Night Shaymalan is back and as good as ever. If you liked Split and Unbreakable, I think you'll like this.

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

7

d0vla11Jan 20, 2019

A perfect ending to a trilogy. Even though Split is the best to me, this one delivers it too. Awesome acting, pacing is great - it kept me interested until the end of it. You should watch it! :)

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

10

Patoka-ivanJan 20, 2019

Glass is a very good film.The great trilogy ended on an epic note. I advise you to go to the cinema.В

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

4

SquaredRenJan 20, 2019

I give all the credit to James McAvoy, he did an awesome performance every time he was on screen. Now, for the film itself the 1st act was carried by James and Bruce. 2nd act was so slow I almost felt asleep, and the 3rd act was a huge letI give all the credit to James McAvoy, he did an awesome performance every time he was on screen. Now, for the film itself the 1st act was carried by James and Bruce. 2nd act was so slow I almost felt asleep, and the 3rd act was a huge let down. Bruce got forgotten once the 1st act ended, the only good parts was when James was on screen, and the "twist" at the end was like..."are you serious?".

This is just not a good movie, lots of fans are trying to justify it but NO!. Wait for it to come on Netflix, don't spend a dime on this one.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

10

SolantusJan 20, 2019

I like the origin story, Where can ı get more. Movie is Very Good, Acting is very impresive especially McAvoy. You are never get bored a minute.

And Never Listen The Critics They are corrupt

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

9

duralasterJan 20, 2019

It seems like the critics have something against M. Night and this movie. The critics are wrong. The movie is good. It's cheesy at times, but it had to be. He is making a movie in which comic books are based on reality and superheroes areIt seems like the critics have something against M. Night and this movie. The critics are wrong. The movie is good. It's cheesy at times, but it had to be. He is making a movie in which comic books are based on reality and superheroes are real! If you didn't like the movie, I could think of rating nothing less than an average score, but I saw one critics' headline as "Do Not See Glass." That's absurd. Critics give Glass a total metacritic score of 42, but The Boy Who Would Be King, where a modern kid meets Merlin as a classmate in school, gets 72...… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

8

opiiouJan 20, 2019

I saw this movie yesterday, and i gotta say it was really worth the money.
The cinematography is very beautiful, just like the use of color. I enjoyed the performances of James McAvoy and Sam Jackson (Elijah is probably the only characterI saw this movie yesterday, and i gotta say it was really worth the money.
The cinematography is very beautiful, just like the use of color. I enjoyed the performances of James McAvoy and Sam Jackson (Elijah is probably the only character that is not literally Sam Jackson himself).
In general i really like Shyamalan's take on this superhero stuff.
On the other hand i can see why some people are dissapointed, the ending was... i wouldnt say bad, but not what i wanted. Its (thank god) not a superhero blockbuster, if you saw unbreakable and split, you knew what you were in for.
Anyways, despite this rather unexpected ending, Shyamalan has redeemed himself in my eyes.
I am now willing to forget about the last airbender.
To sum up: Really cool and good movie, with an unusual ending.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

9

Davrosdaleks1Jan 20, 2019

From what I hear, this is one of those really polarizing movies with some people really liking it and some not. I came into Glass a little cautious, but I was surprised to find out how MUCH i liked this.

I just found the whole world of thisFrom what I hear, this is one of those really polarizing movies with some people really liking it and some not. I came into Glass a little cautious, but I was surprised to find out how MUCH i liked this.

I just found the whole world of this so fascinating. Some people don't like that a lot of this is talking, but this is an M. Night Shamyalan movie and considering Unbreakable had a lot of talking, I wasn't surprised. (Action fans shouldn't be too worried. There are two major fight scenes, and they are both pretty good, especially the first one.) The whole film focuses on characters like Mr. Glass (Samuel L. Jackson) arguing for the existence of real life superheroes and the psychiatrist (Sarah Paulson) providing plausible arguments why they don't exist. Yeah, this rehashes concepts from Unbreakable, but I still found the ideas and dialogue to all be really interesting.

There is one thing they do near the end that rubbed me the wrong way, but then they quickly followed up with something I found so satisfying that I quickly forgave.

The third act is a little rushed, including one character's jump to a conclusion a little hard to swallow. Also, some of Mr. Glass' obvious comparisons to comic books sometime feel like Shamyalan is talking down to the audience. Still, it wasn't enough to take me from the film.

Also, this is a serious film but it does have some pretty good funny bits to lighten the mood.

Mr. Glass, the wheelchair-bound genius with brittle bone disease, and the Horde (played by James McAvoy), a serial killer with multiple personalities with different moral leanings, are still fascinating characters. Yeah, they've both done monstrous things and yet the movie still makes you feel for them. Jackson nails every scene, and it's pretty impressive how many characters McAvoy are able to shift between. (However, since they are revealing more personalities here, it seems like McAvoy was running out of ideas for voices.)

Unfortunately, Bruce Willis' superhero David Dunn gets short shrift here. He gets a good introduction, but once the second act kicks in they do very little with him, and I felt like the ending didn't do him justice.

Heard a lot of people complain about the psychiatrist being too talky, but I didn't see any issues. I liked that she didn't fall into frustrating movie psychiatrist tropes, by being well-meaning but totally incompetent and clueless or being an uncaring jerk. All three of the exceptional people have a supporting character on the outside who all really work well and again the actors do great work.

Say what you will about Shamyalan's writing style, but he has an excellent sense of visuals. He really pulls you in, which helped me be less bothered by any little stumbles in the plot. It is so nice to see a director who knows that you can shoot a scene at night and still have color and see what is going on.

I admit that many people could be bothered by the ending more than me. Seeing this could be a gamble, but if you were a fan of Unbreakable and Split, I suggest you take your chances on this.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

9

DarthVader2015Jan 20, 2019

Para aqueles que esperam um filme de super-heróis, não esperem por isso, pois essa nunca foi a proposta. O filme interliga os fatos acontecidos em Fragmentado "Split" e em Corpo Fechado "Unbreakable, nos envolvendo em um enredo intrigantePara aqueles que esperam um filme de super-heróis, não esperem por isso, pois essa nunca foi a proposta. O filme interliga os fatos acontecidos em Fragmentado "Split" e em Corpo Fechado "Unbreakable, nos envolvendo em um enredo intrigante sobre acreditar ser um super-herói de acordo com o psicológico da pessoa. É um filme inteligente, intrigante, com ideias complexas que em certos pontos nos faz questionar sobre os acontecimentos dos outros dois filmes. As atuações são excelentes aos papéis, com destaque novamente para James McAvoy, que tem uma interpretação excelente no seu personagem. O filme possui também a inserção de uma importante personagem: a psicóloga. Sua participação no longa parece meio "nada a ver", mas a medida que o filme avança e principalmente no final, percebemos o seu objetivo, que acaba fracassando nos últimos minutos. As vezes nos parece que a participação da personagem Casey pode ter parecido forçada no começo, mas por mais que sua participação seja pequena, ela é importante ao final. A participação do Joseph ao filme me pareceu um tanto estranha e sem muita importância ao longo do filme. Certamente não havia muito espaço para eles dois. Percebe-se que quando o diretor fez o filme "Corpo Fechado" ele não pensou em futuramente criar o "Fragmentado" e juntar os dois, mas a mente humana é incrível e esse terceiro filme encaixou muito bem a junção entre eles. Conclusão: "Vidro" é um ótimo filme, com um enredo pertinente e bem feito, que explora o passado dos personagens para questionar os acontecimentos dos outros dois filmes. onde os três personagens principais acabam por ter uma ligação muito boa. Novamente, não espere por um filme de super-herói, como já estamos acostumados a ver sempre nos filmes da Marvel e DC, pois o objetivo do filme não é esse, e ainda bem que não é, pois assim não seria possível entender o real objetivo do mesmo: envolver nós espectadores e os personagens em questionamentos sobre serem super humanos. O filme não é um blockbuster mas é melhor do que muitos e nos surpreende com seu enredo mais ousado. O filme cumpre bem com o que é proposto e vai além, nos surpreende de um bom jeito. O filme também possui um plot twist, que funciona bem e o torna diferente e melhor do que se não tivesse. Vidro é um ótimo filme e um ótimo desfecho da "trilogia" criada por M. Night Shyamalan.… Expand

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

8

EborjasJan 20, 2019

This movie gave me what I wanted just like the previous films. Suspense, kept me guessing, some nice revenge, some closure, character interaction, unique developments. The ending was not cliche and I loved it. I feel everyone wanted a clicheThis movie gave me what I wanted just like the previous films. Suspense, kept me guessing, some nice revenge, some closure, character interaction, unique developments. The ending was not cliche and I loved it. I feel everyone wanted a cliche ending and when they didn't get it, they felt betrayed. everyone has been conditioned to expect certain plots and that is why I feel this move got bad review. If you came in wanting something different. You got it. I did and I loved it.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

9

flash246Jan 20, 2019

The best thing to do is to go in with nothing on your mind. Ignore the critics and try to forget any trailer that made this seem like a normal superhero movie. It's not. It plays with your expectations on how it will end. The acting is superbThe best thing to do is to go in with nothing on your mind. Ignore the critics and try to forget any trailer that made this seem like a normal superhero movie. It's not. It plays with your expectations on how it will end. The acting is superb and was overall a worthy conclusion to the trilogy.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

9

kobenaufJan 20, 2019

I really enjoyed the story and the acting. I didn't know anything about this movie going in, which is ideal, but now after the fact, looking at the critics' comments, makes me think, why do we think those people should be experts at every movie.

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

3

JazzwazlerJan 20, 2019

3.2/10

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

8

FMisHereJan 20, 2019

Honestly, if you like the other two, you will 100% percent enjoy and appreciate this one. There are flaws in this fun but the grounded and realism of these superhero characters feel good in Glass. People have reasons to not enjoy this and theHonestly, if you like the other two, you will 100% percent enjoy and appreciate this one. There are flaws in this fun but the grounded and realism of these superhero characters feel good in Glass. People have reasons to not enjoy this and the ending is iffy but overall, its very fun and enjoyable. Go in with an open mind and not expecting action like Marvel or DC. Its a different kind of superhero film… Expand

9 of 15 users found this helpful96

All this user's reviews

9

jacob4Jan 20, 2019

Definitely lives up to the unconventional superhero trope. Though at times the movie may seem slow-paced and just a bunch of exposistion all that leads up to a pretty satisfying climax and awesome fight scene. The characters are interestingDefinitely lives up to the unconventional superhero trope. Though at times the movie may seem slow-paced and just a bunch of exposistion all that leads up to a pretty satisfying climax and awesome fight scene. The characters are interesting and unique, and the final twists are crazy and awesome like always. A pretty good way to wrap up a trilogy, but hope for to come!… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

9

KaspianJan 20, 2019

I'm not fan of Shyamalan's movies, but this one is good. Not perfect, but really good.

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

8

Reviewer2201Jan 20, 2019

Good movie, very surprising. Watch unbreakable and split, understand them first before seeing this movie.

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

6

SSRJan 19, 2019

Not as good as Unbreakable, and a notch lower than Split, and although it still has some interesting moments and some great performances they are letdown by an overwrought story.

9 of 13 users found this helpful94

All this user's reviews

5

Compi24Jan 19, 2019

Fans of either "Unbreakable" or "Split" beware, "Glass's" blatant disregard for its central trio of characters may just infuriate, disappoint, or otherwise disturb you. The movie's first three-quarters had me so rapt, riveted, and drawn in,Fans of either "Unbreakable" or "Split" beware, "Glass's" blatant disregard for its central trio of characters may just infuriate, disappoint, or otherwise disturb you. The movie's first three-quarters had me so rapt, riveted, and drawn in, but it's the ending that ultimately left me feeling like Samuel L. Jackson's "Elijah Price" at the beginning of this trilogy's first installment -- alone, small, and misunderstood. I thought I was on the same page with Shyamalan when it came to the rules of this world, the import of these characters, and the direction at hand. I suppose I was wrong, and I'm crestfallen as a result. Ugh.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

7

Trineo99Jan 19, 2019

First of all, all three of the main leads did marvellous jobs as their characters. Now I haven’t seen Unbreakable yet but I still felt like I understood everything that David and Elijah stood for. I had already seen Split, the other movie inFirst of all, all three of the main leads did marvellous jobs as their characters. Now I haven’t seen Unbreakable yet but I still felt like I understood everything that David and Elijah stood for. I had already seen Split, the other movie in this series, so I already knew how great James McAvoy would be in this movie. He just brings so much energy to each and every single personality making them all seem like a different person. Some of the side characters though didn’t stand out as much for me and just seemed two dimensional. One of them being the doctor. She had no major character development and just seemed like a last minute addition. Spencer Treat Clark, who plays Joseph Dunn, brought nothing to the film and just seemed really bland. Just like any M. Night Shyamalan, there is a plot twist but in this film, there isn’t just one, not two but three. One of them is actually really good and will shock people but the other two are just dumb and should’ve just been taken out. This film is two hours and six minutes long and man does it feel longer than that. There were some parts that were enticing for me and brought me into the story but a majority of the film had me zoning out a lot. The film had my attention for one of the final scenes in the film and that was really it. This film feels like three different movies as well. There were some awkward transitions in this film and some weird moments where the camera was shaking. In the end, Glass in a decent film that I think could have and should’ve been better.… Expand

12 of 21 users found this helpful129

All this user's reviews

10

cylackJan 19, 2019

Don't listen to the critics. This was a fitting conclusion to the trilogy. Night subverts the whole superhero genre, a genre in which he was ahead of the curve when he came out with Unbreakable. Glass was never going to be a Superman typeDon't listen to the critics. This was a fitting conclusion to the trilogy. Night subverts the whole superhero genre, a genre in which he was ahead of the curve when he came out with Unbreakable. Glass was never going to be a Superman type film that was going to have a mega battle like Superman did with Zod. This film examines what it means to be a hero vs. villain, or sane vs. insane. Touches on identity and how one finds it. Definitely worth seeing.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

7

ABAwesomeJan 19, 2019

It's good, not great. And it's a lot of good, with the exception of two or three major things (mostly plot points, but one thematic element that's just super sophmoric more than anything else) but it could've been worse. It's not what IIt's good, not great. And it's a lot of good, with the exception of two or three major things (mostly plot points, but one thematic element that's just super sophmoric more than anything else) but it could've been worse. It's not what I really wanted to the final chapter of this trilogy I never thought would happen, but it's an ending, anyway. It's not perfect, but definitely not a disaster. It's also quite funny, and not unintentionally like several other Shyamalan films. James McAvoy is easily the MVP and kills every time he's on-screen.… Expand

11 of 18 users found this helpful117

All this user's reviews

10

scsalJan 19, 2019

I must say, I just made this account to review this movie because it felt really unfair.
I stayed completely amused while watching this movie. Every second of it makes it worth watching: great actors, great characters, intriguing plot and theI must say, I just made this account to review this movie because it felt really unfair.
I stayed completely amused while watching this movie. Every second of it makes it worth watching: great actors, great characters, intriguing plot and the camera work and style is astounding. Sure it could be a better on some points but they're not that relevant, the movie does a great job on showing a relatable fictional universe and not being over the top.… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

8

grayhammondJan 19, 2019

I usually find that critical consensus is spot on, but in this case I wonder if we saw the same movie. Far from perfect (with action that's a bit clunky) but very entertaining and a completely worthy capper to Shyamalan's superhero trilogy. II usually find that critical consensus is spot on, but in this case I wonder if we saw the same movie. Far from perfect (with action that's a bit clunky) but very entertaining and a completely worthy capper to Shyamalan's superhero trilogy. I honestly wonder if a lot of critics went in expecting an ACTUAL superhero film rather than one that is quite literally about examining what it might look like if supernatural beings were really among us. My advice, go see it but keep in mind that it had a budget of $20 million (no, I didn't accidentally leave off a zero) and think about the ways it subverts the genre while still being a part of it. A solid, clever film.… Expand

18 of 26 users found this helpful188

All this user's reviews

9

DlamasJan 19, 2019

Okey critics, lets going to talk: you don´t have a f***ing idea of critising movies. The score of Glass is absurd compared with the deep story created by Mr. Shyamalan in this marvelous triology. I have to reconize that my hopes were highOkey critics, lets going to talk: you don´t have a f***ing idea of critising movies. The score of Glass is absurd compared with the deep story created by Mr. Shyamalan in this marvelous triology. I have to reconize that my hopes were high before entering to the movie threatre, but it was better than I expected. Brilliant, intelligent and unexpected twists, interesting process of creation of this three heroes and villans, its connection and sociality. I didn´t expected than a singular but curious movie like "UNBREAKABLE" could make a great game for the spectators and making chills to the comic lovers, who were gratified with ties and nods combined with one of the best heroes triology I have never seen. Okay, maybe its not much mysterious or thrilling than "Split" or having a slow but marked rhythm like "Unbreakable", but that`s argued and defended thanks to a sensational conclusion, which shows the love and interest of the director for this world of incredible powers and for his original characters. Thanks Mr. Shyamalan, you are my new hero now in my collection of movies (and comics ;D). Glass deserves between 7 and 9, not 4. (a****les)

Okey criticos, vamos a hablar seriamente: no tenéis ni p**a idea de criticar películas. La calificación de Glass es absurda comparada con la historia profunda que ha creado el señor Shyamalan en su maravillosa triología. Tengo que reconocer que ya iba con grandes expectativas antes de entrar a la sala de cine, pero ha llegado a ser incluso mejor de lo que me esperaba. Brillantes, inteligentes e inesperados giros de guión, interesante proceso de creación de estos tres heroes y villanos, su conexión y sociabilidad. No llegué a imaginar que una película como "El Protegido" daría lugar a un gran juego para los espectadores y haciendo gritar en las butacas a los amantes de los cómics, que fueron muy bien homenajeados con guiños y lazos combinados con la que posiblemente sea una de las mejores triologías de héroes que he visto en mi vida. Vale, puede que no sea tan misteriosa o aterradora como "Múltiple" o no tenga un lento pero marcado ritmo como "El Protegido", pero esto se defiende y argumenta gracias a su conclusión sensacional, que nos muestra el amor e interés del director a este mundo de poderes increíbles y, como no, a sus personajes originales. Mil gracias Sr. Shyamalan, usted es mi nuevo héroe de mi colección de películas (y comics ;D). Glass merece una nota entre 7 y 9, no un 4 (ca****os)… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

9

tim73034Jan 19, 2019

I noticed a rather low review score on this movie and was apprehensive going into it.. This movie was awesome.. Ive seen every comic book movie that has come out and this is much better than either Aquaman and / or Venom (not that thoseI noticed a rather low review score on this movie and was apprehensive going into it.. This movie was awesome.. Ive seen every comic book movie that has come out and this is much better than either Aquaman and / or Venom (not that those movies were horrible, I just likes this better) I thought it was really cool, very original concept, has a good story.… Expand

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

9

JHenrickson97Jan 18, 2019

I have no idea what to say, except 2 things...
1. I enjoyed the film.
2. I have issues with the parts of the climax.

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

4

BodOpsJan 19, 2019

'Glass' review (no spoilers):

This doesn't do the previous films justice. From my perspective, 'Unbreakable' was a gem. M Night Shyamalan's uncanny ability to handle trauma and melancholy made it unique. The ‘hero’ aspect was secondary to'Glass' review (no spoilers):

This doesn't do the previous films justice.

From my perspective, 'Unbreakable' was a gem.

M Night Shyamalan's uncanny ability to handle trauma and melancholy made it unique. The ‘hero’ aspect was secondary to the exploration of fragile family relationships. You cared about David because of his personal grief, his hopes of patching things up with his wife and son, and his growing sense of fear and bewilderment.

With 'Split', you came for James McAvoy's head-spinning performance, but you stayed for Anna Taylor-Joy's compelling and heart-breaking backstory (and hopefully the epic end-credits reveal too). Shyamalan has many detractors - but when he's on form, he conjures character depth effortlessly.

You lie in wait of the gut-punch monochrome reveals, but his artful exploration of deep (and often, uncomfortable) emotions is what carries his stories through.

‘Glass’ does, at times, carry weight. In fact, the first 30 minutes are brilliant – and even when it falls away after that, there *are* parts that drag you back into the slipstream of the intended experience.

However, those false dawns emphasise how bafflingly convoluted and hollow the ending is – and thus, how much of a disservice it does to the story as a whole.

After the credits rolled, the first words that came to mind were ‘massive production problems’.

Lo and behold, the day after the Premiere, Samuel L Jackson admitted:

“There was a different ending when we first started this that kind of needed to be changed because of the way society is and what's going on in the world and what it would have looked like.”

Cancel culture 1. Artistic vision 0.

Summary: One of the most confusing and disappointing experiences I’ve ever had in a cinema. And that includes the time I caught my foot in a drinks-holder and accidentally threw a super-size sprite in a child’s face.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

8

bataguilaJan 19, 2019

Muy buena, No mejor que SPLIT, pero si mejor que UNBREAKABLE. El inicio es emocionante, luego cae en un bache tratando de explicar una teoría, pero las batalla finales son maravillosas, y el final muy bueno, hasta lloré :´( Por que por que!!!!

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

9

IAmMooseJan 19, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Glass. This movie was an excellent ending to a fascinating trilogy. It will divide audiences on the twist of the movie, but overall is worth the price of admission alone.

All three of our main characters die at the end of this movie. Each one of them die in a way that uses their weaknesses. David Dunn dies of drowning, Kevin Crumb dies by sharing who he is with Casey, and Mr. Glass dies through his betrayal to The Beast.

If you haven't seen the film yet, go watch it in theatres or on any streaming device when it comes out.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

9

HKramerJan 19, 2019

M. Night Shyamalan continues his bold direction of not giving the viewer what they want, but what he wants to give. It's frustrating but also refreshing in a way to not be pandered to. I left the theater excited about a universe that mayM. Night Shyamalan continues his bold direction of not giving the viewer what they want, but what he wants to give. It's frustrating but also refreshing in a way to not be pandered to. I left the theater excited about a universe that may never occur.. Some of the critics reviews have been ridiculously negative prompting my first ever review..… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

10

dip92Jan 19, 2019

I just don't get the critics on this one. I was a little sceptical walking into the theatre seeing the critical score but this movie was freaking great. I would have given it a solid 8 but it deserves a couple extra points for the way it hasI just don't get the critics on this one. I was a little sceptical walking into the theatre seeing the critical score but this movie was freaking great. I would have given it a solid 8 but it deserves a couple extra points for the way it has been treated by the critics.… Expand

8 of 14 users found this helpful86

All this user's reviews

10

ProFeatJan 19, 2019

Good movie don't understand what all dug. The film is not a blockbuster it is essentially philosophical. It's not the Avengers and the action is not here to be a movie conversational. Generally I liked it. And still this film many did notGood movie don't understand what all dug. The film is not a blockbuster it is essentially philosophical. It's not the Avengers and the action is not here to be a movie conversational. Generally I liked it. And still this film many did not like because of the trailer. Everyone was waiting for the other Avengers but alas, this is a good psychological movie… Expand

12 of 20 users found this helpful128

All this user's reviews

10

DukeRedsJan 19, 2019

Don't Listen to the critics. If you liked and understood Unbreakable and Split, this movie is a layered Masterpiece. With complex themes, meta narrative and multiple good plot twists, this movie thrills the heart and the mind. I can't wait toDon't Listen to the critics. If you liked and understood Unbreakable and Split, this movie is a layered Masterpiece. With complex themes, meta narrative and multiple good plot twists, this movie thrills the heart and the mind. I can't wait to re-watch it to look for more foreshadowing, hints or just details, of which there are plenty to discover.… Expand

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

8

easterfieldsJan 19, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. ***SPOILERS***
I loved this film! I also hated it! I'll explain. I absolutely loved 98% of this movie. The first 98% of it. There are parts and scenes that are mesmerizing and just plain brilliant! In fact, it's only the last 10 minutes or so, that it lets us down. All acting efforts are done superbly well, especially James McAvoy. I mean...James McAvoy could be pound for pound one of the most talented actors in the business today. He's that fantastic in this film. He actually steals the show from two legendary actors in Bruce Willis and Samuel Jackson. There are just so many incredible moments here, but the reason why it doesn't hit a home run is really because the ending sees a "Kill them all and let God sort them out" approach. In fact, I'm going to go so far as to compare the last 10 minutes to that of The Last Jedi. It really comes down to poor writing leading to an unfulfilled character arch. When a character the fans (including myself) have devoted so much time and reverence to, ends up dying due to very lame reasons, it leaves a sour taste in the mouth. Bruce Willis is drowned in a pothole. In a literal pothole. James McAvoy gets shot by a sniper. And Mr.Glass is punched in the stomach. God I just can't believe how bad they fd up this ending. Everything was perfect. PERFECT! Ugh...… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

8

RaduAJan 19, 2019

It's a good movie but I felt disappointed.
M. Night Shyamalan could have done much more. He had some good ideas, but he did not develop them. I didn't really liked the plot twist.
The acting is good ( especially James McAvoy ). Several scenesIt's a good movie but I felt disappointed.
M. Night Shyamalan could have done much more. He had some good ideas, but he did not develop them. I didn't really liked the plot twist.
The acting is good ( especially James McAvoy ).
Several scenes were filmed badly and some very well.

I do not think it deserves so much hate from critics.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

10

havigalaxyJan 19, 2019

DON'T LISTEN TO THE CRITICS! M. Night has done it again! I was at the edge of my seat trying to figure out how this will end and then when it does my jaw drops, which is is a common recurring thing that happens when I watch M. Night's moviesDON'T LISTEN TO THE CRITICS! M. Night has done it again! I was at the edge of my seat trying to figure out how this will end and then when it does my jaw drops, which is is a common recurring thing that happens when I watch M. Night's movies and that is very well a GOOD thing, which means he is doing something right!
This movie is not like any other superhero movie I have seen. M. Night brings such a realistic bend. From the fight scenes, which are played out like it truly would be in real life, the conflict through the characters of battling the belief in real super powers, to the whole demeanor of the movie, it has such a realistic and literal vibe to the plot that sets it apart from all the other superhero movies and making the audience truly believe that the concept of superpowers could actually be real. Its stunningly executed from the cinematography, score, color scheme, plot and all of the above. Not to Mention James McAvoy's acting was presented stunningly. I didn't think his acting could get any better after Split, but it did! WHY HASN'T THIS GUY WON AN OSCAR YET!?!?
If your looking for a remarkable superhero movie like no other, I wouldn't recommend any other movie than this one!… Expand

13 of 20 users found this helpful137

All this user's reviews

10

JimeJan 19, 2019

This movie is not without its flaws however, the style acting and characters create a wonderful aura that I just love.

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

5

Sam11Jan 19, 2019

The only thing that keeps this movie from being awful is James McAvoys absolutely stunning performance. Unfortunately he alone cannot save this movie. As a conclusion to it's amazing prequels it ultimately disappoints with an ending that willThe only thing that keeps this movie from being awful is James McAvoys absolutely stunning performance. Unfortunately he alone cannot save this movie. As a conclusion to it's amazing prequels it ultimately disappoints with an ending that will most likely sour your experience with these 3 movies.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

10

satan1349Jan 19, 2019

Loved it. Don't listen to the critics on this one. Go out and see it. It will be well worth it.

9 of 17 users found this helpful98

All this user's reviews

3

amheretojudgeJan 18, 2019

Split Into Disappointments.

Glass Shyamalan's conclusion to his beloved project is a disappointing loose thread that thoroughly convinces you to hold on to it, but barely is ready to be the host for it. There is too much going behind theSplit Into Disappointments.

Glass

Shyamalan's conclusion to his beloved project is a disappointing loose thread that thoroughly convinces you to hold on to it, but barely is ready to be the host for it. There is too much going behind the screen- his signature move- that when it is reveal it does leave you in an awe of it, but when it comes to show definite figures on screen, the numbers are often mismatching. There is no romance in either the characters or the storytelling. And it is the primary reason why it shatters so vigorously. Without any whatsoever flow, the storytelling often comes off as news, which too frankly isn't intriguing. To be informative is one thing and to be a narrator another.

What it does get right, is the mythology that Shyamalan has constructed in his mind. His sincere respect to the concept itself can easily be filtered out in his mannerism. His film lives on glorifying these characters to their limits. He gives them enough range and room to flaunt in their persona and the impact it creates to the surrounding of it. And clearly he has kept McAvoy at the front of it, the time, space, energy and range he has offered to that character, is all admirable accepted by McAvoy, and the result is stupendous.

His awe-inspiring performance both challenges and mocks his fellow actors, his commitment on the nakedness and innocence of each personality is the soul reason, he emerges as the only survivor from this tale. Challenging him with few good scenes, resides Jackson's thirst for the quest and abomination. With very little to do, he makes sure he leaves a last longing impression on the viewers. Paulson has a bit edgy character to portray, either way, she never is able to enchant us nor overpower us through her schemes.

Willis, as probably the biggest disappointment, is playing a cameo, with very little finesse on his performance. The other supporting cast like Johnson and Treat Clark too falls under the same pit. Shyamalan has always managed to build up the hype like no one else, he aces in it, but when it comes to reveal the cards, they are often disappointing or rushed over. In this case, the physical sequences are not only dull and off putting but annoying, which is mostly mutilated by the eerie camera work that is there to actually enhance the momentum of the scene; irony.

Aforementioned, his last thought on this big war of comic books, is sharp and illuminating, it shifts our perspective to a whole new dimension. But before any of it scrolls open, it is already too late. While its first act maps out the characters in a different state, the second one that ought to be husky and cunning; especially since Jackson is in control of the ride, it isn't thoroughly justified with very little skin in the whole "mastermind" game. Glass aches you more than you would anticipate, the beloved characters over the years, they deserved much more and so did we.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

0

El_HyenaJan 18, 2019

Not only a boring film, the ending ruins all the intrigue and mystique of the other films. Except the acting it is a film that fails on every level. I was quite excited for this film having loved 'Unbreakable' and 'Split', but this was soNot only a boring film, the ending ruins all the intrigue and mystique of the other films. Except the acting it is a film that fails on every level. I was quite excited for this film having loved 'Unbreakable' and 'Split', but this was so disappointing.… Expand

8 of 23 users found this helpful815

All this user's reviews

6

moviemitch96Jan 18, 2019

So I was really looking forward to this once it was revealed that the films 'Unbreakable' and 'Split' were tied together and that Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson's characters from 'Unbreakable'would be meeting James McAvoy's from 'Split'.So I was really looking forward to this once it was revealed that the films 'Unbreakable' and 'Split' were tied together and that Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson's characters from 'Unbreakable'would be meeting James McAvoy's from 'Split'. For those unfamiliar with the stories to both those films, in 'Unbreakable', Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson play individuals with unique traits and abilities. Having gone his whole life surviving several severe accidents and realizing he just might be immortal, David Dunn (Willis) uses his superhuman strength and psychic abilities for good and helping others, while a fragile and crippled man named Elijah Price (Jackson) acts as a resentful villain to Willis's hero. In 'Split', McAvoy plays Kevin Wendell Crumb, a man who not only kidnaps young women, but also happens to have multiple personality disorder, one of these personalities being a large, dangerous, and aggressive one known as 'The Beast.' This film unites these three characters together and ultimately pits them against one another. While this premise had been in the making for years and sounded so cool as an idea and the way it was teased at the end of 'Split', I have to say that I was quite underwhelmed with the execution of said idea in this film. I really felt like it had great potential, but this film really took forever to get moving at a decent pace and mostly felt like build-up and set-up, with the final half hour being the only somewhat exciting portion of the film. It just seemed to take a while to find its footing and wasn't sure what it wanted to be. Another thriller? Another action film? A drama? It certainly felt like a drama to me, as it took forever to get into the action and thriller elements that made 'Unbreakable' and 'Split' pretty solid films. I will say that as expected, the acting from all was outstanding, with McAvoy once again juggling and shifting back and forth between so many different personalities and expressions seamlessly, and Willis and Jackson both having some great and worthwhile moments of their own as well. Overall, the acting was definitely a highlight, and on paper, the premise sounded so perfect and cool, but the film's uncertainty with its pacing and exactly what genre it wanted to be or stick with made it fall short of my hopes and expectations unfortunately. But if for anything, see it for the nostalgia from Willis and Jackson, as well as for McAvoy's brilliant performance (or should I say performances thanks to his multiple personalities.) Seriously, he's easily steals the show, just as he did in 'Split'! Oh and of course, since it is M. Night Shyamalan directing again, you're right to expect some sort of twist at the end.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

8

ryu9376Jan 18, 2019

Honestly, forget the critics... this film was phenomenal. The ending "most definitely throws you, but the whole body of work of the film comes together seamlessly... & Elijah himself... a true bloody mastermind... til the very end.

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

8

AudraGayleJan 18, 2019

I'm not sure why so many folks do not like this movie. It's awesome! The ending was interesting and left me with more questions that I'd like to be answered. I know that Shyamalan said this was the end for him, so I guess those questions willI'm not sure why so many folks do not like this movie. It's awesome! The ending was interesting and left me with more questions that I'd like to be answered. I know that Shyamalan said this was the end for him, so I guess those questions will remained unanswered.… Expand

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

3

P3ERJan 18, 2019

What a disastrous final act. It just completely falls flat on its face. Everything which lead to this just gets thrown out the window and replaced with an underwhelming conclusion. I have to admit that the the first hour and a half was reallyWhat a disastrous final act. It just completely falls flat on its face. Everything which lead to this just gets thrown out the window and replaced with an underwhelming conclusion. I have to admit that the the first hour and a half was really good, but I wonder why the movie just took a 90 degree turn and just decides to bodge a seemingly alternate ending. I really wish I can give this a better score, but this movie just leaves me with a sour taste.… Expand

4 of 17 users found this helpful413

All this user's reviews

Glass

User Reviews