Read Negative User Reviews for Glass

0

DioGrenOct 30, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What???? We were waiting for This 19 years? $20 milion budjet??? А теперь нормальным языком. Единственный Адекват это Брюс, которому нужно было и двух злодеев и бабу эту дуру из за которых погибло опять много людей включая злодеев, остановить но это не случилась, вместо хеппи энда - трешь. Баба еще хуже злодеев, она здесь главный злодей. Лишив жизни единственного героя данного фильма (и еще кучи людей) , она осталась не наказанной. Тупость концовки зашкаливает. Как раз из за такого фильма не кто не пойдет геройствовать и спасать чью то жизнь, потому что его утопит коп или кто он там в луже воды.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

imthenoobSep 6, 2019

Jackson is disappointingly absent for most of the film. Pacing is a massive issue, I feel like the story never picks up and stays flat throughout. And that ending...my god. What a terrible ending, Arguably the worst ending I've ever seen. ItJackson is disappointingly absent for most of the film. Pacing is a massive issue, I feel like the story never picks up and stays flat throughout. And that ending...my god. What a terrible ending, Arguably the worst ending I've ever seen. It took what was already a bad movie and made it an utter disaster.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

mrusakovDec 8, 2019

Это просто отвратительное зрелище, не советую никому, это просто пиздец...

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

JohnnyCanuckJan 26, 2019

There is a nugget of a better movie in the first 1/3 of this film. But what remains is absolute horsesh*t. The logic of the universe just does not add up and the rest is just sloppy. 3 super powered people - and 2 orderlies to watch themThere is a nugget of a better movie in the first 1/3 of this film. But what remains is absolute horsesh*t. The logic of the universe just does not add up and the rest is just sloppy. 3 super powered people - and 2 orderlies to watch them all. makes sense. SOmeone wake up Shymalan.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

3

AdamBeamJan 26, 2019

Unbreakable is the best film Shyamalan has ever done, and Split was a genuinely nice surprise, but sad to say that Glass breaks your heart if your fan of either film, and is just a complete mess. A film that fails as a sequel, and as aUnbreakable is the best film Shyamalan has ever done, and Split was a genuinely nice surprise, but sad to say that Glass breaks your heart if your fan of either film, and is just a complete mess. A film that fails as a sequel, and as a competent movie as well, just a very upsetting disappointment to start the year off with. Glass waste all the potential and interesting concepts it offers, and whatever good graces the film still had with audiences or my patience will be immediately dashed in the last 15 minutes, where the twist(s) absolutely destroy the film and all hopes it had. Seriously your best bet with the film is either skip the movie, or leave before the last 15 minutes and just imagine a better ending than what we're actually given.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

0

TomL11Apr 11, 2019

I wasn't going to leave a review, but when I saw this insanely high score I just thought I would warn people that this garbage film is one of the worst things I have ever sat through in my life.

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

0

iceman994Feb 5, 2019

This movie is 0. My problem is these actors got the skill but the writers totally lost their skill to create great characters why? Why is it so hard now to find a good writer? also Director was sleeping or what? Critics should put 0 to thisThis movie is 0. My problem is these actors got the skill but the writers totally lost their skill to create great characters why? Why is it so hard now to find a good writer? also Director was sleeping or what? Critics should put 0 to this movie not 50. Also users who put it to positive you totally have no brain for this movie you are the worst viewers who help hollywood to make more ******it movies.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

3

Supergaz27Jan 22, 2019

Third act is horrendous, nothing original or clever about it. They could of cut out about an hour of Sarah Coulson monologuing and perhaps it wouldn't of been as boring.

If you're a fan of the the other two I'd say avoid it. Left a bad tasteThird act is horrendous, nothing original or clever about it. They could of cut out about an hour of Sarah Coulson monologuing and perhaps it wouldn't of been as boring.

If you're a fan of the the other two I'd say avoid it. Left a bad taste in my mouth.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

1

Hectic101Jan 20, 2019

If you care about Unbreakable and Split then I suggest leaving this movie when the third act begins, because it's a doozy. The movie is rather dull and redundant up until then but still ok, but that last 30 minutes or so really takes a dumpIf you care about Unbreakable and Split then I suggest leaving this movie when the third act begins, because it's a doozy. The movie is rather dull and redundant up until then but still ok, but that last 30 minutes or so really takes a dump all over everything with a REALLY dumb ending and lazily annoying twists. Gets a "1" strictly because of McAvoys performance, otherwise it'd be a "0" it pissed me off that badly. Massive step down from the last two movies of this "trilogy". Wish I had listened to my concerns going in and not seen it. Now I don't know if I can ever watch Unbreakable again without thoughts of this dumpster fire ruining it...… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

3

amheretojudgeJan 18, 2019

Split Into Disappointments.

Glass Shyamalan's conclusion to his beloved project is a disappointing loose thread that thoroughly convinces you to hold on to it, but barely is ready to be the host for it. There is too much going behind theSplit Into Disappointments.

Glass

Shyamalan's conclusion to his beloved project is a disappointing loose thread that thoroughly convinces you to hold on to it, but barely is ready to be the host for it. There is too much going behind the screen- his signature move- that when it is reveal it does leave you in an awe of it, but when it comes to show definite figures on screen, the numbers are often mismatching. There is no romance in either the characters or the storytelling. And it is the primary reason why it shatters so vigorously. Without any whatsoever flow, the storytelling often comes off as news, which too frankly isn't intriguing. To be informative is one thing and to be a narrator another.

What it does get right, is the mythology that Shyamalan has constructed in his mind. His sincere respect to the concept itself can easily be filtered out in his mannerism. His film lives on glorifying these characters to their limits. He gives them enough range and room to flaunt in their persona and the impact it creates to the surrounding of it. And clearly he has kept McAvoy at the front of it, the time, space, energy and range he has offered to that character, is all admirable accepted by McAvoy, and the result is stupendous.

His awe-inspiring performance both challenges and mocks his fellow actors, his commitment on the nakedness and innocence of each personality is the soul reason, he emerges as the only survivor from this tale. Challenging him with few good scenes, resides Jackson's thirst for the quest and abomination. With very little to do, he makes sure he leaves a last longing impression on the viewers. Paulson has a bit edgy character to portray, either way, she never is able to enchant us nor overpower us through her schemes.

Willis, as probably the biggest disappointment, is playing a cameo, with very little finesse on his performance. The other supporting cast like Johnson and Treat Clark too falls under the same pit. Shyamalan has always managed to build up the hype like no one else, he aces in it, but when it comes to reveal the cards, they are often disappointing or rushed over. In this case, the physical sequences are not only dull and off putting but annoying, which is mostly mutilated by the eerie camera work that is there to actually enhance the momentum of the scene; irony.

Aforementioned, his last thought on this big war of comic books, is sharp and illuminating, it shifts our perspective to a whole new dimension. But before any of it scrolls open, it is already too late. While its first act maps out the characters in a different state, the second one that ought to be husky and cunning; especially since Jackson is in control of the ride, it isn't thoroughly justified with very little skin in the whole "mastermind" game. Glass aches you more than you would anticipate, the beloved characters over the years, they deserved much more and so did we.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

3

JDIGITALJan 24, 2019

Movie Review, I saw Glass and it was Ass. The three main characters from there respected movies are interesting but they just got smushed together in this boring, lackluster film.

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

3

JazzwazlerJan 20, 2019

3.2/10

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

1

StHoustonJan 23, 2019

Вы когда-нибудь ловили себя на мысли что в кинотеатре вы смотрите не на экран? Добро пожаловать на просмотр данного фильма.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

2

Daniel_EndureJan 18, 2019

Glass is interesting at times, no doubt, but it's one of those sequels that takes away a little something from its predecessors just simply by existing. Glass's biggest problem is that the script never gives a clear reason to care about anyGlass is interesting at times, no doubt, but it's one of those sequels that takes away a little something from its predecessors just simply by existing. Glass's biggest problem is that the script never gives a clear reason to care about any of its three protagonists, instead promoting their lock-up as ultimately justifiable when all is said and done. The entirety of the second act is even a first-class trip straight into boredom. Any and all attempts at humor, which usually come from one of McAvoy's many personalities, in particular, Hedwig, come off flat and usually are more striking as random than humorous. Lastly, if you still can't muster skipping this one, prepare for Shyamalan's signature unnatural-feeling character interactions, directing, and acting from those supporting the main players of the cast.… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

2

AfonsoCarlosJan 24, 2019

Holy hell that was disapointing, I knew going in that Glass wasn't going to be anywhere near decent, but how did they manage to miss this by such a longshot? This property had potencial but i feel like they just ran it into the ground. TheHoly hell that was disapointing, I knew going in that Glass wasn't going to be anywhere near decent, but how did they manage to miss this by such a longshot? This property had potencial but i feel like they just ran it into the ground. The story was not captivating, the sets were boring and i feel like they wasted the awesome characters they had built... In conclusion, when Im asked about what movie disappointed me the most, despite already having low expectations, i will answer "Glass" (2.4/10)… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

0

timaoJan 18, 2019

What's frustrating, final-act is terrible, that there really is nobody to root for in Glass.

7 of 19 users found this helpful712

All this user's reviews

0

eyalbentancurJan 24, 2019

What a piece of **** I do not know how it got this rating but it deserve 0!
bore fest, buildup of 2 films for nothing and the whole goddamn movie is in the asylum with that terrible actress with the resting **** face.
avoid like it the plague!

7 of 19 users found this helpful712

All this user's reviews

0

corinthiansJan 18, 2019

Its plot is absurdly contrived, and very stilted. I can´t believe. Bad Shyamalan, really bad.

8 of 22 users found this helpful814

All this user's reviews

0

El_HyenaJan 18, 2019

Not only a boring film, the ending ruins all the intrigue and mystique of the other films. Except the acting it is a film that fails on every level. I was quite excited for this film having loved 'Unbreakable' and 'Split', but this was soNot only a boring film, the ending ruins all the intrigue and mystique of the other films. Except the acting it is a film that fails on every level. I was quite excited for this film having loved 'Unbreakable' and 'Split', but this was so disappointing.… Expand

8 of 23 users found this helpful815

All this user's reviews

3

torgnyhylenApr 15, 2019

What a muddled mess. It takes too long to get to the psych ward and once there nothing happens. McAvoy seems to be enjoying his Horde... but the others phone it in. Too many points of view. Nobody to root for. Too many bystanders. Just notWhat a muddled mess. It takes too long to get to the psych ward and once there nothing happens. McAvoy seems to be enjoying his Horde... but the others phone it in. Too many points of view. Nobody to root for. Too many bystanders. Just not very clever and ultimately a predictable bore. If you liked unbreakable and split, you will NOT enjoy this luke warm half baked offering.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

3

EikoxJan 24, 2019

So you saw Unbreakable, you enjoy Split and you are ready for Glass!! But after 20 minutes of watching suddenly you notice something odd, oh yes is the poor will of Bruce Willis in his acting where he can be replaced easily for a obscureSo you saw Unbreakable, you enjoy Split and you are ready for Glass!! But after 20 minutes of watching suddenly you notice something odd, oh yes is the poor will of Bruce Willis in his acting where he can be replaced easily for a obscure silhouette with his voice or a random double with a green poncho. Is sad that one of the most iconic character bring down the whole movie, where you can find a decent plot carried by the marvelous performance of McAvoy and the always reliable Samuel L.J.
From the side of the plot is good see this three character collide (more of ten if you count the multiple one of McAvoy) and continue with the developed under the influence of each other.
From the technical aspect is nothing from another world, if you pay enough attention you will encounter some mistakes in the continuity but still for sometimes seems a movie filmed for a project and not a jewel of hollywood so dont expect to much, as I say McAvoy and Jackson carried the movie in their shoulders.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

2

JackusBlackusFeb 7, 2019

I suppose that if you have seen two other movies by M. Night Shyamalan, Unbreakable and Split, you might quickly figure out that this is the sequel that was previously alluded to, and it might be what you have been waiting for.

You will beI suppose that if you have seen two other movies by M. Night Shyamalan, Unbreakable and Split, you might quickly figure out that this is the sequel that was previously alluded to, and it might be what you have been waiting for.

You will be disappointed. The movie starts out well, but soon deteriorates into a formula super-hero action movie with some mystery, horror, and suspense thrown in. It is a M. Night Shyamalan movie, so it has a twist at the end, of course. Unfortunately, the twist is ridiculous and absurd, and it adds nothing. I suspect that its sole purpose is to set up yet another sequel in which the two twenty-somethings get married and have a baby with mutant powers.

Bruce Willis does a good job playing the stoic hero and James McAvoy handles his role with precision. Samuel Jackson plays Samuel Jackson.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

3

P3ERJan 18, 2019

What a disastrous final act. It just completely falls flat on its face. Everything which lead to this just gets thrown out the window and replaced with an underwhelming conclusion. I have to admit that the the first hour and a half was reallyWhat a disastrous final act. It just completely falls flat on its face. Everything which lead to this just gets thrown out the window and replaced with an underwhelming conclusion. I have to admit that the the first hour and a half was really good, but I wonder why the movie just took a 90 degree turn and just decides to bodge a seemingly alternate ending. I really wish I can give this a better score, but this movie just leaves me with a sour taste.… Expand

4 of 17 users found this helpful413

All this user's reviews

2

danteabadApr 8, 2019

What it seems to be a different kind of superheroes film mixed with psychological ideas... ended up being a pretty boring 3/4 of a film made exclusively to achieve an "expected" twist plot ending where.. quite frankly didnt exort any kind ofWhat it seems to be a different kind of superheroes film mixed with psychological ideas... ended up being a pretty boring 3/4 of a film made exclusively to achieve an "expected" twist plot ending where.. quite frankly didnt exort any kind of surprise feeling.
I was intrigued to find out how were these 3 characters trying to co-live in the dullest sanatorium ive seen in movies ever... but i think i didnt miss anything during the 2h of the film because they dont even interact with each other in any way until the very end.
Weird camera angles not suitable for the scenes or emotions they "tried" to achieve. Bruce Willis was kinda sleep most of the part of the film just as Samuel Jackson.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

3

KayVen17Mar 20, 2019

Deutsche Review

Pro: - gute Schauspielerwahl - der Plot ist interessant Contra: - der Film zieht sich wie Kaugummi - der Showdown ist ein Griff ins Klo - der Film will nicht zum Punkt - Potenzial der Schauspieler wird nicht richtigDeutsche Review

Pro:
- gute Schauspielerwahl
- der Plot ist interessant Contra:
- der Film zieht sich wie Kaugummi
- der Showdown ist ein Griff ins Klo
- der Film will nicht zum Punkt
- Potenzial der Schauspieler wird nicht richtig verwendet
- das Ende ist sehr unbefriedigend… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

3

LuzioonApr 13, 2019

I'm disappointed with it, i was expecting more from this, more action, more feeling, more story.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

2

RudygerApr 2, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. ATROCIOUS ENDING
I'm not one of those people who kneel before Unbreakable. I found it deeply boring. Split was ok, except for some character's huge stupidity. The begining of Glass was ok, but the ending is soooo anti-climactic. If you think about the whole trilogy, what was the point? Have people believe in themselves? Yeah, we surely needed 3 films for that.
Not much character development, by the way.
I didn't like the plot of Glass. The psychiatric ward, with having the audience guessing "was it all in their head despite seeing them do superhuman stuff?". I didn't buy it at all. Though, I like the fact that they tried to do something different, rather than a classic superhero movie. But I would've liked something inbetween.
My review is messy. So is the movie. I understand why people liked it, despite its dumpster fire ending.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

2

addict-insaneApr 6, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Congratulations Shami, just you killed the three reasons any of us had to go watch any of your future films.

You also magically minimized the talent of one of our generation's greatest, Sarah Paulson, by directing her into making a resting B*tch face with a holier-than-thou attitude for the whole film. The whole Film! After she blew our minds in the few minutes she was in Birdbox, you took such a great talent, and your direction to her was "make this one facial expression, and do not emote for the rest of the movie". AND, you took James McAvoy's greatest flamboyant display of acting prowess, and put it in 2019's worst movie. McAvoy is acting for the Oscars, Shami is directing for the Razzies. Oh, and while McAvoy is personality shifting mid-conversation, you focused the camera on the other actors, or on the wall, not on his incredibly nuanced changes in facial gestures, because if you don't deserve an Oscar, then by hell is anyone in your movies ever getting any as well!

Are you secretly trying to make bad movies because your real dream is to have a rapping career? Like that guy from Final Fantasy? Not trolling. Honest question.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

1

froglegsApr 3, 2020

Some of the most nonsensical plot elements ever written, all the best acting in the world can't salvage this train wreck of a script. I bailed about 40 minutes in, could no longer take the idiocy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

BroyaxJan 15, 2021

Voici l’espèce de conclusion, du moins on l’espère de la trilogie des pseudo-super-héros à tendance dépressive, en l’occurrence les psycho-névropathes de pacotille sans les capes et super-collants habituels… comme dans les deux précédentsVoici l’espèce de conclusion, du moins on l’espère de la trilogie des pseudo-super-héros à tendance dépressive, en l’occurrence les psycho-névropathes de pacotille sans les capes et super-collants habituels… comme dans les deux précédents films de Shyamalan qui signe décidément avec une constance consternante plusieurs daubes d’affilée : un combo de daubes ! Shyamalan est donc le super-héros de la daube en série !

Comme de coutume, les comédiens cabotinent et/ou prennent la pose (et des pauses) dans ce film à dormir debout du début à la fin : tout y est en effet d’une lenteur pathétique et d’un ennui particulièrement affligeant. L’espèce de scénario est un puissant narcoleptique et la mise en scène est digne d’un hébéphrène atteint du dernier degré d’hébétude. Il lui faudrait 10 bonnes séances d’électro-chocs à la suite pour le réveiller !

Il se passe que dalle donc et les dialogues sont d’une rare stupidité et de surcroît d’une étonnante prétention à moins que ce ne soit un mélange de psychologie de comptoir à un demi-dollar avec de la prétentieuse prétention d’un peigne-cul qui pète plus haut que son cul. Et comme déjà mentionné, tout le monde est si mauvais là-dedans qu’on se croirait dans un téléfilm de troisième zone !

En bref et en diagonale, tout est si foireux et merdique qu’une seule destination s’impose pour ce Glass : la poubelle blanche, direction le recyclage immédiat !… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

bhappenstanceApr 2, 2021

A promising first hour gradually devolves into a preposterous mishmash of pretentious nonsense. Unbreakable remains one of Night's best films, and Split was a welcome return to form, but the dude just can't help himself. Given a slightlyA promising first hour gradually devolves into a preposterous mishmash of pretentious nonsense. Unbreakable remains one of Night's best films, and Split was a welcome return to form, but the dude just can't help himself. Given a slightly bigger budget, and a few inches too much creative oversight, he loses his goddamned mind. There's a relatively great 90-minute movie here that gets suffocated by **** "comic book" metacommentary (would not be surprised in the least to find out that Night has never read a comic book in his life), and a completely nonsensical "twist" -- his worst yet, for anyone still counting -- that leads into a final few minutes that make no sense whatsoever. I loved Glass at first and absolutely hated it by the time the credits rolled. Please restrict this particular filmmaker to $5M budgets. His ego simply can't handle anything more than that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

Fox_VanillaApr 28, 2020

Glass serves serves as yet another classic M. Night Shyamalan misstep in his inconsistent career. Unbreakable is one of my favorite movies ever made and to see the utter disservice that Glass gives to its story and characters is unforgivable.Glass serves serves as yet another classic M. Night Shyamalan misstep in his inconsistent career. Unbreakable is one of my favorite movies ever made and to see the utter disservice that Glass gives to its story and characters is unforgivable. No spoilers are present in this review but if you're an Unbreakable fan I strongly advise giving Glass a miss. While Glass has a relatively strong start, giving nice fan service in the opening battle; it is over far too soon and the movie quickly dissolves into a boring, convoluted therapy session with little engagement from the main protagonists we've come to love.

The movie had so much potential with the strong leads of the previous two films in the franchise, Unbreakable and Split. Glass instead completely underutilizes the talents of Bruce Willis as David Dunn and Sam Jackson as Mr. Glass for the entire first half of the film, instead focusing on some convoluted, boring narrative driven by supporting actors to set up the lore destroying final act. When ALL we want to see is Mr. Glass, David Dunn and The Beast embroiled in some dramatic caper which will lead to some dramatic, conclusive twist ending to *SATISFYINGLY* end the story arcs of these main three characters. Instead, the movie Glass delivers the exact opposite.

Glass completely and utterly KILLS the hype built from the final scene of the movie Split where Dunn is seen in the diner and the incredible Unbreakable score starts thumping to life (a score which is barely even muttered in Glass). I could have honestly written a better script myself. Whilst McAvoy gives a strong performance it has nothing to bounce off of due to the total watering down of David Dunn's character (mind the pun).

Most disappointing movie of the year.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

hnestlyontheslyOct 7, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I saw Split last year without any background information, not having seen even a trailer, possibly, with Friend at the Capitol Drive-In. I’m someone who’s had a love-hate relationship with Shyamalan, like I think a lot of people.

My older brother told me a story of going to an advanced screening of some festival movie and sitting through the trailers of a kind of cool horror film about the devil on an elevator or something, and the moment that Shyamalan’s name popped onto the screen, everyone in the theater started laughing and booing. I was 10 years old when Unbreakable came out. That was one year after The Sixth Sense. Shyamalan made The Village when I was 14, and I still hold a warm place in my heart for that movie, ditto Lady in the Water, which I appreciated as the offbeat comedy it appeared he intended to make. I know a lot of people made fun of Avatar: The Last Airbender, but I was just so psyched to see that movie on screen that I let a lot of things slide. Hell, I even saw The Visit, which, like did anyone else see that dumpster fire? I walked out of that movie having sweat through my whole shirt, because I’ll be damned if it didn’t set me on edge.

Even so, when the end scene of Split tipped its hand as a sequel, I couldn’t contain a surly **** off, Shyamalan” or the automatic gag reflex that followed. He had taken a perfectly good, standalone film staring one of my favorite young actors of the decade, Anya Taylor-Joy, and succeeded in making me sympathize with a truly creepy villain. Why **** that up with a trilogy twenty years in the making that no one asked for?

I’m not doing anything brave by sniping a month late at the final installment of a substandard trilogy by Shyamalan, but there was just so much potential here for the guy to actually comment on the state of comic book films after twenty years of reflection and the street cred to make a statement, á la Birdman or the Incredibles. Split had bought him time and goodwill to tell a challenging story, but instead we have a series of disappointingly bland close-up fights, a lot of awkward running on all fours by McAvoy, a lot of navel gazing, and cloying self-referentialism (including a too long explanation of the director’s second cameo).

Bruce Willis looks like he couldn’t be bothered to show a range of emotion beyond tired and bored. The premise for their treatment facility is pretty bonkers, as is the reason cited for allowing a teenage girl into the same room as her murderous abductor. The false bottom endings don’t feel clever. They feel cheap, like someone’s trying to get away with a windowless bedroom by putting hotel art on the wall.

We’re not mad, we’re just disappointed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

TonyCalziniDec 1, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As somebody who Loves movies of all sorts. Including the terrible ones that give us something to compare the great movies to, This Movie is a huge let down. Of all the different directions MNS could have went, He decided to Pull this terrible ending out of his **** Slap his name on it and call it quits. Seriously. He should've hired the guys here making reviews to help develop a decent plot.
Hes all over the map through out this whole movie, flashing back to pointless scenes, repeating insignificant information, and worst of all, cramming a variety of lost imagery onto a fight scene that could've been depicted better by a high school film class.
1: David is unbreakable and supposed to be super strong, yet a cop can drown him in a puddle (easilyforeshadowed when the tank busted) and wasnt his son standing like 30 ft away with momma glass and homegirl?
2: Mr glass is like 60 years old. How's his mom still alive. She should have died and the character been replaced with a wife or brother. Seriously she stayed the same age the whole film. What's she eating? Asking for a friend
3: why would you reveal a hidden organization at the end of a movie, leaving absolutely no room or opportunities for sequels, which if this **** had done, MNS could've made history with the basis for this story line. A four leave clover? Come on man. Gathering in a hotel bar to discuss something so hidden and organized? With what looks like random people? Just why?
4: killing off all the main characters without maybe hinting that their family has powers too? Initiating another movie.
5: back to the fight scene. I've watched high school girls throw better punches. If the beast has enough power to bend steel bars and walk like a **** grudge demon, he should be able to RIP his opponent apart. Neither characters showed any bruising, bloody lips, redness... **** anything.
6: should've given Casey did as well. Giving her something to relate to with t
Kevin. Would've made a great twist.
7: please explain the beginning of split... hedwig states that Casey helped him find those two girls... wtf. And why didnt he spray her when he entered the car like he did with the other two girls?
8: What kind of Psychiatric facility has one guard. Then 3 guards in the basement, and two who are in cars lol that place also looks like the school from the simpsons.
9: it took David maybe 4 tries to break down that door. How would a few pressure washers stop him. Its water not fire. He not only escaped being wrapped in a pool cover, completely submerged, but also being choked under water in the tank, which was stupidly brittle.. also hes out in the rain like 5 different scenes.
10: How did Mr. Glass not be seen on any of the cameras while removing the piece from the machine when the doc said it was being live streamed all times, which is why she woke him up and sedated him before taking him to the machine. How did they not see him and report it as soon as it was happening, or see him removing the piece?
Dude..I get trying to get the viewers to walk away thinking, but this just leaves too many unanswered questions. I came into this devoted and invested with high expectations. Now I'm sitting here with a stank face writing this review while my wife get to sit there with pride. She suggested the Twilight series. I failed as a husband. I wish I would've watched the sparkly vampires..… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

TheEventsOf1989Jan 11, 2020

Maybe, if you go searching, you can find some examples of good story. Maybe even some examples of post-spielberg film language, but at the end of the day, "Glass" has many errors, and many missed opportunities.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

PharosDec 13, 2020

What a negativity! Really didn't like this movie. I felt really bad watching this.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews