Glass
Universal Pictures | Release Date: January 18, 2019
6.5
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 587 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
344
Mixed:
166
Negative:
77
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
8
grayhammondJan 19, 2019
I usually find that critical consensus is spot on, but in this case I wonder if we saw the same movie. Far from perfect (with action that's a bit clunky) but very entertaining and a completely worthy capper to Shyamalan's superhero trilogy. II usually find that critical consensus is spot on, but in this case I wonder if we saw the same movie. Far from perfect (with action that's a bit clunky) but very entertaining and a completely worthy capper to Shyamalan's superhero trilogy. I honestly wonder if a lot of critics went in expecting an ACTUAL superhero film rather than one that is quite literally about examining what it might look like if supernatural beings were really among us. My advice, go see it but keep in mind that it had a budget of $20 million (no, I didn't accidentally leave off a zero) and think about the ways it subverts the genre while still being a part of it. A solid, clever film.… Expand
18 of 26 users found this helpful188
All this user's reviews
9
SmikhailJan 18, 2019
It is completely incomprehensible to me how critics could rate a film at such a low ball.
All elements of the film (plot, play of actors, rezhisura) are made very high quality. And, even with a biased or subjective opinion, I would never notIt is completely incomprehensible to me how critics could rate a film at such a low ball.
All elements of the film (plot, play of actors, rezhisura) are made very high quality. And, even with a biased or subjective opinion, I would never not put the film below 6 out of 10.… Expand
16 of 27 users found this helpful1611
All this user's reviews
10
NotADumbCriticJan 18, 2019
Critics are complete idiots more often than they believe they aren't and this movie is no exception. If you enjoyed Unbreakable and Split then this movie will certainly not disappoint as the plot is just what it needs to be. Without givingCritics are complete idiots more often than they believe they aren't and this movie is no exception. If you enjoyed Unbreakable and Split then this movie will certainly not disappoint as the plot is just what it needs to be. Without giving anything away, this isn't a standard 'let me just blow things up and fight aliens' movie as it is far more grounded than that. What this movie is in fact representative of is the complicated struggle between what is the 'good' and what is the 'evil' as well as what is the 'crazy' and what isn't the 'insane'. What you should expect from this movie is a riveting balance of suspense, drama, various plot twist that are actually really good, more action scenes than Unbreakable or Split, and an incredibly well-casted cast of talent. I made an account just to review this film because the critics completely missed the cinematic mark on this one, well the ones that rated it anywhere in the yellow or red - they can go kick big rocks.… Expand
40 of 80 users found this helpful4040
All this user's reviews
0
DioGrenOct 30, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What???? We were waiting for This 19 years? $20 milion budjet??? А теперь нормальным языком. Единственный Адекват это Брюс, которому нужно было и двух злодеев и бабу эту дуру из за которых погибло опять много людей включая злодеев, остановить но это не случилась, вместо хеппи энда - трешь. Баба еще хуже злодеев, она здесь главный злодей. Лишив жизни единственного героя данного фильма (и еще кучи людей) , она осталась не наказанной. Тупость концовки зашкаливает. Как раз из за такого фильма не кто не пойдет геройствовать и спасать чью то жизнь, потому что его утопит коп или кто он там в луже воды.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
LORDtroldemort1Jun 22, 2019
Even though its not quite the spectacular finale people were hoping for, Glass still delivers an entertaining and quite satisfying end to the, unbreakable trilogy.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
0
imthenoobSep 6, 2019
Jackson is disappointingly absent for most of the film. Pacing is a massive issue, I feel like the story never picks up and stays flat throughout. And that ending...my god. What a terrible ending, Arguably the worst ending I've ever seen. ItJackson is disappointingly absent for most of the film. Pacing is a massive issue, I feel like the story never picks up and stays flat throughout. And that ending...my god. What a terrible ending, Arguably the worst ending I've ever seen. It took what was already a bad movie and made it an utter disaster.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
mrusakovDec 8, 2019
Это просто отвратительное зрелище, не советую никому, это просто пиздец...
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
jfrisbyApr 3, 2019
An incredible film and end to the trilogy, thanks M. Night. I liked the ending. Don't understand the critic hate, maybe because he self-funded this?
7 of 8 users found this helpful71
All this user's reviews
8
MB2KForeverJan 24, 2019
This movie is NOT 33%. Its not a D, or C movie - its a bold, different, and enjoyable super hero movie, and that's what people are faulting it for - that it's not a "Avengers" or "Spiderman". It's certainly not perfect - and I'd admit IThis movie is NOT 33%. Its not a D, or C movie - its a bold, different, and enjoyable super hero movie, and that's what people are faulting it for - that it's not a "Avengers" or "Spiderman". It's certainly not perfect - and I'd admit I wanted it to be a traditional super hero movie going in and was initially dissapointed that it wasn't - but its still a good, enjoyable movie (with flaws). Too many people are expecting a traditional super hero movie with this movie but forgetting this was never a traditional super hero franchise. Unbreakable and Split are unconventional, quirky, slow movies. Also important is that this director does not make traditional super hero movies. He makes movies that defy audience expectations. This movie definitely does that, and that's its strength. The third finale to the trilogy is different, its bold, and it goes against the expectations of your traditional super hero movie, and ends the trilogy in a way that is consistent with what we are familiar with in the director's previous movies (including those in the trilogy). I applauded this movie for finding a different way to do a superhero movie, and think this is one of the "good" M. Night movies, and would watch it again. A worthy part of the trilogy, even if I don't agree with all the choices in this movie.… Expand
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
8
DubeauApr 6, 2019
A really nice ending for that trilogy. The acting was amazing. The story was solid, in the sens that it tied everything and it stayed true to a certain level of realism. I think there was a long moment in the middle that was divided ofA really nice ending for that trilogy. The acting was amazing. The story was solid, in the sens that it tied everything and it stayed true to a certain level of realism. I think there was a long moment in the middle that was divided of action, and maybe some actions scenes are weaker then some others. It was also a psychology film in many ways. It was disturbing, captivating. The ending was very satisfying. Night Shyamalan controlled it's craft here without going overboard. I give it a 80%.… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
8
ArtilectMar 5, 2019
It was a good movie. Not a great movie, definitely not like Unbreakable, but a good movie that follows the premise of the last two films in the series. Seriously, it was good. Most negative reviews just don't get the importance or power ofIt was a good movie. Not a great movie, definitely not like Unbreakable, but a good movie that follows the premise of the last two films in the series. Seriously, it was good. Most negative reviews just don't get the importance or power of the superhero genre's deconstruction. Superhero origin films can't all be the same formula, with the same tropes. In my opinion, this film is better than most hero and antihero films out there right now, at least it portrays heroes in an almost realistic world (I repeat, almost realistic).… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
9
shorinryu22Apr 29, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Excelentes personajes, actuaciones impecables, trama y argumento muy solido y con buen cierre. sin duda de las mejores peliculas de lo que va el año 2019, esperemos Jocker tambien cumpla a estas alturas.… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
8
Happy-KMay 26, 2019
An Interesting take on the Superhero topic. The movie isn't by any means perfect it still has some flaws like the ending and the character arc from David Dunn. Still the movies raises some interesting Question about Heroism and havingAn Interesting take on the Superhero topic. The movie isn't by any means perfect it still has some flaws like the ending and the character arc from David Dunn. Still the movies raises some interesting Question about Heroism and having Superpowers in an modern and realistic Time like our World. About the ending (no Spoilers)..... yeah i didn't liked it but after all it isn't a Marvel Movie =). So i kind of understand why this Film ended this way. Its an gritty down to Earth superhero movie. Even having superpowers these people are still human beings and things....Just Happen, even when you don't like it it still can happen. As someone who loves Reading Comics i found fast an connection with the Story, its was like a Love Letter to Comics and it influence to the Real world. This is a Film were i Think "This is what the Superhero genre needed". I personally find "Glass" really Great, and I cannot understand the Mixed Reviews.… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
7
allensajiMay 28, 2019
A good movie with a descent twist..... A usual M Night shyamalan movie. Must follow previous movies of the series (split,unbreakable).
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
7
Kirollos-NoahFeb 22, 2019
Glass is directed and written by M. Night Shyamalan, with a simple role as we saw him in Unbreakable and Split. Starring James McAvoy, Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson, Anya Taylor-Joy and Sarah Paulson.
Bruce Willis returns as David Dunn asGlass is directed and written by M. Night Shyamalan, with a simple role as we saw him in Unbreakable and Split. Starring James McAvoy, Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson, Anya Taylor-Joy and Sarah Paulson.
Bruce Willis returns as David Dunn as does Samuel L. Jackson as Elijah Price, known also by his pseudonym Mr. Glass. Joining from Split are James McAvoy, reprising his role as Kevin Wendell Crumb and the multiple identities who reside within, and Anya Taylor-Joy as Casey Cooke, the only captive to survive an encounter with The Beast. Following the conclusion of Split, Glass finds Dunn pursuing Crumb's superhuman figure of The Beast in a series of escalating encounters, while the shadowy presence of Price emerges as an orchestrator who holds secrets critical to both men.

Glass was one of my anticipating movies list since I watched Split and surprisingly reveal that it's a sequel to the 2000's Unbreakable, which I liked. So yeah, I was very excited to see these three characters gathering together in one movie.. sadly it's the last movie of that trilogy.. and we will get to that ending in the spoiler review. But for now, let's do the spoiler-free review!

Okay, as the title says "Underrated, but disappointing" the movie is underrated, but let me say that it's not, because not everyone is gonna like this movie.. yeah, maybe underrated, but still disappointing. The first act of this movie was pretty cool, I loved it, the third act also is pretty, no no.. the final fight, because it was pretty epic I enjoyed it very much.. the conclusion and the ending were a little bit messy, the twist was cool, but the "character" wasn't that convincing, and I felt like it's not how this character should've been, because it reminded me with Unbreakable, and how it was rushed, Glass is giving us a little more surprising one, but not well crafted.

The second act is my biggest flaw with this movie, it was super slow, and confusing.. like how Glass is getting out of his cage? How is he just getting in any room he wants with no keys? Also it's not what you wanted to see from these characters, especially Anya Taylor-Joy, I loved her in Split, but in this one.. she's just there. I mean Spencer Treat Clark had a better role in this movie. Sarah Paulson is also bad, I didn't like her character which was "You're not that, you're that!", even her performance was emotionless and in the second act she was just there to go to a room from a room to say and to give us info we already know or ones that we don't care about! So yeah, the second act was new for this trilogy,but still it lacks a lot!

James McAvoy is pretty good in this movie just as he was in Split, once more he's the best thing in the movie but I have a flaw with it, which is a spoiler so, I'm gonna talk about it in the spoiler review... Bruce Willis is very good as well, but I have the same flaw which I found with James McAvoy's character, but even more! Samuel L. Jackson is not there most of the movie, but once he's there, he gave the movie a good spirit!! He has also one of the best scenes in the whole trilogy, as we saw in the trailer, when he was moving with his wheelchair and the beast the killing some people behind him, that was pretty cool!

Glass disappointed me, but still it's a fresh movie and I'm gonna give it a positive review, don't get me wrong, but I like Split more, but in the mean while, I liked it a little bit more than Unbreakable. I'm gonna give Glass a B!

Thank you, guys as always for reading my review, look forward for my spoiler review, and if you liked it, you can click on my name up above and read my other reviews.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
10
Sensible_PersonJan 23, 2019
Absolutely fabulous movie filled with compelling performances and characters you genuinely care about. Contrary to everyone else the third act reveal really was unexpected and awesome for me and took the story in an interesting new direction.Absolutely fabulous movie filled with compelling performances and characters you genuinely care about. Contrary to everyone else the third act reveal really was unexpected and awesome for me and took the story in an interesting new direction. While everyone was fantastic in their respective roles James McAvoy and Samuel L Jackson were the clear standouts. I suggest everyone give this a shot if you are willing to have an open mind and are okay with the movie going in directions you wouldn't expect. This is Shyamalan's film after all and I was thoroughly entertained and genuinely moved by it from beginning to end. Congratulations to everyone involved in closing out this unique trilogy in just as introspective and quietly compelling manner as those films that came before it.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
7
Jmorgan62Jan 24, 2019
NO SPOILER TIME Glass is the final movie to M. Night Shyamalan's trilogy that started with Unbreakable in 2000 and I have to say I really enjoyed this movie. The plot and story telling was pretty good but the way it is presented inst theNO SPOILER TIME Glass is the final movie to M. Night Shyamalan's trilogy that started with Unbreakable in 2000 and I have to say I really enjoyed this movie. The plot and story telling was pretty good but the way it is presented inst the best, Its better for a movie to let people figure things out. and how the movie is told is very similar to how Unbreakable was which was pretty good. there is minor things in this movie that all adds up and can annoy you, well at least it did to me as far as camera angles, editing, and writing. the performances was great especially Samuel Jackson and James Mcavoy, Bruce Willis could've done better and I mean a lot better but he wasn't given much to do. Some character were defiantly not needed even towards the end because it'll show why they are not needed. toward the end/ third act things kinda took a weird end that some people will not expect and might be disappointing. The structure of the movie was a little unbalanced and which is why I say Bruce could've done more. Towards the end also He quote on quote "Shyamalaned" it but He still has a lot to learn and improve on for himself and I praise this man for his hard works. go see it if you love the previous movies

SPOLIER TIME YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

Glass is the final movie to M. Night Shyamalan's trilogy that started with Unbreakable in 2000 and I have to say I really enjoyed this movie. The plot takes places fairly close after the events of Split from what I can remember from the movie, and from how it is laid out it was also really good but I wish the directing would have left a lot of the surprises for the audience to figure out and theorize about instead of it being told to us about what happened. the pace of the story telling was fairy close to unbreakable's pace, a nice slow burn. I really wanted the movie to expand to more than just the asylum and a few other minor locations. We never ended up going to tallest building made and that would've been sweet to see but we were just teased. The theme of the movie fitted everything in a nice way but not much was done for to make it a thriller, Split was a thriller movie and that felt like one but this one was great on the theme of sci-fi and drama with action mixed in. The art was pretty good and seeing Mr. Glass new suit looked fresh and everyone had their classical outfits that made it a charm to watch and not much other stuff to say about the art. Cinematography was interesting, new and sometimes plain annoyingly not wise, the angles that looks like it takes a lot of time to do was fine but there was so many extremely close up shots and awkward angles, but it wasn't too annoying to the movie because the cuts were about evenly good nothing to go off on. Same goes with the editing, it was interesting and wasn't anything annoying. The fonts at the start of the movie kinda got in the way but it was a style choice I'm assuming. Acting was about 50/50. I loved Samuel L. Jackson as well as James Mcavoy, and they did a great job. As far as Bruce Willis I wanted him to do more in this movie because I felt as though he was pushed to the side a lot and he could've given a better performance I know he could've. and more could've been better from pretty much all supporting casts. Anya Taylor-Joy in my opinion had no reason to be in this movie and served no purpose in my opinion. Spencer Treat Clark also did a great job too, almost perfect too. the writing of this movie was pretty good, there was a lot of things that could've been done smarter. Kevin could've wrapped a pillow around his head, Mr. G didn't have to do this suicide mission, and my goodness the ending of this movie was not satisfying, everything before the main characters death was great and enjoyable and I find it disrespectful to the fans of these characters and the way they went out and it was all in silly ridiculous ways and the people who saw it will most likely agree. Music was good too and every piece fitted every scene just fine. as far as originality it fine and I really do see this as an origin story to maybe M. Knight's next series of films, possibly. The secret organization wasn't really needed but we have it and it sets up a few questions. It kinda doesn't make since this organization didn't go to David's house when they heard a man survived a train crash so these people were forced in. Overall This movie was good and enjoyable and if acting was done a tad bit better it would've been even more better. The ending sets up a possibility for more superhero like moves from M. knight but we will just have to wait and see. There is a lot of small things M. knight needs to work on from here on and I applaud him for sticking with this movie and finishing it. He is truly a good man and has a passion for movies like very few others. Please see Unbreakable and Split before this movie and after those two. If I were to grade this movie it would get a 86 percent, but for reviewing over all it gets a 7 out of 10… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
7
RadReviewerFeb 8, 2019
This movie is legitimately a 8.5-9.0 until the last 20-30 minutes of the movie. This makes the outcome even more disappointing. M. Night does what he does best and overplays his hand with an awful twist and no grounding to be seen.
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
8
KingMathisFeb 12, 2019
This script could've been better along with the conclusion, M. Night seems to be getting his groove back.
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
9
AlexKallinskyFeb 26, 2019
A compelling psychological thriller starring Samuel L. Jackson, Bruce Willis, and James McAvoy. Shyamalan is back. You see the returning of his greatness in multiple scenes of this movie, as well as another refreshing take on the superheroA compelling psychological thriller starring Samuel L. Jackson, Bruce Willis, and James McAvoy. Shyamalan is back. You see the returning of his greatness in multiple scenes of this movie, as well as another refreshing take on the superhero genre. We also get very good performances from everyone.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
10
AlvaroGFMar 12, 2019
Solo ignoraré las críticas, la película me ha encantado y es lo que más importa.
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
8
WillFFeb 15, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------gud
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
7
OdinMovieBlogMar 5, 2019
After many years M Night Shyamalan finishes a trilogy that many of us never knew we wanted until Split came out a couple years ago. Though the first two acts are extremely slow, he climax and conclusion of the film leave you wondering andAfter many years M Night Shyamalan finishes a trilogy that many of us never knew we wanted until Split came out a couple years ago. Though the first two acts are extremely slow, he climax and conclusion of the film leave you wondering and will likely split many audiences. Personally I find the twists that the director throws in at the end to be thought-provoking and interesting. all of us could likely think of an infinite number of scenarios in endings that may have suited this story better, but this one really isn't all that bad. This is is one I would definitely want to see again to see if knowledge of where the story goes affects how one might view the rest of the film. B-… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
9
VinigphApr 18, 2019
Just dont listen to the critics, if you loved Unbreakable and Split u will like this one.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
9
TheQuietGamerApr 28, 2019
One of the biggest underlying themes in the previous two entries of Shyamalan's surprise trilogy is that the potential for extraordinary powers rests inside all of us and that our minds are the key to unlocking them. This message is broughtOne of the biggest underlying themes in the previous two entries of Shyamalan's surprise trilogy is that the potential for extraordinary powers rests inside all of us and that our minds are the key to unlocking them. This message is brought to the forefront for this closing chapter acting as the heart of the story. The real villain in Glass isn't the beast inside McAvoy or even the returning titular anti-hero. It's the people who try to explain away the incredible in order to keep us locked away in a prison of the mundane.

In a time where we have been trained to want/expect big flash and spectacle from our superhero movies, Shyamalan stays true to the world he created some 19 years ago. This is means that even when it looks like things are about to take a turn for the grandiose, Glass sticks to its guns by remaining grounded and small-scale throughout. It's a nice change of pace from the standard blockbuster formula that's become the norm for our superpowered adventures.

The performances are incredible. Bruce Willis is genuinely acting again for the first time in years and McAvoy once again stuns with his ability to embody so many different characters in what is essentially one role. There's a scene where he is forced to cycle through all of the different personalities he portrays rapid-fire and it is absolutely incredible. The real star of the show for me though was Samuel Jackson, although I'll admit I'm a little biased as this has easily become my favorite role of his due to how easy Shyamalan made Mr. Glass to empathize with.

The ending is the only real downside. It's sad to see these characters suffer such tragic fates. The disappointment is somewhat alleviated though by the third plot twist that allows the film to conclude on a more positive note, but ultimately it's still just bitter-sweet at best.

Glass is thrilling in it's smallness. There's a fascinating plot here that's backed by some great subject matter. It's definitely an atypical superhero movie for this day and age, but it's no less exhilarating in its own way than the more traditionally exciting works of Marvel, DC, or any of their imitators. Shyamalan created an original work when he could have just used the modern cinematic universe mold, and it's hard to not respect that.… Expand
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
8
MoviesAreNiceJan 27, 2019
It has an epic start and a very good 2nd act. The ending might be "split" but the "glass" is "unbreakable" personally. I think its worth a watch and is mostly good with a bit of bad.
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
6
SSRJan 19, 2019
Not as good as Unbreakable, and a notch lower than Split, and although it still has some interesting moments and some great performances they are letdown by an overwrought story.
9 of 13 users found this helpful94
All this user's reviews
10
Sleepy-TJun 4, 2019
On this Movie i don't understand the critics. Its a down to Earth Superhero movie. Sure the ending is for some disappointing but M.Night has balls to end a movie like that and i respect him for that.I really enjoyed it, but it isn't a movieOn this Movie i don't understand the critics. Its a down to Earth Superhero movie. Sure the ending is for some disappointing but M.Night has balls to end a movie like that and i respect him for that.I really enjoyed it, but it isn't a movie for everyone. Its really slow paced and it takes it time. But still the Movie raises some interesting questions about Heroism and having powers. I really like stuff like that.If you liked Unbreakable and Split you may like this one too. But don't expect an big Showdown to the universe Of these Movies. Glass is something different and i am Glade it exists.… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
7
FedericoSierraFeb 4, 2019
GLASS will shatter the expectations of anyone who comes in looking for a satisfying conclusion to a trilogy that never was. Like both its predecessors, UNBREAKABLE and SPLIT, they are all standalone movies in their own right. That being said,GLASS will shatter the expectations of anyone who comes in looking for a satisfying conclusion to a trilogy that never was. Like both its predecessors, UNBREAKABLE and SPLIT, they are all standalone movies in their own right. That being said, GLASS is an audacious social commentary about the superhero landscape that's been paved in mainstream cinemas. GLASS is a flawed movie, but I respect it for having its own identity, and even more for the reflective ending that makes us question who the villain really is.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
PinokiaJan 21, 2019
The film is good, watched in one breath. But before the start it is worth watching the first two films in the trilogy, otherwise much will not be clear
13 of 20 users found this helpful137
All this user's reviews
10
havigalaxyJan 19, 2019
DON'T LISTEN TO THE CRITICS! M. Night has done it again! I was at the edge of my seat trying to figure out how this will end and then when it does my jaw drops, which is is a common recurring thing that happens when I watch M. Night's moviesDON'T LISTEN TO THE CRITICS! M. Night has done it again! I was at the edge of my seat trying to figure out how this will end and then when it does my jaw drops, which is is a common recurring thing that happens when I watch M. Night's movies and that is very well a GOOD thing, which means he is doing something right!
This movie is not like any other superhero movie I have seen. M. Night brings such a realistic bend. From the fight scenes, which are played out like it truly would be in real life, the conflict through the characters of battling the belief in real super powers, to the whole demeanor of the movie, it has such a realistic and literal vibe to the plot that sets it apart from all the other superhero movies and making the audience truly believe that the concept of superpowers could actually be real. Its stunningly executed from the cinematography, score, color scheme, plot and all of the above. Not to Mention James McAvoy's acting was presented stunningly. I didn't think his acting could get any better after Split, but it did! WHY HASN'T THIS GUY WON AN OSCAR YET!?!?
If your looking for a remarkable superhero movie like no other, I wouldn't recommend any other movie than this one!… Expand
13 of 20 users found this helpful137
All this user's reviews
6
moviemitch96Jan 18, 2019
So I was really looking forward to this once it was revealed that the films 'Unbreakable' and 'Split' were tied together and that Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson's characters from 'Unbreakable'would be meeting James McAvoy's from 'Split'.So I was really looking forward to this once it was revealed that the films 'Unbreakable' and 'Split' were tied together and that Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson's characters from 'Unbreakable'would be meeting James McAvoy's from 'Split'. For those unfamiliar with the stories to both those films, in 'Unbreakable', Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson play individuals with unique traits and abilities. Having gone his whole life surviving several severe accidents and realizing he just might be immortal, David Dunn (Willis) uses his superhuman strength and psychic abilities for good and helping others, while a fragile and crippled man named Elijah Price (Jackson) acts as a resentful villain to Willis's hero. In 'Split', McAvoy plays Kevin Wendell Crumb, a man who not only kidnaps young women, but also happens to have multiple personality disorder, one of these personalities being a large, dangerous, and aggressive one known as 'The Beast.' This film unites these three characters together and ultimately pits them against one another. While this premise had been in the making for years and sounded so cool as an idea and the way it was teased at the end of 'Split', I have to say that I was quite underwhelmed with the execution of said idea in this film. I really felt like it had great potential, but this film really took forever to get moving at a decent pace and mostly felt like build-up and set-up, with the final half hour being the only somewhat exciting portion of the film. It just seemed to take a while to find its footing and wasn't sure what it wanted to be. Another thriller? Another action film? A drama? It certainly felt like a drama to me, as it took forever to get into the action and thriller elements that made 'Unbreakable' and 'Split' pretty solid films. I will say that as expected, the acting from all was outstanding, with McAvoy once again juggling and shifting back and forth between so many different personalities and expressions seamlessly, and Willis and Jackson both having some great and worthwhile moments of their own as well. Overall, the acting was definitely a highlight, and on paper, the premise sounded so perfect and cool, but the film's uncertainty with its pacing and exactly what genre it wanted to be or stick with made it fall short of my hopes and expectations unfortunately. But if for anything, see it for the nostalgia from Willis and Jackson, as well as for McAvoy's brilliant performance (or should I say performances thanks to his multiple personalities.) Seriously, he's easily steals the show, just as he did in 'Split'! Oh and of course, since it is M. Night Shyamalan directing again, you're right to expect some sort of twist at the end.… Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
9
accent_sharkFeb 12, 2019
There is so much to say. I've seen a lot of super heroes movies in my life, and it is the best trilogy I've seen so far. It's simple, well crafted, it's human, the actors are really good, all of them. It's not perfect because anything is, butThere is so much to say. I've seen a lot of super heroes movies in my life, and it is the best trilogy I've seen so far. It's simple, well crafted, it's human, the actors are really good, all of them. It's not perfect because anything is, but the cirle is neatly closed. I'll just say this: Thank you everyone for your hard work.… Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
7
ABAwesomeJan 19, 2019
It's good, not great. And it's a lot of good, with the exception of two or three major things (mostly plot points, but one thematic element that's just super sophmoric more than anything else) but it could've been worse. It's not what IIt's good, not great. And it's a lot of good, with the exception of two or three major things (mostly plot points, but one thematic element that's just super sophmoric more than anything else) but it could've been worse. It's not what I really wanted to the final chapter of this trilogy I never thought would happen, but it's an ending, anyway. It's not perfect, but definitely not a disaster. It's also quite funny, and not unintentionally like several other Shyamalan films. James McAvoy is easily the MVP and kills every time he's on-screen.… Expand
11 of 18 users found this helpful117
All this user's reviews
10
ProFeatJan 19, 2019
Good movie don't understand what all dug. The film is not a blockbuster it is essentially philosophical. It's not the Avengers and the action is not here to be a movie conversational. Generally I liked it. And still this film many did notGood movie don't understand what all dug. The film is not a blockbuster it is essentially philosophical. It's not the Avengers and the action is not here to be a movie conversational. Generally I liked it. And still this film many did not like because of the trailer. Everyone was waiting for the other Avengers but alas, this is a good psychological movie… Expand
12 of 20 users found this helpful128
All this user's reviews
8
FMisHereJan 20, 2019
Honestly, if you like the other two, you will 100% percent enjoy and appreciate this one. There are flaws in this fun but the grounded and realism of these superhero characters feel good in Glass. People have reasons to not enjoy this and theHonestly, if you like the other two, you will 100% percent enjoy and appreciate this one. There are flaws in this fun but the grounded and realism of these superhero characters feel good in Glass. People have reasons to not enjoy this and the ending is iffy but overall, its very fun and enjoyable. Go in with an open mind and not expecting action like Marvel or DC. Its a different kind of superhero film… Expand
9 of 15 users found this helpful96
All this user's reviews
10
SupremeCheeseJan 25, 2019
Great and very harshly criticized. Shyamalan is consistently putting good movies out now and people are really hating on him.
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
10
RogerYoung32717Jan 26, 2019
I just left Glass and my mind is boggled at the Critics Score. Mr. Shamalan has done us proud and tied up the trilogy with a perfect bow. As a part of the trilogy, this movie deserves a 10. Between the critic score for this movie andI just left Glass and my mind is boggled at the Critics Score. Mr. Shamalan has done us proud and tied up the trilogy with a perfect bow. As a part of the trilogy, this movie deserves a 10. Between the critic score for this movie and what they scored for The Last Jedi, I guess it is user scores only for me from now on. ALWAYS check User scores, IGNORE critic scores, or don't waste your time checking reviews at all because the critics are clearly under some influence other than the desire to steer us towards quality filmmaking.… Expand
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
6
TVJerryJan 25, 2019
M. Night Shyamalan reunites the stars of his 3 biggest films (Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson and James McAvoy) into a sort of trilogy finale to Unbreakable and Split. Willis is not reviving his role from Sixth Sense, he's playing anotherM. Night Shyamalan reunites the stars of his 3 biggest films (Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson and James McAvoy) into a sort of trilogy finale to Unbreakable and Split. Willis is not reviving his role from Sixth Sense, he's playing another character with superhuman powers. This trio is brought together in a psychiatric hospital, where Sarah Paulson's talky character tries to convince them that they're just deluded. While the premise starts with some promise, the rambling pace and sometimes confusing writing keep it from paying off. There is a conclusion (that may even augur a new world of superheros), but it's more frustrating than satisfying. A few moments of intensity don't make for a taut thriller.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
7
dharmaApr 13, 2019
M Night Shyamalan's trilogy capper is definetely a controversial film. Why? Because of his instinct to be original, and not in subjugating to the audience's expectation. The original 'Unbreakable' actually suffers because of this...It was aM Night Shyamalan's trilogy capper is definetely a controversial film. Why? Because of his instinct to be original, and not in subjugating to the audience's expectation. The original 'Unbreakable' actually suffers because of this...It was a moderate box office success due to its high budget, and ends up being a cult classic. This one is more of the same variety...going to a certain direction that will baffle audiences, yet is essentially a 'logical' conclusion in light of what is happening in this genre. I will not spoil the controversial 3rd act, but be prepared to be surprised. Whether you like it or not, we need film makers of this ilk.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
6
kiwijinxterJan 24, 2019
I tried hard to go into this movie without any expectations. I mostly succeeded although I had read some reviews ("normal people" user reviews - not the useless professional critics' reviews). Some user reviews gave me the impression thatI tried hard to go into this movie without any expectations. I mostly succeeded although I had read some reviews ("normal people" user reviews - not the useless professional critics' reviews). Some user reviews gave me the impression that there was a fantastic major twist at the end that's bigger than Sixth Sense. Yes, there was a twist at the end but not quite at Sixth Sense levels. Still it was a nice twist.

Overall the movie had great veteran actors in the 3 main "superhero" parts who all gave very good performances for their parts - James McAvoy, Bruce Willis and Samuel L Jackson. You'd expect that, and you got that. Their performances held the movie up. The movie itself - without giving anything away - wasn't as "twisty" as I expected but it does keep you on edge due to the tenseness of all the characters, particularly McAvoy's "Split" character. In the end I did get the similar feeling I got when I watched Unbreakable. (I haven't watched Split yet). It was OK satisfying but not over the top. I think the problem M. Night Shyamalan is that Sixth Sense was so extraordinary that it is very hard for him to top that. Overall, it's a reasonably satisfying movie, but I felt that I wanted more fleshed out. Personally, I give it a 6/10… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
7
HighHeelKnightJan 24, 2019
"Glass" is a good movie, but it is not good enough for 2019. "Unbreakable" came out in 2000, the year that "X-Men" sparked a superhero renaissance. If "Split" and "Glass" could have shifted back 6 to 10 years, as the MCU brought a new"Glass" is a good movie, but it is not good enough for 2019. "Unbreakable" came out in 2000, the year that "X-Men" sparked a superhero renaissance. If "Split" and "Glass" could have shifted back 6 to 10 years, as the MCU brought a new renaissance, then Shyamalan's trilogy would have been brilliant. Today, superhero projects dominate movies and television, from "Watchmen", "Deadpool", "Avengers", and the Arrowverse to "The Incredibles", "Big Hero 6", "The Lego Batman Movie", and TWO types of Teen Titans. All seven of the main actors of "Glass" have been in superhero or comic book projects as well. The world has elevated past with Shyamalan wants to offer. "Glass" is worth seeing, but it is too late to the superhero party. Don't see it in Imax either.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
7
CriticalBwepFeb 11, 2019
Shyamalan's take on the popular superhero franchise truly stands out from the rest, making an overall intriguing and original movie. Despite this, I'm ashamed to admit that I was disappointed on after my first viewing of the film, as IShyamalan's take on the popular superhero franchise truly stands out from the rest, making an overall intriguing and original movie. Despite this, I'm ashamed to admit that I was disappointed on after my first viewing of the film, as I expected so much more from the last movie in the 'Unbreakable' trilogy. The positives of 'Glass' really do shine, however, I found that the movie dragged, and the poor pacing was the movie's largest and most noticeable flaw. James McAvoy returning as Kevin and the other personalities was a real pleasure to see; his performance was fantastic. Although McAvoy stole the spotlight, every character in the movie, even supporting characters, played a significant role and made the film work. Although I would have loved to have seen more from certain characters, their setup during at least the first half an hour of the movie was done perfectly. For me, the movie started to lose momentum around the middle. The pace was much slower and it was hard to understand where the film was actually going. It is until the end where it makes sense and for me, the film's finale saved it from becoming painfully average. Overall, M. Night Shyamalan has made a decent follow up to the previous films. It is certainly not a bad movie; it is a good movie, even though I felt disappointed after my first impressions of 'Glass'. I am satisfied with the way it turned out.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
9
JHenrickson97Jan 18, 2019
I have no idea what to say, except 2 things...
1. I enjoyed the film.
2. I have issues with the parts of the climax.
10 of 17 users found this helpful107
All this user's reviews
10
IpecacJan 20, 2019
Go and see this movie. It is awesome. Blows away the disney garbage. It does not rely on CGI in every scene. Both me and my son had a blast at movies with this one.
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
10
DukeRedsJan 19, 2019
Don't Listen to the critics. If you liked and understood Unbreakable and Split, this movie is a layered Masterpiece. With complex themes, meta narrative and multiple good plot twists, this movie thrills the heart and the mind. I can't wait toDon't Listen to the critics. If you liked and understood Unbreakable and Split, this movie is a layered Masterpiece. With complex themes, meta narrative and multiple good plot twists, this movie thrills the heart and the mind. I can't wait to re-watch it to look for more foreshadowing, hints or just details, of which there are plenty to discover.… Expand
11 of 19 users found this helpful118
All this user's reviews
10
JimeJan 19, 2019
This movie is not without its flaws however, the style acting and characters create a wonderful aura that I just love.
11 of 19 users found this helpful118
All this user's reviews
7
Trineo99Jan 19, 2019
First of all, all three of the main leads did marvellous jobs as their characters. Now I haven’t seen Unbreakable yet but I still felt like I understood everything that David and Elijah stood for. I had already seen Split, the other movie inFirst of all, all three of the main leads did marvellous jobs as their characters. Now I haven’t seen Unbreakable yet but I still felt like I understood everything that David and Elijah stood for. I had already seen Split, the other movie in this series, so I already knew how great James McAvoy would be in this movie. He just brings so much energy to each and every single personality making them all seem like a different person. Some of the side characters though didn’t stand out as much for me and just seemed two dimensional. One of them being the doctor. She had no major character development and just seemed like a last minute addition. Spencer Treat Clark, who plays Joseph Dunn, brought nothing to the film and just seemed really bland. Just like any M. Night Shyamalan, there is a plot twist but in this film, there isn’t just one, not two but three. One of them is actually really good and will shock people but the other two are just dumb and should’ve just been taken out. This film is two hours and six minutes long and man does it feel longer than that. There were some parts that were enticing for me and brought me into the story but a majority of the film had me zoning out a lot. The film had my attention for one of the final scenes in the film and that was really it. This film feels like three different movies as well. There were some awkward transitions in this film and some weird moments where the camera was shaking. In the end, Glass in a decent film that I think could have and should’ve been better.… Expand
12 of 21 users found this helpful129
All this user's reviews
10
ocean1505Jan 21, 2019
I cannot understand why people are being so harsh on this movie. This will most definitely develop a cult following as the years pass, much like unbreakable in my opinion.
8 of 14 users found this helpful86
All this user's reviews
10
dip92Jan 19, 2019
I just don't get the critics on this one. I was a little sceptical walking into the theatre seeing the critical score but this movie was freaking great. I would have given it a solid 8 but it deserves a couple extra points for the way it hasI just don't get the critics on this one. I was a little sceptical walking into the theatre seeing the critical score but this movie was freaking great. I would have given it a solid 8 but it deserves a couple extra points for the way it has been treated by the critics.… Expand
8 of 14 users found this helpful86
All this user's reviews
6
Meth-dudeJan 23, 2019
While it's not awful, it's no masterpiece either. The acting is generally good, although watching McAvoy's character constantly changing personalities was cringe inducing, the cinematography looks good, and the ending was fun. Unfortunately,While it's not awful, it's no masterpiece either. The acting is generally good, although watching McAvoy's character constantly changing personalities was cringe inducing, the cinematography looks good, and the ending was fun. Unfortunately, the movie is quite boring and the plot twist at the end was predictable. It's not a bad movie, it's just very average.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
8
twall3Feb 5, 2019
I ALMOST got talked out of seeing this, thanks to the critics and my own skepticism of the many positive citizen reviews from people who had no other reviews to their name. But a snowstorm stranded me and needing to kill some time, chose toI ALMOST got talked out of seeing this, thanks to the critics and my own skepticism of the many positive citizen reviews from people who had no other reviews to their name. But a snowstorm stranded me and needing to kill some time, chose to see the movie in spite of my reservations. I REALLY liked it! I loved "Unbreakable", did not see "Split" and everything seemed to make sense. My head is still spinning a little. What a great follow up to "Unbreakable". Thank you to M. Night and the crew for putting together an entertaining and in the end a thought-provoking and inspiring ending!… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
9
DragonMan85Feb 2, 2019
Well... the user scores tell the REAL story here.
After years of being spoon fed production-line superhero movies, this was a welcome return to a more realistic style of superhero movie. In fact, I would barely even call it that.
I am sureWell... the user scores tell the REAL story here.
After years of being spoon fed production-line superhero movies, this was a welcome return to a more realistic style of superhero movie. In fact, I would barely even call it that.
I am sure that the critics will be confused at the fact that nobody is flying around in a cape, throwing magical lightning hammers with their half ripped off shirts and exposed oiled bodies. There is no typical Hollywood, easily digestible 'Candy' writing in this movie. The fights are gritty, the characters are human, the story is honest.
Going into this movie with expectations on what a superhero movie 'should be' will see you quickly running back to the counter for Aquaman tickets to sit with the critics.
Watching Unbreakable and Split beforehand is an absolute MUST! If you decide to give this a miss, you will find yourself being very quickly confused.
Conclusion... This movie was a unique experience that left myself and my partner discussing the events on our way home. It was awesome to see the characters and actors from the previous films again, and the conclusion will certainly leave you thinking.
I created an account and reviewed this movie just to rectify the critics poor understanding of what people actually like.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
8
HarryPettigrewJan 22, 2019
Note: I advise you watch Unbreakable and Split before reading any reviews for Glass.
Glass is an alternative take on the superhero origin story as David Dunn and Kevin Wendell Crumb start to question their supernatural abilities.
The film isNote: I advise you watch Unbreakable and Split before reading any reviews for Glass.
Glass is an alternative take on the superhero origin story as David Dunn and Kevin Wendell Crumb start to question their supernatural abilities.
The film is set in the same universe as M. Night Shyamalan previous films Unbreakable and Split. All the main cast from the previous films reprise their characters in this film.The main cast consists of James McAvoy, Bruce Willis, Samuel L Jackson, Sarah Paulson and Anya Taylor-Joy.
It deviates from the traditional superhero genre by focusing on the psychology of its main characters and doesn't rely on big action set pieces to intrigue its audience. The film follows themes established in the first film in the series Unbreakable and only brings in certain aspects that were established in its sequel Split.
If your favourite film in the series so far was Unbreakable you will enjoy Glass because of their shared similarities.
The similarities in both films allows the mystery surrounding the series to finally come to a close. This trilogy started nineteen years ago and is impressive that the series has maintained its level of quality after all this time. You can tell that the director M. Night Shyamalan is passionate about the series as he doesn't normally do sequels to his films. He has also confirmed he will not produce a sequel to Glass so this film is the final entry in the series.
M. Night Shyamalan's has redeemed himself with this latest release after he released the critically panned The Last Airbender and The Happening in the 2000's which tainted his filmography.
The writing in the film is questionable at times as some conversations in the film can come across as unnatural. I believe this is due to issues with the script and isn't caused by the acting featured in the film. James McAvoy's performance in the film is a real showcase of his acting range as he effortlessly interchanges between the twenty-four personalities his character possesses. With the surprise inclusion of Black Panther being nominated for Best Picture at the Academy Awards this year, it would be outrageous if James McAvoy isn't considered for a best actor nomination.
The run time for the film clocks in at 2hr 9 minutes which is needed to establish the connections for all the characters from the previous two films. This doesn't affect the pace of the film and compliments the film's climax well.
Glass received an age rating of 15 in the United Kingdom, so it is targeting a mature audience and will be inappropriate for younger audiences. This is due to the inclusion of graphic violence and swearing.
The film seems to have been faced with mixed reviews with critics. At the time of writing this, review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes awarded it 37% while its competitor Metacritic gave it 42 which is lower than the two previous films. This can be subject to change in the following weeks.
Glass is a great film for fans of the franchise but does require you to be familiar with the previous films to enjoy it. It is also one of the first major releases of the year, so I believe it will do extremely well at the box office due to the lack of competition.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
8
donuhrieFeb 8, 2019
Glass was entertaining to watch. McAvoy's performance is top rate. I highly recommend viewing the director Shyamalan's prequels: Unbreakable and Split, to get the full impact of Glass.
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
10
TryASummersaultJan 20, 2019
9.5/10 A spectacularly bizarre fusion of psychological intricacy, and signature clever plotting, M. Night crafts his tragic yet powerful magnum opus with this future classic; GLASS.

As the ultimate culmination of Unbreakable and Split, this9.5/10 A spectacularly bizarre fusion of psychological intricacy, and signature clever plotting, M. Night crafts his tragic yet powerful magnum opus with this future classic; GLASS.

As the ultimate culmination of Unbreakable and Split, this film has already been insanely misunderstood and unfairly rated/reviewed by “ critics” and some average moviegoers alike. They seemed to have expected a fast paced superhero film without deep character study, and dedicated storytelling with heart which is what this film has in bunches. If anything this is the most realistic and grounded film about super humans/heroes/villains that we've ever seen with dramatic outcomes that don't fit the usual formula of so many superhero related films. Another reason Shymalan deserves tons of respect for swinging away ambitiously with his stories and overall vision knowing many won't understand it.

The film starts out with a marvelous opening sequence that throws us back into familiar territory with these intriguing characters and what they are up to presently, and sets the tone nicely with excitement. As things progress the film does slow down drastically to spend time on characterization and the story's overall emotional depth. When everything comes together for the conclusion, the pace picks up intensely to an absolutely mind blowing string of events that will leave people talking for ages to come. Shyamlan is known for clever twists and extremely crazy endings and this one might be his most effectively executed one yet and that says something.

On the acting spectrum, this showcases once again just how mind boggling and versatile James McAvoy's Kevin/Horde character is. His enthusiasm, dedication, and wide range execution is up there with some of the greatest and most legendary acting I've ever seen, and he was snubbed of an Oscar and most likely will be again. He deserves massive amounts of credit once again. Sam Jackson's Elijah Glass portrayal is fantastic as well and just as witty and eccentric as ever, though i wish we would've had more dialogue from him. Speaking of dialogue, one of my only gripes is just how underutilized Bruce Willis's David Dunn character was in the film. I felt like they could've really designated some more time to his character, and especially given him some more lines. He was still solid and his normal self, but wasn't around enough imo.

Presentation wise, this was classic M. Night with crisp camera work, colorful schemes, and creative angling. He clearly has a keen eye for setting up certain scenes and shots in a unique and brilliant manner and keeps the film visually intriguing throughout. The effects in the action sequences are relatively solid especially when you think of the practical and frugal budget, which makes it all the more impressive. The soundtrack perfectly blends the familiar sonic themes from the first 2 films and compliments the overall experience fantastically.

Overall I would say to go into this like its more of a psychological drama than a thriller, and to really stop and think just how grounded its identity really is with all of its emotional power and symbolic messages. I believe once people can do that eventually they will learn to love this film the way its intended to be.… Expand
10 of 18 users found this helpful108
All this user's reviews
8
Datzman290Jan 28, 2019
My 17-year old son and I (I'm 50) saw this together after re-watching both Unbreakable and Split together the week before. It's not your typical Marvel/DC super hero movie; putting things in a far more "what if this really happened" frame ofMy 17-year old son and I (I'm 50) saw this together after re-watching both Unbreakable and Split together the week before. It's not your typical Marvel/DC super hero movie; putting things in a far more "what if this really happened" frame of mind, and wondering about the potential of it. Some questions remain unanswered (I'm guessing very purposefully), but the movie did exactly what we wanted... It wrapped up the story line with us looking forward to the potential Shyamalan twist. Once again the acting by McAvoy was FANTASTIC (He's truly a talent), though everyone else was great as well (not wanting to dismiss the talent of the rest of the cast). If you didn't like the other 2 movies, leave this one alone. If you did, it's recommended.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
5
AcaciaJan 22, 2019
I have seen all of M. Night’s movies, good and bad. For me, this one falls somewhere in the middle. I did not enjoy this movie and had a pretty hard time figuring out what was going on. I thought it was very confounding and often just kindI have seen all of M. Night’s movies, good and bad. For me, this one falls somewhere in the middle. I did not enjoy this movie and had a pretty hard time figuring out what was going on. I thought it was very confounding and often just kind of stupid. For those of you who really liked it, I am happy for you, because I really wanted to like it too. Unfortunately, I just came away feeling very disappointed. So much of it didn’t make any sense to me.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
4
Rebecca31Jan 25, 2019
Just take a moment to think about the fact that M. Night Shyamalan set up a more successful film Universe than the dead on arrival Dark Universe. I'm sure none of you actually wrote to M. Night requesting a sequel to Split/Unbreakable but ifJust take a moment to think about the fact that M. Night Shyamalan set up a more successful film Universe than the dead on arrival Dark Universe. I'm sure none of you actually wrote to M. Night requesting a sequel to Split/Unbreakable but if films aren't part of some franchise anymore will anyone even bother seeing them? So here we are anyway. The third film in the M. Night Universe, well that is until he decides The Sixth Sense fits into this mess somehow. M. Night is no fool, most of his films (not you Lady in the Water) make a huge amount of money no matter what you think of them. In today's climate superhero movies and horrors are nearly always a sure thing when it comes to financial success so why not combine the genres and see what you get, so we've gotten Glass. A film somewhere in the area of better than The Happening but not as good as Split. But what does it matter what I think of it, or what anyone thinks of it? Glass has only been in cinemas a week and it has already made five times its production budget and you just know this isn't the last we've seen of the M. Night Cinematic Universe. For those of you who do want to know what I thought of it, please continue to read because in case you couldn't tell I didn't like it.

David Dunn (Bruce Willis) is back from Unbreakable and has adopted his vigilante persona as "The Overseer" a raincoat wearing stalkery superhero who beats up bad guys. He turns his attention to Kevin Wendell Crumb (James McAvoy) who is still at large and currently mutilating girls around the town. We also have the return of Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson) cause reasons. Meanwhile Doctor Sarah Paulson apparently specialises in this area of mental illness because why not, sure it's the M. Night Universe and anything is possible. Look closely and you might even see a little cameo from M. Night himself. I don't mind a directors cameo but seriously don't give yourself lines you're not an actor. Leave that to the actual actors. Although the only one doing any real acting in this is McAvoy. He's outdone himself yet again and if you thought Split was impressive then watch him transform into all twenty-four personalities before your eyes. Willis on the other hand doesn't look like he cares at all about this film, it's a look of "give me my damn pay cheque and get on with it." I'm beginning to wonder if we just took him out of the film altogether would it even make a difference. Glass will force you to question the possibility of real life superheroes or is it all just happening in their heads, either way don't worry because the movie will stop and explain everything to you every few minutes, and I do mean every few minutes. Split was guilty of this unnecessary plotsplaining only it's somehow worse in Glass. The story felt like it was trying to be more impressive than it was, and although it did try to bring the superhero genre in a new direction I found myself getting repeatedly bored and the only thing that was keeping my attention was McAvoy's performance. As with Split, he is carrying the film and he is honestly the only reason you should give Glass the time of day. Not recommended unless you really have nothing better to do with your time.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
8
Reviewer2201Jan 20, 2019
Good movie, very surprising. Watch unbreakable and split, understand them first before seeing this movie.
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
8
RaduAJan 19, 2019
It's a good movie but I felt disappointed.
M. Night Shyamalan could have done much more. He had some good ideas, but he did not develop them. I didn't really liked the plot twist.
The acting is good ( especially James McAvoy ). Several scenesIt's a good movie but I felt disappointed.
M. Night Shyamalan could have done much more. He had some good ideas, but he did not develop them. I didn't really liked the plot twist.
The acting is good ( especially James McAvoy ).
Several scenes were filmed badly and some very well.

I do not think it deserves so much hate from critics.… Expand
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
8
mrmonsterJan 20, 2019
Don't listen to the critics, this is a great movie. It proves that M. Night Shaymalan is back and as good as ever. If you liked Split and Unbreakable, I think you'll like this.
8 of 15 users found this helpful87
All this user's reviews
8
cmilitanteJan 18, 2019
I really liked Glass. I felt satisfied with the end result. Sure it could've been better but glad it somewhat lived up to the hype. Great performances all around but McAvoy hands down stole the show.
8 of 15 users found this helpful87
All this user's reviews
9
kobenaufJan 20, 2019
I really enjoyed the story and the acting. I didn't know anything about this movie going in, which is ideal, but now after the fact, looking at the critics' comments, makes me think, why do we think those people should be experts at every movie.
8 of 15 users found this helpful87
All this user's reviews
8
ryu9376Jan 18, 2019
Honestly, forget the critics... this film was phenomenal. The ending "most definitely throws you, but the whole body of work of the film comes together seamlessly... & Elijah himself... a true bloody mastermind... til the very end.
8 of 15 users found this helpful87
All this user's reviews
8
AudraGayleJan 18, 2019
I'm not sure why so many folks do not like this movie. It's awesome! The ending was interesting and left me with more questions that I'd like to be answered. I know that Shyamalan said this was the end for him, so I guess those questions willI'm not sure why so many folks do not like this movie. It's awesome! The ending was interesting and left me with more questions that I'd like to be answered. I know that Shyamalan said this was the end for him, so I guess those questions will remained unanswered.… Expand
8 of 15 users found this helpful87
All this user's reviews
10
satan1349Jan 19, 2019
Loved it. Don't listen to the critics on this one. Go out and see it. It will be well worth it.
9 of 17 users found this helpful98
All this user's reviews
10
wenas33Jan 18, 2019
The movie is not about David, Kevin or even Mr Glass. This movie is about you. Having said that, the rhythm, twists, and dialogues that the critics so much complain about are completely congruents with this movie´s proposal and very good ifThe movie is not about David, Kevin or even Mr Glass. This movie is about you. Having said that, the rhythm, twists, and dialogues that the critics so much complain about are completely congruents with this movie´s proposal and very good if you ask me. If you like Unbreakable then you are gonna love this closure. I didn´t even like Split, and now, thanks to "Glass" I think I really do. It is easy the best Superhero trilogy ever made.… Expand
10 of 19 users found this helpful109
All this user's reviews
9
jacob4Jan 20, 2019
Definitely lives up to the unconventional superhero trope. Though at times the movie may seem slow-paced and just a bunch of exposistion all that leads up to a pretty satisfying climax and awesome fight scene. The characters are interestingDefinitely lives up to the unconventional superhero trope. Though at times the movie may seem slow-paced and just a bunch of exposistion all that leads up to a pretty satisfying climax and awesome fight scene. The characters are interesting and unique, and the final twists are crazy and awesome like always. A pretty good way to wrap up a trilogy, but hope for to come!… Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
2
JohnnyCanuckJan 26, 2019
There is a nugget of a better movie in the first 1/3 of this film. But what remains is absolute horsesh*t. The logic of the universe just does not add up and the rest is just sloppy. 3 super powered people - and 2 orderlies to watch themThere is a nugget of a better movie in the first 1/3 of this film. But what remains is absolute horsesh*t. The logic of the universe just does not add up and the rest is just sloppy. 3 super powered people - and 2 orderlies to watch them all. makes sense. SOmeone wake up Shymalan.… Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
3
AdamBeamJan 26, 2019
Unbreakable is the best film Shyamalan has ever done, and Split was a genuinely nice surprise, but sad to say that Glass breaks your heart if your fan of either film, and is just a complete mess. A film that fails as a sequel, and as aUnbreakable is the best film Shyamalan has ever done, and Split was a genuinely nice surprise, but sad to say that Glass breaks your heart if your fan of either film, and is just a complete mess. A film that fails as a sequel, and as a competent movie as well, just a very upsetting disappointment to start the year off with. Glass waste all the potential and interesting concepts it offers, and whatever good graces the film still had with audiences or my patience will be immediately dashed in the last 15 minutes, where the twist(s) absolutely destroy the film and all hopes it had. Seriously your best bet with the film is either skip the movie, or leave before the last 15 minutes and just imagine a better ending than what we're actually given.… Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
0
TomL11Apr 11, 2019
I wasn't going to leave a review, but when I saw this insanely high score I just thought I would warn people that this garbage film is one of the worst things I have ever sat through in my life.
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
10
NileOuroborosJan 20, 2019
I've been reading several critic reviews for this film, and can't stop shaking my head. These are people I respect, who are usually spot on for how I feel about films, A.A. Dowd in particular who gave this one a B-. So I'll state myI've been reading several critic reviews for this film, and can't stop shaking my head. These are people I respect, who are usually spot on for how I feel about films, A.A. Dowd in particular who gave this one a B-. So I'll state my position: This film is perfect. Flawless. At long last and thank heaven, M. Night Shyamalan has arrived; fully self-realized and glorious to behold.

I think where the critics are at a disadvantage comes from two things. First, M. Night Shyamalan has become such a joke in this business that he's practically a meme, certainly a cautionary tale in hubris, and they simply can't accept that he might emerge fully formed from the trash heaps of The Happening and Airbender and After Earth as the seminal film auteur that he always showed the potential of being. Second, Shyamalan has only ever made one movie (barring the ones written in whole or in part by others), and this one is no different. He's just finally perfected it.

And the only movie he's ever made is this: "You're not gonna believe this, but it's true," and he then dissects what he just showed you to irrevocably prove that indeed, it can't be true, and he's transparent about everything the whole time, and in the end he pulls a rhino out of thimble and lo! - It's actually true, and your mind is blown. Or the short version: "The Twist Ending." And the problem with that story is that it is, at its core, a con. Unless it's perfect, in which case it's magic. And it's worked exactly five times (The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable, Signs, Split, and Glass). Every other attempt failed, and we felt cheated and conned at the end of it.

I do not think less of the auteur for trying to perfect one story over and over. I admire it. If you 'got' Jiro Dreams Of Sushi, you'll understand my perspective. Jiro spends his entire life perfecting one thing. And he only achieves perfection after a full life pursuing it. Compared to that, Shyamalan is precocious in his achievement with Glass.

But why? How? What makes Glass perfect? The best imagery I can provide is one the film itself raises during a therapy session: that the world's finest magicians work at the subtlest levels with inhuman precision to read minds, fool eyes, make believers out of skeptics. What Shyamalan has always been, even in relative drivel like Airbender, is a unique filmmaking voice. His pacing, his framing, lighting, sets, performances... absolutely every single element of what ends up on the screen is distinctly and uniquely his, and almost invariably beautiful to behold. To quote the respected A.A. Dowd: "Every shot is an event." Take a second to appreciate this. The craft of moving images has been evolving at breakneck speed for a solid century, and within all that susurrus, Shyamalan stands out, is distinct, is unique and even momentous in his craft unlike anything current (no disrespect Mr. Tarantino), and surpassing even his inspiration in deliberate purpose: Mr. Hitchcock himself.

The 'meta' nature of this film is brought up in every professional review. What this means is that Shyamalan here is not only a magician, or a magician rolling up his sleeves to show you he isn't cheating. He's walking out on stage completely in the buff, hiding and holding nothing. And as he proceeds to perform his magic he's explaining every step to you in excruciating detail. And at the end, from nowhere, a thimble appears, and a rhino is pulled out, and it sings the national anthem in falsetto.

How does he accomplish this? Let's take for granted that his cinematic craft is flawless, as always. What's different? What's different is that his usual shortcoming has finally been shored up. Even in Split, his secondary characters suffered from what they usually do: they are his exposition. The therapist there is his stopgap, explaining wall climbing and bluntly postulating the film's thesis, which is that DID is an evolutionary step past normal humanity (i.e. a super power). It's too direct. While Split and the others survived this flaw, The Village and the rest were much worse and did not. But it's part of his ploy, to reveal all upfront so you can't believe the final twist. Yet it weakens these characters, which erodes their nominal job as supporting structures for the main characters. Why it works here in Glass is because that exposition comes more from the image sequences themselves, and of course from the meta element - delivered by the titular Mr. Glass himself - which fits both his character and the nature of the whole magic trick.

And that's pretty much it. The eternal fatal flaw finally healed. It doesn't hurt that his leads are some of the most talented actors. Ever. Yeah, you heard me - go ahead, look at Willis' body of work and prove me wrong.

But okay yeah, there is one flaw here. Mr. Glass' mama's aging makeup in super close up. But I'm gonna call that the mole on the supermodel's face that highlights the perfection of everything else.… Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
10
Tarot1575Jan 21, 2019
Yet again critics get it wrong, and the people who say the end is terrible are just plain loony. This is M. Night at his best and all I could say at the end was WOW because I was blown away. It’s ballsy and original and the end rivals theYet again critics get it wrong, and the people who say the end is terrible are just plain loony. This is M. Night at his best and all I could say at the end was WOW because I was blown away. It’s ballsy and original and the end rivals the Sixth Sense. If you like Unbreakable and Split you’ll love this film. I took my daughter who had not seen Split and saw Unbreskable 15 years ago, and she too loved it too. This is one of those times to ignore the critics.… Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
8
EborjasJan 20, 2019
This movie gave me what I wanted just like the previous films. Suspense, kept me guessing, some nice revenge, some closure, character interaction, unique developments. The ending was not cliche and I loved it. I feel everyone wanted a clicheThis movie gave me what I wanted just like the previous films. Suspense, kept me guessing, some nice revenge, some closure, character interaction, unique developments. The ending was not cliche and I loved it. I feel everyone wanted a cliche ending and when they didn't get it, they felt betrayed. everyone has been conditioned to expect certain plots and that is why I feel this move got bad review. If you came in wanting something different. You got it. I did and I loved it.… Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
7
sassymahJan 24, 2019
Testing this feature. Good blend of genres and plotlines from Unbreakable and Split.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
10
Krtek90Jan 22, 2019
This is a great but underrated movie. If you liked Split and Unbreakable, you will definitely like this movie.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
9
AfonsobJan 22, 2019
Glass had the courage and originality to bring a conclusion to its story line, speaking about superhero movies it's not usual and only Watchmen and Logan brought it until now. It's not a flawless movie but It's far from what the critics areGlass had the courage and originality to bring a conclusion to its story line, speaking about superhero movies it's not usual and only Watchmen and Logan brought it until now. It's not a flawless movie but It's far from what the critics are saying. It's a original, deep and intense movie that brings a fresh air to the gender of superhero movies, something made by few before. I would say that Glass deserves a place among Logan and Watchmen.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
9
Angus9821Jan 24, 2019
This film has a few flaws and a slightly disappointing ending, but the critics have been slamming this film way to hard which is undeserved, Night’s filmmaking techniques are outstanding and this film is one of his most exhilarating filmsThis film has a few flaws and a slightly disappointing ending, but the critics have been slamming this film way to hard which is undeserved, Night’s filmmaking techniques are outstanding and this film is one of his most exhilarating films yet,definitely go see this film!… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
7
MattBrady99Mar 1, 2019
“This was an origin story the whole time”.

Eastrail 177 trilogy, a franchise we didn’t expect to exist or needed, but M. Night Shyamalan surprise us once again with his twist and turns. After the unexpected hit of ‘Split’, people were“This was an origin story the whole time”.

Eastrail 177 trilogy, a franchise we didn’t expect to exist or needed, but M. Night Shyamalan surprise us once again with his twist and turns.

After the unexpected hit of ‘Split’, people were warming up for Shyamalan’s follow up ‘Glass’, and the return of familiar faces like David Dunn, Kevin and Mr. Glass himself. By continuing with the grounded approach towards superheroes while making the fantasy aspects implanted into reality. And of course the unnatural dialogue, a usual trademark for Shyamalan. While I don’t think ‘Glass’ is as bad as people made it out to be, but not to say it’s perfect or great, just plenty of missed opportunities in an already solid conclusion.

M. Night Shyamalan manage to craft a trilogy that took him over a decade to make. If you keep in mind of how popular superheroes are now - this stands out from the rest, as being both compelling and meaningful. While Shyamalan is a 50/50 director, but I can tell there’s passion in everything he makes, even if it doesn’t work out and makes questionable decisions. His ego died along time ago and him going back to smaller budget movies is the right move. There’s plenty of long times, close ups and a clever way of structuring the films pace. We start with Dunn, then we follow Kevin, and finally Elijah. Coincidence?

The cinematography is solid with a beautiful mixture of colours and the music perfectly fits with the characters and story.

James McAvoy returns as Kevin, the man with crowded personalities with an extra set of new faces. It’s amazing how McAvoy can switch between the different characters and make it look so effortlessly, sometimes in a blink of an eye. A mixture of colorful personalities with comedic moments, but there are personalities that can be vicious and a force to be reckon with. So it comes to no surprise he’s the strongest element of this movie.

Now I joked in the past about Bruce Willis cold attitude towards his recent roles. I mean, just watch the ‘RED 2’ interview, it’s hilarious how he doesn't hide it. When Willis cares, he’s great, so it’s incredibly sad seeing him lose any care to not only in his performances, but in film choices. In 'Glass', Willis is stilted, but at the same time grounded in his reactions and facial expressions. There was a point midway through through where the film seemed to forget about Dunn. While not a come back role, but at least I see his interest in the story, character and director. By the way, I’m still a fan of him.

Samuel L. Jackson is great as the genius, yet wickedly evil Mr. Glass. Despite his disease (brittle bone disease) keeping him permanent in a wheelchair, but that doesn't stop him. It’s psychological manipulation that gives him power and makes him truly dangerous. There’s a great little moment in a scene (without spoilers) where he watches someone die right in front of him, and he leans forward and watches in amusement.

The other supporting cast are pretty good as well. Anya Taylor-Joy is good as always, but unfortunately doesn’t have anything to do here. I’m glad they brought back Spencer Treat Clark, who played David Dunn’s son in ‘Unbreakable’ and now working with his dad to track down and stop criminal activity. He really gives an emotional performance, especially towards the end. Sarah Paulson is fine in the movie, but I don’t like where her character goes in the third act, which goes into my issues.

As I said before, it’s a flawed movie. While I thought the second act was still pretty good, but was nowhere near as solid as the first act. I’ve got mixed feelings about the ending, because at first I like how bleak it is, basically saying in real life, the villains win. However, the twist itself gets so bizarre it leaves more holes in the story.

Overall rating: A clunky movie that will popularize audiences for along time, but at least didn’t play it safe like most superhero movies.

“It’s not so bad being in the light.”… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
9
257sandJan 22, 2019
After an hour of slow pacing, that has you on the edge of your seat, Glass delivers a rather superb turnover by presenting a payoff that will keep you smiling until the end credits roll. Leaving the merits of its predecessors aside, GlassAfter an hour of slow pacing, that has you on the edge of your seat, Glass delivers a rather superb turnover by presenting a payoff that will keep you smiling until the end credits roll. Leaving the merits of its predecessors aside, Glass succeeds in making you empathize with its supposedly "superhuman" cast along with the seemingly normal array of supporting characters. Impressive use of camerawork to appropriately frame the various states of each character without confusing the audience. The soundtrack felt right and was never blaring but also not silent enough to keep your feelings on the same string. James McAvoy continues with his impressive skillset of portraying the most amount of characters an actor has ever played. Each personality really did house a different person because of his acting. Samuel Jackson's performance gives a light-hearted tone to the film, a testament to his commitment to the "villain" role. Bruce Willis' continues his style of acting from 'Unbreakable', which in my opinion is the best use of him as an actor.

After a series of debacles with big-budgeted movies, returning to form IS the best path for Shyamalan. There were no flashy capes, big explosions or snarky one-liners as is the standard for superhero films nowadays and that's a good thing. The best thing even. What Shyamalan did to his way of approaching things can be seen in this film that gets closer to the heart even with various subtleties.

Shyamalan grounded himself like Glass was grounded in reality, and, more importantly, empathy. And in so doing, he's made a film that truly does shatter expectations like the paper-mache bones of the lovable titular character.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
7
Brando217Mar 9, 2019
A bit disappointing, but I must give it the credit to have the balls to end things where it did.
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
7
LarianApr 4, 2019
One of M Night Shamalans better efforts. Some did not like the twist, but that's to be expected. I would say that the end kind of left me annoyed, but it is MNS... "shurg"
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
7
LinkxPeachFeb 13, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is one of the worst superhero movie I ever watched. The setting was horrible, mental institute?! Really?! The movie has so much dialogue, and rarely any fighting in it. The superheroes in this movie hardly have no powers. Their discover able powers was limited and they didn't gain any new powers. The ending sucks! All three superheroes was killed by humans. Glass was okay, but the thing is that the movie lacks a lot of action in it.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
onyxhFeb 2, 2019
Many audiences believe that the film did not meet their expectations due to its "disappointing" ending, and many of them are idiots who do not understand the theme of M. Night Shyamalan's trilogy. It is suppose to give superheroes a moreMany audiences believe that the film did not meet their expectations due to its "disappointing" ending, and many of them are idiots who do not understand the theme of M. Night Shyamalan's trilogy. It is suppose to give superheroes a more realistic perspective if they were ever a possible existence in our world. Glass provided us with an anticlimatic ending because it stayed true to its theme. Audiences were expecting a linear story where a final showdown in some sort of grand stadium occurs with the hero winning and going home. This would probably be what would've happened if this was any other superhero movie like X-men. However, realistically, the super-humans probably would've just fought in a more common area in the society they lived in, and they probably would've been condemned quickly by authorities. There are many subtle messages and hidden clues laid out all over the film. If move critics watched the movie a couple more times they would likely see it in a different light, but they usually only care about racing to be the first people writing a review on the movie. They are making the same mistake they did 19 years ago when Unbreakable first came out...… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
10
lytrunghieuJan 31, 2019
this is not a satisfied movie for everybody especially those who haven't seen Unbreakable or Split yet, though this film is a super x3,14 good movie, why? i'll tell you because Shyamalan worked so good for the twists, for the hidden hint,this is not a satisfied movie for everybody especially those who haven't seen Unbreakable or Split yet, though this film is a super x3,14 good movie, why? i'll tell you because Shyamalan worked so good for the twists, for the hidden hint, easter eggs and etc,...... 2/3 of the movie was soooooo great,the slow running type, talk scene, the rest 1/3 is the end, the end of this movie is good, worth it, reasonable, but yet not comfortable and satisfied, you may think that there'are ways to make the end better but Shyamalan chose this way, he wants to make different, he wants to deliver deep meaning of this film. and you can find infinite hint in this movie through youtube, google, ,...etc.... trust me, if you love Unbreakable, and Split, i can not stop you from watching this movie, give it a try, and you'll be surprised.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
artardmosheaFeb 25, 2019
I think this movie would be impossible to enjoy without seeing both Unbreakable and Split, even taking that into account I think this movie was the weakest of the three and suffers greatly for needing to take so much time building the bridgeI think this movie would be impossible to enjoy without seeing both Unbreakable and Split, even taking that into account I think this movie was the weakest of the three and suffers greatly for needing to take so much time building the bridge to the first two without retelling the story and not spending enough time creating it's own story.

So what you are left with has very little weight to it and comes off as a goofy sub-superhero movie with no flash of a big blockbuster and no story that you would hope for.

McAvoy does all the heavy lifting, Jackson was good, Willis wasn't given much to do.

The ending was jarring and unsatisfying.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
Compi24Jan 19, 2019
Fans of either "Unbreakable" or "Split" beware, "Glass's" blatant disregard for its central trio of characters may just infuriate, disappoint, or otherwise disturb you. The movie's first three-quarters had me so rapt, riveted, and drawn in,Fans of either "Unbreakable" or "Split" beware, "Glass's" blatant disregard for its central trio of characters may just infuriate, disappoint, or otherwise disturb you. The movie's first three-quarters had me so rapt, riveted, and drawn in, but it's the ending that ultimately left me feeling like Samuel L. Jackson's "Elijah Price" at the beginning of this trilogy's first installment -- alone, small, and misunderstood. I thought I was on the same page with Shyamalan when it came to the rules of this world, the import of these characters, and the direction at hand. I suppose I was wrong, and I'm crestfallen as a result. Ugh.… Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
8
easterfieldsJan 19, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. ***SPOILERS***
I loved this film! I also hated it! I'll explain. I absolutely loved 98% of this movie. The first 98% of it. There are parts and scenes that are mesmerizing and just plain brilliant! In fact, it's only the last 10 minutes or so, that it lets us down. All acting efforts are done superbly well, especially James McAvoy. I mean...James McAvoy could be pound for pound one of the most talented actors in the business today. He's that fantastic in this film. He actually steals the show from two legendary actors in Bruce Willis and Samuel Jackson. There are just so many incredible moments here, but the reason why it doesn't hit a home run is really because the ending sees a "Kill them all and let God sort them out" approach. In fact, I'm going to go so far as to compare the last 10 minutes to that of The Last Jedi. It really comes down to poor writing leading to an unfulfilled character arch. When a character the fans (including myself) have devoted so much time and reverence to, ends up dying due to very lame reasons, it leaves a sour taste in the mouth. Bruce Willis is drowned in a pothole. In a literal pothole. James McAvoy gets shot by a sniper. And Mr.Glass is punched in the stomach. God I just can't believe how bad they fd up this ending. Everything was perfect. PERFECT! Ugh...… Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
0
iceman994Feb 5, 2019
This movie is 0. My problem is these actors got the skill but the writers totally lost their skill to create great characters why? Why is it so hard now to find a good writer? also Director was sleeping or what? Critics should put 0 to thisThis movie is 0. My problem is these actors got the skill but the writers totally lost their skill to create great characters why? Why is it so hard now to find a good writer? also Director was sleeping or what? Critics should put 0 to this movie not 50. Also users who put it to positive you totally have no brain for this movie you are the worst viewers who help hollywood to make more ******it movies.… Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
9
HKramerJan 19, 2019
M. Night Shyamalan continues his bold direction of not giving the viewer what they want, but what he wants to give. It's frustrating but also refreshing in a way to not be pandered to. I left the theater excited about a universe that mayM. Night Shyamalan continues his bold direction of not giving the viewer what they want, but what he wants to give. It's frustrating but also refreshing in a way to not be pandered to. I left the theater excited about a universe that may never occur.. Some of the critics reviews have been ridiculously negative prompting my first ever review..… Expand
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
All this user's reviews
8
opiiouJan 20, 2019
I saw this movie yesterday, and i gotta say it was really worth the money.
The cinematography is very beautiful, just like the use of color. I enjoyed the performances of James McAvoy and Sam Jackson (Elijah is probably the only characterI saw this movie yesterday, and i gotta say it was really worth the money.
The cinematography is very beautiful, just like the use of color. I enjoyed the performances of James McAvoy and Sam Jackson (Elijah is probably the only character that is not literally Sam Jackson himself).
In general i really like Shyamalan's take on this superhero stuff.
On the other hand i can see why some people are dissapointed, the ending was... i wouldnt say bad, but not what i wanted. Its (thank god) not a superhero blockbuster, if you saw unbreakable and split, you knew what you were in for.
Anyways, despite this rather unexpected ending, Shyamalan has redeemed himself in my eyes.
I am now willing to forget about the last airbender.
To sum up: Really cool and good movie, with an unusual ending.… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
9
flash246Jan 20, 2019
The best thing to do is to go in with nothing on your mind. Ignore the critics and try to forget any trailer that made this seem like a normal superhero movie. It's not. It plays with your expectations on how it will end. The acting is superbThe best thing to do is to go in with nothing on your mind. Ignore the critics and try to forget any trailer that made this seem like a normal superhero movie. It's not. It plays with your expectations on how it will end. The acting is superb and was overall a worthy conclusion to the trilogy.… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
3
Supergaz27Jan 22, 2019
Third act is horrendous, nothing original or clever about it. They could of cut out about an hour of Sarah Coulson monologuing and perhaps it wouldn't of been as boring.

If you're a fan of the the other two I'd say avoid it. Left a bad tasteThird act is horrendous, nothing original or clever about it. They could of cut out about an hour of Sarah Coulson monologuing and perhaps it wouldn't of been as boring.

If you're a fan of the the other two I'd say avoid it. Left a bad taste in my mouth.… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
9
IAmMooseJan 19, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Glass. This movie was an excellent ending to a fascinating trilogy. It will divide audiences on the twist of the movie, but overall is worth the price of admission alone.

All three of our main characters die at the end of this movie. Each one of them die in a way that uses their weaknesses. David Dunn dies of drowning, Kevin Crumb dies by sharing who he is with Casey, and Mr. Glass dies through his betrayal to The Beast.

If you haven't seen the film yet, go watch it in theatres or on any streaming device when it comes out.… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
7
MNfilmloverJan 18, 2019
Loved Unbreakable and really liked Split. Glass was good, but left a few things on the table. Acting by Willis, McAvoy and Jackson was STELLAR! I think Paulson was seriously miscast. She just didn't fit the part. Sorry, far too manyLoved Unbreakable and really liked Split. Glass was good, but left a few things on the table. Acting by Willis, McAvoy and Jackson was STELLAR! I think Paulson was seriously miscast. She just didn't fit the part. Sorry, far too many injections in the face-no movable parts. Her character may have needed to be stoic, but not frozen from enhancements. SO many other actresses out there. She really stuck out for me.… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
10
0000hJan 18, 2019
Glass is a good movie with a terrible ending. It has other shortcomings but to any fan of thriller movies it lives up to split and unbreakable. Also it has Samuel Jackson
8 of 18 users found this helpful810
All this user's reviews
7
BrianMcCriticJan 21, 2019
I've thought a lot about this film and while there were some problems I had with pacing and a character that was central to the story that I really didn't like, this is still an idea movie that goes for it. M. Night deserves credit for thisI've thought a lot about this film and while there were some problems I had with pacing and a character that was central to the story that I really didn't like, this is still an idea movie that goes for it. M. Night deserves credit for this trilogy and while to me Glass is the worst of the three I still appreciated it. Overall a low 7 a B.… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
5
ScienceAdvisorJan 22, 2019
The last third of the movie is exposition city, describing what is going on instead of doing it. The degredation of the writing is shockingly poor with plot holes and contrivance that leaves the buildup as disposable. The Shyamalanic twistThe last third of the movie is exposition city, describing what is going on instead of doing it. The degredation of the writing is shockingly poor with plot holes and contrivance that leaves the buildup as disposable. The Shyamalanic twist is disappointing to say the least, and the big reveal ranges from yawn-inspiring to soul-shattering. The dropped continuity of two murderers (the largest mass murderer in history and the other a cannibal of young girls) suddenly being treated their powers are a positive, is downright demented and betrays the previous two movies in yet another attempted retcon by Hollywood. The final objective point is that for a movie called Glass, it would have been nice if he was in the first two-thirds of the film. When he finally does arrive it does pickup, but by that point the writing has degraded to the point where even McAvoy and Jackson can save it. The combat is decent in the first third, and lackluster and disappointing for the rest of the movie.

I guess all the people handing out 10s while suggesting the reviewers are wrong were not really paying attention to the series, and are treating Glass as a stand-alone movie, when it is the third part of a trilogy. As a single movie it would be better by one point, but as the climax to a nearly 20 year series it just falls flat. You would have to be not only easy to please, but have a comprehensive disorder to truly enjoy Glass. Either that or use some form of temporary method of achiving that state. If you have seen the previous two movies (Unbreakable and Shattered) you will have to see it for yourself, but set your expectations very low as it all falls apart in the end. Great performances from McAvoy and Jackson as well as the build up, but sadly the delivery is unsatisfying. Stand alone movie 6/10, as the end to the trilogy 5/10
Breakdown by thirds (out of 10): 8, 5, 3… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
8
llectricJan 22, 2019
Not sure as to why this movie is getting panned first of all. My only advice for someone going to see this is, do not go with the mindset that this is a generic super hero movie. There are no flashy action scenes like you would expect from aNot sure as to why this movie is getting panned first of all. My only advice for someone going to see this is, do not go with the mindset that this is a generic super hero movie. There are no flashy action scenes like you would expect from a Marvel or DC movie. As most M. Night Shyamalan film's, what carries the film is his ability to get the best performance out of the actors & actresses involved with the "obvious" twist at the end. Obvious meaning that it's not an M. Night Shyamalan movie without the obligatory twist you thought you would never see coming.

It is a good movie, far from a perfect one in fact. Though it was able to keep my interest right to the end. I am glad I did not allow the critics review sway me from seeing the final chapter to M. Night Shyamalan's vision. I hope that Mr Glass's word do ring true for the future, that this is an origin story and we will see different meta humans within this universe.… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

43 Critic Reviews

6.5 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL