Columbia Pictures | Release Date: December 21, 2005
5.5
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 147 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
60
Mixed:
52
Negative:
35
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
PatC.Aug 27, 2007
Some funny moments, but nothing really refreshing.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
6
CharlieN.May 17, 2006
Very average...you expect much better from Jim Carrey.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
6
MarkB.Jan 10, 2006
Never remake your hits, said legendary producer Samuel Goldwyn seven decades ago, only your flops. Despite occasional hiccups like Peter Jackson's brilliant reimagining of King Kong and (okay, okay) the esthetically bankrupt but hugely Never remake your hits, said legendary producer Samuel Goldwyn seven decades ago, only your flops. Despite occasional hiccups like Peter Jackson's brilliant reimagining of King Kong and (okay, okay) the esthetically bankrupt but hugely profitable Adam Sandler redo of The Longest Yard, this is advice that still rings true 90% of the time (although most studios have obviously turned a 100% deaf ear to it). The original Fun with Dick and Jane, a fluffy but forgettable 1977 romp with George Segal and Jane Fonda as a successful professional couple who turn criminal after the bottom falls out, was no flop, but let's be honest: the only two things about it that people remember were a surprisingly amusing performance by Johnny Carson's old sidekick Ed McMahon and a shot of Fonda on the toilet, so it's fair game, I guess. This remake is actually heavier on the social commentary than the original, with lots of broadsides aimed at everything from WorldCom to Wal-Mart (and if you're wondering why it's set in 2000 rather than 2005, you won't find out until literally the last few seconds before the closing credits). When corporate up-and-comer Dick Harper (Jim Carrey) is made the patsy in a major scandal, he resorts to unorthodox measures with reluctant but intrigued wife Jane (Tea Leoni) in tow...leading to a good many economic-desperation gags that look like the punchlines that Barbara Ehrenstein somehow left out of her bestseller Nickel and Dimed. This version deemphasizes D&J's attempts to rob convenience stores and the like, a wise move that actually strengthens the satire, since the only real victims of these crimes are often the hapless, low-paid clerks, who if they aren't shot are sometimes fired for not making like Steven Seagal on the criminals' butts. And the best running gag comes early on, before the anvil drops on the Harpers' super-affluent lifestyle, when we discover that their little boy has, by dint of spending far more time with the maid than with his workaholic parents, has become unofficially Hispanic. Unfortunately, most of this film is uneven at best, with a spaghetti-on-the-wall approach to comedy that reflects itself most obviously in Carrey's between-Oscar-attempts performance, a throwback to his Ace Ventura days: when in doubt, keep the camera running and just let him make silly faces at it. The continually underrated Leoni is actually a lot more amusing: her reactions are really funny and delightful as she goes along with Carrey's wild schemes with a mixture of spousal devotion, bemusement and fascination. Alec Baldwin as Carrey's boss, who's played similar roles in Elizabethtown and Along Came Polly, is beginning to define unctuous corporate slime in much the same way Conrad Veidt used to define Nazis in 1940s movies. Baldwin's behavior, and the film's inevitable wish-fulfillment fantasy of his comeuppance is undoubtedly what will make Fun With Dick and Jane a populist hit: since we're obviously never going to see news footage of Kenneth Lay, Jeffrey Skilling and Andy Fastow being persuaded to play drop-the-Lifebuoy in the prison showers with several six-foot-three, 250-lb. dudes who can benchpress cattle and have lots of tattoos, many viewers will find this the next best thing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
JamesB.Apr 30, 2006
Barely passable sitcom material. Great cast--this was way below par for them. I spent 20 bucks on the dvd--please take advantage of my stupidity and don't waste your time..But, if you do--it's worth checking the deleted scenes for Barely passable sitcom material. Great cast--this was way below par for them. I spent 20 bucks on the dvd--please take advantage of my stupidity and don't waste your time..But, if you do--it's worth checking the deleted scenes for the great JAMES WHITMORE, whose scene was cut (and funnier than most in the movie) At 85, he deserves better. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
SteveP.Dec 27, 2005
Jim Carrey is my boy -- he often makes me laugh just looking at him. But J.C. is just collecting a paycheck with this one (or he can't find a decent script to work with). It's just not that funny. The only truly funny scene is so Jim Carrey is my boy -- he often makes me laugh just looking at him. But J.C. is just collecting a paycheck with this one (or he can't find a decent script to work with). It's just not that funny. The only truly funny scene is so racist that you (should) feel guilty for laughing. And it felt really long. Wait for video if you must see it, but if you could be doing anything else, don't even waste your time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
RhettW.Dec 30, 2005
More fun than funny. I was hoping for more of a revenge comedy.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
bobbyj.Jan 2, 2006
Pros: acting is great, some hilarious scenes. Cons: not that fun..., some incredibly dull scenes. Overview: the funny and dull scenes combine to make an utterly bland film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
DThompsonDec 22, 2005
Moments of real wit spoiled by poor attempts to ape Farrelly Bros. Such promise from the talent that brought us Galaxy Quest, Monk, Larry Sanders Show. This is nothing like any of their previous work.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
JohnRDec 28, 2005
I totally agree with Steve R. Wait for the DVD - don't waste your hard-earned buck on thei vacuous Carrey romp.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
ChadS.Feb 27, 2006
For "Fun with Dick and Jane" to connect with an audience, the filmmakers should've put the Harpers in a lower tax bracket. There's not enough contrast when you have the moderately rich going up against the filthy rich. We want to For "Fun with Dick and Jane" to connect with an audience, the filmmakers should've put the Harpers in a lower tax bracket. There's not enough contrast when you have the moderately rich going up against the filthy rich. We want to see somebody from the working class, stick it to the man. But "Fun with Dick and Jane" makes fun of those low-level employees that were hurt by the Enron fallout. This is the wrong movie to make fun of people who work at Wal-Mart-like businesses, because that's where some Enron refugees might've ended up at. It's hard to tell what this film's position is on matters of race and class. We're supposed to root against the mega-corp baddies, and yet the film seems to have a condescending attitude towards the working class. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
StevenFMay 14, 2013
While certainly worlds away from Jim Carrey's best work, Fun with Dick and Jane provides plenty of laughs and satisfactory poke in a world where embezzlement and fraud within large corporations is very much in control.
Carrey plays Dick
While certainly worlds away from Jim Carrey's best work, Fun with Dick and Jane provides plenty of laughs and satisfactory poke in a world where embezzlement and fraud within large corporations is very much in control.
Carrey plays Dick Harper, a man who has worked his whole life to achieve what he feels he deserves, the VP of Communications at the firm he works at, Globodyne. What he is unaware of, which eventually he finds out live on air, is that the company's stock is plummeting after CEO Jack McCallister mysteriously buys out 80% of his stock, thus surging the company into bankruptcy.
As Dick and his wife Jane (Tia Leoni) contemplate life without all of their luxuries, which eventually winds down to life even without the basics, they must come up with a way to get out of their predicament, which of course involves the other side of the law.
The film starts off in style, with Carrey's pristine comic timing setting up a wild ride of hilarious missteps for the hapless couple, but there are too many gaping plot holes that prevent this film from being so much better than it ended up being.
The scenes involving our two leads turning to crime are quite funny, and also when hundreds of employees apply for the same job sets up quite a hilarious surge to the top floor. But the dramatic downturns of the Harpers fortune definitely brings down the intended tone of the film, with one mishap after another, the film seems to open up avenues but doesn't explore them to their potential, instead shortening the film to give Carrey room to play, while Leoni tags along, seemingly undeterred by how quickly her marital life has spiralled out of control.
On the case of the cast, Carrey is on fine form as Dick Harper, is bursting energy which is now his signature is in full force here, but his screen time is shared mostly with Leoni who also puts in a good performance, again, the problem here being that there isn't much in the way of chemistry outside of these two, again something not fully explored.
Alec Baldwin also stars as greedy Globodyne CEO McCallister, his limited screen time is unfortunate as he is played out as quite an interesting character, buy one who ultimately isn't done much justice.
Its got its flaws, but for an easy sit down of enjoyable quips and far-fetched situations, this is a movie that might be worth a look.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
cameronmorewoodNov 15, 2012
Carrey's as manic as ever, but this rancid reboot plays like a sitcom, and movies need more motivation than that.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MarickMar 5, 2015
It's a really funny movie. It is a little naive but pretty funny and interesting.*********************************************************************
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Sosmooth1982Dec 23, 2022
Interesting movie. It's a shame that there's lives got ruined. This what they resorted to. Different type of roll to see Jim Carey in.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews