Paramount Pictures | Release Date: March 31, 2023
7.5
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 392 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
311
Mixed:
45
Negative:
36
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
bertobellamyApr 11, 2023
There are some funny characters in there, and some jokes did land, but the movie feels too much like an MCU one, and not in the best way. The forgettable villains and the lack of development for some characters don't help. Also, extremelyThere are some funny characters in there, and some jokes did land, but the movie feels too much like an MCU one, and not in the best way. The forgettable villains and the lack of development for some characters don't help. Also, extremely long, but I had a good time in some parts. Chris Pine and Michelle Rodriguez make for an effective comedy/action combo. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
4
royalguy07Apr 8, 2023
The humor is good and its good to have Pine in this, but the plot and globe trotting is very loose and the combat is particularly weak.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
6
Gen3sixApr 7, 2023
I don't know how they did it, but even though I feel like I've seen this movie a hundred times before, there's still something about it that feels fresh. Maybe it's the characters, or maybe it's the chemistry between the cast - whatever itI don't know how they did it, but even though I feel like I've seen this movie a hundred times before, there's still something about it that feels fresh. Maybe it's the characters, or maybe it's the chemistry between the cast - whatever it is, I found myself enjoying it despite my initial skepticism Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
TVJerryApr 6, 2023
Full disclosure: I've never played D&D, so I can't comment on the film's fidelity to the game or any sly references. Chris Pine heads up the gang that's out to rescue his daughter from the evil ruler (Hugh Grant, once again relishing the badFull disclosure: I've never played D&D, so I can't comment on the film's fidelity to the game or any sly references. Chris Pine heads up the gang that's out to rescue his daughter from the evil ruler (Hugh Grant, once again relishing the bad guy role). They go on an adventure that's relatively typical for this sort of tale, although there are surprisingly few dragons and virtually no dungeons. The actions sequences are OK and the effects are OK. What gives this movie its charm is the addition of a comic sensibility; not outright punchlines, but eye-rolling reactions that generate a few laughs. If it weren't for the popular franchise, this movie would quickly be relegated to the dungeon of similar movies. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
sproutpodApr 4, 2023
Fun, but second half drags so badly that my wife walked out to avoid falling asleep. Otherwise, loads of fun.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
JLuis_001Mar 31, 2023
My knowledge about Dungeons & Dragons is basically null.
I only have a small understanding of the most elemental stuff about it and I must confess that because of this and because the movie didn't necessarily look appealing I wasn't so sure
My knowledge about Dungeons & Dragons is basically null.
I only have a small understanding of the most elemental stuff about it and I must confess that because of this and because the movie didn't necessarily look appealing I wasn't so sure about watching it, but for that same reason I didn't predispose myself to anything and for that, watching Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves turned out to be a pleasant and fun surprise for me.

I don't know to what extent its charm will be enough to build the franchise it's evidently aiming to build, but it has the cast and formula to work if things don't get out of hand. I admit that it can feel a bit heavy at first because the story throws a lot at you to digest and the plot doesn't do the best job explaining its own world, but as far as I'm concerned it's more than comprehensible to any viewer. It's all a matter of paying enough attention.

The power of this movie lies in how much you are willing to immerse yourself in its fantasy, because everything revolves around it.
It's a kind of world that reminded me a bit of the Warcraft movie, but where Duncan Jones failed to introduce such a humongous world, John Francis Daley and Jonathan M. Goldstein succeed in making this experience more humorous, more fun, more lighthearted, much more accessible and above all more exciting, and that also has a lot to do with the cast. There is chemistry in all of them, even when the group of actors look like a troupe of cosplayers, and the truth is that this helps a lot in any movie to advance the narrative in a better way. Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves is a solid action/fantasy film that fits quite nicely into the spectrum of big franchises in CGI worlds. Worthy for fans and non-fans alike. If you understand that, then go and have a nice entertaining time because if you're expecting an art-film filled with super deep themes and want to judge it that way, then you are choosing your own disappointment.
Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
4
TouchjudgeApr 7, 2023
Oh dear me. I am going to be in a minority here. I went to the cinema to watch this based on the rave reviews I read online. I have to say, I was quite disappointed. The characters are wafer thin with very little invested for me to get toOh dear me. I am going to be in a minority here. I went to the cinema to watch this based on the rave reviews I read online. I have to say, I was quite disappointed. The characters are wafer thin with very little invested for me to get to know or like any of them. I didn’t care much about any of them. I quickly grasped the plot and suspended belief for 2+ hours and sat back to enjoy the show. Except, I didn’t. It lacked sincerity. It lurched from one chaotic scene to the next. There was no finesse. The jokes were telegraphed miles ahead and although people in the audience laughed, it was a polite chuckle rather than a guffaw. The movie tried to simulate the chaos, arguments and spontaneity of the D&D game. There was strong element of “making it up as they went along,” but it failed for me in conviction and delivery. There were no moody sets or backgrounds to the action. There was no attempt to create a universe in the manner of Star Wars or Lord of the Rings. It was superficial, lacked sincerity and had a comic book quality, which, for me, was a missed opportunity. One of the most addictive aspects of the D&D game is for players and dungeon masters to populate the worlds, the landscape and towns, with detailed and absorbing descriptions of inns and castles and even the battles themselves. All this was missing here in order to move the plot from one disaster to the next. The cast is undeniably world-class but I cannot imagine in years to come that any of them will look back at this movie as anything other than a bit of fun and a pay check. None of them had anything to get their teeth into, except perhaps Hugh Grant as the campy villain, Forge Fitzwilliam. Classic it is not. The best scene ironically is where the protagonists try to get information from a series of dead people. Now that was really funny and resembles the sort of antics that may well occur in a real game of D&D. I so wanted to love this movie. I tried. I failed. Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
5
GohanHitsugayaApr 9, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. ...I was one of the ones that walked out. It was *way* too shallow, and it was all something you've seen a dozen times before; and the CGI, I suppose it was what *passes* for decent nowadays; to below average, so I guess a 4 or 5/10. But then, I really don't think CGI looks good through a projector. It always looks better through a monitor, which makes sense I suppose; that's where it's gonna spend most of it's life after all.

That being said, if you are gonna make something *that* shallow; then you *need* to at least make it funny. It wasn't. It *might* pull a small chuckle or 2 out of you. But that's not really worth the price of admission and hours of general boredom, aka time wasted.

Also, as a side note. It didn't help that in a theater that was mostly empty, a guy and I assume his date; just *had* to sit in their "assigned seats" which happened to be right next to me. I was in 5, they were 6 & 7. Literally told them I "stole" the seat I was in as a hint, (I like to be at the center of the screen) and the silence your phones thing was already playing; yet still they sat down.

They didn't say anything, so it just felt rude to just get up and go sit in the same seat but two rows down. And, the guys nose kept whistling because he refused to blow it. The bastard.

Anyway, as for the movie itself; based on what I've seen, I'd probably rate it around the same as the CGI. It's a 4 or 5/10. Average or below average, which; considering it's D&D, well it's rather... Appropriate; I suppose.

Oh, and the choreography for the fight scenes was kinda; well, see above.

*Spoilers, I guess; not really.*
You've seen this plot point a thousand times, and I'm not giving many details; just wanted to say I almost lasted to the end, I think; forgot to check the time, but suffice it to say; I got up and walked out when the bad guy put his knife to the daughters throat.

And since I did walk out, I'm giving it a 5/10 I guess it could have gotten better or worse after I walked; but I kinda doubt it.

Oh, and the actors were fine; just, fine. They, worked with what they had.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
VinningmoviegodApr 1, 2023
Good movie but the way the press was reviewing this like its the best thing since sliced bread... Its a fun afternoon with color by numbers plot and predictable twists. The woke in this is strong yet will not get the bad reviews like otherGood movie but the way the press was reviewing this like its the best thing since sliced bread... Its a fun afternoon with color by numbers plot and predictable twists. The woke in this is strong yet will not get the bad reviews like other studios. Hugh Grant was great, I like Sophie Lillis too. Could've been so much better. Expand
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
6
43in2014May 2, 2023
The short review: Two partners in thievery assemble more members for a heist to get back what is valuable to them in this middling sword and sandals pic. > Related media: I don't play D&D and I have not seen the reportedly terrible 2000'sThe short review: Two partners in thievery assemble more members for a heist to get back what is valuable to them in this middling sword and sandals pic. > Related media: I don't play D&D and I have not seen the reportedly terrible 2000's movie(s?). > Negatives: > 1. The unfortunate thing is that the film is so similar to what TV can produce nowadays - it is so middling and the first impressive scene only happens quite a while into the film. The final fight scene was also middling. I do wonder if the film could have made use of the gameplay of D&D to make this film distinct from all the swords and sandals pic around, but this franchise has already had flops in the 2000's so I think it was decided to be risk-adverse this time. Unfortunately, that is one wrong decision and the film is looking at a loss that will prevent future films being made. >2. There is quite a lot of D&D references about races, objects, places, etc. that without the subtitles and without a lot of giving it the benefit of doubt, I would have difficulty following. >3. Michelle Rodríguez always looks tired in this film. She was a downer that made the stories around her hard to believe. >4. Other parts of the film could have been emphasised more to highlight them, to make this film stand out amongst all the other similar films out there. These are all signs of poor directing and screenwriting. > How would the different age groups rate this: > Children: Average. > Teens: Average. > Young adults: Good. > Medium-age adults: Good. > Older adults: Average. > My rating: 3/5 (no half scores). Save your money and watch it on TV. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
Onlyclassicvg1May 7, 2023
Starring: Alexis Rodney, Bryan Larkin, Chloe Coleman, Chris Pine, Daisy Head, Dan Poole, Edgar Abram, Hugh Grant, Jason Wong, Justice Smith, Kenneth Collard, Lati Gbaja, Michelle Rodriguez, Nicholas Blane, Rege-Jean Page, Sophia Eleni, SophiaStarring: Alexis Rodney, Bryan Larkin, Chloe Coleman, Chris Pine, Daisy Head, Dan Poole, Edgar Abram, Hugh Grant, Jason Wong, Justice Smith, Kenneth Collard, Lati Gbaja, Michelle Rodriguez, Nicholas Blane, Rege-Jean Page, Sophia Eleni, Sophia Lillis, Spencer Wilding Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
StealthgearSep 9, 2023
This movie is a hard watch due to the dead acting and dialogue. The slide show plot advancements where CGI monsters or magic solutions emerge to the adventurers in peril is not too clever. There are good action and fx scenes but not enough toThis movie is a hard watch due to the dead acting and dialogue. The slide show plot advancements where CGI monsters or magic solutions emerge to the adventurers in peril is not too clever. There are good action and fx scenes but not enough to justify the runtime. It has some laughs. The character writing, delivery, and plot are bad. You’ll wish it was over halfway through. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
getsmeliftedMay 10, 2023
Not bad. Not great. It's break neck pace will keep you entertained but you'll forget it in a week.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
o_retyMay 17, 2023
A Hollywood's fan service to nerds. More an assumption Hollywood has what a nerd would like to see than what an actual nerd would like to see. I give a bigger score than it deserves, because at least they try. They still don't seem to graspA Hollywood's fan service to nerds. More an assumption Hollywood has what a nerd would like to see than what an actual nerd would like to see. I give a bigger score than it deserves, because at least they try. They still don't seem to grasp though why GoT (sans the last season) was such a massive success. You have to be serious about fantasy. Not try to wink-wink audience into your belief that it's all utter bollocks so let's better get it on with it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TuhkakasaApr 15, 2023
Preaty avarage movie. It has few moments that are alright. Some weakness in worldbuilding and some plot holes. But movies tries and in it's core there is decent story. You can get some joy out off it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
ExceladeogunMay 15, 2023
Dungeons and Dragons

Episodic quests, a dash of dragons and mythos, lots of silly comedy (that don't necessarily land well) and even more backstories, and you have Dungeons and Dragons. Dungeons and Dragons is steeped in comedy, so much so
Dungeons and Dragons

Episodic quests, a dash of dragons and mythos, lots of silly comedy (that don't necessarily land well) and even more backstories, and you have Dungeons and Dragons.

Dungeons and Dragons is steeped in comedy, so much so that every ounce of depth it could offer is quenched. With the plot bouncing from quest to quest, there's little time spent on character development and the story itself becomes convoluted.

The fight scenes are delicious, and that's where most of the potential Dungeons and Dragons could have is shown, albeit, they're mostly unnecessary, introduced poorly or undermined by their succeeding scenes. The CGI is also an eyesore.

To sum up, this movie was like an AI generation of a weak Marvel offering with Dungeons and Dragons as its lore. 5/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Oceanus_VIJul 13, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Fear not Ranger. Barbarian, Magician, Thief! Cavalier and Acrobat. I am Dungeon Master, your guide in the realm of Dungeons & Dragons.

Admittedly I'm not too sure if I would have liked an actual live-action recreation of the classic 80's cartoon going by Hollywood's track record on these things. I mean take a look at the small cameo we get of the classic team in this new movie. Yes we do actually see Dungeon Master's teen team pop up in this wannabe franchise. I'm sure it will have flown over younger viewers heads but to those in the know it was a fleeting moment of joy. But taking a closer look and you can see how Hollywood always manages to mess things up. Firstly the team are bizarrely older than they are supposed to be. Bobby the barbarian, Diana, and Presto all looked like middle-aged parents in costumes. Hank and Sheila looked okay but Eric they somehow managed to race-swap...sigh! Why Hollywood? The actual costumes looked pretty good though, Hank the Ranger especially.

As for this movie, well it's a pretty bog-standard mission (or level) based mcguffin search scenario. Find a person to ask for information, follow information to specific location for an item or another person. Go to next location for another item or another person etc...Eventually it all leads to end of movie showdown with end of movie big boss. That isn't necessarily a problem with this movie though as it's based on the Dungeons & Dragons franchise and that's what you tend to do. However, it does come across as somewhat overly basic and more like a generic videogame adaptation. Visually speaking it was a mixed bag really. Like many movies these days the effects swing from being impressive in one scene to downright terrible in another. Case in point here; whilst there are some really good makeup and prosthetics effects for various fantasy characters along with some really nice-looking sets, there are also some blatantly obvious greenscreen shots and God-awful CGI. I still don't get how this happens in these big-budget movies. An obvious greenscreen shot or sequence always pulls me out of the movie, or moment.

The casting was poor all around in my opinion. Once again there seems to have been an outright obvious push to make the movie as diverse as possible whilst sacrificing quality choices. Most actors here are unknown to me but their acting skills didn't really impress, nor did their appearances in their costumes. Justin Smith, Rege-Jean Page, and the overly-used tough female character actress Michelle Rodriguez all looked completely out of place. Smith was a Black half-elf apparently, was this to rub in the faces of all the LotR's fans? I'm sorry but Elves aren't Black and neither are Dwarves. And yes I didn't like Pine's casting either, for me his face just didn't fit his character or this world. The only casting that did work for me was Hugh Grant as the slimy smarmy double-crossing Fitzwilliam, a far better villain than the actual main villain.

There were other aspects I found all too silly. I really didn't like the overweight dragon which was obviously CGI. Was this for comedy purposes? Swing and a miss. I also cringed at the all-too-common trope of using bald men with head tattoos as some kind of villainous horde of cult-like er...villains. How many fantasy movies have used that lazy idea? Geez!! Alas we also got the same for the main female baddie, bald with head tattoos...ugh! Because a powerful female sorceress has to be bald with head tattoos? She also turned out to be a really weak villain and got a blatantly nasty looking CGI ending courtesy of the CGI owlbear.

I couldn't really decide whether I liked this movie or not really. Some aspects I really enjoyed such as the various D&D species/races you see throughout, some of which looked great. I liked the settings or locations throughout, a nice range that showcased the world or realm. The hero roster was a good selection and overall the plot moved along nicely. But apart from the few things I've already mentioned there was a little too much that brought the movie down in the end. Close but overall not quite enough to grab me.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
dundoJul 11, 2023
4 stars
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
4 stars
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Guedes73May 9, 2023
This movie is a cliche, it brings nothing new... it lacks development of world and characters...
Best suited for younger audience
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Arsenal-HawkJun 1, 2023
Generic action film with a D&D skin. Not good , not bad, just there for a couple of hours. Not much in ever watching it again
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
huginodensenMay 3, 2023
Algo aburrida y tediosa, me visualizaba algo mas cercano al juego, los actores sin genialidad ni originalidad.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
tai_fungJul 3, 2023
I did NOT want to see this movie. I was steadfast against it because of the writers saying the quiet part out loud about purposely emasculating men. Spoiler alert: they weren't kidding (except for a nicely portrayed old school Paladin). But,I did NOT want to see this movie. I was steadfast against it because of the writers saying the quiet part out loud about purposely emasculating men. Spoiler alert: they weren't kidding (except for a nicely portrayed old school Paladin). But, being a parent of a teen, he was quite keen to see this movie, and we have strongly bonded over both baseball and old school AD&D, so off to the theater we went (matinee prices). I played AD&D in the 80s, during the height of the "zomg satanic" scares. My friends and I were, above all, nerds. Stranger Things portrayed that aspect of us quite well, minus the parallel world and telekinetic teen. It's been a joy to play AD&D as DM for my children and friends, although we are strictly a 1e, not 5e world. I'm sort of pleased to see so many people trying to retrofit to 1e from 5e in light of latest drama. However, having said that, I still recognized that this movie was going to try to cater/nod its way towards 5e players. The inclusion of things like the Dragonborn and bird people(?) races confirmed that for me. To the critiques: Even APART from "most tabletop adventures at home will be better than what the writers can come up with" criticism (which I find quite valid), we shouldn't forget that Gary Gygax et al created just EPIC adventures in module form. Tomb of Horrors, the Against the Giants series, even The Temple of Elemental Evil are all rousing adventures that are just sort of . . . out there for inspiration. My son pointed out that adventures like that almost might be better for a streaming service, in a serial form. That would also allow for far more character development/arcs. More nitpicky: I guess that while I enjoyed the movie, I also had quite a few problems with the writers not taking a few simple extra steps for either fan service, or just . . . making the movie MORE like D&D. For instance, Capt. Kirk certainly is portrayed to be a Bard. The old Bard started off as a fighter, abandons that class to become a thief, and then after sufficient time becomes a Bard, whereupon the character can employ abilities from the two abandoned classes. Capt. Kirk is shown, early in the movie, to be a fighter (armored, with a sword), later gives that up to become a thief, and then wields a lute, but there's no mention as to why that's important. IS he even a Bard, or do they just go to efforts to make it look that way, and then "lol nope?" Even a throwaway line might have helped, much less him using his OWN lute to cast an illusion at a later point in the movie (I won't be specific since it's just out). Also, what was with the "wheel of spells" thing on the belt of the Magic User? Not a line about how he got it, what it even is, or why he is inept at selecting spells? Is it a random thing, like the Deck of Many Things, or a Wand of Wonder? There is a single mention of the word "Cleric" in the movie -- those are typically healers. With a bit more knowledge, the writers could have allowed the Magic User to say, at a CERTAIN point in the movie ("I can't help [person]. I'm not a cleric."). Something like that, at least. Finally, they went to a hell of a lot of trouble to obtain the helm -- did anyone see what became of it by the end of the movie? Is this a Shazam 2 thing, where in the next movie someone is going to find it in a museum? Despite all these criticisms overall the movie was certainly . . . mid. Worth the matinee price at least. I'll be interested in how much 5e players like this movie compared to my traditionalist 1e self. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews