Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation | Release Date: March 25, 2011
7.1
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 98 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
69
Mixed:
19
Negative:
10
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
jimmytancrediJun 25, 2011
The eternal fight between brothers is something that may never have the solution. After all, the older one teases with the youngest or the youngest suffering in the hands of the older one? What really matters is that one day they will see theThe eternal fight between brothers is something that may never have the solution. After all, the older one teases with the youngest or the youngest suffering in the hands of the older one? What really matters is that one day they will see the importance of real brothers. The second adaptation of the books/comics of Jeff Kinney, follows the same pace as the first, only takes a different focus. Instead of seeing how the friendship of children, now we see the relationship that Greg (Zachary Gordon) has with his brother Rodrick (Devon Bostick), by the way is very turbulent. The screenplay light and relaxed, serves for anyone to watch and have fun, even as a child movie content, but hindered by Greg at school or even at home are very identifiable, I mean, everyone has gone through something similar. The film depicts this relationship and family and friendship between older brothers and younger and all its ups and downs, as in the film is perhaps a little better to see. The script is simple even though some holes, and some things that leave the air ... Perhaps expectations for the next film, leaving more unanswered questions is always a danger, even more attentive to the eyes. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
heyitsmegrif4Dec 30, 2011
Although it is definitely not as good as the solid first one for me it is because the loss of Chloe Moretz, but it is hilarious and offers some great acting from the kids. I give this movie 62%.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
ShiiraApr 17, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So what changed between the sixth and seventh grade? Gupta(Karan Brar) must be wondering. Over the summer, the diminutive, yet outspoken and exceedingly confident Indian kid moved back to the motherland, "the jewel of Southeast Asia", supposedly for good, but now he's back stateside, attending the same middle school as Greg Heffley(Zachary Gordon), only to receive the cold shoulder from his once cherished friend. Was it something he said? At the roller rink, the last time Gupta saw the old gang before the start of the new semester, he and his nerdy friends, as usual, forming a united front of losers, found themselves on the outside looking in, watching the popular kids having fun, while they kept themselves company, trying desperately to look cool. (Memo to Greg: Don't come with your parents.) Perhaps the wimpy kid thinks that by ostracizing Gupta, his social circle will move up the ladder of high school society, determining that their association with a foreigner was holding them back from making inroads with the cheerleaders and the jocks. If popularity means so much to Greg, then the wimpy kid needs to be far more scrupulous and cutthroat than that. Hanging around Rowley(Robert Capron) seems far more disadvantageous to his goal of widespread junior high societal acceptance. In the original "Diary of a Wimpy Kid", Rowley, who is, to put it kindly, a tad on the big-boned side(Fregley, played by Grayson Russell is worse, the scraggly kid looks like he doesn't wash), rides around the neighborhood on a girl's bike, complete with pink tassels, and shows up to class dressed in traditional Guatemalan peasant clothing, featuring a serape, which when translated into English, means "girl repellent". In "Rodrick Rules", an adaptation of the fourth title in the popular children's literature series by Jeff Kinney, Rowley is guileless as ever, this time bringing his love of magic tricks into the open, the school hallway, of all places, where he asks Greg to be his assistant for the talent show. The wimpy kid flat out rejects his friend's offer, which normally would be the prudent choice, but in Kinney's filmic universe, individual expression is lauded, not ridiculed, best exemplified when Rowley gets away with bringing his mother to a formal dance in the first film. Undeservedly, Greg is part of a well-received act, reluctantly collaborating on the magic presentation with Rowley, who never finds out that the wimpy kid was in actuality, supporting his older brother, not him. Greg is no Napoleon Dynamite(Jon Heder), who in the Jared Hess indie sensation, goes the whole nine yards to help Pedro win the election by tripping the nerd fantastic, in possibly the best dance sequence since John Travolta took to the disco floor in John Badham's "Saturday Night Fever". Pedro's ethnicity is never becomes an issue with Napoleon. He's true blue. Greg, on the other hand, in a shockingly nefarious move, coordinates a school-wide prank on Gupta, in which the entire student body conspires to pretend that the olive-skinned seventh grader is invisible. In the cafeteria, Greg scores a cheap easy laugh at Gupta's expense. It's a gutsy move on the filmmaker's part to present a flawed hero, but the Indian boy's expulsion from his peer group borders on mean-spiritedness. Because of India's caste system, to Gupta, being thought of as invisible must hurt real bad, because it bears the connotation of being "an untouchable", somebody who hails from the Harijan class, a group who stands outside the system. In essence, using the public school hierarchy for the purpose of an analogy, Greg casts the Indian from the middle school untouchables: the nerds. And where does that leave him? Alone. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
watithink123Apr 26, 2012
I got to admit it was better than the book. But however it was a lot different from the book witch ether saved this film or made it worst. I think it saved it. And worth renting if you asked me. Diary of a wimpy kid 2 RR 6.6/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
molemaster43Apr 6, 2013
Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules is the second installment in the Diary of a Wimpy Kid movie franchise. However, I feel that this one fell completely flat when comparing to the book. Not only did this not really fit with the book, it wasDiary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules is the second installment in the Diary of a Wimpy Kid movie franchise. However, I feel that this one fell completely flat when comparing to the book. Not only did this not really fit with the book, it was nowhere near as funny as the book. This movie just had a lot of it that wasn't actually apart of it. Overall, okay movie with some humor, but nothing great. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
jeff_reviewsJul 9, 2013
"Diary of a Wimpy Kid 2: Rodrick Rules" manages to pull off a sequel that meets its predecessors marks, but the film (like its original) lacks true depth, which is similar to the book. The film is funny Rodrick and Greg Heffley's brotherly"Diary of a Wimpy Kid 2: Rodrick Rules" manages to pull off a sequel that meets its predecessors marks, but the film (like its original) lacks true depth, which is similar to the book. The film is funny Rodrick and Greg Heffley's brotherly love is fun to watch, and other characters are enjoyable as well. It's fun to watch, but nothing as special as more deepening films out there. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
FranzHcriticMay 27, 2014
As devoid of all the witty and satirical realism as the first movie, 'Rodrick Rules' will most likely be my last Wimpy Kid film. The characters are unfunny, cold, and even despicable. Greg Heffley is even more selfish and self-absorbed in theAs devoid of all the witty and satirical realism as the first movie, 'Rodrick Rules' will most likely be my last Wimpy Kid film. The characters are unfunny, cold, and even despicable. Greg Heffley is even more selfish and self-absorbed in the films, to the point of where its not funny. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MovieGuysSep 27, 2013
Just more of the same adventures of Greg with myriad sight gags and fart jokes, enough to last you a lifetime. But, like the first movie, it does have a certain reality to it about middle school life. But Greg is getting a little bit too oldJust more of the same adventures of Greg with myriad sight gags and fart jokes, enough to last you a lifetime. But, like the first movie, it does have a certain reality to it about middle school life. But Greg is getting a little bit too old for the role now.... Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
EpicLadySpongeJan 29, 2016
I can't either tell which one is the weakest and which one's the strongest because it looks like that they all get the same score at the end. Welcome to Rodrick's movie, wimpy kids.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
reviewfrom19842Oct 9, 2016
Diary of a Wimpy Kid 2: Rodrick Rules is better then the first movie it has more heart then the other movie and the main charter is a little more likeable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews