Chappie

10

NightReviewsMar 9, 2015

A sense of belonging seems to be writer/director/producer Neill Blomkamp’s greatest asset when it comes to filmmaking. The man behind the revered District 9 picks up the pieces of his fumbled second feature film Elysium by introducing us toA sense of belonging seems to be writer/director/producer Neill Blomkamp’s greatest asset when it comes to filmmaking. The man behind the revered District 9 picks up the pieces of his fumbled second feature film Elysium by introducing us to the second cutest robot to ever grace the silver screen, Chappie.

If you are wondering who managed to snatch the first place title of cutest robot to hit the big screen, I would easily argue Wall-E as the clear champion, albeit, animation (as well as Disney) have a fantastic way of bringing out the cute in everything, even a teapot. Luckily for audiences and movie-goers, Chappie is different; Chappie is real: Chappie is alive and Chappie is very much one of the best things to happen to the year 2015 in film.

Blomkamp again introduces us to a world not far off from the one we live in today. Launching his story in his hometown Johannesburg, South Africa, local police are shown to have begun implementing a robotic policing force, known as the Scout program, from a weapons corporation Tetravaal. Its creator, Deon Wilson (Dev Patel), has been successful in creating easily operated and incorruptible weapons for the greater good, but we quickly learn that Deon is in search of something more – artificial intelligence and the creation of the first living, feeling sentinel being.

While Blomkamp’s film relies heavily on action, visual effects, and character development, Chappie can easily be hailed as the director’s most personal, emotional, and sentimental feature film. Never shying away from very real and often times imaginative social commentaries set within uncomfortable and contemporary political setting, Blomkamp wastes no time in introducing Chappie, developing his character as much (if not more) than any other human being seen on screen.

Hot off the heals of a very painful and personal failed program, ex-soldier turned engineered Vincent Moore (Hugh Jackman) is persistent to prove Wilson’s Scout program as a failure, never being able to trust or rely on artificial intelligence. Deeming the program unpredictable, and arguing the ethics of A.I with that of a human being and the morality, ethics and fine fabrics that make man, Moore sets up the film for its greatest and deepest commentary. The very essence of Chappie relies heavily between the conflicts and struggles of two very real people: Deon and Vincent, and how their creations used for the greater good become catalysts to eliminate crime in a violently filled South African capital. Yet, throughout Chappie, the greatest animalistic behaviours and torn examples of violence, inhumanity and injustice/crime are seen by human beings. Moore spends most of the film trying to deceit and ruin Wilson, from nothing more than we can understand as revenge and jealousy, allowing us to pose the questions: would we want this man governing and policing our streets? Are these the beginnings of corruption?

In addition to these scenes of treacherous human behaviour, the realest and most humane scenes of the film are those, almost exclusively, involving Chappie. From a quiet and sad encounter with a dog, to a very confused and apologetic encounter with a bleeding police officer on a bridge during a heist, to his many interactions with his “maker” Deon, Chappie shines with the most unwavering signs of humanity and moral justice.

The underlining context of Blomkamp could easily be observed for many viewings, which makes Chappie, a robot with a bright orange “reject” sticker across his forehead, one of the most brilliant and under-apprecaited films of 2015, deserving of being seen at least twice.

Thankfully, although Chappie may be credited as being the most human character in the film, despite the simple fact that he is indeed a robot, he is not the only interesting individual. Endearing robot aside, Blomkamp’s emotionally rich and deeply subconscious film is filled with fascinating characters. The two roles bound to be the most talked about make up the duo that will determine whether or not people enjoy the film. Of course, the pair is none other than Chappie’s Mommy and Daddy: Ninja and Yolandi (Watkin Tudor Jones and Anri du Toit or, better known as, Ninja and Yo-Landi in the rap/synth South African musical duo Die Antwoord). Quite possibly the biggest reason Chappie may not be a success nor treated as the bravest science fiction film of 2015, is the inclusion of Die Antwoord. As it was for myself once I got wind of the casting choice, their involvement may be a real mystery to viewers. Truthfully, I wasn’t fully able to understand their significance being cast up until the rolling of the end credits, ironically enough, while their song Cookie Thumper! penetrated my ear lobes. Blomkamp, a master filmmaker whose obsession with analyzing and capturing the essence of reality and significance of his hometown upbringing, truly brings a unique commentary about lower class societies and gangster culture.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

4

njlakeMar 9, 2015

As I was watching this, the one thing that kept standing out to me was just how amazing the CG was. It was really hard to tell when it was CG and when it was a model which is a testament to the post-production work.

That's about where theAs I was watching this, the one thing that kept standing out to me was just how amazing the CG was. It was really hard to tell when it was CG and when it was a model which is a testament to the post-production work.

That's about where the praise ends for this. When it got to the end I was thinking "why didn't you focus on that aspect the whole time?!" It was frustrating to watch and a little irritating because I've liked Blomkamps work so far (District 9 being excellent and Elysium being decent). This movie has a cool concept that goes into a completely different concept and then loses itself half-way through with plotting. There's really a lot going on but not a whole lot happening. It's frustrating and ultimately a let down.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

10

vrildoxMar 9, 2015

I've been shocked by reviews before, but I have never been more blown away than by the critical response of Chappie. This movie is damn near perfect. I think it might be the South African sensibility of the whole movie. This is one of theI've been shocked by reviews before, but I have never been more blown away than by the critical response of Chappie. This movie is damn near perfect. I think it might be the South African sensibility of the whole movie. This is one of the most fundamentally sound films I've seen in a very long time. It's an action-comedy love letter to the musical duo Die Antwoord. I'm a Die Antwoord fan but even if I wasn't I would understand what Blomkamp was trying to do. This was like a modern day Yellow Submarine with more movie than music and Die Antwoord doesn't suck at acting like the Beatles did. Ninja and Yolandi were actually very solid actors for this being their first film. The rest of the cast crushed it because they're all incredibly talented especially Patel. I hear a lot about Jackman's two dimensional villain and how bad it was, but that's what kind of movie this is. It's a serious movie that never takes itself too seriously. I swear to Science that film critics these days are so far up their own a***s that they wouldn't know a good movie if it puked in their face. Chappie is a solid flick and deserves praise. I think Die Antwoord should be praised for how solid they were in this movie.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

7

DelCastMar 9, 2015

I went into Chappie expecting to fully hate it, as I am not a big fan of Neil Blomkamp and his lack of subtlety when dealing with social differences. But once I realized this was more a science fiction action comedy more than a politicalI went into Chappie expecting to fully hate it, as I am not a big fan of Neil Blomkamp and his lack of subtlety when dealing with social differences. But once I realized this was more a science fiction action comedy more than a political diatribe, I was pleasantly surprised.
Don't get me wrong, this is not a great movie by any standard, but it is extremely entertaining. In fact, I'd say it's Blomkamp's best in my books.
It doesn't take itself too seriously and decides to go for action comedy rather than half baked pseudo socio-political commentary.
The movie is at it's best when it embraces the silliness and fully goes with it, as the sappy drama and the social insight feel very unpolished.

Additionally, a lot of the acting from the Die Antwoord band members is sub par, and Hugh Jackman, plays a ridiculously artificial caricature of an antagonist. But as style rules over realism, these conflicts are easily ignored.

Not nearly as self serious, ridiculously moralistic or grotesquely caricaturesque as District 9 or Elysium, and a much better movie for it.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

AfropMar 9, 2015

I Massively disagree with the "critics" that are reviewing this film. I for one massively enjoyed it and thought it was great fun. it was interesting to see Chappie grow and the mannerisms and personality that he develops is brilliant. thereI Massively disagree with the "critics" that are reviewing this film. I for one massively enjoyed it and thought it was great fun. it was interesting to see Chappie grow and the mannerisms and personality that he develops is brilliant. there are many "critics" who say there wasnt enough character development for Hugh Jackmans character or any of the others, but there is plenty time given to developing Chappies character and thats really all you need.
see the film for yourself and dont trust the "critics"… Expand

9 of 13 users found this helpful94

All this user's reviews

10

Bio-Machine-AbhMar 9, 2015

The critics are coming off as narrow-minded and superficial. Whether this is due to philosophical bias, or whether this is due to its failure to include "Hollywood's Best and Whitest", it does show a blind spot in their collective ideology.

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

9

khrysgMar 9, 2015

I loved it. It was unexpected, thought provoking, emotional and things blow up - sometimes substance is in the absurdity. The only thing that really kind of annoyed me was how close Chappie and Ninja's voices were to each other. BrandonI loved it. It was unexpected, thought provoking, emotional and things blow up - sometimes substance is in the absurdity. The only thing that really kind of annoyed me was how close Chappie and Ninja's voices were to each other. Brandon Auret, Ninja and Yolandi were awesome.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

benjamindcMar 9, 2015

Great movie, really fresh and also love the way they use the Die Antword's world, I don't understand why such a bad review with this movie, critics as alway doing their jobs.
Great movie and really fund to watch!

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

10

recentnamebrandMar 9, 2015

I have always felt it important there be a dialog about computers versus society in general. Neill Blomkamp adds a modicum to this complex notion we must face. As many science fictions have written about these sorts of things in the pastI have always felt it important there be a dialog about computers versus society in general. Neill Blomkamp adds a modicum to this complex notion we must face. As many science fictions have written about these sorts of things in the past modern day film makers have the tools to present us with their visions. Like a brochure to sway our thinking it's a niche study ongoing. It's not black hole theory but plays on our emotions like some cheap trick. Some psychosis we have for formative adolescence development. I have kids and I bear a responsibility "What have I born upon society?" some kind of Frankenstein notion. But let's have context I think Neill Blomkamp is having fun and he wants us to have fun to. We wish we all had access to Chappies programming but the movie is not interactive. My scope is weakening and maybe the critics would like it that way since that is the reason I'm writing this in the first place. There seems to be a wide discrepency between viewer and critic. And it might just be new movie shock. I am no critic only a person who tries to keep his finger on the pulse of popular notion. This movie rocks.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

5

heathermMar 8, 2015

Chappie is a reasonably entertaining movie, but there are times when it tried my patience and strained my suspension of disbelief pretty severely. The gag of having a robot speak in the gangster vernacular and strut around wearing chainsChappie is a reasonably entertaining movie, but there are times when it tried my patience and strained my suspension of disbelief pretty severely. The gag of having a robot speak in the gangster vernacular and strut around wearing chains that say "hustler" got old pretty quickly, and the lightning-fast jumps in capability and understanding toward the end of the movie left me very skeptical--even in the technology-rich future that Blomkamp presents, and even suspending my disbelief as a viewer as much as I could, it was a bit much.

I did really enjoy the struggle for Chappie's affection between Dev Patel, Ninja, and Yolandi. I was not at all familiar with Die Antwoord and their work until this movie, but I looked them up after, and I think it's really neat that they seemed to be basically playing their music personas in the movie; some critic reviews have criticized this choice, but even as an outside viewer rather than a fan, I loved their persona and dynamic. (It did make a lot more sense once I had watched a couple of music videos though.)

One of the things I enjoyed most in the movie was the set design. There was an incredibly interesting aesthetic, especially for the criminal hideouts. The place Chappie called home was this amazingly dreary, dystopian place with these gorgeous pops of colour and graffiti everywhere that somehow made it gorgeous. There were also really nice, small touches, like figurines of Cartman and Mr. Hanky the Christmas Poo from South Park on the bedside table.

That said, I do think that the cast was a bit crowded. Our time and attention was split between a large number of main characters, which made the big name actors like Hugh Jackman and Sigourney Weaver seem underused. There was an awful lot going on, and the big action scenes sometimes seemed to go on too long; to me at least, it would have been preferable to trim the shoot 'em up scenes and have more engagement with Chappie and his development, since that was the more interesting and unique part of the movie.… Expand

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

10

aeroplasmaMar 8, 2015

I am officially a Neil Bomkamp fan. I loved District 9 and I loved Chappie. Sadly, I don't think this movie will get the recognition it deserves due to what seem to be dismal box office earnings. The movie was not as hardcore as district 9 inI am officially a Neil Bomkamp fan. I loved District 9 and I loved Chappie. Sadly, I don't think this movie will get the recognition it deserves due to what seem to be dismal box office earnings. The movie was not as hardcore as district 9 in that it wasn't trying to make a comment on the human condition. It was a genuinely funny, entertaining movie. Could not recommend enough. Don't listen to the artsy fartsy critics.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

10

Raymond0256Mar 8, 2015

From an Engineer's and Computer Scientist's point of view, Chappie explores the ideas of computer intelligence, robots as tools, the basis of consciousness, human nature, mortality, creation, and many other important themes. Chappie isFrom an Engineer's and Computer Scientist's point of view, Chappie explores the ideas of computer intelligence, robots as tools, the basis of consciousness, human nature, mortality, creation, and many other important themes. Chappie is surrounded by realistic characters that have a desire to create better intelligence and people who fear computer consciousness, people who view machines as lovable and those who view them as merely tools. Chappie must sort through these views and face his own mortality just like any person would, without the over the top action of Transcendence or the muddled physics of time travel from Terminator. I have not only seen these themes examined, sometimes badly, in other pieces of art, but these are themes that real scientists and engineers are exploring with current technology, such as emotional bonding with robots based on vocal and facial cues. I eat this stuff up, and I hope that at the very least it will make everyone think about these themes in a meaningful way. I think much of the negativity toward this film is based on either not understanding the field of artificial intelligence or not identifying with what could be considered a "good" character, but I urge that even if you do not view robots as "human" that you at least consider all sides of the discussion critically.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

9

mrc77Mar 8, 2015

I am not sure what is going on with all of the critics' reviews of this movie, but I thought it was thoroughly enjoyable. I liked it way better than I ever liked any of the Robocop movies (which it was compared to). I liked it better thanI am not sure what is going on with all of the critics' reviews of this movie, but I thought it was thoroughly enjoyable. I liked it way better than I ever liked any of the Robocop movies (which it was compared to). I liked it better than Wall-E (although, I enjoyed that movie, too). I enjoyed the acting of Sigourney Weaver, Hugh Jackman, Die Antwood, and Dev Patel. The special effects were amazing. The songs and score used in the movie added to the great atmosphere of the movie. There were some great scenes done really well, such as the time Chappie gets really good at stealing cars. I did not enjoy Elysium that much, but I loved District 9 and I loved this movie so I am still a big Neill Blomkamp fan. I also really enjoy Sharlto Copley's acting.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

1

DamionMar 8, 2015

Disastrous. Juvenile. Insulting.

Three words that perfectly describe the latest offering from Neill Blomkamp, three words that would not have been expected to describe a film directed by this man. Blomkamp is best known for theDisastrous. Juvenile. Insulting.

Three words that perfectly describe the latest offering from Neill Blomkamp, three words that would not have been expected to describe a film directed by this man.

Blomkamp is best known for the absolutely brilliant "District 9," a reflection on apartheid, but also responsible for the almost equally fascinating "Elysium," which was a sci-fi look at the ongoing 1% debate.

So, expectations for his third feature, "Chappie," were understandably considerably high.

However, the expectations are sadly unfounded as this film does not even remotely live up to expectation. In fact, it doesn't live up to anything. At all.

In short, "Chappie" is the story of a "broken" robot from a fleet of robot police now protecting Johannesburg, which gets rebooted by fully self-sufficient artificial intelligence installed by the developer of the police robots, Deon Wilson (Dev Patel, "Slumdog Millionaire"). Having been "kidnapped" by a ridiculous gang of wannabe "gangstas," played absolutely horrifically by members of South African rap group Die Antwoord (Ninja, Yo-Landi Visser), with absolutely no acting ability whatsoever, Chappie, which needs to learn from scratch like a baby, is "raised" by these bumbling idiots to help them pull off a huge heist.

After screwing up a drug deal for Hippo, one of the few worthwhile characters in the film played with brilliant, anarchic, shirtless hotness by Brandon Auret, Ninja and Yolandi owe him $20 million. And they have a week to get it to him.

And thus, this film then wants you to believe, without actually showing you how it is actually accomplished, that this robot named Chappie, in the hands of idiotic, failed gangsters and with limited input from the wasted Dev Patel, could go from zero and baby-like to an almost full-fledged, heist-worthy "adult"…in about a week. Because "gangstas" would have time for this.

All the while, teaching him to "act gangsta," making the film a complete joke while practically verging on racist gansgta clichés…diving head first into a pool of utter ridiculousness.

With its amateur soundtrack, its "gangsta" stupidity, its horrific acting, complete lack of logical narrative and deflection of all its shortcomings through the use of explosions, this film truly caters to the absolute lowest common denominator.

In fact, it expects its audience to be so truly uneducated, when Hippo speaks, the film features English subtitles. Um, Hippo speaks English.

This film was so dumb, and assumed its audience would be so uneducated, they put English subtitles under a guy speaking English. The film, in all its stupidity, actually manages to directly insult the intelligence of its audience.

So, where do big names Hugh Jackman and Sigourney Weaver fit into this? Jackman plays Vincent Moore, a spoiled brat with a horrific haircut who designed a similar type of police robot which was deemed far too big and expensive to be used, so he devises a plan to knock out Wilson's robots so his will be implemented. Weaver merely plays Wilson and Moore's boss at the company which created these droids.

Why they wanted to be involved in this film is beyond me.

So, listen to me when I say, avoid this film at all costs. Unlike the strong, important political messages of his first two films, on his third outing, Blomkamp has achieved absolutely nothing but creating a film that wants to show an audience just what an epic failure looks like.… Expand

7 of 17 users found this helpful710

All this user's reviews

9

CuddleheadMar 8, 2015

Just saw the movie, and while a few things were a bit over the top, i can say i really enjoyed it. It depicts real world unanswered issues such as consciousness and self awareness, but also has a somewhat goofy tone. Die Antword were ok as well.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

3

Movi3R3vi3werMar 8, 2015

This years Transcendence, CHAPPiE is a hugely disappointed film and a major step down from the once great Neill Blomkamp. No character development, horrific acting, and an absolutely ridiculous third act makes CHAPPiE nearly cringeworthy.

9 of 18 users found this helpful99

All this user's reviews

10

bumblestripeMar 8, 2015

I must not have seen the same movie as the critics because this film has become one of my top ten movies. Neill Blomkamp has created a unique film, however critics seem to only be looking at it as copying other movies with robots in them.I must not have seen the same movie as the critics because this film has become one of my top ten movies. Neill Blomkamp has created a unique film, however critics seem to only be looking at it as copying other movies with robots in them. Chappie tackles issues about family and nature vs nurture. He has a creator looking out for him and hoping to nourish his mind with art and poetry while the people with custody over him influence him negatively leading to gangster activities. Another common complaint is that Ninja and Yolandi were horrible actors. I disagree Yolandi had me genuinely interested. She is a very unique person and had a motherly side that I grew to love. Ninja also achieved the his characters point. He abused his son and forced him to conform to his style of life and do what he wanted, rather than allow his son to become who he wanted to be. Another issue that was tackled in this film was spirituality and consciousness. How do we define consciousness? Blomkamp creates a robot that can think. i immediately fell in love with Chappie. His mannerism and outlook on life was extremely interesting to watch. I was emotionally distraught in scenes were Chappie was beaten or mistreated in anyway. This kind of emotional response is what a good movie can create. I understand that the ending may not be for everyone but the way that a Blompkamp takes two characters and ultimately they are one in the same. I actually felt like the robot Chappie was another human inside the shell of a robot and I think that is what Blompkamp was really trying to get across. I believe that this film's major flaw was that it was marketed in two different ways. One was a movie focused on violence and the "oppressive police force" as some descriptions call it, however never once in the film are the Scouts in anyway oppressive. They are simply doing their police work effectively. Another way the movie was marketed was a way that seemed to be trying to appeal to families. I believe some people thought the movie would be something that children would enjoy and then when they found out about the R rating they dropped interested. Among all of the criticism I think people should stop listening to others and see Chappie for themselves and experience a truly entertaining experience.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

DrZoidberg4LifeMar 8, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Short version: don't be discouraged by the negative reviews, give it a chance in the theaters and then decide!
Long version:
I get that it's not a perfect movie from an execution point of view, but i really don't think the reviews are doing this one justice.
Sure,there are some plot holes but it seems people are focusing way too much on that instead of focusing on the good stuff this movie has to offer. Chappie, the robot, is really charming, convincing and very well developed as he goes from toddler, curious child witnessing the wonders of the world for the first time to facing the harsh reality of life and ultimately becoming conscious of his own mortality and freaking out about it. Also, how the opposing outside influences of Deon as the book worm science guy, Yolandi as the nurturing punk mom and the semi-abusive gangster father figure of Ninja have a believable impact on Chappie's growing up and understanding of the world I found well done and very believable.
Sure, Yolandi and Ninja may not be the best actors in the world (they're not actors after all), but I personally think they play themselves in a way that services the film, with a few exceptions. Blomkamp clearly knew how to direct them and use them in the story and although some may argue they're a distraction and seem "stitched in", I took them as a well deserved dose of levity and color and an interesting couple set to raise a sentient robot.
There were some pretty funny scenes at some point, most memorably the "putting them to sleep" part, that gave the dark and violent 3rd act a much more personal undertone and more power. It's the old "get them to have some good moments so you feel for them much more when the beep hits the fan".
But what it boils down to, for me personally, is that this movie takes good SciFi concepts and portrays them is a better way and raises smarter questions about AI, consciousness, mortality and the difference between man and machine way better that any movie I've seen these last years. Certainly better than Transcendence witch was utter garbage.
Also, as a software engineer myself, I think this movie does a very good job of keeping itself grounded in reality from a computer science point of view. All the concepts used are things expected to become reality and are being worked on in present. That is what makes it a good SciFi movie first and foremost, mixing in just the right amount of Fi with a substantial amount of Sci to keep it believable. The substance is there, even if in order to get all the ideas on screen some of the character development was sacrificed making the characters seem one note of cartoon y. I'm sure they all have complex lives and reasons for doing what they do, but there's only that much screen time and you can't show all of that. Not excusing it, but I don't think it's a reason to damn this movie.
I'd put it on par with District 9, certainly better than Elysium. In this case I think the negative reviews are doing the movie a disfavor, there's nothing better out anyway, so why not give it a try and see if you like it for yourselves. And even if it bombs, this for me has the makings of a cult classic. … Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

phildogMar 8, 2015

These reviewers are crazy. Loved this movie. There are so many scenes with just this incredibly painful emotional resonance. It's a beautiful story about a child growing up in an abusive home and a **** world, developing his own sense ofThese reviewers are crazy. Loved this movie. There are so many scenes with just this incredibly painful emotional resonance. It's a beautiful story about a child growing up in an abusive home and a **** world, developing his own sense of morality and becoming his own person. There is some weak dialogue and poorly resolved characters. Normally I'd dock it more points for that, but nope. It's been a long time since I saw a movie that made me FEEL like this one did.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

0

SesshomuraiMar 8, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Complete trash. Poorly cast. Characters saying and doing things that don't make any sense. Dialog is horrible. The goonie accents almost unbearable. Here's one for you. The guy who invented the robots to make robot company very successful goes to CEO claiming he invented a "sentient" A.I. (in his studio apartment filled with old Ataris and extension cords) that could be smarter than a human. Asks CEO if he can test it on some soon-to-be-crushed robot parts. CEO says "No way! Are you crazy??" Really??? That's what a CEO would say to the inventor of their primary asset?
Then we get force fed this whole 'hate crime against robots' thing. Not that the scene made any sense. Guy drives robot to some undisclosed location for unknown reasons and leaves it there. Random thugs show up and decide to harass and beat the robot. Again, why? Then we're forced to watch this and have real sympathy. Oh I get it, its a metaphor for human hate crimes. Ahhhhh. I see it now. Cleverly veiled by your heavy handed jamming it down my throat technique. Almost missed it there.

Absurdity to the nth degree. Walked out.… Expand

6 of 23 users found this helpful617

All this user's reviews

1

Brent_MarchantMar 8, 2015

What was Neill Blomkamp thinking? This incredibly awful offering from the talented director of "District 9" misses the mark in virtually every way conceivable. The filmmaker serves up an overlong, implausible tale full of plot holes,What was Neill Blomkamp thinking? This incredibly awful offering from the talented director of "District 9" misses the mark in virtually every way conceivable. The filmmaker serves up an overlong, implausible tale full of plot holes, continuity goofs, overacting, cloying dialogue and a derivative narrative that pieces together elements of "Short Circuit," "Robocop," "Avatar" and "Transcendence." Its constant switches in tone, from dramatic to campy to action-oriented, grows ever more annoying with each passing minute, making you beg for the end to come.… Expand

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

10

jazzagenomadMar 8, 2015

I am a twenty-year-old male cinephile. Films like "Life is Beautiful" and "All Quiet on the Western Front" have brought a tear to my eye, but "Chappie" is the first movie to ever make me break down and cry. It's a truly brilliant film; evenI am a twenty-year-old male cinephile. Films like "Life is Beautiful" and "All Quiet on the Western Front" have brought a tear to my eye, but "Chappie" is the first movie to ever make me break down and cry. It's a truly brilliant film; even its action sequences affirm the humanity of the movie's title character. Its refreshing, idealistic (and ultimately proper) view of human nature is something we sorely need in an era where nihilism dominates our culture. It's a hopeful film and a wonderful one. It's also brilliantly written, acted, and shot. Don't believe the critics on this one. The cerebral could broadside them with a club and they'd still cast their bids for Oscar-bait trash. "Chappie" is a magnificent exploration on what it means to grow as a human person. If you've even an inkling of hope or creativity in you, then this movie is for you.… Expand

9 of 15 users found this helpful96

All this user's reviews

7

BshopMar 7, 2015

Crazy to think consciousnesses and moral are what really define us as human beings.
Movie brought up some great questions about morality, conditioning, and psychology.
Can Artificial Intelligence be created to feel and think? Maybe, butCrazy to think consciousnesses and moral are what really define us as human beings.
Movie brought up some great questions about morality, conditioning, and psychology.
Can Artificial Intelligence be created to feel and think? Maybe, but what rules will it follow?
Those are the questions raised by this movie. Really a plus in my book to get viewer to mull over for a while.
In summary, one of the better movies this year so far. On par for entertainment as Elysium, but more thought provoking like District 9. Who knew people could feel sorry for a robot onscreen (of all places)?… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

8

LubetekMar 7, 2015

This movie was great! The Wife and I really enjoyed it. Very well done and they did an amazing job of helping us the viewers connect to Chappie. Being a parent it was quite an experience seeing Chappie behave as a child and grow as a being.This movie was great! The Wife and I really enjoyed it. Very well done and they did an amazing job of helping us the viewers connect to Chappie. Being a parent it was quite an experience seeing Chappie behave as a child and grow as a being. Really well done, fun movie!!… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

10

kraenkMar 7, 2015

Seems like 2015 is the year where the credibility of reviewers all over the globe and in all media finally comes to an end!
This is a good movie, maybe not as great as District 9 but very enjoyable.

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

7

asjklasjklasMar 7, 2015

Chappie isn’t a failed mission more than it is a missed opportunity. Because despite the many, many critics firing at it to its post-apocalyptic hell and back—specifically targeting director Neill Blomkamp’s 2009 commercial and criticalChappie isn’t a failed mission more than it is a missed opportunity. Because despite the many, many critics firing at it to its post-apocalyptic hell and back—specifically targeting director Neill Blomkamp’s 2009 commercial and critical breakthrough District 9, calling his success a “fluke” after 2013’s disappointing Elysium and considering him a “one-hit wonder” among the sci-fi genre—I, however, found Chappie to be both conceptually and visually involving when it wasn’t balancing on a tightrope between Chappie’s Short Circuit’s innocence-meets-Iron Giant’s naivety and the “gangsta” glorification or glamorization of their respective stereotypes. It’s one of the rare occasions where the R rating felt quite restrictive and main protagonist Chappie’s awe-inspiring lightheartedness and the supporting characters’ vulgarity and ugliness and the film’s gritty nature crossover in what appears to be Blomkamp’s identity crisis of whether he wants his ‘80s sci-fi influences to tug audiences at the heartstrings or the attention span.

As you can tell from the “awe-inspiring” comment, maybe I’m of the minority that found Chappie’s childlike nature both charming and, dare I say, cute as a former police bot could be. It’s a bit frustrating when I hear film critics call adolescent characters in any film “annoying” based on, let’s say in Chappie’s case, their immature, inquisitive, or at certain scenes, whiny qualities. Because aren’t all children annoying because of their wondrous behavior? I could’ve understood these criticisms if I didn’t let out so many damn ‘awe’s at Chappie’s dialogue; from Chappie’s use of “mommy” and “daddy”—both [spoiler] referring to the South African rave-rap duo Die Antwoord, ok—to the take-it-or-leave-it “f***-mother!” to the questions that even bask in the back of our minds from time to time regarding our own existence (“Why did you make me so I would die?”). The supporting characters—Chappie’s good-natured AI creator and the oppositely-natured Die Antwoord respectively—are all there, ready to adopt the bot for their own selfish moral desires, which is engaging entertainment in its own right once you see Chappie’s rapid character growth due to their influences all-in-one. But it’s as if the human characters themselves experience frequent and unusual personality malfunctions throughout Chappie’s two-hour duration, where DA’s Yo-Landi even becomes more nurturing than the creator.

Besides the narrative shortcomings, philosophical and political undertones also make their way into Chappie in typical Blomkamp style, where we are not once explicitly aware of what he’s actually trying to say outside of obvious topics—such as the state of consciousness and how far it may or may not expand beyond that of current common knowledge, not that 2013’s Her didn’t already quite commendably confront that—and AI—already. Because let’s face it, Blomkamp just can’t take a breather when it comes to the film’s overabundance of action sequences. The $50 million budget definitely results in some visually striking imagery and the South African setting feels original in an era where everything in cinema is happening in either America or Europe nowadays. But couldn’t we get at least a hint that the storyline can progress itself without the need of guns, explosions, ultraviolence toward the third act, and more and more explosions. As if its identity crisis couldn’t have been distracting enough regarding its moral stance and aforementioned change in tone.

But as much as I could nitpick Chappie for simply not being District 9’s much, much more successful storytelling, I’d be a damned liar if I said I didn’t feel enchanted or engulfed at least once throughout its desperation of wondering what Short Circuit would be like if it existed in the RoboCop universe. If I was ambivalent at certain moments, I began to see the inspiration start to sneak through the tiniest bits of dialogue or visual sequences, particularly those involving Chappie himself. It’s an excellent concept that merely needed a longer lifespan during the developmental process, perhaps if Blomkamp wasn’t so anxious to direct the next Alien sequel—but, I mean, who wouldn’t be? After reading online into many professional’s reportedly slim expectations regarding its fulfillment of its half-of-a-hundred million dollar budget, I’ll be even more disappointed if Chappie doesn’t at least garner a cult following just so I can hope for the slightest chance that Blomkamp—or another director, if so many others don’t find him fit enough—to reintroduce us into this universe, whether it’s in the form of a sequel or perhaps even a reboot in the distant, distance future. Please!

Overall rating: 7.1

P.S., without revealing any major SPOILERS, one of the scenes has Chappie in his childlike form receiving quite a bit of physical and emotional abuse and has received negative reactions from former victims of child abuse, saying it triggered painful memories. A warning, I suppose.… Expand

11 of 17 users found this helpful116

All this user's reviews

9

raidendaigoMar 7, 2015

A fun ride. This movie is a pure entertainment experience. The story isn't the new religion like alot of critics were wanting and that's good because this is an entertaining movie that touches on some larger concepts but doesn't try to beatA fun ride. This movie is a pure entertainment experience. The story isn't the new religion like alot of critics were wanting and that's good because this is an entertaining movie that touches on some larger concepts but doesn't try to beat you down with them. This was a gangster movie wearing the clothes of a hard sci-film, grimy and cartoonish but a hoot none the less. A dog becomes a god, a man transcends life and Hugh Jackman sports a business mullet. Chappie is the number one gangster.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

10

ericx13Mar 7, 2015

You wouldn't know it from the ads, but Die Antwoord definitely makes this movie. I couldn't believe what I had just seen. Wow. Must see for any Die Antwoord fan.

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

10

DMTMar 7, 2015

Chappie was slated by the critics for no reason. We saw it last night and loved it. It's better than Elysium and almost as good as d9. There were some silly p lines in the movie but overall was funny but emotional for chappie.

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

8

KPJasonMar 6, 2015

This is a movie not just entertaining but also refreshingly create a very solid and foreseeable future. Though it might have peppered with some unreasonable moments and few screenwriting drawbacks, it's still an awesome action-packed movieThis is a movie not just entertaining but also refreshingly create a very solid and foreseeable future. Though it might have peppered with some unreasonable moments and few screenwriting drawbacks, it's still an awesome action-packed movie (and heart-wrenching sometimes) in a way that as well enables me to wonder if we are more human or robot if conscience could be transferred from human to a robotic body comparing to a self learning sentient android that could develop its own "conscience"...
P.S. This could also be a good lesson to how one should bring up a kid by setting good example and using the right language in front of them...… Expand

9 of 14 users found this helpful95

All this user's reviews

4

BrianMcCriticMar 6, 2015

I really like the character Chappie, but Chappie the movie that's a different story. Chappie himself along with the moments with his maker are easily the best part of this film. Then you get Ninja and Yolandi two criminals that teachI really like the character Chappie, but Chappie the movie that's a different story. Chappie himself along with the moments with his maker are easily the best part of this film. Then you get Ninja and Yolandi two criminals that teach Chappie the ways of the world. Those two bring this film down, they're in the movie way to much and their characters (especially Ninja) are just awful people. Plus you get a wasted Hugh Jackman and Sigourney Weaver. C… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

9

ice05Mar 6, 2015

I'm not sure why people are being so hard on it. A movie is a story, just because the story doesn't go the way you want it to, or because it makes you think then that makes it bad?
This film is not Transformers... It makes you think, it's aI'm not sure why people are being so hard on it. A movie is a story, just because the story doesn't go the way you want it to, or because it makes you think then that makes it bad?
This film is not Transformers... It makes you think, it's a risky movie that isn't for everyone, clearly. I really liked this film a lot because it was something I have not seen before, it touches on something hardly talked about, I don't want to spoil anything in this movie. But just go in with a open mind and know it's not a normal Hollywood film.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

8

leeshmarshallMar 6, 2015

I didn't have high hopes for this movie because of the director. (I was not a big fan of District 9) However, I thought Chappie was great. Chappie looked and felt so real! It wasn't perfect, but it was still good!

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

8

papadrew7Mar 6, 2015

I really don't understand the hate from "critics" about this movie. I thought it was a great movie filled with action and big ideas about the inevitable ai "consciousness". It was fun to watch chappie grow up rapidly during the movie. ScrewI really don't understand the hate from "critics" about this movie. I thought it was a great movie filled with action and big ideas about the inevitable ai "consciousness". It was fun to watch chappie grow up rapidly during the movie. Screw the haters and watch this movie.… Expand

9 of 16 users found this helpful97

All this user's reviews

10

GruntygruntMar 6, 2015

This movie was the best movie of 2015 in my opinion so far it was really fun to go see and I love the idea of how Chappie is like a kid and has to learn just like a human

28 of 55 users found this helpful2827

All this user's reviews

0

FyendoMar 6, 2015

Just awful in all regards. Without Peter Jackson to hold his hand Neil Domkop fails again. Hopefully after this they will yank the Alien sequel from him before he ruins it.

6 of 26 users found this helpful620

All this user's reviews

8

PlescarMar 6, 2015

The movie is awesome! It encompasses the incipient phases of socialization of a sentient android. Even though the ending might seem far fetched one should bear in mind that this is the extent of a youthful imagination of a being who is theThe movie is awesome! It encompasses the incipient phases of socialization of a sentient android. Even though the ending might seem far fetched one should bear in mind that this is the extent of a youthful imagination of a being who is the epitome of children who discovers reflexivity.… Expand

9 of 16 users found this helpful97

All this user's reviews

6

ThegodfathersonMar 6, 2015

Chappie fares far better than Blomkamp's previous- Elysium, a muddled drama with an unsatisfying payoff. But, even with Copley's excellent motion performance and Jackson's furious engineer, the movie suffers from bad story elements. TheChappie fares far better than Blomkamp's previous- Elysium, a muddled drama with an unsatisfying payoff. But, even with Copley's excellent motion performance and Jackson's furious engineer, the movie suffers from bad story elements. The visual effects are brilliant, and Blomkamp doesnt hold onto his ghetto Johannesburg that looks lush and gorgeous. Dev Patel is presentable as Deon Wilson, the creator of Chappie. But, Die Artwood steal the show with their emotional acting, that will surely fare better on in their careers. Look, Chappie isnt a bad film, it is coated with beautiful visuals and great acting, but beneath that layer, there is a movie that shouldn't have been made. Blomkamp's work wasnt used to its limit in Chappie, and that is what fears me, he is one of the best directors in Hollywood, and Chappie isnt his best work.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

8

ahnehnoisMar 6, 2015

I don't get the negative press, I really don't. This movie's take on AI isn't exactly the most scientifically accurate portrayal, but as a fun popcorn movie, Chappie takes a little bit of cerebral, a larger bit of Neill Blomkamp action, and aI don't get the negative press, I really don't. This movie's take on AI isn't exactly the most scientifically accurate portrayal, but as a fun popcorn movie, Chappie takes a little bit of cerebral, a larger bit of Neill Blomkamp action, and a lot of South African weirdness. If you're expecting just a cameo from South African rappers Die Antwoord, you're wrong. They're surprisingly in focus.

There are more than a few plot holes and writing mistakes, but it's largely made up for by how compelling the on-screen reality is. Neill Blomkamp directed the heck out of this movie. If he ever gets a really brilliant script, he'll make a great movie. As a writer, he's too eager to please a crowd and not eager enough to answer its questions.

Given how hard it reportedly was to make a film with non-actors, this may be the only Die Antwoord sci-fi action thriller we ever see. However, they are impossible to duplicate, and the sheer absurdity of watching them prance around unironically in skimpy Americana, juxtaposed against an entirely convincing emancipated police robot learning to think, makes the movie work. It isn't quite as exciting as District 9, but it's far less ponderous and heavy-handed than Elysium. Go watch it and have some fun.… Expand

14 of 19 users found this helpful145

All this user's reviews

10

brainfreezeMar 6, 2015

Lots of fun, emotion and fantastic action! Chappie character was charming, funny, mean and ghetto, couldn't be a cooler robot movie! Loved it! Very entertaining!

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

8

KisholayMar 6, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Critics seem to have taken an offence to this film and have literally badgered the ratings in Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. They feel this film is worse than Elysium and it’s Neill Blomkamp’s worst film. “Robocopy”, “Jar Jar wept..”, etc. were the exact comments critics came out with. One of them has even quoted “I haven't been as happy to see a movie end since the third Transformers.”

Are you kidding me? It was a blast and this film keeps you engaged throughout the film. There’s never a boring moment. I’ve read most of the reviews and they only have a very few valid points. There are things like how Jackman pins Dev Patel with a gun in office without anyone saying anything or how gangsters let their kidnapping victim come and go. Yes, these are some screenwriting concerns which makes the experience unreasonable at times. But it’s still a breezy script and the action moves along without having a dull moment. Trust me, most of the reviews are just wild rants and people conforming to peer pressure. I’ll take down their points one by one.

This film has been heavily criticized for its derivativeness, especially with its links to Robocop. But hey, there’s nothing original in art, and art is all about referencing other art forms. Also, original may be uninteresting and boring. On the contrary, this film is refreshing new especially the way he combined old references to create something unique. Much like Tarantino, he took it to a whole new level of existential philosophy and action. In fact, it’s way better than any Robocop sequels ever made.

Now, an annoying Chappie seems to have bothered many. But hey, wasn’t Chappie was just as fun like being with a child. And, making it behave like a child must include a little annoyance. It makes it cute and realistic. No wonder Yolandi’s motherly instincts kicked in so well. If anyone thinks that an annoying child is a bad thing then they should check with their psychiatrist immediately.

Yes, the acting wasn’t great like Birdman but it wasn’t a distraction either. If people are upset because the actors look odd and aren’t as good looking then they should think again. Nothing is noticeably bad, rather it’s realistic. And, if Birdman hasn’t bagged any Oscars for acting then what acting are we talking about? Sharlto Copley was awesome and how he brings Chappie to life from an inanimate is commendable.
Blomkamp has expanded big time on philosophical content in films and he really provides us with something to think about. What is consciousness and how can it pass on? Does it itself make someone exist or we only exist when others believe that we do? It’s a classical existential film which tells us how important it is for us to attach meaning and purpose to a cause. It’s also a statement on how the world is a bad place for an outcast or someone who is different, and expands on his earlier xenophobic themes in films.

I must add that there are some missed opportunities in this film as well. The sense of style in District 9 was there but not as good and because of this the film lacked unity in style. Secondly, they could have done better with some strong actors even though the acting wasn’t so bad. Third, some of the characters were really not necessary for e.g. Dev Patel could have had a minor role. They draw attention away from our main character i.e. Chappie. Also, the antagonists could have definitely been stronger and more intimidating. Lastly, it needed to be a little darker and going by D9 it fell a little short.

However, saying all that doesn’t take away from the fact that this is still a very emotional film and gets you to choke every now and then. At the same time it is filled with some tense action scenes. It’s delivered on its ideas too and is subtle enough to scratch your head when you think about those existential questions. But, above all it’s a fun ride with Chappie who’s thrown into this world with no knowledge of things around him. Definitely could have done better with a little more fun and humor, but either way it was still a great watch. I loved it and I have my own reasons no matter what the others say, especially the recognized critics. So, I suggest to go and find it out for yourself because, “I am consciousness, I’m Chappie”… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

9

blizzardblueMar 6, 2015

I loved it, of course it has it's weak spots but i didn't had any expectations of it being a "Metropolis" caliber kind of sci-fi; it's cute, pop cool and the violence is there to make a point. Calm scenes are lovely shot, the technicalI loved it, of course it has it's weak spots but i didn't had any expectations of it being a "Metropolis" caliber kind of sci-fi; it's cute, pop cool and the violence is there to make a point. Calm scenes are lovely shot, the technical aspects of chappie the character are phenomenal, for a moment i thought he looked too real to be cgi. Die Antwoord's presence in the film was an unexpected surprise & even more memorable than big stars Jackman & Sigourney.
Go watch it with an open heart and you'll enjoy it. I recommend it for those in care of small children, just don't bring them with you.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

5

beladrimMar 6, 2015

Beautiful to look at and interesting main character.

Sadly, the movie overall doesn't live to its potential. If you have watched other movies from Neill Blomkamp (District 9, Elysium), than you will find nothing new about Chappie otherBeautiful to look at and interesting main character.

Sadly, the movie overall doesn't live to its potential.

If you have watched other movies from Neill Blomkamp (District 9, Elysium), than you will find nothing new about Chappie other than the main character. Blomkamp has an obsession on portraying the lack of equality and fairness and in a sci-fi uthopia setting. While it was fresh with disctrict 9, it is really getting annoying at this point.

Great Blomkamp, the formula worked in discrit 9... You don't have to use it for EVERY single movie you make! Considering, that Blomkamp is working on a new "alien" movie, I am starting to fear that he will try to shoe horn his moral values in this one aswell (Maybe the aliens are actually misunderstood creatures bullied by humans? Please... don't Blomkamp!)

While Chappie is likable, his "parents"... Are not... You get that Blomkamp is going for the missunderstood minority and oppressed group. But honestly... I never felt any empathy for these people. They are scum. They manipulate and abuse chappie because he has the mind of a child. Just because they are the "oppressed", doesn't mean that we are suppose to care for them. These are bad people and you will want them to die, so that Chappie can break free from their influence.

Blomkamp knows how to shoot good action scenes and make breath taking sci-fi worlds. It is a shame that the South African director feels the need to create an analogy to the apartheid in all the movies he makes.

Blomkamp is on his way to become the next M night shyamalan. He needs to let the all "oppressed" in a sci-fi setting go, and show us that he can make something new and refreshing.… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

2

UnfearingMar 6, 2015

2 stars for 2 scenes which had action in it. Charming movie, but disgusting story and zero development of characters. Don't go in expecting an action movie, or you'll be leaving sorely disappointed. Elements of the movie that attempt to2 stars for 2 scenes which had action in it. Charming movie, but disgusting story and zero development of characters. Don't go in expecting an action movie, or you'll be leaving sorely disappointed. Elements of the movie that attempt to appeal to emotion are far fetched and seem to insult my intelligence, and one has to try their utmost best to believe elements of the story. Comedy is inserted at absolutely random intervals, and seem to work against the movie. There is absolutely zero build up, and no gut clenching finish that I was expecting.… Expand

6 of 22 users found this helpful616

All this user's reviews

8

LamontRaymondMar 6, 2015

If you're a fan of Die Antwoord, you're not going to want to miss this film. It has a huge heart, and I really enjoyed it. Perhaps my super-low expectations based on the critical reception laid the groundwork for my warming up to it, but IIf you're a fan of Die Antwoord, you're not going to want to miss this film. It has a huge heart, and I really enjoyed it. Perhaps my super-low expectations based on the critical reception laid the groundwork for my warming up to it, but I had a huge smile on my face for most of the film. Dev Patel as "The Creator" and Yo-Landi Visser as "Mommy" are both terrific. The action is brilliant, and the direction is solid. This movie is SO much better than Blomkamp's previous film Elysium, which was so bogged down in social politics that it forgot to make a living, breathing, feeling story. One critic suggested that Chappie might have been better suited for cinemas 20 years ago, and I can't disagree. Maybe even 30 years ago - E.T. style. But I greatly enjoyed this in the here and now. Especially given how BAD movies have been lately.… Expand

12 of 19 users found this helpful127

All this user's reviews

Chappie

User Reviews