Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)
Fox Searchlight Pictures | Release Date: October 17, 2014
8.2
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1882 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,585
Mixed:
154
Negative:
143
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
10
JE61Oct 26, 2014
I congratulate Alejandro González Iñárritu on this absolutely superb black comedy. The script is delightful and witty as he cleverly uses magical realism to near perfect effect as he examines the failure and fulfillment of fictionalI congratulate Alejandro González Iñárritu on this absolutely superb black comedy. The script is delightful and witty as he cleverly uses magical realism to near perfect effect as he examines the failure and fulfillment of fictional actor/director, Riggan Thomson.

The protagonist's on screen and off screen struggles whirl around at a dizzying pace as the camera follows him through the narrow shabby, sets, halls and rooftops of the theater. Seamlessly the audience slides along with him from one stormy long take to the next spirited long take. Skillfully, acted and choreographed, the camera follows the players through the grimy backstage of a broadway play as the fragile production teeters on collapse at every turn.

The accident ridden production reflects Riggan's internal strife as he teeters on the edge mental breakdown. Haunted by inexorable unconscious voices that foment both his ambition and self doubt, he struggles to be the artist he envisions . . . if only he doesn't destroy the whole thing himself along the way. Take this certain "Best Picture" nominee roller coaster ride and hold on with two hands.… Expand
56 of 74 users found this helpful5618
All this user's reviews
0
SoxerJan 10, 2015
This has to be probably the worst film I have seen in easily the last 15 years. I agree with the others on this platform who low rated it. Yes the camera work was highly irritating as was the be bop (if that's what it was) music drumwork. NoThis has to be probably the worst film I have seen in easily the last 15 years. I agree with the others on this platform who low rated it. Yes the camera work was highly irritating as was the be bop (if that's what it was) music drumwork. No story, complex dialogue that said nothing. I too regret sitting through this movie. I certainly didn't see it as a black comedy or as any form of entertainment.… Expand
18 of 26 users found this helpful188
All this user's reviews
1
rbmccawNov 15, 2014
Read the NY Observer review before wasting your money on this "miserable load of deranged, deluded crap masquerading as a black comedy." This is really an awful movie. I nearly walked out after the first half hour and was ultimately sorryRead the NY Observer review before wasting your money on this "miserable load of deranged, deluded crap masquerading as a black comedy." This is really an awful movie. I nearly walked out after the first half hour and was ultimately sorry that I didn't.… Expand
29 of 52 users found this helpful2923
All this user's reviews
1
killingspreeNov 15, 2014
I don't understand why this has so many good critical reviews. It's boring, pointless, and the shaky super tight camera work is obnoxious. The first 3/4 of the movie doesn't even matter because there's no plot.
22 of 44 users found this helpful2222
All this user's reviews
4
wymanOct 26, 2014
This movie really should've been good, but I think the filmmakers got caught up in making oscar-bait as opposed to making an actually good movie. Let's start off with the acting: The acting is great, not phenomenal, but definitely deservingThis movie really should've been good, but I think the filmmakers got caught up in making oscar-bait as opposed to making an actually good movie. Let's start off with the acting: The acting is great, not phenomenal, but definitely deserving of some Oscar nominations. Edward Norton kills it, and gives the best performance in the film, but that shouldn't detract from the other performances. Keaton, Stone, Watts, Galifianakis; all of them are great. The writing is also good, but again, it's not phenomenal. It touches on many different aspects of Broadway, and show business in general, but at times seems corny and unrealistic. Overall, however, the writing is effective, and one of the better aspects of the film.

Now, the bad part. The shtick of the film is that it is all in one continuous shot. I assume this is because it is a story about a play, and thus this is to give it a play-like feel. However, this ends up making the film messy, and entirely distracts us from what is going on. There are tons of extreme close-ups that after a while get boring and repetitive. We feel like we're almost trapped in this theater, with all these characters, and like we can't escape. Yes, the shots are cool, but they do nothing to progress the story. Thus, they only exist so that critics can rave about the, "Unique, beautiful cinematography." It is unique, yes, but does that mean it is good? As they say, "...your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should." If you made a film that was shot entirely using the color Brown, it would be unique, but nothing about that would make it a good film.

It isn't boring, and it isn't awful. However, it is over-hyped and over-done. It is well acted and written, but doesn't have any more substance than other films that consistently get looked over come oscar season; honestly, the film Bad Words has just as good of writing and acting as this, and I can guarantee you it will earn approximately zero Oscar nominations. Don't even get me started on the ending, where the film completely could have redeemed itself, only to flush that opportunity down the toilet in exchange for an ending that, while UNIQUE, entirely doesn't answer the questions proposed throughout the film.… Expand
19 of 40 users found this helpful1921
All this user's reviews
2
night4Apr 28, 2016
I understand what this movie is, a sort of parody of Hollywood, and it's intentionally making fun of the very things it's doing. But it gets really old really fast.

There's some good acting, but no amount of that can make a person want toI understand what this movie is, a sort of parody of Hollywood, and it's intentionally making fun of the very things it's doing. But it gets really old really fast.

There's some good acting, but no amount of that can make a person want to sit through such an obnoxious movie.… Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
4
crankyermaMay 3, 2018
I honestly couldn't sit through this. It was insufferable. From what I saw, I can sum up what it is and why it did well during awards season in one sentence: "Actory actors acting as actors acting actory."
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
1
FarsheedJun 6, 2016
On the contrary to 2015, I think 2014 was one the worst years in Hollywood in film making. Birdman was awarded as the best while I found it with no significance.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
TrilobiteGJul 31, 2015
With a helping of wonderful acting and messages about how society has evolved in entertainment from past decades, Birdman surely was one of the best movies of 2014 but is slowed down by a small amount of meaningless dialogue that made theWith a helping of wonderful acting and messages about how society has evolved in entertainment from past decades, Birdman surely was one of the best movies of 2014 but is slowed down by a small amount of meaningless dialogue that made the message of the movie seem cheesy in a sense.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
BoogeeFilmGuyAug 24, 2015
This is one of the best films I have ever seen in my life. In all honesty. The acting was phenomenal. The director definitely put the right people in the right film. The way it was shot so it looked like it was all one take was a great andThis is one of the best films I have ever seen in my life. In all honesty. The acting was phenomenal. The director definitely put the right people in the right film. The way it was shot so it looked like it was all one take was a great and original idea. I recommend this film to anyone who loves movies. It was just so good, and I can't even describe it with words.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
kyle20ellisMar 21, 2022
Despite the near-universal acclaim from critics, 'Birdman' very much divided audiences to a quite extreme degree. This division is very much understandable, 'Birdman' has a great many merits but not everything will work for everybody.

To meDespite the near-universal acclaim from critics, 'Birdman' very much divided audiences to a quite extreme degree. This division is very much understandable, 'Birdman' has a great many merits but not everything will work for everybody.

To me 'Birdman' was an excellent film. Maybe not quite as good as the hype suggests, but nowhere near deserving of the many 1/10 votes when its merits are a great many that some people seem to have not acknowledged. Although, from personal opinion, a little over-hyped, 'Birdman' ('Gone Girl', 'The Grand Budapest Hotel' and 'Whiplash' were also personal favourites, and 'Boyhood' was also better than given credit for considering the amount of hate it's garnered) was a 2014 highlight and a worthy Best Picture winner.

Not everything in 'Birdman' works. Some of the pace is a touch frenetic in parts of the second half and not everything feels quite as tied up as ought with things left a little loose.

However, 'Birdman' is an exceptionally well made film, with some of the best and cleverest cinematography of the year, some of the cinematography and editing is so dazzling it's enough to take the breath away. The special effects are also tremendous. Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu (in the first of his deserved director wins, the best being 2015's 'The Revenant), 'Birdman' is one of the best directed films of 2014 too and shows Iñárritu's immense talent as a director, with breath-taking vision, sense of mood and the ability to make the story as gripping as possible.

The script is fun, thought-provoking and at times touchingly profound. The story mostly, while sometimes thin, is gripping and the characters engage.

Michael Keaton gives his best performance in years, an outstanding performance and perhaps a career-best. Edward Norton is similarly superb, his performance also ranking among his best. Emma Stones charms and delights too.

Overall, very much divisive, with some people adoring or admiring it and others hating it, personally was one of the people who loved it while acknowledging its imperfections. 9/10 Bethany Cox… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
YellowKirbyMar 11, 2016
Alejandro González Iñárritu's brilliant direction, Emmanuel Lubezki's wonderful cinematography and, of course, Michael Keaton's superb acting make Birdman one of the best movies of 2014, certainly deserving of all the Oscars it won.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
obijuankenbiOct 12, 2015
An Amazing Film! it almost feel like the whole film is one take, and the story has so much great depth! It's amazing! Downey Jr and The Avengers cast should definitely check this film out because they are heading for that Superhero retirement!
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
luisferreiraDec 5, 2015
When I saw Birdman for the first time, I had no idea what type of film I was going to see. But now I know this was one of the most ambitious, magnificent, original and well-directed that I've ever seen.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
CalibMcBoltsMay 30, 2016
Technically brilliant, but lacks an interesting/flesh-and-blood story to keep the movie structured. Birdman is a thrilling leap forward for director Alejandro González Iñárritu, and it is an ambitious technical showcase but aside from that itTechnically brilliant, but lacks an interesting/flesh-and-blood story to keep the movie structured. Birdman is a thrilling leap forward for director Alejandro González Iñárritu, and it is an ambitious technical showcase but aside from that it has very little to offer. While I personally do not believe this film should have won "Best Picture", it is still a fine film due to incredibly strong and personal performances from both Keaton and Norton. It does get a little impressed with itself at times, and has about ten different endings before concluding on a ambiguous note.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
MasterRileyAug 2, 2016
Birdman tells a story that feels so real, with characters and a world that are so relatable. It revolves around a man named Riggan who used to be the famous 'Birdman' and is now looking for success through broadway. The cinematography isBirdman tells a story that feels so real, with characters and a world that are so relatable. It revolves around a man named Riggan who used to be the famous 'Birdman' and is now looking for success through broadway. The cinematography is outstanding as long takes and clever editing are used to make the entire film look like one single shot. This allows the audience to feel completely immersed in the narrative as if they are apart of Birdman's world. The writing, casting, acting, direction, and music are also all beautifully done. This is truly a one of a kind film.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
DiptanshuApr 17, 2020
Insanely driven movie ever!literally from start scene to end engaging amazing acting.screenplay and music the one shot camera was literally legendary felt whole movie like rollercoaster ride!great scenes portrayed message beautifully likeInsanely driven movie ever!literally from start scene to end engaging amazing acting.screenplay and music the one shot camera was literally legendary felt whole movie like rollercoaster ride!great scenes portrayed message beautifully like critisizing the film by critics who are those who can't make career and didn't know the effort putting in play amazing to see starting references to ironman or tinman and x-men!great ending with don't know what happened just like the obsession of the movie u are what u think great drama!love the scene where he realize he's not a good actor but celebrity!A engaging ride with great camera work which literally felt one shot without any cut although didn't some scenes felt over the top like flying didn't know what happend but overall A masterpiece.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
Pluto744Jun 21, 2021
●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●
".".".".".".".".".",",".",",",",",",",".".".".".".".".".
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
grandpajoe6191Aug 15, 2015
Director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu is no stranger when it comes to directing masterpieces, but this movie just might be his best one yet. With a dazzling 360-degree choreography that follows around the characters throughout all events thatDirector Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu is no stranger when it comes to directing masterpieces, but this movie just might be his best one yet. With a dazzling 360-degree choreography that follows around the characters throughout all events that happen, "Birdman" offers a compelling, witty story around a washed up superhero actor who invests everything into his self-produced broadway play as he fights his inner and outer demons that torment and mock him and strives to prove his true worth as a artist. Michael Keaton undoubtedly deserved his oscar; he was the excellent choice for the lead role Riggan Thomoson, as his honest down-to-earth performances truly was, in some sense, a mirror image of himself back when he struggled as an actor after his hit film "Batman". Overall, "Birdman" is a great film packed with excellent acting and writing, a must watch for the moviegoers.… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
1
evearcherMar 28, 2015
Wow, all we can say is this film was soooo boring. It takes a long time to get started and yes the whole entire movie is about a theatre play (which in itself is really boring) there are very few interesting moments. Michael Keaton doesWow, all we can say is this film was soooo boring. It takes a long time to get started and yes the whole entire movie is about a theatre play (which in itself is really boring) there are very few interesting moments. Michael Keaton does well with the material but the film is weird in a boring way, it just never goes far enough. Rent it, or just watch the trailer. It is not best picture material at all.....… Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
5
Eilidh2Nov 21, 2014
An over-long and annoying exercise in (sort of) magical realism. Michael Keaton is fine in the title role and goes a long way towards redeeming the project. But Edward Norton and Emma Stone's aggravatingly over-the-top performances areAn over-long and annoying exercise in (sort of) magical realism. Michael Keaton is fine in the title role and goes a long way towards redeeming the project. But Edward Norton and Emma Stone's aggravatingly over-the-top performances are exhausting to watch. The conceit of the 'single take' is claustrophic and ultimately pointless.

I had been looking forward to this one. Very disappointing.… Expand
8 of 10 users found this helpful82
All this user's reviews
5
dennismachJan 19, 2015
Such a very self-indulgent movie. More about "the actor" and the acting profession than a watchable movie. As a side note, mental illnes of the magnitude shown in the moive typically on-sets at age 20 - 30, and by age 50 - 60, the person isSuch a very self-indulgent movie. More about "the actor" and the acting profession than a watchable movie. As a side note, mental illnes of the magnitude shown in the moive typically on-sets at age 20 - 30, and by age 50 - 60, the person is well medicated or at least not surprised by its onset. I'll pass.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
3
yezoMar 30, 2015
I think most people are going to hate. I personally did not enjoy the movie. The story was quite confusing and probably I am a bit dumb to understand. I admit both Michael Keaton and Edward Norton acted extraordinary well. However, I do notI think most people are going to hate. I personally did not enjoy the movie. The story was quite confusing and probably I am a bit dumb to understand. I admit both Michael Keaton and Edward Norton acted extraordinary well. However, I do not understand why people like how Emma Stone acted in that particular movie. I like Emma in many movie, but in Birdman she did not play a big role and I did not see much acting from it. Overall, I do not like the movie and probably not going to watch it again.… Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
4
rpmMar 16, 2015
I like Keaton as an actor. Magic Realism is a genre I enjoy. I like jazz music. I've only seen one Broadway play (Pippin) and consider it one of the highlights of my life.

That should add up to me really loving this film right? OhI like Keaton as an actor. Magic Realism is a genre I enjoy. I like jazz music. I've only seen one Broadway play (Pippin) and consider it one of the highlights of my life.

That should add up to me really loving this film right?

Oh well...I guess the whole does not equal the sum of its parts in this case.

Keaton mumbles his way through this film, even when on stage in a play (who mumbles line in a play?). The Magic Realism elements are interesting but seem mostly out of place amongst the grunge of backstage Broadway. The jazzy drum soundtrack didn't so much support the film as it distracted from the film. The play within the film was so briefly shown and so stunted as a plot element that it seemed to me much ado about nothing.

I didn't hate the film but after having read so many positive reviews from critics I'd say I was immensely disappointed. The critic I now most agree with on this film is Rex Reed, except he thought Keaton's performance was a bright note and I wouldn't even give him that.… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
2
SnowDayMay 29, 2015
Not funny, not exciting, and not anything I will be watching again. I recommend this movie for insomniacs who need something to fall asleep to, and hipsters that like to pretend it's a work of art.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
6
ScarziFeb 27, 2015
There was a couple good moments in this movie but it was just bad. This is just one of those movies that is hyped into the sky that just doesn't deliver. I am sure a lot of people in the movie/theatre industry can relate to and is the soleThere was a couple good moments in this movie but it was just bad. This is just one of those movies that is hyped into the sky that just doesn't deliver. I am sure a lot of people in the movie/theatre industry can relate to and is the sole reason its gotten so much hype. At most its a 6.… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
5
swammerdamFeb 19, 2015
Great acting from Michael Keaton but a flat scenario which make a long film.
An average movie about critics and acting industries and only critics will love it.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
6
alexnexusJan 16, 2015
If Ego were a human been, it would have casted, co-written and directed this movie long, long, long time ago..... -having Pretentious as its producer.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
4
markmunroJan 9, 2015
i will start by saying i didn't particularly enjoy this film, i will agree with what many others have said and that it was a good idea and had some hugely interesting themes and sub-plots running throughout, sadly i just found it long,i will start by saying i didn't particularly enjoy this film, i will agree with what many others have said and that it was a good idea and had some hugely interesting themes and sub-plots running throughout, sadly i just found it long, ponderous and pretentious, i got how the lead character was portraying how we are all trying to find our place in the world and how he was scared he was going to be forgotten after he was gone and I also got how the film was about the lead character's personal battles vs schizophrenia and also on how to be a success in hollywood (make something 'meaningful' vs selling-out and also a comment of what these two things actually mean and whether or not these things are actually nonsense when compared to real-life success in being a man, being a good father, husband etc), it was also a comment on big hollywood blockbusters vs real art whilst also simultaneously mocking the over-pretentious nature of theatre, all very clever, it was just delivered in an overly-long and slow manner, i also hated the inane freestyle jazz drumming which constantly repeated itself throughout and the single shot camera trickery did my head in too, this though is just my opinion, if you don't agree fair enough, i don't care.… Expand
8 of 11 users found this helpful83
All this user's reviews
5
21gramsJan 17, 2015
This movie is so overrated, I almost cannot believe it got so many nominations for oscars. The movie has nothing to offer apart Michael Keaton. It's just mediocre movie about mediocre theater play. Don't know why, but critics buy thisThis movie is so overrated, I almost cannot believe it got so many nominations for oscars. The movie has nothing to offer apart Michael Keaton. It's just mediocre movie about mediocre theater play. Don't know why, but critics buy this pseudo-innovative weirdness as a pure art, but it's just lots of bull*** squeezed into one movie.… Expand
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
3
NeilG1217Nov 16, 2014
Hollywood has a long and hostile tradition of mocking theater, and this movie is part of that tradition. We are supposed to both care about, and laugh at, Keaton's character's attempts to go from Hollywood to Broadway. However, the tensionHollywood has a long and hostile tradition of mocking theater, and this movie is part of that tradition. We are supposed to both care about, and laugh at, Keaton's character's attempts to go from Hollywood to Broadway. However, the tension and the humor are both based on something that resembles mental illness but is passed off as magical realism, which felt out of place. While there are things to like, mixing all these elements and more made the movie feel confusing, and undermined both the tension and humor for me.… Expand
14 of 20 users found this helpful146
All this user's reviews
2
jlplandMar 2, 2015
Boring, boring, Slow and uncomfortable. There's nothing interesting except for a lot of great actors wasting their time making you waste yours , do not Recomendate, Dont waste your time
7 of 10 users found this helpful73
All this user's reviews
2
lauranycDec 21, 2014
To see a would-be artist suffer, be consumed by her art while producing a masterpiece, go watch Black Swan. To be dragged along on every drinking binge you've had with your suffering, drunk, artist friends who hang on too long to the dreamTo see a would-be artist suffer, be consumed by her art while producing a masterpiece, go watch Black Swan. To be dragged along on every drinking binge you've had with your suffering, drunk, artist friends who hang on too long to the dream only to be destroyed by it, go see Birdman. Good acting, interesting direction, terrible script. Boring after 20 minutes.… Expand
11 of 16 users found this helpful115
All this user's reviews
0
dierregiJan 18, 2015
Washed up Hollywood star Riggan wants to prove he is a “real” actor by directing and starring a play on Broadway. But perhaps he cannot, because he is mental.

Wrapped around the claustrophobic world of actors, the movie is an exercise inWashed up Hollywood star Riggan wants to prove he is a “real” actor by directing and starring a play on Broadway. But perhaps he cannot, because he is mental.

Wrapped around the claustrophobic world of actors, the movie is an exercise in navel-gazing and smugness. I guess it must be a big deal for a Hollywood superstar to prove to his peers that he is not just a money-making machine but also a talented actor. However, I truly do not care about the hysterics and anguish of Hollywood actors.

That is why, when Birdman was acclaimed by the critics I already suspected yet another inflated balloon full of nothing. I waited until I could watch the movie for free, because I was very reluctant to waste money on yet another “Academy-worth” piece of crap and I am very happy I saved my hard-earned money.

The joke is twice on the audience, because the other theme explored by Birdman, besides narcissist actors, is audience stupidity. Not being the sort of person who cares about superheroes movies, I was nevertheless annoyed by the fact that the public of said movies is vilified by this piece of elitist crap.
It is difficult to point out what I disliked most about Birdman, since I hated everything: the overbearing drum soundtrack, characters shouting their lines, the smugness of the whole concept, the patronizing dialogues, etc… I do not even think Keaton was so great in it.

Finally, it is depressing to notice that the number of movies I want to walk out from is increasing exponentially. After decades of watching movies, what I expect is an interesting story told in an engaging way, but what I find is more and more egotistic directors busy only with producing crap bearing their trademark signature, being it Tim Burton Goth-chic or Wes Anderson smug-naïve.… Expand
13 of 19 users found this helpful136
All this user's reviews
0
WindupgirlJan 18, 2015
I walked out after an hour. Don't worry...I've read how this piece of trash ends.

The people reviewing on this site are delusional...I'd much rather watch Seth Lloyd give a You Tube lecture on quantum mechanics. His laugh alone is moreI walked out after an hour. Don't worry...I've read how this piece of trash ends.

The people reviewing on this site are delusional...I'd much rather watch Seth Lloyd give a You Tube lecture on quantum mechanics. His laugh alone is more engaging than this nonsense...… Expand
13 of 19 users found this helpful136
All this user's reviews
7
beingryanjudeOct 19, 2014
Leave it to Alejandro González Iñárritu to orchestrate this technical, cinematic and storytelling brilliance. Michael Keaton is back and better than ever before alongside notable performances from Naomi Watts, Edward Norton and Emma Stone.Leave it to Alejandro González Iñárritu to orchestrate this technical, cinematic and storytelling brilliance. Michael Keaton is back and better than ever before alongside notable performances from Naomi Watts, Edward Norton and Emma Stone. Birdman is like nothing you've ever seen.… Expand
14 of 21 users found this helpful147
All this user's reviews
6
JamesLNov 9, 2014
I have seen everyone of the director's films and this just does not live up to the hype. The acting is great but I cannot tell you why it is so highly rate or what the point of the film was. The obvious point was for Keaton be a successfulI have seen everyone of the director's films and this just does not live up to the hype. The acting is great but I cannot tell you why it is so highly rate or what the point of the film was. The obvious point was for Keaton be a successful actor on the stage but there are numerous other currents running through the film. Most of them are left unexplored and the illusory effects of Keaton losing his clarity only come to play near the end.. The film left me speechless because it is so overrated. It is this year's "Inside Llewellyn Davis".… Expand
10 of 15 users found this helpful105
All this user's reviews
1
Mancunian2014Jan 13, 2015
I went in to see Birdman with zero expectations and thank goodness I did. Aside from the lovely Naomi Watts and the newcomer (to me) Miss Riseborough, there is very little I could like, let alone tolerate, in this movie. The continuousI went in to see Birdman with zero expectations and thank goodness I did. Aside from the lovely Naomi Watts and the newcomer (to me) Miss Riseborough, there is very little I could like, let alone tolerate, in this movie. The continuous camera rolling is really nothing innovative (way to copy Russian Ark, Inarritu...) so I don't understand what all the fuss over that was. Moreover, the film was simply loud with too much yelling, breaking and torturous drum-beat music. I had a headache after leaving the theatre. Just because it's "New Yawk and Broadway, baby" doesn't mean poor viewers need to be practically browbeaten into loving it with noise, aggression and uncontrolled emotions that are impossible to empathize with.

And of course the movie's failed plot line and tasteless attempt attempt to make light of a has-been actor's possible schizophrenia was probably a better idea on paper than in "real", cinematographic life. Birdman is really just the result of a film student not listening to his elders when they've said, "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should." And all of you should not watch this demnetia, whether you can or can't. Please do not feed this giant troll of movie that so many otherwise logical and nice people seem to love and urinate adulation over.… Expand
10 of 15 users found this helpful105
All this user's reviews
2
ealeydJan 2, 2015
This is a hugely disappointing film - some funny lines but the overall whole is just not up to it. Very up itself and desperate to show how clever the filmmaker is
10 of 15 users found this helpful105
All this user's reviews
0
ConjureFeb 23, 2015
My god, what a piece of junk Hollywood foisted on the general public with this movie.
After watching the first 25 minutes of it I realized that I had wasted 30 minutes of my life.
The movie should have been titled “The Bird” because itMy god, what a piece of junk Hollywood foisted on the general public with this movie.
After watching the first 25 minutes of it I realized that I had wasted 30 minutes of my life.

The movie should have been titled “The Bird” because it was so awful. Overacting, poor script, and unrealistic dialogue all fitted into the formula for this flick. It was Hollywood’s overindulgence to itself.

I am glad Michael Keaton got a chance to star in a movie but his acting was so over the top. And the same applied to Edward Norton, who is a fine actor.

I am sure a better movie could have be written about an actor who wanted to transition from Comic Hero to a dramatic actor. But this movie falls so flat on its face it needs nose surgery.… Expand
8 of 12 users found this helpful84
All this user's reviews
2
AkashVijayJan 18, 2015
All credit to Lubezki for his stunning camera work and to all the actors for bringing their A game. But despite their best efforts Birdman doesn't work. So much of it feels self-consciously quirky and in many cases, downright sophomoric. TheAll credit to Lubezki for his stunning camera work and to all the actors for bringing their A game. But despite their best efforts Birdman doesn't work. So much of it feels self-consciously quirky and in many cases, downright sophomoric. The film's most embarrassing attempt at humour is when Mike (Edward Norton) describes an ageing theatre critic (Lindsay Duncan) as having a face that looks "like she just licked a homeless man's ass." Really? That’s what passes for funny these days?
But the biggest problem with the film is its utter superficiality and pretentiousness. Tackling everything from the challenge of living in the present in a post-as-it-happens world, to the struggles of modern-day parenting, to the uncomfortable compromises made for celebrity status, to the folly of critics who aren't "courageous" enough to offer the world anything but cynicism, this film is all over the map. Sadly not one theme is explored with a shred of depth. Same can be said for a lot of Inarritu's previous films (babel most notably). Birdman is ambitious but flawed and ultimately self-defeating.… Expand
8 of 12 users found this helpful84
All this user's reviews
0
silveradoMar 7, 2015
Some of my very favorite movies are about the subject of taking a look behind the curtains of the movie industry. I'm talking about the brilliant films All About Eve and Sunset Boulevard. Both movies featured an actress, struggling with ageSome of my very favorite movies are about the subject of taking a look behind the curtains of the movie industry. I'm talking about the brilliant films All About Eve and Sunset Boulevard. Both movies featured an actress, struggling with age and a declining career. As I am writing this I realize why I probably loved these film's anti hero's and why I hate Birdman: only women are awesome when hysterical, defenitely not men. Lately I kind of start to hate modern 'art house' movies. These movies take themselves so serious, and that's why they are so boring. In my opinion, opposite a cynical caracter should be a loveable and warm caracter. But in the movies of especially this Inarrity guy, all caracters drown in their indulging misery. It's like you, the movie goer, is forced to agree with him, which I completely reject.… Expand
8 of 12 users found this helpful84
All this user's reviews
1
diondiikaFeb 25, 2015
I don't understand of all the critics praising this dull movie, and what really inconvenient is that this movie won Academy Award's Best Picture, this movie should've nominated at Razzies anyway, rather than Oscars
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
6
kman5473Mar 19, 2017
One of the most overrated movies by far. The script is solid, the acting is fairly good throughout, but the plot as whole has me scratching my head the whole time, asking the question, "Why am I watching this?"

It delivers on all the themesOne of the most overrated movies by far. The script is solid, the acting is fairly good throughout, but the plot as whole has me scratching my head the whole time, asking the question, "Why am I watching this?"

It delivers on all the themes its going after, and uses a technique that I admire for the effort put into it. But I just can't get passed how rotten with pretentiousness this entire film is. There's no redeemable character, and there is no heart or soul in this film. We have an empty shell of a man, surrounded by equally hollow people, all trying to desperately to grasp at the meaning of their own existence with very little payoff, and resolution that is completely predictable as it is ludicrous. From the perspective of someone that works in entertainment, I get it. But for everyone else--for all the good 'ol fashioned families out there, I couldn't get past this thought: "Who the **** cares?"

This is the ultimate Hollywood-sucking-its-own movie I have ever seen, and it really wasn't that entertaining to watch. There are so many other stories that are so much more important to watch, and so much better out there. I get it--this flick is going after to depicting the themes of melancholy (which is like "The Ultimate" theme in art to attempt to depict)--but screw this movie.

I regret watching it, to be perfectly frank.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
diogomendesJun 14, 2015
Birdman's inventive, original screenplay, sharp dialogue, excellent performances -- as well as a good dose of black humor -- make it one of the most fresh cinematic achievements since "The Pianist".

9/10.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
Jess_HillJul 12, 2015
Utterly compelling, confounding and complex in equal measure, this is a must see film. Phenomenal cinematography and brilliant performances by the exceptional cast made this a film during which your attention won't waver. The storyline isUtterly compelling, confounding and complex in equal measure, this is a must see film. Phenomenal cinematography and brilliant performances by the exceptional cast made this a film during which your attention won't waver. The storyline is both darkly comic and tragic, and the pacing is done beautifully. Whilst this will not appeal to a mainstream audience, this multilayered tragicomedy is masterfully directed and will stay with you well after the credits roll. 9.37/10… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
3
shaunmedJan 17, 2015
Not without merit but reviews of this film are again an example of an industry that celebrates itself. The story is just plain uninteresting and never gains any emotional involvement from the viewer as the protagonist is confused even in hisNot without merit but reviews of this film are again an example of an industry that celebrates itself. The story is just plain uninteresting and never gains any emotional involvement from the viewer as the protagonist is confused even in his own role.… Expand
9 of 14 users found this helpful95
All this user's reviews
0
victoratorFeb 23, 2015
My God. What a complete disaster and disgrace to moviemaking. This 'movie' is a bunch of jibberish that makes no sense. It's painful to watch, it's boring and while you sit there waiting for something to happen every passing minute is justMy God. What a complete disaster and disgrace to moviemaking. This 'movie' is a bunch of jibberish that makes no sense. It's painful to watch, it's boring and while you sit there waiting for something to happen every passing minute is just another nail to the coffin. Spoiler: Nothing happens! It's a load of crap. AVOID AT ALL COSTS!… Expand
9 of 14 users found this helpful95
All this user's reviews
0
Gerry863Feb 23, 2015
Only Hollywood types would love this weird film. Music was terrible, filmography was worse. Acting consisted of shouting at each other. I certainly wasn't entertained by this crap. If this was a film about Hollywood it shows how bad it has become.
9 of 14 users found this helpful95
All this user's reviews
0
screenqueenJan 1, 2015
This film should be called the Emperor's New Wings. It's as irrelevant and pretentious as the characters on screen. I was thankful for the gimmicky "single shot" technique as it gave me something to watch for two painful hours. Of course, IThis film should be called the Emperor's New Wings. It's as irrelevant and pretentious as the characters on screen. I was thankful for the gimmicky "single shot" technique as it gave me something to watch for two painful hours. Of course, I fell for the hype surrounding this awful film. The drum track is annoying.As others have said, "different" does not mean "better." As far as calling it a comedy, I'm not sure what idiot decided that. I snickered maybe twice, but never even laughed aloud. This movie was pigeon poop.… Expand
14 of 22 users found this helpful148
All this user's reviews
5
analogkid280Nov 2, 2014
I left the theater not really knowing if I liked this movie or not. I still do not even know. I might have to think about it some more. One thing I did like is seeking Keaton! I miss the days when he was an A list actor. Now we just have thisI left the theater not really knowing if I liked this movie or not. I still do not even know. I might have to think about it some more. One thing I did like is seeking Keaton! I miss the days when he was an A list actor. Now we just have this semi-parody of a fictional version of him. The long shots were cool. The annoying pressure building non stop drama was not cool. Dang, I almost thought I liked this movie for a minute.… Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
0
sobellejanetMar 1, 2015
We watched it because it won Best Picture. Why I don't know (that it won). For a film to truly connect and be likable, it's helpful to be able to like some of the characters. I can't remember when I've ever been introduced to such aWe watched it because it won Best Picture. Why I don't know (that it won). For a film to truly connect and be likable, it's helpful to be able to like some of the characters. I can't remember when I've ever been introduced to such a shallow, angry, selfish, bunch of hipsters. For that's what they are. Just edgy hipsters with lots and lots of "clever" snarky lines. I suppose Hollywood finds this meaningful as that is about all they know, but the rest of us are lucky enough to live away from that empty world of full time self absorption. Maybe the way it was shot was innovative; that certainly doesn't make it worthy of anything more than some technical achievement. I had stopped reading the 1st book in Will Durant's History of Civilization series to watch this movie. What a mistake. There is more value for the soul and intellect in any 1 page of that book than anywhere in the entire length of this movie.… Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
0
kingofkoopasApr 7, 2015
This movie is one of the worst things I have ever seen. I had fifteen minutes left and I had to turn it off, I just could not leave my brain off any longer. This pile of crap won best picture? This movie is pointless, and extremely boring,This movie is one of the worst things I have ever seen. I had fifteen minutes left and I had to turn it off, I just could not leave my brain off any longer. This pile of crap won best picture? This movie is pointless, and extremely boring, nothing ever happens. What a pretentious pile of ****. I know that there are people in this world who will call something like "Schindler's List" crap. And even though that person is probably a moron, it is still just an awful OPINION. Birdman being a pile of **** is not one of those opinions, it's a FACT. Bandwagon idiots want to feel smart and act like they see something that we cannot, lol. You idiots want to feel smart huh? Well then get me an A on my calculus homework. Or write me my five page essay on J.S. Bach!… Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
3
clivelipsettDec 10, 2014
Fun central idea about a theater production takes an off-kilter approach to conventional character foibles, cliche relationships and stereotypes. It's all familiar except for the stylistic way it's put together. The magical realism theme isFun central idea about a theater production takes an off-kilter approach to conventional character foibles, cliche relationships and stereotypes. It's all familiar except for the stylistic way it's put together. The magical realism theme is kept barely alive just to have a fanciful set-piece in the third act which doesn't add any depth. The contrast of an Ex-Blockbuster Superhero actor clawing his way back to Broadway Stage legitimacy is occasionally rewarding in a handful of scenes spaced between too many predictable ones.… Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
1
MurrayTJan 11, 2015
This is a good example of the disconnect between film critics and movie goers. The critics watch so many movies, and here they see something different and they're intrigued. However, different doesn't mean good, and this movie is not good. ItThis is a good example of the disconnect between film critics and movie goers. The critics watch so many movies, and here they see something different and they're intrigued. However, different doesn't mean good, and this movie is not good. It spans from boring to ridiculous to can't-wait-until-it's-over.
Critics fawn over the art of the film, and there indeed it may earn 8 of 10. The rest of us are interested in the entertainment of the movie, and that's where it earns 1 of 10.… Expand
12 of 19 users found this helpful127
All this user's reviews
4
argaliteNov 21, 2014
What a piece of crap. The characters are miserable losers that you do not want to know. It gets good reviews because it is about critics and actors. Lame and stupid, with no redeeming qualities.
10 of 16 users found this helpful106
All this user's reviews
3
henrickzFeb 22, 2015
I'm glad my wife and I rented this on iTunes and didn't spend the money at a theatre. I can't believe this film is rated as highly as it is. I've seen worse films but I have seldom been this disappointed. It's highly overrated. My onlyI'm glad my wife and I rented this on iTunes and didn't spend the money at a theatre. I can't believe this film is rated as highly as it is. I've seen worse films but I have seldom been this disappointed. It's highly overrated. My only thought is it's unique so all of the critics just fell in love with the idea that it's not some type of sequel, prequel, crap fest that Hollywood usually puts out. I will say this is a unique film and it's definitely different.… Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
2
skykappahFeb 24, 2015
The only reason I can think of, how people could like this film was because they were afraid of snooty alternative types calling them dumb. Really... it was crap... and for it to win an Oscar... well it figures, because awards mostly goThe only reason I can think of, how people could like this film was because they were afraid of snooty alternative types calling them dumb. Really... it was crap... and for it to win an Oscar... well it figures, because awards mostly go against the grain. Good acting by Keaton though, everybody else seemed too absorbed in the fact that they were in an Oscar baiting movie. I watched the nominated films before the awards and knew Birdman would win. So embarrassingly predictable.… Expand
8 of 13 users found this helpful85
All this user's reviews
0
franissavioFeb 22, 2015
Wow, this BIRDCRAP swept Oscar, an award made by, of , to hypocrites in Hollywood. Like the movie title says 'the unexpected virtue of ignorance'‼‼‼‼‼‼‼‼‼‼
8 of 13 users found this helpful85
All this user's reviews
0
loulou11Feb 22, 2015
This is the worst picture I had to sit through. It was depressing an not entertaining at all. Acting may have been good but the movie was one I wish I had not bothered to see.
8 of 13 users found this helpful85
All this user's reviews
9
FleshWorldOct 17, 2014
The movie starts out a little pretentiously, but after the first five minutes or so it becomes quite an extraordinary film. Michael Keaton of course does a great job but the most inspired casting was clearly Edward Norton. He hasn't beenThe movie starts out a little pretentiously, but after the first five minutes or so it becomes quite an extraordinary film. Michael Keaton of course does a great job but the most inspired casting was clearly Edward Norton. He hasn't been this good in a movie maybe since Primal Fear. Naomi Watts is also super effective in a smaller role. What makes this movie great however is the directing and the continuous shot approach. It takes the rather ordinary life of a boring old Broadway play at infuses it with a sense of energy. Not since Noises Off have I've been this wired watching a behind-the-scenes view of the Broadway show. Really good stuff, but clearly not for everyone.… Expand
12 of 20 users found this helpful128
All this user's reviews
6
The__ShowmanFeb 17, 2015
Birdman or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance is an American Black Comedy directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu. This movie is highly appreciative for it camera work and editing. Emmanuel Lubezki (Cinematographer), Douglas Crise andBirdman or The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance is an American Black Comedy directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu. This movie is highly appreciative for it camera work and editing. Emmanuel Lubezki (Cinematographer), Douglas Crise and Stephen Mirrione (Editors) deserves a big round of applause for most intensive care they took for this film as the whole movie looks like a single cut. This style of single-cut making is highly comparable to Alfred Hitchcock's 'Rope' which is an epic dramatic thriller. Although this movie 'Birdman' is touted to be a Black Comedy, it lacks that F*****g comedy because it is a drama based on a drama and what we hear most of the time is 'F**K'. You will get to know the theme of the movie at the pre-climax and it is hard for a common audience to sit 100 minutes listening to the word F**K and try to understand its meaning metaphorically. This story is about an impatient orthodox director cum actor who is trying to make a 60 year old miserable drama to reach this generation audience and believes that, it will redeem his career. Michael Keaton did a wonderful job and he is the heart and soul of this movie. But the misery is his fight with his own alternative character who is hampering him to be some other who the world really likes. This melodrama is throughout the movie and for a normal cine-goer, it is a painful watch. Do watch this movie if you want to really know how cinematography and editing looks like and if you are ardent fan of Micheal Keaton. Else forget it.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
9
foxgroveOct 17, 2014
In a world where most movie these days are generic and formulaic, Birdman is a refreshing and exciting concept. An exhilarating and inventive movie that has one licking one's lips in eager anticipation as to what will happen next.
Most ofIn a world where most movie these days are generic and formulaic, Birdman is a refreshing and exciting concept. An exhilarating and inventive movie that has one licking one's lips in eager anticipation as to what will happen next.
Most of the film takes part in and around a theatre on Broadway. Here, the actors are getting ready to open a new play which is meant to resurrect the career of Riggans (Michael Keaton). After success as a superhero called Birdman, both audiences and critics have been unable to take him seriously in any other roles. He sees this as his big chance to prove them all wrong. For Keaton, it could be said, life is imitating art. However, here he has never been better. Dispensing with his usual repertoire of tics and mannerisms he is a revelation giving possibly the year's tour de force performance. This is deserved Oscar calibre stuff. Sentiment doesn't come in to it.
He is surrounded by an intriguingly eclectic bunch of top class actors who add a fantastic dynamic to the overall picture. Edward Norton and Emma Stone shine the brightest and both have knockout scenes, but Andrea Riseborough, Naomi Watts, Amy Ryan and Zach Galfianikis are all equally exciting.
Director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu demonstrates a firm and confident hold on the material and pulls of an amazingly innovative feat by making most of the film look as if it has been shot in one continuous take. The reality is that visual effects have been at work. Never the less the result is sensational and left me awestruck at the sheer bravado on display.
The two hour running time flies past and whilst enjoying the brilliance of the actors and the maturity of great writing and technique, one is also able to applaud the wonderful cinematography, effective sound and the inspiredl, but perfectly fitting score.
It's also refreshing to have a superhero movie that is most definitely about something other than explosions, noise and special effects. This is a true original. The type of film that the cinema was made for.… Expand
11 of 19 users found this helpful118
All this user's reviews
1
amboyNov 20, 2014
This is a mixture of backstage comedy and science fiction; they don't mix. All About Eve and Batman must forever remain strangers. The result is a miserable hash that has nothing to say about creativity, fantasy, or indeed anything else.This is a mixture of backstage comedy and science fiction; they don't mix. All About Eve and Batman must forever remain strangers. The result is a miserable hash that has nothing to say about creativity, fantasy, or indeed anything else. The cast tends to mumble, and that may be a mercy. Profoundly awful.… Expand
12 of 21 users found this helpful129
All this user's reviews
4
gdog243Jan 15, 2015
I don't understand the love this movie is getting. It seems to be riding on a gimmick of shooting it on one shot, but I found it nauseating and just ok. Also, the score might be one of the most annoying scores I've heard in film in a long time.
8 of 14 users found this helpful86
All this user's reviews
5
zouz123Jan 26, 2015
I can't say it's awful and can't say it's excellent. This is is an overrated average movie that is completely forgettable. This is the type of movie that you watch once, and only once, and you may even think that it would've been better ifI can't say it's awful and can't say it's excellent. This is is an overrated average movie that is completely forgettable. This is the type of movie that you watch once, and only once, and you may even think that it would've been better if you didn't see it at all. The life of a demented Broadway actor, who gives a damn. Was completely bored and uninterested throughout the whole movie.… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
1
FairFaithFeb 21, 2015
In recent weeks I have read a number of critics reviews and recommendations for the movie and it's worthiness of an Oscar. I was also curious about the themes of art imitating life with Michael Keaton's performance, as well as a cinemaIn recent weeks I have read a number of critics reviews and recommendations for the movie and it's worthiness of an Oscar. I was also curious about the themes of art imitating life with Michael Keaton's performance, as well as a cinema verite look at fame, ego, and art. While it is true these themes were explored, it didn't seem authentic, rather just another exercise in ego for these actors and Director. This is a congratulatory piece of film making made for the critics to validate THEIR wit, intelligence and insight on what poses as Art. Hope you all had fun, but I a real ticket purchasing human thought it was a scam......… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
2
jaytcachedFeb 22, 2015
pre·ten·tious This years critics darling is like last years American Hustle good character acting in a utterly boring movie. How do these artsy idiots brainwash themselves into giving accolades to this overrated piece of **** If this ispre·ten·tious This years critics darling is like last years American Hustle good character acting in a utterly boring movie. How do these artsy idiots brainwash themselves into giving accolades to this overrated piece of **** If this is movie of the year then it was a bad year. No real laughs or cries and the ending was totally predictable and par for the course of the new trend of movies never reaching a true conclusion. **** you academy!… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
0
Bio-Machine-AbhMar 9, 2015
I literally fell asleep. Maybe at another time I could appreciate a movie like this, but ultimately it came off as overly narcissistic, basically it was by thespians, about the struggle of being a thespians, then promoted or highly rated byI literally fell asleep. Maybe at another time I could appreciate a movie like this, but ultimately it came off as overly narcissistic, basically it was by thespians, about the struggle of being a thespians, then promoted or highly rated by thespians to help their friend thespians. Nothing is wrong with that, but a film should be rated on its merit, not how much your friends like it. It also comes off as lazy writing. Autobiographical type fiction, that basically means all you have to do is write down what events happened during the day. "I woke up, took a shower, went to work, ate a sandwich."… Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
9
ArgeonOct 25, 2014
This movie is simply fascinating. It starts off being very confusing, sort of like staring at a painting 3 centimeters from it, and then as the movie continues, you zoom out and can see the entire picture. The acting is top notch, on-par withThis movie is simply fascinating. It starts off being very confusing, sort of like staring at a painting 3 centimeters from it, and then as the movie continues, you zoom out and can see the entire picture. The acting is top notch, on-par with The Master and The Godfather, and touches on many subjects, such as the pressures of theatre and the meaning of performance. It's a very thoughtful movie with a quirky style and fantastic message behind it. I cannot recommend it enough. If you want to watch some Oscars-material and want to think, don't hesitate to watch it.… Expand
9 of 16 users found this helpful97
All this user's reviews
9
kevtheobaldOct 31, 2014
If you like Black Swan or Fight Club, there is a good chance you will like Birdman. The cast is talented and delivers some great performances. The camera work is impressive. The pacing can be little slow in parts. It is not your standardIf you like Black Swan or Fight Club, there is a good chance you will like Birdman. The cast is talented and delivers some great performances. The camera work is impressive. The pacing can be little slow in parts. It is not your standard blockbuster style film. It is a nice break from those cookie cutter style films. If you are expecting a super hero flick, this is nothing of the sort. If you want a drama with good writing, good acting, and not just the same old story, this is a great choice.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
3
Loler13grJan 28, 2015
I regret every single euro I gave to watch that movie. The only good things about it was the directing and some of the performances. Other than that the plot is really boring and did not keep me interested , only the main character has anyI regret every single euro I gave to watch that movie. The only good things about it was the directing and some of the performances. Other than that the plot is really boring and did not keep me interested , only the main character has any development , the camera that follows the actors around is interesting at the beginning but gets tiring after a while and the drum effect also get annoying. IMDb claims this movie is a comedy/drama which makes things even worse since the comedic parts are really awkward and do not fit in the movie at all. Finally I was really disappointed with the ending since the movie could have finished 10 minutes earlier during the final act of the play which may not seem a lot but it would really make a difference. The only enjoyable thing other than the pop-corn was the confrontation scene between Keaton and the play critic. I would suggest watching it only so you can form your own opinion about it.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
2
royphishoohJan 19, 2015
Yet another overrated Oscar nomination. Keaton's character is interesting, but overall the film is dull and pretentious. The irony bludgeons when is should deliver a light touch.
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
3
HeiligebimbamJan 19, 2015
Maybe the euphoria surrounding this film pushed my expectations too high, but whatever the reasons I found this to be an average film. It was enjoyable, but nothing out of the ordinary. Considering that they give Oscars for a lot of rubbishMaybe the euphoria surrounding this film pushed my expectations too high, but whatever the reasons I found this to be an average film. It was enjoyable, but nothing out of the ordinary. Considering that they give Oscars for a lot of rubbish films these days, I am not surprised at the nominations, but I would not give it any awards whatsoever.… Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
8
Brent_MarchantOct 26, 2014
An audacious black comedy that speaks to our notions of what we believe constitutes love and admiration and what really matters in the end. Despite some occasional lapses in the writing and some periodic pacing issues in the first half-hour,An audacious black comedy that speaks to our notions of what we believe constitutes love and admiration and what really matters in the end. Despite some occasional lapses in the writing and some periodic pacing issues in the first half-hour, the film delivers on all other fronts, especially its biting humor, intriguing visuals and stellar performances by Michael Keaton, Edward Norton and Emma Stone. This is definitely not for everyone, but for those seeking a film that will make them laugh -- and think -- this is a terrific offering on both fronts.… Expand
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
3
Tone01Jan 15, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Look at me! My film is brilliant, the rest are crap.

While there are strokes of brilliance and humor in "Birdman," the sum effect is ennui and shock at the narcissistic disdain the director holds for audiences.

The plot is simple enough: a huge action star (Keaton) refusing to add another franchise film to his resume attempts to break away by mounting a pretentious, overstuffed play based on Raymond Carver's writings. A coterie of malcontents and neurotics abet Keaton. Using an experimental brush loaded with mysticism, surrealism and existential angst, Iñárritu follows the on and off stage drama in one take. (Acclimating to the lack of cuts takes a few moments, but an unbroken shot does not really add to this story just as it failed in Hitchcock's "Rope.")

The good is aforementioned. Unfortunately, the bad tilts the scale way over.

Partly meant as commentary about the nature of art and distilling culture to the lowest common denominator, the director beats a dead horse, resuscitates, and then beats it to death again.

Add commentary about the craft of acting on stage and film and stumbling upon success.

Ironically, those who are drawn by this big budget art film have the sophistication to realize the message already. Those who wouldn't see "Birdman" on a bet, the audience whose nose elitist Iñárritu tweaks, will never receive the message. Why should they? People like what they like, and if they like cotton candy let them go forth and eat. Only one with a huge ego – this director – would have the temerity to call anyone on their preferences.

Then add narcissistic, whining actors portraying every showbiz cliché while the film spools on and on and on.

Then add the irony of effects like those in frowned upon action tentpoles are what made the single shot possible in "Birdman."

The actors bought into this story. They give it their all and do good work, particularly Edward Norton. However, Zach Galifinakis proves he's out of his depth outside man-child roles for which he's best known. One wonders if Galifinakis was cast to prove the director's corollary.

Slow, boring, distasteful and insulting does not offer a pleasant experience. The best to be said is "Birdman" tried for heights others fear to attempt. Like Icarus, the wax melted.… Expand
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
0
TomMattJan 20, 2015
The first hour is too boring. The drums playing in the back all the time makes me wanna go home. Edward Norton was the true star in this movie, is ridiculous how the other guy is overrated. He doesn't deserve to be nominated for a Oscar.
9 of 17 users found this helpful98
All this user's reviews
9
benuttyOct 17, 2014
Birdman perfectly translates theater to screen. The film speaks as the actor, director, producer and critic all at once, examining the changing nature of fame and art and how stars cultivate it. Although at times leaving me dizzy, Lubezki'sBirdman perfectly translates theater to screen. The film speaks as the actor, director, producer and critic all at once, examining the changing nature of fame and art and how stars cultivate it. Although at times leaving me dizzy, Lubezki's effortless cinematography steals the show, while Keaton and Norton give exemplary performances. Stone is better than usual, while Watts continues to baffle. For me, the film never chooses a side on the topic of fame-whoring, but most seem to disagree.

My biggest gripe is that it should have ended elsewhere.… Expand
10 of 19 users found this helpful109
All this user's reviews
4
CalimackDec 12, 2014
What a badly paced and ill-conceived "black" comedy. Movie was too long and full of pretentious bits of "knowledge" that were "dropped" on our heads. Rather watch Todd Solondz films that don't take themselves seriously, the first step inWhat a badly paced and ill-conceived "black" comedy. Movie was too long and full of pretentious bits of "knowledge" that were "dropped" on our heads. Rather watch Todd Solondz films that don't take themselves seriously, the first step in actually being a "comedy."

Don't buy into the Oscar hype machine on this. This movie will be forgotten much like Michael Keaton's career.… Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
10
TotallyEpicHDNov 8, 2014
Although it may be a little weird, Birdman's all-star cast, great storytelling, and original plot places Birdman as one of the best films that we have seen from Fox Searchlight, and put together beautifully by Alejandro González Iñárritu.
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
1
supemoneylifeJan 25, 2015
I saw this described as a comedy but i cant say that it made me laugh even once. It seems more like some arty pose stuff to 'showcase' actors. I didnt like it tbh. I left half way thru so maybe it gets good about a hour in.
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
2
exceeder616Feb 23, 2015
THsi movie was extremely boring. The camera moved way to much, i dont care if thats artictic it blows. I really didnt even know what the hell was going one because of it.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
6
tonysopranozDec 23, 2014
this movie has very unlikeable, stupid, weird, creepy, annoying, depressing, and pretentious characters. this was probably intentional, but it makes watching the movie difficult because its very uncomfortable. you will want to punch everythis movie has very unlikeable, stupid, weird, creepy, annoying, depressing, and pretentious characters. this was probably intentional, but it makes watching the movie difficult because its very uncomfortable. you will want to punch every main character in the face because they deserve it. sometimes its hard to tell if the movie is encouraging this kind of terrible behaviour, or if it is just doing these characters very well as a way of satirizing it. if it is taken satirically, the movie goes down a lot smoother, but sometimes it seems like the movie actually wants you to take these characters seriously, which is very frustrating because they are all idiots....

however, somehow, the movie feels high quality and made me think. it wasn't a very comfortable or enjoyable experience, but it did get my mind working in ways it normally doesn't work, which was nice. so i give it a 6/10.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
michael1208Jan 26, 2015
It is not a usual drama full of dialogue or a superhero film, but the way that the screenwriters manipulate to present the whole story is surprisingly stunning. It ventures into the stage performance, film industry, the fight between theIt is not a usual drama full of dialogue or a superhero film, but the way that the screenwriters manipulate to present the whole story is surprisingly stunning. It ventures into the stage performance, film industry, the fight between the integrity and mind of the artists, the critics, the over bloating superheroes film in Hollywood; all are perfectly crafted into the life of an old actor who is struggling with his egoism in attempting to recover both his career and family. This journey of crisis, transformation, battling of stressful emotions and the inner powerful demon of himself are well played by Michael Keaton, thanks to the strong and loud jazz drum scores as well as magical, thrilling, ambitious style of delivering by Mexican director Alejandro González Iñárritu. The mind blowing and overwhelming development might make the audiences to feel that this film about art and life is imitating Nolan's style of cinematography, but the ambiguous ending has rather more complex which gives the opportunity to the audiences to decide whether to end it positively or negatively.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
unionjack26Jan 26, 2015
Firstly, I have to say it was refreshing to finally see a movie fully deserving of all the accolades and awards it's being nominated for and winning... After seeing the horrible and over-hyperd Boyhood and the lackluster Gone Girl, this was aFirstly, I have to say it was refreshing to finally see a movie fully deserving of all the accolades and awards it's being nominated for and winning... After seeing the horrible and over-hyperd Boyhood and the lackluster Gone Girl, this was a much needed glimmer of hope.

This film grabbed my attention from the get-go. It was a mish mosh of arthouse, big-budget, independent but with a theatre feel to it. I was about 5 mins in before I had to ask myself, 'Is this all one shot?!" The film flowed scene to scene effortlessly, giving the feeling of one continuous shot, a remarkable feat by director, cinematograher and editor (all deserving of awards). It gave a sort of theatre atmosphere to the film that brought you into their world and made you feel like a fly on the wall, observing but not intruding.

The dialogue was well-written and the acting performances all around were top notch. Michael Keaton is phenomenal, as he portrays an actor in the twilight and dwindling years of his career, trying to stay relevant and risking everything to do so. His alter-ego subconcious plays a significant role in his psyche that appears to affect the world around him. It gives us a glimpse into his world and allows us to better understand the character.

You can easily tell that a lot of planning, consideration, care and thought went into making this film. It's not a gimmick, but an amazing accomplishment by everyone involved in the making of. It's not a movie that needs to be explained or defended, it stands on it's own, delivers a clear message, but still leaves a little personal interpretation for the audience.

For those of us who grew up with Keaton films, there's the added nostalgia and links to his film past as the Batman and his alter-ego (Birdman) almost as a Beetlejuice feel to it. I can't say enough good things about his performance, watching him reminded me of what real acting should be and I have no doubt that his co-actors raised their game to this new standard.

The arthouse-like score blended the film together from beginning to end, giving a more anxious feeling and sense of urgency, appropriate to the scenes and story. There were few slow spots in the film, but were necessary for the audience to relax before bringing us back into the moment. The SFX were very well done and again, major kudos have to be given considering this appeared to be a single shot throughout (I'm still blown-away by it).

NYC was the perfect backdrop; the landscape and sounds virtually took me there and for 2 hours I forgot I wasn't.

This is a must-see film for anyone (except those who only like $200 million Michael Bay action/explosion-porn movies). Easily in my top 5 of all time… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
GWisahoaxJan 28, 2015
This movie is a classic, original and funny wonderful performances all round, I don't understand how anyone could give it a bad review. We need more films like this, I am sick of killer robots, this is in a class of it's own, love it,This movie is a classic, original and funny wonderful performances all round, I don't understand how anyone could give it a bad review. We need more films like this, I am sick of killer robots, this is in a class of it's own, love it, congratulations to all involved.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
Arthur_S_PoeFeb 11, 2015
I must admit that my first 'meeting' with Iñárritu turned out to be quite a fascinating experience. The concept of the movie is absolutely fantastic and it is certainly a film about art and artists, a classical literal theme transferred toI must admit that my first 'meeting' with Iñárritu turned out to be quite a fascinating experience. The concept of the movie is absolutely fantastic and it is certainly a film about art and artists, a classical literal theme transferred to the screen with such masterful skill that you can't help but admire the art.

It is a brilliantly devised black comedy, full of sardonic humor but also a very specific viewpoint that allows the viewer to look into the mind of an artist, in this case both the actor and the director, as the border between the movie and reality, between what is actually the plot of the movie and what is the artistic idea of Iñárritu, is very fluid, sometimes even non-existent. Iñárritu actually utilizes a theatrical method, a characteristic of modern theatre, thereby destroying the classical border between several aspects - the film itself, the viewers, the director, the plot and the idea. It is a metaesthetical analysis of the visual arts and Iñárritu realized it masterfully.

The acting is also a very strong aspect of the movie. All of the actors fulfill their roles brilliantly, but you cannot escape from the magical interpretations of Edward Norton and Michael Keaton. Norton, one of my favourite actors, is absolutely amazing, is a cynic and a bohemian, a master of the theatre enjoying the praise of a master actor, of a true artist positioned above the more popular yet artistically weaker Michael Keaton, whose Riggan Thomson is trying to revitalize his career and find true artistic meaning through the theatre, an institution so familiar to Norton's brilliant Mike Shiner. It is an absolute shame that Norton found himself alongside the brilliant J.K. Simmons this year (a sure victor at the Oscars), because he undoubtedly delivered an Oscar-winning performance. The same goes for Michael Keaton, who, in addition to that, certainly delivered the role of his career. His Golden Globe-winning performance is an absolute hit, in every way adapted to the idea Iñárritu envisioned with this film and certainly an internal battle for Keaton himself, who had to wait up until now to deliver such a dramatically and artistically strong role. Riggan Thomson is a psychologically polarized actor, an ex-star realized through shallow superhero roles, looking to prove to the world and to himself that he is wroth something, that he is actually an actor. His internal struggle, his obsession and his self-devouring psyche - all of them brilliantly portrayed by the excellent Keaton who managed to give us a look into a very specific mental construction (I thought to myself - now I finally know what went through Heath Ledger's mind before his tragic death).

Iñárritu has also presented us with a very specific aesthetic in 'Birdman', a very gentle approach to the technical and visual realization of the film combined with a series of surreal elements that wonderfully add up to the concept itself, thereby creating a magnificent blend only a few selected directors can create.

To conclude, 'Birdman' is truly a wonderful movie with a very specific set of exceptional strengths that are masterfully combined with a strong crew and a powerful idea. It is a surrealist retelling of a psychological process often foreign to the common viewer, but nonetheless amazing and wonderful.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
DoovdahFeb 12, 2015
Didn't know really what to expect going along to see this, and I have to say I was pleasantly surprised. Keaton plays his part very well indeed, and the supporting cast are great.

The visuals are quite mesmerizing too. Happy to recommend it.
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
5
BshopDec 7, 2014
Hard to watch. Maybe I'm not as entertained by theater, but this movie seemed to blend the fantasy with reality.
Keaton plays a mixed up character, with a host of equally messed up family/co-stars on the stage.
In the end, some surprises IHard to watch. Maybe I'm not as entertained by theater, but this movie seemed to blend the fantasy with reality.
Keaton plays a mixed up character, with a host of equally messed up family/co-stars on the stage.
In the end, some surprises I was not expecting, but kinda hard to watch and stay entertained.
Then again, I've never really like "theater-type" productions, so maybe a little biased.
In summary, see it if you like theater or the draw of "Broadway" production. Otherwise, wait for the rental to see it, if at all.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
DavidV293Mar 2, 2015
It was okay. Is not the type of movie that you could watch again over and over. But it's an average comedy with great Performances by Michael Keaton And Ed Norton. Emma Stone also did a great job
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
0
Notacritic13Aug 6, 2020
Worst film ever in the history if mankind cannot believe I sat through this. I have no idea what it’s about and have wiped it from my mind.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
9
TheQuietGamerJun 28, 2015
Hilarious, compelling, thought-provoking, and more than a little bat crap crazy. "Birdman" is satire of the film industry, celebrity life, and all the insanity that goes with it. With stunning performances all around, excellent writing, bigHilarious, compelling, thought-provoking, and more than a little bat crap crazy. "Birdman" is satire of the film industry, celebrity life, and all the insanity that goes with it. With stunning performances all around, excellent writing, big laughs, and stunning direction this is a must see.

The biggest area where it succeeds though is that it speaks to everyone. We all want to feel loved and important. Special even. That force inside of us that drive us to achieve that feeling is the driving force behind this film. It's also the force that drove all of this film's characters to edge and said "it's up to you from here. Make the jump or fall and die." It's an emotional complex and intelligent film.

The way it talks about movie goers attention spans and what succeeds at the box office is sure to step on some toes. Yes, big blockbuster action movies do get more attention than more thoughtful dramas like, but what's the big deal? We pay for entertainment so shouldn't we get that rather than being bored out of our minds while some filmmaker preaches at us for two hours? While some of it's messages seem a little pretentious the film is unbelievably aware of this and even calls itself out on it. Regardless of how you feel regarding writer and director Alejandro González Iñárritu's views you can't say the film won't get you thinking.

What about what he has to say in regards to reviews? The labels we put on people's work. It certainly points out how hurtful and meaningless the reviews of both professional and us wannabe reviewers can be to the people behind what is being reviewed. It is our right to tell how we feel about a piece of entertainment, but do we have to be so darn cruel about it? Especially to those with a different view than our own?

This fim brings up plenty of interesting topics that you will dwell on for quite a long time if you have any interest in movies outside of shear entertainment factor. However all of that intelligence Birdman shows ultimately results to nothing if the movie isn't enjoyable to watch. Luckily the movie succeeds. With captivating performances all around, particularly from Keaton and Norton, and absolutely hilarious moments this is one that will keep comedy fans rolling on the floor with laughter. You also really begin to care about these characters and their plots as the film progresses. Before it's over you are emotionally invested.

Did I mention the soundtrack? Jazz has never been better utilized as far as I'm concerned. The special effects are awesome. They add a sense of craziness and unpredictability to the film. You never know when Keaton's powers are going to show up and put a whole new spin on things. They are used to excellently capture the character's insanity.

Birdman succeeds in just about every category. You may be able to predict a certain plot element that takes place near the end (you know exactly how Keaton's character is going to end his play before the big reveal), but for the most part it's an unpredictable ride. One with hilarity and originality all around. Simply put, this is one you should highly consider seeing.

I give "Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)" a 9.3/10.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
truckproductionApr 6, 2015
Wow! Absolutely incredible filmmaking here. The film perfectly captures the narcissism and obsession that comes with a career in the creative arts. The cinematography was perfection. And every actor and actress in the picture was at the topWow! Absolutely incredible filmmaking here. The film perfectly captures the narcissism and obsession that comes with a career in the creative arts. The cinematography was perfection. And every actor and actress in the picture was at the top of their game. This film will be remembered for decades. Bravo!… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
DanBurritoMar 11, 2016
This is a gripping and visually brilliant black comedy with an outstanding performance from Michael Keaton. The film gives a deep and painfully honest portrayal of the nature of stardom and fame, as well as the growing fear of irrelevancyThis is a gripping and visually brilliant black comedy with an outstanding performance from Michael Keaton. The film gives a deep and painfully honest portrayal of the nature of stardom and fame, as well as the growing fear of irrelevancy that we all face. Michael Keaton was magnetic. I can't work out why he didn't win an Oscar. He deserved it! The rest of the cast were also brilliant- Emma Stone, Edward Norton and Zach Galifinakis were just a few of the mesmerising performances in the film. The cinematography was excellent. The only real gripe is that some of it was a bit hard to understand- I became a little confused about which parts were real and which parts were the main character's hallucinations. Still, it was a brilliant and often funny film that truly deserved the Best Picture Oscar. Overall, a great movie.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
The3AcademySinsOct 20, 2017
A spectacular film from beginning to end. A masterclass in directing, acting, cinematography, sound design, and writing. This is a film that I believe our society will keep coming back to for years to come. Birdman is a modern-day classic.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
Knux0rzFeb 28, 2015
This movie is not for people who enjoy movies. It is for people who would interpret a black & white video of a rat as a metaphor for America's sins. Not enjoyable in any way, not funny, not dramatic. The movie made me feel uncomfortable andThis movie is not for people who enjoy movies. It is for people who would interpret a black & white video of a rat as a metaphor for America's sins. Not enjoyable in any way, not funny, not dramatic. The movie made me feel uncomfortable and bored the entire time. Also, I feel like the trailers for the movie should qualify as false advertising. 0/10, worst movie of the decade.… Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
4
JonDocJan 27, 2015
This one trick pony of a movie might appeal to self-referential AKtors or theatre luvvies but most normal people will find this a bit of a chore. It feels like a play (no cuts, see?) and had a few fleeting moments of interest but why theyThis one trick pony of a movie might appeal to self-referential AKtors or theatre luvvies but most normal people will find this a bit of a chore. It feels like a play (no cuts, see?) and had a few fleeting moments of interest but why they hell couldn't they hire a proper screen writer and editor?… Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
0
raporgiJan 11, 2016
boring tripe. Its basically a rip on Death of a Salesman. I was expecting it to be some sort of weird movie about Michael Keaton being schizo and acting **** to people but no its a puddle deep drama which underutilizes the cast. Disappointing.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
0
FILMCRITIC22Feb 23, 2015
Honestly this movie doesn't deserve to win anything! It is SO BAD that when I saw it in theaters back in December, I yawned 15 times then left disappointingly. The Script was terrible, Storyline awful and the acting- I have never Emma Stone'sHonestly this movie doesn't deserve to win anything! It is SO BAD that when I saw it in theaters back in December, I yawned 15 times then left disappointingly. The Script was terrible, Storyline awful and the acting- I have never Emma Stone's acting be so horrible that this is definitely her worst movie that she has ever done! I can't even sleep knowing that this piece of garbage won best film of 2014. What was the Hollywood Foreign Press and The Academy of Motion Pictures and Science thinking by having this film win best picture!?… Expand
6 of 14 users found this helpful68
All this user's reviews
0
vickyxs12Feb 22, 2015
Worst waste of time ever. Bad acting, bad plot, bad directing, bad edit, bad script, with empty scenes. The main character is a psycho-loser with a huge ego, just like the actor who plays it. Just awful.
6 of 14 users found this helpful68
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

87 Critic Reviews

8.2 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL