User Score
3.5

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 8685 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    This game is **** They've all been the same since CoD4 and all you god damn sheep still buy them. Grow up and get a mans game like Skyrim or BF3. CoD is killing itself and you need to realize that.
  2. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    worst call of dutyworst call of duty ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Expand
  3. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    There is a reason this game has such a low user score. The game is an utter disapointment, and this is from a series fan who has been playing cod since it first started. Most of the assault rifles sound the same, the map design on multiplayer is horrible, the animations are exactly the same from COD4, most of the emblems and call signs are exactly the same from mw2, all the same soundThere is a reason this game has such a low user score. The game is an utter disapointment, and this is from a series fan who has been playing cod since it first started. Most of the assault rifles sound the same, the map design on multiplayer is horrible, the animations are exactly the same from COD4, most of the emblems and call signs are exactly the same from mw2, all the same sound effects when you level up, same voices. The only good things about this game are the spec ops, but that's not saying very much at ALL. The campaign was also dissapointing for all the hype it was getting. It's really obvious that this game took a huge hit when half of infinity ward left. When it comes to graphics, there is only minor polish. Not much at all. Sure this game has sold insane, but now I think fans are just tired of the same old thing year after year. COD is eventually going to end up the same as guitar hero and tony hawk: a dead franchise. I read some of the user scores, and a lot of you are saying exactly what I'm saying, but yet you still give it 9s and 10s. If that doesn't scream fanboy I don't know what does. It's been a long run with COD since the beginning, but MW3 is the last COD game I will ever buy. Save your money for skyrim, arkham city, or uncharted 3. Plenty of other games out that are way better. Expand
  4. Nov 11, 2011
    2
    The game is identical to Modern Warfare 2. The maps are uninspired and all very similar in scale and layout. If they wanted to sell it for $30 it would make a lot more sense, but instead they are making people pay an additional $50 a year to get extra maps and stat tracking that has been free on games in the past (Halo 2, World At War, etc.). Overall the game has very poor value forThe game is identical to Modern Warfare 2. The maps are uninspired and all very similar in scale and layout. If they wanted to sell it for $30 it would make a lot more sense, but instead they are making people pay an additional $50 a year to get extra maps and stat tracking that has been free on games in the past (Halo 2, World At War, etc.). Overall the game has very poor value for anyone who has ever played a shooter in the past (specifically Modern Warfare 2). Expand
  5. Nov 11, 2011
    5
    Well, well, well. It's another year and here we have another COD game. Also want to welcome back Infinity Ward and what is left of their staff after all those "creative guys" left to form their own studio. Thanks, Activision. You rule. Well, here is how it goes. The campaign is more of the same. You play multiple characters as you make your way through a story of what can only beWell, well, well. It's another year and here we have another COD game. Also want to welcome back Infinity Ward and what is left of their staff after all those "creative guys" left to form their own studio. Thanks, Activision. You rule. Well, here is how it goes. The campaign is more of the same. You play multiple characters as you make your way through a story of what can only be described as "sensory overload" of having to move from point A to point B while shooting pockets of seemingly endless spawning bad guys. Long story short, I got the feeling of been there, done that. Even de ja' vu at times. Story won't blow your mind; however, it does do it's best to tie up loose ends in this trilogy. If you loved the previous two games, you will like this. Can be a little "samey, samey". You know, like Michael Cera's movie characters. Seen him in one movie and that is what you can expect in every single movie you will ever see him in. The multiplayer is more of the same, as well. If you like the previous games, you will like this one; but, may experience some burnout if you were on your way there in previous installments. At this point, I am digging it; but, I will see how many more "Michael Cera characters" I can stomach before it becomes just annoying. Expand
  6. Nov 11, 2011
    1
    "If I was 13, I might like this game."

    Okay, so this is my first time posting on this site and my first time ever really criticizing the call of duty franchise. To be honest, I was really hoping for something awesome here. I gave the last game they sold a pass because I thought they were just going to make up for it on this one. here's the thing, this game is exactly like the last
    "If I was 13, I might like this game."

    Okay, so this is my first time posting on this site and my first time ever really criticizing the call of duty franchise. To be honest, I was really hoping for something awesome here. I gave the last game they sold a pass because I thought they were just going to make up for it on this one. here's the thing, this game is exactly like the last three games I have played. So much so that it takes away from the fun and originality that could have been possible with any amount of risk taking or changes in the game. The fast-pace arcade style game just got even more fast paced, and now feels almost like a cartoon. I mean sure, when your standing still the graphics are pretty amazing, but who stands still in this game? Who even has the skills to stand still in this game? People stop caring about graphics when they are trying to rack up as many kills as possible in a constantly moving dead space. I gave it a try I really did. Maybe I'm growing old (being a huge fan of the ww2 based call of duty 3). I've seen it through the last 7 years, I've watched the COD game creators turn from genius and uninhibited fun makers, to plain Janes - who milk cows dry (for the simple fact they can).

    Please, Please, Please change it up and create some kind of monument that amazes the world! Not just another paved road.
    Expand
  7. Nov 11, 2011
    5
    ahh why critics why did you give this game so much positive feed back the only things they did was add a map pack in the multiplayer added some tweaks to guns and killstreaks. The story line yes the game is good for the story line is good and have some memorable moments but overall its just the same game as modern warfare 2. Over all the game is a meh for me.
  8. Nov 11, 2011
    5
    First, I would like to say that I had this game on pre-order for some time and have owned ALL of the COD games on the XBOX360. I can truly say, as a fan of the COD series, I am disappointed with MW3. Yes it had the elements that I enjoyed from MW2, but to me it seemed more like an add-on than a new game. All in all, it is more of the same and if you liked MW2 then you will like MW3. IfFirst, I would like to say that I had this game on pre-order for some time and have owned ALL of the COD games on the XBOX360. I can truly say, as a fan of the COD series, I am disappointed with MW3. Yes it had the elements that I enjoyed from MW2, but to me it seemed more like an add-on than a new game. All in all, it is more of the same and if you liked MW2 then you will like MW3. If you are looking for something different, like most of us were, then save your money. Expand
  9. Nov 11, 2011
    9
    First off, I don't understand what all the 0's are about. Sure, the game isn't revolutionary, bringing innovation after innovation; however, it's still a very enjoyable game. For those who are browsing these reviews looking at all the negatives, I advise you to ignore them. They're either trolls or people who get kicks out of venting their anger. Either way, no game deserves a 0 unless itFirst off, I don't understand what all the 0's are about. Sure, the game isn't revolutionary, bringing innovation after innovation; however, it's still a very enjoyable game. For those who are browsing these reviews looking at all the negatives, I advise you to ignore them. They're either trolls or people who get kicks out of venting their anger. Either way, no game deserves a 0 unless it is completely broken or unplayable from the start, which it surely isn't. With that being said, if you're thinking about getting this game, ask yourself: "do I enjoy Call of Duty multiplayer?" If the answer is yes, then you will enjoy this game. It's as simple as that. The multiplayer does have new features; they're not mindblowing, but they are there. There are new maps, weapons, perks, killstreaks, etc. Call it Modern Warfare 2.5, an expansion pack, or a clone if you wish. The fact is, the multiplayer experience was already a good system, which they improved upon. It's more accessible to new players while still retaining its appeal to hardcore players. the ONLY--and I do mean only--complaint I have of the game is concerning the maps. Most of them are small, filled with buildings that cater to CQC players such as SMG/Shotgun users.

    As the old adage goes, don't fix what ain't broken.
    Expand
  10. Nov 11, 2011
    0
    I am a huge MW fan since COD 4 when they took many hours of my life away, but this game is somewhat of a let down and my main grip is quick scoping, and the nuke two stupid things that do not add anything to the game. I'm not looking for a realistic warfare simulation, but I also don't want to see nukes from campers and quick scoping is just ridiculous. I'm sure I"ll spend time playing,I am a huge MW fan since COD 4 when they took many hours of my life away, but this game is somewhat of a let down and my main grip is quick scoping, and the nuke two stupid things that do not add anything to the game. I'm not looking for a realistic warfare simulation, but I also don't want to see nukes from campers and quick scoping is just ridiculous. I'm sure I"ll spend time playing, but a huge disappointment nothing new, might as well came out with a map pack for mw2 and a few new perk / gun options. Expand
  11. Nov 17, 2011
    0
    Crap from start to finish, soul-less cash in. and LOL at the MW3 developers twittering to their supporters to come and give mw3 a good score. pathetic. dont buy this game, dont support lazy, cash in, console ports like this trash
  12. Nov 15, 2011
    2
    I guess I'm kinda a COD fan still, even after allot of disappointment in the past....and well still not impressed even with mw3's release. They really could have done so much better...essentially what I'm seeing is activision juicing every last bit of $$ and making fools out of the consumers because there in a good position to do so. they asked for a honest review on twitter, they got it!I guess I'm kinda a COD fan still, even after allot of disappointment in the past....and well still not impressed even with mw3's release. They really could have done so much better...essentially what I'm seeing is activision juicing every last bit of $$ and making fools out of the consumers because there in a good position to do so. they asked for a honest review on twitter, they got it! why is it that activision have to request for people to give a supposed "honest review" when really there calling for all the fanboys to give a biased review? so that they can potentially get sales up? these reviews do not benefit the people, they just set the fundemental basics up to take advantage of even more people while they still have the ability to do so...cash cow! I would have given a 4/10 but due to there unethical marketing its now a 2/10 Expand
  13. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    For people expecting a completely new experience, prepare to be disappointed. This game is basically a DLC for Modern Warfare 2. I hate to say this is what has become of the amazing game, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. For a Call of Duty game, this is pretty good. Not the best *cough* CoD 4 *cough* but it does it well enough. But for a FPS in 2011? No. It needs work. A dated engine,For people expecting a completely new experience, prepare to be disappointed. This game is basically a DLC for Modern Warfare 2. I hate to say this is what has become of the amazing game, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. For a Call of Duty game, this is pretty good. Not the best *cough* CoD 4 *cough* but it does it well enough. But for a FPS in 2011? No. It needs work. A dated engine, terrible physics, lackluster campaign and cut-and-paste multiplayer make this game an unworthy launch for 2011. It's been said for the last year, and it almost must be compared to Battlefield 3. A game that brings a fresh look at how massive multiplayer can be done with an amazing engine releasing a couple of weeks before this copy-and-paste shooter leaves much to be desired. Will Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 sell more copies, sure. But sales don't equate value. If you're a fan of the series, go ahead and pick it up, I'm sure you will, anyway. But I can't recommend this to anyone I know. Expand
  14. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Hey guys remember the days when games were like £40 and each sequel brought new changes and were far superior to there predecessors,well that time has died with Activision and Call of Duty. Since MW changed the genre hugely by adding perks etc, only WaW has really added anything (zombie mode). Now little kids spend £50 every year to buy CoD when all it is is aHey guys remember the days when games were like £40 and each sequel brought new changes and were far superior to there predecessors,well that time has died with Activision and Call of Duty. Since MW changed the genre hugely by adding perks etc, only WaW has really added anything (zombie mode). Now little kids spend £50 every year to buy CoD when all it is is a re-skin of the previous game, a cash in. We need to send that message that it is not ok to just give a game a new look every year and call it a sequel. Expand
  15. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Dear Glen Schofield,

    Next time you want a high Metacritic score, consider making an original and interesting game. Here's some tips: avoid making the exact same game as you did two years ago; stop re-using textures from previous games; try and create some original graphics; introduce something different in multiplayer; stop using the same old (rubbish) sounds etc etc. In short, stop
    Dear Glen Schofield,

    Next time you want a high Metacritic score, consider making an original and interesting game. Here's some tips: avoid making the exact same game as you did two years ago; stop re-using textures from previous games; try and create some original graphics; introduce something different in multiplayer; stop using the same old (rubbish) sounds etc etc.

    In short, stop cashing in on the success of your previous games by making the same thing to sell to the inebriates that can't understand what you're doing, and next time come up with something interesting and original.
    Expand
  16. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Im sorry but this game looks like just one big ole patch that could've been done over xbl. Its the same damn game with a little bit of difference, and no not graphics wise. I took mine back and got Skyrim. Sorry COD you have failed me....and also a lot of other people. It's pretty sad when a developer of this game has to beg it's users to up the score. Anyway, yeah at least Halo changed upIm sorry but this game looks like just one big ole patch that could've been done over xbl. Its the same damn game with a little bit of difference, and no not graphics wise. I took mine back and got Skyrim. Sorry COD you have failed me....and also a lot of other people. It's pretty sad when a developer of this game has to beg it's users to up the score. Anyway, yeah at least Halo changed up in pretty much every game Bungie put out to the world. Back to BF3 though...you dissapoint me MW3. Expand
  17. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Poor excuse for a squeal, just one very expensive map pack really. Its incredibly unfair on consumers to charge such excessive prices for such little content.
  18. Nov 12, 2011
    2
    MW3 fails to meet my expectations. Pros are that multiplayer weapons are somewhat different to MW2, still proving to be more "modern-like" which is good. Also Special Ops has actually been a major improvement (the only reason i rate it 2/10). Singleplayer - didn't expect it to be amazing as most fps multiplayer games tend to be short and just a "glimpse" of the overall game. Storyline wasMW3 fails to meet my expectations. Pros are that multiplayer weapons are somewhat different to MW2, still proving to be more "modern-like" which is good. Also Special Ops has actually been a major improvement (the only reason i rate it 2/10). Singleplayer - didn't expect it to be amazing as most fps multiplayer games tend to be short and just a "glimpse" of the overall game. Storyline was good though. Cons are that the maps are too small. Very hard to get killstreaks and feels way too rushed. As a fan of both MW2 and BO, i think the game's dynamics were changed too much. I would've preferred multiplayer to be just an upgrade of MW2, including changes to the levels and killstreaks and a few tweaks to the perks. The thing with franchise releases is that we learn to love them for what they are, so why change that??? This game is like the reject child of the family, rushed out too early & failing to meet 2011 benchmarks. This game feels oddly strange to play, even though it's part of the Call of Duty series it's nothing like the predecessors. Also the fact that you have to wait to level up before the better perks are available, given that you get little ammo for weapons to begin with and the perks are in the wrong sequence. Big shame to the developers of this game as it hasn't lived up to the hype. Hard to say if the franchise should make big changes or not to the series, I for one prefer just an "upgrade" rather than major changes. My vote goes to BF3 this year for the better FPS shooter. Expand
  19. Nov 12, 2011
    1
    Search and Destroy is now TERRIBLE!!!! The maps are sooo small and boring it sucks because thats the only game mode I played......why not fix quick scoping it takes skill out the game an its just makes the game feel water down....The campaign is so over the top .......it doesnt feel authentic.......the A.I is bad they run n gun like bullets dont mean anything .....Im now a battlefield 3Search and Destroy is now TERRIBLE!!!! The maps are sooo small and boring it sucks because thats the only game mode I played......why not fix quick scoping it takes skill out the game an its just makes the game feel water down....The campaign is so over the top .......it doesnt feel authentic.......the A.I is bad they run n gun like bullets dont mean anything .....Im now a battlefield 3 fan a first but a nice transition from this mess Expand
  20. Nov 21, 2011
    9
    This is my honest review based on how I feel about MW3 after playing it for 20+ hours, not based on the manufactured rivalry between MW3 and Battlefield 3. The rivalry was made up by EA to sell games. If you want to hear about their game, go to the BF3 review page. If you want to hear about MW3, read on. They're both perfectly good games, so play whatever you like.

    This review is based
    This is my honest review based on how I feel about MW3 after playing it for 20+ hours, not based on the manufactured rivalry between MW3 and Battlefield 3. The rivalry was made up by EA to sell games. If you want to hear about their game, go to the BF3 review page. If you want to hear about MW3, read on. They're both perfectly good games, so play whatever you like.

    This review is based only on MW3's multiplayer. At the time of this review, I'm still only a few hours into the campaign, I haven't touched Spec Ops, but I've invested 20+ hours in multiplayer. That's how I play every Call of Duty game. I bought the game specifically for the multiplayer, and for me that was worth the $60 USD. I personally wouldn't advise anyone to buy a COD game only for the single player campaign. I always play the campaign eventually, and enjoy it, but I don't think a COD campaign is worth the full $60 USD investment. Most of the campaigns are a 10 hour, very linear, but very cinematic experience.

    MW3's multiplayer is the most balanced and fully realized of all of the COD games that I've played. While we all have a particular iteration of the series that we've put the most hours into and feel the most attached to, MW3 feels the most clean and equitable after years of tweaking in the series. If you can still burn hundreds of hours on the multiplayer, or if this is your first COD game, I highly recommend it for the multiplayer experience alone. If you're burned out on COD multiplayer or never liked it to begin with, then there's no reason to buy this one.
    Expand
  21. Nov 12, 2011
    3
    There is nothing suspicious about low review scores, MW3 is garbage! The only reason i gave it a 3 is because i get to shoot my friends in their face online. Otherwise, it would be a 0 !! They got rid of personalized emblems for the same old tired mw2 emblems and titles! Lame! They beefed up the guns and made them louder and faster, which is great but i have to shoot someone three timesThere is nothing suspicious about low review scores, MW3 is garbage! The only reason i gave it a 3 is because i get to shoot my friends in their face online. Otherwise, it would be a 0 !! They got rid of personalized emblems for the same old tired mw2 emblems and titles! Lame! They beefed up the guns and made them louder and faster, which is great but i have to shoot someone three times in the face to get a kill, and at distance at least 5 times. The maps are terrible, complain all you want about WAW and BO but treyarch had great maps. Scenery is blurry, hectic and the elevations are ridiculous, you cant climb except stairs! Kill streaks have been changed to allow objective focused players some benefits (thank you)! Problem is now every 10 seconds theres another chopper or reaper or stealth bomber. Activision has let this game drown in its past glory, like that idiot guy you see around town driving the same car since 1983, because back then it was the coolest car on the street. Unfortunately you cant tell them that because their blind to the truth. This game is worn down, out of date and in need of an innovative over haul. I recommend do not buy this game at a store! There will be a million on ebay by the months end.! Expand
  22. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    New box art, same sad game. MW2 was bad enough then they repackaged it and called it "MW3". Very disappointing, they should offer refunds. They spent more time on marketing and coming up with stupid themed accessories than they did coming with something new for the actual game. They recycled entire buildings!
  23. Nov 12, 2011
    0
    Wow... just finished the single player... Everything was; Wave->kill, Wave2-kill, run up 5 steps, Wave3-kill, Wave 4-kill, cut scene.

    Battlefield 3 has a better camp IMO, not good enough, but better.

    MW2 Single player is better than this by far, and also better than BF3.

    Bad game MW3, only thing improved is the methods to induce addiction.
  24. Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I remember playing this game in 2007, but I think it was called COD4. This games formula is staid to say the least, but I have to wonder what it might have really been like if Infinity Ward hadn't imploded. Oh, and it is a 0 because I don't think a map pack should cost $60.
  25. Nov 13, 2011
    0
    I'm sorry but this game is just an absolute piece of crap, soooo disappointed. The campaign is the same as always **** well boring, you always just hide somewhere kill a load of people, move some where else, kill another load. You have like 1 or 2 missions that are fun. The game online as well as the campaign is just repetitive, run and gun, its as boring as hell. Maps are crap, its just aI'm sorry but this game is just an absolute piece of crap, soooo disappointed. The campaign is the same as always **** well boring, you always just hide somewhere kill a load of people, move some where else, kill another load. You have like 1 or 2 missions that are fun. The game online as well as the campaign is just repetitive, run and gun, its as boring as hell. Maps are crap, its just a terrible game. I really wouldn't recommend the game to anyone. This really pissed me off, I was expecting great things, but it was just bull. I have played all of the Call of Duty games, and this is the worst, by far, and they are that desperate to get better ratings, someone from sledgehammer twittered people to put in high ratings or something like that! This game sucks massive sweaty balls, and so does everyone that helped made it. Expand
  26. Nov 14, 2011
    0
    Played ANY cod game before? then you will have seen everything on offer.
    Fan of MW1? rinse, repeat and save yourself a few quid.

    Doesn't even have the benefit of mouse and keyboard LOL.
  27. Nov 21, 2011
    8
    Okay, most people are going to say that I'm a little kid for writing a good review for a bad game and that I should go get a life, but honestly just think about it. CoD 4 great game, WaW great game, but then what? We got greedy and pissy, we wanted more and more and more. We, the gamers pushed the creators to a breaking point. We gotta stop with all the complaints that most creators can'tOkay, most people are going to say that I'm a little kid for writing a good review for a bad game and that I should go get a life, but honestly just think about it. CoD 4 great game, WaW great game, but then what? We got greedy and pissy, we wanted more and more and more. We, the gamers pushed the creators to a breaking point. We gotta stop with all the complaints that most creators can't help with. For example, quickscoping, it's not that bad and the creators can't stop it, adding sway and slowing down scope speed wont do anything to stop it. Besides, everyone has faster and easier guns to use instead of a sniper and can kill "quickscopers" easy, if you cant your just bad and GTFO. I'm sorry to say but Infinity Ward is like the dad and we're the pissy little daughters who keep asking for money, just love the game and embrace it, I made the same mistake of saying this game was bad and was going to be bad so I bought a different game and rented MW3, worst mistake, MW3 is way better than I expected. 8.8/10 only because I only played for 3 hours but I enjoyed it. Expand
  28. Nov 17, 2011
    0
    While the game is decent to someone who never played MW1 or MW2 the simple fact is that the game is MW2 with very minor adjustments. The fact that this game made world records in selling almost 10million copies in it's first 24hrs is even more infuriating. We waited 2 years for this piece of **** copy game? Hell no, I will not buy this game till it is inevitably 20$ pre-owned at gamestopWhile the game is decent to someone who never played MW1 or MW2 the simple fact is that the game is MW2 with very minor adjustments. The fact that this game made world records in selling almost 10million copies in it's first 24hrs is even more infuriating. We waited 2 years for this piece of **** copy game? Hell no, I will not buy this game till it is inevitably 20$ pre-owned at gamestop by Christmas. Infinity Ward you honestly think this is going to be forgotten? 2 years from now you will regret **** us over when you make news again by getting outsold by the newest Mario in the first 24 hours. All in all, MW3, huge disappointment, but I guess we can't have Skyrim, AC: Revelations, Uncharted3, Batman, AND a good COD game come out. Thank you for showing that you don't give a **** about us Infinity Ward.

    Sincerely, Ex-COD Fanboy.
    Expand
  29. Nov 14, 2011
    0
    If you've played the original modern warfare out modern warfare 2 you've played modern warfare 3. Nothing new here same cheaters in multiplayer that can be found in the first games are in this game, no new game play is ask the same. Go rent our wait a couple of months and buy used from Gamestop for half the price if you must but don't waste $70 on this piece of crap.
  30. Nov 14, 2011
    0
    This game is horrible and is a disgrace to COD 4. I have been a modernwarfare fan since that iteration and I keep getting let down with this shovel ware
Metascore
88

Generally favorable reviews - based on 81 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 79 out of 81
  2. Negative: 0 out of 81
  1. Jan 11, 2012
    85
    Ultimately, Modern Warfare 3 feels similar to it's brethren, but that doesn't mean it isn't a great game. The single player element is still exciting, and multiplayer has more options than ever – if you're a fan of Call of Duty, Modern Warfare 3 is a no brainer.
  2. Dec 28, 2011
    84
    Modern Warfare 3, while still an excellent thrill ride in its own right, feels far too similar to MW2 or even Black Ops for my taste.
  3. I never expected Modern Warfare 3 to go toe-to-toe with EA's juggernaut this year, but it came out of the gates with a tour de force campaign and co-op mode. It loses points with a perhaps too-familiar multiplayer that caters to the juvenile on Xbox Live; though don't be mistaken, Modern Warfare 3 is one hell of a shooter and a highlight for a series that just won't die – no matter how much we wish it bloody would, at times.