User Score
3.6

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1479 Ratings

User score distribution:
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Nov 8, 2021
    7
    This is one of the most 7/10 games I've ever played. Solid, but forgettable. Classic Sledgehammer.
  2. Nov 17, 2021
    7
    Campaign : 5 Hours on Regular Difficulty. All-Around One of the Weakest CoD Campaign Since CoD Ghosts/BO3. Level Designs, Gameplay Design, Presentation. Campaign is Just a Slightly Better Battlefield 1-V War Stories. Big Missed Opportunity To Tell an Alternative Post-WW2 Story. You Are Literally Flashbacking The 4 Main Characters. They All Have Unique Personalities But Not That InterestingCampaign : 5 Hours on Regular Difficulty. All-Around One of the Weakest CoD Campaign Since CoD Ghosts/BO3. Level Designs, Gameplay Design, Presentation. Campaign is Just a Slightly Better Battlefield 1-V War Stories. Big Missed Opportunity To Tell an Alternative Post-WW2 Story. You Are Literally Flashbacking The 4 Main Characters. They All Have Unique Personalities But Not That Interesting To Fell Connected to Them. You Are Again Fighting Against Nazis Like %99.8 of Entire WW2 Games. Eastern Front and SSCB ? No, They Aren't There. İt is 1 Soviet Sniper vs Nazi Army in Stalingrad. Unfortunately A lot of Missed Opportunities. İf You Are Planning to Play Only Campaign, I Would Recommend Call of Duty WW2 (2017) Which is Made By Same Developer.

    Multiplayer : Best Feature of The Game İs MP. Good Content, A Lot Things to Grind Even İn The Pre-Season and a Developer (Sledgehammer Games) That Keep Consistently Listens the Community Unlike İnfinity Ward. One of the Best Launched CoD Game Ever. Some Maps Are Way too Big But I Would Say 10/16 Maps Are Good For Fast Pace Yet Game Still Feels Slow on 6v6 on Some Maps. İs İt a Better MW ? Yes, in a lot of Way, With its Own Identity. İt's Like Between MW19 and CW.

    Zombies : Weakest Feature of the Game. Can Compete Against MW19 Spec-Ops. Terrible Co-Op Experience, No Replayability, No Round Based Map. İt Feels Like They Made This Mode in 2 Months. I Was Planning to Grind for Zombies Camos But I Will Not After Seeing This Mess. Sorry For All The Zombies Community. Just Wait for a Discount and New Updates For Now.
    Expand
  3. May 8, 2022
    7
    Good story but short, classic gameplay, nice graphics with some framedrops.
  4. Nov 6, 2021
    7
    Could be way more and way better, but it is what it is i guess. Better than many previous cods if that says anything...
  5. Jan 18, 2022
    7
    SP is good, but story could be better and more history accurate. It feels a bit to shallow. Also the poltical influence is not helping at all...
    MP is not as fun as in other COD games. Maps are too small and there are way to many power positions. It just not fun to play unless you´re going to camp or use power positions..
  6. Nov 19, 2021
    7
    Tem algumas armas que o sentido delas é meio estranho, tipo, poder recarregar uma panzer
    Faz nada de sentido.
    Fora uns furos na história que tem
  7. Nov 14, 2021
    7
    it’s alright- if your got a spare £70 and want something to pass a few hours then go for it
  8. Nov 15, 2021
    7
    It has been a long time since I played a CoD game. The story is fine but the length of it is short. I tried the Zombie part as well. I believe that it would be much more fun if you play with a friend when you want to play this mode.
  9. Nov 20, 2021
    7
    This is a solid multiplayer game. It’s a cross between MW(2019) and WAW with a little punkish alt history vibe. The gameplay is fast and fluid, weapons are absurd but fun. Overall a pretty decent title in the COD library. There are a few bugs you’ll occasionally run into, but if fast arcade PVP FPS games are your thing it’s a good time.
  10. Nov 20, 2021
    7
    This game have some good and bad sides;
    The good side
    +Game size 25 GB Multiplayer+Zombies, 60 GB with campaign +Fun multiplayer and maps and gunfight +operators and their favourites weapon mechanic +optimalization, better than cold war +movement is very satisfying +campaign is decent (5 h to beat) Bad Side: -Poor zombies content at the moment (No pap camos, no easter egg) worst
    This game have some good and bad sides;
    The good side
    +Game size 25 GB Multiplayer+Zombies, 60 GB with campaign
    +Fun multiplayer and maps and gunfight
    +operators and their favourites weapon mechanic
    +optimalization, better than cold war
    +movement is very satisfying
    +campaign is decent (5 h to beat)
    Bad Side:
    -Poor zombies content at the moment (No pap camos, no easter egg) worst than cold war zombies at the start, We can't pause zombies, so after 3 minutes you will be kicked from the server if you, are away from console or PC
    - Some camo levels and prestige levels do not progress
    - STG44 is overpowered, must to be nerfed asap
    -
    Expand
  11. Nov 22, 2021
    7
    I think in general the game is good, the campaign is good, but talking about the multiplayer, there are some problems, I think the major problem are the spawn ones, and some overpowered guns, but in general I have fun playing it and it has a lot of content.
  12. Nov 30, 2021
    7
    Personally, I didn't like Cold War. It was boring, and it lacked innovation. I see a lot of people saying the same thing about Vanguard, but I disagree. For starters, I love how you can choose your combat pacing. For those unaware, Vanguard has a setting where you can choose how many people you want in your games. This brings the life back to Vanguard. If you're playing tactical(thePersonally, I didn't like Cold War. It was boring, and it lacked innovation. I see a lot of people saying the same thing about Vanguard, but I disagree. For starters, I love how you can choose your combat pacing. For those unaware, Vanguard has a setting where you can choose how many people you want in your games. This brings the life back to Vanguard. If you're playing tactical(the slowest paced setting) and you're getting bored, you can always switch to assault(medium-paced) or blitz(fast-paced). This helps the game from becoming stale and boring like Cold War. Also, this is one of the first times in a COD where the amount of players in a certain map varies from map to map. This is definitely a step in the right direction because I never liked how huge maps like Euphrates Bridge would have the same amount of players as Shipment or Shoot House. It just didn't make sense, and I'm surprised it took Activision this long to fix this. Well, at least they did fix it, and the game is much better for it. Also, I'm really enjoying how guns can hold 10 attachments as opposed to the traditional 5. It allows for much more customization, and I'm here for that. As for the graphics, they are incredible. Especially people's faces. They look real. I find myself staring into these characters' faces for hours at a time, trying to find something that doesn't look real, but there's nothing. Don't ask me about Zombies. It sucks ass, but that's not what this review is about. Some dev at Activision took CW's Zombies and pasted it into Vanguard. If you want Zombies, PLEASE don't buy this game. The Campaign? Eh. Nothing much to say about it. More of the same. Too short. I buy COD for MP, so this review is mainly about Vanguard's MP. Expand
  13. May 28, 2022
    7
    I've been a Call Of Duty fan since the games first came out, and will probably always be one. My biggest complaint with most installments is that the campaign mode is unbelievably short. It seems like the only real point of even getting a COD game anymore is for online multiplayer. However short as it may be, I thought the story was great, cinematics were phenomenal and you really getI've been a Call Of Duty fan since the games first came out, and will probably always be one. My biggest complaint with most installments is that the campaign mode is unbelievably short. It seems like the only real point of even getting a COD game anymore is for online multiplayer. However short as it may be, I thought the story was great, cinematics were phenomenal and you really get submerged in the story. Just wish the stages took longer to get through than the cutscenes did. I also really enjoy the fact that you can use weapons and characters etc from Vanguard and Cold War in the online play. Overall, great game, way too short. Expand
  14. Jul 9, 2022
    7
    Nov 20, 2021

    El juego se ve y se siente bien pero dista mucho de mejorar o siquiera llegar al nivel de otros COD ( y ya es decir en algunos casos) La campaña es muy corta, se que nadie juega un CODF por la campaña, pero nadie lo hace porque el jugador no lo exige y se conforma. Los mapas almenos por ahora del multi son un poco roñosos. Mejorará con el tiempo pero no deja de ser un
    Nov 20, 2021

    El juego se ve y se siente bien pero dista mucho de mejorar o siquiera llegar al nivel de otros COD ( y ya es decir en algunos casos) La campaña es muy corta, se que nadie juega un CODF por la campaña, pero nadie lo hace porque el jugador no lo exige y se conforma. Los mapas almenos por ahora del multi son un poco roñosos. Mejorará con el tiempo pero no deja de ser un lanzamiento un poco flojo.
    Expand
  15. May 30, 2023
    7
    El juego es bueno en cuanto a jugabilidad y mecánicas. Tiene buenos gráficos en mi opinión jugandolo desde una PS5 con el VRR. Va optimizado el juego y pesa menos que otros call of duty. Vale la pena en mi opinión si esta en descuento a menos de 35$. El juego tiene mala calificación en general porque el modo zombies está mal desarrollado. Una campaña 7/10. Zombies 4/10. Y con elEl juego es bueno en cuanto a jugabilidad y mecánicas. Tiene buenos gráficos en mi opinión jugandolo desde una PS5 con el VRR. Va optimizado el juego y pesa menos que otros call of duty. Vale la pena en mi opinión si esta en descuento a menos de 35$. El juego tiene mala calificación en general porque el modo zombies está mal desarrollado. Una campaña 7/10. Zombies 4/10. Y con el multijugador un 8/10. Merece la pena el videojuego solo si lo juegas con amigos y si esta en oferta. Pero por lo demás no te lo recomiendo mucho. Expand
  16. Aug 8, 2023
    7
    The single-player story lacks excitement and fails to make characters memorable, except for one. The gun mechanics are a highlight, surpassing the previous game, but dialogue can be disappointing. Multiplayer strikes a good balance between old and new, with well-designed maps and satisfying gun customization. However, the Zombies mode lacks notable additions compared to the last game'sThe single-player story lacks excitement and fails to make characters memorable, except for one. The gun mechanics are a highlight, surpassing the previous game, but dialogue can be disappointing. Multiplayer strikes a good balance between old and new, with well-designed maps and satisfying gun customization. However, the Zombies mode lacks notable additions compared to the last game's version. Overall, the game's story and character attachment could be improved, while multiplayer offers an enjoyable mix of elements. Expand
  17. Dec 7, 2021
    6
    Game is pretty decent from a multiplayer standpoint, except on some maps that are too small and sometimes literally spawn you in the middle of enemies. My biggest problem are Dev errors and snapshot errors which only seem to happen when you are having your best games....it just boots you and you lose all progress you made....It happened to me about 5 times in a row a couple nightsGame is pretty decent from a multiplayer standpoint, except on some maps that are too small and sometimes literally spawn you in the middle of enemies. My biggest problem are Dev errors and snapshot errors which only seem to happen when you are having your best games....it just boots you and you lose all progress you made....It happened to me about 5 times in a row a couple nights ago....The campaign is good, no complaints there, I really enjoyed it. Expand
  18. Nov 10, 2021
    6
    mediocre shooter campaign undertone graphics not so excellent recycled animations usually multi is a saga that will have to be renewed
  19. Nov 29, 2021
    6
    I thought Vanguard was great in places and lacked in others. Multiplayer is just too small and spawn points can be so bad that you can easily die instantly. The new mode patrol I thought was a cool addition. Gun's are varied and killstreak's are cool. Time to kill is ridiculously fast and very twitch like. Zombies mode is so bare bones and not worth even trying. The campaign I thought wasI thought Vanguard was great in places and lacked in others. Multiplayer is just too small and spawn points can be so bad that you can easily die instantly. The new mode patrol I thought was a cool addition. Gun's are varied and killstreak's are cool. Time to kill is ridiculously fast and very twitch like. Zombies mode is so bare bones and not worth even trying. The campaign I thought was really cool but could have been padded out a little. Props to the female sniper missions which were my fav. Expand
  20. Nov 7, 2021
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It turns out that it was actually better than I expected at launch. The Beta was kinda null in certain points, but Sledgehammer Games actually listened to what we wanted in the game, and they did it. Various adjustments and additions, balances, visibility, and everything else in betweens. The superior IW 8.0 engine did show the beauty here, but there are some things that I need to pointed out.

    (+3) Multiplayer at launch was better than I expected. Seems like they have tuned down their controversial and "rage-inducing" skill-based matchmaking (at least, from my perspective). Players are now rewarded more often and penalized less. A solid step-up from Black Ops: Cold War, where in that game, everything would not be able to go along together in the right direction.

    (+1.5) SUPPORT BOTH NVIDIA DLSS AND AMD FIDELITYFX SUPER RESOLUTION.

    (+1.5) Visiblity is an improvement here compared to Modern Warfare (2019). More colors are visible and you can still see characters in certain dark areas.

    (+1) Maps were well-designed, with balances between "predictable lanes" and "encourage camping." They allowed for a more wider-range of engagement, dynamics and balance of gunfights. Covers and destructible environments make this even more intriguing.

    (+0.5) Tons of settings to play around.

    (0) I wish the campaign was longer and go through the beginning of World War 2.

    (0) Despite using IW 8.0 engine. There are NO ray-tracing options in the game. A slight let down, but it really does not matter since a game like this demanded quick reaction and fast frames, and the game still look beautiful without ray-tracing.

    (0) Don't expect historical accuracy from this game.

    (-0.5) No factions. This can cause confusions during an intense gunfight.

    (-0.5) Sniper rifles take forever to aim. But I think they were intended to preserve their true roles to support from long range and not going in aggressively.

    (-1) Grinds take too much time. Even with Double XPs enabled, you can level up your weapon on average - 3 to 4 levels per match.

    (-1) Cheaters are in the game already! They got everything unlocked before they even play their first match! (Still not widespread, though.)
    [New anti-cheat is coming. I hoped that it will deal a major blow to them.]

    (-1) Some bugs were seen, hopefully they will fix them in the future.

    (-3) Zombies were a let down. It feels unfinished for a reason.
    Expand
  21. Jul 16, 2022
    6
    Please never let Sam Maggs write another video game script again. The campaign features some of the most awful writing I’ve heard in my life. “I shoot Nazis. They die. That’s my plan.” The story treats the audience like they’re incredibly dumb and results in an unsatisfying climax. The characters are boring and aren’t even memorable too. What happened to the days when we had iconic, wellPlease never let Sam Maggs write another video game script again. The campaign features some of the most awful writing I’ve heard in my life. “I shoot Nazis. They die. That’s my plan.” The story treats the audience like they’re incredibly dumb and results in an unsatisfying climax. The characters are boring and aren’t even memorable too. What happened to the days when we had iconic, well written, characters like Frank woods, Captain Price, Reznov, Mason, and all of them? They were incredible. These characters don’t hold a candle to them. Forget about zombies. Has to be the worst zombies ever created that negates literally everything that made it great in the first place. Edit: They’ve made multiplayer pretty fun now. It’s in a far better state than at launch. For this reason I’d give the game a 6 Expand
  22. Nov 10, 2021
    6
    Well the game is okay. No more and no less. Zombie mode is absolutely worth seeing, as is parts of the campaign. The multiplayer unfortunately breaks that itself, I wonder why you don't change the system? Absolutely noob friendly, an absolute cheek. And the German troop is not even mentioned in multiplayer or you play them here! It annoys me, there you have cool war locations but notWell the game is okay. No more and no less. Zombie mode is absolutely worth seeing, as is parts of the campaign. The multiplayer unfortunately breaks that itself, I wonder why you don't change the system? Absolutely noob friendly, an absolute cheek. And the German troop is not even mentioned in multiplayer or you play them here! It annoys me, there you have cool war locations but not the required factions. Expand
  23. Apr 18, 2023
    6
    Fine game with a very fun single player campaign.

    The multiplayer, however, is the worst I've ever played in the COD franchise. Terrible game modes, woeful matchmaking and just a garbage experience in general. I will say it was fun playing old World at War maps before the rage inducing gameplay would resume. Zombies was meh and there was no need to add such a grindy trophy for
    Fine game with a very fun single player campaign.

    The multiplayer, however, is the worst I've ever played in the COD franchise. Terrible game modes, woeful matchmaking and just a garbage experience in general. I will say it was fun playing old World at War maps before the rage inducing gameplay would resume.

    Zombies was meh and there was no need to add such a grindy trophy for killing 10K enemies.
    Expand
  24. Dec 9, 2021
    6
    admirable
    [ ad-mer-uh-buhl ]

    adjective
    worthy of admiration; inspiring approval, reverence, or affection.
  25. Nov 10, 2021
    6
    Is a decent game that works fine. Only the campaing is too short. Multy is the same as mw.
  26. Nov 14, 2021
    6
    It doesn’t reach the quality level I wanted for €60, but it’s playable and scratches my fps itch for the moment as no other recents fps game tends to it better this year. You can see it as fast food guilty pleasure in the fps gaming scene. A lot of money for garbage content but you always want to have that option when nothing else is around. Still needs a lot of balancing to be thatIt doesn’t reach the quality level I wanted for €60, but it’s playable and scratches my fps itch for the moment as no other recents fps game tends to it better this year. You can see it as fast food guilty pleasure in the fps gaming scene. A lot of money for garbage content but you always want to have that option when nothing else is around. Still needs a lot of balancing to be that shooter that everybody wants to play without stopping. Expand
  27. Nov 14, 2021
    6
    Same old game same old feel same old grind . Atleast it comes with campaign even if it is short and more scene than actual game play..
  28. Nov 16, 2021
    6
    Not a bad game but it could be better , campaign was enjoyable and multiplayer was just like past years
  29. Nov 23, 2021
    6
    Alot of political correct bs ...They re-write history so they can sell more games and be liberal Biden supporters..Black females did not fight combat in WW 2!! gameplay is not bad and I like the MVP scoring thing. I think the game could be a bit more polished..seems rushed..
  30. Nov 25, 2021
    6
    The zombies is disappointing but still playable the campaign is alright and multiplayer is Cold War with destructive walls
  31. Jan 1, 2022
    6
    Divertido al inicio, pero q se vuelve repetitivo.
    Una campaña decente, con muchos fallos pero algunos aciertos q no la haces deplorable.
    Zombies olvidables.
    Multijugador con varios errores de sonido, rendimiento pero q tiene un gran potencial si se arreglan estos
  32. Jan 30, 2022
    6
    Honestly, I expected worse this game is not as good as CoD MW:2 or any of those games but in recent years it's been a bit better than other games. CoD MW: 2019 is still the best CoD since CoD Black Ops 2. so I'm comparing it mainly to CoD MW: 2019.
  33. Jun 27, 2022
    6
    The story isn't as good as it was in Cold War nor is the multiplayer as refined.
  34. Nov 15, 2021
    5
    Where Black Ops embraces the 'bro'-ness with battle passes that include Stallone and Willis as playable characters, Vanguard is the complete opposite--with an absurd push for female participants: to the point where most operators are womens...this is World War 2, supposedly. Multiplayer is decent if you just use a machine gun to mow down players using controllers that are aim-assisted upWhere Black Ops embraces the 'bro'-ness with battle passes that include Stallone and Willis as playable characters, Vanguard is the complete opposite--with an absurd push for female participants: to the point where most operators are womens...this is World War 2, supposedly. Multiplayer is decent if you just use a machine gun to mow down players using controllers that are aim-assisted up the ass. You can see in killcams just how dumb it is. Never play campaigns on COD but if the operator gender ratio from multiplayer gives any idea--i'm sure it's just as retarded. Seen other reviewers mention a reskin of MW19: completely yes. But that game was a fun revitalization of the franchise--this game is a servicable but ultimately dissapointing continuation. Since I've had fun on multiplayer merking aim-assisted noobs I'm giving the game a 5. Expand
  35. Aug 17, 2022
    5
    Campaign is mid, zombies were bad at first but it seem like they are finally adding good content but its too late since this CoD is at its last season. Multiplayer was the mode I enjoyed and put most of my time in out of the three game modes and it had a lot of potential to be really good and it was all wasted because they decided to barely support it making it very dull and makingCampaign is mid, zombies were bad at first but it seem like they are finally adding good content but its too late since this CoD is at its last season. Multiplayer was the mode I enjoyed and put most of my time in out of the three game modes and it had a lot of potential to be really good and it was all wasted because they decided to barely support it making it very dull and making Vanguard one of the most mediocre and boring cods I have ever played. Expand
  36. Feb 27, 2022
    5
    Ok campaign is quite long but relatively poor, multiplayer is a bit of a mess and very very buggy, I couldn’t believe how badly this game was reviewed by the pro’s but after playing I would tend to agree with a lot that they said, in my opinion COD has gone very stale and there hasn't been a genuinely good one for a very long time, for the first time in many years I WONT be buying the nextOk campaign is quite long but relatively poor, multiplayer is a bit of a mess and very very buggy, I couldn’t believe how badly this game was reviewed by the pro’s but after playing I would tend to agree with a lot that they said, in my opinion COD has gone very stale and there hasn't been a genuinely good one for a very long time, for the first time in many years I WONT be buying the next one unless it reviews extremely well, there is one positive however it still not as bad as battlefield 2042. Expand
  37. Nov 27, 2021
    5
    First of all you're here for the campaign because you know how multiplayer and zombies works with COD. It's COD. Now the campaign is not included on the disc. That's right people get the game without the GAME. It's a separate download once you've probably copied the disc then downloaded the most recent update. This gets 2 points knocked off.

    So the 10's i see here, either tell me
    First of all you're here for the campaign because you know how multiplayer and zombies works with COD. It's COD. Now the campaign is not included on the disc. That's right people get the game without the GAME. It's a separate download once you've probably copied the disc then downloaded the most recent update. This gets 2 points knocked off.

    So the 10's i see here, either tell me they're playing a digital version or they're fake reviews. Because this leads onto the important question why wasn't this just released a stand alone campaign? £24.99. It would lose them a lot of money, but it'd be the sensible thing to do for people who don't wanna play the multiplayer and the "zombies". Don't worry since this trick was pulled with the previous COD and i knew it'd happen again. I'm not giving them money, this is from boomerang rentals.

    So you've downloaded the campaign, can you play? no I'm sorry it's not all in one download, you have to download each pack before you can even start to play the campaign (I'm not kidding). So it loses another point.

    we're 7/10 and we haven't even played the game yet. What are you doing?

    So you start in 1945, yes it's one of those games trying to be clever but failing it because we've seen plenty of media formats copy the same thing. I half expected a record to be scratched somewhere in this half hearted attempt for a first level. Lots of rain and a little buggy I had almost all my allied soldiers avoid shooting the Germans. As i stood on the train being shot at, I realised it was from the other train just behind where my allies were standing looking forward ignoring the German firing. I back tracked and sure enough 2 feet behind my allies a German soldier was firing at me. Not at them. Hilarious stuff. Yes this is the obligatory train level, so generic it only highlights what you're about to experience.

    Graphically it doesn't really stand out. Nothing that again made me think "I'm glad I have a PS5 for this". The sound seems copied from the previous COD game set in WW2 (2017). I wouldn't even be surprised if that was the case. honestly. Also like Aloy, if you spot yellow you can climb it.

    Can it be any more generic, yes. actually. Your first mission, as I've said is from 1945 and you're joined up with mix of various nationalities from Australians to Russians. Which is mostly just fantasy. Although the SOE did exist (so something factual still finds its way there). None of the characters are interesting; they're walking stereotypes. They even throw in racial slurs and to be honest it's just cringeworthy. They were probably going for "bold" and "insightful" but it feels tacky. it all feels forced (like a Russian in the SOE; pure fantasy). There's also 2 British soldiers among the 6, and you know that's not going to last. diversity laws and all. I'd have liked another female (French resistance) that'd have made more sense.

    Just always surprises me that you are all captured, and then the game follows the same tropes (back in time we go record scratches freeze frame).. the same formula (whether it's taking guns on a cliff face, or taking pillboxes on a ridge). There's nothing innovative here, nothing ground breaking. It's a shame. A lot of it is so disjointed and badly written. Honestly the caricature Nazi's should not have fallen for the terrible acting they do. It feels like a 12 year old wrote it for creative writing homework. You can tell Americans wrote it, the Australian uses "British" during "acting" when they mean the English. Scots and Irish shake their heads. Master - servant huh

    I can talk about the terrible implementation for example during the battle of midway as you're dealing with Japanese aircraft, if you go anymore than 100 metres away from a specific area you get the warning "return to mission" as a Japanese plane passes you by going towards that area. There's just so much technically and fundamentally wrong, it fails as a single player ww2 experience. Learn all these things about the plane which you'll never use. Hell EA's star wars squadrons did it better than this... attempt. But hey you wanna play a game where you can magically avoid all battleship gunfire and make 20 enemy planes disappear, just fly into the clouds. Don't worry more magically appear several miles later. The realism is off the scale (if you get a belly wound [cutscene] it doesn't magically heal). just drama for the sake of badly written cutscene worthy of a razzie award. (It also doesn't give you supernatural "focus" abilities! but sure enough in this game; it does! i feel every anime blushing at this nonsense)

    COD now feels stale. If you're just playing the campaign do not pay for this. Just rent it or borrow it or something. And unless you really like Zombies and Multiplayer that you can't get from a previous COD game or the current version. It's not worthy of your time.

    I'd like to get back the time wasted playing !
    Expand
  38. Nov 9, 2022
    5
    First mission is one of the worst missions in all of CoD games... Absolutely disgusting, after only first 10 minutes I wanted quit this game... But despite stupid "teenagers behaviors" at the beginning, after some time game was pretty enjoyable . Mission in Petersburg was very good! Graphics isn't bad but sometimest's really rough, definitely uneven. There were also occasionally crushes.First mission is one of the worst missions in all of CoD games... Absolutely disgusting, after only first 10 minutes I wanted quit this game... But despite stupid "teenagers behaviors" at the beginning, after some time game was pretty enjoyable . Mission in Petersburg was very good! Graphics isn't bad but sometimest's really rough, definitely uneven. There were also occasionally crushes. After all it's a really average CoD with little bit of a really good moments. Expand
  39. Nov 19, 2021
    5
    It's nice, not better than WW2, but nice, i love it, it can be better with some updates to fix bugs
  40. Nov 8, 2021
    5
    1. Искаженные факты. 2. феминизм 3. Неуважение жемщинам и героям которые сраьались за наши ьизни против фашизма. 4 . Красивая графика. 5. тупые боты. 6. Недостоверность 7. Разрабы зделайте пожалусто всё по историческим фактам!!! и вас будут уважать!!!!!!1. Искаженные факты. 2. феминизм 3. Неуважение жемщинам и героям которые сраьались за наши ьизни против фашизма. 4 . Красивая графика. 5. тупые боты. 6. Недостоверность 7. Разрабы зделайте пожалусто всё по историческим фактам!!! и вас будут уважать!!!!!!
  41. May 10, 2023
    5
    A mediocre game. Not as bad as Cold War, still not good however. It is quite literally a lazy copy of MW2019. Maps are the only redeeming quality and even then they are not of the best quality. Zombies got better over time but the game, overall, is the definition of mid.
  42. Nov 23, 2021
    5
    Лучшее во что я играл за последнее время. Battlefield 2042 откровенно разочаровал
  43. Nov 13, 2021
    5
    Buggy mess got kicked out of servers a few times and there was a few times my sound was messed up I reset my ps5 to fix it
  44. Nov 8, 2021
    5
    The campaign is decent but no any memorable moments. It takes about 4-5 hours to complete and is mostly flashbacks of the characters you meet at the first mission.

    Multiplayer is horrible you or the opponent spawn right in each others eye sight like 5 meters away and this happens more frequently than you think. Some of the guns have muzzle flare which cover up your eye of sight which
    The campaign is decent but no any memorable moments. It takes about 4-5 hours to complete and is mostly flashbacks of the characters you meet at the first mission.

    Multiplayer is horrible you or the opponent spawn right in each others eye sight like 5 meters away and this happens more frequently than you think. Some of the guns have muzzle flare which cover up your eye of sight which makes it hard to shoot.

    The zombies mode is a bare bones version compared to other treyarch versions of zombies. There are no round based maps, no easter egg, no pack a punch weapon camos and the list goes on. There are 3 objectives to do in the map which gets repetitive after doing for an hour. There is no replayability in the game besides levelling up your guns, getting levels or going for high rounds. I bought this game mainly for the zombies mode and regret I've bought the game.
    Expand
  45. Nov 8, 2021
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Terrible. The game has no pack a punch. No wall buys. No original perks. No Easter egg. No weapon progression, no side Easter egg. And 1 map. And also no wonder weapon. The multiplayer is that exact same as modern warfare 2019 if not worse. And the campaign is boring, incredibly short, and terrible story and story telling since the entire thing is a flashback of stories we won’t care about. Expand
  46. Xos
    Nov 24, 2021
    5
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The game is good, but it lacks some ideas, such as a kill strike mode, dogs, and many other things. It is also very difficult to upgrade weapons as well, since I am a zombie lover. I did not like it at all and was not expected, it is very bad. There is no story or anything else besides insulting you For the religion of Islam, this is disgusting, playlists and others are good. The game deserves a rating of 6 or less Expand
  47. Mar 15, 2022
    5
    If you enjoy dying every few seconds, this is the game for you. For some reason, the devs took an already low health and seemingly cut it in half. COD needs to stop releasing every year so these devs can take their time and put out something original and fresh for once.
  48. Dec 7, 2021
    5
    It seems that Metacritic is tactically limiting the exposure of negative critic reviews. This game should be sitting at 71 right now, as all of the most-liberal game review sites (IGN & Polygon) even gave it a 70 already. Metacritic has not officially posted their reviews, which is artificially-inflating the score.

    If the game were good and the changing of history and diversity of
    It seems that Metacritic is tactically limiting the exposure of negative critic reviews. This game should be sitting at 71 right now, as all of the most-liberal game review sites (IGN & Polygon) even gave it a 70 already. Metacritic has not officially posted their reviews, which is artificially-inflating the score.

    If the game were good and the changing of history and diversity of themes had good gameplay and the studios working on the game actually had passion, wouldn't the score speak for itself without having to be manipulative?
    Expand
  49. Dec 9, 2021
    5
    It was alright. Multiplayer is kinda fun with some friends. The soviet woman, Polina is by far the worst character. A forced mary sue “bad ass” who is unlikeable to the max. The rest of the characters are fine though
  50. Mar 4, 2022
    5
    I played it on PS5 and im gonna talk about story mode only so if you are an online multiplayer type guy this review wont help you much
    9 chapters are all you get in story mode its all cliche and has nothing to surprise you all ww2 and nazzi and hilter things . there is no touching scene in whole game and after you finished the game its gone. no memorable scene in your head and you
    I played it on PS5 and im gonna talk about story mode only so if you are an online multiplayer type guy this review wont help you much
    9 chapters are all you get in story mode its all cliche and has nothing to surprise you all ww2 and nazzi and hilter things . there is no touching scene in whole game and after you finished the game its gone. no memorable scene in your head and you probably forget all character games in 30 days, i mean there is no GHOST BETRAYAL tears or Cap mctavish thing here...
    no adrenaline no cinematic story telling you know its just a simple moderate quality call of duty nothing more
    the graphic&sound&music are good but not perfect. you never WOW during game ,but you would like to end the game. i give it 5
    Expand
  51. Mar 11, 2022
    5
    SBMM im Public Multiplayer und Grafikfehler trüben den Spielspaß. Der Shop scheint im Vordergrund zu stehen. Einige Charaktere sind nur käuflich freischaltbar. Absolut Frech.
    Story ist absolut okay. Zombiemodus hat neuen Content bekommen und kann zwischendurch echt Spaß machen, wenn der Multiplayer mal wieder zu sehr die Laune versaut.
  52. Oct 4, 2022
    5
    Great graphics, great mechanics, but it's story is sooooo boring. I couldn't connect with the characters and didn't care for them. Level design was mid. Multiplayer was not bad, though.
  53. Sep 17, 2022
    5
    WWII COD games simply bore me. Gameplay feels recycled in some areas and overly dependent on microtransitions. It was the definition of “meh” to me
  54. Mar 16, 2023
    5
    Vanguard is an okay game at worst. At best, its still just an okay game.
    The campaign, while somewhat cliche, is still fun, and somewhat enjoyable. Multiplayer is fine, and the challenges to get new skins are actually quite enjoyable. If you're looking for a COD game to start out with, I would not recommend this one.
  55. Sep 3, 2023
    5
    Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaameeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!!!!!!!!!
  56. Oct 30, 2022
    4
    Its typical COD gameplay, nothing rly new, historical accuracy is below 0, amount of propaganda and political correctness is overwhelming and really hurts so I don't know what was the point in making this game the way it is. Got it on sale and im glad i didn't paid full price, not worth it. Even on sale i think i overpaid.
  57. Nov 8, 2021
    4
    Campaign is ok. It's dull shooting with occasional tactical phases.
    We come to the multi-player. Absolute garbage and with a downward trend. If this is not revised and the game continues to be offered overpriced, the rip-off principle flies around the ears.
  58. Nov 7, 2021
    4
    Ну как же задолбала повестка в играх Вы делаете игру для всего мира и вновь запихиваете туда ценности БЛМ. Сюжет максимально бредовый, абсолютный художественный бред, подвязанный к реальным событиям. В принципе большего от колды и не ждал, лучше бы выпустили игру без сюжета, чем так позориться. Ну и 7 часов на максимальной сложности - это оч коротко как по мнеНу как же задолбала повестка в играх Вы делаете игру для всего мира и вновь запихиваете туда ценности БЛМ. Сюжет максимально бредовый, абсолютный художественный бред, подвязанный к реальным событиям. В принципе большего от колды и не ждал, лучше бы выпустили игру без сюжета, чем так позориться. Ну и 7 часов на максимальной сложности - это оч коротко как по мне
  59. Nov 18, 2021
    4
    Clunky game!No audio for footsteps running like a deaf man and and get shoot in de back, respawn is just chaos!
  60. Nov 14, 2021
    4
    ffsfgycccicficfufkffugfufucififucufufucuvfifucucfkfjcfjcuckcfjcicudkxiducucgyfkffucificicig
  61. Nov 6, 2021
    4
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I dont know what has been happening with games recently but they all seem to have the same theme of shoehorning modernday politics into them.
    A game set in the 1940s and the main character is calling the nazis racist... in a time when the WHOLE WORLD WAS RACIST!!! Yeh it was bad but it was considered normal back in those days. Anyways one of the missions you play as Arthur Kingsley ( the black guy on the front cover) and you land behind enemy lines with a bunch of other British paratroopers ...who then instantly all decide to make Arthur squad leader...WHICH WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED!!! so straight away the immersion of it being a ww2 game has already been broken. Yes it was bad how black people were treat back then but it happened and people need to stop trying to cover it up.
    This stage is just one of many which all follow similar patterns

    Next you have the dirty muddy graphics which also shows up blurry most of the time. Yeah I can see they were trying to give the game atmosphere of WW2 but making your graphics ugly doesn't make it gritty like how World at war was . The first mission is the worst as you cant even see much because of how blended and mushed together the graphics are combined with the weather effects .

    Next is the online, theres alot wrong with it but I will call out the obvious
    Theres only 1 team and it's the allies, you cant play as the bad guys like you could in every other call of duty because they were too scared to add the Nazi faction into it so yet again the immersion has been broken, especially when the people you are killing are playing as the same character as you. Owh and they added in a lesbian operator ...in the 1940s, she would of been lynched by her own team....also it's the only character where it mentions her sexuality which is weird. This entire game seems to be someone's fan fiction

    Other than those issues the gunplay is fun and the gun sound effects are amazing, map level design is ok but there's the obvious problem of spawning on the enemy team. I have nothing else good to say about it
    Expand
  62. Nov 19, 2021
    4
    The online multyplayer is shocking has been for year's
    Zombies is atually decant for once
    The campaign is always good to be fair
    Cod games are never worth full price
  63. Nov 8, 2021
    4
    TLDR : Flashback simulator

    Story : 3/10 , so short and the problem is 90 % of the game were flash back . my friend got killed nah let me told you the past of this guys. we cant trust him , nahh let me tell you the story why we can trust him and so on by the time all flash back finished we reach the ending of the game LMAO Graphic 7/10 , lookgood on outside but if you look closely
    TLDR : Flashback simulator

    Story : 3/10 , so short and the problem is 90 % of the game were flash back . my friend got killed nah let me told you the past of this guys. we cant trust him , nahh let me tell you the story why we can trust him and so on by the time all flash back finished we reach the ending of the game LMAO

    Graphic 7/10 , lookgood on outside but if you look closely there are too many blury object even the facemodel look undetail unlike the previous cod

    Gameplay 5/10 : Gunplay look very solid from miho but the AI are so stupid sometimes and very minor bug occurs many times.

    if you are like me who buy this game for campagin , Skip this one it;s so bad and have no meaningful story
    Expand
  64. Nov 11, 2021
    4
    I had high hopes as I really liked Cold War. Man was I disappointed. The MP experience is a total mess. You spawn right in front of enemies. Sometimes the same enemy two times in a row. Matchmaking is a joke. Matches are often lopsided and players quit mid game. Lot of mods for weapons but the system is actually a step down from Cold War. The shooting feel was my favorite part of Cold War.I had high hopes as I really liked Cold War. Man was I disappointed. The MP experience is a total mess. You spawn right in front of enemies. Sometimes the same enemy two times in a row. Matchmaking is a joke. Matches are often lopsided and players quit mid game. Lot of mods for weapons but the system is actually a step down from Cold War. The shooting feel was my favorite part of Cold War. Now it's just childish. The maps look nice with all the explosions and stuff but it's just too messy. One positive though.. I got a nice laugh from reading the bios of the mp characters. Devs have really felt the need to be woke. The women characters are like socialites and the guys are grunts. Expand
  65. Nov 11, 2021
    4
    This game by no means is great. It's ok at best and definitely the worst of the three. The story mode, so far, isn't half bad. The characters are compelling enough to keep playing through even though it seems PC at times. It's nothing fantastic and pleases through narrative but who plays COD for the story mode. Next you have zombie mode. This mode is pretty basic and lacks theThis game by no means is great. It's ok at best and definitely the worst of the three. The story mode, so far, isn't half bad. The characters are compelling enough to keep playing through even though it seems PC at times. It's nothing fantastic and pleases through narrative but who plays COD for the story mode. Next you have zombie mode. This mode is pretty basic and lacks the essentials that made Black Ops zombies entertaining. It may be fun at first playing with some friends but overall is very repetitive and becomes tiresome quickly. Last you have multiplayer. There's nothing that really stands out on multiplayer. Most of the levels are ok at best. The weapons are nothing to be excited about. Some are way overpowered and need to be nerfed. The killstreaks can be a pain. The worst part of all is dealing with constant hackers and cheaters. Almost every other match you're bombarded against a team who can easily shoot through walls and kill everyone while you're cornered at your spawn point. There needs to be better presence in banning these individuals. Hopefully when they launch their new cheating system, it will help out. Another annoyance is the long after game summary and voting system. It takes up too much time and seems unnecessary plus you can not back out during it. Overall the game is ok. Nothing spectacular. There is still plenty to be fixed and hopefully improved on if they want to keep people playing. Expand
  66. Nov 13, 2021
    4
    Keep in mind, most games released now a days are far from complete. When it comes to Vanguard, the game definitely need a good 8-10 months more to stew. Campaign is probably the only bright spot of the entire game which isn’t saying much. Multiplayer and Zombies are absolutely atrocious! “Packet Burst” is a phrase you’ll be seeing a lot when playing Vanguard. The enemies seem to kill youKeep in mind, most games released now a days are far from complete. When it comes to Vanguard, the game definitely need a good 8-10 months more to stew. Campaign is probably the only bright spot of the entire game which isn’t saying much. Multiplayer and Zombies are absolutely atrocious! “Packet Burst” is a phrase you’ll be seeing a lot when playing Vanguard. The enemies seem to kill you before they even pop up on your screen. The worst part about Multiplayer however, is the god awful spawn locations! I can’t tell you how many times I would spawn DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE ENEMY! Needless to say, it’s insanely frustrating to deal with. Even when the game first starts, it doesn’t take more then 1-2 seconds before you are already killed due to the awful spawns. In my opinion, it’s gamebreaking. Previous COD’s gave you a good 15-30 seconds to get into position before running into an enemy but Vanguard decided that the player needed to jump into the action right away, whether they are ready or not. It’s just awful.

    Many of the weapons are currently broken. Meanwhile, the “sweats” all use the same load out and attachments and why not? You won’t have much luck getting kills in this game unless you use the STG44, MP40, Or the Type 100. Hopefully we won’t have to wait long before we get some weapon buff/nerf patches to even things out. The new “blitz” game mode is exactly as advertised… sheer chaos. With the game already suffering when it comes to fair spawn locations, adding smaller maps and larger teams just make the game even more frustrating. A lot of players have resorted to camping and head glitching to get ahead in this game. Of course, nothing new in the COD universe but as I said before, coupled with the many bugs, glitches and poor game mechanics, it’s a recipe for disaster. There are some good aspects of the game however… the weapon customization is decent. The graphics are gorgeous as always and the game is nicely optimized for PC players. When it comes to Vanguard however, the cons heavily outweigh the pros. I’m optimistic about what the future can hold for Vanguard but the devs really need to buckle down and fix a lot of the flaws this game has.
    Expand
  67. Jun 1, 2022
    4
    I think this is honestly the worst cod game I’ve ever played. I can’t remember disliking any other cod this much. Ghosts was bad at the time but this is a new low. Let’s start off with the campaign, which can be described in just three words: boring, lackluster, and extremely generic. They try to create these memorable “operators” and they’re all just so boring and generic. “I kill nazis,I think this is honestly the worst cod game I’ve ever played. I can’t remember disliking any other cod this much. Ghosts was bad at the time but this is a new low. Let’s start off with the campaign, which can be described in just three words: boring, lackluster, and extremely generic. They try to create these memorable “operators” and they’re all just so boring and generic. “I kill nazis, that is my plan.” My god is the writing awful. Stack that on top of the most stereotypical nazi antagonist and boom you have this **** This years zombies is probably the worst rendition we’ve seen so far; they completely ditched the rounds and tried out an objective based gameplay loop, which might have worked out if there were more than 5 activities. That’s right, you do the same 5 activities over and over and over again until you get bored and let the zombies have their way with you. The multiplayer is full of an egregious amount of paid for content, 90% of their effort in multiplayer went towards getting you to buy ridiculous skins. (To those who have wasted money on these skins, literally everyone in the lobby is laughing at how ridiculous you look). Mid maps, super unrealistic and stupid attachments, “woke” operators, and garbage monetization completely overshadow the actually pretty decent gunplay, but the credit goes to infinity ward for that since it’s their engine. The series is at absolute rock bottom here, and I pray this **** doesn’t make it into MW2 Expand
  68. Nov 15, 2021
    4
    Сюжетная линия совсем огорчила, не думал, что игра станет настолько фальшивой, очень много багов, как будто делали на скорую руку, лишь бы люди схавали это. Но есть и положительные стороны, оптимизация хорошая, графика впечатляет, голливудские сцены присутствуют, но их мало. Не думаю, что стоит покупать эту игру.Сюжетная линия совсем огорчила, не думал, что игра станет настолько фальшивой, очень много багов, как будто делали на скорую руку, лишь бы люди схавали это. Но есть и положительные стороны, оптимизация хорошая, графика впечатляет, голливудские сцены присутствуют, но их мало. Не думаю, что стоит покупать эту игру.
  69. Nov 17, 2021
    4
    Basically a warzone gun levelling simulator. If u like warzone and have money to effectively level up guns with this game (*dlc*) get this sweaty SBMM game
  70. Nov 19, 2021
    4
    MW2019 but worse and WWII themed. I really don't know how anyone would give this above a 4 at best
  71. Nov 22, 2021
    4
    Good game (probably because of MW19 engine), but:
    1. A lot of bugs and mistakes. You can't even get the gold camo for a few guns, because there's not needed attachments.
    2. Sound design. You CAN'T hear your enemies in Multiplayer even if they without Ninja perk. 3. Ninja perk. 4. No factions. Especially in hardcore modes, you can't recognize who's who, because everyone have the same
    Good game (probably because of MW19 engine), but:
    1. A lot of bugs and mistakes. You can't even get the gold camo for a few guns, because there's not needed attachments.
    2. Sound design. You CAN'T hear your enemies in Multiplayer even if they without Ninja perk.
    3. Ninja perk.
    4. No factions. Especially in hardcore modes, you can't recognize who's who, because everyone have the same skins. You kill teammates and sometimes don't shoot when you see enemies.
    5. You have to waste your time while all "play of the gave" and "mvp" animations are going. You can't leave the match.
    6. Spawn system. Terrible.
    7. Last, but not least — operators. My first MVP animations, three operators: Arthur, Solange, Taliba.
    Seriously? WWII chronic? Ridiculous.
    At least 26 000 000 Russian people died during this war and all we have is Polina, who's not even looks like Lyudmila Pavlichenko and speaks with Middle East accent as if she's Farah from MW19.

    For me, it's alive and playable only because it is MW19's parasite-clone.
    Expand
  72. Dec 24, 2021
    4
    Terrible and completely ruined warzone. Ever since the new modern warfare the series is in a serious downfall. Basically it gets worse every year. Such a disappointment.
  73. Dec 30, 2021
    4
    I think the graphics and gameplay are ok, but the dialogue and zombie mode are pretty bad and horrible
  74. Jan 4, 2022
    4
    Bought at launch and it was full of bugs and connection issues with servers. Not worth 93 dollars and the graphics on some of the maps are absolutely atrocious.
  75. Feb 23, 2022
    4
    The best thing about this game is that it’s playable. Trash story, garbage zombies and a bad MP. Oh and also infinite micro transactions. I don’t care that this is an alternate reality of WWII, this is insulting and embarrassing. Activision please die already and give everything up to Microsoft.
  76. Mar 2, 2022
    4
    The game has a bunch of bugs and it’s basically unplayable, the progression has issues suck as weapon camos. There are issues everywhere in this game but knowing Activision always rushing it’s games it was already expected.
  77. Jul 20, 2022
    4
    Honestly, I was loving Vanguard until season 2.
    I'm present in 4, where they only add horrible maps, suitable for camping, weapons with attachments that make no sense, it's simply impossible to play.
    Bugs since launch that haven't been fixed and optimization issues that have gotten worse every season. Other than these crucial issues, the campaign is amazing as always and the zombies are
    Honestly, I was loving Vanguard until season 2.
    I'm present in 4, where they only add horrible maps, suitable for camping, weapons with attachments that make no sense, it's simply impossible to play.
    Bugs since launch that haven't been fixed and optimization issues that have gotten worse every season.
    Other than these crucial issues, the campaign is amazing as always and the zombies are 50/50 according to the community and I don't even dislike it.

    -1 PLAYER because of multiplayer issues.
    Expand
  78. Nov 30, 2021
    3
    Unfinished, boring mess of a game with 0 feeling, forgettable characters, worst spawn places in the history of cod..and the list goes on and on.
  79. Nov 7, 2021
    3
    I actually fell asleep in 1 of the missions, every mission feels similar and nothing feels new.. shouldve expected that by now.
  80. Mar 18, 2022
    3
    Activision is really running this series into the ground. It needs a break and some serious introspection.
  81. Nov 15, 2021
    3
    All in all, I bought to game with low expectations hoping only for a mediocre shooting gallery with nice graphics, but the result was well below what I expected.
  82. Nov 7, 2021
    3
    This is the most dry the CoD formula has ever got, and is now a new low for the franchise. The campaign is the most tropey cookie cutter campaign I have ever seen, zombies was the most bland it ever was too; and on top of that, the multiplayer is the exact same formula from the Modern Warfare 1 and 2 days. If anyone from Activision is reading this: Quit milking CoD and get more concernedThis is the most dry the CoD formula has ever got, and is now a new low for the franchise. The campaign is the most tropey cookie cutter campaign I have ever seen, zombies was the most bland it ever was too; and on top of that, the multiplayer is the exact same formula from the Modern Warfare 1 and 2 days. If anyone from Activision is reading this: Quit milking CoD and get more concerned about the onslaught of lawsuit heading your way. After that, revive IPs like Blur or Spyro for a change, assuming you ever gain the trust of your consumers again. I would rather see a Blur 2 or a new Spyro game and not see a CoD for a few years. Expand
  83. Nov 21, 2021
    3
    Grafics are cool, the main reason for a 3.
    Story is bad, really bad. The first scene is ridicoulous, so stupid it's hard to believe.
    It's an up and down between good moment and bad ones. Ultimatly the bad ones wins after all.
  84. Nov 26, 2021
    3
    Idiotic level design, the levels are literally filled with holes from which the enemy can come out at any time. Absurd unbalanced perks for specialists (Perks for returning the radar or increasing the enemy's head say hello), miserable modules for weapons.
    The main advantages of this game are sounds and animations of weapons, registration of hits, however, this is the merit of the
    Idiotic level design, the levels are literally filled with holes from which the enemy can come out at any time. Absurd unbalanced perks for specialists (Perks for returning the radar or increasing the enemy's head say hello), miserable modules for weapons.
    The main advantages of this game are sounds and animations of weapons, registration of hits, however, this is the merit of the Infinity Ward's engine.
    Expand
  85. Nov 19, 2021
    3
    It's a DLC of MW with WW2 design, even in the menu the only thing they had is the horrible vote after each game, 60€ DLC aie aie aie...
  86. Nov 19, 2021
    3
    Worst multiplayer ever created. Spawns are incredibly broken, TTK is extremely fast and with Killstreak combined, it encourages players to camp and preaim everywhere and also to mount the guns. Maps are too big and open, and same like MW you can be shot from milion angles. But despite of MW you now have milion flanking routes so you will be constantly shot in the back because you have noWorst multiplayer ever created. Spawns are incredibly broken, TTK is extremely fast and with Killstreak combined, it encourages players to camp and preaim everywhere and also to mount the guns. Maps are too big and open, and same like MW you can be shot from milion angles. But despite of MW you now have milion flanking routes so you will be constantly shot in the back because you have no chance to predict where the enemy is coming from. Add the destructibles, which reveal even more angles. Bad visibility, terrible sounds of guns, you almost never hear enemy sprintig... Just be gladly rerturning to Cold War and dont touch this **** ever again Expand
  87. Nov 22, 2021
    3
    First of all. The game Looks nice and if you want to play online multiplayer it's fun.
    Every other player will be disappointed. --No split-screen zombie Mode.
    -No Koop-campaign.
    I don't know why they have cancelled the split-screen Feature it's just disappointing, what the brand has become.
  88. Nov 15, 2021
    3
    Cod vanguard review Wasn’t expecting much here and I was still underwhelmed
  89. Nov 9, 2021
    3
    Konveer. Morazm krephyal. Grafika na urovne, ostalnoe mi uje videli.........
  90. Nov 30, 2021
    3
    Bad singlpayer Not bas mutliplayer Need fix bug and add more mods On PS 5 crash game all day 2-3
  91. Dec 11, 2021
    3
    Empty matches, horrible respawn system, a lot of graphic glitches and low resolution textures. The gunplay is terrible broken. They need to fix this game soon or I will drop it and get back to Cold War.
  92. Nov 21, 2021
    3
    disappointing short campaign with more movies than gameplay with crap characters and the multiplayer has regressed and actually gotten worse a blatant excuse to level up low level variety of guns that you have for warzone this call of duty provides nothing absolutely nothing literally nothing
    both Cod Vanguard and Battlefield 2042 are equally barebones unifinished and absolutely shiate
  93. Nov 20, 2021
    3
    Колда никогда не меняется.Зашкварные карты в мультиплее, где тебя могут убить с каждой стороны, даже когда ты только заспавнился.Решающий донат.Повесточка.Опять сопливый сюжет про героев войны.Давно колда была хорошей, потом ухудшилась и тащила только засчет мемов, сейчас колда - это просто унылое говно.Оптимизация вроде хорошая, хотя графика и так мыльная, но спасибо, что хотя бы не какКолда никогда не меняется.Зашкварные карты в мультиплее, где тебя могут убить с каждой стороны, даже когда ты только заспавнился.Решающий донат.Повесточка.Опять сопливый сюжет про героев войны.Давно колда была хорошей, потом ухудшилась и тащила только засчет мемов, сейчас колда - это просто унылое говно.Оптимизация вроде хорошая, хотя графика и так мыльная, но спасибо, что хотя бы не как новая батла Expand
  94. Nov 9, 2021
    3
    At this point it's a copy and paste game year in, year out. The only good thing I can say about COD nowadays is that the single player is decent and for the most part is decent most years however the multiplayer is stale. I was bored after a few MP games on Vanguard (when the servers decided not to be poor..) because I've played this same rinse and repeat gameplay the last few year.At this point it's a copy and paste game year in, year out. The only good thing I can say about COD nowadays is that the single player is decent and for the most part is decent most years however the multiplayer is stale. I was bored after a few MP games on Vanguard (when the servers decided not to be poor..) because I've played this same rinse and repeat gameplay the last few year. There's nothing new to make this a buy and I'm glad I purchased this on a disc so I can sell it while I can.

    The amount of release titles this series has is beyond belief and for the past few year it's fallen out of touch with what made the first few original games so good.

    I used to be a 'COD fanboy' but as I'm not a kid anymore (unlike the mindset of many adults nowadays) it's quite obvious the gameplay isn't something they're looking to improve on but just change the graphics, add a few guns, some DLC content to make the guns look cool and fancy.
    Expand
  95. Nov 7, 2021
    3
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Серия игр Call of Duty все больше напоминает фильм крепкий орешек. 1. Очень много вопросов к локализации на русский язык. Вы что серьёзно настолько безрукие что не можете нормально наложить звуковую(голосовую) дорожку на персонажей? Я уж не говорю про интонации в кат.сценах и во время самой игры. 2.Что за бред со шрифтами на листвоках, вывесках зданий? На одном из зданий так вообще перевода нет. Что за бочки нефть? Где вы видели что бы горючин средства хранили так открыто и ещё подписано большими буквами на бочках НЕФТЬ? Что за бред про персонажа Полину? Вам не кажется что это Брюс Уилис в шапке ушанке? Вы когда нибудь занимались паркуром в военных сапогах 1942года и в юбке? Почему у неё отсутствуют черты характера которые присуще молодой наивной девочке. Да при первой упавшей бомбе она должна была рыдать и охуевать от происходящего, и только потом взять себя в руки и начать мстить немцам, а не так "о нихуя бомбы! Немцы! Ебану ка я до дома по крышам. А далее так просто забрать жизнь у человека, хоть и у фашиста, так просто без всяких эмоций. После того как её отца расстреляли так без эмоционально задвинуть речь из 4 слов и все... Вам не кажется что вы окончательно ебанулись со своим сексизмом Невозможно было видеть непонятное барабанное ружье и обвесы почти на каждом автомате немцев. Негр которому разрешили командовать в 44году? Аллооо здравый смысл приём!!! Приём!!!! Очевидно дроп после Сталинграда. Картинка красивая, выстрелы красивые, вода как была киселем 5 лет назад так и есть, ограничения на кровь все так же есть что бы охватить больше аудитории. Ах да чуть не забыл, я так и не понял как Полина так лихо бегает по вентиляции (это как то супер присед сгорбившись с автоматом в руках и в юбке). Как сказал бы Папич - разрабы дауны Expand
  96. Nov 7, 2021
    3
    Clunky game!No audio for footsteps running like a deaf man and and get shoot in de back, respawn is just chaos!
  97. Nov 8, 2021
    3
    So sick of video games staying Woke with their characters . The multiplayer does not even feel like ww2. its all these white girls and black girls running around.... Total joke of a video game. Give us Nazis vs USA. Not this weird take on what the devs thought was going on in ww2.
  98. Nov 9, 2021
    3
    Campaign and zombies are hot garbage. Multiplayer is the only reason I’m giving it a 3.
  99. Nov 18, 2021
    3
    Одна из худших частей call of duty за всю историю существования серии!!! В ней есть очень много минусов. Например, размытая графика (даже на максимальных настройках), несбалансированные карты, где все сидят по углам и убивают в спину, как только ты заново появишься, несбалансированное оружие, перки, модули, да абсолютно всё!
    Сюжет очень унылый и слабый! Недостоверность тех времён, ужасные
    Одна из худших частей call of duty за всю историю существования серии!!! В ней есть очень много минусов. Например, размытая графика (даже на максимальных настройках), несбалансированные карты, где все сидят по углам и убивают в спину, как только ты заново появишься, несбалансированное оружие, перки, модули, да абсолютно всё!
    Сюжет очень унылый и слабый! Недостоверность тех времён, ужасные скрипты и откровенная лень в дизайне уровней. И ещё (лично для меня) минусом - это сам сеттинг игры, вторая мировая война, которая была обжовенна со всех сторон. Также магазин с косметикой (что в принцапе уже норма в играх, но всё же). Да ещё слишком неоправданный ценник!
    Вывод, брать только по большой скидке, либо только для warzone!
    Expand
  100. Mar 20, 2022
    3
    This game is terrible. Mite aswell stick to Cold war or MW2016. Each time Sledghammer make a Call of duty game it always seems to be worse in my opinion. I have nothing against the studio, they just seem to make games that aren't as good as Treyarch or IW.
    I hate it when a game makes a Ww2 story that is inaccurate. I think it is disrespectful for those who put their lives on the line.
    This game is terrible. Mite aswell stick to Cold war or MW2016. Each time Sledghammer make a Call of duty game it always seems to be worse in my opinion. I have nothing against the studio, they just seem to make games that aren't as good as Treyarch or IW.
    I hate it when a game makes a Ww2 story that is inaccurate. I think it is disrespectful for those who put their lives on the line. Both Sledghammers WW2 games they always try to be accepting of all genders and races by making them have job roles that were equal or higher than everyone. But the thing is in WW2 you didn't get that. If you wanna be accepting of all races and genders then DON'T MAKE A WW2 GAME BECAUSE IT DOESN'T WORK! I am all for equal rights across all people. I am quite sure all women understand that back in WW2 they didn't fight on the front line with a gun in their hand. Its history so portray it accurately or not at all. I thought Sledghammer learnt their lesson last time they did some cringe ww2 game that no one liked the campaign on. So why are they doing it again. Who the hell even let this company continue to make cod games when every single one just upsets so many people.
    The zombies is also terrible and just not worth it when you have cold war. Its not round based and you have to do these missions or something. I played it a couple times and hated it.
    The multiplayer is basically the same as the previous 2 games just a reskin. Hopefully Microsoft put an end to the crap where you get a reskin of the previous each year and then pay £60 for it.
    Expand
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 68 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 34 out of 68
  2. Negative: 0 out of 68
  1. Jun 8, 2022
    70
    Call of Duty: Vanguard is a great Call of Duty entry with absolutely stellar ser pieces, fantastic visuals, and plenty of modes surrounding an excellently fun campaign. The only downsides are the muddied stories… not to mention what is happening in the company that published it. Highly recommended for CoD fans and people looking for a bit of mindless fun set in WW2.
  2. PLAY
    Feb 23, 2022
    80
    While not quite hitting the series high of Modern Warfare, Vanguard is Call Of Duty as it should be: fast, satisfying, and always calling you back for more. [Issue#10, p.92]
  3. Feb 21, 2022
    60
    Even though the campaign is extremely predictable and the multiplayer is plagued with tones of issues, Call Of Duty: Vanguard is, after all, still a Call of Duty title, and will appeal to all hardcore Call of Duty fans.