Battlefield 2042

 PlayStation 5
User Score
2.6

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1271 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 216 out of 1271
  2. Mixed: 87 out of 1271
  3. Negative: 968 out of 1271
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. M1sfiT
    Sep 3, 2023
    1
    Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamessss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bring back the old Battlefield. No specialists, no all-in crossplay.
  2. das_dennis
    Aug 21, 2023
    0
    please ea sell the franchise - i got this game for free and it still sucks - do you know how bad you have to be that when you get it for free you hate it !
  3. moomoo1068
    Aug 14, 2023
    0
    A truly disappointing "game", it is hardly a Battlefield title. EA/DICE really failed to deliver any features that made the past BFs fun and turned the franchise into a mere shell of its intentions. There is nothing in this "game" to even work towards, so don't waste your time.
  4. sammypepsi
    Jul 28, 2023
    0
    a huge fraud from ea. i paid 100€ and now im supposed to buy a battlepass for 10€ when they released barely anything in nearly 2 years. disgusting service.
  5. masswindu
    Jul 14, 2023
    1
    One of the worst game ever created. Nothing is good, sound, weapons, controls.
  6. phidget
    Jun 30, 2023
    1
    Long time fan of the series, played through the beta, hell I even liked the specialists but man.....

    From the first match this was a bad experience, I'll skip past the horrendous launch issues and many bugs that plagued the game early on as well as the completely empty maps with zero cover. Instead I'll talk about what the game is now. I will say that much has improved and there is    Long time fan of the series, played through the beta, hell I even liked the specialists but man.....

    From the first match this was a bad experience, I'll skip past the horrendous launch issues and many bugs that plagued the game early on as well as the completely empty maps with zero cover.

    Instead I'll talk about what the game is now. I will say that much has improved and there is fun to be had but even after a break of several months it's only taken a couple of matches before the glaring problems drag me down. In one match I tried Lis as I wanted to see if her launcher was improved at all but immediately ran into a problem where whenever I fire her launcher the camera glitches and sticks to the ground pointing at my feet! After a brief search I find this problem has been going on for around 5 months. This is simply unacceptable to have a specialist's signature tool rendered unusable for that long. I also found this issue on another specialist that has the minigun turret as well as spawning into helicopters so it's a pretty major issue.

    The other disappointments are still present too - the weapons from earlier games have arrived but we were promised full customisation options but this hasn't fully materialised yet and many of these weapons from older games are just terrible as a result. One of the core game modes for the PS5 version had also been removed since launch - I got the game based on it having both of those 128 player modes so to have a feature removed that I paid to access feels like a real kick in the teeth.

    The fact this game launched with so many issues and still has so many game breaking bugs is an absolute scam. More protection for gamers and their money needs to be put in place around this kind of thing - if you bought any appliance and it didn't work as advertised you'd be able to get a refund within a pretty large window of time but 2 hours is ridiculous.

    Edit: I just wanted to add that although the specialists were incredibly cheesy and a poor attempt to appeal to the hero shooter fans it was still a kick in the teeth to have the flexibility they afforded removed. A large group of very vocal people voiced their dismay at the lack of the class system present in previous titles claiming that it was necessary for team play as people played the roles of the medic/engineer etc. Well now it's changed and guess what - bots are still more reliable and reviving you compared to human players so it wasn't about that at all. If somebody doesn't play the objective and just focuses on shooting then re-instating the class system will do nothing to change their playstyle as people do what they enjoy doing and that's fine. I used to like playing as Angel with a rocket launcher so I could provide a range of options from reviving, ammo packs, loadout drops and explosive damage so having that flexibility taken away for a to solve a problem it was never going to solve kinda sucked. As a result it now feels like a game with an identity crisis as it doesn't have a clue what it wants to be since everything is a fix on top of big change on top of yet another fix - it's like Jenga in a hurricane.

    I've been checking in on the game every month or two when there's been a few updates but I find myself feeling less and less likely to even bother. They created a game with way too many problems and still haven't been able to fix them all.    … Expand
  7. Hevox
    Jun 15, 2023
    3
    If you're looking for a game that defines mediocrity, look no further, you've found it.
  8. Tanksmasher88
    Jun 14, 2023
    10
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Has come a really far way since it's original release and now plays and feels like the battlefield I played as a child.… Expand
  9. AdrikD
    Mar 17, 2023
    10
    This is good battlefield, but I am speaking only about "rush" mode. For me, battlefield was all about analysing the battlefield. It is important how you move, how you analise situation, how you use gadgets and interact with squad. In this battlefield this is the most significant skills. I still don't figured out why, probably because of maps. They are big, but really good(most ofThis is good battlefield, but I am speaking only about "rush" mode. For me, battlefield was all about analysing the battlefield. It is important how you move, how you analise situation, how you use gadgets and interact with squad. In this battlefield this is the most significant skills. I still don't figured out why, probably because of maps. They are big, but really good(most of them)(When you play "rush") Now you can't just sit in a corner and making easy kills!!!(bf5 trauma) "Breakthrough" is too much chaos, but "Conquest" is obviously bad. I have never been playing battlefield so good, and this is not because my personal skills grew up.… Expand
  10. arostislavna
    May 31, 2023
    4
    So I wasted $20 on this game (and returned it) a few months ago, but when it was available for PS+ I decided to give it another try. This latest update has put it in a passable state and it is much better now.

    With that said, I don't think it does enough to make you WANT to play it because I haven't played it in two months..., the plot is nonsensical and was clearly abandoned while they    So I wasted $20 on this game (and returned it) a few months ago, but when it was available for PS+ I decided to give it another try. This latest update has put it in a passable state and it is much better now.

    With that said, I don't think it does enough to make you WANT to play it because I haven't played it in two months..., the plot is nonsensical and was clearly abandoned while they tried to save the game from it's demise.

    Nopats (non patriated forces) were supposed to make this game essentially a PMC warzone, with the inclusion of "hero-shooter mechanics" a la Overwatch, but was pigeonholed into factions of US v RU which is the antithesis of the entire game. This design choice was done deliberately to sell battlepasses and cosmetics, and it did not work.

    Lastly, Battlefield 2042 should have launched in a finished state, not early access. And that is a trend that will continue if you support EA and DICE in the future. This franchise is irreparably damaged and should be avoided.    … Expand
  11. Nekoking698
    May 26, 2023
    5
    du deja vu rien de changer toujours la même chose de meilleurs graphisme de nouveaux mode mais rien de spectaculaire
  12. darktemper
    May 17, 2023
    1
    I was actually excited for this game. I had never played a Battlefield game in my life, but hot damn that trailer looked good. Turns out that's where all the money went. Out of my excitement, I bought Battlefield 1, sadly it wasn't active at the time. but the gameplay was great, graphics were flawless, and (i assume) the class system was incredible. This is what I expected to see inI was actually excited for this game. I had never played a Battlefield game in my life, but hot damn that trailer looked good. Turns out that's where all the money went. Out of my excitement, I bought Battlefield 1, sadly it wasn't active at the time. but the gameplay was great, graphics were flawless, and (i assume) the class system was incredible. This is what I expected to see in Battlefield 2042. Damn, was I dead wrong.

    The bugs in 2042 were horrendous. Players couldn't go 3 feet without some **** happening on the screen that wasn't supposed to. Flying enemies, flying cars, sinking enemies, sinking cars, flickering lights, gun firing nerf darts, bad frame rates, not even being able to play the game, etc. That's not even scratching the surface. No, I wasn't even NEAR the surface. So much was wrong with the game, it baffles me that critics actually liked it at the time.

    I was expecting the class system to return like in EVERY BATTLEFIELD GAME EVER, but nah, specialists. Frickin' specialists. I didn't play BF1 long enough to experience it, but the class system is very important to Battlefield. Playing as an unnamed solider in all out warfare is an incredible experience. So, when the devs of their own game can't understand that specialists don't belong in a Battlefield game, yeah, it's time to quit your job. Because of specialists, everyone on each team looks exactly the same, like they couldn't be bothered to just make a few changes to character design. Abilities are good, and I would love them, if this wasn't a Battlefield game. Voice lines suck, and so on.

    Now, there's a lot more to talk about, but 2042 really, REALLY, doesn't deserve this much of a what would be a polished review. 2042 disappointed a lot of players that year, and despite these problems being somewhat fixed, specialists still suck, destruction sucks, and 2042 just... sucks. I ended up just getting Call of Duty: Vanguard that year, and, well, I wasn't pleased any better.    … Expand
  13. PremiumDamian
    May 12, 2023
    0
    Battlefield 2042 is a disaster. I bought the ultimate edition on PS5 and I regret every penny. The game's graphics are good but the gameplay, maps and 128 players are a disaster. This game is more like APEX than a BATTLEFIELD franchise game.I've bought every game in the franchise so far and here I will stop. BATTLEFIELD is no longer what it used to be. DICE offers us the experience of 128Battlefield 2042 is a disaster. I bought the ultimate edition on PS5 and I regret every penny. The game's graphics are good but the gameplay, maps and 128 players are a disaster. This game is more like APEX than a BATTLEFIELD franchise game.I've bought every game in the franchise so far and here I will stop. BATTLEFIELD is no longer what it used to be. DICE offers us the experience of 128 players but in 38 frames of the new consoles and on the most powerful computers. Anyone could have done that. Overall the game is not worth more than grade 2 and I strongly advise you NOT to BUY IT.… Expand
  14. MikiMaou
    May 5, 2023
    4
    Its getting better but the lack of maps and some very questionable additions make it still lackluster
  15. rodrigorkc
    Apr 6, 2023
    10
    Great game, true Battlefield, great graphics and physic. Good maps, best war game
  16. woddydoughnutsb
    Mar 30, 2023
    0
    These POS killed the FPS genre. It was the only viable alternative to COD and not only did they fail they failed in every way possible. This game is raw sewage. Broken on so many levels that it doesn't even dignify further review. They had to give it away for 'free' to PS users just to get some numbers and guess what, a week later they all deleted it. So you have to play with PC cheatersThese POS killed the FPS genre. It was the only viable alternative to COD and not only did they fail they failed in every way possible. This game is raw sewage. Broken on so many levels that it doesn't even dignify further review. They had to give it away for 'free' to PS users just to get some numbers and guess what, a week later they all deleted it. So you have to play with PC cheaters to even find games.… Expand
  17. Andrreus
    Mar 24, 2023
    0
    Just tried it today and in all my years of gaming I haven’t found a game to bore me as quick as this one . This is a real shame on Dice.
  18. miruges
    Mar 24, 2023
    0
    Shame to dice, this game belong to trash, i tried it twice, once in open beta obviously 0/10, now it is on ps plus "free" game and nothing changed! 0/10, there is nothing good about this game
  19. saikyouren
    Mar 19, 2023
    7
    Free on ps5 plus, what you can say lol. Free free free free free. Free on ps5 plus, what you can say lol. Free free free free free .
  20. Jimmymcjim
    Mar 19, 2023
    3
    Missing the “feel” of battlefield just isn’t a good game overall. No campaign was also the worst decision that could have been made
  21. Young__fool
    Mar 14, 2023
    8
    I understand why people are upset about the game's state at launch. It was filled with bugs and glitches that really made the game a lot less fun (even though some of the bugs were hilarious).
    But i think that the game has gotten much better since launch. Almost all the bugs and glitches has been removed, there has been added new content to the game and the envoirnmental destructability    I understand why people are upset about the game's state at launch. It was filled with bugs and glitches that really made the game a lot less fun (even though some of the bugs were hilarious).
    But i think that the game has gotten much better since launch. Almost all the bugs and glitches has been removed, there has been added new content to the game and the envoirnmental destructability has been improved significantly and smaller structures can now be brought down completeley.
    And the introduction of classes to the game has really added a whole new layer to the game and it really encourages teamwork.
    Overall i think battlefield 2042 is much better now but sometimes it just doesen't quite feel like battlefield. Sometimes. So don't purchase the game blindly as you might be disappointed alt least if you are a fan of the old BF games, but if you just want some pure multiplayer mayhem i think it is worth it at least if you can grab it on sale cuz 70 bucks can be spent more wiseley.    … Expand
  22. alimsans
    Mar 11, 2023
    1
    Can’t play with K&M. I got it for free and still feel like I was scammed. Doesn’t feel like a battlefield game. Smells like a COD game from a mile away
  23. Bzone
    Jul 31, 2022
    0
    The music alone makes this a definite zero. Is it unfair? No because my ears are bleeding. I literally can't even find a match in my region. Good job removing the server browser!
  24. SuperMoritz1
    Nov 16, 2021
    0
    I am very disappointed. Not only is the game buggy and seemingly very far from finished but there is also a lot of gameplay decisions I can not understand whatsoever. Ranging from specialists over weapon spread both on guns as well as the vehicle's guns such as the nightbird's miniguns or the tank's mgs to vehicle flight mechanics. Everything just seems like a step back. There are manyI am very disappointed. Not only is the game buggy and seemingly very far from finished but there is also a lot of gameplay decisions I can not understand whatsoever. Ranging from specialists over weapon spread both on guns as well as the vehicle's guns such as the nightbird's miniguns or the tank's mgs to vehicle flight mechanics. Everything just seems like a step back. There are many things older Battlefield games did better than 2042 which is weird considering they had so much feedback and knew what works and what doesn't. It is apparent that the game was (at least partly) designed around the concept of trying to sell as many microtransactions as possible, even if that meant sacrificing the gameplay. I do not like the way Battlefield is headed and I honestly hope they can turn this around. I always thought "I'm a Battlefield fan, it can't be that bad" and blindly pre-ordered the ultimate edition despite all the negative feedback from YouTubers and other internet personas I knew very well have been playing Battlefield for ages. But now I know: ESPECIALLY if you're a Battlefield fan, hold back with buying the game. Try testing it out first, there are many options. In its current state I do not think 2042 is worth the money; I also think Bf4 still is the better game. Please be very careful when thinking about buying this Battlefield game!… Expand
  25. JeffreyDahmer1
    Feb 19, 2023
    10
    Definitely worth it for the price. Everyone complaing is just displaying misplaced anger
  26. Inen
    Feb 3, 2023
    0
    I'm always in the back, I'm always in the front. Where the mice go wrong!!!
  27. max-ti
    Dec 31, 2022
    0
    Still, a piece of **** The number of cheaters is incredible. Tried to play a few times, can't do that. The PS5 version is super random. You can get to a good server with acceptable ping or some **** one in some **** or something.
  28. goodgriff33
    Dec 24, 2022
    4
    Answer: 75 characters is between 10 words and 19 words with spaces included in the character count. If spaces are not included in the character count, then 75 characters is between 12 words and 25 words.
  29. Flashyboy89
    Dec 17, 2022
    6
    Update Dec 2022 : After multiple updates, the game is okay now. Just okay, not good or great.

    So far, my play time with the game has been mostly frustrating compared to any early playtime with a any Battlefield game. It’s just too buggy, clunky, some server crashing and just not much fun to play right now. Payed a premium price too for essentially being a beta tester. Lack of content at    Update Dec 2022 : After multiple updates, the game is okay now. Just okay, not good or great.

    So far, my play time with the game has been mostly frustrating compared to any early playtime with a any Battlefield game. It’s just too buggy, clunky, some server crashing and just not much fun to play right now. Payed a premium price too for essentially being a beta tester. Lack of content at the moment and no campaign/story mode. I will update and change my score if things improve in future. As it stands, 6 out of 10    … Expand
  30. Random124
    Dec 15, 2022
    0
    BY FAR the worst battlefield game ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

6
#6 Most Discussed PlayStation 5 Game of 2021

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
63

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 15 out of 21
  3. Negative: 2 out of 21
  1. GameCritics
    Feb 24, 2022
    70
    While the repetition and lack of content cooled my enthusiasm a bit, I am excited to see where DICE can take Battlefield 2042 from here — if current industry trends hold, I’m confident this will be a strong addition to my already-full shooter rotation after a few months of additions and updates.
    Read full review
  2. PLAY
    Feb 23, 2022
    80
    Despite a traditionally rocky launch, the latest Battlefield proves itself one of the best in the series. Tell Edwin Starr we found out what war is good for. [Issue#9, p.72]
  3. Edge Magazine
    Dec 30, 2021
    60
    As nostalgic joys go, though, it's a damning one. [Issue#367, p.106]
See all critic reviews »