Battlefield 2042

 PlayStation 5
User Score
2.6

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1271 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 216 out of 1271
  2. Mixed: 87 out of 1271
  3. Negative: 968 out of 1271
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Flashyboy89
    Dec 17, 2022
    6
    Update Dec 2022 : After multiple updates, the game is okay now. Just okay, not good or great.

    So far, my play time with the game has been mostly frustrating compared to any early playtime with a any Battlefield game. It’s just too buggy, clunky, some server crashing and just not much fun to play right now. Payed a premium price too for essentially being a beta tester. Lack of content at    Update Dec 2022 : After multiple updates, the game is okay now. Just okay, not good or great.

    So far, my play time with the game has been mostly frustrating compared to any early playtime with a any Battlefield game. It’s just too buggy, clunky, some server crashing and just not much fun to play right now. Payed a premium price too for essentially being a beta tester. Lack of content at the moment and no campaign/story mode. I will update and change my score if things improve in future. As it stands, 6 out of 10    … Expand
  2. drcoomer
    Jan 3, 2022
    7
    Once this game is patched and finished, it will be a fantastic title. Depsite what you might be hearing about 2042, there is something to say about how fun this game has the potential to be. The maps, gunplay, and graphics are all very good. But the game is so broken that it's unplayable. Give it time, and this game may end up surprising a lot of us down the road.
  3. Rahswan
    Nov 14, 2022
    5
    Disappointing and medicore, this game was rushed and sent out to die with riddled false promises and shinning example of how not to do a live service game. A bit let down.
  4. Shirohae
    Sep 27, 2022
    7
    Its okay now. Exodus 64 multiplayer maps are very nice and i enjoy grinding the battlepass
  5. Small_Islander
    Nov 22, 2021
    5
    As much as people want to mob together and rate this 0 because it's unfinished, here me out:

    This game is not up to par, but that being said, it does have great potential, people have been annoyed that most AAA games seem to lack polish (Andromeda, BF, GTA: DE etc) , but when it comes to Dice I can say without a doubt they'll see it through to its full potential. While the game is not    As much as people want to mob together and rate this 0 because it's unfinished, here me out:

    This game is not up to par, but that being said, it does have great potential, people have been annoyed that most AAA games seem to lack polish (Andromeda, BF, GTA: DE etc) , but when it comes to Dice I can say without a doubt they'll see it through to its full potential. While the game is not what I was hoping for right away, and having pre-ordered I can say that it was not a good investment, but that being said I'm still invested in this game as it grows, as many other Battlefield games have. Give it time, and if you like the maps/gamemodes/core gameplay than you shouldn't rate the game 0, because in all honesty most people will visit this game again and it'll be drastically different. Also, hovercraft.    … Expand
  6. CallMeGod420
    Nov 19, 2021
    6
    Game is fin but needed more time in the oven
    Lot of glitches most are funny but some are frutrating
  7. SamuraiMaxis
    Nov 14, 2021
    5
    Early Acces Level 16 Review

    I Wouldn't Say it's a Disappointment After Experiencing the Beta. Maps are very big even for 64v64, İt feels like you are playing 32v32 on much much bigger maps. Hitbox, Accuracy, Bullet Velocity all around broken. 22 Weapons in a Battlefield Multiplayer is unacceptable. Specialist are another unnecessary change. Yet these Specialists has no characterstic    Early Acces Level 16 Review

    I Wouldn't Say it's a Disappointment After Experiencing the Beta. Maps are very big even for 64v64, İt feels like you are playing 32v32 on much much bigger maps. Hitbox, Accuracy, Bullet Velocity all around broken. 22 Weapons in a Battlefield Multiplayer is unacceptable. Specialist are another unnecessary change. Yet these Specialists has no characterstic whatsoever.

    Game doesn't have a campaign. You know when you are buying the game for 80€. But at least you are expecting some narrative, and its there .. for 2 minutes cinematic intro, than its gone. You are starting to game and your mission is push back either US troops or Russia Troops. Also musics are very bad unfortunately. Round Ending themes are way too forgettable. Listened all of the tracks even main theme is not good.

    Tried Hazard Zone and Portal as well but unfortunately at the moment they are not promising.

    I would suggest if you aren't big Battlefield fan, just wait for the Season 1 of this game which will release on Q1 of 2022. Because Battlefield 2042 doesn't worth the 80€. Just Wait for Discount on Q1 of 2022 or wait more for this game to come EA Acces.    … Expand
  8. gugaloli
    Nov 16, 2021
    5
    MOUSE support for consoles!

    Me, as a most time PC gamer, can't play this game on my PS5 because I don't play FPS on controller, mainly when I play against PC players (crossplay).
  9. luckydutch
    Nov 14, 2021
    5
    It’s very buggy still (expected) but my bigger issue is that is just not that fun to play on console. Specifically, the gunplay is really bad. Weapons have a lot of recoil, but they also seem to have aim ‘bloom’ where the bullets will literally fire off to the side of where it is actually aiming. Combine all that with the weaknesses of a controller for aiming and weak aim assist and itIt’s very buggy still (expected) but my bigger issue is that is just not that fun to play on console. Specifically, the gunplay is really bad. Weapons have a lot of recoil, but they also seem to have aim ‘bloom’ where the bullets will literally fire off to the side of where it is actually aiming. Combine all that with the weaknesses of a controller for aiming and weak aim assist and it just feels so RNG and frustrating. I also don’t like specialists and the lack of classes but that has been discussed as-nauseam at this point.… Expand
  10. Bhaulsdeep
    Nov 25, 2021
    5
    The game is a solid 5 out of 10. The weirdest issue with the game is that it has no scoreboard which makes the game feel soulless. The game play is OK to burn an hour of time. After that it becomes pretty stale, especially with the bugs in the game. The one good thing bf2042 has done is that the maps are some of the best maps i have played in a battlefield series.
  11. fuuuuuuuuuuuuu
    Nov 14, 2021
    7
    Currently lvl 22 and im loving it. The game definitely has a a lot of bugs that needs to be adressed, and some fixes like adding a scoreboard and fixing bullet spread. it’s the only reason I didn’t give it an 8. Most people just hate on the game because they don’t like change. The game runs great on ps5 btw. Except for a couple of spawn bugs that I’ve encountered.
  12. BBUENO
    Dec 4, 2021
    6
    It's the best multiplayer fps game for sure but I don't appreciate the direction EA is taking. First Battlefield is a MATURE audience, most of the gamer are male - 20-45 years old. They do not wish to have a Fortnite experience in Battlefield. + Nothing justified that solo campaign is missing on this game
  13. Ozirys
    Nov 23, 2021
    7
    Bon jeu, bien que bugué lors de l'accès anticipé je n'ai pas été si gêné que çà. Avec le premier patch on doit saluer des améliorations cependant il manque certaines petites choses pour en faire un très bon jeu. Un mode entrainement par exemple, des menus plus clairs, plus de map, plus d'armes, et le Hazard Zone plus étoffé.
  14. RKrogh
    Dec 18, 2021
    5
    The game was released in an unfinnished state with tons of bugs showering over us during the first weeks. Whilst most of the more obvious and obtrusive are solved, the game feels unfinnished and unbalanced in the normal modes. This is no news for the returning BF player who seems to endure this every iteration. The new modes of Portal, making it able to play legacy modes from other games,The game was released in an unfinnished state with tons of bugs showering over us during the first weeks. Whilst most of the more obvious and obtrusive are solved, the game feels unfinnished and unbalanced in the normal modes. This is no news for the returning BF player who seems to endure this every iteration. The new modes of Portal, making it able to play legacy modes from other games, as well as Hazard Zone, a version of battleroyal customized for the new mechanics of 2042, makes me put a higher score as they are fun additions. The fact that there are no official Hardcore servers, making it moot to get any progress unless you want to play playing the normal, broken settings is weird too. It is like they skipped any user testing before launch and just wanted it out there before the hollidays. Hopefylly we'll get it down the line, but thinking about the hot mess they need to clean before balancing any weapons/settings or even getting to a new official server, will take a looong time.… Expand
  15. Lemonade1408
    Nov 19, 2021
    5
    I echo much of what has been said here, the game is fun, but the feature that are missing that have been in other BF games are astounding

    It will probably be a good game in 6 to 12 months
  16. IRON_MAN
    Dec 17, 2021
    5
    As a Battlefield Fan I Am Disappointed, Here Are The Biggest Problems:

    Clunky, The game feels so clunky, even after putting the sensibility to Max, when turning left or right it just feels slow and clunky, it's unbelievable. The Guns don't have or don't feel with power no animation that satisfies your experience, I don't see smoke coming out of the Guns.. It's like if the guns were not    As a Battlefield Fan I Am Disappointed, Here Are The Biggest Problems:

    Clunky, The game feels so clunky, even after putting the sensibility to Max, when turning left or right it just feels slow and clunky, it's unbelievable.
    The Guns don't have or don't feel with power no animation that satisfies your experience, I don't see smoke coming out of the Guns.. It's like if the guns were not real.. Like if they were made outta plastic instead of metal..
    The Sound     … Expand
  17. Itzakadoozee
    Nov 26, 2021
    5
    Frustrating pos. Battlefield was my favorite franchise…was. Graphics are sub par for Battlefield. Guns feel like **** Sound is worse then previous games. Worst thing is level design. Some matches are un-winnable due to **** objective placement. All around downgrade. Wish they would have just kept updating Battlefront 2.
  18. lucascrzsatiro
    Nov 17, 2021
    7
    (JOGO NO PS5) Peguei o acesso antecipado do jogo, logo eu tenho propriedade para escrever o que eu penso sobre. Bom, a começar pelos gráficos, introdução das partidas, que foi baseada no COD, são pontos que eu considero muito bons do jogo. A jogabilidade eu, particularmente, gostei também, mas com certeza pode melhorar. A tempestade também é um ponto positivo. Contudo, falando dos que eles(JOGO NO PS5) Peguei o acesso antecipado do jogo, logo eu tenho propriedade para escrever o que eu penso sobre. Bom, a começar pelos gráficos, introdução das partidas, que foi baseada no COD, são pontos que eu considero muito bons do jogo. A jogabilidade eu, particularmente, gostei também, mas com certeza pode melhorar. A tempestade também é um ponto positivo. Contudo, falando dos que eles podem melhorar, o servidor está bastante instável nesses dias. Existem momentos que eu consigo entrar, outros que não. Durante a partida, existe presença de lags ou pequenos travamentos, o que dificulta mais ainda o rendimento do jogador em uma partida que já é muito difícil por conta do crossplay. Os setores do mapa, em que os jogadores precisam conquistar as duas partes pra ter o setor específico completamente dominado, achei que está em tamanhos ideais para a quantidade de jogadores disponíveis, porém os próprios mapas são MUITO GRANDES pra uma quantidade de 128 players. Você muitas vezes anda pra caramba até se deparar com adversários. Caberia mais jogadores sem dúvidas, porém não sei se será possível. Quanto ao menu, existem coisas a serem corrigidas sim. Um exemplo: os servidores das partidas do modo conquista. Tem gente que prefere optar por procurar partidas disponíveis no servidor Br, dos EUA e etc. Para não me prolongar muito, Battefield 2042 é um jogo bom, mas pode melhorar e muito para chegar em seu estágio ideal. Muitos erros precisam ser corrigidos. Minha nota é 7. Antes que me detonem, eu também não gostei de jogar com PC. Agora pensando a longo prazo, vai demorar para o jogo morgar e ficar com servidor mais escasso de players. Agora.. sei lá.. era melhor ter uma opção de não jogar com PC mesmo. Fica bem desbalanceado. Bastava Xbox com PS e pronto. Poderia colocar com PC também pra quem quisesse. Pelo menos, com PC, o jogo se torna mais difícil ainda, que é a graça, mas ao mesmo tempo fica apelão. Isso não posso deixar de admitir.… Expand
  19. CoyoteClassique
    Nov 15, 2021
    7
    It’s definitely not as bad as everyone’s crying it is
    The core problems are:
    - balance of guns - no scoreboard - obvious bugs (although there’s way less of them then at the release of BF1 and BFV) People complaining about graphics must be blind, that’s all I’m gonna say about that. The maps are more than fine, yes, sometimes it takes you a while to get from one point to another but hey    It’s definitely not as bad as everyone’s crying it is
    The core problems are:
    - balance of guns
    - no scoreboard
    - obvious bugs (although there’s way less of them then at the release of BF1 and BFV) People complaining about graphics must be blind, that’s all I’m gonna say about that. The maps are more than fine, yes, sometimes it takes you a while to get from one point to another but hey AREN’T THERE VEHICLES YOU CAN SUMMON? If you want to spawn right into action then CoD should suit you best buddy, come on. The content. Yes, I too wish there was more of new maps and guns. Hopefully they add more stuff later on, but right now I have a lot of fun with what we have at this point. Portal is amazing. Hazard Zone is not my thing, but an alright mode to switch things up. Overall, a decent 7 with a potential to go up to 8 if they fix the obvious stuff and add more content and a goddamn scoreboard. Stop the hysteria, the game is a lot of fun, seriously. P.S. Just saw a review of a guy complaining about his K/D like it’s the game’s fault. Yup.    … Expand
  20. Lawndart1981
    Nov 18, 2021
    5
    It's ok. There is a clear lack of content at launch despite the game being in development for 3 years by multiple studios and already being delayed a month: only 7 entirely way too large maps, only 24 weapons across all types, numerous performance issues in all platforms, and several odd design decisions that would have worked very well on other FPS franchises but not Battlefield. I dontIt's ok. There is a clear lack of content at launch despite the game being in development for 3 years by multiple studios and already being delayed a month: only 7 entirely way too large maps, only 24 weapons across all types, numerous performance issues in all platforms, and several odd design decisions that would have worked very well on other FPS franchises but not Battlefield. I dont know if they are trying to capture a younger generational audience or incorporate more features that their competitors offer but the BF 2042 product as presented at launch feels off and inconsistent with Battlefield's long standing DNA.. Review is on progress and 2 more patches are due in the next 30 days, but after BF4, BF5 and Battlefront 2's launches we shouldn't be having this discussion again... Especially after that CDPR did with CP2077 last year.… Expand
  21. shodan452
    Nov 15, 2021
    6
    Я вот даже не понимаю нравится мне или нет. По режиму Portal - всё офигенно!

    AoW - я искренне надеюсь, что этот режим загнется и забросится. Серии батлфилд не нужны какие то координальные изменения. Делайте нормальные ИНТЕРЕСНЫЕ карты, нормальный ТТК и баланс Ну куда нахрен в AoW такие пустыри? ну? Зачем растягивать экшн? Зачем специалисты? Чтобы на корню убить идею командной игры?    Я вот даже не понимаю нравится мне или нет. По режиму Portal - всё офигенно!

    AoW - я искренне надеюсь, что этот режим загнется и забросится. Серии батлфилд не нужны какие то координальные изменения. Делайте нормальные ИНТЕРЕСНЫЕ карты, нормальный ТТК и баланс

    Ну куда нахрен в AoW такие пустыри? ну? Зачем растягивать экшн?
    Зачем специалисты? Чтобы на корню убить идею командной игры?
    Мы тут не в Call of duty пришли играть в конце концов.

    В итоге предзаказал еще летом, а теперь не знаю, забирать ли диск 19 числа или нет .....
    Сейчас играю по подписке EA    … Expand
  22. KiruskaLohushka
    Nov 15, 2021
    5
    1) Poor registration of hits, I didn't really understand how to shoot in this game, perhaps there is an element of randomness in the shooting.
    2) There is no server list, you are forced to play on the maps on which you were thrown. In portal you can join an almost finished game, and in the main all-out warfare mode you sometimes wait for the server to fill up.
    3) There is no table to    1) Poor registration of hits, I didn't really understand how to shoot in this game, perhaps there is an element of randomness in the shooting.
    2) There is no server list, you are forced to play on the maps on which you were thrown. In portal you can join an almost finished game, and in the main all-out warfare mode you sometimes wait for the server to fill up.
    3) There is no table to view the kills / deaths / ping of other players, at best you can calculate your KD (you can see the kills / help / captures of the players of your squad, or the general statistics of another squad, i.e. competitiveness is removed).
    4) I am glad that in all modes there is a store tab, otherwise I was afraid not to find it (just kidding).
    5) Huge TTK, it is impossible to shoot two people, they overwhelm the mass.
    6) Too long pumping, you need to kill 360 people in order to open all the modules for weapons, moreover, it became more difficult to kill people due to the large mode, earlier it was possible to fill in the superiority and clash of teams. The task for the skill skin (red-black skin) is unrealistic, you need to kill 1200 people with grenades or treat 2400 people with a Falki pistol.
    7) Huge maps, you need to run 1 km to get to another point (in the next sector)
    8) There is no pumping on the servers in the portal, the level is pumped only in the recommended section.
    1) Плохая регистрация попаданий, не особо понял, как стрелять в этой игре, возможно в стрельбе присутствует элемент случайности.
    2) Нет списка серверов, ты вынужден играть на картах, на которые тебя закинули. В portal можешь присоединиться к почти законченной игре, а в основном режиме all-out warfare иногда ждешь, когда заполнится сервер.
    3) Нет таблицы чтобы посмотреть убийства/смерти/пинг других игроков, в лучшем случае можешь посчитать свое KD (можно посмотреть убийства/помощи/захваты игроков своего отряда, либо общую статистику другого отряда, т.е. убрана соревновательность).
    4) Радует, что во всех режимах есть вкладка магазин, а то боялся не найти (шутка).
    5) Огромный TTK, невозможно перестрелять двух человек, они перелавливают массой.
    6) Слишком долгая прокачка, нужно убить 360 человек, чтобы отрыть все модули на оружие, притом убивать людей стало сложнее из-за большого режима, раньше можно было набить в превосходстве и схватке команд. Задание на скин мастерства (красно-черный скин) выполнить нереально, нужно убить 1200 человек с гранат или полечить 2400 человек с пистолета Фальки.
    7) Огромные карты, нужно бежать 1 км, чтобы добраться до другой точки (в следующем секторе)
    8) Отсутствует прокачка на серверах в portal, прокачивается уровень только в разделе рекомендуемое.    … Expand
  23. seovikings
    Nov 17, 2021
    6
    I like that Battlefield has modern / semi-futuristic setting again. When the game works it can be quite fun. Every now and then there are these signature Battlefield moments of chaos everywhere. Though I agree specialist system needs more tuning however all the basic Battlefield roles can be covered with specialists and they offer range of gameplay diversity. 3 different gameplay modes areI like that Battlefield has modern / semi-futuristic setting again. When the game works it can be quite fun. Every now and then there are these signature Battlefield moments of chaos everywhere. Though I agree specialist system needs more tuning however all the basic Battlefield roles can be covered with specialists and they offer range of gameplay diversity. 3 different gameplay modes are also welcome because everyone can find something that they might enjoy or switch around from time to time if they get bored with one mode. If Dice keeps updating Portal with new maps from other Battlefield games, it could become huge success. All out war could also benefit from new content in the future and updates to the existing maps as currently some of them are underwhelming because there is no cover and are not infantry friendly.
    At the time of writing this review, there are multiple major issues that needs to be solved for the game to be great:
    - Fix game breaking bugs (stuck in revive, starting match without possibility to join it, server issues)
    - Fix the rest of the bugs (possibility to clip through walls, driving hovercraft up the side of a building, be marked as an enemy, cannot revive in water or if teammate is blocked by an environment)
    - Shooting mechanics (bullet spread for most weapons, balancing issues)
    - Gun upgrades (some of them have the same effects as other upgrade from the same category)
    - UI problems (no scoreboard, limited ui customization, ui can get too cluttery and obstruct vision, too many menus within menus)
    - No voice chat, no public chat
    - Spotting feels inconsistent
    - map improvements (should fill the large areas without cover to make them infantry friendly)
    - combat improvements (add more ways to deal with enemy vehicles, add more weapons)
    - add more vehicles at the base to avoid running for most of the team to the first flag
    - improve spawning (some spawns cannot be selected on consoles, at the beginning you get auto-spawned on the ground)
    - destruction is underwhelming compared to other Battlefield titles
    - Improve feeling of reward (add military ranks with each level, show damage done to enemies and enemy vehicles (what does "broke a part" even mean?), add "assist count as kill")
    - make the tone of the game consistent (match end screen with specialists saying cheesy line are not consistent in tone with the rest of the game)

    These are just some issues with the game. Battlefield 2042 has huge potential, especially if they continue to update and fix the game for upcoming years without releasing a new one every other year. Luckily when the game works it's fun but when it doesn't it can get really frustrating.    … Expand
  24. Tool_
    Nov 19, 2021
    7
    It's so hard that it makes me hate the game and it is really buggy. I was better at Battlefield 5 and I first played it in 2020 and it was easy. I have no idea what it is. Maybe it's because them **** at ea let people play the game a week early.
  25. Logo8
    Nov 14, 2021
    5
    Okay so yes there is bugs and there some issues with severs, but even looking past all this there is still something about this game that just doesn’t feel good. Gunplay seems to be annyoing and way off there’s no aim assist. The specialists obviously suck and play not important role in the game. There’s 64 players on your team and no voice chat for squads or a voice chat for all squadOkay so yes there is bugs and there some issues with severs, but even looking past all this there is still something about this game that just doesn’t feel good. Gunplay seems to be annyoing and way off there’s no aim assist. The specialists obviously suck and play not important role in the game. There’s 64 players on your team and no voice chat for squads or a voice chat for all squad leads to coordinate strategic plays. The guns are just meh and there’s only 22. The maps are okay I guess. Conquest is a boring game mode since it’s too big. Most of the time you are running back forth to objectives to capture and then retracing steps without barely seeing anymore. Breath through is the better game mode but can be crazy with the constant spawn killing and some maps have impossible objectives to capture. Portal is fun but there is no progression which kinda sucks but it’s definitely the best section of the game. Haven’t even tried the battle royale stuff but I heard it’s not worth the time. I wish I would have done the trial instead of cashing out $100 to play early for a game I’ll probably get over before the actual launch date on the 19th. This game needs updates and help fast… Expand
  26. Kostya_Nikitin
    Nov 15, 2021
    5
    Ну что сказать.. получили на релизе практически то, с чем столкнулись в бете. Большие открытые карты в "Захвате", на которых, очевидно, практически нечего делать пехоте. Слишком большие расстояния между точками интереса, можно половину матча бегать от точки к точке в поисках пары фрагов и двух захваченных флагов. Очень странная система в 100+20 Hp через бронепластину. Противники и такНу что сказать.. получили на релизе практически то, с чем столкнулись в бете. Большие открытые карты в "Захвате", на которых, очевидно, практически нечего делать пехоте. Слишком большие расстояния между точками интереса, можно половину матча бегать от точки к точке в поисках пары фрагов и двух захваченных флагов. Очень странная система в 100+20 Hp через бронепластину. Противники и так жирные в плане здоровья, так еще и дополнительные 20% здоровья подкидывают душноты. Доходит до абсурда, когда 3!!! попадания в голову из штурмовой винтовки не отправляют противника на респаун. Плюс довольно странный разброс у разного оружия. Пулеметы лупят практически как по рельсам, но у штурмовых винтовок ощущение, что в магазине 50-й калибр, вместо обычных боеприпасов.

    Абсолютно убитый режим "Прорыв". Та же проблема, что и в "Захвате" - огромные, просто нереальных размеров, карты, на которых попросту пехота не успевает перемещаться от точки к точке. Гораздо выгоднее заиметь транспорт и быстро перемещаться между точками, чтобы поскорее закончить матч.

    "Hazard Zone" - эдакий симбиоз Apex Legends и "Побега из Таркова". Вы в составе отряда из 4 человек охотитесь за несколькими жесткими дисками, попутно отстреливая ботов и живых противников из соседних отрядов. Вот тут то и пригождаются огромные карты, предлагая множество локальных столкновений на большой карте. Беда только одна - нужен сыгранный стак игроков. В противном случае вы просто замучаетесь сидеть на экране "Наблюдателя" за последним выжившим игроком. Очевидно, что в этом году именно на этот режим рассчитывали DICE и готовили Battlefield 2042 исключительно под Hazard Zone.

    Единственной надеждой ветеранов станет режим "Portal", который тоже не без косяков. Кратко - это привычный многим геймплей на картах из прошлых игр Battlefield. С абсолютно теми же правилами, набором оружия, техники и т.п. Грубо говоря - это Battlefield 1942, Bad Company 2, тройка и четверка на новом движке. НО! На текущий момент (16 ноября 2021) невозможно создать полностью кастомные подборки карт. В "Штурм" невозможно играть на сервере со 128 людьми потому что: А) их не наберется; Б) 75 очков подкреплений (а их пока нельзя настроить) сгорают за одну атаку. И матч длится, самое долгое, 5 минут.

    Наверное, режим "Portal" будет самым долгоиграющим среди большинства игроков. После "восторженной" волны стримеров, которые, естественное, будут боготворить Hazard Zone, а через неделю уйдут обратно в "Тарков" и "Warzone", настоящим поклонникам игры останется маленький огрызок в виде "Portal'a", за который они отдадут, как минимум 5,5 тысяч рублей. Ну и периодически поигрывать в "Захват" ради практики на различной технике.
    И, кстати, в игре нет сюжетной кампании или кооперативных миссий. За 5,5 тысяч рублей.    … Expand
  27. Kenamo
    Nov 18, 2021
    6
    A fun but flawed shooter. An undeniable step down from quality in the franchise with this launch but not an irredeemable mess. Give it a bit longer to bake.
  28. JanvanAswegen
    Nov 23, 2021
    5
    Well i have almost no issues with the game and a bunch of fun!! Graphics is amazing and runs perfect on my ps5
  29. Maxwill444
    Nov 29, 2021
    5
    Overall I love Battlefield but this Game is too limited with literally everything , After the Update the weapons are a lot better but, we need bigger squads, we need infanterie maps, or at least we need tdm servers on Portal where you can Level your weapons because this wasnt fixed
  30. DeltaEchoZulu19
    Dec 2, 2021
    5
    As a long time Battlefield player I was hoping so much this would be the end all of who had the better game between BF and COD. I was expecting a actual Battlefield type experience with this game but it doesn't fully immerse you like the other Battlefield games. The graphics are good on next gen and PC. It runs smooth depending on hardware. I play on PS5 and haven't had but a few issues.As a long time Battlefield player I was hoping so much this would be the end all of who had the better game between BF and COD. I was expecting a actual Battlefield type experience with this game but it doesn't fully immerse you like the other Battlefield games. The graphics are good on next gen and PC. It runs smooth depending on hardware. I play on PS5 and haven't had but a few issues. The UI however is a mess and doesn't have a smooth flow to it. The maps also feel empty and not lived in. I see where they were going with the concept and mechanics of the game but I really think they missed what their core fan base wanted. Some of the new features are enjoyable and I like some of the direction they went in. However too many corners were cut, to many key features that makes Battlefield, well, Battlefield were left out and the community is down right angry about it. They need to listen to the players, the fan base that has supported them for years with there time and money. There are several things that need to be added back in. I don't need to go through the list because it's all over the internet what they screwed up. I want to have hope for this game and I truly hope Dice can get there act together and change it for the better. With the new systems in place they should be able to not only patch and update but to fully adjust how the game feels and plays. If they can add in what they left out to get back to the basics, bring new and seasonal events to keep the game fresh and not go the route of how the other FPS have gone with gimmicks and pay to win items, then I think this could be a really great game. Yes there are bugs, yes the game does not feel complete, no it is not worth $60-$70 currently, but, this is a big but, if they listen and open their eyes to what their community truly wants, fix problems quickly, and communicate with players it could turn out to be a game well worth hundreds of hours worth of play. For the time being I will be going back to playing Warzone and BF 1 & 5 until they fix the issues.… Expand
  31. saikyouren
    Mar 19, 2023
    7
    Free on ps5 plus, what you can say lol. Free free free free free. Free on ps5 plus, what you can say lol. Free free free free free .
  32. timbrax
    Nov 25, 2021
    7
    To all the crying beaches who give this game a 0, You just suck, go back to your fortnite.
  33. huraka13
    Nov 11, 2022
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Llevo unas seis horas jugadas y de momento es todo lo que esperaba. Tiene la esencia battlefield de siempre pero con mapas más grandes y más posibilidades, si además le añades el modo portal puedes volver a jugar con mapas de antaño com 64 jugadores. Quizá le faltan mas modos de juego y armas, algo que supongo con el tiempo irán añadiendo. Por último, no se si soy el más afortunado del mundo o que, pero no me he encontrado bugs de momento.… Expand
  34. Anar-9999
    Nov 18, 2021
    5
    I game with great potential just need to fix all the glitches in it and it will be a great game I hope that they will fix it all and bring this game to mind
  35. Anthem2p
    Nov 27, 2021
    6
    Hugh unattractive map, with less action than free CoD warzon.
    Graphics don’t match new generation , even ps4 look better. Small amount of weapons and gadgets.
    No fun in new modalities
  36. CnPx98
    Nov 11, 2022
    5
    The game has gotten better with updates as well all know it launched in a terrible state.
    Still thou as far as value for money goes it still is far to over priced. £70 ($80) for a game that's heavily monitized and has nothing to offer other then multiplayer just isn't worth it. When you compare it to call of duty which has campaign, multiplayer and co-op (Zombies or spec ops) for the same    The game has gotten better with updates as well all know it launched in a terrible state.
    Still thou as far as value for money goes it still is far to over priced. £70 ($80) for a game that's heavily monitized and has nothing to offer other then multiplayer just isn't worth it. When you compare it to call of duty which has campaign, multiplayer and co-op (Zombies or spec ops) for the same price then it makes you wonder how they think £70 is a reasonable price. It should be half that. Overall the multiplayer is solid since they updated it. I personally got the game second hand for £15 ($18). I stopped pre ordering games because they end up launching the way this game did. I decided to check back and seen they fixed some issues and seen it cheap so I grabbed it and for £15 it's a good price. To summarize it's a good game but extremely overpriced for a game that has the same amount of micro-transactions as games which are free. There isn't enough content to make £70 worth while when there are games which offer way more entertainment for the same price.    … Expand
  37. Mangojerry125
    Nov 20, 2021
    6
    Well, I know people are not really happy with this game, but I see a great potential. A little hard work and you can do it Dice.
  38. Cynycal
    Nov 20, 2021
    7
    Have had a fair amount of fun in the game with friends. It still needs some work in a lot of areas though. Specialists in particular seem out of place in Conquest, maybe they should be in Hazard Zone / Portal exclusively. Either way, I've still had fun. Will definitely keep playing the game while hoping it improves.
  39. nolosantos3
    Nov 21, 2021
    7
    Ehhh gráficos horribles... acaso lo habeís jugado? Unico problema bugs y que faltan cosas
  40. Omer_00
    Nov 22, 2021
    5
    1:call of duty should be free 2:keep playing warzone 3rd rtx is not eye catching
  41. Mehmoud
    Dec 7, 2021
    5
    Game playable now. It is getting better.
    Look forward for the next. Seems promising
  42. MikeNibbx
    Jan 15, 2022
    7
    I've put 30 hours in. I'm enjoying the game. Specialists bring some nuance despite their controversial addition. Some more destruction would be nice. The maps are pretty wide open and could use some tightening up and detail added to indoor areas. Could be a bit more optimized but as of now it seems to have its major bugs ironed out. It gives those "only in battlefield" moments, and is aI've put 30 hours in. I'm enjoying the game. Specialists bring some nuance despite their controversial addition. Some more destruction would be nice. The maps are pretty wide open and could use some tightening up and detail added to indoor areas. Could be a bit more optimized but as of now it seems to have its major bugs ironed out. It gives those "only in battlefield" moments, and is a decent entry I hope will grow to be even better with time seeing as it's a live service.… Expand
  43. NeonReplicant
    Feb 5, 2022
    6
    I have tried to enjoy Bf2042 since launch despite a raft of issues, but finally it's really just shown a surprising lack of depth. Overall art design is good, but level design is terrible. No usable cover on capture points make you cannon fodder for mouse pad snipers. I find myself constantly popping smoke to stay alive. No peek around cover options or weapon mounting doesn't help. NoI have tried to enjoy Bf2042 since launch despite a raft of issues, but finally it's really just shown a surprising lack of depth. Overall art design is good, but level design is terrible. No usable cover on capture points make you cannon fodder for mouse pad snipers. I find myself constantly popping smoke to stay alive. No peek around cover options or weapon mounting doesn't help. No choke points to enable tense gunplay. Vehicle balancing is broken and light transports are useless, which makes Conquest feel like a sprinting simulator. 128 player matches can be a thrill and this kept me coming back until I realised the maps were garbage. With servers seeming laggier than ever and player counts plummeting the state of the game is far from ideal. Patches have fixed assault rifle bloom and hit reg issues. But these shouldn't have existed in the first place in a game with an active beta. Dice clearly dropped the ball on what should have been a slam dunk.… Expand
  44. BrianDavid94
    Aug 26, 2022
    5
    Quick background on me the reviewer, I tend to like single player games that is heavy on narrative the most. I also play a lot of racing games and use to play multiplayer games in my high school days but now that it's hard for me and my friends to find a good time to link up so now I hardly play any. Up to try any genre of games and sometimes I find something new that I didn't think I'dQuick background on me the reviewer, I tend to like single player games that is heavy on narrative the most. I also play a lot of racing games and use to play multiplayer games in my high school days but now that it's hard for me and my friends to find a good time to link up so now I hardly play any. Up to try any genre of games and sometimes I find something new that I didn't think I'd like. I play on every platform but prefer PlayStation.

    So I started playing this series with Bad Company and instantly fell in love with the multiplayer. I loved the everbody has a role to play, teamwork focus, destructive environments, and the feeling that you where in a war. They continued to do well and peaked at Battlefield 3/4. Battlefield 1 they started going on a downward trend. Starting with this game they launch games with very little contact in regards to maps, weapons, and campaign. Even the multiplayer component seemed to loose there teamwork/role aspects that made Battlefield unique. Battlefield 5 they added hero shooter aspects to be more like other games instead of sticking to their uniqueness. Felt more and more like Call of Duty but there is already a Call of Duty. Stick to your history it's what made Battlefield a threat agaisnt Call of Duty. When they started the marketing for Battlefield 2042 they were saying all the right things and they got me hyped. Once again I was dissapointed. Hero shooter is still there, hardly any maps and the maps they have don't flow well, no weapons to choose from, and no campaign at all. I felt scammed since their marketing made it seem like they where going back to their old formula.

    This game has potential but they would have to make a lot of gameplay changes and add content which i doubt they'll do. There Aug 2022 announcement seemed like they are making some better decisions but I'll wait until i see it.    … Expand
  45. umrttl
    Dec 10, 2022
    7
    Its not even that bad, I encountered like 2 bugs in 50 hours. Gameplay is pretty fun but I don't enjoy the game's main mode, conquest and ngl these maps sometimes feel too big.
  46. Nekoking698
    May 26, 2023
    5
    du deja vu rien de changer toujours la même chose de meilleurs graphisme de nouveaux mode mais rien de spectaculaire

Awards & Rankings

6
#6 Most Discussed PlayStation 5 Game of 2021

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
63

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 15 out of 21
  3. Negative: 2 out of 21
  1. GameCritics
    Feb 24, 2022
    70
    While the repetition and lack of content cooled my enthusiasm a bit, I am excited to see where DICE can take Battlefield 2042 from here — if current industry trends hold, I’m confident this will be a strong addition to my already-full shooter rotation after a few months of additions and updates.
    Read full review
  2. PLAY
    Feb 23, 2022
    80
    Despite a traditionally rocky launch, the latest Battlefield proves itself one of the best in the series. Tell Edwin Starr we found out what war is good for. [Issue#9, p.72]
  3. Edge Magazine
    Dec 30, 2021
    60
    As nostalgic joys go, though, it's a damning one. [Issue#367, p.106]
See all critic reviews »