Assassin's Creed Valhalla: Dawn of Ragnarok

 PlayStation 5
User Score
5.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 174 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 88 out of 174
  2. Mixed: 17 out of 174
  3. Negative: 69 out of 174

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. 0wn3df1x
    Mar 16, 2022
    6
    AC Odyssey w all DLCs took 200 hours (100+100) to complete.
    AC Valhalla w all DLC have only 163 hours. 90+73 hours of 2 DLCs from the season pass, all sorts of free additional tasks and Dawn of Ragnarok.
    Ubisoft said it's "the most ambitious expansion in the history of the series". in my opinion, this is a blatant lie. In terms of scale, this addition was not even close to the Fate of    AC Odyssey w all DLCs took 200 hours (100+100) to complete.
    AC Valhalla w all DLC have only 163 hours. 90+73 hours of 2 DLCs from the season pass, all sorts of free additional tasks and Dawn of Ragnarok.
    Ubisoft said it's "the most ambitious expansion in the history of the series". in my opinion, this is a blatant lie. In terms of scale, this addition was not even close to the Fate of Atlantis from Odyssey. Their attempt to sell this DLC not in a season pass, but separately, citing its scale, also does not stand up to criticism. In terms of scale, this expansion is the same as the previous Siege of Paris DLC. Nothing justifies releasing this expansion on its own rather than in the Season Pass. The plot is frankly weak, throughout the DLC there is only one strong cutscene, but it does not justify a separate sale. And the DLC itself is frankly weak, like Valhalla itself. 6/10.    … Expand
  2. MyOwnOpinion230
    Mar 14, 2022
    5
    Assassin's Creed just isn't what it used to be anymore. The gameplay is bland and every release seems to lose sight of the original point of Assassin's creed.
  3. Alexandr1987
    Nov 15, 2022
    5
    бросил после 1го босса, затыкивать его оказалось скучно, дальше даже не стал играть.
  4. z3r0w
    Jun 19, 2022
    7
    The game is great. One of the best AC games I’ve played. But, I was waiting for a more “impressive” visual. But, beside the scenarios, the rest remember me a lot of Odissey. And, it’s too big, just like odyssey. To me, games should have something around 30 hours. 60 hours to rush the game is too much. I can’t get myself attached that much
  5. Zezman
    Feb 8, 2023
    7
    Good game, graphics are nice, combat is well done, parkour, as before, I didn't notice any errors, everything goes smoothly. The game is interesting, but I don't think it's wow, it's not perfect. I'd probably recommend it, but it's interesting to spend time in it exploring!

Awards & Rankings

44
#44 Most Discussed PlayStation 5 Game of 2022

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
71

Mixed or average reviews - based on 33 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 33
  2. Mixed: 19 out of 33
  3. Negative: 0 out of 33
  1. PSX Brasil
    May 7, 2022
    85
    Dawn of Ragnarok is the perfect expansion for what the latest trilogy in the Assassin's Creed franchise set out to tell. With a fun new world to explore, new skills and, most importantly, a very well written story that should please longtime fans of the series.
    Read full review
  2. PLAY! Zine
    Apr 7, 2022
    70
    Dawn of Ragnarok is a much better paced and written experience than vanilla AC Valhalla is, but suffers from the same gameplay and design problems, even with its better condensed and well thought out world and characters.
    Read full review
  3. PLAY
    Apr 1, 2022
    60
    Despite a nice map, the content and additional mechanics never really come together, and Havi’s adventure feels notably weaker than Eivor’s.[Issue#13, p.86]
See all critic reviews »