User Score
1.7

Overwhelming dislike- based on 144 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 144

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Aug 29, 2023
    0
    this game shows everything that is wrong with the gaming industry
    greedy developers coping for your money
  2. Aug 25, 2023
    0
    It could have been phenomenal but they did this instead. If you want a true remaster do not support this game, they listen to your wallet
  3. Aug 24, 2023
    0
    Я фанат RDR 2, але Rockstar опускаються до рівня EA і Ubisoft, тому що просити за гру 50$ якій вже 13 років це дорого, це навіть не ремастер. Я дуже чекав що гра вийде на пк але ви й цього не зробили. Strauss Zelnyk suck my dick.
  4. Aug 24, 2023
    1
    Es muy caro (49.99USD), considerando que es un juego sin ninguna modificación respecto a su versión original y que salió hace más de 10 años.
  5. Aug 18, 2023
    0
    Ridiculously overpriced for a 13 year old port. This should have been a complete remake.
  6. Aug 19, 2023
    1
    روکستار ئەفە شەش حەفت سالە زبل زبلە لعبەکا هوسا و 50 دولار گرافیکین بلەیستیشن ۳ ،
  7. Aug 18, 2023
    0
    The original game was great for the ps3 at that time. This is just a ported version for much to much. It's just disrespectful to the fans and makers of the game to put so few effort in and ask a so high price. It screams just "Take two needs cash without doing something for it"

    I will buy it as soon as they properly remastered it.
  8. Aug 18, 2023
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is more like Red Dead Redemption (Money Grab Edition) when they released the GTA Trilogy Defective Edition. Expand
  9. Aug 18, 2023
    0
    Trash, you can probably get a PS3 and a used copy for $50 and not give rockstar money for their "effort". They've become a joke.
  10. Aug 18, 2023
    0
    This game is an absolute huge steaming pile of garbage. This is easily the worst "remaster" I have ever seen in my life. The greedy developers are charging $50 for a 13 year old port without any improvements. This outrageous greed makes EA and Activision look like saints in comparison. To make matters worse, it's only half of the game. Where's the multiplayer? These left-wing liberalThis game is an absolute huge steaming pile of garbage. This is easily the worst "remaster" I have ever seen in my life. The greedy developers are charging $50 for a 13 year old port without any improvements. This outrageous greed makes EA and Activision look like saints in comparison. To make matters worse, it's only half of the game. Where's the multiplayer? These left-wing liberal bully-victims at Rockstar wouldn't shut up about their hatred for capitalism in GTA games. According to them, capitalism is dirty business in which you rip people off and get paid for it. That's exactly what these hypocrites are doing with their ports. Speaking of hypocrisy, Rockstar made fun of COD for being the same game as the last in GTA 5. At least COD has actual new games every year. After the release of RDR2, it's been nothing but re-releases. I don't want to hear any excuses about this being Take-Two's fault. If it were up to Take-Two, they would've forced these lazy developers to release a new GTA before PS5 launch. Clearly T2 gives Rockstar too much freedom.

    It's funny seeing these toy-collecting millennials claiming Rockstar were "consumer friendly" in the past. Rockstar has always been greedy, it's just you millennials were either too little to care or easily fooled by these companies. And don't even get me started with Rockstar San Diego's greed. They cut Midnight Club 1 in half and called the other half Smuggler's Run. Don't forget they joined the greedy trend of releasing an incomplete game with RDR 1, only to release the complete game within a year. Undead Nightmare came out only 5 months after RDR, you mean to tell me they couldn't wait to release the complete game within that timeframe? That reminds me, they did this with Midnight Club 3 on PS2 when they released the Remix edition one year later, meaning you had to pay a total of $100 to get the complete MC3 experience if you had bought the original. Sure they're greedier and lazier than ever before, but my point still stands. This is the same company that couldn't even give characters fingers on the original PS2 GTA Trilogy for goodness sake.

    As I mentioned before, there's no multiplayer. So once you beat the story, there's literally not a reason to play this game again. Charging $50 for a game with no replay value is a cash grab. I see Rockstar is taking a page from Naughty Dog by re-releasing games at $50+ without the multiplayer. I'm sick to death of these developers cutting games in half. Rockstar couldn't even do the bare minimum and give this game fps boost. You think that's bad? It only gets worse from here. These developers couldn't even make a PS5 version. Are you freaking kidding me? A PS4 and Switch only release in 2023 is what you would expect from no-name developers making shovelware, not a AAA studio making bank. That's embarrassing and pathetic. Not even EA would stoop that low. Rockstar are so greedy, so lazy and cheap, I'm about to lose it so I'll end it here. I don't recommend this poor excuse of a port at all.
    Expand
  11. Aug 19, 2023
    0
    Overpriced cash grab. They took the code of a 14 year old game recompiled it for PS4, changed resolution, added FSR2, left everything else unchanged and put a lazy ass 50 Euro price tag on it. The lack of 60 FPS VRR is mind boggling. I will not pay for this crap!

    Here's what I expect from a studio like RockStar Games: 1. A max. 15 EUR/USD price tag for the re-testing efforts 2. Free 60
    Overpriced cash grab. They took the code of a 14 year old game recompiled it for PS4, changed resolution, added FSR2, left everything else unchanged and put a lazy ass 50 Euro price tag on it. The lack of 60 FPS VRR is mind boggling. I will not pay for this crap!

    Here's what I expect from a studio like RockStar Games:
    1. A max. 15 EUR/USD price tag for the re-testing efforts
    2. Free 60 FPS upgrades for GTA5, RDR2, and RDR
    Expand
  12. Aug 19, 2023
    2
    Low effort cash grab by Strauss Zelnick, but what did we expect really from the company that gave us the GTA Trilogy "remaster"?
  13. Aug 19, 2023
    4
    Are you crazy to ask for $50 for a game that doesn't support 60fps and doesn't even have a PS5 version? It's not even an enhanced edition.
  14. Aug 19, 2023
    0
    13-year-old game -> 30 fps on PS5 -> $50. :clown-face:
    This game is also available on Xbox at 30 fps for $30 thanks to backward compatibility, but on PS5, you have to pay $50 for the same experience.

    The game itself is very good, and it's fortunate that no one from Grove Street Games touched it (thank God), but $50 is a completely inadequate price.
  15. Aug 20, 2023
    0
    I'ma put as much effort in the review as rockstar did with this piss poor port
  16. Aug 19, 2023
    0
    $50 for a 13 years old game.
    And it's not even a remake or a remaster.
    Rockstar is well on its way to becoming the new EA.
  17. Aug 19, 2023
    0
    It was Rockstar previously, now it's Rocks*it. And Ubisoft looks like a cool company in comparison.
  18. Aug 19, 2023
    0
    Doesn't have multiplayer, Overpriced and port has many bugges and glitches.
  19. Aug 19, 2023
    0
    50 bucks for an unacceptable lazy port? This kind of money grabbing shouldn't exist.
  20. Aug 19, 2023
    0
    Nos toman por tontos, un port capado sin opción online al precio de un remake. Se ríen en nuestra cara.
  21. Aug 19, 2023
    10
    works well, $50 is a little expensive, but on PS3 if you buy with DLS it costs the same $50 ((I put 10 since I play for the first time and the game is like new for me ((
  22. Aug 18, 2023
    0
    Screw this cash grab. That's all it is. Don't give then any money for this ridiculous bs
  23. AYN
    Aug 19, 2023
    0
    When these mother f***ING money sucker's gonna learn how to develop a god damn remake/remastered that's looks like a brand new game? I don't know how the f they thought fans would be satisfied with this port. Gta trilogy wasn't enough they dragged enother franchise through the mud so they can just make some money out of it. Take two president's should have a serious talk with theseWhen these mother f***ING money sucker's gonna learn how to develop a god damn remake/remastered that's looks like a brand new game? I don't know how the f they thought fans would be satisfied with this port. Gta trilogy wasn't enough they dragged enother franchise through the mud so they can just make some money out of it. Take two president's should have a serious talk with these bastards from Rockstar about this embarrassment Expand
  24. Aug 19, 2023
    3
    $50 asking price is just not right. Meanwhile Xbox and PC users can enjoy the game for much less via backwards compatibility and emulation. This truly shows that Rockstar doesn't care about its users.
  25. Aug 20, 2023
    9
    Just masterpiece!
    The gameplay, graphics and story is still great and wonderful.
    I wish there was a remaster.
  26. Aug 18, 2023
    0
    Lovely high effort port with lots of love added in, great price point as well!
  27. Aug 18, 2023
    8
    Aside from the 30 fps lock when playing on a PS5, this is a solid port of the game. It didn't need fancy new features. The story and gameplay hold up. I was never a fan of the multiplayer when it originally released so it's not really missed for me.
  28. Aug 20, 2023
    10
    Switch and PS4 players who never had the chance to play this masterpiece, now can.

    Many complain that it brings little news or the price, yes, but surely if they had done a remake or a remastering changing things there would also be complaints. The same press that did not take into account the price of some "remake" recently, now puts it as a negative of this game It's a port, a
    Switch and PS4 players who never had the chance to play this masterpiece, now can.

    Many complain that it brings little news or the price, yes, but surely if they had done a remake or a remastering changing things there would also be complaints.

    The same press that did not take into account the price of some "remake" recently, now puts it as a negative of this game

    It's a port, a good port on both consoles that exactly resembles the original changing the resolution on ps4 and switch 1080p (improved on ps4 pro and ps5, 4k), shadow improvements and less blur, with some new subtitle languages ​​plus the dlc (one of the best dlc ever).

    Remember that in the case of playstation it could be free if the console was backwards compatible, sony's fault.

    The original game is a masterpiece and even with a few additions this version still is. And even with the years that have passed and taking that into account, it seems to me a much better game than current games.
    Expand
  29. Aug 20, 2023
    0
    Shameless cash grab even if this was only 20 bucks. But no, it’s 50. Their willingness to put this out at that price makes me nervous about their future. Even worse showing than the gta remasters.
  30. Aug 20, 2023
    0
    Not worth the price tagg for a 13 year old port. Low effort, no 60fps and the map and assets are still the same as 2 console generations ago. DO NOT BUT
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 11
  2. Negative: 0 out of 11
  1. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 18, 2024
    80
    Objectively, Red Dead Redemption is a true classic. Not only does it conclude the beloved story of both its successor and predecessor, but it does so with equal flourish and narrative quality. [Issue#330]
  2. Oct 4, 2023
    80
    Red Dead Redemption as a game is still a fantastic romp that any cowboy or open world fan should experience. Meanwhile, playing it on my PS5 (via backwards compatibility) is a treat, even if it doesn’t change how the game runs or looks. It has one of the best open worlds you can ask for and a compelling story to boot. But, it’s bogged down by its lazy cash-grab nature, with the Rockstar team opting to do away with content and instead do the absolute bare minimum.
  3. Sep 30, 2023
    83
    Red Dead Redemption is an unbelievably good game, even in 2023, however the lack of effort put into elevating the game to the current day’s technical benchmarks damages its modern legacy.