Red Dead Redemption and Undead Nightmare

 PlayStation 4
User Score
1.7

Overwhelming dislike- based on 144 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 144
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 144
  3. Negative: 121 out of 144

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. RYZE-ICONIC
    Aug 19, 2023
    4
    Are you crazy to ask for $50 for a game that doesn't support 60fps and doesn't even have a PS5 version? It's not even an enhanced edition.
  2. cscs
    Aug 19, 2023
    3
    $50 asking price is just not right. Meanwhile Xbox and PC users can enjoy the game for much less via backwards compatibility and emulation. This truly shows that Rockstar doesn't care about its users.
  3. Deadheadbill
    Aug 19, 2023
    2
    Low effort cash grab by Strauss Zelnick, but what did we expect really from the company that gave us the GTA Trilogy "remaster"?
  4. Orochi777
    Sep 7, 2023
    1
    A remaster of this game is unnecessary, a remake would be better. Also the game is very expensive for what it is....
  5. danar
    Aug 19, 2023
    1
    روکستار ئەفە شەش حەفت سالە زبل زبلە لعبەکا هوسا و 50 دولار گرافیکین بلەیستیشن ۳ ،
  6. Zeon1982
    Aug 20, 2023
    1
    I used to be able to stream the PS3 version of this game on PS Plus. I'm not paying £40 for this, it's identical to the PS3 version they removed. It should of been put on PS Plus day one release. Suck my ass rockstar.
  7. The_D4RknesS
    Aug 21, 2023
    1
    It's exactly the same as the 2010 version, it hasn't changed a damn thing and the worst thing is that they're charging $50 dollar for a game that's over 10 years old. At least there should be a PC version there, maybe it would be acceptable because everyone dreamed of playing this shi# on PC. It's much more acceptable to buy a PS3 and play it over there since it's much more accessible andIt's exactly the same as the 2010 version, it hasn't changed a damn thing and the worst thing is that they're charging $50 dollar for a game that's over 10 years old. At least there should be a PC version there, maybe it would be acceptable because everyone dreamed of playing this shi# on PC. It's much more acceptable to buy a PS3 and play it over there since it's much more accessible and cheaper in value.… Expand
  8. MaqiMk1
    Aug 25, 2023
    1
    Laziest port in recent memory. Rockstar clearly don’t give a damn and haven’t learnt from their lacklustre GTA remasters. They have lived long enough to become the villains in the gaming industry.
  9. EDUARDOMR33
    Aug 24, 2023
    1
    Es muy caro (49.99USD), considerando que es un juego sin ninguna modificación respecto a su versión original y que salió hace más de 10 años.
  10. ragerino
    Aug 19, 2023
    0
    Overpriced cash grab. They took the code of a 14 year old game recompiled it for PS4, changed resolution, added FSR2, left everything else unchanged and put a lazy ass 50 Euro price tag on it. The lack of 60 FPS VRR is mind boggling. I will not pay for this crap!

    Here's what I expect from a studio like RockStar Games: 1. A max. 15 EUR/USD price tag for the re-testing efforts 2. Free 60    Overpriced cash grab. They took the code of a 14 year old game recompiled it for PS4, changed resolution, added FSR2, left everything else unchanged and put a lazy ass 50 Euro price tag on it. The lack of 60 FPS VRR is mind boggling. I will not pay for this crap!

    Here's what I expect from a studio like RockStar Games:
    1. A max. 15 EUR/USD price tag for the re-testing efforts
    2. Free 60 FPS upgrades for GTA5, RDR2, and RDR    … Expand
  11. ason313
    Aug 20, 2023
    0
    Shameless cash grab even if this was only 20 bucks. But no, it’s 50. Their willingness to put this out at that price makes me nervous about their future. Even worse showing than the gta remasters.
  12. The_Seaman_
    Aug 20, 2023
    0
    Not worth the price tagg for a 13 year old port. Low effort, no 60fps and the map and assets are still the same as 2 console generations ago. DO NOT BUT
  13. Panchogul
    Sep 8, 2023
    0
    Un port PEREZOSO y que además llega muy tarde a precio de triple A de lanzamiento. Este tipo de malas prácticas deben acabar.
  14. OnlyOneHere
    Aug 18, 2023
    0
    This game is an absolute huge steaming pile of garbage. This is easily the worst "remaster" I have ever seen in my life. The greedy developers are charging $50 for a 13 year old port without any improvements. This outrageous greed makes EA and Activision look like saints in comparison. To make matters worse, it's only half of the game. Where's the multiplayer? These left-wing liberalThis game is an absolute huge steaming pile of garbage. This is easily the worst "remaster" I have ever seen in my life. The greedy developers are charging $50 for a 13 year old port without any improvements. This outrageous greed makes EA and Activision look like saints in comparison. To make matters worse, it's only half of the game. Where's the multiplayer? These left-wing liberal bully-victims at Rockstar wouldn't shut up about their hatred for capitalism in GTA games. According to them, capitalism is dirty business in which you rip people off and get paid for it. That's exactly what these hypocrites are doing with their ports. Speaking of hypocrisy, Rockstar made fun of COD for being the same game as the last in GTA 5. At least COD has actual new games every year. After the release of RDR2, it's been nothing but re-releases. I don't want to hear any excuses about this being Take-Two's fault. If it were up to Take-Two, they would've forced these lazy developers to release a new GTA before PS5 launch. Clearly T2 gives Rockstar too much freedom.

    It's funny seeing these toy-collecting millennials claiming Rockstar were "consumer friendly" in the past. Rockstar has always been greedy, it's just you millennials were either too little to care or easily fooled by these companies. And don't even get me started with Rockstar San Diego's greed. They cut Midnight Club 1 in half and called the other half Smuggler's Run. Don't forget they joined the greedy trend of releasing an incomplete game with RDR 1, only to release the complete game within a year. Undead Nightmare came out only 5 months after RDR, you mean to tell me they couldn't wait to release the complete game within that timeframe? That reminds me, they did this with Midnight Club 3 on PS2 when they released the Remix edition one year later, meaning you had to pay a total of $100 to get the complete MC3 experience if you had bought the original. Sure they're greedier and lazier than ever before, but my point still stands. This is the same company that couldn't even give characters fingers on the original PS2 GTA Trilogy for goodness sake.

    As I mentioned before, there's no multiplayer. So once you beat the story, there's literally not a reason to play this game again. Charging $50 for a game with no replay value is a cash grab. I see Rockstar is taking a page from Naughty Dog by re-releasing games at $50+ without the multiplayer. I'm sick to death of these developers cutting games in half. Rockstar couldn't even do the bare minimum and give this game fps boost. You think that's bad? It only gets worse from here. These developers couldn't even make a PS5 version. Are you freaking kidding me? A PS4 and Switch only release in 2023 is what you would expect from no-name developers making shovelware, not a AAA studio making bank. That's embarrassing and pathetic. Not even EA would stoop that low. Rockstar are so greedy, so lazy and cheap, I'm about to lose it so I'll end it here. I don't recommend this poor excuse of a port at all.    … Expand
  15. Mindurbidniss
    Aug 24, 2023
    0
    Same game you played over a decade ago on a decade old system but, and this is the great part, now it's $50! Isn't it great? Thank the heavens for Strauss Zelnick and the brilliant minds at Rockstar for re-gifting us this gem that they gave us before.... Sad thing is people will still buy this.
  16. BABERKA
    Aug 28, 2023
    0
    "When wealth is multiplied, do not put your heart to it" (Ps. 61:11) This also applies to Sony companies
  17. Weidenwiesel
    Aug 20, 2023
    0
    Zero effort was put into this port. They just copy pasted the (inferior to the Xbox 360 version) ps3 version and janked it onto the ps4. Without any changes, optimizations or improvements. What you get are blurry textures, no antialiasing, a laughable 30fps and no 4K support. And lets not forget that they removed the multiplayer. The only Premium about this product is the ridiculous price.Zero effort was put into this port. They just copy pasted the (inferior to the Xbox 360 version) ps3 version and janked it onto the ps4. Without any changes, optimizations or improvements. What you get are blurry textures, no antialiasing, a laughable 30fps and no 4K support. And lets not forget that they removed the multiplayer. The only Premium about this product is the ridiculous price. Fk Rockstar.… Expand
  18. geweth
    Aug 19, 2023
    0
    13-year-old game -> 30 fps on PS5 -> $50. :clown-face:
    This game is also available on Xbox at 30 fps for $30 thanks to backward compatibility, but on PS5, you have to pay $50 for the same experience.

    The game itself is very good, and it's fortunate that no one from Grove Street Games touched it (thank God), but $50 is a completely inadequate price.
  19. Coluk003
    Aug 18, 2023
    0
    Screw this cash grab. That's all it is. Don't give then any money for this ridiculous bs
  20. AYN
    Aug 19, 2023
    0
    When these mother f***ING money sucker's gonna learn how to develop a god damn remake/remastered that's looks like a brand new game? I don't know how the f they thought fans would be satisfied with this port. Gta trilogy wasn't enough they dragged enother franchise through the mud so they can just make some money out of it. Take two president's should have a serious talk with theseWhen these mother f***ING money sucker's gonna learn how to develop a god damn remake/remastered that's looks like a brand new game? I don't know how the f they thought fans would be satisfied with this port. Gta trilogy wasn't enough they dragged enother franchise through the mud so they can just make some money out of it. Take two president's should have a serious talk with these bastards from Rockstar about this embarrassment… Expand
  21. Ebola8MyFace
    Aug 20, 2023
    0
    It's still one of my favorite games of all time. Too bad it's owned by people who have no shame, class or appreciation for the love that went into it. 2010 was a very different time than 2023, and Rockstar is a shallow, corporate urinal cake of its former self.
  22. Gosticouilles
    Aug 20, 2023
    0
    Would've been acceptable for 10$. After dragging the same game over three consoles generations, releasing the worst remaster trilogy in the video game history and then releasing a RDR port for 70$, Rockstar really went from king to nothing.
  23. Sheepsyhere
    Aug 18, 2023
    0
    Lovely high effort port with lots of love added in, great price point as well!
  24. bertheeren
    Aug 18, 2023
    0
    The original game was great for the ps3 at that time. This is just a ported version for much to much. It's just disrespectful to the fans and makers of the game to put so few effort in and ask a so high price. It screams just "Take two needs cash without doing something for it"

    I will buy it as soon as they properly remastered it.
  25. Viking-killer12
    Aug 20, 2023
    0
    I'ma put as much effort in the review as rockstar did with this piss poor port
  26. nauticalUwU
    Aug 27, 2023
    0
    do i really need to explain why this game deserves this note?
    if only they placed minimum effort on this game it would have been great but this is rockstar
  27. overb1st
    Aug 24, 2023
    0
    Я фанат RDR 2, але Rockstar опускаються до рівня EA і Ubisoft, тому що просити за гру 50$ якій вже 13 років це дорого, це навіть не ремастер. Я дуже чекав що гра вийде на пк але ви й цього не зробили. Strauss Zelnyk suck my dick.
  28. Mychaelwo
    Aug 26, 2023
    0
    Such a shame, i don't even cara about this game anymore, just give us a PS5 native version of Red Dead Redemption II!!!
  29. Dadazuma
    Aug 19, 2023
    0
    The same game as the original for $50? What heresy is this? Shame on you Rockstar.
  30. hs412
    Aug 21, 2023
    0
    Hey psmoon21,

    I played RDR in 2011, 2013 on PS3. Fantastic Game. I played it again in 2021. On PS4. Still good.
    How did I manage to do that? Well, you could play it for years via PS Now till a couple of months ago, when Rockstar decided to make this cash grab and remove the Stream Version.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

7
#7 Best PS4 Game of 2023
1
#1 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2023

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 11
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 11
  3. Negative: 0 out of 11
  1. LEVEL (Czech Republic)
    Jan 18, 2024
    80
    Objectively, Red Dead Redemption is a true classic. Not only does it conclude the beloved story of both its successor and predecessor, but it does so with equal flourish and narrative quality. [Issue#330]
  2. PSX Extreme
    Oct 4, 2023
    80
    Red Dead Redemption as a game is still a fantastic romp that any cowboy or open world fan should experience. Meanwhile, playing it on my PS5 (via backwards compatibility) is a treat, even if it doesn’t change how the game runs or looks. It has one of the best open worlds you can ask for and a compelling story to boot. But, it’s bogged down by its lazy cash-grab nature, with the Rockstar team opting to do away with content and instead do the absolute bare minimum.
    Read full review
  3. Player 2
    Sep 30, 2023
    83
    Red Dead Redemption is an unbelievably good game, even in 2023, however the lack of effort put into elevating the game to the current day’s technical benchmarks damages its modern legacy.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »