Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. clone901
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    This game is broken and the d day is not as good as medial of honor. the multiplayer is boring and the guns sound like paintball guns. this game is a terrible and boring just buy iw,bo3 or bo2
  2. xxxsssjjjk
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The campaign is about 1 hour long, the multiplayer only comes with 9 maps!!! and zombies only has 1 map. The graphics suck and the guns are unrealisitic and sound fake. The game is not worth 60 dollars wait until its on sale or buy battlefield 1.
  3. ProGamerbf1
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Very bad game. The maps are have tight cornors so the only gun you can use is an smg. The hit detection is off and the game is just like infinite warfare but with no jump packs. Plus the servers have been down every time I try to play it, if you are looking for boots on the ground get Modern Warfare Remastered. It is just as good as the origional.
  4. Sworld
    Nov 9, 2017
    0
    This game is an EPIC FAIL for me. Why this game dont have lolal multiplayer for 4 players???? It is made for playstation 4 and if you dont know dear developers... playstation 4 have 4 controllers !!!
    We were looking forward for this game with my friends .... and now we cant play together. It is stupid. Why some COD has 4 players local.... some not, some yes, some not..... PLEASE FINALLY    This game is an EPIC FAIL for me. Why this game dont have lolal multiplayer for 4 players???? It is made for playstation 4 and if you dont know dear developers... playstation 4 have 4 controllers !!!
    We were looking forward for this game with my friends .... and now we cant play together. It is stupid. Why some COD has 4 players local.... some not, some yes, some not..... PLEASE FINALLY DECIDE WHAT GAME DO YOU WANT TO DO !!!!    … Expand
  5. Jedimaster007
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    R.I.P Call of Duty.

    I was really looking forward to this game because of all the media-fed hype. IMO wasted my money on this lame excuse for a game. There is nothing new here to see.... "please move along". You can see that they have completely run out of any new ideas: instead opted to create a lame game with heavy overtones of Battlefield 1 (which is a good game). This game is    R.I.P Call of Duty.

    I was really looking forward to this game because of all the media-fed hype. IMO wasted my money on this lame excuse for a game.
    There is nothing new here to see.... "please move along". You can see that they have completely run out of any new ideas: instead opted to create a lame game with heavy overtones of Battlefield 1 (which is a good game).

    This game is simply a cash-cow for Activision: a guarantee'd earner: micro-transaction hell.

    In multiplayer: the graphics are pretty dismal. The maps nothing new. Weapons boring. I'm trying really hard to think of anything that impressed me.

    On day of release the servers were running really slow. Sometimes we waited 5 minutes+ to get into a match. One thing in particular that I found annoying was the 'Headquarters' a place where all online gamers congregate prior to finding a match - more like a pen to contain the sheep.

    I have bought and played all of the Call of Duty games since CoD 4 and watched as Activision have run out of ideas and produced lesser titles. I honestly didn't think anything could have been a greater disappointment than Infinite Warfare. This is.

    The reality is a group of 6 of us - gamers who loved playing CoD were talking about trading the game in on day 2 of release really puts it in perspective.

    If you enjoy FPS don't waste your money on this pile of tripe. If we keep buying this junk and filling their purses without saying how it really is then this is the end of gaming. :)

    Have a nice day.    … Expand
  6. ResQ2
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Played the single player campaign. Absolutely pointless quick time events and the most bland missions i've never seen. absolutely standard cod, nothing special. The graphics could easily be from 2010 too. Definitely worse campaign than the "future settings" ones - and those were already pretty bad.
  7. kyper007
    Nov 25, 2017
    7
    Играл в call of duty еще с ее начала.Купил магазине так как игра была по скринам на коробке очень похожа на Медаль за отвагу и не прогадал. Новая кола это возвращение к этим самым истокам,довольно удачное.
  8. swagerx
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Just close the series already . Its just getting worse. Quick tip : IF YOU EVER TRY TO DO A HISTORICAL GAME , **** LEARD HISTORY , DUMB **** .The last enjoyable / playable CoD was Black Ops 1 . Everything after it is just trash.
  9. eYeArr
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    I got this game on day one, the best thing so far is amazon delivery service, lets point out some stuff:

    Negative The size of the installation is HUGE Connecting to play day 1, 2 3, was impossible After it managed to connect the view of the guns is awful, when you have 2,3 4 games with other optics it really sucks. The teams respawn on the same side almost all the game its all so    I got this game on day one, the best thing so far is amazon delivery service, lets point out some stuff:

    Negative
    The size of the installation is HUGE
    Connecting to play day 1, 2 3, was impossible
    After it managed to connect the view of the guns is awful, when you have 2,3 4 games with other optics it really sucks.
    The teams respawn on the same side almost all the game its all so lineal, what makes camping the most common thing.
    Killing its hard dying is easy
    The zombie mode is boring and you get 10000000 points of life, it gets so boring after round 15
    The maps are really with good texture but not enjoyable

    Goods
    Maps graphics
    Campaign

    I am selling or returning this game, it really sucks I am very very dissapointed.    … Expand
  10. RaRaRa
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Don't listen to these reviews people are crying because of supply drops even though they aren't pay to win. Also most of these people haven't even played the game but give it a 1/10 anyway. Thank you for reading this and do yourself a favour and look at a different website.
  11. fakkel
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Worse Cod game ever! Multiplayer= head glitching, Shoot first die first, Weapons with now weight behind them, poorly designed maps made for campers. GG well played
  12. Belialll
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    Если коротко, то WWII - та самая игра, про которую говорили "раньше было лучше". Она во многом копирует классические CoD'ы, при этом выглядит и играется абсолютно современно. Кампания вполне стандартная, для такого сеттинга, с простой историей, приятной стрельбой и красивой графикой. Мультиплеер хорош, в том числе и из-за нововведений, например режим "Война" довольно интересный. Сам неЕсли коротко, то WWII - та самая игра, про которую говорили "раньше было лучше". Она во многом копирует классические CoD'ы, при этом выглядит и играется абсолютно современно. Кампания вполне стандартная, для такого сеттинга, с простой историей, приятной стрельбой и красивой графикой. Мультиплеер хорош, в том числе и из-за нововведений, например режим "Война" довольно интересный. Сам не фанат "зомби", но в целом не плохо. В итоге: классический CoD, выполненный в соответствии с современными тенденциями.… Expand
  13. HoldDAfort
    Jan 16, 2018
    8
    If an old school COD fan of the series this one fits the bill., yet the depth of it not anywhere near many would of hope, Single Campaign lovers who have been aggravated as the publishers seem to put a little more vision into the online aspect will not be disappointed, anyway you slice it this game should not be scored any lower than a 7.5 imo.. the crawl is a little frustrating in stealthIf an old school COD fan of the series this one fits the bill., yet the depth of it not anywhere near many would of hope, Single Campaign lovers who have been aggravated as the publishers seem to put a little more vision into the online aspect will not be disappointed, anyway you slice it this game should not be scored any lower than a 7.5 imo.. the crawl is a little frustrating in stealth and buggy yet a fun run through.… Expand
  14. lega_lol
    Nov 17, 2017
    0
    instead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up forinstead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badly… Expand… Expand
  15. xCxJ
    Nov 7, 2017
    8
    WW2 Isn't a perfect game by any means but it has it's moments, graphics are really good, at least on the Pro. The single player campaign isn't anything spectacular but it's actually really decent for a CoD game, it definitely has it's moments and it can be challenging at times. It's a campaign that I personally could go back to and play it again. When it comes to the multiplayer, well,WW2 Isn't a perfect game by any means but it has it's moments, graphics are really good, at least on the Pro. The single player campaign isn't anything spectacular but it's actually really decent for a CoD game, it definitely has it's moments and it can be challenging at times. It's a campaign that I personally could go back to and play it again. When it comes to the multiplayer, well, it's just another CoD game, if you like CoD multiplayer then you'll like the multiplayer in WW2. The HQ is an interesting choice, it's really cool other than the fact that you can watch people opening loot boxes that fall from the sky...Overall, WW2 is a welcomed change compared to the past couple of years and I would recommend it to anyone who's a CoD fan and anyone who hasn't played any CoD games before but would like to get into the world of CoD, it's a good starting point. In my honest opinion and as someone who prefers Battlefield I will gladly give WW2 an 8.5/10… Expand
  16. Sikver91
    Nov 8, 2017
    3
    una literal mierda de juego ahora con sus cajitas y sin emocion en el multijugador no hay miedo a morir, cheaters y hacks por todo lado servidores caidos un juego de una nota por ahy de 3 por mucho a 4 y esta en 8 ? es una broma ? que basura de juego
  17. lewismichaelbbc
    Jan 19, 2018
    10
    The campaign mode is simply incredible. Such a powerful story... such a sad ending. Really loved this will never forget this. Thank you developers for this amazing creation.
  18. Bossuk
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    the single player is not bad as far as COd games goes, much better than infinite warfare.
    But the Multiplayer is the worset i have ever seen with multiple server crashes, huge delays in joining games, huge delays in getting a map started, and the whole orders implementation is manged badly.
    COD is a multiplayer game, and Activision have really messed up. I've played every COD and got    the single player is not bad as far as COd games goes, much better than infinite warfare.
    But the Multiplayer is the worset i have ever seen with multiple server crashes, huge delays in joining games, huge delays in getting a map started, and the whole orders implementation is manged badly.

    COD is a multiplayer game, and Activision have really messed up. I've played every COD and got everyone on launch day, but what ias the point if you can't play thay game!!!!

    Awful. Don't buy until they promise to invest in the MP.    … Expand
  19. Draclif2
    Nov 4, 2017
    9
    Amazing graphics, amazing sound, amazing acting. Any review under 5 is written by children. While not.a masterpiece, this game is a top notch experience. Take your time with the story. Play on veteran mode. Make it last. The pvp is creative and diverse although I want more game modes and variety in war mode.
  20. UncutSuspiria
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    80 gigabytes of garbage.

    I have hated COD since BLOPS2. As soon as it turned into Halo, I started hating it. But, I was really looking forward to this one because it was going back to their roots. This is 80 gigs of trash. I sold it less than owning it for 24 hours. Campaign: SUCKS. This is NOT a campaign. It is only 5 hours long. I am sorry, but a campaign should not take 5 hours    80 gigabytes of garbage.

    I have hated COD since BLOPS2. As soon as it turned into Halo, I started hating it. But, I was really looking forward to this one because it was going back to their roots.

    This is 80 gigs of trash. I sold it less than owning it for 24 hours.

    Campaign: SUCKS. This is NOT a campaign. It is only 5 hours long. I am sorry, but a campaign should not take 5 hours to beat. I have purchased DLC content greater than that.

    Multiplayer: TERRIBLE. COD continues to use the same gaming engine from 2007 and it shows in the graphics, they are terrible. Gameplay and movement is horrible. You are constantly swaying side-to-side which was intentional to give it that feel of really walking, it failed. Aiming is choppy as well. Above all that, the thing that really destroys COD is the community. You still have the same people playing that ruin the game. This game requires no skill, you can pick it up and get 15 kills without trying. People either hide or run around aimlessly like morons.

    Zombies: Didn't even play. I was so displeased with everything else that I sold the game not even 24 hours later.

    Lootboxes: These are NOT pay to win, they are cosmetic crap only.

    I really wanted to like this game so much.    … Expand
  21. mackenzie129
    Nov 9, 2017
    3
    Read before you downvote
    I hate that I'm going to get down-voted to hell for rating it so low, But honestly lets be real I'm a call of duty fan boy bought it every release. I try to be fair to games never rating them in red unless they are broken or a rip off. I like many people bought it on the psn store so no tax yay...but now i cannot return it boo..... A lot of people my dumbass    Read before you downvote
    I hate that I'm going to get down-voted to hell for rating it so low, But honestly lets be real I'm a call of duty fan boy bought it every release. I try to be fair to games never rating them in red unless they are broken or a rip off. I like many people bought it on the psn store so no tax yay...but now i cannot return it boo..... A lot of people my dumbass included thought it'd be W.a.W2 (It is not)

    Pros
    -Campaign is good return to form
    -Zombies is fun
    -WW2
    -Graphically it inst shiet
    -When your team actually works together War mode is fun
    -Headquarters is neat

    Cons
    -Multiplayer is broken (Spawns, Finding matches, Contracts, Guns)
    -Multiplayer maps are honestly ****
    -Campaign can easily be beaten in one sitting
    -Zombies is overly convoluted
    -Multiplayer is unbelievably broken
    -BS deaths in the campaign

    I don't care about the supply drops they are in every game seriously if you're rating it low for that shut the **** up. The playing as black people and women in the MP who ****ing cares, The iron crosses in Campaign who cares?! Yeah I wouldve liked it if the Nazi army had swastikas but whatever its no bother. Fan boys accept that its not perfect get off the 10s Haters accept that its a game out there that people enjoy get off your 0s. So much hype so much disappointment.
    When they fix the actual broken things my rating will go up    … Expand
  22. Klayer44
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The last Call of Duty game I purchased was MW2. I have tried each game since, but not parted with my money because I thought 'if I keep paying them they will think it's okay to keep producing this copy/paste detritus'.

    Maybe this time there would be improvements, genuinely well thought out ideas that added value to the game. I had a weekend to kill and a few friends were buying so I    The last Call of Duty game I purchased was MW2. I have tried each game since, but not parted with my money because I thought 'if I keep paying them they will think it's okay to keep producing this copy/paste detritus'.

    Maybe this time there would be improvements, genuinely well thought out ideas that added value to the game.
    I had a weekend to kill and a few friends were buying so I joined in and I wish I hadn't bothered.

    The campaign is somehow worse than the most recent transformers, and most recent fast/furious films,and that's just the story and voice acting.
    The most frustrating element is the illusion breaking invisible walls and magic shields that force the player to do tasks in exactly the way the developer planned.
    This is fine for certain games, but when the illusion of choice is given to you, and then for no logical reason and without explanation is taken away; forcing you to start at the last checkpoint, it's offensive, it's lazy and it's not acceptable for a AAA title.

    Minor (and even a few mission failing) bugs could be forgiven if the above wasn't true and coupled with this title's cream of the crop price tag. Something HAS to change.

    Whilst the multiplayer is better than the campaign, it too has seen very very little innovation unless you include the headquarters lobby which I don't as it isn't game play. The illusion of being surrounded by players does not create an atmosphere as there is very little you can do to interact with each other and no one bought the game to socialise with random players.

    Same old copy paste create a class system with only superficial changes. Same old bulletproof hedges, invisible map walls funneling players into one of seven(not several) engagement positions on each map. Same old grind, fast twitch no scope, zero strategy , low team cooperation as the last 8 COD derivatives.

    And FINE. I might be able to forget all this and just sip my BUY&LARGE cup cake in a cup and play..

    IF I COULD CONNECT TO THE ONLINE SERVERS MORE THAN 1/20 TIMES.

    Obviously don't buy it, but I did so I won't blame you. We need to stop giving battlefield/battlefront/cod/fifa our money and start demanding a better product from them than a repackaging. We need to change the game, so we can change the game.    … Expand
  23. Deafdumbmute
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    People complaining about this being a twitch shooter is like people complaining Mario games are platformers, it's stupid. Also if you knew it had microtransations and it was a twitch shooter why buy it?
    Are you stupid? Secondly after the debacle with the Wolfenstein II reviews, it's pretty obvious that there are many who simply want to downvote it for political reasons. At this stage in    People complaining about this being a twitch shooter is like people complaining Mario games are platformers, it's stupid. Also if you knew it had microtransations and it was a twitch shooter why buy it?
    Are you stupid? Secondly after the debacle with the Wolfenstein II reviews, it's pretty obvious that there are many who simply want to downvote it for political reasons. At this stage in the game, Metacritic's user scores are not fit for purpose.    … Expand
  24. DlO-BRANDO
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    This game is definitly a huge step forward compared to Infinite Warfare, the graphics look nice, the gameplay is tight, and the zombies mode is scary as hell. Didn't play the single player yet but i will do that after writing this review. The game is good.
  25. nickae01
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    With the game going back to WWII, of course people see it as a last resort or a way to profit. I feel it could be for this, but the game actually feels like real time and hard work were put into it. The story is a story again and not a jumbled together piece of action, zombies is an intense and real mode where you feel intimidated and excited at the same time while playing, and multiplayerWith the game going back to WWII, of course people see it as a last resort or a way to profit. I feel it could be for this, but the game actually feels like real time and hard work were put into it. The story is a story again and not a jumbled together piece of action, zombies is an intense and real mode where you feel intimidated and excited at the same time while playing, and multiplayer while still keeping elements from every game before, is still innovative and exciting. The new headquarters to me even though it is a rip off of the tower from Destiny still seems better than the tower, and I myself am a day 1 destiny player. The zombies mode especially to me shows much improvement and along with the story I think it's helped push cod into a better era than the boost jumping toddler fest we've all come to know.… Expand
  26. rezagtx
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    تا دیروز میگفتن فضایی شده و فلان شده و ... حالا نه انگا امریکایی ها فضایی دوست ندارن از مذخرفات استاروارز و استارترک! همون قسمت ها قبلیهم عالی بودند و نمراتشون مشخصه- اصلا این کاربرها خودشون هم نمیدونن چی میخوان.. حالا که اومده کلاسیک شده نه خوب نیست برگردیم همون قبل-برید بمیرید بتمرگید ول کنید بازی رو .تا دیروز میگفتن فضایی شده و فلان شده و ... حالا نه انگا امریکایی ها فضایی دوست ندارن از مذخرفات استاروارز و استارترک! همون قسمت ها قبلیهم عالی بودند و نمراتشون مشخصه- اصلا این کاربرها خودشون هم نمیدونن چی میخوان.. حالا که اومده کلاسیک شده نه خوب نیست برگردیم همون قبل-برید بمیرید بتمرگید ول کنید بازی رو .
  27. Br0dyxx
    Jan 3, 2018
    9
    This is my first review on Metacritic. I really, really tried to like this game. Played the single player twice and also have logged quite a few hours in multi player. It's nice to see that COD has taken a step away from the jet packs etc. but the feel and look of the game seems to be another re-skin that has been done time and time again. I absolutely love first person shooters of allThis is my first review on Metacritic. I really, really tried to like this game. Played the single player twice and also have logged quite a few hours in multi player. It's nice to see that COD has taken a step away from the jet packs etc. but the feel and look of the game seems to be another re-skin that has been done time and time again. I absolutely love first person shooters of all types but this game unfortunately falls extremely flat, and really doesn't do much to hold you attention beyond a couple of rounds of team death match.

    Update: So after playing the game for nearly 8 weeks I've really started to enjoy it. Haven't spent much time on the single player mode, I've been mostly playing multi player matches. Changing the score from a 3 to a 9.    … Expand
  28. PolleDK
    Nov 7, 2017
    3
    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and    Once again the Cod franchise disappoints.....
    the game has amazing graphics and starts out really awesome, but after some short time the game just keeps coming up with RANDOM encounter of German soldiers that fight to the dead the 1 sec and surrender the next. the first mission has more action packed in the whole mission than the whole game of Modern warfare 2 and it makes it dull.. and to make it a lot worse the main story Glorifies the American Perverted vision on themselves in WW 2
    And whats up with all this STRONG independent Woman in games now a days!??! i can understand the women in the resistance but in the British special forces??? give me a break from all this feminist ****    … Expand
  29. tetetoto
    Nov 6, 2017
    10
    all time best blockbuster came back ! It's perfect resurrection of old school. Must play for WW2 lovers. Wish to ask Cons is there other FPS game instead of this.
  30. Vermelho_
    Nov 7, 2017
    10
    Played the whole single-player campaign, completed first easter egg in zombies, and level 40 in multiplayer. I Have enough to say that this game is quite perfect. The graphics for the previous CODs is nice, gameplay bringing the good old days back, and with changes so it doesn't get boring. I really don't know why people are hating this game but it sure made up to my expectations. For me,Played the whole single-player campaign, completed first easter egg in zombies, and level 40 in multiplayer. I Have enough to say that this game is quite perfect. The graphics for the previous CODs is nice, gameplay bringing the good old days back, and with changes so it doesn't get boring. I really don't know why people are hating this game but it sure made up to my expectations. For me, the best CODs ever were BO1, WaW, MWs. Is good to be back to a promising game.… Expand
  31. Peptide
    Nov 6, 2017
    9
    Lets get one thing clear....more than 75% of all the negative reviews are from trolls. Most of the remainder are Mario gamers who do not like CoD anyway.
    This game is awesome. Its fun to play. There is a lot of variety in the MP part. Between the MP, Zombies, and the campaign, there is an enormous amount of polished content for the price. I'll take this over Destiny or Overwatch or    Lets get one thing clear....more than 75% of all the negative reviews are from trolls. Most of the remainder are Mario gamers who do not like CoD anyway.
    This game is awesome. Its fun to play. There is a lot of variety in the MP part. Between the MP, Zombies, and the campaign, there is an enormous amount of polished content for the price. I'll take this over Destiny or Overwatch or any BF game anyday. And the campaign is fantastic.    … Expand
  32. Turbodowg
    Jan 6, 2018
    1
    Cod WW2 is IMO one of the worst in the entire series along side Ghosts and Blops 2 and 3. It is basically broken.
    I have no idea what they've done to the servers but for the past two weeks they no longer work. The lag is game breaking and completely destroys all the fun. It makes the game a frustrating mess. Nearly every game I play I see the enemy first, unload a full clip into them    Cod WW2 is IMO one of the worst in the entire series along side Ghosts and Blops 2 and 3. It is basically broken.
    I have no idea what they've done to the servers but for the past two weeks they no longer work. The lag is game breaking and completely destroys all the fun. It makes the game a frustrating mess. Nearly every game I play I see the enemy first, unload a full clip into them getting 10 hit markers while they kill with one bullet. Even playing with steady aim and firing from the hip doesn't work, as soon as you see an enemy -as you are pulling the trigger- you are dead. On the rare occasion you will beast but sadly knowing it's because everyone else is lagging. Sometimes it hilarious; like when I came up behind a camper facing the opposite direction, unleashed a series of bullets into his head only for him to suddenly teleport around and quick scope me. Sometimes you could cry - like the round I played and went 0.20 because not a single bullet from any weapon would register.

    I switched back to IW and there I was, top of every game pulling high scores and low deaths. No other game I own lags like COD WW2. Battlefield runs perfect, Overwatch runs perfect, COD IW runs perfect, COD 4 remaster runs perfect yet WW2 is like playing on a 46k modem.

    The social hub is still a ghost town which they haven't bothered to fix, but made sure they added COD Points to buy loot crates!

    Maps are a mess, badly designed and boring. There's next to no content.

    The war maps are actually pretty fun and for some bizarre reason don't lag anywhere near as much as the standard maps, but there's only 3 of them!

    With the season pass you get a remastered map from COD2 which is insulting considering they didn't give enough maps with the main game, no doubt it was removed simply to entice people to buy the season pass.

    Basically it doesn't work, we should all be refunded for paying for a product that is basically in alpha stage still.

    Worst Cod in the history of cod. Avoid at all costs.

    ....................................................

    Update 06.01.18
    Two months after launch I have deleted COD WW2. The servers are completely broken to a point where it is now impossible to play. Lag com, poor hit detection, teleportation and spawns are destroying any fun that could have been had. Every game is a constant frustration and doing well is not based on skill but if you have lag comp for or against you. It's beyond frustrating to shoot first, get 12 hit markers and die to see in your kill cam you haven't even fired a bullet. This is officially the worst COD in the entire history of COD. It's a cheap rushed bare bones mess.    … Expand
  33. MonkiReviews
    Jan 14, 2018
    9
    The best Call of Duty I have played (the other two were Black Ops III and Infinite Warfare). The campaign was amazing. The characters were memorable, the story was emotional and exciting, and was fun to play. It is my favorite Call of Duty campaign I have played. The multiplayer was awesome. I like others, I had no problems with connecting to the online servers. The HQ was a nice area too.The best Call of Duty I have played (the other two were Black Ops III and Infinite Warfare). The campaign was amazing. The characters were memorable, the story was emotional and exciting, and was fun to play. It is my favorite Call of Duty campaign I have played. The multiplayer was awesome. I like others, I had no problems with connecting to the online servers. The HQ was a nice area too. I thought the war game mode was very fun, and my second favorite was free for all. Lastly, the zombies mode was good but needs a little work. I thought it was detailed, and the zombies looked excellent. The zombies was great, but I experienced a couple glitches. The graphics and animations are also good in every mode. I recommend it.… Expand
  34. KittyWhisky
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The story tells the usual story of a military soldier. Together with brothers in arms wades through a real hell. We've seen similar stories in games, the war has not been shown so realistically. Basically, this effect causes dismemberment. Very often we will see people without body parts, burning people and the atrocities of the Nazis.

    The plot is simple, but you believe in this war, believe what is happening on the screen. All the characters have their own character, everyone has their demons. It is interesting to observe the drama of the characters.

    The gameplay is now in spirit first every part OF CALL OF DUTY. Because of this the gameplay has become more boring. You sit behind cover and aims at enemies. Diversity is not. But there is one good innovation. The developers decided to implement in a single company element of teamwork. If we need supplies, first aid kit or swegene about the enemy - we are asking comrades. This is an interesting thing. and Yes, now health itself is not restored - it is necessary to look for kits. Here you don't feel like a super soldier ready to kill everyone, you could die at any moment.

    Call of Duty: WWII is a game about realistic warfare. A single company is not very long, but no time to get bored. It's not the best Call of Duty, gameplay and artistic design can to lose IW, but nevertheless it was nice to return to the battlefields of WWII.    … Expand
  35. Dankie
    Nov 6, 2017
    9
    The game brings back all of the best aspects of call of duty there's been a lot of hate but to me, it brings back the weapon balance and plus sniper power too they did really good well done Sledgehammer
  36. EJSC_pt
    Nov 7, 2017
    9
    Best Call of Duty I ever played.

    The game is very gun-skill based, unlike the previous versions. It rewards the player with better aim on close quarters gunfights. If you don´t have reflexes or good aim you will not kill your enemy. And that is how a shooter should be, just like Quake. Most of the users hating on the game, are just doing it because they are either bad players or    Best Call of Duty I ever played.

    The game is very gun-skill based, unlike the previous versions.

    It rewards the player with better aim on close quarters gunfights. If you don´t have reflexes or good aim you will not kill your enemy. And that is how a shooter should be, just like Quake.

    Most of the users hating on the game, are just doing it because they are either bad players or they hate cod overall and like to contribute for a low score user rating.

    The numbers don´t lie, this is the best selling CoD ever on launch already, on console, and the most played CoD on PC ever. There is a reason for that. The game is good, skilled. If you´re not good at it, you will not like it. You can go back to casual and slow Battlefield or Pubg for a different experience.    … Expand
  37. WorstNovak
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game is unfettered **** Sledgehammer Games is incompetent and I personally will never buy anything they touch ever again. The servers are unstable and **** the hit detection is functionally non-existent, the weapon balance is bad, the maps are boring and there's only 9 of them, the list goes on and on and on. Do not buy this game.
  38. njustcritic
    Nov 14, 2017
    1
    Достаточно посмотреть несколько отзывов пользователей, просто без слов всё итак с этой игрой понятно, не пойму никогда людей которые предпочтут купить калду, вместо очень годного шутера на рынке взять даже BF1. Всё осталось на прежнем уровне, ладно если бы этот уровень был велик и все бы восприняли игру как 5-6/10. Но всё как и было плохо всё плохо и осталось, денег своих это игра точно неДостаточно посмотреть несколько отзывов пользователей, просто без слов всё итак с этой игрой понятно, не пойму никогда людей которые предпочтут купить калду, вместо очень годного шутера на рынке взять даже BF1. Всё осталось на прежнем уровне, ладно если бы этот уровень был велик и все бы восприняли игру как 5-6/10. Но всё как и было плохо всё плохо и осталось, денег своих это игра точно не стоит советую всем пройти мимо или лучше купить Battlefield 1… Expand
  39. SchroederRock
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    WWII suits Call of Duty better, to a degree, than all the future stuff. However, where CoD WWII stumbled the most is in its scale. The campaign has its moments and ends up being a good reason to pick up Call of Duty to begin with but its multiplayer pairing is not so fortunate. Much of WWII's multiplayer feels heavily rehashed from previous games, adding little new to spice up the formula.WWII suits Call of Duty better, to a degree, than all the future stuff. However, where CoD WWII stumbled the most is in its scale. The campaign has its moments and ends up being a good reason to pick up Call of Duty to begin with but its multiplayer pairing is not so fortunate. Much of WWII's multiplayer feels heavily rehashed from previous games, adding little new to spice up the formula. Maps are typically dense and lead to more encounters between players but that doesn't translate to more fun. Often times, players can be cornered into spawn kill/deaths, especially if an opposing team knows where to stop pressing to keep the predictable computing from spawn-swapping. It really bugs me that no Activision title with the CoD moniker has fixed this problem after years of abuse. Nazi Zombies always has its fun moments, bringing a more visceral experience to the shooter. It's clear to me that this game mode is the only aspect that delivers time after time. It shows complexity, strategic thinking, and white-knuckle experiences because of how unpredictable the game mode can be. Good on Sledgehammer for keeping this part of the game fun and interesting. However, outside of an OK campaign, there isn't much to love here. Call of Duty continues to be nothing more than a re-skinned version of itself, year after year. This is a huge irritation as Call of Duty is begging to break out of its shell. Perhaps the future will yield a larger sandbox feel to CoD, especially as console and PCs continue to advance and offer more horsepower to smoothly handle the heavy computing that can come with AAA games.

    As for WWII - if you like the setting, this is not the game to play. Battlefield 1 offers a much deeper and open experience that encourages a little role play here and there. Only CoD fanboys that wait on the scraps that fall from Activision's table will ever find a lot to love here. WWII continues the tradition of CoD failing to impress. It is clearer to me year after year that the original Infinity Ward crew were the lifeblood of Call of Duty and once Activision broke up that team, some of which went on to make Titanfall years later, that the pulse of CoD fell dramatically. With the exception of Black Ops, Call of Duty hasn't been interesting since the Modern Warfare series. I'm still waiting for the franchise to be resurrected and WWII does nothing to make that happen. Buy at your own risk.    … Expand
  40. CyclePlus
    Nov 10, 2017
    4
    Game is trash. Campaign is around 5 hours and is a fairly standard corridor shooter with nothing memorable that comes to mind in regards to the storyline or characters. It basically plays like an fps from 2003 but with fancier graphics.

    Multiplayer is where the ineptitude of Activation and Sledgehammer really shines through though. MP is a bug filled, lagging mess full of hit-markers    Game is trash. Campaign is around 5 hours and is a fairly standard corridor shooter with nothing memorable that comes to mind in regards to the storyline or characters. It basically plays like an fps from 2003 but with fancier graphics.

    Multiplayer is where the ineptitude of Activation and Sledgehammer really shines through though. MP is a bug filled, lagging mess full of hit-markers that don't kill your enemies due to Activision's refusal to implement dedicated servers and one of the most counter intuitive menu systems of all time. The perk system in this game is pretty much non-existent and there are only 9 maps available which are all uninspired 3 route camper fests and a chore to play.

    The only reason anyone even likes this game is because the previous three titles in this franchise set the bar so astronomical low that something as asinine as boots on the ground game play seems refreshing to the fanboys who waste their money on this game year after year.    … Expand
  41. martyisruling
    Nov 11, 2017
    7
    The Game as a whole is good, but not Great. It looks and plays amazing. The Campaign is great, but it's short. That's pretty much the theme with this COD. The new War mode is pretty solid. The problem is there are few maps all around in multiplayer in general. Unless you want to pay $50 for the season pass. So, before you buy this game you have to ask yourself, is $60 too much to pay forThe Game as a whole is good, but not Great. It looks and plays amazing. The Campaign is great, but it's short. That's pretty much the theme with this COD. The new War mode is pretty solid. The problem is there are few maps all around in multiplayer in general. Unless you want to pay $50 for the season pass. So, before you buy this game you have to ask yourself, is $60 too much to pay for half a game? Is the full game worth $100? Next year there will be another COD, and players will migrate over. Buyer beware.… Expand
  42. xenomorph287
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    Im conflicted about this game. I love the singleplayer, every mission was fun and the characters were memorable, and probably my 3rd favorite story in COD. Multiplayer on the other hand, is pretty bad. I enjoy the war mode a lot, but every other game mode is bland. In short, wait until a sale, and just play the campaign.
  43. xenofiend95
    Nov 9, 2017
    5
    I was interested to here COD would be going back to WW2 for the first time in nearly a decade, being that World at War was one of my favorite games in the series along with COD 2. This game happens to be anything but interesting, not terrible, not bad, it is just incredibly mediocre. Campaign is uninteresting, multiplayer maps are uninspired and not fun to play or look at, then you haveI was interested to here COD would be going back to WW2 for the first time in nearly a decade, being that World at War was one of my favorite games in the series along with COD 2. This game happens to be anything but interesting, not terrible, not bad, it is just incredibly mediocre. Campaign is uninteresting, multiplayer maps are uninspired and not fun to play or look at, then you have the obligatory zombies mode. The game is a huge disappointment, but not bad.… Expand
  44. v4vendetta
    Nov 16, 2017
    9
    I am so upset that a game like this gets 3/4 in user score ... what happened to you guys ? Why so sluggish ?

    Dudes, this is a good game. Graphics looks great. Story goes great, feels great, feels epic.
  45. softshoedancer
    Nov 18, 2017
    10
    Well, frankly, I usually cannot get in to COD multiplayer for the first week or so. Then, I can't stop playing. The last COD I play(ed) a lot was MW remastered. I never played the original. But usually, I don't like the game until it hooks me, after the week or so. Advanced Warfare was a game I loved also. And I freely admit to being a WW2 nut...I love anything WW2 combat related...esp.Well, frankly, I usually cannot get in to COD multiplayer for the first week or so. Then, I can't stop playing. The last COD I play(ed) a lot was MW remastered. I never played the original. But usually, I don't like the game until it hooks me, after the week or so. Advanced Warfare was a game I loved also. And I freely admit to being a WW2 nut...I love anything WW2 combat related...esp. War Thunder - a classic! So I might be biased...but I freakin' insta-love this game! The campaign is a blast...at least, it gets better as it goes on; by the end I was totally immersed in the protagonist's story. And re: multiplayer...well, this is the first COD whereby I have loved the multiplayer from the get-go. The guns FEEL like real guns...not like Andy-Pandy futuristic pea-shooters. And the maps feel epic from the word go. Honestly? I could not be more impressed with this game thus far. Love it.… Expand
  46. haydos89
    Nov 13, 2017
    5
    I can't go as far to say that COD WW2 is a bad game. The campaign is fantastic with a great story, likable characters and a real sense of realism when it comes to the hellish circumstances that came battling in World War 2. Unfortunately that only lasts around 6 hours or so and then you're left with the multiplayer modes...which is basically has just been re-skinned to suit the WW2I can't go as far to say that COD WW2 is a bad game. The campaign is fantastic with a great story, likable characters and a real sense of realism when it comes to the hellish circumstances that came battling in World War 2. Unfortunately that only lasts around 6 hours or so and then you're left with the multiplayer modes...which is basically has just been re-skinned to suit the WW2 setting. The pace, scorestreaks etc are all the same as before and to be honest it is getting quite old and never makes you feel like you're in a true battle or makes you feel like you've accomplished anything when you win a match.

    It is a shame because i was looking forward to heading back to the classic COD we all came to love, but unfortunately it's a big miss for me. Personally i am happy to trade it in for battlefront 2 and also head back to battlefield 1.    … Expand
  47. bmc87
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    Single player campaign is alright but nothing special. My biggest beef is the tired old graphics engine that looks basically the same as BO1. It's 2017, these graphics are unaccetable. I don't have a problem with twitch shooters or lack of realism but good lord, visually this game is not good.
  48. Sexbot-5000
    Nov 12, 2017
    5
    There really isn’t a need for a long review. It’s call of duty. It’s WW2, it’s mostly unchanged, and they added a couple tropes from other games. War mode from Battlefield’s rush, COD version of social from destiny, and the loot boxes from Overwatch without cartoon style to give them the freedom to create actual costumes. If you think you’ll like this game you probably will. If you thinkThere really isn’t a need for a long review. It’s call of duty. It’s WW2, it’s mostly unchanged, and they added a couple tropes from other games. War mode from Battlefield’s rush, COD version of social from destiny, and the loot boxes from Overwatch without cartoon style to give them the freedom to create actual costumes. If you think you’ll like this game you probably will. If you think you won’t like this you probably won’t. It’s that easy. There’s a long list of more unique and creative shooters out there. At the end of the day if you like the game you’ve been playing for a decade you have no reason to think you won’t like this one. It’s a five. Equal parts exciting and boring.… Expand
  49. ViniciusBrito
    Mar 8, 2018
    8
    The game possess 3 modes that you can go through the journey. They are :
    Story : I'm gonna say that this Call of Duty have the best story mode of the hole saga, in pretty much every aspect, the graphics are fire, it does have a noticiable imporvment, the choice to go to the world war 2 was great, the ambience that they put in this game really puts you at that time. The characters, they    The game possess 3 modes that you can go through the journey. They are :
    Story : I'm gonna say that this Call of Duty have the best story mode of the hole saga, in pretty much every aspect, the graphics are fire, it does have a noticiable imporvment, the choice to go to the world war 2 was great, the ambience that they put in this game really puts you at that time. The characters, they have charisma and you really get to care about them, having importance in the story and in the gameplay, helping you with supplies and techniques. You will have differnt types of gameplay, controlling a tank or a plane for example, giving a little of variety to the gameplay. Generally isn't that original or anything, but still pretty fun.
    Multiplayer: The multiplayer isn't the best of the franchise, but it's pretty fun. They added some modes that really are worth to talk about, the mode War, it consists in one team trying do advance and complete one objective per time, and the other trying to stop it, this mode really explore the map and how you can use the map in favor or against you, it really reminded me from Rush in Battlefield 3, the mode Pop Hunt that is based on things that already existed but is soo much fun, i enjoyed that one very much, it consist in one team becoming and object and hiding, during the other is trying to find those, playing that with friends are a sure fun moment. The variety of weapons considerable, hand to hand and shooting weapons.
    Zombies: This mode in this game really made me had a lot of fun, the zombies here aren't completely new but have some good and interesting inovation, the prologue passes in a small house and you can work around that and keep going on wave to wave, very fun to do it so. The Final Reich worked very well to me, a i did enjoyed how the map was constructed and how it worked out, the amount of enemies is ok, not very much. What i really liked it, are the easter eggs, it took time and aren't that easy to do, if you can get together some friends to do them, you will definely have some hours of fun and struggling.
    This Call of Duty is the first one that i played since BO2, so i wasn't bored or even knowing what was going on on the franchise very much, so it possibly counted to this review.    … Expand
  50. merengueti
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    la verdad que el juego es un copia pega con algunas texturas cambiadas y poco mas, aparte el sistema de loot que la gente no quiere, lo han implementado para intentar engachar a la gente a los micropagos con sus politicas abusivas. te has lucido activision
  51. Alexuis
    Nov 8, 2017
    9
    I actually like this game. I'm into war/action genre. I love the sound of exploding grenades and dirt tossed in mid-air. The overall feeling for me is amazing. With accumulated user-score of 4.4, this made me realize that the over-all quality of a game sorely rely on our personal taste. From now on, i will not depend on User/Critics rating of a game whether it's low or high. As long as i'mI actually like this game. I'm into war/action genre. I love the sound of exploding grenades and dirt tossed in mid-air. The overall feeling for me is amazing. With accumulated user-score of 4.4, this made me realize that the over-all quality of a game sorely rely on our personal taste. From now on, i will not depend on User/Critics rating of a game whether it's low or high. As long as i'm enjoying it. This time COD WW2. The game made me feel like I'm back as a kid playing the classic COD. I think the reason why this game has a low user score is because most gamers today are too critical to the point where even a very tiny mistake or not meeting their expectations , the game is trash for them. If you're just a casual gamer who are into war/action games, looking for fun and missing the classic COD experience, i highly recommend this for you. For me, COD WWII is worth my money.… Expand
  52. vitek__ok
    Nov 9, 2017
    7
    "+":
    - Well-made campaign;
    - Good visuals(except sprite fire), great prerendered cutscenes in singleplayer;
    "-":
    - Bad running and weapons animations straight from 2007, especially noticeabe in multiplayer;
    - Boring shooting;
    - Bad sound-design in russian version (some elements too loud, some are too quiet);
  53. DoritoBag
    Mar 31, 2018
    8
    I do recommend this game to anyone who loved playing multiplayer in Call of Duty series (mostly every single review on this game just talks about the campaign) zombie mode is fun and everything but I spend my time on multiplayer anyways it's very fun and I do recommend buying the game
  54. Tgamer15
    Nov 18, 2017
    10
    Great game. Hater 1: "Oh BuT iTs NoT InNoVaTiVe" Hater 2: "ItS a CoPy Of ThE OrIgInAl"
    First of all, if its fun, who gives a damn about innovation. Its entertainment, not a van gogh painting. doesnt have to be art. Second, the original was released over a decade ago. most of the players buying the newer Cod's are not the people who got the first game. Its a new thing to about 95% of    Great game. Hater 1: "Oh BuT iTs NoT InNoVaTiVe" Hater 2: "ItS a CoPy Of ThE OrIgInAl"
    First of all, if its fun, who gives a damn about innovation. Its entertainment, not a van gogh painting. doesnt have to be art. Second, the original was released over a decade ago. most of the players buying the newer Cod's are not the people who got the first game. Its a new thing to about 95% of buyers. Also, most of the unfavorable reviews are just idiots who cant accept that we live in a capitalist world. Things are done to support the bottom line. If you want to rant about companies taking your money, go to battlefront 2. Now for the review. Campaign was awesome, Multiplayer was nice, and despite what others are saying about sniping, it can be done, it just requires skill lmao. shotguns actually work in this game, and aren't just filler weapons. Their range is perfect. I just wish that enemy health bars are displayed, like in infinite warfare. People complain about how the guns are just reskins, but what the hell were you expecting? You cant just make fictional weapons and call it WW2. TL;DR: Stop hating on this game, its great. MAKE MORE OF THESE GAMES SLEDGEHAMMER!    … Expand
  55. 1983Electric
    Nov 22, 2017
    4
    Campaign player here. I felt like all the cool stories happened with World at War, and then they had to try and come up with other things that just weren't as interesting; too short. Also.. you play as a girl trying to deliver a briefcase for a level. The graphics were really nice though.
  56. LittleL
    Nov 25, 2017
    5
    I want to really like this game, call of duty was a favorite of mine growing up and when i heard we'd be going back to boots on the ground gameplay i was excited. While this is not the worst game in the series (cough infinite warfare cough) it is in my opinion the worst boots on the ground experience we've been given so far.

    Campaign - While i know most play call of duty for the    I want to really like this game, call of duty was a favorite of mine growing up and when i heard we'd be going back to boots on the ground gameplay i was excited. While this is not the worst game in the series (cough infinite warfare cough) it is in my opinion the worst boots on the ground experience we've been given so far.

    Campaign -
    While i know most play call of duty for the multiplayer, i still love playing the campaigns as well. The one were given here in WW2 has to be one of the worst in the franchise. Characters who i cant remember with the exception of Daniels because everyone was screaming his name every 2 seconds, clipping that can be spotted easily with one example being in the opening scene and vehicle physics that are plain awful. The first level was so much fun but it all just fell apart after that. If your buying just for the campaign, pass on this one.

    Multiplayer -
    Here is where the game should really shine but it just doesn't. We all know what a disaster the launch was so i'm just going to skip over that. The game comes standard with 9 maps and to be honest i only kinda like 2 or 3 of them. Theres no map that comes up in the rotation that i get excited to play on. The spawns are AWFUL and i seem to always be put right infront of someone who ends up shooting me in the back. The guns need some serious work as everyone is just running around with the STG, Bar, PPSH and kar. The new mode war is pretty fun until you realize there are only 3 maps to play on with it and the new headquarters is ripped straight from destiny and feels pointless. I dont play zombies so i cant personally speak on that but from what im hearing its not to great either.

    I hope one day i'll be able to love a call of duty game again but this most definitely is not the one.

    My final rating of Call Of Duty: WW2 is a 5/10    … Expand
  57. gamer_za
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    If you're a big Call of Duty fan like me, who has played since the early releases, then the chances are you have also been fed up with over-the-top futuristic additions in recent releases. WW2 removes all of this and takes it straight back to its roots - action that is more focused on gunplay, with an incredibly cinematic campaign. Its a breath of fresh air and everything you've wantedIf you're a big Call of Duty fan like me, who has played since the early releases, then the chances are you have also been fed up with over-the-top futuristic additions in recent releases. WW2 removes all of this and takes it straight back to its roots - action that is more focused on gunplay, with an incredibly cinematic campaign. Its a breath of fresh air and everything you've wanted Call of Duty to be for a while.

    I will not compare to other games (e.g. Battlefield), because they are different games, each fantastic in their own way. I personally prefer Call of Duty for fast-paced action, and WW2 is no different in that regard. Multiplayer matches kick in to sixth gear from the get-go, in beautifully crafted environments that will sometimes make you stop and appreciate the design work that has gone in.

    The usual formula that all prior games use is still here, so don't expect a massive change. There are micro-transactions available to purchase, but these are in no way vital to the experience, as WW2 is more about how well you can shoot than how well you can unlock. Most unlockables are aesthetic, so they will not make or break your ability.

    Zombies mode feels incredibly familiar, as there are few new additions to this mode. It does begin to feel like a chore, and there isn't huge replayability in it. The included map is huge, although it would be great if we were given more zombies maps to choose from - even something simple like the survival maps from BO2 (town and farm). That being said it is still a lot of fun, and why change a winning formula?

    Many reviews on Metacritic seem very biased and thats because everybody has preferences. If you have been with the franchise for a long time like me, you most certainly won't be disappointed - this is the COD you've been waiting for for a long time.

    Rating the three categories:
    Campaign - 10/10
    Multiplayer - 10/10
    Zombies - 8/10

    Overall: 10/10    … Expand
  58. carpetad
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Start playing with a very beautiful epic music, returning this series of games to their roots. Great sound when shooting and blasting, using cinematic characters ...
    But in some cases, such as explosion and dispersal of dust, there is still a problem. Enemies have low artificial intelligence.
  59. ocelotx
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    it's just the best that was with the franchise for the last time. in all seriousness I urge everyone to play in single-player campaign , is just gorgeous. the graphics are excellent , sound is good, I'm just excited for this game
  60. SnyderVanHoven
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    CoD WW2 opens with a dramatic flair, befitting of the prestigious franchise that CoD is. The moment I started the game I knew for sure I was in for something great. Sledgehammer and Activision deliver on the high quality that this brand is known for, delivering high octane and responsive action that we've never seen the likes of for the past decade. In fact, I daresay this game is a lifeCoD WW2 opens with a dramatic flair, befitting of the prestigious franchise that CoD is. The moment I started the game I knew for sure I was in for something great. Sledgehammer and Activision deliver on the high quality that this brand is known for, delivering high octane and responsive action that we've never seen the likes of for the past decade. In fact, I daresay this game is a life changer. Since playing this game, I've noticed that some aspects of my life have changed dramatically. Food is trivial to me, as CoD WW2 has provided me all sustenance I need. I no longer require sleep, I no longer **** the way mere mortals **** I now **** rainbows, befitting of my godlike status after playing this game. I've also since had all my debt cleared and, in fact, received riches that no one could even fathom. My gamer skills have gone up +100000000000000000000000000000000000 points, now video games are a mere novelty and now equate to pictures moving rapidly on a screen. What nonsense! My IQ has raised to be around 300, so yes, playing this game DOES make you smarter than watching Rick and Morty!(to all the naysayers out there) No game could E V E R compare to the splendor of CoD WW2, they could only hope to lick the boots of it. I implore you all, BUY THIS GAME! It will change your life for the best.… Expand
  61. gameofrasht
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    call of duty ww2 is one of the best cod series
    ww2 have good zombie and perfect modes in multi player and good story with lovely weapons of world war 2
    tnx activision
  62. ahmadgoly
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    عالی بود واقعا. یکی از بهترین کال هایی که اومده. واقعا بازگشت داده به ریشه ها. فوق العاده بود. بی نظیر و صد البته ترسناک و خوف انگیز.
  63. b123blake
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty: WW2 is, to be honest, a great game with few faults. With an amazing Campain, fun zombies mode (with a sweet horror factor that keeps the player on his or her edge the entire game), and of course a great multiplayer, Call of duty hasn't been this good since 2012. Also, don't even get me started on the fantastic soundtrack, sound effects, and graphics. This truly is a must-playCall of Duty: WW2 is, to be honest, a great game with few faults. With an amazing Campain, fun zombies mode (with a sweet horror factor that keeps the player on his or her edge the entire game), and of course a great multiplayer, Call of duty hasn't been this good since 2012. Also, don't even get me started on the fantastic soundtrack, sound effects, and graphics. This truly is a must-play in 2017-18.… Expand
  64. Dialex9
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Played CoD: WW2 yesterday and wow, if you are fan of zombies, well I gotta say you're gonna love it, based on screamers, terrifying zombies, excellent weapons, the graphics are just amazing, upcoming 4K patches for PS4 Pro and Xbox One X, the only bad thing yesterday was that I wasn't able to play with friends due to the servers, but right now you might be able to play online, but out ofPlayed CoD: WW2 yesterday and wow, if you are fan of zombies, well I gotta say you're gonna love it, based on screamers, terrifying zombies, excellent weapons, the graphics are just amazing, upcoming 4K patches for PS4 Pro and Xbox One X, the only bad thing yesterday was that I wasn't able to play with friends due to the servers, but right now you might be able to play online, but out of that, WW2 is breaking boundaries!… Expand
  65. Freaxuk
    Nov 4, 2017
    9
    I did play CoD since first one , i hate infinity warfare , black ops 3 etc all this futuristic crap , but this one come back to basics and is really good game , campaign as always short but action packed with cool graphic , zombie with few new things really great , and multiplayer as classic i love it , for people who love CoD they will love it , haters will hate, people who say is theI did play CoD since first one , i hate infinity warfare , black ops 3 etc all this futuristic crap , but this one come back to basics and is really good game , campaign as always short but action packed with cool graphic , zombie with few new things really great , and multiplayer as classic i love it , for people who love CoD they will love it , haters will hate, people who say is the same thing never did play a game :) same game every year is fifa but they did come back to classic and people will enjoy it ;)… Expand
  66. sityoazzdown
    Nov 6, 2017
    8
    After the abomination that was infinite warfare, I had little hype for this game ( I also bought this game accidentally on psn). But I must say after beating the campaign and putting in 5 hours into the multiplayer I can say this game is good. The campaign is amazing and easily a 9/10 for me. The gunplay is great, the journey (story) and pacing/variety in the campaign is amazing. TheAfter the abomination that was infinite warfare, I had little hype for this game ( I also bought this game accidentally on psn). But I must say after beating the campaign and putting in 5 hours into the multiplayer I can say this game is good. The campaign is amazing and easily a 9/10 for me. The gunplay is great, the journey (story) and pacing/variety in the campaign is amazing. The characters are believable and likeable and for some reason the graphics in the campaign is amazing, whilst the multiplayer looks last gen. I like how we switched between characters (kinda like gta 5) depending on the circumstances; and the surprise and smile on my face when we got to fight in the skies was great. It also has amazing blockbuster driving sequences and explosive sequences that are really fresh and jaw-dropping. I can't like and recommend this campaign enough. Fun diverse gameplay, captivating journey, amazing cutscenes; campaign is definately a 9/10. Now the multiplayer is serviceable but it's only serviceable because they slapped a COD on it. Maps are a **** which promotes camping, 80% of it's map are too small and feel like mazes. The divisions are a disappointment and takes away player freedom. Guns feel/look/ sound too similar too each other. Typical COD playlist. Positives on multiplayer: will be dominated by veterans, more tactical and not as much run and gun, is satisfying when you're on a killstreak. Multiplayer was ok for me and is a generous 6/10. In a nutshell I want to say buy/rent (if you want) for the campaign and treat the serviceable mp as a treat. However if you're buying COD just for multiplayer I would advise skip it, (well it depends what type of gamer you are, definitely skip if you want 100 hours into mp type of game, as I feel this MP will grow stale quick.)… Expand
  67. Euknowia
    Nov 5, 2017
    4
    Another prosaic iteration in the COD series fulfilling the expectations of most – although the loot crates add a nice sinister touch (not to mention alluring players to the insidious and addictive temptation of gambling by incentivizing an exhibition of the virtually vain where lottery rewards are braggingly presented to varying onlookers assuring critics that Activision is indeed takingAnother prosaic iteration in the COD series fulfilling the expectations of most – although the loot crates add a nice sinister touch (not to mention alluring players to the insidious and addictive temptation of gambling by incentivizing an exhibition of the virtually vain where lottery rewards are braggingly presented to varying onlookers assuring critics that Activision is indeed taking steps on realizing their daunting casino dream through a system which they so modestly patented).
    - The campaign is too short, although decent, forgettable.
    - Game modes are banal (big surprise), done much better in alternative games of the same genre
    - Zombies are still fairly entertaining to play with friends, but the game mode is quite like the nature of a zombie – lifeless, often pedestrian, and mostly uninspired.

    This time around, I’d say COD is lower than mediocre. I absolutely encourage waiting for a price drop (unless you absolutely adore COD multiplayer/zombies).    … Expand
  68. arnav99
    Nov 5, 2017
    8
    this game is amazing. the campaign is actually really good, especially the stealth missions, however, there are a few meh moments in there, just a whole lot more whoa moments in the campaign though. I don't understand the destiny style hub area though. it doesn't make too much sense since most people will rush to match lobbies rather than roam around in some place that could easily havethis game is amazing. the campaign is actually really good, especially the stealth missions, however, there are a few meh moments in there, just a whole lot more whoa moments in the campaign though. I don't understand the destiny style hub area though. it doesn't make too much sense since most people will rush to match lobbies rather than roam around in some place that could easily have been accessed in a menu. also, at least in Europe, i see no one in the hub area, like 0. I waited for a 1v1 match for 3 whole minutes and I was the only one in the queue the whole time. however, the multiplayer is damn awesome, I love the map designs, really fun and easy to move around in and the designs are actually really cool. cod should probably change their engine in the next coming years since graphics are starting to look dated, it's far from bad but we can see better from AAA games. it's kinda hard to understand how the whole hub area works, I have no idea how supply drops work even after 15 hours of gameplay, I just somehow get them from time to time. I also don't know how to get armory credits, like at all, the whole thing with the quartermaster is hard to understand. I guess I'll have to figure it out as I go along. the weirdest thing to me is that no one is in the hub world, I mean it takes literally no time to get a match but it's no man's land in the hub world. so far the game is 8 but it could be a 9 when I understand how everything works, it's so hard to figure out these things, right now but just playing this game is a joy, I really like these map designs even though the template is pretty much the same.… Expand
  69. CrazyCRO
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    Simply for all FPS games out there this one is G.O.T.Y. Love every single part of this game and to be honest i didn't expect such a good product. I am sorry for all negative reviews out there because this game and dev team that made this miracle happen don't deserve that.

    GG Dev's
  70. RealKandari
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    COD WW2 is Activision's and Sledgehammer Games' greatest COD since MW3 and the best COD in the entire series since COD 4.

    The campaign mixes humor, story-telling and action really well and it's no way a disappointment. I've played little multiplayer mode since it came out and it's very different from past modes. This year you have to strategise your movement and weapon choice due to    COD WW2 is Activision's and Sledgehammer Games' greatest COD since MW3 and the best COD in the entire series since COD 4.

    The campaign mixes humor, story-telling and action really well and it's no way a disappointment.

    I've played little multiplayer mode since it came out and it's very different from past modes. This year you have to strategise your movement and weapon choice due to the small maps.

    This COD is by far the best in the entire series after MW1 and the boot-to-the-ground aspect really helped with the series' sales and enjoyment diverting from space-combat    … Expand
  71. CPD98
    Nov 3, 2017
    9
    La gente nunca está contenta al parecer. La campaña es una vuelta a las raíces de la saga con la jugabilidad de hoy en día, el multijugador es muy adictivo y la inclusión del CG es sensacional. El modo zombis recupera el encanto terrorífico de antaño. Una entrega muy recomendable.
  72. Devistator66
    Nov 3, 2017
    9
    Amazing Call of Duty experience and one you will definitely love. The game offers a fun campaign that doesn't last too long just like other entries in the franchise. The multiplayer is very fun especially if you are playing with your friends. The Nazi Zombies mode definitely delivers on the scare factor and it's overall action gameplay is spectacular! Sledgehammer delivered on what theyAmazing Call of Duty experience and one you will definitely love. The game offers a fun campaign that doesn't last too long just like other entries in the franchise. The multiplayer is very fun especially if you are playing with your friends. The Nazi Zombies mode definitely delivers on the scare factor and it's overall action gameplay is spectacular! Sledgehammer delivered on what they promised and gave us what we wanted. This game in my opinion deserves a solid 9/10 because there is always room for improvement but hopefully as the year goes on Sledgehammer will keep adding innovative content to this amazing game.… Expand
  73. NeoReaper
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    The campaign should be nominated for an Oscar. Zombies is alright. The Multiplayer is yet again another **** show. The graphics are really bad(PS4 Pro). It's like the game has a very hard time to figure out what to focus on which leaves blurring everywhere.

    Metacritic needs to figure out away to tell if someone has actually played the game instead of letting the BF kiddies come one here    The campaign should be nominated for an Oscar. Zombies is alright. The Multiplayer is yet again another **** show. The graphics are really bad(PS4 Pro). It's like the game has a very hard time to figure out what to focus on which leaves blurring everywhere.

    Metacritic needs to figure out away to tell if someone has actually played the game instead of letting the BF kiddies come one here and just review bomb it.    … Expand
  74. destinyfan1
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    I have played cod ghosts, aw , bo3 and infinite warfare and now their is cod ww2 and from all of them this is the best cod
    Note that I still need to play a lot of zombies and multiplayer before i finish my review
    I beat the campaign ,and while it may not be the best cod campaign ,it is finally not as dull and boring as the last cods But its still far from perfect and it is very short    I have played cod ghosts, aw , bo3 and infinite warfare and now their is cod ww2 and from all of them this is the best cod
    Note that I still need to play a lot of zombies and multiplayer before i finish my review
    I beat the campaign ,and while it may not be the best cod campaign ,it is finally not as dull and boring as the last cods
    But its still far from perfect and it is very short like every cod
    From the couple of hours zombies and multiplayer i must say that I like the changes for now, and overall I have an enjoyable experience
    Zombies is now scarier , but people on youtube are overreacting like its a horror masterpiece , but i like it already a lot, not sure or i like it more then bo3 zombies but its definitly fun.
    Multiplayer is not so much different and feels a little bit like aw but its still fun,but i am not amazed
    I am not prestige yet so i still need to do a part of the headquarters,but so far i really like it
    Microtransactions are definitely back , but I don't give a **** about them anymore because almost every game in this dirty game industry does it right now

    So far the most enjoyable cod in years    … Expand
  75. Xalon
    Nov 7, 2017
    1
    They screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game aThey screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game a chance? Pass on this at all costs.… Expand
  76. Ubermonkey88
    Nov 6, 2017
    7
    I've seen a lot of varying reviews of COD WW2 but a lot seem to be bashing by fanboys of another franchise or completely biased praise by COD fanboys, so hopefully I can give a bit more of a balanced view.

    I've played most CODs (some for a long time, some VERY briefly) since the very original on PC all those years, and although the return to WW2 does suggest a lack of new ideas etc,    I've seen a lot of varying reviews of COD WW2 but a lot seem to be bashing by fanboys of another franchise or completely biased praise by COD fanboys, so hopefully I can give a bit more of a balanced view.

    I've played most CODs (some for a long time, some VERY briefly) since the very original on PC all those years, and although the return to WW2 does suggest a lack of new ideas etc, it's one of the better recent releases, especially following last year's abysmal Infinite Warfare. The return to WW2 obviously means no jetpacks, double-jumps or futuristic tech that distracted from the actual gunplay, which for now, is a welcome change. There are plenty of issues too, which I will mention below, along with the positives -

    Pros

    - The single player campaign is fun, which is something that can't be said for the past few iterations of COD. It does visit settings and places that have been done in every other WW2 game but it does it with a level of polish that isn't seen in many others. Objectives are varied, so although it is the familiar campaign, it does help mix things up a bit. The introduction of squad mates who provide you with supplies/health packs/support is a nice addition that keeps you on your toes.

    - The multiplayer benefits greatly from the lack of futuristic nonsense (drones, robots, nanobots etc) and is a much more focused experience for it. Because of the WW2 setting, the developers are more restricted in types of weaponry available and the game benefits from it, meaning it''s a bit more balanced and not quite as chaotic as before. It also introduced Headquarters, which is a social hub, not unlike The Tower in Destiny/Destiny 2. It's initially overwhelming but once you get used to it, it's good to be able to run about in and check with vendors while waiting for a game to start.

    - Graphically the campaign looks great. Textures are nice, it's very polished and it all runs very smoothly.

    Cons

    - Graphically, the multiplayer doesn't look great (which is nothing new in COD) especially now that the devs have had a few years with the PS4 (and XBone) kits, which is disappointing. It looks like it could easily be from the last generation of consoles, but I suppose graphics aren't everything.

    - Considering that it's gone back to WW2, it's no surprise there isn't an awful lot of innovation, and nothing that hasn't been seen in other WW2/COD/BF games.

    - The biggest issue at the moment is the servers - at times the online is unplayable due to errors, extremely slow matchmaking (which has been confirmed to be an issue with the servers as opposed to my connection) and completely empty Headquarters hubs. It's completely possible that if you do manage to connect to the online services that you could be sitting in a lobby waiting for a game for 15 minutes - it's that slow. It is assumed that this issue will be fixed with a patch or update very very soon, but it's still shocking that for a game as big and popular as COD that this is such a problem.

    Other points

    - Zombies - it has zombies mode as usual. I don't care, and never have cared for Zombies but if it's something you like, it's there and is pretty much the same as previous Zombies modes in previous games, so if you liked them then yay! If not, it likely won't change your mind.

    Overall, COD WW2 is an enjoyable enough game with a few issues holding it back, none more so than the servers which will hopefully be fixed soon. Definitely worth playing through and having a go on multiplayer - if you loved older CODs (such as 2, 3, Modern Warfare and World at War), then you'll feel right at home. If you don't like COD though, I don't think this will change your mind.    … Expand
  77. thaesino
    Nov 6, 2017
    7
    (Disclaimer: I will not comment on microstransactions, nor take that into account when reviewing this game, as it is our fault, the gamers, that these publishers have gotten away with such things. Placing a bad rating on the Developers' hard work due to the greed of the Publishers and the ignorance of the Players, would not do justice to any of the many AAA titles riddled with(Disclaimer: I will not comment on microstransactions, nor take that into account when reviewing this game, as it is our fault, the gamers, that these publishers have gotten away with such things. Placing a bad rating on the Developers' hard work due to the greed of the Publishers and the ignorance of the Players, would not do justice to any of the many AAA titles riddled with microtransactions or DLC. If you want them out, STOP PAYING FOR THEM. YOU ARE THE ONES PAYING FOR THEM TO BE THERE.)

    Let me make this short and break it down into three sections: Call of Duty: WW2, the game; Call of Duty: WW2, the Comparisons; and, Call of Duty: WW2, the Community.

    --- The Game: This is a game which can be easily scored anywhere between 5 and 8, depending on your mood, on your common sense, on your intelligence, or on your need to defend your purchase of this game, or to attack it in order to defend your purchase of another game (i.e. BF1, Destiny 2). The Campaign is good, albeit short. The MP is exactly like the Beta, plus the usual millions of microtransaction options which just keep getting cleverer and cleverer.

    --- The Comparisons: This game is not BF1. It has great visuals and good voice acting/writing. However, because it is not BF1, it also moves faster, which is great. BECAUSE it moves faster, it does not need to look as good. No one buys a game like this in order to stare at puddles in the mud, that's what games like Horizon: Zero Dawn are for. People compare for various reasons, not the least of which is, they simply don't know what they want anymore... and it is not our fault. Publishers and Critics and even YouTubers swing us left and right (bet they have fun doing it) for the sake of a sale, or for the sake of a sponsorship. In the end, so many people ended up buying Infinite Warfare BECAUSE of MW:RE... so it didn't matter. Activision won. Yay! And so did DICE/EA, because they also bought BF1. And so did Blizzard (Activision's merge), because they also bought Overwatch. And there go more than $180.

    The Community: I'll lay it flat. Go anywhere. Whether here on Meta, or YouTube, or the Activision community, or just on the mics on PS4 and you'll reach the same conclusion I have reached: Call of Duty has been hijacked by children, and this is here to stay. Children, because, well, that is what children do, are not the best at playing well, although if you don't take the game too seriously, you'll be fine, since they are pretty good at just having plain fun in ridiculous ways, without worrying about dying or having their teammates killed, etc etc, and heck... since when did we get so serious about games?

    Enjoy this game if you bought/buy it. That's all I can say. I couldn't enjoy it, but notice my score. My personal experience doesn't change what I see to be a solid COD experience, like in the past with MW and MW2.    … Expand
  78. FluffyBunnyBro
    Mar 10, 2018
    4
    Call of Duty WWII is a solid game, though it has MANY flaws. But before we get to the heart and soul of the game, the multiplayer, lets talk about the campaign.

    THE CAMPAIGN: It's pretty good, one of the better in the series, and the first one I've actually played all the way through since BO2. This campaign is a lot of the same stuff, but it feels more engaging because of the WW2    Call of Duty WWII is a solid game, though it has MANY flaws. But before we get to the heart and soul of the game, the multiplayer, lets talk about the campaign.

    THE CAMPAIGN:
    It's pretty good, one of the better in the series, and the first one I've actually played all the way through since BO2. This campaign is a lot of the same stuff, but it feels more engaging because of the WW2 setting, and shooting Nazis with iconic WW2 guns was pretty cool. The characters were okay, they were a bit flat, but at least there was something here. They felt like flat characters, but they were still characters, which is more than I can say about some of the other games. Overall, it was a Call of Duty campaign, and if you enjoyed the other game's campaigns, you'll enjoy this one. If you're not a fan, I would still recommend trying it, as it makes some improvements I really like, like being able to request ammo, and meds from squad mates. It was pretty good for a CoD campaign, but nothing amazing.

    THE MULTIPLAYER:
    Oh, where do I start.
    First off, the good: The gameplay is fun, and it does feel more like the older Call of Dutys without the jetpacks and all that crap. It's pretty fast paced, but I found the gunplay pretty satisfying and the overall gameplay just pretty fun. Also, in this game they introduced a new mode, War, and put simply, its a blast. It's basically Battlefield's rush but in Call of Duty. You have to make it through a few objectives while the other team tries to stop you. I really like it, and hope to see it return in future titles. Yeah, so gameplay is pretty good.
    And now, the bad: This game had the WORST launch in all of CoD history. The first 2-3 days I couldn't even get into a multiplayer. It finally started working for me, but it's still a bit shaky, sometimes lagging, or taking longer than it should to find a match. Other people have been getting it worse than me, and apparently can't get into a match even now. This is unacceptable for a $60 AAA game. Also, Headquarters is an epic fail. Currently, it is impossible to get into headquarters with another player, which is the whole point. Your stuck wandering around by yourself. Some achievements even require you to do things with other players, which is hard to do WHEN THERE'S NO OTHER GODDAMN PLAYERS!!!! I also just hate the idea in general, I just wanna get into a game and shoot some dudes while blasting classic rock in the background (Please tell me I'm not the only one who does that). But I don't give a s*** about "Social Score" and doing stuff in the headquarters. Why not just put all that stuff in menus? Anyways, now that I've covered some launch issues, lets cover things about the game's fundamental mechanics. Divisions is a stupid system. When they said they were "going back to their roots" I didn't think they meant they were legit going back and removing some of the great innovative features of the recent CoDs. This system was a complete step back from the pick-10 system. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Sledgehammer said this one would feature more customization than ever before, which is just a flat out lie. In fact, it''s the opposite of the truth. There's less customization options for your classes in this one.
    This game is also lacking some iconic WW2 weapons. For example. the Sten, it was promised before the game launched, but it's nowhere to be seen. The Mosin Nagant, perhaps the most iconic sniper of the war, is completely absent from the game. We're also missing the Gewehr 43. This game doesn't feature a revolver of any kind either, which is most perplexing of all. Revolvers are such an iconic part of any war, I don't see why they wouldn't bother to include one in the multiplayer. Especially because there's one featured briefly in the campaign. They programmed the model and all the animations but didn't put it in the multiplayer?
    And finally, black female Nazis. Just, why. NOBODY would have complained if women weren't in the game. It's almost disrespectful to all the men who fought and died in the war. Even more stupid, is that you couldn't play as a female soldier in Infinite Warfare, a game taking place a few hundred years in the future, in freaking space for crying out loud. Nope, no females in that but WW2, yup, put women in it. Wtf?
    And finally,

    THE ZOMBIES:
    I'm not a huge zombies fan but this one's okay.

    THE VERDICT:
    CoD WWII is a good change of pace, and a solid Call of Duty experience, but is plagued with launch issues and broken gameplay mechanics. If you're a huge Call of Duty fan, and was looking forward to this one, go ahead and buy it. If you're not really into Call of Duty and are on the fence, I might be a bit hesitant to spend $60 on it. 6/10. Solid WWII shooter, and a needed change of pace for Call of Duty.
    Edit: 5 months in and I'm done. Boring gameplay, terrible maps, I only have 30 characters left, but no replay value basically.    … Expand
  79. lheg95
    Nov 11, 2017
    5
    I play like 8 or 10 hours and this game is so boring. The first mission of the campaign, the D-Day, the moment all WWII lover wait for is disappointing. The campaign is short and mediocre. There are some "wanna be BF1" points like the Train Mission or the multiplayer mode that is the same as conquest but in a shorter map.
    The graphics are great, they really upgrade all the visual effects    I play like 8 or 10 hours and this game is so boring. The first mission of the campaign, the D-Day, the moment all WWII lover wait for is disappointing. The campaign is short and mediocre. There are some "wanna be BF1" points like the Train Mission or the multiplayer mode that is the same as conquest but in a shorter map.
    The graphics are great, they really upgrade all the visual effects (finally!), but, to be a game that sells more than 10 millions copies each year, the upgrade is less that I expect.
    The sound is great, I really doesn't have any complaint.

    For zombies, I like the scary sounds and ambient that create for this mode, but the map is not great and it's not bad and the survive mode is ok, nothing special.    … Expand
  80. ZeoN
    Nov 27, 2017
    5
    Call Of Duty clasico que quizas atraiga a seguidores antiguos de la franquicia.Mapas bien construidos en su mayoria a excepcion de algunos.Campaña profunda y modo zombis aceptable.
    Como siempre,las politicas abusivas de Activision de sus 4 DLCs e introducir los CPs antes de reparar el propio juego no se podian hacer esperar.Este juego tecnicamente merece un 8,pero las politicas y mala    Call Of Duty clasico que quizas atraiga a seguidores antiguos de la franquicia.Mapas bien construidos en su mayoria a excepcion de algunos.Campaña profunda y modo zombis aceptable.
    Como siempre,las politicas abusivas de Activision de sus 4 DLCs e introducir los CPs antes de reparar el propio juego no se podian hacer esperar.Este juego tecnicamente merece un 8,pero las politicas y mala gestion de el hacen que su puntuacion se reduzca.

    Juego recomendable si eres fan de la franquicia de CoD    … Expand
  81. se7enX90X
    Nov 6, 2017
    5
    -Some of the worst multiplayer maps in the call of duty franchise. Majority of your deaths will come from being shot from behind due to awful map design.

    -When this game was first announced Sledgehammer lied to the world by saying they were making an authentic WWII game that was going to be true to the war and as accurate and realistic as possible....That was a big fat lie.    -Some of the worst multiplayer maps in the call of duty franchise. Majority of your deaths will come from being shot from behind due to awful map design.

    -When this game was first announced Sledgehammer lied to the world by saying they were making an authentic WWII game that was going to be true to the war and as accurate and realistic as possible....That was a big fat lie.

    -Censorship in a game that's supposed to be for adults is inappropriate. Sledgehammer has no right to tell others what's too sensitive to view and what's not. Hiding swastikas in a game about WWII is just immature and illogical on Sledgehammer and Activision's part.

    -The outdated connection service they use is really showing just how outdated it is. A mass amount of people that bought the game cannot connect to the servers. The fact that Activision makes literally billions of dollars a year from their gambling crates but still use the cheapest possible multiplayer service is disgusting...

    When its all said and done this game could've been amazing. Sledgehammer could've created a masterpiece and proved to everybody that they really don't just make these games on a yearly basis as a cash grab. They dropped the ball and WWII is the result. I've been playing cod for over 10 years and after the amount of disappointment I received from WWII, I'm officially done with the franchise. Won't be contributing to a company like Activision who is 100% anti consumer.    … Expand
  82. aaronaccidently
    Nov 7, 2017
    6
    How this game garners 8 and 9/10 scores is insane, and unless COD gets special handicap treatment for being such a heavyweight in game titles, it is not an accurate grade for the quality of this game.

    I was excited for COD WWII because I read it had team members from the original Deadspace, and the last COD WWII game, World at War was pretty good. I played through the first level,    How this game garners 8 and 9/10 scores is insane, and unless COD gets special handicap treatment for being such a heavyweight in game titles, it is not an accurate grade for the quality of this game.

    I was excited for COD WWII because I read it had team members from the original Deadspace, and the last COD WWII game, World at War was pretty good.

    I played through the first level, the D-day landing and it was okay, but no better than Allied Assault on PC a decade ago. As a historical shooter goes, Battlefield 1 is superior in every way. The Zombie mode is okay, but it's the same old same old deal. If you were expecting anything new or different...

    This is the best COD game I've played since the first Modern Warfare, but it still seems like a rushed/cheap wannabe triple a game. Considering it's nearly 2018, this game feels like it's a couple years old. I had no interest in multiplayer, so I didn't try it. Immediately swapped it in for Wolfenstien 2, which I hope is better.    … Expand
  83. howdy0501
    Nov 14, 2017
    10
    Als ganzes gesehen ein super Spiel. Die Grafik, Sound und Umsetzung ist sehr gut gelungen.
    Was noch behoben werden muss sind die Startprobleme wie die Verbindungsabbrüche oder verschiedene kleinere Bugs.
    Sprich, wenn möglichst alle Probleme beseitigt sind, ein Super Spiel!
  84. NopdAuron
    Nov 23, 2017
    8
    I don't understand all the hate here. Yes, the servers were bad at launch but oh well. Call of Duty is finally back to its roots with World War 2 and boots on the ground. The single player is great and worth a try. The multiplayer is pretty good and so is the zombies.
  85. Critchy
    Dec 10, 2017
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I enjoyed this game, especially in the context of the underwhelming COD games of the past few years. I have so far only played the single-player, although I have watched videos of people playing the MP and it looks fun- but I'll restrict my comments to the campaign.
    First off, the campaign is largely back to basics and this, for me, is a good thing. Gimmicks like missions spent driving a tank or a plane are there, but kept to a minimum. In the main, missions are you and your platoon engaging in advancing towards and objective through waves of enemies with a few enjoyable stealth segments in the mix. This is what I want from a FPS game. I just want an enjoyable combat experience, no gimmicks, no clunky vehicle missions, just fun FPS action- and, in the main this is what COD WWII delivers. (Although there are still annoyingly clunky vehicle sections (but short ones at least)).

    The story of the game was also quite enjoyable for me. I liked the characters, the weren't as 1 dimensional as other COD characters have been, I actually cared whether Zussman survives or not. Indeed the fact that your platoon members all have tangible roles and utility (i.e. one can give you health packs, another one gives ammo, another spots enemies) made it for once feel like in a FPS game I'm not winning the war all on my own.

    I also thought that the graphics of the game were better than previous COD games, which I felt had produced largely 'same-old, same-old' graphics. This game looked more detailed and vibrant, for a change- although it could be argued that COD still lags behind other FPS games in this regard.

    Turning to negatives, going back to my earlier point- there are still clunky gimmick missions- for example the driving the tank section where you're expected to drive a tank in FP perspective, whilst operating the gun and not getting stuck. The problem is that the vehicle controls are always clunky in games not centred around vehicles, thus sections spent flying planes or driving tanks just end up feeling frustrating and gimmicky. The mission where you deliver the briefcase, although arguably gimmicky as well, involved stealth elements which I found quite enjoyable in this game. Thus it was mainly the driving missions which irked me.

    In this game sledgehammer have changed melee hits. In previous COD games (as far as I can recall) melee hits are one hit knife kills. In this game this is only true of stealth melee kills from behind, when you rush an enemy and melee attack you hit them with the butt of your gun, this only stuns enemies at full health. As someone who enjoys classic COD games, I personally want a game that stays true to the basic mechanics of those games. What made this COD enjoyable for me was that it was more similar to classic COD in some ways (i.e. returning to BOTG). However, changing the melee kills, and also removing health regen from campaign seemed pointless- if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    I also found that there were some glitches in the campaign, particularly I found that heroic actions, where you drag a wounded teammate back to cover would often not resolve themselves when I got the person to the cover spot. By that I mean my character would not set the wounded teammate down when I got to the spot I was meant to get them to. Also I found that sometimes I would be desperately trying to get off of a turret and my character would not do so not matter what I did.

    Finally, if you are going to include gimmicky driving missions, try to make the controls not absolutely unbearably clunky.

    Overall, I enjoyed this game (the single-player, at least). It returned to a more classic COD formula- with missions that were standard COD-type missions, nothing crazily innovate but highly enjoyable for me. The world and characters were immersive, the story kept me relatively engaged, with only a few glitches and gimmicks putting a damper on an fun experience. I will almost certainly play this campaign again. In summary, if you enjoyed the campaigns of the previous BOTG COD games, then I'd say you'll enjoy this one. As for the MP, you'll have to read other reviews, because as I said at the start of this review I haven't played it yet.    … Expand
  86. sir_walter
    Dec 18, 2017
    7
    As someone who enjoyed COD: WaW (The other WWII game in the COD series), I thought this was a enjoyable update to the era. I loved the zombies changes and gameplay. I think the maps aren't has fun as I would like but they're not terrible. So far the campaign is alright as well. The loading times between screens is horrible though.
  87. matinsareban
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Start playing with a very beautiful epic music, returning this series of games to their roots. Great sound when shooting and blasting, using cinematic characters ...
    call of duty ww2 is one of the best cod series
    is the best ...
  88. MKGamer
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    1 hour ago I finished this game.It was a strange feeling.I wish it was never finished. I think the story is fantastic. I love that so much.It's very beautiful and emotional ... It was very magnificent. This is the best game of 2017...touched my heart.I wish it continued forever
  89. Yunior
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    SMH!!! People coming in here to give a bad review just because they suck at the game. People, the game is way better in all aspects than any previous COD game. Is it perfect?? No, it is not perfect. It still has many areas where it needs improvements. But it is way better and way more fun than any other COD. Don't listen to all the exo suit fanboys coming in here to give bad reviews.
  90. KratosGodOfWar
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    TOXIC!! That is how I want to explain the CoD community, they **** and moan about everything!! "It's a twitch shooter, wah, wah, bloody wah..." CoD has ALWAYS been a twitch shooter...like wtf? The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over again expecting a different result...like CoD haters, you know it's a twitch shooter and still expect it to be different? GTFO! ThisTOXIC!! That is how I want to explain the CoD community, they **** and moan about everything!! "It's a twitch shooter, wah, wah, bloody wah..." CoD has ALWAYS been a twitch shooter...like wtf? The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over again expecting a different result...like CoD haters, you know it's a twitch shooter and still expect it to be different? GTFO! This is easily the best Multiplayer in CoD in a long time. None of this insta-melt Infinite Warfare crap. I gave up playing that mid year, although the DLC was really good I must say, they were redeeming themselves a bit. All this ****ing about microtransactions, yet it's exactly like Modern Warfare Remastered, everything can be unlocked through grinding...plus CoD points aren't even available to buy yet you lying butthurt virgins. Hating a game because it has been something it always has been is like hating God Of War because it has QTE. Just don't buy it and play it if you're no good at it instead of trolling Metacritic with your pimply arsed, Lil' Jimmy noob reviews. Game is what the hardcore fans wanted...BOOTS ON THE GROUND and not this bunny hopping, zero quick scoping catastrophe that has become of it lately. This is just straight up fun, nice maps to flank on, awesome zombies mode and refreshing campaign. Haters are gonna hate, players are gonna play...what do you want to be?… Expand
  91. cjwallington
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    absolutely horrible. no manual, no tutorial, no (even in-game) controller layout and a completely linear plot. Now I remember why I dislike the CoD series. Perpetually dying is no way to win a following.
  92. IDNUNUN
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    Honest Opinions:
    I've never played a Call of Duty game for months though this game delighted me. Call Of Duty WWII is a diverse Call of duty game. The game is an amazing with good gameplay, a great story, and a horrifying zombie mode.
    The singleplayer was great with memorable characters and missions. Call Of Duty leads you towards the action and makes you feel more like a real soldier.    Honest Opinions:
    I've never played a Call of Duty game for months though this game delighted me. Call Of Duty WWII is a diverse Call of duty game. The game is an amazing with good gameplay, a great story, and a horrifying zombie mode.

    The singleplayer was great with memorable characters and missions. Call Of Duty leads you towards the action and makes you feel more like a real soldier. Enemy A.I has "EXTREMELY" improved with its actions. Friendly A.I react very realistically to their movement. The problems with the singleplayer are, that when characters talk, the characters don't even look like they are talking, and plus the beginning of the campaign felt like you were more than special but after the first quarter, you start to feel like a real soldier.

    Multiplayer is "Astonishing" with its well-paced gameplay and great animations. Call Of Duty WWII supplies you with weapons used in the 1st and 2nd World War. When I first played this, I had a big smile on my face because of how fun the gameplay was. But there is a big fall down with the multiplayer and it is the map design. Though some maps were great, in Call Of Duty WWII's map design, it felt like you knew where to go.

    Zombies was a disappointment but I didn't say it was bad. Zombies put you in a great stance if you want to get scared. The experience was great but I didn't play too much of it.    … Expand
  93. NRPostma
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Let's be clear. People giving this game below a 5 are pathetic reviewers. They can't imagine a perspective outside their own and let anger interfere with their judgment. The developers put loads of work into this game and it came out great, while not perfect, no COD ever is. The argument that it deserves a 0 or 1 because it is a twitch shooter is absurd. If you don't like twitch shootersLet's be clear. People giving this game below a 5 are pathetic reviewers. They can't imagine a perspective outside their own and let anger interfere with their judgment. The developers put loads of work into this game and it came out great, while not perfect, no COD ever is. The argument that it deserves a 0 or 1 because it is a twitch shooter is absurd. If you don't like twitch shooters that's fine, but understand lots of people love them. There are lots of amazing games that I hate to play because they are not my type! I don't go and review them as a 1 because they don't suit my taste, or because I'm bad at them. Yes, this is the millionth cod and they are all relatively similar. People complain they want something new. They get something new and complain they want old cod. Accept you guys can never be satisfied. It's not the games fault, you have just grown out of the series. When you start a new job, you may love it at first, but as the year's progress you will find complaints and issues with it even though its the same old job from before. COD games bring in BILLIONS of dollars for a reason. Overall, people cant stop playing, hating, and loving every moment of the games. Get a grip on your all or nothing opinion.… Expand
  94. agent13
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Most of the critics have given the right score to this game, like advanced warfare, sledgehammer games has been successful in making a good and memorable campaign that you would play more than once but i wish it was longer. But regarding multiplayer, ww2 is somehow disappointing micro transaction ruins the balance of multiplayer mode still battlefield gives you a much better multiplayerMost of the critics have given the right score to this game, like advanced warfare, sledgehammer games has been successful in making a good and memorable campaign that you would play more than once but i wish it was longer. But regarding multiplayer, ww2 is somehow disappointing micro transaction ruins the balance of multiplayer mode still battlefield gives you a much better multiplayer experience but i don't really care about online mode i think the soul and the most important part of a game is it's story and ww2 has a good one.
    I don't have any comments about zombies mode since i don't like zombie games.
    There is something that nobody has mentioned about this game and it's the name, they could be much more creative about naming the game world war 2 sounds like this is the second game of a series but it's not.    … Expand
  95. zippitybop
    Nov 4, 2017
    10
    lot of the zero out of ten ratings are nonsense it implies that the game is literally unplayable or can have no joy derived from it at all. For me this was not the case and have thoroughly enjoyed it. i will be upfront and say it probably does not deserve a full ten and i have not fully dived into every aspect of the game. but it is certainly a better cod title than some of the recent oneslot of the zero out of ten ratings are nonsense it implies that the game is literally unplayable or can have no joy derived from it at all. For me this was not the case and have thoroughly enjoyed it. i will be upfront and say it probably does not deserve a full ten and i have not fully dived into every aspect of the game. but it is certainly a better cod title than some of the recent ones and I plan on trying to see if my attention span can hold up to max prestige.… Expand
  96. Marionette64
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    This call of duty just came out and people are already giving negative reviews! just give up!!! This is not infinite warfare, its not pay-to-win, its a good game, just stop! Unless you have played it, don't review it.
  97. sargent
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    This year we saw a very powerful headline. Both in terms of visual effects and personality in the narrative The best first-person shooter of the year ever since
  98. FearAndLoathing
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    Finally. This is a gem, its the true successor to black ops that has made COD unplayable for some time now. The pace is slower, the maps are well done, the weapons and visuals are great. The fact that pretty much any style of play can work is something we haven't seen in too long. LMGs setup down a corridor or in a bunker can hold down a point until flanked, and teamworking points seems toFinally. This is a gem, its the true successor to black ops that has made COD unplayable for some time now. The pace is slower, the maps are well done, the weapons and visuals are great. The fact that pretty much any style of play can work is something we haven't seen in too long. LMGs setup down a corridor or in a bunker can hold down a point until flanked, and teamworking points seems to happen more naturally because of the maps.

    So far, some cons to note are the networks have been off and on, and they disabled HQ mode while they fix it. Honestly, the destiny-style hq mode annoys me - id rather go through menus than fake interactions but whatever, its down right now if thats your thing.

    Steep upgrade curve - until you get a few attachments, your basically cannon fodder feeding the silly negative reviews on here.

    And i'll just address the negative reviews head on, it certainly feels to me (as someone who swore off any more cod games until I had tried this one and was won back over) that many of these reviews have not actually played the game, and have it out for the devs. Reviews that talk about bad starts, probably legit, but just be wary.    … Expand
  99. luckydutch
    Nov 4, 2017
    7
    I don't really get all the hate for this. It's not groundbreakingly innovative but the campaign is interesting and the multiplayer is just classic CoD multiplayer. The microtransactions are FAR less toxic and invasive than the RNG P2W rubbish in the upcoming Battlefront 2. Based on my current experience, I reckon I will unlock every gun within 30-40 hours of online play which is prettyI don't really get all the hate for this. It's not groundbreakingly innovative but the campaign is interesting and the multiplayer is just classic CoD multiplayer. The microtransactions are FAR less toxic and invasive than the RNG P2W rubbish in the upcoming Battlefront 2. Based on my current experience, I reckon I will unlock every gun within 30-40 hours of online play which is pretty reasonable.

    If you like CoD, you'll like this. If you don't like CoD, why are you buying it in the first place?    … Expand
  100. jay_caspian
    Nov 17, 2017
    8
    I found Call of Duty WWII to be a refreshing jump back into the glory days of the series, it's been 7. Years since I last called a CoD title, so many of the issues other people complained about did not effect me. I found the story to be fantastical driven, gameplay to be excellent, and multiplayer to be as fun as ever, even if I suck at it. My only gripe is that Sniper missions wereI found Call of Duty WWII to be a refreshing jump back into the glory days of the series, it's been 7. Years since I last called a CoD title, so many of the issues other people complained about did not effect me. I found the story to be fantastical driven, gameplay to be excellent, and multiplayer to be as fun as ever, even if I suck at it. My only gripe is that Sniper missions were repetitive. Overall, fun game… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »