Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. PrimalBanana
    Nov 3, 2017
    7
    Another year and another Call of Duty game. This time they've ditched the jetpacks and what not and gone back to their roots. CoD WW2 unsurprisingly takes place during WW2. Trailers shown before release had me actually looking forward to the campaign. In fairness its not terrible but its not exactly engrossing or exciting. We get to play through a story that we've played a thousand timesAnother year and another Call of Duty game. This time they've ditched the jetpacks and what not and gone back to their roots. CoD WW2 unsurprisingly takes place during WW2. Trailers shown before release had me actually looking forward to the campaign. In fairness its not terrible but its not exactly engrossing or exciting. We get to play through a story that we've played a thousand times before. Im struggling to really connect with the chatacters too. Mainly because squad mates are bloody useless in a fire fight leaving it up to me to do everything. The AI is as dim as ever and the dialogue is just a clichè fest. Like i said its not terrible but its certainly not worthy of anything over a 6 or 7 out of 10. The MP is as you'd expect. Solid and tight and raining loot crates. Activision go to extreme legths to try to convince you to part with your cash, its kind of embarassing to be honest. There's even a daily mission to watch 3 people open loot crates in the social space. Gunplay is good, sounds are good and the level design is overall pretty decent. Graphically Call of Duty continues to show its age and as i've said in the past its desperate for a new engine. Certainly a better Call of Duty than we've had in the last few years but its nothing special so dont expect too much except your normal Call of Duty experience.… Expand
  2. Fabulous_Filou
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    So... first time Review. This game is probably the worst in the Series and I really regret to have bought it. The cmpaign is just a really big pain. It's so unaccurate its not even funny. Russian guns in the Normandy, in under three minutes is Omaha Beach taken (it took about half an hour until they arrived at the bunkers in reality, even Medal Of Honor did this right 15 Years ago). ThatSo... first time Review. This game is probably the worst in the Series and I really regret to have bought it. The cmpaign is just a really big pain. It's so unaccurate its not even funny. Russian guns in the Normandy, in under three minutes is Omaha Beach taken (it took about half an hour until they arrived at the bunkers in reality, even Medal Of Honor did this right 15 Years ago). That was the first Mission. Okay, it was okay, I didn't expect much but it got worse. The driving parts are so fast, its like playing Need For Speed. And then the tankdriving... Horrible, especialy when my little Sherman with his short 75mm gun takes out multiple Panzer 4s and a freaking Kingtiger... What a laugh! Over alll it was a really nice showcase of how freaking great the americans where and that they won the war ALONE. Well, no... for me it's just bitter how they try to tell this story. I am german and yes, my great grandfathers fought in this terrible war. I know a lot about it. The Story forgot the Brits and Canadians, even on the overview Map there where no signs of them, STUPID. The resistance part of the game was a bit new and gave a new perspective but here was also nearly everything wrong. First i thought the Voiceacting was cool, all Germans speak perfekt german and the conversations made sense but then there was this one offizier that name i forgot... He spokes very bad german with a stupid acsent... and the game lost me once again. So the unrealistic story went on and I played through.... but then there was the part i was most disappointed: The scene at the end with the KZ... Just some random buildings, two hanging copses, some corpses on the ground... nothing really shocking nd tht is the problem. If yo visit a real memorial site of a KZ and you read all the history and look at the pictures you can't sleep for days, thats how horrific it really is and this game needet to tell this story better, more shocking. But no, it looks like a random prison with some people who might have died. Seriously? The developers didn't take the time for research, everything is wrong about it. The Bunkers, the Tanks, the Soldiers, the Weapons... I've been even to france, I know how it should look like.
    But CoD isn't really about the campaign, right? So what about the Multiplayer. Well... It's standart, the Wa Mode is fun but nothing really new. I wish i could wright more about it, but the last three days where just a pain in the you know where. Server problems, buggy HQ, Lootboxes disappering. Nothing really works and thats all AFTER closed and open Beta. so no... nothing to be proud of right now.
    But there's a Zombiemode. And yes, it's fun, but not for so long. pretty standart, too.
    Overall this game is screwed and no recomandation at all!
    Battlefield 1 did so much right last year. The campaign was great, Told many storyyys and you cared about the characters. The multiplayeer WORKED and was fun, too.    … Expand
  3. vangoat
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    I am not recommending this game to my friends.

    I got it thursday night...and couldn't play it because servers were down, yay. Played some friday morning had some fun. Played saturday with my friend very sporadically because we were both continually being kicked form servers. Zombies was awesome, feels just like the best of the the old zombies. What I played of campaign was decent.    I am not recommending this game to my friends.

    I got it thursday night...and couldn't play it because servers were down, yay. Played some friday morning had some fun. Played saturday with my friend very sporadically because we were both continually being kicked form servers. Zombies was awesome, feels just like the best of the the old zombies. What I played of campaign was decent. Multiplayer tho...it sucks. War is great. The rest tho, is just like other reviewers say, very empty. Absolutely terrible spawns...how many times did I spawn in to immediately (seriously seconds later) be killed by the same exact person! OMG!

    Its just so spastic of a game, all reflexes, no thinking. Quick-scoping!? really? Why keep that in these games!? I watched one play of the game where a sniper quick-scoped two people from 12 feet away! So stupid. Campers absolutely galore! Campers and quickscopers will love this game.

    It is a much better installment of COD, BUT everything that ever annoyed me about old COD games is still present. And the servers are absolute garbage so good luck not getting errored out. I would think game companies would be better prepared for releasing games than this...why run a beta if you cant even properly release a working game? Cant they figure out how stressed their servers will be by how many freaking preorders they had?!?! obviously not...very disappointed. Theres a good chance this is the last COD I will play.

    I really wanted to like this game. I will play it some more. But today was Sunday, I woke up did some chores and played games most of the day, but did not once feel inclined to play COD WW2. 2 days after having it and I already was losing interest. That sums it up for me. I would love my 60 bucks back.    … Expand
  4. Skydog
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    "Call of duty is back to it's roots"
    Um no. It's definitely not. This game is full of tiny ass maps where the ADHD children can continue to run to spawns and feel like their tiny dicks are bigger. No one in their right mind would give this game over a 5. It's got a decent campaign and zombie mode but the MP is complete and utter trash STILL.
  5. PCMasterRaceFTW
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    I preordered the digital deluxe edition, something like 150$ CAD , the game is TRASH. Right on release , all servers went down for more than 3 hours and there you go all the ppl who preordered got screwed.
    The first thing I noticed was how HEAVILY supply drops are advertised in this game, that whole headwaters thing or whatever is the most shady thing Ive ever seen in a game. You're    I preordered the digital deluxe edition, something like 150$ CAD , the game is TRASH. Right on release , all servers went down for more than 3 hours and there you go all the ppl who preordered got screwed.
    The first thing I noticed was how HEAVILY supply drops are advertised in this game, that whole headwaters thing or whatever is the most shady thing Ive ever seen in a game. You're basically encouraging little kids to watch other people open their supply drops and get all those cool guns, encouraging those kids to ask mommy and daddy for money so that they can get them. On top of that you have the supply drop matchmaking which puts bad players against good players who have Supply drop weapons, on purpose, in order to further advertise them. If you're a parent DO NOT BUY THIS GAME FOR YOUR KIDS
    The game takes a ridiculously long time to load , the graphics look horrible. The hit detection and lag and insanely bad too. And last but not least , speaking of insanely bad , the MAPS are the worst maps ive ever seen in call of duty. Not only is it super hard to see people in the first place, but the maps themselves have so many openings, so much stuff everywhere. It doesn't matter how you play , you can get shot from behind. I can barely hear footsteps too. There is no way to tweak the graphics to make it easier to see ppl either ,everyone is headglitching and spawn camping in what seems to be an endless labyrinth of bs. The menu is awful, I want the old create a class point system. How does a 5KD player in all other boots on the ground cods struggle to get a 1KD in this game ? How does my 50mbps up and 50 mbps down drop to 2 bars every time I meet an enemy ?
    Every cod game seems to be getting worse and worse ever since Ghosts and every time they are trying harder and harder to push supply drops . Its like its not even about the game anymore, its about, what kind of shady bs we can do to sell more supply drops.
    You know what Im not even mad. Thank you for the refund PlayStation ! This is the 3rd CoD game I return following Ghosts , Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare.
    I swear on my mothers grave I will never buy another CoD game every again ! Not only that, I genuinely feel relieved and dont feel like id miss anything.
    Let's conclude this with the fact that supply drops should be made illegal, this is literally gambling, and Im not really concerned about me, as I haven't spent a dime on that scam, I'm more concerned about the younger audience. Manipulation of young innocent children to such high extent with what should be ILLEGAL gambling like I said should be made illegal.
    Every single game that has supply drops in it SUCKS, as they are nothing more than a corrupted scheme to steal people's money and CoD WW2 is the perfect example of what happens when you try to push this ever harder.
    Good luck dealing with legal trouble in the future Activation , it won't be long till you start getting lawsuits and all those money which you manipulated people and pretty much near stole it from them is going to be taken away from you.    … Expand
  6. Firewing2
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    Honestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncated it felt. A lot of cutscenes and not a lot of game play... trying too hard to shove the story of "brotherhood" down your throat. The squad system feels tacked on, and the campaign brought nothing new to the franchise.

    I'm a huge fan of the CoD    Honestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncated it felt. A lot of cutscenes and not a lot of game play... trying too hard to shove the story of "brotherhood" down your throat. The squad system feels tacked on, and the campaign brought nothing new to the franchise.

    I'm a huge fan of the CoD series as a whole, and was very excited by the promise of a return to the WW2 roots, but this game is just disappointing.    … Expand
  7. timaloy
    Nov 21, 2017
    0
    game runs terrrible total hackfest no support very poor from SHgames, More went into loot boxes than the actual game HQ is a joke, easy way to rip off kids
  8. happythoughts
    Nov 18, 2017
    0
    Summary: Mediocre gameplay, sub-par graphics and multiplayer lag and broken party settings. Feels like a PS3 game.

    I can't believe this game came out after BF1 and Titanfall 2, because the graphics are very mediocre. The servers are crazy laggy in multiplayer, and even though TitanFall2 and BF1 had lag, not to this degree. This seems unforgiveable considering that the games and maps    Summary: Mediocre gameplay, sub-par graphics and multiplayer lag and broken party settings. Feels like a PS3 game.

    I can't believe this game came out after BF1 and Titanfall 2, because the graphics are very mediocre. The servers are crazy laggy in multiplayer, and even though TitanFall2 and BF1 had lag, not to this degree. This seems unforgiveable considering that the games and maps are so small. Kind of reaffirmed what I thought of recent CoD games. Maybe I'll revisit if my friend tells me they have fixed the lag issues. I remember BF4 had some serious multiplayer issues on launch, so hopefully they fix this game so it's not a complete waste of $60.    … Expand
  9. RyanJamesSez
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    Get this loot box crap out of this game. It has no place in the experience and ruins the game. I already gave you my money, stop trying to take more. You're screwing over your customers.
  10. McEmow
    Nov 8, 2017
    0
    A full priced game with Free-to-play lootbox elements? Rewarding players in watching others opening lootboxes??? Are you kidding me? What is this nonsense. 1/10.
    Same old COD with a WW2 skin. The headquarter only exists for lootbox purpose. Nothing more.
  11. Mexican_Jesus
    Nov 15, 2017
    0
    I will not stand for a 'return to form' which is simply a re-skin of the same Call of Duty game we've had for years, relying solely on the outdated technical aspects from prior and the resulting lack of impact or originality. The game takes place in World War II just as many people have been wishing for, however from the moment of the game's reveal it was completely apparent thatI will not stand for a 'return to form' which is simply a re-skin of the same Call of Duty game we've had for years, relying solely on the outdated technical aspects from prior and the resulting lack of impact or originality. The game takes place in World War II just as many people have been wishing for, however from the moment of the game's reveal it was completely apparent that Activision were trying to capitalise on Battlefield 1's success in a desperate attempt to remain prominent within the genre.

    The game is entirely lifeless and the setting feels one layer deep, as opposed to the historically accurate 'realism' of war that made the earlier Call of Duty games such a hit. If I can use any gun in any fight, regardless of historical accuracy, I might as well call in a giant Loot box to crush the opponent, that's how immersion shattering it is.

    Speaking of Giant Loot boxes....Call of Duty: WWII is absolutely atrocious in it's dependence on Loot boxes to generate excessive wealth for Activision, and to exploit the consumer. Any game that dares to reward me for watching other people gamble in an attempt to convince me to do so as well will not be tolerated at all.

    To Conclude:
    Call of Duty: WWII is a half-hearted attempt to cash in on the success of its rivals and restore the dwindling fanbase of the series that lacks meaningful characterization or weight both in its writing and technical aspects. The game compromises the legitimacy of its historical emulation for the sake of Loot Boxes and it shows a terrible lack of confidence or respect for both the series itself and the dedicated fans who've supported the series for years.    … Expand
  12. brat1111
    Jan 7, 2018
    5
    The shooting, that I liked so much in Black Ops 3, just feels off and clunky in this game. The graphics are good in some campaign levels but not that great overall. I am very disappointed. Don't bother buying this game, that's my advice, man.
  13. mrrader72
    Nov 12, 2017
    5
    When I person can run around the map with just a shovel while everyone else has machine guns, and have the high score your WWII shooter has problems. This game is buggier than road kill. Snipers quick scoping in close quarters without taking time to aim, because the aim assist for snipers is ridiculous. it has the potential to be so much fun too. That's what makes playing it so frustrating.
  14. shlammer
    Nov 15, 2017
    10
    This game checks so many boxes. If you like COD for the full-bore arcade action this will not disappoint. So happy Activision released something strong, simple, and on point.
    No bull - just a straight up quality close quarters FPS with ample grime and gore for the console gamer in mind with all three Career, Multiplayer and Zombies being rich and rewarding. Feels like tons of replay value    This game checks so many boxes. If you like COD for the full-bore arcade action this will not disappoint. So happy Activision released something strong, simple, and on point.
    No bull - just a straight up quality close quarters FPS with ample grime and gore for the console gamer in mind with all three Career, Multiplayer and Zombies being rich and rewarding. Feels like tons of replay value 15 hours in have only scratched the surface. It will be exciting to see what additional maps are to come!    … Expand
  15. 000Sarmad
    Nov 12, 2017
    6
    I’ve been waiting for this game for so long. After playing I would say it is a disappointment of the year. Being a fan of fps, I thought COD WII would replace battlefield 1 but I was wrong. Let’s back to the game-play and of course multiplayer, which is the most popular feature of this series.
    Firstly, campaign is just mediocre. I would say that the game play is good but story is    I’ve been waiting for this game for so long. After playing I would say it is a disappointment of the year. Being a fan of fps, I thought COD WII would replace battlefield 1 but I was wrong. Let’s back to the game-play and of course multiplayer, which is the most popular feature of this series.
    Firstly, campaign is just mediocre. I would say that the game play is good but story is disappointing thought. Graphic is good but not as good as I was expecting. In campaign, I was expecting Russian, Japanese, Italian and many other countries that were the victim of WWII but the campaign only focus on few events between US and Germany. How could COD not include Russian and Japanese in campaign? I love COD World at War campaign and if I compare to this latest edition I would say it is below par.
    Secondly, multiplayer is repetitive and I got bored after few matches. War mode is a good addition but it is not enough to make things right. There are few maps and all of them were small, poorly designed and heaven for SMGs, being a fan of bolt action rifles and M1 Garand it is frustrating.
    In the end, I would like to say that it is just like an old COD games with WWII theme. No innovation nothing new in it, War mode is a copy of Battlefield 1 operation mode, Headquarter mode is a replica of Destiny 2 clan, campaign is a more or less same as Saving Private Ryan Hollywood movie. Just 5 hour campaign, it would easily extend to 10 hours by adding more content by including Russia, Japan, Italy and other main players in WWII.
    I would honestly give COD WII 5 out of 10, but being a little bias and as a fan of this series; my final verdict is 6 out of 10.    … Expand
  16. Joshinatir2200
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    This game takes all of the problems from previous COD titles and amplifies them. Ridiculous wait times, button functions not working (this is fixable), etc. The campaign is very meh, multiplayer is very unmemorable, and the nazi zombies is boring after playing it once, even zombies in space land was better.. I can't believe I spent $60 on this junk. It's worth half that at most. MayThis game takes all of the problems from previous COD titles and amplifies them. Ridiculous wait times, button functions not working (this is fixable), etc. The campaign is very meh, multiplayer is very unmemorable, and the nazi zombies is boring after playing it once, even zombies in space land was better.. I can't believe I spent $60 on this junk. It's worth half that at most. May be the last COD game I ever buy.… Expand
  17. cesar042
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    The multiplayer is very bad with nothing of content, the campaigns is a vas copy of "Ryan soldier rescue" and the zombies mode is the same every year nothing of innovación.
  18. VoldemortsNip
    Nov 16, 2017
    0
    Sledgehammer and Activision should be utterly embarrassed and ashamed. Broken, unfinished, poorly designed, only 9 maps and theyre all some of the worst in Cod history.
  19. Cire
    Nov 20, 2017
    0
    La historia tiene caídas de fps y eso lo hace muy complicado a la hora de jugar (tengo una ps4 slim no se en las demás versiones de ps4) y el online tiene caídas de partidas y muy pocos mapas los cuales son muy malos solo se salva la mitad de los mapas y el colmo son los 50€ del season pass , la verdad jo lo tengo y espero que valga la pena , pero de momento no lo recomiendo.
    Lo bueno es    La historia tiene caídas de fps y eso lo hace muy complicado a la hora de jugar (tengo una ps4 slim no se en las demás versiones de ps4) y el online tiene caídas de partidas y muy pocos mapas los cuales son muy malos solo se salva la mitad de los mapas y el colmo son los 50€ del season pass , la verdad jo lo tengo y espero que valga la pena , pero de momento no lo recomiendo.
    Lo bueno es que vuelven a la segunda gerra mundial.    … Expand
  20. bloodyice56
    Jan 28, 2018
    1
    Dont waste your money on this cash grab, same old processed trash, less content than any other call of duty. How does this game have less weapons than world at war. Also i thought this was about the U.S army vs the nazi germany, why are there Japanese and Russian guns and hardly any bolt action rifles, besides the snipers. Historically inaccurate, you can get better ww2 games with moreDont waste your money on this cash grab, same old processed trash, less content than any other call of duty. How does this game have less weapons than world at war. Also i thought this was about the U.S army vs the nazi germany, why are there Japanese and Russian guns and hardly any bolt action rifles, besides the snipers. Historically inaccurate, you can get better ww2 games with more content, no loot boxes, and cheaper.… Expand
  21. ApexCryptLord
    Nov 3, 2017
    4
    I must say the story is really great, it has some great missions and it has some really great moments. But tbh. the multiplayer is still not good as the old ones. What is really disappointing. And i don't really know, why CoD has a MMO mod?
  22. mrcrunch08
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    I don't get the hype and high reviews. Level layout in mp is pretty crap and controls are clunky. It feels like a big step back and oddly feels older and worse than cod remastered. The campaign is good and looks great but is short as usual. It's just the mp that is a huge let down. My guy constantly stops running for no reason resulting in my guy standing still or slowly walking into aI don't get the hype and high reviews. Level layout in mp is pretty crap and controls are clunky. It feels like a big step back and oddly feels older and worse than cod remastered. The campaign is good and looks great but is short as usual. It's just the mp that is a huge let down. My guy constantly stops running for no reason resulting in my guy standing still or slowly walking into a bullet. The majority of the maps seem to have no effort at all put in to them. It blows my mind that some people think this is better than infinite. There is nothing at all new or exciting here. Just a slow paced, clunky fps with mediocre mp. It doesn't even come close to cods of old and shouldn't even be allowed to sit on a shelf next to bf1.… Expand
  23. CommonSenseGuy
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    I've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% isI've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% is actually playing the game. The game itself, when I can actually play it, isn't bad. I haven't touched the campaign because, like I mentioned before, I only bought this to play online multiplayer with my loved ones. I'm willing to change my review score if Sledgehammer can patch things up so I can actually play the game that I bought. I only ask that I can go 10 minutes without an error popping up. An error literally just showed up as I was typing this review. I'm not even joking. Kill me… Expand
  24. mdrenth
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    gameplay is pretty okay but the loading screens and waiting times are horrible, wouldn't recommend buying right now. multiplayer feels like an early acces
  25. TomasLacerda
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    For the sake of you wallet, DO NOT. BUY. THIS GAME.

    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.    For the sake of you wallet, DO NOT. BUY. THIS GAME.

    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.

    Don't play it.    … Expand
  26. Tenacidad963
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Este Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero seEste Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero se pierde el aspecto de inmersión. A pesar de tener gráficos actuales se ve como si fuera para niños. Entonces te das cuenta de que te subestiman como jugador, independientemente de que si ya has jugado a otros Call Of Duty´s. La campaña dura poco de entre 5 o 6 horas, el multijugador parece que le han puesto mucho entusiasmo parece que creen que el jugador es conformista y fácil de manejar.

    In English
    This Call Of Duty is a mockery to the intelligence, it can have in some parts good graphics and few good moments that please those who do not ask much for a game. However, they spoil a very important historical fact by putting boxes of micropayments. Eliminate a moment that should be epic for putting in the face of the player his bad practice of selling items that help you, but you lose the immersive aspect. Despite having current graphics it looks as if it were for children. Then you realize that they underestimate you as a player, regardless of whether you have already played other Call Of Duty's. The campaign lasts little between 5 or 6 hours, the multiplayer seems to have put a lot of enthusiasm seems to believe that the player is conformist and easy to handle.    … Expand
  27. Arutairu
    Nov 11, 2017
    0
    I cant believe people pay for this game , only campaing is decent but very short...I rather replay first two call of duty then this......People got really brainwashed by return to ww2 to buy this...If u like watching people opening cases game is for you otherwise stay away from this waste of time.

    PS: i refunded game.
  28. AAT
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Multiplayer is not even close to history. COD still (for a 10+ years) doesn't have any dedicated servers. Still same old stupid multiplayer mechanic. Nothing new to me.
  29. czdz87
    Nov 8, 2017
    0
    This is not a game for e-sport games. S & D mode, too much noise on the map. The maps are too small and too fast. Class of "mountains" in quiet walking destroys game. E-sport in this game does not exist.
  30. Towel1905
    Nov 8, 2017
    10
    Its good CoD! Better iw and bo3. Zombies not suck like in iw. Loot boxes balance. good game! The best online on pc and on ps! Record! SHG, good job!!!
  31. TalentUK
    Nov 8, 2017
    0
    First things first i am glad to say i did not line activisions pockets by buying this game, i borrowed it from a mate for 2 days then asked him would he like me to bin it for him.....He said yes
    For those people who buy this (including my mate) your destroying gaming for gamers ..... while this recycled trash with added money for this and that plagues the industry you the gamers will get    First things first i am glad to say i did not line activisions pockets by buying this game, i borrowed it from a mate for 2 days then asked him would he like me to bin it for him.....He said yes
    For those people who buy this (including my mate) your destroying gaming for gamers ..... while this recycled trash with added money for this and that plagues the industry you the gamers will get ripped off with cheap nasty games like this.....The Good old copy and d paste with a new background seems to fool most off you.....It is the same game without the jumping boosts with extra censorship and lots of Bull S*$t PC .....    … Expand
  32. cheater95
    Nov 9, 2017
    1
    The game is awesome i loved the story of all campaign,multiplayer and zombies.But i put this score because it has so many bugs it's getting frustrating i can't play a game without a server error i was about to finish the Easter Egg and it kicked me out because of the server.It doesn't matter what kind of story it has or anything if you can't play a game properly.Fix the issues and the bugsThe game is awesome i loved the story of all campaign,multiplayer and zombies.But i put this score because it has so many bugs it's getting frustrating i can't play a game without a server error i was about to finish the Easter Egg and it kicked me out because of the server.It doesn't matter what kind of story it has or anything if you can't play a game properly.Fix the issues and the bugs and i'll definitely put a positive review.But for know this is what you get 100% for the bug issues.… Expand
  33. Jcupps12
    Nov 10, 2017
    3
    I can’t believe all the people praising the graphics. They are a huge turn off for me especially after seeing how good battlefield 1 looked 2 years ago they are a complete embarrassment. Online time to kill is ridiculously fast. Doesn’t matter what gun you use as recoil is no existent and again time to kill is so fast regardless it’s rarely noticeable the damage differences of weaponsI can’t believe all the people praising the graphics. They are a huge turn off for me especially after seeing how good battlefield 1 looked 2 years ago they are a complete embarrassment. Online time to kill is ridiculously fast. Doesn’t matter what gun you use as recoil is no existent and again time to kill is so fast regardless it’s rarely noticeable the damage differences of weapons unless the suppressor is attached. Sniping is essentially just everyone quick scoping. The sound design is actually fairly good but would ay I mainly noticed it on grenades and explosives. Gun sounds are better in bf1. Game play is better in bf1. Loot boxes.....I mean really? It’s fun to hop on play 3 or 4 games and then move on. Campaign is short, boring, and doesn’t seem to matter to be honest. Glad it’s back to boots on the ground but it is miles and miles and miles away from being a great game or recapturing what call of duty once was. Put simply, it’s just not very good.… Expand
  34. pappm94
    Nov 15, 2017
    2
    This is just a very very average first person shooter, that Activision releases every damn year. It is recycled, which is not a good word in the gaming industry. On top of that, microtransactions, of course.
    Just please don't buy ....
  35. HerrRoman
    Jan 25, 2018
    9
    Campaign only review: THE BEST COD SO FAR.
    Return to past was a great move. In this interactive feel train movie I had so many awesome moments. I am more Black ops or Modern Warfare type of a gamer, but this World War II theme was processed amazingly.
    ..I don't care about nazi zombies.
  36. Ghoster
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    Sad! I had big expectations for that game looking forward COD is back to WW2. Unfortunately game is terrible. Strong aim assist make me feel game is made for 7 years old.
  37. Guilfred
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    luck boxes en un cod? enserio, aparte de tener la campaña mas sosa y corta que e visto en un juego de la 2da guerra mundial, del asco, despues de todo eso entras al multijugador y llena de cheatters pff no recomiendo el juego, lo acabo de regresar en steam
  38. liamandjo
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Disappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to thinkDisappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to think just run around a corner and get blasted. Campaign mode is OK, hence the 1 point. But I doubt I will get back to it. And the graphics - seriously? I feel I am back on my PS3.… Expand
  39. joseLuis1
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    no lo recomiendo, las cajas con regalos caen del cielo (las cuales te sacan del video juego por completo), hay muertes ilimitadas, muy repetitivo y poco innovador, parece un casino de la segunda guerra mundial, muy decepcionado de esta entrega, espero que las próximas entregas mejoren.
  40. dannija96
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    A game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovativeA game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovative ways for players to enjoy the game.… Expand
  41. Rafasempere
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Un auténtico engaño de juego a base de corta-pega de otros títulos de la saga. Coge cualquiera de los últimos CoD, quítale los saltos y las movidas futuristas y ponle una skin de la segunda guerra mundial. Ya tienes el CoD WW2.
    Armas sin retroceso alguno y totalmente descompensadas, texturas y animaciones tan simples que el Counter Strike le da un buen repaso. Los mapas multijugador son    Un auténtico engaño de juego a base de corta-pega de otros títulos de la saga. Coge cualquiera de los últimos CoD, quítale los saltos y las movidas futuristas y ponle una skin de la segunda guerra mundial. Ya tienes el CoD WW2.
    Armas sin retroceso alguno y totalmente descompensadas, texturas y animaciones tan simples que el Counter Strike le da un buen repaso. Los mapas multijugador son enanos, simples y monótonos diseñados para contentar a los niños rata en su carrera a ver quien es el primero en sacarse los prestigios.
    Haber pagado más de 60€ por semejante aberración me hace arrepentirme de haberlo comprado digital (si lo tuviera en físico ya lo tendría a la venta).
    El que quiera jugar a un fps con ambientación clásica que compre el Battlefield 1. Ya está bien de tanto engaño con la serie CoD. Nunca más.    … Expand
  42. TsukasaHiiragi
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    Single player is essentially just more of the same, nothing new or groundbreaking. Some missions are more annoying than others, especially missions requiring stealth can be annoying or even buggy. Multiplayer is a mess, loot boxes in a COD game? Seriously?

    The entire franchise is desperate to add something new, but in the end always settles for focusing on the multiplayer side of    Single player is essentially just more of the same, nothing new or groundbreaking. Some missions are more annoying than others, especially missions requiring stealth can be annoying or even buggy. Multiplayer is a mess, loot boxes in a COD game? Seriously?

    The entire franchise is desperate to add something new, but in the end always settles for focusing on the multiplayer side of the game, which the codtards always eat up.

    Another MAJOR issue is that the tank controls are awful, straight up terrible. It makes for an incredibly difficult and frustrating experience when your tank turns like a slug, gets stuck on scenery and is downright bad - the controls need to be reworked. Another major issue is the hit boxes, they are bad - really really bad, more than a few times on a quick time event you can just blindly fire your gun and miss the target...but it'll still register as a hit/kill.

    I would like to see COD evolve from both a weak single player experience, and a weak multiplayer arena shooter, the logical step would be an open world live war with dynamic missions, drop in/out multiplayer.    … Expand
  43. Defalc0
    Nov 5, 2017
    2
    Multiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that wasMultiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that was ok? the helmets that all players can equip look ridiculous when they are on german soldiers... because they are american GI helmets. ive never played such an immersion breaking (WW2) game. I never have wrote a review on here, but this game pushed all the wrong buttons with me.Seriously, how is World at War STILL a superior game in this day and age. OH YEA, because it wasnt afraid to make you feel uncomfortable, it wasnt afraid to make you uneasy. That game still gives me chills, so dark and so gruesome. Thats the image of war that haunts me. one day this pandering needs to stop.

    The standard issue calling cards DO NOT include flags of nations that actualy faught in the war, instead we have to swallow the image of these LGBT my little furrie flags flying over Normandy. GOD ALMIGHTY, stop with this political **** you are literally killing yourselves with this stuff sledge...
    If i could go back in time only once, I would stop sledgehammer games from ever being part of the call of duty cycle.

    im giving this game 2 points because zombies is actually good, and might only play that.    … Expand
  44. aeuteneuer
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    This game is a complete waste of money. Please, I urge you not to buy; you will be highly disappointed. From the basic non-strategical gameplay to the tiny maps there is not much to enjoy about this game. Compare this to another game with world war two style settings and guns like Battlefield One and there is no comparison. Battlefield One blows Call of Duty World at War out of the water.This game is a complete waste of money. Please, I urge you not to buy; you will be highly disappointed. From the basic non-strategical gameplay to the tiny maps there is not much to enjoy about this game. Compare this to another game with world war two style settings and guns like Battlefield One and there is no comparison. Battlefield One blows Call of Duty World at War out of the water. Call of Duty really let their fans down with this game. I don't like the game play, maps are way too small, small amounts of people in a game (6 Person teams), and on top of that its just not fun. I was not a fan of Call of Duty's last release of Advance Warfare but looking back even that is 100 times better than this new one. I am trying to find something positive to say about it so I will say that their cut scene are very cool and the graphics are amazing but non of that translates into the actual gameplay. The zombies can be fun and seems to be the main selling point of their game because its really the only thing people play. I would highly recommend NOT buying Call of Duty World War II. Instead, If you are looking for a strategic world war II game with big detailed maps and large amount of players in games then, I would Battlefield One. It far surpasses any of its competition at the moment and is an incredibly fun game to play.… Expand
  45. Hecatom
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Just like many others have said before me.
    This game is the culmination of everything bad in the AAA game industry so far.
    The sad part is that as usual the lowest common denominator will keep enabling this kind of practices until is too late.

    Watch how the next Starwars Battlefront 2 will up all the negative aspects of this game and people will eat it gladly.
  46. Mikedee
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    Campaign is great. Zombies good. Multiplayer horrible. Cod ww2 is a AAA game that is treated like a free-to-play game except you pay full price for a game and then to compete you have to buy supply drops. Never again will I support these guys until they quit with the cash grab.
  47. Tubey
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    CoD: WWII goes back to the roots of the series in all the wrong ways possible. Instead of taking the best of what made CoD a smash hit and injecting new life into it, they have cherry picked the same old same old stale nonsense, cobbling together a dated, lifeless single player campaign with every FPS "story mode" trope you care to think of, combined it with the same old same old casualCoD: WWII goes back to the roots of the series in all the wrong ways possible. Instead of taking the best of what made CoD a smash hit and injecting new life into it, they have cherry picked the same old same old stale nonsense, cobbling together a dated, lifeless single player campaign with every FPS "story mode" trope you care to think of, combined it with the same old same old casual multiplayer boredom and dropped in the most bollocks loot box system yet devised by mankind.

    Oh, but the critics love it, don't they? Well, they would, given that most of them reviewed it at a special swanky event held by Activision, closely supervised for their impressions whilst having their every need catered for. "Gaming journalism" indeed; integrity personified. Amazing how that little tidbit of trivia isn't widely publicised eh? Pfft...

    I am convinced people buy this out of habit at this point. I certainly don't buy it, but I think everyone has that one friend who still does because the series made him happy when he was a teenager or something and it's become a drug to them. They tolerate any level of pure crap the series throws at them because they scored that perfect kill 10 years ago and it made them smile.

    Good for them. For the rest of us who can't casually discard our brain, CoD:WWII is a complete waste of time and epitomises every single last thing wrong with this ridiculous industry.    … Expand
  48. id_archer
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    графоний растворился в мыльце...(( и чуство что я в это уже играл не как не покидает меня
  49. Edjin
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    A game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovativeA game with promise and disappointment. More work should be done to figure out the core of what this franchise is, with the story being fun but way too short. Sure multiplayer is the focus, but more effort can be placed to put more action set pieces for story players. Multiplayer has not had much innovations in the last iterations of the franchise, it needs to figure out new and innovative ways for players to enjoy the game… Expand
  50. matdevine21
    Nov 4, 2017
    4
    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes. My main problem with this supposed next generation    Had high hopes but the entire campaign feels disjointed and lacking focus, also the change from regenerating health to health packs whilst adding a level of difficulty does stop this feeling like a COD game and more like a Steam Unity knock off.

    Multiplayer is meh, nothing different from the old World at War, lacks maps and game modes.
    My main problem with this supposed next generation of maps is that they are no different than last gen, where is the dynamic settings? why cant there be a physical changes to the map randomly i.e. a battle on a sinking battleship or a war around you with buildings exploding? its just lazy and derriviative but compared to what Activision charges for season pass / map packs its just insulting!

    Loot crates are obviously there, disgusting to have them opening on normandy batlefield in your "social area" and visable to all, there really isnt an "enough money earned here" is there!

    Overall I feel more down on the franchise now than ever before, it needs to go away and have a high level rethink about COD's future as come next year, COD will not be a pre order or even a day one purchase for me!    … Expand
  51. Aresman
    Nov 5, 2017
    3
    I got this game for the SP campaign, but after finishing it in less then 6 h, i can't recommend this game not even on sale at how mediocre the missions were the single mission that i enjoyed and was good from the begging to the end was the Battle of Bulge but even on that the map was almost a copy and paste from united offensive, i wish there was more idk, i mean the D-Day mission onlyI got this game for the SP campaign, but after finishing it in less then 6 h, i can't recommend this game not even on sale at how mediocre the missions were the single mission that i enjoyed and was good from the begging to the end was the Battle of Bulge but even on that the map was almost a copy and paste from united offensive, i wish there was more idk, i mean the D-Day mission only the begging is epic after that all u do is clear bunkers but the way it looks and it's made makes me thing they had a very limited and small budget to make that mission and they wasted too much on the first part and after that they reused same bunker over and over with little change to it and it's things like that that makes the campaign boring and dull, idk how a game that's 12 y old is more epic has more awesome action and bigger then this but idk maybe it's just my opinion and blind by nostalgia, i hope i am.… Expand
  52. Cuberian
    Nov 6, 2017
    3
    You really need an explanation? You saw this black soldier in Germany army in multiplayer ?! No, because it looks like I'm looking through the eyes of myopic
  53. IONOSGAMES
    Nov 4, 2017
    6
    Un juego de disparos, shooter sin mas. No profundiza en la historia, no innova, es un juego para pasar el rato, divertido sin mas. Es recomendable a los que les gusta el shooter a bajo precio, ya que su duracion pienso que no esta acorde a su precio. Lo malo es el parche de salida que es OBLIGATORIO. No se puede jugar sin ese parche, por lo que suspendo este juego
  54. c9sasza
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Lootboxes and trailer from dlc map before game come out? I must say no i sold this after beat campain in 5 hours.Zombie is good but you buy season pass other way you got only one map
  55. AMX121
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    CoD is the primal representation of everything wrong with the game industry. Multiplayer focused, loot boxes, micro-transactions, season pass, dlcs and pay to win **** **** THEM AND EVERYTHING THEY MAKE
  56. DayFul
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    I skipped infinite warfare due to being tired of the tiny maps, Ultra low ttk and terrible connectivity that has been a hallmark of recent COD games. Activision have Blizzard in their back pocket and are still too cheap to use their dedicated servers that ensure Overwatch provides a vastly superior online experience (EA's Battlefiled series also embarasses COD in this area). The game isI skipped infinite warfare due to being tired of the tiny maps, Ultra low ttk and terrible connectivity that has been a hallmark of recent COD games. Activision have Blizzard in their back pocket and are still too cheap to use their dedicated servers that ensure Overwatch provides a vastly superior online experience (EA's Battlefiled series also embarasses COD in this area). The game is simply living off it's name at this point there's zero inspiration it may as well be a sport game with how little improvements are made. It's simply a new coat of paint on what it's a knackered car.… Expand
  57. Jumballi
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Rather than innovate, they simply went back and repackaged the previous game and just took out the super jumps. The only innovation is the fact they made loot boxes more toxic than any game before it.
  58. Dog3117
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    I was stuck between this game and wolfensetin 2, I ended up choosing this one hoping for the replay-ability/longevity factor. Made the cock up of choosing this. BS microtransactions, boring multiplayer, and all round scumbag business ethics by the publisher of this game. This game had a fairly enjoyable campaign, and I did appreciate the attempt and creativity of war mode but these are theI was stuck between this game and wolfensetin 2, I ended up choosing this one hoping for the replay-ability/longevity factor. Made the cock up of choosing this. BS microtransactions, boring multiplayer, and all round scumbag business ethics by the publisher of this game. This game had a fairly enjoyable campaign, and I did appreciate the attempt and creativity of war mode but these are the only 2 positives I see in an otherwise boring soulless cash grab of a 'game'. To y'all giving it a 1 or 0, quit being sheep and be honest, its not a genuine 1 and your the reason this site is nearly completely useless… Expand
  59. deLama
    Nov 17, 2017
    6
    6/6 6/66/6 6/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/66/6 6/66/6 6/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/6… Expand
  60. Alex1010500
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    Игра, наполненная микротранзакциями и созданная исключительно чтобы только продавать лутбоксы. Молодцы так держать, играйте сами в свою игру.
  61. StanleyFatmax
    Dec 2, 2017
    0
    This game is doodoo.

    I hate most of all, the fact that you get to pick what you look like going into a battle. In the last COD WW2 game, if you were on the side of the Japanese then you wore a Japanese uniform. Same goes for being on the American team, German, Russian and so on... Now, not only do you get to pick what uniform you wear, you also get to pick your gender and ethnicity.    This game is doodoo.

    I hate most of all, the fact that you get to pick what you look like going into a battle. In the last COD WW2 game, if you were on the side of the Japanese then you wore a Japanese uniform. Same goes for being on the American team, German, Russian and so on... Now, not only do you get to pick what uniform you wear, you also get to pick your gender and ethnicity. That is so dumb, imo. For me, it takes away from the feelings of immersion to see a black female in a Wehrmacht uniform. Also, it makes it hard to tell friend from foe.    … Expand
  62. hoohoo
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    Well.. it's not a bad game. But I'm still really disappointed. I expected so much more, but it is just a tunnel run with some quite weak story around it. Shoot the same predictable enemies, who just run into your bullets. Meh.
  63. RJ_Crooks
    Dec 28, 2017
    5
    There is nothing special about WWII that separates it from previous iterations of the COD franchise. The story is sub-par and the online play is full of quick scoping snipers, and spawn camping boost lobbies. Of course you have the pay to play loot system for those that are into wasting their money. All in all not a bad game, but one that will quickly be forgotten.
  64. IronTusk
    Nov 21, 2017
    1
    They managed to bring us the most boring and bland collection of multiplayer maps I ever seen in a CoD game. It's a new kind of low.

    It's ass.

    I give this game 11/10 asses because it's much ass.

    It's really just a whole lotta ass. And not the good kind of ass either.
  65. iHamid4Wizard
    Nov 11, 2017
    10
    Amazing i loved back to roots graphics sounds music game play all very very good i loved ....................................... عالیه محشر پادشاه برگشت
  66. Matttappen
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    By far, the worst call of duty ive ever played. Just terrible in all aspects. I was actually kind of excited about this game but it was such a huge dissapointment. The zombies is okay. If i were to rate the zombie game mode by itself id give it a 6.5. But the multiplayer is honestly terrible.
  67. lufy617_elfo
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game is just **** because it's a copy of battlefield 1 and battlefield 1 is a copy of the 1st world war wich is also a copy of the Carthaginian wars, so it's a copy of greek people.
  68. BlakDak666
    Nov 6, 2017
    4
    Call of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am trulyCall of Duty has been a series that has struggled to stay relevant in recent years due to a shift in the futuristic styles that people have come to dislike and loathe. As a player to the franchise since COD4 and playing pretty much every COD since, I have absolute confidence in saying that this game is hot garbage and if this is the direction and attitude it has chosen, then I am truly done with this series for good. I will breakdown the campaign, multiplayer and zombies and give my thoughts on them:

    Campaign - This is easily one of the worst COD campaigns and maybe even worse campaigns as a whole to a game I have ever played. Maybe this is because I'm a history major and researching WW2 as a teen but this genuine trash. The narrative struggles to be either a Band of Brothers style or a over the top action film you'd see from Michael Bay, with explosions and scenes of "loud explosion following ears ringing and dude pulling you on your feet" scattered in too many times. The characters are mostly cardboard cutouts that have no real personality, depth or weight to the situation and their abilities you use in combat are more frustrating and gimmicky than satisfying. The mission variety is typical COD design: boring shooting galleries of killing scores of people with little to no reaction, QTEs and gimmicky additions like tank and plane escorts that don't bring out the full potential it should. The authenticity of WW2 is pretty much trashed; it takes place in 1944-1945, which is invalidating most of the war (in which the first three CODs and World at War did correctly), the Allied forces are largely set aside for the American v.s. Nazis clash and more as gimmicky tokenism of cultures that disrespect their service (despite the opening clearly stating over 50 countries fought and left 65 million dead), characters don't act realistic to the situation, hitmarkers, retreading the same exact structure as other CODs before it. The climax and ending was forced and tonally out of place. It's trash and deserves no love and only scorn. I don't care that people only buy it for the multiplayer; if you put something in your game you want those players to play that in their game. Case closed. 3/10

    Multiplayer- Standard COD multiplayer with a WW2 skin. It wasn't like COD 2 or 3 had great multiplayers anyways, it was COD 4 that put COD on the map in the first place. The game modes are still the same, the division system is pointless as you can pick any gun you want anyways, war mode is weak on operations, the inclusion of PC friendly race and gender options instantly destroys any authenticity this game claims to have, a **** hub world copy and paste from Destiny, loot boxes that fall from the sky and promote gambling and skinner box mentality that is abhorrent and should be scorned deeply. I suppose if you play with friends there can be some fun to be had and it feels more grounded compared to the last entries, but it doesn't do anything new that is concerning and by my fifth match I was already bored and wanted to play something else. Also add connectivity issues at launch and you got a fine example of a rushed product. 4/10

    Zombies- Usually my favorite mode COD ever has and in some ways is the best to date. I like some of the changes made to the design of the game, but I unfortunately couldn't help to feel that it is too easy (as a vet of zombies since 2008). The characters aren't interesting and boring; their constant breathing and gasping becomes grating and annoying after awhile. The zombies themselves lose their dark charm quickly and their voicework makes them goofier than what should be (since I thought this was going to be a far more edgier zombies). Loot boxes in this mode is pointless and extremely ****. With it being easy and being able to get to high rounds with little challenge, I honestly felt bored and wall guns are just powerful as mystery box guns, completely making it pointless to use. The most disappointing part is each past zombies game (WAW and the Black Op series) had ideas that never got here despite being worth the inclusion. The human like models of WAW, the extra maps from BO1, the passive perks you get and the bank system in BO2 and gumballs in BO3 all could have been in this game, but isnt. The single map at launch is insulting and even with friends it can only last so long before you get bored. Decent overall. 6/10

    The game will have microtransactions, has a season pass and generally feels like 'another Call of Duty', no matter if it returns to its roots or not. I am sick and tired of this series, the greed behind it and the stupid masses (myself included) who buy these games anymore and pass it off as dudebro topics. I gave COD a chance and after a decade, it's time to throw in the towel for any hope for the series. COD definitely has found its roots, but to grow a big nasty parasite of a plant instead of the hopeful tree of originality and charm. 4/10 overall. DO NOT BUY THIS GAME.    … Expand
  69. TheOnlyHopee
    Nov 13, 2017
    0
    este juego no sirve todo con microtransacciones es una cagada danando todo lo que es COD mardita empresa sigan defiendo estas mierdas porque no son sinceros y dicen lo que enrealidad es
  70. cem12
    Nov 10, 2017
    5
    Gráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas lasGráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas las cuales jamás hubo batalla alguna. Es un juego lleno de micro transacciones, fomentando la compra de productos ya que te muestra descaradamente lo que le toca al resto de jugadores. Los emblemas nazis "volaron", jamás podrás elegir uniforme aleman. Siendo americano juegas con armas alemanas, no te da opción a elegir. Sigo enamorado el Cod: World at War, un juego que sí cumplía con la historia, escenarios y soldados. pensaba que Activision por fin lo iba a volver a hacer, pero me equivoque. Han creado un juego de "guerra antigua" por llamarlo de alguna manera, para que los "niños rata" sean felices. Creando micro transacciones, matar por matar ya que no matas Nazis, sino alemanes que no han hecho nada; poniendo mujeres que apenas las hubo en los ejércitos alemanes ni americanos, creando las cajas de de premios "traga perras" Lo único que celebro, es que por fin se abandonen los malditos juegos futuristas.… Expand
  71. Rembo
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Sorry for my english. How do dear critics of various gaming editions put this game 9-10 points? Are you crazy? "Apparently, they got a good salary from the creators of the game." There is nothing interesting in this game! The BLACK OPS series is 10 points! Missing confidence in the ratings of critics! Only users' opinions can be trusted!
  72. willsmichael964
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    Let me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into theLet me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into the FPS genre with classic titles like Goldeneye and Perfect Dark. Call of Duty launched (many years later), and wow what a fantastic beginning to a franchise! Epic multiplayer and short yet powerful campaigns. It almost seemed like it would never stop either, every year a new COD would launch and it was a must have! Suddenly it seemed like it started to falter. It went from a perspective I understood to double jumping and running along the walls; flying through the air with jet packs.. Needless to say I wasn't much of a fan and only bought the new franchise titles when they were on sale or at a killer discount. Even then... After playing Ghosts, I realized the franchise had completely fallen into disarray and I converted my attention more into the battlefield franchise. I played Infinite Warfare with a friend and almost couldn't physically do it. Another COD failure. I should have known better. Then alas! A "boots on the ground" Call of Duty! Could this be a rebirth of a once great franchise!? Could this be another great title; reminiscent of the original Black Ops 1?? How exciting! I had to go out and get it on launch day! Nov 3rd! I had high hopes and hadn't bought a COD title in years. I dove right into multiplayer and tested every available weapon I could. It had a renewed feeling and I was excited. For 20 minutes. Then the endorphins settled and I took note to aspects of the game that became more evident. Like why do I keep playing the same 2 or 3 maps over and over? why is everyone running around with SMGs? Why is every map so small and contained? I quickly started to feel like I spent 59.99 for a few hours of enjoyment, and that afterwards, this game would sit on the shelf with the dozen or so other titles I have that rarely played in the last 6 months or so, and as I sit here typing, that is where CODWW2 sits. In the case, on my shelf, next to The Wolf Among Us. I anticipate that is where it will stay, while Battlefield 1 sits pretty in my Playstation. Mark my words, this WILL be the last COD game that I purchase, and I implore you to not make the same mistake that I did. Now I sit, eagerly awaiting the next Battlefield installment, but even if that takes years, Battlefield 1 will still satisfy me more than CODWW2 ever could.… Expand
  73. beardedwarrior1
    Nov 12, 2017
    3
    A good solid base, completely and utterly ruined by dreadful programming, connections and server issues. After putting a solid 20+hours into the game, around 5 in single player and 15+ in multiplayer I can honestly say "save your money", i'm quite regretting purchasing the game myself. When the game is fun, it is great (Mainly when playing with friends), however, it constantly disconnectsA good solid base, completely and utterly ruined by dreadful programming, connections and server issues. After putting a solid 20+hours into the game, around 5 in single player and 15+ in multiplayer I can honestly say "save your money", i'm quite regretting purchasing the game myself. When the game is fun, it is great (Mainly when playing with friends), however, it constantly disconnects you from your party, from games, halfway through games, when the game ends, when the game begins. Gives you loading screens that last in excess of 20 minutes. Black screens that you can not back out of, therefore making you reset the game completely. No dedicated servers. No host migration (it simply ends the game if the host leaves). Completely empty HQ thanks to **** connections, so you cant complete some of the challenges e.g. give 50 commendations to other players. The game is shipped out with the bare minimum when it comes to maps and variation, probably waiting to release more maps via season pass (as if we didn't realise Activision is money hungry already). The maps they give us are very poorly designed and thought out, because playing as a black, female Nazi in the London Docks was somehow going to make sense. In the last 2 hours of gameplay alone I have been disconnected/kicked/black screen'd at least 17 times. Party members have been thrown into random games not with the party and if that wasn't infuriating enough when we joined the game, the remaining 3 party members where split 2/1 on the teams, fantastic right?

    Honestly, if you are REALLY interested in the single player campaign (which lasts maybe 5 hours) then wait for a sale and then get it, or at best lend/rent it from somewhere. This game is not worth the £49 asking price. Not by a long shot, unless they get their fingers out their ass and fix the myriad of problems it currently has.    … Expand
  74. KpblcoLLoB
    Nov 15, 2017
    0
    Этот кусок деньгоотнимающего говна не должен существовать. Не позволяйте зажравшимся ААА издателям иметь вас. Голосуйте рублем,
  75. Joeyz
    Nov 21, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty has went back to its roots, no more jetpacks, wall running, and etc. But I have seen a large amount of people complaining about micro transactions and loot boxes in WW2. I will be talking about my opinion of CoD WW2, the campaign, multiplayer, and zombies.

    Campaign - It's probably one of the best Call of Duty Campaigns up to date. Lots of fun, challenging depending on the    Call of Duty has went back to its roots, no more jetpacks, wall running, and etc. But I have seen a large amount of people complaining about micro transactions and loot boxes in WW2. I will be talking about my opinion of CoD WW2, the campaign, multiplayer, and zombies.

    Campaign - It's probably one of the best Call of Duty Campaigns up to date. Lots of fun, challenging depending on the difficulty, and more. However I feel like the campaign is a little short, you can complete it within 5 hours, but it doesn't matter, as long as I'm having a good time, I have nothing to complain about.

    Multiplayer - Now I will agree that this is probably one of the worst launch for any Call of Duty title, however Sledgehammer is continuing to fix it and multiplayer is now playable. I don't like the fact that you lose some XP or you get the correct amount, I hope they fix that sometime soon. Besides all that, boots on the ground made MP better than the last few CoDs. People are saying that "It's a reskin from the past few CoDs" or "They just copied WAW or BF1", now I will have to highly disagree with this statement, didn't everyone want Boots on the Ground Call of Duty back? Why are they complaining now, by the end of the day they just end up playing it no matter what. MP playing with friends or by yourself is still fun.

    Zombies - This mode has been in the last few CoDs, starting with WAW, BO1, BO2, AW, BO3, IW, and now WW2. Now this zombies mode doesn't beat Treyach Zombies, theirs will always be my favorite out of all of the CoDs. However zombies is still fun, especially with friends. Sledgehammer did a good job with the map (The Final Reich), zombies can come out of no where and they actually look terrifying, yet they can even scare you at times. I wish there were more maps to play on but I guess we will just have to wait for more DLC.

    Micro Transactions - Micro-transactions has been in almost every multiplayer game, Overwatch, Rainbow 6 Siege, Battlefront 2, and more. It's not surprising that Call of Duty: WW2 has micro-transactions, however I see no point of complaining about micro-transactions and here's why. You don't need it. They're just cosmetics for you to wear or use on your guns, and you don't need DLC weapons to be good in a game. To be good in a game, you must be skillful, yes I understand that some CoD players might just sit in corners just to wait for you but here's a solution, throw a grenade to get them out of there. even if they have a DLC weapon or not, they will lose most likely. It's not like Star Wars Battlefront 2 where you get a hero and you become more powerful. Plus people feel the need to get it and the only way to get it is to buy it.... well here's where they're wrong, you don't need to buy items in a game to be good, most likely Sledgehammer is gonna make it so you can spend your Armory Credits on collections to get a DLC weapon and they're not that hard to get. You can complete contracts that will grant you a free supply drop or armory credits or you can be lucky and get a free Rare Supply Drop by the end of the game. So stop complaining, you don't NEED to buy them.

    Issues -
    Maps are tiny (Not that bad though)
    Some guns are weak (like the Shotguns or some SMGs)
    Not enough maps (Only about 9 playable maps, 3 War Maps)
    XP not working correctly
    Disconnected by the end of the game
    Party not working correctly (Sometimes it will kick you out or you will see a black screen until the next game starts)

    Other than that I gave CoD WW2 a 8/10, not a great launch but it is a great game, boot on the ground is back, fun game, I would give it a try.    … Expand
  76. ManOfChap
    Nov 17, 2017
    2
    "BOOTS ON THE GROUND" what a load of nonsense. This is another copy and paste CoD game. Campaign is absolutely awful. Zombies is decent but 1 map is not worth it. MP is lacking and the EXACT SAME for years now.
  77. RuslanDZE
    Nov 14, 2017
    5
    CAMPAIGN ONLY REVIEW.
    YES, I am one of these players that playing COD games for a campaign.
    From campaign I usually expect great, creative and epic action scenes and stereotyped vilians. From the announcement that was obvious, they wanna double down on the realism and drama. Game is trying to make sense of comradory and make you care about characters but problem is that there is    CAMPAIGN ONLY REVIEW.
    YES, I am one of these players that playing COD games for a campaign.
    From campaign I usually expect great, creative and epic action scenes and stereotyped vilians.
    From the announcement that was obvious, they wanna double down on the realism and drama.
    Game is trying to make sense of comradory and make you care about characters but problem is that there is nothing special about them to start care. Sometimes you think that game will give you something interesting but after a while you are dissapointed. There is no vilian and story is not cohesive. It feels more like episodes from B1. If I would replace characters in each mission I would not miss anything. QTE is very dissatisfied, even tho you can make them cool (Heavy Rain). There is some new things in the gameplay like you can ask for particular things from your team members. There is some action scenes too, probably the best one is train chase. But these scenes are not impressive because we saw it before. Other games are caught up with crazy action. Lets say few years ago in modern warfare times I would say yes only COD developers can make action as crazy as here.
    I loved France Liberation section.
    THE WORST THING in the game is story. At the announcement event of this game Activision was saying about how personal and important this game to them because they care about history of WW2. Well, that was a joke probably. Whole game is representing how you should not make story about WW2. There is some playing with history but in general is so bad. And I am not expecting everything smart from a Call Of Duty game. But why would deveopers lie about how they care about history..... oh yeah it is marketing.

    Overall, I partly enjoyed this game. Call Of Duty did returned to the throne of FPS games. It is maybe even step back compare to IW in terms of campaign.    … Expand
  78. Phil_Panteleit
    Nov 13, 2017
    6
    I have waited for 10 days to give this game a proper review. It's not a 0 out of 10 like some idiots say it is. However it is not close to bing a 10 either. The campaign is great but WAY TO SHORT. 5 hours and its done. Multiplayer is well great too. This is COD i don't think this part needs to be even talked about because you either love it or you don't. Zombies is fun but once again ifI have waited for 10 days to give this game a proper review. It's not a 0 out of 10 like some idiots say it is. However it is not close to bing a 10 either. The campaign is great but WAY TO SHORT. 5 hours and its done. Multiplayer is well great too. This is COD i don't think this part needs to be even talked about because you either love it or you don't. Zombies is fun but once again if your a zombie fan you will love it.

    However, this is the part where I say do not waste your money. The reason is because the game is broken. Headquarters is broke. When you get into a game with your friends you are guaranteed for one or more of you to be kicked or lose connection to host after every game. There is a glitch in one of the trophies for doing daily challenges. Sledgehammer has had ample of time to fix the bugs and still have not. They had a Beta and never thought to put the HQs in it and wow now its broke.

    Sledgehammer needs to go. This game is a solid 6 out of 10 and a good pick up for no more than $40    … Expand
  79. Chronos1
    Nov 14, 2017
    5
    The single player campaign is rather mediocre but then again this is call of duty so not really a big let down there.. the MP is rather bland because there is no real changes there that makes it more interesting to play.. zombie mode is same old same old.. basically another bland COD game.
  80. Termin8ter
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Another year, another Call of Duty game. First off, the engine still needs to be rebuilt completely or shot on the spot, ok? Still using the Quake engine from 99? Really? The art team did a good job though. The gameplay still feels the same as it did ten years ago in Call of Duty 4, despite the massive change in setting. The campaign is quite good, quite lengthy as well. Better thanAnother year, another Call of Duty game. First off, the engine still needs to be rebuilt completely or shot on the spot, ok? Still using the Quake engine from 99? Really? The art team did a good job though. The gameplay still feels the same as it did ten years ago in Call of Duty 4, despite the massive change in setting. The campaign is quite good, quite lengthy as well. Better than Infinite Borefare and BO3's overly complicated plot. It's just a slimmed down, grounded war experience, and that I like. The multiplayer is mostly a very samey Call of Duty multiplayer experience that we have gotten since Modern Warfare, aside from the great new War mode, which is a fantastic addition. But it unfortunately doesn't quite save the multiplayer mode. Zombies. Sledgehammer's last crack at Zombies in AW only proved that only Treyarch could nail it correctly, so I was hoping they could save face here. I like how the mode feels like it's own beast and not a clone of BO3 zombies. The tone is very serious and mature, and that ascends the overly humorous tone of IW's zombies, which is great too. The gunplay itself is quite good, and I liked how the team opted for a proper campaign with horde sections, rather than repeating Treyarch's zombies mode. To be honest, the zombies is probably the best part of World War II. This game is definitely better than Destiny 2, and takes some strong strides in the right direction, but It doesn't earn a purchase at full price. I wouldn't get it for more than 15$.… Expand
  81. BorderlineBunk
    Nov 7, 2017
    4
    I gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when gamesI gave this game a 4 for the passable campaign and the barely adequate zombies mode, but GOD is multiplayer trash. I feel like I'm constantly playing this game in a state of lag where it feels like the same 4 bullets to kill take half the time for my enemies than it takes me. Its likely a result of their garbage peer to peer connectivity COD insists on implementing every game when games like BF1 are just burying them in quality. This isn't even a Battlefield fanboy over here. I've been with COD since COD 2, but its blatantly obvious that they don't care about making a fun UNIQUE experience anymore and its just about **** on this years version of another subpar game. God just give up COD this is the nail in the coffin of the series for me. So done with their ****… Expand
  82. CaptainPuGDoG
    Nov 16, 2017
    4
    Spend 50+ hours
    Story 2/10 So stuipid history,where Great America try to win war,a lot of hero doing dont many actions don't make sense,just 2 or 3 interesting missions, all other is a ****
    Mp 5/10 After 10 or 15 hours,play it is very boring and there is not any interest
  83. mikepatyaev
    Nov 17, 2017
    4
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  84. Calitoris
    Nov 11, 2017
    7
    People hating the game just because it comes out every year. It's a polished game, runs smooth, but it's just the same good game new skin. It's obviously not a bad game, just a repeating well oiled machine. Single player is short but it's not what everyone plays COD for.
  85. SeptemberFly
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Call of Duty World War 2 is, well... It's a Call of Duty game. I haven't played a call of duty game since black ops 2, so it's been a good bit since I've played one of these games so this review is coming from someone with an outside perspective. Playing this game after a long break from the series, it still feels very much the same as when I stopped playing the series. The changes inCall of Duty World War 2 is, well... It's a Call of Duty game. I haven't played a call of duty game since black ops 2, so it's been a good bit since I've played one of these games so this review is coming from someone with an outside perspective. Playing this game after a long break from the series, it still feels very much the same as when I stopped playing the series. The changes in multiplayer feel very minor, as the experience felt about the same to me as it has always been. The only changes to multiplayer that I really noticed is that there's a hub area in multiplayer that you're in before going into a match and that transitioning to new matches feels a lot more seamless than it used to. However, the changes that were made are probably feel a lot more important to a hardcore call of duty fan than it was to me. The zombies mode in the game is very fun to play with friends. I didn't play too much of it, but the time I had with it was fun and I was surprised that they actually made a campaign out of it. The strongest part of Call of Duty WW2 to me was the main campaign. It feels like the Call of Duty campaigns fly under the radar, which I've always felt is unfortunate. Strange as it may sound, I think that the Call of Duty campaigns can be compared to the Marvel films. They feel like pretty standard cookie cutter stories that always play it pretty safe, but the experience is usually a good time and has characters you can feel attached to. Call of Duty WW2 uses this format as well, and it's probably one of the best campaigns in the entire series. It gives off a Saving Private Ryan kind of vibe, and includes many characters that you actually become attached to and care about what happens to them. The main protagonist Robert "Red" Daniels is one of the more interesting characters, who has a good backstory and his chemistry with the rest of the cast helps make the story remain engaging. Overall, Call of Duty WW2 feels like the same Call of Duty that we've always known it to be. The multiplayer feels the same as it did when I played it many years ago, as does almost every other area. If you are a Call of Duty fan who plays the game every year, you won't need my recommendation because Call of Duty fans will buy the game no matter what. As for other outsiders to the series like myself, I'd recommend either renting the game or waiting for the price to drop just to play the campaign or zombie mode, but I wouldn't pay full price for it.… Expand
  86. Smoda
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby.When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby. There are many signs of laziness in this game and it feels like a cash grab.… Expand
  87. evani
    Nov 8, 2017
    3
    if you care at all about multiplayer then do not buy this cod, 9 maps 4 of which are decent the rest are average at best! the game play is also terrible combined with minimal gun management and perk customization, possibly the worst CoD MP i have ever played.
  88. lufuxe
    Nov 8, 2017
    7
    Graphics: from the last parts there is a step forward, but if you peer into the textures, everything is bad ..
    Physics: bad, so is the physics of weapons .. they simply do not have ..
    Plot: I liked it
    That's why 7 points
  89. millerjr9566
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    Seriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The onlySeriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The only positive outcome of this game was they got rid of those exo-skeleton jet packs.… Expand
  90. Hanbarku
    Nov 14, 2017
    4
    best call of duty in a long time. unfortunately loot boxes drop from the sky on the beaches of normandy no less. do they have any shame anymore. at least its cosmetic. 4/10. no more loot boxes
  91. parham76
    Nov 15, 2017
    4
    I wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machineI wrote this review after attempting to play with a shotgun. I ran around a corner, fired into someone's head and didn't receive a hit marker before I was killed. A respawn later, I sprinted and rounded into someone who ran around a corner at the same time as myself, but somehow fired 4 shots before I could hit my trigger once. This is so bad because it makes the entire sub machine gun/shot gun classes unplayable for those with strong connections. I *have* to use long range assault rifles and even then, I *have* to be viewing down scope before someone is in sight to stand a chance. Ever wanted to know what it feels like to consistently prone down in a corner half covered by a wall waiting for someone to round a corner(not because you're a camper, but because you *have* to camp) and then when they do, they STILL manage to zoom down their scope at you and fire 3 shots before you get to fire one, and then in the replay that half second you saw them before being shot was actually a full 1-2 seconds? Then play this.… Expand
  92. hectortheboss
    Apr 27, 2018
    0
    this game isnt a call of duty. Is a comercial product. Activision are changing to Ea. dont buy his games if you are a fan of the old saga of call of duty
  93. MaxieZeus
    Sep 20, 2022
    3
    Same **** with a ww2 skin, gun-play doesn't feel any different from other games and they didn't even try to make this game historically accurate.
  94. iamevilhomer
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol. Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol.

    Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough research and have seen that the game is as I had expected. Trash... But hey... We smart people all saw this coming. We knew it was going to suck lol. Just another terrible cod game with the WW2 paint coat put on.

    Short 6 hour campaign that's not very historically accurate as advertised. Also has dumb AI and glitches on top of stuttering issues many have been reporting.

    Game also has micro transactions which automatically knocks the game down several points.

    Lobbies and load times are totally garbage in this game. Dead zone issues with aiming have been reported multiple times.

    Trash maps that are very few with many guns missing that I'm sure will be released over time through dlc/micro transaction horse **** and butt ****ery...

    Here's the funniest thing of all... Apparently the ps4 version is working better than the xbox one version. The xbox one version was unplayable for the first few days of launch for most xbox one folk... At least the online multiplayer part. So why is the ps4 version getting a slightly lower metacritic critic score by the critics???? Lol whatever... Maybe it's got something to do with that over priced and pretty much useless for gamers console known as the xbox one x? Who knows who cares...

    There are other problems but I don't care to remember them right now. I'm just caring enough to do this review for laughs and for the good of gaming. DON'T buy jokes of a game like this one. They exist to rob you blind and leave you with nothing but frustration. You people should honestly know this by now. I mean for ****s sake... It's cod... It's crap division... It's supposed to suck lol.

    Decent visuals though... Lets not let this review be all negativity... Gotta give credit where it's due I suppose... Just to be fair and nice : )

    Even without many of the problems I listed though... It's still just trashy cod at the end of the day so I would still give it a low score lolz.    … Expand
  95. Jarhead335
    Nov 10, 2017
    8
    This is a genuinely objective review: CoD WWII is really quite good.

    The last CoD I played was Black Ops 3, and I thought that iteration was acceptable. The last truly great Call of Duty I've played was Modern Warfare 3. After half a decade of the wallrunning, exosuit-toting madness, I was really not holding out hope for WWII to be anything other than a bland money grab. Of course,    This is a genuinely objective review: CoD WWII is really quite good.

    The last CoD I played was Black Ops 3, and I thought that iteration was acceptable. The last truly great Call of Duty I've played was Modern Warfare 3. After half a decade of the wallrunning, exosuit-toting madness, I was really not holding out hope for WWII to be anything other than a bland money grab. Of course, being a giant moron, I pre-ordered it at 11:45 on the night of launch rather than go for broke on Wolfenstein 2. I spent the 15 minutes before actual launch wondering who had drugged my dinner to make me do such a thing. And then I played it.

    Barring the launch night issues connecting to multiplayer servers, the game is a beautiful and sincere addition to the franchise. The campaign is, in its purest essence, Saving Private Ryan without the Private Ryan. It even opens with the landing at Normandy, and from there blossoms into a not so imaginative, but hellishly fun shooter. I'm on the third or fourth level at this point, and I'm eager to play the rest: It sounds amazing (Sledghammer took notes from the original Star Wars: Battlefront reboot) and it looks just as great. The audio and visuals have never been better in CoD. Character design is pretty standard for the FPS genre, but the connection and relationships between characters is still suitable to make the campaign enjoyable, rather than a chore.

    Multiplayer is quite refreshing in that it gets straight back to what once made Call of Duty the must-own in FPS land: Raw, skill-based arcade shooting, with a delicious array of weapon attachments, cosmetic upgrades, and skill perks to unlock which revolve around a new and intriguing "Division" system. This isn't in line with the usual CoD title, where ten or so custom classes are yours to outfit. Instead, it gives you that option with the ability to truly maximize a given class's skillset: If you play as the "Mountainous" (Sniper) Division, you will see added rewards for keeping your sniper equipped rather than toting an SMG in your ghillie suit. The Divisional loadouts give reason to diversify your classes, rather than set up five different iterations of the same OP rifle or other that typically plague CoD installments. How many of us used anything other than an ACR combo in the old days? Now, you're incentivized to branch out with your custom classes in order to maximize your killing potential. Lastly, the new War mode is really compelling: It can be difficult at times given some spawn and location advantages for defenders/attackers depending on map, but a really neat mode that I look forward to them expanding upon. New maps and variants should make War a great staple mode, particularly for those who like campaigns and don't traditionally favor online multiplayer.

    Zombies, too, has met a drastic and much-needed upgrade. BLOPS3 zombies at launch, frankly, sucked. It was too hard to progress, too unclear in its rules, and ultimately if you didn't matchmake with someone who knew what they were doing, it was far too difficult to last beyond the initial waves, no matter how fun Jeff Goldblum is to play with. With a refreshing return to actual zombies and shambling mutants that are - above all else - enjoyable to kill and fight, I was really pleased with the experience. So far I've gotten a few 1.5-2 hour long runs under my belt, although I have yet to meet the "big boss" I've heard about waiting at the finish. That dang zeppelin gets me every time. From the ground up, the zombies mode is creepier and more intricate in its campaign mission and overall tone: It feels more cohesive than any mode before, including my beloved Tranzit from the BLOPS2 days. Guns feel good in zombies mode, and everything but the starting pistol packs enough punch to at least feel useful in some scenario or other. The added quest markers and objective notes make it that much more user-friendly to get to the bottom of the campaign and make tangible progress, which is both friendly to noobs and dismissable entirely for those who want to try their hand at exploring with no direction. The lore is at least suitably engaging, and on the whole it's a treat to play, with friends or online.

    The ultimate bads:

    Campaign: Derivative: doesn't do much that's new for WWII, but brings a nice exposure to the conflict to a younger audience that doesn't remember Finest Hour or Medal of Honor the way I do. Characters are well-worn tropes that could use some inspiration.

    Multiplayer: not very friendly to newbies. At this point, if you're not well-versed in CoD and FPS shooters generally, you're going to get killed a lot and that's going to really frustrate you. But the modes are just diverse enough to stay interesting. Guns are fun to use and sound great, but really there are only a handful that you see time and time again. The community knows the STG-44 is it.

    Zombies: Needs a non-campaign mode.

    Verdict: Dang good. 8/10.    … Expand
  96. xismius
    Nov 4, 2017
    3
    El juego no está mal pero el problema más gordo ahora de lanzamiento es que no se puede ni jugar de la cantidad de bugs que hay sobretodo con el tema de la conectividad, el juego ahora mismo está roto, por lo demás yo lo veo un juego bastante decente, no diré de los mejores de la saga, pero pasable e infinitamente superior a los anteriores aunque eso tampoco es muy difícil viendo el nivelEl juego no está mal pero el problema más gordo ahora de lanzamiento es que no se puede ni jugar de la cantidad de bugs que hay sobretodo con el tema de la conectividad, el juego ahora mismo está roto, por lo demás yo lo veo un juego bastante decente, no diré de los mejores de la saga, pero pasable e infinitamente superior a los anteriores aunque eso tampoco es muy difícil viendo el nivel de los ultimos años.… Expand
  97. GamerElephant
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    Whole lot of little children who shouldn't be allowed on the internet let alone rating things with their undeveloped immature minds thinking their pointless opinion means anything. But definitely side with the critics on this one. Not like you wouldn't anyway. You already know how toxic the COD community is with these little squeakers. They ruin the game and than negatively vote theWhole lot of little children who shouldn't be allowed on the internet let alone rating things with their undeveloped immature minds thinking their pointless opinion means anything. But definitely side with the critics on this one. Not like you wouldn't anyway. You already know how toxic the COD community is with these little squeakers. They ruin the game and than negatively vote the game they ruined.

    In fairness, the game maps are incredible although I wanted at least 2-3 more. The graphics are amazing. The story is pretty fun so far although not my favorite of the 3 modes. Zombies is actually gorey and dark finally with some amazing multiplayer fun to be had. But most of all the multiplayer is amazing. The servers had their ups and downs at launch so little 9 year old billy finds the need to lose his Hi C over it. but even with unstable servers so far the HQ is amazing, the camos aren't tasteless, it actually has better multiplayer achievements and gives you a sense of reward for good matches. Random supply drops ect... it needs more with updates added. More camos, more outfits and more calling cards. But all and all the game is legendary. Enjoy. :)    … Expand
  98. Keitha313
    Jun 1, 2018
    4
    Just keeping the review short and sweet.
    P.S. don't listen to the positive reviews they're just having you on trust me!
    Graphically the game isn't anything special, for a triple A title that had 3 years to work on the game they really dropped the ball big time on this! Gameplay wise, it's your usual COD minus wall running, boost jumping which isn't a bad thing when the game actually    Just keeping the review short and sweet.
    P.S. don't listen to the positive reviews they're just having you on trust me!

    Graphically the game isn't anything special, for a triple A title that had 3 years to work on the game they really dropped the ball big time on this!

    Gameplay wise, it's your usual COD minus wall running, boost jumping which isn't a bad thing when the game actually works, yes, that's right the game runs like total crap!
    The game suffers from so many wtf moments of how did I die, why does my gun seem like its doing less damage than his and this isn't just me saying this I've seen big Youtuber/Twitch players say the exact same thing!
    The lack of proper servers and the problematic lag compensator really screw this game up couple all of that with the fact the game matches people from across the world to play in lobbies, seriously how is that even happening!!

    Authenticity next, do they deliver? HELL NO they don't! Guns have terrible fake animations, it's just incredibly lazy, for an example when you shoot one bullet from the KAR98k and you go to reload instead of putting a single bullet in the character puts an entire stripper clip into the gun and they even put an entire stripper clip into the gun when you only have 1 bullet left in reserve, it's just absolutely laughable!
    Guns have no recoil they all shoot like damn lasers, snipers are just a one-hit kill from any range which just makes them the total unskilled weapon of many peoples choice.

    Then zombies... oh my god!!
    Making something easier isn't making it better, the zombies are basically invisible, yes they run faster, but it's so damn easy to avoid them you can run through them essentially and the map complexity is nil, void, there is no complexity or teamwork required so props to Sledgehammer on that *slow clap*...

    Finally, the story, it's a good war experience it displays some epic moments, nice change up of gameplay requiring health packs instead of regenerating health, but the story is far too short and lacks the same storytelling level that Treyarch brought to such a high standard.

    Overall, It's maybe not as low as I scored it, but the game is such a huge let down that I had to score it this way, so much for a short and sweet review.    … Expand
  99. JasonBaureBond
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    WW2 is back that mean no jumping jets and other futuristic nonsense. Gameplay is good there could be more maps but everyting is good.
    Sory but women dont belong to this it s painfull to watch and listen them.
  100. AstartesXVI
    Nov 13, 2017
    0
    DO NOT BUY! I lost $65 on this horrid pile of trash, so inaccurate in it's portrayal of world war II it makes inglorious basterds look like real history. The multi player is pointless garbage, it's idiotic.
    Trash-hammer games have managed to make "boots on the ground in world war II" feel like some bizarre alternate reality where black females are fighting for the Nazis and shovel's rule    DO NOT BUY! I lost $65 on this horrid pile of trash, so inaccurate in it's portrayal of world war II it makes inglorious basterds look like real history. The multi player is pointless garbage, it's idiotic.
    Trash-hammer games have managed to make "boots on the ground in world war II" feel like some bizarre alternate reality where black females are fighting for the Nazis and shovel's rule the field of battle. Haha what a bad joke this game is, COD IS DEAD.

    Will be trading my copy in to deny the filth known as activision a sale.    … Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »