Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. MaxieZeus
    Sep 20, 2022
    3
    Same **** with a ww2 skin, gun-play doesn't feel any different from other games and they didn't even try to make this game historically accurate.
  2. CommonSenseGuy
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    I've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% isI've only played this game for like 4 hours, but I've had to restart it about 20 times because I keep getting errors. I'm not a big COD fan, but I bought the game to play with a few friends. Meeting my expectations shouldn't have been difficult, but this experience has been worse than I could ever imagine. 80% of this game has been about actually trying to play it. The other 20% is actually playing the game. The game itself, when I can actually play it, isn't bad. I haven't touched the campaign because, like I mentioned before, I only bought this to play online multiplayer with my loved ones. I'm willing to change my review score if Sledgehammer can patch things up so I can actually play the game that I bought. I only ask that I can go 10 minutes without an error popping up. An error literally just showed up as I was typing this review. I'm not even joking. Kill me… Expand
  3. Seifer706
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    This game is horrible. Literally the only redeeming quality is parts of the campaign but even then it is one of the shortest campaigns in CoD history and still does nothing compared to CoD4/MW2/WaW/BO1/BO2.

    The MP... good lord is it horrible... guns lack any authenticity and are completely reskins (Tommy gun is literally the ASM-1 of AW). Returning the moment I leave work.
  4. ManOfChap
    Nov 17, 2017
    2
    "BOOTS ON THE GROUND" what a load of nonsense. This is another copy and paste CoD game. Campaign is absolutely awful. Zombies is decent but 1 map is not worth it. MP is lacking and the EXACT SAME for years now.
  5. TechMarine
    Nov 26, 2017
    2
    What a huge waste of money. Should be called Connection Off Duty. Multiplayer is entirely dependent on who has the minutely better connection. Maps are TINY and 6v6 boring roflstomps. Does nothing great for the franchise except Zombies. Hope I can get 30 bucks for this **** on aftermarket.
  6. Zukku
    Jul 11, 2020
    2
    What a terrible game. What a sad return to WW2. I actually enjoy the campaigns of COD games - this is the first that i just find totally unplayable. Bad characters, the worst quick-time-events i've ever seen, arcade-style shooting and the most boring story.
  7. REAPER007
    Nov 22, 2017
    2
    F***ing trash. Nothing else to add. Every goddamn year Activision profits on CoD series without making ANYTHING TO IMPROVE IT SOMEHOW. Since the Modern Warfare came out in 2007 the devs have changed absolutely NOTHING (well, besides zombies mode which is improving a bit with every game and the mp mode in Black Ops 2). A complete disaster and lack of any ideas lead to this - a big pile ofF***ing trash. Nothing else to add. Every goddamn year Activision profits on CoD series without making ANYTHING TO IMPROVE IT SOMEHOW. Since the Modern Warfare came out in 2007 the devs have changed absolutely NOTHING (well, besides zombies mode which is improving a bit with every game and the mp mode in Black Ops 2). A complete disaster and lack of any ideas lead to this - a big pile of ten year old excrement with a scent of WW2 piss. And then they demand 50$ for this. Amen CoD, you are dead to me!… Expand
  8. Matttappen
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    By far, the worst call of duty ive ever played. Just terrible in all aspects. I was actually kind of excited about this game but it was such a huge dissapointment. The zombies is okay. If i were to rate the zombie game mode by itself id give it a 6.5. But the multiplayer is honestly terrible.
  9. mrsalty101
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Why is everyone so pissed about the 85 rating from the critics. I don't feel bad for the kids that fall for it and play this like it's the best thing ever. I feel bad for the parents that didn't block their kid's accounts from spending, because you know those idiots are buying loot boxes galore.
  10. Quijote
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    Why the press is giving 85 to this crap? You irresponsible liars! You're lying to the poor people to buy this garbage. Once again we have the cruel politics who want to take all your money. All this practices are going to end the console industry. Did you see the boxes falling from the sky?
  11. kinlopunim
    Nov 3, 2017
    2
    instead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badlyinstead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badly copied game mechanics.… Expand
  12. pina
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    I bought it yesterday since it was back to the roots, but it went literally back to the roots. They forgot that we're in 2017 and not in 2007. This game is SO poor: graphics are nowhere as it should be on today's consoles, animations are the same as 10 years ago, explosives are poorly done and the indestructible and hidden borders of the environment is something retarded.

    That's because    I bought it yesterday since it was back to the roots, but it went literally back to the roots. They forgot that we're in 2017 and not in 2007. This game is SO poor: graphics are nowhere as it should be on today's consoles, animations are the same as 10 years ago, explosives are poorly done and the indestructible and hidden borders of the environment is something retarded.

    That's because of the old engine from the beginning of the franchise. They just 'modified' it but the basics remain the same. The download package is 70GB (!!!!), all of which is bloatware. We're not talking about ultra HD graphics are heavy renedering for next gen consoles.

    The gameplay in multiplayer is very arcade, very fast and it's like I'm playing against and with bots. They all move so jerky. Shooting mechanics are poorly done, it doesn't feel right, it's all too fast. After a MP round, it takes ages and ages before a new game starts and you have to stare five minutes at the scoreboard without any possiblity to go to another screen.

    What's great? The unlockables, the perks and kill cams are still great and something to play for. But the gaming experience is so so so poor and it's painful to see how the gaming press keep giving it high scores. Perhaps it's because of the Campaign Mode, which I'm not interested in.

    But the whole game experience and above all, the game mechanics are retarded and outdated. This is a game for PS3, not for current gen consoles. Once again, you should be ashamed Activision to support publishing a cheap rip off of this franchise. IW or Sledgehammer MUST create a new engine for this game.

    This is like like playing FIFA 07 on a PS4 in 2017.    … Expand
  13. Rembo
    Nov 4, 2017
    2
    Sorry for my english. How do dear critics of various gaming editions put this game 9-10 points? Are you crazy? "Apparently, they got a good salary from the creators of the game." There is nothing interesting in this game! The BLACK OPS series is 10 points! Missing confidence in the ratings of critics! Only users' opinions can be trusted!
  14. Defalc0
    Nov 5, 2017
    2
    Multiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that wasMultiplayer is a joke, such a bad joke. To hell with PC culture and its influence. Women (portrayed WAY out of context) , LGBT flags, and furries. what in the hell is this. Player customization is tolerable, but where is AXIS customization??? The allies have some cool uniforms. BUT we only get to customize our player to use for only 50% of our playtime?!!! who the heck thought that was ok? the helmets that all players can equip look ridiculous when they are on german soldiers... because they are american GI helmets. ive never played such an immersion breaking (WW2) game. I never have wrote a review on here, but this game pushed all the wrong buttons with me.Seriously, how is World at War STILL a superior game in this day and age. OH YEA, because it wasnt afraid to make you feel uncomfortable, it wasnt afraid to make you uneasy. That game still gives me chills, so dark and so gruesome. Thats the image of war that haunts me. one day this pandering needs to stop.

    The standard issue calling cards DO NOT include flags of nations that actualy faught in the war, instead we have to swallow the image of these LGBT my little furrie flags flying over Normandy. GOD ALMIGHTY, stop with this political **** you are literally killing yourselves with this stuff sledge...
    If i could go back in time only once, I would stop sledgehammer games from ever being part of the call of duty cycle.

    im giving this game 2 points because zombies is actually good, and might only play that.    … Expand
  15. Smoda
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby.When this game works it's great but it never works. There are constant disconnects and issues with lobbies and matches. Many times your progress does not get recorded and you can't complete the daily and weekly objectives. Even when you do not get disconnected you still do not always see your wins recorded. Constant lag makes many matches unplayable for all but a few players in the lobby. There are many signs of laziness in this game and it feels like a cash grab.… Expand
  16. willsmichael964
    Nov 9, 2017
    2
    Let me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into theLet me start by saying that I 'am a 34 year old die hard gamer. I have owned systems and played games that some may have never seen or even heard of. Games have been a major part of my life since I was a child throwing tantrums over Thrillas Surf and Safari. I have played many COD titles and always at least tried to remain a loyalist. It wasn't until the N64 era that I really dug into the FPS genre with classic titles like Goldeneye and Perfect Dark. Call of Duty launched (many years later), and wow what a fantastic beginning to a franchise! Epic multiplayer and short yet powerful campaigns. It almost seemed like it would never stop either, every year a new COD would launch and it was a must have! Suddenly it seemed like it started to falter. It went from a perspective I understood to double jumping and running along the walls; flying through the air with jet packs.. Needless to say I wasn't much of a fan and only bought the new franchise titles when they were on sale or at a killer discount. Even then... After playing Ghosts, I realized the franchise had completely fallen into disarray and I converted my attention more into the battlefield franchise. I played Infinite Warfare with a friend and almost couldn't physically do it. Another COD failure. I should have known better. Then alas! A "boots on the ground" Call of Duty! Could this be a rebirth of a once great franchise!? Could this be another great title; reminiscent of the original Black Ops 1?? How exciting! I had to go out and get it on launch day! Nov 3rd! I had high hopes and hadn't bought a COD title in years. I dove right into multiplayer and tested every available weapon I could. It had a renewed feeling and I was excited. For 20 minutes. Then the endorphins settled and I took note to aspects of the game that became more evident. Like why do I keep playing the same 2 or 3 maps over and over? why is everyone running around with SMGs? Why is every map so small and contained? I quickly started to feel like I spent 59.99 for a few hours of enjoyment, and that afterwards, this game would sit on the shelf with the dozen or so other titles I have that rarely played in the last 6 months or so, and as I sit here typing, that is where CODWW2 sits. In the case, on my shelf, next to The Wolf Among Us. I anticipate that is where it will stay, while Battlefield 1 sits pretty in my Playstation. Mark my words, this WILL be the last COD game that I purchase, and I implore you to not make the same mistake that I did. Now I sit, eagerly awaiting the next Battlefield installment, but even if that takes years, Battlefield 1 will still satisfy me more than CODWW2 ever could.… Expand
  17. millerjr9566
    Nov 10, 2017
    2
    Seriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The onlySeriously? Small maps, even for CoD standards. But my biggest complaint has to be the servers/connection. From playing EVERY single other CoD online, I have never had this many issues before. Complete trash, and I've never written a single game review in 15 years of gaming. Congrats on being that bad. You're right up there with that P.O.S. grinding for nothing Destiny game. The only positive outcome of this game was they got rid of those exo-skeleton jet packs.… Expand
  18. pappm94
    Nov 15, 2017
    2
    This is just a very very average first person shooter, that Activision releases every damn year. It is recycled, which is not a good word in the gaming industry. On top of that, microtransactions, of course.
    Just please don't buy ....
  19. BlackAndWhite
    Nov 24, 2017
    2
    Before I list the pros and cons I want to say that this review is not based on me being bitter or being a "hater" or any of that crap. I got my kill/death ratio to around 2.6 so I'm a lot better than the average player. This is an honest review.

    Pros: ▪Not a bad campaign but not great either. ▪Graphics are good in the campaign and average in multi-player. ▪Footsteps are easily    Before I list the pros and cons I want to say that this review is not based on me being bitter or being a "hater" or any of that crap. I got my kill/death ratio to around 2.6 so I'm a lot better than the average player. This is an honest review.

    Pros:

    ▪Not a bad campaign but not great either.
    ▪Graphics are good in the campaign and average in multi-player.
    ▪Footsteps are easily heard unlike MW Remastered.
    ▪ I personally like the new HQ instead of just sitting looking at a lobby screen. Pretty cool how you can look around and interact with different things.

    Cons:
    ▪Team balancing is horrendously poor. I played around 100 games and was on the team full of clueless morons about 75% of the time. A lot of games were not close at all, too one-sided.
    ▪The game lags quite often and has caused me multiple deaths (Not my connection as every other multi-player game is fine).
    ▪There is something massively wrong in multi-player. In many 1 v 1 gunfights where on my screen we (Me and an opponent) see eachother at the same time and I shoot first, get about 10 bullets into my opponent and he picks his **** gun up whilst being shot and drops me in 2 bullets. I watch the killcam and somehow he was already shooting me before I even lifted my gun up?? He had taken no damage either WTF??! Absolute joke.
    ▪Loot crates should not be in any game ever unless the game was free maybe. People already paid £50+ for the game and these greedy developers aren't satisfied and want more money for doing nothing basically.
    ▪Perk system/Division is just stupid in my opinion as it restricts you. If you don't want to show up on the enemy UAV then you have to use the Mountain division. You may also want to resupply from dead enemies.. Nope! Sorry, you can't have both as resupplying is in another division. So dumb. Should have just had normal perks as usual.
    ▪The maps are absolute garbage except 3. The other 6 are just painful to play. The inept developers had very little imagination when designing them. Only 9 **** maps in the base game is absolutely pathetic as well. The war game mode has its own 2-3 unique maps but that gamemode is pretty poor anyway.
    ▪They are copying off Battlefield with the Bayonet charge, War mode etc.
    ▪Gameplay is too fast paced.. everyone runs around like they are **** Olympic athletes on steroids. Why can't the game just be a bit slower paced??
    ▪Guns have basically no recoil making it very easy for terrible scrubs to shoot you from 40 yards with an SMG, laughable.
    ▪No-scoping and quick-scoping is too easy. Something else that caters to the 10 year olds who think they are pros, Jesus Christ.
    ▪You die a bit too quickly. Well.. I do at least. On my screen I am killed instantly but when I shoot enemies it sometimes takes 15 bullets and that's without missing.
    ▪The community is absolutely cancerous. Sitting in windows or behind objects head-glitching, sitting in corners, drop-shotting etc etc. This is not the developers fault obviously but it is another reason not to buy this trash.

    I could be on all day with the cons so I will just end it there. I give it a 2/10. Just absolutely terrible. The amount of **** which happens in multi-player is just mind-boggling. I almost smashed my controller on 10 seperate occasions. It's depressing thinking how great CoD used to be. WaW, BO1 were just brilliant. This **** doesn't come close to either. This is 100% the last CoD I ever, ever purchase. Deleted the game. Good **** riddance.    … Expand
  20. Hourless
    Jan 1, 2018
    2
    Pros:

    -World War 2 setting -Competitive Multiplayer has it's moments I guess Cons: -Same mechanics for the past few games, felt like the only change was the World War 2 setting -BORING coop zombie mode, high priced game that only produces ONE map and you can imagine it gets boring and repetitive very quickly. I honestly preferred the coop in COD: Ghosts. -Generic WW2 single    Pros:

    -World War 2 setting
    -Competitive Multiplayer has it's moments I guess

    Cons:

    -Same mechanics for the past few games, felt like the only change was the World War 2 setting
    -BORING coop zombie mode, high priced game that only produces ONE map and you can imagine it gets boring and repetitive very quickly. I honestly preferred the coop in COD: Ghosts.
    -Generic WW2 single player campaign, it's been covered so many times by different games it's hard to get excited
    -Outdated graphics, graphics look pretty much the same as COD: Ghosts were
    -Expensive DLCs to come, you would think the game is expensive enough as it is but wait there's more!
    -Just a twitch shooter, honestly most guns lack any kind of real feel behind them.    … Expand
  21. andrewcarey7
    Dec 3, 2017
    2
    Maps are garbage - they have no structure and the gameplay quickly falls into a mess of no strategy especially on objective game modes. The hit detection is extremely poor; 1v1 gunfights are horribly inconsistent. This game was pretty much my last chance for COD. Will be selling this game
  22. UltraVIbe
    Dec 26, 2017
    2
    COD WWll is a complete mess. You can pick out the bad things all damn day from the Gun loadouts and variety (COD WW1 had more weapons) to the maps being completely laid out the same and bland maps. The maps in multiplayer doesn't just feel that they lack variety of where to go but all the maps have a 3-laned way from each side. And the loot boxes. When are we ever going to get rid of thisCOD WWll is a complete mess. You can pick out the bad things all damn day from the Gun loadouts and variety (COD WW1 had more weapons) to the maps being completely laid out the same and bland maps. The maps in multiplayer doesn't just feel that they lack variety of where to go but all the maps have a 3-laned way from each side. And the loot boxes. When are we ever going to get rid of this means of marketing that always cycles and repeats. Everytime you ask for a loot box it gives you the same thing such as grips that you cant even look at ingame to Emotes that look all the same with different titles and rarity. COD WWll Zombies Stripped out some features that it was known for as well. Like the music that you get from the box and is now replaced with... well nothing (there is no recognizable sound). It hardly takes any sort of means to actually come up with a strategy anymore because all you have to do is run and gun then hopefully you get that OP gun that the Zombie mode gives you FOR FREE!!! The one thing I actually feel is sorta well done is the campian. It might have a couple of flaw from there to there but the campian does offer a variety of missions with different playstyles (unlike multiplayer)… Expand
  23. joker41187
    Feb 13, 2018
    2
    Wow this is a bad game, online is fun enough... But the campaign mode is the cheesiest most unrealistic waste of cinematics. The gameplay is fun enough. I am done with the call of Duty franchise...
  24. Physastra
    Apr 21, 2018
    2
    This game is complete trash, probably the worst cod game ever created. All the hype scores were for week one when everyone was blinded by botg.. it is unforgivable the scores that people have given this game just because it doesn’t have jet packs. The maps are terrible, the divisions system is way too restrictive, the score streaks are boring. Everything about the game is bland, boringThis game is complete trash, probably the worst cod game ever created. All the hype scores were for week one when everyone was blinded by botg.. it is unforgivable the scores that people have given this game just because it doesn’t have jet packs. The maps are terrible, the divisions system is way too restrictive, the score streaks are boring. Everything about the game is bland, boring and ordinary. Don’t buy it unless you know what you’re getting into.… Expand
  25. ifeelit
    Jul 2, 2018
    2
    - cliche camapign story. Never onced cared for a single character like I did in BO and MW

    - MP maps suck. Too small, Too cluttered, objects purposly placed to block view and every room has 92 open windows and hallways leading to you always getting shot from behind. One map in this game should be the size of all current maps combined - The MP system sucks, too many perks that never    - cliche camapign story. Never onced cared for a single character like I did in BO and MW

    - MP maps suck. Too small, Too cluttered, objects purposly placed to block view and every room has 92 open windows and hallways leading to you always getting shot from behind. One map in this game should be the size of all current maps combined

    - The MP system sucks, too many perks that never get used and the kill streaks are actually boring. Along with that, it takes too long to unlock what you want with the skin you favor being locked behind a loot crate. I quit the game only after playing it off and on for 4 months and i only collected maybe 15% of the stuff that I actually wanted.

    - the game, installed and played from disc with all the updates, was taking up 60gb on the my harddrive (for such a contentless game)

    - No soul in this game whatsoever.    … Expand
  26. Camman12
    Dec 10, 2018
    2
    To be honest, it has it's fun moments, but that can be said for any Call of Duty game. I have never felt so board and upset to a Call of Duty game and this one made the list. The multiplayer is just awful, maps are a three lane system that keeps getting repeated, lackluster customization to classes, supply drops that give you nothing but trash, and hardly any fun game modes. The campaignTo be honest, it has it's fun moments, but that can be said for any Call of Duty game. I have never felt so board and upset to a Call of Duty game and this one made the list. The multiplayer is just awful, maps are a three lane system that keeps getting repeated, lackluster customization to classes, supply drops that give you nothing but trash, and hardly any fun game modes. The campaign is really good and is the only saving grace for this game, but it fell into a hole of trying to play it safe and have a World War 2 generic story. Zombies I thought would be fun, but I was wrong. It's just so bad I only played one map and didn't even bother with the other maps because it felt boring and stale whiten a few matches and it's even more disappointing when this gamemode is not meant for solo players and made more for co-op. 2/10 a Call of Duty you shouldn't waste your money on because it's boring and you don't get your money's worth out of it.… Expand
  27. oBeSeMoDeo
    Oct 27, 2019
    2
    This game had so many problems for 6 months of its life cycle. It lost its player base before it even became the full product. Horrible management from the developers.
  28. Free_Mind
    Jul 11, 2020
    2
    Stop listening to the corrupt, fake, paid-off reviews. This game is not worth buying. The story is boring and forgettable. The multiplayer is repetitive, boring and has some of the worst cut scene animations which look like they belong in a PS1 era game.
  29. StudentCritic20
    Mar 26, 2022
    2
    Got this game from my PS+ subscription and still feel cheated/scammed. They story was so boring by the third mission, I had just removed it from my console. The game was a cash grab more than a return to the roots claim they made.
  30. Xalon
    Nov 7, 2017
    1
    They screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game aThey screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game a chance? Pass on this at all costs.… Expand
  31. UhMing
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    I'm only interested in campaign which was disappointing

    + Visually stunning.
    - Shortest CoD campaign ever.
    - Plot is scattered, unfinished, and feels truncated.
  32. Bossuk
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    the single player is not bad as far as COd games goes, much better than infinite warfare.
    But the Multiplayer is the worset i have ever seen with multiple server crashes, huge delays in joining games, huge delays in getting a map started, and the whole orders implementation is manged badly.
    COD is a multiplayer game, and Activision have really messed up. I've played every COD and got    the single player is not bad as far as COd games goes, much better than infinite warfare.
    But the Multiplayer is the worset i have ever seen with multiple server crashes, huge delays in joining games, huge delays in getting a map started, and the whole orders implementation is manged badly.

    COD is a multiplayer game, and Activision have really messed up. I've played every COD and got everyone on launch day, but what ias the point if you can't play thay game!!!!

    Awful. Don't buy until they promise to invest in the MP.    … Expand
  33. Ghoster
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    Sad! I had big expectations for that game looking forward COD is back to WW2. Unfortunately game is terrible. Strong aim assist make me feel game is made for 7 years old.
  34. SoakerCity
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    This game is the culmination of every bad video game trend in the last decade.

    Its a **** twitch shooter, that totally misses the point of the subject matter. If you like respawning, dying, dying, dying, flukey kill, what happened there, dying, dying, dying, wtf, really?!?, dying, dying, ughhhhh... this has the pacing of a Virtual AI machines meet and fight in nanoseconds-but    This game is the culmination of every bad video game trend in the last decade.

    Its a **** twitch shooter, that totally misses the point of the subject matter.

    If you like respawning, dying, dying, dying, flukey kill, what happened there, dying, dying, dying, wtf, really?!?, dying, dying, ughhhhh... this has the pacing of a Virtual AI machines meet and fight in nanoseconds-but ATTACHED TO THE GODDAMN SECOND WORLD WAR...

    It makes no sense. It isn't fun. Its packed with super-honed COD players that treat WW2 like Quake. Its just gross. And the extra money-grabs are just the icing. Avoid this game, its a waste of time. you could be playing something fun. This is a serious setback for Activision. Worst game I've played in years. Its like forcing long-time fans to fight like dogs. Unelegant. Crass. Tampered-with. Admit it, you played this game and it WASN'T fun. I'd rather play Counterstrike, Battlefront, checkers, with myself, ANYTHING is more fun than this. 2/10, because nice single player...sorta. Crashed 4 times on me on PS4 before I got to "play". TWITCH SHOOTERS CANT BE WW2 SHOOTERS!    … Expand
  35. MetroidFelipe
    Feb 24, 2019
    1
    Worst Call Of duty , Return of WW II no Thats a pile o ****

    Pior Call of Duty que joguei campanhas em graça, multiplayer pobre e cheio de microtransações, não pula as cinematics lixo armas não realistas, Inteligência artificial burra e repetitivo,
    Passe Longe quer um bom game Coop jogue Battlefield 4 ou One, ou os Antigos Call Of Duty como o World At War!
  36. Turbodowg
    Jan 6, 2018
    1
    Cod WW2 is IMO one of the worst in the entire series along side Ghosts and Blops 2 and 3. It is basically broken.
    I have no idea what they've done to the servers but for the past two weeks they no longer work. The lag is game breaking and completely destroys all the fun. It makes the game a frustrating mess. Nearly every game I play I see the enemy first, unload a full clip into them    Cod WW2 is IMO one of the worst in the entire series along side Ghosts and Blops 2 and 3. It is basically broken.
    I have no idea what they've done to the servers but for the past two weeks they no longer work. The lag is game breaking and completely destroys all the fun. It makes the game a frustrating mess. Nearly every game I play I see the enemy first, unload a full clip into them getting 10 hit markers while they kill with one bullet. Even playing with steady aim and firing from the hip doesn't work, as soon as you see an enemy -as you are pulling the trigger- you are dead. On the rare occasion you will beast but sadly knowing it's because everyone else is lagging. Sometimes it hilarious; like when I came up behind a camper facing the opposite direction, unleashed a series of bullets into his head only for him to suddenly teleport around and quick scope me. Sometimes you could cry - like the round I played and went 0.20 because not a single bullet from any weapon would register.

    I switched back to IW and there I was, top of every game pulling high scores and low deaths. No other game I own lags like COD WW2. Battlefield runs perfect, Overwatch runs perfect, COD IW runs perfect, COD 4 remaster runs perfect yet WW2 is like playing on a 46k modem.

    The social hub is still a ghost town which they haven't bothered to fix, but made sure they added COD Points to buy loot crates!

    Maps are a mess, badly designed and boring. There's next to no content.

    The war maps are actually pretty fun and for some bizarre reason don't lag anywhere near as much as the standard maps, but there's only 3 of them!

    With the season pass you get a remastered map from COD2 which is insulting considering they didn't give enough maps with the main game, no doubt it was removed simply to entice people to buy the season pass.

    Basically it doesn't work, we should all be refunded for paying for a product that is basically in alpha stage still.

    Worst Cod in the history of cod. Avoid at all costs.

    ....................................................

    Update 06.01.18
    Two months after launch I have deleted COD WW2. The servers are completely broken to a point where it is now impossible to play. Lag com, poor hit detection, teleportation and spawns are destroying any fun that could have been had. Every game is a constant frustration and doing well is not based on skill but if you have lag comp for or against you. It's beyond frustrating to shoot first, get 12 hit markers and die to see in your kill cam you haven't even fired a bullet. This is officially the worst COD in the entire history of COD. It's a cheap rushed bare bones mess.    … Expand
  37. IronTusk
    Nov 21, 2017
    1
    They managed to bring us the most boring and bland collection of multiplayer maps I ever seen in a CoD game. It's a new kind of low.

    It's ass.

    I give this game 11/10 asses because it's much ass.

    It's really just a whole lotta ass. And not the good kind of ass either.
  38. TsukasaHiiragi
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    Single player is essentially just more of the same, nothing new or groundbreaking. Some missions are more annoying than others, especially missions requiring stealth can be annoying or even buggy. Multiplayer is a mess, loot boxes in a COD game? Seriously?

    The entire franchise is desperate to add something new, but in the end always settles for focusing on the multiplayer side of    Single player is essentially just more of the same, nothing new or groundbreaking. Some missions are more annoying than others, especially missions requiring stealth can be annoying or even buggy. Multiplayer is a mess, loot boxes in a COD game? Seriously?

    The entire franchise is desperate to add something new, but in the end always settles for focusing on the multiplayer side of the game, which the codtards always eat up.

    Another MAJOR issue is that the tank controls are awful, straight up terrible. It makes for an incredibly difficult and frustrating experience when your tank turns like a slug, gets stuck on scenery and is downright bad - the controls need to be reworked. Another major issue is the hit boxes, they are bad - really really bad, more than a few times on a quick time event you can just blindly fire your gun and miss the target...but it'll still register as a hit/kill.

    I would like to see COD evolve from both a weak single player experience, and a weak multiplayer arena shooter, the logical step would be an open world live war with dynamic missions, drop in/out multiplayer.    … Expand
  39. JerTheStampede
    Apr 29, 2021
    1
    I hadn't picked up a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 2 back on the Xbox 360, I thoroughly enjoyed each instalment until BO2 at which point I felt something went horribly wrong but couldn't put my finger on it at the time.
    Roll on several years and I picked up WWII for PS4, to start with I thought yes the controls are tight the action reasonably well paced I thought 'this might be pretty    I hadn't picked up a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 2 back on the Xbox 360, I thoroughly enjoyed each instalment until BO2 at which point I felt something went horribly wrong but couldn't put my finger on it at the time.
    Roll on several years and I picked up WWII for PS4, to start with I thought yes the controls are tight the action reasonably well paced I thought 'this might be pretty solid'.. I was wrong.
    1st the quick time events (QTE) are horrible maybe it's me but reading the prompts wasn't obvious initially, and these QTE start getting over used real quick.
    2nd If anything makes me scream obscenities at a game it's headshotting an enemy (not a boss a normal grunt) and them getting up as if nothing more inconvenient than a tenis ball had bopped them on the nose and if you shoot a German in his velar weave mithril silver trench coat expect to empty several rounds to inconvenience him, what the hell man!? it isn't 1996 anymore! games moved past this kind of cheap bullet sponging decades ago.
    3rd British SOE agents, there is SOO much wrong with this anyone with half a brain or any level of understanding of the SOE is forced to cringe and I'm not talking about the now obligatory female agent (they existed maybe not in the capacity shown but I can live with that) what made me cringe was as soon as SOE were mentioned I thought ok when do they roll out the cockney weasels.. TADA as if by magic.
    By the time I derailed an heavily armoured train WITH A JEEP!!! ffs I had had enough, I couldn't suspend my disbelief any further this campaign was badly written poorly implemented garbage.
    I'm glad I didn't pay full price for this game I would have felt violated.
    I'm yet to try the multiplayer, for all I enjoy MP COD, the campaign is primarily why I used to buy these titles.    … Expand
  40. MrRedMarsmallow
    Dec 11, 2017
    1
    - Only 10 MP maps
    - Guns are in no way authentic
    - Loot boxes - Loot boxes - Loot boxes - Gameplay feels extremely unrewarding - War mode is terrible - Campaign is far too short and very boring - PPSH-1 is far too powerful - MP maps are poorly designed - Quick-scoping - Zombies is nothing to write home about - Doesn't feel nor look like a WWII game - "Daily Orders" and    - Only 10 MP maps
    - Guns are in no way authentic
    - Loot boxes
    - Loot boxes
    - Loot boxes
    - Gameplay feels extremely unrewarding
    - War mode is terrible
    - Campaign is far too short and very boring
    - PPSH-1 is far too powerful
    - MP maps are poorly designed
    - Quick-scoping
    - Zombies is nothing to write home about
    - Doesn't feel nor look like a WWII game
    - "Daily Orders" and "Contracts" systems feel unrewarding
    - "Headquarters" makes the frame rate plummet (and you can't choose to be alone in HQ)
    - Menu system is horrendous
    - Game still has server errors and connectivity issues

    + Graphics are okay    … Expand
  41. JustMK
    Dec 30, 2017
    1
    Boringest Call of Duty that put me into sleep with first minutes of gameplay. I really liked Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare for their awesome futuristing setting, and I completely bored, annoyed of WWII theme in 2000's.
    I want back AW/IW-like CoD games. That was awesome
  42. iamevilhomer
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol. Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol.

    Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough research and have seen that the game is as I had expected. Trash... But hey... We smart people all saw this coming. We knew it was going to suck lol. Just another terrible cod game with the WW2 paint coat put on.

    Short 6 hour campaign that's not very historically accurate as advertised. Also has dumb AI and glitches on top of stuttering issues many have been reporting.

    Game also has micro transactions which automatically knocks the game down several points.

    Lobbies and load times are totally garbage in this game. Dead zone issues with aiming have been reported multiple times.

    Trash maps that are very few with many guns missing that I'm sure will be released over time through dlc/micro transaction horse **** and butt ****ery...

    Here's the funniest thing of all... Apparently the ps4 version is working better than the xbox one version. The xbox one version was unplayable for the first few days of launch for most xbox one folk... At least the online multiplayer part. So why is the ps4 version getting a slightly lower metacritic critic score by the critics???? Lol whatever... Maybe it's got something to do with that over priced and pretty much useless for gamers console known as the xbox one x? Who knows who cares...

    There are other problems but I don't care to remember them right now. I'm just caring enough to do this review for laughs and for the good of gaming. DON'T buy jokes of a game like this one. They exist to rob you blind and leave you with nothing but frustration. You people should honestly know this by now. I mean for ****s sake... It's cod... It's crap division... It's supposed to suck lol.

    Decent visuals though... Lets not let this review be all negativity... Gotta give credit where it's due I suppose... Just to be fair and nice : )

    Even without many of the problems I listed though... It's still just trashy cod at the end of the day so I would still give it a low score lolz.    … Expand
  43. BoTToX_CH
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    Useless game of 2017 !!! That's all folks !
    Servers Crash, boring and very short campaign, ridiculous sounds effects.
    Multi player in very little maps without soul and all in same type of environment !
    Just a little bad game
  44. liamandjo
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Disappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to thinkDisappointment seems to under-describe it. The multiplayer is just rubbish compared to BF1 and, as my first COD purchase since the current gen consoles (having grown tired of paying for the same maps release after release), I am gob-smacked at how little COD has developed, If I want to pew-pew then Doom is so much better and more fluid. Stupid spawn points, tiny maps, not time to think just run around a corner and get blasted. Campaign mode is OK, hence the 1 point. But I doubt I will get back to it. And the graphics - seriously? I feel I am back on my PS3.… Expand
  45. EmirKhorasani
    Nov 10, 2017
    1
    The multiplayer is wildly inconsistent. Under the exact same circumstances one game it will take 3 bullets to kill a full health player and 6 the next game. The hit boxes for sniper rifles extend in a 3 foot radius around player making sniper rifles win every single time in close quarters with the auto aim snapping. It's broken and it's annoying as hell.
  46. UncutSuspiria
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    80 gigabytes of garbage.

    I have hated COD since BLOPS2. As soon as it turned into Halo, I started hating it. But, I was really looking forward to this one because it was going back to their roots. This is 80 gigs of trash. I sold it less than owning it for 24 hours. Campaign: SUCKS. This is NOT a campaign. It is only 5 hours long. I am sorry, but a campaign should not take 5 hours    80 gigabytes of garbage.

    I have hated COD since BLOPS2. As soon as it turned into Halo, I started hating it. But, I was really looking forward to this one because it was going back to their roots.

    This is 80 gigs of trash. I sold it less than owning it for 24 hours.

    Campaign: SUCKS. This is NOT a campaign. It is only 5 hours long. I am sorry, but a campaign should not take 5 hours to beat. I have purchased DLC content greater than that.

    Multiplayer: TERRIBLE. COD continues to use the same gaming engine from 2007 and it shows in the graphics, they are terrible. Gameplay and movement is horrible. You are constantly swaying side-to-side which was intentional to give it that feel of really walking, it failed. Aiming is choppy as well. Above all that, the thing that really destroys COD is the community. You still have the same people playing that ruin the game. This game requires no skill, you can pick it up and get 15 kills without trying. People either hide or run around aimlessly like morons.

    Zombies: Didn't even play. I was so displeased with everything else that I sold the game not even 24 hours later.

    Lootboxes: These are NOT pay to win, they are cosmetic crap only.

    I really wanted to like this game so much.    … Expand
  47. danelectroman
    Dec 28, 2017
    1
    godawful! Why do these money grubbing corporations think all we want to do is watch a frickin movie. Stupid cut scene after cut scene. golly, AFTER another ten minute hollywood derived cut scene you mean you're actually going to give me the privilege of pulling a trigger on a gun. Oh, thank you idiot programmer, who has no vision and is only happy to be typing code in a cubicle next to agodawful! Why do these money grubbing corporations think all we want to do is watch a frickin movie. Stupid cut scene after cut scene. golly, AFTER another ten minute hollywood derived cut scene you mean you're actually going to give me the privilege of pulling a trigger on a gun. Oh, thank you idiot programmer, who has no vision and is only happy to be typing code in a cubicle next to a lame female you don't have the nerve to ask out because you're spineless. A 1 for the graphics but who cares, I'd rather play a nineties war game where you can actually play instead of this cut scene crap!… Expand
  48. weirdmagican21
    Jan 11, 2019
    1
    i really wanted to like this game i wanted to grind to max rank nut this is probably the worst launch in call of duty history and the microtransactions are disrespectful to people who fought in WWII and the veterans who are still alive today.
  49. xpyrosh
    Dec 31, 2017
    1
    You spend 130 dollars of your hard earned cash towards a game just to be given "unable to connect to host" every single time you try to play with the people you bought the game to play with. This is disgusting and there should be compensation or full refunds available to people due to this. Completely unacceptable for 2017 standards.
  50. lakings78
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    First time doing a metacritic review. Just going to speak my mind. I'm a 39 y/o gamer. The way the COD franchise has gone, has left me highly disappointed in a game series that used to be absolutely great. This whole twitch shooter crap is just garbage. There hasn't been a decent COD game since Black Ops One, and even then, that's where the series started to change for the worst.First time doing a metacritic review. Just going to speak my mind. I'm a 39 y/o gamer. The way the COD franchise has gone, has left me highly disappointed in a game series that used to be absolutely great. This whole twitch shooter crap is just garbage. There hasn't been a decent COD game since Black Ops One, and even then, that's where the series started to change for the worst. Even the remake of Modern Warfare has left little to be desired. Twitch shooters are not fun, just mindless running around. I really wanted to give this game a chance, as they promised going back to the roots. Well, they went back to the roots of Call of Duty on the surface only, that being a themed game in World War Two. That's the only thing. It is still a stupid, mindless twitch shooter. My first hour in, I was four matches into playing just regular Team Death Match and my soldier score was 16/45 with a KDR of .36. I don't seem to have that trouble on games like Battlefront or Battlefield. I do like the layout of the maps, lots of choke points, but the fact remains that this is a twitch shooter. The gameplay gets very tiresome very quickly. The last Call of Duty game I "bought' brand new was with my Xbox One and that was Ghosts. Ghosts was a better attempt to fix the last couple of releases prior to it, but still fell short. I vowed never to buy a COD game again. Yet the promises and hope that Activision finally drilled into the developers heads that the players wanted a solid COD game again, has fallen very short. It's the same rinse and repeat re-skinned twitch shooter. So now that I have wasted my money, I can say that I am officially DONE with this franchise. I will never purchase another COD game new. I didn't even buy the remastered Modern Warfare new because I had a feeling it was going to be trash, I bought it cheap on ebay and I recommend anyone wanting to give this game a chance to wait a while and do the same, get the game cheap on ebay as a re-sell and the company doesn't get the profit. OH, and if you thought the microtransactions of the last game were bad...wait until you see COD WW2's. Micro transactions everywhere. This is a trash game, save your money and continue to have faith in DICE and the Battlefield series...they for the most part listen to their customers and deliver a mostly solid game.… Expand
  51. merengueti
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    la verdad que el juego es un copia pega con algunas texturas cambiadas y poco mas, aparte el sistema de loot que la gente no quiere, lo han implementado para intentar engachar a la gente a los micropagos con sus politicas abusivas. te has lucido activision
  52. cjwallington
    Nov 5, 2017
    1
    absolutely horrible. no manual, no tutorial, no (even in-game) controller layout and a completely linear plot. Now I remember why I dislike the CoD series. Perpetually dying is no way to win a following.
  53. Boscovelli
    Nov 6, 2017
    1
    I've played (and fully prestiged in) every Call of Duty aside from Infinite Warfare (for obvious reasons) and I can say with confidence that this is in the bottom three Call of Duty games.

    Now, I, myself, don't play zombies. Which is a 1/3rd of the draw for most people. So take that into consideration when I say there's just not enough to warrant paying $80 for me. The campaign clocks    I've played (and fully prestiged in) every Call of Duty aside from Infinite Warfare (for obvious reasons) and I can say with confidence that this is in the bottom three Call of Duty games.

    Now, I, myself, don't play zombies. Which is a 1/3rd of the draw for most people. So take that into consideration when I say there's just not enough to warrant paying $80 for me. The campaign clocks in at around 6.5 hours. So don't even consider it if you're strictly a single player fan. The multiplayer is more of the same with a fresh (kind of) coat of paint. Same old bullet sponge casual mechanics, Same old glitches throughout that likely won't ever get addressed, but perhaps worst of all - completely unbalanced maps. I was a little surprised at this because map design for the most part has been fairly consistent in Call of Duty, but alas, never count the franchise out for brand new disappointments.

    Some of the maps are just glaringly uneven. Objective based maps where one team is constantly fighting uphill in the open puts that team at a considerable disadvantage and makes for a 100% consistent rate of losses on those maps in my experience. Even with a party of 6 good players we found ourselves losing on those specific maps in those specific game modes.

    The game is a joke. The franchise has been a joke for nearly a decade. Do not buy this game.    … Expand
  54. aeuteneuer
    Nov 8, 2017
    1
    This game is a complete waste of money. Please, I urge you not to buy; you will be highly disappointed. From the basic non-strategical gameplay to the tiny maps there is not much to enjoy about this game. Compare this to another game with world war two style settings and guns like Battlefield One and there is no comparison. Battlefield One blows Call of Duty World at War out of the water.This game is a complete waste of money. Please, I urge you not to buy; you will be highly disappointed. From the basic non-strategical gameplay to the tiny maps there is not much to enjoy about this game. Compare this to another game with world war two style settings and guns like Battlefield One and there is no comparison. Battlefield One blows Call of Duty World at War out of the water. Call of Duty really let their fans down with this game. I don't like the game play, maps are way too small, small amounts of people in a game (6 Person teams), and on top of that its just not fun. I was not a fan of Call of Duty's last release of Advance Warfare but looking back even that is 100 times better than this new one. I am trying to find something positive to say about it so I will say that their cut scene are very cool and the graphics are amazing but non of that translates into the actual gameplay. The zombies can be fun and seems to be the main selling point of their game because its really the only thing people play. I would highly recommend NOT buying Call of Duty World War II. Instead, If you are looking for a strategic world war II game with big detailed maps and large amount of players in games then, I would Battlefield One. It far surpasses any of its competition at the moment and is an incredibly fun game to play.… Expand
  55. cheater95
    Nov 9, 2017
    1
    The game is awesome i loved the story of all campaign,multiplayer and zombies.But i put this score because it has so many bugs it's getting frustrating i can't play a game without a server error i was about to finish the Easter Egg and it kicked me out because of the server.It doesn't matter what kind of story it has or anything if you can't play a game properly.Fix the issues and the bugsThe game is awesome i loved the story of all campaign,multiplayer and zombies.But i put this score because it has so many bugs it's getting frustrating i can't play a game without a server error i was about to finish the Easter Egg and it kicked me out because of the server.It doesn't matter what kind of story it has or anything if you can't play a game properly.Fix the issues and the bugs and i'll definitely put a positive review.But for know this is what you get 100% for the bug issues.… Expand
  56. Crockpot19
    Nov 12, 2017
    1
    Another money grab by this infamous title. I have played this game for a couple day and I am already sick of the lack of maps and all around absence of creativity involved with this game. It looks and runs like a cut rate Battlefield 1. Half the time after you finish a multiplayer game, it kicks you or your friends from the lobby. This forces you or your party to back out of the lobby andAnother money grab by this infamous title. I have played this game for a couple day and I am already sick of the lack of maps and all around absence of creativity involved with this game. It looks and runs like a cut rate Battlefield 1. Half the time after you finish a multiplayer game, it kicks you or your friends from the lobby. This forces you or your party to back out of the lobby and regroup or reset your game.

    They also added a "public" area for interactions with other players. The game servers run so poorly though that you can't even connect to random online players. If the game did run correctly, the game would make you go into these public area to open your loot boxes in front of everyone. They do this in hopes of sparking other players to buy loot boxes if yours contains a good weapon skin or other useless items.

    The 6 hour long campaign and one zombie map doesn't justify the full $60 price tag. I hope you don't repeat my mistake of buying this game.    … Expand
  57. njustcritic
    Nov 14, 2017
    1
    Достаточно посмотреть несколько отзывов пользователей, просто без слов всё итак с этой игрой понятно, не пойму никогда людей которые предпочтут купить калду, вместо очень годного шутера на рынке взять даже BF1. Всё осталось на прежнем уровне, ладно если бы этот уровень был велик и все бы восприняли игру как 5-6/10. Но всё как и было плохо всё плохо и осталось, денег своих это игра точно неДостаточно посмотреть несколько отзывов пользователей, просто без слов всё итак с этой игрой понятно, не пойму никогда людей которые предпочтут купить калду, вместо очень годного шутера на рынке взять даже BF1. Всё осталось на прежнем уровне, ладно если бы этот уровень был велик и все бы восприняли игру как 5-6/10. Но всё как и было плохо всё плохо и осталось, денег своих это игра точно не стоит советую всем пройти мимо или лучше купить Battlefield 1… Expand
  58. davidas101
    Nov 25, 2017
    1
    Boring, Bland, Buggy, This COD game is a huge disappointment for me, its single player campaign was average at best, the multiplayer was absolute garbage in comparison to COD Black ops 3 or even Infinite Warfare. The best way to describe this game in my opinion is that the entire time I was playing this I was thinking this game should have launched about 4 years ago instead of AdvancedBoring, Bland, Buggy, This COD game is a huge disappointment for me, its single player campaign was average at best, the multiplayer was absolute garbage in comparison to COD Black ops 3 or even Infinite Warfare. The best way to describe this game in my opinion is that the entire time I was playing this I was thinking this game should have launched about 4 years ago instead of Advanced Warfare or something along those lines. DO NOT BUY… Expand
  59. Quitrightnow
    Nov 22, 2017
    1
    Get the boys back together said the commercial and so we did. But i did not become the happy reunion we were hoping for. This game killed Call of Duty for me. So sad but true. There is just something wrong with the game. I cant put my finger on it but its just not good.
  60. bloodyice56
    Jan 28, 2018
    1
    Dont waste your money on this cash grab, same old processed trash, less content than any other call of duty. How does this game have less weapons than world at war. Also i thought this was about the U.S army vs the nazi germany, why are there Japanese and Russian guns and hardly any bolt action rifles, besides the snipers. Historically inaccurate, you can get better ww2 games with moreDont waste your money on this cash grab, same old processed trash, less content than any other call of duty. How does this game have less weapons than world at war. Also i thought this was about the U.S army vs the nazi germany, why are there Japanese and Russian guns and hardly any bolt action rifles, besides the snipers. Historically inaccurate, you can get better ww2 games with more content, no loot boxes, and cheaper.… Expand
  61. Voorhees91
    Mar 12, 2018
    1
    I fell out of COD after BO2 so it's been a while. I was excited for this entry but of course came away disappointed and frustrated. The campaign is generic but decent enough. The multiplayer is the main point of the game and it is horrendous. I can't remember worse maps on a COD game. Every map is tiny and forces you into 3 lanes. There's no strategy at all. Basically the multiplayer isI fell out of COD after BO2 so it's been a while. I was excited for this entry but of course came away disappointed and frustrated. The campaign is generic but decent enough. The multiplayer is the main point of the game and it is horrendous. I can't remember worse maps on a COD game. Every map is tiny and forces you into 3 lanes. There's no strategy at all. Basically the multiplayer is like taking a bunch of autistic children, giving them guns and crack, and throwing them into a tiny map. Hit detection is nothing short of horrific. Time after time I'd fire a shotgun point-blank into an enemy's chest only to have it not register at all and be killed. Most gunfights are based on some perverse sense of luck rather than any skill. The weapon damage has no basis in reality. HQ is a waste of time, and the micro-transactions are simply another insult to an already poor game. If you want mindless run and gun with campers, horrible hit detection, no skill required, etc. then this game is for you. If you want a half decent FPS then look somewhere else.… Expand
  62. Nick-C
    Jul 6, 2018
    1
    It is approaching a year since this game was released and it is less functional than when it was released. The functionality of this game at a fundamental level is so broken that I have utterly given up on the franchise as a whole. It fails to connect to online services more than it succeeds. This franchise has taken up thousands of my life ever since I discovered World At War all thoseIt is approaching a year since this game was released and it is less functional than when it was released. The functionality of this game at a fundamental level is so broken that I have utterly given up on the franchise as a whole. It fails to connect to online services more than it succeeds. This franchise has taken up thousands of my life ever since I discovered World At War all those years ago but ladies and gentlemen I come to you today a broken man. Words cannot describe how much of an insult to our community this is. This is a game that IF you manage to connect will shove microtransactions and supply drops down your throat at every screen and opportunity its absurd. Once you clear away that trash and try to find a game there's a solid chance you'll be disconnected before it even starts. If it starts and you maintain a ping less than 100 then congrats you'll get to enjoy the most inconsistent gameplay I have ever experienced in an online game. The pacing in a humble game of TDM can change so fast. In one moment it'll be balls to the wall and then absolute silence for the rest of the game. The maps are simplistic, uninspired and boring to look at. In each DLC pack you pay for all you will get is a few new maps that are just as **** as the vanilla ones. Zombies has been turned into an overly complicated mess which is just completely against the ethos of zombies. The Colour palate is bland and washed out, the menu navigation is the slowest and most broken it has ever been in the history of the franchise and will straight up block you from accessing parts of the menu for no apparent reason. The campaign uninspiring, the script and its delivery make me want to do a Van Gough. At no point has this game felt worth the price it makes you pay. This game fails on all fronts. Microsoft had the good taste many years back to apologise for Windows Vista many years back and and that was good of them but, Activision, the only thing you can do to make up for this dumpster fire is to give a full refund to all who bought the game and desire one. This game, from a standpoint of gameplay and user friendliness , is more flawed than No Mans Sky. standpoint… Expand
  63. One-Jammer
    Nov 12, 2018
    1
    The updates are too much and too many. Changes are ridiculous. The action was fine and now they keep adding stuff that don't make sense and are making the game not interesting at all. They took the game Gridiron away as a challenge and combined it with others. Sucks big time! Games are changing as you play. Very poor entertainment.
  64. arconevv
    Mar 26, 2019
    1
    A piece of feminist **** SJW. The veterans of this war did not die for it. **** cuckolds, what happened to the white man?
  65. levimans
    Aug 31, 2019
    1
    just a one for the graphics. I want to play a game, not a f...ing movie. I thought: finally a WWII shooter like World At War but nooooooo. almost no action in singleplayer and when there is action and you want to replay it, you have see al those video scenes again, can't skip them, f...ing annoying, jesus tapdancing christ. as well as the multiplayer: almost NOBODY plays it. medal of honorjust a one for the graphics. I want to play a game, not a f...ing movie. I thought: finally a WWII shooter like World At War but nooooooo. almost no action in singleplayer and when there is action and you want to replay it, you have see al those video scenes again, can't skip them, f...ing annoying, jesus tapdancing christ. as well as the multiplayer: almost NOBODY plays it. medal of honor allied assault was one of the best games ever. Why don't they make something like that again. So much fun to play, but this ain't fun at all. Money wasted for nothing except for good graphics. That's all… Expand
  66. Jtalk
    Jun 13, 2020
    1
    This is the worst shooter game I’ve seen in a while. The single player part features crowd favourites, such as:
    - Very hard QTE where you fight a nazi, that reloads very slowly - Dumb AI that likes blocking your line of sight on the enemy only to engage one further away
    - Aim that jumps up every time you get hit - A mount machine gun that doesn’t scare enemies in the slightest, it’s    This is the worst shooter game I’ve seen in a while. The single player part features crowd favourites, such as:
    - Very hard QTE where you fight a nazi, that reloads very slowly - Dumb AI that likes blocking your line of sight on the enemy only to engage one further away
    - Aim that jumps up every time you get hit - A mount machine gun that doesn’t scare enemies in the slightest, it’s easier to use a rifle
    - Lots of running - Enemies with amputated self-preservation instinct (and common sense)

    This game represents all the bad stuff that happens with commercialised milking of franchises these days.    … Expand
  67. Idontlikecodww2
    Aug 2, 2020
    1
    Campaign, although fun, didnt give a ww2 vibe, wich is a huge letdown. Zombies is souless and boring while the multiplayer is bad
  68. vicente453
    Oct 17, 2020
    1
    lo compre por el trailer que se veia muy bien esperaba una historia epica y un buen online lo que tuve fue una campaña algo aburrida los personajes se te olvida que existen a los 2 minutos de juego los graficos son una mierda. el online es peor se trata de puras cajas y de comprar cosas para tu personaje basicamente es un juego decepcionante page two win y totalmente mediocre
  69. C3py
    Dec 28, 2020
    1
    Worst CoD i ever played , very closed missions with claustrophobia and bad weapons choices.
    I also don't want watch boring cutscenes
  70. lipefe
    Feb 14, 2021
    1
    normal garbage, nothing new, get ready for random aimbot during the campaign and a lot of frustration. the enemies manage to hit you through the smoke grenade and depending on it is hitkill. CGI is good but during the game the graphics is all locked and grotesque, melee attacks don't work well and when you try to do some heroic act the enemies keep hitting you with aimbot.
  71. raefon
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    COD was once the bench mark for FPS and what every one strived to be. However those days are long gone and sledge hammer has continued to not only put nails in the coffin, but has dug the hole and started throwing dirt in.

    This game is beyond rubbish, its has outdated graphics, terrible animation, weapons, physics, map development and sound. There is not one single redeeming feature.    COD was once the bench mark for FPS and what every one strived to be. However those days are long gone and sledge hammer has continued to not only put nails in the coffin, but has dug the hole and started throwing dirt in.

    This game is beyond rubbish, its has outdated graphics, terrible animation, weapons, physics, map development and sound.

    There is not one single redeeming feature. Activision and sledge hammer should hold their heads in shame as this shambles and desecration of COD.

    R.I P. old friend its a shame you died with out the grace and respect you deserved.    … Expand
  72. timaloy
    Nov 21, 2017
    0
    game runs terrrible total hackfest no support very poor from SHgames, More went into loot boxes than the actual game HQ is a joke, easy way to rip off kids
  73. Skydog
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    "Call of duty is back to it's roots"
    Um no. It's definitely not. This game is full of tiny ass maps where the ADHD children can continue to run to spawns and feel like their tiny dicks are bigger. No one in their right mind would give this game over a 5. It's got a decent campaign and zombie mode but the MP is complete and utter trash STILL.
  74. Hecatom
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Just like many others have said before me.
    This game is the culmination of everything bad in the AAA game industry so far.
    The sad part is that as usual the lowest common denominator will keep enabling this kind of practices until is too late.

    Watch how the next Starwars Battlefront 2 will up all the negative aspects of this game and people will eat it gladly.
  75. NeoReaper
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    The campaign should be nominated for an Oscar. Zombies is alright. The Multiplayer is yet again another **** show. The graphics are really bad(PS4 Pro). It's like the game has a very hard time to figure out what to focus on which leaves blurring everywhere.

    Metacritic needs to figure out away to tell if someone has actually played the game instead of letting the BF kiddies come one here    The campaign should be nominated for an Oscar. Zombies is alright. The Multiplayer is yet again another **** show. The graphics are really bad(PS4 Pro). It's like the game has a very hard time to figure out what to focus on which leaves blurring everywhere.

    Metacritic needs to figure out away to tell if someone has actually played the game instead of letting the BF kiddies come one here and just review bomb it.    … Expand
  76. Riddler68
    Dec 13, 2017
    0
    They promised an back to the roots boots on the ground call of duty, well let's see:

    Lootboxes: Check Broken Skill-based matchmaking: Check Terrible hit-detection: Check Garbage maps: Check Whole 9 maps (woow): Check **** up perk system: Check Useless    They promised an back to the roots boots on the ground call of duty, well let's see:

    Lootboxes: Check
    Broken Skill-based matchmaking: Check
    Terrible hit-detection: Check
    Garbage maps: Check
    Whole 9 maps (woow): Check
    **** up perk system: Check
    Useless killstreaks: Double Check
    Ruined Nazi Zombies: Triple Check

    Ok well... just like every call of duty since mw 3 they **** up and no one was expecting this... right. Guys, what were you expecting? it's still Call of Duty, the series that **** on the customers opinion to sell as many copies as possible.

    They will never change no matter what they say. This series dumbed them self down to be as appealing to every **** dumbass from every **** corner in this world.

    Save your money and wait for proper games that will be released in 2018.    … Expand
  77. clone901
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    This game is broken and the d day is not as good as medial of honor. the multiplayer is boring and the guns sound like paintball guns. this game is a terrible and boring just buy iw,bo3 or bo2
  78. happythoughts
    Nov 18, 2017
    0
    Summary: Mediocre gameplay, sub-par graphics and multiplayer lag and broken party settings. Feels like a PS3 game.

    I can't believe this game came out after BF1 and Titanfall 2, because the graphics are very mediocre. The servers are crazy laggy in multiplayer, and even though TitanFall2 and BF1 had lag, not to this degree. This seems unforgiveable considering that the games and maps    Summary: Mediocre gameplay, sub-par graphics and multiplayer lag and broken party settings. Feels like a PS3 game.

    I can't believe this game came out after BF1 and Titanfall 2, because the graphics are very mediocre. The servers are crazy laggy in multiplayer, and even though TitanFall2 and BF1 had lag, not to this degree. This seems unforgiveable considering that the games and maps are so small. Kind of reaffirmed what I thought of recent CoD games. Maybe I'll revisit if my friend tells me they have fixed the lag issues. I remember BF4 had some serious multiplayer issues on launch, so hopefully they fix this game so it's not a complete waste of $60.    … Expand
  79. whatever523
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Yay, lootboxes!

    You are paying for those extra profits with user ratings. I think you will find that in the long run, it's not worth it. Just ask Ubisoft.
  80. javironcho
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    The campaign is like 5 hours, it has no replayability at all, and the multiplayer fells like a very bad battlefield 1 team deathmatch clone, it is exactly the same game we got 10 years algo with a wwii reskin
  81. Allthat
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit to having this feature apart from showing off to everyone what you get from loot boxes. This allows Activision to bank on other players jealousy and sell even more loot boxes.

    The historical inaccuracies are really insulting too. Red dot sights and hollow sights did not exist during WW2, soldiers weren't allowed to wear colorful uniforms yet this game allows you to buy weird skins that do fit warfare or even the time period, AND WHY ARE THERE BLACK NAZIS? This is insulting to black people. Nazis were openly racist and I wouldn't want to dress up as someone who committed major atrocities against my race.

    Swastikas are censored BTW. And you can play as female soldiers just as easily as male ones. SJWs have hit the gaming industry really hard.

    Not gonna talk about zombies cause I'm tired of shooting zombies. ENOUGH ZOMBIES.

    Campaign has a very good story and characters are interesting, but its too short. 6 hours is too little and this game was clearly developed multiplayer first with single-player as an afterthought. I won't be surprised when the day comes that CoD ships without a single player campaign.

    DONT BUY THIS. LETS CHANGE THE INDUSTRY WE LOVE. VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET.    … Expand
  82. RyanJamesSez
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    Get this loot box crap out of this game. It has no place in the experience and ruins the game. I already gave you my money, stop trying to take more. You're screwing over your customers.
  83. DayFul
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    I skipped infinite warfare due to being tired of the tiny maps, Ultra low ttk and terrible connectivity that has been a hallmark of recent COD games. Activision have Blizzard in their back pocket and are still too cheap to use their dedicated servers that ensure Overwatch provides a vastly superior online experience (EA's Battlefiled series also embarasses COD in this area). The game isI skipped infinite warfare due to being tired of the tiny maps, Ultra low ttk and terrible connectivity that has been a hallmark of recent COD games. Activision have Blizzard in their back pocket and are still too cheap to use their dedicated servers that ensure Overwatch provides a vastly superior online experience (EA's Battlefiled series also embarasses COD in this area). The game is simply living off it's name at this point there's zero inspiration it may as well be a sport game with how little improvements are made. It's simply a new coat of paint on what it's a knackered car.… Expand
  84. fakkel
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Worse Cod game ever! Multiplayer= head glitching, Shoot first die first, Weapons with now weight behind them, poorly designed maps made for campers. GG well played
  85. PCMasterRaceFTW
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    I preordered the digital deluxe edition, something like 150$ CAD , the game is TRASH. Right on release , all servers went down for more than 3 hours and there you go all the ppl who preordered got screwed.
    The first thing I noticed was how HEAVILY supply drops are advertised in this game, that whole headwaters thing or whatever is the most shady thing Ive ever seen in a game. You're    I preordered the digital deluxe edition, something like 150$ CAD , the game is TRASH. Right on release , all servers went down for more than 3 hours and there you go all the ppl who preordered got screwed.
    The first thing I noticed was how HEAVILY supply drops are advertised in this game, that whole headwaters thing or whatever is the most shady thing Ive ever seen in a game. You're basically encouraging little kids to watch other people open their supply drops and get all those cool guns, encouraging those kids to ask mommy and daddy for money so that they can get them. On top of that you have the supply drop matchmaking which puts bad players against good players who have Supply drop weapons, on purpose, in order to further advertise them. If you're a parent DO NOT BUY THIS GAME FOR YOUR KIDS
    The game takes a ridiculously long time to load , the graphics look horrible. The hit detection and lag and insanely bad too. And last but not least , speaking of insanely bad , the MAPS are the worst maps ive ever seen in call of duty. Not only is it super hard to see people in the first place, but the maps themselves have so many openings, so much stuff everywhere. It doesn't matter how you play , you can get shot from behind. I can barely hear footsteps too. There is no way to tweak the graphics to make it easier to see ppl either ,everyone is headglitching and spawn camping in what seems to be an endless labyrinth of bs. The menu is awful, I want the old create a class point system. How does a 5KD player in all other boots on the ground cods struggle to get a 1KD in this game ? How does my 50mbps up and 50 mbps down drop to 2 bars every time I meet an enemy ?
    Every cod game seems to be getting worse and worse ever since Ghosts and every time they are trying harder and harder to push supply drops . Its like its not even about the game anymore, its about, what kind of shady bs we can do to sell more supply drops.
    You know what Im not even mad. Thank you for the refund PlayStation ! This is the 3rd CoD game I return following Ghosts , Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare.
    I swear on my mothers grave I will never buy another CoD game every again ! Not only that, I genuinely feel relieved and dont feel like id miss anything.
    Let's conclude this with the fact that supply drops should be made illegal, this is literally gambling, and Im not really concerned about me, as I haven't spent a dime on that scam, I'm more concerned about the younger audience. Manipulation of young innocent children to such high extent with what should be ILLEGAL gambling like I said should be made illegal.
    Every single game that has supply drops in it SUCKS, as they are nothing more than a corrupted scheme to steal people's money and CoD WW2 is the perfect example of what happens when you try to push this ever harder.
    Good luck dealing with legal trouble in the future Activation , it won't be long till you start getting lawsuits and all those money which you manipulated people and pretty much near stole it from them is going to be taken away from you.    … Expand
  86. TomasLacerda
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    For the sake of you wallet, DO NOT. BUY. THIS GAME.

    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.    For the sake of you wallet, DO NOT. BUY. THIS GAME.

    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.

    Don't play it.    … Expand
  87. adamf13
    Nov 11, 2017
    0
    - Terrible linear campaign
    - Historical inaccuracies
    - Only 8 MP maps
    - Feels like recent COD game with different skin.
    - Total let down wish I hadn't bought it.

    Really was the last chance with COD for me and it has been really poor, never buying COD again.
  88. McEmow
    Nov 8, 2017
    0
    A full priced game with Free-to-play lootbox elements? Rewarding players in watching others opening lootboxes??? Are you kidding me? What is this nonsense. 1/10.
    Same old COD with a WW2 skin. The headquarter only exists for lootbox purpose. Nothing more.
  89. Daikenkini
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    A game purely defined by the conglomeration of each and every bad trend nowadays gaming industry currently has to offer - if you buy Call of Duty: WWII, not only do you give up your demands you should have as a customer for the publishers, you even reward them for patenting and abusing a shady transaction scheme that is purposely matching high-spenders with normal edition buyers so as toA game purely defined by the conglomeration of each and every bad trend nowadays gaming industry currently has to offer - if you buy Call of Duty: WWII, not only do you give up your demands you should have as a customer for the publishers, you even reward them for patenting and abusing a shady transaction scheme that is purposely matching high-spenders with normal edition buyers so as to get ALL players to spend money on loot boxes - yeah it's not only that. You will also be left completely disappointed with the game overall, which offers absolutely nothing new, and is not enjoyable whatsoever.… Expand
  90. HENCHMAN
    Feb 14, 2018
    0
    Absolutely tired of the lack of effort and creativity of this franchise. I quit on this franchise a few installations back however I will continue to write a review and give a Zero because of their total disregard for the end user. Interestingly enough, it's the end user that enables them to repeat this year after year. In my 3 years supporting the franchise, nothing new was offered, justAbsolutely tired of the lack of effort and creativity of this franchise. I quit on this franchise a few installations back however I will continue to write a review and give a Zero because of their total disregard for the end user. Interestingly enough, it's the end user that enables them to repeat this year after year. In my 3 years supporting the franchise, nothing new was offered, just smoke and mirrors masquerading as something new, again at a premium of $60. None of us would buy a new car and trade it in for the newer version every year, yet most of the community does it with this game. I really wish the player base who share my sentiments would just stop buying the game and force them to change their model. The current model is to maximize profits, and give the impression of improvement or added value without actually doing it. The marketing and press are essentially lobbyists artificially inflate what is truly a inferior game. I could go on but I'll stop now. This franchise is forever ruined as long as Activision is involved, as is Destiny. Good day!… Expand
  91. leonardo2360
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    este videojuego es el claro ejemplo de como esta la industria en estos momentos cajitas aleatorias cayendo del cielo, season pass, campaña cortisima, penoso de verdad no compren este juego no apoyen a estas compañias que quieren dividir la comunidad del videojuego por politicas de mierda.
  92. Mexican_Jesus
    Nov 15, 2017
    0
    I will not stand for a 'return to form' which is simply a re-skin of the same Call of Duty game we've had for years, relying solely on the outdated technical aspects from prior and the resulting lack of impact or originality. The game takes place in World War II just as many people have been wishing for, however from the moment of the game's reveal it was completely apparent thatI will not stand for a 'return to form' which is simply a re-skin of the same Call of Duty game we've had for years, relying solely on the outdated technical aspects from prior and the resulting lack of impact or originality. The game takes place in World War II just as many people have been wishing for, however from the moment of the game's reveal it was completely apparent that Activision were trying to capitalise on Battlefield 1's success in a desperate attempt to remain prominent within the genre.

    The game is entirely lifeless and the setting feels one layer deep, as opposed to the historically accurate 'realism' of war that made the earlier Call of Duty games such a hit. If I can use any gun in any fight, regardless of historical accuracy, I might as well call in a giant Loot box to crush the opponent, that's how immersion shattering it is.

    Speaking of Giant Loot boxes....Call of Duty: WWII is absolutely atrocious in it's dependence on Loot boxes to generate excessive wealth for Activision, and to exploit the consumer. Any game that dares to reward me for watching other people gamble in an attempt to convince me to do so as well will not be tolerated at all.

    To Conclude:
    Call of Duty: WWII is a half-hearted attempt to cash in on the success of its rivals and restore the dwindling fanbase of the series that lacks meaningful characterization or weight both in its writing and technical aspects. The game compromises the legitimacy of its historical emulation for the sake of Loot Boxes and it shows a terrible lack of confidence or respect for both the series itself and the dedicated fans who've supported the series for years.    … Expand
  93. lufy617_elfo
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game is just **** because it's a copy of battlefield 1 and battlefield 1 is a copy of the 1st world war wich is also a copy of the Carthaginian wars, so it's a copy of greek people.
  94. Jumballi
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Rather than innovate, they simply went back and repackaged the previous game and just took out the super jumps. The only innovation is the fact they made loot boxes more toxic than any game before it.
  95. JasonBaureBond
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    WW2 is back that mean no jumping jets and other futuristic nonsense. Gameplay is good there could be more maps but everyting is good.
    Sory but women dont belong to this it s painfull to watch and listen them.
  96. MadMax3
    Oct 1, 2020
    0
    Trash mais um jogo mal desenvolvido pela activision, tinha potencial para ser o melhor, mas como sempre os bugs e os glichs tomam contam de um jogo promissor.
  97. lega_lol
    Nov 17, 2017
    0
    instead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up forinstead of being the trendsetter, Activision has forced CoD to just borrow what it liked from other shooters. it's mostly battlefield and rainbow six siege. frustratingly long load times also hinder enjoyment. the hub world is wholly unnecessary and is mostly just used for the loot box thing, (where other players can see what you get in the loot boxes). good visuals don't make up for badly… Expand… Expand
  98. fr003ank
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    They put the maps that are supposed to be in the base game in the first dlc which only leaves the base game with 10 MP maps including the bonus map, this is unacceptable for a COD game
  99. timefish576
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    Single player seems fine, even if it is more of the same. I play COD for the multiplayer but this is a step backward (and I don't mean because its BOTG). This plays like it is Advanced Warfare (BOTG Edition). If I paid attention and saw that Sledgehammer was making this I would have rented before buying. I'm pretty sure they even used some of the same sounds from AW. So far for me itSingle player seems fine, even if it is more of the same. I play COD for the multiplayer but this is a step backward (and I don't mean because its BOTG). This plays like it is Advanced Warfare (BOTG Edition). If I paid attention and saw that Sledgehammer was making this I would have rented before buying. I'm pretty sure they even used some of the same sounds from AW. So far for me it is purely twitch gameplay which means you can't play smart. For most of the COD multiplayers I'm a 2.0 KD player. I like to outsmart people, not just out reflex them. Sniping is a joke, no point when a AR can pick you off across map. Shotguns are way to powerful (probably will be nerfed). Overall the movement and aiming feel floaty, like AW. I'll keep playing for now but I'll probably be going back to MW remastered soon. Please Please make a Modern Warfare 2 remaster!

    FWIW my top COD multiplayers:

    MW2
    Ghost (all the hate ruined the series IMO)
    MW3
    MW Remastered
    BO2    … Expand
  100. MysticDingo
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Same old, same old, except this time with loot crates and micro transactions galore. I used to love COD, but the series has been going down hill for quite some time. Idk if it's just franchise fatigue, the fact that it's the same twitchy shooter on absolutely horrible maps(because I actually like twitchy shooters on good maps), or if people are just sick of the money grabbing ofSame old, same old, except this time with loot crates and micro transactions galore. I used to love COD, but the series has been going down hill for quite some time. Idk if it's just franchise fatigue, the fact that it's the same twitchy shooter on absolutely horrible maps(because I actually like twitchy shooters on good maps), or if people are just sick of the money grabbing of Activision, but this game is absolute garbage. Money better spent elsewhere. Maybe COD should take a cue from Ubisoft and take a year or two break from COD and really take the time to craft a sick shooter, with an actually good campaign, and awesome multiplayer. Most likely though, we will be seeing a trailer for the next COD in 4-5 months. 0/10 trash.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »