Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. pizkaH12
    Dec 22, 2020
    9
    Sinceramente, un modo campaña increíble, sin fallos, variedad, refleja perfectamente un escenario de guerra mundial, muy bien hilado etc.
    Su multijugador una vez más es impresionante
  2. Jimmyb10
    Mar 1, 2021
    9
    best call of duty game ever!
    positive:
    - campaign is so good!
    - multiplayer is also very good!
    - nazi zombies is good but better in other cods
    negative:
    - campaign is short 7-8 hours but it is long enough for a very good campaign.
  3. realjaytheboom
    Mar 8, 2022
    9
    Call of Duty WW2: This has to be one of the darkest COD games of all time. You play as Ronald “Red” Daniels set in different times dusting World War 2. Obviously with a COD game it’s going to look great but they game took my breath away at some points because of how real it looked it happens when one of your partners get shot and you are dragging them all of a sudden a cutscene startsCall of Duty WW2: This has to be one of the darkest COD games of all time. You play as Ronald “Red” Daniels set in different times dusting World War 2. Obviously with a COD game it’s going to look great but they game took my breath away at some points because of how real it looked it happens when one of your partners get shot and you are dragging them all of a sudden a cutscene starts playing and I swear it looks so real it’s crazy, I even showed it to my stepdad who love watching war stuff and he I think had a hard time thinking that it was a game it looked that real. The gameplay is always solid the guns feel great to use because they are all from the 40s or when ever World War 2 happened. But the guns always feel like real weapons because of how they feel and sound. But it doesn’t mean the game is going to hold your hand oh no, they game is difficult even from the start you play on the first level D-Day on the beach it doesn’t hold back, but sometimes there are easy levels then it goes back to BS levels. Overall it’s a very beautiful looking game and one of the most dark COD games I have played it’s free for anyone who has a PlayStation Plus subscription.… Expand
  4. tututdyure
    Jan 2, 2022
    9
    I like this game. It bring the terms to World War II when each other war for conquest Dominion.
  5. sityoazzdown
    Nov 6, 2017
    8
    After the abomination that was infinite warfare, I had little hype for this game ( I also bought this game accidentally on psn). But I must say after beating the campaign and putting in 5 hours into the multiplayer I can say this game is good. The campaign is amazing and easily a 9/10 for me. The gunplay is great, the journey (story) and pacing/variety in the campaign is amazing. TheAfter the abomination that was infinite warfare, I had little hype for this game ( I also bought this game accidentally on psn). But I must say after beating the campaign and putting in 5 hours into the multiplayer I can say this game is good. The campaign is amazing and easily a 9/10 for me. The gunplay is great, the journey (story) and pacing/variety in the campaign is amazing. The characters are believable and likeable and for some reason the graphics in the campaign is amazing, whilst the multiplayer looks last gen. I like how we switched between characters (kinda like gta 5) depending on the circumstances; and the surprise and smile on my face when we got to fight in the skies was great. It also has amazing blockbuster driving sequences and explosive sequences that are really fresh and jaw-dropping. I can't like and recommend this campaign enough. Fun diverse gameplay, captivating journey, amazing cutscenes; campaign is definately a 9/10. Now the multiplayer is serviceable but it's only serviceable because they slapped a COD on it. Maps are a **** which promotes camping, 80% of it's map are too small and feel like mazes. The divisions are a disappointment and takes away player freedom. Guns feel/look/ sound too similar too each other. Typical COD playlist. Positives on multiplayer: will be dominated by veterans, more tactical and not as much run and gun, is satisfying when you're on a killstreak. Multiplayer was ok for me and is a generous 6/10. In a nutshell I want to say buy/rent (if you want) for the campaign and treat the serviceable mp as a treat. However if you're buying COD just for multiplayer I would advise skip it, (well it depends what type of gamer you are, definitely skip if you want 100 hours into mp type of game, as I feel this MP will grow stale quick.)… Expand
  6. HoldDAfort
    Jan 16, 2018
    8
    If an old school COD fan of the series this one fits the bill., yet the depth of it not anywhere near many would of hope, Single Campaign lovers who have been aggravated as the publishers seem to put a little more vision into the online aspect will not be disappointed, anyway you slice it this game should not be scored any lower than a 7.5 imo.. the crawl is a little frustrating in stealthIf an old school COD fan of the series this one fits the bill., yet the depth of it not anywhere near many would of hope, Single Campaign lovers who have been aggravated as the publishers seem to put a little more vision into the online aspect will not be disappointed, anyway you slice it this game should not be scored any lower than a 7.5 imo.. the crawl is a little frustrating in stealth and buggy yet a fun run through.… Expand
  7. joaopontesvaz
    Mar 5, 2018
    8
    Graphics: 8.4 Sound: 8.8 Gameplay: 8.8 Fun/Story: 8.2

    A good improvement with the successful backward to the beginning of the series. Good graphics and nice gameplay.
  8. Jambobbyb
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    Review based on PS4 Pro @ 4K ... Single player is great looking plays well and has been thoroughly enjoyable. Zombies looks immense and plays again really well all the zombies are nicely done and the sound effects are A++ Multiplayer is decent but I feel the colour pallets is a little bit drab not massively keen on the customisation and a lot of the TDM maps are smaller sized. I’m no CODReview based on PS4 Pro @ 4K ... Single player is great looking plays well and has been thoroughly enjoyable. Zombies looks immense and plays again really well all the zombies are nicely done and the sound effects are A++ Multiplayer is decent but I feel the colour pallets is a little bit drab not massively keen on the customisation and a lot of the TDM maps are smaller sized. I’m no COD fan boy but This is the best COD in a long time 8.5//10 but I’m voting if a 9...… Expand
  9. Yunior
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    SMH!!! People coming in here to give a bad review just because they suck at the game. People, the game is way better in all aspects than any previous COD game. Is it perfect?? No, it is not perfect. It still has many areas where it needs improvements. But it is way better and way more fun than any other COD. Don't listen to all the exo suit fanboys coming in here to give bad reviews.
  10. SuperkenGaming
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty WWII
    Great Campaign, mess of an online
    Call of Duty WWII comes from the sledgehammer studio that made advanced warfare and modern warfare 3… This game features a 5 and a half hour long campaign, a Nazi zombies mode and of course an online competitive mode The star of this game is hands down the campaign.. Here you play as Daniels, a member of the United States army during    Call of Duty WWII
    Great Campaign, mess of an online
    Call of Duty WWII comes from the sledgehammer studio that made advanced warfare and modern warfare 3…
    This game features a 5 and a half hour long campaign, a Nazi zombies mode and of course an online competitive mode
    The star of this game is hands down the campaign..
    Here you play as Daniels, a member of the United States army during World War II…
    You occasionally play as a few surprise characters to infiltrate or take control of a tank for example...
    But the games campaign mostly focuses on him…
    And the story here is so personal, that for the first time in call of duty’s history I felt this soldier and his story wasn’t throw away…
    Easily my favorite campaign in the entire call of duty series…
    These characters are so fleshed out, all having their own personalities to them... it feels like an interactive movie..
    You have a girl waiting for you to get home, and you feel her pulling you through the entire way as you feel immersed in the battleground of world war 2
    Unique to this campaign is that you have to manage your health…
    It’s definitely takes some time getting used to patching yourself up rather than taking cover and waiting for your health to regenerate..
    But this leaves you being more cautious and aware of cover…
    This health management is made less of a nuisance thanks to your squad members... stopping this from feeling like a survival game…
    depending on the mission you’re on you’ll have different squad mates with a cool down meter to give you a med pack or ammo for example.. Mark enemies in the field…
    Again immersing me into the game, caring about my position and where my squad mates are…
    There aren’t really those epic moments you’d expect from a call of duty campaign... as this one feels more grounded in reality…
    But there is plenty of variety as you’ll be in the trenches, in a tank, in a plane, you’ll go undercover as a Nazi.. There are car chases...
    Making this campaign hard to step away from…
    but once your time in the campaign is over its back to what you’re used to from call of duty// zombies, multiplayer, and regenerating health…
    The zombies mode this time is all about Nazi tech, you’re killing zombies for points to buy new weapons, armor, upgrades, and unlocking gates and fulfilling objectives, not so much boarding up windows this time around…
    And then there’s the online multiplayer which currently during launch weekend is a complete mess…
    The game will get stuck on a load screen… there are server issues that force you to reset your router to fix.. End game results freeze on screen not giving any indication anything is happening... finding a match is a chore…
    once you do finally get a match you’re thrown into your typical call of duty modes around some pretty weak maps…
    probably my least favorite maps in the game’s history…
    And since this is a world war 2 game the weapon variety doesn’t feel that present …
    you start choosing your infantry out of 5 choices based on your play style and working on leveling them up to unlock their unique perks…
    making matches and players more unpredictable…
    once you choose your infantry you’re given that classes weapon, though you aren’t stuck with it as you can unlock any gun with rank tokens…
    And then you take your favorite gun out into the call of duty world and level it up to unlock attachments for it…
    Pretty typical stuff
    There are also daily challenges for you to do to unlock items like supply drops or earn currency to buy cards in game and unlock a special weapon or cosmetic item to give you an xp bonus or a one hit kill bonus in zombies…
    giving players something to work towards and play for online..
    It could be just me... but the maps, modes, and variety of weapons just couldn’t hook me…
    And the games awful server issues at launch didn’t help this...
    That being said... this game is worth picking up on its own for its campaign...
    I give Call of Duty WWII
    an 8/10    … Expand
  11. marcelorockz
    Dec 13, 2017
    8
    A principio a historia do jogo eu achei bem interessante e cativante, mostra o avanço dos aliados pela normandia atravessando a belgica com a famosa batalha de bulge chegando na alemanha.. Os cenarios estão muito bonitos e as cutscenes mais ainda. Para quem gosta de WWII vale a pena!
    O multiplayer eu joguei pouco, mais do mesmo, CoD de sempre.
  12. Jarhead335
    Nov 10, 2017
    8
    This is a genuinely objective review: CoD WWII is really quite good.

    The last CoD I played was Black Ops 3, and I thought that iteration was acceptable. The last truly great Call of Duty I've played was Modern Warfare 3. After half a decade of the wallrunning, exosuit-toting madness, I was really not holding out hope for WWII to be anything other than a bland money grab. Of course,    This is a genuinely objective review: CoD WWII is really quite good.

    The last CoD I played was Black Ops 3, and I thought that iteration was acceptable. The last truly great Call of Duty I've played was Modern Warfare 3. After half a decade of the wallrunning, exosuit-toting madness, I was really not holding out hope for WWII to be anything other than a bland money grab. Of course, being a giant moron, I pre-ordered it at 11:45 on the night of launch rather than go for broke on Wolfenstein 2. I spent the 15 minutes before actual launch wondering who had drugged my dinner to make me do such a thing. And then I played it.

    Barring the launch night issues connecting to multiplayer servers, the game is a beautiful and sincere addition to the franchise. The campaign is, in its purest essence, Saving Private Ryan without the Private Ryan. It even opens with the landing at Normandy, and from there blossoms into a not so imaginative, but hellishly fun shooter. I'm on the third or fourth level at this point, and I'm eager to play the rest: It sounds amazing (Sledghammer took notes from the original Star Wars: Battlefront reboot) and it looks just as great. The audio and visuals have never been better in CoD. Character design is pretty standard for the FPS genre, but the connection and relationships between characters is still suitable to make the campaign enjoyable, rather than a chore.

    Multiplayer is quite refreshing in that it gets straight back to what once made Call of Duty the must-own in FPS land: Raw, skill-based arcade shooting, with a delicious array of weapon attachments, cosmetic upgrades, and skill perks to unlock which revolve around a new and intriguing "Division" system. This isn't in line with the usual CoD title, where ten or so custom classes are yours to outfit. Instead, it gives you that option with the ability to truly maximize a given class's skillset: If you play as the "Mountainous" (Sniper) Division, you will see added rewards for keeping your sniper equipped rather than toting an SMG in your ghillie suit. The Divisional loadouts give reason to diversify your classes, rather than set up five different iterations of the same OP rifle or other that typically plague CoD installments. How many of us used anything other than an ACR combo in the old days? Now, you're incentivized to branch out with your custom classes in order to maximize your killing potential. Lastly, the new War mode is really compelling: It can be difficult at times given some spawn and location advantages for defenders/attackers depending on map, but a really neat mode that I look forward to them expanding upon. New maps and variants should make War a great staple mode, particularly for those who like campaigns and don't traditionally favor online multiplayer.

    Zombies, too, has met a drastic and much-needed upgrade. BLOPS3 zombies at launch, frankly, sucked. It was too hard to progress, too unclear in its rules, and ultimately if you didn't matchmake with someone who knew what they were doing, it was far too difficult to last beyond the initial waves, no matter how fun Jeff Goldblum is to play with. With a refreshing return to actual zombies and shambling mutants that are - above all else - enjoyable to kill and fight, I was really pleased with the experience. So far I've gotten a few 1.5-2 hour long runs under my belt, although I have yet to meet the "big boss" I've heard about waiting at the finish. That dang zeppelin gets me every time. From the ground up, the zombies mode is creepier and more intricate in its campaign mission and overall tone: It feels more cohesive than any mode before, including my beloved Tranzit from the BLOPS2 days. Guns feel good in zombies mode, and everything but the starting pistol packs enough punch to at least feel useful in some scenario or other. The added quest markers and objective notes make it that much more user-friendly to get to the bottom of the campaign and make tangible progress, which is both friendly to noobs and dismissable entirely for those who want to try their hand at exploring with no direction. The lore is at least suitably engaging, and on the whole it's a treat to play, with friends or online.

    The ultimate bads:

    Campaign: Derivative: doesn't do much that's new for WWII, but brings a nice exposure to the conflict to a younger audience that doesn't remember Finest Hour or Medal of Honor the way I do. Characters are well-worn tropes that could use some inspiration.

    Multiplayer: not very friendly to newbies. At this point, if you're not well-versed in CoD and FPS shooters generally, you're going to get killed a lot and that's going to really frustrate you. But the modes are just diverse enough to stay interesting. Guns are fun to use and sound great, but really there are only a handful that you see time and time again. The community knows the STG-44 is it.

    Zombies: Needs a non-campaign mode.

    Verdict: Dang good. 8/10.    … Expand
  13. filip92
    Jul 9, 2022
    8
    Campaign is very good. There are no big WW2 games for a long time, but this COD hits it very hard with a storytelling. Brutal and emotional campaign. Must try.
  14. arnav99
    Nov 5, 2017
    8
    this game is amazing. the campaign is actually really good, especially the stealth missions, however, there are a few meh moments in there, just a whole lot more whoa moments in the campaign though. I don't understand the destiny style hub area though. it doesn't make too much sense since most people will rush to match lobbies rather than roam around in some place that could easily havethis game is amazing. the campaign is actually really good, especially the stealth missions, however, there are a few meh moments in there, just a whole lot more whoa moments in the campaign though. I don't understand the destiny style hub area though. it doesn't make too much sense since most people will rush to match lobbies rather than roam around in some place that could easily have been accessed in a menu. also, at least in Europe, i see no one in the hub area, like 0. I waited for a 1v1 match for 3 whole minutes and I was the only one in the queue the whole time. however, the multiplayer is damn awesome, I love the map designs, really fun and easy to move around in and the designs are actually really cool. cod should probably change their engine in the next coming years since graphics are starting to look dated, it's far from bad but we can see better from AAA games. it's kinda hard to understand how the whole hub area works, I have no idea how supply drops work even after 15 hours of gameplay, I just somehow get them from time to time. I also don't know how to get armory credits, like at all, the whole thing with the quartermaster is hard to understand. I guess I'll have to figure it out as I go along. the weirdest thing to me is that no one is in the hub world, I mean it takes literally no time to get a match but it's no man's land in the hub world. so far the game is 8 but it could be a 9 when I understand how everything works, it's so hard to figure out these things, right now but just playing this game is a joy, I really like these map designs even though the template is pretty much the same.… Expand
  15. Empyrea
    Sep 19, 2021
    8
    I only played the campaign and I just can say that I liked it. Graphics are good and gameplay as well. Bad things would be that you have to download 35 GB if you want to play this game even if you are only going to play the campaign. It's the first time I see this. I normally play games english but because I would have to change the language of my ps4 I played directly in Spanish. VoicesI only played the campaign and I just can say that I liked it. Graphics are good and gameplay as well. Bad things would be that you have to download 35 GB if you want to play this game even if you are only going to play the campaign. It's the first time I see this. I normally play games english but because I would have to change the language of my ps4 I played directly in Spanish. Voices were ok but the recording of the voices was quite bad (sometimes loud, sometimes low). I didn't try the zombies because I'm not a fan of them. Good game.

    The campaign is 11 missions plus the epilog and each mission last about half an hour so it will take you about 6 hours.    … Expand
  16. MasterRiley
    Nov 13, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty: WWII delivers a gritty and emotionally driven campaign that emphasizes the realities of war and the importance of friendship. It has a great story and cast of characters, as well as solid gameplay and cinematic moments you have come to expect from the series. The multiplayer is back to old school Call of Duty, for the better. It is lacking a bit on content, specifically mapsCall of Duty: WWII delivers a gritty and emotionally driven campaign that emphasizes the realities of war and the importance of friendship. It has a great story and cast of characters, as well as solid gameplay and cinematic moments you have come to expect from the series. The multiplayer is back to old school Call of Duty, for the better. It is lacking a bit on content, specifically maps and party game modes, but hopefully in time those will come. And finally the zombies is fun and absolutely terrifying.… Expand
  17. agent13
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Most of the critics have given the right score to this game, like advanced warfare, sledgehammer games has been successful in making a good and memorable campaign that you would play more than once but i wish it was longer. But regarding multiplayer, ww2 is somehow disappointing micro transaction ruins the balance of multiplayer mode still battlefield gives you a much better multiplayerMost of the critics have given the right score to this game, like advanced warfare, sledgehammer games has been successful in making a good and memorable campaign that you would play more than once but i wish it was longer. But regarding multiplayer, ww2 is somehow disappointing micro transaction ruins the balance of multiplayer mode still battlefield gives you a much better multiplayer experience but i don't really care about online mode i think the soul and the most important part of a game is it's story and ww2 has a good one.
    I don't have any comments about zombies mode since i don't like zombie games.
    There is something that nobody has mentioned about this game and it's the name, they could be much more creative about naming the game world war 2 sounds like this is the second game of a series but it's not.    … Expand
  18. destinyfan1
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    I have played cod ghosts, aw , bo3 and infinite warfare and now their is cod ww2 and from all of them this is the best cod
    Note that I still need to play a lot of zombies and multiplayer before i finish my review
    I beat the campaign ,and while it may not be the best cod campaign ,it is finally not as dull and boring as the last cods But its still far from perfect and it is very short    I have played cod ghosts, aw , bo3 and infinite warfare and now their is cod ww2 and from all of them this is the best cod
    Note that I still need to play a lot of zombies and multiplayer before i finish my review
    I beat the campaign ,and while it may not be the best cod campaign ,it is finally not as dull and boring as the last cods
    But its still far from perfect and it is very short like every cod
    From the couple of hours zombies and multiplayer i must say that I like the changes for now, and overall I have an enjoyable experience
    Zombies is now scarier , but people on youtube are overreacting like its a horror masterpiece , but i like it already a lot, not sure or i like it more then bo3 zombies but its definitly fun.
    Multiplayer is not so much different and feels a little bit like aw but its still fun,but i am not amazed
    I am not prestige yet so i still need to do a part of the headquarters,but so far i really like it
    Microtransactions are definitely back , but I don't give a **** about them anymore because almost every game in this dirty game industry does it right now

    So far the most enjoyable cod in years    … Expand
  19. KittyWhisky
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The story tells the usual story of a military soldier. Together with brothers in arms wades through a real hell. We've seen similar stories in games, the war has not been shown so realistically. Basically, this effect causes dismemberment. Very often we will see people without body parts, burning people and the atrocities of the Nazis.

    The plot is simple, but you believe in this war, believe what is happening on the screen. All the characters have their own character, everyone has their demons. It is interesting to observe the drama of the characters.

    The gameplay is now in spirit first every part OF CALL OF DUTY. Because of this the gameplay has become more boring. You sit behind cover and aims at enemies. Diversity is not. But there is one good innovation. The developers decided to implement in a single company element of teamwork. If we need supplies, first aid kit or swegene about the enemy - we are asking comrades. This is an interesting thing. and Yes, now health itself is not restored - it is necessary to look for kits. Here you don't feel like a super soldier ready to kill everyone, you could die at any moment.

    Call of Duty: WWII is a game about realistic warfare. A single company is not very long, but no time to get bored. It's not the best Call of Duty, gameplay and artistic design can to lose IW, but nevertheless it was nice to return to the battlefields of WWII.    … Expand
  20. Saeed9988
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Ok, first of all, why are people saying the game is "not authentic".Like they explained a billion times the campaign is the historically accurate part of the goddman game, not the multiplayer.And second of all, really, your complaining about micro transactions that do no bullsh*t to your weapon other than giving it a new look.Whatever, for me the game is good, but not the best.TheOk, first of all, why are people saying the game is "not authentic".Like they explained a billion times the campaign is the historically accurate part of the goddman game, not the multiplayer.And second of all, really, your complaining about micro transactions that do no bullsh*t to your weapon other than giving it a new look.Whatever, for me the game is good, but not the best.The campaign(The historically accurate part of the game)is actually good.The old health system is great, the idea of allies giving you supplies to help you is great and much more.My only complaint is that the idea of having to press the middle button on the ps4(Or the back button on XB1 and any button you chose for it on PC)so you can see where the objective is can be annoying,Also, it makes the game look black and white.Wow.Whatever, overall the campaign is good.The multiplayer is ok, but I have 3 complaints about the multiplayer.First of all, why 9 maps(War maps don't count)?Seriously, I think they should add more(Maybe when Carentan is free which I know it will).Second of all, a lot of the tasks so you can earn rewards in the HQ can be difficult.Third and finally, 3 war maps is small.They should've added like maybe 5.Overall, the multiplayer is better(Better than last year, but we don't talk about it).Finally, zombies.First of all, the mods are OP af.Anyways, the maps that they choose were ok.The main map(The Final Reich)is really great.It has good atmosphere and the time being at night really sets the atmosphere.However, it's complex.Shadows of evil complex.Then the second and least important map(Grousten haus, I think that's what it's called), which is really hard.Even harder than The Final Reich.The map is tight, there is no box, you only have 3 wall weapons and you only have the random blitz(Basically, the wundersphere)so you can have perks.Dont forget that there is no PAP.The map is really hard(I am good at zombies and I died on round 6)due to the amount of zombies that spawn and the tightness of the map.For me, this gamemode should never be played by new players.Overall, the game is good.I hope that Activision doesn't f*** with us again and add weapons(They will, I know they will).Well, whatever.If you disagree with me then it's fine.People have different opinions and I can respect that(Unless the reason is absolute bullsh*t).… Expand
  21. boris_out
    Jun 3, 2020
    8
    Одна из лучших сюжетных компаний шутеров за последние года, и уж точно самая лучшая компания за последние игры серии call of duty.
  22. ViniciusBrito
    Mar 8, 2018
    8
    The game possess 3 modes that you can go through the journey. They are :
    Story : I'm gonna say that this Call of Duty have the best story mode of the hole saga, in pretty much every aspect, the graphics are fire, it does have a noticiable imporvment, the choice to go to the world war 2 was great, the ambience that they put in this game really puts you at that time. The characters, they    The game possess 3 modes that you can go through the journey. They are :
    Story : I'm gonna say that this Call of Duty have the best story mode of the hole saga, in pretty much every aspect, the graphics are fire, it does have a noticiable imporvment, the choice to go to the world war 2 was great, the ambience that they put in this game really puts you at that time. The characters, they have charisma and you really get to care about them, having importance in the story and in the gameplay, helping you with supplies and techniques. You will have differnt types of gameplay, controlling a tank or a plane for example, giving a little of variety to the gameplay. Generally isn't that original or anything, but still pretty fun.
    Multiplayer: The multiplayer isn't the best of the franchise, but it's pretty fun. They added some modes that really are worth to talk about, the mode War, it consists in one team trying do advance and complete one objective per time, and the other trying to stop it, this mode really explore the map and how you can use the map in favor or against you, it really reminded me from Rush in Battlefield 3, the mode Pop Hunt that is based on things that already existed but is soo much fun, i enjoyed that one very much, it consist in one team becoming and object and hiding, during the other is trying to find those, playing that with friends are a sure fun moment. The variety of weapons considerable, hand to hand and shooting weapons.
    Zombies: This mode in this game really made me had a lot of fun, the zombies here aren't completely new but have some good and interesting inovation, the prologue passes in a small house and you can work around that and keep going on wave to wave, very fun to do it so. The Final Reich worked very well to me, a i did enjoyed how the map was constructed and how it worked out, the amount of enemies is ok, not very much. What i really liked it, are the easter eggs, it took time and aren't that easy to do, if you can get together some friends to do them, you will definely have some hours of fun and struggling.
    This Call of Duty is the first one that i played since BO2, so i wasn't bored or even knowing what was going on on the franchise very much, so it possibly counted to this review.    … Expand
  23. SethDaReviewer
    May 3, 2018
    8
    It may not be a great game per say, but it is in my opinion a fun and mindless shooter. I really love the online community and it's plentiful plethora of World War 2 weaponry. Play this games multiplayer if you are looking for a fun mindless experience.
    In my opinion I really like the campaign, sure the D-day stage maybe forgettable but advancing forward in my case I got enthralled into    It may not be a great game per say, but it is in my opinion a fun and mindless shooter. I really love the online community and it's plentiful plethora of World War 2 weaponry. Play this games multiplayer if you are looking for a fun mindless experience.
    In my opinion I really like the campaign, sure the D-day stage maybe forgettable but advancing forward in my case I got enthralled into the campaign with it's high octane action, amazing single player narrative and great cutscenes.    … Expand
  24. jay_caspian
    Nov 17, 2017
    8
    I found Call of Duty WWII to be a refreshing jump back into the glory days of the series, it's been 7. Years since I last called a CoD title, so many of the issues other people complained about did not effect me. I found the story to be fantastical driven, gameplay to be excellent, and multiplayer to be as fun as ever, even if I suck at it. My only gripe is that Sniper missions wereI found Call of Duty WWII to be a refreshing jump back into the glory days of the series, it's been 7. Years since I last called a CoD title, so many of the issues other people complained about did not effect me. I found the story to be fantastical driven, gameplay to be excellent, and multiplayer to be as fun as ever, even if I suck at it. My only gripe is that Sniper missions were repetitive. Overall, fun game… Expand
  25. b123blake
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty: WW2 is, to be honest, a great game with few faults. With an amazing Campain, fun zombies mode (with a sweet horror factor that keeps the player on his or her edge the entire game), and of course a great multiplayer, Call of duty hasn't been this good since 2012. Also, don't even get me started on the fantastic soundtrack, sound effects, and graphics. This truly is a must-playCall of Duty: WW2 is, to be honest, a great game with few faults. With an amazing Campain, fun zombies mode (with a sweet horror factor that keeps the player on his or her edge the entire game), and of course a great multiplayer, Call of duty hasn't been this good since 2012. Also, don't even get me started on the fantastic soundtrack, sound effects, and graphics. This truly is a must-play in 2017-18.… Expand
  26. DlO-BRANDO
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    This game is definitly a huge step forward compared to Infinite Warfare, the graphics look nice, the gameplay is tight, and the zombies mode is scary as hell. Didn't play the single player yet but i will do that after writing this review. The game is good.
  27. RaRaRa
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Don't listen to these reviews people are crying because of supply drops even though they aren't pay to win. Also most of these people haven't even played the game but give it a 1/10 anyway. Thank you for reading this and do yourself a favour and look at a different website.
  28. Marionette64
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    This call of duty just came out and people are already giving negative reviews! just give up!!! This is not infinite warfare, its not pay-to-win, its a good game, just stop! Unless you have played it, don't review it.
  29. NRPostma
    Nov 3, 2017
    8
    Let's be clear. People giving this game below a 5 are pathetic reviewers. They can't imagine a perspective outside their own and let anger interfere with their judgment. The developers put loads of work into this game and it came out great, while not perfect, no COD ever is. The argument that it deserves a 0 or 1 because it is a twitch shooter is absurd. If you don't like twitch shootersLet's be clear. People giving this game below a 5 are pathetic reviewers. They can't imagine a perspective outside their own and let anger interfere with their judgment. The developers put loads of work into this game and it came out great, while not perfect, no COD ever is. The argument that it deserves a 0 or 1 because it is a twitch shooter is absurd. If you don't like twitch shooters that's fine, but understand lots of people love them. There are lots of amazing games that I hate to play because they are not my type! I don't go and review them as a 1 because they don't suit my taste, or because I'm bad at them. Yes, this is the millionth cod and they are all relatively similar. People complain they want something new. They get something new and complain they want old cod. Accept you guys can never be satisfied. It's not the games fault, you have just grown out of the series. When you start a new job, you may love it at first, but as the year's progress you will find complaints and issues with it even though its the same old job from before. COD games bring in BILLIONS of dollars for a reason. Overall, people cant stop playing, hating, and loving every moment of the games. Get a grip on your all or nothing opinion.… Expand
  30. xCxJ
    Nov 7, 2017
    8
    WW2 Isn't a perfect game by any means but it has it's moments, graphics are really good, at least on the Pro. The single player campaign isn't anything spectacular but it's actually really decent for a CoD game, it definitely has it's moments and it can be challenging at times. It's a campaign that I personally could go back to and play it again. When it comes to the multiplayer, well,WW2 Isn't a perfect game by any means but it has it's moments, graphics are really good, at least on the Pro. The single player campaign isn't anything spectacular but it's actually really decent for a CoD game, it definitely has it's moments and it can be challenging at times. It's a campaign that I personally could go back to and play it again. When it comes to the multiplayer, well, it's just another CoD game, if you like CoD multiplayer then you'll like the multiplayer in WW2. The HQ is an interesting choice, it's really cool other than the fact that you can watch people opening loot boxes that fall from the sky...Overall, WW2 is a welcomed change compared to the past couple of years and I would recommend it to anyone who's a CoD fan and anyone who hasn't played any CoD games before but would like to get into the world of CoD, it's a good starting point. In my honest opinion and as someone who prefers Battlefield I will gladly give WW2 an 8.5/10… Expand
  31. BenRiley83
    Nov 14, 2017
    8
    Very good game. The campaign is awesome and the multiplayer as fun and addicting as ever. The only issue I have so far are all the server issues the launch has had. They are quite bad, but besides that the game is super fun! I recommend it.
  32. DoritoBag
    Mar 31, 2018
    8
    I do recommend this game to anyone who loved playing multiplayer in Call of Duty series (mostly every single review on this game just talks about the campaign) zombie mode is fun and everything but I spend my time on multiplayer anyways it's very fun and I do recommend buying the game
  33. Joeyz
    Nov 21, 2017
    8
    Call of Duty has went back to its roots, no more jetpacks, wall running, and etc. But I have seen a large amount of people complaining about micro transactions and loot boxes in WW2. I will be talking about my opinion of CoD WW2, the campaign, multiplayer, and zombies.

    Campaign - It's probably one of the best Call of Duty Campaigns up to date. Lots of fun, challenging depending on the    Call of Duty has went back to its roots, no more jetpacks, wall running, and etc. But I have seen a large amount of people complaining about micro transactions and loot boxes in WW2. I will be talking about my opinion of CoD WW2, the campaign, multiplayer, and zombies.

    Campaign - It's probably one of the best Call of Duty Campaigns up to date. Lots of fun, challenging depending on the difficulty, and more. However I feel like the campaign is a little short, you can complete it within 5 hours, but it doesn't matter, as long as I'm having a good time, I have nothing to complain about.

    Multiplayer - Now I will agree that this is probably one of the worst launch for any Call of Duty title, however Sledgehammer is continuing to fix it and multiplayer is now playable. I don't like the fact that you lose some XP or you get the correct amount, I hope they fix that sometime soon. Besides all that, boots on the ground made MP better than the last few CoDs. People are saying that "It's a reskin from the past few CoDs" or "They just copied WAW or BF1", now I will have to highly disagree with this statement, didn't everyone want Boots on the Ground Call of Duty back? Why are they complaining now, by the end of the day they just end up playing it no matter what. MP playing with friends or by yourself is still fun.

    Zombies - This mode has been in the last few CoDs, starting with WAW, BO1, BO2, AW, BO3, IW, and now WW2. Now this zombies mode doesn't beat Treyach Zombies, theirs will always be my favorite out of all of the CoDs. However zombies is still fun, especially with friends. Sledgehammer did a good job with the map (The Final Reich), zombies can come out of no where and they actually look terrifying, yet they can even scare you at times. I wish there were more maps to play on but I guess we will just have to wait for more DLC.

    Micro Transactions - Micro-transactions has been in almost every multiplayer game, Overwatch, Rainbow 6 Siege, Battlefront 2, and more. It's not surprising that Call of Duty: WW2 has micro-transactions, however I see no point of complaining about micro-transactions and here's why. You don't need it. They're just cosmetics for you to wear or use on your guns, and you don't need DLC weapons to be good in a game. To be good in a game, you must be skillful, yes I understand that some CoD players might just sit in corners just to wait for you but here's a solution, throw a grenade to get them out of there. even if they have a DLC weapon or not, they will lose most likely. It's not like Star Wars Battlefront 2 where you get a hero and you become more powerful. Plus people feel the need to get it and the only way to get it is to buy it.... well here's where they're wrong, you don't need to buy items in a game to be good, most likely Sledgehammer is gonna make it so you can spend your Armory Credits on collections to get a DLC weapon and they're not that hard to get. You can complete contracts that will grant you a free supply drop or armory credits or you can be lucky and get a free Rare Supply Drop by the end of the game. So stop complaining, you don't NEED to buy them.

    Issues -
    Maps are tiny (Not that bad though)
    Some guns are weak (like the Shotguns or some SMGs)
    Not enough maps (Only about 9 playable maps, 3 War Maps)
    XP not working correctly
    Disconnected by the end of the game
    Party not working correctly (Sometimes it will kick you out or you will see a black screen until the next game starts)

    Other than that I gave CoD WW2 a 8/10, not a great launch but it is a great game, boot on the ground is back, fun game, I would give it a try.    … Expand
  34. NopdAuron
    Nov 23, 2017
    8
    I don't understand all the hate here. Yes, the servers were bad at launch but oh well. Call of Duty is finally back to its roots with World War 2 and boots on the ground. The single player is great and worth a try. The multiplayer is pretty good and so is the zombies.
  35. manuto2002
    Dec 30, 2017
    8
    1317/5000
    I have been playing Call of Duty since Black Ops 3 and I have never seen a game with such an atmosphere, it is simply fantastic and complements very well with the style of game that the game provides (frenetism and non-stop).
    In the campaign I have noticed a step forward for the next games of the saga (not extremely large but if remarkable) with the incorporation of point and    1317/5000
    I have been playing Call of Duty since Black Ops 3 and I have never seen a game with such an atmosphere, it is simply fantastic and complements very well with the style of game that the game provides (frenetism and non-stop).
    In the campaign I have noticed a step forward for the next games of the saga (not extremely large but if remarkable) with the incorporation of point and click and some decision making. This can please people or otherwise but personally to me I liked it despite not having seen it before in a COD. The plot is quite simple but you always get to enjoy it and in some cases get fondness for certain characters. One of the things that I do not like in this way is the duration of the campaign that goes around 5 or 6 hours but if you are a normal player and even a normal rhythm you can reach 9 hours. The campaign lets you do a lot of things like driving and I think they use the concept of WWII very well note of the campaign 8

    Regarding the Multiplayer I have already played about 15 hours and I can notice that it is quite addictive and the formula is to relay the same as always. That's why it's fun but the same again and again note the multi 8

    With the zombies I have tried them and it seems easier than in previous ones and it is a fun fiente note 7

    final note 7    … Expand
  36. DoritoFan80
    Jan 7, 2018
    8
    It might be another call of duty game , but this one returns to how it should've been always (in WW2).Great graphics , mediocre story and same for the gameplay , the multiplayer is ok and same to the sound itself.
  37. Critchy
    Dec 10, 2017
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I enjoyed this game, especially in the context of the underwhelming COD games of the past few years. I have so far only played the single-player, although I have watched videos of people playing the MP and it looks fun- but I'll restrict my comments to the campaign.
    First off, the campaign is largely back to basics and this, for me, is a good thing. Gimmicks like missions spent driving a tank or a plane are there, but kept to a minimum. In the main, missions are you and your platoon engaging in advancing towards and objective through waves of enemies with a few enjoyable stealth segments in the mix. This is what I want from a FPS game. I just want an enjoyable combat experience, no gimmicks, no clunky vehicle missions, just fun FPS action- and, in the main this is what COD WWII delivers. (Although there are still annoyingly clunky vehicle sections (but short ones at least)).

    The story of the game was also quite enjoyable for me. I liked the characters, the weren't as 1 dimensional as other COD characters have been, I actually cared whether Zussman survives or not. Indeed the fact that your platoon members all have tangible roles and utility (i.e. one can give you health packs, another one gives ammo, another spots enemies) made it for once feel like in a FPS game I'm not winning the war all on my own.

    I also thought that the graphics of the game were better than previous COD games, which I felt had produced largely 'same-old, same-old' graphics. This game looked more detailed and vibrant, for a change- although it could be argued that COD still lags behind other FPS games in this regard.

    Turning to negatives, going back to my earlier point- there are still clunky gimmick missions- for example the driving the tank section where you're expected to drive a tank in FP perspective, whilst operating the gun and not getting stuck. The problem is that the vehicle controls are always clunky in games not centred around vehicles, thus sections spent flying planes or driving tanks just end up feeling frustrating and gimmicky. The mission where you deliver the briefcase, although arguably gimmicky as well, involved stealth elements which I found quite enjoyable in this game. Thus it was mainly the driving missions which irked me.

    In this game sledgehammer have changed melee hits. In previous COD games (as far as I can recall) melee hits are one hit knife kills. In this game this is only true of stealth melee kills from behind, when you rush an enemy and melee attack you hit them with the butt of your gun, this only stuns enemies at full health. As someone who enjoys classic COD games, I personally want a game that stays true to the basic mechanics of those games. What made this COD enjoyable for me was that it was more similar to classic COD in some ways (i.e. returning to BOTG). However, changing the melee kills, and also removing health regen from campaign seemed pointless- if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    I also found that there were some glitches in the campaign, particularly I found that heroic actions, where you drag a wounded teammate back to cover would often not resolve themselves when I got the person to the cover spot. By that I mean my character would not set the wounded teammate down when I got to the spot I was meant to get them to. Also I found that sometimes I would be desperately trying to get off of a turret and my character would not do so not matter what I did.

    Finally, if you are going to include gimmicky driving missions, try to make the controls not absolutely unbearably clunky.

    Overall, I enjoyed this game (the single-player, at least). It returned to a more classic COD formula- with missions that were standard COD-type missions, nothing crazily innovate but highly enjoyable for me. The world and characters were immersive, the story kept me relatively engaged, with only a few glitches and gimmicks putting a damper on an fun experience. I will almost certainly play this campaign again. In summary, if you enjoyed the campaigns of the previous BOTG COD games, then I'd say you'll enjoy this one. As for the MP, you'll have to read other reviews, because as I said at the start of this review I haven't played it yet.    … Expand
  38. Maxttvd
    Jun 18, 2020
    8
    CoD WW2 tem excelente campanha e multiplayer e co-op que ficam no meio termo de bons e medianos, mesmo sendo o melhor disponível no PS4 depois de BO3.
  39. TheJohn1105
    Dec 23, 2017
    8
    The game has a nice and immersing campaign, a very interesting zombies mode and a multiplayer that tries to innovate, removing trademark components, like the 3 perk tier system, and going for a different approach towards the Class creation, with the new Divisions. It might resemble other recent shooters in many ways, but Sledgehammer didnt have many ways to please the fanbase, so theyThe game has a nice and immersing campaign, a very interesting zombies mode and a multiplayer that tries to innovate, removing trademark components, like the 3 perk tier system, and going for a different approach towards the Class creation, with the new Divisions. It might resemble other recent shooters in many ways, but Sledgehammer didnt have many ways to please the fanbase, so they played safe and created an engaging experience in general.… Expand
  40. KnightReviews
    Dec 28, 2017
    8
    Another year, another Call of Duty title. However, this year, we see a return to form for the series as it goes back to its "boots on the ground," World War II-era that helped define it as the gold standard for console first-person shooters. Once again, this title offers three main ways to play the game, offering a campaign mode, an online multiplayer component, and the co-op survival NaziAnother year, another Call of Duty title. However, this year, we see a return to form for the series as it goes back to its "boots on the ground," World War II-era that helped define it as the gold standard for console first-person shooters. Once again, this title offers three main ways to play the game, offering a campaign mode, an online multiplayer component, and the co-op survival Nazi Zombies mode. Appropriately enough, each section will be reviewed separately, and finally summarized as one whole package.

    History buffs will fall in love with what the campaign of WWII. The story follows American soldier Private Red Daniels and his journey with his platoon through the Western Front. For those hoping to see the war in the Pacific, I am sad to say that the campaign does not explore that aspect of the war. What is easily noticed is the feeling of the war that is captured quite well through the campaign, as the first mission has Daniels and crew storming the beaches of Normandy on D-Day. The gruesome nature of battle along with the horrific cries of falling soldiers paints a larger picture of the war altogether. The sound and graphical capabilities of WWII make it one of the best looking games of the year. Throughout the story, players will visit a variety of areas, including war-torn towns, German embassies, and snow-covered forests. The variety in location reminds players that progress is being made on the Western Front, and gives a breath of fresh air. The weapons look and sound how they do to their real life counterparts, clearly the developers did their homework on the weapons and equipment used during this time. This year, the campaign introduces squad abilities. Essentially, killing enemies translates into receiving health packs and ammunition from squad mates, providing a feeling of teamwork with AI companions. The story itself is where WWII falls short, however. Red Daniels and his squad are not the most interesting characters, and while the Axis Powers are certainly the enemies, there is no strong central villain for this more concentrated tale about a squad trying to survive the war. The campaign should take about six hours to complete, with replay value through discovering collectibles and attempting to beat the game on a higher difficulty.

    Zombies mode returns and is as strong as ever. Titled "The Third Reich," players have to fend off multiple waves of the undead in an attempt to get the highest round count. Players that are strong at multitasking and working together will be drawn to this mode, and the addition of custom loadouts, objectives, and secrets to discover make the replay value for this mode very high. For those patient and skilled enough, there are many secrets to uncover around the map, as well as an easter egg to complete that has become a staple of the Call of Duty Zombies mode.

    Finally, the multiplayer. Call of Duty is famous (or infamous to some) for its solid multiplayer gameplay. Even though the series returned to its roots, the developers at Sledgehammer Games made several changes to how this year's game is played. Create a Class is gone this year, and players now choose divisions to play. Divisions are essentially playstyles that help determine how one plays the game, with each having their own drawbacks and strengths. Choose the Airborne division to rush objectives or flank quickly around the enemy, or decide on the Armored division to set up at a location and hold down lanes. Divisions is an attempt to give more defined roles to players. Perks are replaced as well this year, with one basic training slot being chosen. Paired with a player's division, basic trainings provide a bit more variety to class customization. The loss of the perk system does hinder the experience a bit, though. While customization seems to be simpler, the basic training perks do not encourage a lot of experimentation, making more predictable customization. Gone are the days where players wait in lobbies until their next match begins with the introduction of Headquarters, a player hub where supply drops can be opened, orders can be undertaken, and players can engage in one-on-one combat (my personal favorite). These changes give players a stronger connection to their in game characters, and makes ranking up more meaningful. Supply drops also make a return, but the items earned do not impact in-game statistics of the weapons. Instead, all of the items are cosmetic or XP-based, which I am sure many fans of the series will be happy to hear about. The weakest part of the multiplayer is the map design. The game ships with a total of ten maps, but most of the maps feel unmemorable, at least for the good reasons. New players may find these maps difficult to navigate, as experienced players can position themselves in arguably unfair positions oftentimes.

    Call of Duty: WWII is a strong addition to the series, and gives a lot of bang for one's buck. The return to the series roots is welcoming.    … Expand
  41. ShadowForce
    Apr 23, 2018
    8
    I personally enjoyed the game quite a lot. With this being said I also had a lot of issues with this game. Some of these were the maps aren’t the best, aren’t enough guns, killstreaks aren’t great, and the loot boxes are my biggest complaint. I overall enjoy the multiplayer and campaign even with all the criticisms.
  42. bersi84
    Jun 8, 2020
    8
    I only rate this game for the solo campaign, so please be aware of that. The game is brilliant (as most CoD solo campaigns are) when it comes to cinematography, scenery, atmosphere and scripted precision events but in my opinion lacks a little bit by sometimes frustrating QTE sequences and a tad bit too much of war glory. I still have to admit it is impressive how the developers caught upI only rate this game for the solo campaign, so please be aware of that. The game is brilliant (as most CoD solo campaigns are) when it comes to cinematography, scenery, atmosphere and scripted precision events but in my opinion lacks a little bit by sometimes frustrating QTE sequences and a tad bit too much of war glory. I still have to admit it is impressive how the developers caught up what must have been one of the worlds darkest times.

    I played this on a PS4 Pro with SSD and I can say there were no framedrops, bluescreens, bugs or long loading times. The game engine provides an intense and brilliant game feeling even facial animations are top notch in this one. Weapons lack a little bit and some weapon handling could be improved. The campaign progresses throughout 12 missions that will take you busy for around 7hrs. Gameplay is covered by quick time events (which are imho more frustrating then useful) and very well made cutscenes.

    The world is fittingly dark but the developers were able to bring in diversity with different characters, emotional bonds and nice locations you have to visit not forgetting what it means to be out on the battlefield.

    Afterall if you buy it only for the campaign it might be a bit pricey but once again this campaign proves to be very worthy in my opinion.    … Expand
  43. madmorningstar
    Sep 18, 2018
    8
    HONEST REVIEW

    I don't understand how has it got a 4.2 rating in the user score...I played the game in summer of this year and it is safe to say that the game was mind blowing.. it really gave me the experience of being in ww2. the medical kit function I did not like 2 much but it was essential to the game so that the players could have the ww2 experience. there is no denying that the    HONEST REVIEW

    I don't understand how has it got a 4.2 rating in the user score...I played the game in summer of this year and it is safe to say that the game was mind blowing.. it really gave me the experience of being in ww2. the medical kit function I did not like 2 much but it was essential to the game so that the players could have the ww2 experience. there is no denying that the graphics and visuals have never better then this one in the whole call of duty series.    … Expand
  44. Sanel00
    May 18, 2019
    8
    This game has a pretty good story mixed with a lot of action, good characters and the return to the origins with the health is something magic but, you know, crazy and too
  45. Nameless2131
    Feb 6, 2020
    8
    8/10 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  46. Rockygun1232
    Oct 4, 2019
    8
    The campaign is amazing, while it is a little basic it's definitely worth the 60 price. However the Multiplayer is lacking with small maps and awful sounding guns it's disappointing. Zombies is fun but feels more like a fetch-quest than survival
  47. POPEST
    Oct 29, 2019
    8
    Campaign: 8/10 (Not a bad campaign. Probably the best come from a cod game in years. But the thing is, it's a campaign. You play it once or twice, it's really not a big deal to me.)
    Multiplayer: 9/10 (Really great. I really enjoy the multiplayer experience. Especially the Shipment 1944 map.)
    Zombies: 7/10 (I guess it's an OK game mode that they put out. But not as great as the ones    Campaign: 8/10 (Not a bad campaign. Probably the best come from a cod game in years. But the thing is, it's a campaign. You play it once or twice, it's really not a big deal to me.)
    Multiplayer: 9/10 (Really great. I really enjoy the multiplayer experience. Especially the Shipment 1944 map.)
    Zombies: 7/10 (I guess it's an OK game mode that they put out. But not as great as the ones Treyarch or Infinite Ward Made in BO2-4 and Infinite Warfare. Maybe it's because I like fantasy looking games.)    … Expand
  48. joel_tdl
    Jun 23, 2020
    8
    Reseña de la Campaña.
    JUGABILIDAD:
    Bastante buena, aunque un poco repetitiva. Existen algunas misiones que pretenden darle un aire fresco al shooter, y son buenas y bastante entretenidas. Aunque tampoco es para alardear. Todo el tiempo hay acción desenfrenada, y algunas partes puntuales podemos pasarlas con sigilo. La narrativa es espectacular, pero muy inconsistente. Cada misión    Reseña de la Campaña.
    JUGABILIDAD:
    Bastante buena, aunque un poco repetitiva.
    Existen algunas misiones que pretenden darle un aire fresco al shooter, y son buenas y bastante entretenidas. Aunque tampoco es para alardear.

    Todo el tiempo hay acción desenfrenada, y algunas partes puntuales podemos pasarlas con sigilo.

    La narrativa es espectacular, pero muy inconsistente. Cada misión se siente como un mini juego y no como parte de una obra, lo cual afecta la experiencia en general. Tal vez si fuera un poco más largo se solucionarían los huecos, pero eso haría del juego AÚN MÁS repetitivo.

    La verdad es que es entretenido.

    GRÁFICOS:
    La narrativa es excelsa, y cada cinemática se disfruta como un proyecto completo en sí misma. Claro que con el problema del que ya hablaba.
    Así mismo, he de decir que aquellas en primera persona me han parecido superiores a cuando podemos ver al protagonista. Y eso es otro de los ejemplos sobre la inconsistencia del juego.

    Dentro del juego, el apartado gráfico es decente, con una buena ambientación y nivel de detalle. No obstante, todo es meramente un adorno puesto que hay realmente pocas cosas con las que interactuar.

    La gama de colores es acertada y se disfruta bien. La dirección de cámaras es muy buena y, en resumen, es un juego muy cinemático.

    SONIDO:
    Tiene algunas piezas decentes, pero realmente son opacadas por los "ruidos de guerra". No es precisamente malo, pero pudo ser mejor. Supongo.
    Es su apartado más descuidado, pero dada la temática tampoco es que perdamos demasiado.

    INNOVACIÓN:
    Es un shooter más. Uno entre miles.    … Expand
  49. MCShootsa
    May 31, 2020
    8
    First game, that made me to join multipleer game. Zombi mose is really great and hardcore one
  50. BerkeKk
    Apr 2, 2020
    8
    Oyunun görselleri,hikayesi ve mekaniği çok güzel!
    ama oyunu sadece bir kere oynayabildim, tekrar tekrar oynanacak bir oyun değil
  51. rcoberle54
    Jan 23, 2021
    8
    The campaign is everything you come to expect with a game like this. Completely generic but totally well executed. The single player story is fine but ultimately a meh experience. But when you combine it with the refreshed zombie mode and the "more fun than you expected" multi-player you have a really well rounded game and a solid 8/10. This is the first COD I've really played in nearly aThe campaign is everything you come to expect with a game like this. Completely generic but totally well executed. The single player story is fine but ultimately a meh experience. But when you combine it with the refreshed zombie mode and the "more fun than you expected" multi-player you have a really well rounded game and a solid 8/10. This is the first COD I've really played in nearly a decade and I forgot how fun they can be. I think the secret is giving yourself a buffer. I burnt myself out on them and this was a refreshing reminder of why I played them so much in college.… Expand
  52. Electrohead
    May 31, 2020
    8
    The campaign is more memorable than many of the other Call of Duty games I have played and manages to put you into quite a few interesting combat situations.

    Multiplayer is a lot of fun, with the 'War' mode being a highlight. Having longer battles with multiple game types built-in makes for a more interesting multiplayer experience. I just wish there were more maps for 'War' in the base    The campaign is more memorable than many of the other Call of Duty games I have played and manages to put you into quite a few interesting combat situations.

    Multiplayer is a lot of fun, with the 'War' mode being a highlight. Having longer battles with multiple game types built-in makes for a more interesting multiplayer experience. I just wish there were more maps for 'War' in the base game. The only major gripe with multiplayer is that the cosmetic items come across super tacky; but thankfully you can choose to ignore them.    … Expand
  53. WudzZalesia
    Jun 12, 2020
    8
    For a free PS Plus game, campaign was pretty good. I didn't touch the multiplayer, but i had a great time with the campaign. And the zombie's mode is a quite good couche coop mode imo.
  54. Skurttish
    Jul 22, 2020
    8
    This is only a review for the single player campaign, because that’s all I played. I thought it had a good story, one that you remember after it’s done, and the gameplay was satisfying. I enjoyed the feel of the rifles, and it felt like an accomplishment when each enemy fell because they don’t take many shots if you aim well, and that gives your shots weight. Although the story is short,This is only a review for the single player campaign, because that’s all I played. I thought it had a good story, one that you remember after it’s done, and the gameplay was satisfying. I enjoyed the feel of the rifles, and it felt like an accomplishment when each enemy fell because they don’t take many shots if you aim well, and that gives your shots weight. Although the story is short, it isn’t too short—I enjoyed it.… Expand
  55. srinu634
    Jun 26, 2020
    8
    Campaign only review:
    This is my first COD game and I loved it. The campaign is short and not too long. Making it perfect to end the game before it started becoming repetitive and boring. The graphics are amazing and the sound is great too. I honestly haven't played other COD games and I also see a lot negative reviews here.I cannot compare with other COD games but this one had pretty    Campaign only review:
    This is my first COD game and I loved it. The campaign is short and not too long. Making it perfect to end the game before it started becoming repetitive and boring. The graphics are amazing and the sound is great too. I honestly haven't played other COD games and I also see a lot negative reviews here.I cannot compare with other COD games but this one had pretty good graphics and was a great game to play.    … Expand
  56. BOGOMEGO49
    Jul 17, 2020
    8
    La storia è semplicemente fantastica, molto commovente e ti fa sentire dentro il gioco, unica pecca: i personaggi non vengono "focussati".
    Il multiplayer mi sembra abbastanza normale, nella media
  57. bartiken
    Nov 19, 2020
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Best call of duty in last years. I don't understand hate of it. It have a problems but is still very good game… Expand
  58. thiagosrdg
    Dec 6, 2020
    8
    Me diverti no jogo porém o modo história é muito curto e senti falta de maior variedade de armas durante a campanha do jogo, até por que eu prefiro jogar offline e aproveitar a história dos games. O modo zombies é legal mas não supera o modo zombies do black ops 2. E no modo multiplayer online demora muito pra desbloquear as armas e acessórios o que torna a experiência um pouco frustrante.Me diverti no jogo porém o modo história é muito curto e senti falta de maior variedade de armas durante a campanha do jogo, até por que eu prefiro jogar offline e aproveitar a história dos games. O modo zombies é legal mas não supera o modo zombies do black ops 2. E no modo multiplayer online demora muito pra desbloquear as armas e acessórios o que torna a experiência um pouco frustrante. A nota é 8/10 por que apesar das críticas eu pude me divertir jogando a campanha e a temática da segunda guerra mundial é muito interessante.… Expand
  59. RTCWFAN
    Jun 21, 2023
    8
    Solid COD with nice multiplayer, cool story and great action. One of my favourites. Overall rating: 7.7.
  60. AntonL1kesPotat
    Jul 14, 2021
    8
    I bought this game from a second hand store like every other game for like 15€-10€ and it was worth it in my opinion: decent storyline (not that good but still), nice mechanics and other things though this game can get very annoying at times.
  61. nfs7379
    Sep 4, 2022
    8
    8/10.......................................................................
  62. ArekSuzme
    Oct 4, 2022
    8
    Maybe not a masterpiece but one of the best COD's for me. Great acting, pretty good characters, perfect story and a magnificent ending. I have finished the campaign 3 times and probably will do again a few times more.
  63. AliciaGiraldo
    Apr 12, 2023
    8
    Bon jeu mais grand manque de contenue gratuit sur le mode zombie et sans parler du mode histoire un peu trop court
  64. JuanMS
    Aug 20, 2023
    8
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
  65. FrankCreeper
    Jul 28, 2023
    8
    A great return back to the origins for the franchise,the gameplay is very similar to others CoD the graphic is improved but the awesome in this is the campain C.o.D. WWII has a very cool campain mode,multiplayer is very different compared to others and is very cool to play for the zombie mode is seem very too easy to play but is still good play it with friend
  66. Harthik69
    Jul 9, 2023
    8
    Very Good game. Can spend some time to play and exeprience it again. Download and give it a try again in future
  67. TheQuietGamer
    Nov 24, 2018
    7
    Call of Duty goes back to its World War 2 roots. A return to form that will be welcomed by anyone tired of wall running and jet packs. This back-to-basics approach is comfortable as an old shoe, but the new additions are hit-or-miss and the lack of risks taken won't do anything to win back those who found the series to have gotten stale some time ago.

    The campaign: Sledgehammer Games    Call of Duty goes back to its World War 2 roots. A return to form that will be welcomed by anyone tired of wall running and jet packs. This back-to-basics approach is comfortable as an old shoe, but the new additions are hit-or-miss and the lack of risks taken won't do anything to win back those who found the series to have gotten stale some time ago.

    The campaign:
    Sledgehammer Games shows once again that they're almost as good at telling stories as the team at Treyarch. With the exception of the protagonist (whose voice actor has some trouble maintaining his southern accent), I actually cared about the characters. I wasn't a big fan of the gameplay changes though. The removal of recharging health for a limited bar that you need to keep an eye on is at odds with the chaotic nature of the action where bullets come at you from every direction. The new squad system where your AI teammates can resupply you with ammo and first aid kits is interesting, but not fleshed out enough to have any real impact. While I was invested in the story actually playing through it wasn't something I enjoyed all that much.

    Zombies:
    I think WWII actually has one of the best iterations of the fan favorite cooperative mode. The new tone and setting are really creepy giving it a distinct vibe. All of the abilities, power-ups, and single use skills will be easier for newcomers to wrap their heads around than they were in Black Ops 3. While this change may not sit well with some, I love the addition of regularly updated goals for the sense of direction they give. Of course playing with randoms isn't ideal. Especially if you or they don't have a mic. This is still a mode that is at its strongest with friends.

    Multiplayer:
    The biggest portion of the package and the thing that's kept this franchise alive. It's where you'll feel the effects of the return to boots-on-the-ground style gameplay the most. With the removal of all the movement systems introduced over the years as the series pushed further and further into the future this really does feel like playing old school CoD. The new War mode can be quite a bit of fun with each map offering different objectives for teams to complete in order to win the match. It adds some nice variety, but can be a little unbalanced at times with certain objectives giving one side a clear advantage over the other. The Hub is kind of an odd addition. Giving you a place to interact with other players. It has its amusements, but for the most part I never used it.

    The loot box system is understandably controversial as it has led to the inclusion of microtransactions. They are totally frivolous though as all they offer are cosmetic options. They're given out at random and you can earn them by completing "contracts" that require you to complete certain challenges. You can even get specific things you want with the easy to amass in-game currency by going to the Hub. So you'll never feel pressured to spend any money on them. Personally, I kind of like them as they mean I don't have to hit some crazy goal just to get a stupid charm or skin for my guns.

    Newcomers and longtime fans alike are going to face a bit of a learning curve when it comes to navigating WWII's confusing mess of menus. I don't know why Sledgehammer decided to ditch the sleak, easy to figure out layout of previous CoD titles, but it wasn't a smart move. Its the kind of thing that helped put Medal of Honor: Warfighter in a very early grave and has kept me from ever sticking with a Battlefield game for too long. I also encountered a startling amount of disconnects from matches. The stability is quite questionable given the meaty update sizes.

    Technical:
    Patch sizes are something Sledgehammer really needs to work on. I've been able to get every update put out for all of both Treyarch's and Infinity Ward's entries in the series over the years without ever having to worry about whether or not I had enough space for them. Here though I had to clear out a nice chunk of memory to make room. This was in issue for Advanced Warfare as well and I abandoned that game because of it.

    Conclusion:
    If you've wanted to see the series return to a more grounded style of play that's free of laser beams and robots then this is the CoD for you. Sledgehammer has tried to add some defining changes to the mix with varying degrees of success. Overall though this is another solid addition to the franchise and a sign that perhaps we haven't seen everything this conflict has to offer.

    7.9/10    … Expand
  68. Gaz
    Nov 12, 2020
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'm going to be as fair and balanced as I possibly can with this game. It's completely average in just about every way. Honestly, this is the video game equivalent of a failing student getting a C- minus and the teachers all say how good he is. The bar was set so low that it looks good by comparison.

    The campaign was something I found enjoyable, but suffers from archaic design choices. It felt like I was playing Call of Duty 2 or 3, and while I enjoyed some of the nostalgia and simplicity of it all, I was constantly reminding myself that this was a 2017 release that cost millions of dollars to make and promised a return to form while pushing boundaries, and the game failed to deliver in that regard. Worse still, where the game goes over-the-top with it are the most immersion-breaking parts of the story. There's seriously a scene where you sneak into a Nazi camp with suppressed SMG's ( the stealth sequences are terrible, by the way) and later in that same level, you chase a train and flip your vehicle sideways in front of it and end up grinding against the train before it eventually derails and you fly out of your jeep. A lot of the game doesn't feel like WWII and instead feels like a weird pseudo-WWII. Honestly, the only way I got through it and found myself having fun was by acting like it was Inglorious Basterds The Game. Seriously guys, take this campaign with a grain of salt and try to treat it like a war movie and just enjoy the ride because if you're looking for a realistic or immersive experience, you won't find it here. It's a good campaign, but only if you appreciate it with the right mindset. If you're like me and you loved World at War, this game's campaign won't be dethroning it.

    Multiplayer made me keep reminding myself that, once again, this was a multi-million dollar franchise because the multiplayer is about as basic as it gets. You get all the modes that come in traditional CoD fare with a few additions like the War mode which really just boils down to, "Defenders camp and attackers shove their bodies into objectives and ruin their K/D." But the maps are basic, bland, and uninspired and the weapon selection is mostly acceptable at best. Again, this multiplayer is easily 10x better than Infinite Warfare's, but that's barely saying anything. I truly felt like I was playing a lesser shooter made by a smaller developer instead of a powerhouse franchise. It's pitiful, actually.

    The zombies, however, is something I enjoy for the most part. It's familiar enough to draw me in, yet different enough to feel unique. The map is huge, the zombies have different movement patterns than the other CoD games, there's different zombie types, and catalogued objectives that guide you on a path. I feel like this game gives you the tools to last longer and it feels like the devs want you to survive and see it through if you can figure out what you're doing. There's a story there, and it peaks your interest.

    But one of the areas this game stumbles in is the accuracy department. Suppressed weapons, manually reloading M1 Garands, red dot sights, incendiary bullets, and NO FREAKING SWASTIKAS in multiplayer really hold this game back. Because Nazi zombies with a bunch of iron crosses draped on everything doesn't look anywhere near as sinister as it should. In fact, just to mock the absurdity of this game's political correctness, my multiplayer soldier is a black woman who's calling card is Normandy beach with a gay pride flag raised on it. Seriously. These are things Sledgehammer put in their game about WWII, folks. And speaking of things put in the game, the microtransactions and the season pass are back and just as prevalent as ever, and given the fact that Activision recently patented methods to shove them down our throats even more, it seems that they're going to be content to alienate their fans and bleed whoever's left dry until the cash cow can't be milked any further.

    At the end of the day, Call of Duty WWII is strictly average in every way. It's by no means a terrible game, but it never comes close to greatness, either. This will be a game relegated to the dead center of every CoD ranking list, and that's where it belongs. If you need to wash the taste of Infinite Warfare out of your mouth and want that CoD experience you can't get elsewhere, this game is for you. As for me, this is a game I'd buy on sale for about 20 bucks because that's all I feel it's worth. But if you're looking for historical shooters, Battlefield 1 is a much better game and there are plenty of other first-person shooters on the market that outclass this one. Like I said, it's a C- grade from a failing student. It's good compared to its last few outings alone, and that's not saying much.    … Expand
  69. PictoPirate
    Jul 27, 2020
    7
    Call of Duty: WWII is exactly what you'd expect from a Call of Duty game. Big production values, bombastic set-pieces and all the shooty shooting you can stomach.

    The combat is as good as ever, the weapons feel meaty and satisfying and there is a decent amount of variety in weapons to keep things interesting. The graphics are good, as you'd expect from a CoD game. The story is decent    Call of Duty: WWII is exactly what you'd expect from a Call of Duty game. Big production values, bombastic set-pieces and all the shooty shooting you can stomach.

    The combat is as good as ever, the weapons feel meaty and satisfying and there is a decent amount of variety in weapons to keep things interesting. The graphics are good, as you'd expect from a CoD game.

    The story is decent and brilliantly acted, if a little one dimensional and lacking in any really interesting twists and turns. So, yeah... it's a call of Duty game where you get to shoot Nazis. Nothing groundbreaking but a fun romp while it lasts.

    *I don't care about multiplayer so I can't tell you if that is any good or not.    … Expand
  70. iKen
    Sep 1, 2020
    7
    Played on PS4 Pro.
    Gameplay: GOOD
    Graphic: GREAT
    Story: GOOD
    Music/Sound : GOOD
    Dialogue/Voice Acting: GREAT
  71. gdmatt
    Dec 22, 2017
    7
    The best CoD since Black Ops 2, however given the quality of recent titles, that's not much to brag about. A solid entry that adds nothing of any value to a tried and tired series.
  72. p1menta
    Jul 5, 2018
    7
    same old same old, not bad, but it's still not really fine. the story is cliche and boring and stupid, and the brazillian portuguese voices are terrible, i wish i could at least play this **** in english. i dont ever play the multiplayers
  73. sgy0003
    Nov 5, 2017
    7
    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter ****

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter ****

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are fun it only lasts about 15-20 min as part of a mission, and NOT as a whole mission. Espionage while entertaining, it's easy enough for anyone with basic stealth instincts can plow through. And Stealth.....oh my god, it sucks. There is so much stealth in this game. You'd think that would be nice taking a break from full frontal combat, but these stealth sections are annoyingly paced. I was expecting a brother-in-arms type of bonding with my npc comrades, but that never happened.

    Multiplayer is also a lot better, but still kinda the same. We finally don't have jet-packs and futuristic abilities, so the gameplay is much more grounded (literally). It's still only fun when you are the one kicking asses, but you'll still be plagued with cheap shots, 6-year olds who apparently did your mother, and **** who are better than you. Oh and lootboxes, while unnecessary, shows the greedy corperate **** side of Activision in a full force.

    If you are looking to get COD, WWII is the game I'd recommend(sorta). The game looks great, campaign has its moments, and multiplayer as always needs some serious balancing.    … Expand
  74. martyisruling
    Nov 11, 2017
    7
    The Game as a whole is good, but not Great. It looks and plays amazing. The Campaign is great, but it's short. That's pretty much the theme with this COD. The new War mode is pretty solid. The problem is there are few maps all around in multiplayer in general. Unless you want to pay $50 for the season pass. So, before you buy this game you have to ask yourself, is $60 too much to pay forThe Game as a whole is good, but not Great. It looks and plays amazing. The Campaign is great, but it's short. That's pretty much the theme with this COD. The new War mode is pretty solid. The problem is there are few maps all around in multiplayer in general. Unless you want to pay $50 for the season pass. So, before you buy this game you have to ask yourself, is $60 too much to pay for half a game? Is the full game worth $100? Next year there will be another COD, and players will migrate over. Buyer beware.… Expand
  75. psylife
    Nov 15, 2017
    7
    A well-paced piece of Zionist propaganda. Despite being cheesy, cliche, and misleading in its depiction of the events, it still manages to delight thanks to solid and varied game-play mechanics and an expertly designed single player campaign.
  76. Voodoo123
    Oct 15, 2019
    7
    +Exceptional visual quality/animations
    +Great cast
    +Excellent level design -Predictable set pieces -Extremely linear experience There was alot of big talk from the devs leading up to the release suggesting a reinvention of the COD game design, sadly this was not the case just more of the same in a new skin - that isnt a flaw as the formula is still successful here, just    +Exceptional visual quality/animations
    +Great cast
    +Excellent level design
    -Predictable set pieces
    -Extremely linear experience

    There was alot of big talk from the devs leading up to the release suggesting a reinvention of the COD game design, sadly this was not the case just more of the same in a new skin - that isnt a flaw as the formula is still successful here, just disappointing that more couldn't be done to push the franchise forwards given the IMO extremely entertaining (but poorly received) infinite warfare. COD WW2 is a great but not ground breaking game (review as based on SP not MP).    … Expand
  77. Paragon89
    Mar 5, 2018
    7
    Bit of a tough one to review.

    I haven't played COD since BOP2- so cant really judge on the evolution on the next-gen platforms. But based on what I've heard its been a pretty crap Era. Start with the Good. + Visuals Looks grest especially in the campaign. Havent played any of the next-gen era titles but it seems really good. I was happy with that. + Zombies is still good,    Bit of a tough one to review.

    I haven't played COD since BOP2- so cant really judge on the evolution on the next-gen platforms. But based on what I've heard its been a pretty crap Era.

    Start with the Good.
    + Visuals Looks grest especially in the campaign. Havent played any of the next-gen era titles but it seems really good. I was happy with that.

    + Zombies is still good, different but at least its not same old and they actually evolved it. But hasn't become some bloated expanded mess and have managed to keep it feeling fairly simple and ground the classic maps. They have objectives now but are entirely optional. and is better than BOP2 Zombies anyway.

    + More customisation - plenty of customisation if your into that like your character, weapon skins etc

    + War and Headquarters, adds new multiplayer depth. added value and things to do. Tries to bring a story to the multiplayer.

    + Solid Multiplayer experience, not really a plus, but if your used to what they do year in year out, and are happy with that then you know your going to get a solid pick up and play multiplayer experience to fill in your hours when your bored.

    + While I haven't played AW/BOP3/IW so I don't know if they have these features. I really like the addition of Divisions and the new way of doing Perks to create unique combinations.

    Negatives
    - My biggest gripe with COD has always been the respawn system in multiplayer progressively getting worse with each instalment coupled with the average size of maps getting smaller means I often find I have enemies closer to me than allies and usually behind me. There's no logical direction to run in when you spawn. Which with WWII is still broken it seems.

    - Loot crates, that was a obvious one to get on the list. While it doesn't really bother me for COD as its a game where you grab any gun and kill people. I don't really see the need to pay for anything for the core experience. its all mainly cosmetic. and any guns don't really hamper you.

    -value for money , there is less maps at launch and have paid the same price, fair enough there's WAR mode but doesn't really justify it as I imagine its not something the core player base will get involved with. Same with map packs, less for your money.

    Now the personal things that stand out for me

    While COD gains superficial changes each year often depending on who's developing. Some Key features are missing or changed that I miss.

    for example I loved the Support and Specialist Play styles of MF3 it was a great way to help Assist/Support and lone wolves playstyles build a different set of killstreaks/perks and bring changes to the game. While this game kinda has it with divisions and the new Perk system Its something I miss.

    Killstreaks - I know its WW2 so its rooted and limited in technology etc, but Attack Dogs is missing!? I know we have paratroopers but come on! give us more streaks! - there seems to be a general lack of streaks(different streaks as well) to be fair I cant really think of any beyond the dogs that is missing, maybe drop a AI controlled tank on the battlefield that enemy team has to blow up....

    - Rooted is bad in a way - off the back of the last point, while its nice to be simple and go back to the roots, I cant help but feel they have stripped a lot meat from its bones. and while there is a solid core experience it lacks the added value to help with longevity. I feel ive grown tired on this COD instalment a lo faster than I have the others.

    Overall I've given it a 7. Its Classic COD and I love it for that and can pass many hours playing it. its solid and you cant go wrong. however it hasn't evolved as a franchise and doesn't have the added value to make it worth the price. Id give it a 9 if they would fix the respawn system.

    Whats Next? Call of Duty: Chronicle's - a time travelling adventure that features Easters eggs and cameos from all games. and Resets the whole timeline. and the Multiplayer maps is just remastered versions of the top 20 maps of all time.    … Expand
  78. wigclyne
    Nov 22, 2017
    7
    It is great to have boots on the ground again and WW2 is better than Infinite Warfare but the game as whole is a let down. Online connections at launch has been terrible but this has improved but you do not share the barracks anymore . There seems to be few maps but the addition of War mode is a welcome one.

    Story mode is average and a little short but there is a decent amount of    It is great to have boots on the ground again and WW2 is better than Infinite Warfare but the game as whole is a let down. Online connections at launch has been terrible but this has improved but you do not share the barracks anymore . There seems to be few maps but the addition of War mode is a welcome one.

    Story mode is average and a little short but there is a decent amount of scenarios and does have a few great moments.

    Online, microtransactions and it seems a little light on content have let this down. More of WW2 should have been added, it was a world war after all.    … Expand
  79. Termin8ter
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Another year, another Call of Duty game. First off, the engine still needs to be rebuilt completely or shot on the spot, ok? Still using the Quake engine from 99? Really? The art team did a good job though. The gameplay still feels the same as it did ten years ago in Call of Duty 4, despite the massive change in setting. The campaign is quite good, quite lengthy as well. Better thanAnother year, another Call of Duty game. First off, the engine still needs to be rebuilt completely or shot on the spot, ok? Still using the Quake engine from 99? Really? The art team did a good job though. The gameplay still feels the same as it did ten years ago in Call of Duty 4, despite the massive change in setting. The campaign is quite good, quite lengthy as well. Better than Infinite Borefare and BO3's overly complicated plot. It's just a slimmed down, grounded war experience, and that I like. The multiplayer is mostly a very samey Call of Duty multiplayer experience that we have gotten since Modern Warfare, aside from the great new War mode, which is a fantastic addition. But it unfortunately doesn't quite save the multiplayer mode. Zombies. Sledgehammer's last crack at Zombies in AW only proved that only Treyarch could nail it correctly, so I was hoping they could save face here. I like how the mode feels like it's own beast and not a clone of BO3 zombies. The tone is very serious and mature, and that ascends the overly humorous tone of IW's zombies, which is great too. The gunplay itself is quite good, and I liked how the team opted for a proper campaign with horde sections, rather than repeating Treyarch's zombies mode. To be honest, the zombies is probably the best part of World War II. This game is definitely better than Destiny 2, and takes some strong strides in the right direction, but It doesn't earn a purchase at full price. I wouldn't get it for more than 15$.… Expand
  80. PrimalBanana
    Nov 3, 2017
    7
    Another year and another Call of Duty game. This time they've ditched the jetpacks and what not and gone back to their roots. CoD WW2 unsurprisingly takes place during WW2. Trailers shown before release had me actually looking forward to the campaign. In fairness its not terrible but its not exactly engrossing or exciting. We get to play through a story that we've played a thousand timesAnother year and another Call of Duty game. This time they've ditched the jetpacks and what not and gone back to their roots. CoD WW2 unsurprisingly takes place during WW2. Trailers shown before release had me actually looking forward to the campaign. In fairness its not terrible but its not exactly engrossing or exciting. We get to play through a story that we've played a thousand times before. Im struggling to really connect with the chatacters too. Mainly because squad mates are bloody useless in a fire fight leaving it up to me to do everything. The AI is as dim as ever and the dialogue is just a clichè fest. Like i said its not terrible but its certainly not worthy of anything over a 6 or 7 out of 10. The MP is as you'd expect. Solid and tight and raining loot crates. Activision go to extreme legths to try to convince you to part with your cash, its kind of embarassing to be honest. There's even a daily mission to watch 3 people open loot crates in the social space. Gunplay is good, sounds are good and the level design is overall pretty decent. Graphically Call of Duty continues to show its age and as i've said in the past its desperate for a new engine. Certainly a better Call of Duty than we've had in the last few years but its nothing special so dont expect too much except your normal Call of Duty experience.… Expand
  81. PeterAlexander
    Sep 11, 2018
    7
    Call of Duty WWII has an amazing campaign, but it isn't enough to save it from being one of the weaker entries in the series. The online play is disengaging and tarnished by easily forgettable maps and the zombies mode is incredibly lacklustre in comparison to the main Black Ops series entries.
  82. geo333
    Jun 25, 2022
    7
    This game would have gotten a better score by me if it was not for the glitches in the campaign some of them just are soo bad considering I played this game 5 years later after its release, it should have been fixed aside from it, the campaign is fantastic and the multiplayer great as well, if you like ww2 stuff this is a gem, great game.
  83. kylocosplay
    Jul 29, 2020
    7
    Le he puesto un 7 porque la campaña me pareció espectacular, el nivel de gráficos está a nivel del the last of us 2 y las interpretaciones son muy buenas, la campaña te lleva a batallas muy importantes de la SGM como el desembarco de Normandía, la jugabilidad innova como curar mediante botiquines que te lo dan los compañeros o por el mapa, actos heroicos ya sean arrastrar a un soldadoLe he puesto un 7 porque la campaña me pareció espectacular, el nivel de gráficos está a nivel del the last of us 2 y las interpretaciones son muy buenas, la campaña te lleva a batallas muy importantes de la SGM como el desembarco de Normandía, la jugabilidad innova como curar mediante botiquines que te lo dan los compañeros o por el mapa, actos heroicos ya sean arrastrar a un soldado herido para llevarlo a cubierto o salvarlo de un aprieto. Los zombis no están nada mal y el multijugador está muy bien hecho con una lobby donde coger misiones, abrir paquetes de ayuda, duelos 1 vs 1...
    Conclusión, a mi me ha encantado y gracias a PSPlus que lo regalaron lo he podido jugar, el único defecto que tiene el juego es que en mi PS4 PRO los ventiladores se ponen al máximo que incluso a veces me salía el mensaje de sobrecalentamiento, por lo demás todo está muy bien.    … Expand
  84. SleepNot
    Mar 7, 2021
    7
    Call of duty WW2 is a good game. It’s good action without drama and soul :) Good to kill but not very interesting
  85. johnnypxc
    Jan 17, 2018
    7
    Id rate it a 7.8/10 if there were decimals allowed here. Id say it is pretty solid in terms of returning to the classic boots on the ground combat. Its ages better than the last couple cods. The only things I really disliked about it were that id rate the zombies a 6/10 because it has changed too much from the golden day waw-bops 2 era and is far too fast paced, "if it aint broke dont fixId rate it a 7.8/10 if there were decimals allowed here. Id say it is pretty solid in terms of returning to the classic boots on the ground combat. Its ages better than the last couple cods. The only things I really disliked about it were that id rate the zombies a 6/10 because it has changed too much from the golden day waw-bops 2 era and is far too fast paced, "if it aint broke dont fix it", and of course the loot boxes which are hilariously bad, (you always get pistol grips that you cant even see on your gun).… Expand
  86. luckydutch
    Nov 4, 2017
    7
    I don't really get all the hate for this. It's not groundbreakingly innovative but the campaign is interesting and the multiplayer is just classic CoD multiplayer. The microtransactions are FAR less toxic and invasive than the RNG P2W rubbish in the upcoming Battlefront 2. Based on my current experience, I reckon I will unlock every gun within 30-40 hours of online play which is prettyI don't really get all the hate for this. It's not groundbreakingly innovative but the campaign is interesting and the multiplayer is just classic CoD multiplayer. The microtransactions are FAR less toxic and invasive than the RNG P2W rubbish in the upcoming Battlefront 2. Based on my current experience, I reckon I will unlock every gun within 30-40 hours of online play which is pretty reasonable.

    If you like CoD, you'll like this. If you don't like CoD, why are you buying it in the first place?    … Expand
  87. Ubermonkey88
    Nov 6, 2017
    7
    I've seen a lot of varying reviews of COD WW2 but a lot seem to be bashing by fanboys of another franchise or completely biased praise by COD fanboys, so hopefully I can give a bit more of a balanced view.

    I've played most CODs (some for a long time, some VERY briefly) since the very original on PC all those years, and although the return to WW2 does suggest a lack of new ideas etc,    I've seen a lot of varying reviews of COD WW2 but a lot seem to be bashing by fanboys of another franchise or completely biased praise by COD fanboys, so hopefully I can give a bit more of a balanced view.

    I've played most CODs (some for a long time, some VERY briefly) since the very original on PC all those years, and although the return to WW2 does suggest a lack of new ideas etc, it's one of the better recent releases, especially following last year's abysmal Infinite Warfare. The return to WW2 obviously means no jetpacks, double-jumps or futuristic tech that distracted from the actual gunplay, which for now, is a welcome change. There are plenty of issues too, which I will mention below, along with the positives -

    Pros

    - The single player campaign is fun, which is something that can't be said for the past few iterations of COD. It does visit settings and places that have been done in every other WW2 game but it does it with a level of polish that isn't seen in many others. Objectives are varied, so although it is the familiar campaign, it does help mix things up a bit. The introduction of squad mates who provide you with supplies/health packs/support is a nice addition that keeps you on your toes.

    - The multiplayer benefits greatly from the lack of futuristic nonsense (drones, robots, nanobots etc) and is a much more focused experience for it. Because of the WW2 setting, the developers are more restricted in types of weaponry available and the game benefits from it, meaning it''s a bit more balanced and not quite as chaotic as before. It also introduced Headquarters, which is a social hub, not unlike The Tower in Destiny/Destiny 2. It's initially overwhelming but once you get used to it, it's good to be able to run about in and check with vendors while waiting for a game to start.

    - Graphically the campaign looks great. Textures are nice, it's very polished and it all runs very smoothly.

    Cons

    - Graphically, the multiplayer doesn't look great (which is nothing new in COD) especially now that the devs have had a few years with the PS4 (and XBone) kits, which is disappointing. It looks like it could easily be from the last generation of consoles, but I suppose graphics aren't everything.

    - Considering that it's gone back to WW2, it's no surprise there isn't an awful lot of innovation, and nothing that hasn't been seen in other WW2/COD/BF games.

    - The biggest issue at the moment is the servers - at times the online is unplayable due to errors, extremely slow matchmaking (which has been confirmed to be an issue with the servers as opposed to my connection) and completely empty Headquarters hubs. It's completely possible that if you do manage to connect to the online services that you could be sitting in a lobby waiting for a game for 15 minutes - it's that slow. It is assumed that this issue will be fixed with a patch or update very very soon, but it's still shocking that for a game as big and popular as COD that this is such a problem.

    Other points

    - Zombies - it has zombies mode as usual. I don't care, and never have cared for Zombies but if it's something you like, it's there and is pretty much the same as previous Zombies modes in previous games, so if you liked them then yay! If not, it likely won't change your mind.

    Overall, COD WW2 is an enjoyable enough game with a few issues holding it back, none more so than the servers which will hopefully be fixed soon. Definitely worth playing through and having a go on multiplayer - if you loved older CODs (such as 2, 3, Modern Warfare and World at War), then you'll feel right at home. If you don't like COD though, I don't think this will change your mind.    … Expand
  88. thaesino
    Nov 6, 2017
    7
    (Disclaimer: I will not comment on microstransactions, nor take that into account when reviewing this game, as it is our fault, the gamers, that these publishers have gotten away with such things. Placing a bad rating on the Developers' hard work due to the greed of the Publishers and the ignorance of the Players, would not do justice to any of the many AAA titles riddled with(Disclaimer: I will not comment on microstransactions, nor take that into account when reviewing this game, as it is our fault, the gamers, that these publishers have gotten away with such things. Placing a bad rating on the Developers' hard work due to the greed of the Publishers and the ignorance of the Players, would not do justice to any of the many AAA titles riddled with microtransactions or DLC. If you want them out, STOP PAYING FOR THEM. YOU ARE THE ONES PAYING FOR THEM TO BE THERE.)

    Let me make this short and break it down into three sections: Call of Duty: WW2, the game; Call of Duty: WW2, the Comparisons; and, Call of Duty: WW2, the Community.

    --- The Game: This is a game which can be easily scored anywhere between 5 and 8, depending on your mood, on your common sense, on your intelligence, or on your need to defend your purchase of this game, or to attack it in order to defend your purchase of another game (i.e. BF1, Destiny 2). The Campaign is good, albeit short. The MP is exactly like the Beta, plus the usual millions of microtransaction options which just keep getting cleverer and cleverer.

    --- The Comparisons: This game is not BF1. It has great visuals and good voice acting/writing. However, because it is not BF1, it also moves faster, which is great. BECAUSE it moves faster, it does not need to look as good. No one buys a game like this in order to stare at puddles in the mud, that's what games like Horizon: Zero Dawn are for. People compare for various reasons, not the least of which is, they simply don't know what they want anymore... and it is not our fault. Publishers and Critics and even YouTubers swing us left and right (bet they have fun doing it) for the sake of a sale, or for the sake of a sponsorship. In the end, so many people ended up buying Infinite Warfare BECAUSE of MW:RE... so it didn't matter. Activision won. Yay! And so did DICE/EA, because they also bought BF1. And so did Blizzard (Activision's merge), because they also bought Overwatch. And there go more than $180.

    The Community: I'll lay it flat. Go anywhere. Whether here on Meta, or YouTube, or the Activision community, or just on the mics on PS4 and you'll reach the same conclusion I have reached: Call of Duty has been hijacked by children, and this is here to stay. Children, because, well, that is what children do, are not the best at playing well, although if you don't take the game too seriously, you'll be fine, since they are pretty good at just having plain fun in ridiculous ways, without worrying about dying or having their teammates killed, etc etc, and heck... since when did we get so serious about games?

    Enjoy this game if you bought/buy it. That's all I can say. I couldn't enjoy it, but notice my score. My personal experience doesn't change what I see to be a solid COD experience, like in the past with MW and MW2.    … Expand
  89. Berrlett
    May 9, 2018
    7
    Good thing I bought it heavily discounted, going through the campaign its surely no match for BF1 but still enjoyable, the D day landing on French beach was created with saving private Ryan in vision, brutal and unforgiving what follows afterwards is average. Have yet to try the on-line features but if you're here for advice thinking to buy it mine will be yes, at a big discount (somethingGood thing I bought it heavily discounted, going through the campaign its surely no match for BF1 but still enjoyable, the D day landing on French beach was created with saving private Ryan in vision, brutal and unforgiving what follows afterwards is average. Have yet to try the on-line features but if you're here for advice thinking to buy it mine will be yes, at a big discount (something like 50% off)… Expand
  90. Calitoris
    Nov 11, 2017
    7
    People hating the game just because it comes out every year. It's a polished game, runs smooth, but it's just the same good game new skin. It's obviously not a bad game, just a repeating well oiled machine. Single player is short but it's not what everyone plays COD for.
  91. Leandro5an
    Jun 20, 2020
    7
    Hace años que no jugaba un Call of Duty. Me gustó la campaña pero nunca tanto para ponerle una nota verde. En el online no sé para qué pone en franco tiradores si los mapas son super chicos (pequeños).
  92. BSchwarz95
    Nov 14, 2018
    7
    True CoD will always have three pillars to the game: campaign, zombies, and multiplayer. The campaign was okay, the zombies was great, and the multiplayer was an absolute blast. I haven't played a Call of Duty game since MW3, until WWII. I jumped into the multiplayer and loved every second of it. There weren't many maps at the start but that meant that players could completely master theirTrue CoD will always have three pillars to the game: campaign, zombies, and multiplayer. The campaign was okay, the zombies was great, and the multiplayer was an absolute blast. I haven't played a Call of Duty game since MW3, until WWII. I jumped into the multiplayer and loved every second of it. There weren't many maps at the start but that meant that players could completely master their technique and strategy in order to bend the combat to their will. My favorite game mode was easily Hardcore Dom and after reaching master prestige, I still can't get enough of that game mode. The zombies mode felt fresh, too. The easter eggs, mechanics, and story were exciting to spend time with and although it's exactly what you'd expect the zombies mode to be like, I still thoroughly enjoyed it as somebody who never felt interested in playing it at all. And, the campaign. Meh. It was "fine." The story, gameplay, level design, characters, all acceptable with no real emotion or excitement at all. All in all, a lot of fun but the lack of true creative genius makes this a hard recommendation. This is more of a guilty pleasure than anything else.… Expand
  93. kyper007
    Nov 25, 2017
    7
    Играл в call of duty еще с ее начала.Купил магазине так как игра была по скринам на коробке очень похожа на Медаль за отвагу и не прогадал. Новая кола это возвращение к этим самым истокам,довольно удачное.
  94. SeptemberFly
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Call of Duty World War 2 is, well... It's a Call of Duty game. I haven't played a call of duty game since black ops 2, so it's been a good bit since I've played one of these games so this review is coming from someone with an outside perspective. Playing this game after a long break from the series, it still feels very much the same as when I stopped playing the series. The changes inCall of Duty World War 2 is, well... It's a Call of Duty game. I haven't played a call of duty game since black ops 2, so it's been a good bit since I've played one of these games so this review is coming from someone with an outside perspective. Playing this game after a long break from the series, it still feels very much the same as when I stopped playing the series. The changes in multiplayer feel very minor, as the experience felt about the same to me as it has always been. The only changes to multiplayer that I really noticed is that there's a hub area in multiplayer that you're in before going into a match and that transitioning to new matches feels a lot more seamless than it used to. However, the changes that were made are probably feel a lot more important to a hardcore call of duty fan than it was to me. The zombies mode in the game is very fun to play with friends. I didn't play too much of it, but the time I had with it was fun and I was surprised that they actually made a campaign out of it. The strongest part of Call of Duty WW2 to me was the main campaign. It feels like the Call of Duty campaigns fly under the radar, which I've always felt is unfortunate. Strange as it may sound, I think that the Call of Duty campaigns can be compared to the Marvel films. They feel like pretty standard cookie cutter stories that always play it pretty safe, but the experience is usually a good time and has characters you can feel attached to. Call of Duty WW2 uses this format as well, and it's probably one of the best campaigns in the entire series. It gives off a Saving Private Ryan kind of vibe, and includes many characters that you actually become attached to and care about what happens to them. The main protagonist Robert "Red" Daniels is one of the more interesting characters, who has a good backstory and his chemistry with the rest of the cast helps make the story remain engaging. Overall, Call of Duty WW2 feels like the same Call of Duty that we've always known it to be. The multiplayer feels the same as it did when I played it many years ago, as does almost every other area. If you are a Call of Duty fan who plays the game every year, you won't need my recommendation because Call of Duty fans will buy the game no matter what. As for other outsiders to the series like myself, I'd recommend either renting the game or waiting for the price to drop just to play the campaign or zombie mode, but I wouldn't pay full price for it.… Expand
  95. JeremyDoesGames
    Nov 5, 2017
    7
    1. Don't get ANY of the negative reviews

    2. Why is a 7 considered mixed? To me it means really good; 5 is mixed for me and under that is negative Anyway, onto the review. "Call of Duty: WWII" is the best "Call of Duty" game since "Black Ops 2" a mere 5 years ago. The gameplay feels fresh, the campaign has an excellent story (and it's the games' biggest strongpoint), and the    1. Don't get ANY of the negative reviews

    2. Why is a 7 considered mixed? To me it means really good; 5 is mixed for me and under that is negative

    Anyway, onto the review.

    "Call of Duty: WWII" is the best "Call of Duty" game since "Black Ops 2" a mere 5 years ago. The gameplay feels fresh, the campaign has an excellent story (and it's the games' biggest strongpoint), and the characters are really great. The multiplayer is nothing new, but it is fun. It's not a GREAT game, but I really enjoyed play "Call of Duty: WWII" (especially for the campaign), and I'm excited to play it some more. A pretty solid entry to this series that hasn't had a good game in years.    … Expand
  96. lufuxe
    Nov 8, 2017
    7
    Graphics: from the last parts there is a step forward, but if you peer into the textures, everything is bad ..
    Physics: bad, so is the physics of weapons .. they simply do not have ..
    Plot: I liked it
    That's why 7 points
  97. vitek__ok
    Nov 9, 2017
    7
    "+":
    - Well-made campaign;
    - Good visuals(except sprite fire), great prerendered cutscenes in singleplayer;
    "-":
    - Bad running and weapons animations straight from 2007, especially noticeabe in multiplayer;
    - Boring shooting;
    - Bad sound-design in russian version (some elements too loud, some are too quiet);
  98. DMein
    Nov 16, 2017
    7
    I think this is the best call of duty game in the past few years. Still doesn't compete with the Modern Warefares or the Black Opps games. However, call of duty has finally created a throw back to the times of no jet packs or running on walls that the gaming community has been asking for for a long time. I really enjoy both the game play of both multiplayer and nazi zombie game modes, butI think this is the best call of duty game in the past few years. Still doesn't compete with the Modern Warefares or the Black Opps games. However, call of duty has finally created a throw back to the times of no jet packs or running on walls that the gaming community has been asking for for a long time. I really enjoy both the game play of both multiplayer and nazi zombie game modes, but both of these game modes lack map size and/or number of maps available to play on. I know that more maps in both game modes will come out, but this will just be another payment addition on the already kind of expensive price tag. I give this game a 10/10 on game play but a 5/10 on game play availability.… Expand
  99. Hardy1987
    Nov 16, 2017
    7
    I really enjoy this game but the bugs let it down, the games been out for 2 weeks and I've seen very little in progress... So much potential and when fixed will be the best CoD I've played since MW3 BUT needs fixing.
  100. Shalakur
    Nov 22, 2017
    7
    So Call of Duty World War 2, the game i have been waiting for since World at War was released in 2008, was not a disappointment. The game features a detailed story that utilizes the old style health bar system, reminds me of the old medal of honor days. I would give this game at least a 9 if the story was the only feature, but its not. Sledgehammer took zombies in somewhat differentSo Call of Duty World War 2, the game i have been waiting for since World at War was released in 2008, was not a disappointment. The game features a detailed story that utilizes the old style health bar system, reminds me of the old medal of honor days. I would give this game at least a 9 if the story was the only feature, but its not. Sledgehammer took zombies in somewhat different direction that promotes horror and gore rather than the goofy style of Infinite Warfare, it's a rather detailed and immersive zombies experience. Now the important topic, multiplayer. Multiplayer is your standard boots on the ground game play, it has an new create-a-class system called divisions. The division style is much like Battlefield but it allows more customization, by that I mean you can run the machine gunner division with a shotgun and it would still work fine. I really enjoyed the multiplayer but as of Thanksgiving 2017 my game is broken, not the disc I mean the game itself. Many people such as myself have experienced the game-breaking bugs known as error code 1, 3, and 5. The bug downloads a quick playlist update then automatically fails returning you to the start screen, then when you try to join multiplayer (or any other online function) it re-downloads and errors again sending you into an infinite loop. Many of us paid $60-120 on this game just to not play it. That is not the only multiplayer bug, there have been many reports of black-screening, server kicks, and overall complications revolving around the servers. Would be a great game if myself and many others could play it.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »