Call of Duty: WWII

 PlayStation 4
User Score
5.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 2065 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 718 out of 2065
  2. Mixed: 482 out of 2065
  3. Negative: 865 out of 2065
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Maciag33
    Dec 10, 2017
    7
    Call of Duty is a franchise that I grew up on, my favorite game in the series is Call of Duty: World at War so I was obviously very excited for the franchise to go back into World War II. I love American military history and its one of the reason why I connected with video games, it’s a chance for our youth to not only see history but an attempt to play through it. It makes it a learningCall of Duty is a franchise that I grew up on, my favorite game in the series is Call of Duty: World at War so I was obviously very excited for the franchise to go back into World War II. I love American military history and its one of the reason why I connected with video games, it’s a chance for our youth to not only see history but an attempt to play through it. It makes it a learning experience. Now saying this, I’m disappointed that COD didn’t make an accurate depiction of World War II. Depictions such as gender, race, marketing of the Nazi party, accurate depiction of weapons, clothing, etc. is something I would complain about, then again it is just a game and not a history book. It’s just something that I found disappointing.… Expand
  2. sir_walter
    Dec 18, 2017
    7
    As someone who enjoyed COD: WaW (The other WWII game in the COD series), I thought this was a enjoyable update to the era. I loved the zombies changes and gameplay. I think the maps aren't has fun as I would like but they're not terrible. So far the campaign is alright as well. The loading times between screens is horrible though.
  3. kiank
    Dec 19, 2017
    7
    I have played over 24 hours of this Cod and I believe that it is a step in the right direction for call of duty. For me, it is the first decent Cod since Black Ops III. I love the idea of a Headquarters and think it is the best addition in this Cod, especially with the firing range and one v. one mode. I also love the pace of the multiplayer and have always loved the different modes.I have played over 24 hours of this Cod and I believe that it is a step in the right direction for call of duty. For me, it is the first decent Cod since Black Ops III. I love the idea of a Headquarters and think it is the best addition in this Cod, especially with the firing range and one v. one mode. I also love the pace of the multiplayer and have always loved the different modes. The new War mode was fun for a while, but I would like to see more operations added to it. I like the gun options and feel the progression system/loot boxes are rewarding. I have not had time to touch the campaign but have heard good things from friends. On the other hand, I dislike most of the maps and the map variety is pretty bad overall. The worst part about this Cod has been all the bugs. I've had trouble connecting with friends, staying in lobbies, and I've seen different bugs in the headquarters. This has been the buggiest Cod I've ever played. Overall, I'd give it a 7.2.… Expand
  4. Ninjeye
    Dec 28, 2017
    7
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The game is great, it is finally good to have a COD that does not run on walls, jump and hover or have any of the futuristic warfare in combat. I am a little sad as I am stationed in Japan and play on American servers on base and deal with a persistent lag, though I have noticed that it is worse than Black ops III. The sniper maps are amazing and remind me of Ghost even though this one is set during World War II. Being an actual Military member, I would have liked to see more emphasis on stealth, tactics and strategy as opposed to run and gun but I do understand that this is more of an arcade first person shooter than simulation. You are guaranteed to like it, which is why I actually give this game a 7.7, just under an 8 however, I believe my score will change once they hand over the first DLC and patches that fix the issues that I see happening on the game. For one thing, I have noticed how easy it is to team kill as your gun will lock on to a friend with ease and have difficulty locking onto the enemy. I have seen only a hand full of hackers and some will even tell you they are doing it which is my biggest issue as I do not believe in cheating. Anyways this is my first review but hopefully not the last. I am Ninjeye… Expand
  5. MustafaTqu95
    Feb 9, 2018
    7
    طور اللعب الفردي أو القصة كان جيد كـ قصة وايضا طريقة لعب ولكن كان وللأسف قصير وكنت أتمنى لو يكون بهيئة العب التعاوني بدل أصدقاء داخل اللعبى بذكاء اصطناعي , وبالنسبة لطور الزومبي ف هو تقريبا الحسنة الوحيدة في اللعبة رغم قلة الخرائظ ولكن وبشكل عام كان جيد وأستمتعت به نوعا ما وبالنسبة لطور اللعب الجماعي ورغم عدم وجود القفز ولكن لازال الموت بسرعة بحيث لا يمكن أتخاذ أي ردة فعل عند الأطلاق عليكطور اللعب الفردي أو القصة كان جيد كـ قصة وايضا طريقة لعب ولكن كان وللأسف قصير وكنت أتمنى لو يكون بهيئة العب التعاوني بدل أصدقاء داخل اللعبى بذكاء اصطناعي , وبالنسبة لطور الزومبي ف هو تقريبا الحسنة الوحيدة في اللعبة رغم قلة الخرائظ ولكن وبشكل عام كان جيد وأستمتعت به نوعا ما وبالنسبة لطور اللعب الجماعي ورغم عدم وجود القفز ولكن لازال الموت بسرعة بحيث لا يمكن أتخاذ أي ردة فعل عند الأطلاق عليك .… Expand
  6. dr_zorua
    Mar 6, 2018
    7
    A great game with a great campaign and good quick time events and great stealth that you will love! The multiplayer is fun but the community is too salty, like play the mountain faction in a comp map that doesn't have good sniping spots you will get yelled at by like a five year old or a twenty year old yelling at you. Still a great game!
  7. GrantD243
    Oct 21, 2018
    7
    The campaign was a joke, but the multiplayer of WWII was a solid throwback to earlier Call of Dutys, and I never got tired of it. The orders and supply drops may be seen as a cash grab by some people, but they kept me coming back to the game over and over. One of the better Call of Duty games in a while.
  8. R3HAP3R
    Feb 4, 2019
    7
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  9. mikemormai
    May 6, 2019
    7
    call of duty , mais do mesmo, poderia ter ficado melhor, a historia e bem legal, pena que o multi ficou mais do mesmo
  10. FrpMan
    Dec 19, 2020
    7
    Single player olarak kısa olmuş. Ayrıca bölüm bölüm olması biraz olayı bozmuş. O eski Call of tadını alamadım.
  11. svonton
    Jun 5, 2020
    7
    common pew pew from Activision but in this time they back again to WW2 setting. saw a lot negative review about MP and loot boxes but i play only single player and will tell you my experience. and so what i can say if you have some thing like 6hours of free time and wanna shoot some bad nazis this game is definitely you will like. during the story, that represents mission set about mostcommon pew pew from Activision but in this time they back again to WW2 setting. saw a lot negative review about MP and loot boxes but i play only single player and will tell you my experience. and so what i can say if you have some thing like 6hours of free time and wanna shoot some bad nazis this game is definitely you will like. during the story, that represents mission set about most famous WW2 operations, you will not only shorting like regular infantryman but will able to control some vehicle like tanks and planes (and it was kinda fun). what about plot - story about soldiers that don't forget be a real humans during execution of an order, support each other as long as they can - it interest but not so much to worry about the characters, i think it completely "OK". yeah game have some bugs (one of them that when during one mission my weapon completely gone but still able to kill enemy by my sight =D) and questions (like why half of nazi use soviet PPSh-41 but lets leave it on the conscience of developers =D). in conclusion if u wanna some pew pew in WW2 setting you will get =D… Expand
  12. Garfield2010
    Sep 6, 2019
    7
    I got this game at a well discounted price. It is a typical Call of Duty game. I have only played the single player campaign thus far. The pace is very fast. As per usual you are a super human killing 50+ enemies per mission and you are a specialist bombardier, recon, sniper, driver etc. The game jumps from the one scene to the next - non stop action. The pacing seems a bit off withI got this game at a well discounted price. It is a typical Call of Duty game. I have only played the single player campaign thus far. The pace is very fast. As per usual you are a super human killing 50+ enemies per mission and you are a specialist bombardier, recon, sniper, driver etc. The game jumps from the one scene to the next - non stop action. The pacing seems a bit off with too much happening all the time. Every mission has an element where you need to rescue someone, clear certain areas, hold certain areas for a time period, some allies dying violently and a little bit of quick time melee. Very very linear.

    Good entertainment for a teenager I would say. Its basically a gaming version of Saving Private Ryan 15 years later    … Expand
  13. Flashyboy89
    Jun 12, 2020
    7
    From a Campaign point of view, Sledgehammer Games did a good job with Call of Duty: WWII. I haven’t played Online so, this score is for the Campaign only.
  14. Jonasluas
    Jun 20, 2020
    7
    Un juego muy clásico de activition buen juego buena historia graficos y tema de la segunda guerra mundial misiones entretenidas y buen desarrollo mecanicas de siempre algo para jugar un dia aburrido o una campara juego muy caotico y clasico de los call of duty
  15. sergio123456
    Feb 19, 2020
    7
    El juego cumple con lo que se espera de un Call Of Duty, es la vuelta a los orígenes, se hace demasiado corta la campaña.
  16. Wolf359
    Jul 10, 2020
    7
    O multiplayer tradicional deste COD é o mais fraco, entretanto, o Modo Zombies é excelente e a campanha não deixa a peteca cair. No frigir dos ovos é um bom game, e graficamente muito lindo. As mecanicas de solicitação de pacotes de vida, de munição, de bombas e sinalizadores é muito boa também. Por fim, é um game legal com um ou outro momento de destaque na campanha, não é um Call of DutyO multiplayer tradicional deste COD é o mais fraco, entretanto, o Modo Zombies é excelente e a campanha não deixa a peteca cair. No frigir dos ovos é um bom game, e graficamente muito lindo. As mecanicas de solicitação de pacotes de vida, de munição, de bombas e sinalizadores é muito boa também. Por fim, é um game legal com um ou outro momento de destaque na campanha, não é um Call of Duty no nível de Modern Warfare (o original de PS3) nem de um Black Ops, mas traz muita coisa interessante, e serve como um throwback aos CODs de PS2/XBOX/GC que eram ambientados na Segunda Guerra.… Expand
  17. alexandrumna
    May 11, 2020
    7
    I was really excited about the story having heard it will return to WW II , but aside from the amazing graphics and good gameplay and a nice story, you could tell they really didn't put much effort into it as it feels a little rushed. Don't really care about zombies to be honest. And the multiplayes is like any othe CoD game, pretty boring for me.
  18. lesiuML
    Feb 20, 2022
    7
    Very solid story. Although really not emotional one... Lot of things were very safe for example deaths camps. There were few really great stealth mission ant few really memorable moments. It's seriously good game that shows how ww2 game could be interesting, exciting and varied. I must admit that soud design in campaign is great. The sound of guns and scream of soldiers are really deep andVery solid story. Although really not emotional one... Lot of things were very safe for example deaths camps. There were few really great stealth mission ant few really memorable moments. It's seriously good game that shows how ww2 game could be interesting, exciting and varied. I must admit that soud design in campaign is great. The sound of guns and scream of soldiers are really deep and realistic. Despite the fact that this game is not really historical correct and it's lack of maturity moments it is really a good game.… Expand
  19. PaektusanLeader
    Jun 24, 2020
    7
    It is certainly better than all the other CoDs in recent years, but it still doesn't hold up with the original CoDs that took place during WW2.
  20. Sammyboo21
    Jul 28, 2020
    7
    Although it’s not a great game it’s still a solid if predictable tribute to all those who served.
  21. Datojet
    Jul 1, 2020
    7
    Just finished this game after I got it through my PS+ subscription.
    I don`t know why COD WW2 took so much heat from the audience, but I had a great time while playing it.
    The graphics are decent, the plot is very simple yet manages to keep one entertained, the campaign length is enough for 5-6 eves of intensive gameplay. What else do ya`ll want from a shooter? You run and you shoot, as    Just finished this game after I got it through my PS+ subscription.
    I don`t know why COD WW2 took so much heat from the audience, but I had a great time while playing it.
    The graphics are decent, the plot is very simple yet manages to keep one entertained, the campaign length is enough for 5-6 eves of intensive gameplay. What else do ya`ll want from a shooter? You run and you shoot, as simple as that. Yes, the dialogues in this game are dull and full of washed out cliches, but it`s not a first FPS to abuse that and definitely not the last. COD WW2 also has a number of gameplay shortcomings that get quite annoying after several hours of playing, like indistructible tables or other seemingly fragile objects that absorb RPG shots and leave enemies untouched, or crazy damage the nazis do on high level of difficulty resulting in frequent one-shots. Also, the friendly NPC`s are often annoying as they constantly run in front of you making it more difficult to aim at the enemies.
    But generally, I liked the dynamics of the game, I loved the missions where you operate a tank or a plane, the shooting itself feels pretty good, and the whole COD WW2 just feels like a solid game to spend a few eves with.    … Expand
  22. BjarniboyNR2
    Jul 20, 2020
    7
    The story is decent and the gameplay as well, but it's just more of the same old, same old.
  23. Sr_PuXiToPuiG
    Jan 3, 2021
    7
    Piola. . .
  24. storygamer
    Jan 17, 2023
    7
    Call Of Duty: WWII is one of the last innovative and good COD games, after the franchise became a repetitive evergreen. While the multiplayer is strong as usual, the single player campaign is a bit short, but well written. But the most impressive aspect is the atmosphere. You dive deep into emotional WWII moments and experience rotatory slow and fast scenes. A good historical FPS!
  25. adam_carl
    Jan 27, 2021
    7
    I never enjoyed such a good story like in this game with bombastic graphics but in other way the gameplay bugs and such a lame shooting actions...
  26. tariq_almandhar
    Aug 16, 2020
    7
    من ناحية القصة فالأمر كان من الممكن أن يكون بشكل أفضل فالقصة مقبولة وأسلوب اللعب تنقصه بعض الأمور لكنه جيد والمهمات بها تنوع ممتاز وتنوعت بيئات اللعب والمطلوب منك كذلك في المهمات من قنص أو تمدير طائرات أو دبابات أو حماية حلفاء ومناطق وتحرير مناطقمن ناحية القصة فالأمر كان من الممكن أن يكون بشكل أفضل فالقصة مقبولة وأسلوب اللعب تنقصه بعض الأمور لكنه جيد والمهمات بها تنوع ممتاز وتنوعت بيئات اللعب والمطلوب منك كذلك في المهمات من قنص أو تمدير طائرات أو دبابات أو حماية حلفاء ومناطق وتحرير مناطق
  27. killerwhalom2
    Sep 13, 2020
    7
    Personally I think this game gets to much hate, the multiplayer is very fun and fast paced unlike the newer games, and the campaign is amazing.
  28. FRIST_008
    Jan 2, 2022
    7
    + Очень ленивый код с обычной стрельбой. Отсутствием хоть чего-то, что может тебя развлекать и сюжетными провалами уровня facepalm. Это тот самый момент когда бателфилд 1 лучше не в стрельбе, а лучше во всем.
    - стрельба на 8
    - сюжет 7 - красивый Голливуд 8 - другой геймплей 7 Итого 7.5    + Очень ленивый код с обычной стрельбой. Отсутствием хоть чего-то, что может тебя развлекать и сюжетными провалами уровня facepalm. Это тот самый момент когда бателфилд 1 лучше не в стрельбе, а лучше во всем.
    - стрельба на 8
    - сюжет 7
    - красивый Голливуд 8
    - другой геймплей 7
    Итого 7.5
  29. Aykarg
    Oct 10, 2020
    7
    I got it from PS Plus. Entertaining campaign. Good graphics and robust gameplay.
  30. BrayanOchoa
    Apr 26, 2021
    7
    Campaña meh
    no me gusto la campaña muy aburrido sin emociones y muertes Zzzzzzz A mi me encanto la saga de ps2 y world at war 1
    Pero este ww2 es una mamada esperaba algun evento emotivo y llorar para decir este juego es demasidado pero no,me ponen una historia que esta de la vrga.
  31. trinovatic
    Nov 27, 2022
    7
    El COD más infravalorado en mi opinión, esta bueno, la campaña me gustó y la ambientación que hay en el modo zombies también.
  32. uoKAOS
    Oct 20, 2022
    7
    This one is truly awesome to play! Graphics are well made! Snipers and throwing knives are very enjoyable and pleasant to play with! Great one for once!
  33. goodgriff33
    Dec 24, 2022
    7
    Answer: 75 characters is between 10 words and 19 words with spaces included in the character count. If spaces are not included in the character count, then 75 characters is between 12 words and 25 words.
  34. bramchvh
    Feb 10, 2023
    7
    This is a strange game. It is a Call of Duty that tries a lot differently which is respectable but a lot of it falls flat. The campaign is beautiful and is pretty fun with a couple of changes but nothing big but the zombies is something completely different. It is still the round based system but tries to scare you a lot more than the other zombies games. Unfortunately it isnt scary atThis is a strange game. It is a Call of Duty that tries a lot differently which is respectable but a lot of it falls flat. The campaign is beautiful and is pretty fun with a couple of changes but nothing big but the zombies is something completely different. It is still the round based system but tries to scare you a lot more than the other zombies games. Unfortunately it isnt scary at all. The multiplayer is really nothing to comment on.… Expand
  35. miguellopez99
    Jun 1, 2023
    7
    71/100 .
  36. gaset04
    Jun 20, 2023
    7
    I enjoyed playing this game. WWII is so realistic (atmosphere and graphics), it's like you are going to the war for die. The plot it's not the best perhaps it is plain. I should put more missions but each mission last less because it's veeerryy looong. The online flag. Nevertheless, zombies mode is pretty good. I put 7 out of 10. Personally, it's not bad but it's still well
  37. SchroederRock
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    WWII suits Call of Duty better, to a degree, than all the future stuff. However, where CoD WWII stumbled the most is in its scale. The campaign has its moments and ends up being a good reason to pick up Call of Duty to begin with but its multiplayer pairing is not so fortunate. Much of WWII's multiplayer feels heavily rehashed from previous games, adding little new to spice up the formula.WWII suits Call of Duty better, to a degree, than all the future stuff. However, where CoD WWII stumbled the most is in its scale. The campaign has its moments and ends up being a good reason to pick up Call of Duty to begin with but its multiplayer pairing is not so fortunate. Much of WWII's multiplayer feels heavily rehashed from previous games, adding little new to spice up the formula. Maps are typically dense and lead to more encounters between players but that doesn't translate to more fun. Often times, players can be cornered into spawn kill/deaths, especially if an opposing team knows where to stop pressing to keep the predictable computing from spawn-swapping. It really bugs me that no Activision title with the CoD moniker has fixed this problem after years of abuse. Nazi Zombies always has its fun moments, bringing a more visceral experience to the shooter. It's clear to me that this game mode is the only aspect that delivers time after time. It shows complexity, strategic thinking, and white-knuckle experiences because of how unpredictable the game mode can be. Good on Sledgehammer for keeping this part of the game fun and interesting. However, outside of an OK campaign, there isn't much to love here. Call of Duty continues to be nothing more than a re-skinned version of itself, year after year. This is a huge irritation as Call of Duty is begging to break out of its shell. Perhaps the future will yield a larger sandbox feel to CoD, especially as console and PCs continue to advance and offer more horsepower to smoothly handle the heavy computing that can come with AAA games.

    As for WWII - if you like the setting, this is not the game to play. Battlefield 1 offers a much deeper and open experience that encourages a little role play here and there. Only CoD fanboys that wait on the scraps that fall from Activision's table will ever find a lot to love here. WWII continues the tradition of CoD failing to impress. It is clearer to me year after year that the original Infinity Ward crew were the lifeblood of Call of Duty and once Activision broke up that team, some of which went on to make Titanfall years later, that the pulse of CoD fell dramatically. With the exception of Black Ops, Call of Duty hasn't been interesting since the Modern Warfare series. I'm still waiting for the franchise to be resurrected and WWII does nothing to make that happen. Buy at your own risk.    … Expand
  38. hoohoo
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    Well.. it's not a bad game. But I'm still really disappointed. I expected so much more, but it is just a tunnel run with some quite weak story around it. Shoot the same predictable enemies, who just run into your bullets. Meh.
  39. Markos-
    Nov 27, 2020
    6
    I was never a big fan of CODs but this one caught my attention because of the WW2 setting. Well, it was also given for free in PS Plus so that might have something to do, too.
    I played a third of the campaign. At first, I thought it was awesome, the graphics are great in cinematics, there seemed to be a gripping story and I thought I would really feel immersed.
    However, after 2-3    I was never a big fan of CODs but this one caught my attention because of the WW2 setting. Well, it was also given for free in PS Plus so that might have something to do, too.
    I played a third of the campaign. At first, I thought it was awesome, the graphics are great in cinematics, there seemed to be a gripping story and I thought I would really feel immersed.
    However, after 2-3 missions, i started to clearly see 'I've been here before' all over the place. The action is always pushed to the limit with explosions etc, and it's always the same old 'clear the enemies - move to next checkpoint' that we know so well from ALL these games. I just lost immersion and stopped caring completely on the action, I realized the characters were also very empty and I didn't even know who was who (not that it mattered anyway). Great envelope (graphics, presentation, music), but a very empty core (feeling, engagement, uniqueness).
    The multiplayer , I lasted 30 minutes. It's just too fast and chaotic, and you need to train a lot to get competitive. I don't see the point on playing unless its with friends.    … Expand
  40. Reciter5613
    Nov 9, 2017
    6
    It was alright. I mean the campaign is really what I was into then anything else.

    It really felt like a war most of the time and the story felt like Band of Brothers. Of course the stealth elements were frustrating and the objectives are hard to understand right away. The multiplayer is still the same. Mostly run & gun with you getting killed almost instantly so it seems why bother.    It was alright. I mean the campaign is really what I was into then anything else.

    It really felt like a war most of the time and the story felt like Band of Brothers. Of course the stealth elements were frustrating and the objectives are hard to understand right away.

    The multiplayer is still the same. Mostly run & gun with you getting killed almost instantly so it seems why bother. The new WAR mode was a nice idea however.

    Zombie mode was boring as ever making me wanna die just to end it.

    Overall, this installment was nice for a short time but it one of the reasons I prefer renting games then buying.    … Expand
  41. The_XIII
    Nov 6, 2017
    6
    The game is far from perfect, and honestly not that enjoyable in the long rung. But you know what's hilarious? Reading these severly autistic kids crying about black women in videogames.
  42. xenomorph287
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    Im conflicted about this game. I love the singleplayer, every mission was fun and the characters were memorable, and probably my 3rd favorite story in COD. Multiplayer on the other hand, is pretty bad. I enjoy the war mode a lot, but every other game mode is bland. In short, wait until a sale, and just play the campaign.
  43. erfanbasket
    Apr 13, 2018
    6
    the story is really simple and nothing special but the game is overall entertaining
  44. metooo
    Nov 4, 2017
    6
    I wanted to mention something a little different from other reviews. Played cod since mw1. My biggest gripe is that maps have been getting more and more streamlined, to the point where cod feels like glorified laser tag. I got the deluxe edition hoping it would be a throwback to the good old days where you'd snipe from a destroyed building, lurk through tall grass, or hide in the carcassI wanted to mention something a little different from other reviews. Played cod since mw1. My biggest gripe is that maps have been getting more and more streamlined, to the point where cod feels like glorified laser tag. I got the deluxe edition hoping it would be a throwback to the good old days where you'd snipe from a destroyed building, lurk through tall grass, or hide in the carcass of a downed helicopter, but instead they got rid of all that realistic hc Tdm stuff to appease the trigger fingers of people who complain about camping. The result is that it feels more streamlined than ever, in a very backward way. No you can't climb that tower it's decoration. No you can't hide in that grass, it's decoration too. BF1 really ruined COD for me, that was truly next gen and I got this hoping Cod was really gonna go back to the roots and then innovate from there. Loved advanced warfare btw, sledgehammer makes good games, but the slow boots on the ground doesn't work IMHO if you're using a map style still suited for fast play in the vein of advanced or infinite warfare. Slow play should have a tense stealth element to it which is what made the old games so fun for me,… Expand
  45. Phil_Panteleit
    Nov 13, 2017
    6
    I have waited for 10 days to give this game a proper review. It's not a 0 out of 10 like some idiots say it is. However it is not close to bing a 10 either. The campaign is great but WAY TO SHORT. 5 hours and its done. Multiplayer is well great too. This is COD i don't think this part needs to be even talked about because you either love it or you don't. Zombies is fun but once again ifI have waited for 10 days to give this game a proper review. It's not a 0 out of 10 like some idiots say it is. However it is not close to bing a 10 either. The campaign is great but WAY TO SHORT. 5 hours and its done. Multiplayer is well great too. This is COD i don't think this part needs to be even talked about because you either love it or you don't. Zombies is fun but once again if your a zombie fan you will love it.

    However, this is the part where I say do not waste your money. The reason is because the game is broken. Headquarters is broke. When you get into a game with your friends you are guaranteed for one or more of you to be kicked or lose connection to host after every game. There is a glitch in one of the trophies for doing daily challenges. Sledgehammer has had ample of time to fix the bugs and still have not. They had a Beta and never thought to put the HQs in it and wow now its broke.

    Sledgehammer needs to go. This game is a solid 6 out of 10 and a good pick up for no more than $40    … Expand
  46. IONOSGAMES
    Nov 4, 2017
    6
    Un juego de disparos, shooter sin mas. No profundiza en la historia, no innova, es un juego para pasar el rato, divertido sin mas. Es recomendable a los que les gusta el shooter a bajo precio, ya que su duracion pienso que no esta acorde a su precio. Lo malo es el parche de salida que es OBLIGATORIO. No se puede jugar sin ese parche, por lo que suspendo este juego
  47. arostislavna
    Jun 19, 2020
    6
    This game is inauthentic for a WWII experience, which is a shame because Activision is banking on success since the last 4 lackluster games.

    The Campaign is average, arcade-y, and in part feels like a remastered Medal of Honor: Underground. Multiplayer is pretty much exactly the same as every game before it. I will give praise to Nazi Zombies, being able to unlock and choose    This game is inauthentic for a WWII experience, which is a shame because Activision is banking on success since the last 4 lackluster games.

    The Campaign is average, arcade-y, and in part feels like a remastered Medal of Honor: Underground.

    Multiplayer is pretty much exactly the same as every game before it.

    I will give praise to Nazi Zombies, being able to unlock and choose characters is fantastic.    … Expand
  48. Lewis-Angelo
    Oct 12, 2018
    6
    la historia está bien, pero es una de cal y otra de arena constante
    gráficamente es una pasada, con unas cgi brutales, y algunas misiones que están muy chulas
    el sonido normalito, con un doblaje mejorable y una mezcla bastante mala, sorprende porque ahí solían ser los mejores y se nota descuidado el argumento obviamente no sorprende y se ha quedado corta, se hecha de menos que avancen    la historia está bien, pero es una de cal y otra de arena constante
    gráficamente es una pasada, con unas cgi brutales, y algunas misiones que están muy chulas
    el sonido normalito, con un doblaje mejorable y una mezcla bastante mala, sorprende porque ahí solían ser los mejores y se nota descuidado
    el argumento obviamente no sorprende y se ha quedado corta, se hecha de menos que avancen más, imposible no acordarse de los Medal of Honor
    y como COD tampoco es que destaque, mejor que los Black Ops es fácil ser, pero el Advanced Warfare les había quedado mejor a Sledgehammer

    detalles como que te falte una bala en el rifle y meta las 5 de golpe quedan mal, el apuntado del francotirador que ralentiza tampoco me ha entusiasmado, la IA parece que ha ido hacia atrás, vuelven los enemigos infinitos en algunas zonas, etc
    o que se quede el juego pillado porque tienes que ponerte en X zona para que pase Y cosa, pero como ya te moviste previendo la acción, pues estás matando enemigos atontados mientras el juego espera que vuelvas al sitio

    del multijugador y los zombies mejor no decir nada, ya ni atrae probar esos modos    … Expand
  49. red_ninja_9
    Dec 21, 2017
    6
    This game is ok 6/10 at most. I don't know why they went too far back in history, all we asked was modern day warfare. MW2 was the best COD period. I don't really care for old outdated weapons and world as it was back then. Another problem is, not enough maps, 9 multiplayer maps is not enough. Desperately need more maps or the game will be quite routine for most people, like myself.This game is ok 6/10 at most. I don't know why they went too far back in history, all we asked was modern day warfare. MW2 was the best COD period. I don't really care for old outdated weapons and world as it was back then. Another problem is, not enough maps, 9 multiplayer maps is not enough. Desperately need more maps or the game will be quite routine for most people, like myself. Another gripe is, the maps are too small. Typical 3 lanes maps with no variety and...again too small. I cant wait until MW2 remastered. Getting bored with this game already.… Expand
  50. Lowzone
    Feb 20, 2018
    6
    Trop court.... manque de materiel pour le mode de jeu solo. Le mode zombie n’est pas aussi addictif qu’il aurait pu l’etre.... je m’ennuie de world at war....

    Bon points: sound design impressionnant Gameplay efficace et combat bien balancé VO excellent Visuellement magnifique Mauvais points : Manque de contenu Balancement des armes me semble inadéquat Variété inexistante ... 1    Trop court.... manque de materiel pour le mode de jeu solo. Le mode zombie n’est pas aussi addictif qu’il aurait pu l’etre.... je m’ennuie de world at war....

    Bon points:
    sound design impressionnant
    Gameplay efficace et combat bien balancé
    VO excellent
    Visuellement magnifique

    Mauvais points :
    Manque de contenu
    Balancement des armes me semble inadéquat
    Variété inexistante ... 1 mission de char, 1 mission d’aviation.... donnez m’en plus!
    Zombie ennuyant
    Multiplayer = reskin des derniers titres de la série aucune innovation.

    Overall: 5.5/10    … Expand
  51. deLama
    Nov 17, 2017
    6
    6/6 6/66/6 6/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/66/6 6/66/6 6/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/66/6 6/66/6… Expand
  52. alexstunky
    May 25, 2018
    6
    Que puedo decir.....no es mal juego, pero tampoco brilla.
    Tenia esperanzas de que este juego subiera esta saga, pero creo que nos quedo a deber mucho, eso si la campaña me encanto demasiado, pero....el MP es mas de lo mismo cada año, no innova en nada, a veces es divertido, pero como dije antes, es mas de lo mismo cada año, lleno de DLC y obvio el modo zombies es lo mejor de cada año,    Que puedo decir.....no es mal juego, pero tampoco brilla.
    Tenia esperanzas de que este juego subiera esta saga, pero creo que nos quedo a deber mucho, eso si la campaña me encanto demasiado, pero....el MP es mas de lo mismo cada año, no innova en nada, a veces es divertido, pero como dije antes, es mas de lo mismo cada año, lleno de DLC y obvio el modo zombies es lo mejor de cada año, pero los DLC son muy exagerados ya, una lastima estas políticas.    … Expand
  53. Lyvins
    Nov 3, 2017
    6
    the game itself is ok but not worth the price tag.
    To be fair this might look like WW2 but doesn't feel like it.
    I would honestly say save your money and buy battlefront 2. Atleast you got no season pass to buy and they changed the lootbox system so it's pretty much buy base and enjoy game now. This game is not a 8 or higher, nor is is a 5 or lower. but anyone giving it more are just    the game itself is ok but not worth the price tag.
    To be fair this might look like WW2 but doesn't feel like it.
    I would honestly say save your money and buy battlefront 2.
    Atleast you got no season pass to buy and they changed the lootbox system so it's pretty much buy base and enjoy game now.

    This game is not a 8 or higher, nor is is a 5 or lower. but anyone giving it more are just overreacting.    … Expand
  54. 000Sarmad
    Nov 12, 2017
    6
    I’ve been waiting for this game for so long. After playing I would say it is a disappointment of the year. Being a fan of fps, I thought COD WII would replace battlefield 1 but I was wrong. Let’s back to the game-play and of course multiplayer, which is the most popular feature of this series.
    Firstly, campaign is just mediocre. I would say that the game play is good but story is    I’ve been waiting for this game for so long. After playing I would say it is a disappointment of the year. Being a fan of fps, I thought COD WII would replace battlefield 1 but I was wrong. Let’s back to the game-play and of course multiplayer, which is the most popular feature of this series.
    Firstly, campaign is just mediocre. I would say that the game play is good but story is disappointing thought. Graphic is good but not as good as I was expecting. In campaign, I was expecting Russian, Japanese, Italian and many other countries that were the victim of WWII but the campaign only focus on few events between US and Germany. How could COD not include Russian and Japanese in campaign? I love COD World at War campaign and if I compare to this latest edition I would say it is below par.
    Secondly, multiplayer is repetitive and I got bored after few matches. War mode is a good addition but it is not enough to make things right. There are few maps and all of them were small, poorly designed and heaven for SMGs, being a fan of bolt action rifles and M1 Garand it is frustrating.
    In the end, I would like to say that it is just like an old COD games with WWII theme. No innovation nothing new in it, War mode is a copy of Battlefield 1 operation mode, Headquarter mode is a replica of Destiny 2 clan, campaign is a more or less same as Saving Private Ryan Hollywood movie. Just 5 hour campaign, it would easily extend to 10 hours by adding more content by including Russia, Japan, Italy and other main players in WWII.
    I would honestly give COD WII 5 out of 10, but being a little bias and as a fan of this series; my final verdict is 6 out of 10.    … Expand
  55. Vebshtar
    Nov 3, 2017
    6
    Call of Duty has been a complete failure for years now. Does WWII redeem the franchise? No, it doesn't. But it's a start.
    Graphics: 7/10. I've seen better.
    Gameplay: 8/10. Simple boots on the ground. I like it. Campaign: 7/10. I haven't finished it, but it's decent so far. Multiplayer: 7/10. I'm out of practice, but it's still fun. Historical Accuracy: 2/10. You'll see. Call of    Call of Duty has been a complete failure for years now. Does WWII redeem the franchise? No, it doesn't. But it's a start.
    Graphics: 7/10. I've seen better.
    Gameplay: 8/10. Simple boots on the ground. I like it.
    Campaign: 7/10. I haven't finished it, but it's decent so far.
    Multiplayer: 7/10. I'm out of practice, but it's still fun.
    Historical Accuracy: 2/10. You'll see.

    Call of Duty is like an Adam Sandler movie. I know I'm not getting the best, and parts of it may suck, but it's still fun.    … Expand
  56. dexter3
    Nov 6, 2017
    6
    I've been playing this game since COD 3. Here's what I think:

    Campaign: I have found it to be decently fun. Not an amazing experience, not horrible either. There are some people complaining about realism. If you're looking for realism, you shouldn't be playing COD. It's the same type of COD campaign that we've seen in most of the games. Multiplayer: The new war mode is the most fun I    I've been playing this game since COD 3. Here's what I think:

    Campaign: I have found it to be decently fun. Not an amazing experience, not horrible either. There are some people complaining about realism. If you're looking for realism, you shouldn't be playing COD. It's the same type of COD campaign that we've seen in most of the games.

    Multiplayer: The new war mode is the most fun I have had in COD for a long time. It's freaking awesome!! Your KD doesn't matter so it really encourages the team to play the objective. It very much takes after Battlefield One (a lot of the game does), but that doesn't bother me because I enjoy this game mode very much. If taking the positive elements from other games bothers you, you might have a problem with this. The downside is there are only 3 war maps and 9 regular MP maps... way too few. I have not experienced any server problems, my matchmaking times have been basically instant (I'm not denying the problem, I'm saying the people who come here are generally the ones who want to complain so you're going to read about more problems than good things). The rest of the MP is not very different, so if you've played any other COD game you know what to expect. Except gun camos are like COD4 which is fantastic. Gun balance is good and sniping is really fun so good job on that.

    Zombies: Only one real map so far which is pretty disappointing. The map itself is pretty good though. I like the changes to zombies. Blitz machines replace perks, armor replaces Juggernog and gets more expensive each time you buy it, which is a welcome and challenging change. The zombie types are varied (there are 5 main types, plus a boss you can fight), and are done cleverly. The zombies are quite different than old BO and BO2 zombies. The music is phenomenal at the beginning and really adds to the horror of the game, but I found it getting annoying after a while and turned it off. They have added a real progression system which is great. You can unlock and equip perks (mods) and start with new starting guns, unlock attachments, etc.

    -----

    Other points:

    - The UI is horrible. It is the worst UI I have seen in a COD game. It is extremely counterintuitive and I find myself constantly searching too long for what I want. Maybe I'm too used to the old menus, but this one is just poorly laid out.
    - Microtransactions are a disease in gaming and every game with them deserves a lower score. Please DO NOT BUY THEM.
    - SPLITSCREENERS BEWARE: The splitscreen is completely broken. The things that pop on screen (objective lost, pick up gun, etc.) are HUGE and completely block your view. It's like no one even tested this. It's so so bad. It has great potential but they need to make everything way smaller. I have a 65' TV and it is very difficult to play splitscreen. I really hope they fix this.
    - Graphics are in the middle. Obviously there are better looking games but it does the job for me.
    - The content is high quality for COD standards, but there's not much of it. Not a whole bunch of guns and not very many maps. Campaign is short.
    - SJW stuff is a sad sad part of the world now, and breaks some of the immersion.    … Expand
  57. aaronaccidently
    Nov 7, 2017
    6
    How this game garners 8 and 9/10 scores is insane, and unless COD gets special handicap treatment for being such a heavyweight in game titles, it is not an accurate grade for the quality of this game.

    I was excited for COD WWII because I read it had team members from the original Deadspace, and the last COD WWII game, World at War was pretty good. I played through the first level,    How this game garners 8 and 9/10 scores is insane, and unless COD gets special handicap treatment for being such a heavyweight in game titles, it is not an accurate grade for the quality of this game.

    I was excited for COD WWII because I read it had team members from the original Deadspace, and the last COD WWII game, World at War was pretty good.

    I played through the first level, the D-day landing and it was okay, but no better than Allied Assault on PC a decade ago. As a historical shooter goes, Battlefield 1 is superior in every way. The Zombie mode is okay, but it's the same old same old deal. If you were expecting anything new or different...

    This is the best COD game I've played since the first Modern Warfare, but it still seems like a rushed/cheap wannabe triple a game. Considering it's nearly 2018, this game feels like it's a couple years old. I had no interest in multiplayer, so I didn't try it. Immediately swapped it in for Wolfenstien 2, which I hope is better.    … Expand
  58. Jb22reviews
    Nov 14, 2017
    6
    Cod ww2 fun but not new
    Single player: the single player player campaign brings new features like med kits rather than health regeneration which sounds like a decent idea but turns out being very annoying having to rummage around for packs or search for a healer becomes repetitive and pointless while also featuring historical inaccuracies like black female nazis and some overblown action    Cod ww2 fun but not new
    Single player: the single player player campaign brings new features like med kits rather than health regeneration which sounds like a decent idea but turns out being very annoying having to rummage around for packs or search for a healer becomes repetitive and pointless while also featuring historical inaccuracies like black female nazis and some overblown action scenes aside from that the campaign is quite enjoyable and one of the better in recent years however with a lack of character development and quite a short length the fun gameplay and setting become less exciting
    Multiplayer: the multiplayer experience is just like any other cod with It's usual modes with the addition of war mode an attack and defence based objective game which is a breath of fresh air amongst other modes like Tdm and ffa which are fun but Arcady and can get stale with only 9 mp maps with few good ones and with a new headquarters space where you can open supply drops get contracts and meet with other players feels like a tower ripoff which doesn't help the fact that there is no one in headquarters anyway because of a glitch the mp is fun but leaves much to be desired
    Overall cod ww2 is the same fun arcade shooter but I wish we saw more innovation    … Expand
  59. HCL
    Nov 15, 2017
    6
    I must admit i was pretty bored with the futuristic style of the last couple Call of duty's.
    Now they have returned to their roots but with the same fast shooting style. Now its boots on the ground and i liked it allot. But with the messy servers its like they went back to their roots with the servers also, and that's a shame. Games disconnecting or you get kicked out the lobby for now    I must admit i was pretty bored with the futuristic style of the last couple Call of duty's.
    Now they have returned to their roots but with the same fast shooting style. Now its boots on the ground and i liked it allot. But with the messy servers its like they went back to their roots with the servers also, and that's a shame. Games disconnecting or you get kicked out the lobby for now reason. Sledgehammer games what is wrong with the headquarters you promised that the gamers are all in one headquarters but now most gamers are holy solo in there.

    Its like that this COD WW2 wasnt ready to be released. But i must admit when the game does what i must do, its almost the best Cod i played in years.

    The singleplayer experience is like the serie Band of brothers. Its pretty awesome but its still a hollywood like story.

    Conclusion:
    The singleplayer is a Hollywood like story so i gave this a 7 for it.
    with the multiplayer its pretty great but with the messy servers its almost unplayable. so i gave this a 6.

    If you want to buy it wait a couple of months for the patches and fixes, and then you have the best multiplayer experience in almost 9 years.    … Expand
  60. Enddless
    Jan 3, 2018
    6
    Мультиплеер хорош, особенно война, убийство подтверждено и зомби. Сюжет говно и вся кампания это коридор сботами.
  61. SlightedHand
    Mar 23, 2018
    6
    Call Of Duty: WW2 is an above average game (just). For the price range, it isn't really, but there is still a lot of good old fashioned Call Of Duty in there. Is it fun? Yeah, sometimes. Is it replayable? Multiplayer yes, Campaign no, Zombies can be.
    Gameplay-
    This game is not revolutionary or innovative in a single aspect, nothing is inspired and because of that there isn't all that    Call Of Duty: WW2 is an above average game (just). For the price range, it isn't really, but there is still a lot of good old fashioned Call Of Duty in there. Is it fun? Yeah, sometimes. Is it replayable? Multiplayer yes, Campaign no, Zombies can be.
    Gameplay-
    This game is not revolutionary or innovative in a single aspect, nothing is inspired and because of that there isn't all that much interest in what you're doing. However there's a reason for this, and that is that Call Of Duty essentially has set the model for FPS games. It can't revolutionise because then it stops being true to its series. You could argue that this means the series should just stop, an argument I sit on the fence with. Anyway, the campaign is mediocre. The voice acting is good but aside from that its just occasional cinematic moments and repetitive points (and whoever created that piece of garbage tank section in the Aachen mission is going to hell, that is truly terrible). It's a Call Of Duty campaign. Not bad, definitely not great. The multiplayer I actually properly enjoyed. TDM, S&D etc are the same thing as in every other game. However war, this is just good, thank whatever god you pray to they made this. This mode is repetitive but it's actually fun, a brilliant bridge between campaign and multiplayer. It takes you along these mission based maps each with their own tense checkpoints. This kept this game from being a 4 and bumped it up to a 6. This is exactly what you'd hope for in a Call Of Duty game. The zombies is pretty good. They pivoted completely from Infinite Warfare and went for a dark, nightmarish approach, there are literal moments of almost pure darkness in the easter egg. The problem primarily with the zombies is that really there is only one base game zombies map which gets boring after completing the Easter egg for your fifth time. The mini map you get for completing the EE is just bad. It has a quick pace but it honestly feels like a tutorial map, because it is also the tutorial map, it's pretty lazy for the developer to release it as the only other map. Also David Tenants character doesn't really fit in this area of the game, he has quips and is meant to be a bit of comic relief. However their approach of a horror zombies makes his character just seem wrong.
    Aesthetic-
    Visually this game has a fine aesthetic. Its hyper realistic but its very brown and grey as their primary hues. In the zombies its really cool though, the zombies are covered in torn flesh and twisted metal, it really fits their tone of a near horror approach to zombies. The soundtrack and audio is pretty good. Its got no pumping riffs and power chords like Black Ops 1, instead it's quite classical and very similar to Battlefield 1's soundtrack. Good, but nothing inspiring.
    Replayability-
    If a single person says that the campaign is replayable, they are full of it. It is not even remotely interesting enough to be worth playing more than once, it's barely worth playing just that once. Multiplayer, it generally is except for War which just yes. War is the smartest, most replayable thing a COD game has implemented in years. The zombies is until you've played it for more than 20 solid goes. Then it gets stale, which is frustrating as it is designed as a mode to be done lots of times.

    In conclusion, COD:WW2 is fairly uninspired with almost nothing thats particularly new or interesting. I give it a 6 as there is enough to do and is worth the price tag, however if you dislike previous Call Of Duty's then you'll dislike this one. Except for War. Mhm that is actually good. It's fine, not bad, but certainly not revolutionary either.    … Expand
  62. mboscht
    Feb 20, 2022
    6
    Call of Duty: WWII .
  63. RubenPrinsloo
    Aug 8, 2018
    6
    I can really say that it is a great game. It is also not the best Call of Duty I have played. I like the characters and where it takes place.

    My only problem is as follows: My game is lagging like really a lot. Every time I play, it starts to lag. Then when I want to continue someone killed me or my game does not want to continue. So, every time this happens, I must restart the whole    I can really say that it is a great game. It is also not the best Call of Duty I have played. I like the characters and where it takes place.

    My only problem is as follows:
    My game is lagging like really a lot. Every time I play, it starts to lag. Then when I want to continue someone killed me or my game does not want to continue. So, every time this happens, I must restart the whole game and start from the beginning. Then I also want to ask to bring in more powerful weapons. For example, it takes 4 shots to kill someone, and by that time someone already killed me. My game also takes very long to connect online or in multiplayer.

    The Pros of the game:
    I really like the maps in the game. It has really nice hideouts for sniping. I also like to follow the story of how the game takes place. The best for me is the great graphics. It really looks realistic.

    I would recommend this game to people who likes war games.    … Expand
  64. mikect92
    Aug 15, 2018
    6
    Call of Duty WWII can be split into 3 game modes each of which is radically different to each other.

    The campaign is the best in the Call of Duty franchise since Black Ops. It has stunning visuals, great characters and has a compelling story. It has replay-ability and manages to stay interesting. The only real negative of the campaign is that it is too action packed, which is a common    Call of Duty WWII can be split into 3 game modes each of which is radically different to each other.

    The campaign is the best in the Call of Duty franchise since Black Ops. It has stunning visuals, great characters and has a compelling story. It has replay-ability and manages to stay interesting. The only real negative of the campaign is that it is too action packed, which is a common problem with COD games. Huge explosions, great falls and unrealistic odds make the game unrealistic and goofy.

    The online multiplayer (which for most is the highlight of the game) is the polar opposite of the campaign. The visuals take a hit and are noticeably worse than the story. The maps are boring and not very re playable and it is a forgettable and boring experience. The maps are small and linear, the invisible walls are unforgivable and 2 of the very limited maps are obvious copies of Modern Warfare maps. Unlike the campaign which was over the top, the multiplayer is so under whelming. On top of this, the multiplayer suffers from pay to win mechanics and poor servers. Most guns are locked behind loot boxes which you can either pay real money for or grind like hell, only to end up with customised weapon grips. A FPS has customised weapon grips which are barely visible! As for servers, i played the game about 7-8 months after release and i keep being kicked from games and being locked out of matches. After 8 months, this should have been fixed.

    The final game mode is Zombies. Zombies is fun and interesting. There is a story and multiple different objectives and the map is huge. It is difficult however and is best played with friends in co-op.

    Over all, this game is a mixed bag, excelling in some game modes but horrifically failing in others. The campaign is great, as is Zombies, however the Online seriously holds the game back from greatness.    … Expand
  65. Berik
    Nov 14, 2020
    6
    Released in 2017, this game goes back to WWII to provide a Michael Bay take on the allied Invasion of Europe. Story: Pretentious, historically inaccurate and all written with knowledge of what happens after in mind. Actual soldiers weren't this foolishly brave, nor did they have any illusion about 'becoming heroes.' The game sets up moments that are clearly straight up stolen from moviesReleased in 2017, this game goes back to WWII to provide a Michael Bay take on the allied Invasion of Europe. Story: Pretentious, historically inaccurate and all written with knowledge of what happens after in mind. Actual soldiers weren't this foolishly brave, nor did they have any illusion about 'becoming heroes.' The game sets up moments that are clearly straight up stolen from movies like Saving Private Ryan, but then follows it up by dozens of allied soldiers just running into the fire of the enemy... What the **** ??

    However, after the liberation of Paris the darker tone of the story starts to set in as the war becomes more vicious in German territory. I was enjoying this part of the story much more.

    Gameplay:
    The shooting mechanics are actually very good. The practical WWII weapons provide a much more intimate fighting style, as battles are fought in narrow fields or streets. The reaction of hitting and eliminating an enemy feels very satisfying, and the results are quite gory. There are obligatory quick-time events, though these do show intense fights to the death that get you on the edge of your seat. There is a particular mission where you you operate a Sherman tank that fights a Panzer and a Tiger Tank. Though this is very simplified (and a Sherman tank is no match for a Tiger II Tank) it is quite entertaining! I find the single player campaign of WWII to be very enjoyable due to the satisfying gameplay and darker missions later on. Had this been the only content of WWII for 20 bucks i could have given it a 7/10. Graphics:
    It's a pretty game, no doubt about that. The cinematics are especially stunning to look at, and i like the inclusion of gory effects by explosives.

    Multiplayer:
    Chickens running around with no head gameplay, that lacks all the satisfaction that is present in the single player campaign. There are some fun modes that change up the gameplay, but Team Deathmatch and the basic modes are poorly put together pools of mud.

    Zombies:
    Quite fun, but i feel like it is overstuffed and overcomplicated. A zombies mode like in World at War with a bunch of new small maps would have been enough.

    Though the game reeks of inspiration out of movies instead of books, i find the single player campaign to be great. Unfortunately i can't say the same about the rest of the game, as it seems to lack polish and effort. I give the game a 6/10.    … Expand
  66. Cooper_Reviews
    Nov 29, 2018
    6
    Visuals: 8/10
    Audio and sound design: 9/10
    Game-play: 5/10 Story: 5/10 Replay-ability: 5/10 Overall Score: 6.2/10 Call of Duty: WWI, is a true example of style over substance. The game is beautiful and the presentation is top notch but the substance of this game negates much replay-ability, the generic maps, a boring and lazily written story with a few good moments, and overall    Visuals: 8/10
    Audio and sound design: 9/10
    Game-play: 5/10
    Story: 5/10
    Replay-ability: 5/10

    Overall Score: 6.2/10

    Call of Duty: WWI, is a true example of style over substance. The game is beautiful and the presentation is top notch but the substance of this game negates much replay-ability, the generic maps, a boring and lazily written story with a few good moments, and overall just a mediocre package. Not a horrible game by any means but certainly not a good one.    … Expand
  67. ToshLichev
    Jun 21, 2020
    6
    An absolutely average game to the core. An instantly forgettable main campaign that takes us through D-Day...and a bunch of boring events after it, towards the end of WW2. The actual gameplay works well and the graphics are quite impressive at times, however the utter mediocrity that surrounds it makes the game boring, specially if u play it for more than an hour at a time. The multiplayerAn absolutely average game to the core. An instantly forgettable main campaign that takes us through D-Day...and a bunch of boring events after it, towards the end of WW2. The actual gameplay works well and the graphics are quite impressive at times, however the utter mediocrity that surrounds it makes the game boring, specially if u play it for more than an hour at a time. The multiplayer is ok for me, but I barely play multiplayer in general.… Expand
  68. 24ysoldgamer
    Jul 27, 2019
    6
    The campaign in this game is not the best it's shallow and they play it safe but I enjoyed it and had some good time in it especially d_day and the multiplayer is really cool and I love it especially that challenges it's very rewarding but there is so many loading that kill the experience and that new war mode is not very much but I like it finally the zombie mode is boring and repetitive .
  69. BradMorgan
    Sep 10, 2019
    6
    This game was a nice representation of what happened in history. Full action from the first minute. Gameplay sometimes did not feel completely good and often the scripted moments are very clear. After completing the campaign, you no longer pick up the game quickly. Nevertheless nice to have played the game!
  70. AbhinavDasiga
    Jun 20, 2020
    6
    *Single Player Campaign Only* Sledgehammer's attempt at a gritty shooter set in World War 2 Europe had great promise. Unfortunately as things progressed through the campaign story, it devolved into your standard America is good narrative. The protagonists history with his brother and friends is never brought out as an arc but rather some throw away aspects in the script. Shooting mechanics*Single Player Campaign Only* Sledgehammer's attempt at a gritty shooter set in World War 2 Europe had great promise. Unfortunately as things progressed through the campaign story, it devolved into your standard America is good narrative. The protagonists history with his brother and friends is never brought out as an arc but rather some throw away aspects in the script. Shooting mechanics are just about fine. Overall it's a decent playthrough but no more.… Expand
  71. marvsfontanilla
    Mar 31, 2021
    6
    Story: 6
    Graphics: 9
    Sound: 6
    Gameplay: 5
    Game Time: 6 Hours (Main Story) + Online MP
    Duration: 5-6 Hours (Campaign) + MP
  72. Relah
    May 1, 2020
    6
    The singleplayer is, like any cod game, a simple action movie. The multiplayer is standard with a lot of maps that go into 3 lanes, zombies are amazing, yes the map is bigger and there are objectives but its super fun to play if you have friends over. Overall its a standard cod game, if you get it you will have a lot of fin with it.
  73. samtimes89
    May 29, 2022
    6
    Ps4 te bitirdim Pc'de oynamak istedim sanırım bir kere oynasam yeter bir daha sarmadı
  74. Fana-du-jeu
    Jun 27, 2020
    6
    Plutôt un bon jeu , il manque un peu de contenu , mais il fait très bien l'affaire pour une partie entre amis ,les loot box pour débloquer certaines armes sont un peu abusé il faut bien l'admettre ( déjà que le nombres d'armes n'est pas conséquent) donc je peut tout a fait comprendre la note final, bien que je soit satisfait du jeu
  75. renatoelyone
    Jun 7, 2021
    6
    campaign for this game is dull and full of cliche, pre-assembled action scenes that do not surprise anyone the characters do not have much charisma. Multiplayer and a big payout to win almost every weapon you unlock only if you get the premium version and the matches are quite long. The multiplayer maps are huge filled with useless empty spaces that could reduce a lot. The difficulty curvecampaign for this game is dull and full of cliche, pre-assembled action scenes that do not surprise anyone the characters do not have much charisma. Multiplayer and a big payout to win almost every weapon you unlock only if you get the premium version and the matches are quite long. The multiplayer maps are huge filled with useless empty spaces that could reduce a lot. The difficulty curve is ridiculously bad, meaning you have to play a lot even if you want to have some fun in this game. One of the few positive points of this game is the destruction of scenarios. This game is not recommended for beginners… Expand
  76. michealmyles
    Jan 20, 2021
    6
    The single player campaign is good. Multiplayer is sub-par, the maps are far too small. The loot box system is abhorrent - but so are the times. Until a new generation of developers arise, this will continue. Everything after MW2 was a downhill, but this game is different. Its good enough - for me. If you want a better WW2 game I recommend Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and Call Of Duty:The single player campaign is good. Multiplayer is sub-par, the maps are far too small. The loot box system is abhorrent - but so are the times. Until a new generation of developers arise, this will continue. Everything after MW2 was a downhill, but this game is different. Its good enough - for me. If you want a better WW2 game I recommend Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and Call Of Duty: World At War. You wont be playing much multiplayer with that, but the engine is more true to the standards of what a good shooter is, responsive controls, nice textures, etc. If I were to recommend this game, I wouldn't say its worth more than $20. The grind of the multiplayer loot box mechanic is a gambling trap that you should be wise not to fall into. Collecting just for the sake having a skin or texture forces you to play the game in a way that is streamlined and that is deceitful and misguided. Its understandable that there should be unlockable skins, etc, but the randomization is explicit gambling, which I don't think should be in games, unless you like that sort of thing - more power to you. If you can take anything away from this review - please note the developer and publishers to avoid: EA, Activision, Ubisoft. They are game manufacturers with a quota. Never forget that. Its big business. DONT TRUST THE "CRIT" REVIEWS. The only thing critical about them is their bias.… Expand
  77. 34m2121
    Jul 21, 2023
    6
    Diğer CODlardan farklı olarak çok oyunu etkilemesede skill kullanabiliyoruz, ara sahnelerin kalitesi mükemmel, duygusal ama vasat bir hikaye. onun dışında sıradan bir COD
  78. KrowKrof
    May 13, 2023
    6
    ........................................................................mid
  79. SauceBox6
    Nov 26, 2022
    6
    10 - Masterpiece
    9 - Amazing
    8 - Great
    7 - Good
    6 - Okay
    5 - Mediocre
    4 - Bad
    3 - Awful
    2 - Painful
    1 - Unbearable
  80. RJ_Crooks
    Dec 28, 2017
    5
    There is nothing special about WWII that separates it from previous iterations of the COD franchise. The story is sub-par and the online play is full of quick scoping snipers, and spawn camping boost lobbies. Of course you have the pay to play loot system for those that are into wasting their money. All in all not a bad game, but one that will quickly be forgotten.
  81. RuslanDZE
    Nov 14, 2017
    5
    CAMPAIGN ONLY REVIEW.
    YES, I am one of these players that playing COD games for a campaign.
    From campaign I usually expect great, creative and epic action scenes and stereotyped vilians. From the announcement that was obvious, they wanna double down on the realism and drama. Game is trying to make sense of comradory and make you care about characters but problem is that there is    CAMPAIGN ONLY REVIEW.
    YES, I am one of these players that playing COD games for a campaign.
    From campaign I usually expect great, creative and epic action scenes and stereotyped vilians.
    From the announcement that was obvious, they wanna double down on the realism and drama.
    Game is trying to make sense of comradory and make you care about characters but problem is that there is nothing special about them to start care. Sometimes you think that game will give you something interesting but after a while you are dissapointed. There is no vilian and story is not cohesive. It feels more like episodes from B1. If I would replace characters in each mission I would not miss anything. QTE is very dissatisfied, even tho you can make them cool (Heavy Rain). There is some new things in the gameplay like you can ask for particular things from your team members. There is some action scenes too, probably the best one is train chase. But these scenes are not impressive because we saw it before. Other games are caught up with crazy action. Lets say few years ago in modern warfare times I would say yes only COD developers can make action as crazy as here.
    I loved France Liberation section.
    THE WORST THING in the game is story. At the announcement event of this game Activision was saying about how personal and important this game to them because they care about history of WW2. Well, that was a joke probably. Whole game is representing how you should not make story about WW2. There is some playing with history but in general is so bad. And I am not expecting everything smart from a Call Of Duty game. But why would deveopers lie about how they care about history..... oh yeah it is marketing.

    Overall, I partly enjoyed this game. Call Of Duty did returned to the throne of FPS games. It is maybe even step back compare to IW in terms of campaign.    … Expand
  82. FreedomFighters
    Jun 14, 2020
    5
    Here’s a game I never expected that I’d be writing a review of. I’ve played a few of the “Call of Duty” games before, but I’d say I have a weird history with this franchise. My friends and I have spent numerous hours playing several “Call of Duty” games (notably the “Black Ops” sub-series) in local multiplayer (mostly through fighting bots and taking on Zombies), and I’ve had some funHere’s a game I never expected that I’d be writing a review of. I’ve played a few of the “Call of Duty” games before, but I’d say I have a weird history with this franchise. My friends and I have spent numerous hours playing several “Call of Duty” games (notably the “Black Ops” sub-series) in local multiplayer (mostly through fighting bots and taking on Zombies), and I’ve had some fun playing those games, since I enjoy some local cooperative multiplayer with friends, but “Call of Duty” is in a weird boat where I feel it's simultaneously the most underrated and overrated game franchise out now. Underrated in that the games are relatively fun in short bursts, and perhaps not as bad as the internet might lead you to believe, but overrated in that they aren’t nearly as good as their blockbuster sales might lead you to believe. “Call of Duty” is not one of the greatest franchises in gaming, it’s simply one of the most persistent, as it continues to receive yearly installments that sell like hotcakes in spite of their general averageness. And while 2017’s “Call of Duty: WWII” was a hyped entry when it was announced for returning to the boots-on-ground gameplay style after so many futuristic entries, this entry honestly epitomizes the “averageness” that has rendered the series unexciting.
    “Call of Duty: WWII,” presentation-wise, does things pretty solidly: of course, the game is graphically impressive, just as any number of Activision games are, and gameplay-wise, it's at the very least functional. It’s fast-paced, the controls are fluid, and the gunplay is competent stuff. Beyond the campaign, this is another “Call of Duty” game that I’ve played with friends (as I mentioned, mostly against bots because that’s what we like), and it is occasionally pretty fun. This is a very minor thing, but I never got to mention this when I reviewed “Battlefield 1,” which I’m using just for the sake of comparison, but one thing I found so fun in that game was being able to use a shovel as a weapon, just because it was so jarring yet gratifying. “Call of Duty: WWII” does also allow you to use a shovel, which…I’m sorry, I know it’s really minor, but I just get a kick out of it.
    The reason I had to mention something that minor, though, is because I'm really reaching to find something positive to say about this game. I had some big issues with it, but the biggest, most glaring one is this: if you've played one “Call of Duty” game, you’ve played them all, and this entry hits that nail on the head. There’s nothing exciting about the gameplay here, it’s competently made but severely lacking in anything that captivating. Beyond the lack of standout gameplay elements (well, outside of vehicle sections that stand out for the WORST reasons), the campaign is unbelievably short and painfully unfulfilling. Much of the story is a mishmash of clichés with forgettable characters, and the game is so cinematic that it feels like most of the game’s length is spent watching. I know I mentioned in my review of “Battlefield 1” that it too had a campaign that felt short and occasionally had too much watching, but “Call of Duty: WWII” takes those flaws and turns them up to eleven. And the difference here is that “Battlefield 1” actually had a good game to go along with it, but with “Call of Duty: WWII,” I mean, I just beat the remaster of “Modern Warfare 2” about a month ago and I feel like I’m playing that exact same game here. By the way, I know I’m hanging around the “Battlefield 1” comparison a lot in this review, and I don’t want this to feel like a compare-and-contrast piece because a game should be judged on its own, but frankly, I feel the comparison is worth bringing up because I refuse to believe that “Call of Duty: WWII” would exist had the fanbase not caused such a stink about “Infinite Warfare” a year prior, and then EA not hit it so big with the announcement and trailer for “Battlefield 1” not long after. This game feels like it was conceptualized and created only to ride on the coattails of “Battlefield 1,” and frankly, to me, it often just feels like a rip-off of it.
    I really have to hand it to the “Call of Duty” series, because it is just extremely good at diluting and watering down the entire FPS genre for the biggest audience possible, most specifically casual gamers who don’t play enough video games to understand why the franchise is not nearly on the level of creativity as the many games it finds itself so eager to copy off of And that is precisely the case with “Call of Duty: WWII,” which has its moments of fun, but continues to carry a “been there, done that” vibe. It’s the same game you’ve played for years, and it remains a very safe, stale, lowest common denominator shooter that I can’t help but feel simply indifferent towards.
    Final rating: 5 out of 10 “Hmm…”    … Expand
  83. claytastic
    Feb 4, 2018
    5
    Call of Duty continues to prove itself to be the most boring franchise out there with WWII. I didn't have high expectations, and actually wasn't planning on buying it. But some of my friends told me I would enjoy it, so I got it when it was on sale. They were pretty wrong.

    Don't get me wrong, it has some of the best graphics and sound design out there, and nails the look and feel of    Call of Duty continues to prove itself to be the most boring franchise out there with WWII. I didn't have high expectations, and actually wasn't planning on buying it. But some of my friends told me I would enjoy it, so I got it when it was on sale. They were pretty wrong.

    Don't get me wrong, it has some of the best graphics and sound design out there, and nails the look and feel of World War 2. It also plays pretty well, and can be enjoyed for an unextended amount of time, but in terms of the rest of it, there's nothing here.

    Let's start off with the campaign. It's bad. I mean, what did you expect? The characters are boring and lifeless, and no amount of Hollywood actors is going to make me change my mind about that. Call of Duty just doesn't have good campaigns anymore. They pretty much stopped trying after the first Black Ops because I guess they realised that no one played the campaigns anymore. This one really proves that point, though, because in the multiplayer, they censored the Swastikas, and there are black and female soldiers running about, even on the side of the Nazis. Not that I'm opposed to diversity, but in a game selling itself on historical accuracy, that really puts a dent in the illusion. However, in the campaign, there are Swastikas everywhere, and no females in sight (minus one who plays a fairly minor role). Why do you think this is? Because no one plays the campaign. They could make it the most violent game ever, and no one would care. Besides that problem, the campaign never really has any twists or turns. It's just standard and pretty boring most of the time. I'm not gonna sit here and pretend to care about ANOTHER soldier who has family at home who we can all predict is gonna die.

    The multiplayer isn't much of a step up, either. At first, I was kinda upset that they were continuing to make futuristic games with Infinite Warfare, but World War 2 has made me realise something. Going futuristic was the best thing that happened to Call of Duty. Both Advanced Warfare and Black Ops 3 are two of my favourites because the futuristic setting allowed for more variety. The double jumps and wall running in Advanced Warfare was the biggest change the series had made since the switch to a modern setting in CoD 4. Plus, this gave them the opportunity to have more weapon and ability variety. It needed refining, but it was a nice change of pace. Black Ops 3 was the perfect follow up because it did all of the refining that needed to be done in Advanced Warfare, and became what I would say is my favourite Call of Duty (even though the campaign didn't measure up to that of previous franchise entries). The only reason I hated Infinite Warfare was because it was just Black Ops 3 with worse maps and one of the series' worst campaigns. To say World War 2 has improved on this or evolved the series in any way is a joke because all they did was return to a style that everyone thought they wanted, but then realised they didn't. I always kind of knew that just going back to modern or historical settings wouldn't automatically fix Call of Duty, but I was hoping that it would provide some slight ounce of innovation. And it kinda did. The new War mode, which is the newest thing CoD has done since the jump kits in Advanced Warfare, is actually pretty neat. You're dropped into a linear map in which you and your team either have to complete an objective or drive the other team back from doing that. And while it's infinitely more fun to play the attacking team than it is to play defending, I still enjoyed my time with it. Other than that, though, there's nothing new or fresh about World War 2's multiplayer. If you've played a modern or historical CoD's multiplayer, you've played this one.

    Lastly, there's the zombies, which has absolutely nothing new or interesting about it. It's just boring, honestly. So much so that I have absolutely nothing to say about it besides the fact that Ving Rhames is in it, so that's cool.

    Overall, CoD WW2 is the furthest thing from a fresh gaming experience as you can possibly get. It's fun in short bursts and has some creative ideas, but none of them are ever executed to their full potential. 5/10.    … Expand
  84. JMARSseph
    Nov 13, 2017
    5
    Campaign....beautiful graphics, great sound, not very good dialogue and story and a horrible ending....
    Zombies..... great map, but of course only one... decent customization although the unlockables weren't exactly mind blowing
    Multiplayer...typical Call of Duty, extreme downgrade in presentation next to campaign and the new lobby is a poor, poor attempt to be a community playground    Campaign....beautiful graphics, great sound, not very good dialogue and story and a horrible ending....
    Zombies..... great map, but of course only one... decent customization although the unlockables weren't exactly mind blowing
    Multiplayer...typical Call of Duty, extreme downgrade in presentation next to campaign and the new lobby is a poor, poor attempt to be a community playground
    The campaign is quick and forgettable, the zombies are a dangling carrot to spend more for more and the multiplayer , as usual, was plagued with issues..... already traded this title at the local Vintage Stock...and would not recommend.....high hopes for a return to ww2 were only that, high hopes...    … Expand
  85. Chronos1
    Nov 14, 2017
    5
    The single player campaign is rather mediocre but then again this is call of duty so not really a big let down there.. the MP is rather bland because there is no real changes there that makes it more interesting to play.. zombie mode is same old same old.. basically another bland COD game.
  86. HappyPhilXD
    Mar 1, 2018
    5
    Just bought it for PS4 because a friend wanted to play with me.

    Visuals: Graphics are mediocre, it tries to stay at 60fps, the effects are from 2009. Controls: It's ok to play with controller, the auto aim is pretty heavy so you can hit something. It's not as smooth as Halo or Destiny when it comes to aiming. Gameplay: There are good amount of weapons but for the most times all    Just bought it for PS4 because a friend wanted to play with me.

    Visuals:
    Graphics are mediocre, it tries to stay at 60fps, the effects are from 2009.

    Controls:
    It's ok to play with controller, the auto aim is pretty heavy so you can hit something. It's not as smooth as Halo or Destiny when it comes to aiming.

    Gameplay:
    There are good amount of weapons but for the most times all players use the same guns because some of them are over effective. Talking to you fire shotgun.
    The maps are not the best part. I enjoy only 2 of the 9 maps because for the most parts there was no thought behind them.
    It wouldn't be an CoD without Cheaters. I thought there couldn't be that many Cheaters on PS4 than on PC but I was wrong. There is at least one blatant 360° spinning aimboting idiot in 1 of 3 games and some other "strange" players.

    Gamemodes:
    There are enough maps and modes to keep me occupied for a little while, most of them standard fps fast food.
    The zombie mode is good. They changed some thing and I have to say it's refreshing.
    Campaign is standard. Pew pew action with nice settings.

    All in all a normal mediocre CoD with the attempt to cash in on the World War hype Battlefield 1 started. Does nothing particular wrong but neither right. Should be ok for fans but I would suggest waiting for a sale.    … Expand
  87. xenofiend95
    Nov 9, 2017
    5
    I was interested to here COD would be going back to WW2 for the first time in nearly a decade, being that World at War was one of my favorite games in the series along with COD 2. This game happens to be anything but interesting, not terrible, not bad, it is just incredibly mediocre. Campaign is uninteresting, multiplayer maps are uninspired and not fun to play or look at, then you haveI was interested to here COD would be going back to WW2 for the first time in nearly a decade, being that World at War was one of my favorite games in the series along with COD 2. This game happens to be anything but interesting, not terrible, not bad, it is just incredibly mediocre. Campaign is uninteresting, multiplayer maps are uninspired and not fun to play or look at, then you have the obligatory zombies mode. The game is a huge disappointment, but not bad.… Expand
  88. wapakalypse
    Nov 4, 2017
    5
    I give it a five. It looks amazing and I like the HQ concept. Its fun to play. Its boots on the ground COD. There are a lot of desperate people pulling drop shots and jumping around like fairies to avoid being shot but that is just the reality of COD right now.

    The servers are unable to handle these cool new ideas. It is constantly crashing, infinite loading screen and error codes all    I give it a five. It looks amazing and I like the HQ concept. Its fun to play. Its boots on the ground COD. There are a lot of desperate people pulling drop shots and jumping around like fairies to avoid being shot but that is just the reality of COD right now.

    The servers are unable to handle these cool new ideas. It is constantly crashing, infinite loading screen and error codes all day. The error codes present a link to www.callofduty.com/wwii/status where you can check updates on the server status however this page is clearly not updated because no one on my friends list can access any online function of this game yet the website indicates that all systems are green...

    The worst part, is that they have censored WWII and made it politically correct.

    Next Gen video games are ruining the gaming experience because video game developers seem to be simply riding the hype of next gen gaming while putting minimal effort into the actual performance of the games. Micro transactions have turned gaming into a profit first industry, have removed the artistic integrity of games, and have completely disregarded the consumer.

    My advice is to buy this game used on Kijiji and prevent these developers from making m.ore money than they deserve    … Expand
  89. albodoin
    Nov 5, 2017
    5
    First time I'm buying a COD game since MW3, I decided to move on from this franchise because it preferred by far Battlefield (still do). For once in a cod game I can say that the campaign is spot on. Okay it might be built around war cliches but it's just enough to be enjoyable without being to corny. The zombie mode is amazing as always but this time it's less cryptic with the addition ofFirst time I'm buying a COD game since MW3, I decided to move on from this franchise because it preferred by far Battlefield (still do). For once in a cod game I can say that the campaign is spot on. Okay it might be built around war cliches but it's just enough to be enjoyable without being to corny. The zombie mode is amazing as always but this time it's less cryptic with the addition of clear objectives. But the main drawback (which is a huge one) is the multiplayer...thank god they added the War mode and the headquarter as a lobby to join friend! Finally Activition is trying to improve, but that is pretty much it. The rest is still the same as always, corridor maps, run and gun, corner camping, people that plays for their kill ratio instead of the objectives. It's basically a Modern Warfare or Black Ops with a WW2 skin!; nothing new. Maybe I'm getting old but I'm tired of reflex shooters and would like something more immersive because right now I really don't feel like I'm fighting against hordes of nazis but more like farming kill for xp to unlock the next **** weapon skin for my pistol.… Expand
  90. SrPepe
    Jan 2, 2018
    5
    Una campaña... cuestionable y aburrida. Si quieres pasar de dar escenarios increibles como la destrucción de la torre Eiffel o la estatua de la libertad a pelear en campos y casas viejas debes saber muy bien como manejarlo y no lo han sabido hacer. Una campaña que se me hizo aburrida.

    Probe el multijugador muy poco, pero lo mismo de siempre.
  91. brat1111
    Jan 7, 2018
    5
    The shooting, that I liked so much in Black Ops 3, just feels off and clunky in this game. The graphics are good in some campaign levels but not that great overall. I am very disappointed. Don't bother buying this game, that's my advice, man.
  92. haydos89
    Nov 13, 2017
    5
    I can't go as far to say that COD WW2 is a bad game. The campaign is fantastic with a great story, likable characters and a real sense of realism when it comes to the hellish circumstances that came battling in World War 2. Unfortunately that only lasts around 6 hours or so and then you're left with the multiplayer modes...which is basically has just been re-skinned to suit the WW2I can't go as far to say that COD WW2 is a bad game. The campaign is fantastic with a great story, likable characters and a real sense of realism when it comes to the hellish circumstances that came battling in World War 2. Unfortunately that only lasts around 6 hours or so and then you're left with the multiplayer modes...which is basically has just been re-skinned to suit the WW2 setting. The pace, scorestreaks etc are all the same as before and to be honest it is getting quite old and never makes you feel like you're in a true battle or makes you feel like you've accomplished anything when you win a match.

    It is a shame because i was looking forward to heading back to the classic COD we all came to love, but unfortunately it's a big miss for me. Personally i am happy to trade it in for battlefront 2 and also head back to battlefield 1.    … Expand
  93. mrrader72
    Nov 12, 2017
    5
    When I person can run around the map with just a shovel while everyone else has machine guns, and have the high score your WWII shooter has problems. This game is buggier than road kill. Snipers quick scoping in close quarters without taking time to aim, because the aim assist for snipers is ridiculous. it has the potential to be so much fun too. That's what makes playing it so frustrating.
  94. Sexbot-5000
    Nov 12, 2017
    5
    There really isn’t a need for a long review. It’s call of duty. It’s WW2, it’s mostly unchanged, and they added a couple tropes from other games. War mode from Battlefield’s rush, COD version of social from destiny, and the loot boxes from Overwatch without cartoon style to give them the freedom to create actual costumes. If you think you’ll like this game you probably will. If you thinkThere really isn’t a need for a long review. It’s call of duty. It’s WW2, it’s mostly unchanged, and they added a couple tropes from other games. War mode from Battlefield’s rush, COD version of social from destiny, and the loot boxes from Overwatch without cartoon style to give them the freedom to create actual costumes. If you think you’ll like this game you probably will. If you think you won’t like this you probably won’t. It’s that easy. There’s a long list of more unique and creative shooters out there. At the end of the day if you like the game you’ve been playing for a decade you have no reason to think you won’t like this one. It’s a five. Equal parts exciting and boring.… Expand
  95. Firewing2
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    Honestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncated it felt. A lot of cutscenes and not a lot of game play... trying too hard to shove the story of "brotherhood" down your throat. The squad system feels tacked on, and the campaign brought nothing new to the franchise.

    I'm a huge fan of the CoD    Honestly, I was extremely disappointed with this game. I played through the campaign in a short afternoon, and was surprised at how truncated it felt. A lot of cutscenes and not a lot of game play... trying too hard to shove the story of "brotherhood" down your throat. The squad system feels tacked on, and the campaign brought nothing new to the franchise.

    I'm a huge fan of the CoD series as a whole, and was very excited by the promise of a return to the WW2 roots, but this game is just disappointing.    … Expand
  96. lheg95
    Nov 11, 2017
    5
    I play like 8 or 10 hours and this game is so boring. The first mission of the campaign, the D-Day, the moment all WWII lover wait for is disappointing. The campaign is short and mediocre. There are some "wanna be BF1" points like the Train Mission or the multiplayer mode that is the same as conquest but in a shorter map.
    The graphics are great, they really upgrade all the visual effects    I play like 8 or 10 hours and this game is so boring. The first mission of the campaign, the D-Day, the moment all WWII lover wait for is disappointing. The campaign is short and mediocre. There are some "wanna be BF1" points like the Train Mission or the multiplayer mode that is the same as conquest but in a shorter map.
    The graphics are great, they really upgrade all the visual effects (finally!), but, to be a game that sells more than 10 millions copies each year, the upgrade is less that I expect.
    The sound is great, I really doesn't have any complaint.

    For zombies, I like the scary sounds and ambient that create for this mode, but the map is not great and it's not bad and the survive mode is ok, nothing special.    … Expand
  97. ZeoN
    Nov 27, 2017
    5
    Call Of Duty clasico que quizas atraiga a seguidores antiguos de la franquicia.Mapas bien construidos en su mayoria a excepcion de algunos.Campaña profunda y modo zombis aceptable.
    Como siempre,las politicas abusivas de Activision de sus 4 DLCs e introducir los CPs antes de reparar el propio juego no se podian hacer esperar.Este juego tecnicamente merece un 8,pero las politicas y mala    Call Of Duty clasico que quizas atraiga a seguidores antiguos de la franquicia.Mapas bien construidos en su mayoria a excepcion de algunos.Campaña profunda y modo zombis aceptable.
    Como siempre,las politicas abusivas de Activision de sus 4 DLCs e introducir los CPs antes de reparar el propio juego no se podian hacer esperar.Este juego tecnicamente merece un 8,pero las politicas y mala gestion de el hacen que su puntuacion se reduzca.

    Juego recomendable si eres fan de la franquicia de CoD    … Expand
  98. mrseannathan
    Nov 3, 2017
    5
    I will keep an open mind seeing as it hasn't even been 24 hours since launch.

    1. I expected a much better visual experience when playing online. Graphics feel like they were pulled from a COD 4 -5 years ago. 2. This social hub or whatever it is.. yes, i know it's obvious but damn, way to copy Destiny. I want my COD to be simple with the menus and everything the way it has been. 3.    I will keep an open mind seeing as it hasn't even been 24 hours since launch.

    1. I expected a much better visual experience when playing online. Graphics feel like they were pulled from a COD 4 -5 years ago.
    2. This social hub or whatever it is.. yes, i know it's obvious but damn, way to copy Destiny. I want my COD to be simple with the menus and everything the way it has been.
    3. LOADING TIMES.. HOEEEE LEEEEEEEEE (Holy!)... Even when leaving a match, i'm waiting ages until I can leave.

    I give this a 5/10 only because I am a long fan of Call of Duty and I will always love the series. Despite the poor execution, it still offers that appeal in a WW2 game... Especially now that they have added 'WAR', a mode perfected by Battlefield and one I have always wish to see in COD. There are some things that need to get fixed and I'm sure they will over the next couple days but in my eyes, it's failed on launch unlike the past releases.

    I'm a huge sucker for WW2 games but I have to say.. I miss the jumping, fast-paced gameplay COD evolved into.. and at this current moment, I can say I enjoyed IW way more that WWII.    … Expand
  99. CoreGamer1408
    Jun 3, 2020
    5
    Dropped on PS+ for free and gave it ago. Nice visuals lots of cinematic action and cut scenes. You know the usual scripted CoD formula story telling and gameplay. Not into PvP MP shooters so the SP campaign is the only thing I do in CoD games. Period World War shooters have been done to death. Modern Military shooters have been done to death. Personally I preferred the out of this worldDropped on PS+ for free and gave it ago. Nice visuals lots of cinematic action and cut scenes. You know the usual scripted CoD formula story telling and gameplay. Not into PvP MP shooters so the SP campaign is the only thing I do in CoD games. Period World War shooters have been done to death. Modern Military shooters have been done to death. Personally I preferred the out of this world CoD like Infinite Warfare the most. Glad Call of Cliche was free of sorts. I was bored and out by the third level.… Expand
  100. cem12
    Nov 10, 2017
    5
    Gráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas lasGráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas las cuales jamás hubo batalla alguna. Es un juego lleno de micro transacciones, fomentando la compra de productos ya que te muestra descaradamente lo que le toca al resto de jugadores. Los emblemas nazis "volaron", jamás podrás elegir uniforme aleman. Siendo americano juegas con armas alemanas, no te da opción a elegir. Sigo enamorado el Cod: World at War, un juego que sí cumplía con la historia, escenarios y soldados. pensaba que Activision por fin lo iba a volver a hacer, pero me equivoque. Han creado un juego de "guerra antigua" por llamarlo de alguna manera, para que los "niños rata" sean felices. Creando micro transacciones, matar por matar ya que no matas Nazis, sino alemanes que no han hecho nada; poniendo mujeres que apenas las hubo en los ejércitos alemanes ni americanos, creando las cajas de de premios "traga perras" Lo único que celebro, es que por fin se abandonen los malditos juegos futuristas.… Expand
Page:

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Best PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2017
9
#9 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 83 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 62 out of 83
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 83
  3. Negative: 0 out of 83
  1. CD-Action
    Jan 10, 2018
    70
    I really wanted CoD’s return to World War II to be something more than a solid game – but it’s not. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’ve already seen all this, that the developers (or perhaps the publisher) chose to create something as safe as possible. There’s just one campaign mission that surprised me with its scale, the rest is just a disappointing “best of Call of Duty”. The multiplayer is as good as usual, but it was infused with unnecessary systems resembling mobile titles, e.g spending in-game currency on pointless tasks of the “kill 100 enemies” variety. Missions that make you watch other players open their loot boxes are the pinnacle of absurdity. [13/2017, p.64]
  2. The Digital Fix
    Dec 22, 2017
    70
    A solid return to its roots, Call of Duty WWII reminds us what made us all fall in love Call of Duty in the first place. It ticks all the boxes which is both a blessing and a curse. Good fun and worth your time but offers nothing exceptional.
    Read full review
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 15, 2017
    90
    Revitalised and exemplary FPS gaming. Multiplayer trims back to the essentials, campaign shows sensitivity and Zombies...well it's a new excuse to play CoD Zombies. [Christmas 2017, p.77]
See all critic reviews »