Battlefield 1

 PlayStation 4
User Score
7.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 2521 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,851 out of 2521
  2. Mixed: 411 out of 2521
  3. Negative: 259 out of 2521
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. wobblydoggy
    Oct 24, 2016
    7
    Battlefield 1 is a great game, but the people giving it 10's are crazy or haven't played the game long enough. The single player is a solid 10. It's super fun, immersive and tells a great story... but it's pretty short. The graphics throughout the game are gorgeous, and everything is perfectly fluid.
  2. EL-MiNiO
    Oct 23, 2016
    7
    A must have for FPS fan. .
  3. christhewiz
    Nov 4, 2016
    7
    Once again EA delivers the fully gaming experience only to those who are willing to spend additional cash. To do so, they made leveling really tedious and the awards mediocre in comparison to the goodies in the battle packs. Latter are sometimes awarded when leveling and can be bought via the PS store. What a surprise... Spending most of the time being killed by overpowered gamers who tookOnce again EA delivers the fully gaming experience only to those who are willing to spend additional cash. To do so, they made leveling really tedious and the awards mediocre in comparison to the goodies in the battle packs. Latter are sometimes awarded when leveling and can be bought via the PS store. What a surprise... Spending most of the time being killed by overpowered gamers who took the shortcut and spent loads of cash for battle packs ruins the game and the incentive the regular way. It also has to be said that there are very few MP maps and those are identical with the areas in the campaign. The scope of weapons and vehicles is also disappointing; also the massive graphics downgrade when switching from the campaign to MP modus.… Expand
  4. zuldo
    Oct 27, 2016
    7
    While I am having a lot of fun in multiplayer the single player was such a HUGE let down!!!
    WTF how are reviewers talking good about the singleplayer? Operations: Kaiserslacht 64 player is a more realistic WW1 experience than the single player which can only have been made by Sylvester Stallone and Michael Bay.
    The prologue sets the tone of what it should have been. A gritty grueling    While I am having a lot of fun in multiplayer the single player was such a HUGE let down!!!
    WTF how are reviewers talking good about the singleplayer? Operations: Kaiserslacht 64 player is a more realistic WW1 experience than the single player which can only have been made by Sylvester Stallone and Michael Bay.
    The prologue sets the tone of what it should have been. A gritty grueling hell-like representation of one of the worst wars that ever was. Where is Verdun? Where is the Somme? Where are the endless waves of human meat churning against stale-mate trench lines?
    WW1 is such an epic story. And the SP in BF1 is SO MUCH LOST POTENTIAL to re-tell it, and instead go with the cheap hollywood version in an attempt to please the 13 year olds playing this.    … Expand
  5. d3sm0nd
    Apr 22, 2018
    7
    Amazing game. DICE managed to create an immersive massive multiplayer combat experience. The WW1 setting is interesting and unique. Game suffers from severe team balance issues.
  6. Sky-Line___
    Jan 25, 2017
    7
    Absolutely beautiful graphically, the sound effects are amazing too !

    However, the multiplayer mode lacks of depth in content (weapons, armies and even maps). I also regret the fact of not being able to do a +5 squad, it might not be everyone's problem, but I have a lot of friend playing it and separating in 2 squads is annoying. There are also big framerate problems on certain maps    Absolutely beautiful graphically, the sound effects are amazing too !

    However, the multiplayer mode lacks of depth in content (weapons, armies and even maps). I also regret the fact of not being able to do a +5 squad, it might not be everyone's problem, but I have a lot of friend playing it and separating in 2 squads is annoying.
    There are also big framerate problems on certain maps when there are a lot of craters on the ground with many people around and shooting everywhere. A game, especially a FPS, should always feel fluid.

    Unlike many other people I'm not a fan of the solo mode even if it is decent. Yes some missions are surprisingly entertaining, but on the other hand there are a lot of identical missions (infiltration phases for example are very present in the game and it gets boring after a while).

    It's a good BF, occasional players will love it, but more serious gamers will get bored after a few dozen hours.    … Expand
  7. YetiYeti
    Oct 24, 2016
    7
    Die Kampagne ist nicht schlecht für einen Multiplayer Titel, jedoch niemals mit einem klassischen Single FPS zu vergleichen. Grafik ist top. Der Multiplayer Part ist für Anfänger unspielbar, leider. Wahrscheinlich weil gerade so viele Pros spielen.
  8. TheStudioBoy
    Dec 15, 2016
    7
    First of, the story is way to short. You follow a few people's stories throughout the front from France to the Ottoman empire but most of them don't have much or any character development and that means you can't grow attached to them and feel what they feel in that moment. The first two story missions are the exceptions with the prologue having real emotion in it and the first real storyFirst of, the story is way to short. You follow a few people's stories throughout the front from France to the Ottoman empire but most of them don't have much or any character development and that means you can't grow attached to them and feel what they feel in that moment. The first two story missions are the exceptions with the prologue having real emotion in it and the first real story having long enough to develop characters. It also doesn't have any story from the central powers (Germany, Austro-Hungary and the Ottomans) which means that they are portrayed as pure evil like you would portray the Nazi's in a WW2 game which is horribly wrong. It stands as a nice piece of tutorial for multiplayer though.

    The multiplayer is very fun with each map needing different tactics and weapons if you want your team to succeed and win. It has a few game modes with each being very different but some aren't as good as others. Operations is the best game mode with it feeling like an actual battle with progress but War Pigeons is kind of bland but can be chaotic fun. There are a variety of weapons for each class but it is definitely less than what you had on offer in BF3 and BF4. Tank and plane combat is really fun with each vehicle felling powerful and weak all the time. The destruction is brilliant in this game with small bits of wall falling of and even injuring people. However some maps favor certain weapons to much like Argonne forest favoring shotguns and Suez favoring snipers, which can lead to so much rage because you are always killed by the same things.    … Expand
  9. corpsed
    Oct 21, 2016
    7
    Battlefield 1 is a great game, but the people giving it 10's are crazy or haven't played the game long enough. The single player is a solid 10. It's super fun, immersive and tells a great story... but it's pretty short. The graphics throughout the game are gorgeous, and everything is perfectly fluid.

    Multiplayer unfortunately is about a 6, which is where you will spend most of your    Battlefield 1 is a great game, but the people giving it 10's are crazy or haven't played the game long enough. The single player is a solid 10. It's super fun, immersive and tells a great story... but it's pretty short. The graphics throughout the game are gorgeous, and everything is perfectly fluid.

    Multiplayer unfortunately is about a 6, which is where you will spend most of your time. You've still got the great graphics, but in terms of actual gameplay it too often feels like a just whole bunch of chaos. War, of course, is chaos... so in some sense I guess that works, but the gist of what you do in every multiplayer scenario is run around randomly until you get killed or see a hint of moment and start shooting. There's sniping and healing, etc... but for the most part you play for a short burst until you get clipped by a random bullet. It's really frustrating when you start taking damage and can't figure out where it's coming from which happens constantly, and if you run around a corner an another enemy appears, skill takes a back seat to luck... what weapon are you carrying and how twitchy is your finger.

    In Conquest mode, for example, you can choose to spawn on other teammates or certain spawn points, and before you have even turned around or walked two steps you are shot in the back of the head, and forced to respawn again. You might run out of a building and a bomb from a plane drops on your head... respawn again. Spawn in a tank, but the tank is at 10% health and you're suddenly dead again. And don't forget the enemies can spawn anywhere too... You might round a corner only to have someone spawn behind you. There's nothing you can do but take the death.

    You will never feel like you are in control of the game or that you can just play better to change the outcome. Nor do you ever feel like winning means anything. You'll continue to play to get more weapon upgrades, but at the end of the day whether you are at the top or bottom of the scoreboard means nothing. Your team feels soooo impersonal.

    Basically multiplayer feels very "casual".... It's really cool to chill and play like you're in a real war, but the randomness feels unrewarding and wins feel unrewarding.

    Don't get me wrong... Battlefield 1 is a solid 7 great game. But it is far from a 10... It's a war simulator with very realistic graphics and effects. It's multiplayer is fun to play, but begins to get boring due to your lack of control of outcomes and generally unrewarding feeling you have after each match.    … Expand
  10. Nathan1423
    Jul 8, 2018
    7
    If you love multiplayer, this review is not for you. I play these games for the single player campaign. This one was short and divided into several small stories. The stories are told very well and the game also feels very good to play, minus the stiff running which feels like sliding. However, there wasn't enough time to get invested in any character too much or really feel like it wasIf you love multiplayer, this review is not for you. I play these games for the single player campaign. This one was short and divided into several small stories. The stories are told very well and the game also feels very good to play, minus the stiff running which feels like sliding. However, there wasn't enough time to get invested in any character too much or really feel like it was you in the thick of it at all. Also the time to die under fire can sometimes be a little short, requiring you to only play the game a certain way instead of fighting however you want. This is more realistic but less enjoyable for me personally. I enjoyed the cutscenes more than the shooting sometimes, and for a fps game, that's not ideal. I would give it a 6 but some of the stories are epic and memorable, even if I didn't feel connected to the characters as I was playing them. If you're like me and mostly play these for single player, you might want to get this game at a hefty discount.… Expand
  11. Jaga-9403
    Jun 13, 2017
    7
    Battlefield 1, y el nuevo motor grafico Frostbite es un juegazo graficamente un mounstruo, jugabilidad; sus controles y movimientos, fisicas, muy bueno. y el sistema de destruccion de estructuras por disparos, minas, granadas, disparos de tanque, es maravilloso, justo lo que un FPS deberia ser.
    Un Multijugador asombroso, el fuerte del videojuego, DICE Lo supo hacer muy pero muy bien, me    Battlefield 1, y el nuevo motor grafico Frostbite es un juegazo graficamente un mounstruo, jugabilidad; sus controles y movimientos, fisicas, muy bueno. y el sistema de destruccion de estructuras por disparos, minas, granadas, disparos de tanque, es maravilloso, justo lo que un FPS deberia ser.
    Un Multijugador asombroso, el fuerte del videojuego, DICE Lo supo hacer muy pero muy bien, me he pasado mas de 75 horas, con rango nlv 70, lo he disfrutado con amigos, modo operaciones, partidas de hasta mas de 40 minutos, hacer uso de tanques pesados personalizados, caballeria, vehiculos, armas con recarga manual.
    El "2" mejor Battlefield, que se come a cualquier Call of Duty de estos ultimos 10 años.
    Pero no todo es bueno, y recordemos un titulo de EA sacaran hasta el ultimo beneficio de esto, y es un modelo de negocio inaceptable, un juego recordato, es decir un juego basado en la 1 guerra mundial y no te dejan jugar con el ejercito frances o ruso? :(
    Inaceptable, un "premium pass" por $49.99. No recomiendo la compra de este premium pass, no apoyemos este modelo de negocio.
    El juego me lo consegui por $40 , no recomiendo pagar mas por este titulo.
    PD: Para mi el mejor Battlefield es el 3 :D    … Expand
  12. bobalopacus
    Nov 16, 2016
    7
    To put it simply: not as good as bf4, better than hardline/star wars battlefront , but suffers in the same areas as those two games i.e. severe lack of weapons compared to bf4; poor/bland map design on close quarters modes; lacking a decent progression system (unlike bf4).

    The sound and graphics are excellent, but gameplay can be frustrating - too much emphasis on dumbed- down close    To put it simply: not as good as bf4, better than hardline/star wars battlefront , but suffers in the same areas as those two games i.e. severe lack of weapons compared to bf4; poor/bland map design on close quarters modes; lacking a decent progression system (unlike bf4).

    The sound and graphics are excellent, but gameplay can be frustrating - too much emphasis on dumbed- down close quarters combat where things quickly get chaotic. it lacks the subtlety and intelligence of bf4 opting instead for a high sheen/high impact but shallower feel. The new operations mode can be dramatic and immersive and is probably the best new addition. The battlepacks now seem pretty pointless (who really cares about skins?). TDM and the new mode Warpidgeons are really lacklustre, feeling like tacked on afterthoughts - the maps are particularly bad on these modes. Let's see what DIce brings with the dlc, maybe the game can get up to an 8 or 9 with better maps, more modes, more weapons and better balance between classes...all in all a big disappointment (as bf4 was so good - why get rid of the bits that worked???) - however, still worth buying and at least they didn't go into space...    … Expand
  13. vitaminbeer
    Dec 7, 2016
    7
    Good but short campaign mode.

    Multiplayer is unfortunately completely random and is in need of some serious balancing. Camping is too easily rewarded here, AA guns take down planes from across the map, tanks are taken out way to easy by infantry. The dreadnaught is also way to easy to kill with boats and cannons from offshore. Please fix multiplayer!
  14. BlakDak666
    Nov 17, 2017
    7
    Battlefield 1 reinvigorated my interest in multiplayer games; a true Battlefield that wages 64 players in a all out war of the first World War in stunning visuals, sounds and gameplay that is truly spectacular. Bayonet charging with chaotic screaming, blowing down towers and houses with explosions and more make the experience feel very convincing and my jaw was down when I played a match.Battlefield 1 reinvigorated my interest in multiplayer games; a true Battlefield that wages 64 players in a all out war of the first World War in stunning visuals, sounds and gameplay that is truly spectacular. Bayonet charging with chaotic screaming, blowing down towers and houses with explosions and more make the experience feel very convincing and my jaw was down when I played a match. Conquest and Rush is apart of the BF staple for fans, with also Domination and Team Deathmatch as a reach for Call of Duty fans and other shooters but not as creative. Even its War Pigeons is lackluster, but what sells it is Operations; a hour long pseudo-meta game that sets up attackers and defenders and wages control over points with only three attack attempts. It is the coolest idea and deserves alot of praise for this.

    With all this praise there are some issues needing to be addressed of why it stays to a 7/10. Microtransactions, loot boxes and season passes loom over this game much like the previous and have an effect that hurts this grand scale of war play entirely. The campaign is mediocre that feels more like a glorified tutorial than an actual campaign. There are also some issues with network connections and servers as well. In the end however Battlefield 1 delivers a exhilarating experience of war that deserves your time, just be cautious with your money.    … Expand
  15. moy_rocker
    Mar 17, 2017
    7
    OK, first of all, this game has great mechanics like previous releases which I particularly find it great. The reason why I give a 7 is because this game has serious problems between menus, specially during battle. at this day (mar/17/17) EA released an UPDATE, giving new maps, etc, but you know what? SOME GLITCHES they have solved, ARE F*****G BACK! The cursor on menu during a match isOK, first of all, this game has great mechanics like previous releases which I particularly find it great. The reason why I give a 7 is because this game has serious problems between menus, specially during battle. at this day (mar/17/17) EA released an UPDATE, giving new maps, etc, but you know what? SOME GLITCHES they have solved, ARE F*****G BACK! The cursor on menu during a match is slow AF. Don't get me wrong, I really like other features of this battlefield (since I own BF BC, BC2, BF3, BF4) but they are ruined with unsolved glitches. You can't enjoy a game with errors like that, you are blind or tolerant enough to ignore those thing, but I don't because I paid 60 dollars for having a complete game without errors, glitches and flaws.
    I have this game 3 weeks after release by recommended friends, and none of F***ERS told about the flaws. I cursed those Mofos.
    I hope you find this review to consider before you buy.
    And I want EA solve this game ASAP instead trying to make easy money from hardcore/casual gamers, I'm sick of this thing of half games fully priced...    … Expand
  16. Unnamed_gamer
    Jun 30, 2017
    7
    I like this game only for online / not great story and Campaign Ends like 5-6 Hours
    But Online of BF1 for me Best online game of Last year (final word: if u want a awesome Online Game buy BF1 But this game not Good for Offline)
    7/10 My score to this game
  17. cem12
    Nov 9, 2017
    7
    En grandisimo juego, una calidad gráfica nunca antes vista y unos mapas muy bien hechos. El fallo que le veo, es que apenas hay jugadores en los servidores debido a la gran opción de búsqueda de servidores. Deberían simplificarla a fanático y normal El modo fanático es impresionante
  18. XxAlbertoBuzzxX
    Jun 2, 2020
    7
    Battlefield 1
    ..............................................................
  19. HeavyMetalSloth
    Jan 9, 2019
    7
    I have not played battlefield in a long time so i decided to put down this game as one of the games i wanted to get and i eventually got it and to be honest it left a lot to be desired and it wasn't the game i was expecting it to be. Here are my likes and dislikes about the game:

    Likes: -You can run over ANYTHING with the tanks which is very satisfying -The sound effects are great. If    I have not played battlefield in a long time so i decided to put down this game as one of the games i wanted to get and i eventually got it and to be honest it left a lot to be desired and it wasn't the game i was expecting it to be. Here are my likes and dislikes about the game:

    Likes:
    -You can run over ANYTHING with the tanks which is very satisfying
    -The sound effects are great. If you fired in a enclosed space your rifle will be louder whereas if you were to shoot in an open field you can hear the sound spread across the lands.
    -The cut scene visuals are some of the best i have ever seen.
    -Friends in high places is my favorite story as you get to battle in the air.

    Dislikes:
    -There are a multitude of war stories to play and different characters for each war story. Since this is the case you don't get attached to the characters or the story at all. This was something new to me as i have never played so many characters in a game. I tried to get attached to them and the story, but i just couldn't. Eventually it got to the point where i just wanted to be done with the game because i didn't want to play the game anymore than i needed to. I think there should've been one main story.
    -When the history of the war is displayed they don't give you enough time to read it. So if you are a slow reader you are going to have to read faster.
    -not being able to pause during most cut scenes was kind of annoying, but it wasn't a huge turn off by any means.

    With all this being said the lack of bonding between characters and the short story is why i gave this game a 7/10.    … Expand
  20. Sergiusz56
    Apr 2, 2018
    7
    Great gameplay, beautiful graphics and a real feeling of immersion in the Austro-Hungarian vs Russian and Italian maps. Unfortunately forced diversity ruined immersion on just about every other map.
  21. Henriquez94
    Jun 5, 2018
    7
    Es un gran juego, pero su gran defecto el premium pass.
    El modo offline, o sus historias de guerra fue algo que sorpredio mucho, te narraban la guerra desde diferentes perspectivas, muy interactivo, lo malo que fueron demasiado cortas, pero muy bien desarrolladas, primera guerra mundial, un juego muy bien hecho.
    Graficamente asombroso para consola, pero su apuesta mas grande no fue el    Es un gran juego, pero su gran defecto el premium pass.
    El modo offline, o sus historias de guerra fue algo que sorpredio mucho, te narraban la guerra desde diferentes perspectivas, muy interactivo, lo malo que fueron demasiado cortas, pero muy bien desarrolladas, primera guerra mundial, un juego muy bien hecho.
    Graficamente asombroso para consola, pero su apuesta mas grande no fue el modo offline, sino el multiplayer, y lastimosamente, poco contenido si compraste la version standard, pocos mapas, pocas armas, lo mas destacable fue su modo multijugador operaciones, que podian jugar hasta 64 players en un mismo mapa, asombroso, pero todos queriamos ver a francia o al ejercito frances, a los rusos, mas armas, mas mapas, y en efecto EA lo tenia pero tenias que pagar mas por el.
    Decepcionante como las politicas tan abusivas pueden arruinar un titulo que superaba en todo aspecto a los ultimos 5 COD incluyendo los black ops, pero en fin, EA nunca aprende.
    Me compre el premium pass junto a un amigo por $15 en total, y el juego lo compre no de salida a unos meses de lanzamiento por $40.
    Actualmente si lo compras por $20 en su version complete, y para PC vale la pena.
    Saludos.    … Expand
  22. Professorfett
    Apr 21, 2020
    7
    UGH!! It’s time for another WW2 FPS that we’ve played a 1000 times. Will this have D-day in it? Wait… This isn’t WW2 but takes place in World War 1! **** yes I’m in. Hello everyone B-rod here again to talk about the latest Battlefield. EA has said enough of this modern war, and you guys didn’t buy enough copies when we did future war so let’s do a war that is hardly ever covered in theUGH!! It’s time for another WW2 FPS that we’ve played a 1000 times. Will this have D-day in it? Wait… This isn’t WW2 but takes place in World War 1! **** yes I’m in. Hello everyone B-rod here again to talk about the latest Battlefield. EA has said enough of this modern war, and you guys didn’t buy enough copies when we did future war so let’s do a war that is hardly ever covered in the media World War 1. If you’re like me a love history knowing the historical facts about how truly brutal and terrifying trench warfare is would make you super excited before this game came out. Sadly you can’t really make sitting in a trench for weeks into a game, but what they did came out fantastic.

    The game actually has a story, unlike typical FPS stories where you follow one character who somehow is at every important battle in history you follow five different characters all from different countries, all different styles of gameplay. You follow the British tank crew, an American pilot, an Italian soldier who plays like a walking tank, a Australian sharpshooter, and a Syrian I believe that is hanging with Lawrence of Arabia. This stories are great little snippits of the war and all play out as if you were watching a short film with these characters. The story isn’t super long, but because the stories are all so different in gameplay it acts as a tutorial to the multiplayer.

    That what everyone gets Battlefield for the the multiplayer and I must say holy **** is that fun. I personally love this multiplayer because it really captures the hecticness of war. There are times you are in firefight were bullets and explosions are happening all around you, and then out of the blue some crazy **** on a horse comes charging at you, and you forgot to reload… This gameplay seems authentic enough to how battles were fought except the zero trench warfare. This is just me, but I do with there was either a story mission or a beginning of a multiplayer segment where you must jump out of the trenches and full on charge at the enemy encampment. Load in your pants dropping fun. The game only had a couple of hiccups in the multiplayer, and the vehicles never to seem to be overpowering, but if utilized correctly can be very dangerous. I personally had a great tank crew for over half a match we were the scourge of the battlefield. Until the enemy team had us outnumbered two to one in fire power, but it still was just the greatest experience having that badass tank crew that can mop the floor with the enemy team. The game looks beautiful, with the guns seeming authentic honestly with the decade of WW2 shooters I only know that era of guns, and not so much The Great War era of weaponry.

    Overall if you’re looking for a fantastic large scale multiplayer look no further than Battlefield 1. If though you’re a more single player focused gamer I’d honestly say skip even if you’re into historical games or were excited by the trailers. The singleplayer is so short that it acts more like a tutorial than an actual single player experience. I personally hope World War 1 turns into the new thing FPS shooters milk because I’d love to see what they can do with that era. Until next time folks.    … Expand
  23. Defer94ARG
    Sep 4, 2018
    7
    Great game, quite fun to play, and the graphics are excellent. The multiplayer, the best part, but its more fast-paced that the older games: lots of people running through the map with automatic weapons and little people playing the objective. Its not COD, of course, but its different to other battlefields. Terrible progression, you can unlock the weapons you want, literally, in your firstGreat game, quite fun to play, and the graphics are excellent. The multiplayer, the best part, but its more fast-paced that the older games: lots of people running through the map with automatic weapons and little people playing the objective. Its not COD, of course, but its different to other battlefields. Terrible progression, you can unlock the weapons you want, literally, in your first day. Also, if you´re looking for a WW1 game, this is not for you; this doesnt look like WW1 at all. Finally, the single player campaign its ok, but, again, you are not going to see a great representation of the Great War. Most of the time its you, alone, behind enemy lines, with a really stupid (almost inexistent) IA. Only a few missions are different between each other. Dissapointing for me, as a long time battlefield player, but you cant denny the game quality. 7/10… Expand
  24. Kvantaliani03
    Nov 20, 2021
    7
    rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
  25. trarantino
    Dec 29, 2018
    7
    Игра шидевр! Просто лучшая игра всех времён и народов. Какая графика, какой графон!
  26. Kuifje
    Jan 17, 2019
    7
    This is a very beautiful but mediocre game. The story mode is very short, the menus are very confusing and the multi-player mode is fun only for a short time. There is a big problem with team-balancing and there is no strategy, just a lot of players who rush to the enemies, only to get killed by a higher level sniper from miles away.
  27. lmtz1618
    Feb 27, 2019
    7
    Good good and good. Stunning visuals are the backdrop of solid gameplay in Multiplayer. The campaign portion of the game feels disjointed and uninteresting, but damn is that multiplayer good.
  28. MartinEzy225
    Aug 22, 2020
    7
    This was my first multiplayer game. At first, I didn't know subscription was needed to play online, and turns out I was using the 2-day free trial. The game is dead with many dead lobbies. Customization was lacking but understandable as, during WWI, there wasn't much of a choice. The campaign was very fun and I 100% completed the campaign.
  29. sergio123456
    May 20, 2020
    7
    Juego con muy buenos gráficos, que cuenta la historia de la primera guerra mundial desde varias perspectivas y países. Puedes manejar tanto aviones, tanques, caballos...Es un poco más completo que los juegos de su género pero se queda algo corto en duración.
  30. Parsa2079
    Sep 11, 2023
    7
    They should have added more campaign stories.
    Xheu71o937dygzhw72uehdhiwi288q8ushhzghwhw
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

8
#8 Best PS4 Game of 2016
11
#11 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2016
21
#21 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
89

Generally favorable reviews - based on 34 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 34 out of 34
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 34
  3. Negative: 0 out of 34
  1. BaziCenter
    Feb 10, 2017
    90
    Despite a very short campaign, Battlefield 1 still offers the best single-player experience in the series. Mix it with a huge, brilliant multi-player that the series is known for and you have an almost complete package. Definitely the best approach to World War 1 yet.
    Read full review
  2. Games Master UK
    Jan 1, 2017
    90
    Set in the past but still a defining modern day shooter. Smart and uproariously entertaining. [Christmas 2016, p.62]
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 27, 2016
    90
    The rougher edges of WWI make Battlefield a louder, fiercer, more engaging shooter. But the carefully interwoven campaign and multiplayer aspects show a more reflective side. [Christmas 2016, p.86]
See all critic reviews »