Battlefield 1

 PlayStation 4
User Score
7.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 2521 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1,851 out of 2521
  2. Mixed: 411 out of 2521
  3. Negative: 259 out of 2521
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. corpsed
    Oct 21, 2016
    7
    Battlefield 1 is a great game, but the people giving it 10's are crazy or haven't played the game long enough. The single player is a solid 10. It's super fun, immersive and tells a great story... but it's pretty short. The graphics throughout the game are gorgeous, and everything is perfectly fluid.

    Multiplayer unfortunately is about a 6, which is where you will spend most of your    Battlefield 1 is a great game, but the people giving it 10's are crazy or haven't played the game long enough. The single player is a solid 10. It's super fun, immersive and tells a great story... but it's pretty short. The graphics throughout the game are gorgeous, and everything is perfectly fluid.

    Multiplayer unfortunately is about a 6, which is where you will spend most of your time. You've still got the great graphics, but in terms of actual gameplay it too often feels like a just whole bunch of chaos. War, of course, is chaos... so in some sense I guess that works, but the gist of what you do in every multiplayer scenario is run around randomly until you get killed or see a hint of moment and start shooting. There's sniping and healing, etc... but for the most part you play for a short burst until you get clipped by a random bullet. It's really frustrating when you start taking damage and can't figure out where it's coming from which happens constantly, and if you run around a corner an another enemy appears, skill takes a back seat to luck... what weapon are you carrying and how twitchy is your finger.

    In Conquest mode, for example, you can choose to spawn on other teammates or certain spawn points, and before you have even turned around or walked two steps you are shot in the back of the head, and forced to respawn again. You might run out of a building and a bomb from a plane drops on your head... respawn again. Spawn in a tank, but the tank is at 10% health and you're suddenly dead again. And don't forget the enemies can spawn anywhere too... You might round a corner only to have someone spawn behind you. There's nothing you can do but take the death.

    You will never feel like you are in control of the game or that you can just play better to change the outcome. Nor do you ever feel like winning means anything. You'll continue to play to get more weapon upgrades, but at the end of the day whether you are at the top or bottom of the scoreboard means nothing. Your team feels soooo impersonal.

    Basically multiplayer feels very "casual".... It's really cool to chill and play like you're in a real war, but the randomness feels unrewarding and wins feel unrewarding.

    Don't get me wrong... Battlefield 1 is a solid 7 great game. But it is far from a 10... It's a war simulator with very realistic graphics and effects. It's multiplayer is fun to play, but begins to get boring due to your lack of control of outcomes and generally unrewarding feeling you have after each match.    … Expand
  2. strondbokken
    Oct 26, 2016
    6
    This is LITERALLY the exact same game that DICE has been shoving down our throats for years. Uninspired combat, awful weapons, and the ever so lovely "run run run die" style that makes pretty much all BF games terrible.

    You can buy into the hype and think "oh this will be a great game", but you'll be sadly disappointed. 12-year-old kids spending their parents' money probably think it's    This is LITERALLY the exact same game that DICE has been shoving down our throats for years. Uninspired combat, awful weapons, and the ever so lovely "run run run die" style that makes pretty much all BF games terrible.

    You can buy into the hype and think "oh this will be a great game", but you'll be sadly disappointed. 12-year-old kids spending their parents' money probably think it's great. Anyone who has played anything by DICE can play any of their other games and it's the exact same thing.

    It's not a FPS war simulator. At all. It's a zerg fest with poor weapon options. The end.    … Expand
  3. goodgriff33
    Jan 7, 2023
    7
    Answer: 75 characters is between 10 words and 19 words with spaces included in the character count. If spaces are not included in the character count, then 75 characters is between 12 words and 25 words.
  4. CthuluFthagn
    Oct 26, 2016
    6
    Chaos. Bombs. Explosions. Chaos. Airplanes. Bombs. Explosions. Tanks. Bombs. Explosions. Chaos.

    It's just like that every single multiplayer round. Overwhelming randomness with no rewards. This game lacks everything i like online shooters for. No depth, no tactics (if you believe you playing with your four mates in squad can change the outcome of 64 player battle then think again).    Chaos. Bombs. Explosions. Chaos. Airplanes. Bombs. Explosions. Tanks. Bombs. Explosions. Chaos.

    It's just like that every single multiplayer round. Overwhelming randomness with no rewards. This game lacks everything i like online shooters for. No depth, no tactics (if you believe you playing with your four mates in squad can change the outcome of 64 player battle then think again). Every game mode is like that. Chaos and randomness with no depth. It gets boring very fast. Character/account progression doesnt exist on this game. Rank 10 weapons are mediocre and often worse than the beginners ones (cough cough medic class). I know for sure i wont be getting season pass since new expansions will most likely be just the same chaos and explosions but on just different maps. Money wasted.    … Expand
  5. upsilonh24
    Nov 9, 2016
    5
    This is a gorgeously crafted game that unfortunately could not go beyond the flaws of its genre. I will keep this brief.

    As has been said numerous times already, Dice has indeed pulled off its bet of a WW1 shooter, especially in terms of presentation. Graphics, sound design, level design and animation... fear not, this is all AAA level. Weather effects are especially impressive.    This is a gorgeously crafted game that unfortunately could not go beyond the flaws of its genre. I will keep this brief.

    As has been said numerous times already, Dice has indeed pulled off its bet of a WW1 shooter, especially in terms of presentation. Graphics, sound design, level design and animation... fear not, this is all AAA level. Weather effects are especially impressive. However, any real semblance to WW1 stops here. In truth, despite a high level of polish and some originality, Battlefield 1 is still a more refined Call of Duty of sort.

    Multiplayer is the core of this game and there is some welcomed variety in gameplay. Modes go from the epic, (the new multi-map Operations), to the annoyingly similar to Call of Duty (Team Deathmatch). I will not talk about War Pigeons.

    Multiplayer's problem is that you'll still have to try to survive among the same confusing and erratic cat herd. There is no (possible) coordination among teams or squads (unless you play with friends, which is fun). You will get shot at from across the map. Tank drivers will drive with no consideration of you being in there. Pilots will crash the plane in the first 60 seconds about 50% of the time. You will learn to never count on medics reviving you. All the while, the immortal words of Dwight Schrute will echo in your head "We are no more a team than the people staying at a hotel are a team". Oh and that invisible grey blob hiding among grey rubble will shoot you right in the head.

    Even the somewhat interesting but too short to be engaging mini-campaigns bear little ressemblance to how WW1 was actually fought. Unless you enjoy this kind of multiplayer experience (which it definitely succeeds at but does not transcend), I suggest you pass on this game -- even at a lower price than launch.    … Expand
  6. phoeniix23
    Dec 8, 2016
    6
    Battlefield 1 is my first ever Battlefield experience, and I approached the game expecting an authentic and emotional take on WW1 from it's campaign. I am disappointed after having played all War Stories. It started out super impressive and promising with a sombre and serious tone, moving quotes and a grim prologue. I was really hoping for more stuff along those lines. What I took awayBattlefield 1 is my first ever Battlefield experience, and I approached the game expecting an authentic and emotional take on WW1 from it's campaign. I am disappointed after having played all War Stories. It started out super impressive and promising with a sombre and serious tone, moving quotes and a grim prologue. I was really hoping for more stuff along those lines. What I took away from the rest of the campaign is very cliche and cheesy stuff. Tank mission reminded me of Fury which was OK. The flying mission was grand and bombastic, very Hollywood. The Runner mission is very typical of a veteran taking a liking to a private soldier, assaulting a fort on his own. Very predictable. The Italian Iron Man is just completely ridiculous. The Arabian mission is just Deus Ex in WW1. Most of these missions have a one man vs whole world feel to them, with superhuman stealth sections, and overpowered guns. I didn't even bother completing the last war story cos I was just so turned off by the non-immersion of the campaign. I just finished watching Band of Brothers and The Pacific, and World War themes always focus around brotherhood and carmaraderie, with human atrocity lessons and philosophical ideas. This is just action, over the top heroism and unauthentic take on war. Games like Wolfenstein, destiny, titanfall, etcaynget away with this cos it fits their respective themes but WW1?? Come on, I expected much much more. What I got was just annoyance and irritance at a missed opportunity to deliver a poignant WW1 experience.

    Graphics though, are AMAZING!!

    I didnt play much multiplayer, except for deathmatch and capture the flag. Kinda fun but my MP time is completely for Destiny. I am definitely missing out on the complete Battlefield experience but i really bought this game for a WW1 single player experience, and it failed to deliver that to me.

    If you're buying this for the campaign only, i highly recommend renting it.    … Expand
  7. TheStudioBoy
    Dec 15, 2016
    7
    First of, the story is way to short. You follow a few people's stories throughout the front from France to the Ottoman empire but most of them don't have much or any character development and that means you can't grow attached to them and feel what they feel in that moment. The first two story missions are the exceptions with the prologue having real emotion in it and the first real storyFirst of, the story is way to short. You follow a few people's stories throughout the front from France to the Ottoman empire but most of them don't have much or any character development and that means you can't grow attached to them and feel what they feel in that moment. The first two story missions are the exceptions with the prologue having real emotion in it and the first real story having long enough to develop characters. It also doesn't have any story from the central powers (Germany, Austro-Hungary and the Ottomans) which means that they are portrayed as pure evil like you would portray the Nazi's in a WW2 game which is horribly wrong. It stands as a nice piece of tutorial for multiplayer though.

    The multiplayer is very fun with each map needing different tactics and weapons if you want your team to succeed and win. It has a few game modes with each being very different but some aren't as good as others. Operations is the best game mode with it feeling like an actual battle with progress but War Pigeons is kind of bland but can be chaotic fun. There are a variety of weapons for each class but it is definitely less than what you had on offer in BF3 and BF4. Tank and plane combat is really fun with each vehicle felling powerful and weak all the time. The destruction is brilliant in this game with small bits of wall falling of and even injuring people. However some maps favor certain weapons to much like Argonne forest favoring shotguns and Suez favoring snipers, which can lead to so much rage because you are always killed by the same things.    … Expand
  8. lmtz1618
    Feb 27, 2019
    7
    Good good and good. Stunning visuals are the backdrop of solid gameplay in Multiplayer. The campaign portion of the game feels disjointed and uninteresting, but damn is that multiplayer good.
  9. wobblydoggy
    Oct 24, 2016
    7
    Battlefield 1 is a great game, but the people giving it 10's are crazy or haven't played the game long enough. The single player is a solid 10. It's super fun, immersive and tells a great story... but it's pretty short. The graphics throughout the game are gorgeous, and everything is perfectly fluid.
  10. STARTtheREACTOR
    Dec 3, 2016
    5
    The campaign is basically just a bunch of extended vehicle tutorials, getting you ready for multiplayer by forcing you to endure boring vehicular combat and set pieces.
    Multiplayer is literally just run around, get shot in the back. Run around, kill, kill, get shot in the back.
    Here's the thing, team based combat should be two teams on either side meeting in the middle. Not spawning all    The campaign is basically just a bunch of extended vehicle tutorials, getting you ready for multiplayer by forcing you to endure boring vehicular combat and set pieces.
    Multiplayer is literally just run around, get shot in the back. Run around, kill, kill, get shot in the back.
    Here's the thing, team based combat should be two teams on either side meeting in the middle. Not spawning all over the place so you end up getting killed within 20 seconds because you've spawned in an enemy infested area.    … Expand
  11. YetiYeti
    Oct 24, 2016
    7
    Die Kampagne ist nicht schlecht für einen Multiplayer Titel, jedoch niemals mit einem klassischen Single FPS zu vergleichen. Grafik ist top. Der Multiplayer Part ist für Anfänger unspielbar, leider. Wahrscheinlich weil gerade so viele Pros spielen.
  12. EL-MiNiO
    Oct 23, 2016
    7
    A must have for FPS fan. .
  13. msg78
    Dec 10, 2016
    6
    What do you guys see that I don't? There is nothing special about this game, it's actually a worse FPS than the older games such as CoD Modern Warfare 1 and 2. It's decent, it's a good game. There is nothing great about it whatsoever.
  14. cylentstorm
    Apr 5, 2017
    6
    Welcome to Star Wars Battlefront with a WWI skin. The latest entry in this ancient series takes a step forward in presentation, but two or three backwards in terms of gameplay. It plays a little like a blend of BF 1942/1943 and SWB. That translates to wildly inconsistent weapon damage and behavior, terrible collision detection (gas/incendiary/explosives ignore walls and cover,Welcome to Star Wars Battlefront with a WWI skin. The latest entry in this ancient series takes a step forward in presentation, but two or three backwards in terms of gameplay. It plays a little like a blend of BF 1942/1943 and SWB. That translates to wildly inconsistent weapon damage and behavior, terrible collision detection (gas/incendiary/explosives ignore walls and cover, vehicles/infantry becoming stuck on invisible boundaries,) overpowered sniper rifles with nearly zero bullet drop, and the typical DICE bugfest.

    Despite all this, there is fun to be had, but only if one is fortunate enough to find a team with players who know how to play the classes and objectives without adding to the 32 other snipers in each round.    … Expand
  15. evOlvedParasite
    Oct 22, 2016
    5
    I am giving this game a 5/10. The multiplayer is excellent casual fun, but single player is awful which I guess is to be expected of EA. I can't believe DICE did not learn anything from Battlefield 4 single player. The AI is terrible! So many times a AI airplane crashed into me killing me instantly, enemies spawning in front of me and enemies that just stand there. Maybe they should justI am giving this game a 5/10. The multiplayer is excellent casual fun, but single player is awful which I guess is to be expected of EA. I can't believe DICE did not learn anything from Battlefield 4 single player. The AI is terrible! So many times a AI airplane crashed into me killing me instantly, enemies spawning in front of me and enemies that just stand there. Maybe they should just stick to making multiplayer. Last thing, the game mentions real world facts of WW1 and sets a realistic feel but it is really over the top and no way realistic. Like a guy carrying and huge machine gun and wearing plate bulletproof armor. Made me laugh, what a joke.… Expand
  16. zuldo
    Oct 27, 2016
    7
    While I am having a lot of fun in multiplayer the single player was such a HUGE let down!!!
    WTF how are reviewers talking good about the singleplayer? Operations: Kaiserslacht 64 player is a more realistic WW1 experience than the single player which can only have been made by Sylvester Stallone and Michael Bay.
    The prologue sets the tone of what it should have been. A gritty grueling    While I am having a lot of fun in multiplayer the single player was such a HUGE let down!!!
    WTF how are reviewers talking good about the singleplayer? Operations: Kaiserslacht 64 player is a more realistic WW1 experience than the single player which can only have been made by Sylvester Stallone and Michael Bay.
    The prologue sets the tone of what it should have been. A gritty grueling hell-like representation of one of the worst wars that ever was. Where is Verdun? Where is the Somme? Where are the endless waves of human meat churning against stale-mate trench lines?
    WW1 is such an epic story. And the SP in BF1 is SO MUCH LOST POTENTIAL to re-tell it, and instead go with the cheap hollywood version in an attempt to please the 13 year olds playing this.    … Expand
  17. Rc20150990
    Oct 25, 2016
    6
    The gameplay for this game is really good, however the campaign is broken up into six different small campaign stories. They have a good story to them and it is entertaining. For multiplayer, it seems really unrealistic at times in the fact that u can hit someone in the head three times and they shoot u once and u die, as of now there r limited amount of game modes and maps
  18. JoeJutty
    Dec 6, 2016
    6
    Looks nice. Plays okay. Multiplayer got boring really quick. Played mostly conquest and TDM, but I'm just not into it. Too many "what the hell just happened" deaths, players spawning all over the place, mediocre classes/builds, and not a fan or the vehicle mechanics. The in-game map needs work too.
  19. d3sm0nd
    Apr 22, 2018
    7
    Amazing game. DICE managed to create an immersive massive multiplayer combat experience. The WW1 setting is interesting and unique. Game suffers from severe team balance issues.
  20. EmirKhorasani
    Dec 5, 2016
    6
    It's Battlefield. Plain and simple.

    If you're expecting World War I Simulator, do not buy. It's a battlefield game with full auto weapons and nearly invincible tanks with a WWI aesthetic. Horrific balancing and infuriating choices (invincible gas that permeates everything, friendly gas obstructs your vision, going prone where the game determines you may not makes your character stand up    It's Battlefield. Plain and simple.

    If you're expecting World War I Simulator, do not buy. It's a battlefield game with full auto weapons and nearly invincible tanks with a WWI aesthetic. Horrific balancing and infuriating choices (invincible gas that permeates everything, friendly gas obstructs your vision, going prone where the game determines you may not makes your character stand up and you are trapped in that animation, meaning 9/10 times you die) plague multiplayer which is the main draw of the game. But that's to be expected from a DICE/EA online shooter.

    The single player is pretty great. It's vignettes into the war from a few different perspectives. They are sometimes infuriating (Avanti Savoia) and sometimes wildly fun and made me cheer out loud (The Runner, Friends in High Places).

    If you want another Battlefield, this is the game for you. If you want realistic WWI combat and a deep complex dive into the war with a single player campaign and more than 12 hours of offline gameplay, do not buy.    … Expand
  21. BlakDak666
    Nov 17, 2017
    7
    Battlefield 1 reinvigorated my interest in multiplayer games; a true Battlefield that wages 64 players in a all out war of the first World War in stunning visuals, sounds and gameplay that is truly spectacular. Bayonet charging with chaotic screaming, blowing down towers and houses with explosions and more make the experience feel very convincing and my jaw was down when I played a match.Battlefield 1 reinvigorated my interest in multiplayer games; a true Battlefield that wages 64 players in a all out war of the first World War in stunning visuals, sounds and gameplay that is truly spectacular. Bayonet charging with chaotic screaming, blowing down towers and houses with explosions and more make the experience feel very convincing and my jaw was down when I played a match. Conquest and Rush is apart of the BF staple for fans, with also Domination and Team Deathmatch as a reach for Call of Duty fans and other shooters but not as creative. Even its War Pigeons is lackluster, but what sells it is Operations; a hour long pseudo-meta game that sets up attackers and defenders and wages control over points with only three attack attempts. It is the coolest idea and deserves alot of praise for this.

    With all this praise there are some issues needing to be addressed of why it stays to a 7/10. Microtransactions, loot boxes and season passes loom over this game much like the previous and have an effect that hurts this grand scale of war play entirely. The campaign is mediocre that feels more like a glorified tutorial than an actual campaign. There are also some issues with network connections and servers as well. In the end however Battlefield 1 delivers a exhilarating experience of war that deserves your time, just be cautious with your money.    … Expand
  22. Fruitylemon11
    Mar 3, 2017
    5
    This game is a MASSIVE disappointment (ASTEROID SIZE). But listen I won't even write on it DICE looks incredibly fragile and weak after this nonsense of a excuse for Battlefield. Graphics are cool but unfortunately it won't make the game better. I promise you it'll put you to bed early so try it out. Lastly, I won't even talk about guns or anything because I want people get the EA (BOSS)This game is a MASSIVE disappointment (ASTEROID SIZE). But listen I won't even write on it DICE looks incredibly fragile and weak after this nonsense of a excuse for Battlefield. Graphics are cool but unfortunately it won't make the game better. I promise you it'll put you to bed early so try it out. Lastly, I won't even talk about guns or anything because I want people get the EA (BOSS) DICE (CADET) BF1 (SCRUB) first person WWI experience so get yourself a copy GUYS!!!!!! No comment on maps either.… Expand
  23. Henriquez94
    Jun 5, 2018
    7
    Es un gran juego, pero su gran defecto el premium pass.
    El modo offline, o sus historias de guerra fue algo que sorpredio mucho, te narraban la guerra desde diferentes perspectivas, muy interactivo, lo malo que fueron demasiado cortas, pero muy bien desarrolladas, primera guerra mundial, un juego muy bien hecho.
    Graficamente asombroso para consola, pero su apuesta mas grande no fue el    Es un gran juego, pero su gran defecto el premium pass.
    El modo offline, o sus historias de guerra fue algo que sorpredio mucho, te narraban la guerra desde diferentes perspectivas, muy interactivo, lo malo que fueron demasiado cortas, pero muy bien desarrolladas, primera guerra mundial, un juego muy bien hecho.
    Graficamente asombroso para consola, pero su apuesta mas grande no fue el modo offline, sino el multiplayer, y lastimosamente, poco contenido si compraste la version standard, pocos mapas, pocas armas, lo mas destacable fue su modo multijugador operaciones, que podian jugar hasta 64 players en un mismo mapa, asombroso, pero todos queriamos ver a francia o al ejercito frances, a los rusos, mas armas, mas mapas, y en efecto EA lo tenia pero tenias que pagar mas por el.
    Decepcionante como las politicas tan abusivas pueden arruinar un titulo que superaba en todo aspecto a los ultimos 5 COD incluyendo los black ops, pero en fin, EA nunca aprende.
    Me compre el premium pass junto a un amigo por $15 en total, y el juego lo compre no de salida a unos meses de lanzamiento por $40.
    Actualmente si lo compras por $20 en su version complete, y para PC vale la pena.
    Saludos.    … Expand
  24. chenson87
    Oct 22, 2016
    5
    Weapons are inaccurate and basic. You can call this realism, I call this an unfun game.
    Frames per second constantly drop to about 25 or less
    Menus lag like crazy in between rounds.
    Visuals are sub par for 2016 battlefield. Literally any BF game in the last 10 years looks better.
    Charging $20 for a couple of icons and skins that shouldve come with the base game.
    EA strikes again.
  25. christhewiz
    Nov 4, 2016
    7
    Once again EA delivers the fully gaming experience only to those who are willing to spend additional cash. To do so, they made leveling really tedious and the awards mediocre in comparison to the goodies in the battle packs. Latter are sometimes awarded when leveling and can be bought via the PS store. What a surprise... Spending most of the time being killed by overpowered gamers who tookOnce again EA delivers the fully gaming experience only to those who are willing to spend additional cash. To do so, they made leveling really tedious and the awards mediocre in comparison to the goodies in the battle packs. Latter are sometimes awarded when leveling and can be bought via the PS store. What a surprise... Spending most of the time being killed by overpowered gamers who took the shortcut and spent loads of cash for battle packs ruins the game and the incentive the regular way. It also has to be said that there are very few MP maps and those are identical with the areas in the campaign. The scope of weapons and vehicles is also disappointing; also the massive graphics downgrade when switching from the campaign to MP modus.… Expand
  26. Jonnif1
    Feb 24, 2018
    6
    Graphics is the bes I ve ever seen so far
    The game is stupid , has no strategy in multiplayer just rush
    and enemies can hit you from everywhere I d rather a multiplayer like Rainbow six in maps more little Also the headshot sucks you can hit enemy so many times with a rifle but anything happens .. so bad because the game is beautiful graphics and everything but is not playable is    Graphics is the bes I ve ever seen so far
    The game is stupid , has no strategy in multiplayer just rush
    and enemies can hit you from everywhere
    I d rather a multiplayer like Rainbow six in maps more little
    Also the headshot sucks you can hit enemy so many times with a rifle
    but anything happens .. so bad because the game is beautiful graphics and everything
    but is not playable is just run and shoot .    … Expand
  27. THATcreepyUncle
    Nov 4, 2016
    5
    A WW1 skin of BF4.

    Still reasonably solid, but not particularly fun or revolutionary. Snipers and Tanks will usually rule the roost, but if you can't overcome it, you are probably not good enough.
  28. Sky-Line___
    Jan 25, 2017
    7
    Absolutely beautiful graphically, the sound effects are amazing too !

    However, the multiplayer mode lacks of depth in content (weapons, armies and even maps). I also regret the fact of not being able to do a +5 squad, it might not be everyone's problem, but I have a lot of friend playing it and separating in 2 squads is annoying. There are also big framerate problems on certain maps    Absolutely beautiful graphically, the sound effects are amazing too !

    However, the multiplayer mode lacks of depth in content (weapons, armies and even maps). I also regret the fact of not being able to do a +5 squad, it might not be everyone's problem, but I have a lot of friend playing it and separating in 2 squads is annoying.
    There are also big framerate problems on certain maps when there are a lot of craters on the ground with many people around and shooting everywhere. A game, especially a FPS, should always feel fluid.

    Unlike many other people I'm not a fan of the solo mode even if it is decent. Yes some missions are surprisingly entertaining, but on the other hand there are a lot of identical missions (infiltration phases for example are very present in the game and it gets boring after a while).

    It's a good BF, occasional players will love it, but more serious gamers will get bored after a few dozen hours.    … Expand
  29. Nathan1423
    Jul 8, 2018
    7
    If you love multiplayer, this review is not for you. I play these games for the single player campaign. This one was short and divided into several small stories. The stories are told very well and the game also feels very good to play, minus the stiff running which feels like sliding. However, there wasn't enough time to get invested in any character too much or really feel like it wasIf you love multiplayer, this review is not for you. I play these games for the single player campaign. This one was short and divided into several small stories. The stories are told very well and the game also feels very good to play, minus the stiff running which feels like sliding. However, there wasn't enough time to get invested in any character too much or really feel like it was you in the thick of it at all. Also the time to die under fire can sometimes be a little short, requiring you to only play the game a certain way instead of fighting however you want. This is more realistic but less enjoyable for me personally. I enjoyed the cutscenes more than the shooting sometimes, and for a fps game, that's not ideal. I would give it a 6 but some of the stories are epic and memorable, even if I didn't feel connected to the characters as I was playing them. If you're like me and mostly play these for single player, you might want to get this game at a hefty discount.… Expand
  30. Jaga-9403
    Jun 13, 2017
    7
    Battlefield 1, y el nuevo motor grafico Frostbite es un juegazo graficamente un mounstruo, jugabilidad; sus controles y movimientos, fisicas, muy bueno. y el sistema de destruccion de estructuras por disparos, minas, granadas, disparos de tanque, es maravilloso, justo lo que un FPS deberia ser.
    Un Multijugador asombroso, el fuerte del videojuego, DICE Lo supo hacer muy pero muy bien, me    Battlefield 1, y el nuevo motor grafico Frostbite es un juegazo graficamente un mounstruo, jugabilidad; sus controles y movimientos, fisicas, muy bueno. y el sistema de destruccion de estructuras por disparos, minas, granadas, disparos de tanque, es maravilloso, justo lo que un FPS deberia ser.
    Un Multijugador asombroso, el fuerte del videojuego, DICE Lo supo hacer muy pero muy bien, me he pasado mas de 75 horas, con rango nlv 70, lo he disfrutado con amigos, modo operaciones, partidas de hasta mas de 40 minutos, hacer uso de tanques pesados personalizados, caballeria, vehiculos, armas con recarga manual.
    El "2" mejor Battlefield, que se come a cualquier Call of Duty de estos ultimos 10 años.
    Pero no todo es bueno, y recordemos un titulo de EA sacaran hasta el ultimo beneficio de esto, y es un modelo de negocio inaceptable, un juego recordato, es decir un juego basado en la 1 guerra mundial y no te dejan jugar con el ejercito frances o ruso? :(
    Inaceptable, un "premium pass" por $49.99. No recomiendo la compra de este premium pass, no apoyemos este modelo de negocio.
    El juego me lo consegui por $40 , no recomiendo pagar mas por este titulo.
    PD: Para mi el mejor Battlefield es el 3 :D    … Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

8
#8 Best PS4 Game of 2016
11
#11 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2016
21
#21 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2016

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
89

Generally favorable reviews - based on 34 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 34 out of 34
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 34
  3. Negative: 0 out of 34
  1. BaziCenter
    Feb 10, 2017
    90
    Despite a very short campaign, Battlefield 1 still offers the best single-player experience in the series. Mix it with a huge, brilliant multi-player that the series is known for and you have an almost complete package. Definitely the best approach to World War 1 yet.
    Read full review
  2. Games Master UK
    Jan 1, 2017
    90
    Set in the past but still a defining modern day shooter. Smart and uproariously entertaining. [Christmas 2016, p.62]
  3. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Dec 27, 2016
    90
    The rougher edges of WWI make Battlefield a louder, fiercer, more engaging shooter. But the carefully interwoven campaign and multiplayer aspects show a more reflective side. [Christmas 2016, p.86]
See all critic reviews »