Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

 PlayStation 3
User Score
5.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 272 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 102 out of 272
  2. Mixed: 70 out of 272
  3. Negative: 100 out of 272
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. KitkatChunky
    Aug 15, 2015
    9
    Despite looking through the other reviews here I really liked this game and think this is where the franchise started to pick back up after the release of Ghosts which I thought was awful. I like the gender equality aspect where you can choose to be a female soldier, and overall I think the story is brilliant. It is so futuristic and different, and allows use of new equipment. The jet packDespite looking through the other reviews here I really liked this game and think this is where the franchise started to pick back up after the release of Ghosts which I thought was awful. I like the gender equality aspect where you can choose to be a female soldier, and overall I think the story is brilliant. It is so futuristic and different, and allows use of new equipment. The jet pack aspect in multiplayer is great fun.… Expand
  2. JrDouble
    Dec 11, 2022
    8
    Standard Call of Duty game with a a few new mechanics. Solid entry in the series, nothing special, but enjoyable all the same.
  3. tommyboy247
    Nov 8, 2014
    7
    Call of Duty Advance Warfare is a fun game but with a few issues on the Play Station 3. The game's campaign is really well done where power can corrupt anyone, and Kevin Spacey's role as Jonathan Irons(CEO of ATLAS Corporation) just stole the show, however the campaign suffers with awkward loading screens during missions which come random times, frame rate and texture pop ins.

    The    Call of Duty Advance Warfare is a fun game but with a few issues on the Play Station 3. The game's campaign is really well done where power can corrupt anyone, and Kevin Spacey's role as Jonathan Irons(CEO of ATLAS Corporation) just stole the show, however the campaign suffers with awkward loading screens during missions which come random times, frame rate and texture pop ins.

    The multiplayer is the games strongest part with all new style of play with the EXO suit where you can fly around the map and dodge gunfire, the EXO can also a perk slot where you can have heal you, make you move faster or have a shield equipped. The only bad thing about multiplayer and I'm being very strict about this but the visuals on the menu is terrible.

    Then there's the games third function EXO Survival which I don't really like that much because it just feels like a knockoff of MW3 Survival mode and the only originality is you have the EXO suit.

    So besides the games few issues and the EXO Survival, the game is a must buy for long time COD fans and new COD fans.    … Expand
  4. DeepFat
    Nov 17, 2014
    2
    When you were six, did you enjoy spinning around and jumping up and down on the furniture?

    Of course you did because at that age it was the pinnacle of human achievement. It's also the sole purpose of AW. There are so many things that are wrong with this game it's hard to know exactly where to start. So let's start with the load screen. Now because the developers think that all we    When you were six, did you enjoy spinning around and jumping up and down on the furniture?

    Of course you did because at that age it was the pinnacle of human achievement. It's also the sole purpose of AW. There are so many things that are wrong with this game it's hard to know exactly where to start.

    So let's start with the load screen. Now because the developers think that all we want to do is play dress up with our dollies rather than shoot the **** out of random strangers, the game is overburdened with character loadouts, clothing and accoutrements that the system simply cannot cope with the simple process of loading up your avatar in what would reasonably be considered an acceptable time.

    And that then leads to the next problem - the graphics. Quite simply COD has not looked this bad since MW2 which at least has the excuse of being an old (comparatively ancient) game. There is not texture or depth, the maps quite frankly all look the same, and above all it's just dull.

    dull, dull, dull.

    And then there's the gameplay. Remember how on every other COD game you knew that there were certain maps for snipers, some for campers, some for those of us that like to run around like idiots? Well welcome to AW where every map has been designed for one simple purpose... spinning around and jumping up and down - because apparently we're all six years old.

    It's impossible to have any kind of strategy or tactic because of the exo suits. Instead everyone is just running around like headless chickens.

    Did I mention the snipers? There the ******* that are bouncing around the map in their exosuits quickscoping everyone else before bouncing back off again, maybe with some spinning involved. I'm not sure. I've always hated quickscopers and the lowest levels of hell are reserved for these "people" so why, oh why, did Activision sanction another COD that panders to them?

    Because quickscoping noobs have an average mental age of six and this is Activision's target demographic, that's why.

    Oh and the story mode? Completed in 4 hours and I'm not even sure I was completely awake for most of that time either. Dull, predictable, thoroughly unchallenging and quite obvious that Kevin Spacey was there just for some beer money.

    Back to the load screen for a moment and specifically the font used. I last saw it on an Amiga 500 back in the early 90's... just awful.

    Having navigated the load screen you're probably wanting to have a match, right? Well tough. For some reason the quickest I have ever got in to a match is fifteen seconds after it started and the slowest? Over a minute. And don't think it's my internet - that clocks in at a healthy 75 Mpbs.

    Naturally that then leads me on to lags, glitches and exploits. There are at least two maps where you can hide in the scenery so yay - those maps are unplayable. The game regularly stutters and the reason I am here right now is because the game has just crashed my system.

    I almost forgot - because of the whole jumpy round rubbish - frags and semtex are absolutely useless.

    Annoyingly I'm not even doing that badly on AW and I've really tried to like it since the abomination that was Ghosts but I can't. Sorry but I've tried to like this mongrel of a game but the only decent thing you can do with it is take it out back and shoot it, it's time that COD was put out of its misery.

    I've had every iteration of COD since MW2. I was top 500 in BLOPS2 and top 3000 in MW3. Despite the rant I am no COD hater but I've paid £45 for a game and all I got was a turd.

    It's just not good enough.    … Expand
  5. jasonlonski
    Nov 28, 2014
    0
    This game was pretty much trash. I played it for the first weekend and and decided to go back to Payday 2. this what an unfortunate waste of potential. One thing that most people can agree on that being able to constantly double jump ruins the game. Nobody wants to have to constantly watch out for rooftop flyers. if i hadn't bought the season pass i would have taken this heap of crap back.
  6. zckaln
    Nov 11, 2014
    2
    I love the Call of Duty franchise, even despite the poor showing of Ghosts, which I'd likely rank a 7. Advanced Warefare, however, is a really poor game. The maps are uninteresting and flawed. The new guns and killstreaks are bizarre, and just not enjoyable to use. The jetpack is the worst addition of all. Matches consist of users flying over one another and shooting enemies in the back,I love the Call of Duty franchise, even despite the poor showing of Ghosts, which I'd likely rank a 7. Advanced Warefare, however, is a really poor game. The maps are uninteresting and flawed. The new guns and killstreaks are bizarre, and just not enjoyable to use. The jetpack is the worst addition of all. Matches consist of users flying over one another and shooting enemies in the back, or on the top of the head. This is the first time that I've ever sold a Call of Duty game back. I really didn't find anything redeeming about it.… Expand
  7. muzikplumz
    Nov 12, 2014
    3
    Have been playing since COD4. Advanced Warfare is good to start with, has amazing new features (like the exo suits) but you get over it pretty quickly and after that it easily becomes one of the worst Call of Duty. Every multiplayer game I play I join in 30 seconds late due to the nonexistant freezetime. Snipers useless. Exo abilities pretty pathetic and useless, I'd love to see what theHave been playing since COD4. Advanced Warfare is good to start with, has amazing new features (like the exo suits) but you get over it pretty quickly and after that it easily becomes one of the worst Call of Duty. Every multiplayer game I play I join in 30 seconds late due to the nonexistant freezetime. Snipers useless. Exo abilities pretty pathetic and useless, I'd love to see what the pro gamers have to say about it. EMBARRASSING killstreaks! no specialist (which sucks). no Kem or nuke (makes multiplayer pointless as there is no challenge). Easy fixes to the game which nobody makes... quit adding stupid map features like in ghosts and quit making so many unnecessary game modes. COD4 is the best cos its SIMPLE... dont make it complicated and add loads of silly features just to sell. Yes the game looks cool and awesome but doesnt deliver like any other COD. If you add features add something good like League play on BO2, amazing feature and loved every bit of it, ghosts ruined it and AW **** it up.
    Campaign is just like every other cod, decent.
    AW has very little to offer besides multiplayer and campaign mode. ghosts had extinction. BO had zombies and MW had those missions, AW has nothing comparable.
    And no matter what you'll always get campers so scrap those "no campers comments"
    Kevin Spacey is merchandise and advertisement, just like Eminem (huge fan) on ghosts... COD need to get there **** right next time and do lots of updates on this one.    … Expand
  8. nocfirst
    Jan 1, 2015
    4
    A terrible port (or at least it seems like it). Sad, because it is probably worthwhile for the next gen consoles or PC. My main problems had to do with online multiplayer: create-a-class screen is broken and loading anything in general is glitchy and takes a long time. Also, the guns sound and feel like airsoft.
  9. showikjavakh
    Nov 4, 2014
    10
    This is great, better than ghosts. typical call of duty story line, i like that. multiplayer is same just added some jumps and other. also i like characters
  10. DisapointedFan
    Nov 4, 2014
    1
    This is a joke, its like farries with guns jumping around. online play is also slow to choppy and i played on zero day, imagine what it will be like when everyone is online playing.limited gun selection crappy graphics,poor spawning already spawn killers. the only things new i see are vertical maps and the ability to jump. oh and you can change how your online character looks big friggingThis is a joke, its like farries with guns jumping around. online play is also slow to choppy and i played on zero day, imagine what it will be like when everyone is online playing.limited gun selection crappy graphics,poor spawning already spawn killers. the only things new i see are vertical maps and the ability to jump. oh and you can change how your online character looks big frigging deal. nothing new here but some new paint on a old tired car. thought ghosts was bad this might even be worse. pointless to play in surround sound,sounded better from my tv speakers. Black Ops II was by far the best in the series for online play. Maybe the campaign is good,haven't tried that yet.… Expand
  11. r2tito
    Jan 11, 2015
    1
    This has to be the worst CoD in History; at least for the ps3 version, it's the worst, glitchy as F@&k, if you play Exo Survival with ppl online, it's probably to get stuck on waves 42-43-45; if you do it local, it gets stuck on wave 43; and that's not all.... if you play the online multiplayer, be prayful and happy if your ps3 doesn't freeze after 4 or 5 matches; and by the way.... it'sThis has to be the worst CoD in History; at least for the ps3 version, it's the worst, glitchy as F@&k, if you play Exo Survival with ppl online, it's probably to get stuck on waves 42-43-45; if you do it local, it gets stuck on wave 43; and that's not all.... if you play the online multiplayer, be prayful and happy if your ps3 doesn't freeze after 4 or 5 matches; and by the way.... it's not the ps3 since i can play all previous CoD's (MW2 all the way to Ghosts) without a problem, and the Battlefields (from Bad Company 2 to BF4) without a problem; do a little research before buying this game (i didn't and thought it was running well) and it gives problems on all platforms; as for me..... i really hate this unplayable game… Expand
  12. gui2310gBR
    Feb 22, 2015
    10
    the game until not bad and good very good beautiful graphics, good gameplay, incredible sound, fun and the incredible history better than the annoying ghosts
  13. commenter-x
    Jan 5, 2015
    5
    Call of Duty is showing its age, and the attempt to bring new life to it with the main gambit of this game, the "Exo Suit", has failed. The added dimension of verticality doesn't bring anything new to the formula, perhaps mainly for the bland map design that doesn't take advantage of it.

    The strong point of this game is, surprisingly, the campaign. If you're used to the formula, you    Call of Duty is showing its age, and the attempt to bring new life to it with the main gambit of this game, the "Exo Suit", has failed. The added dimension of verticality doesn't bring anything new to the formula, perhaps mainly for the bland map design that doesn't take advantage of it.

    The strong point of this game is, surprisingly, the campaign. If you're used to the formula, you won't find anything groundbreaking, but it's still a lot of fun to play. Believe the hype with Kevin Spacey. He was good. Too bad the plot is so predictable, as his character had so much potential. Another very fun -yet already tired- play mode, is the horde co-op survival. Between the campaign and this mode, you'll have good value for your money.

    Where this game fails spectacularly is in its raison d'etre, the online multiplayer. Every problem in Call of Duty before, seems to be enhanced in this game. The **** of players spawning all over the place reduce tactics to shoot first and have a better Internet connection. The maps do nothing but aid this mess, and winning doesn't matter as much as having a good K/D. The killstreaks are no longer fun. The lack of dedicated servers give an unfair advantage to the people with best connection. Skill in this game means nothing. Multiplayer is an unplayable mess.

    Clearly, Call of Duty is on its last gasps, and unfortunately, the new additions to this game have failed to pump a fresh approach into it.    … Expand
  14. SpasmicPuppy
    Nov 16, 2014
    7
    Better than CoD: Ghosts, but that's not hard. Good campaign, but terrible netcode for multiplayer. Lots of lag and delay, even on the menus.
    Dips in graphical quality in the multiplayer menus and just waiting for weapon images to load is infuriating.

    Exo suits are really good fun though, and add a much needed injection of adrenaline in to the gameplay in general.
  15. ThatOneCoDGuy
    Dec 29, 2014
    4
    To give context to my review, I'm a fan of the franchise and have played the series more than any other FPS. That being said I do enjoy other games and have had the opportunity to play a variety of FPS.

    CoD AW is not your typical Call of Duty, in my opinion it is more along the lines of Halo. While the game offers a variety of new directions for the franchise, overall execution is piss    To give context to my review, I'm a fan of the franchise and have played the series more than any other FPS. That being said I do enjoy other games and have had the opportunity to play a variety of FPS.

    CoD AW is not your typical Call of Duty, in my opinion it is more along the lines of Halo. While the game offers a variety of new directions for the franchise, overall execution is piss poor.
    - Movement is buggy and lacks the smoothness you'd expect in an FPS.
    -The game is plagued by loading, loading, loading and un-rendered textures
    -Multi-player matchmaking is awful e.g. lag, merging, and more un-rendered textures
    -Exo survival matchmaking has no ranking system making it difficult to find players that know what they"re doing (also merging with games in progress happens frequently)
    -Choppy gameplay online and offline
    -The exo suit feature which may be the saving grace of the game offers a new dimension to playing
    however hurts the casual aspect of the game by making players unpredictable

    Overall it seems that Sledgehammer games tried to make CoD spectacular by adding as much filler as they could, making a simple FPS overly complex. Potential buyers of the game should be warned, the PS3 version is garbage based alone on the optimization on the system, the game is frustratingly slow and choppy. Sledgehammer should of cut parts of the game or not release a ps3 version if they knew it would run so poorly.
    If you are a die hard fan of CoD, go ahead and buy it. If you enjoy FPS games, get the game for a better system or give it a pass.    … Expand
  16. Corrugated_Fox
    Nov 6, 2014
    6
    I can't help but feel a bit disappointed by CoD: AW. I'm not a big CoD fan, in all honesty, but I was captivated by the games brilliant gameplay trailer. The trailer showed off some amazing graphics (obviously this was from the PS4 or Xbox One), high intensity gameplay, and what looked to be a killer storyline that featured Kevin Spacey... which I thought was pretty cool.

    Unfortunately,    I can't help but feel a bit disappointed by CoD: AW. I'm not a big CoD fan, in all honesty, but I was captivated by the games brilliant gameplay trailer. The trailer showed off some amazing graphics (obviously this was from the PS4 or Xbox One), high intensity gameplay, and what looked to be a killer storyline that featured Kevin Spacey... which I thought was pretty cool.

    Unfortunately, if you haven't moved on to the newer generation of consoles you are going to be disappointed with CoD: AW - or at least I am. The first thing you're sure to notice: the graphics are horrendous! Seriously. This game looks like it could've been a release title for the PS3. The textures are muddy, the pop-in is atrocious, and simply put the game is just ugly. I'm not the kind of gamer that plays a game because of graphics, but after watching a PS4/PS3 comparison video I can't help but be disappointed. You can just sense that the game's developers didn't really care about releasing a grade-A title to last-gen gamers.

    As for the multiplayer, it is fun, don't get me wrong, but it's not the evolution I had expected. Sure you can jump higher, sure there are some new high tech weapons, but in the end it's simply classic CoD multiplayer. Some will love this, some will hate it, but I'm in the middle somewhere. It's enjoyable, but I can't help but feel disappointed.

    Overall I am disappointed by CoD: AW for PS3. The gameplay just doesn't feel as "advanced" as I had hoped and the last-gen graphics are simply ugly. This isn't a terrible game but it's also not a great one.    … Expand
  17. Lemke
    Nov 4, 2014
    10
    Best COD in years. The only down point here is the co-op mode. The best thing from many games. Domination mode now is incredible, no more campers. You must run to save the day.
  18. alo007alo
    Nov 3, 2014
    5
    This game is good and much beter than ghosts.
    Call of Duty is back and it is good.

    BUT there is alot but i mean alot BUTTHURT haters hahahahaaha their tears are delicious.
  19. CPD98
    Nov 4, 2014
    7
    ¿¿4,4?? Ni caso a los trolls haters, etc. que votan aquí.
    Desde 2010, COD no me había ofrecido tanta diversión. La campaña ofrece un buen espectáculo, con el lujo de tener a Kevin Spacey, unas cinemáticas geniales y mejoras que nos invitan a la rejugabilidad.
    El modo coop., parecido al de MW3, divierte bastante. Pero la palma se la lleva el multijugador, donde, ahora sí, uno se    ¿¿4,4?? Ni caso a los trolls haters, etc. que votan aquí.
    Desde 2010, COD no me había ofrecido tanta diversión. La campaña ofrece un buen espectáculo, con el lujo de tener a Kevin Spacey, unas cinemáticas geniales y mejoras que nos invitan a la rejugabilidad.

    El modo coop., parecido al de MW3, divierte bastante. Pero la palma se la lleva el multijugador, donde, ahora sí, uno se divierte y juega a gusto. La nueva forma de jugar es brutal, COD necesitaba esto desde hace años. Quien se queje de los saltos que se vaya a otro juego, es un cambio a mejor, haciendo así las partidas mucho mas dinámicas y entretenidas de jugar. Promete diversión para muchos, muuchos meses.

    Y los que dudéis, deciros que en PS3 merece mucho la pena, gráficamente es mas que decente.
    Una entrega realmente divertida, con una selección de mapas acertadísima. No es fiéis mucho de los que dan tantos negativos, es un pedazo de shooter con el que os aseguro que lo pasaréis genial.    … Expand
  20. kirkkh
    Nov 5, 2014
    6
    It's a trainwreck. All glitz-n-glamour to conceal the deluded. Mix in hackers, glitches and crashes galore. It's amazing how shallow thus cake is. Ultimately boring and not recommended, unless you're ten.
  21. KatoLivess
    Nov 9, 2014
    10
    This game is awesome. To all the nerds who gave this game a low score: leave your parent's basement, get a job, burn all your World of Nerdcraft games, and quit bemoaning a game superior to the crap you play. Get a life. Get contacts, crush your glasses, and burn your stupid comic books.
  22. TFORPULLONE
    Nov 17, 2014
    6
    Sledgehammer as a new director to the franchise tried fresh Call of Duty with jet-packs, LAZORS
    and new kind of story with Kevin Spacey. New figures like customization to your multiplayer character
    is welcome figure to the game. Even 6-hour length story is even enjoyable since first. Black Ops.The new suit and jet-pack mixed up with combat is surprisingly not so bad even the fast based    Sledgehammer as a new director to the franchise tried fresh Call of Duty with jet-packs, LAZORS
    and new kind of story with Kevin Spacey. New figures like customization to your multiplayer character
    is welcome figure to the game.
    Even 6-hour length story is even enjoyable since first. Black Ops.The new suit and jet-pack mixed up
    with combat is surprisingly not so bad even the fast based shooter combat reminds you lots of Titanfall and copies some of the gameplay from there.Some of the multiplayer maps have even good variety
    from nature to cities and bunkers. The game is still above average CoD whit new combat with jet-packs and LAZORSSSS .And also, why is on the PC dedicated servers are completely deleted. Why?
    PS 17.11.2014    … Expand
  23. Lazarus-Vector
    Dec 8, 2014
    8
    Advanced Warfare has an interesting theme assuming that legitimate use of violence has been outsourced from states to companies by the 2050s, and the use of exo-skeletons, jump-packs and robot-suits makes the game innovative enough to represent a new fresh start for the series. The Graphics is generally good but quality is uneven due to that the PS3 is now an aging console, but it holds upAdvanced Warfare has an interesting theme assuming that legitimate use of violence has been outsourced from states to companies by the 2050s, and the use of exo-skeletons, jump-packs and robot-suits makes the game innovative enough to represent a new fresh start for the series. The Graphics is generally good but quality is uneven due to that the PS3 is now an aging console, but it holds up well compared to previous titles. The story is full of twists and turns, and as varied as it is short. The single player Campaign thus gets an 8/10 from me. For me, Modern Warfare 3 was the peak in the series, but Advanced Warfare is a good reboot for an aging series.… Expand
  24. CanadianMuffin
    Nov 7, 2014
    7
    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a big improvement for the Call of Duty franchise, and may lead the franchise into a good future, but there are many flaws just like any other game.

    Single-Player: The single player is the typical 6 hour; go here, shoot this and that. This is very disappointing, and you would expect the game to be longer since this game had a 3 year development cycle.    Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is a big improvement for the Call of Duty franchise, and may lead the franchise into a good future, but there are many flaws just like any other game.

    Single-Player: The single player is the typical 6 hour; go here, shoot this and that. This is very disappointing, and you would expect the game to be longer since this game had a 3 year development cycle. But as disappointing as the shortness of the campaign is, it is still very fun. Nothing new to the Single-Player except for the Exo-Suit. To sum it up; boring dull, repetitive. Nothing special.

    Multiplayer: As it may be the same multiplayer as before ie; game-modes, the multiplayer plays completely different with the new Exo-Suit. Double jump, strafe left to right, will bring a whole new level of enjoyment to the game.

    I recommend the game; you won't get anything too special here, but as I stated in the beginning of this review; it is a big improvement for the Call of Duty franchise. If you are going to buy it, just expect the same Call of Duty, but with massive improvements; especially for multiplayer.    … Expand
  25. Bosefus123
    Nov 3, 2014
    0
    The multiplayer is horrible. All guns are reskins from ghosts. Maps are generic looking. The boost jumping ruins the flow of play. Terrible spawns, lag and time to kill. Just bad bad bad.
  26. vizard00
    Nov 3, 2014
    0
    I cant even try this game , u used to play a modern military combat in COD4 , and when i need scfi i put my halo or any scfi game , but now ! COD is totally gone
  27. MaxAmmo
    Nov 9, 2014
    10
    If you look at idiot Str1ker, ALL his reviews are COD games. And ALL are hateful. This site is full of jackturds like him. This game is a BLAST to play. I literally am waiting to get off work to play. Don't be fooled by these imbeciles giving it zero. They have no life.
  28. JokerWalkTrough
    Nov 24, 2014
    7
    Story is interesting yet painfully predictable, Kevin Spacey and Troy Baker are excellent, Gameplay feels the same as the past cod games especially on old gen consoles, but grenade switching and exo suits are good new additions. MP works and Pick 10 is now Pick 13, even though the exo suits make the combat feel faster and more fun it still plays familiar, Exo Survival is boring as hellStory is interesting yet painfully predictable, Kevin Spacey and Troy Baker are excellent, Gameplay feels the same as the past cod games especially on old gen consoles, but grenade switching and exo suits are good new additions. MP works and Pick 10 is now Pick 13, even though the exo suits make the combat feel faster and more fun it still plays familiar, Exo Survival is boring as hell don't even bother on that one.

    Buy When the Price Drops, overall Good but very Familiar.    … Expand
  29. boy_number_8
    Mar 20, 2015
    4
    On the ps3 console i have found this came pretty unplayable.
    The most important part of the Call of duty franchise these days is the multi player. While advanced warefare is better than Call of Duty:Ghosts, it suffers from one major flaw. That flaw being, only having two guns that are worth using. Most of the guns seem so unmatched compared to the BAL or the ACR, that there is really no    On the ps3 console i have found this came pretty unplayable.
    The most important part of the Call of duty franchise these days is the multi player. While advanced warefare is better than Call of Duty:Ghosts, it suffers from one major flaw. That flaw being, only having two guns that are worth using. Most of the guns seem so unmatched compared to the BAL or the ACR, that there is really no point using them.
    The new Exo abilities are rarely used if your not playing competitive as the amount of boost jumping that happens in pubs makes the game lack any kind of strategy.

    There also seems to be a constant lag the the game, personally ive never played a call of duty as connection based this this one. The lag is mostly noticed in the menu screens and while opening loot crates which becomes annoying super quick.

    While i do like the looting system, nothing you get differentiates your player from the others so loots become left unoponed.

    While i do enjoy a lot of the maps, i just find this game gets boring and more frustrating really quick.    … Expand
  30. Snooch
    Nov 9, 2014
    10
    A phenomenal game. I love all the COD games. It really is sad to see all these haters giving it a zero when they have not played it. Or, if they did, their source of reference is World of Warcraft. The idiots are alive and well. Buy this game. You will LOVE it!!
  31. sanluis20
    Nov 10, 2014
    9
    ***This review is for multiplayer only***
    As others have stated this game is miles better than ghosts. Ignore the zeros, as they are haters. The game is fast paced and does not have annoying ass as hell camping materials (IED anyone?). The exo movements is fresh and makes the game even more fun. The only reason this gets a 9 for me is the God awful connections, however I know    ***This review is for multiplayer only***
    As others have stated this game is miles better than ghosts. Ignore the zeros, as they are haters. The game is fast paced and does not have annoying ass as hell camping materials (IED anyone?). The exo movements is fresh and makes the game even more fun. The only reason this gets a 9 for me is the God awful connections, however I know Sledgehammer will probably fix this in a patch soon. Game is overall balanced, however scorestreaks are not that good, but again I like that since people tend to game for them like in MW2. Definitely a step in the right direction after such a disappointed year in COD last year with Ghosts.    … Expand
  32. Razor547
    Nov 11, 2014
    6
    CoD is back with yet another installment of their overworked franchise. This edition has been revised with some new mechanics, nothing impressive or quite different which was a dissapointment, but they are giving fan service for once and with the promise of zombies, on DLC only unfortunately, it seems like there will be a few redeeming qualities for this game. But lets get to the game, TheCoD is back with yet another installment of their overworked franchise. This edition has been revised with some new mechanics, nothing impressive or quite different which was a dissapointment, but they are giving fan service for once and with the promise of zombies, on DLC only unfortunately, it seems like there will be a few redeeming qualities for this game. But lets get to the game, The campaign? Very predictable, you take out terrorists, so on and so forth like every other CoD. Multiplayer? As of this review it has been riddled with connection issues along with the debate on the lack of guns in it. I side with the devos though on the decision to cut it down though because honestly no one uses but 5 different guns for the most part reguardless of choices. And finally the Exo Survival and in my opinion was the best of the game. Challenging AI with a smooth learning curve made it an enjoyable experience, at least for a while. Well there you go love or leave CoD is just gonna pump these out for as far as we can see into the future… Expand
  33. mPinkii
    Nov 23, 2014
    7
    This game delivers quite an array of new concepts which makes it different like the exo suits and the new weapons. However, different does not mean very good but it is also not very bad, its more around the middle of the two. The game has a few bugs like any other typical COD such as lag, and spawn points but there are also bugs like misaligned sniper sights for example. There is anotherThis game delivers quite an array of new concepts which makes it different like the exo suits and the new weapons. However, different does not mean very good but it is also not very bad, its more around the middle of the two. The game has a few bugs like any other typical COD such as lag, and spawn points but there are also bugs like misaligned sniper sights for example. There is another issue on the game freezing multiple times despite the ps3 system requirements are met. In my opinion the game delivers a steep learning curve for those who are used to the old COD styles of game plays, but it does get more fun when players get used to the new movements, weapons, etc. Overall this game is good; not great nor is it bad. They could have done more with the co-op exo survival like that zombie trailer they released.… Expand
  34. TemplarQuacks95
    Nov 27, 2014
    8
    This game is exactly what you'd expect from a Call of Duty game: Generic set-pieces, lots of explosions, and predictable plot-twists. The graphics for the Ps3 version are pretty much on par with previous Call of Duty installments which isn't too bad considering it's a port. It's not exactly a revolutionary piece of work, but I still had a good time playing it. And the incorporation ofThis game is exactly what you'd expect from a Call of Duty game: Generic set-pieces, lots of explosions, and predictable plot-twists. The graphics for the Ps3 version are pretty much on par with previous Call of Duty installments which isn't too bad considering it's a port. It's not exactly a revolutionary piece of work, but I still had a good time playing it. And the incorporation of private military companies was an interesting backdrop for the story. The multiplayer is the same as it always has been. It may be just another Call of Duty, but it certainly isn't a bad game at all.… Expand
  35. Tonecapone911
    Dec 9, 2014
    6
    Campaign is fun,but short.They stole the theme from Quake 3(pc).Graphics are much better and kills are much more gratifying in multiplayer than Ghost.I love the bright colored hit markers. The cartooney look is better than the real grainy graphics in Ghost.I get a higher K.D.R than ever.But theres alot less weapons to choose from compared to B.O.2.Why have such a vast weapon selectionCampaign is fun,but short.They stole the theme from Quake 3(pc).Graphics are much better and kills are much more gratifying in multiplayer than Ghost.I love the bright colored hit markers. The cartooney look is better than the real grainy graphics in Ghost.I get a higher K.D.R than ever.But theres alot less weapons to choose from compared to B.O.2.Why have such a vast weapon selection (pick13) if they decreased the amount of weapons overall.They needed at least 20 more weapons to pick from.They needed a Groundwar server with just alot of people on each side. Practically no recoil on weapons.They needed to tweek those "out of bounds" areas for the maps. But they still run off that same IW engine tho.Its time for a new engine.They need to buy that Frostbite engine from Battlefield 4 outright.They can afford it and can do so much more with it.If they're gonna have so many C.O.D. franchises make one that's worthwhile. Im happy but not that impressed… Expand
  36. mentalipter
    Dec 28, 2014
    6
    This game is better than Ghosts, but fails to be better than most CoD's. The campaign is a typical CoD campaign with nothing special. Exo survival=MW3 survival which makes playing it useless. As for multiplayer, the exo suits make it more fun and fast-paced, but if you want to play competitively they are a detriment, making you appear on the radar and missing a lot of bullets and makingThis game is better than Ghosts, but fails to be better than most CoD's. The campaign is a typical CoD campaign with nothing special. Exo survival=MW3 survival which makes playing it useless. As for multiplayer, the exo suits make it more fun and fast-paced, but if you want to play competitively they are a detriment, making you appear on the radar and missing a lot of bullets and making gunfights ridiculously long. The maps are nice, the weapons are good although they are less, and the killstreaks are downright boring.… Expand
  37. JLPA
    Feb 12, 2015
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Advanced Warfare has taken things a little further than previous games whilst retaining the familiar fast paced run-and-gun style. After promising the moon on a plate, the game certainly has a different feel but whether expectation lines up with reality is another matter. The Multiplayer and Exo-Survival modes are done effectively however the Campaign story is a little too familiar.

    Sci-fi technology/equipment unseen in previous titles is introduced. What was the futuristic technology of novels and movies has now become an interactive world the gamer can delve into with super-soldiers in body enhancing exoskeletons, sonic mufflers, threat detection and hologram USB technology being just some of the features. At some points this technology seems to mimic that of games such as Resistance and Killzone.

    The campaign’s story starts off in the mid 2050s, the player assuming the role of Private Jack Mitchell in his first frontline battle in Seoul, South Korea. US Marines have been deployed to fight the advancing North Koreans.

    There are 15 missions available with a noticeable repetition from past COD games developing. For example, the exciting-but-boring-after-awhile boat chases seen in each title since Modern Warfare 2, along with the near-useless friendly AI units that get in the way more often than not. Most of the levels are planned out more like shooting galleries with targets appearing on a similar lines to a rail shooter. For this reason it is the most enjoyable part of this mode, even though the player may as well be a zombie, no initiative is needed- just have to follow the guy in front and be told what to do as no alternative stories exist like in Black Ops 2.

    Annoying stereotypes are also present, with the typical American hero figure fighting terrorists, political corruption and power hungry madmen. However, don’t let this be all negative, exciting new toys are accessible in missions, one being a hovertank with 3 weapons that can be cycled through. From EMP to shoot down helicopters and gunships, to rockets which take out incoming enemy tanks and machine guns which deal with the infantry. What’s not to love about toys such as these? Another major positive is the superb quality of graphics. They’re so good sections of the cut scenes are possible to be mistaken for live action instead of computer graphics. The ending is disappointingly average, with a cliché “this is just the beginning” however the overall campaign gameplay is mostly okay- as there is lots to kill with some seriously awesome weapons.

    Advanced Warfare’s multiplayer section has had a Michael Jackson sort of face-lift. Certainly it is the game’s silver-lining, after the disappointment of the campaign story mode. Style and structure of the Multiplayer maps have been another seriously improved area. The maps have been enhanced to take advantage of the new exoskeleton manoeuvres. However, the loud elephant in the room is not uncommon to other COD titles; lag…lag…”host migrating”…server disconnect…LAG. The majority of games are plagued with this before and during games.

    Survival mode has returned from Modern Warfare 3, keeping with the ability to purchase weapons and perks to fight against increasingly difficult AI in a wave based game. Players choose from three Exo classes; Light, Heavy and Specialist. Each start with different weapons and Exo suits aimed at certain play styles i.e. from fast movement and low armour to slow movement and high armour. There are four objective based rounds with dramatic assignments including defusing bombs, defending locations against bots/dogs/alien-AI, collecting intel and dog tags. This mode seems to be an exhilarating training ground, building players’ abilities to prepare them for multiplayer.

    Overall the game developers have done an extraordinary job keeping up with previous titles while still adding something different. No game thus far can compete with the graphics, that’s a ‘no brainer’. The quality of the story however brings the game down a little as it really needs some work and move away from the whole American hero saving the world thing that appears in each game. Multiplayer as usual far exceeds the rest of the game and is pretty much on par with the graphics for top quality which will definitely be the major selling points. As for the Co-Op Survival, this has some additional fun but will quickly fade once any zombie maps get released unless worked on.    … Expand
  38. Iamthe1
    Nov 8, 2016
    9
    OMG this game is so cool it is my favourite COD game. I really enjoy the exo suits and the badass futuristic weapons. I really think though that this should have been the last futuristic game unless they made a sequel
  39. PsychoTrevor
    Jan 2, 2021
    0
    Worst cod ever made singleplayer and multiplayer both garbage I hate this game so much but graphics in ps3 was good
  40. foulis67
    Aug 17, 2015
    5
    Call of duty has become boring because they use the same gameplay mechanics since cod 4.This year Sledgehammer games developed a game that changed this mechanic a little bit.In fact is an advanced version of cod 4's mechanic.This game has 3 playable modes:Singleplayer campaign, Multiplayer and coop survival.The Singleplayer campaign is fun and i enjoyed it a lot,but i wouldnt play itCall of duty has become boring because they use the same gameplay mechanics since cod 4.This year Sledgehammer games developed a game that changed this mechanic a little bit.In fact is an advanced version of cod 4's mechanic.This game has 3 playable modes:Singleplayer campaign, Multiplayer and coop survival.The Singleplayer campaign is fun and i enjoyed it a lot,but i wouldnt play it again.Unfortunately the multiplayer isnt so good.Lazy designed maps ,no balance in the guns and its the classic cod multiplayer with jetpacks.Survival is very boring that i played only once.Generally i think that cod has started a big downfall from the masterpiece it was to the failure.… Expand
  41. Gerrit210
    May 30, 2015
    2
    Same old same old, there's nothing good or anything impressive for this COD game. It's repetitive, and takes the same type of ideas from others and makes it the same kind of game again.
  42. godumbledork
    Jan 24, 2015
    7
    Surprisingly, it's slightly better than all the other Call of Duty games. I like its futuristic setting (although it's sadly not the same future we see in Star Trek or The Jetsons). Also, you can fly, which really helps in tough situations. Although, it still has that signature CoD mindlessness.
  43. KeybladeWarrior
    Apr 6, 2015
    3
    COD in general is okay, and its main aspect is that it is casual. AW ruins both aspects, the game, although many deny it, is laggy and wasn't designed for the ps3. The fast movements aren't suited to the COD series and don't really work. The companies making COD (all of them) are scamming people for money, exo survival is TERRIBLE, it is simple and plain, so boom wow this new exo-zombiesCOD in general is okay, and its main aspect is that it is casual. AW ruins both aspects, the game, although many deny it, is laggy and wasn't designed for the ps3. The fast movements aren't suited to the COD series and don't really work. The companies making COD (all of them) are scamming people for money, exo survival is TERRIBLE, it is simple and plain, so boom wow this new exo-zombies arrives, but oops you have to pay $20!!! Next, the matchmaking is really bad, and every time I gun game I get disconnected, and there is always fan boys raging because someone is better than them. Lastly, if you want a casual game which is laggy and distorted and isn't really a casual game, which rips you off and wastes your time then go ahead. And in my book it has taken the title of the worst COD game out there.… Expand
  44. Yobagera
    May 24, 2015
    5
    This is one of the worst Call of Duty games on the market. The story is pretty much about an ex-military working for a multi-international corporation. The CEO turn “super-criminal” and you have to stop him. The story is something you would get out a bad but expensive Hollywood flick. The good side is that there are some new cool scenes and features. Some of the weapons are pretty coolThis is one of the worst Call of Duty games on the market. The story is pretty much about an ex-military working for a multi-international corporation. The CEO turn “super-criminal” and you have to stop him. The story is something you would get out a bad but expensive Hollywood flick. The good side is that there are some new cool scenes and features. Some of the weapons are pretty cool like a futuristic Thompson sub-machine gun. The thing with the Call of Duty is that you also get it not only to play the story but also to play multiplayer. Sadly, the multiplayer is fairly boring and buying new maps is expensive. You could easy burn 100 dollars on this game just buying all the extras. You also have to pay for Zombies. You don’t even get one map for free. I understand that they want to make money but one also have to understand that people (including me) buy Call of Duty because of the quality and the added value. That is why it is so popular. If you take that away there is little meaning buying the game. I think the Call of Duty series risk going into the toilet if they don’t start to shape up and produce better games. Frankly, I don’t care if they have an A-listed Hollywood actor. I didn’t buy the game for him. There are plenty of good voice actors which come cheaper. If you are a fan of Call of Duty you will be entertained but nothing more. If you are new to the Call of Duty series then buy some of the older games such as the Modern Warfare Series.… Expand
  45. Review_For_You
    Nov 27, 2015
    5
    Call of duty advanced warfare is not the best in the series and i'm not saying it is but people are rating it way to harshly. I have played most of the call of duty games and well advanced warfare is on the lower side but it is still a decent game for it's cool new weapons,grenades,and the whole exo-suit idea it's not as bad as people say and even though it's not the best call of duty gameCall of duty advanced warfare is not the best in the series and i'm not saying it is but people are rating it way to harshly. I have played most of the call of duty games and well advanced warfare is on the lower side but it is still a decent game for it's cool new weapons,grenades,and the whole exo-suit idea it's not as bad as people say and even though it's not the best call of duty game it's still a game that will keep you entertained for a while.… Expand
  46. samos2-3
    May 23, 2019
    7
    As a disclaimer I would like to point out that this review and score are only for the campaign. I haven't bothered playing the multiplayer since it has been several years since the game was released and the experience for multiplayer years down the road usually isn't that great. That being said I found the campaign enjoyable. It is a bit of a mix between the MW games and Ghosts. The voiceAs a disclaimer I would like to point out that this review and score are only for the campaign. I haven't bothered playing the multiplayer since it has been several years since the game was released and the experience for multiplayer years down the road usually isn't that great. That being said I found the campaign enjoyable. It is a bit of a mix between the MW games and Ghosts. The voice acting is done especially well and the graphics even on the PS3 look rather good but more importantly the game runs well and I never had any technical issues whatsoever. The story isn't especially original but I thought it was still fun to play through. The combat is done well and now there are some new game mechanics thrown in, albeit most are context sensitive. Overall, I felt that this was an okay game and if you are still rocking the PS3 and want a decent FPS, this will wet your appetite for a short time and probably for pretty cheap at this point.… Expand
  47. ronthereddragon
    Feb 4, 2016
    10
    Not a Bad Game i love it. i make videos on my youtube channel about it so check them out. its my username :) i love the Supplydrops. makes the game fun
  48. Shadow1
    Mar 2, 2017
    5
    In last moment I rated this game in 10/10, but now I think this game is **** and one of the worst Cod Games, but Infinite Warfare is worse. I rated this game on 10/10, because multiplayer is good, but now I am rating storyline and storyline in this game is terrible and who think "Advanced Warfare is better than Ghosts" are knuckleheads, I not saw shooter, which the worse COD AW (not toIn last moment I rated this game in 10/10, but now I think this game is **** and one of the worst Cod Games, but Infinite Warfare is worse. I rated this game on 10/10, because multiplayer is good, but now I am rating storyline and storyline in this game is terrible and who think "Advanced Warfare is better than Ghosts" are knuckleheads, I not saw shooter, which the worse COD AW (not to mention COD IW, Warface and CS GO)… Expand
  49. SrPepe
    Oct 30, 2017
    6
    La campaña de este Call of Duty es brutal. Kevin Spacey se roba todo el show, él solo ya le da 5 puntos extras al juego. En cuanto al online, bastante fácil sacarse rachas y con problemas típicos de conexión.
  50. TheCastleFinder
    Aug 31, 2016
    8
    Great game! The story and the gameplay is pretty good and the online multiplayer and the exo-Zombies is great. I don't know why they give negative reviews.
  51. raccoondaddy
    Jul 14, 2017
    7
    Overall, I'm a Battlefield fan, but dropped off the CoD series after this. To be honest, its just that CoD NEVER changes its formula. Everything has to be fast and furious and never about strategy and good gunplay. What made this one good for me, was that the double jumps and abilities gave the series a much needed change. Most people hated this change but thats because they like theOverall, I'm a Battlefield fan, but dropped off the CoD series after this. To be honest, its just that CoD NEVER changes its formula. Everything has to be fast and furious and never about strategy and good gunplay. What made this one good for me, was that the double jumps and abilities gave the series a much needed change. Most people hated this change but thats because they like the same recycled garbage.
    If you want to play an older CoD, go do that. All of them are still pretty active.
    As for the story, it wasn't bad, the campaign is starting to feel more like a on-rails shooter and less of what it used to be.. which was a theatrical campaign that had a bit of intrigue and just the right amount of explosions.
    My other gripe is the aliens multiplayer, which does replace the usual zombies. While I admire the direction to move away from zombies, but with CoD, its sort of something that is a hit and probably always will be.    … Expand
  52. KingJailson
    May 30, 2018
    8
    Advanced Warfare é melhor que bo3, IW e ghosts, tirando o grafico o jogo é bom, mas seu multiplayer acabou morrendo rapido
  53. Jyadaus
    Jan 24, 2020
    4
    This game has only 2 good things.

    1) "Press F to pay respect" meme.
    2) Multiplayer (copy of Titanfall, and typical CoD MP)

    Scenario, is very bad. They declared main villain of the game on trailers. And then, they try to make it surprise.

    Who the **** think its a good game? And who let Activision to publish this stupid game?
  54. Kvantaliani03
    Nov 20, 2021
    7
    rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
  55. Evvex
    Dec 29, 2018
    9
    Call of Duty Advanced Warfare is what a futuristic Call of Duty should be. Ghosts was a hoot and a half but it didn't have the greatest thing made for a first person shooter. The Exo suits. It is so satisfying to use and makes for cool trickshots. Also included is an Exo launcher for grenades and an Exo ability such as hover, invisibility, and shield. The controls feel like your normalCall of Duty Advanced Warfare is what a futuristic Call of Duty should be. Ghosts was a hoot and a half but it didn't have the greatest thing made for a first person shooter. The Exo suits. It is so satisfying to use and makes for cool trickshots. Also included is an Exo launcher for grenades and an Exo ability such as hover, invisibility, and shield. The controls feel like your normal Call of duty and the graphics are looking pretty next gen for this console. With all of this good, why does this game have a 4.9 average on its score? The campaign is a mix of unique and filler. It is pretty interesting but at the same time it just feels like an excuse to slap Call of Duty on the box. I would have liked to see a better campaign and not remove it (ahem Black Ops 4 you scum). As for multiplayer the maps are, just maps. Also then making your loadout Activision brought back my least favorite system, the item limit. But to be fair the limit makes sense because the suits can be really overpowered and we get 13 instead of 11. But none of that bogs down the experience for me. As for Exo Zombies I can't tell you my DLC code from the Gold Edition hasn't worked even though my copy was bought new. Overall, if you like Call of Duty, this is a game for you and I would highly recommend playing it.… Expand
  56. X-bobafett24-x
    Apr 26, 2020
    8
    Gameplay is same but graphics is really bad I know ps3 is last gen but even 2012 games looking better than this mechanics are same and fun multiplayer is great too i liked it. But in ps4
  57. FidelGastro
    May 24, 2021
    8
    After reading a few average reviews, I didn't have high expectations of this game. As a result, however, it surprised me very nicely. Especially in terms of graphics, because this game has taken advantage of all the limits (in terms of performance) that the Playstation 3 console offers. I liked the handy solution, where when loading from location to location, the loading window popped upAfter reading a few average reviews, I didn't have high expectations of this game. As a result, however, it surprised me very nicely. Especially in terms of graphics, because this game has taken advantage of all the limits (in terms of performance) that the Playstation 3 console offers. I liked the handy solution, where when loading from location to location, the loading window popped up for a few seconds before the graphics loaded.

    But the overall setting for the future does not suit me at all for the Call of Duty series. In my opinion, the developers could have released this game into the world as a separate title.

    However, the gameplay itself is interesting, though perhaps unnecessarily relieved by various grenades, drones, guidance systems, sights, and so on. However, the experienced gameplay spoils the exo-suites the most, I really couldn't get used to them.

    The story was made interesting and dragged into the story, but it could have been at least an hour or two longer. So especially the end of the story is very hurried.

    I also give plus points for a well-crafted soundtrack and weapon sound effects.

    In the last paragraph, I want to pick up famous actors who played in this game.

    In the end, I give this game a rating of 8/10, the game exceeded my not very high expectations.    … Expand
  58. storygamer
    Sep 1, 2020
    8
    What I really like about Call Of Duty: Advanced Warfare is that it breaks out of the always recurring repetition of this series. Many innovations make this title special and replayable. And the graphics look great on the PS3!
  59. DannyJepp
    Sep 23, 2020
    10
    I really enjoyed the movement system they came up with for this game. Online multiplayer was soooo fun! It seemed like most people didn't like the jetpacking around but I loved it, and it just felt really good to play.
  60. Domdom21br
    Nov 9, 2021
    6
    o jogo é divertido porém sofre de um problema chamado "sem inovação'', não tem nada de novo, e pelas criticas de outros usuarios, parece que esse game foi feito sem coração
  61. Giero
    Jan 4, 2023
    5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  62. Joe2539
    Jan 3, 2023
    10
    Very Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good
  63. OMGitsTHEMEMI
    May 18, 2023
    7
    The history is pretty decent but this version multiplayer was pretty dated for its time and wasnt very fun.
  64. FrankCreeper
    Jul 28, 2023
    7
    This is a very improved sequel compared to ghost this new game added in summary futuristics tecnologies with jetpack and super strength...the gameplay is fun but isnt very different compared on other cod this game only added few things...but has fantastic campain and a well done PvE mode,
    talking for the multiplayer isnt very outstanding anymore compared to others CoD
    P.S I Played both    This is a very improved sequel compared to ghost this new game added in summary futuristics tecnologies with jetpack and super strength...the gameplay is fun but isnt very different compared on other cod this game only added few things...but has fantastic campain and a well done PvE mode,
    talking for the multiplayer isnt very outstanding anymore compared to others CoD
    P.S I Played both versions of the game console (PS3/PS4)    … Expand

Critic Reviews

All reviews »

There are no critic reviews yet.