• Publisher: Capcom
  • Release Date: Nov 1, 2005
Metascore
45

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 25 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 25
  2. Negative: 15 out of 25
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Without Warning has a lot of technical problems, and they can make play repetitive and aggravating. But taking out wave upon wave of terrorists can be fun. It is not high art, but it tries too hard to escape the fun, lighthearted game it really is.
  2. This hackneyed terrorist shooter is without story, without characters, without originality, and most importantly, without fun.
  3. TotalGames.net
    42
    Without Warning fails miserably at whatever it set out to achieve. A lousy camera and ropey AI take a lot away from the cinematic style, and the sheer weight of repetition involved in the missions does little to expand on an idea that could have become a great title.
  4. Play Magazine
    40
    Testosterone carries Warning. It does not carry it very far, nor very fast. [Nov p.88]
  5. There's nothing devastatingly awful about this, it's just thoroughly outclassed by most of everything else on the market.
  6. 40
    Its shooting is tame, forward progress is tedious, most enemies are foolish, the environment is dreary, and the unprofessionally delivered storyline is predictable and quite unentertaining.
  7. AceGamez
    40
    A pretty-looking but utterly mediocre gaming experience that's little more than space invaders with terrorists. The concept is sound, the storyline is okay, but the implementation just doesn't work.
  8. 40
    A game that had a lot of potential in its concept, but a few solid ideas can't make up for poor gameplay.
  9. Official Playstation 2 Magazine UK
    40
    You can actually feel your IQ drop as you play. A pretty-looking but otherwise feeble attempt at a political thriller. [Nov 2006, p.148]
  10. The story and voice acting offered me several unintentional laughs, but inexcusably stupid elements, such as unskippable cut-scenes and the inability to pick up fallen enemies' weapons, pair with rotten gameplay to make this one of the worst games I've played all year.
  11. PSM Magazine
    35
    Bad design, with mediocre action, voice acting, and bland missions. [Dec 2005, p.108]
  12. A simple, one dimensional story, horrible voice acting and frustratingly boring and inconsistent gameplay make Without Warning an easy game to skip this holiday. Fair graphics keep it from being a complete waste of time.
  13. games(TM)
    30
    This could have been so much more, but the shoddy engine and woeful AI let down some fairly solid and slightly confusing concepts. [Nov 2005, p.125]
  14. Edge Magazine
    30
    By any standards that have existed during the last ten, Without Warning is a work of stultifying incompetence that seems to hate its own players. [Dec 2005, p.108]
  15. Plays more like a kind of arcade light-gun shooter with legs, and feels like it needed a better script and about six more months of development time.
User Score
6.5

Mixed or average reviews- based on 12 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 12
  2. Negative: 4 out of 12
  1. Aug 2, 2022
    6
    This game has everything I admire in a beautiful shooting game like.... you kill someone and his body doesn't disappear. but the game is notThis game has everything I admire in a beautiful shooting game like.... you kill someone and his body doesn't disappear. but the game is not that fun after finishing, very average game Full Review »
  2. HaroldG.
    Aug 13, 2007
    10
    This game looks great on the PS2 and the action is OTT and fun.....too bad it was badly received.
  3. FrankieA.
    Dec 19, 2005
    3
    This game did nothing to capture my interest. It was doomed from the start for several reasons. Bad camera, cruddy control, bland gameplay This game did nothing to capture my interest. It was doomed from the start for several reasons. Bad camera, cruddy control, bland gameplay and a story that flew through one ear and out the other. It took an effort just to continue playing. It could have been so much better, had creators/developers followed through and at least attempted to create a decent game. Giving the game a three is generous. Full Review »