• Publisher: Acclaim
  • Release Date: Sep 1, 2002
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 35 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 35
  2. Negative: 6 out of 35
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. RyanM.
    Feb 9, 2003
    4
    I was extremely mad about the quality of the game. I never play the adventure mode, and without the multiplayer i would never play this game...ever.
  2. Sam
    Oct 23, 2004
    3
    Alex s. is a fool. The graphics are on par with the worst of NES, the plot is terrible, and the controls are horrible. Suprisingly however, the controls are the same but feel smoother in multyplayer, and there is no plot, so the multyplayer is suprisingly entertaining, but the single player still is sickinglily bad and the graphics are still terrible in both so the multyplayer is Alex s. is a fool. The graphics are on par with the worst of NES, the plot is terrible, and the controls are horrible. Suprisingly however, the controls are the same but feel smoother in multyplayer, and there is no plot, so the multyplayer is suprisingly entertaining, but the single player still is sickinglily bad and the graphics are still terrible in both so the multyplayer is entertaining, but the remainder of the game has way to many flaws so if you want to enjoy this game, go with the multyplayer. Or if your not a big fan of multypalyer overall, get the orignal classic for your dino-asskicking spree. Expand
  3. Sep 30, 2022
    1
    close to the 2nd game this one is crap, confusing and horrible commands, bad camera to control, the commands can't be changed. Turok 2 is good because it has a PC version

Awards & Rankings

69
#69 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2002
80
#80 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2002
Metascore
61

Mixed or average reviews - based on 20 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 20
  2. Negative: 5 out of 20
  1. If you have other consoles and are going to get a version of it, it's probably better to look at the GameCube and Xbox versions.
  2. Entertainment Weekly
    75
    A solid title - but still, we would have loved to see a game that was less evolutionary and more revolutionary. [27 Sept 2002, p.89]
  3. 63
    Isn't a horrible game, but underneath its pretty exterior and impressive CG work, is a mediocre, linear game, replete with erratic AI, annoying voice acting, an over-reliance on weapon animation and kill animations.