User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 52 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 35 out of 52
-
Mixed: 9 out of 52
-
Negative: 8 out of 52
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
TarikT.Sep 25, 2002
-
-
jimtrashashMar 20, 2003i would rather have cancer then play this game ever again,i mean this game is so terrible the only reason i gave it a 1 was the satisfaction i got from taking it out of my ps2 dropping it in the toilet pulling down my pants and stooling all over it then letting it set there for 3 months..i mean dont even rent the f****** thing you stupid motherf******
-
-
AnonymousAnonymousOct 1, 2002Absolute trash. The game wasn't scary. In fact I was more afraid of the lint in my pocket. Your men are all infected so when you get one its better to waste two shots then a weapon. You are kill in a couple hits, you always need a egineer or you need to open a door, the guns are crap your men (if you are dumb enough to keep them) will NEVER follow orders and usually kill them selves
-
-
[Anonymous]Sep 12, 2002This game is horrible. The atmosphere is really bad. Not to much to explore and action takes forever to take place. Playstations Shame!!!
-
-
Mar 17, 2014
Awards & Rankings
|
60
|
|
|
21
|
#21 Most Discussed PS2 Game of 2002
|
|
24
|
#24 Most Shared PS2 Game of 2002
|
-
Another barrier to immersion was that the level of realism is inconsistent, and conveniently tossed aside when necessary.
-
There’s almost a complete absence of soundtrack and it really works in creating a sense of dread (coupled with the sporadic nature of the thing attacks, at least in the early going).
-
Entertainment WeeklyThis contrived implementation of a great concept is disappointing, but at least the surrounding game delivers some taught cinematic moments that would make Carpenter proud. [6 Sept 2002]